The New Yorker's Scores
- Movies
- TV
For 3,482 reviews, this publication has graded:
-
37% higher than the average critic
-
2% same as the average critic
-
61% lower than the average critic
On average, this publication grades 0.8 points higher than other critics.
(0-100 point scale)
Average Movie review score: 66
| Highest review score: | Fiume o morte! | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest review score: | Bio-Dome |
Score distribution:
-
Positive: 1,940 out of 3482
-
Mixed: 1,344 out of 3482
-
Negative: 198 out of 3482
3482
movie
reviews
- By Date
- By Critic Score
-
-
Reviewed by
Justin Chang
By the time Dorothy and her friends march on Elphaba’s lair, there seems to be something more pernicious than mere mediocrity at work. It’s as if the picture were so cowed by its iconic predecessor that it could only respond with a petulant urge to destroy the classic it could never be.- The New Yorker
- Posted Nov 21, 2025
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Brody
The result is a movie thinned out almost to the point of total insubstantiality—as close to a non-experience as I’ve had at the movies in a while.- The New Yorker
- Posted Sep 18, 2025
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Brody
Despite, or perhaps because of, the story’s stark melodramatic clarity—the rooting interest of saving a child from injustice, the outlaw with a heart of gold risking his life to undertake that responsibility—“Rust” is a painful slog and a nearly inert experience.- The New Yorker
- Posted May 21, 2025
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
All in all, Beau Is Afraid gave me the unsettling feeling that, owing to some administrative error, I had stumbled upon an extended therapy session instead of a movie—looking on, or scarcely able to look, as the director digs deep into who knows what private funks.- The New Yorker
- Posted Apr 17, 2023
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
Bedazzling, overlong, and unjust, “Blonde” does a grave disservice to the woman whom it purports to honor.- The New Yorker
- Posted Sep 19, 2022
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Brody
The involvement of a stylish horror-film director, Sam Raimi, in this tawdry slog of corporate constraint is as fascinating as it is disheartening.- The New Yorker
- Posted May 11, 2022
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
What is this “fun” of which Selina speaks? It’s certainly not a concept that The Batman, dropsical with self-importance, and setting a bold new standard in joylessness, has much use for.- The New Yorker
- Posted Mar 5, 2022
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Brody
Cyrano is a thuddingly dull film that sinks under the ponderous undigested mass of its own bombast, squandering the talents of a fine cast and a fine concept.- The New Yorker
- Posted Feb 28, 2022
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
One mark of the Godzilla franchise is the ingenuity with which each director manages to waste the talents of an excellent cast.- The New Yorker
- Posted Apr 2, 2021
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Brody
It is a grind, it is a slog, it is a bore—it’s a mental toothache of a movie, whose ending grants not so much resolution as relief.- The New Yorker
- Posted Mar 18, 2021
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Brody
Its effortful grandiosity transforms it into something hollow and even, at times, risible.- The New Yorker
- Posted Jan 15, 2021
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
Birds of Prey, alas, is an unholy and sadistic mess.- The New Yorker
- Posted Feb 7, 2020
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Brody
The hermetic logic of the plot is as impeccable as it is ridiculous. It’s a drama crafted with robotic insularity for the consumption of viewers being rendered robotic at each moment of the soullessly uniform spectacle.- The New Yorker
- Posted Feb 1, 2020
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Brody
These basic failures of taste and sensibility are a subset of Hooper’s over-all failure of literal vision: he doesn’t really see what he’s doing, and the virtual invisibility of his own movie to himself is reflected in an odd set of metaphors that result from his casting.- The New Yorker
- Posted Jan 22, 2020
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Brody
The so-called long take serves as a mask—a gross bit of earnest showmanship that both conceals and reflects the trickery and the cheap machinations of the script, the shallowness of the direction of the actors, and the brazenly superficial and emotion-dictating music score.- The New Yorker
- Posted Jan 22, 2020
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Brody
Even though the target of satire in Jojo Rabbit is clearly the Nazis, the movie sharply but unintentionally satirizes itself, as well as its makers and the movie industry at large that saw fit to produce, release, and acclaim it.- The New Yorker
- Posted Oct 24, 2019
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
Gemini Man is largely a sad affair. Fans of double characters should stick with Austin Powers, who, in “The Spy Who Shagged Me” (1999), enjoys the rare privilege of meeting the person he was ten minutes ago. “You,” he says, “are adorable.”- The New Yorker
- Posted Oct 14, 2019
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
Such is the strenuous effort of Phoenix’s performance that it becomes exhausting to behold.- The New Yorker
- Posted Sep 30, 2019
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Brody
It’s built on such a void of insight and experience, such a void of character and relationships, that even the first level of the house of narrative cards can’t stand.- The New Yorker
- Posted Aug 22, 2019
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Brody
With extraordinary material, a merely ordinary approach is worse than a bore; it’s a betrayal.- The New Yorker
- Posted Apr 14, 2019
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
Whatever they pay these movie stars to keep a straight face, it’s not enough.- The New Yorker
- Posted Jan 28, 2019
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
It’s when Landais departs from the original, or has a bright idea for expanding on it, that the movie’s troubles begin.- The New Yorker
- Posted Jan 7, 2019
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Brody
It’s a calculatedly heartwarming and good-humored look at atrocious actions, ideas, and attitudes with a pallid glow of halcyon optimism, a view of a change of heart that’s achieved through colossal exertions and confrontations with danger.- The New Yorker
- Posted Nov 19, 2018
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- The New Yorker
- Posted Mar 5, 2018
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Brody
Gillespie stages his empathy for Tonya at arm’s length; he fails to respond to her experience in a direct, personal way. The result is a film that’s as derisive and dismissive toward Tonya Harding as it shows the world at large to have been.- The New Yorker
- Posted Dec 8, 2017
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
Travel-folder footage of Rio mixed with father-daughter incest (in a disguised form)...Most of the movie is an attempt to squirm out from under its messy erotic-parental subject.- The New Yorker
Posted Jun 28, 2017 -
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Brody
The director of Rogue One, Gareth Edwards, has stepped into a mythopoetic stew so half-baked and overcooked, a morass of pre-instantly overanalyzed implications of such shuddering impact to the series’ fundamentalists, that he lumbers through, seemingly stunned or constrained or cautious to the vanishing point of passivity, and lets neither the characters nor the formidable cast of actors nor even the special effects, of which he has previously proved himself to be a master, come anywhere close to life.- The New Yorker
- Posted Dec 13, 2016
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
Maguire has the nerve to give her heroine a big speech on the “integrity” of proper journalism — this after Bridget Jones’s Baby has made fun of foreigners’ names, and arranged for her to put the wrong Asian guest in front of the cameras. (Do all Asians look alike to her? Is that the joke?) So reliably does she embarrass herself at every public event that the film, trudging by on automatic, becomes an embarrassment, too.- The New Yorker
- Posted Sep 19, 2016
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
To say that the movie loses the plot would not be strictly accurate, for that would imply that there was a plot to lose, and that Ayer, in a forgetful moment, left it in the glove compartment of his car on the way to the studio.- The New Yorker
- Posted Aug 6, 2016
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
The first film scored a few palpable hits, but the new one barely makes the effort.- The New Yorker
- Posted Feb 15, 2016
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by