For 20,324 reviews, this publication has graded:
-
46% higher than the average critic
-
5% same as the average critic
-
49% lower than the average critic
On average, this publication grades 4.2 points lower than other critics.
(0-100 point scale)
Average Movie review score: 61
| Highest review score: | Short Cuts | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest review score: | Gummo |
Score distribution:
-
Positive: 9,408 out of 20324
-
Mixed: 8,449 out of 20324
-
Negative: 2,467 out of 20324
20324
movie
reviews
- By Date
- By Critic Score
-
- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Dana Stevens
(Director Bigelow) piles up one nerve-racking crisis after another, interspersed with moments of ethereal, almost otherworldly beauty.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
A.O. Scott
Its bone-deep willingness to do anything to entertain is exhausting.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Stephen Holden
What sets the "Stuart Little" franchise above most of the competition is its emphasis on sharply drawn character and its profusion of witty remarks (mostly from the mouth of Snowbell) that are cutting enough to amuse grown-ups without sailing over children's heads.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Stephen Holden
Shot in just two weeks with a hand-held digital camera, the movie often looks frayed around the edges. Yet it has a soulful heart and a clear grasp of its rarefied milieu (Manhattan upper-level moneyed academia).- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
A.O. Scott
Awkward, obvious and sporadically -- very sporadically -- amusing.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Dave Kehr
As a believer preaching to an audience of believers, he (Nalin) feels no need to offer proofs or anything even approaching a rational argument.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
A.O. Scott
Much of All About Lily Chou-Chou is mesmerizing: some of its plaintiveness could make you weep. If only Mr. Iwai trusted the material enough.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
A.O. Scott
A terrifically deft picture about the thick line that separates movie glamour from the real world, and the thin line between common sense and paranoia.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Dana Stevens
Metropolis retains its power to overwhelm, trouble and move because it is connected to the deep anxieties of modern life as if by a high-voltage cable.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Dana Stevens
A curiously thrilling and often hilarious experience.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Dana Stevens
For the most part, it works beautifully as a movie without sacrificing the integrity of the opera.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
A.O. Scott
Loads of fun. It has a jamming B-picture buzz -- the kind of swift filmmaking and high spirits that have been missing from movies for a while.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
A.O. Scott
Both refreshing and confusing, the film equivalent of an ice cream headache.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Stephen Holden
The movie, like its lovers, is really two films smushed together in the faint hope that sheer incongruity can grind out laughter.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Dave Kehr
Spectators will indeed sit open-mouthed before the screen, not screaming but yawning.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Stephen Holden
One of the thrills of the movie is watching the improvisatory trial-and-error process as the dancers explore psychological themes, contorting their graceful, amazingly limber bodies into visual representations of relationships and emotional states.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Dave Kehr
It is billed as a "restored version," though the sound is still fuzzy and the image only occasionally rises to the level of murk.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Dave Kehr
Makes compelling viewing. But it is viewing of an eerily familiar kind, almost as if the real-life lawyers in the film had patterned themselves on television archetypes.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Dana Stevens
Neither the neighborhood intimacy of "Mean Streets" nor the grandeur of the "Godfather" movies is imaginable without Visconti's example. Its richness, though, is inexhaustible, and well served by the spotless new 35-millimeter print being shown at Film Forum.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Stephen Holden
Under its drab contemporary trappings, the movie, is really a Jane Austen-like moral parable in which goodness is rewarded and selfishness punished.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Dana Stevens
Like so many European pictures these days, Read My Lips seems destined to be remade in Hollywood, and it is unlikely to be improved by the addition of vainer actors, a simpler screenplay and flashier direction.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
A.O. Scott
It is all a contrivance; the cast and filmmakers were under the delusion that putting unhappy women in a room would lead to drama.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
A.O. Scott
The problem with the baroque and overripe Tattoo Bar is that everybody has a past. And there's so much crosscutting to those pasts in flashbacks, it's hard to keep track of whose past you're witnessing.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
A.O. Scott
The director's breezy steadiness keeps the movie from hitting us over the head -- well, not too hard, anyway, no small feat since the steroid-juiced sentimentality of the ending may force some to flee before the outtakes unspool under the credits.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Dana Stevens
As fizzy as the first, but not quite as refreshing. The pleasurable, eye-popping sense of surprise has diminished, and the teasingly referential attitude shows signs of fatigue.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Elvis Mitchell
A heartbreakingly thoughtful minor classic, the work of a genuine and singular artist.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Stephen Holden
What's really so appealing about the characters is their resemblance to everyday children. They're wildly energetic, competitive and (sometimes dangerously) impulsive. But they also learn from their mistakes, and their instincts are good. More power to them.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by