For 20,324 reviews, this publication has graded:
-
46% higher than the average critic
-
5% same as the average critic
-
49% lower than the average critic
On average, this publication grades 4.2 points lower than other critics.
(0-100 point scale)
Average Movie review score: 61
| Highest review score: | Short Cuts | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest review score: | Gummo |
Score distribution:
-
Positive: 9,408 out of 20324
-
Mixed: 8,449 out of 20324
-
Negative: 2,467 out of 20324
20324
movie
reviews
- By Date
- By Critic Score
-
-
Reviewed by
A.O. Scott
There will no doubt be better movies released in 2015, but Furious 7 is an early favorite to win the prize for most picture.- The New York Times
- Posted Apr 1, 2015
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Manohla Dargis
Mr. Rahimi opens up an entire world inside the couple’s modest house, filling its few rooms with enough air, sharp words and slow-boiling intrigue that the walls never feel as if they’re closing in on you.- The New York Times
- Posted Aug 13, 2013
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Jeannette Catsoulis
Wisely deciding to refrain from rapping our knuckles with greenhouse gas statistics and Al Gore-style pie charts, the filmmakers fashion a portrait of a conscience spurred to action by an unexpected opportunity.- The New York Times
- Posted May 16, 2013
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
A.O. Scott
Passion is often sleek and enjoyable, dispensing titillation, suspense and a few laughs without taking itself too seriously.- The New York Times
- Posted Aug 29, 2013
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Jeannette Catsoulis
As subtle as its title, Cockneys vs. Zombies is mildly funny and easily likable.- The New York Times
- Posted Aug 1, 2013
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
A.O. Scott
Within this gore-spattered, superficially nihilistic carapace is an old-fashioned platoon picture, a sensitive and superbly acted tale of male bonding under duress.- The New York Times
- Posted Oct 16, 2014
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Andy Webster
Mr. Liford (yet another emergent indie filmmaker from Texas) can clearly write a script, handle a camera and construct a mood. Wuss may be slight, but Mr. Liford’s sense of pitch is spot on.- The New York Times
- Posted May 2, 2013
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Manohla Dargis
You’re unlikely to turn away. The problem with aesthetic shocks is that their power can drain off and their original effects become harder to replicate, so we’ll just have to see what happens next.- The New York Times
- Posted Mar 20, 2014
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Neil Genzlinger
Scott Derrickson, the director, and his special-effects crew really deliver the creepy goods here, providing an apt climax for as taut and credible a movie involving demonic possession as you’re likely to see.- The New York Times
- Posted Jul 1, 2014
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anita Gates
This is a sweet adventure story for children. (Surely, American parents can deal with the bare breasts of one talking painting.) For adults it is short on narrative sophistication but visually a true objet d’art.- The New York Times
- Posted May 9, 2013
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Nicolas Rapold
It’s not unlike many of Mr. Strickland’s beloved Italian films, which could be superb exercises in cinematic style and atmosphere while remaining imperfect.- The New York Times
- Posted Jun 13, 2013
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Nicolas Rapold
It’s gratifying to see the care taken with his characters, though it would be no betrayal of them for Mr. Hartigan to flesh out their world and their lives further.- The New York Times
- Posted Aug 13, 2013
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- The New York Times
- Posted Jun 11, 2013
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Daniel M. Gold
The vistas are spectacular, the waves fearsome, the filming often amazing.- The New York Times
- Posted Jun 13, 2013
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Rachel Saltz
These mostly silent home movies often have the tug of nostalgia, especially those that show domestic life... But images can be slippery, showing something different from what their creators intended. Even as Mr. Lilti constructs a history...he seems to show its fissures.- The New York Times
- Posted Jul 10, 2013
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
A.O. Scott
It is a modest, competent, effective movie, concerned above all with doing the job of explaining how the job was done.- The New York Times
- Posted Dec 24, 2013
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Jeannette Catsoulis
Raw and resolute, this unsettling fable feels driven by an anger that remains largely unexpressed.- The New York Times
- Posted May 14, 2013
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Rachel Saltz
The plot of Aurangzeb is inevitably too complicated, and the themes presented more interestingly than they are wrapped up. But for much of the nearly two-and-a-half-hour running time, it ably weaves Bollywood tropes...with contemporary outrage at the rules of the game.- The New York Times
- Posted May 19, 2013
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Manohla Dargis
Mr. Hirokazu never overly explains his stories through the dialogue, preferring to tease out their meaning visually.- The New York Times
- Posted Jan 16, 2014
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
A.O. Scott
In rushing in where wise men might fear to tread, Mr. Franco has accomplished something serious and worthwhile. His As I Lay Dying is certainly ambitious, but it is also admirably modest.- The New York Times
- Posted Oct 10, 2013
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
A.O. Scott
This is a calm film about strong emotions, but it does find a reservoir of intensity in the two central performances, in particular Mr. Del Toro’s.- The New York Times
- Posted Feb 13, 2014
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
A.O. Scott
Intent on showing that Arbor and Swifty live in a world of radically limited possibilities, barely sustained by their families and failed by the state, Ms. Barnard locks them into a narrative prison. Their fates seem predetermined less by their circumstances than by the iron will and limited imagination of their creator.- The New York Times
- Posted Dec 19, 2013
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Neil Genzlinger
It may not make much sense in a brief plot summary, but it makes perfect, daffy sense on the screen.- The New York Times
- Posted May 30, 2013
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Manohla Dargis
Non-Stop doesn’t make any sense, but that’s expected, uninteresting and incidental to the pleasures of a slow-season Liam Neeson release as diverting as this one.- The New York Times
- Posted Feb 27, 2014
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Neil Genzlinger
Free Samples is a modest but pleasant small-budget movie with two bits of laziness in the script, but one particularly sweet performance that makes up for them.- The New York Times
- Posted Jun 6, 2013
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Nicolas Rapold
A deserved tribute that puts us inside the music, and the head space, of a great, lost band.- The New York Times
- Posted Jul 2, 2013
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Manohla Dargis
It doesn’t aspire to art-house significance, just to white-knuckled entertainment.- The New York Times
- Posted Jun 6, 2013
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Janet Maslin
Wish You Were Here has a quaint, inviting period look - the year is 1951, the setting a British coastal village - and a cast that's well attuned to Mr. Leland's brand of cleverness.- The New York Times
- Posted Dec 7, 2023
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Janet Maslin
There is the sense that Mr. Leigh, whose unusual collaborative method with actors is an essential facet of his writing and direction, is too willing to confuse tics with truth. Indeed, this time the actors' solipsism is more apparent.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Janet Maslin
Drawing upon the novel with merciful selectivity, and adding such a contemporary flavor that the film's woodsmen often have a laid-back air, Michael Mann has directed a sultrier and more pointedly responsible version of this story.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by