Slant Magazine's Scores

For 7,789 reviews, this publication has graded:
  • 33% higher than the average critic
  • 3% same as the average critic
  • 64% lower than the average critic
On average, this publication grades 6.2 points lower than other critics. (0-100 point scale)
Average Movie review score: 59
Highest review score: 100 Mulholland Dr.
Lowest review score: 0 Jojo Rabbit
Score distribution:
7789 movie reviews
  1. Many of the character actors occasionally elevate the film above some of the more clichéd family humor.
  2. This unfocused, awkwardly paced film never quite gets off the ground and, as a result, will do little to change perceptions of the Korean War as the “forgotten war.”
  3. The original Brian and Charles short focused entirely on its titular characters, and it’s clear that was for the best.
  4. By resolving its story around a mano-a-mano, the film narrows its understanding of a system in which exploitation is privatized.
  5. Distractingly indebted to No Country for Old Men, the film’s wild tonal swings mostly leave it feeling impossibly disjointed.
  6. The focus on Ferragamo’s craft, and the very structure of manufacture, is exciting, but the narrative’s tendency to embody the opposite of his innovativeness feels lazy and contradictory.
  7. Even the director’s most rabid fans will find Cronenberg’s debut to be a tough sit.
  8. Agnieszka Smoczyńska’s film is unwilling to really sit with the peculiarity of its protagonists’ unique psyches.
  9. Writer-director Ruben Östlund’s pessimism ultimately leads the film toward a self-negating dead end.
  10. The filmmakers never effectively detail the characters’ relation to the various cultural, psychological, or historical intricacies of their milieu.
  11. Georgis Grigorakis’s film may not revolutionize the western genre by transposing it to an unlikely setting, but it doesn’t dilute it either.
  12. Aly Muritiba’s film is always telling the viewer that death-ness and trans-ness bear the intimacy of Siamese sisters.
  13. The film is a perfectly entertaining retelling of an offbeat tale, but it’s also superficial and borderline exploitative.
  14. Sylvain Chomet provides only a scant sense of Marcel Pagnol’s creative inklings, such as the ideas and themes that fuel the films that he fights so vehemently to make.
  15. Kristoffer Borgli is unduly proud of himself for concocting his unlikable protagonists, and he marinates in their repulsive self-absorption.
  16. While Strange World’s examination of generational tension is tender and inspiring, as well as nicely tied to its theme of the necessity of adapting to changing times, the film’s sci-fi elements and environmental message are more half-baked in their execution.
  17. She Will can’t decide if its horror or comedy, nor does it strike the balance that would harmoniously hybridize them.
  18. A few scenes show glimmers of promise for what Alex Thompson can achieve when he’s more in his wheelhouse. It’s a shame that the horror and tension that make up the bulk of Rounding are so clearly outside of it.
  19. Pearl is ultimately an empty exercise in style masquerading as a character study, and for as fantastic as Mia Goth is, her performance mostly succeeds at making Ti West’s homages just a little bit easier to stomach.
  20. When it decides to sober up, the film’s comedy lurches into awkward attempts at melancholy.
  21. As the film explodes into numerous subplots that rapidly move far apart from one another, it necessitates constant leaps between characters and locations that only further disrupt the narrative flow of the proceedings.
  22. Both Taylor Russell and Timothée Chalamet are sadly at a disadvantage given how many of the older actors gnaw at the scenery like it’s a still-warm cadaver.
  23. The film is too invested in treacly cinematic optimism for its character dynamics to feel sketched out beyond their basic narrative function.
  24. In Sam Mendes’s film, the power of the movies comes off feeling disappointingly like an afterthought to the script’s more romantic and socially oriented concerns.
  25. Lee Cronin serves up considerable gore with monotonous, po-faced earnestness.
  26. For a while, the work on the part of the performers is nuanced enough to distract us from the film’s implausibilities.
  27. Henry Selick’s flair for phantasmagorical sights is on full display, though Wendell & Wild’s excessively CGI-enhanced look is a far cry from the grounded tactility of much of his prior work.
  28. For better and worse, writer-director Sarah Polley’s adaptation of Women Talking is most noteworthy for its imagery.
  29. Rodrigo García’s film is fastidious, tidy, and lifeless, with every obligatory gesture in its place.
  30. However faithfully the film transposes the plot and themes of the source material, it struggles to capture the spirit, ironing out D.H. Lawrence’s modernity-skeptical modernism and losing sight of his poetic vision.

Top Trailers