San Francisco Examiner's Scores

  • Movies
For 927 reviews, this publication has graded:
  • 49% higher than the average critic
  • 4% same as the average critic
  • 47% lower than the average critic
On average, this publication grades 4.7 points lower than other critics. (0-100 point scale)
Average Movie review score: 60
Highest review score: 100 Big Night
Lowest review score: 0 Luminarias
Score distribution:
927 movie reviews
  1. A finely coiffed, cream-cheese "8 1/2" remix with Gere, a Marcello Mastroianni for Oprah Winfrey times.
    • San Francisco Examiner
  2. As movies about relic sex machines go, this one lacks mojo.
  3. A weakly performed rehash of master-slave role-reversal tales.
    • San Francisco Examiner
  4. An adrenaline-pumping, post-musical musical.
    • San Francisco Examiner
  5. Too smitten with the Eisenhower-era nostalgia.
  6. Another "Exorcist" bastard -- one with a chick-flick pedigree.
  7. The sort of smutty scandalmongering the average moviegoer can really get behind.
    • San Francisco Examiner
  8. De Felitta has taken potentially overripe material and given it real heart.
  9. Some delightful surprises, but the sort of heavy-metal, high-definition sci-fi look that dominates the proceedings, plus the relentless pace and endless morphing, are somewhat tiring.
    • San Francisco Examiner
  10. Collapses under its own contempt.
    • San Francisco Examiner
  11. What begins as unassumingly dull wanders into disarming chaos.
  12. It's one of the most beautifully unpleasant movies ever made - its reverse charge being that it is no fun at all.
  13. There's a sense of genuineness throughout Girlfight.
    • San Francisco Examiner
  14. A proudly unsophisticated demonstration of racial progress.
  15. SORRY, SALLY. I didn't like it. I really didn't like it.
    • San Francisco Examiner
  16. Gets blue-ribbon results from its thoroughbred cast of improvisational comics.
    • San Francisco Examiner
  17. It seems like another misstep - the story just doesn't hold up to Ritchie's treatment.
    • San Francisco Examiner
  18. You're smarter than this, but occasionally it tricks you into thinking it might be up to something you haven't considered, like an above-average, extra-bloody episode of "Scooby Doo."
  19. Not the sweaty midnight stroll through the garden of carnal delights that its title wants you to believe.
  20. A movie too smart and too urgent to be categorically awful. Clinically insane may be another matter altogether.
    • San Francisco Examiner
  21. The film is alt-schmaltz, and it'll do.
  22. At its best when it's hovering around the muted dysfunction between a father and a son, who never understood each other to begin with.
  23. Dreamy and elegantly filmed.
  24. Misses some creative opportunities to really drive this story home, but it's a naturally haunting story nonetheless.
    • San Francisco Examiner
  25. Too much of nothing and far from the potentially star-making material that Foxx deserves.
    • San Francisco Examiner
  26. Quickly degenerates into a grueling piece of unpleasantness.
  27. Miserable as it crawls for two eternal hours toward being "life-affirming."
    • San Francisco Examiner
  28. Soberly, deeply effective.
    • San Francisco Examiner
  29. More often than not the film casts an infectious, evocative spell.
    • San Francisco Examiner
  30. A misfire.

Top Trailers