For 4,534 reviews, this publication has graded:
-
56% higher than the average critic
-
3% same as the average critic
-
41% lower than the average critic
On average, this publication grades 0.6 points higher than other critics.
(0-100 point scale)
Average Movie review score: 65
| Highest review score: | The Wolf of Wall Street | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest review score: | Joe Versus the Volcano |
Score distribution:
-
Positive: 2,923 out of 4534
-
Mixed: 982 out of 4534
-
Negative: 629 out of 4534
4534
movie
reviews
- By Date
- By Critic Score
-
-
Reviewed by
Peter Travers
The result is a failed and lifeless experiment in which everything goes wrong.- Rolling Stone
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Peter Travers
To shine in a turd like this shows Brody has the stuff that -- damn the Oscar jinx -- makes an actor last.- Rolling Stone
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Peter Travers
A comedy so devoid of wit and point that not mentioning the other actors trapped in this rathole would be an act of charity.- Rolling Stone
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Peter Travers
The actors hit the jackpot, but only in terms of their paychecks. The audience gets a tension-free, tight-assed, "Casino" ripoff that leaves them thoroughly fleeced.- Rolling Stone
- Posted Oct 11, 2013
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Peter Travers
Writer-director Angelina Jolie's attempt to emulate European art cinema is a slow, sodden, stupefyingly dull take on a 1970s marriage gone bad.- Rolling Stone
- Posted Nov 13, 2015
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Peter Travers
Don't ask whether or not you should take The Day After Tomorrow seriously. Don't take it at all.- Rolling Stone
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Peter Travers
Start hating me now, Twihards, but the sexless, bloodless, padded and plodding Breaking Dawn, Part 1 is the worst Twilight movie to date. (I don't get it either.)- Rolling Stone
- Posted Nov 17, 2011
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Peter Travers
Diapers, even from three babies, can't stink worse than this.- Rolling Stone
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Peter Travers
Film critics have been asked to say as little as possible about M. Night Shyamalan's new scare film about the perils of messing with Mother Nature. Fair enough. But I will say this: It's not happening.- Rolling Stone
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Peter Travers
I have the same allergic reaction to this open faucet of tear-jerking swill as I do to the 1996 Nicholas Sparks novel that inspired it.- Rolling Stone
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Peter Travers
I'd prefer to think of Sandler in "Punch-Drunk Love," the one good movie of the three he did this year.- Rolling Stone
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Peter Travers
Build a comedy around Jim Carrey in manic mode and they will come. Case in point: Fun With Dick and Jane, a pointless, painfully unfunny and yet inexplicably popular remake of the 1977 fizzle with Jane Fonda and George Segal.- Rolling Stone
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Peter Travers
Except for a rare scene of shaggy charm, nothing works. Nothing.- Rolling Stone
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Peter Travers
This is Berg's debut outing as a director, but other first-timers, namely Joel Coen (Blood Simple) and Danny Boyle (Shallow Grave), had it all over him for blending horror and hilarity.- Rolling Stone
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Peter Travers
Director Michael Hoffman sprays on the tears like a toxic mist. Avoid like the plague.- Rolling Stone
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Peter Travers
The true audiences for Fifty Shades of Grey are gluttons for punishment — by boredom.- Rolling Stone
- Posted Feb 11, 2015
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Peter Travers
Not since Gus Van Sant inexplicably directed a shot-by-shot remake of Hitchcock's "Psycho" has a thriller been copied with so little point or impact.- Rolling Stone
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Fear
The problem with setting a familiar story in a foreign universe is that you have to establish the parameters of said universe or risk losing your audience. That's world-building 101, folks. Bright does not care about that. Bright's attitude is closer to "fuck you for not somehow keeping up with our cool shit" before doing a lot of push-ups.- Rolling Stone
- Posted Dec 21, 2017
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Rolling Stone
- Posted Mar 17, 2017
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Peter Travers
Yikes! I saw Pixels as a 3D metaphor for Hollywood's digital assault on our eyes and brains. Not funny. Just relentless and exhausting.- Rolling Stone
- Posted Jul 23, 2015
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Critic Score
One might think that a movie featuring Bill Murray, Matthew McConaughey, Janeane Garofalo and an elephant couldn't be all that bad. Think again. This is a terrible, terrible movie.- Rolling Stone
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Peter Travers
Hollywood has again turned a challenging book into negligible cinema. Forget the $13 million budget and the reputations involved. This Handmaid’s Tale is merely a piss-poor rehash of The Stepford Wives with delusions of grandeur.- Rolling Stone
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Peter Travers
Yikes! Chris Renaud and Kyle Balda direct strictly for short-attention spans on a fruit-loopy palette that made me want to puke. Had Dr. Seuss lived (he died in 1991), I'm confident he would have puked as well.- Rolling Stone
- Posted Mar 2, 2012
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Rolling Stone
- Posted Nov 27, 2013
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Peter Travers
Charlie Day owns one of the highest-pitched male squeaks in the business and he puts it to hilarious use on It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia. I could watch him in anything – but Fist Fight is pushing it, given that's it's always raining a storm of comic clichés that quickly drowns any semblance of audience goodwill.- Rolling Stone
- Posted Feb 17, 2017
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Peter Travers
This movie really moves. But a fleet of tanks couldn’t help the brothers Dowdle push past the plot holes in this rancid mess.- Rolling Stone
- Posted Aug 27, 2015
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Peter Travers
Stephen Rodrick's New York Times article about the making of The Canyons had humor, suspense and propulsion. They should have made that movie. What we have here is dead on arrival.- Rolling Stone
- Posted Aug 1, 2013
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Peter Travers
A movie utterly devoid of wit , excitement and any reason for being.- Rolling Stone
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Peter Travers
This movie isn't over-the-top -- it doesn't know where the top is. Trash addicts will eat up every graphic minute, even if they prefer to wait for the DVD.- Rolling Stone
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Rolling Stone
- Read full review