Newark Star-Ledger's Scores
- TV
For 511 reviews, this publication has graded:
-
50% higher than the average critic
-
2% same as the average critic
-
48% lower than the average critic
On average, this publication grades 4.2 points lower than other critics.
(0-100 point scale)
Average TV Show review score: 63
| Highest review score: | The Handmaid's Tale: Season 1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest review score: | In the Motherhood: Season 1 |
Score distribution:
-
Positive: 270 out of 270
-
Mixed: 0 out of 270
-
Negative: 0 out of 270
270
tv
reviews
- By Date
- By Critic Score
-
-
Reviewed by
Alan Sepinwall
You get out what you put into it--even in the episodes that are weaker, I was rarely bored--and it's a consistent scripted oasis in a sea of shows where people take lie detector tests on camera.- Newark Star-Ledger
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Alan Sepinwall
Cranston's performance alone is enough to keep me watching for a while, but I'd like to see something resembling a completed formula, and soon.- Newark Star-Ledger
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Alan Sepinwall
With the start of season two, it looks like the expectations might finally meet the reality--or however real a show with aliens and time travel can get.- Newark Star-Ledger
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Alan Sepinwall
Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles happens to contain that show's most interesting character. It just ain't Sarah Connor.- Newark Star-Ledger
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Alan Sepinwall
The fifth and final season may be the most overtly farcical, but only because things in this slightly fictionalized Baltimore have become, if you can imagine, worse than ever.- Newark Star-Ledger
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Alan Sepinwall
Pick your adjective--Predictable. Insufferable. Detestable. Tacky. --and it fits.- Newark Star-Ledger
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Alan Sepinwall
Some of the performances are good, particularly by Deschanel (who gets to sing near the end, good news for anyone who saw "Elf"), McDonough and Cumming, but solid acting and monkeys flying out of, um, someplace aren't enough to justify spending six hours over three nights on a labored attempt to make a classic children's story seem grown-up and cool.- Newark Star-Ledger
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Newark Star-Ledger
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Alan Sepinwall
The humor provided by the new setting makes the show a bit more palatable than it was last season, but Nip/Tuck is still Nip/Tuck, for both good and ill.- Newark Star-Ledger
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Alan Sepinwall
Samantha Who? isn't remotely as bad as the worst of this season's rookie class ("Cavemen," "Big Shots," CBS' upcoming "Viva Laughlin"), but it's ultimately forgettable in a way that a show about an amnesiac would probably want to avoid.- Newark Star-Ledger
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Newark Star-Ledger
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Alan Sepinwall
It's the best-looking pilot of the season--maybe the best new show, period--even though it may not look that good in the future.- Newark Star-Ledger
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Alan Sepinwall
There's some amusing material on the margins of the show--the guys use OnStar to settle a debate about the lyrics to a song on the radio, Dougie admits his marriage isn't perfect and his wife "sometimes she gets up in the middle of the night and bakes in her sleep"--but outside of Jerry Minor's winning performance as the overextended but always cheerful Aubrey, it's completely forgettable.- Newark Star-Ledger
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Alan Sepinwall
Aliens is very much in the vein of previous nerd comedies like "Malcolm in the Middle" and "Freaks and Geeks," though it's not as explosively funny as either one of them.- Newark Star-Ledger
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Alan Sepinwall
Because Dexter's victims are always so evil, we're inclined to root for him, but moments like that--or one in where Dexter admits he doesn't really care about saving innocents, just scratching his itch to kill--gives the show more moral complexity than you would expect, and it's the better for that.- Newark Star-Ledger
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Alan Sepinwall
The show plays like bad imitation noir where the private eye can occasionally sink his teeth into the villain.- Newark Star-Ledger
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Alan Sepinwall
Big Shots, an obnoxious waste of time that's likely the season's worst new show.- Newark Star-Ledger
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Alan Sepinwall
Jamie is our heroine, the one we're supposed to like and care about, but as played by British actress Ryan ("EastEnders," "Jekyll"), she's a mopey blank, badly upstaged every time Sackhoff makes one of her all-too-brief appearances as Corvus.- Newark Star-Ledger
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Alan Sepinwall
Krause could be hard to digest as the self-righteous Nate on "Six Feet Under," but he makes a fine, amusingly flustered straight man to the cast of eccentrics that Wright and producer Greg Berlanti have assembled.- Newark Star-Ledger
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Alan Sepinwall
Lewis is a strong enough actor (again, see "Band of Brothers") that there are moments where he pulls together all these tics into a character who could be interesting, but too much time gets wasted on pedestrian mysteries to give him room to work.- Newark Star-Ledger
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Alan Sepinwall
Addison isn't very strong or decisive in her professional capacity either, spending most of the pilot waffling on whether she should have left Seattle Grace.- Newark Star-Ledger
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Alan Sepinwall
The CW's Reaper and NBC's "Chuck," the two shows featuring the aforementioned Sam and, um, Chuck, are an unusual pairing in that they're not only both good--with ABC's "Pushing Daisies," they're the best new shows of the season.- Newark Star-Ledger
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Alan Sepinwall
It's a watered-down, TV version of the familiar tale, as bland and inoffensive as possible.- Newark Star-Ledger
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Alan Sepinwall
Journeyman doesn't do anything especially interesting with its time-twisting premise. It's competently produced, but unless you have a tremendous amount of affection for McKidd left over from his work as the insane Lucius Vorenus on HBO's "Rome," it's skippable.- Newark Star-Ledger
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Alan Sepinwall
Chuck starts a step slower, with more exposition in the first two episodes and no larger-than-life character like Satan to smooth over that, but by episode three, it's just as assured and entertaining in its own extremely similar way.- Newark Star-Ledger
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Newark Star-Ledger
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Alan Sepinwall
None of those jokes serve any purpose except to be jokes, and they suffer for the fact that real people don't talk, think or act this way.- Newark Star-Ledger
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Alan Sepinwall
It's very well-done teen angst, but at the same time made me feel very old and slightly pervy while watching it.- Newark Star-Ledger
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Alan Sepinwall
All the gunplay, pedal-to-the-metal action and cartoon villains cheapen any serious talk of what's going on in the city.- Newark Star-Ledger
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Alan Sepinwall
Much as I admire Lilley's ability to pull off a sort of one-man Christopher Guest movie, only one of the three Summer Heights High leads is funny on a consistent basis.- Newark Star-Ledger
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by