Newark Star-Ledger's Scores
- TV
For 511 reviews, this publication has graded:
-
50% higher than the average critic
-
2% same as the average critic
-
48% lower than the average critic
On average, this publication grades 4.2 points lower than other critics.
(0-100 point scale)
Average TV Show review score: 63
| Highest review score: | The Handmaid's Tale: Season 1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest review score: | In the Motherhood: Season 1 |
Score distribution:
-
Positive: 270 out of 270
-
Mixed: 0 out of 270
-
Negative: 0 out of 270
270
tv
reviews
- By Date
- By Critic Score
-
-
Reviewed by
Vicki Hyman
The show wallows in lowest common denominator jokes that more often than not don't land.- Newark Star-Ledger
- Posted Oct 2, 2014
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Vicki Hyman
The CGI is still pretty cool, and some chuckles are wrought from the futuristic premise (Iggy Azalea is considered a classic in 2065), but at its heart Minority Report is a by-the-book cop procedural with turgid writing and complete absence of subtlety.- Newark Star-Ledger
- Posted Sep 21, 2015
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Vicki Hyman
It tries to deliver a biting geopolitical satire about unconventional warfare with weapons that are depressingly conventional.- Newark Star-Ledger
- Posted Jun 22, 2015
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Vicki Hyman
The TV series is a rote procedural that dulls the film's premise further by making it an ensemble piece (the monomaniacal nature of Neeson's Mills is the point of "Taken") and has a lead actor, Clive Standen of History's "Vikings," most notable for not being Neeson.- Newark Star-Ledger
- Posted Feb 28, 2017
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Vicki Hyman
Backstrom isn't edgy; he's a formulaic anti-hero with too much emphasis on the anti- and very little evidence of the hero.- Newark Star-Ledger
- Posted Jan 22, 2015
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Vicki Hyman
The show fails to engage on any level, striving at best for a vague earnestness.- Newark Star-Ledger
- Posted Jun 18, 2015
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Vicki Hyman
The prospect of jumping from era to era to stop Savage holds promise, but there isn't enough interplay between the characters to add any dimension to the early episodes. If only they could go back in time two hours and make a different show.- Newark Star-Ledger
- Posted Jan 21, 2016
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Vicki Hyman
Chestnut, a reliably charming presence on screens small and large, is by far the best the thing about this painfully conventional procedural that borrows aethestically from "Miami Vice."- Newark Star-Ledger
- Posted Sep 23, 2015
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Alan Sepinwall
The premise is pretty standard Joseph Campbell, journey of the hero stuff, but the execution is poor.- Newark Star-Ledger
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Alan Sepinwall
The material is so inherently dramatic that there are occasional moments where Three Rivers is affecting despite itself. But it's also a danger sign that one of the premiere episode's story lines has absolutely nothing to do with a patient in need of an organ.- Newark Star-Ledger
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Alan Sepinwall
In general, "Philadelphia" pulls back just short of being really tasteless, which seems to miss the point. [4 Aug 2005]- Newark Star-Ledger
Posted Jul 15, 2013 -
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Alan Sepinwall
The longer you watch the show (I've seen all eight episodes of its first season), the emptier and more frustrating it becomes, to the point where even the brief running time begins to feel too long.- Newark Star-Ledger
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Alan Sepinwall
It's a watered-down, TV version of the familiar tale, as bland and inoffensive as possible.- Newark Star-Ledger
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Alan Sepinwall
Melrose does a better job integrating its two casts, and it embraces what it is: a trashy remake of one of the most memorably trashy hits in primetime history. It's still not good, mind you, but it's more honest and enthusiastic about its badness, you know?- Newark Star-Ledger
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Alan Sepinwall
Valentine is more what I was anticipating when I heard about the MRC-on-CW deal: low-budget, disposable and artery-clogging in its levels of cheese.- Newark Star-Ledger
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Alan Sepinwall
Heroes may be better this year than it was last year, but it's still a very dumb show that just wants you to think it's smart.- Newark Star-Ledger
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Alan Sepinwall
The three episodes of the new season that I've seen are almost entirely flat. [29 Jun 2006]- Newark Star-Ledger
Posted Jul 15, 2013 -
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Alan Sepinwall
Despite two fine leading performances by Eddie Izzard and Minnie Driver and a premise that's not like anything else on television, there's something missing in the execution.- Newark Star-Ledger
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Alan Sepinwall
Most of the humor feels like a show that’s trying too hard, except when we’re watching the great-yet-tiny character actress Linda Hunt as the boss of NCIS’s Los Angeles field office.- Newark Star-Ledger
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Alan Sepinwall
Basically, The Deep End is "Grey's Anatomy" with lawyers, and the execution is as cynical and flat as that premise sounds.- Newark Star-Ledger
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Alan Sepinwall
"Vanished" is already lacking in the kind of star performances that make "Prison Break" or "24" worthwhile even when they're foot-dragging.- Newark Star-Ledger
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Alan Sepinwall
Samantha Who? isn't remotely as bad as the worst of this season's rookie class ("Cavemen," "Big Shots," CBS' upcoming "Viva Laughlin"), but it's ultimately forgettable in a way that a show about an amnesiac would probably want to avoid.- Newark Star-Ledger
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Alan Sepinwall
"Weeds" isn't nearly as shocking or hilarious as it clearly thinks it is. [5 Aug 2005]- Newark Star-Ledger
Posted Jul 11, 2013 -
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Alan Sepinwall
Unfortunately, the idea's a little too thin to support a weekly sitcom.- Newark Star-Ledger
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Alan Sepinwall
Maybe McBride has more pitches in his arsenal than he's shown so far, but the repertoire on display in Eastbound & Down feels too limited for a long stint on HBO's mound.- Newark Star-Ledger
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Alan Sepinwall
None of those jokes serve any purpose except to be jokes, and they suffer for the fact that real people don't talk, think or act this way.- Newark Star-Ledger
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Alan Sepinwall
The one moment people will talk about, and remember, from The Jay Leno Show debut was one of the least comic of Jay's career. It's going to get NBC some water cooler talk, and a lot of website hits, but it's not going to work as a signature "This is why Jay is awesome" clip like I think they were hoping.- Newark Star-Ledger
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Alan Sepinwall
Unlike "Life on Mars," the concept seems elastic enough that the show could run for a long time, but first its American producers would need to work on storytelling basics like pacing and developing interesting characters.- Newark Star-Ledger
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Alan Sepinwall
On paper, the idea of building a new democracy from the ruins of war while government contractors run amok--in other words, showing what would happen if the reconstruction of Iraq took place in our heartland--is just as strong as the original premise of Jericho. But the execution remains mediocre.- Newark Star-Ledger
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Alan Sepinwall
There's potentially a good show here; the pilot's just a miss.- Newark Star-Ledger
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by