New Times (L.A.)'s Scores

  • Movies
For 639 reviews, this publication has graded:
  • 52% higher than the average critic
  • 1% same as the average critic
  • 47% lower than the average critic
On average, this publication grades 5.3 points lower than other critics. (0-100 point scale)
Average Movie review score: 60
Highest review score: 100 Donnie Darko
Lowest review score: 0 Rollerball
Score distribution:
639 movie reviews
  1. Offers both a gentle humor and a sly but unmistakable optimism about what life in Iran might one day be.
    • New Times (L.A.)
  2. Arteta targets Middle American ennui with wit, compassion and no shortage of ornery malaise.
  3. It's far more than merely disappointing that Spy Kids 2: The Island of Lost Dreams lacks the charm and wit -- and humanity --of its predecessor. It's dispiriting.
    • New Times (L.A.)
  4. That's all Full Frontal is: a brilliant gag at the expense of those who paid for it and those who pay to see it.
    • New Times (L.A.)
  5. Not strong enough to stomach this leather-clad jerk-off session, which Miramax dumped onto Paramount in a rare case of common sense.
    • New Times (L.A.)
  6. It's the usual struggle of growing up and growing old, but Muccino's twists are plucky and revealing when he's not suffocating us with heavy-handed mortality and pathos.
  7. Signs blessedly displays a sense of giddy dark humor absent from Shyamalan's previous outings. It appears for much of the film he's merely having fun with the genre, goofing on its paranoid roots.
    • New Times (L.A.)
  8. Mostly this happy train wreck feels like a longer, better movie that was chopped up and reassembled by retarded monkeys; what should have been a rush instead feels rushed.
    • New Times (L.A.)
  9. The film is a masterpiece of nuance and characterization, marred only by an inexplicable, utterly distracting blunder at the very end.
  10. It's either the world's greatest infomercial for fame (and its omnipresent companion, notoriety) or the saddest eulogy of all.
  11. what we've got here is a little propaganda film. A mild one, certainly, but the cliché of DIY hopefuls (band) versus the Big Machine (music industry) foments the same tedious struggle of art versus commerce.
  12. The result is a lovely piece of writing brought to life by a terrific cast, a vivid sense of place and, not incidentally, some perfectly chosen pop tunes by such as Bree Sharp, Leona Naess, Smog and Tin Star. As for Lauren Ambrose, her big-screen debut is a revelation.
  13. What it lacks are solid performances, save Slater's game attempt to take everything seriously.
    • New Times (L.A.)
  14. This film is just too damn weird to pass up, and for the blacklight crowd, way cheaper (and better) than Pink Floyd tickets.
    • New Times (L.A.)
  15. The movie will leave you smiling forgetfully on the way out, and Myers will have done his job.
    • New Times (L.A.)
  16. It manages to be sentimental without seeming trashy.
    • New Times (L.A.)
  17. Filled with sharp observations and interesting, often subtle, bits of visual trickery, much of it evoking the technique of Douglas Sirk's American domestic melodramas. Still, the very simple story seems too simple and the working out of the plot almost arbitrary.
  18. Schnitzler's film has a great hook, some clever bits and well-drawn, if standard issue, characters, but is still only partly satisfying. The problem may very well be one of cultural translation.
    • New Times (L.A.)
  19. Does a masterful job of combining digital imagery and voice performance to create totally believable animal characters.
    • New Times (L.A.)
  20. Lansdown has a pretty good score by Atli Orvarsson... Nope, nothing else nice to say.
    • New Times (L.A.)
  21. Of all the A-list men playing dedicated authority figures, Star Wars alums Harrison Ford and Liam Neeson remain among the most amusing and pleasing, which is why K-19: The Widowmaker glides along engagingly rather than sinking.
    • New Times (L.A.)
  22. Overcomes its visual hideousness with a sharp script and strong performances.
    • New Times (L.A.)
  23. This thing's all in fun. It's just a perfect movie for people who like to shout at the screen, so have at it.
    • New Times (L.A.)
  24. The next time Irwin wants to make a feature, however, he should find a director who knows how.
    • New Times (L.A.)
  25. Fans of convoluted narrative in the manner of Christopher Nolan and David Lynch are likely to be intrigued, although Medem has a far stronger streak of sentiment.
    • New Times (L.A.)
  26. The beasts are employed to splendid metaphorical effect, which may be lost on viewers perceiving nothing but an action romp.
    • New Times (L.A.)
  27. This movie would be worth feting in any season. It's wrenching but never manipulative, stoic but never dull, exhausting but never wearying.
    • New Times (L.A.)
  28. There's an eerie coolness to this film that's quite unsettling and un-Oshima-like. Rather lengthy, it requires patience. But adventurous moviegoers aren't likely to mind.
  29. Audiences are advised to sit near the back and squint to avoid noticing some truly egregious lip-non-synching, but otherwise the production is suitably elegant, a fine retreat from summer cinema overkill.
  30. Thing is, movie's 100 percent mystery-free, but mildly creative, mixing Psych 101 with cynical Hollywood in-jokes with Tylenol-sponsored grainy-cam footage. Best revelation is source of Myers' superhuman strength: eats big rats, apparently.
    • New Times (L.A.)

Top Trailers