Dallas Observer's Scores

  • Movies
For 1,518 reviews, this publication has graded:
  • 48% higher than the average critic
  • 3% same as the average critic
  • 49% lower than the average critic
On average, this publication grades 5.8 points lower than other critics. (0-100 point scale)
Average Movie review score: 59
Highest review score: 100 Final Destination 3
Lowest review score: 0 How to Lose a Guy in 10 Days
Score distribution:
1518 movie reviews
  1. Among the several iterations of Jules Verne's novel about the inventor's adventures whilst traipsing through England, Asia and the Wild West, this new one is the least impressive and most depressive. Even the 1989 made-for-TV version starring Pierce Brosnan possessed more spark and steam than this lazy, lackluster take.
  2. Perhaps realizing that rare performances in snoozers like "The Horse Whisperer" and "The Last Castle" weren't doing him (Redford) any favors, he seems to have entered a new phase in his career, with a wealth of old man roles now open to him. He was very good in last year's "The Clearing;" he's better in this.
  3. If you're going to fall for this movie, you're going to have to buy not only the idea that adultery is excusable if you're "following your heart," but also that following your heart amounts to falling in love at first sight, a formulation that seems adolescent at best.
  4. Carrey and the Farrellys are equal-opportunity offenders.
  5. This sort of thing is the problem with making stuff up as you go along.
  6. Emperor gives off a distinctly musty odor -- not least because Kline's character.
  7. A bucket of crap, but at well under 90 minutes it's a small bucket, and half the crap is amusing.
  8. It's just a familiar bore, offering chills and thrills only to those who have never seen a movie before.
  9. The fact that Romance was written and directed by a woman doesn't make the film any better; it simply makes it objectionable on other grounds.
  10. It is unfortunate that von Trotta does not trust her audience enough to think for themselves -- her themes are carved on a sledgehammer en route to our skulls.
  11. An entertainment success, a triple threat of fresh writing, inspired directing, and, yes, good acting.
  12. It's a skillfully made film, but not especially fun to watch, and the apparent thesis that poverty justifies such acts doesn't quite wash.
  13. Is it worth the goofy characters and weak story for the effects and action sequences? Absolutely.
  14. Its heart is in the right place, but it has no soul.
  15. Nothing deeper than a stale retread, it seems. And this is coming from a critic who listed the original "Charlie's Angels" movie as one of the top five films of 2000.
  16. Fortunately the film's humor kicks in with McKenzie Brothers Rick Moranis and Dave Thomas stealing the show as a dopey pair of moose. Could've done without Phil Collins's generic, annoying tunes.
  17. The movie, which feels as amateurish as a student film made for cable access, doesn't deliver the goods; the gotcha moment never comes.
  18. Never quite works, despite the wonderful performances or the decency in the screenplay's margins.
  19. The movie remains engaging, with a couple of sequences verging on stunning.
  20. All Sinbad has going for it is Pfeiffer's Eris.
  21. If you've never seen a Sandler movie, however, this isn't the one to start with. Proceed only if you're sure you like the guy.
  22. This trifle is better approached as a suburban haunted-house attraction thrown by enthusiastically confused teenagers. It's a little bit eerie, completely disjointed and sporadically amusing--kind of like "Lost in Translation," but with wanton slaughter. Do not expect more.
  23. Actually quite amusing, thanks mainly to a script that keeps the gags flying so fast that even though so many of them are bad, they're quickly followed by something new, and occasionally something good.
  24. If Chicken Little were in 3-D, shown in a theme park as you sit in motion simulators, the lame gags might not be so much of a problem.
  25. Vertical Limit represents another kind of propaganda--namely the current Hollywood notion that the bigger and louder and longer a movie is, the more people will want to see it, even if that means getting numbed before your popcorn's cold.
  26. Once more, Tim Allen drops a lump of coal down the chimney.
  27. Sometimes the laughs here seem unintentional, but most giggles are properly earned, and the movie's fun and exciting if you can accept its inherent camp factor.
  28. Turns out to be one of the most original and imaginative children's films in a long time.
  29. It strains to be funny where the original's gags were efficiently deadpan, yet it's also so unbearably lazy, stooping to cliché and caricature when it backs itself into the shower.
  30. When it comes to World War II movies, you may never have seen one like this before -- if only because it's like three different movies at the same time.

Top Trailers