Overall, Agatha Christie: Evil under the Sun is definitely an improvement over the previous title in the series, albeit a slight one.

Gameplay is pedestrian, ultimately annoying and not as replayable as a Sims title should be.

Despite the repetitiveness and other issues I think the game is probably well suited for its younger target audience. If you’re planning on purchasing this game, though, I would highly recommend either using a gamepad or simply buying the console version instead.

Psychonauts may be an excellent concept and creatively realized, but it is translated into an average game.

The game can be fun and the game can be maddening.

The bottom line is that Gun could have, and probably should have, been great. It's got some very good ideas, a good storyline, and excellent voice acting and characterizations. The gameplay and level design is miserable.

Unfortunately, while the game has heart, it just doesn't have the goods.

The major weakness of the game is the fact that you can only save at checkpoints.

I was really disappointed with this game because it has good potential and includes certain qualities that makes a great game, but fails to deliver.

Overall, I’m simply disappointed with Rockstar when it comes to Grand Theft Auto IV. PC gamers already get shafted with the slow GTA releases compared to the consoles. To have all the bugs at launch that it did makes me wonder what happened during the testing period. It’s also missing a lot of great features that were included in San Andreas.

When I first started playing, I was impressed with the game, as it seemed the first real advancement since the "Diablo" genre was created years ago. After one play-through, though, I’m done with it.

Guerrilla is fun, until you make a terrible discovery: it’s pretty easy.

The series is greater than the sum of its parts. So, consider Requiem as not a full-fledged Penumbra game but rather a small add-on that should keep you busy and humbled for a weekend.

Queen's Gambit is a mixed bag. The new campaigns are solid and well-worth the effort despite their obvious flaws, but the vanishingly small number of new features, weapons, and vehicles make it difficult to recommend.

Technically splendid, but lacks the soul and the focus that made its previous games such powerful experiences.

Another reason I like this game is because there is a number of ways to go about playing it. You can be aggressive and pick the soldiers for that, or you can be stealthy and snipe through your missions.

It doesn’t have that cardboard feeling you get in certain games.

The move to vibrant, fully-realized 3D hasn’t altered the formula at all.

The total effect of the expansion pack is still positive (multiplayer is still fun; even the single-player has its uses) but there are a few worrying signs – the introduction of hero units and special abilities and the inward-looking nature of the entire game (SP as preparation for MP).

It’s fun, addicting, and satisfying, but nothing about 2008 Edition makes it a substantial update or upgrade.

Quotation forthcoming.

Fallout 3 is just mediocre. It’s bogged down by too many problems, engine issues, and poor writing to really wrestle its way into classic status.

An average game, but I really like the film footage.

I would only recommend this game to adventure fans that are into the Agatha Christie series of novels. However, they should prepare to be faced with repetitive and secretarial tasks.

Graphics could be better.

This game frustrates where it should rejuvenate.

For ten dollars, I had enough content to enjoy myself and certainly liked it more than some of the other Fallout related DLC I have completed in the past.

The skirmishes usually don’t last very long, making this an excellent game to play for a quick fix.