Chicago Reader's Scores
- Movies
For 6,312 reviews, this publication has graded:
-
42% higher than the average critic
-
2% same as the average critic
-
56% lower than the average critic
On average, this publication grades 4.9 points lower than other critics.
(0-100 point scale)
Average Movie review score: 60
| Highest review score: | I Stand Alone | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest review score: | Old Dogs |
Score distribution:
-
Positive: 2,983 out of 6312
-
Mixed: 2,456 out of 6312
-
Negative: 873 out of 6312
6312
movie
reviews
- By Date
- By Critic Score
-
-
Reviewed by
Dave Kehr
A brilliant work of popular art, it redefined nostalgia as a marketable commodity and established a new narrative style, with locale replacing plot, that has since been imitated to the point of ineffectiveness.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Critic Score
Terrific escapist entertainment...It's a polished and exciting thriller, mercifully unburdened with heavy political/philosophical digressions.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
- Critic Score
Jack Starrett's 1973 entry in the violent inner-city drug-bust genre is talkier and more subdued than the usual fare, with a surer technical polish.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Dave Kehr
Guy Hamilton's direction lacks enthusiasm and pace, while even the art direction—long the Bond films' real secret weapon—seems to have fallen to a shrunken budget. Not much fun.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Dave Kehr
The most visually inventive film of the 60s is also one of the funniest.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Critic Score
Uneven and slightly muddled futuristic horror story—not really science fiction, more like an antipollution PSA gone berserk.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Dave Kehr
Ryan O'Neal is a con man and Tatum O'Neal is the foundling who may or may not be his daughter. Though their relationship is conventionally drawn, it has a heart that Bogdanovich hasn't been able to recapture.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Critic Score
Jack Hill directs for maximal suspense, violence, and voyeuristic appeal (which Grier certainly embodies).- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Dave Kehr
At the time, its way of wringing thrills from genre conventions at the same time it mocked them seemed imaginative and original; but in the light of Carrie (1976), Obsession (1976), and The Fury (1978), it seems more like a dead end—the mark of a superficial stylist unable to take anything seriously, including his own work.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Dave Kehr
The film is so inventive in its situations and humor that its shortcomings—the blunt ideas at its core—don't become apparent before several viewings.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Critic Score
It preserves some of the form and language of White's original but fattens and sweetens his lean and pungent prose with songs by Richard and Robert Sherman (Mary Poppins).- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Dave Kehr
The surface plausibility is probably the contribution of Marlon Brando, whose performance has strength and detail enough to counterbalance Bertolucci's taste for pure psychological essence.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Critic Score
A failure of resolution mars it, but it is diverting enough for the first couple of reels to make it worth seeing.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
- Critic Score
Newman does a remarkable John Huston impression, and screenwriter John Milius demonstrates once again that he went to film school.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Jonathan Rosenbaum
Traffic is a masterpiece in its own right—not only for the sharp picture of the frenetic and gimmick-crazy civilization that worships cars, but also for many remarkable formal qualities: an extraordinary use of sound (always one of Tati’s strong points), a complex interplay of chance and control in the observations of everyday behavior, and, in some spots, a development of the use of multiple focal points to articulate some of the funniest gags.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Jonathan Rosenbaum
Frightening, funny, profound, and mysterious.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Dave Kehr
Clearly, it’s an affront to Holiday’s art, but just as clearly, it’s a good piece of low entertainment.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Dave Kehr
Ruthless, poundingly violent horror film, directed by Wes Craven. It isn't artistically adroit, but if success in this genre is counted by squirms, it's a success.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Dave Kehr
Roundly condemned as a glorification of drug dealing, it's actually an acrid film noir on a classic theme—the hood who must make one last score before he quits the business.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Dave Kehr
John Huston's 1972 restatement of his theme of perpetual loss is intelligently understated, though the recessive camera compositions put an unnecessary distance between the viewer and the characters.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Critic Score
John Boorman's 1972 film of the James Dickey novel has a beautiful visual style that balances the film's machismo message.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Dave Kehr
Yasujiro Ozu’s 1949 film inaugurated his majestic late period: it’s here that he decisively renounces melodrama (and, indeed, most surface action of any kind) and lets his camera settle into the still, long-take contemplation of his gently drawn characters.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by