Chicago Reader's Scores
- Movies
For 6,312 reviews, this publication has graded:
-
42% higher than the average critic
-
2% same as the average critic
-
56% lower than the average critic
On average, this publication grades 4.9 points lower than other critics.
(0-100 point scale)
Average Movie review score: 60
| Highest review score: | I Stand Alone | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest review score: | Old Dogs |
Score distribution:
-
Positive: 2,983 out of 6312
-
Mixed: 2,456 out of 6312
-
Negative: 873 out of 6312
6312
movie
reviews
- By Date
- By Critic Score
-
-
Reviewed by
Jonathan Rosenbaum
It's been a month since I attended a preview, and I'm more grateful than sorry that I no longer remember it well. Drug thrillers and revenge plots bore me.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Dave Kehr
For all her prolificacy, Agatha Christie relied too often on one particular plot twist, and as soon as you recognize her old favorite here, the film loses all interest—it has nothing going for it apart from the mystery, which, of course, is no way to make a mystery movie.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
J.R. Jones
This drama about Baltimore firefighters makes a serious effort to honor the sacrifices of professional rescue workers, but blasts of hokum keep threatening to collapse the building.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Dave Kehr
It doesn't display an ounce of planning or simple craftsmanship (the Jamaican locations are photographed to look like the banks of Lake Calumet), but with a cast like that, it can't help but have its moments.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Dave Kehr
Assembled by Gene Kelly, it jerks and sputters along through an overedited collection of songs, dances, comedy routines, and dramatic excerpts, with a strong tendency toward camp. Gene should know better.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Jonathan Rosenbaum
Maybury's art-world talents don't include storytelling, and his visceral bursts of fast editing and extreme close-ups don't yield any full-blown characters, narrative, or political vision.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Lisa Alspector
The ultimately uncomplicated view of sexual and emotional violence in a family is only tragic, not insightful.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Andrea Gronvall
The exotic plant and animal life is enhanced by the 3D process--which makes the two-dimensional screenplay all the more disappointing. With its weighty dialogue the movie becomes depressing well before the final violent showdown.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Ronnie Scheib
It's all so overdetermined -- each encounter of the present-day lovers mirrors some moment from the long-ago day when they parted -- that it reduces their whole affair to a matter of last-minute revisionism.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Jonathan Rosenbaum
There's something offensive about the movie's chintzy view of death and the way it periodically flirts with promising conceits (i.e., Goldberg offering her body as a surrogate so that Swayze and Moore can "touch" one another) only to back away from them in as cowardly a manner as possible.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Jonathan Rosenbaum
Dog slobber enthusiasts (as well as fans of dog farts) will have a field day. Everyone else will have to settle for a formulaic cop comedy that has Hanks but little else.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Ronnie Scheib
Far less insulting to Pakistanis or Mancunians than it is to its audience.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Jonathan Rosenbaum
It's predictable stuff, though with a nice old-fashioned edge.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Jonathan Rosenbaum
Despite a good deal of witty, bantering dialogue and clever plotting, some interesting moral ambiguity about the relative corruption of a cop (Russell) and a drug dealer (Gibson), and a likable performance by Raul Julia, this film seems overinfected by the kind of southern California narcissism that makes all of the male characters a little too pleased with themselves, with Pfeiffer little more than a beanbag in the little-boy macho games.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Jonathan Rosenbaum
Thematically the film starts off like “The Believer,” Henry Bean's 2001 drama about an anti-Semitic Jew, and winds up like “Sullivan's Travels” without the comedy.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Critic Score
Ultimately Barker's style drains the life from the film, making it feel like an academic exercise as it becomes increasingly inert, emotionally and dramatically.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Jonathan Rosenbaum
The heroes (Kilmer, Derek Luke) are all totally good, the villains (Ed O'Neill, William H. Macy) are all totally bad, and the macho one-liners are sufficiently adolescent to produce the desired snickers. I tried very hard to imagine I was somewhere else.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Jonathan Rosenbaum
Unfortunately this is much tamer than it had to be--Rudnick Lite, meaning on the edge of evaporation.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Dave Kehr
A flat, stagy, artificially cheerful affair that falls far short of the memorably creepy Laurel and Hardy version of 1934.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
- Critic Score
It's hard to enjoy the movie's charms when writer-director Todd Graff (Camp, Bandslam) keeps trying to shove them down your throat.- Chicago Reader
- Posted Jan 12, 2012
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Jonathan Rosenbaum
The direction of this clammy 1935 horror item is credited to Louis Friedlander, which is actually Lew Landers in hiding—perhaps understandably.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Jonathan Rosenbaum
Lugubrious and rather contrived... Because this whole project seems detached at times to the point of indifference—no one ever seems to be having any fun, including the filmmakers—even one's clinical interest eventually begins to evaporate.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Ted Shen
Bay Area filmmaker Jon Moritsugu (Fame Whore, Mod Fuck Explosion) is known for his angry, manic energy, but the characters in this video, denizens of the San Francisco art fringe, seem like they're heavily sedated.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Jonathan Rosenbaum
The ideological reasons for the heroine's project aren't divulged, so I guess we're supposed to be fascinated simply by the fanaticism of her will, doubts and all. I wasn't.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Lisa Alspector
Better than slick, though it feels pointless -- another homage to a kind of filmmaking that's had more than its share.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by