Charlotte Observer's Scores

  • Movies
For 1,652 reviews, this publication has graded:
  • 56% higher than the average critic
  • 3% same as the average critic
  • 41% lower than the average critic
On average, this publication grades 0 points lower than other critics. (0-100 point scale)
Average Movie review score: 65
Highest review score: 100 Frost/Nixon
Lowest review score: 0 Waist Deep
Score distribution:
1652 movie reviews
  1. Larry Clark's documentary-like direction and Harmony Korine's undeviatingly dull screenplay make it possible to believe these useless lumps of flesh exist. [1 Sept 1995, p.3F]
    • Charlotte Observer
  2. Director Michael Bay surrounds them with action scenes cut as rapidly and irritatingly as a Gap commercial. At points, we can't tell one darting car from another, a drug triggerman from a cop. [7 April 1995, p.1F]
    • Charlotte Observer
  3. Represents everything that over-budgeted Hollywood can possibly get wrong in a period piece: It feels both long and slow, it's unfocused and self-contradictory, its generic characters are played too broadly, it's anachronistic..
  4. I don't know if Nispel and Scott Kosar, who make their feature film debuts here, are the worst director and writer in the world, though they might well represent the United States if anyone holds a competition. I do know they deliver a total of zero laughs, scares or surprises in this remake of the infamously creepy 1974 picture.
  5. No characterization. A plot you could write on a single sheet of toilet paper. Sadistic violence we’re meant to cheer. A surprise that wouldn’t fool anyone who left the theater after the opening credits and came back for the last 10 minutes.
  6. Birth, which should never have been conceived, is obscure in every way: visually, philosophically and psychologically.
  7. It's the cheapest looking, least exciting, least funny Chan project I've ever seen.
  8. The most frustrating thing about the movie (as with “Cloud Atlas”) is that it could’ve been memorable, had the Wachowskis turned their vision over to more talented storytellers.
  9. The plot's as thin as a debutante's cigarette case.
  10. This movie is an act of hubris so huge that, in Alexander's time, it would draw lightning bolts from contemptuous gods. Today it will get sniggers from stunned critics and a collective yawn from a public unlikely to share Stone's egomania.
  11. Babbit clumsily underlines emotional moods.
  12. Not even the repeated sight of Jessica Alba in a bikini, the camera caressing her like the eyes of a strip-club patron, can lift this leaden refuse off the ocean floor.
  13. Here’s something I never expected to say, something I doubt I’d have believed if someone else had said it to me: Martin Scorsese can make a three-hour movie without one fresh perspective or compelling character from end to end. The proof, for three agonizing hours, can be found in The Wolf of Wall Street.
  14. It's the poster child for bad taste, not to mention bad construction.
  15. Does David Arquette have a career? If so, what's he doing in this unintentionally hilarious gangster movie?
  16. Director Ivan Reitman used to know how to tell a silly story, back around the time of "Stripes" and "Ghostbusters."
  17. The movie's weirdness isn't organic; it's imposed, like barber-pole stripes painted on a prison wall.
  18. It's a fable that descends rapidly into nonsense.
  19. Pitof can be blamed for the 89-cent digitized sets, the jerky or rubbery special effects, some clunky performances and more continuity errors than I could count.
  20. The picture lasts 111 minutes, partly because of numerous false endings. Now, that constitutes cruel and unusual punishment.
  21. The best acting comes from the enigmatic, always urbane Freeman, who has recently enlivened the likes of "Outbreak" and "Moll Flanders." But so what? Acting with dignity in mediocre pictures turns you into Vincent Price. [2 Aug 1996, p.4E]
    • Charlotte Observer
  22. Mostly, you get a pain in the head from the assault on your senses and déjà vu as thick as heartburn after an anchovy pizza.
  23. As a British politician said of a corrupt but articulate peer, "The Cat in the Hat" is like a rotten mackerel seen by moonlight: It shines as it stinks.
  24. As close to perfectly unwatchable as it can be.
  25. Everything here has been done better in other books, other movies. The lone remarkable thing is the level of violence, which exposes the cowardice and hypocrisy of the Motion Picture Association of America's ratings system.
  26. Atmosphere goes only so far in a story where the major characters fade from memory.
  27. Let me say, in my desire always to be positive, that Serving Sara is the funniest film I know where a man sticks his arm up a bull's rectum to massage its prostate.
  28. We can all share frustration with a process that frees the Doobs of the world, but this heavy-handed movie won't provide catharsis. The filmmakers treat subtlety as a sin - unless Schlesinger thinks he's being subtle by showing us O.J. prosecutor Marcia Clark for only a couple of seconds on a TV screen. [12 Jan 1996, p.4E]
    • Charlotte Observer
  29. I'm afraid it just stinks.
  30. Embodies all that's wrong with the sellout culture of Hollywood.
  31. Emotionally stultifying and brain-dead.
  32. Spike Lee's films have been provocative, blunt, thoughtful, misguided, daring, sentimental, funny, honest and silly. But 25th Hour earns the director two new adjectives: irrelevant and tedious.
  33. Directed by William "When's the next chase scene?" Friedkin, acted by comatose David Caruso and monotonous Linda Fiorentino and Chazz Palminteri, Jade is more like "Jaded." [13 Oct 1995, p.11F]
    • Charlotte Observer
  34. I think this camp classic is an accident along the lines of "Showgirls": howlingly funny, filled with gratingly earnest performances, riddled with dialogue that will be quoted at parties.
  35. A painful bore.
  36. Weak, obligatory stabs at humor make it more generic than it might've been.
  37. And what of Roger Avary, the writer who shared the Academy Award for writing with Tarantino? He continues to plummet toward oblivion with The Rules of Attraction, which ranks with the Great Pyramid of Khufu as a monument to self-indulgence.
  38. Bertino directs at a funereal pace. Speedman remains comatose, though Tyler flickers fitfully to life. The mournful look on her face suggests she's remembering the days when she was given more psychologically complex scripts, such as "Armageddon."
  39. I do have one overpowering Y2K fear: that Hollywood will keep belching out movies as excruciatingly dull, brutal, mindless and overlong as End of Days.
  40. To call the film “unwatchable” is to unfairly insult Josée Deshaies; his lush cinematography delights the eye when the camera roams around Saint Laurent’s workrooms. But “incomprehensible,” “interminable” and “immaterial” all apply.
  41. It's an uncoordinated, flailing hodgepodge of music videos, chases, crashes and moronic plot twists.
  42. This script by the husband-and-wife team of Leora Barish and Henry Bean is hopelessly contrived and takes forever to get to the point. (I warn you: The film does not absolutely identify the killer.)
  43. Just when the story reaches its idiotic nadir, Neil (Diamond) shows up to save the day with a song and a smile.
    • Charlotte Observer
  44. The worst horror sequel of this or many another summer.
  45. It's bombastic, chaotic, plodding, visually dreary and patchily written.
  46. Zomboid, convoluted excuse for a thriller is among year's worst.
  47. Whenever the music subsides and the characters speak the Coens' lines, the film turns back into mush.
  48. About 45 minutes into Swordfish, the picture degenerates permanently from drivel to sleaze (only a short drop).
  49. The most catastrophic misfire in a dreadful movie season.
  50. Director Vondie Curtis-Hall has managed to top (or should I say "bottom"?) his last theatrical release, Mariah Carey's "Glitter," with a movie that offers not one praiseworthy moment: not a scene, not a performance, not a technical achievement, not even a line of dialogue.
  51. Bad actors, bad music and bad plot make it a hellish bummer.
  52. It's well-shot and well-edited by Hollywood standards, though special effects don't reach the top Hollywood level. The stars have their hearts in their work: Cameron and Johnson don't have great depth but give their all. Currie makes a subtle villain.

Top Trailers