Results May Vary
by Limp Bizkit
User Score
4.2

Mixed or average reviews- based on 223 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 87 out of 223
  2. Mixed: 22 out of 223
  3. Negative: 114 out of 223

Review this album

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. KrisL.
    Mar 25, 2004
    3
    Limp Bizkit is now like a dog who was just neutered and had its teeth kicked in . The edge and energy they had in their first 2 albums are but a thing of the past. The whiny nu-metal kids raised on Staind, Linkin Park, and most of the crappy bands today like that will probably like it (and are rabidly apparent in their reviews), but old school fans and just about everyone else need not apply.
  2. DAX616
    Jan 17, 2013
    3
    I can honestly say this album sucks. It's got a couple good songs, but overall it seems they didn't know what to do with their new guitar player. Durst never understood that nobody cared about how troubled his childhood/teen years were, I personally don't care as long as his lyrics give me something to think about, and lame rhymes with loads of complaints is not a good combination. TheI can honestly say this album sucks. It's got a couple good songs, but overall it seems they didn't know what to do with their new guitar player. Durst never understood that nobody cared about how troubled his childhood/teen years were, I personally don't care as long as his lyrics give me something to think about, and lame rhymes with loads of complaints is not a good combination. The music overall is not so good, they wrote a couple good riffs for this album, but the rest is just forgettable. The song they made with Snoop Dogg, instead of giving the album a stand-out track for Dogg or LB fans, it was mostly ignored by all people, because nobody likes annoying and repetitive rap-like electronic music.
    So I should give this album a 3, maybe, and my problem with this album is that I like it a lot even though I realize only idiots like me could like it, knowing it's a piece of **** But oh, well....    … Expand
  3. Cancerous12
    Dec 26, 2017
    3
    If you are regarded by Limp Bizkit fans (some of the dumbest fans of all time) as a big mistake, I think it's time to reconsider your career.
  4. Mellowry
    Aug 12, 2021
    3
    It goes from the Intro track with a (at the time of the release) 33 year old wanting to sniff on panties, ending with a horrible Behind Blue Eyes cover from the The Who original. For me, this album has only one song, that isn't completely garbage, which is "Let Me Down", which at least HAS some Lyrics you can listen to without cringing the next couple days over how this album even could beIt goes from the Intro track with a (at the time of the release) 33 year old wanting to sniff on panties, ending with a horrible Behind Blue Eyes cover from the The Who original. For me, this album has only one song, that isn't completely garbage, which is "Let Me Down", which at least HAS some Lyrics you can listen to without cringing the next couple days over how this album even could be released with about 1 year of work on it. I have to admit on Behind Blue Eyes, the acoustic guitar has some vibe, like in the end of the tact when it ends with the A String Chord, that is really catchy if it wouldn't be a The Who cover with Durst trying to sing and the text to speech voice like, it's begging for some Input. It is needless to say that the band would be way better off without Fred Durst, and if i have to put out an A String Chord to say at least anything positive about this album at all, then this is not a great album.… Expand
  5. EdgeC
    Oct 4, 2003
    2
    Limp are has-beens. The album is consistantly weak and is nothing new. How many tracks are on the CD? It doesn't matter, you'll keeping skipping every track until it's over anyway.
  6. AjamAjam
    Oct 29, 2003
    2
    This album is mediocre is only crap. 1.- The music is crap, only metal guitar whitout emoution or line whit the song, bateri and bass are mediocre, no innovate and is the same like other mediocre neo-punk band like God Charlote or neo metal like Linkin Park (Linkin Park Ultimete album is more best than this crap). Well the music no have style and nothin to say... checkout the music of The This album is mediocre is only crap. 1.- The music is crap, only metal guitar whitout emoution or line whit the song, bateri and bass are mediocre, no innovate and is the same like other mediocre neo-punk band like God Charlote or neo metal like Linkin Park (Linkin Park Ultimete album is more best than this crap). Well the music no have style and nothin to say... checkout the music of The Smith... the instrument are alive. 2-. The Lyric and the concep of the album is junt crap the lyric of sad song are like "Fuck you Fuck you i'm so sad Madafuker in the dark" is all SHIT... Look the lyrics of Morrissey or The Stroke or AFI or or the crap of Evanencence the early albums of metalica. The albums of Nsync or Britney are best than this crap they are better pop than Limp Bizkit are. Limp Bizquit= Bad Pop whit Mediocre Rock Pretending darknes. Somebody tell Fred "PLEASE SHUT YOUR HEAD AND NEVER DO A ALBUM AGAIN" THE PEOPLE WHO LISEN LIMP BISKIT ARE IDIOT SKATE WANNABE WHO PRETENDING LISEN MUSIC AND NITHER KNOW HOW ARE VELVET UNDERGROUND. YEA RIGH THE "ANTI-POP" WHEN THEY ARE POP... BUT CRAP BOB... MORE CRAP THAN BSB… Expand
  7. RobC
    Jul 15, 2006
    2
    I don't know what happened, they never been the best but not that bad
  8. Joe
    Aug 19, 2006
    2
    So many things went wrong with this album. First and foremost: Fred Durst still can't write lyrics to save his life. He's 30-something years old and still writes with the mindset of a drunken frat boy. Secondly: The band's best musician, guitarist Wes Borland, is MIA on RESULTS MAY VARY. Mike Smith does an okay job replacing Borland, but it simply isn't the same. So many things went wrong with this album. First and foremost: Fred Durst still can't write lyrics to save his life. He's 30-something years old and still writes with the mindset of a drunken frat boy. Secondly: The band's best musician, guitarist Wes Borland, is MIA on RESULTS MAY VARY. Mike Smith does an okay job replacing Borland, but it simply isn't the same. Third, like "Chocolate Starfish" before it, the album runs on too long (although not as long as "Chocolate Starfish," where seven tracks out of the eight in the album's second half exceeded five minutes in length). Third: The cover of "Behind Blue Eyes" is the best song on the album. This is a problem for two reasons: a) The instrumental from the original has been replaced by a dull, monotonous voice repeating "L-I-M-P...discover" over and over; and b) If a subpar cover of someone else's song is the best song on your band's album, then you're probably in big trouble because none of your own songs are standing out as much. The only thing that could have made this album any worse is if they stuck with their original idea for the album title and called this record -- I kid you not -- PANTY SNIFFER.… Expand
  9. MetalMovieNerd
    Nov 6, 2012
    2
    I could just say what I did about their last album, but I'm not going to. Wes Borland isn't even remotely present on this album and the musicianship is dreadfully dull. The lyrics are surprisingly worse than they were before due to Fred Durst and his "zanny" acts and stupidity and it doesn't help that the lyrics are irrelevant. I'll give the first two albums some kind of credit (not muchI could just say what I did about their last album, but I'm not going to. Wes Borland isn't even remotely present on this album and the musicianship is dreadfully dull. The lyrics are surprisingly worse than they were before due to Fred Durst and his "zanny" acts and stupidity and it doesn't help that the lyrics are irrelevant. I'll give the first two albums some kind of credit (not much but some), but here its just shocking. Truly a testament to how bad nu metal is and its demise.… Expand
  10. Jiano74
    Nov 11, 2016
    2
    This album has some okay songs but overall this is a truly dreadful album. There is a reason whilst many people don't like Limp Bizkit and this is exactly why a mess of an album.
  11. hornysoul
    Oct 5, 2018
    2
    Um total pesadelo. Um lixo musical. Uma dor auditiva. Basicamente, este álbum está repleto de sons tóxicos que matam as nossas células cerebrais. Até mesmo aqueles que defendem com unhas e dentes a banda, provavelmente irão achar que "Results May Vary" é monótono, aborrecido e com um conceito indefinido.
  12. wills
    Oct 4, 2003
    1
    this CD does serve one purpose, it will make you laugh.
  13. wackyman
    Oct 13, 2003
    1
    are they seriously thinking anyone will take this crap seriously?
  14. LauraBlB
    Oct 6, 2003
    1
    Unbelievably awful!!
  15. Wander
    Nov 5, 2005
    1
    Satan gave us da bizkit. It marks our decline back to monkeyhood brain damage. Who listens to bizkit, deserves no better.
  16. DanielW
    Apr 4, 2006
    1
    I pretty much love "Ben S" and I couldn't agree with him more. BUT WAIT, something catchy? Ah, wait. Just kidding. Kudos for miraculously catching the public's attention though.
  17. darkg
    Mar 16, 2007
    1
    one of the two WORST albums ever (along with Lostprophets - Start Something)
  18. mikethauthority
    Oct 20, 2003
    0
    i'll never get over it.
  19. Razael
    Oct 8, 2003
    0
    This is so fucked up...the new album is the same shit like all the other ones, only a lot crappier!!! Fred, go find yourself another job or move to Canada and never come back..please.
  20. mattp
    Oct 20, 2006
    0
    ha ha ha ah ah ha
  21. Rudys
    Jan 28, 2006
    0
    Pure crap
  22. JakeM.
    Oct 5, 2003
    0
    WOW, I never knew Limp Bizkit can suck so damn much.
  23. Tom
    Oct 7, 2003
    0
    Without even a shred of socially redeeming value. Fred has to be the whiniest, most self-absorbed "rock star" ever. Must be cause he's bald as a baby's bottom. Give it a rest already. NOONE CARES.
  24. SimonA
    May 1, 2004
    0
    incredible bad they turning The Who's masterpiece Behind Blue Eyes to a joke.Every song is about how sorry he feels for him self because Britny left him.
  25. ShelR
    Jan 22, 2005
    0
    this is the worst cd i have ever heard
  26. BlaineR
    Mar 7, 2005
    0
    Vomit in audio form
  27. maxpower
    Aug 2, 2005
    0
    These guys should just quit now, this is awful music plain and simple. Fred Durst is one of the worst vocalists in the history of recorded music.
  28. EdC
    Aug 5, 2005
    0
    Notice how all of the Limp Biscuit supporters are just too dumb to make a good arguement for the album, so they just tell everyone else who is not tone deaf like they are to shut up. Limp Bistcuit, Linking Park, MudVain, Pudders of Mud, just suck! Really! But in the case of the Biscuit, the garbage they claim to be music is uninspired, uncreative, idiotic, stupid, and total crap. But Notice how all of the Limp Biscuit supporters are just too dumb to make a good arguement for the album, so they just tell everyone else who is not tone deaf like they are to shut up. Limp Bistcuit, Linking Park, MudVain, Pudders of Mud, just suck! Really! But in the case of the Biscuit, the garbage they claim to be music is uninspired, uncreative, idiotic, stupid, and total crap. But wait, we havent heard anything yet. Wait till Limp Biscuit, Linking Park, N*Sink, and $0.50 get together to go on tour. Wow, what crap that would be.… Expand
  29. Rudys
    Jan 28, 2006
    0
    Pure crap
  30. Dr.F.A.Chuck
    Oct 5, 2006
    0
    If you actually like this album, or even anything by this band for that matter, you need to face up to the fact that you have terrible taste. It's that simple. You don't ever see fast food reviewed by food critics. It's because it sucks. I'm willing to wager that if you like this band, you also like to eat fast food. A lot. And the only thing you can come up with to If you actually like this album, or even anything by this band for that matter, you need to face up to the fact that you have terrible taste. It's that simple. You don't ever see fast food reviewed by food critics. It's because it sucks. I'm willing to wager that if you like this band, you also like to eat fast food. A lot. And the only thing you can come up with to say when confronted with your own bad taste is, "Limp Bizkit rulez!!!" That is not making a point. That is saying something with nothing to back it up, just like I can tell you that I can eat an apple and shit out a fruit salad. People, especially people with bad taste, like to say a lot of meaningless things. It does not make them right, nor does it mean we should take them seriously. People who actually know what they are talking about, you know, people with good taste, intelligent people, etc... they have all gotten together and guess what? We all agree that this music is one of the worst examples of the medium. Now get back to flipping burgers, you lame jocko retards.… Expand
prev
Page:

Awards & Rankings

10
#10 Most Discussed Album of 2003
27
#27 Most Shared Album of 2003

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
33

Generally unfavorable reviews - based on 11 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 1 out of 11
  2. Mixed: 4 out of 11
  3. Negative: 6 out of 11
  1. Playlouder
    0
    This is so so crap.
    Read full review
  2. Q Magazine
    80
    A far more rounded proposition than 2000's water-treading Chocolate Starfish. [Dec 2003, p.132]
  3. Dot Music
    10
    Eventually, 'Results May Vary' could become a fascinating document - a frightening insight into the vacuous state of 21st century culture.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »