Results May Vary
by Limp Bizkit
User Score
4.2

Mixed or average reviews- based on 223 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 87 out of 223
  2. Mixed: 22 out of 223
  3. Negative: 114 out of 223

Review this album

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. Mellowry
    Aug 12, 2021
    3
    It goes from the Intro track with a (at the time of the release) 33 year old wanting to sniff on panties, ending with a horrible Behind Blue Eyes cover from the The Who original. For me, this album has only one song, that isn't completely garbage, which is "Let Me Down", which at least HAS some Lyrics you can listen to without cringing the next couple days over how this album even could beIt goes from the Intro track with a (at the time of the release) 33 year old wanting to sniff on panties, ending with a horrible Behind Blue Eyes cover from the The Who original. For me, this album has only one song, that isn't completely garbage, which is "Let Me Down", which at least HAS some Lyrics you can listen to without cringing the next couple days over how this album even could be released with about 1 year of work on it. I have to admit on Behind Blue Eyes, the acoustic guitar has some vibe, like in the end of the tact when it ends with the A String Chord, that is really catchy if it wouldn't be a The Who cover with Durst trying to sing and the text to speech voice like, it's begging for some Input. It is needless to say that the band would be way better off without Fred Durst, and if i have to put out an A String Chord to say at least anything positive about this album at all, then this is not a great album.… Expand
  2. hornysoul
    Oct 5, 2018
    2
    Um total pesadelo. Um lixo musical. Uma dor auditiva. Basicamente, este álbum está repleto de sons tóxicos que matam as nossas células cerebrais. Até mesmo aqueles que defendem com unhas e dentes a banda, provavelmente irão achar que "Results May Vary" é monótono, aborrecido e com um conceito indefinido.
  3. Cancerous12
    Dec 26, 2017
    3
    If you are regarded by Limp Bizkit fans (some of the dumbest fans of all time) as a big mistake, I think it's time to reconsider your career.
  4. Jiano74
    Nov 11, 2016
    2
    This album has some okay songs but overall this is a truly dreadful album. There is a reason whilst many people don't like Limp Bizkit and this is exactly why a mess of an album.
  5. WXYZ
    Oct 17, 2015
    0
    I would honestly listen to a cat getting its tail chopped off than this. Chocolate Starfish & The Hot Dog Flavored Water was bad, but not terrible. This, however, is a travesty. Not one single song is worth listening to, and what's even worse is that they made a cover of the beautiful The Who song "Behind Blue Eyes". All the people who gave this 10s just wrote "Hey, this CD rocks! Go LimpI would honestly listen to a cat getting its tail chopped off than this. Chocolate Starfish & The Hot Dog Flavored Water was bad, but not terrible. This, however, is a travesty. Not one single song is worth listening to, and what's even worse is that they made a cover of the beautiful The Who song "Behind Blue Eyes". All the people who gave this 10s just wrote "Hey, this CD rocks! Go Limp Bizkit!" "Another masterpiece by the great Limp Bizkit!" No. Just NO. Those are not valid arguments. After listening through the whole album I just wish I could take it all back. I will admit it, though, it's not the worst album I have ever heard; Kevin Federline beat them to it three years later.… Expand
  6. nathanbo
    May 24, 2015
    0
    For a title "Results May Vary" it is surprising how one sided the reviews have been. Limp Bizkit has always carried great energy in their music and were even one of the most respected metal bands of the 90's; however, to many they lost what made what made them so unique in the early naughties. This is clearly evident in this "album." I quoted album because I'm not quite sure it's theFor a title "Results May Vary" it is surprising how one sided the reviews have been. Limp Bizkit has always carried great energy in their music and were even one of the most respected metal bands of the 90's; however, to many they lost what made what made them so unique in the early naughties. This is clearly evident in this "album." I quoted album because I'm not quite sure it's the right word to describe this collection of noise. Toxic sounds or mathematically formulated wavelengths designed kill brain cells are better ways of describing this cornucopia of audio pain. Hardcore Limp Bizkit fans may enjoy this, but even they will probably find most of the tacks generic and boring. Limp Bizkit's unique blend of metal, rap, funk and alt metal is not present in this "album." Instead we are treated with nu metal that comes across as blander than a week old bowl of oatmeal. While listening to this I felt like I was being eaten alive by an all encompassing creature designed by the most cookie cutter music producers of L.A. I think Limp Bizkit needs some sort of re-entry in sound because whatever they have been doing the past decade has not been working. The whole time I was listening to this I was wishing it was almost over. If I hear any of these "tracks" in my car it is proof that radio is dead. I rather drown in white noise that is most of Nickelback's hits than listen to this.… Expand
  7. DAX616
    Jan 17, 2013
    3
    I can honestly say this album sucks. It's got a couple good songs, but overall it seems they didn't know what to do with their new guitar player. Durst never understood that nobody cared about how troubled his childhood/teen years were, I personally don't care as long as his lyrics give me something to think about, and lame rhymes with loads of complaints is not a good combination. TheI can honestly say this album sucks. It's got a couple good songs, but overall it seems they didn't know what to do with their new guitar player. Durst never understood that nobody cared about how troubled his childhood/teen years were, I personally don't care as long as his lyrics give me something to think about, and lame rhymes with loads of complaints is not a good combination. The music overall is not so good, they wrote a couple good riffs for this album, but the rest is just forgettable. The song they made with Snoop Dogg, instead of giving the album a stand-out track for Dogg or LB fans, it was mostly ignored by all people, because nobody likes annoying and repetitive rap-like electronic music.
    So I should give this album a 3, maybe, and my problem with this album is that I like it a lot even though I realize only idiots like me could like it, knowing it's a piece of **** But oh, well....    … Expand
  8. MetalMovieNerd
    Nov 6, 2012
    2
    I could just say what I did about their last album, but I'm not going to. Wes Borland isn't even remotely present on this album and the musicianship is dreadfully dull. The lyrics are surprisingly worse than they were before due to Fred Durst and his "zanny" acts and stupidity and it doesn't help that the lyrics are irrelevant. I'll give the first two albums some kind of credit (not muchI could just say what I did about their last album, but I'm not going to. Wes Borland isn't even remotely present on this album and the musicianship is dreadfully dull. The lyrics are surprisingly worse than they were before due to Fred Durst and his "zanny" acts and stupidity and it doesn't help that the lyrics are irrelevant. I'll give the first two albums some kind of credit (not much but some), but here its just shocking. Truly a testament to how bad nu metal is and its demise.… Expand
  9. sanddude
    Jan 5, 2011
    0
    Limp Bizkit always sucked, but this is just--- to bad to simply put in words. The vocals are even more terrible than on Siginificant Other or Chocolate Starfish, the lyrics are a violent, misogynystic mess, and many more reasons are available why this album sucks.
  10. ChadC.
    Jul 15, 2008
    0
    This is the most horrendous piece of shit ever. Well, okay, I'll admit: it is better than K-Fed's album. But that's it.
  11. SophieM
    Oct 18, 2007
    0
    I heard the terrible reviews for this one and I realised that a friend had bought it - I lent it to play through and it was absolutely awful. Seriously, diabolical. It wasn't even so bad you could make fun of it, it went beyond that.
  12. Angelo
    May 9, 2007
    0
    Beyond awful.
  13. darkg
    Mar 16, 2007
    1
    one of the two WORST albums ever (along with Lostprophets - Start Something)
  14. mattp
    Oct 20, 2006
    0
    ha ha ha ah ah ha
  15. Dr.F.A.Chuck
    Oct 5, 2006
    0
    If you actually like this album, or even anything by this band for that matter, you need to face up to the fact that you have terrible taste. It's that simple. You don't ever see fast food reviewed by food critics. It's because it sucks. I'm willing to wager that if you like this band, you also like to eat fast food. A lot. And the only thing you can come up with to If you actually like this album, or even anything by this band for that matter, you need to face up to the fact that you have terrible taste. It's that simple. You don't ever see fast food reviewed by food critics. It's because it sucks. I'm willing to wager that if you like this band, you also like to eat fast food. A lot. And the only thing you can come up with to say when confronted with your own bad taste is, "Limp Bizkit rulez!!!" That is not making a point. That is saying something with nothing to back it up, just like I can tell you that I can eat an apple and shit out a fruit salad. People, especially people with bad taste, like to say a lot of meaningless things. It does not make them right, nor does it mean we should take them seriously. People who actually know what they are talking about, you know, people with good taste, intelligent people, etc... they have all gotten together and guess what? We all agree that this music is one of the worst examples of the medium. Now get back to flipping burgers, you lame jocko retards.… Expand
  16. Joe
    Aug 19, 2006
    2
    So many things went wrong with this album. First and foremost: Fred Durst still can't write lyrics to save his life. He's 30-something years old and still writes with the mindset of a drunken frat boy. Secondly: The band's best musician, guitarist Wes Borland, is MIA on RESULTS MAY VARY. Mike Smith does an okay job replacing Borland, but it simply isn't the same. So many things went wrong with this album. First and foremost: Fred Durst still can't write lyrics to save his life. He's 30-something years old and still writes with the mindset of a drunken frat boy. Secondly: The band's best musician, guitarist Wes Borland, is MIA on RESULTS MAY VARY. Mike Smith does an okay job replacing Borland, but it simply isn't the same. Third, like "Chocolate Starfish" before it, the album runs on too long (although not as long as "Chocolate Starfish," where seven tracks out of the eight in the album's second half exceeded five minutes in length). Third: The cover of "Behind Blue Eyes" is the best song on the album. This is a problem for two reasons: a) The instrumental from the original has been replaced by a dull, monotonous voice repeating "L-I-M-P...discover" over and over; and b) If a subpar cover of someone else's song is the best song on your band's album, then you're probably in big trouble because none of your own songs are standing out as much. The only thing that could have made this album any worse is if they stuck with their original idea for the album title and called this record -- I kid you not -- PANTY SNIFFER.… Expand
  17. RobC
    Jul 15, 2006
    2
    I don't know what happened, they never been the best but not that bad
  18. DanielW
    Apr 4, 2006
    1
    I pretty much love "Ben S" and I couldn't agree with him more. BUT WAIT, something catchy? Ah, wait. Just kidding. Kudos for miraculously catching the public's attention though.
  19. ZachM
    Feb 3, 2006
    0
    the cover of ''behing blue eyes'' is insulting to music. this whole album is insulting to mankind
  20. Rudys
    Jan 28, 2006
    0
    Pure crap
  21. Rudys
    Jan 28, 2006
    0
    Pure crap
  22. AFWhigs
    Jan 13, 2006
    0
    Limp Bizkit were barely tolerable when they were new. Fred Durst is a brainless hack who lucked into a musical career. Hopefully this is the death knell for Angry White Boy rock, nu metal, rap rock, or however you want to describe it. This is the epitomy of soulless, whining narcissicm. Good job Fred, now go get in line to participate in Surreal Life.
  23. DylanP
    Jan 3, 2006
    0
    I can't believe how bad the cover of Behind Blue Eyes is... utterly terrible.
  24. BenS
    Nov 21, 2005
    0
    hmmmmmmmmmmmm, lets give this album some careful, consideration, listen, relisten and till, oh whats the point, FOR CHRISSAKES FRED NOONE CARES YOU FAT OLD FRATBOY, ahhhhhhhhhhhhh
  25. Wander
    Nov 5, 2005
    1
    Satan gave us da bizkit. It marks our decline back to monkeyhood brain damage. Who listens to bizkit, deserves no better.
  26. MichaelA
    Sep 27, 2005
    0
    You can't buy this and say you have good taste in music. It's that simple.
  27. CodyD.
    Aug 24, 2005
    0
    Alrite. So there I was, in the movie theater finishing Gothica. Then as the credits start to roll, I hear "Behind Blue Eyes". I notice right away that its not The Who, yet I still think it is decent. After finding out it was Limp Bizkit, I purchased the cd. I turned on the cover of "Behind Blue Eyes" right away and actually started getting into it. And then, when the amazing interlude Alrite. So there I was, in the movie theater finishing Gothica. Then as the credits start to roll, I hear "Behind Blue Eyes". I notice right away that its not The Who, yet I still think it is decent. After finding out it was Limp Bizkit, I purchased the cd. I turned on the cover of "Behind Blue Eyes" right away and actually started getting into it. And then, when the amazing interlude from the original I am shocked to hear it coming late. And then not at all. And then some Simon Says like voice coming on saying discover. I mean seriously. What the hell? I think that alone should earn this cd at least a 3...Now, the rest of the cd, that is what drops it down to a zero. This cd is so horrible that I actually recomend that you go to your local music store, buy it, take it home, and frame it along with a Hillary Duff cd and you'll have your very own wall of shame. Someone shoot Fred Durst.… Expand
  28. EdC
    Aug 5, 2005
    0
    Notice how all of the Limp Biscuit supporters are just too dumb to make a good arguement for the album, so they just tell everyone else who is not tone deaf like they are to shut up. Limp Bistcuit, Linking Park, MudVain, Pudders of Mud, just suck! Really! But in the case of the Biscuit, the garbage they claim to be music is uninspired, uncreative, idiotic, stupid, and total crap. But Notice how all of the Limp Biscuit supporters are just too dumb to make a good arguement for the album, so they just tell everyone else who is not tone deaf like they are to shut up. Limp Bistcuit, Linking Park, MudVain, Pudders of Mud, just suck! Really! But in the case of the Biscuit, the garbage they claim to be music is uninspired, uncreative, idiotic, stupid, and total crap. But wait, we havent heard anything yet. Wait till Limp Biscuit, Linking Park, N*Sink, and $0.50 get together to go on tour. Wow, what crap that would be.… Expand
  29. maxpower
    Aug 2, 2005
    0
    These guys should just quit now, this is awful music plain and simple. Fred Durst is one of the worst vocalists in the history of recorded music.
  30. MikeG
    Jun 16, 2005
    0
    How about a -45,000,000,000 for the score. This album's booklet is toilet paper if I ever saw some. The disc itself doesn't even make a good coaster or even a frisbee. The lyrics are embarassingly horrid, the music is bland and lifeless. Durst's supposed rage is whiny and cringe-worthy, and never comunicates anything but feces. I wonder if anyone heard this before it was How about a -45,000,000,000 for the score. This album's booklet is toilet paper if I ever saw some. The disc itself doesn't even make a good coaster or even a frisbee. The lyrics are embarassingly horrid, the music is bland and lifeless. Durst's supposed rage is whiny and cringe-worthy, and never comunicates anything but feces. I wonder if anyone heard this before it was released. If they had they probably would have tossed the originals out the window of a seventeen story building. Limp Bizkit live up to their name.… Expand
prev
Page:

Awards & Rankings

10
#10 Most Discussed Album of 2003
27
#27 Most Shared Album of 2003

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
33

Generally unfavorable reviews - based on 11 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 1 out of 11
  2. Mixed: 4 out of 11
  3. Negative: 6 out of 11
  1. Playlouder
    0
    This is so so crap.
    Read full review
  2. Q Magazine
    80
    A far more rounded proposition than 2000's water-treading Chocolate Starfish. [Dec 2003, p.132]
  3. Dot Music
    10
    Eventually, 'Results May Vary' could become a fascinating document - a frightening insight into the vacuous state of 21st century culture.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »