Read User Reviews and Submit your own for War of the Worlds (2005)

6

eva3si0nAug 11, 2023

War of the Worlds is an expensive Sci-Fi action disaster film. Star cast, eminent director and good literary primary source. What could go wrong? And it's enough just to transfer the action of the film to modernity. And here's a kind ofWar of the Worlds is an expensive Sci-Fi action disaster film. Star cast, eminent director and good literary primary source. What could go wrong? And it's enough just to transfer the action of the film to modernity. And here's a kind of disaster movie from Spielberg. But there is no scale, Wells wrote War of the Worlds before the World Wars, he had no idea what it would look like. This movie begins to fall apart like a house of cards. Special effects are not surprising even by the standards of the early 2000s. There is no scale of what is happening. So it turns out that War of the Worlds cannot but show a catastrophe, not a fantastic show something due to primitiveness, not to surprise with scale. Also, the main character (who was well played by Tom Cruise in general) without a characteristic and the surrounding people sometimes behave inadequately. And the end of the film is as delusional and meaningless as the film itself. War of the Worlds is a bad disaster movie. As a Sci-Fi movie, it's not bad, but it's clearly not Spielberg's best work.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

Craftnight405Mar 28, 2023

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Ray Ferner (Tom Cruise) muss sich um seine Kinder Rachel und Robbie kümmern. Seine Ex-Frau und Ihr Mann besuchen Ihre Eltern in Boston. Während sich die Kinder unter Rays Obhut befinden greifen irgendwelche Wesen die Stadt an. Ray und seine Kinder sind auf den Weg nach Boston. Das ist für mich bis jetzt der schwächste Tom Cruise Film und auch gleichzeitig von Steven Spielberg. Wie auch in dem Film Minority Report gibt es einige Szenen die viel zu Hell bzw grell Beläuchtet sind die das Szenario schlechter macht und es sieht nicht realistisch aus. Es gibt hier ein paar Entscheidungen von Charakteren die einfach nur dumm sind. Die beiden Kinder gehen mir auf die Nerven, vor allem Rachel, welche sehr viel Schreit und Ohrenschmerzen verursacht. Es nervt zwar, aber es ist eine realistische Reaktion auf so ein Szenario. Robbie ist einfach nur dumm, ihn hätte man gut und gerne streichen können. Seine Handlungen machen keinen Sinn, vor allem wo er sich "opfert". Am Anfang handelt Ray auch richtig dumm und geht richtig nahe an Blitze ran. Die Szene wo sie in dem Haus seiner Ex- Frau sind fande ich gut und witzig. Die Vater-Tochter-Beziehung fande ich auch nicht gut gelöst. Es gibt keine richtig Emotionalen Moment in diesem Film, was ich schon erwartet habe. Es gab ein paar Szene die gut wahren. Die Erklärung, warum die Aliens angreifen musste ich googlen, weil ich es nicht verstanden habe und es nur kurz erklärt wird.
In Scary Movie 4 wurde dieser Film parodiert und den fande ich interessanter und besser als diesen hier.
Definitiv der schlechteste Film von Spielberg den ich bis jetzt gesehen habe.

5/10… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

Gts08Jun 23, 2022

Exciting alien invasion drama, Tom Cruise's acting was meh, but it had a brilliant atmosphere, aand lots of plot holes. The ending was a bit weird. Not in the good way. I give it a 5-6.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

GiugiOct 2, 2022

Film of a devastating slowness and with a fairly banal plot, but with the action scenes and special effects it is saved. An honorable mention is to be made to the tense parts that are masterfully rendered in this film.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

glommanJun 11, 2022

It's an alright 'desaster' movie. However, given the source material, it's really lacking both character development, pace, and it generally feels cut short almost everywhere. It's not necessarily a bad adaptation, it's certainly fun toIt's an alright 'desaster' movie. However, given the source material, it's really lacking both character development, pace, and it generally feels cut short almost everywhere. It's not necessarily a bad adaptation, it's certainly fun to watch, but it feels incredibly bland and flattened out once you consider that it stems from one of the greatest authors of the past two centuries.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

HotelCentralMay 8, 2022

The worst part of this film is when Tim Robbins (I think) points out that the aliens have been planning their invasion of the Earth for at least a million years. No one in the 1953 version said anything like that (as I recall) and all itThe worst part of this film is when Tim Robbins (I think) points out that the aliens have been planning their invasion of the Earth for at least a million years. No one in the 1953 version said anything like that (as I recall) and all it does is point out that with a million years of planning (apparently) none of the "vast intellects" of the aliens (as described in the 1938 Mercury Theatre radio version) ever considered the possibility of encountering biological hazards here on Earth. Which is really kind of amazing when you consider that mere humans have been thinking about it before they even launched anybody into space.

Well, of course, it's only a movie and apparently none of the "vast intellects" in charge of making this movie considered how the aliens might have accounted for biohazards and still fail in their invasion.

All in all, this is a fairly typical Tom Cruise movie full of non-stop action and lots of FX but little to stimulate the higher faculties of the brain. Personally, I prefer the 1953 version with Gene Barry. Better pacing. Better plot.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

kyle20ellisMar 25, 2022

'War of the Worlds' had a lot going for it, considering the story, that it was directed by Steven Spielberg and a decent cast on paper. It turned however to be a frustratingly uneven film, with a good first half and a pretty lousy second'War of the Worlds' had a lot going for it, considering the story, that it was directed by Steven Spielberg and a decent cast on paper. It turned however to be a frustratingly uneven film, with a good first half and a pretty lousy second half.

Starting with what's good, the film looks fabulous, the atmosphere that the cinematography and lighting evoked is just incredible and the special effects are without complaint too. John Williams can be relied upon to compose a good score and he does here, being both rousing and spooky. Spielberg does an impeccable job directing the first half of the film, giving a lot of the first half thrills, suspense and genuine scares.

Tom Cruise does a good job in the lead and Tim Robbins is eerily eccentric. As said, the first half has many great moments and is filled with unnerving suspense and scary chills. Truly imaginative details like the burning train, the birds/tripod scene and the river of the dead bodies burn in the memory for a long while after.

However, the human drama was not as transfixing as it should have been, being hurt by the dysfunctional family subplot being rammed down the throat with no subtlety at all with nothing relatable at all and especially by the kids.

Spielberg has demonstrated before that he is capable of directing great child performances, prime examples being Haley Joel Osment in 'AI' and Christian Bale in 'Empire of the Sun', but the performances of both Dakota Fanning and Justin Chatwin are incredibly irritating. Not sure which is more so, Fanning's constant screaming or brattiness or Chatwin made to act throughout the film but especially the second half like an indecisively written character who makes stupid decisions and acts rebellious in the most insufferable of ways. The dialogue is often insipid.

After a lot of promise in the first half, 'War of the Worlds' is let down significantly by the second half where the pace slackens (a notable example being that overlong scene in the basement) and the suspense dramatically wilts (such as when the aliens are introduced, and they are not menacing in the slightest) and is replaced by ridiculousness, frustrating character decisions and sentimentality. The Hollywood schmaltz kicks in and keeps assaulting the viewer at full throttle, while the ending is up there as one of film's most false, cloying and anti-climactic.

In conclusion, a frustratingly uneven film that starts off quite well and then completely falls apart. 5/10 Bethany Cox… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

HabibiehakimSep 5, 2021

Spielberg's somehow turns 180° from making an alien movie with no damage to the world (Close Encounters Of The Third Kind), and then an alien who is lovely (E.T.), then to a robot who got destroyed by human (A.I.), to making a movie about aSpielberg's somehow turns 180° from making an alien movie with no damage to the world (Close Encounters Of The Third Kind), and then an alien who is lovely (E.T.), then to a robot who got destroyed by human (A.I.), to making a movie about a robot with an alien inside it, completely destroying the world, and it shows all of it from the beginning till the end so crazy, so madness, and that's what War Of The Worlds look like, making it the craziest movie he's ever made.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

Eulogist111May 21, 2021

+×÷=__@#$%^&*()-":;!?,.☆⊙°•¤《》¡¿♧◇♡♤■□●○▪{}[]`~
...........,,,,,,,,:;";:;:;:;:;:;$$$$$$$$$$☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

Obstinate177May 15, 2021

********************************************************
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

ConsortApr 25, 2021

♡♡♡♡♡♡♡♡♡♡♡♡♡♡♡♡♡♡♡♡♡♡♡♡♡♡♡♡♡♡♡♡♡♡♡♡◇◇◇◇◇◇◇◇◇◇◇◇◇◇◇◇◇◇◇◇◇◇◇◇◇◇◇◇◇◇◇◇◇◇●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●♡♡♡♡♡♡♡♡♡♡♡♡♡♡♡♡♡♡♡♡♡♡♡♡♡♡♡♡♡♡♡♡♡♡♡♡◇◇◇◇◇◇◇◇◇◇◇◇◇◇◇◇◇◇◇◇◇◇◇◇◇◇◇◇◇◇◇◇◇◇●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

4

geewahJan 12, 2021

This is one boring action flick and one of Spielberg's worst efforts. Throw in the wooden Cruise and this is a movie not worth investing your time in.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

MahmusSep 25, 2020

While I enjoyed it, it's definitely a mixed bag.
It's like for everything it does right, it does something wrong.
Its scenes of chaos and panic are absolutely horrifying, but it's the most unsubtle 9/11 allegory I've ever seen. The tripodsWhile I enjoyed it, it's definitely a mixed bag.
It's like for everything it does right, it does something wrong.

Its scenes of chaos and panic are absolutely horrifying, but it's the most unsubtle 9/11 allegory I've ever seen.

The tripods are incredibly scary, but the aliens inside them are hilariously goofy.

The performances are all solid, but the characters are very annoying.

What pushes it above average for me it's the ending. I really like the ending. I know some hate it and think it's unsatisfying, but it's refreshingly hopeful and it makes me feel that if aliens were to attack, everything would be ok.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

AWESOM-0Sep 12, 2020

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Good and preposterous at the same time. That can’t really be held against it tho, the speculative science and technology of alien invaders couldn’t be realistically depicted at the time the novel was written (not as if we can realistically predict it now either). Still, it’s a good movie and well acted.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

akshatmahajanSep 11, 2020

War Of The Worlds was enjoyable but it had a lot of potential. Movie was not upto the mark and there were many plot holes (When the attack begins, every piece of electronic equipment stops working. However, moments later when the Tripod risesWar Of The Worlds was enjoyable but it had a lot of potential. Movie was not upto the mark and there were many plot holes (When the attack begins, every piece of electronic equipment stops working. However, moments later when the Tripod rises from the earth, people are snapping pictures on digital cameras and one person is videotaping everything on a camcorder). I didn't expect this type of mistake from Spielberg. Well, leaving this plot hole aside there were other things also which were not upto the mark like storyline and emotions were seriously lacking. This movie could have been a blockbuster like Independence Day (1996) but that didn't happen.

I would also like to add the point that even after so much mistakes, you will enjoy this movie mainly due to pacing and alien attack story (which almost everyone likes).

If you want to watch Spielberg's work, then I will definitely not recommend this movie to you as it is not his good work but yes, you can watch this movie for entertainment.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

1

egoBorderAug 19, 2020

If you want to know what an alien invasion would be like completely devoid of tension and filled with inane cliches instead of characters, you'll love this. In case of an actual alien invasion, find Tom Cruise immediately because even thoughIf you want to know what an alien invasion would be like completely devoid of tension and filled with inane cliches instead of characters, you'll love this. In case of an actual alien invasion, find Tom Cruise immediately because even though he's just a car mechanic he basically figures out everything. Skip this dumb movie, or watch it on mute as the visuals are the only good thing.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

Mrman69Jul 27, 2020

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

Toasty87Jul 12, 2020

Terrible casting and terrible script what could have been at least the CGI holds up somewhat today.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

zNeverSleepingMay 31, 2020

Steven Spielberg fez um bom trabalho aqui!

Dakota Fanning está excelente aqui, junto com Tom Cruise, que entrega muito bem o papel de um pai que nunca esteve presente, mas que está disposto a salvar a vida dos seus filhos de qualquer forma.Steven Spielberg fez um bom trabalho aqui!

Dakota Fanning está excelente aqui, junto com Tom Cruise, que entrega muito bem o papel de um pai que nunca esteve presente, mas que está disposto a salvar a vida dos seus filhos de qualquer forma.

A trama é muito boa, nos prendendo desde o inicio. Toda a apresentação da família foi inteiramente essencial para o resto do filme, pois mesmo se tratando de uma invasão extraterrestre, o que há de mais importante ali é a ligação entre os personagens. Todo o mistério e volta dos "aliens" funciona muito bem, nos prendendo desde o inicio. O filme não se preocupa em explicar, porém visto a perceptiva, não há nada de errado nisso.

A OST é muito boa e a fotografia igualmente. Os efeitos especiais são excelentes e a cena da zona de guerra foi simplesmente magnifica. Achei o plot final satisfatório. Acredito que faça sentido, mas tendo em vista a inteligencia dos aliens, acredito que deveria se ter trabalhado mais nisso.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

DiptanshuMar 31, 2020

Okish!first 20 mins were teribble and boring felt like a scumbag father wants a war to love his children!after 20 mins or so movie felt entertaining and engaging with its awesome screenplay and john william's score and sure acting even thenOkish!first 20 mins were teribble and boring felt like a scumbag father wants a war to love his children!after 20 mins or so movie felt entertaining and engaging with its awesome screenplay and john william's score and sure acting even then ending was like what the hell the invasion was stopped with just grenades felt incomplete ending with great lines!overall a one time watch kind of movie!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

JP32Mar 24, 2020

The story of War of the Worlds focuses on the everyday people and how these events affect them. The film is above all else, effective. Here is a film about panic that literally induces it.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

JPKJun 14, 2019

Pretty Good
War Of The Worlds is definitely not Spielberg’s best and Dakota Fanning might scream a little bit too much, But it’s still intense, at times scary, well acted, and beautiful visuals.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

TyranianApr 13, 2019

Has a lot of Spielberg's trademark quality with visuals, acting, writing and music though ending is unsatisfying.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

1

shag00Mar 1, 2019

I am at a loss to understand how this movie was so well received. This is a modern, poorly dramatised remake of a classic book and fails on just about every level. The first and last narration pieces stand at odds with the guts of the movieI am at a loss to understand how this movie was so well received. This is a modern, poorly dramatised remake of a classic book and fails on just about every level. The first and last narration pieces stand at odds with the guts of the movie and appear trashy while trying to give film status. The story of mankind's survival is superseded by the crappy soap opera of a dysfunctional American family, for lack of a better term.

What was the point of having the tripods buried (a million years ago, what is the point of manning them through capsules and lightning. Just stupid **** A good story spoiled by having to listen and watch Cruise continually argue with his brain dead off spring.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

jonslowFeb 16, 2019

A contemporary retelling of H.G. Wells's seminal classic, the sci-fi adventure thriller reveals the extraordinary battle for the future of humankind through the eyes of one American family fighting to survive it.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

SirSloppithOct 2, 2018

I give this movie a 9 for this reason. The acting was great and the action was perfect. Something about those Tripods scared me as a kid. Must've been the noise they made. The only thing I don't like about the movie is the lack of story.I give this movie a 9 for this reason. The acting was great and the action was perfect. Something about those Tripods scared me as a kid. Must've been the noise they made. The only thing I don't like about the movie is the lack of story. However, maybe that's what spielberg wanted was for the audience to know nothing of the Aliens. Anyway great movie should definitely watch!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

gzayas91Aug 17, 2018

Not a fan of this movie nor the book. This one is of Spielberg's weaker films. I rather watch Pacific Rim.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

4

FilipeNetoFeb 12, 2018

Entertaining, but disappointing

In this film, directed by Steven Spielberg, Earth is attacked by aliens with giant mechanical tripods in a contemporary approach of the famous H.G. Wells sci-fi novel, and a remake of a homonym film by 1953.Entertaining, but disappointing

In this film, directed by Steven Spielberg, Earth is attacked by aliens with giant mechanical tripods in a contemporary approach of the famous H.G. Wells sci-fi novel, and a remake of a homonym film by 1953. Has Tom Cruise in the lead role, Ray Ferrier, a father who seeks to put his daughter, Rachel (Dakota Fanning) in a safer place.

Although Steven Spielberg have used enough computer special effects and killed half of mankind, this film isn't only a human calamity, but the drama of a father trying to save his daughter from alien invasion, a theme who has been subject of several stories. In fact, most of them has been, directly or indirectly, influenced by the novel "War of the Worlds" ("Independence Day", just to quote one of them).

The tension follows all the film, where action and special effects scenes are mixed with suspense and expectation enlivened by scenes that remind us of the Holocaust or 9/11. The two main characters easily captivate the audience's sympathies and make us become more anxious and "clinging" to the film, which is always good. Tom Cruise managed to come out very well in his role, despite a certain ambiguity of his character, who only thinks about running away during the first half of the movie and spends the second half acting like the hero of "Mission Impossible", without we understand why exactly he changes his attitude. Another problem of this movie are the fairly obvious plot holes that we don't like to see in a Spielberg's film (I would even say that they aren't forgivable in a film directed by him).

For all this, this film leave some critics a bit disappointed, having just been nominated for Oscars in three technical categories (Sound Editing, Sound Mixing and Special Effects). Commercially, however, it was a success, largely due to the fame of Spielberg and Cruise, but also due to the special effects and the fact that is able to achieve its main goal: entertain who pays to see him.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

AginagalaNov 9, 2017

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I remember seeing this as a kid and having to hold my dads hand before I got into bed as I was scared of one of the movies iconic scenes happening to me. War of the Worlds shows the struggles of a father and two children surviving in a world being taken over by aliens. Watching that first scene of the Tri-pods rising from the ground gives me goosebumps even now. Fantastic CGI that has aged extremely well make this film satisfying to watch, and enthralls you in it's immersive world. Accompanied by a stellar performance by lead actor Tom Cruise and supported by talented young actors, make for a believable and colorful film. A must watch for Sci-Fi fans.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

smilzobobozJul 2, 2017

When a dramatic movie makes you laugh the point was lost somewhere...
Extremely boring plot, totally uninteresting plot-twists, very nice CGI effects (that's good), alien invaders.
The plot goes more or less like this: good-for-nothingWhen a dramatic movie makes you laugh the point was lost somewhere...
Extremely boring plot, totally uninteresting plot-twists, very nice CGI effects (that's good), alien invaders.

The plot goes more or less like this: good-for-nothing ex-husband needs alien invaders to prove his ex-wife he's not good-for-nothing, constantly screaming little-girl included.

This movie was such a disappointment that up until the end I was waiting for something to happen and then the movie ended and yet nothing happened.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

bfoore90Jun 19, 2017

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. To put it in perspective, I like everyone else enjoyed 70-75% of this movie. Spielberg brings it all into this movie, the themes and imagery come with a purpose to frighten and disturb rather than thrill, making ingenious use of familiar 9/11 imagery along with clear references to the Holocaust and the war in Iraq. The references and themes are so chilling that its almost to the point its as if the movie is a post 9/11 propaganda film. Tom Cruise, who was excellent in Collateral also brings it in this film by delivering a very committed and tense performance as a seemingly failed father. Then comes the second act, the movie begins to stumble and fall leading up to a clear Dues Ex Machina conclusion that almost makes me wonder as if Mass Effect 3 took a page out of Spielberg's book to deliver a unsatisfying conclusion to an otherwise satisfying movie. The film tragically changes and almost with no regard for itself violates its carefully established tone and internal logic to become a typical and cliche summer action film where our hero valiantly goes one-on-one with an alien invader to eventually turn the tide in humanities favor. The transition is jarring almost to the point to where you feel disconnected from the story. It's also troubling that the guy who created Jaws and Jurassic Park also couldn't hold himself in check before misfiring and showing his badly designed and poorly CGI'd alien invaders. Still, War of the Worlds is well worth a view for fans and movie goers. Whereas, despite it's otherwise weak second half, it's an excellent film. Considering it was made in the wake of 9/11, its not hard to view the film as a form of post 9/11 or Iraqi war propaganda. Its almost brilliant when you think about it, America under attack by technologically advanced "sleeper cell terrorists" coming from within, hellbent on destroying America with extreme prejudice. The only thing that would make it more evident would be if Spielberg decided to put beards and turbans on the aliens while having them speak a strong middle eastern dialect.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

ZerpnosMar 25, 2017

Küçüklüğümde Film satan bir yerden, boş zamanımda izlerim diyerek, kutusunu ve adını beğenerek aldığım fakat izlerken o yaşlarda bile uzaylı kavramını kötü hissettiren film olmuştur. Ayrıca filmin sonunda tek yaprağın bile ne kadar önemliKüçüklüğümde Film satan bir yerden, boş zamanımda izlerim diyerek, kutusunu ve adını beğenerek aldığım fakat izlerken o yaşlarda bile uzaylı kavramını kötü hissettiren film olmuştur. Ayrıca filmin sonunda tek yaprağın bile ne kadar önemli olduğunu göstermesi, doğaya karşı daha dikkatli olmamızı gösteren bir şeydi. Kötünün iyisi olarak değerlendirdiğim bu filme puanım 5.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

SpangleJul 1, 2016

I am not sure why audiences were lukewarm to War of the Worlds. For me, this shows Steven Spielberg at peak Spielberg. Heartwarming and built around family with childlike wonder, the film also shows Spielberg's great ability to create thrillsI am not sure why audiences were lukewarm to War of the Worlds. For me, this shows Steven Spielberg at peak Spielberg. Heartwarming and built around family with childlike wonder, the film also shows Spielberg's great ability to create thrills and scares along the way. Tom Cruise is great in the lead role and really does a great job as the deadbeat dad tasked with saving his kids who do not really like him too much. Dakota Fanning does very well as his daughter, though she does become annoying a few times. The special effects and creature design are incredible, while also demonstrating why everybody is so paranoid. The film also does a great job drawing parallels with historical occupations (French in Algeria, Britain in the United States), while capturing the paranoia of post-9/11 America all in one swoop. Overall, War of the Worlds is a fantastic science fiction film that really is a testament to Spielberg's skill in the director's chair.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

Compi24Mar 29, 2016

Spielberg successfully adapts H.G. Wells' classic science-fiction novel into a more intimate and human tale of survival for modern audiences. And, though the film's infamous ending may indeed be worthy of all the infamy it has accrued overSpielberg successfully adapts H.G. Wells' classic science-fiction novel into a more intimate and human tale of survival for modern audiences. And, though the film's infamous ending may indeed be worthy of all the infamy it has accrued over the years, "War Of The Worlds" is still a pretty fantastic film. The thrilling set piece design, engrossing performances, and surprisingly enduring visual effects all add up to an incredibly memorable and occasionally horrifying experience that shouldn't go unnoticed.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

RickyReviewsFeb 22, 2016

In my personal opinion, I think this is not as good in Independence Day in some ways, better in some ways. Overall, this film doesn't have the suspense Independence Day had or even the realism. I'm giving this film a solid mixed review of 6/10

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

3

QuelhasSep 15, 2015

This site doesn't allow me to write just one word, that for me, best describes this movie, so I'm writing this just to submit that word that best describes the feeling I had watching this at the cinema: Painful.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

CineAutoctonoJul 21, 2015

It was unbelievable what I saw an incredible , unexpected and chilling alien , well even if it comes from a book invasion, unspoilable the movie eh !. And that good performance from Tom Cruise . Good job Tom !

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

DavidV293Apr 17, 2015

This movie is one my favorite movies of all time. Love every bit of it. Tom Cruise actually killed the role and the little girl did it too. To be honest this my favorite movie because it has suspense and some scenes just left me breathless.

3 of 4 users found this helpful31

All this user's reviews

8

DukeJonOct 1, 2014

A great film, faithfully recreating the essence of the book. Tense and forboding throughout, the Martiain invasion is brilliantly paced and handled expertly. Cruise gives a workmanlike performance. The ending, however, is dissapointing andA great film, faithfully recreating the essence of the book. Tense and forboding throughout, the Martiain invasion is brilliantly paced and handled expertly. Cruise gives a workmanlike performance. The ending, however, is dissapointing and although it follows the book closely I do feel they wrapped it all up too quickly. One of my favourite science fiction films of recent years… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

beingryanjudeAug 28, 2014

An exhilarating re-imagination of Orson Welles' classic. Spielberg brings the story and the genre into the modern era. Nevertheless, I cannot help but feel War of the Worlds would have benefited from casting another actor instead of Tom Cruise.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

MuddsjrAug 10, 2014

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. very good stuff that is regularly scary and irregularly boring. it had me hurriedly making sandwiches (and throwing them at windows in despair) each time a patch of dark clouds and thunder came over days afterwards. the scariest parts for me were the aliens themselves and Tom Cruises acting (which was good!)… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

TokyochuchuJul 6, 2014

When I first saw War of the Worlds at the time of release, I thought; "meh... It's alright". At that time I was young and single. I'm now married with two daughters. When I returned to the film recently, it had a much more profound effect onWhen I first saw War of the Worlds at the time of release, I thought; "meh... It's alright". At that time I was young and single. I'm now married with two daughters. When I returned to the film recently, it had a much more profound effect on me. The family stuff was riveting and the action sequences actually quite terrifying. I guess being able to identify with the movie's themes makes all the difference!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

PvtJacksonJun 16, 2014

Not so great and amazing. I actually demanded much more from my favorite director, Steven Spielberg - creator of E.T, Close Encounter of the Third Kind and Minority Report, to deliver another thought-provoking, visually striking sci-fiNot so great and amazing. I actually demanded much more from my favorite director, Steven Spielberg - creator of E.T, Close Encounter of the Third Kind and Minority Report, to deliver another thought-provoking, visually striking sci-fi thriller rather than this somewhat flat, boring, tension-free summer blockbuster. I even fell asleep for the last 20 minutes of the film, which, i was told later by one of my friends, "explained" the sudden fall of these machines rising from the deep ground beneath Earth's surface. I don't know, to tell the truth, because after staying tuned for over the first hour, i don't care much about what happened in the end. I suppose a 6 would be rational, as sound editing, color blending and interesting description of the three-leg machines, to some extent, made up for the film's lack of good ideas to work on… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

MovieReviewsMay 17, 2014

War of the Worlds is a near perfect experience however, I had some hard time getting into the visual effects because for some reason I couldn't like the CGI in this movie, I am not saying that the CGI bad but it is out of my league. Despite,War of the Worlds is a near perfect experience however, I had some hard time getting into the visual effects because for some reason I couldn't like the CGI in this movie, I am not saying that the CGI bad but it is out of my league. Despite, the movie is one of the best science fictions in recent memory, it is clever, tense and leaves at the edge of your seat. However, I am not used to seeing a Steven Spielberg film that is so hardcore and heartless, so I would consider this movie Spielberg's weakest. On the other hand, I would consider it a distinct achievement in movie history of Sci-Fi. It is recommended, other than some weak CGI, it is a wonderful popcorn B movie!… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

8

Meth-dudeApr 23, 2014

That's what i call a good sci-fi movie.Tom Cruise is brilliant in his irresponsible dad role. There is always action and some awkward characters like the guy in the house in the middle of the movie.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

JacobFeb 23, 2014

The film doesn’t have much substance but it is still pretty entertaining. The film is well shot and knows how to pull at your heart strings. If you want good visuals, emotional connection, and be midly entertained check this out. If you wantThe film doesn’t have much substance but it is still pretty entertaining. The film is well shot and knows how to pull at your heart strings. If you want good visuals, emotional connection, and be midly entertained check this out. If you want something more sophisticated this isn’t it is just one long chase/survival movie.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

2

joegFeb 21, 2014

Way too much Tom Cruise in this movie. They took a great story line and made it about Tom Cruise rather than about alien invasion. They didn't do justice to the wonderful HG Wells story

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

busbfranDec 26, 2013

War Of The Worlds has defined alien/action movies, whilst setting a new bench mark that continues to be undefeated. Tom Cruise has performed to his A game in which could be his best acting to date, the whole cast was exceptional and they workWar Of The Worlds has defined alien/action movies, whilst setting a new bench mark that continues to be undefeated. Tom Cruise has performed to his A game in which could be his best acting to date, the whole cast was exceptional and they work well together. War Of The Worlds is a action pack adventure of the survival of humanity on its last breath from extinction via the threat of alien invaders. This is a must watch for all Si-fi fans and a great movie to watch with family/friends.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

calhouniteDec 20, 2013

Guess the overacting was appropos given this was a cataclysmic alien invasion, but when the supposedly hyper-advanced super sophisticated beings show up as naked savages suspension of disbelief ends.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

RayzorMooseNov 13, 2013

War of the Worlds only battles with viewers interest.
Based on the classic sci-fi novel; War of the Worlds is somewhat limited by design. Characters are left as shells, and the ongoing threat never is really addressed with any rhyme or reason.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

10

einvolkermannSep 1, 2013

Its really great and interesting movie. Its not only about alien invasion, but although this movie shows society in unusual conditions. Best movie in its kind.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

2

Badger01Jul 26, 2013

I don't know how one of the greatest film makers alive (Steven Spielberg) managed to turn one of the most iconic pieces in early sci fi literature in to just another bland boring action film. It reminds me a lot of 'Independence Day', exceptI don't know how one of the greatest film makers alive (Steven Spielberg) managed to turn one of the most iconic pieces in early sci fi literature in to just another bland boring action film. It reminds me a lot of 'Independence Day', except with out even the pluses of saying it's special effects are (comparative to the time) very good or having a memorable, stirring speech. In fact, that's a problem of the whole film, not one god damn thing in it is memorable, just Tom Cruise and his constantly screaming daughter driving every where. I think the big problem was that setting it in the modern era removes any sort of tension at all. When all the alien just have big anti-everything shields that can't be hurt by squat, there's no sense of humanity fighting back, so it turns from "War" of the Worlds in to "Ants on poking at an exterminators shoe" of the Worlds. Bland, samey, dull, boring, lazy, cliche, and all other manor of adjectives. And the worst thing is, this means it'll be far longer until someone is allowed to actually make a GOOD adaptation at last. (Stick with the radio drama/rock opera).… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

FatspudJun 15, 2013

Pretty good film, if it wasn't for the BLOODY little girl; seriously, kills so much of the otherwise immersive atmosphere. But yer, the rest is good enough.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

0

voidersApr 26, 2013

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. That is the first one in my "black list" os worst movies ever.
I hate when a history force too much to give a good end without any reason.

The movie dont have a start, a middle and an end, have nothing. Every behavior from humans and aliens are so stupid. The script has so bizarre errors. Like someone recording a PEM with a cam, or Tom Cruise leting off the city in a car with ALL cars stoped in the streets, how?

When i saw the end, i just ask "why"? The perspect of view was amazing, but all the rest was disastrous.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

1

ballpark_frankNov 24, 2012

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. OK...team up Tom Cruise, Steven Spielberg, and one of the greater science fiction writers' best story...like the saying in "Crazy Like a Fox": "What could possibly happen?". As it turns out, not too much. Cruise running around like a maniac would not be too bad...IF it'd happened following the 'invasion'. However, it seems like that's the way the character normally acts. Dakota Fanning's claim-to-fame seems to be her ability to remember one line of dialog: "SHRIEK!". 'Sir' Spielberg places this film in the modern day, which might have worked. However, in this case, it didn't. In his re-imagining of the invasion, it turns out the aliens have been here all along (Spoiler...naw...). The so-called effects just seem too Michael Bay-ish, with the only item that I enjoyed being the 'harvesting' tripod. I will mention that the ending was great...it meant this tripe was finally over.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

CollinPJul 18, 2012

The ending was indeed lame, but taken exactly from the book. You got a problem with the ending, take it up with H.G. Wells. In terms of "disaster" movies, this is as good as they get - Spielberg is a master filmmaker. It has heart, adventure,The ending was indeed lame, but taken exactly from the book. You got a problem with the ending, take it up with H.G. Wells. In terms of "disaster" movies, this is as good as they get - Spielberg is a master filmmaker. It has heart, adventure, and terror (a river of dead people!!) not seen in normal movies of the same ilk. All in all, a worthy picture.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

DiscordMay 28, 2012

A solid piece. Good acting, as well as a believable plot, rather nice effects. Only qualm I had was the minor issues with the H.G. Wells novel, but those can be overlooked. Overall, a rather nice film.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

JuanoloApr 2, 2012

First off, I would give this a 9.5 out if 10. Acting is good. Not amazing, but everyone does a good job. Score was really good. Had an incredible story. It also has really good special effects and great set pieces. Overall, this is a reallyFirst off, I would give this a 9.5 out if 10. Acting is good. Not amazing, but everyone does a good job. Score was really good. Had an incredible story. It also has really good special effects and great set pieces. Overall, this is a really good movie. Great movie, and one of my favorite Tom cruise movie. Highly recommended.… Expand

13 of 16 users found this helpful133

All this user's reviews

6

Trev29Mar 31, 2012

Not the best film, but it certainly delivered. It was smart of Spielberg to leave the audience wanting more. I totally picked up on the frightening vibe and the movie was intense. Still... I thought it was boring and don't really have aNot the best film, but it certainly delivered. It was smart of Spielberg to leave the audience wanting more. I totally picked up on the frightening vibe and the movie was intense. Still... I thought it was boring and don't really have a desire to watch it again.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

9

csw12Mar 30, 2012

War of the Worlds is an excellent sci-fiction movie. The visuals were truly amazing but what makes this movie so good is that it comes across as very scary and that is were Spielberg shines. I only wished for slightly more battle scenesWar of the Worlds is an excellent sci-fiction movie. The visuals were truly amazing but what makes this movie so good is that it comes across as very scary and that is were Spielberg shines. I only wished for slightly more battle scenes between the humans and aliens.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

EssenceOfSugarFeb 14, 2012

I could see that the expectations for this sort of film would be mixed, but, for me, in a sense, I was optimistic about seeing Tom Cruise in a different film rather than Mission:Impossible. Funnily enough, Spielberg managed to pull if off,I could see that the expectations for this sort of film would be mixed, but, for me, in a sense, I was optimistic about seeing Tom Cruise in a different film rather than Mission:Impossible. Funnily enough, Spielberg managed to pull if off, especially filming an American adaptation. But that didn't bother me, because I was gripped more or less by the time the tripods arrived. There are quite a few unnerving moments which made my skin crawl. It was worth watching, because it felt quite real, especially how the characters were feeling. A thrilling ride - Tom Cruise should do more of this. Great how the Americans could have a shot at this. The special effects were mind-blowing.The beginning felt a little stretched out, but at least the pace was relaxed halfway through the film. Overall, a film definitely worth watching.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

Jedi_JettsonDec 28, 2011

Great movie and I'm very much impressed with Steven Spielberg's work and the visual effects. It takes the survival and family plot seriously. Its also one hell of a thrill.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

javis10Dec 14, 2011

I've alreday watched the film of 1953, it was enterteining, but the adaptation was awful as well the story. But this one was better. Enterteining, awesome, the effects are thrilling and the story too. Steven Spielberg will always make good movies.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

RONGIUDec 3, 2011

Lightning storm.

"At the end of the nineteenth century no one would believe that things of the earth were keenly and closely by intelligences greater than those observed in men ... Â» HERBERT GEORGE WELLS Man is able toLightning storm.

"At the end of the nineteenth century no one would believe that things of the earth were keenly and closely by intelligences greater than those observed in men ... Â»

HERBERT GEORGE WELLS

Man is able to theorize, invent, build. It can create. The creation is quite another thing, is not yet within his reach, and perhaps never will be and maybe it's all well and good. "The War of the Worlds" has a deeper meaning in itself, rigid, introverted.

And 'the act of the mirror, I understand, the true ruler of the narrative, that's where you find the starting point to delve into a story far from simple you see, do not listen / emotionally strong, because for many verse in terms of asynchronous communication and achromatic visual one. Dropped the mirror, as perverse as a catalyst for feelings is healthy nothingness, absence, emptiness.

But, man, that's true, that is not wounded and bent soul immortality by an irresistible urge to imperialism, still able to find in the tears of a child, to give the world a teenager hungry for love of one's gender it is from this type of man that the world expects to see the spark to rise to a new time dimension.

This world, upon reflection, is chock full of tripods as small as powerful for their destructive capacity. We begin our defuse; those from higher intelligence to us, we can do, quietly without.

Good Click!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

JAM123Oct 22, 2011

Amazing movie! Steven Spielberg yet again, brings his movie magic to the big screen and astonishes us all. Amazing special effects(helped by the big budget) was only one of the many characteristics that made it an unforgettable movie. AmazingAmazing movie! Steven Spielberg yet again, brings his movie magic to the big screen and astonishes us all. Amazing special effects(helped by the big budget) was only one of the many characteristics that made it an unforgettable movie. Amazing plot line and awesome cast was what made it an awesome film. The cast included Tom Cruise, Dakota Fanning, and a lot more. The plotline of this sweet alien invasion adaption of H.G. Wells' 1898 award winning classic novel is another of Steven Spielbergs masterpieces and great adaptions to books. Like Minority report this one made it, with a four star rating and a 73/100 on this website. In this movie the world really is invaded. A lot of destruction and devestation in this horror/sci-fi about a dad trying to find a safe haven for his two children. I love this movie and highly reccommend to all.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

smijatovJun 26, 2011

If anyone can make an amazing blockbuster, it is Spielberg, and he has proven this once again. Overall, this is a rather good film. Technically - simply stunning. Great visual effects, sound and cinematography make it a pleasure to watch. ItIf anyone can make an amazing blockbuster, it is Spielberg, and he has proven this once again. Overall, this is a rather good film. Technically - simply stunning. Great visual effects, sound and cinematography make it a pleasure to watch. It is one of the rare blockbusters that are actually decent when it comes to the plot, also. Ironically enough, the screenplay is also its weakest point. I was especially annoyed with the ending and the "happy family" crap. The demise of the aliens also came a bit too suddenly, and Spielberg could have made the transition more subtle, more intense. Nonetheless, "War of the Worlds" is going to be definitely one of the many blockbusters of Spielberg's that is going to be remembered as a good, entertaining, and thrilling film.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

3

Andy92Sep 12, 2010

this movie i must say is very unsuccessful in my eyes for starters not providing an entertaining story i thought was even boring in some parts. the acting from the cast is the only thing that saves it in my opinion

0 of 9 users found this helpful09

All this user's reviews

5

ArkonBladeAug 28, 2010

the plot of the original war of the worlds film was better then this. the original was about how helpless we where against a aliens invasion focusing on the the military just getting beatin down . the new one is all about the survivle of tomthe plot of the original war of the worlds film was better then this. the original was about how helpless we where against a aliens invasion focusing on the the military just getting beatin down . the new one is all about the survivle of tom cruises charicter and his 2 obnoxous kids. the aliens are only there to chase him down . while this is not completely unentertaining it just doesnt bring what the original had to the table . woulda been better served being called some thing els .… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

1

JSDec 5, 2009

This is the worst movie I've seen in a very long time. It has no style, no personality. Its sole purpose is just to show a small town get blown to pieces in the first 20 minutes. Every other second of the movie is agonizing! Its not This is the worst movie I've seen in a very long time. It has no style, no personality. Its sole purpose is just to show a small town get blown to pieces in the first 20 minutes. Every other second of the movie is agonizing! Its not even a movie, its what the "nails on a chalk board" sound is to the visual sense. The actors all spend the whole time screaming at each other in a very melodramatic fashion. Or just screaming in general. I've never seen people scream so much before in my life. If a giant robot is trying to kill me, I'm not going to be like "DAD WHY ARE YOU UPSET ITS ONLY THE END OF THE WORLD!!!! DAD!!! DAD!!! DAD!!! AAAAAAH YOU'RE MAKING ME NERVOUS TRYING TO FLEE FOR YOUR LIFE!!!!!" The characters don't even have lines when they're not screaming or acting stupid. At one point, Tom Cruise's son begs him to let him go watch a battle between the US army and aliens, and Tom has to try and drag him away; to no success. That's the dumbest thing I've ever seen in a movie, and it was totally non-secateurs. No plot. No nothing. When the pretty visual effects stop momentarily, Tom Cruise resorts to throwing peanut butter and breaking the windows of his house to entertain us. I guess they ran out of budget after making all the terrible CGI.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful

8

CollinPNov 13, 2009

The ending was indeed lame, but taken exactly from the book. You got a problem with the ending, take it up with H.G. Wells. In terms of "disaster" movies, this is as good as they get - Spielberg is a master filmmaker. It has heart, The ending was indeed lame, but taken exactly from the book. You got a problem with the ending, take it up with H.G. Wells. In terms of "disaster" movies, this is as good as they get - Spielberg is a master filmmaker. It has heart, adventure, and terror not seen in normal movies of the same ilk. All in all, a worthy picture.… Expand

3 of 4 users found this helpful

4

JayHOct 5, 2008

Between my dislike of tom cruise, the poor acting and average special effects this wasn't a very good film.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

TrevorLJul 31, 2008

Visceral, vile, repulsive and totally awesome. Alien meets the Nazi death camps. And the creepy sound effects as the tripods processed and disgorged human blood towards the conclusion freaked me out-it was the sound of death.

0 of 1 users found this helpful

5

KenWApr 27, 2008

I must admit that I agree with alot of the other reviews in regaurds to the fact the movie could have been better. I personally do not like Tom Cruise an any way, shape or form, but at least the movie did keep me going. Yes the constant I must admit that I agree with alot of the other reviews in regaurds to the fact the movie could have been better. I personally do not like Tom Cruise an any way, shape or form, but at least the movie did keep me going. Yes the constant screaming of Dakota Fanning did get on the nerves, but given the point of view of a little girl in a crazy situation, it could be understood. Overall though the movie was definitely worth watching.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

ConnerSJan 4, 2008

Holy crap this was good! This is like the best movie ever. the acting was phenominal (especially tom and decota) and the effects were so realistic! For those of you who gave it low ratings, you obviously did not understand the sybolism Holy crap this was good! This is like the best movie ever. the acting was phenominal (especially tom and decota) and the effects were so realistic! For those of you who gave it low ratings, you obviously did not understand the sybolism entwind in the plot. To Adam e.- nobody found a tripod because the aliens were smart enough to put them in the ground deep enough so no one would find them, Robbie is a smart kid he figured out something, The aliens didn't notice the desieases because the were arrogent and only focused on wepons, THey store people because they need to spread the blood everywere, not just all at once, who cares if they're nude (YOUR MISSING THE POINT!), the airplane crashed a little bit away and slid into the house, You would scream to if you were being attacked by bloodthirsty aliens, and the clothes show that the aliens are so sofisticatied and interested in our planet, that all they want to do is get rid of us, not anything else!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

guy!Sep 2, 2007

True, this film doesn't quite compare to Spielbergs' other works, but that doesn't mean it isn't good! I liked the apacoliptic feeling of the 'war', and Spielbergs' message that there is more in a war than True, this film doesn't quite compare to Spielbergs' other works, but that doesn't mean it isn't good! I liked the apacoliptic feeling of the 'war', and Spielbergs' message that there is more in a war than just guns and blood and hi-tech gadgets. Now for the cons: [Spoiler warning] why didn't the aliens die of the bacteria when they first came to earth? They didn't really explain that. And what was up with that kid? He wanted to abandon his family just to watch the soldiers fight? Wake up man! You're about to die! [end spoilers]. Having said that, perfect way for Spielberg to return.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

5

AdamE.Apr 19, 2007

What could have been an awesome alien movie is crippled by the fact that most of the movie is "Tom Cruise hiding in a basement" and the story is riddled by innumerable flaws: Why didn't anyone find a tripod? Why does some American What could have been an awesome alien movie is crippled by the fact that most of the movie is "Tom Cruise hiding in a basement" and the story is riddled by innumerable flaws: Why didn't anyone find a tripod? Why does some American nutjob now about events in Osaka? How does Robby survive "going to fight" an alien death machine? If aliens observed people, wouldn't they notice disease? Why do the tripods store people when all they want is blood? Why are the aliens nude? How did a plane crash next to the house Cruise and kids were hiding in without vaporizing it? Why did Dakota Fanning's character not stop screaming? Why are clothes not vaporized when people are? I could just keep going, but you get the idea.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

ETCCCMar 30, 2007

Spielberg's rendering of a sci fi nightmare is simply stunning. His mastery of visual effects and composition is amazing. Sure the acting (except for a fine performance by Dakota Fanning) is lame. But don't see it for character Spielberg's rendering of a sci fi nightmare is simply stunning. His mastery of visual effects and composition is amazing. Sure the acting (except for a fine performance by Dakota Fanning) is lame. But don't see it for character development; see it to watch our world being destroyed by big things... and rescued by little things. A visual treat.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

CliffordF.Mar 27, 2007

I love this film! Spielberg yet again delivers another masterpiece in the form of an inpsired story with a good ending. Visual effects are awesome and the aliens attacking everyone bring an apocalyptic feeling to it. Tom Cruise has a good I love this film! Spielberg yet again delivers another masterpiece in the form of an inpsired story with a good ending. Visual effects are awesome and the aliens attacking everyone bring an apocalyptic feeling to it. Tom Cruise has a good role as Ray. John Williams' score also gives the menacing atmosphere to the film. Excellent.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

1

EonMar 3, 2007

Now I'm almost convinced that Spielberd is a patsy for the elite. Now that the "terrorist" fear is starting to work not-so-well , they are preparing public to "threat from outer space". And they allways do it in entertainment first, so Now I'm almost convinced that Spielberd is a patsy for the elite. Now that the "terrorist" fear is starting to work not-so-well , they are preparing public to "threat from outer space". And they allways do it in entertainment first, so we will accept it as something "natural" when it actually occurs. They showed the idea of "enhanced-human-through-implanted-microchips" in Star Trek long ago. And what a coincindence - one of the Star Trek creators happened to work for the NASA. And now the microchips are started being pushed towards public, what-a-natural-event. It is interesting that no matter what crap Mr. Spielberg makes, it always gets some "100 percent" positive reviews, no how mysterious is that... Although , most of you will think I'm crazy.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

1

TomSDec 10, 2006

Wow, this movie sure is scary. As horror films go, it's really horrifying. Unfortunately, I got up to greet the pizza-man, and when I got back a minute later, somehow all the aliens were mysteriously dying. We're told this was from Wow, this movie sure is scary. As horror films go, it's really horrifying. Unfortunately, I got up to greet the pizza-man, and when I got back a minute later, somehow all the aliens were mysteriously dying. We're told this was from bacteria of some sort, then shown a zoom-in beyond the level of DNA (much smaller than bacteria) to some indefinite specks. Don't try to think about this one. The whole movie just meandered lazily from one grotesque scene to another. Completely sadistic, really. I didn't see The Passion, but I imagine it's sort of the same thing. This movie only makes sense in the context of 'New World Order' conspiracy theories about Speilberg -- like, if 'they' decide that a billion people have to die to preserve the world's resources, let's just stage a temporary 'alien invasion,' where a ton of people will be helplessly killed, and then the killing will miraculously stop without anyone doing anything. (Probably why we see only the plight of a do-nothing citizen, rather than an actual story a-la ID4.) This sort of speculation is necessary for entertainment because the movie gives you nothing else to think about. No plot, no drama, no honor in the actions of the characters, no imagination. I didn't see it at the theater, only on someone's enormous plasma TV, but the visual effects were underwhelming -- nothing we haven't seen many times before. Many scenes are interrupted in the height of suspense by a fade to silent black that has no purpose except as a future commercial break. Lots of loud noises to keep you and your neighbors awake, though. That earns one point.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

5

AJHDec 7, 2006

First off, this movie was visually stunning. Some of the best sets and special effects I've seen. I was definitely on the edge of my seat throughout most of the film. However, this movie is hampered by the minor detail that the entire First off, this movie was visually stunning. Some of the best sets and special effects I've seen. I was definitely on the edge of my seat throughout most of the film. However, this movie is hampered by the minor detail that the entire premise makes absolutely no sense. Morgan Freeman's opening narration tells us that the aliens have grown envious, watching humanity. But then it turns out that they buried "tripods" millions of year ago, before humans were even here. Then for some reason the aliens waited for a few million years, until our civilization thrived, and then came to blow us up. That's quite a lot of foresight...I wonder if they bury their spaceships on every planet, just in case they need them millions of years later? This is just one of the massive plotholes (never mind the "I survived somehow" ending). Blah.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

5

DanC.Aug 6, 2006

Sure, it looks great, the special effects are seamless, but is it any good? Nope. It's weak sauce, as the kids say. Nothing compelling, a lot of awkward missteps (everything from the missed details of newscasters referring to "THE Sure, it looks great, the special effects are seamless, but is it any good? Nope. It's weak sauce, as the kids say. Nothing compelling, a lot of awkward missteps (everything from the missed details of newscasters referring to "THE Ukraine" to Tom Cruise unconvincingly being unpleasantly surprised by the taste of humus to the son's inexplicable behavior after the invasion). But the biggest misstep is the casting of Cruise as the everyday working stiff just waiting to be a hero. Weak sauce indeed, Mr. Spielberg, Mr. Cruise.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

4

CaioO.Jul 10, 2006

Critic seems to like it, but to me it was just a bunch of aliens coming and killing everybody during the whole movie, until a stupid end.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

BrettC.Jul 6, 2006

Great movie Steven does it again. Its now on my top ten with KIng Kong, Revenge of the sith and Saving Private Ryan.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

6

AndrewH.Jun 23, 2006

This was a really exciting and entertaining movie....until you watch the last ten minutes of it.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

JalilS.May 18, 2006

this movie is the return of spielberg to his roots.spielberg is characteristic of making suvivor type of movies that include some thrilling and thats what a lot of people enjoy watching

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

RichardY.Mar 22, 2006

Some need to realize that it's difficult to transfer an 1898-set story to a 2005-set story. Most families are like that. The girl got annoying, and I got a little monotonously lethargic about the bickering, and the van was unrealistic, Some need to realize that it's difficult to transfer an 1898-set story to a 2005-set story. Most families are like that. The girl got annoying, and I got a little monotonously lethargic about the bickering, and the van was unrealistic, how it could survive all of that calamity but be hijacked. I was also disappointed in the Martians; nothing like Wells described. Pendragon's version meets that dead-on. Those are the only downsides, and all the rest is accurate, even, yes, folks, the ending. Even the book ended it that abruptly, in the spanse of a meer chapter. I however do think it would be neat if they switched: Pendragon would have Spielberg's budget, to do a completely FAITHFUL and REALISTIC retelling of the novel, and Paramount would do a low-budget modernized tale. But, with what is had, War of the Worlds is one of those films that comes to mind as you're falling asleep exhausted (comparing to how the characters must have felt, stumbling right back into danger).… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

4

PeterB.Feb 23, 2006

Overly exaggerated acting (if you could call it that). This was just one of those movies that revolved around special affects, and used acting to fill the gaps. Although the effects really were neat, they did not carry the film.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

4

PatC.Feb 10, 2006

Good special effects, but once again Tom Cruise plays a character with the depth of personality of a potato. Whether this movie is about humanity's best or worst tendencies under stress, it is painful to contemplate.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

JohnFeb 2, 2006

I think it was a really good film actually, Only disapointing bit for me was maybe the ending.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

ColinB.Jan 23, 2006

I gave this movie a 7/10. The movie itself is ok, however it had some "problems" with it that I found hurt the movie quite badly. First off, you know how you get those movies such as this one where someone (usually aliens) is trying to kick I gave this movie a 7/10. The movie itself is ok, however it had some "problems" with it that I found hurt the movie quite badly. First off, you know how you get those movies such as this one where someone (usually aliens) is trying to kick the human races ass, and it happens - so you sit through it for maybe half or even two thirds of the film, then you get the payoff of the satisfaction of watching us "get our own back"? Well, this is one of those rare movies where you never get this payoff. (it's a bit like the Animatrix Episode "The 2nd Renaissance" or even the Matrix Trilogy itself) What you're treated to is the human race having it's ass handed to it for 90 minutes then the attackers basically just die, at the hands of a virus (I think it was the common cold... :|). The only remotely satisfying bit of them taking any flack is near the end when one is already half dead and the army take it out with rocket launchers. The other problem is that the film seems to lose it's way about half way through, with a pretty pointless bit involiving a nutter hiding in his basement, though this part does have some quite well executed suspense momemts. As always with Spielberg you can expect awesome special effects and all that, and you will probably feel some emotions, probably anger because a lot of people do get killed and not much happens to the attackers. One thing I did like though was the attitude of the son in the movie, his desire to follow the army into the heat to try and get some sort of vengeance pretty much summed up my feelings while watching the movie, like I said though, you never really get this. Overall a decent movie, probably one I might buy on DVD but it could have been a lot better in my opinion.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

1

TigerlilyJan 12, 2006

All that leaps off the kneejerk critical page to me - a lot more than this irritating brainless movie per se can muster anyway - are comments regarding 'top-notch special effects'. What are all you peeps smoking? I'd sure like All that leaps off the kneejerk critical page to me - a lot more than this irritating brainless movie per se can muster anyway - are comments regarding 'top-notch special effects'. What are all you peeps smoking? I'd sure like an optimistic drag, because the only thing I found 'special' about these effects is how often I've seen less laughable and amateurish effects on bilge made for the Sci-Fi Channel.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

ritaj.Jan 5, 2006

The movie was excellent, but the dvd does not have much to offer besides the movie itself.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

0

WarrenL.Dec 30, 2005

I just watched it on DVD. All I can say is thank God I did not pay to see this in the theater. It was one of the most disappointing efforts of the once great Mr. Spielberg. Steven have you thought about retirement? Nothing made sense. It I just watched it on DVD. All I can say is thank God I did not pay to see this in the theater. It was one of the most disappointing efforts of the once great Mr. Spielberg. Steven have you thought about retirement? Nothing made sense. It confirmed that Tom Cruise can't act. As for the story it was comical. You don't run toward the danger you run away from it. Every scene was stolen from a previous movie. Awful.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

CJonesDec 29, 2005

Very intense! I enjoyed every minute of it. The 0 scores are just plain ridiculous. Even if you don't like the the original HG Wells story, you have to give it props for the mind blowing special effects.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

4

JamesBDec 28, 2005

I have just finished watching this movie for the second time and can say in all honesty that Speilberg's update of the classic War Of The Worlds tale is a complete disappointment. This picture could have been one of the best science I have just finished watching this movie for the second time and can say in all honesty that Speilberg's update of the classic War Of The Worlds tale is a complete disappointment. This picture could have been one of the best science fiction epics in recent years, however its success was inevitably going to be mared by the lack of scope and imagination implemented by those producing it. The trailer made the film look nothing short of breathtaking, hinting and teasing audiences with samples of the Spielberg and Cruise creativity madjesty that we've seen before in the likes of Minority Report. Unfortunately, this is exactly what the movie itself demonstrates; pure speculation. At the best of times the film is prolonged, slow and uninspired, and whenever the amazing special effects that the film makers have created are shown, they are again limited to a smattering of brief action sequences that you hope will accure countless times throughout the course of the picture. however this is not to be. Overall War of the Worlds is an underdeveloped experience that could have been so much more. I personally am a huge fan of Tom Cruise and feel incredibly disappointed to see him placed in role where he can cannot fully express his true talent and form as his character is hardly ever given anything demanding to do besides runaway and act dumb. This movie is a victim of its own limitations and if more time was spent illustrating epic encounters between the invaders and us humans instead of focusing on a dead end plotline about a single family, this film could have ultimately been much improved.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

sharoh.Dec 27, 2005

I thought it was a great movie I got sort of scared with big alaans as I would say people should watch this movie!

0 of 0 users found this helpful

0

DenisS.Dec 21, 2005

Positively the most boring 'major' movie I have seen all year. Incomprehensible dialogue, poor scripting and equally poor, dark, under imaginative, photography. Independence Day might have been cheesy but it shows how alien Positively the most boring 'major' movie I have seen all year. Incomprehensible dialogue, poor scripting and equally poor, dark, under imaginative, photography. Independence Day might have been cheesy but it shows how alien invasion films should be done. Usual dysfunctional family and brattish kids. When will Hollywood move on and stop repeatedly depicting this tired cliche? The real action was in how the USA would respond at a military political level to such an invasion, not in running around the streets or countryside screaming at each other while irrationally walking back into danger as soon as you have escaped it. Independance Day recognised that. War of the Worlds did not. Which made the most money for their backers?… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

4

MikeDec 20, 2005

This movie is what is wrong with movies. You find a big name director, a big name actor, and then people will actually think it's a good movie. This movie had a dead plot to begin with, and they didn't make it anymore interesting. This movie is what is wrong with movies. You find a big name director, a big name actor, and then people will actually think it's a good movie. This movie had a dead plot to begin with, and they didn't make it anymore interesting. Just like any other action film out there: mindless and hopeless. So over-rated.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

3

PhilDec 20, 2005

This movie had so much potential and just did not deliver. The holes in the plot were large and frequent. The main charecters were annoying and at times I wanted them to die. The special effects were good but could not rescue this flop.

0 of 1 users found this helpful