Read User Reviews and Submit your own for Under the Skin

8

santasaJan 24, 2023

I am really stunned by the reviews, top to bottom, and both users' and pro reviewers'. Most of them are disingenuous, without proper elaboration on this work. This is not your average feature film, go to cinema with a girlfriend or mate sortI am really stunned by the reviews, top to bottom, and both users' and pro reviewers'. Most of them are disingenuous, without proper elaboration on this work. This is not your average feature film, go to cinema with a girlfriend or mate sort of movie, it's not even for the late night TV program. This is an experimental film, a video project with lots of reality TV shots, documentary bits, theatrical choreographed performance, composed sequences of (choreographed) steps and moves, strange scene settings and designs, and most importantly, almost entire cast are "naturchiks" - non-professional and/or one-time actors/performers.
Unexpectedly American reviewers did not pan this project with sneer and low ratings, that is, until New York Post, veritas et virtus et scientia bastion, treated it with "tedious and pretentious" :-)… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

boltronJan 1, 2023

An amazing brain-melting movie. Brilliant sci-fi on a budget, it leaves a lot of room for you to fill in the blanks while it gets on with the job of being white-knuckle and claustrophobic. Like all my favorite horrors, there are zero jumpAn amazing brain-melting movie. Brilliant sci-fi on a budget, it leaves a lot of room for you to fill in the blanks while it gets on with the job of being white-knuckle and claustrophobic. Like all my favorite horrors, there are zero jump scares in this, everything is telegraphed from a mile away, yet there are still real surprises and a few "WHAT THE HELL!?" moments.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

PixarPalMar 31, 2022

To consider this film obtuse or pretentious is understandable if lazy or ill-informed. But to label this film empty and complain that 'nothing is happening' is totally false. Glazer uses silence, repetition, and simplicity throughout the filmTo consider this film obtuse or pretentious is understandable if lazy or ill-informed. But to label this film empty and complain that 'nothing is happening' is totally false. Glazer uses silence, repetition, and simplicity throughout the film to pare back an elaborate, special effects-heavy concept to a sparse, cohesive story focusing on an alien perspective of the human world. Glazer manages to conjure his own style, melding a naturalistic documentary approach to the horror/sci-fi mastery of Kubrick classics emphasising absorbing imagery and ethereal soundscapes. A mesmerising lead performance from Scarlett here.
9/10 [A]… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

yeqksDec 30, 2021

One of the most unique sci-fi films out there, and my favorite for that very reason. Feels like a spiritual successor to 2001 in a lot of ways. Scarlett Johansson's best performance by far by far, accompanied by one of the best scores inOne of the most unique sci-fi films out there, and my favorite for that very reason. Feels like a spiritual successor to 2001 in a lot of ways. Scarlett Johansson's best performance by far by far, accompanied by one of the best scores in science fiction history.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

DawdlingPoetNov 26, 2021

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This is a sci-fi thriller film which features themes including desire, deformities, disguise and seduction. The film starts with a quite futuristic and spooky, disorientating scene, whereby we're looking at something from very, very close up and only slowly does the camera pan back to allow us to realise what we're seeing. There is a heavy presence of edgy sounding, screechy musical pieces, a bit like the well known classical score in Psycho. I found myself feeling quite intrigued by the main character, known, or regarded, only as 'The Female'. I felt it seemed quite claustrophobic, there was something really quite unsettling about it from early on, which was mostly coming across via said edgy musical pieces, which were mostly more along the lines of incidental music, rather than actual song tracks.

As well as edgy, its quite mysterious, both dark in terms of the lighting and environment and also in terms of the themes and plot itself. Some scenes came across to me like some kind of peculiar dream sequence. I should perhaps state that this film is directed by Jonathan Glazer, perhaps more well known for his other films including Sexy Beast and Birth, which are cult classics (maybe less so Birth, but certainly Sexy Beast). Suffice to say, there is quite an art house feel to the film and I found myself feeling somehow frustrated by the lack of constant dialogue. You could say this is a bit of a 'Marmite' film, in as much as you might really enjoy its edginess, the fact the plot is so slow to build (the plot pace is very slow) and so on, or it may really frustrate you. I thought it did quite well at making me wonder what the back story was to said main/lead female character, wondering what may happen next and what we might or might not discover. I certainly thought it did well at creating a mysterious and spooky feel and it seemed somewhat original, perhaps not so in terms of the type of film it was but in terms of some aspects of the plot and how we're shown things. It is a bit 'arty' but I wouldn't say its not without merit - its definitely different, thats for sure. If I had to criticise it, I'd say there wasn't quite enough of a general direction clearly put across and that if I hadn't read the main plot synopsis prior to watching it, I'd likely feel significantly more at a loss as to what its all about. If I had to compare it, I'd say think of the films of David Lynch and the like.

Its one of those films which leaves you wondering how am I supposed to interpret this? I wouldn't say there's no pretention present, there is but there is definitely something intriguing about it which kept me watchinhg. I feel that some aspects, certainly the musical score (or incidental pieces played, whatever the correct term is) were very well picked out and certainly helped to add to a very unsettling atmosphere, which some may quite appreciate and enjoy and which might spook out other people, that all depends on your personal taste of course.

Content wise, the film features quite a lot of nudity at different times, including full frontal male nudity and sex scenes. There is violence, although its not especially graphic or gory, being mostly mild to moderate with a bit of blood shown but otherwise nothing too excessive, which may surprise you (it did me). There also isn't a great deal of very strong language present but the film has a quite spooky and unsettling feel throughout and so, due to this, it could be deemed as somewhat frightening and disturbing for some people. Rather than scary as such, I'd say its definitely unsettling, in a kind of a spine chilling sense. The film has been given a 15 rating due to said content.

I think, hesitatingly, yes I would recommend this film but with the caveat that if you don't like being kept literally in the dark or being confused by things, then its likely not for you. If, however, your somewhat open minded and like artsy, mysterious films with intrigue, then you may find this quite good and certainly interesting. I suppose I'll go with the undecided option, as it really depends on your personal taste in films, whether you'd like this or not, so I'll leave it to you to decide.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

LumdogNov 13, 2021

I was pretty confused the whole time watching it; but by the end I appreciated the imagery and message the film was trying to convey. I mean it's a really slow burn; there's literally no dialogue until 20 minutes in. It's definitelyI was pretty confused the whole time watching it; but by the end I appreciated the imagery and message the film was trying to convey. I mean it's a really slow burn; there's literally no dialogue until 20 minutes in. It's definitely thought-provoking and worth watching to build your own interpretation of the film. But...this may prove just too weird for most people I reckon.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

TrailesqueFeb 18, 2021

A genuinely weird and haunting little SF/horror/art flick that does get under one's skin. It stars Scarlett Johansson as an alluring but deadly creature of some kind. She roams around dull sections of urban Scotland in a plain van, pickingA genuinely weird and haunting little SF/horror/art flick that does get under one's skin. It stars Scarlett Johansson as an alluring but deadly creature of some kind. She roams around dull sections of urban Scotland in a plain van, picking up solitary men and doing something very strange to them. Around halfway thru, things change, and it becomes an interesting exploration indeed. The dialogue is very sparse, and the soundtrack is dominated by Mica Levi's dark score. There is some fine cinematography of Scottish winter landscapes towards the end.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

3

joejouzuJan 14, 2021

There are really interesting visuals in the movie, the kind that could make it a pretty good one - but the story is garbage. It's way too abstract, and leaves you bored.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

MahmusSep 25, 2020

Here's a movie I love to stare at in awe at how succesfully it manages to keep my atention, despite it's very slow pace.

One of the very few movies have made my heart almost stop with some of its imagery and sound. It's a hauntingHere's a movie I love to stare at in awe at how succesfully it manages to keep my atention, despite it's very slow pace.

One of the very few movies have made my heart almost stop with some of its imagery and sound.

It's a haunting masterpiece that's as fascinating as it is captivating

I love it.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

ggiovaniJul 15, 2020

Impact, deep and unforgettable scenes, style, atmosphere, visuals & music, Scarlett Johansson's interpretation. Unique experience. Masterpiece.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

NEONFLEXIQMar 31, 2020

Phenomenal experience that I wish was more celebrated, but I guess it's too slow and ambiguous for some.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

wealthychefMay 18, 2020

This movie is incredibly artistic and beautiful in so many ways. Scarlett is gorgeous and fearless in this role in using her body and face compellingly to help tell the story. My big knock on this movie would be that it is confusing. Also,This movie is incredibly artistic and beautiful in so many ways. Scarlett is gorgeous and fearless in this role in using her body and face compellingly to help tell the story. My big knock on this movie would be that it is confusing. Also, slow paced. Personally, I generally hate slow paced, indulgent movies. I would hate this one too normally. Scenes drag out with almost nothing happening but literally every scene also is so beautifully done it kept me engrossed. I was so fascinated by what the hell was happening that I stuck it out. The ending was eery and somehow satisfying to me. And some of the characters were really cool. But slooowwww pacing throughout.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

1

AllanRutenbergApr 6, 2020

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I kept seeing this on lists of the "best Netflix movie" you haven't seen or best Sci fi everyone should see OR even "not great, but visually stunning," etc. So today, I decide to finally watch it. What a mistake.

Here's my synopsis - long, unnecessarily long shots of, mainly, Scarlett's character staring at things followed by unsuspecting men in Scotland getting metaphysically or metaphorically (can't decide yet) asorpbed into a liquid nothingness. Could you at least give us a motive for the lead, or do you just prefer to channel the wayyy overrated director Terrence Mallick? As for, "not the best" movie but visually stunning - go check out The Fall by Tarsem Singh instead. Hey, Jonathan Glazer - how about you go back to directing music videos & we'll call it (almost) even?

For the record, I'm writing this (FIRST Metacritic review @ the 1 hr & 11 min mark (on pause) DEBATING whether I should continue or not. Things is, I NEVER quit a movie! For if (I think) it's bad, I want to know how much worse it can get OR to see if it will actually redeem itself at some point. Honestly, I just want to stab my eyes out...… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

AWESOM-0Jan 25, 2020

Such a great movie! I want to give it a 10 but I think it will end up being a 9/9.5. Scarlett Johansson give her best performance ever, especially knowing that a lot of that was improvised, amazing. She is believable in every aspect of thatSuch a great movie! I want to give it a 10 but I think it will end up being a 9/9.5. Scarlett Johansson give her best performance ever, especially knowing that a lot of that was improvised, amazing. She is believable in every aspect of that character.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

BeastJ18Apr 27, 2018

Everything about this film is exquisite, the cinematography, editing, subtle performance, direction, etc... All of these film aspects are executed in the most masterful and subdued manner. It is a modern fable of discovery and tells the storyEverything about this film is exquisite, the cinematography, editing, subtle performance, direction, etc... All of these film aspects are executed in the most masterful and subdued manner. It is a modern fable of discovery and tells the story with little exposition, only imagery. This is an instant critical classic that explores humanity, love, femininity, identity, compassion and has a lot more subtext. The most Kubrickian film ever made, without being directed by the legend himself. It sways from immensely creepy, to powerfully brutal, to beautifully introspective with great ease and care. One of the best films of the 21st Century and one of my favourite films ever.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

TheSweBooDec 19, 2018

This is not a movie for everyone, let's just get that out of the way. It's an *artsy* movie with a lot of visual storytelling and metaphors. Play the MLG sound effects. I went into this movie since ScarJo is my favorite actress of all timeThis is not a movie for everyone, let's just get that out of the way. It's an *artsy* movie with a lot of visual storytelling and metaphors. Play the MLG sound effects. I went into this movie since ScarJo is my favorite actress of all time somewhat blind. I did not know she'd be nude in it, that came as a pleasant bonus surprise. I came out the other side disturbed but intrigued. Under the Skin is the type of movie that when you're finished you don't really know what you just watched and you don't really start appreciating the movie once you read up and watch theories, explanations and analyses. And sleeping on the movie for a while, I really do like it. It has some issues, nothing too major, but what it does right it does extremely well. A big part of the movie is the fear of the unknown and the movie **** nails that. You will see disturbing stuff you've hopefully never seen before accompanied by some of the most bone-chilling and unsettling music I've ever heard, serious props to the composer. This movie has the most terrifying jump scare I've ever seen, I am not kidding. I had to take a pause from watching the movie. And once again after 'Her' (my fav movie of all time), ScarJo wants to know what it means to be a human and the movie tackles that topic very well too. Those scenes with the men in the street are however the least engaging and can drag the pacing down varying degrees (I'm especially thinking of a scene with ScarJo walking around a telephone booth). ScarJo is great throughout the movie and also great is Adam Pearson, what a guy. Under the Skin is interesting and well made, there is no denying in that and the storytelling is there, you just have to think to take part in it. The movie won't throw anything into your face except disturbing terror that... gets under your skin hehe… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

wollam11Oct 31, 2018

You could take a short dive into a deep black abyss and experience the sense of ennui and melancholy that comes with questioning one's own existence in a world where you are alone. I did and ... meh.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

TheQuietGamerSep 16, 2018

I remember there being a lot of hype for this. Not because people were excited for another deep, thoughtful sci-fi movie or anything like that, but because Scarlett Johansson was going to be naked. When it finally came out I saw that it gotI remember there being a lot of hype for this. Not because people were excited for another deep, thoughtful sci-fi movie or anything like that, but because Scarlett Johansson was going to be naked. When it finally came out I saw that it got good reviews, but nobody really talked about it after that. So I assumed that everybody masturbated then moved on with their lives and that I wouldn't be missing anything by skipping it. It wasn't until a few years later that someone I met online recommended it to me and I decided that I might as well check it out at some point. I have ended up glad that they convinced me to look past my misconceptions and give it a shot.

The premise of an alien seductress leading men to their deaths with the promise of sex sounds like it should be the basis for a movie where the sole appeal is in the nudity. Not something as dark and haunting as this. Under the Skin has a B-movie setup, but ended up with art house appeal. The cinematography is gorgeous. Watching Johansson drive around in a van and do almost nothing is way more entertaining than it should be. Not just because of how great Jonathan Glazer and Daniel Landin were able to make the mundane look, but also because of Johansson herself. Her stare that is both empty, but full of curiosity is mesmerizing. You really want to get inside of her character's head just as much as all these men want to get inside her pants.

It's a very vague movie. Perhaps intentionally so that viewers may be able to draw their own conclusions as to what it's about. Loneliness from a true outsider's perspective? Trying to find your place in a cold world? A celebration of individuality? A critique of men's harassment and objectification of beautiful women? Even something as simple as real beauty being on the inside? I couldn't quite say. All I know is that it's a movie that is able to overcome most of the boredom one would typically find in something this slow-paced thanks to a wonderful performance from it's lead actress and that I enjoyed it very much.… Expand

2 of 2 users found this helpful20

All this user's reviews

10

OlivierPielMay 15, 2018

This is one of the best movies made since 2000. This movie represents the best metaphor of the abyss at the edge of which our Western democratic societies dance perilously close to at the moment. The underlying repulsion of nihilism andThis is one of the best movies made since 2000. This movie represents the best metaphor of the abyss at the edge of which our Western democratic societies dance perilously close to at the moment. The underlying repulsion of nihilism and materialism at the heart of this work of art is a wake up call to all of us to rebuild new values for a world where sex has replaced love, where selfishness pass as will to power, where utter loneliness has reduced our humanity to its most primitive form.
Brilliant. Real horror. Exactly what Colonel Kurtz meant.… Expand

0 of 6 users found this helpful06

All this user's reviews

7

amheretojudgeFeb 26, 2018

how was that..

Under The Skin Expressing emotions and creating tension and urgency on the screen despite of using word is a sign of excellence in both writing and directing field. Under The Skin is a character-driven movie that is equallyhow was that..

Under The Skin

Expressing emotions and creating tension and urgency on the screen despite of using word is a sign of excellence in both writing and directing field. Under The Skin is a character-driven movie that is equally smart and soft to its core contradict to its hard raw brutal physique. Jonathan Glazer aces in projecting the on-paper words to the screen and brings out the character alive and pumping. Scarlett Johansson justifies her role and works hard on her character that itself remains mystery till the last frame. Under The Skin is a slow pill that unfolds in each phase and twists its way out as the plot thickens and the character ages on the screen.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

davd123Feb 25, 2018

So artistic and strange. If you love art you should love this movie. It was very strange but beautiful at the same time. After the movie I didn't knew how to feel and I was thinking about this movie a lot.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

DEEPVALLEYJan 16, 2018

Under The Skin brings an unbelievably dark perspective on sexual desires and selfishness. The middle of the film is where I have my problems. The sex scenes become repetitive, and there were some confusing imagery that were trying toUnder The Skin brings an unbelievably dark perspective on sexual desires and selfishness. The middle of the film is where I have my problems. The sex scenes become repetitive, and there were some confusing imagery that were trying to symbolize something but I couldn't understand them. The films is at its strongest in the beginning and the end. The ending makes up so much for the confusing middle. The environment built around her sex life is so surreal. This films makes you question your selfishness during sexual activities.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

4

GREEK-GODJan 6, 2018

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I would like to start by saying i am a fan of films that are "different". I don't need a million gunshots or explosions to entertain me. I am not set on good guy vs bad guy and good guy winning. I like thought provoking films; i enjoy them much more than the soul sucking films that are manufactured on a daily basis. So i was intrigued by this one. The trailer was dark and seemed full of suspense. The critics had made bold comparisons with Stanley Kubrick, which in itself is a massive compliment. And as someone who lives in Scotland it had a little sentiment to it. But for me it was dull. Every time i thought it was going to pick up the pace, it decelerated. It was so slow it may as well have been going backwards. There are far too many scenes that are prolonged. I am fully aware of its intention to focus on aesthetically driven scenes. But 5/6 seconds is enough to appreciate it, not 10/15 seconds. At some points i thought the reel had maybe stuck and was expecting a CineWorld employee to come pacing round the corner to explain that there was something wrong. It just pauses at points that don't need that much attention. I am also aware of the symbolic nature the film carries. It is clearly a film you need to look further to understand it in more depth. That is fine; i welcome that, but the problem is that it does this without conviction. I don't need to see the masses of drunkards who swarm Sauchiehall Street 20 times. What is the purpose? To let us know that we, as people, blindly walk through life intoxicated not appreciating the finer things in life? That Under the skin we are empty? I assume that is a candidate for its meaning.

Scarlett Johansson doesn't have a lot to do in this film; basically make small talk and get naked, all the while with a plain face. And considering how ridiculous the Scottish actors are made to look, maybe she is due some credit for maintaining that straight face. There are a few things that bug me however; like she can walk down your average staircase, but panics with a spiral staircase. There is a definite point to this film, but with the layout, with there being no real culmination, no real explanation, it leaves you feeling you have been robbed of a film that could have been more. Could have told a better story. And for any Americans who watch, not all Scottish people talk like that, or wear horrible purple shirts, unnecessarily tucking them into our over elevated jeans. We don't all support Hibs and when a van is parked not all of us will gang up and try to break into the van. So feel free to visit. It is a nice place after all. Although the film had some stunning scenes and promotes Scotland visually, it doesn't exactly put the people in a great light. I wanted to enjoy this film, but i couldn't. I wanted to agree with comparisons with Kubrick, but i certainly won't. You can throw arguments of it was beautifully crafted or had symbolic serenity, but at the end of the day it is slow, uneventful and lacked culmination.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

inaneswineNov 14, 2017

Under The Skin, as an oft-proclaimed "art film", is far less focussed on script and character than it is on pushing the boundaries of cinematography and intriguing editing to create truly one of the most beautiful-looking films of recentUnder The Skin, as an oft-proclaimed "art film", is far less focussed on script and character than it is on pushing the boundaries of cinematography and intriguing editing to create truly one of the most beautiful-looking films of recent times, its striking imagery and atonal soundtrack harking back to some of Kubrick's best work. Even if it is far too weird for some, and far too dull for others.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

John935Nov 1, 2017

You might not like this film. You probably won't. The story won't unfold the way you want it to. You probably shouldn't see it. The score is dissonant. The photography's unnerving. Definitely you shouldn't watch this movie. I liked it butYou might not like this film. You probably won't. The story won't unfold the way you want it to. You probably shouldn't see it. The score is dissonant. The photography's unnerving. Definitely you shouldn't watch this movie. I liked it but what do I know?… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

1

BroyaxAug 18, 2017

Attention : il s'agit d'un film surréaliste. Mais a contrario d'un film de David Lynch (à part Inland Empire bien sûr, à part et à éviter) il n'est ni captivant ni ironiquement drôle ni étrangement bizzare sur un fond un minimum rationnel.Attention : il s'agit d'un film surréaliste. Mais a contrario d'un film de David Lynch (à part Inland Empire bien sûr, à part et à éviter) il n'est ni captivant ni ironiquement drôle ni étrangement bizzare sur un fond un minimum rationnel.

C'est-à-dire qu'ici, on ne cherche pas bien longtemps à tenter d'interpréter le grand ni'mporte quoi sans queue ni tête de ce foutoir de mauvais goût, à part sans doute une vague psychose psychotique puisqu'en dehors de draguer dans sa fourgonnette (trop glamour, ouais), elle fait littéralement disparaître tous les gars qu'elle rencontre....

Pour le reste, on pourra sans doute trouver dans cette espèce de "film" d'autres sujets d'étude d'ordre psychiatrique, si l'on est soi-même un tant soit peu tourneboulé ou grand fumeur de moquette d'ascenseur.

Il y a néanmoins un soupçon d'intérêt, un embryon de curiosité à soulever dans cette "chose", cela concerne Scarlett Johansson elle-même : non pas que sa performance soit éblouissante, non, elle y est aussi médiocre que d'habitude ; non, c'est juste que Scarlett est souvent à poil dans ce film à la con !

Elle devrait faire quelques pilates et ralentir sur les gâteaux mais à part cela, c'est une fille généreuse qui pourrait figurer sur l'un de ces tableaux de la Renaissance ; les sujets féminins de cette époque y étaient en effet vilains de visage et bien en chair.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

3

RoyGolanJul 6, 2017

This was the most boring movies I have ever seen. I get the meaning behind it, but there is really nothing here. 108 minutes and only 5 very small things that actually happen. The entire movie she is driving or walking somewhere with noThis was the most boring movies I have ever seen. I get the meaning behind it, but there is really nothing here. 108 minutes and only 5 very small things that actually happen. The entire movie she is driving or walking somewhere with no dialogue. That's it. And don't expect any answers either. I don't get the critics nowadays , they must be out of their minds.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

triple_coJan 3, 2017

A very strange but engaging film that is unsettling and highly metaphorical. With very little dialogue, long and seemingly empty shots, as well as slow movement and pace, 'Under The Skin' is definitely not for everyone. But, when given enoughA very strange but engaging film that is unsettling and highly metaphorical. With very little dialogue, long and seemingly empty shots, as well as slow movement and pace, 'Under The Skin' is definitely not for everyone. But, when given enough attention and focus, it is very rewarding. The most unsettling part of the entire project is its documentary style of filming. The camera use, lighting and cinematography makes it seem extremely realistic and grounded in the imperfect reality of rural Scotland. Shopping centres look like real places, unpolished and ordinary, and so Scarlett Johansson's luring of male victims seems all the more unnerving. An interpretive film, with creepy and emotionally distressing moments, it is definitely worth a watch. If you're a fan of subjective meaning and ambiguity, this may be something you will enjoy. It is definitely not for everyone, however, and it's no surprise that it didn't make huge profits at the box office.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

3

TornadoCreatorApr 21, 2016

A film marketed as a sci-fi horror but with so little of both that it comes across as boring, far too slowly paced, and at times insultingly pretentious. There where at least some interesting concepts in this film but it felt extremely cheapA film marketed as a sci-fi horror but with so little of both that it comes across as boring, far too slowly paced, and at times insultingly pretentious. There where at least some interesting concepts in this film but it felt extremely cheap and without focus. Really, if felt like someone just followed Scarlett Johansson around and filmed her as she **** about in Scotland for a bit, only with the caveat that no-one would recognise her. The vast majority of the film has no dialogue, and there are way to many lingering shots where nothing happens except Scarlett stares at a wall, out of the window, at the ocean etc. for sometimes up to a minute or more. Yes, there is an ending that will explain at least some of what happened, but there's far too much left unexplained in an attempt to maintain mystery.

The only positive I can say about this film if I'm brutally honest, is kudos to the director for convincing Scarlett Johansson to give us three long scenes of full frontal nudity, including one that actually systematically pans around her body as she clenches in the nude. For any red-blooded heterosexual men, that scene will be reason alone to own this on DVD, but I can save you the trouble now and tell you 16 minutes, 59 minutes, and 1h 17mins. Those are the times for her nude scenes... fast forward through everything else.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

SomePersonaFeb 14, 2017

Extensively original and incredibly crafted. All the secret allegories and meanings of this film are totally brilliant, and you can tell that a lot of time, work, and planning were required for this film to be totally amazing. Also, the scoreExtensively original and incredibly crafted. All the secret allegories and meanings of this film are totally brilliant, and you can tell that a lot of time, work, and planning were required for this film to be totally amazing. Also, the score by Mica Levi (aka Micachu) is an innovation to film music, just like this movie is an innovation to motion pictures.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

stephen42Feb 1, 2017

A film of such chilling beauty and shocking power Johnathan Glazers "Under The Skin" is one of the best science-fiction films of the last twenty years.

Featuring a breathtaking central performance from a truly beautiful but sinister ScarlettA film of such chilling beauty and shocking power Johnathan Glazers "Under The Skin" is one of the best science-fiction films of the last twenty years.

Featuring a breathtaking central performance from a truly beautiful but sinister Scarlett Johansson and played out to a strikingly haunting score from Mica"Jackie"Levy this is a true modern classic.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

TokyochuchuDec 25, 2016

Under the Skin is a supurb art-house sci-fi flick that is completely devoid of hand-holding. It's a bleak and beautiful vision featuring truly eye-catching cinematography. After watching the movie I just couldn't stop thinking about it. TheUnder the Skin is a supurb art-house sci-fi flick that is completely devoid of hand-holding. It's a bleak and beautiful vision featuring truly eye-catching cinematography. After watching the movie I just couldn't stop thinking about it. The inscrutable nature of the film is so alluring and mysterious. I needed to go watch it again. And I did... And my appreciation deepened considerably. Under the Skin is an excellent film.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

6

LeZeeDec 14, 2016

The lady from the white van.

First of all, this is not an entertaining film, but an alien theme on a fictional plot like how they would come live among us. Before that, they need to look like us, so they steal human skins and that's whatThe lady from the white van.

First of all, this is not an entertaining film, but an alien theme on a fictional plot like how they would come live among us. Before that, they need to look like us, so they steal human skins and that's what this film is about. Most of the film was in a van driving around in the Scottland. An alien disguised as a human, looking for the single men in the uncrowded places to seduce and steal their skins. But one day after got curious about being a human being, her routine work gets affected seriously and so what happens to her after is told in the remaining film.

It's certainly not the film I was looking for. That's the reason I did not watch it when it got out. But I kind of liked it, it was not as boring as the others advised me. Usually films are for pleasure and timepass and this film did not have those qualities. Hence it financially failed. Surely some people would enjoy it, particularly the critics praised it which is unusual.

From the director of 'Birth', Scarlett Johansson in the lead and she was the only good thing in it. The story was a little complicated, so not everybody going the get it, not at the first glance, but if you do, you will enjoy it. The locations were awesome. Watching it on the cold stormy day brought me that original Scottish atmosphere here. I should have rated it better, but no regret for what I gave for it. Its not a suggestible kind, though worth a watch if you're fed up with the regular commercial films.

6/10… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

pdw123Sep 19, 2016

Wow, certainly one of the most technically brilliant films I've ever seen, but one with the storyline and theme severely lacking. 5--for originality, visuals 5-for the sound and score, incredible! 5-for the stage production and breathtakingWow, certainly one of the most technically brilliant films I've ever seen, but one with the storyline and theme severely lacking. 5--for originality, visuals 5-for the sound and score, incredible! 5-for the stage production and breathtaking scenery in Scotland/cinematography, the best ever! 4-Johansson does a great "Blade Runner" replicant or whatever here, she's got it down pat, other indie actors also good. 5-for great pacing in the spirit of Kubrick, "Foxcatcher" also has that pacing with the dialog that I love. Glad filmmakers are starting to "get it", as the ADD chatter and rapid TV editing drives me crazy, as does, of course, watching the news!! 1 or 0--on that storyline, which made the whole film a bit incoherent, which is unfortunate, because would've been a GREAT film, otherwise...… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

0

tethysdustSep 14, 2016

Pretty much nothing happens in this movie, and there is very little dialogue. I am baffled by the good ratings. It seemed like more of an art film than a science fiction film.

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

2

shiftworkerAug 22, 2016

A sci-fi / thriller fusion that doesn't work well as either for me. There's an arty style throughout which some may love, but which left me cold rather than engaged me. I felt some sympathy but no empathy. The sci-fi element was mostly behindA sci-fi / thriller fusion that doesn't work well as either for me. There's an arty style throughout which some may love, but which left me cold rather than engaged me. I felt some sympathy but no empathy. The sci-fi element was mostly behind the scenes rather than explicit. I felt relieved when this movie finished, wouldn't watch it again or recommend it to anyone I know personally. One for Scarlett Johansson and one for good use of Scottish locations.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

talisencrwAug 8, 2016

This was a very bizarre and unique viewing experience for me. I greatly enjoy cinematic puzzles, and directors who have the wherewithal, guts and personal integrity to stick to their guns and project their distinct visions without caving inThis was a very bizarre and unique viewing experience for me. I greatly enjoy cinematic puzzles, and directors who have the wherewithal, guts and personal integrity to stick to their guns and project their distinct visions without caving in to corporate pressure or normal sensibilities. It is work like this at the cinematic vanguard that makes cinema the most aesthetic of all art forms and the greatest and most intrinsically satisfying component of my life. Though I have Glazer's previous two films, I have sadly not seen them yet, a condition I hope to remedy as soon as possible. A woman and actress of Johansson's beauty is perhaps one of only a select few currently out there who could pull this sort of thing off. And yes, this would make a remarkable double bill with 'The Man Who Fell to Earth'.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

SmaseliafJun 13, 2016

This unconventional sci-fi thriller set in Scotland is one of the best recent movies I've seen. S. Johannson stars as a taciturn femme fatale in the service of unspecified aliens who lures unsuspicious men into a lethal trap. The storyThis unconventional sci-fi thriller set in Scotland is one of the best recent movies I've seen. S. Johannson stars as a taciturn femme fatale in the service of unspecified aliens who lures unsuspicious men into a lethal trap. The story doesn’t get repetitive or boring, as after a couple of snatches, different encounters unfold.
Some viewers may reject it as arty or pretentious, but it isn't either: the simple, short and original story coupled with the eerie Scottish landscape (urban and natural) and J. Glazer’s mesmerising direction deliver an outstanding cinematic title, which was sadly a box-office flop.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

0

clinteastwooMay 11, 2016

................................................................................................................................................One of worst films ever made...

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

0

sicranoApr 8, 2016

What is Good in This???,Why The ACCLAIM???,Is Because the FIRST NAKED SCARLETT MOVIE???.

Nothing in this movie is Good Even the NAKED Scenes of Scarlett Johansson Could Be Better, Could be Better Filming, With Better Angles, BetterWhat is Good in This???,Why The ACCLAIM???,Is Because the FIRST NAKED SCARLETT MOVIE???.

Nothing in this movie is Good Even the NAKED Scenes of Scarlett Johansson Could Be Better, Could be Better Filming, With Better Angles, Better Lighting, and FOCUS.

FOCUS, LIGHTING, ANGLES, And BETTER FILMING & ANGLES IN SHE'S BOOBS & ASS… Expand

1 of 6 users found this helpful15

All this user's reviews

6

marcmyworksMar 12, 2016

This film felt like a commentary on the abuse humans give to one another, to show interest only to gain. The disturbing part is that because the film is so slow and light, when things actually do happen they have an uncomfortable payoff.This film felt like a commentary on the abuse humans give to one another, to show interest only to gain. The disturbing part is that because the film is so slow and light, when things actually do happen they have an uncomfortable payoff. Overall beautifully shot, however dull and lifeless and lacks the depth it is trying to create.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

3

B5HARPFeb 22, 2016

If any other female lead was cast this movie would not have been rated so highly. I'm sure most of us men, including myself watched this just because of ScarJo. Yes she is nude in this, but this movie is horrible. She seduces a veryIf any other female lead was cast this movie would not have been rated so highly. I'm sure most of us men, including myself watched this just because of ScarJo. Yes she is nude in this, but this movie is horrible. She seduces a very disfigured man. Very few works are spoken. I'm sure it's supposed to be one of those DEEP/Intellingent movies, but it's not. No origin of who she is and why she does what she does. Unless you're into seeing Scarjo in her birthday suit, avoid this movie like a hot woman in a van at night.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

fangirlingtaniNov 15, 2015

Ok so I love this film and if you haven't see it, watch it. Bare in mind it's not for everyone. Anyway, I was at a party the morning this film came out, and I was super excited I literally left the party even though I had JUST dropped a tabOk so I love this film and if you haven't see it, watch it. Bare in mind it's not for everyone. Anyway, I was at a party the morning this film came out, and I was super excited I literally left the party even though I had JUST dropped a tab of acid, I had no car at the time so I could only walk, I walked to the store, bought a copy and went home made some tea while I listened to a rap playlist that my friend had given me, not that I listen to rap but I thought "hey why not". (So, I couldn't actually put a name to the songs that were playing or anything it was completely new to me). I put the film into my laptop and started watching, the first 5 or so minutes is a montage of deep space, with what seems like Scarlett Johansson learning phonics for the first time, anyway, without realising the rap-playlist my friend had given was still playing in another window on my laptop, but I didn't realise until maybe 15 minutes into the film, so I started it again, then it just got weirder from there, the acid finally kicked in and all I saw was Scarletts face melting in almost every shot, and at another point I thought I was drowning and gave birth to a child. it was not a good time and I thought that was the weirdest film I had ever seen in my life, anyway, I watched it again, sober this time, and loved it even more :) probably wont be doing acid any more.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

llamayarmybarAug 7, 2015

I've never been so upset by the last 40 minutes of a film in my life. Compound that with the amount of people literally implying such ridiculous notions as, "you probably just didn't understand everything going on in the film- that's why youI've never been so upset by the last 40 minutes of a film in my life. Compound that with the amount of people literally implying such ridiculous notions as, "you probably just didn't understand everything going on in the film- that's why you didn't like it." No. No I understood what was going on, and it was fairly obvious by about an hour into the film. Up until that hour I was actually enjoying it, I saw it as a sort of abstract thought experiment film that tried to convey the mind of a female serial killer femme fatale- and my goodness realizing what this film WASN'T gonna be about was far more shocking by the time I ultimately reached the miserable ending. You wanna know what obvious imagery they put in this film for people pretentious enough to tell you its a film that involves multiple viewings? Ant on her hand, the ant is human beings! Fly on the glass trying to escape! So is she! This isn't obvious imagery at all! I'm a character that doesn't understand human beings so we'll set the film somewhere in Europe. How about some country where people have a really strong accent! That will make it even more obvious how "alien" Scarlett Johansson's character feels! Scotland? Perfect! Hey lets have a sequence where she completely disregards human life or their safety and totally mislead people in the audience to think, "wow she is totally a psychopath!" This film has disturbing imagery, a nightmarish soundtrack, is immensely suspenseful and all this is immediately ruined by the films sudden desire to commit plot suicide in one of the most contrived, silly, dumb, and poorly written endings that will literally have you wondering why you just waited nearly two hours on a film that ruined its own "twist" only an hour in. If it wasn't obvious from the beginning of the film its only more obvious as it goes on. Which is just abominable and quite frankly could've been pulled off so much better. I'm not accusing the film of being pretentious, but you can't combine a thriller with a Science-fiction twist with the kind of imagery and sequences in this film. It paints the wrong picture for the audience and its very disappointing to both crowds of those particular genres. You want to see Scarlett Johansson nude here and there? Than definitely watch it, however, if you want an E.T. meets Species kind of film you're going to probably want to turn this off, and pick out one or the other- you can't have both anyway- that would just be filthy.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

2

BlaKDemonaZJul 11, 2015

Uma das poucas coisas que realmente vale a pena nesse filme é a interpretação da Scarlett. No mais, a história se mostra interessante mas não se desenvolve direito, deixa várias pontas soltas e muitas coisas acabam sem explicação e sem oUma das poucas coisas que realmente vale a pena nesse filme é a interpretação da Scarlett. No mais, a história se mostra interessante mas não se desenvolve direito, deixa várias pontas soltas e muitas coisas acabam sem explicação e sem o mínimo de ideia de "por que" ou "como". É realmente um filme que não vale a pena ser visto, na minha opinião, 2/10.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

3

ValcanKrullJul 4, 2015

I wanted to like this but couldn't. It felt like Jonathan Glazer had just watched the last 30 minutes of Stanley Kubrick's "2001: A Space Odyssey" and George Lucas's college short "THX-1138" and decided to make this on a dare. I understoodI wanted to like this but couldn't. It felt like Jonathan Glazer had just watched the last 30 minutes of Stanley Kubrick's "2001: A Space Odyssey" and George Lucas's college short "THX-1138" and decided to make this on a dare. I understood what was happening by the end of the film but it took too long to get there and left out so much of the narrative from the book that you end up with a hollow film.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

4

EuknowiaJun 30, 2015

A Sci-Fi horror film methodically shot in ways that pay homage to the genres classics, but misses both the lore and revulsion necessary to justify much appraisal. The “fill in the blank” story route seems more ignorant and apathetic thanA Sci-Fi horror film methodically shot in ways that pay homage to the genres classics, but misses both the lore and revulsion necessary to justify much appraisal. The “fill in the blank” story route seems more ignorant and apathetic than artistic or thought provoking. Aliens in human skin is not so revolutionary a concept that it needs much explaining (just examine any politician), but to the degree that Scarlett’s character knew English, how to drive, how to walk, possessed property, rationalized target selection, knew how to seduce, etc., I couldn’t help but wonder what backstory must exist in order for any of that to seem slightly plausible in its fictional world without simultaneously contradicting Scarlett’s jejune character. Alternatively, the poor backstory may have been overlooked if the horror aspect of the film was stronger. Outside of seeing a dude get his organs Criss Angel’d, red goop on a slide (artsay symbologay!!!), babies being Tarzan’d (beginning of crab people?), and perverts, for an alien horror movie this is located fairly low on the terror spectrum. I think it is worth noting that Johanssan’s hidden camera improv was good, but her awkward attitudes manifested in a fairly unnatural or disingenuous way (awkwardly acting awkward-ception). Also, why was nudity a thing? Naked people still= artsy? Seemed more like eye candy for boner grins instead of an honest illustration of on the surface beauty. Overall, certainly not a bad movie, especially for its genre, but personally I did not find it all that great either (less is not always more). Maybe robot instead of alien (perhaps a bit easier to explain)? Illuminati confirmed…… Expand

3 of 3 users found this helpful30

All this user's reviews

4

NRNSWMay 19, 2015

This feature-length sci-fi thriller has all the makings of an excellent short film. If you can get past the lack of dialogue and the lengthy scene shots, you will enjoy this film.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

chwApr 23, 2015

Under the Skin was a very interesting indie flick. I wouldn't say it's a must-see movie, and I wouldn't say many people would enjoy it as much as I did, but people who see this will probably be entertained, at the least.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

gd01skorpiusApr 20, 2015

First: This is not an action movie with lots of special effects and Oscar-winning performances. This movie is super downbeat, cerebral, quiet, and sometimes unsettling. If you get bored easily this movie is not for you. Second: I never readFirst: This is not an action movie with lots of special effects and Oscar-winning performances. This movie is super downbeat, cerebral, quiet, and sometimes unsettling. If you get bored easily this movie is not for you. Second: I never read the book, and if I did I wouldn't rate this movie based on it. With that out of the way I found myself transfixed when watching this movie. To be honest, I think I would have been bored silly watching ScarJo drive around for as much as she did, but the eerie, grindy violin soundtrack was hypnotizing, and the camera work, scene composition, and lighting were quite beautiful. It was a pleasure to watch. These moment of course are punctuated with some very trippy and unsettling scenes where the true nature of the mysterious woman who drives around picking up men is revealed, and the effect it has on her. It's a strange movie, but worth the watch.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

10

truckproductionApr 6, 2015

If I could give this film an 11 I would. Having loved the book I was concerned to hear that Glazier had altered the film narrative. But only a few frames in and I already could tell it was going to be incredible. A film that relies mostly onIf I could give this film an 11 I would. Having loved the book I was concerned to hear that Glazier had altered the film narrative. But only a few frames in and I already could tell it was going to be incredible. A film that relies mostly on the emotional response from the audience to tell the story, many filmgoers won't connect having been so used to the overly absurdist films of today. But this film is a classic. Fantastic… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

0

tommyk154Mar 28, 2015

There is no way this movie was made to be watch while not under the influence. This is the worst, most boring, most stupid movie I've ever seen. There is no plot and no explanation at any point of what's going on. The characters don't haveThere is no way this movie was made to be watch while not under the influence. This is the worst, most boring, most stupid movie I've ever seen. There is no plot and no explanation at any point of what's going on. The characters don't have names and barely speak. The "critics" have no idea what a good movie is, because this certainly isn't one. To be fair it's more like a 2/10 due to Scarlett Johansson's full frontal nudity, but I'm giving it a 0 to balance out the ratings, because all kidding aside this is the worst movie ever made. Like worse than Manos Hands of Fate… Expand

1 of 6 users found this helpful15

All this user's reviews

8

danippMar 13, 2015

A very interesting film about the humanization of an alien. It's quite bizarre what we see on screen and because of that people might dislike it but after the script is being developed you learn how to enjoy it. It's not a typical ET filmA very interesting film about the humanization of an alien. It's quite bizarre what we see on screen and because of that people might dislike it but after the script is being developed you learn how to enjoy it. It's not a typical ET film with a weird creature and a lot of action since Glazer focus on Johansson's killings (they're not violent as you might think) and how she starts to change after a a long time on Earth. With an incredible score, Under the Skin is an amazing film about an alien who starts recognizing itself as a human being and trying to live and act like one. Johansson is magnificent!… Expand

2 of 2 users found this helpful20

All this user's reviews

7

BrushedRedMar 12, 2015

Picked this up tonight because it was $11 at my local MovieStop in addition to the awesome reviews and interesting plot. If you're just wondering if it's good or bad and don't wanna read a review I'll tell you, in short, yes it is good, butPicked this up tonight because it was $11 at my local MovieStop in addition to the awesome reviews and interesting plot. If you're just wondering if it's good or bad and don't wanna read a review I'll tell you, in short, yes it is good, but it's certainly not for everyone.

The movie itself begins with something similar to a 2001-Esque intro. The pacing is very slow, and is hard to keep the casual moviegoers attention, but to art movie fans, there are plenty of symbolic and artistic qualities shown throughout. There are only a few words spoken but the images are very interesting. They sort of give this movie a dreamy quality. Now with all of that said, there isn't much else to say. I probably would've enjoyed it more had I known what to expect, because I certainly wasn't expecting to see what I saw. There is lots and lots AND LOTS of nudity so this isn't a family-gathering type of movie. My friend and I enjoyed it, although the reviews are a bit too high. My sister, who is more casual with movies absolutely loathed it. I say go for it if you're feeing whimsy. It's an interesting piece to say the least.… Expand

7 of 7 users found this helpful70

All this user's reviews

10

DreadLordAvatarMar 12, 2015

Stunning experience - weird, intriguing, mysterious, brilliant, provoking, masterpiece. The audio/sountrack is a key driver in completing the film's visuals and beautiful cinematography. The acting is spot on - love the natural feel of theStunning experience - weird, intriguing, mysterious, brilliant, provoking, masterpiece. The audio/sountrack is a key driver in completing the film's visuals and beautiful cinematography. The acting is spot on - love the natural feel of the victims and Scarlett is brilliant (although I would say there's an imbalance of character when she becomes scared at the end - thinking she should be tougher than humans). McWilliams is totally creepy and perfect, and his biking skills are insane! In one scene where the camera is following him he's pulling away on the camera/car on curvy wet roads and they're going fast...awesome scene, got my heart pumping. They style of this film is similar to Kubrick eerie 2001 and Eyes Wide Shut. I went into watching this film without a shred of knowledge, and I plan to watch it again - love the soundtrack and audio - absolutely eerie and feels out of this world. Beautiful Scotland scenes, touches many human emotions, lots of symbolism, it'll make you think, draw your own conclusions. Highly recommended for those who love contemporary art and film, and have an open mind. Only drawback is wish it was longer. Can't wait for director Jonathan Glazer's next film -- 10/10… Expand

4 of 4 users found this helpful40

All this user's reviews

1

datalogicMar 4, 2015

Poorly explained plot with lots of gaps and heavily deviated from the book.

If aliens have the technology to reach earth then why harvest the odd human here and there - lots of energy used for low returns, surely they would have advancedPoorly explained plot with lots of gaps and heavily deviated from the book.

If aliens have the technology to reach earth then why harvest the odd human here and there - lots of energy used for low returns, surely they would have advanced nano-tech and bioengineering to synthetically produce whatever they want if they can travel the vast distance. Save yourself wasted time and avoid.… Expand

0 of 4 users found this helpful04

All this user's reviews

6

AndreS1974Feb 18, 2015

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Long waitings for those who doesn't like sensorial movies (intentionally dragged) or feel it not so absorbing or whatever lest disgusting. The insensibility of Johansson's character by what is typically human is terrifying. Her wanderings stops in a slaughterhouse art-movie, over a syllogism of fragmented images where the black stuff and the annoying sound are the materialization of the Johansson's human emptiness. Maybe once banished, some experiments for feel like humans (eat, sex) come back to her with disgusting aversion and put she lost in the mist of peculiar human nature. Human cognitive world is as annoying to "they" as the plain life for/of some of us. She then tasted be preyed by weird human inhumanity of a sort of men (as the same of her own kind of fellows). Fixing of human skin by other kind of taxidermist, the visitors wrenching out the resemblance of humanity that is present in all men for disguise of some. There is a strong appeal in this experimental movie, cumbersome and disturbing.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

0

MurrayTFeb 7, 2015

The only good thing about this movie is that it allowed me to replace Saw 3 as the worst movie I've ever seen. If someone wanted to torture me they'd just have to make me watch this completely useless and pointless piece of crap again.

1 of 5 users found this helpful14

All this user's reviews

9

PureTJan 27, 2015

The scene-to-scene change was almost TOO obtuse, so that it was close to confusing rather than cool and bizarro (suddenly the beach scene appeared and who was who and was that person drowning?) but the movie was still fascinating and theThe scene-to-scene change was almost TOO obtuse, so that it was close to confusing rather than cool and bizarro (suddenly the beach scene appeared and who was who and was that person drowning?) but the movie was still fascinating and the ending was great - once I saw the ending, I started making sense of the rest of it.
It is the kind of movie I think about long after I've watched it - a rarity these days! The music really added too it...my non-sci fi pal announced that she was falling asleep but stuck it out.… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

9

OpinionatedGuyJan 25, 2015

If you wanted to see this movie just because of Scarlett Johansson and you don’t really like slow-paced movies, then I am afraid you should see another movie.

For me, I enjoyed this movie despite its slow-paced story. I never expected toIf you wanted to see this movie just because of Scarlett Johansson and you don’t really like slow-paced movies, then I am afraid you should see another movie.

For me, I enjoyed this movie despite its slow-paced story. I never expected to be immersed watching this movie as its plot slowly unveils itself.

There might have been many interpretations what this movie is about so in my own interpretation, the story is told from an alien humanoid point of view of what human life is like and how she tries to adapt the world around her. I wouldn’t be surprised if this is what the movie is trying to tell.

The best part about this movie was its direction and cinematography. It’s what made this movie worth my time to watch thanks to its eye appealing cinematography. Not to forget is the score of this movie in which enhances the movie experience for me so much that it literally gave me chills in the backbone.

Scarlett Johansson played her role brilliantly in a very ambitious art house movie. She is a very good listener on what the director wants her to do and she had a good improvise timing on many scenes where she has to improvise. She shows that she isn’t just some actress with a pretty face, she is a serious actress who will do what’s tasked to her.

Under The Skin is a great art-house movie with great performance and on screen presence of Scarlett Johansson and eye-appealing cinematography and direction but this movie is not for everyone to see.… Expand

2 of 2 users found this helpful20

All this user's reviews

3

LynJan 18, 2015

Do they give a Weirdest Film Oscar? We have a winner! I get it -- critics looove Scarlett Johansson, whether they get to see her naked body (this film) or are forced to imagine it ("Her"). And she is luminous in this arty movie ...Do they give a Weirdest Film Oscar? We have a winner! I get it -- critics looove Scarlett Johansson, whether they get to see her naked body (this film) or are forced to imagine it ("Her"). And she is luminous in this arty movie ... drivingdrivingdriving stripping, drivingdrivingdriving stripping, fastening her alien eyes on gullible Earthlings willing to follow her anywhere. The creepy-crackly soundtrack is apt but can't quite make up for the lack of meaningful dialogue. If I hadn't read about the sci-fi subtext, I would have been even more mystified, and that's my main problem with the film. If it doesn't make sense without advance research, something's wrong.… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

0

virginiaproudJan 10, 2015

I absolutely loved this book but the movie, what a waste of time. After the the first 15 mins I discovered you can fast forward this entire film at 2x and not miss a thing. Everything is so agonisingly drawn out and with absence of anyI absolutely loved this book but the movie, what a waste of time. After the the first 15 mins I discovered you can fast forward this entire film at 2x and not miss a thing. Everything is so agonisingly drawn out and with absence of any meaningful dialogue it actually feels like you're watching in normal time! The whole thing is Scarlett driving or standing with a dopey slack jawed expression - it's not remotely sexy or entertaining to watch her, nothing is conveyed, and not even for the occasional absence of her clothes is it worth sitting though this huge stinking pile or nonsense.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

9

RMckayJan 4, 2015

Although I found it to be a tad more puzzling than need be to convey such a simple tale, the imagery pays off in silver dollars. Scarlett plays a very sterile creature and although its' one of her most low on dialogue roles, actions speakAlthough I found it to be a tad more puzzling than need be to convey such a simple tale, the imagery pays off in silver dollars. Scarlett plays a very sterile creature and although its' one of her most low on dialogue roles, actions speak louder than words in this beautifully twisted tale of morality.… Expand

2 of 2 users found this helpful20

All this user's reviews

10

TrevorDevendorfDec 22, 2014

Visually stunning. Breath-taking. The overall story amazed me, and it's the weirdest i've ever witnessed in a film, esp. with Scarlett Johansson. Despite Scarlett's nudity, the mysteriousness behind what she is intrigued me the most. TheVisually stunning. Breath-taking. The overall story amazed me, and it's the weirdest i've ever witnessed in a film, esp. with Scarlett Johansson. Despite Scarlett's nudity, the mysteriousness behind what she is intrigued me the most. The director and writer, Jonathan Glazer brought the novel of the same name to life, although i didn't read the book, i still fell in love with this film, everything a guy like me could ask for Thriller, Sci-Fi, with Scarlett Johansson.… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

10

RamonGuerreroDec 18, 2014

An amazing erotic and metaphorical journey about the true meaning of beauty and the analyse of what it is to be a human being, by the hand of a mind blowing performance by Scarlett Johansson, and a terrific score.
Everything here just worksAn amazing erotic and metaphorical journey about the true meaning of beauty and the analyse of what it is to be a human being, by the hand of a mind blowing performance by Scarlett Johansson, and a terrific score.
Everything here just works perfectly.… Expand

2 of 2 users found this helpful20

All this user's reviews

8

oDjentoDec 14, 2014

This film is visually beautiful, with it's eerie atmosphere with deception theough seduction looming over so many scenes. Scarlett Johansson's performace is certainly one of her most interesting she's done. This film does have a lot ofThis film is visually beautiful, with it's eerie atmosphere with deception theough seduction looming over so many scenes. Scarlett Johansson's performace is certainly one of her most interesting she's done. This film does have a lot of ambiguity to it though as not all is explained clearly or concluded properly, but nevertheless this film is a cinematic gem and should definitely be pick up!… Expand

2 of 2 users found this helpful20

All this user's reviews

9

BikerjamesDec 12, 2014

I was mesmerized the entire movie. Thank God for directors that don't rely on a heavy classical soundtrack that annoys and distracts. Natural noises, such as wind blowing, footsteps, clocks ticking are far more effective. When music wasI was mesmerized the entire movie. Thank God for directors that don't rely on a heavy classical soundtrack that annoys and distracts. Natural noises, such as wind blowing, footsteps, clocks ticking are far more effective. When music was used it was creepy and atmospheric. The bleak Scottish cityscapes and natural beauty only added to the atmosphere. There are scenes in the film I will never forget. I thought Scarlett Johansson was terrific, although I'm already a big fan of hers. I don't need a complete story tied up in a bow for satisfaction, this little slice of Sci Fi was excellent. My only small critiques was that the story of an alien or robot becoming sympathetic to humans has been done before many times, and the Scottish accents were so heavy I couldn't understand some of the dialogue, but it was not distracting enough to ruin my enjoyment. Not for everyone but if it is your style you will love it. A director to watch for sure.… Expand

2 of 2 users found this helpful20

All this user's reviews

2

finetunesDec 8, 2014

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I rated it a 2 because of Scarlett Johansson; if it had been Melissa McCarthy I would have given it a zero.
The main message of this movie is that life (and this movie) is long, lonely and boring unless you are having sex.
A "man cave" is one thing but an "alien cave" is a whole different matter.
One of the messages the movie conveys (which every man knows and no woman will ever believe) is that a man doesn't care what a woman's house looks like, just as long as he's gonna get laid.
There was another very enlightening concept in the movie - when S.J's character is in the restaurant and all the patrons turn and stare at her and realize that she is an alien because humans never gag on dessert.
Spoiler alert: Scarlett Johansson's character was played by a black person!… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

10

dukstufNov 24, 2014

Easily the smartest and most interesting film I've seen in 2014. Scarlett Johansson offers a brilliant performance- subtle at the start with an increasing sense of emotional peril as she loses her "human" exterior but seems to gain an innerEasily the smartest and most interesting film I've seen in 2014. Scarlett Johansson offers a brilliant performance- subtle at the start with an increasing sense of emotional peril as she loses her "human" exterior but seems to gain an inner humanity.

The story follows her change from heartless, unemotional and detached alien doing her job of collecting specimens, (or skins) for an unsaid nefarious purpose, to her bonding with humanity to the point that she betrays her employer/fellow aliens as she tries to rather hopelessly join the local earthlings and taste the joys and pains of humanity.

The film handles this in such an abstract and original way that it takes effort to keep up. It is not a film for those who want to leer at naked Johansson- which results in the negative scores, which, if you think about it, is really funny.

This is a film of the quality found in the directorial hands of a very few directors- Antonio and Kubrick spring to mind. It demands we watch it at it's own pace, and it moves away from the regular trappings of standard sci-fi fare into more artsy, thinking realms.

The performances of many of Scarlett's male victims seem natural and unforced- you really get the feeling she is preying upon people on our "real earth" as we pass through shopping malls and drab, regular, lower middle class places. This wildly complements the scenes aboard the alien's den, which are stark, artistically blank canvases. The effect is jarring and unsettling.

Some viewers complain about a "lack of story", but I didn't find this true at all. Johansson's brilliant double metamorphosis from lovely perfect human exterior with it's cold, calculating inhuman interior, into just the opposite- an alien monstrosity which now possesses empathy, joy, curiosity, pity and fear- is a might and moving transformation, and for this viewer, following this path is what gives Under the Skin it's unique look at the human condition, from a perspective I had not visited before.

And that is what film, when it is art, is all about.
Beautiful and horrific at the same time, this magnificent film reminds me of that similar balance of humanity and terror found in the equally wonderful Swedish vampire film, Let the Right One In.

This movie is for those who like real contemplation after their films- definitely not for the quickie gore/sexy nude actress crowd, nor the thrill ride set either, and I expect having Scarlett in the lead role, and the knowledge that she bares all here, (more than most actors ever will in the most extraordinary ways), probably has led many to expect an entirely different sort of experience than this smart, beautifully original motion picture.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

2

SpangleNov 22, 2014

Under the Skin is a great example of a film that wants to be more than it is, which ruins what it is. The film wanted to be very elusive and deep, but ultimately wound up being incredibly dull and uninteresting. On top of that, it wasUnder the Skin is a great example of a film that wants to be more than it is, which ruins what it is. The film wanted to be very elusive and deep, but ultimately wound up being incredibly dull and uninteresting. On top of that, it was essentially like eavesdropping on a conversation between two people you do not know and you hear one of them tell the other a story. Along the way, you pick up some details and know what is going on, but you never really feel involved in the conversation and, ultimately, the story does not really have any kind of impact on you. That is this film. It tried so hard to be deep that it never really made you feel involved and care about the characters involved. On top of that, it never truly develops any character, namely because it never established any of them. This one did nothing with its characters for many reasons, the main one to me being that they wanted it to seem more artsy than it truly was, which was off-putting.

Now, there are some positives, namely the incredible cinematography. There are some seriously gorgeous shots in this one that truly floored me to the point that I really wanted to love this film. Scarlett Johansson was also very good here, even though her lines were limited. As a whole, Under the Skin is a beautiful film that lacks any true substance or quality beyond its looks. There is nothing under the skin about this one.… Expand

0 of 4 users found this helpful04

All this user's reviews

0

makdrumzNov 22, 2014

This is the worst piece of sh1t i 've ever watched in my life. DO NOT WASTE your precious hours of life, watching this abomination. Even thinking about it makes me wanna puke. You may thank me in advance.

4 of 9 users found this helpful45

All this user's reviews

7

LINUSSPACEHEADNov 20, 2014

I can't help it I loved this movie. Great visually. Excellent creepy sounds and music score. Looking back however I wish the plot and some scenes were understandable. I know it's based on a novel but a film should be able to stand on it's ownI can't help it I loved this movie. Great visually. Excellent creepy sounds and music score. Looking back however I wish the plot and some scenes were understandable. I know it's based on a novel but a film should be able to stand on it's own in telling it's story.
I understand some things can be left to our imagination,
but 1)what happened to the swimmer?
2)what in the hell went down with the diseased man?
3)Why was there a small group of aliens (human form/bikers) already there?
So I will be a bit shocked if this gets a best picture nomination although I loved it anyway.
I mean there are critics raving about this movie as one of the best of the year. Seriously? I mean did seeing Scarlet naked really rock some of these critic's worlds that much or what?… Expand

4 of 5 users found this helpful41

All this user's reviews

10

SatiricalewokNov 7, 2014

Really, this film is flawless. Scarlett Johansson is fantastic, as in fact are all of the supporting cast members. Visually it is one of the most stunning and captivating films I have ever seen. The soundtrack alone makes this film a cutReally, this film is flawless. Scarlett Johansson is fantastic, as in fact are all of the supporting cast members. Visually it is one of the most stunning and captivating films I have ever seen. The soundtrack alone makes this film a cut above the rest. And it also contains strong emotional moments, I cried at I think three separate points of the film, all for different reasons.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

10

TheZeroPercentOct 28, 2014

Wow! This movie is cool! It has a slightly slow start, and it's a touch low budget, but, the movie as a whole is a true cinematic masterpiece! If you like your sci-fi mixed with your horror, AND a lil thrill, don't even think twice, rent this one!

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

0

sponkeymonkeyOct 24, 2014

Dumbest movie ever
Biggest waste of time in my life
Nothing good ever happend in this movie Just when you think it might have a slite chance of picking up and something interesting is going to happen...BOOM,,,it doesnt Ugh i was so dangDumbest movie ever
Biggest waste of time in my life
Nothing good ever happend in this movie
Just when you think it might have a slite chance of picking up and something interesting is going to happen...BOOM,,,it doesnt
Ugh i was so dang mad when this ended. HORRIBLE HORRIBLE movie… Expand

4 of 7 users found this helpful43

All this user's reviews

5

SolidJakeOct 22, 2014

While I was extremely disappointed at the end of the movie, I don't want to give a scathing review. This film is meant to be watched several times. It's meant to be studied, and I didn't study it.

As a work of art, this movie shines. As aWhile I was extremely disappointed at the end of the movie, I don't want to give a scathing review. This film is meant to be watched several times. It's meant to be studied, and I didn't study it.

As a work of art, this movie shines. As a science-fiction movie, this movie fails utterly. The science fiction aspects are cast aside, as if the details are unimportant. Who are they? Where are they from? What are they doing? What do they want? If you're watching the film as a piece of art, the answers don't really matter. But as someone who enjoys science fiction, the film ended prematurely before most of the questions were answered, or in some ways even addressed.

Under The Skin's merit lies almost entirely in its subtle, deeper analysis. As a viewer, we're not expected to enjoy the movie without a considerable amount of effort on our part. This is not to say that all movies should spoon-feed a plot to the viewer, but I think there is a healthy balance between story-telling and allegory, and this film seems miss that happy medium.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

9

DenisManuOct 12, 2014

Mysterious and mind-blowing after you unlocked it,Under the Skin is a fantastic Sci-Fi & Fantasy movie,centered on human kind's perspective of beauty.

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

10

chirobenSep 30, 2014

Simple flow diagram for this movie:

Do you like Arthouse movies? | | Yes No |Simple flow diagram for this movie:

Do you like Arthouse movies?

| |

Yes No

| |

Do you like Scarlett Johanssen? Do you like Scarlett Johanssen?

| | | |

Yes No Yes No

| | | |

Watch this film Watch this film Don't watch this film Don't watch this film… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

1

LesfromSanDiegoSep 28, 2014

The king's not wearing any clothes! Really, can't believe that the critics like this movie so much. Reminded me of a Bergman movie with less happening or "Waiting for Godot" with no dialogue. No story. No moral. Many loose ends. HighlyThe king's not wearing any clothes! Really, can't believe that the critics like this movie so much. Reminded me of a Bergman movie with less happening or "Waiting for Godot" with no dialogue. No story. No moral. Many loose ends. Highly recommend you skip this movie even if it is free.… Expand

2 of 5 users found this helpful23

All this user's reviews

8

emeraldcitySep 4, 2014

A genuinely disturbing science fiction movie unlike anything else I have ever seen. Good work. It's nice to see Scarlet Johansson doing something a bit out of the ordinary since she came to the public eye like most young women in film-doingA genuinely disturbing science fiction movie unlike anything else I have ever seen. Good work. It's nice to see Scarlet Johansson doing something a bit out of the ordinary since she came to the public eye like most young women in film-doing more girlie type movies that were meant for audiences of young women. That being well and good I liked the ending of this movie and they way they portrayed the aliens as something truly alien that we basically couldn't communicate with at all. Might be like that. I liked the scenery of Scotland also. I think that them shooting it there was a good idea as it gave the project a feeling of otherness somehow. Go see it, but don't go alone.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

4

beingryanjudeSep 4, 2014

I'm left needing something more... despite a masterful performance from Scarlett Johansson. Under the Skin takes a look at an alien taken human form as Scarlett Johansson somewhere in Scotland over the course of a week. That's about allI'm left needing something more... despite a masterful performance from Scarlett Johansson. Under the Skin takes a look at an alien taken human form as Scarlett Johansson somewhere in Scotland over the course of a week. That's about all you'll take away from this one.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

9

PhoferSep 2, 2014

A fantastic surrealist film. Very scary and thought provoking. Scarlett Johanson does a good job of beeing attractive, scary and heartbraking. One you must need to think about a lot after you see it.

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

10

pianocomposerAug 24, 2014

I saw this movie and initially liked it very much but became concerned because it overlooked some obvious problems with the narrative especially towards the end where 1) somehow the ugly man escapes, and 2) something scares her in the cabinI saw this movie and initially liked it very much but became concerned because it overlooked some obvious problems with the narrative especially towards the end where 1) somehow the ugly man escapes, and 2) something scares her in the cabin in the woods. The more I think about it, though, these details do not matter. The viewer is given room to think for themselves and I appreciated the opportunity to fill in the gaps myself. Most of the movie provides enough information to draw general conclusions and powerful emotions. Some people will hate it because this is a sensual rather than a narrative experience. People expect stories and this is more like an out of body experience. I found it fascinating. I learned things about people, about humanity. We are good. We are lustful. We are kind. We are ugly. We are stupid. We are beautiful. We are tragic.

I will give a positive rating to any movie that is unforgettable. Or a movie that can change the way I see humanity. I think the scene where she leaves the baby on the beach will stay with me forever. And the conversation she has with the ugly man and her decision to run away after his escape. These scenes were powerful, logical, and downright fascinating. I can’t stop thinking about this movie.

It was disturbing to see humanity through the lens of this thing that walked among us in such a friendly city. That she was looking for lonely men made her less despicable. That she attempted to fit in for a while and try to live among us was both charming and pathetic. What happened at the end of the movie made sense, because she didn’t fit in. She was objectified by men… brought out the worst in most (but the best in others).

Art is left up for interpretation, and I think this qualifies. People will either hate or love this movie. It was too over-simplified to mask its deficits with confusing b.s. … it did not attempt to hide its flaws. It was deliberately made this way, whether you liked it or not. I liked it better than most movies i have ever seen. It gave me new insights. It got under my skin.… Expand

4 of 6 users found this helpful42

All this user's reviews

7

AtheusGMAug 23, 2014

I don't know what I watched, I fell asleep while watching it. Though I remember a lot of "buzz" sound which made me extremely sleepy over the movie. Good thing I also waked up when the film started to actually play what it was playing soI don't know what I watched, I fell asleep while watching it. Though I remember a lot of "buzz" sound which made me extremely sleepy over the movie. Good thing I also waked up when the film started to actually play what it was playing so let's see.
Firstly I need to say that this movie IS artistic. Being very VERY weird. The storyline is not a storyline, the characters are not characters and so long! Actually; the characters aren't very detailed. May that Scarlett Johnson played in this movie as the main character, this didn't make the movie better. It was a very creepy movie some times or rather boring at the start. The soundtrack is the part of the creepiness and also the idea. The storyline is also not very detailed but very well placed and I liked, to be honest, it's idea. Not a very good movie, a short one but a rather fascinating one. I don't know if this should be like a recommending review but it's your choice.… Expand

1 of 5 users found this helpful14

All this user's reviews

7

pedvieAug 22, 2014

Spoiler alert: quite intentional that Scarlett Johansson would be cast as the otherworldly predator sent to capture human men. She is such a stunning example of the human female form, that there would be no need for extraterrestrial powers.Spoiler alert: quite intentional that Scarlett Johansson would be cast as the otherworldly predator sent to capture human men. She is such a stunning example of the human female form, that there would be no need for extraterrestrial powers. Her naked body (displayed at length in the movie) is all that's necessary to get the average heterosexual male to follow her anywhere. : )

Now on to the review. For those who are fans of the Faber novel - on which this movie is based - don't expect to know what in the hell the book is all about. I had to look up the Cliff notes. The movie is a stylistic, art house, abstract adaptation of the book. Sort of like a trip to the MoMA rather than the Met. Is you're in the mindset...you'll enjoy it. It's well acted, well written and generally well put together. Thought provoking, powerful imagery are the strongest points of the movie. Overall, a memorable piece of film worth watching.… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

2

ilovegames32Aug 22, 2014

I've watched and enjoyed movies like rubber, anti-christ and even kung pow:fist of legend but this? I just couldn't get into it at all. I think you have to make up your own story since there isn't one here...is she an alien? a demon? a witchI've watched and enjoyed movies like rubber, anti-christ and even kung pow:fist of legend but this? I just couldn't get into it at all. I think you have to make up your own story since there isn't one here...is she an alien? a demon? a witch maybe? take your pic and run with it because i guess that's the point! she spends most of the movie driving around trying(and occasionally succeeding) to pick up guys,takes them to her.....home? dark void? black abyss filled with water maybe? heck if i know, but i do know that once these poor souls went in, they never returned for you see, they willingly(hypnotized? their body was numb once they entered her home and couldn't feel the water....maybe?) walked into the water and....well, they didn't drown but instead, had their skin taken, actually, all of their organs were removed and only the skin remained. At first i was wondering why she (it?) was killing since theirs seems to be no apparent reason but later i assumed "it" needed the skin of men but the last 25+ minutes of the movie has her(it?) roaming around aimlessly, riding buses, not being able to have sex for some strange reason,almost getting raped,getting gas thrown on her only to die a fiery death in a snow filled forest...... this movie just sucked since you havent the slightest idea of what's happening in front of you, it's like the director said....hey we'll just roll with it and hope the audience gets it! I just couldn't get into it, i just couldn't like this movie at all. 2/10… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

7

eyeteethAug 18, 2014

Enigmatic, slow, repetitive film, but at least offers a bit of a "surprise" at the end. Yet after watching the film I wondered if it was even worth trying to figure it out. Wish Johansson had saved the nude scenes for a better film. Anyway,Enigmatic, slow, repetitive film, but at least offers a bit of a "surprise" at the end. Yet after watching the film I wondered if it was even worth trying to figure it out. Wish Johansson had saved the nude scenes for a better film. Anyway, what does it all mean? One possible clue, I think, lies in a very brief, but pointed mention of the upcoming Referendum for Scotland and the possibility of independence from England. When considering who the characters are and the plot, this wider political context made sense to me. So, for me the film is a parable about the shedding of a colonial power for national independence. Interesting how "woman" figures in such anti-colonial narratives. But your guess is as good as mine!… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

9

FilipanOtinanAug 18, 2014

Personally, I Wont Take The Path Of Pretentious Criticism & Multivariate Jargon, But I Want To Point That the movie is radiant example of contemporary cinema, away from the typical sci-fi manifestations, and even from recent cinematicPersonally, I Wont Take The Path Of Pretentious Criticism & Multivariate Jargon, But I Want To Point That the movie is radiant example of contemporary cinema, away from the typical sci-fi manifestations, and even from recent cinematic expression in its totality.

If u want good, creative, inspiring cinema please do ur self a favour and watch the movie. If u want something else, widely approachable and easily "consumable" I suggest you better tune ur self to Godzilla, or Transformers. Have fun what ever u choose.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

5

HeadroomAug 10, 2014

Under the Skin was generally disappointing, but if you don't mind watching a movie that gets really confusing and never explains anything it might fit your taste.

The visual aspects of the film were nice, but the overall composition andUnder the Skin was generally disappointing, but if you don't mind watching a movie that gets really confusing and never explains anything it might fit your taste.

The visual aspects of the film were nice, but the overall composition and artistic direction were mild at best. That said, it did provide some thought provoking perspectives on male and female relations.… Expand

3 of 6 users found this helpful33

All this user's reviews

2

EludiumQ36Aug 9, 2014

There are people that dig this style of weird, mostly silent, long-scene film and there are those like me, that don't. If you're going to use this style, which taxes the hell out of one's attention, then there has to be a big payoff of someThere are people that dig this style of weird, mostly silent, long-scene film and there are those like me, that don't. If you're going to use this style, which taxes the hell out of one's attention, then there has to be a big payoff of some sort, and that's what this lacked. Hence, it's mostly a waste of your time. I'd wager reading the source material would be better.… Expand

2 of 5 users found this helpful23

All this user's reviews

6

Trev29Aug 5, 2014

If you just roll with it, it is intriguing and kind of fun. However, there were just too many moments of sheer nothingness that detracted from this otherwise good movie.

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

0

csw12Aug 3, 2014

Besides the fact the movie made absolutely no sense, there were scenes were literally nothing was happening. The silence throughout the movie begins to grow painful and combine that with a monotonous pace and horrible images and you have oneBesides the fact the movie made absolutely no sense, there were scenes were literally nothing was happening. The silence throughout the movie begins to grow painful and combine that with a monotonous pace and horrible images and you have one of the worst movies of the year.… Expand

10 of 12 users found this helpful102

All this user's reviews

0

wallaceja09Aug 2, 2014

The whole move is a complete disappointment for me. It starts slow, and I would say it ends slow, but there really isn't much of an ending. But whatever it does in the final minutes of the movie, it does that slow as well.

I understandThe whole move is a complete disappointment for me. It starts slow, and I would say it ends slow, but there really isn't much of an ending. But whatever it does in the final minutes of the movie, it does that slow as well.

I understand that many people see much that is deep visually and metaphorically, but lets be real. This movie was not about entertainment. I don't know what anyone saw in any scene to be called "beautiful" or when exactly the plot was "mindblowing" because it simply never did anything for me.

The plot was simple, unoriginal. The music was fitting (I guess) since it matched the movie's content (of which there was very little). Now while I do like many of the modern action films full of explosions, I also really love anything that makes me think. This one only made me think of why I bothered sitting through this entire movie. Again, nothing was visually all that appealing. Special effects at times reminded me either of a movie made in the 60s or 70s or perhaps just a super crappy 80s B movie.

Bash modern films as you will, but they were certainly much more appealing visually than this one. Personally there was more depth to the script, the visuals, the effects, the story, the everything in a movie like Transformers (gasps all around), and I only watch those movies to watch explosions! I don't even expect good acting or good stories out of the Transformer movies, but wow they really beat up on Under the Skin in every conceivable way.

I guess if you want an awkward movie that is predictable, that gives you nothing, that makes you consider sleeping or turning it off, look no further because it's here.… Expand

6 of 12 users found this helpful66

All this user's reviews

0

behtAug 1, 2014

My mind is absolutely blown by the positive reviews of this insufferable movie. When I read the positive reviews from some folks saying, "Nothing happens in this movie," I thought great, I'll probably love it, as I loved the Tree of Life byMy mind is absolutely blown by the positive reviews of this insufferable movie. When I read the positive reviews from some folks saying, "Nothing happens in this movie," I thought great, I'll probably love it, as I loved the Tree of Life by Terrence Mallick. No I don't need a plot, no I don't mind a slow movie, yes, I love an elusive movie.

This is some of those things but so, so much less! People seem to be satisfied with, wonderful shots, such as the child on the beach. "That was a unique shot." To them I say SO WHAT!? Go to a gallery then to stare at some wonderful photographs or paintings. I don't mind lack of narrative, but this movie has lack of interest, lack of anything. No, you don't have to be a Hollywood movie lover to "not get" this movie or to never want to watch it again, or to recommend it to no one.… Expand

8 of 11 users found this helpful83

All this user's reviews

10

lmorseJul 29, 2014

My favourite film so far this year. The atmosphere is creepy, tense and disturbing. It says a huge amount with elegance and economy. It forces the viewer to think and evaluate, come to their own conclusions and (probably) fill in the gapsMy favourite film so far this year. The atmosphere is creepy, tense and disturbing. It says a huge amount with elegance and economy. It forces the viewer to think and evaluate, come to their own conclusions and (probably) fill in the gaps with their own fears and short-comings. I should also mention that the soundtrack is perfectly fitting.
I would not recommend the film for people who enjoy the usual Hollywood fare of spectacle and explosion. If you enjoyed movies like those of Andrei Tarkovsky, you will love this. Scarlett Johansson is once again beguiling and stunning. An amazing movie!… Expand

4 of 6 users found this helpful42

All this user's reviews

0

elvenkingJul 28, 2014

That was like a torture. 80% of this film was standing still Scarlett Johansson, still images and boring driving scenes. I'll never buy a blu-ray disk by the combined metaciritic-user score (78 metaciritic and 6.9 user by now). if you likeThat was like a torture. 80% of this film was standing still Scarlett Johansson, still images and boring driving scenes. I'll never buy a blu-ray disk by the combined metaciritic-user score (78 metaciritic and 6.9 user by now). if you like sci-fi movies, don`t watch it. If you like drama movies don`t watch it.
- If you like nonsense and torture.
- If you want to be the first person to like a movie that none of your friend liked before.
- Or if you want to impress a person because you`ve watched a sci-fi - drama - art movie
then even in this situations don`t watch.
Read a detailed spoiler and just 50x fastplay, without sound watch it. First half of the film was a greater torture. I considered minimum 4 times quit watching and countless times fast forwarding (That was first time in my life). God please help me to forget this experience. What a waste of time… Expand

8 of 12 users found this helpful84

All this user's reviews

10

FutureMugglesJul 27, 2014

This will split the community into those expecting the Nude-Avengers and those seeking esoteric Arthouse. It belongs firmly in the latter and is top-line. Johansson shows again what she is capable of when given the opportunity to develop aThis will split the community into those expecting the Nude-Avengers and those seeking esoteric Arthouse. It belongs firmly in the latter and is top-line. Johansson shows again what she is capable of when given the opportunity to develop a character (see Lost in Translation).

With little dialogue, the interactions of the characters are intensified into a choreography and the story, itself almost banal, is just a space in which to dance. There will not be a sequel and both sides of the community will be grateful, but for very different reasons.… Expand

4 of 6 users found this helpful42

All this user's reviews

10

DigmasterJul 26, 2014

Yes, that is a 10 rating. Why? Because it is refreshing to see a film that relies on the exercising of our cerebrums rather than satisfying the "lizard" parts of our brain with non-stop action, gratuitous sex, and over-the-top CGIYes, that is a 10 rating. Why? Because it is refreshing to see a film that relies on the exercising of our cerebrums rather than satisfying the "lizard" parts of our brain with non-stop action, gratuitous sex, and over-the-top CGI animation. Ironically, it is exactly that older, basic part of our brain to which the hapless victims in this film succumb, lured by the de-glammed and striking natural beauty of Scarlett Johansson, an apparent alien known to the viewers and her prey as "Laura." At times both mesmerizing and repulsive, Laura is both succubus and protagonist as we ride this existential roller-coaster to a surprising yet oddly appropriate conclusion. I will admit that your average sci-fi addict may find this film a bit to "artsy," but this movie is much more than a science fiction about aliens who have developed a fondness for human flesh tartare (a far too common theme). This film is more of a mirror reflecting back a sobering view of the human condition, both at its worst and at its best.

When the film starts as a small point of light in the distance surrounded by total darkness, growing ever larger until it is large enough to morph into what appears to be a surreal image of birth, then followed by a transformation into an eclipse and then a human pupil and iris. The accompanying musical score is both irritating and eerie, a combination that makes the viewer edgy and fixated on the imagery. I couldn't help but immediately think of certain scenes from Stanley Kurbrick's "2001: A Space Odyssey," a stylistic homage not lost on many viewers and critics, it seems. Next we see a fully safety-suited motorcyclist (the suit almost reminds one of a space garment) retrieve the body of a young woman (Scarlett Johansson) from what appears to be a ditch on the side of the road. The next scene is of this body placed on a lighted floor being stripped by a naked woman (also Ms. Johansson) who then puts on her clothes just as we see a single tear coming from the left eye and running down the cheek of the newly naked woman on the floor. The alien woman (but is she really a woman?) now has the appearance of the doomed female on the floor. From this point forward, "Laura" drives about Glasgow in a white, windowless van selecting her prey (young men) like an urban-camouflaged jaguar. She feigns being lost, a ploy that allows her to interview various men on the street, making sure they meet the right profile (young, strong, single, childless, live alone), then seductively offers them a ride that ends horribly for each victim who passes through the entry way to her home. Once inside, the seductive dance continues as Laura, well ahead of her duped would-be lover, continues to strip in an endless dark space covered by a jet-black, shining floor. Her amorous suitors, following entranced, also de-cloth, and soon the floor turns into black liquid that engulfs each one, at which point Laura gathers up her discarded apparel on what to her is a still solid floor. At one point the director allows us to see the fate that awaits those who become encased in this pool, and it is one of the most horrific scenes in cinematic history, and also where we learn one of the meanings of the film's title .

Ultimately, the huntress Laura lures a facially disfigured man into her inescapable liquid web, but then allows him to leave even after he becomes submerged, the first evidence of compassion exhibited by the alien (As an illustration of just how devoid of compassion these visitors can be, in an earlier scene, Laura is chatting up a foreign surfer on the beach as a woman tries to save her drowning dog from the raging surf, her husband then tries to save her, then finally the surfer tries to save the husband, but fails, only to wash up on the beach to be clubbed over the head by Laura and dragged off to her van, as the family's infant is left crying, now alone on the beach. The abandoned child is still there, hours later, when the motorcycle man shows up to clean up the crime scene, completely ignoring the child.). After letting the one man escape (her act of mercy later thwarted by the motorcycle driver), something changes, leaving Laura in a semi-catatonic state, abandoning her van and wandering aimlessly through Glasgow and into the country side where a well-meaning man takes here in and tries to nurse her back to health. It is at this point she seems to awaken to the fact that humans are more than haute cuisine. It is also following this epiphany that she is exposed to both the best and worst aspects of human behavior, the final consequences of the latter that lead to her demise.

I found this movie refreshing, chilling, artistically brilliant, and thought provoking. Scarlett Johansson was the perfect combination of feline seductress and passionless, other-worldly entity that slowly transforms into confused catatonia as she begins to develop empathy for her former prey.… Expand

4 of 6 users found this helpful42

All this user's reviews

8

TheRimRiderJul 25, 2014

Artistically brilliant. This will become a cult film whose reputation will rise in the years ahead. There are some stunning scenes, particularly the one involving the ocean. The film maintains the essence of the book yet makes its own way.Artistically brilliant. This will become a cult film whose reputation will rise in the years ahead. There are some stunning scenes, particularly the one involving the ocean. The film maintains the essence of the book yet makes its own way. Kudos to the director and Johansson for such brave choices. A great film.… Expand

4 of 5 users found this helpful41

All this user's reviews

5

clayscottbrownJul 21, 2014

Creepy little movie with a Big Star Scarlett Johansson, she rides around in a Van picking up men then takes them to a weird little shack where they sink and die, like quicksand... it's boring ... and very slow, kind of interesting though...Creepy little movie with a Big Star Scarlett Johansson, she rides around in a Van picking up men then takes them to a weird little shack where they sink and die, like quicksand... it's boring ... and very slow, kind of interesting though... as at the end she sheds her skin as it were....

If you're not an Intellectual you'll hate this...

Based on a book by Michel Faber.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews