Transformers: Dark of the Moon

5

JonnyFendiMay 1, 2012

If most of the girls go crazy about THE TWILIGHT SAGA (2008-2012), I think it is totally OK if the boys have their own toys as well! All the boys need is insanely super cool robots and sexy girls. Thiz one is the third movie followingIf most of the girls go crazy about THE TWILIGHT SAGA (2008-2012), I think it is totally OK if the boys have their own toys as well! All the boys need is insanely super cool robots and sexy girls. Thiz one is the third movie following TRANSFORMERS (2007) and TRASNFORMERS: REVENGE OF THE FALLEN (2009). The story still revolves around Sam Witwicky (Shia LaBeouf) and his new super sexy girlfriend Carly Spencer (Rosie Huntington-Whiteley). Thiz time, they have to deal with the mysterious origin of Autobots and Decepticons which later takes them to a hidden fact when Apollo 11 landed on dark side of the moon 42 years ago. The movie featuring a real hero of that historical event, the second person who had ever landed on moon, Edwin Buzz Aldrin. The Director is still Michael Bay. I aware that Michael Bay always has a young spirit as it has shown in every of his films, even in his war movie like PEARL HARBOR (2001). But I also have to say most of his movies are always filled with exaggerated brainless actions and comically overacted characters like in BAD BOYS (1995), THE ROCK (1996) and ARMAGEDDON (1998). If not because of Steven Spielberg involvement as Executive Producer that contributes a lot of technical elements, I think thiz would have been a very easily forgotten movie. Yes, the details of Special Effects are incredible. It is very clear that the main attraction is on its robots. The Autobots comprises the famous yellow Camaro called Bumblebee alongside with Ironhide, Ratchet, Sideswipe, Dino, Brains, Wheelie and the leader Optimus Prime, all are back in action to fight for freedom. And the villainous side named Decepticon which comprises Starscream, Shockwave, Soundwave, Laserbeak and the head Megatron that still dreams of tyranny. The robots are voiced by some notable Actors such as Hugo Weaving as Megatron and Star Trek Mr. Spock, Leonard Nimoy as Sentinel Prime. Thiz is one of the very rare cases in which the robots act better than the Actors itself. All actors are drawn to be unnecessary comical characters without exception include John Malkovich, Patrick Dempsey, John Turturro, Frances McDormand, Ken Jeong and Tyrese Gibson. For the model Rosie Huntington-Whiteley, she has the same color of lipstick and hair, it does not mean that she can instantly replace Megan Fox character. You can see she is there only to provide the visual pleasure, not acting. Julie White repeats her overacted performance as Sam mother, you can see that is one of the ugliest actings of all-time I have ever seen. Sam character is not lovable at all. I do not know what Shia LaBeouf thinks when he delivers such a character. You can see he is just a jerk with amazingly gorgeous girlfriend beside him. He looks so **** and egoistic by always yelling and swearing during the entire film. It comes to my mind, maybe they need to get rid all of the human characters in next films, and let the robots deal with their conflicts, just like what we had in original animated TV series THE TRANSFORMERS in 1984 to 1987. Thiz movie has shown that was one step back for the Actors and one giant leap for the robots.

Visit My Blog on JONNY MOVEE: http://jonnyfendi.blogspot.com… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

MoviebuffreviewJul 24, 2011

Outside of the special effects and action, which are stunning and improved from the second one, and the cut down on annoying humor, Transformers: Dark of the Moon really is a lifeless movie, with nothing very good to offer outside of theOutside of the special effects and action, which are stunning and improved from the second one, and the cut down on annoying humor, Transformers: Dark of the Moon really is a lifeless movie, with nothing very good to offer outside of the effects. The script is weak, the performances are a little underwhelming, the pacing is off, and the movie is far too long. I don't know why so many people liked this movie, but I say compared to some of the quality Summer releases of the past few weeks, like Harry Potter and Captain America, it falls flat on its face. And sure it is better than Revenge of the Fallen, but is that really saying anything?… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

5

PurpleUrpNov 15, 2011

A huge letdown compared to the Megan Fox era. The suspense was exciting, but left us with blue balls and led to a mediocre finish. The CGI was great as always and I wished I could've seen more robot drama instead of human tension.

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

5

akelz7Jun 30, 2011

This movie looks ridiculously good. The first two did, but this one just steps it up big time. We're talking oscar level visuals here. Characters, well the humans all suck. Autobots are all awesome, even the twins get a reduced and non-racistThis movie looks ridiculously good. The first two did, but this one just steps it up big time. We're talking oscar level visuals here. Characters, well the humans all suck. Autobots are all awesome, even the twins get a reduced and non-racist role (thank god). Decepticons get little to no screen time, at all. However, this movie got the most important part right: The final battle between Optimus Prime and the main villain. It's long enough, cool enough, and most importantly, it's **** awesome. However at the end of the day, this is style and nothing else, and even the style isn't good enough to make this movie good.… Expand

1 of 5 users found this helpful14

All this user's reviews

5

rotkuJul 5, 2011

Yet again, a CGI rich, plot and acting dismal movie. Although the CGI is fantastic and the movie works well in 3D, why the hell are the acting talents of John Malkovich and Frances McDormand reduced to pit part players with no opportunity toYet again, a CGI rich, plot and acting dismal movie. Although the CGI is fantastic and the movie works well in 3D, why the hell are the acting talents of John Malkovich and Frances McDormand reduced to pit part players with no opportunity to levitate the movie above mediocrity? if you're an adrenaline junkie than you'll probably love this, otherwise only watch it if you've seen the first two and want to see where the story goes before the inevitable next movie comes along.… Expand

1 of 5 users found this helpful14

All this user's reviews

5

chardr69Sep 28, 2011

Wow, "Dark of the Moon" really sucked! I Never thought that it would be worse then "Revenge of the Fallen", and it was. Special effects were top notch as usual, as was the robot fighting, but the story was beyond awful. It was like theyWow, "Dark of the Moon" really sucked! I Never thought that it would be worse then "Revenge of the Fallen", and it was. Special effects were top notch as usual, as was the robot fighting, but the story was beyond awful. It was like they pulled it out of their ass the day of filming to explain the bad-ass special effects. I at least thought "Revenge of the Fallen" was somewhat entertaining despite the bad storyline, but this one couldn't even do that for me! I really hope this is the end of the franchise, because it went from really good to this!

Special Effects: Awesome!
Robot Storyline: Terrible!
Human Storyline: God Awful! Even worse then "Revenge of the Fallen"! (And that's bad)!… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

Pwnz0r3dJul 10, 2011

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I must say this to start off; i came into the theatre with very low expectations for this flick. Considering how godawful Revenge of the Fallen was, i was curious to see if the final installment in Michael Bay's robot beat em up series was worth watching. I came to the conclusion that its a decent action flick, but when the story, script, and characters are put into consideration, its barely bearable.

The moon landing was the investigation of an autobot ship that contains the autobots original leader before Optimus, Sentinel Prime. He turns out to be working with Megatron and he, Megatron, an evil human and the rest of the Decepticons are holing up in Chicago (of all possible cities) where the autobots wage their last epic battle. In short; good guy is actually a bad guy, good robots fight bad robots, people and bots are killed. Really, thats all you need to know. So the story aspect is crap. Utter crap. Shia's performance was dull, and laughably annoying; he mainly fills in the role of a damsel in distress by yelling and screaming nearly the whole movie. Rosie Huntington Whitley's performance as a replacement for Megan Fox is, well, its there. She's only the hot chick that Sam is willing to die for and thats about it. The fact that her acting is horrible is, well, damnit shes only there to look pretty, nothing more, so i wont critique her performance in depth. Anyways, the movie was also made rather obvious and pathetic attempts at American Patriotism; yes we are in a time of war, but we are not fighting murderous robots or letting robots blow up illegal irani nuclear sites. The movie does shine, however, in a technical level. The robots conversion from vehicle to machine is fluid and realistic, and the number of moving parts in their faces and bodies is remarkable. 3D however.... i failed to see anything really done for 3D. The trailers before the movie made better use of the tech.

Too long to read; Decent, pretty movie. Dont take it seriously and you'll enjoy it. A must see for fire fetishists, as is with every Michael Bay movie.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

5

JGLmanJul 3, 2011

I didn't go into this film with high expectations and that feeling didn't disappoint. As I'm sure most went to see this film to see the action and suspense of these robots defending planet earth, but I found more enjoyment in the comedy inI didn't go into this film with high expectations and that feeling didn't disappoint. As I'm sure most went to see this film to see the action and suspense of these robots defending planet earth, but I found more enjoyment in the comedy in the film. There seemed to be a lot of comedy in it, and I liked that. I believe I, as well as the rest of the crowd, found themselves laughing at every attempt at humor. Don't get me wrong, the film was decent. However, comparing it to the other Transformers, it fell under par.… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

5

endnJul 10, 2011

Starts out with interesting plot, but quickly become dull due to uninteresting and shallow characters. Everyone acts like one trick pony. The action is unimpressive...it's more of the same, "a lot of more" of the same. The fun quicklyStarts out with interesting plot, but quickly become dull due to uninteresting and shallow characters. Everyone acts like one trick pony. The action is unimpressive...it's more of the same, "a lot of more" of the same. The fun quickly becomes frustration by the end of second hours, when you feel like it just won't end.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

shimano6000Jul 16, 2011

"WHAT IS GOING ON?" This is the question I started asking at the beginning and continued to ask pretty much through the whole film. I am still unsure as to why some characters were even in the film. Further to this there is a strong"WHAT IS GOING ON?" This is the question I started asking at the beginning and continued to ask pretty much through the whole film. I am still unsure as to why some characters were even in the film. Further to this there is a strong difference between amazing action (bordering on the unbelievable) and bizarre action (swimming frantically in the middle of unbelievable). Transformers 3 is crap!… Expand

3 of 6 users found this helpful33

All this user's reviews

5

heybuddymoviesAug 1, 2011

Transformerâ

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

DarkstarshadesAug 12, 2011

The effects are extremely good, and they deserve a lot of prizes, however, the acting is horrible, there are many errors, a family that was sitting behind me were counting the errors that they saw, and they were right, Mistakes, mistakes everywhere.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

grandpajoe6191Sep 18, 2011

The movie's CGI is very impressive, i'll tell you that. But the movie lacks strong narration to their overly cliched plot and its overwhelming explosions and flashes will hurt your eyes. However, the movie's main criticism is the British girlThe movie's CGI is very impressive, i'll tell you that. But the movie lacks strong narration to their overly cliched plot and its overwhelming explosions and flashes will hurt your eyes. However, the movie's main criticism is the British girl from Victoria's Secret; in all that 157minutes, she does nothing but screaming and staring at the Decepticons like a brainless moron. The next thing I would need is a another popcorn and Megan Fox.… Expand

20 of 27 users found this helpful207

All this user's reviews

5

TyranianJul 16, 2019

Lots of action, some of it good, much if it stupid. Sometimes funny, mostly dumb.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

mgastrykerMay 30, 2012

Michael Bay has never been very good at the story part of the movie. While the underlying story is very interesting, it ignores elements from the first two movies. The new lead actress almost makes me want Megan Fox back. Yes, she's hot, butMichael Bay has never been very good at the story part of the movie. While the underlying story is very interesting, it ignores elements from the first two movies. The new lead actress almost makes me want Megan Fox back. Yes, she's hot, but she's no actor. Besides that, Michael Bay does deliver the best action movie I've seen so far and it's definitely worth seeing.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

eTurkeyJan 28, 2012

The good news is that "Transformers: Dark of the Moon" is better than its predecessor. The bad news is that it entrusts to heavily on CGI, the people acting is below average and it is far to long. This isn't Ben-Hur. Although DotM isn't asThe good news is that "Transformers: Dark of the Moon" is better than its predecessor. The bad news is that it entrusts to heavily on CGI, the people acting is below average and it is far to long. This isn't Ben-Hur. Although DotM isn't as good as the original film its storyline, voice acting and musical score is simply devine. Perhaps the biggest criticism I have for this movie is how different it is compared to the previous features. This flick sometimes feels like a massive military advertisement for the United States Goverment.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

biscuitboy46Nov 24, 2011

At first, the movie was pretty neat. The decepticon tie-in with the first man on the moon sequence was pretty neat. I was fairly impressed with the acting, but the new girl clearly needs some lessons. Overall, the 80 or so minutes of slowAt first, the movie was pretty neat. The decepticon tie-in with the first man on the moon sequence was pretty neat. I was fairly impressed with the acting, but the new girl clearly needs some lessons. Overall, the 80 or so minutes of slow motion explosions and fighting was pretty cool, but it took up about half the movie. This movie was a nice way to end the trilogy but I dont think the makers put a lot of time or thought into it.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

spadenxJan 7, 2012

I think plot wise it was ok but it didnt have much for backstory but hey this is a Michael Bay film, I cant expect a good script so we can just be happy that he gave us something this decent (suprisingly). Also the acting wasnt as good as theI think plot wise it was ok but it didnt have much for backstory but hey this is a Michael Bay film, I cant expect a good script so we can just be happy that he gave us something this decent (suprisingly). Also the acting wasnt as good as the previous film and easily the worst its been in the series. Rosie Huntington-Whiteley is a terrible replacement for Megan Fox because not only is she less attractive but Megan is a far better actress then her (and that is saying something).

This film also relied super heavy on special effects. Yes I know its a Michael Bay film but the effects were at an all time high for this film. The end result was really boring and stale (you have seen it once you have seen it a thousand times is what im trying to get at).

The film was rather boring and didnt have the excitement the previous films had. The run time makes you suffer through the film longer then you have too and Michael Bay really drags on these scenes to their fullest (rather annoying). These signs all point towards ending the series because it simply doesnt have that spark anymore.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

5

Bruce722Nov 29, 2012

Unfortunately this movie was nowhere near as good as the first two. The cinematography and action sequences were really good (though not as good as the first two which I'll get to later) and the acting (minus Rosie Huntington-Whiteley) wasUnfortunately this movie was nowhere near as good as the first two. The cinematography and action sequences were really good (though not as good as the first two which I'll get to later) and the acting (minus Rosie Huntington-Whiteley) was also really good. However, this movie just lacked everything else from the prior films. For one, it felt like there was a major disconnect in continuity and this is largely due to Megan Fox's absence. I know a lot of people hate on Fox and claim that she's not a good actress but she is 10 times the caliber actress that Huntington-Whiteley is. Her relationship with Shia LaBeouf's character felt so forced and lacked any authenticity whatsoever that it killed a lot of the character dynamic. The dialogue was also kind of mediocre. There was none of that witty humor that provided a lot of laughs in the first two. And this movie should be used as Exhibit A for why NOT to use 3D in films. Instead of just having naturally flowing action that looks and feels awesome, Michael Bay felt the need, for some reason, to randomly include slow-motion sequences during fights that felt nothing but cheesy. The worst part about the movie though was the plot. It was kind of stupid to be completely honest and it didn't develop well at all. Lastly, I don't think anyone could put it better than Tyrese's character did towards the end when he said, "Why do the Decepticons always get the good **** Seriously, why? It's like, the Autobots are all stuck with the same generic technology while in each movie the Decepticons have major leaps in tech and that's just ridiculous. Overall, this movie was entertaining to watch from an action-movie perspective because you get a lot of cool explosions and whatnot but it was not all that good of a film in general. Honestly, it just felt like a cash-in and if they make a 4th (rumored for 2014) then it will probably be a joke. This was an unfortunate butchering of what could've become an epic saga.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

OnAnarchyAug 22, 2012

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I think some progress was made with this film in comparison to Revenge of the Fallen, but there are too many problems with this movie for me to consider it a 'good' film. That being said, I still watch this movie purely for the action and CGI effects, both of which are excellent. But as a fan of the original animated series, the simple fact that Optimus Prime went from a pacifistic natural leader to a frenzied killing machine in the span of a single scene angered me to no end. Finally, the voice acting (apart from Weaving, who is pretty much infallible) was utterly horrid.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

csw12Jan 7, 2013

Transformers has come back half way. Though not as good as the first, it was an improvement from the last. A little better story with much better action. Even though Megan Fox if gone her replacement was dreadful. Good thing the action wasTransformers has come back half way. Though not as good as the first, it was an improvement from the last. A little better story with much better action. Even though Megan Fox if gone her replacement was dreadful. Good thing the action was good because it couldn't have been another diasaster for Michael bay… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

A_NorthernerJul 28, 2012

It is safe to say that most people knew what to expect from Michael Bay's third instalment of the Transformers franchise. Impressive visuals, great special effects and plenty of metal on metal action sequences all flimsily supported by a weakIt is safe to say that most people knew what to expect from Michael Bay's third instalment of the Transformers franchise. Impressive visuals, great special effects and plenty of metal on metal action sequences all flimsily supported by a weak script and storyline. Dark of the Moon is a better film than the previous Revenge of the Fallen but is still beset by the same flaws.

Dark of the Moon starts impressively, taking its initial story from a Transformers novel, where the US moon landings and space race are explained to be a front to investigate a Transformers ship that has crashed on the dark side of the moon. It transpires that the Russians obtained a Transformer energy source from the crash site and began experiments with it at Chernobyl with disastrous consequences. Grounding the beginning of the film in this historical context is the strongest point of all three Transformer films. However, as soon as the initial story is set and the screenplay of Ehren Kruger takes over, starting with the appearance of Sam Witwicky (Shia LeBeouf), the film descends into familiar territory.

Cue another weak script for the same bunch of characters, Special Agent Simmons (John Turturo), Lennox (Josh Duhamel), Epps, (Tyrese) and what was not great but occasionally amusing the first time becomes annoying the third time around. Megan Fox is not present this time and the script throws some barbs in her direction. Her replacement is posh Brit Rosie Huntington-Whiteley, who ticks all the aesthetic boxes Bay must have been looking for in a replacement but provides nothing more. Cameos from John Malkovich and Ken Jeong provide some fresh humour in places.

Despite the criticism that Revenge of the Fallen was bloated, Dark of the Moon clocks in at just over two and a half hours and is far, far too long. I have no problems with long films, I have sat through Apocalypse Now and Once Upon a Time in America many times but for an action film with a cheesy script it is completely unnecessary.

I couldn't help compare the films main protagonist, Sentinel (voiced by Leonard Nimoy), with the Fallen from the previous film in that both were characters from Cybertron's past, re-activated and brought to Earth as part of the Decepticon's plans.

Visually the action looks amazing again, in particular the scenes on the freeway and with the falling skyscraper but it has all been seen before. The film culminates in another huge battle between the Transformers set against a different cityscape (Chicago this time) that feels oh so familiar.

By giving Dark of the Moon 5 out of 10, it made me realise I was too kind to Revenge of the Fallen.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

OfficialNov 2, 2013

"Transformers: Dark of the Moon" is just a slightly better film than the awful "Revenge of the Fallen". At least Michael Bay doesn't fill every second of the movie with noisy garbage or just crude nonsense. That being said, however, the plot"Transformers: Dark of the Moon" is just a slightly better film than the awful "Revenge of the Fallen". At least Michael Bay doesn't fill every second of the movie with noisy garbage or just crude nonsense. That being said, however, the plot is still incoherent and not well planned. The only good thing I can say is that the 3-D effects and the CGI are pretty impressive.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

5

BradySmithJun 15, 2013

Better than Revenge of the fallen for sure, but still not as good as the first. The action has improved from the second movie, and it's not as annoying overall, but it still feels like it was made for 10 year olds. It can be fun, but from aBetter than Revenge of the fallen for sure, but still not as good as the first. The action has improved from the second movie, and it's not as annoying overall, but it still feels like it was made for 10 year olds. It can be fun, but from a story perspective it's brain dead. Some of the plot twists are idiotic, and it lacks a true sense of grandeur like the first movie had. It overloads on c.g.i. way too often, the robots seriously need to shut up, and when it's over it's over. Nothing truly lingers beyond the running time. There's nothing to think or feel about. An impressive action scene or two can't give a movie a soul, or a good story, or a brain. Like I said, it's not as bombastic as the second movie, but if Bay's going to keep milking this cash cow, (and we all know he will), he should seriously look at the first movie again, and see what he did there. Not that it was a masterpiece, but it was good. This one however, I can't truly call good. Ok is more like it.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

mds03May 6, 2013

It's definitely a huge improvement over the God-awful second one. Although Transformers: Dark of the Moon had it's moments, it still wasn't that good. The main problems are the cheesy dialogue and the bad acting. Other than that, I found theIt's definitely a huge improvement over the God-awful second one. Although Transformers: Dark of the Moon had it's moments, it still wasn't that good. The main problems are the cheesy dialogue and the bad acting. Other than that, I found the movie to be kind of dull but it is entertaining.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

Skullgirlsfan13May 15, 2013

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. So the last live action Transformers movie; for now at least, and it's obvious to say that this one is better than the last one. After the hate the last one got from pretty much everybody, I guess Bay decided not to muck up his next as much. I mean don't get me wrong, none these three movies are really that good. This one is entertaining and less offensive than the last one. For starters no twin robots, that's a positive in my book. Okay so I'm tired of the racist stuff about them, I think they're racist stereotypes, but I just hate them because they were so fricking annoying in that last one. Anyways back to this film, the only offensive stereotype to come out of this movie is probably that Asian guy who was in the Hangover. Action in this movie; obviously, is great to look at, but at times bring up questions. Like, how does shockwave drive that worm thing? Where do these new autobots come from? Why were Decepticons hiding on the moon for so long? And why do transformers have to be involved in Chernobyl? That's the main problem with this movie; of course that's debatable, that while all the action and spectacles are occurring, it causes much more questions. I could give any less care for the main character, I grown tired of him, so I don't even care. The new girlfriend however is a bit better, not by much, but at least isn't as bad as that last chick was. There's nothing much to talk about with this one, it made a lot of money, but what else is new!… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

MovieGuysApr 23, 2014

While Dark of the Moon isn't the worst second sequel, it is a distant cousin from the original. The story is simple, and the CGI and effects are okay. I just wish more happened in this one.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

diogomendesJun 1, 2014

Transformers: Dark of the Moon is not horrible as the 'Revenge of the Fallen' but still lacks a human touch, and opens again with more explosions, slow motion shots and action. There's no story in Transformers 3, Michael Bay one of the worstTransformers: Dark of the Moon is not horrible as the 'Revenge of the Fallen' but still lacks a human touch, and opens again with more explosions, slow motion shots and action. There's no story in Transformers 3, Michael Bay one of the worst directors ever, makes another **** film to put in his collection.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

McCrumReviewsAug 12, 2014

Sure, it's an improvement over "Revenge of the Fallen" (slightly), but it's still as noisy as the last movie, and although it actually has somewhat of a plot, it's thin, and the characters are even thinner. Sam does a lot of running andSure, it's an improvement over "Revenge of the Fallen" (slightly), but it's still as noisy as the last movie, and although it actually has somewhat of a plot, it's thin, and the characters are even thinner. Sam does a lot of running and calling for Bumblebee. His girlfriend, Carly, played by Rosie Huntington-Whitely, is a replacement for Megan Fox's character, after Fox was fired from the set due to a dispute with Steven Spielberg, who surprisingly signed on as executive producer. I wish I had not spent the money to see this in theaters when it came out. The CGI work is very impressive, but that doesn't make up for the seven bucks wasted.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

JohnMasterLFeb 4, 2015

Miren...¿Como se los explico?...
Mas de lo mismo pero con una duración de casi 3 horas... (aunque es mucho mejor que la 2 en todos los aspectos)
Michael Bay sigue y sigue creando películas con la misma formula (efectos increíbles, cargadosMiren...¿Como se los explico?...
Mas de lo mismo pero con una duración de casi 3 horas... (aunque es mucho mejor que la 2 en todos los aspectos)
Michael Bay sigue y sigue creando películas con la misma formula (efectos increíbles, cargados de explosiones, pero con un guion pobre y ridículo.)… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

monster0420Apr 29, 2015

This movie is bad, but not as bad as Revenge of the Fallen. This one an be considered a guilty pleasure. Gets boring at times, but it kicks back up after a few minutes. The finale was pretty satisfying. But of course, there were charactersThis movie is bad, but not as bad as Revenge of the Fallen. This one an be considered a guilty pleasure. Gets boring at times, but it kicks back up after a few minutes. The finale was pretty satisfying. But of course, there were characters you don't care about, boring filler, subplots and plot holes, and forced romance. Has good effects, but too many explosions, but not as many as Revenge of the Fallen. This movie is a guilty pleasure movie. Nothing more.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

TheDude-Sep 3, 2015

Dark of the moon is a mostly boring film with way to much government conspiracy dialogue and poor characterization and takes quite a while to finally get to the action which is admittedly awesome but that does not save the res of the film.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

BoogeeFilmGuyAug 9, 2015

Its better than Revenge of the Fallen, but not as good as the first one. Still a poorly made flick, but by this time in the franchise, what are we expect? As usual, its way too long, has major plot issues, bad acting, but its a watchableIts better than Revenge of the Fallen, but not as good as the first one. Still a poorly made flick, but by this time in the franchise, what are we expect? As usual, its way too long, has major plot issues, bad acting, but its a watchable flick with pretty good CGI, which is why i'm giving it a 5 (probably a little too generous, but what the hey, it has enjoyable moments).… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

CineAutoctonoJul 26, 2015

I thought it was the final movie of Transformers but no, excellent plot and action scenes . Megan Fox shame that there was not but almost disappointing but exciting .

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

FlickFreaks83Dec 11, 2015

After he’s cleared of sexual harassment at the end of the classic Simpsons episode, Homer Badman, Homer J. Simpson turns to his wife, and gleefully announces, “Marge, my friend, I haven’t learned a thing.”

Michael Bay is Homer Simpson. NotAfter he’s cleared of sexual harassment at the end of the classic Simpsons episode, Homer Badman, Homer J. Simpson turns to his wife, and gleefully announces, “Marge, my friend, I haven’t learned a thing.”

Michael Bay is Homer Simpson. Not superficially, of course – he has a gorgeous head of lovely, flowing hair, and he’s not yellow. But when it comes to avoiding the same mistakes that beset 2009’s Transformers: Revenge Of The Fallen for this third (and final?) instalment of his toy-based blockbuster trilogy, he hasn’t learned a thing.

OK, admittedly the alarmingly racist robots, Skids and Mudflap, are gone, and there are no disconcerting close-ups of giant robot balls. But that still doesn’t prevent what remains from being, well, giant robot balls.

Exposition scenes are still choppy as hell, the writing is lazy, the plot turns brazen and in bad taste (Chernobyl was caused by Decepticons) the film is overloaded with a cavalcade of superfluous supporting players (look! It’s Josh Duhamel as Captain Wotsit! Huzzah! Here comes Tyrese Gibson as Thingummy!), and there’s an oafish insistence on cheap-seats comedy relief that leaves actors like John Malkovich (as Sam’s scary new boss), Alan Tudyk (as John Turturro’s fey personal assistant) and Ken Jeong (running through his tired old schtick one more time) desperately mugging. It does lead, though, to the year’s most welcome death scene.

That’s the bad news. The good news is that Dark Of The Moon is better than Revenge Of The Fallen. But not by much.

That upturn is testament to its last 45 minutes, in which Bay drops the Homer impression and does his best stab at Michael Bay. For, when all’s said and done, not many directors can handle large-scale action like he can, and the climactic Bayhem, in which the Decepticons occupy Chicago and transform (ten points!) it into a smoking ruin, is stunning. Price-of-admission-alone stunning, as teams of winged base-jumpers dive out of planes and plummet past skyscrapers; those same buildings lurch to 90-degrees in a series of vertiginous shots that will have you clutching your chair (the 3D, probably the best deployment of the form since Avatar, helps here); and giant robots, of course, kick the living oil out of each other.

For a movie squarely aimed at teens, it’s extraordinarily violent. Humans are reduced to smoking skeletons by alien attacks, but the likes of Optimus Prime (when he’s not giving sanctimonious speeches, Jerry Springer-style) and Megatron (almost completely wasted) save the toughest treatment for themselves. Heads are lopped off, spinal columns are ripped out, and several are executed with shotgun blasts to the head, gangland-style, in a manner that suggests that this is the final instalment, at least for a while. If this action were human-on-human, we’d have the next Human Centipede 2 on our hands. Best not show this to your Roomba, though – it’ll be traumatized.

The first Transformers has its flaws, but it did have its charms. LaBeouf’s Sam Witwicky was an intriguing hero, like Woody Allen was parachuted into an action flick. Dark Of The Moon is mostly charmless, however – for the first (surprisingly action-lite, slow-moving) hour, Sam is a moaning, presumptuous brat whose relationship with his new girlfriend (Huntington-Whiteley) is so shabbily-defined that it’s hard to sympathise with him. A boy getting his first car is relatable; a young man throwing a tantrum because his impossibly hot girlfriend has a hotter boss is not.

As for Huntington-Whiteley, the much-trumpeted replacement for Megan Fox (dismissed with an amusing, “She was a **** We didn’t like her.”), Bay introduces her with a self-parodying shot of her barely-clad bottom and it’s all downhill from there. You’ll believe a robot can fly, but you won’t believe a Huntington-Whiteley can talk.

An improvement on Transformers 2, but then what isnt? To paraphrase the Bard, its a tale, full of sound and fury and extremely stupid dialogue and nonsensical plotting and preposterous stunts and robots punching each others heads off, signifying nothing!… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

eva3si0nJan 15, 2022

Transformers: Dark of the Moon 3 part in a series of films, for the good on it it was necessary to complete the trilogy. The second part already looked not so fresh and except for the action could not give anything to the viewer.Transformers: Dark of the Moon 3 part in a series of films, for the good on it it was necessary to complete the trilogy. The second part already looked not so fresh and except for the action could not give anything to the viewer. Transformers: Dark of the Moon looks generally second-rate, not saved by the expansion of the lore of Transformers, not a perfectly staged long filly battle scene. It's just that the viewer is shown the same thing 3 times, and this is also served as stupid and insensitive as possible… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

5

No420SnoopDoggApr 13, 2017

Worth a watch for the cgi but even still, you may as well just skip to the second half because the first is just boring character development which no one cares about because your here for the Transformers. The story also doesn't make sense,Worth a watch for the cgi but even still, you may as well just skip to the second half because the first is just boring character development which no one cares about because your here for the Transformers. The story also doesn't make sense, Sam dies all this heroic **** almost dies twice and somehow managed to do a load more than any of the soldiers do, but still gets shafted.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

5

CoreGamer1408Dec 16, 2018

My thoughts on this sequel is literally the same copy/paste opinion of the last sequel. I think is really for die hard fans only of this version of this Transformers universe. Everyone else only really needs to watch the first movie for sureMy thoughts on this sequel is literally the same copy/paste opinion of the last sequel. I think is really for die hard fans only of this version of this Transformers universe. Everyone else only really needs to watch the first movie for sure and move on. This sequel doesn't improve on the series in any real meaningful way.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

LivingTribunalMay 19, 2018

The title should have been 'The last hope'. Good action sequences, but lack of storytelling.

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

5

ErikTheCriticSep 30, 2018

A slightly better film than its awful predecessor. It focuses more on the Transformers this time around, but its plot is still incoherent.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

Huhan12345Jan 10, 2019

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. In Transformers: Dark of the Moon, there aren't too many robotic fights, but there are too many advertisements and Chicago has been exploded a lot. By the way, it's a pity that Michael Bay doesn't make porn movies. I thought Megan in the first two parts had been exaggerated, and it turned out that... I had made a mistake. Finally, give the advertiser a suggestion, be reserved, don't let adds appear so frequently, they really affect my watching movies.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

pur__0_0__Aug 18, 2021

I often heard a lot about the Transformers movies and how they went from bad to worse. But I never understood how a franchise that's making so cool trailers can possibly be bad. I had even watched the first two movies and liked them more thanI often heard a lot about the Transformers movies and how they went from bad to worse. But I never understood how a franchise that's making so cool trailers can possibly be bad. I had even watched the first two movies and liked them more than the average ratings. Dark of the Moon, however, answered my question. Little did we know that this was the part where the eventual downfall of the franchise will begin. And trust me when I say this, I really wanted to like this movie. Only if the pesky humans gave me a chance to do so.
The movie, once again, starts with Autobots saving the world from Decepticons. But then one of them gets caught by the bad guys. To be honest this, THIS is the very problem of the movie. We have come to watch Transformers for the big CGI fights, not to see the conflicts of humans and robots. Because I believe I'm speaking on behalf of all the people when I say this, but if there's ever a conflict between humans and Autobots, we will any day prefer the Autobots, even if they are wrong.
The CGI of this movie is amazing. This is one thing Michael Bay is really good at (other than the explosions of course). I really like to watch the Transformers turn into sports cars and drive across long distances all the while fighting the Decepticons. The thing is, however, it's literally the only reason why I watch Michael Bay's Transformers movies. I don't watch it to see how Sam enters the gents restroom and someone else who comes in thinks he's in a cubicle having sex with another man. Nor am I interested in seeing Sam's parents trying to be funny because let's get real, they're not.
The acting of this movie is also terrible. Though I'd give it some extra points for completing Sam's arc, I'd also deduct some points for not showing Mikaela. She was the only human character I was interested in looking at ^_^. Even the Transformers act in a very campy manner. The villain of this movie looks like a discount version of The Fallen. And as usual the fight later shifts to Optimus Prime and Megatron, making the villain, once again, completely useless.
There's not a single thing for which I'd want to rewatch this movie. It only stands among a sloppy series, plus it's the part where the franchise starts failing until Bumblebee came to rescue, so there's absolutely no reason to watch it. It's so forgettable I had to watch Honest Trailers and Cinemasins just to remember what happened in it. And even then I couldn't remember half the things.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

liamexeFeb 8, 2023

In conclusion, watch it if you only want to witness 3D, robots, attractive chicks, and explosions. If you watch movies to see a good tale with developing characters and to get some cinematic value. This is nothing new.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

SuperbaDMIkeJun 15, 2022

This movie isn't better than any transformers movies cause they suck but it takes boring amount of time but has it's decent goods.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

4

WinstonoboogieJul 9, 2011

This one is a bit of an improvement over the previous installment in the Transformers franchise, but truth be told, it would actually have been an even more impressive achievement in some ways if Michael Bay had managed to make a movie thatThis one is a bit of an improvement over the previous installment in the Transformers franchise, but truth be told, it would actually have been an even more impressive achievement in some ways if Michael Bay had managed to make a movie that was worse than the execrable Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen. The 3-D looks great, Frances McDormand is fun in a supporting role, and there's an intriguing subplot that ties the whole series into the real-life Apollo 11 moon landing of 1969. Still, 157 minutes is waaaaaaaay too long for this loud, thudding, overblown nonsense. And as for as the new leading lady, Victoria's Secret model Rosie Huntington-Whitely: she's pretty (of course) but so incredibly dull and colorless that I actually started to miss the (extremely limited) thespic stylings of Megan Fox.… Expand

2 of 7 users found this helpful25

All this user's reviews

4

MRedzuanJun 30, 2011

Was definitely better than the second one but let's be honest that might probably be the worst sequel of all time. Dark of the Moon is a real crowd pleaser, if you like your movies really dumb with no plot, a very confusing storyline, lousyWas definitely better than the second one but let's be honest that might probably be the worst sequel of all time. Dark of the Moon is a real crowd pleaser, if you like your movies really dumb with no plot, a very confusing storyline, lousy dialogue and endless explosions. If you're looking for a very long fun movie than this is it. Michael Bay is going for Christopher Nolan's The Dark Knight outline here with a slow first act to build the characters and the platform for the movie. TF3 was all over the place. I don't like Rosie Huntington-Whiteley at all, she can't act to save her life. I mean, how bad can you be up to the point that I was missing Megan Fox. The second act is where things are heating up, plots get underway we're already clear with what the core of the story is about and twists are revealed. TF3 was confusing and messy, ooh the Autobots were betrayed and one em' died, I was supposed to feel something but dagnamit why didn't I give a damn? And the third act is where everything comes together in blazing glory. Dark Side of the Moon couldn't rival The Dark Knight but this one was quite awesome with an hour of non-stop rat-tat-tat-tat, explosions and the big-finale-moment-of-truth and whatnot. Both movies were 2 1/2 hours long but only one was worth hurting my ass for… Expand

7 of 16 users found this helpful79

All this user's reviews

4

teh-reviewerJul 9, 2011

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This movie is like a sandwich, the first and last buns are horrible and old, where the middle has your favorite, whether it's meatballs, patty or ribs, then they sprinkled the worst condiments know to man and serve it to you swearing its good. Transformers 3 began with a series of investigation scenes better saved for a crappy Eagle Eye sequel, introduces new threats and goes on for some expected to be epic sequences only to end on the most mundane note conceivable. The main threat ShockWave got close to no scene time and is the given the simple explanation: "that was ShockWave", and never heard of again until the end where the most action he got was shooting at Optimus once and struggling with a parachute stuck on his face before getting killed. But regardless, optimus goes on a revenge crazed beat down on him for what I can assume is because Optimus hates it when they call his name and shoots him once. Yeah I played the game, but for those who didn't, this would seem a bit stupid, if not beyond stupid. They kept bumblebee and optimus alive for fans sake and went buck wild with the fates of the other transformers, which resulted in the death of all decipticons and half of the autobots, and having Cybertron implode, just for the sake of having an intense emotional moment that ended in a swing and a miss. Most of the moments ended up as predictable and boring. The movie left questions unanswered and answered some unnecessary questions, don't worry you'll see them. The only thing keeping me from dropping a 0 on this review is the unexpected plot twist in the midpoint of the movie.… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

4

sle0609Jul 1, 2011

i didn't like the plot. dialogue not great. there were some cool action scenes. some good laughs. there were moments of ridiculousness that remove you from the story and flow of the movie. the movie went on for too long and i was happy for iti didn't like the plot. dialogue not great. there were some cool action scenes. some good laughs. there were moments of ridiculousness that remove you from the story and flow of the movie. the movie went on for too long and i was happy for it to be over. it's not worth watching in 3D. it's a little bit better than the second movie, but not as good as the first. This franchise had huge potential, but michael bay couldn't deliver.… Expand

1 of 6 users found this helpful15

All this user's reviews

4

asthobaskoroAug 8, 2011

Its special effects -- and 3D shots -- Transformers 3 is all impressive on technical level. The best presentation in 3D. But bloated running time, messy script and ridiculous acting make you laugh.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

4

D0MIN0Jun 30, 2011

well, good special effects - like in all transformers movies, lot's of moving parts going from left to right, new girl (much better from the old one), new plot but beside this all went wrong. Definitely not worth paying extra price for 3D, ifwell, good special effects - like in all transformers movies, lot's of moving parts going from left to right, new girl (much better from the old one), new plot but beside this all went wrong. Definitely not worth paying extra price for 3D, if you start thinking what to cook for tomorrow dinner it means that it is not worth to watch.… Expand

1 of 5 users found this helpful14

All this user's reviews

4

DuderothFeb 23, 2012

If you're looking for cheap action thrills, I guess this movie is okay. As with all the previous Transformers movies, the characters are pretty dull and the plot uninteresting. The CGI is all right, and is probably this movie's only savingIf you're looking for cheap action thrills, I guess this movie is okay. As with all the previous Transformers movies, the characters are pretty dull and the plot uninteresting. The CGI is all right, and is probably this movie's only saving grace. Michael Bay has a problem with CG though. For some reason, whenever there's too much action on the screen, you can't tell what's going on. It just looks like a mess of bits of metal and moving clouds of junk. There's no substance. Visuals: B-, everything else: D-.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

4

OliverBMJul 2, 2011

Transformers 3: Dark of the Moon is (in my eyes) the closest thing to being; beaten, spat on, shouted at and raped in the eyes all in 157 minutes of glittery CGI robot porn without actually being; beaten, spat on, shouted at and raped in theTransformers 3: Dark of the Moon is (in my eyes) the closest thing to being; beaten, spat on, shouted at and raped in the eyes all in 157 minutes of glittery CGI robot porn without actually being; beaten, spat on, shouted at and raped in the eyes. In all seriousness though the film has some good points that i'll get out of the way first before I continue. First the 3D against my initial pre-conceptions was excellent the best 3D i've ever seen in a film and is by a huge margin the best thing the film has going for itself. But, That's it, That's the only good quality transformers 3 possesses other than the fact that it's better than it's atrocious predecessor; revenge of the fallen. The action is mental as is customary in Michael Bay's films with almost all of Chicago massacred by the end of the film and most of the scenes where someone dies being kinda crap. Fortunately the action is handled in a much more controlled way than the second film with the viewer actually being able to walk out of the cinema without a coma. The plot is pretty much non-existent involving a 60â… Expand

4 of 9 users found this helpful45

All this user's reviews

4

HighwayUKJun 1, 2012

The Transformers series is quickly becoming tired and lame.... okay the first few were hard on the eyes due to stupid amounts of action blur etc but now it's become a parody of itself and I think its time to do He-man or Thundercats beforeThe Transformers series is quickly becoming tired and lame.... okay the first few were hard on the eyes due to stupid amounts of action blur etc but now it's become a parody of itself and I think its time to do He-man or Thundercats before this becomes another police academy… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

4

schnideJun 29, 2011

If you like your movies big, dumb and noisy fun then Transformers 3 will be absolutely perfect for you. The plot makes no sense, the immature script reduces every human character (except for Rosie Huntingdon Whiteley because, you know, she'sIf you like your movies big, dumb and noisy fun then Transformers 3 will be absolutely perfect for you. The plot makes no sense, the immature script reduces every human character (except for Rosie Huntingdon Whiteley because, you know, she's the hot chick and the opening shot of her butt establishes exactly what she's there for) to a cliched stereotype at least once, the action goes on for so long - particularly towards the end - that you get explosion fatigue.. This film exists to make money out of people who don't realise that action films can be smart and mind-blowing as well as screen blowing. It's basically the first and second film combined, with an added half hour, and is a license to print more cash. The opinions of critics, just like punctuation, grammar and worthwhile filmmaking, is something that people who'll give this 10 just really won't need to take any notice of. If you do sit through this, remember to thank Michael Bay at the end for making you that little bit dumber.… Expand

6 of 20 users found this helpful614

All this user's reviews

4

ReviewerMan44Jul 1, 2011

To put it shortly, it's better than Revenge of the Fallen, but then again, it doesn't take much to achieve such an honor. It will be remmebered yes, but for it's great action sequences, and everything else it can't manage to do.

2 of 6 users found this helpful24

All this user's reviews

4

FrostyJul 1, 2011

Transformers 3 may be better than the second, but it ain't by much. The third and last installment of the movie, Transformers 3 may have good 3D effects and CGI, but everything else is just bad. First off is the plot, it's just the same oldTransformers 3 may be better than the second, but it ain't by much. The third and last installment of the movie, Transformers 3 may have good 3D effects and CGI, but everything else is just bad. First off is the plot, it's just the same old thing. Optimus Prime saves the humans when the Decepticons try to destroy it. This time it's a little different though, as Sentinel Prime, ex-Leader of the Autobots, betrays his allies to bring Cybertron to earth. The other plot, there is none. Just filler and slapstick humor that gets old fast. The new female star, Rosie Huntington - Whiteley, is first shown walking in her underwear right when the movie starts off and the camera is directed right at her butt. This is the reason why she is here, because she cannot act for her life (I'm trying not to swear if you noticed). Everyone else in the movie wasn't that great of an actor/actress either. The only redeeming life to this movie is the Robots and the Special Effects. There was hardly any action, and if there was, it was short. Only the end was the good part of the movie, and even then it was still not that great. Especially when Whiteley goes up to Megatron and insults him. Really? Give me a break! No one would ever do that. It's so dumb and makes no sense. I know this was supposed to be more for the fan that the Average Joe like myself (I'm more like the Angry Video Game Nerd), but it could have still been suitable for both. This movie had great potential, but in the end it was the same garbage that has been done countless times before. Only recommended for Transformers fans. If you're just like me, you will find yourself bored as well.… Expand

3 of 7 users found this helpful34

All this user's reviews

4

SonofAdamJul 4, 2011

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I went to see Transformers: Dark of the Moon with a descent level of skepticism, expecting a not so smart summer blockbuster movie but a much more coherent one then the over bloated and offensive Revenge of Fallen. Well yes, this film is much more tolerable than the previous Transformers movie however this is a Michael Bay film and sadly all of its awesome CGI and actions scenes arenâ… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

4

oooo35980Jul 12, 2011

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. ACTION ACTION ACTION, forget about the plot! Ah, I think that's just called a lousy movie. Plot holes, overdone action movie cliches. I mean seriously, the new autobot betrays the good guys, the hot chick talks megatron into betraying his partner, the Autobots die, except they obviously don't because that would be ludicrous even for Michael Bay, The movie is blatantly bad, terrible even. It is Michael Bay giving us the middle finger and saying "It's Transformers, you HAVE to go see it.". It makes me a bit angry when people say "forget about the plot". Here's why: THERE IS NO REASON FOR THE PLOT TO BE TERRIBLE!!! He could have made a movie with explosions and autobots as well as a storyline that is at least mediocre (i.e. doesn't make your eyes bleed). He did it in the first one, so I know it's possible. Regardless, as far as explosion filled CGI fests that pander to the lowest common denominator go, it does kill a couple hours. I guess terrible plot+amazing effects = mediocre movie.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

4

RinzlerJul 13, 2011

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Unfortunately Transformers 3 was just all kinds of a mess. From the lack of story and any kind of cohesion to the female lead that kept me thinking her lips were reversed the entire time (and that she had some kind of untold super power that allowed her to not take any sort of damage in the last battle when every single person around her looked like hell at the end of it - shenanigans, says I). The movie is like a skate video for robot fights. Michael Bay doesn't want to give you substance, he just wants you to watch cool stuff blow up while you have to withstand horrible dialogue in hopes that maybe you'll find some kind of meaning behind it all, all-the-while questioning how long it actually takes them to go through the events that the cast is going through. Conveying any type of passage of time was lost somewhere on the cutting room floor. And don't even get me started on what they believe should be emotional moments. I cared more for the robots in Wall-E than I did in this film.

Transformers 3 is a rental at best.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

4

badbrushJul 17, 2011

I watch the transformer movies for mindless action that keeps me mildly entertained with its bullet carnage and missile dodging free for alls and it mostly delivers on this front. So much so that it becomes tedious, I spent some time lookingI watch the transformer movies for mindless action that keeps me mildly entertained with its bullet carnage and missile dodging free for alls and it mostly delivers on this front. So much so that it becomes tedious, I spent some time looking at my watch wondering when the film would end. The acting,plot and blatant advertisement were so horrific that I had to look away and think about bunnies for a while. Personally this film would get a lower rating but a 6 year old child giggled at a deceptacon having its head blown off which made me giggle and if a kid can enjoy it then it can't be that terrible.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

4

Kolar63Jul 25, 2011

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Transformers: dark of moon is the latest in the three transformers film and while not the worst it is not the best in the series and not a good film in general. The story in this movie made little sense and it does not need to as transformer films do not need a good plot just action however this film also fails in that regard. The action fails as it is boring to watch, the action sequences are to long and not well done as there is always a riffled plot moment in the middle of them meaning you won't understand why this fight takes place this would be ok if they did not pop up every five minutes and adding to this is the fact that they are clichÃ© such as when just before a transformer kills another transformer they start talking about the past and then another transformer kills the evil one that is going to kill the good one so hurrah the good transformer has been saved even though this happens in very action film, hurrah. This film just grows tiresome very quickly and this film goes on for three hours that is three hours of boredom, I plead to you if you have not already seen this film do not seat it is not worth your time or money.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

4

bram29Sep 17, 2011

the action was ok, and the robots were ok, but the movie makes very much rookie mistakes. Michael Bay should really learn how to make interesting characters.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

4

DLcriticOct 5, 2011

I saw this movie opening weekend, and I was so bored with it. I bought it on Blu-Ray because I have an appreciation for the amount of detail that goes into the CGI, but I couldn't make myself sit through it again.

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

4

Jedi_JettsonMay 24, 2012

Dear Michael Bay, Transformers: Dark of the Moon is a bit better than Revenge of the Fallen, but you have miscast Rosie Huntington-Whitley and Ken Jeong, the story has too much cliches and good-guy-vs-bad-guy chasing in 150 minutes, andDear Michael Bay, Transformers: Dark of the Moon is a bit better than Revenge of the Fallen, but you have miscast Rosie Huntington-Whitley and Ken Jeong, the story has too much cliches and good-guy-vs-bad-guy chasing in 150 minutes, and the Transformers characters are true and relate to the Transformers TV series, but everything else in the story is not. Stop ruining what you adapt! You adapted the attack on Pearl Harbor into a failure of a love story and a waste of talent making a bad ruined out of that event, and the first Transformers was good but Revenge of the Fallen ruined the perfect image of Transformers though as I said, Dark of the Moon was better than Revenge of the Fallen and the Transformers characters relate enough to the TV series, but the story was still poor. You ruin the history of Pearl Harbor, and now you ruin the history of Transformers. Stop scarring your career as a director with your movie failures and THINK ABOUT WHAT YOUR DOING! Stop miscasting actors and hire better writers and visual effects artists! Also, why the hell did you miscast Patrick Dempsey? Now you've scarred his career as an actor.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

4

Alexander_FredDec 18, 2011

Essentially this unnecessary third installment of the Transformers series simply recycles and reuses everything from the past two films and becomes a cliche in itself. Keep the Autobots vs. Decepticon rivalry. Keep the cliched ending. KeepEssentially this unnecessary third installment of the Transformers series simply recycles and reuses everything from the past two films and becomes a cliche in itself. Keep the Autobots vs. Decepticon rivalry. Keep the cliched ending. Keep the "girl runs away, only to come back" routine, but simply exchange Megan Fox with another attractive girl who can't act (Rosei Huntignton-Whitley). Leave many questions unanswered: Why did Mikalea break up with Sam? How exactly did Sam and Carly come to be together? Then steal the central plot line from Superman Returns. Press play, sit down for 2.5 hours (much, much, much too long), and enjoy the few moments of actual robot violence (they come sparingly and not until after the first hour).… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

4

Creeper5150Feb 3, 2012

Most sequels don't work, even less trilogies are successful. We have learned that over the years, & "Transformers: Dark of the Moon" is no exception. Michael Bay's 1st half of this 3rd chapter seemed promising, the story was a little slow butMost sequels don't work, even less trilogies are successful. We have learned that over the years, & "Transformers: Dark of the Moon" is no exception. Michael Bay's 1st half of this 3rd chapter seemed promising, the story was a little slow but it started to connect little by little. The comedy was a little over the top, but pretty funny I have to admit. This time around, "Sam Witwicky" (Shia LaBeouf) is in a new relationship with his new girlfriend "Carly" (super model Rosie Huntington - Whiteley). Sam feels belittled by his own ego & the fact that he still doesn't have a job, while his girlfriend has a very good job & has taken the role of provider for him. The man she works for is "Dylan" played by (Patrick Dempsey) a very rich yet mysterious man. Up to this point everything seems to be flowing. Optimus Prime finds out that we the humans have kept things from the "Autobots" here on earth, it seems that our mission to the moon back in the 60's was more than we "humans" thought it was. The mission was never about the moon, but what was hidden on it. A powerful being named "Sentinel Prime" he was the key to this chapter, I won't go into spoilers. Again up to this point it's flowing, it's what happens after they find this being, that totally **** this story & film up. It goes from being rather good to very bad in a matter of minutes. Here we go, 1st of all the story gets ruined 1/2 way into the film. 2nd, the film is way too **** long, like way too long. My brother & I figured we could of edited at least 40 to 45 minutes of unnecessary footage. Made the film 2 hours long, instead of the whopping 2 hrs 40+ minutes. It was just very prolonged, which brings us to my 3rd complaint. Not enough action, this is a sequel therefore action sequences are a must, specially in a Michael Bay film. I felt the film was just badly edited, it didn't flow right, in some parts it was right down boring. Now I can't go into too much detail without ruining the film for you. What I will say is that everything that leads up to the final battle in downtown Chicago, is just a **** tease. The battle really never takes flight, the "Autobots" seemed tired & just not what you'd expect. The star of the entire trilogy "Optimus Prime" was nowhere to be found 2/3 of the fight. This film was just too much blah - blah - blah, not enough action & not enough "Optimus". Michael Bay really **** this one up, but the good news is this will be his last take on "Transformers". The one thing I learned from this film is if you're gonna make a bad film, don't make it long in duration. For you just not only piss off your audience, you bore them as well. Thanks a lot, Mr. Bay.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

4

JacobDunstanFeb 29, 2012

Monotonous, incredibly unnecessary entry in this worsening franchise. Young Huntington is as poor an actress as she is aesthetically alluring. Albeit, she isn't helped by such boring dialogue. Typically effects-laden and trite, althoughMonotonous, incredibly unnecessary entry in this worsening franchise. Young Huntington is as poor an actress as she is aesthetically alluring. Albeit, she isn't helped by such boring dialogue. Typically effects-laden and trite, although admittedly the visual effects are impressive (particularly in the nonsensical third-act in which LaBeouf's Sam Witnicky and co tumble through skyscrapers as the city is destroyed around them). Effects aside, the film has little to legitimately recommend about it-- Malkovich as Sam's boss and serial weirdo Ken Jeong as a 'learned in the field of what nefarious robots go after' co-worker are entertaining in throwaway roles, however it's obvious they only signed on for the money as there is little in the way of genuine quality in the screenplay.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

4

AwesomeReviewerMar 26, 2012

To start things off, I thought the movie was going in the right direction when it started, but after the first 30mins or so, it took a turn for the worst. The plot stopped making sense, the characters are as dull as ever, special effects areTo start things off, I thought the movie was going in the right direction when it started, but after the first 30mins or so, it took a turn for the worst. The plot stopped making sense, the characters are as dull as ever, special effects are used poorly, and overall the movie doesnâ… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

4

charlieW24Jul 30, 2012

The third installment in the money making franchise suffers from a poor script, poor acting (particularly from Rosie Huntington Whiteley) and a slow uninteresting start. Despite this, no one can deny the last third of the film with theThe third installment in the money making franchise suffers from a poor script, poor acting (particularly from Rosie Huntington Whiteley) and a slow uninteresting start. Despite this, no one can deny the last third of the film with the destruction of Chicago is visually brilliant, and although it may be overstuffed, it still looks stunning and the interest makes up for the less interesting start. But this film still is not a gem in the film world, just watch the last third and you'll be fine the rest a real waste of time.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

4

JawsLaxerDramaDec 27, 2012

The effects are great, and for once, Megan Fox is all right. Now, the plot is still the same old. While this movie doesn't even deserve to have earned $1,000,000,000 at the box office globally; I still hate to think that people will rate thisThe effects are great, and for once, Megan Fox is all right. Now, the plot is still the same old. While this movie doesn't even deserve to have earned $1,000,000,000 at the box office globally; I still hate to think that people will rate this movie higher than 7. Why? It's too slow, and too predictable. Don't get me wrong, I enjoyed, but at the end...I thought to myself "I could have gone without."
Diagnosis: Please see it and have your own opinion… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

4

quaritchMar 31, 2013

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The CGI's good, but what i hate with this movie is its cliche plot, narration, and bad jokes. However, the action scenes are cool to watch.. My opinion, this is the best Transformers film (It's bad, i know. But the first and second movies are way worse than this.)… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

4

marcmyworksDec 20, 2016

Despite the fantastic CGI and cinematography, this film does exactly what it says on the tin and sometimes even less. The soundtrack, acting and plot make this $195 Million blockbuster quite boring and completely unoriginal. RoseDespite the fantastic CGI and cinematography, this film does exactly what it says on the tin and sometimes even less. The soundtrack, acting and plot make this $195 Million blockbuster quite boring and completely unoriginal. Rose Huntington-Whiteley's who played Shia LaBeouf's new beautiful/vapid girlfriend actually made me long for the days of Megan Fox.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

4

WJSJan 3, 2015

The problem I have with Transformers movies is, when the good guys and bad guys are fighting each other I can never tell them apart! These movies have become increasingly bloated as they moved along and I'm thinking that they need a good doseThe problem I have with Transformers movies is, when the good guys and bad guys are fighting each other I can never tell them apart! These movies have become increasingly bloated as they moved along and I'm thinking that they need a good dose of Beano to relieve the gas builds up. Really loud and noisy and the acting is pretty bloated as well.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

4

FilmMasterEdJan 6, 2016

In the wake of widespread criticism of the second live action Transformers movie, Revenge of the Fallen, director Michael Bay admitted dissatisfaction with the screenplay and blamed it on the writers' strike. So what's the excuse this time?In the wake of widespread criticism of the second live action Transformers movie, Revenge of the Fallen, director Michael Bay admitted dissatisfaction with the screenplay and blamed it on the writers' strike. So what's the excuse this time? If anything, the script for Transformers: Dark of the Moon is worse than that of its predecessor. In the future, maybe Bay should abandon using a screenwriter altogether and just fill up 90 minutes with disconnected images of robo-carnage. That would serve two purposes: eliminate the need to watch actors embarrass themselves trying to outshine the hardware and elide excruciating dialogue, exposition, and "character development," all of which are inferior to what one finds in the average Pink Panther cartoon.

Bay makes the Transformers movies for 14-year old boys. I suspect he's one at heart, which gives him insight into the mindset of his target audience. I remember what it was like to be a 14-year old boy but I'm not sure I would have been more enamored with this movie at that age than I am today. Maybe it would have struck a chord when I was eight. That's when I watched Japanese monster movies which, technological advances in special effects aside, are not all that different from Transformers. In those movies, men in rubber suits pounded on each other. In Transformers and its sequels, CGI robots wreak the same kind of mayhem as Godzilla and friends. The average Japanese monster movie didn't have much of a plot either (aside from the obvious - stomp Tokyo), but it managed to get the job done with about an hour's less screen time.

It's pointless criticizing the action/destruction sequences in Transformers 3. Those are the "money shots" of this strain of cataclysm porn. People pay for extreme special effects. They want to see these Rockem-Sockem robots mash each other into the ground while Shia LaBeouf yells loudly in the hope that a big voice will compensate for his small stature (at least compared to the Transformers). In the biggest battles, I had some trouble figuring out the difference between the good guys (Autobots) and the bad guys (Decepticons), largely because (a) I'm not a Transformers fan (so the nuances escape me), and (b) things were moving a bit too fast. Aficionados will no doubt chortle at my ignorance. As a lapsed Trekkie (maybe not so lapsed, after all), I can provide a catalogue of the Star Trek references in Transformers 3: a clip from "Amok Time", a mention of the Enterprise, and the biggest of all - Leonard Nimoy (providing the voice of Sentinal Prime) delivering this gem: "The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few." I'd love to know who was responsible for that: Bay, screenwriter Ehren Kruger, or Nimoy.

The story, which requires more than a "willing suspension of disbelief" to swallow (an infusion of a mind-altering substance would be a good start), begins in the 1960s when men travel to the moon to investigate a crashed Transformers space ship. 40-plus years later, Optimus Prime (voice of Peter Cullen), having belatedly learned of this discovery, takes a salvage team to our nearest celestial neighbor. They return with the dormant remains of Sentinel Prime (Nimoy), who is resurrected by Optimus. Sentinel is the inventor of the Transformers' greatest weapon, which can be used to help or destroy humanity. The Autobots champion the former, but the Decepticons, led by a crippled Megatron (Hugo Weaving), have other plans. Old friends, like Sam, Lennox (Josh Duhamel), and Simmons (John Turturro), are joined by new ones, like Mearing (Frances McDormand) and Brazos (John Malkovich), to provide a human face to the resistance movement against the Decepticons as the evil metal creatures use Chicago as their base for an all-out assault on the planet.

The words "been there, done that" apply. Transformers 3 is not substantially better or worse than Transformers or Transformers 2 because it's more of the same. There are battles. Things blow up. Human actors give inferior performances to machines. An attractive woman is unabashedly presented as a sex object. More things blow up. A city is leveled, with the destruction lovingly crafted and presented. And, in the end, it comes to a smashdown between Optimus Prime and Megatron, but we wouldn't have it any other way.

Transformers 3 is unlikely to change any minds regarding the franchise. The brilliantly cut trailer makes it look like this might be the first entry into the series to tell a compelling story, but that hope is dispelled fairly early in the proceedings. It should be remembered that Bay's movies, with their high energy action sequences and top-of-the-line special effects, always translate into good trailers and TV commercials.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

4

gameguardian21Feb 24, 2016

While it is an improvement over revenge of the **** Dark of the moon still focuses on it's action more than the story and characters. At least it's watchable.

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

4

nahtan1244Jan 30, 2016

Ok so it is much better than it't's previous movie the god awful transformers revenge of the fallen but not quite as good as transformers 1. I decide to give this movie a chance because i thought what could be worst than revenge of theOk so it is much better than it't's previous movie the god awful transformers revenge of the fallen but not quite as good as transformers 1. I decide to give this movie a chance because i thought what could be worst than revenge of the fallen. I was surprised but at the same time let down. While the acting and story were a step up from the previous movie and optimums primes father was a nice touch this movie is still very forgtable… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

4

FuturedirectorApr 25, 2016

Transformers III: Dark of moon shows thrilling and shocking visual-effects, that doesn't work correctly with the original sequels. It also has unremarkable action and not enough thriller for keep teen and adult viewers in shock. It's betterTransformers III: Dark of moon shows thrilling and shocking visual-effects, that doesn't work correctly with the original sequels. It also has unremarkable action and not enough thriller for keep teen and adult viewers in shock. It's better to don't listen to the bad and ignorant audiences.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

4

Thatonenerd2187Jan 19, 2017

While it is more watchable than revenge of the fallen, it still has some of the same problems. The story and it's characters are actually more interesting than the previous 2 installments, but it's execution isn't that good, with it onceWhile it is more watchable than revenge of the fallen, it still has some of the same problems. The story and it's characters are actually more interesting than the previous 2 installments, but it's execution isn't that good, with it once again focusing on the human characters than the transformers. While the transformers do get more screen time than revenge of the fallen, it's not enough to make it more compelling. The human side of the story is just as dull as the other two, but somewhat better. Once again the special effects are pretty good, and the final act of the movie has an action packed end to it. Even though I don't care about the characters, I still enjoyed watching the final battle in Chicago.The humor in this movie is toned down a bit, but when it shows up, it attempts the same jokes as the other two movies, which isn't good. Overall, while it is better than revenge of the fallen, the story, characters, and overall structure of the film doesn't work, and I wouldn't really recommend it.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

4

CRoger013Dec 28, 2020

This movie is mediocre! I don’t hate the dark of the moon! But revenge of the fallen, age extinction, and the last knight are terrible! The first transformers movie and bumblebee (2018) are great!

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

4

DunyGMar 8, 2021

I thought the movie was fine, in my opinion it was too long and I think that it could have used less money if it was shorter. I know some people liked how it focused more on the humans, but to be honest I didn't like it and I think almostI thought the movie was fine, in my opinion it was too long and I think that it could have used less money if it was shorter. I know some people liked how it focused more on the humans, but to be honest I didn't like it and I think almost every human in this movie is written badly. I don't know how Starscream died in such a stupid way and how can Optimus Prime get stuck on wires if he has a sword? I mean, do the writers want me to believe that Optimus wasn't around for twenty minutes because he got stuck on wires? I did have fun though.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

3

ArkonBladeJul 6, 2011

this film to me pretty much sumerises micheal bay's thinking on making movies . he gets bashed heavily on the second one for a crappy plot , crappy charicter develpment , and other things . so How does Bay respond to all this? by making athis film to me pretty much sumerises micheal bay's thinking on making movies . he gets bashed heavily on the second one for a crappy plot , crappy charicter develpment , and other things . so How does Bay respond to all this? by making a better story and likeable charicters? HELL NO! this is micheal bay we are talkin about . his method is well if it must be that the special effect and action sceanes arnt cool enough. so i must improve that. so what we are left with is pretty much the same lame plot from TF2 decepticons find a wepon to destroy earth and god knows why that stuttering prick shilo boof has to save us all . so most of the movie is focused on Sam whining and complaining how he wants to live a normal life and that no one appriates all that he's done for us blah blah freekin blah. yeah its not like the movie goers dont wana know more about the transformers themselves out side of them just being dragged out to beat the living hell out of each other... noooo we need more shilo . megan fox is now gone and this new girl is brought in cant remember her name and with her god awful acting its unlikely we will see her in much more movies. shes some model who couldnt act well enough to get in a sci fi B movie but apperntly Bay thought she was hot even though her face looks like some one took a metal rake over it for a few days . not to sound shallow or any thing i could have cared less how she looked if her acting was passable like megan foxes was ... maybe thats giving fox to much praise but she wasnt horrable like this girl is thats for sure. in the end if you wana see a mindless action flick with no redeeming qaulitys but its action . you will probubly like this film . if not stay far far far away. i unfortunitly got dragged to this mess cause my 13 year old nephew wanted to see it and begged me .… Expand

5 of 10 users found this helpful55

All this user's reviews

3

jctejadaJul 9, 2011

3D and IMAX versions are not worth the extra money. Some movies you have to watch it in 3D and only in 3D like "Avatar" but unfortunately "Transformers: Dark Of the Moon" does not go in this category. It just didn't have that extra WOW3D and IMAX versions are not worth the extra money. Some movies you have to watch it in 3D and only in 3D like "Avatar" but unfortunately "Transformers: Dark Of the Moon" does not go in this category. It just didn't have that extra WOW factor. 3D felt more like an after thought. The Plot: The lead human character, "Sam Witwicky" seemed more like a desperate 40 year old virgin then a hero who saved the world TWICE. He was more concerned with saving a girl which is just met then actually saving the world. Poor guy... it seemed like he was still recovering from his break up with Megan Fox Oops meant to say Mikaela Banes. By the way the new girl has nothing on Megan Fox. Too bad Katy Perry isn't much into acting (yet), she would had made a wonderful replacement for Megan Fox. The movie ran for 2 hours and 37 minutes but it felt like it ran for 5 hours. This movie could not end fast enough for me. This movie was not all bad. The action was what you expected of a Transformer's movie. I like how they incorporated the lunar landings into the mix and the gamer in me liked the 3rd person shooter bit they had towards the end of the movie. We NEED fresh eyes and fresh minds for the 4th installment (if there is one)… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

3

SacrificeJul 9, 2011

I liked the Transformers cartoon as a child and I even enjoyed the first two films for what they were: action movies with giant fighting robots. That being said, I found TF3 overly long and boring. It spends too much time following the humansI liked the Transformers cartoon as a child and I even enjoyed the first two films for what they were: action movies with giant fighting robots. That being said, I found TF3 overly long and boring. It spends too much time following the humans running around and being tossed around. There are few good "giant fighting robots" scenes. It was rather disappointing.… Expand

1 of 5 users found this helpful14

All this user's reviews

3

yoniw18Jul 6, 2011

I wanted to love this movie. I hyped this film up to the people I went to see it with. I told them I had read the reviews and this one was different and more action packed. Wrong. The action is muddled and chaotic. The transformers all lookI wanted to love this movie. I hyped this film up to the people I went to see it with. I told them I had read the reviews and this one was different and more action packed. Wrong. The action is muddled and chaotic. The transformers all look virtually identical at the speed the action is happening, and several times I could sense a shot that was supposed to be jaw dropping was utterly lost on me and my friends- who looked at each and mouthed "what?". Some movies have comedic relief characters and/or lines of dialogue. This film is comprised entirely of those lines and characters. This is the kind of film where the more you talk about it- the more you realize how angry you are at it… Expand

5 of 11 users found this helpful56

All this user's reviews

3

AlekKolchakJul 22, 2011

You don't go into a Michael Bay movie worrying about the story, but wow, this one had plot holes you could drive a sentient semi trailer through. At times outright ignoring elements established in the first two movies- just don't think aboutYou don't go into a Michael Bay movie worrying about the story, but wow, this one had plot holes you could drive a sentient semi trailer through. At times outright ignoring elements established in the first two movies- just don't think about it too much. The new lead actress is a Victoria's Secret model with no acting experience, so we're not subtle about the whole "style over substance" concept. But most viewers only care about one thing only: Giant Robots Fighting. And this delivers in that area. Bay now uses "bullet time" to make it clear which robot is fighting which, so he is learning, and you will walk out with your Giant Robot Fighting desire satisfied. A popcorn flick that delivers mindless but fun, but if you're looking for the 2011 version of "Inception," this 'aint it.… Expand

10 of 14 users found this helpful104

All this user's reviews

3

cabritaJul 19, 2011

Surprisingly this movie starts off well enough with an actually story. I know it's hard to believe that a Michael Bay movie starts off with a story. Well all that seemed to be going well all went down the drain fair;y quickly . The storySurprisingly this movie starts off well enough with an actually story. I know it's hard to believe that a Michael Bay movie starts off with a story. Well all that seemed to be going well all went down the drain fair;y quickly . The story suddenly stops and the mindless action begins. I sat there asking myself am I the only one who enjoys good movies and doesn't just go watch a movie to see things blow up. The lack of story in this movie causes your mind to wander and focus on the text messages in your pocket instead of the mindless 1 hour long action scene.… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

3

rippley5150Jul 1, 2011

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The action scenes were entertaining and the CGI was spectacular. The plot was pretty bad. What I found to be the worst part of the movie was the Decepticon character development. In the cartoon there was always that tension between Megatron and Starscream. The first two movies sort of had the tension but IMHO they should have started with it from the first film. It sounds silly for robot character development but it would have made more sense than all the human rambling. Just a different perspective I guess lol

The first half of the movie at least tried to make some sense, the second half was all over the place.… Expand

2 of 7 users found this helpful25

All this user's reviews

3

lahaineJul 31, 2011

Michael Bay has graced us with another air-headed, action-trash-of-a-film. It improves on the second (which isn't saying much), and remains inferior to the 1st film. Good visual effects and sound... but that can't save it from being one ofMichael Bay has graced us with another air-headed, action-trash-of-a-film. It improves on the second (which isn't saying much), and remains inferior to the 1st film. Good visual effects and sound... but that can't save it from being one of the worst movies out this summer... I regret seeing it.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

3

somethingnewJul 2, 2011

Almost three hours of an overly complicated plot mixed in with a ton of cool visual effects, explosions and total destruction. A definite mixed bag and not nearly as good as the first.

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

3

DavyJul 10, 2011

As per usual, the animation was amazing. But, as for the story, terrible. Coming from a Transformers lover like myself, I was bitterly disappointed and had high hopes for this film. If youre a transformers fan and have seen the past two andAs per usual, the animation was amazing. But, as for the story, terrible. Coming from a Transformers lover like myself, I was bitterly disappointed and had high hopes for this film. If youre a transformers fan and have seen the past two and watched the cartoons and read the comics and such you will get in the same frustrated mood that I was in. But if youre a first time Transformer-er in search for a half decent action film. I suppose it would do.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

3

aldoo_ufoJul 17, 2011

If you are a big fan of CGIs and action scenes with car chases and explosions, then you should by all means watch this movie. But if you are actually into movies with a coherent plot, tri-dimensional characters and non-clichÃ©If you are a big fan of CGIs and action scenes with car chases and explosions, then you should by all means watch this movie. But if you are actually into movies with a coherent plot, tri-dimensional characters and non-clichÃ© lines, then you'd be completely wasting your time here.
The three points I scored were solely due to the visual effects, which were mesmerizing and will most likely get an Oscar nod. But that's all there is to this movie.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

3

Ali_TJul 18, 2011

A remarkably odd and unsatisfying entry. I loved the first and wasn't too impressed by the second. The first was tightly scripted with a solid main plot and little padding. It was a 2 hour roller coaster and all the better for it. The secondA remarkably odd and unsatisfying entry. I loved the first and wasn't too impressed by the second. The first was tightly scripted with a solid main plot and little padding. It was a 2 hour roller coaster and all the better for it. The second was a mess with too many plot strands and characters linking towards the rather underwhelming final battle and virtually no main plot to hold it together. Sadly, Dark Of The Moon is actually worse. But not because it has no plot. The basic premise involving Sentinel Prime is superb, but it's comprehensively ruined by far too many characters, most of whom are dreadfully acted, especially the usually dependable John Malkovich, in too many plot strands that, unlike the second film, go absolutely nowhere, and all clutter up the film so badly in the first 90 minutes that by the time the action starts. Terrible editing and an almost wanton disregard for very significant deaths in the series rob two of the most poignant moments of any emotional impact. Not to mention the choice to remove Megan Fox and replace her with a fembot. I don't even like Fox, but at least she could act out more than one emotion, that being "slightly confused". Bay's ability to make action sequences look stunning is certainly present, but they are so CGI heavy and the lighting so determined to show off it's HDR abilities on the CGI models that you can't tell what the hell is going on or who's winning. After each battle, you often have to wait for the next dialogue scene to figure out which shiny robot is still alive. All in all, it's just a damned shame. An intriguing plot that should have massive emotional impact for a blockbuster, that turns out to be a confused mess full of throwaway one liners and jokes, none of which are funny, not to mention wasting some serious acting talent on plot strands that go nowhere and rob the film of any momentum. Almost a complete disaster.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

3

JAM123Dec 28, 2011

Michael Bay makes another terrible attempt at a good movie, I'm starting to think he's not even trying. This movie was at least better than the second installment in the never ending death penalty of a trilogy. I was forced into seeing itMichael Bay makes another terrible attempt at a good movie, I'm starting to think he's not even trying. This movie was at least better than the second installment in the never ending death penalty of a trilogy. I was forced into seeing it with my friends and wish I had just stayed out of it. The acting is good and the special effects are great, I must admit, but the storyline and plot of the movie and the characters are terrible and I just didn't care about them. There was no feeling in them and if they lived or died, I didn't care. At times, I thought maybe it would be better if they did. The movie is terrible and so is the director and almost anything is better than the Transformers series.… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

3

BiendeoJul 22, 2011

This movie was okay, but it really felt tiring and long in the end. Firstly, this movie was structured oddly. For the first hour, the movie felt fine, having action scenes separated by a few scenes of dialogue. It felt nice until the ChicagoThis movie was okay, but it really felt tiring and long in the end. Firstly, this movie was structured oddly. For the first hour, the movie felt fine, having action scenes separated by a few scenes of dialogue. It felt nice until the Chicago sequence. This scene took the 90 minutes left of the movie, consisting entirely of every single step these guys had to do to defeat the Decepticons and it felt like a chore to watch it as it just kept going on and on. There wasn't any character development in this section too, just non-stop action. This would be fine if the characters had developed before the scene, but rather are left on a climax and magically end up being developed in the end. The computer graphics looked fine, and it wasn't too impressive since it was done equally well in the past two movies. As for the actors, they didn't really play too well. It wasn't really stand out for me. The dialogue mostly killed the acting for me, because it felt like the actors were doing a mediocre job when really it was just the scripting that's making them suffer. And finally, I watched this movie in 3D, and I can say that it didn't stand out once to me. None of the action felt any better or worse, and it just ended up being unnecessary. I couldn't really tell if anything came out of the screen. Overall, this movie is below average. It is plentiful of action, but if you wanted anything other than that, you're better off seeing another movie.… Expand

12 of 16 users found this helpful124

All this user's reviews

3

SnafuFrankAug 8, 2011

Man, what a boring piece of **** this turned out to be. It's just mindless moronic action with a brainless incoherent plot. I can't believe this sad excuse of a movie made over a billion at the box office, just sad.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

3

EdreiAMAug 10, 2011

Its a horrible movie. You must wait for more than one hour for you can see the transformers fight and i don say that this have importance to me, but for other persons and children can be bored. The history is stupid, dont have the moreIts a horrible movie. You must wait for more than one hour for you can see the transformers fight and i don say that this have importance to me, but for other persons and children can be bored. The history is stupid, dont have the more minimun point of reflection or climax, is totally plane. The actuations are ver bad, dont express anything emotion, are bobas and ridiculous. Nothing are save of be bad un this picture.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

3

Delta_AssaultSep 28, 2011

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I finally went and saw Transformers Dark of the Moon last night. Kinda put it off for a while because I **** hated the second one and this didn't seem much better. But uh, finally got bored and went, this summer's been awful as far as good video games go. They're saving up all the big releases for the fall and holiday season. Here's my thoughts, with spoilers. Though really, this film is so dumb it's not the sort of thing you can spoil. -The story here is taken from the comics and the cartoon. When the Autobots leave in a giant ark that blows up, it's from Dreamwave's first storyline in their Transformers comic. And of course, the Decepticons using a space bridge to transport Cybertron to earth is "The Ultimate Doom" episode from the G1 cartoon. So... no real complaints there, them using the actual source material is a welcome change as they've pretty much butchered everything else up to this point.

-Who the hell is Q? He's some Autobot scientist that has hair? Why would transformers have hair? And how come I've never heard of Q before? I've watched the cartoon and read the comics and the character of Q, autobot scientist, never came to my attention before. Wait a minute. Q, that's the name of the gadget scientist that equips James Bond in every Bond film, isn't it? Is that what Bay is going for here, ripping off James Bond? Why the **** did he do that? The Autobots already have Ratchet and Wheeljack in the cartoons to outfit them with gear, there was no reason to make up some new lame character.

-The comic relief, terrible as it is, comes from the two small robots Wheels and Brains. I'm not sure if Wheels is still voiced by Steve Buscemi but he sounds slightly different. Anyways, these two stupid characters are awful and try their darnedest to remind you of Skids and Mudflap from the second film. They might not be quite as racially offensive, but it's a near thing. Even viewing them without the racial stereotypes, they're just plain annoying as hell and contribute nothing else to the film. Also, Brains for some inexplicable reason has troll doll hair on his head. Again, why would Transformers have hair? These are robots.

-Shia LaBeouf screams and acts like a **** idiot. This does not make him a good protagonist.

-The comedy in this film is bizarre and off-putting, in other words... typical Bay. Ken Jeong of course has to straddle Shia LaBeouf in a restroom stall and call himself "Deep Wang." Of course he does. Of course Bay finds this funny. In fact, this is almost the exact same scenario that Bay gave us in The Island, where it was Steve Buscemi with Ewan McGregor. An unsuspecting innocent walks in on them and thinks they're gay lovers. I'm not saying this sort of situation is unimaginably lacking in comedic value, but the over-the-top manner that Jeong acts just made me feel so embarrassed and disgusted for humanity that the possibility of humor never arrived. Ken Jeong, man, he needs to try and think up some new schtick, because it's just getting old. Cringeworthy comedy is not necessarily a bad thing but it didn't work for me here.

-With the way Michael Bay shoots her, Rosie Huntington-Whitely is not nearly as ugly as she looked in some promo stills. However... her acting sucks and she's still not as attractive as Megan Fox.

-Optimus Prime appears to be a murderous psychopath. I'm not even sure if he's better then the Decepticons. "We'll kill them all." "Let's find out." Whatever happened to the Optimus Prime from the cartoon? That's the one that us kids all looked up to. The Optimus Prime here is either wimpering for his life or slicing and dicing everything in sight like a cold-blooded murderer. We bounce around from one extreme to the other, never quite coming into harmonious alignment with Peter Cullen's majestic and inspiring voice, perfect as always. Don't get me wrong, his voice is great, just not what he's made to say in that voice.

-Optimus is also equipped with his trailer now, which is an improvement over the past films which always had him trailer-less. Here, it finally completes his vehicle profile and also serves a useful purpose as his equipment locker and battle station.

-Why would the Decepticons use humans to rebuild Cybertron? How does that even work? Human slaves are going to be starving and beaten, how are they going to be able to rebuild a totally alien mechanical planet? The Cybertronians are highly advanced technological beings, right? How would 6 billion humans know how to repair this advanced technological planet? Hell, 4 billion humans on earth probably don't even have access to wikipedia yet. I mean, if you want human slaves to build ancient pyramids by dragging giant blocks up ramps, I guess we could probably do that. But I imagine Cybertron has completely alien and sophisticated systems that make up its structure.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

3

comfyconfessionOct 14, 2011

People might think I'm crazy, but I actually liked Revenge of the Fallen better than this. When I saw that movie I saw it for what it was. An awesome visual eye-candy fest, and that's what the Transformers movies are; films that are fun forPeople might think I'm crazy, but I actually liked Revenge of the Fallen better than this. When I saw that movie I saw it for what it was. An awesome visual eye-candy fest, and that's what the Transformers movies are; films that are fun for how great they look, and I actually felt that that was lacking here. Yes the last forty five minutes are ridiculous and crazy, but that's pretty much it, aside from the Chernobyl bit. What we got was basically an hour and a half of Shia Laboeuf looking for a job, then forty five minutes of robots kicking ass. What I wanted to do was forgot about anything that resembled a plot, and just immerse myself in the VISUAL genius of Michael Bay, but I couldn't because there is just some awful butchering of cinema culture by the screenplay and story. For example I can't focus Shia Laboeuf being swung around holding onto a wire latched onto the eye of a massive decepticon in a flurry of wildly unrealistic, dumb fun, because my mind keeps on going back to the worthlessness of John Malkovich's
role in the movie. Lot's of people say that Michael Bay is a bad director, but when they see his films their complaint is usually the plot and script, but what you have to keep in mind is that he doesn't write his films. Ehren Kruger (the writer of scream 3(an abomination)) wrote this not him. There was actually decent directing in this film but it was ruined by that horrible script.… Expand

4 of 6 users found this helpful42

All this user's reviews

3

JollyG87Dec 15, 2011

It's the same crap with a different title. Michael Bay bombards us with mediocrity once again. Just like "Revenge of the Fallen" the characters are worthless, the jokes are bad, and the action scenes are too long and repetitive. Granted, thisIt's the same crap with a different title. Michael Bay bombards us with mediocrity once again. Just like "Revenge of the Fallen" the characters are worthless, the jokes are bad, and the action scenes are too long and repetitive. Granted, this time around the movie does try to take itself a little more seriously. Gone are the racist robots and the constant kid jokes. But saying this is better than "Revenge of the Fallen" is like saying "I Am Number Four" was a better movie than "Battlefield Earth." Michael Bay lowered the bar so much with "Revenge of the Fallen" that he really has nowhere to go but up on this one. The final action scene does have its cool moments, but the action is poorly staged and way too long. I felt like I could have watched the beginning of the action scene, left the theater for 10 minutes, come back and not missed a thing. It's one of those action scenes that's impressive for the first 5 minutes before it overstays its welcome and stays at the same level. I guess if you liked "Revenge of the Fallen," you'll enjoy this as well. It's the same movie with a few improvements. But if you felt like Michael Bay grabbed the money out of your wallet the second time around, stay away from this. You're going to have the exact same experience.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

3

giraffeluver88Jan 2, 2012

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I've sifted through the whole crazy, lazy, non sense filled, plot line to get to the robot destruction. Worth it? Sort of..... but anybody that's that has lazy criticism or was stoned while watching this...
Then soup's on!!!… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

Transformers: Dark of the Moon

User Reviews