Paramount Vantage | Release Date: December 26, 2007
8.1
USER SCORE
Universal acclaim based on 1708 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
1,396
Mixed:
134
Negative:
178
Watch Now
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)
10
MikeB.May 26, 2008
Those who don't give this film a 10 undoubtedly have never heard of Arthur Schopenhauer. The film goes well beyond the pathologies of the American experience or even the juxtaposition of the sacred and secular thirst for power to probe Those who don't give this film a 10 undoubtedly have never heard of Arthur Schopenhauer. The film goes well beyond the pathologies of the American experience or even the juxtaposition of the sacred and secular thirst for power to probe the terrors of life and human alienation. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
JasonE.Jun 14, 2008
One of the best movies in recent memory.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
BillyP.Jun 17, 2008
I'm not entirely sure why but this really is one of my favorite movies of all time. Thats all I have to say about it, excellent film.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
SinjinnN.Jun 18, 2008
This is a love it or hate it film. a lot of people complain about charachter development and plot but i think there is plenty of charachter development , it just doesnt go the way they expect or want. the plot is also not contrived , it isnt This is a love it or hate it film. a lot of people complain about charachter development and plot but i think there is plenty of charachter development , it just doesnt go the way they expect or want. the plot is also not contrived , it isnt a mystery , an action flick or a comedy or a romance, it is instead very original . the truth of of it is that this is a great film with a great cast which some movie goers will hate because it doesnt funnel you down a familiar and comfortable and contrived plot. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
frederikdewildeJul 14, 2008
TWBB is a magnificent film with strokes of genius. The incredible performance of DDLewis and the tantalizing and unnerving soundtrack of Johnny Greenwood is just amazing. The strokes of genius in the movie can be found in all the choices TWBB is a magnificent film with strokes of genius. The incredible performance of DDLewis and the tantalizing and unnerving soundtrack of Johnny Greenwood is just amazing. The strokes of genius in the movie can be found in all the choices made, frame by frame, word by word, step by step, silences and the characters eye to eye contacts. Goddard said that cinema is 24f of truth. TWBB is a film that questions these 24f from the beginning to the end. I am surely going to see it again and again although i had think that the the film struggles to find closure, but what a great film! Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
SeanMJul 17, 2008
Honestly, this movie was fantastic. Unforunately I get the feeling that some people who went to this movie were expecting more blood perhaps? This movie is somewhat slow, but if you really pay attention you can pick up on the countless Honestly, this movie was fantastic. Unforunately I get the feeling that some people who went to this movie were expecting more blood perhaps? This movie is somewhat slow, but if you really pay attention you can pick up on the countless parallels between the oil industry and religious society. Great acting, great theme, great film. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
GrantC.Aug 14, 2008
Fantastic movie. I was worried about whether I liked it or not, but it enthralled me, and I actually saw past what some call a bad ending and saw a great moral lesson. Greed and selfihness lead to misery and despair in the end. The musical Fantastic movie. I was worried about whether I liked it or not, but it enthralled me, and I actually saw past what some call a bad ending and saw a great moral lesson. Greed and selfihness lead to misery and despair in the end. The musical scores were fantastic, done by none other than the genius Jonny Greenwood of Radiohead (my favorite musician ever is Greenwood, favorite band is Radiohead). People like Jeff B. obviously don't know what the intentins of the scores were. It wasn't supposed to be music, but more a backing to support the escalation of the film's suspense. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
JonathanS.Nov 30, 2009
I would have to say that this is quite possibly one of the finest films I have ever seen. And to Jimmy M... bravo. I could not have said it better myself.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
TheManDec 17, 2009
Undoubtedly the greatest film of 2007, and perhaps one of the greatest films of all time. There Will Be Blood is a damning portrayal of the horrifying consequences of greed, obsession and competition in a time where oil was worth gold dust. Undoubtedly the greatest film of 2007, and perhaps one of the greatest films of all time. There Will Be Blood is a damning portrayal of the horrifying consequences of greed, obsession and competition in a time where oil was worth gold dust. Day Lewis captures the true essence and meaning behind the film and conveys it in a superbly astonishing display very few can acheive. Slow burning, yes. Well worth it, most definetly. Just one of those films you will look back on and underline as the highest calibre of modern motion picture. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
4
DWDec 8, 2009
I loved this movie. I loved the photography. The character development. The realism. The premise. All for what? For nothing? Do not make a film if you do not know where the plot is going to go. The plot - goes nowhere. There will be blood? I loved this movie. I loved the photography. The character development. The realism. The premise. All for what? For nothing? Do not make a film if you do not know where the plot is going to go. The plot - goes nowhere. There will be blood? There won't be blood - at least no blood that has any meaning. If you expect to see a good man become evil you will not. If you expect to see an evil man be reformed you will not. If you expect to see an evil man get his comeuppance you will not. If you expect people to suffer terribly or prosper wonderfully, you will be mistaken in your estimation. You instead get: Daniel Day Lewis: a cranky, miserable miser... who is... a cranky miserable miser. The only person who really loses the plot in the film is the screenwriter. There is no plot. And this is why this is not a film, but a series of still of beautiful countryside. There is no plot. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
BradDec 21, 2007
You seriously won't be able to speak when this sucker is over. Your jaw will be on the floor.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
4
[Anonymous]Dec 23, 2007
Is there some kind of mass hallucination going on with these critics? This film is not good. The story is told excruciatingly slowly, and D Day Lewis basically reprises his Bill the Butcher role, but gives him the voice of John Huston. The Is there some kind of mass hallucination going on with these critics? This film is not good. The story is told excruciatingly slowly, and D Day Lewis basically reprises his Bill the Butcher role, but gives him the voice of John Huston. The guy playing the religious zealot is in WAY over his head, he's required to age 30 years yet in the last scene he still has adolescent acne and his voice squeaks as though his testacles are just dropping! All this nonsense about it being a big statement about religion vs money is trying to paste meaning onto a film that was lazily written. Unfortunately, Day Lewis is starting to have shark eyes which look dead and malevolent all the time, generating not much sympathy or interest within this viewer. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
MovieGoerDec 24, 2007
A paramount masterpiece. And I'm not even a fan of P.T. Anderson. Thought "Magnolia" was masturbatory poppycock, an attempt at art that was a 3-hour embarrassment. Clearly, P.T. has matured. D.D. Lewis gives a staggering performance A paramount masterpiece. And I'm not even a fan of P.T. Anderson. Thought "Magnolia" was masturbatory poppycock, an attempt at art that was a 3-hour embarrassment. Clearly, P.T. has matured. D.D. Lewis gives a staggering performance that will go down in cinematic history. This is one of the great allegorical films about the birth of the industrial revolution in this nation: the greed, the lying, the over-ambition of Manifest Destiny, the raping of our land, all embodied in one man. A ruthlessly coldhearted individual. You will not see another film like this in ten years because studios don't greenlight these kinds of movies. Ever. We almost have to go back to Apocalypse Now for something so uncompromisingly bleak. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
JacobB.Dec 26, 2007
This is a great movie, period. I can see that what I suspect is one person has posted multiiple 0 reviews. Don't know why but it is clearly not becuase of the merits of the movie. The way the three reviews are written and posted This is a great movie, period. I can see that what I suspect is one person has posted multiiple 0 reviews. Don't know why but it is clearly not becuase of the merits of the movie. The way the three reviews are written and posted together is obvious. I doubt whoever it is even saw the movie. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
JeffD.Dec 26, 2007
Daniel Day Lewis is ridiculously good in this movie, which is completely of our time and resonates directly on the money-obsessed elite who currently have power in our country. I know it sounds almost ridiculous to say, but the movie this Daniel Day Lewis is ridiculously good in this movie, which is completely of our time and resonates directly on the money-obsessed elite who currently have power in our country. I know it sounds almost ridiculous to say, but the movie this reminded me most of was 'Citizen Kane.' That might be opening night hyperbole, but this is by far the most politically and spiritually meaningful film I've seen in a long time. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
ThomA.Dec 26, 2007
If you haven't seen the movie, don't rate it. What is wrong with you? This is a great film about some very disquieting aspects of the human condition. Ties with No country for my best of 07 pick.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
BrianB.tDec 27, 2007
A must see for any film lover - not to be missed in the cinema. Spare and careful, daring and electric, this is the film that PTA will call his masterpiece. Every single component of the film is operating on a breathtakingly high octane A must see for any film lover - not to be missed in the cinema. Spare and careful, daring and electric, this is the film that PTA will call his masterpiece. Every single component of the film is operating on a breathtakingly high octane level. This is why we have film. Anderson, Day Lewis, the cinematography (not just pretty pictures but complicated layered composition), the unspeakably other worldly genius of a score by Greenwood, the impeccable production design. It's all there. Again, simply put, a must see. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
NickG.Dec 28, 2007
A movie I admired more than enjoyed. The acting is the best of the year and the thematics are great...but it's low budget shows...the most interesting areas of greed are not shown because they didn't have the budget. When it was A movie I admired more than enjoyed. The acting is the best of the year and the thematics are great...but it's low budget shows...the most interesting areas of greed are not shown because they didn't have the budget. When it was over I felt the story let the movie down..in the end I just didn't care. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
5
SashaS.Dec 28, 2007
Good and worthy attempt but sorry, no cigar. People are constantly comparing to other, better works while missing the basic fact that if it were THAT great it wouldn't need to be compared to other, better works. Shakespeare? Please.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
MatthewS.Dec 29, 2007
one of the great achievements in American cinema.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
5
SteveC.Dec 29, 2007
Great acting undermined by overblown and ultimately embarassing plot. Anothe would be epic with nothing to say and 2.5 hours to not say it in. Lewis' incredible performance is sadly wasted.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
6
mathewB.Dec 29, 2007
Great cinematography, good editing, and a fantastic score cannot make-up for the fact the the films observations are superficial at best. Day-Lewis' preformance is over-the-top and not particularly convincing. More characture than Great cinematography, good editing, and a fantastic score cannot make-up for the fact the the films observations are superficial at best. Day-Lewis' preformance is over-the-top and not particularly convincing. More characture than character, he's supposed to be from Wisconsin... with that accent... not on your life. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
5
DWillyDec 31, 2007
dThis might have been a character study... but no, it's not really, there's no revelation of character (he has no sex drive? he's pissed at the preacher as a rival for power or is it a God thing?); Daniel Day Lewis does give adThis might have been a character study... but no, it's not really, there's no revelation of character (he has no sex drive? he's pissed at the preacher as a rival for power or is it a God thing?); Daniel Day Lewis does give a bravura performance (doing the same character he did in "Gangs Of New York") but it's invulnerable and not by itself affecting; this could have been a story about the clash of ideals, or no ideals or... no, it's not that either (the preacher character disappears for maybe an hour at one point). There's a lot of lot of good cinematography and atmospherics on location along with the style of mixing big theatrical performances with realist ones (using many non-actors), but NO STORY. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
AdamK.Nov 28, 2008
Daniel Day Lewis is brilliant.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
ScraperJun 28, 2016
There Will Be Blood's crescendo lies with this character, Daniel Plainview, and the rotting of his soul. At first, I was looking to his success or failure or that of the oil industry to deliver a climax/resolution. Not so. The cinematography,There Will Be Blood's crescendo lies with this character, Daniel Plainview, and the rotting of his soul. At first, I was looking to his success or failure or that of the oil industry to deliver a climax/resolution. Not so. The cinematography, wonderful acting, and dead-on feel of the period allow the perfect breeding ground for all these characters to writhe in their awful ways. Entertaining as hell to watch if you can stand the fact that Forrest and Jenny don't get back together and have a lovely son. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
MantisJan 10, 2017
Daniel Day-Lewis portrays a sly oil seeker in this rather tragic story. The movie is slow paced with attention to the few characters it has, which benefit from that and results in great conversations and beautiful shots. Interesting movie toDaniel Day-Lewis portrays a sly oil seeker in this rather tragic story. The movie is slow paced with attention to the few characters it has, which benefit from that and results in great conversations and beautiful shots. Interesting movie to say the least! Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
imthenoobNov 8, 2012
Only thing bad about this movie is that it's very slow paced and takes quite some time to really get into. By the end of it however, You will love it. Daniel Day-Lewis gives what is easily his best performance (and that's saying something) inOnly thing bad about this movie is that it's very slow paced and takes quite some time to really get into. By the end of it however, You will love it. Daniel Day-Lewis gives what is easily his best performance (and that's saying something) in this movie. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
Gil8ertSep 14, 2012
It is definitely a slow movie, but that's life - some things are fast and some things are slow. But both can have an equal impact. I have seen it 3 or 4 times now - I find it is quite mesmorising and the story compelling. Daniel Day Lewis isIt is definitely a slow movie, but that's life - some things are fast and some things are slow. But both can have an equal impact. I have seen it 3 or 4 times now - I find it is quite mesmorising and the story compelling. Daniel Day Lewis is really sublime in his role, and I found the final scene to be absolute magic!
It is more bizarre than anything else, with the story taking some odd turns at times and playing strange scenarios which you don't expect. Which maybe why I enjoyed it so much - it seemed fresh, it didn't spoon feed me the standard film format and put all it's A,Bs ad Cs in the right order. It was 2 years after release that I watched this, and I didn't read any reviews before I did watch it. Just because it is long and slow with odd music and even stranger dialogue, doesn't necessarily mean it is pretentious - but if you look for it to be, you will most likely find it will be. I did not, I just found it interesting and enjoyable. But then I found the hangover boring so what do I know.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
ClessyJan 6, 2021
Pretentious! That's the best way to describe this movie. This is one of those films that garners so much praise because people are afraid to admit they dont get it. Here's the thing though, there's nothing here to get. It's such a surfacePretentious! That's the best way to describe this movie. This is one of those films that garners so much praise because people are afraid to admit they dont get it. Here's the thing though, there's nothing here to get. It's such a surface level movie masquerading as this masterpiece. It's showing the transitional focus of America going from a culture that over values religion to one that over values wealth and power. The performances given in the film are top notch and everyone really does a fantastic job at delivering what they're supposed to. This however, doesn't make the films plot any better. It comes off as a disjointed tale of episodes that loosy connect showing that the character has no progression. If you want to call his slip is into further anger character development then sure he "evolves" but, both the main character and ellie are the same people with the same agenda the whole movie. Don't feel bad if you're watching the film thinking "I just dont get it". The message is so blunt and ham fisted, its not you it's the poor script. "Religion is bad, Capitalism is bad". But the reality is anything without boundaries or that pushes to the unrealistic levels of extremism demonstrated in this movie are ridiculous. They're pushed so hard the characters become caricatures instead. Lastly, the movie tries so hard to harken back to 1960 in style and feel but really doesn't even compare to the classics it aspires to be. This film isn't the revolutionary piece of art is thinks it is and frankly its not fun or exciting to watch. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
aduneyeDec 29, 2015
It is challenging and pretty slow-paced, requiring a lot of thinking during and after. I would not recommend it to just anyone, because it is a complicated film and the main character is not at all likable. Regardless, it is a very beautifulIt is challenging and pretty slow-paced, requiring a lot of thinking during and after. I would not recommend it to just anyone, because it is a complicated film and the main character is not at all likable. Regardless, it is a very beautiful film, with incredible scenery, an amazing score, and fantastic performances. The plot is simple, but it feels very original, dealing with themes of greed, family, hatred, and faith. I would certainly call it a masterpiece. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
seancriswellOct 7, 2012
While I agree with most of what everyone who loves this movie says about it, I do feel that it doesn't succeed in a couple of areas where the true greats do. If there is such a thing as too much ambiguity, Blood has it. We learn so little ofWhile I agree with most of what everyone who loves this movie says about it, I do feel that it doesn't succeed in a couple of areas where the true greats do. If there is such a thing as too much ambiguity, Blood has it. We learn so little of Plainview that when he does interact with other characters it is impossible to know when he is lying or telling the truth. This gives Plainview little motivation as a character. In contrast to the people who love this movie I feel this is why some people find this movie boring. If we had just the smallest amount of back story on Plainview I think what he does would make this movie much more interesting to those that find it boring. Although Anderson does give us very small glimpses into his characters motivation in his movies, we fail to get even that small glimpse with Plainview. Of course on the positive side Anderson has created another set of characters that stay with you for weeks after viewing the movie. He moves his characters through these worlds he creates in such a way that we become entranced with the characters and the atmosphere. Of course Lewis is brilliant and deserves every bit of recognition he has received for this role. Last but not least the final scene in this movie is mesmerizing. The final confrontation between these two characters is brilliantly written and brilliantly acted. This is one of my top 5 endings for a movie ever, from the much hyped bowling pin, to the less talked about line. "I'm done". Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
NoSugarTonightJul 2, 2012
Certainly eveyone is entitled to their opinion, and some may be praising it just to jump on the bandwagon. But I think there is some ridiculous accusations concerning this film. It must have been doing something right since almost everyCertainly eveyone is entitled to their opinion, and some may be praising it just to jump on the bandwagon. But I think there is some ridiculous accusations concerning this film. It must have been doing something right since almost every single magazine, newspaper, or awards show hailed it as one of the best films of 2007 and one of the best films of the decade. Just because a film isn't exactly what you expected doesn't mean you have to **** all over it. The film has a moral and a point! But it seems everyone here needs the film to shove it right in their face so they don't have to think. Pathetic. And I forgot to rate it last time sorry. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
Iky009Jan 3, 2014
Já começa com Daniel Day-Lewis dando show de interpretação, claro até o fim do filme. Bom Paul Thomas já tem meu eterno respeito, essa película fenomenal.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
Nesbitt10Jul 31, 2013
The closing sequence delivers on the promise of the movie's title in a manner that keeps viewers discussing it long after the picture ends. “There Will Be Blood” is not a movie that disappears quietly. Paul Thomas Anderson's epic masterpieceThe closing sequence delivers on the promise of the movie's title in a manner that keeps viewers discussing it long after the picture ends. “There Will Be Blood” is not a movie that disappears quietly. Paul Thomas Anderson's epic masterpiece "There will be Blood" is a steadfast reflection of the very essence of capitalism in America, where domination, not gain, is the ultimate objective, and by any means necessary.

When we first meet Daniel Plainview (Daniel Day-Lewis) in 1898, he's mining for gold in a shaft he has dug into the ground of his Texas property. He finds what he's looking for, and perhaps more. Several years later, he has shifted his focus from gold to oil and he has been able to hire some hands. When an accident results in a death, Daniel finds himself with an infant orphan to care for. He raises the child, known as H.W., to be his own. By 1912, Daniel has become a well-known oilman, and he his looking to expand his empire. Accompanied by his partner, Fletcher (Ciarán Hinds), and his son (Dillon Freasier), he travels to California to follow a promising lead. What he finds there astonishes him. He seeks to buy large parcels of property, but he is impeded in his goal by the evangelist preacher Eli Sunday (Paul Dano), who wants Daniel to donate $10,000 to the local church before he sells. After the contract is signed, however, Daniel reneges on the deal. Shortly thereafter, once the first drill has become operational, there is an accident that results in an explosion that fuels a major oil fire and costs H.W. his hearing.

For most of the film, Daniel is a fascinating character. He's a mass of contradictions: charismatic, ugly, easygoing, ruthless, silver-tongued, plain-spoken, gentle, violent. He's smart and understands how to manipulate every situation to his advantage. He understands the business of oil and transforms himself from a poor miner into a wealthy businessman. Unfortunately, the more power Daniel amasses, the more corrupt and dissolute he becomes. Anderson chronicles Daniel's personality decay intelligently. He establishes the character as an admirable individual, but eventually his morality slowly erodes. The lives of these two, Daniel and Eli, are self-centered, cunning, and ruthless men who collide and lead us into the dark, unpaved path of madness of self-destruction driven by their unrelenting greed.

“There Will Be Blood” is a rich character study of a fascinating individual who is by turns likable, loathsome, admirable, monstrous, and driven. What Day-Lewis brings to the characterization is more exquisite and complex than anything even Anderson might have imagined at the outset. His Plainview is the most gripping film performance of the year, and as his religious foil, Dano also reveals unsuspected depths. Long, but so well crafted with terrific cinematography, and beautifully written/directed by Paul Thomas Anderson. Daniel Day-Lewis and Robert Elswit both earned Academy Awards.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
DarthnixaDec 14, 2012
This deep, brooding portrayal of a man motivated only by greed is a haunting movie that will both terrify and amaze you. I needn't say, Daniel Day-Lewis delivers one of the best performances of all time as Daniel Plainview.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
SummersausageJan 14, 2013
This movie was a classic depiction of the great storytelling of Paul Tom Anderson with incredible acting by Day-Lewis. It was an independent joy ride through the life of an oil man. A visual and written masterpiece.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
ThegodfathersonMay 26, 2013
Day Lewis kills. Bit by bit, he shapes There Will Be Blood into a masterpiece. The shades and story is tedious and slow but wait and see the drama and excitement you are in for.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
adamSv94Feb 25, 2013
This is a roller-coaster and by that I mean that its quality is very uneven throughout the whole movie. It has some amazing moments but it has some really boring moments as well. The only constants in this movie are Daniel Day-Lewis in theThis is a roller-coaster and by that I mean that its quality is very uneven throughout the whole movie. It has some amazing moments but it has some really boring moments as well. The only constants in this movie are Daniel Day-Lewis in the leading role and Paul Thomas Anderson's directing. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
Mothman13May 4, 2013
This movie is a bit on the long side, but overall it is a really enjoyable story to follow. A class drama. Especially the ending takes the cake! I'm finished.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
ScorpionOct 14, 2013
The major problem of the film Daniel Day Lewis is that he is so good an actor that we were watching only him and his ways to embody the character, we almost forgot about the rest of the film, but the film in question is extremely good andThe major problem of the film Daniel Day Lewis is that he is so good an actor that we were watching only him and his ways to embody the character, we almost forgot about the rest of the film, but the film in question is extremely good and thoughtful (even that sometimes bombastic). Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
TomBeltranMay 27, 2013
Posted on 5/19/13 09:05 AM
Is there any doubt that Daniel day Lewis is the best actor to ever grace the screen, lets say you put his performance aside from this film you still have Paul Dano haunting performance Robert ewlisit cinematography
Posted on 5/19/13 09:05 AM
Is there any doubt that Daniel day Lewis is the best actor to ever grace the screen, lets say you put his performance aside from this film you still have Paul Dano haunting performance Robert ewlisit cinematography and gritty direction to me Lewis performance was enough but wow did I get more
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
ThefilmnerdJul 2, 2013
The performance by Daniel Day-Lewis is just fantastic, and the cinematography is beautiful to look at. Paul Thomas Anderson has made a brilliant movie which is beautiful shot, and the acting by Daniel Day-Lewis is amazing.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
ragekoiSep 13, 2013
Masterful film. Contains an original and interesting narrative, a lot of unsubtle bashes at religion, an emotionally charged and holy-inspired (no pun intended) performance by Daniel Day-Lewis, and a dark ending that has spawned my personalMasterful film. Contains an original and interesting narrative, a lot of unsubtle bashes at religion, an emotionally charged and holy-inspired (no pun intended) performance by Daniel Day-Lewis, and a dark ending that has spawned my personal favorite quote of any movie. Has instantly become a favorite. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
CaesaroctopusMay 2, 2015
This film is the Citizen Kane of the 2000s. An epic story of a man consumed by greed and desire for power, There Will Be Blood is artistic and magnificent in every aspect of its storytelling and presentation.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
Viper8787Sep 10, 2014
I can see how many people find this movie boring but I found it really great, yes it does drag on at a lot of parts but it is just a fantastic movie. Daniel Day Lewis is amazing in this movie and deserved the best actor award at the Oscars.I can see how many people find this movie boring but I found it really great, yes it does drag on at a lot of parts but it is just a fantastic movie. Daniel Day Lewis is amazing in this movie and deserved the best actor award at the Oscars. The visuals are also very good as the scenery in this movie is cool. Also some great cinematography kept me into this film the whole time. Good supporting acting and a very good all around movie. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
katharynmaryNov 9, 2014
After all the hoopla, I found the movie disappointing. It's about ambition, manipulation, power, greed, and the different forms they take in capitalism and religion. One character is a man so full of self loathing he tries to stamp out anyAfter all the hoopla, I found the movie disappointing. It's about ambition, manipulation, power, greed, and the different forms they take in capitalism and religion. One character is a man so full of self loathing he tries to stamp out any feeling of humanity he has ever had. The other is just as bad, but with hypocrisy added to the mix. Both very unpleasant, but sadly we've seen them too many times before. Thank goodness we were spared a redemptive ending. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
marlinspikeMay 24, 2016
A veritable opus. If an still argued against the possibility of cinema as art, I would show them this movie. There isn't much of a spire to the plot (save for the end which you SHOUDN'T SPOIL) but that's because the film tells the story wayA veritable opus. If an still argued against the possibility of cinema as art, I would show them this movie. There isn't much of a spire to the plot (save for the end which you SHOUDN'T SPOIL) but that's because the film tells the story way it wants to. Daniel Plainview is a man that starts out as an indifferent silver prospector and ends as a self serving sociopath. In the the end, for this movie at least, it doesn't really matter if the story took us around d the world and on a detour because it's not about the spectacle, it's about daniel. His progression as a character essentially IS the plot, and second only to a Clockwork Orange is probably the greatest progression, if not film entirely, in history. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
moslegend34Dec 3, 2014
A superb film. Day-Lewis commands the screen with superb facial expressions and well versed dialogue. Greenwood's soundtrack; particularly 'The Prospectors' is majestic. Thomas Andersen does a superb job exploiting the gorgeous scenery asA superb film. Day-Lewis commands the screen with superb facial expressions and well versed dialogue. Greenwood's soundtrack; particularly 'The Prospectors' is majestic. Thomas Andersen does a superb job exploiting the gorgeous scenery as well as the zoom in shot of the well, way beyond his years of experience. If I had to be hypercritical, I would suggest to things:
-Despite the original beginning with no dialogue, the movie was a little slow
-The lack of a strong female character (more to do with the story maybe?)
Overall, an excellent movie, a classic if not quite a masterpiece.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
heathermApr 12, 2015
This sprawling Western epic showed the compelling trajectory of a man who experienced incredibly professional success, but whose personal life was difficult. It was interesting to watch his character adapt to all his successes, but remainThis sprawling Western epic showed the compelling trajectory of a man who experienced incredibly professional success, but whose personal life was difficult. It was interesting to watch his character adapt to all his successes, but remain completely unable to compromise in the face of difficulties and conflicts. It was also a visually stunning movie, as the landscape of the oil fields provided a dramatic backdrop for the entire film. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
Matsoni93Jan 23, 2015
Not heavy on special effects, but rather focuses on strong acting, atmosphere and stylish cinematography. Daniel Day-Lewis's performance is absolutely amazing, and the movie delivers scene after scene.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
VinceRocks123May 13, 2015
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Daniel Day Lewis launches into a highscore grade A+ performance as an ambitious oil man whose life crumbles with insanity and madness by his inner obsession with greed, as he tries to snag a reservoir of oil from a religious zealot family and their sanctimonious pastor of a son,

a film with a chilling performance by the powerful critically acclaimed actor who knows how to keep his acting list clean and a well done philosophical tale from Paul Thomas Anderson, a unforgettable oscar-winning classic
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
smartmartSep 18, 2015
A compelling and fascinating character study and a powerful look into a man's descent into madness and greed. Paul Thomas Anderson is a brilliant filmmaker, and I cannot wait to see what films he has in store for the future!
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
EpicLadySpongeApr 5, 2016
"Oh yes, there will be blood."

And so, there is only one true movie that will have blood and that's There Will Be Blood. Sorry, Saw II, but that tagline belongs in this movie.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
3
marceliniJan 10, 2016
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Tenía muchas expectativas por la puntuación, pero salí defraudado completamente. Cuando había transcurrido una hra y 15 minutos, decidi apagar el televisor. En una sola palabra ABURRIDO. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
micahezzesApr 13, 2016
Truly Paul Thomas Anderson's masterpiece. Everything about this movie is perfect: its scoring, its acting, and its thematic implications that shake up the mainstream view of America's favorite pastime: capitalism. The dichotomy between thisTruly Paul Thomas Anderson's masterpiece. Everything about this movie is perfect: its scoring, its acting, and its thematic implications that shake up the mainstream view of America's favorite pastime: capitalism. The dichotomy between this unfettered capitalism against the established order is brilliantly portrayed through Daniel Day-Lewis's terrifying, dehumanizing Daniel Plainview and Paul Dano's scrawny, opportunistic preacher Eli. The landscapes are beautiful in their desolation, and the landscape reflects the mood and theme wonderfully. Truly nothing bad I could say about this film. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
superbatJun 4, 2021
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. There Will Be Blood is a brilliant character study which tells a true story of how greed can corrupt one's soil. Set in the early 20th century, it depicts oilman Daniel Plainview's relentless quest for wealth, and how this quest for wealth eventually changes him for the worst. This movie is more of a slow burner, but the pace fits well for the story which it tells. One doesn't simply become a soulless capitalist overnight; Plainview's moral decline plays out over the course of nearly three decades. Despite the movie's slow pace, it will still absorb you with its compelling story, as well as with Daniel Day-Lewis' scintillating performance as the merciless oilman. Paul Dano also shines as the charismatic preacher, Eli, who buts heads with Plainview. The technical aspects of this film are brilliant as well. The soundtrack is quite fitting, and the cinematography is captivating too. Overall, There Will Be Blood is undoubtedly a masterpiece. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
Artist18Jul 3, 2016
This movie was amazing and i loved it.It has an incredible perfomance by Daniel-Day Lewis and incredible directing too.This movie shows us the madness and the sadness of a normal businessman and his relastionship with his son with anThis movie was amazing and i loved it.It has an incredible perfomance by Daniel-Day Lewis and incredible directing too.This movie shows us the madness and the sadness of a normal businessman and his relastionship with his son with an excellent way.I like this movie but it is a little boring.Great movie I recomend it!!! Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
JackricherSep 17, 2016
BEST MOVIE OF XX CenturyBEST MOVIE OF XX CenturyBEST MOVIE OF XX CenturyBEST MOVIE OF XX CenturyBEST MOVIE OF XX CenturyBEST MOVIE OF XX CenturyBEST MOVIE OF XX CenturyBEST MOVIE OF XX CenturyBEST MOVIE OF XX CenturyBEST MOVIE OF XXBEST MOVIE OF XX CenturyBEST MOVIE OF XX CenturyBEST MOVIE OF XX CenturyBEST MOVIE OF XX CenturyBEST MOVIE OF XX CenturyBEST MOVIE OF XX CenturyBEST MOVIE OF XX CenturyBEST MOVIE OF XX CenturyBEST MOVIE OF XX CenturyBEST MOVIE OF XX CenturyBEST MOVIE OF XX CenturyBEST MOVIE OF XX Century Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
cine1Dec 29, 2016
A slow burn film about American capitalism and its ability to corrupt and isolate. Daniel Day Lewis towers through the entire film, and his ability to slowly wind his way towards explosive rage and violence is terrifying and fascinating atA slow burn film about American capitalism and its ability to corrupt and isolate. Daniel Day Lewis towers through the entire film, and his ability to slowly wind his way towards explosive rage and violence is terrifying and fascinating at the same time. Paul Thomas Anderson has recreated a period of American history that leaps off the screen and pulses with the ambition, violence, and progress of that time. I highly recommend this one to mature and intellectual audiences. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
IAMBATMAN5362Apr 18, 2018
When I first came around to watch this movie I turned it off after the first
5 minutes coz nothing really happened and it was too slow and boring but After some months that I could really understand the art of film I went back and rewatched
When I first came around to watch this movie I turned it off after the first
5 minutes coz nothing really happened and it was too slow and boring but After some months that I could really understand the art of film I went back and rewatched this film the firs 20 minutes without the dialogue became one of the best things in the film once you are prepared and have tons of free time to just think about the movie rather than your life you can begin to respect the film it’s my favourite movie of all time it’s absloute perfection This is the best directed movie of all time in my opinion and the best acted movie ever DDL’s performance will always remain as the best performance in history of cinema and this movie will be regarded as the godfather of our generation it’s the best of this century
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
KeithDowJul 17, 2017
Paul Thomas Anderson's 'There Will Be Blood' deservingly won 2 Oscars and was nominated for 6 more. Daniel Day-Lewis was given an entire year to prepare for the role of Daniel Plainview and it shows. Even more incredible is the fact thatPaul Thomas Anderson's 'There Will Be Blood' deservingly won 2 Oscars and was nominated for 6 more. Daniel Day-Lewis was given an entire year to prepare for the role of Daniel Plainview and it shows. Even more incredible is the fact that Paul Dano was given just 4 days (!) to prepare for his breakout role as Eli Sunday after he was originally cast to just play the smaller part of Paul Sunday (the script was quickly re-written to make the brothers twins so that Dano could pull double duty). While the Oscar for Day-Lewis' performance is a no-brainer, the other--for cinematography--is actually quite debatable. Sure, the Texas locations and landscapes were quite remarkable, but there were also plenty of times when the images on the screen were unnecessarily dark. I would've preferred if the film won the Oscar for best sound editing (for which it was indeed nominated) as the use of sound--including distinct moments of silence--heightened the overall viewing experience to an even greater degree. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
BeastJ18Apr 23, 2018
Paul Thomas Anderson is a fantastic director and showcased his tremendous ability with this film, probably his best to date. However, I am wrongfully going to ignore that, to praise Daniel Day-Lewis. This, in my opinion, is the greatestPaul Thomas Anderson is a fantastic director and showcased his tremendous ability with this film, probably his best to date. However, I am wrongfully going to ignore that, to praise Daniel Day-Lewis. This, in my opinion, is the greatest performance of all time. I have agonised for years, obsessing about what actor in history was the best in a single movie. There are others that are equally perfect, Brando in On the Waterfront (1954), Nicholson in One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest (1975), Ledger in The Dark Knight (2008), De Niro in Raging Bull (1980), Hopkins in Silence of the Lambs (1991), Pacino in The Godfather (1972), Spacey in American Beauty (1999), Streep in Sophie's Choice (1982), Peck in To Kill a Mockingbird (1962), Olivier in Hamlet (1948), the list goes on... However, no role has required the same level of character transformation and method acting that DDL did as Daniel Plainview. This was a masterpiece in creating nuances, changing speech and inflections, body language and raw acting ability. Day-Lewis is a chameleon that somehow completely morphed himself into another individual, especially one as complex and unique as this one. He stands as one of the best actors of all time with the likes of Nicholson and Brando. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
bohemiangentAug 7, 2017
From the long cinematic shots to the remarkable acting performances, this a masterpiece of movie (my favourite). It depicts greed vs piety and so many other rich themes. Just splendid moviemaking.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
JLuis_001Feb 6, 2018
The only reasons why this film is not perfect for me, despite the fact of giving it a 10, is because it has problems with the rhythm and considering its length it becomes a bit heavy.
And although Daniel Day-Lewis is spectacular, his
The only reasons why this film is not perfect for me, despite the fact of giving it a 10, is because it has problems with the rhythm and considering its length it becomes a bit heavy.
And although Daniel Day-Lewis is spectacular, his performance in several moments feels like an extension of Bill The Butcher of Gangs from New York. Those are pretty much the only issues I have with the film.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
Jaredc324Jul 18, 2019
A masterpiece that if released in any decade in cinema history would be revered. That's all I have to say about this piece of work. It's a phenomenal groundwork film for anyone knowing how to create atmosphere & style into a film.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
drone41Feb 9, 2018
One of the most amazing acting by Daniel Day-Lewis, Oscar deserved. But i can't found something so special in plot. I get the point and message, but it's too long and too much presented for me.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
All_ButTrU4Aug 21, 2022
Visually this is perhaps one of the best films I've seen, a modern masterpiece! It has clear austere cinematography and crisp sound engineering and plays with those strengths rather well as shown in the opening scenes black oil shots withinVisually this is perhaps one of the best films I've seen, a modern masterpiece! It has clear austere cinematography and crisp sound engineering and plays with those strengths rather well as shown in the opening scenes black oil shots within the cave or H.W deafness. Paul Thomas Anderson is incomparable with his direction, detailed and authentic yo a point of non fiction. An analysis of the allure and trappings of greed and ambition, set near a time where such egotism would collide with post war optimism into a cataclysmic stock market crash. It's script is bare in that it doesn't try to say much and places most effort on the subtleties of the actors body language. Daniel Day Lewis is a centerpiece in this drama and captivates with a demure grandeur that constantly feels on the verge of madness, until the epic moment it finally gives way. Paul Dano is nondescript in his duel performance as twins Eli & Paul. Eli simmers with a madness anchored in religious self righteousness that casts a condescending veil of ego that corrodes against the thinning sanity of Daniel Plainview closing the movie is a bloody pulp. Watching these perspective spirals leaves you breathless not out of sympathy, I don't think anyone of the characters inspire that kind of attachment, but out of apprehension. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
DawdlingPoetNov 20, 2021
This is quite a long drawn out movie at over two and a half hours long, one which clearly and unsurprisingly focuses on the presumed need for power and effect of greed and financial motive on people, local communities caught up in the oilThis is quite a long drawn out movie at over two and a half hours long, one which clearly and unsurprisingly focuses on the presumed need for power and effect of greed and financial motive on people, local communities caught up in the oil game, prospectors etc. it has quite a haunting musical score, with what sounds like almost ghostly wail noises present around three quarters of an hour in. It really felt quite claustrophobic in parts with the low key yet somewhat spooky soundtrack, with heavy use of stringed instruments and low beat drumming creating a very tense feel at key points. Also featured are elements of one up manship, highlighting the competitive aspects of bidding for oil and as well as this, religion strongly plays a part, when a man dies in an accident while down one of the wells, a local priest come supposed healer warns that it could have been avoided, had the well been allowed to be given a simple blessing but he's told that this would have only slowed down the process of extracting the oil, so it was never going to be allowed. He also mentions having seen some of the men involved drinking, stating that it can't be a good idea when they need to be alert on site but again his worries are overlooked. Things get particularly heated as the plot develops and I couldn't help feeling sorry for him.

Paranoia also plays a part and I have to say it is a pretty gritty watch in parts, seeing how various characters react to set situations, getting an idea of how they interpret things as they see it, often (presumably) in a much different way to the way we'd see things. Its quite sad to see the toll thats paid in different forms, what such people went through but I suppose it has to be remembered that there was more poverty in those days - this being set in the past of course, it having quite a rural Wild West type feel to it. I suppose it is a case of every man for his own (hence the element of paranoia present), so that would make sense. Given the motives and even actions of the main cast, you'd be forgiven for thinking their pretty selfish and not especially caring but after another accident occurs, Daniels emotions really come in to play and he's faced with a tough decision, having to play different roles as a parent and a prospctor or site manager I suppose - anyway, his more caring nature is brought out. This makes it a more interesting watch, as I always find it difficult to stay keen on a movie that goes on for a long time when the characters don't appear to be particularly likeable.

I found this quite engrossing and atmospheric, almost too much so, being quite claustrophobic due to the camerawork (some quick changes of shot and interesting angles used at times) and the sinister score playing in the background. Among the spookiest and perhaps most atmospheric scenes, are those of Daniel and a previously unknown acquaintance he gives the benefit of the doubt to, who spend time together alone, the spookiest scenes being set at a campfire and indeed fire is very much present throughout the movie, in different scenes.

There was some interesting dialogue in this movie, although it could be seen to be a little bit bland in parts. The scenes involving the healer carrying out ceremonies in a local makeshift church are quite moving - indeed at first you'd think the locals mock the idea of religion but later on it becomes clear that those in need of healing rely on that as a form of obviously hope to them. Given the plot that develops, its quite a bleak movie but I liked how the different characters, family members and others adapted - things do change in time but I wouldn't call it necessarily a very Hollywood movie in the classical sense of that term.

The character portrayals really made this what it is - if the script was different or performances perhaps more wooden then it would be different but as it is, I thought this was a quality movie.

Just to add that cast and content wise, first off content - of course there's moderate violence present, quite bloody violence at times and there's also strong language present, as well as perhaps one or two sexual references but thats about all I can think of thats probably worth mentioning. Onto the cast, which give very good performances and Daniel Day-Lewis plays the main character, Daniel Plainview - coming across as a stern, no nonsense man who at times also isn't afraid to show his deeper side when battling emotions, while Paul Dano plays the religious healer, Eli Sunday. He seems quite plain by way of physical appearance but becomes very animated in certain scenes and the interaction between both of these key members of cast as their relevant characters, works well.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
3
SpacemanGaryFeb 26, 2020
Horribly overacted and boring. More like "there won't be blood" (until like the last minute). The only saving grace is an appearance by my favorite podcaster, Paul F. Tompkins. I bet DDL was furious to be upstaged that day. Stay away from this movie!
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
Lukebaldwin10May 17, 2020
This movie is the best piece of cinema this side of the millennia. I just recently watched this movie because I’m younger and just really began to love watching movies and analyzing them. This movie gets a 10 in all my categories:This movie is the best piece of cinema this side of the millennia. I just recently watched this movie because I’m younger and just really began to love watching movies and analyzing them. This movie gets a 10 in all my categories: cinematography, direction, dialogue, lead actor, supporting actor, plot, soundtrack. I fell in love with this movie in the first 20 minutes when not a single word was spoken yet I was just entranced by the whole thing. It pulled me in so quickly. The music is so undeniably beautiful I find myself listening to it off of Spotify all the time and I was amazed to find out it was Johnny Greenwood’s first major film. There are not enough words to talk about DDL he is himself which is someone who respects his craft to the utmost and handles every role like it’s his life. Paul Dano steals the show in a couple scenes which really does say something and he truly is underrated in this movie. Every scene in this movie feels purposeful and driven. This is perfection. PTA is at his best here. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
JamesDefoeSep 1, 2020
A few events in the narrative are inconsistent for the sake of getting a nice scene or impactful dialogue. Some of those things are very important to the story and would be better off with more coherent storytelling. Despite that, it is aA few events in the narrative are inconsistent for the sake of getting a nice scene or impactful dialogue. Some of those things are very important to the story and would be better off with more coherent storytelling. Despite that, it is a worth watching movie with nice elements to offer. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
adnan_soysalAug 9, 2021
I bought this dvd like 10 years ago, and I did not watch it completely.
The reason was that I found it too long, two and half hours, with not much interesting scenes and dialogues.
But somehow, Daniel character clung on my head. And in recent
I bought this dvd like 10 years ago, and I did not watch it completely.
The reason was that I found it too long, two and half hours, with not much interesting scenes and dialogues.
But somehow, Daniel character clung on my head.
And in recent years my interest in Psychology grow huge.
Then I wanted to re-watch it.
And that was a perfect judgement.

The reason for that is that Daniel character represents the modern personality sickness in a so subtle form.
- He wants to be rich more than anyone around him, and he does not want to deal with anybody.
- He does not give a damn about people. They are just tools, means for him to reach his own goals.
- He hates everyone.
- He is angry inside.
- He is envious inside.
- He believes everyone can be manipulated.
- He does not have a faith, but he can be Christian, can be Muslim, or a Jew at a finger snap, no problem.
- Same goes in politics, he can be leftist, rightist, feminist, environmentalist, communist, BLMist, racist.. you name it..
Bottom line is that whatever he choose to be should be serving his grandiosity among others.
- But in the mean time he wants to love people, and to be loved. Deep inside he is empty, longing for all those feelings.

He wants to fill his emptiness with a normal human being, but that is something he can not do it.
That is not his nature, so he is in a continues suffering state.

Another great sphere of the movie is that you hardly notice these personality traits on Daniel for the first half of the movie.
And this is exactly about these psychos in reality; deception.

In the first half of the movie, Daniel appears like a poor countryman man striving to be a self made millionaire.
But his dialogues, his facial gestures, his body language are so subtle in presenting the modern psychopath I described above.
Daniel starts his own oil drilling adventures in late 19th century in New Mexico.
One of his workers dies in an accident. And he adapts his son, H. W.
Daniel is also single.
Viewer feels the oddness of this adaptation because Daniel is not type of man who has empathy, care for anyone.
I think this is one of the best part of the story, because viewer is always kept in a suspicion on true character of Daniel.
And answer to this adaptation comes at the end of the movie, may be in the best scene, and dialogue of the movie.
It is the best articulation of the Daniel's psychopath.

Movie goes on with Daniels rising about his Oil business together H. W. by buying some poor and religious farmers' land in California.
Although movie concentrated on Daniel, in my view, it takes a twist after half of it concentrating on preacher of the village church, Eli.
Eli is the son of the farmer from whom Daniel bought the land.
Eli asks for money for the church, he wants to have a bigger, better church.
Though Daniel hates Eli's money ripping of him for Church, he still does all those payments.
Even in in his dealings with Christian farmers, he comes to a point he gets baptised and confesses his sins.
Deception is his normal part of life.

But movie, portrays the Eli no less deceptive and sick than Daniel.
This Paradoxical appearance of sick minds of Daniel, and the Preacher is so captivating..
It is a social paradox between "good" and "evil".
And both are suffering inside themselves, their paradoxical sick personalities.

Both characters of Daniel, and Eli dominates the movie.
Daniel Plainview, and Paul Dano casting these characters are magnificent.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
MSF59Nov 29, 2020
Paul T Anderson has made many great films but this is his masterpiece. One of the best films of the past 20 years and one of the truly great performances by DDL.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
geewahAug 9, 2021
An intense, brutal and uncompromising look at greed, religion, ambition and the corruption of morals.
The P.T. Anderson and Daniel Day Lewis collaboration is a match made in heaven and here they have produced one of the best movies of the decade.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
jonasbttencourtJan 13, 2021
One of the best films ever made, you don't get things like this anymore, Daniel Day-Lewis is just fantastic, Paul Dano is in his best work as well.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
AJ_13Jan 11, 2021
The production design, costumes and, of course, photography are out of this world. Nevertheless, Daniel Day-Lewis' performance and Paul Thomas Anderson's direction can't be described with any adjective but PERFECT
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
HabibiehakimSep 19, 2021
Daniel Day Lewis performance in There Will Be Blood is one of the greatest performance i've ever seen in movie ever, 158 minutes film and the man keep his acting perfectly, never miss, and it just amazed me so much, and yet that's not theDaniel Day Lewis performance in There Will Be Blood is one of the greatest performance i've ever seen in movie ever, 158 minutes film and the man keep his acting perfectly, never miss, and it just amazed me so much, and yet that's not the only thing, because Paul Dano performance is again one of the greatest supporting actor performance i've ever seen, There Will Be Blood is just such a powerful and mesmerizing film, directed by the great Paul Thomas Anderson, incredible score by Jonny Greenwood, There Will Be Blood is Unbelievably Fantastic. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
Abso_lute1Jul 17, 2021
A chilling, dark and thought-provoking film that serves as a character study of a conniving oil man is well-crafted and excellently shot.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
Gamzguy17Aug 22, 2021
There are some juicy scenes and performances to bite into from Anderson's epic about the early 20th century western oil exploitation and father/son hardships. 
However, there are too many hammy plot points which hyper-contextualize any dramaThere are some juicy scenes and performances to bite into from Anderson's epic about the early 20th century western oil exploitation and father/son hardships. 
However, there are too many hammy plot points which hyper-contextualize any drama that may have been more heartfelt. 
Another negative is an intrusive and heavy-handed music score which tries to instil the dread of the dynamics being told, but comes across as annoyingly repetitive with its motif. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
NickTheCritickNov 3, 2021
There Will Be Blood is along with Pulp Fiction my all time favourite movie. This film is superb. The first 15 minutes are a homage to silent cinema while the remaining two hours are reminiscent of the Westerns of the gold diggers like JohnThere Will Be Blood is along with Pulp Fiction my all time favourite movie. This film is superb. The first 15 minutes are a homage to silent cinema while the remaining two hours are reminiscent of the Westerns of the gold diggers like John Houston's ones. But this film is much more than that. It is the most beautiful film ever created on the relationship between church and capitalism and it is an understatement to call it an absolute masterpiece. Daniel Day Lewis here gives the greatest performance that an actor has ever given in the history of cinema. Everything is so perfect in this film that a 10/10 rating can't be enough. The direction is perfect, Johnny Greenwood's soundtrack is terrific, as incredibly perfect are the editing and the cinenematography. Masterpiece, There are no words to describe it. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
AgentLviJun 27, 2023
Excellent movie. The story is so enjoyable, scoring is really great, visual is decent, and the voice is stunning
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
royalguy07Aug 10, 2022
Watched this for the first time since its release. It's a full on masterpiece in every aspect. The 2 lead performances are completely engaging and realized, its remarkable how Dano is able to step up to the field of DDL and more than hold hisWatched this for the first time since its release. It's a full on masterpiece in every aspect. The 2 lead performances are completely engaging and realized, its remarkable how Dano is able to step up to the field of DDL and more than hold his own in their scenes. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
pooopsFeb 3, 2023
although the movie is amazing, the thing that leaves me from given it a ten is the slow 1st half.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
Hossein_ShJun 1, 2023
Masterpiece, One of the greatest movie that I have ever seen. Great, great and great.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews