OR

Email Address

Password

Forgot password?

The Taking of Pelham One Two Three (re-release)

2003

METASCORE

Generally favorable reviews based on 4 Critic Reviews

See All

68

USER SCORE

Generally favorable reviews based on 34 Ratings

See All

7.7

VOTE NOW

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

7.7	Your Score
7.7	User Score Generally favorable reviews based on 34 Ratings

Would you like to write a review?

There is a 75 character minimum for reviews. If your review contains spoilers, please check the Spoiler box. Please do not use ALL CAPS. There is no linking or other HTML allowed. Your review may be edited for content. 0/5000

Check box if your review contains spoilers

Play Sound

Please enter your birth date to watch this video:

You are not allowed to view this material at this time.

The Taking Of Pelham One Two Three

Now Playing: The Taking Of Pelham One Two Three

The Taking of Pelham One Two Three (re-release)

Movie Details & Credits

United Artists | Release Date: August 29, 2003 | R

Starring: Robert Shaw, Walter Matthau

Summary: In this 1974 film, four armed men hijack a New York City subway train and demand 1 million dollars -- which must be delivered in 1 hour -- for the train and the lives of the passengers held.

Director: Joseph Sargent

Genre(s): Drama, Thriller, Crime

Rating: R

Runtime: 104 min

See All Details and Credits

Watch Now

Stream On

Buy on

Stream On

Stream On

Stream On

Stream On

Stream On

Stream On

Expand

Metascore

Negative:

0

Critic Reviews

80

The New York Times

Nora Sayre

Throughout, there's a skillful balance between the vulnerability of New Yorkers and the drastic, provocative sense of comedy that thrives all over our sidewalks. Read full review

70

Village Voice

Jessica Winter

Sargent's whole enterprise doubles as a '70s archaeological dig. Read full review

70

TV Guide Magazine Staff (Not Credited)

Exciting, suspenseful drama. Read full review

50

Variety

Staff (Not Credited)

Good action caper. Read full review

SEE ALL 4 REVIEWS

Write a Review

User Reviews

10

akshatmahajan

Jul 23, 2021

The Taking of Pelham One Two Three is one of the best executed movie ever made. This movie was ahead of it's time.

The story and it's execution was near to perfection. It was 1hr 47min movie and I didn't felt bored for 1 second. The acting was good. All lead roles and supporting roles gotThe Taking of Pelham One Two Three is one of the best executed movie ever made. This movie was ahead of it's time.

The story and it's execution was near to perfection. It was 1hr 47min movie and I didn't felt bored for 1 second. The acting was good. All lead roles and supporting roles got proper screen time and after some time you get familiar with these characters. The pacing and editing was spot on. I sounds impossible, but I was not able to find any negetive in this movie. Even if there was any, it got overshadowed by the the beautiness of the story and it's execution.

Overall, I will recommend this to everyone. This movie must in everyone's watchlist.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

10

Tetsuo

Feb 1, 2011

One of the best heist films ever made. It follows Morton Freedgood's book very closely while the difference is that it has a social satire of New York. Another thing remarkable is Walter Matthau and Robert Shaw as the hero and villain. Their acting is tremendous like always. The humour isOne of the best heist films ever made. It follows Morton Freedgood's book very closely while the difference is that it has a social satire of New York. Another thing remarkable is Walter Matthau and Robert Shaw as the hero and villain. Their acting is tremendous like always. The humour is pretty good it isn't laugh-out-loud funny, it more like laughing on the inside type of humour. Jerry Stiller make a good small role as well.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

8

MovieGuys

Apr 23, 2014

The original Taking of Pelham One Two Three is better than the Travolta-Washington remake because of its ability to find tension and thrills without too much bloodshed. In other words, it relies on its script and atmosphere rather than pervasive f-words and heavy gore.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

7

ERG1008

Aug 23, 2010

Men hijack subway train, hold passengers to ransom, try to escape, things don't go to plan.
Excellent Seventies action film with Robert Shaw, Walter Matthau & Martin Balsam in fine form.
It has dated slightly in the look, dialogue & characters but the acting is good & the story flows well.Men hijack subway train, hold passengers to ransom, try to escape, things don't go to plan.
Excellent Seventies action film with Robert Shaw, Walter Matthau & Martin Balsam in fine form.
It has dated slightly in the look, dialogue & characters but the acting is good & the story flows well. Great ending too.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

7

Voodoo123

Feb 5, 2023

The great cast and superior screenplay elevate the otherwise unremarkable cinematography and production quality as we observe both sides of an ever escalating tense hostage situation. It's tough to find originality in this genre but this film really sets the bar for the films that followed it.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

7

Compi24

Nov 28, 2012

"The Taking Of Pelham One Two Three" is a 1974 action thriller starring Walter Mathau and Robert Shaw. The movie was directed by Joseph Sargent and it tells the story of a man (Shaw) who, with some other gunmen, hijack a subway train in New York City. The man is soon pitted against a railway"The Taking Of Pelham One Two Three" is a 1974 action thriller starring Walter Mathau and Robert Shaw. The movie was directed by Joseph Sargent and it tells the story of a man (Shaw) who, with some other gunmen, hijack a subway train in New York City. The man is soon pitted against a railway police official (Mathau) who, with the help of others, tries to stop him. Now let me start off by saying that I actually saw the 2009 Tony Scott remake before I saw the 1974 original. Is the original better than the 2009 remake? In short - yeah, pretty much. In comparing the two movies, it seemed as though, while the 2009 remake felt more up-to-date, it's more modern approach to elements presented in the original often came off as too over-the-top. I felt that in presenting these certain elements, the 1974 version came off more subtle and pulled it off with a lot more finesse. The 1974 movie has two really impressive actors in the leading roles - Mathau and Shaw. Both of which are really, very entertaining in "Pelham", but I'd have to say that Shaw's performance shines the most in this movie. His demeanor throughout the entire movie is really hilarious. He just comes off as this soulless jerk - a soulless jerk with some pretty hilarious one-liners. That brings me to the script which, as I said, contains some pretty great one-liners not only from Shaw, but from Mathau and others. It's nothing really impressive or Oscar-worthy, but it does have a few gems in it here and there. While I, a Generation-Z kid, found this movie to be very easy to watch, it did at times have a few moments of cheese. That being said, I'm not going to knock the movie for being a little long in the tooth - but it does show sometimes. The movie was really entertaining and I can see why it was well received when it came out. I can also see the immense amount of expectations the 2009 movie had to live up to. Overall, I found "The Taking Of Pelham One Two Three" to be a fairly enjoyable crime thriller.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

0

Broyax

Feb 17, 2023

En général, les remakes de vieilleries s’avèrent plus mauvais, plus merdiques que les films d’origine… mais ce n’est pas toujours le cas ! car parfois, la vieillerie était (déjà) une daube à son époque… et effectivement ce métro de 1974 (d’ailleurs plein de **** de *******, on dirait notreEn général, les remakes de vieilleries s’avèrent plus mauvais, plus merdiques que les films d’origine… mais ce n’est pas toujours le cas ! car parfois, la vieillerie était (déjà) une daube à son époque… et effectivement ce métro de 1974 (d’ailleurs plein de **** de *******, on dirait notre reure à nous, putain !) se révèle très inférieur à son remake de 2009 !

On n’aurait pas cru ça et pourtant, c’est la stricte vérité, la vieille daube ne peut lutter et pourtant, oui pourtant, le remake est loin d’être un chef-d’oeuvre, entendons-nous bien…! c’est dire donc si ce film est poussif, souvent ridicule et bien peu crédible : c’est écrit avec les pieds et totalement invraisemblable de A à Z.

Dans ces pathétiques conditions, nous n’insistons pas et tirons immédiatement la sonnette d’alarme : hors de question de continuer à voyager dans un étron pareil ! (et puis en plus, c’est plein de ****** !).… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

SEE ALL 8 REVIEWS

More From Metacritic

What to Watch Right Now on Paramount+

Find a list of the best recent and upcoming film and TV titles added to...

What to Watch Right Now on Amazon's Prime Video

Get a list of the best movie and TV titles recently added (and coming...

What to Watch Right Now on Netflix

Get a list of the best movie and TV titles recently added (and coming...

What to Watch Right Now on Hulu

Get a list of the best movie and TV titles recently added (and coming...

Awards & Rankings

Current Movie Releases

By MetascoreBy User Score

1 81 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple

2 77 Project Hail Mary

5 72 The Sheep Detectives

SEE ALL

More From The Taking of Pelham One Two Three (re-release)

The Taking Of Pelham One Two Three

The Taking Of Pelham One Two Three

The Taking Of Pelham One Two Three (Trailer 1)

The Taking Of Pelham One Two Three (Trailer 1)

SEE ALL TRAILERS