The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring
New Line Cinema | Release Date: December 19, 2001
9.0
USER SCORE
Universal acclaim based on 2599 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
2,432
Mixed:
62
Negative:
105
Watch Now
Stream On
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)

User Reviews

User scoreBy dateMost helpful
9
ZegilgameshDec 28, 2012
A journey like no other, a grand adventure never before filmed, and a movie that is exciting from start to finish, this movie has an undeniable epic sweep that will take you in to the lush atmosphere of Middle Earth.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
10
beingryanjudeAug 24, 2014
A modern epic. A new classic. The Fellowship of the Ring kickstarts one of the finest trilogies in cinematic history. What Peter Jackson is able to accomplish, alongside an impeccable cast and crew, is astounding.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
9
MonsieurEamesJul 12, 2012
I will admit that it could have been a bit shorter, but the Fellowship of the Ring makes up for its length with its astounding visuals, tight performances and direction, compelling dialogue and terrific action sequences.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
9
HadrianusOct 21, 2012
Awesome actors,an amazing director and a genius screenplay.This is a great movie based on a book.Despite that,there's an action scene where gandalf and sauron fight.It don't have good angles.The sound is terrible.The movies of 2001 don't haveAwesome actors,an amazing director and a genius screenplay.This is a great movie based on a book.Despite that,there's an action scene where gandalf and sauron fight.It don't have good angles.The sound is terrible.The movies of 2001 don't have good sound.But there are 4 movies that it can have great sound:
-Amélie
-Black Hawk Down
-Moulin Rouge!
-Pearl Harbor
The movie shows a cliffhanger.A cliffhanger is the thing you can note a second part.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
9
jordiDec 8, 2012
Sin ser fan de la Trilogía ni haber leído los libros, pienso que el producto es notable y necesario revisitar de cuando en cuando. Personajes muy bien definidos. Buenos actores que saltaron a la fama con esta trilogía.Sin ser fan de la Trilogía ni haber leído los libros, pienso que el producto es notable y necesario revisitar de cuando en cuando. Personajes muy bien definidos. Buenos actores que saltaron a la fama con esta trilogía. Tierra Media creíble. Momentos divertidos como la lucha entre los 2 magos, estando Ian McKellen y Christopher Lee un poco mayores para tantos trotes. Momentos de nerviosismo como cuando atraviesan la Mina de Moria. Quizá demasiado larga, aunque muy recomendable.… Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
10
MouthofSauronDec 5, 2012
"The Fellowship of the Ring" is a triumph. Despite its lofty and seemingly "unfilmable" source material, it manages to convey the spirit of J.R.R Tolkien's masterwork.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
6
RikiegeFeb 4, 2013
Possibly people for a good movie, but for me it is another of those movies fun to hang out.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
9
Compi24Jan 3, 2013
With a virtual pantheon of lovable characters, a legendarily unmistakable score, a mirthful set of special effects, and a truly engrossing story jet-pumped full of classic lore, Peter Jackson's first installment of his "Lord Of The Rings"With a virtual pantheon of lovable characters, a legendarily unmistakable score, a mirthful set of special effects, and a truly engrossing story jet-pumped full of classic lore, Peter Jackson's first installment of his "Lord Of The Rings" trilogy makes for a truly indelible and worthwhile filmic escape.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
9
WhiteTalpaDec 27, 2012
A great film and the start of an epic adventure. The characters, story line, special effects are all amazing. One of the best films of all time since "a new hope".
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
7
CephalonJan 24, 2013
This film starts out slowly but I am okay with this, given the character development that occurs for Gandalf, Frodo, and Sam. I found this film brilliantly directed, but Peter Jackson seemed to be unsure of himself during the first half ofThis film starts out slowly but I am okay with this, given the character development that occurs for Gandalf, Frodo, and Sam. I found this film brilliantly directed, but Peter Jackson seemed to be unsure of himself during the first half of the film. The film's second half also had a different, gritty feel compared to the first half, which I both liked and disliked, overall, I found this film to have a strong plot, great action, and one strong scene after another… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
7
mds03Apr 14, 2013
It was good but let's face it, it was an hour too long!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! The running time is really the only problem though. Everything else in this movie that's good makes up for it. Great special effects, great story, great acting, greatIt was good but let's face it, it was an hour too long!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! The running time is really the only problem though. Everything else in this movie that's good makes up for it. Great special effects, great story, great acting, great combat scenes, and a great script.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
9
ScorpionMay 19, 2013
Although somewhat inconsistent the first installment of the trilogy by Peter J. reach its goal, which is introduced in the magical world of Tolkien,with good characters and a broad cast the film holds the attention in ways never seen, andAlthough somewhat inconsistent the first installment of the trilogy by Peter J. reach its goal, which is introduced in the magical world of Tolkien,with good characters and a broad cast the film holds the attention in ways never seen, and leaves us eager to see the sequel.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
5
JmsbppJul 22, 2013
mucha a charla y poca accion para una pelicula que lo tenia todo para un hermoso 10, efectos, tema, actuacion, personajes, paisajes y falto accion lo cual bajo la calificacion
0 of 3 users found this helpful03
All this user's reviews
6
dyshpoMar 22, 2015
1. choppy editing in non action scenes.
2. way to slow character development.
3. to much screen time devoted to unneeded scenery brochure.
4. not enough focus on Languages
5. nazgul impotence.
6. no magic battles.
0 of 5 users found this helpful05
All this user's reviews
10
MovieGuysFeb 2, 2014
The first Lord of the Rings is the best. I'm not one to flock to sci-fi movies, but I find this series to be the epitome of the genre. All of the movies can be enjoyed by almost anyone, and not just fans, which makes these movies even more amazing.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
10
cag11Nov 29, 2013
This is just an epic movie. It does have a long runtime, but that is no excuse to call this movie bad.It made me a LOTR fan, and now nothing can change me. It has the dark sense that I imagined the with the books.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
10
launchpad2132Jan 6, 2015
One of the best movies of all time. It has an epic plot with incredable acting and some of the most beautiful scenes on the planet. It was unlike anything I have scene before. Some people say that Game of Thrones surpasses this. I can't believe it.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
10
andreekaMar 6, 2015
an epic movie although the first half are pretty damn boring and the second one i just saying " awesome". in began you will see how beautiful this film. very recommend film if you have so many times :D
0 of 4 users found this helpful04
All this user's reviews
10
PanchogulAug 19, 2020
Lo único malo con respecto a esta magnífica obra de arte y sus secuelas es el hecho de haber tardado tanto tiempo en animarme a verlas.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
10
merijnjFeb 21, 2018
(95/100)
(I watched the extended cut). A warming and epic start to an epic trilogy! Very good adaptation of the book.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
9
MarvelJoeJan 15, 2019
The first time I saw this movie was on Hulu and at the very beginning of the movie, I was already hook on to the story. The music score and the cinematography are the art form of this film. The visual effects still looks fine for it's time,The first time I saw this movie was on Hulu and at the very beginning of the movie, I was already hook on to the story. The music score and the cinematography are the art form of this film. The visual effects still looks fine for it's time, but stunning beautiful. When it ended, I wanted more.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
3
FairbottomMay 23, 2018
Appearances can be very deceiving. Upon first glance, this seems like a boring and stupid film about a troupe of short people who have to take a ring somewhere that's of some consequence. But this is much too literal an interpretation. TheAppearances can be very deceiving. Upon first glance, this seems like a boring and stupid film about a troupe of short people who have to take a ring somewhere that's of some consequence. But this is much too literal an interpretation. The movie is actually an elaborate metaphor for something else, which is also boring and stupid.

People often miss this nuance.… Expand
0 of 10 users found this helpful010
All this user's reviews
0
IThristaNSep 10, 2022
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Wtf **** dworfs i hate this!!! lol its not cannon guys lets rait this on 0. Report report… Expand
0 of 3 users found this helpful03
All this user's reviews
10
JaredC.Feb 14, 2008
Peter Jackson awakens us into this breathtaking astonishing trilogy The Lord of the Rings. Jackson views a unique conception of fantasy and engages us with plenty of detail. After that crap animated Lord of the Rings came out, I could never Peter Jackson awakens us into this breathtaking astonishing trilogy The Lord of the Rings. Jackson views a unique conception of fantasy and engages us with plenty of detail. After that crap animated Lord of the Rings came out, I could never get the horrific sensation of bad elements in the film out of my head. But in The Fellowship, Jackson amazes our pupils and widens our hearts into his beautiful imagination that will be cherished for generations. The soudtrack will raise your heart strings as every scene has its own heartwarming beat or song that brings each a favorable rhythm each time a new place in the story is discovered to develop more build-up in the plot and setting. The Shire, Rivendell, Lothlorien, Moria, and Amon-Hen each have their own soundtrack so when you think of that one place, you think of the music Howard Shore uses in that setting. The character development is tremendous and each and every image in this film is absolutely beautiful. Jackson succeeds in this brilliant and amazing picture and will now be defined as a master movie-maker. The Fellowship of the Ring is highly recommended and magnificent.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
TyranianApr 11, 2019
As a massive Tolkien fan this film gets the book almost perfect, the look and feel is exactly right and the cahracters are nailed. Shoulda kept Glorfindel however.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
JoeCoolDec 8, 2019
One of the best fantasy movies ever made. Not only a must see, but a must have in your collection.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
imthenoobNov 22, 2012
The Fellowship of The Ring is truly a masterpiece. There really is nothing bad to say about it. It is a grand epic that truly brings to life the source material.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
ObbiePR18Apr 3, 2012
Con efectso especiales del mejor nivel, con actuaciones merecedoras de Oscar, con una historia simplemente fantastica y con una perfecta direccion de Peter Jackson , The Fellowship of the Rings logra establecer espectativa a lo que seria laCon efectso especiales del mejor nivel, con actuaciones merecedoras de Oscar, con una historia simplemente fantastica y con una perfecta direccion de Peter Jackson , The Fellowship of the Rings logra establecer espectativa a lo que seria la mejor trilogia de todos los timepos.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
OfficialDec 6, 2013
The first film of the series, "LOTR: The Fellowship of the Ring" is emotionally fulfilling, brilliantly plotted and exciting. This movie is a masterpiece and a textbook example on how to create an epic adventure. The special extended edition,The first film of the series, "LOTR: The Fellowship of the Ring" is emotionally fulfilling, brilliantly plotted and exciting. This movie is a masterpiece and a textbook example on how to create an epic adventure. The special extended edition, at 208 minutes, does not seem overlong at all.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
SpangleJun 9, 2014
This absolutely floored me. I was always a doubter, thinking that there is no way this was as good as people said it was. Boy was I ever wrong. Phenomenal film. The visual effects were absolutely dazzling (seriously, could one "set" not beThis absolutely floored me. I was always a doubter, thinking that there is no way this was as good as people said it was. Boy was I ever wrong. Phenomenal film. The visual effects were absolutely dazzling (seriously, could one "set" not be absolutely breathtaking, please?), the cinematography was great, the score was pitch perfect, and the acting was great as well. It is amazing how I could sleep so hard on this one. I am unfamiliar with the novels, but still, seeing this world come to life is amazing. On top of everything I mentioned, the action is always amazingly put together and the CGI is used to perfection. Another thing is this one's corner is the fact that its 3 hour run time simply did not feel like 3 hours. The time really flew by and never really dragged. Typically, with films of this length, there are some things that feel like extra, but here, everything included was undoubtedly needed. Ultimately, as the first film in the trilogy, this one sets up the following two films very well. It is amazing to think that this is often considered the lesser of the three films.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
shpreaJul 14, 2014
Honestly I was scared to start watching this trilogy. I figured that the second I started watching I would lose the next 12 hours of my life.
I was right.
The second I started this one up, I knew that it was going to be amazing. EverythingHonestly I was scared to start watching this trilogy. I figured that the second I started watching I would lose the next 12 hours of my life.
I was right.
The second I started this one up, I knew that it was going to be amazing. Everything about it is on point. The acting, script, the score, everything. The cinematography was so good my jaw dropped regularly.
Just watch it. Please. It's amazing.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
genericusenameJun 6, 2013
It's a truly great movie. The cast was incredible and they really brought the characters and story to life, most notably Ian McKellen as Gandalf, Christopher Lee as Saruman, and Sean Bean as Boromir, quite possibly my favorite character ofIt's a truly great movie. The cast was incredible and they really brought the characters and story to life, most notably Ian McKellen as Gandalf, Christopher Lee as Saruman, and Sean Bean as Boromir, quite possibly my favorite character of the movie. There wasn't a lot of action, but it was a good set up for the rest of the series. Translating the book to the big screen is difficult, but Peter Jackson did a good job of it. It's one of the better movies I've seen.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
AReviewsJun 20, 2013
"The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring" is a magnificent experience, with breathtaking visuals, and a heart warming adventure, it is absolutely one of the greatest movies ever made.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
JohnnyStephensAug 31, 2013
Good, but not for 10. In some parts is very boring, but in other parts it's very good and epic. The third chapter of the trilogy is the best in my opinion.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
DibbHansenJul 14, 2013
A great fantasy film that boasts of great acting, cool visuals, awesome music and spectacular cinematography. I really loved this film and I personally think this is still the best of the 'Rings' trilogy with its more adventure feel alongA great fantasy film that boasts of great acting, cool visuals, awesome music and spectacular cinematography. I really loved this film and I personally think this is still the best of the 'Rings' trilogy with its more adventure feel along with emotional concept in the story setting. This is a classic film that I really love and admire.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
kubathereviewerJul 24, 2013
It is an epic adventure and Peter Jackson created a fantastic Middle-Earth. The battle scenes are great and I especially enjoyed the battle of Amon Hen where Boromir died.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
TheApplegnomeDec 9, 2014
A wonderful and touching movie that truly is entertaining to watch.

The Fellowship of the Ring is a highly unique movie, and it keeps me entertained every time I watch it, because it’s so damn good and the music is spectacular! Yes, someA wonderful and touching movie that truly is entertaining to watch.

The Fellowship of the Ring is a highly unique movie, and it keeps me entertained every time I watch it, because it’s so damn good and the music is spectacular! Yes, some people might experience some slow and boring scenes, but I didn’t find anything boring at all, because the story and the characters totally keeps me entertained every time I watch it. I’m also thrilled by how great Peter Jackson did the movie, because there’s almost nothing negative about The Fellowship of the Ring. One thing though, is the CGI. There are a lot of practical effects that totally is superior of todays CGI, and the CGI in The Fellowship of the Ring is amazing if you look at it from a 2000s perspective. I’m stunned how incredible they made this film, but if you look closely there are some vague CGI, but I don’t really care. Because the plot of The Fellowship of the Ring is stunning.

This is one of the best movies of the 2000s.

The Fellowship of the Ring gets a 9/10.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
GerardoAR77Jul 26, 2013
"The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring" is one of the best movies of all time; maybe the greatest fantasy/adventure movie ever made...10/10
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
Eternal409Jul 31, 2013
This movie is definitely the most underrated movie in what I would call the "Middle Earth saga" ('The Hobbit' trilogy and 'The Lord of The Rings' trilogy) this movie also carries the most emotional moments in the series too, whether thisThis movie is definitely the most underrated movie in what I would call the "Middle Earth saga" ('The Hobbit' trilogy and 'The Lord of The Rings' trilogy) this movie also carries the most emotional moments in the series too, whether this will change in the two upcoming hobbit movies unknown.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
AndremaxOct 30, 2018
Here we know Middle-Earth's 3rd era and we are thrown inside a beautiful and vast universe.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
joao1198pedroOct 27, 2013
this first the lord of the rings is absolutely amazing and epic,the battle scenes and the story that is running out is terrific,and the finalyou saw that there is a lot to happen yet.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
ReviewermanuverAug 12, 2014
So where do even begin? This film is the start to a truely legendary film series. This one is my personal favourite film of the three and of all time of course. I can easily say that all three of these films are some of the best films youSo where do even begin? This film is the start to a truely legendary film series. This one is my personal favourite film of the three and of all time of course. I can easily say that all three of these films are some of the best films you will see at this time. All three deserve all of the praise they have recieved. Back to this film, the story is so interesting and immersing that you will feel the insensitivity the excitement the emotion and everything pretty much. The atmosphere of middle earth gives you a masterful sense of adventure that no other films can quite capture to immerse you in. The characters in this are so badass and relatable that you can easily care what happens to them. Sure this film has a slow start but this kind of start really does speak to you unlike many other slow starts as it wins you over with the world of middle earth. The cgi is still good even now and believe me when I say this the people who made these films are like the cgi gods you will buy that the cgi characters In this look real and it keeps you… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
bfoore90Apr 16, 2019
A truly ambitious and wonderful start to the Lord of the Rings franchise and still holds up well today
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
DrewtheDude85May 28, 2015
I love all three Lord of the Rings films, they all flow so well together and they really build up such an epic and amazing story. The first film definitely starts things right with the trilogy, It may not be as action packed when compared toI love all three Lord of the Rings films, they all flow so well together and they really build up such an epic and amazing story. The first film definitely starts things right with the trilogy, It may not be as action packed when compared to it sequels but it's still solid entertainment, and when the action does happen it's really a lot of fun to watch. This film also feels so magical and you will almost appreciate this film's lighthearted feeling once the sequels start taking darker turns. I remember already being in awe of this film near the beginning when Gandalf first enters the Shire just because of how cool the Shire environment is and mainly because of the beautiful music playing in the background. The characters are also very likable, each one feels unique in a certain way. Overall I would highly recommend not just this film but the entire LOTR trilogy to anyone who likes good films about epic adventures and fantasy settings.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
critiMay 2, 2014
the movie, Lord of the Rings is very good, is a film that I recommend to people who like adventure movies, but he has some problems of fidelity to the book, surreal things and poorly explained.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
AaronWasserman2May 5, 2014
A fun engaging movie that captures the spirit of its books. The Lord of the Rings 1 has a great cast, score, effects, action, you name it. Even though this film is nearly 3 hours, and feels like it, but you dont get bored of it.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
JarradGhentAug 9, 2014
If this isn't the best set of fantasy movies then I don't what is. Others tend to disagree but I think The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring is the best of the trilogy with The Return of the King not far behind a brilliant movie.If this isn't the best set of fantasy movies then I don't what is. Others tend to disagree but I think The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring is the best of the trilogy with The Return of the King not far behind a brilliant movie. With great heart and respect.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
SkyrimGuy935Jan 26, 2015
Half of The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring is lighthearted, and the other half is a dark, mature, fantasy tale. Either way though, Fellowship is a thoroughly enjoyable fantasy romp filled with fun, lovable characters, fantasticHalf of The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring is lighthearted, and the other half is a dark, mature, fantasy tale. Either way though, Fellowship is a thoroughly enjoyable fantasy romp filled with fun, lovable characters, fantastic acting, a captivating story, truly pulse-pounding action sequences, and a surprising emotional impact. This film set the stage perfectly for its two sequels.

I give it a rating of 9.7/10, and it is one of my ten favorite films of all time.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
beeblebroxJun 30, 2015
The Fellowship of the Ring was truly a masterpiece among fantasy films. The music was powerful, action scenes were coreographically stunning and CGI was amazing.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
Kai82Jul 20, 2021
Finally I have read the Lord of the Rings and surprisingly I value the movies even higher now. The books are full to the brim with stories, characters, lore and world building. It is a challenge to adapt these to the screen and I would have aFinally I have read the Lord of the Rings and surprisingly I value the movies even higher now. The books are full to the brim with stories, characters, lore and world building. It is a challenge to adapt these to the screen and I would have a hard time to do it. To clarify this: Not everything from a book can be adapted to a different medium and even with 3 long movies they have to make sacrifices. Tolkien takes a lot of hearth and soul into explaining and describing things. Just as example there is a long chapter about Hobbits at the beginning even including pipe-weed and it takes far longer until Frodo even starts his journey. That does not mean on the other hand that I wanted not more content from the books. For example nearly every reade of the book including me would like to see Tom Bombadil as he is a fun character, a mystery and probably one of the most powerful beings in Middle-Earth (many say he would be the last being to fall to Sauron). Other things were changed too but it total I would say it is a loyal adaptation as the jump to a different medium has its price and not everything could fit in. The adaptation makes also some improvements that I will admit. For example Arwen has practically no role / room in the book “The Fellowship of the Ring” and it is only indirectly (and also very shortly) mentioned that Aragon and Arven are a thing. Also Boromir’s struggles are far better laid out and comes less surprising as in the book. Story set up: Thousands of years ago the dark Lord Sauron forged his “One Ring” to increase his powers tremendously and for getting control of the other Rings of power. In a dire a great battle humans, elves and dwarfs aligned and Sauron was defeated when his ring was cut of his hand as it holds a lot of his power (or essence / soul energy?). However as long as the ring exists Sauron is not truly death. It will take him a long time to recover but when he would get the Ring back there is probably nothing that can stop him except a full divine godly intervention. In the present the former Hobbit adventurer Bilbo Baggins (See “The Hobbit” for details) is preparing his 111 birthday party and wants to leave after that for a last adventure giving all his inheritance to his nephew and heir Frodo. This includes a ring he has found many years earlier on said adventure. However his visiting friend the wizard Gandalf the Grey has a suspicion about the ring. With this the epic heroes journey starts. The story is excellent and fully delivers. It is building up the tension, sets up the characters, world and lore while being fully entertaining. Characters. Rarely have I see such a good and fitting cast. Nearly everyone became my definitive version of the characters and they are all convincing. Lets start with the Hobbits. Elijah Wood is amazing as Frodo and Sean Astin is probably even better as Sam. Billy Boyd as Peregin (Pippin) and Dominic Monaghan as Meriadoc (Merry) deliver a good and praiseworthy performance too. They are a bit changed compared to the books (A bit more comic relive and a bit more troublemakers). Then we have our favorite trio with Viggo Mortensen as Aragorn, John Rhys Davis as Gimli and Orlando Bloom as Legolas. I don't think we could get a cast that works better together than these 3. It ends not there as Ian McKellen as Gandalf, Sean Bean as Borromir and Christopher Lee as Saruman also fully deliver. I end it here as I would need to praise the whole cast which is to long for the review. Presentation: The settings are so visually impressive. Various beautiful locations in New Zealand were used and the results are amazing. It is no wonder that tourism has vastly increased because of the movies. Not many movies can compete in this regard. Then there are the special effects. The Hobbits were filmed in real scale and the set to proper size and there is Gollum which is as much praise worthy for the effects and Andy Serkis. The CGI looks often so believable that you often do not notice its use. The soundtrack is also a masterpiece and it enhances the atmosphere and scenes. There is nothing to criticize here. Lastly I want to praise director Peter Jackson and the producers for putting so much care and effort into the movie. Overall this is an adaptation were a lot of work, hearth and soul was put into. It is a great and satisfying movie and a must see as is the whole trilogy.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
anichelsJan 1, 2016
This is one of the greatest epics of all time. Simply amazing, Frodo isn't a fighter: can't wield a sword, shoot an arrow or do magic. So for him to be the main hero in this story is bewildering. I think that deep down, it shows us that fromThis is one of the greatest epics of all time. Simply amazing, Frodo isn't a fighter: can't wield a sword, shoot an arrow or do magic. So for him to be the main hero in this story is bewildering. I think that deep down, it shows us that from small, quaint qualities, great things can be achieved with help from friends.
That's what I took out of this movie/story anyways.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
MaciejCichoszFeb 17, 2016
"The Fellowship of the Ring" proved to be the beginning of an immersive and beautiful adventure that set out for years. As a child I was astonished, the world of Middle-Earth became my obsession and a hobby. Now, nearly 15 years later I"The Fellowship of the Ring" proved to be the beginning of an immersive and beautiful adventure that set out for years. As a child I was astonished, the world of Middle-Earth became my obsession and a hobby. Now, nearly 15 years later I recall "The Fellowship of the Ring" as one of the most inspiring movies ever made. Peter Jackson and his crew did the impossible on making this film - they recreated the world from words into something larger and touchable and vivid.

To me, personally, "the Lord of the Rings" trilogy became the apex of the fantasy film-making and is still unbeatable and looked up to. It left an unremovable mark on the cinematography and on my heart as it is a touching and moving picture that transcends from words, from acting and visuals into emotions. A one of a kind masterpiece.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
SythusRATINGSOct 18, 2014
An epic adventure of good against evil, a story of the power of friendship and individual courage, and the heroic quest to pave the way for the emergence of mankind, J.R.R. Tolkien's master work brought to cinematic life.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
JohnMasterLJul 20, 2015
The Fellowship of the Ring es poderosa, épica y mágica. La primera parte de la trilogía es perfecta en todos los aspectos, un espectáculo fantasioso repleto de secuencias inesperadas e impactantes. Peter Jackson no solo creo una película,The Fellowship of the Ring es poderosa, épica y mágica. La primera parte de la trilogía es perfecta en todos los aspectos, un espectáculo fantasioso repleto de secuencias inesperadas e impactantes. Peter Jackson no solo creo una película, creo un clásico.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
thomasljoguesNov 13, 2014
Fantastic in both presentation and immersion, this iteration of Tolkien's masterpiece is well done. Having both the greatest mentor of cinema and the greatest adventure in literature, this rendition will never be forgotten.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
andrebarrosoDec 20, 2014
I must admit that I was never interested on watching "The Lord of the Rings" franchise, but when I decided to watch it, my conception about fantasy revolutionized.
Marvelous screenplay. Extremely faithful to Professor Tolkien's novel. PeterI must admit that I was never interested on watching "The Lord of the Rings" franchise, but when I decided to watch it, my conception about fantasy revolutionized.
Marvelous screenplay. Extremely faithful to Professor Tolkien's novel. Peter Jackson took risks on adapting the trilogy to the big screen, but surely we can affirm: the risk was worth it.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
AeromusicMar 4, 2018
One of my farovite movie of all times. Amazing cast, storytelling, music and FX's. Much more better than Hobbit.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
MattBrady99Jun 19, 2020
"I think I'm... quite ready for another adventure!"

I've recently re-watched 'The Lord of the Rings trilogy' and 'Alien' during quarantine, so the news of Ian Holm passing hit me the hardest. It would have been anywhere if I did not re-watch"I think I'm... quite ready for another adventure!"

I've recently re-watched 'The Lord of the Rings trilogy' and 'Alien' during quarantine, so the news of Ian Holm passing hit me the hardest. It would have been anywhere if I did not re-watch those movies. An excellent actor with extraordinary range as he slipped into different and complex characters so effortless. It's something I never thought about until now that the man who played a cold, yet calculated android in 'Alien', played the warm heart, but deeply troubled Bilbo Baggins, who also played the tight and rough chief from 'Ratatouille'.

With a filmography like: 'Alien', 'The Lord of the Rings', 'The Fifth Element', 'Chariots of Fire', 'From Hell', 'Ratatouille', 'Lord of War', and 'Time Bandits'. Man, what a life.

A brilliant presence that fitted every genre.

RIP Ian Holm.

"Until our next meeting.”… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
homer4presidentMar 11, 2015
Honestly the one of the most incredible movies I have ever seen, and the fact that it was made 14 years ago makes it even more spectacular. Amazing acting, amazing characters, amazing scenery, amazing actions, amazing story, amazing everything!
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
LOTRfanMar 13, 2015
The Lord Of The Rings: The Fellowhip of the Ring bring me to a new world. This movie is so damn beautiful with the awesome soundtrack. I really have no idea about this
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
VinceRocks123Jun 25, 2015
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. A powerful allegorial epic of friendship and fortitude against corruption and evil, Peter Jackson and the studios of NewLine Cinema brings J.R. Tolkien's spectacular fantasy novel and the magical labrinyth of Middle Earth to life in the first installment in this adventurous franchise.

When the young hobbit Frodo Baggins (Elijah Wood), finds himself left to inherit the One Ring, a ring that is said to contain the powerful evil spirit of Sauron, that can easily seduce and corrupt anyone who possesses it, he must embark on a adventure that will change him and those around him forever.

With the help of the powerfully wise yet humble wizard, Gandalf (Ian McKellen), a forest hunter named Aragorn (Viggo Mortensen), an archer wielding elf Legolas (Orlando Bloom) a giant dwarf Gimli (John Rys-Davies), and a young knight Boromir (Sean Bean) including Frodo's closest friends Merry, Pippin, and Samwise, Frodo and the uncanny Fellowship must set on a legendary odyssey of overcoming shear darkness as Sauron's re-awakened forces begin to rise again from the ashes in pursuit and the legendary chase as well as the War of the Ring soon begins.

At first it seems to long and kind of boring to most viewers who aren't interested in fantasy and stuff. but upon seeing it, all three over and over after being impressed by its spectacular imagery, stunning effects, awesome editing sequences and impactful story, I soon realize that it was better than expected after seeing the entire trilogy very dark, long, painful and gritty but with all the patience God gave me it all made a worthwhile subject to watch and a very important one as well as one of my personal favorites. hands down to one of the most important films that I enjoyed as much as I did with Star Wars back in my old childhood.

Its one of the movies you need to see to believe and be captivated for more fun entertainment the best movie of 2001! its a film that draws out elements similar to Kurosawa and Bergman yet its a faithful adaption that is still enjoyable and vibrant in my eyes....… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
EdwardGregoryApr 19, 2015
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Brooking no argument, history should quickly regard Peter Jackson’s The Fellowship Of The Ring as the first instalment of the best fantasy epic in motion picture history. This statement is worthy of investigation for several reasons.

Fellowship is indeed merely an opening salvo, and even after three hours in the dark you will likely exit the cinema ravenous with anticipation for the further two parts of the trilogy. Fellowship is also unabashedly rooted in the fantasy genre. Not to be confused with the techno-cool of good science fiction, nor even the cutesy charm of family fare like Harry Potter, the territory of Tolkien is clearly marked by goo and goblins and **** Persons with an aversion to lines such as, “To the bridge of Khazad-dûm!” are as well to stay within the Shire-like comforts of home (their loss).

With those caveats in place, it bears repeating: fantasy does not come finer. There are electrifying moments — notably the computer-assisted swooping camera through Isengard as it transforms into a factory for evil — when Jackson’s flight of fancy approaches the sublime as the romantic poets would understand it: inspiring awe.

Leaving aside the thorny issue of Tolkien die-hards and their inevitable gripes — “What no Tom Bombadil?” — Jackson’s screenplay (written in collaboration with Fran Walsh and Phillipa Boyens) is both bolder and more judicious than Steven Kloves’ surprisingly timid retread of Harry Potter. In particular, rescuing the romance of Arwen and Aragorn from the footnotes and the elevation of Saruman to all-action bad guy actually has a corrective influence on Tolkien’s often oblique and female-sparse source material.

There are problems, though. The three-hour running time is high on incident and low on discernible form. After successive detours to Elf habitats Rivendell (the watery home of Elrond) and Lothlórien (the forest home of the Lady Galadriel), the uninitiated might well ask why these crazy Elf kids can’t just live together and spare us all this attenuated dramatic structure.

More importantly, the action clearly climaxes in the desperate flight from the Mines Of Moria, where the largely seamless SFX is showcased in the best possible light — total darkness — but the narrative demands a different, downbeat ending. Indeed, but for some fine emotional playing from Bean, Mortensen, Astin and Wood, the final fight might feel like a particularly brutal game of paintball in Bluebell Wood. But then, the real battles are yet to come...

Putting formula blockbusters to shame, Fellowship is impeccably cast and constructed with both care and passion: this is a labour of love that never feels laboured. Emotional range and character depth ultimately take us beyond genre limitations, and it deserves to play as wide as a certain Mr. Potter.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
EddyGregsApr 19, 2015
Passed to him by his uncle Bilbo, young Hobbit Frodo Baggins becomes the unlikely and unwilling bearer of The One Ring of power, an instrument of unparalleled evil. And so Frodo, along with his three Hobbit chums, the wizard Gandalf and aPassed to him by his uncle Bilbo, young Hobbit Frodo Baggins becomes the unlikely and unwilling bearer of The One Ring of power, an instrument of unparalleled evil. And so Frodo, along with his three Hobbit chums, the wizard Gandalf and a swordsman named Strider, set out on an epic quest.

Fellowship is indeed merely an opening salvo, and even after three hours in the dark you will likely exit the cinema ravenous with anticipation for the further two parts of the trilogy. Fellowship is also unabashedly rooted in the fantasy genre. Not to be confused with the techno-cool of good science fiction, nor even the cutesy charm of family fare like Harry Potter, the territory of Tolkien is clearly marked by goo and goblins and **** Persons with an aversion to lines such as, “To the bridge of Khazad-dûm!” are as well to stay within the Shire-like comforts of home (their loss).

utting formula blockbusters to shame, Fellowship is impeccably cast and constructed with both care and passion: this is a labour of love that never feels laboured. Emotional range and character depth ultimately take us beyond genre limitations, and it deserves to play as wide as a certain Mr. Potter.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
MovieManiac83Apr 23, 2015
In the pantheon of fantasy writers, no diety is treated with greater reverence than J.R.R. Tolkien, who is regarded by most readers as the Father of Modern Fantasy. During the past three decades, the fantasy area in bookstores has expandedIn the pantheon of fantasy writers, no diety is treated with greater reverence than J.R.R. Tolkien, who is regarded by most readers as the Father of Modern Fantasy. During the past three decades, the fantasy area in bookstores has expanded from a minor subsection of science fiction to a major category in its own right. A couple dozen titles have been replaced by hundreds. Fantasy has gone from being a cult genre to entering the mainstream. This would not have happened without the popularity and influence of Tolkien's The Hobbit and The Lord of the Rings. Nearly every published fantasy author acknowledges having read and been inspired by Tolkien's canon, and, while The Lord of the Rings may not be the longest or most complex fantasy series to date, it remains the standard against which all similar works are measured. It is the epic fantasy series.

To say that fantasy movies have not been a big draw at the box office is to understate the matter. A lot of this has had to do with the poor quality of the product. Consider the evidence: titles like Willow, Dragonheart, and Dungeons and Dragons. Finally, 2001 has seen the belated emergence of fantasy as a legitimate cinematic genre. Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone was one of the year's most anticipated releases and, by the end of December, it will be one of the top money-makers of the past 12 months. Now, along comes The Lord of the Rings, as anticipated for 30-50 year olds and Harry Potter was for their children.

As entertaining as Harry Potter may be, it cannot hold a candle to The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring. With this production, Jackson has used The Lord of the Rings to re-invent fantasy for the cinema in the same way that the novel provided the blueprint for the written word. This astounding movie accomplishes what no other fantasy film has been able to do: transport viewers to an entirely different reality, immerse them in it, and maroon them there for nearly three hours. The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring brings Middle Earth to glorious life. From the first moment of the first reel, I was there.

In crafting his vision of Middle Earth, Jackson has employed all of the tricks available to him: miniatures, deceptive camera angles, location shooting, impressive set design, and matte paintings. He has also made use of computer graphics, but not to the extent that another director might have. Thus, The Lord of the Rings has a less artificial appearance than might have been the case if Jackson had relied too heavily on CGI technology. Andrew Lesnie's camerawork has the grand scope expected in an epic motion picture, and Howard Shore's score, which is at times heroic and at times thoughtful, compliments the visuals without ever calling attention to itself.

The Lord of the Rings is not an actors' movie, but each member of the cast acquits himself or herself well. Of special note are Ian McKellan, who presents Gandalf as a vulnerable and sympathetic figure; Ian Holm, whose Bilbo Baggins is a weary and tortured individual; and Elijah Wood, who shows the gradual changes in Frodo as he is transformed from a carefree hobbit to the person upon whom the fate of the world rests. Some recognizable names fill small roles - Liv Tyler is surprisingly good as Arwen; Cate Blanchett is cool and regal as Galadriel; and Christopher Lee brings his chilling presence to the part of the treacherous, traitorous Sauruman.

The strength of Jackson's vision as depicted in The Fellowship of the Ring gives movie-goers cause to hope that we may be in the midst of a cinematic achievement. If The Two Towers and The Return of the King live up to the standard set by this film, The Lord of the Rings will become a milestone not only for its genre, but for motion pictures in general. But, regardless of what the future brings, the single movie we now have before us stands out as one of the most rousing examples of entertainment to reach multiplexes in a long time. At last, someone has figured out how to do an epic fantasy justice on the big screen.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
CinemaBlendMay 6, 2015
To say that fantasy movies have not been a big draw at the box office is to understate the matter. A lot of this has had to do with the poor quality of the product. Consider the evidence: titles like Willow, Dragonheart, and Dungeons andTo say that fantasy movies have not been a big draw at the box office is to understate the matter. A lot of this has had to do with the poor quality of the product. Consider the evidence: titles like Willow, Dragonheart, and Dungeons and Dragons. Finally, 2001 has seen the belated emergence of fantasy as a legitimate cinematic genre. Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone was one of the year's most anticipated releases and, by the end of December, it will be one of the top money-makers of the past 12 months. Now, along comes The Lord of the Rings, as anticipated for 30-50 year olds and Harry Potter was for their children.

As entertaining as Harry Potter may be, it cannot hold a candle to The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring. With this production, Jackson has used The Lord of the Rings to re-invent fantasy for the cinema in the same way that the novel provided the blueprint for the written word. This astounding movie accomplishes what no other fantasy film has been able to do: transport viewers to an entirely different reality, immerse them in it, and maroon them there for nearly three hours. The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring brings Middle Earth to glorious life. From the first moment of the first reel, I was there.

First and foremost, The Lord of the Rings is an adventure, and, in that, it is relentlessly successful. One does not need to have read the books to appreciate the movie. The background is explained concisely in a voiceover prologue, and the action proceeds in a straightforward manner. As long as one enjoys a well-crafted adventure yarn set against the backdrop of a mythical clash between good and evil, The Lord of the Rings will satisfy. Like all great movies of this sort, this one is characterized by tremendous action scenes punctuated by moments of rest and reflection. So, we have the flight from the Shire, followed by the council at Rivendell, followed by the hazardous trek through Moria (the movie's high point), followed by the encounter with Galadriel, followed by the sundering of the fellowship. Along the way, there is triumph, sorrow, and a little philosophical depth. The Lord of the Rings emphasizes two themes: the importance of brotherhood and the need for true strength to come from within.

In crafting his vision of Middle Earth, Jackson has employed all of the tricks available to him: miniatures, deceptive camera angles, location shooting, impressive set design, and matte paintings. He has also made use of computer graphics, but not to the extent that another director might have. Thus, The Lord of the Rings has a less artificial appearance than might have been the case if Jackson had relied too heavily on CGI technology. Andrew Lesnie's camerawork has the grand scope expected in an epic motion picture, and Howard Shore's score, which is at times heroic and at times thoughtful, compliments the visuals without ever calling attention to itself.

The Lord of the Rings is not an actors' movie, but each member of the cast acquits himself or herself well. Of special note are Ian McKellan, who presents Gandalf as a vulnerable and sympathetic figure; Ian Holm, whose Bilbo Baggins is a weary and tortured individual; and Elijah Wood, who shows the gradual changes in Frodo as he is transformed from a carefree hobbit to the person upon whom the fate of the world rests. Some recognizable names fill small roles - Liv Tyler is surprisingly good as Arwen; Cate Blanchett is cool and regal as Galadriel; and Christopher Lee brings his chilling presence to the part of the treacherous, traitorous Sauruman.

The strength of Jackson's vision as depicted in The Fellowship of the Ring gives movie-goers cause to hope that we may be in the midst of a cinematic achievement. If The Two Towers and The Return of the King live up to the standard set by this film, The Lord of the Rings will become a milestone not only for its genre, but for motion pictures in general. But, regardless of what the future brings, the single movie we now have before us stands out as one of the most rousing examples of entertainment to reach multiplexes in a long time. At last, someone has figured out how to do an epic fantasy justice on the big screen.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
DanilSirotkinJul 21, 2015
Определённо,- трилогия "Властелин Колец" является шедевром кино - (как и книга - шедевром литературы), и я абсолютно не понимаю людей, которым она не нравится. Естественно, эти фильмы стали культовыми, - а мной они засмотрены до дыр. Про нихОпределённо,- трилогия "Властелин Колец" является шедевром кино - (как и книга - шедевром литературы), и я абсолютно не понимаю людей, которым она не нравится. Естественно, эти фильмы стали культовыми, - а мной они засмотрены до дыр. Про них можно очень много писать, - и чем больше вы пишете, - тем больше вас захлёстывают эмоции, - и тем больше хочется писать. Теперь перейдём к рецензии на мой любимый фильм "Великой Трилогии", - на мой самый любимый фильм - фэнтези: Властелин Колец: Братство Кольца (The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring). Вот честно - при просмотре этого фильма я нахожусь в состоянии экстаза. Когда я смотрел ВК маленьким, я не особо понимал сами фильмы, но я чувствовал, что перед моим взором предстоит что-то поистине великое. Видеоряд и музыка, меня в них, конечно, завораживали... Пересказывать сюжет фильма я не буду, - однако спойлеры всё равно будут. Однако, - я сомневаюсь, что этот фильм ещё кто-то не видел. Итак, "Братство" - самый неспешный фильм из трех, однако же и самый волшебный и близкий к духу Толкина. В нём - наименьшее количество компьютерной графики из всех экранизаций Толкина. (Для сравнения: в первом фильме - 540 кадров со спецэффектами, в третьем - 1488). Так что сами видите: хоть трилогию и стоит считать единым фильмом, - рассматривать их лучше по отдельности. Сюжет - всем известен: Фродо достаётся кольцо от Бильбо, Гэндальф узнаёт, что это не простое волшебное кольцо - а Кольцо Всевластья, которое подчиняется только Саурону, - Тёмному Властелину. После ухода Бильбо, Гэндальф передаёт кольцо Фродо, говорит, чтобы он унёс его из Шира, и договаривается с ним о встрече в таверне "Гарцующий Пони". Фродо выступает вместе с Сэмом в путь, и вот тут-то и начинаются приключения. Скажете: "И что тут особенного?" И вы были бы правы, если бы сказали это не прочитав книги или не посмотрев фильмы полностью. Узнав же историю до конца, перед вами предстала бы великая картина. Углубляясь же в сюжет ещё глубже, вы осознали бы, что Властелин Колец - это, по сути, "слоёный пирог" о добре и зле, дружбе и преданности, отваге и чести, благородстве и героизме, любви к природе, к дому, о смерти... Но самый главный смысл (на моё мнение) я поведаю в рецензии на 3-й фильм. Мой любимый эпизод в фильме - это эпизод в Мории - заброшенном и удивительно прекрасном царстве гномов, когда герои заходят в Дварроуделф, у меня замирает сердце. Ну и конечно шикарный эпизод с Балрогом. "Ты не пройдёшь!" - ("You shall not pass!"), - говорит само за себя. Ну и конечно шикарный, грустный и одновременно радостный финал с Боромиром и отплытием Фродо. Я скажу так: "Жить ради самого существования этого фильма, - уже неплохо, ибо он придаёт сил." По поводу актёров: все они БЕСПОДОБНЫ, кроме Элайджи Вуда (который мало чем похож на книжного Фродо). Иэн Маккеллен - идеальный Гэндальф, Кристофер Ли - светлая ему память - идеальный Саруман, Вигго Мортенсен (которому, к слову, больше нравится первый фильм трилогии) - идеальный Арагорн. Шон Бин в роли Боромира - очень харзматичный, удивительно сильный и слабый одновременно. Хьюго Уивинг (кто бы что не говорил), - для меня идеальный, мудрый эльф. Сэм - идеальный друг. Всё в этом фильме идеально, нет ни малейшего недостатка. И даже к Фродо привыкаешь. За всё это, говорю спасибо Питеру Джексону (режиссёр), съёмочной группе, актёрам, композитору (одному из 2-х моих любимых) Говарду Шору за поистине шедевральную музыку, и отдельное спасибо Толкину, за величайшее произведение жанра фэнтези. Подводя к концу мой разговор с вами о "Братстве Кольца" (рецензией это уже сложно назвать), я хочу, чтобы вы безаговорочно уяснили: 1) - этот фильм - КЛАССИКА, 2) - в этом фильме заключена ВЕЛИКАЯ СИЛА (что это, пусть пока каждый решает сам), 3) - вы должны ЖИТЬ С НИМ, неся его в своём сердце, и хотя бы ежегодно его пересматривать. Уверяю вас, трилогия Властелин Колец ПРИДАЁТ СИЛ, - и вовсе не обязательно смотреть фильмы, - нужно лишь послушать музыку из них или посмотреть трейлеры. Итак - ВК - один из 2-х моих самых любимых фильмов - (наравне с сагой о Гарри Поттере), Братство Кольца же, - самый близкий к духу Толкина фильм из гексалогии Джексона, и мой любимый из трилогии о Кольце. Ну, и после всего мною написанного, как думаете, рекомендую ли я этот фильм? :) 100/100 или 10/10.(или 5/5 или 4/4).… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
reviewer2015lolDec 12, 2015
If this movie was a car, it would be a rolls royce. Pure perfection,amazing and the best movie of the year 2001. It's maybe dark and not everyone favorite but o my god it's a masterpiece. It's more than ten years old and it's still looks likeIf this movie was a car, it would be a rolls royce. Pure perfection,amazing and the best movie of the year 2001. It's maybe dark and not everyone favorite but o my god it's a masterpiece. It's more than ten years old and it's still looks like a movie that would come out now.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
mazewaxieMay 13, 2019
"The Fellowship of the Ring" is easily one of the greatest and most influential film ever made.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
gameguardian21Mar 7, 2016
A amazing start to an amazing trilogy. You already get interested in the word and its characters, with its action scenes being entertaining as well. This is a must watch if you love good movies, or if you have read the book.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
TheMovieDoctorJan 7, 2016
In the pantheon of fantasy writers, no diety is treated with greater reverence than J.R.R. Tolkien, who is regarded by most readers as the Father of Modern Fantasy. During the past three decades, the fantasy area in bookstores has expandedIn the pantheon of fantasy writers, no diety is treated with greater reverence than J.R.R. Tolkien, who is regarded by most readers as the Father of Modern Fantasy. During the past three decades, the fantasy area in bookstores has expanded from a minor subsection of science fiction to a major category in its own right. A couple dozen titles have been replaced by hundreds. Fantasy has gone from being a cult genre to entering the mainstream. This would not have happened without the popularity and influence of Tolkien's The Hobbit and The Lord of the Rings. Nearly every published fantasy author acknowledges having read and been inspired by Tolkien's canon, and, while The Lord of the Rings may not be the longest or most complex fantasy series to date, it remains the standard against which all similar works are measured. It is the epic fantasy series.

In the late 1990s, New Zealand-based director Peter Jackson (Heavenly Creatures) had two projects on the drawing board - a remake of King Kong and an ambitious, three-film adaptation of The Lord of the Rings. For a while, it looked like King Kong would get the go-ahead, but the project was squashed in the wake of the failure of Sony's Godzilla and Disney's Mighty Joe Young. So, Jackson turned his attention to The Lord of the Rings. After briefly being courted and jilted by Miramax Films, Jackson found a backer in New Line Cinema. The Time-Warner company invested nearly $300 million for the package deal of all three movies, which were filmed back-to-back-to-back. (Including publicity and marketing, the overall price tag will approach $500 million.)

To say that fantasy movies have not been a big draw at the box office is to understate the matter. A lot of this has had to do with the poor quality of the product. Consider the evidence: titles like Willow, Dragonheart, and Dungeons and Dragons. Finally, 2001 has seen the belated emergence of fantasy as a legitimate cinematic genre. Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone was one of the year's most anticipated releases and, by the end of December, it will be one of the top money-makers of the past 12 months. Now, along comes The Lord of the Rings, as anticipated for 30-50 year olds and Harry Potter was for their children.

As entertaining as Harry Potter may be, it cannot hold a candle to The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring. With this production, Jackson has used The Lord of the Rings to re-invent fantasy for the cinema in the same way that the novel provided the blueprint for the written word. This astounding movie accomplishes what no other fantasy film has been able to do: transport viewers to an entirely different reality, immerse them in it, and maroon them there for nearly three hours. The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring brings Middle Earth to glorious life. From the first moment of the first reel, I was there.

Lord of the Rings devotees will be delighted to learn that the motion picture adaptation is as faithful as one could imagine possible (and, consequently, is nearly three hours in length). Jackson and his co-screenwriters (Fran Walsh & Philippa Boyens) do an excellent job condensing more than five hundred pages of text into a script that never feels choppy, uneven, or rushed. The Fellowship of the Ring moves fluidly and, in the process, exhilarates. Certain scenes have been cut or condensed in the name of pacing, and the role of one character (Arwen) has been expanded to enhance a romantic angle, something that was largely absent from Tolkien's work.

First and foremost, The Lord of the Rings is an adventure, and, in that, it is relentlessly successful. One does not need to have read the books to appreciate the movie. The background is explained concisely in a voiceover prologue, and the action proceeds in a straightforward manner. As long as one enjoys a well-crafted adventure yarn set against the backdrop of a mythical clash between good and evil, The Lord of the Rings will satisfy. Like all great movies of this sort, this one is characterized by tremendous action scenes punctuated by moments of rest and reflection. So, we have the flight from the Shire, followed by the council at Rivendell, followed by the hazardous trek through Moria (the movie's high point), followed by the encounter with Galadriel, followed by the sundering of the fellowship. Along the way, there is triumph, sorrow, and a little philosophical depth. The Lord of the Rings emphasizes two themes: the importance of brotherhood and the need for true strength to come from within.

The Fellowship of the Ring gives movie-goers cause to hope that we may be in the midst of a cinematic achievement. If The Two Towers and The Return of the King live up to the standard set by this film, The Lord of the Rings will become a milestone not only for its genre, but for motion pictures in general. At last, someone has figured out how to do an epic fantasy justice on the big screen.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
CinemassacreMar 13, 2016
In the late 1990s, New Zealand-based director Peter Jackson (Heavenly Creatures) had two projects on the drawing board - a remake of King Kong and an ambitious, three-film adaptation of The Lord of the Rings. For a while, it looked like KingIn the late 1990s, New Zealand-based director Peter Jackson (Heavenly Creatures) had two projects on the drawing board - a remake of King Kong and an ambitious, three-film adaptation of The Lord of the Rings. For a while, it looked like King Kong would get the go-ahead, but the project was squashed in the wake of the failure of Sony's Godzilla and Disney's Mighty Joe Young. So, Jackson turned his attention to The Lord of the Rings. After briefly being courted and jilted by Miramax Films, Jackson found a backer in New Line Cinema. The Time-Warner company invested nearly $300 million for the package deal of all three movies, which were filmed back-to-back-to-back. (Including publicity and marketing, the overall price tag will approach $500 million.)

To say that fantasy movies have not been a big draw at the box office is to understate the matter. A lot of this has had to do with the poor quality of the product. Consider the evidence: titles like Willow, Dragonheart, and Dungeons and Dragons. Finally, 2001 has seen the belated emergence of fantasy as a legitimate cinematic genre. Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone was one of the year's most anticipated releases and, by the end of December, it will be one of the top money-makers of the past 12 months. Now, along comes The Lord of the Rings, as anticipated for 30-50 year olds and Harry Potter was for their children.

As entertaining as Harry Potter may be, it cannot hold a candle to The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring. With this production, Jackson has used The Lord of the Rings to re-invent fantasy for the cinema in the same way that the novel provided the blueprint for the written word. This astounding movie accomplishes what no other fantasy film has been able to do: transport viewers to an entirely different reality, immerse them in it, and maroon them there for nearly three hours. The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring brings Middle Earth to glorious life. From the first moment of the first reel, I was there.

First and foremost, The Lord of the Rings is an adventure, and, in that, it is relentlessly successful. One does not need to have read the books to appreciate the movie. The background is explained concisely in a voiceover prologue, and the action proceeds in a straightforward manner. As long as one enjoys a well-crafted adventure yarn set against the backdrop of a mythical clash between good and evil, The Lord of the Rings will satisfy. Like all great movies of this sort, this one is characterized by tremendous action scenes punctuated by moments of rest and reflection. So, we have the flight from the Shire, followed by the council at Rivendell, followed by the hazardous trek through Moria (the movie's high point), followed by the encounter with Galadriel, followed by the sundering of the fellowship. Along the way, there is triumph, sorrow, and a little philosophical depth. The Lord of the Rings emphasizes two themes: the importance of brotherhood and the need for true strength to come from within.

In crafting his vision of Middle Earth, Jackson has employed all of the tricks available to him: miniatures, deceptive camera angles, location shooting, impressive set design, and matte paintings. He has also made use of computer graphics, but not to the extent that another director might have. Thus, The Lord of the Rings has a less artificial appearance than might have been the case if Jackson had relied too heavily on CGI technology. Andrew Lesnie's camerawork has the grand scope expected in an epic motion picture, and Howard Shore's score, which is at times heroic and at times thoughtful, compliments the visuals without ever calling attention to itself.

The Lord of the Rings is not an actors' movie, but each member of the cast acquits himself or herself well. Of special note are Ian McKellan, who presents Gandalf as a vulnerable and sympathetic figure; Ian Holm, whose Bilbo Baggins is a weary and tortured individual; and Elijah Wood, who shows the gradual changes in Frodo as he is transformed from a carefree hobbit to the person upon whom the fate of the world rests. Some recognizable names fill small roles - Liv Tyler is surprisingly good as Arwen; Cate Blanchett is cool and regal as Galadriel; and Christopher Lee brings his chilling presence to the part of the treacherous, traitorous Sauruman.

The strength of Jackson's vision as depicted in The Fellowship of the Ring gives movie-goers cause to hope that we may be in the midst of a cinematic achievement. If The Two Towers and The Return of the King live up to the standard set by this film, The Lord of the Rings will become a milestone not only for its genre, but for motion pictures in general. But, regardless of what the future brings, the single movie we now have before us stands out as one of the most rousing examples of entertainment to reach multiplexes in a long time. At last, someone has figured out how to do an epic fantasy justice on the big screen.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
SrPepeAug 3, 2018
La película es muy buena con una historia excelente, pero falla en el aburrimiento que produce la duración. Igualmente es una obra de arte.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
Muskrat147Oct 23, 2016
An incredible adaptation of the first chapter of J.R.R. Tolkien's masterpiece, Peter Jackson's The Fellowship of the Ring captivates with its dazzling visuals and fascinating story.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
Aaron_WassermanMay 30, 2016
Personally, my favorite of the Lord of the Rings movies, this movie while, like its sequels, is very long, this one manages to keep me into the story the whole time. I can not say the same for the next films.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
superbatMay 27, 2020
The Fellowship of the Ring is the beginning to the best set of fantasy films of all-time: The Lord of the Rings trilogy. It's a fun fantasy adventure with an interesting story, compelling characters, excellent visuals for its time, and anThe Fellowship of the Ring is the beginning to the best set of fantasy films of all-time: The Lord of the Rings trilogy. It's a fun fantasy adventure with an interesting story, compelling characters, excellent visuals for its time, and an epic soundtrack.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
alejandro970Jul 26, 2019
The long-waited adaptation of one of best fantasy sagas fulfills the expectation. The story about a multicultural exodus which mission is prevent a sovereign ring, that cast an unstoppable evil, being retrieved by original owner. The battleThe long-waited adaptation of one of best fantasy sagas fulfills the expectation. The story about a multicultural exodus which mission is prevent a sovereign ring, that cast an unstoppable evil, being retrieved by original owner. The battle sequences are in the right place, and the sequences of redemption and sacrifice. Remarks the art conceptual, the special effects and Ian Mc Kellen as Gandalf.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
gNov 19, 2016
A masterpiece tale of Tolkien's imagination. Magnificent directing by Peter Jackson of growing this as a bug-budget film trilogies of all time. Better than The Hobbit. One of these masterpiece films you've got to see. Brilliant adaptations.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
TheSpideyReviewFeb 5, 2018
A movie that somehow makes exposotion fun. It shows well-thought out characters while showing how dangerous "the one ring to rule them all" can be.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
Thatonenerd2187Jan 20, 2017
This film is one of Peter Jackson's best directed films, as he directs such an amazing film. The story itself has a great start to it, as it takes it's time to develop the world and characters around them, especially since this film is wellThis film is one of Peter Jackson's best directed films, as he directs such an amazing film. The story itself has a great start to it, as it takes it's time to develop the world and characters around them, especially since this film is well paced. All of the characters are very well developed and have a very clear set of personality's. The action scenes are very exciting and well directed that you feel the tension for these characters. As a film it succeeds very well as it's well shot and almost flawless acting. Overall, this film succeeds and I would recommend this to anyone, except if you have a short attention spam.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
DeanomiteDec 29, 2019
My interest in this series has recently renewed as i have been reading the works of CJ Jung, the whole LOTR series is apparently related to Jungian psychology/philosophy, which is essentially about expanding consciousness by bringing light toMy interest in this series has recently renewed as i have been reading the works of CJ Jung, the whole LOTR series is apparently related to Jungian psychology/philosophy, which is essentially about expanding consciousness by bringing light to the unconscious. As such, everyone has a shadow self that needs to be explored. Frodo has Gollum, Gandalf has Saruman etc. Archetypes include the hero, the Wiseman, as well as exploring dark forests (the unconscious) crossing rivers (signifies change, since you never cross the same river twice-because water passes), plot changes always follow a period of waking from unconscious to a bigger world. The Shire represents the first naive consciousness. Maps represent quantifiable knowledge, the 4 hobbits represent the 4 elements of consciousness, Frodo being intellect drives the early phase of enlightenment, later on Sam takes over, representing how instincts become predominant at higher levels of consciousness, also interesting because people all act in instinct prior to discovery of the self, then come full circle back to it as consciousness enlightens the unconscious, wow this stuff is genius. Apparently Jung and Tolkien were buddies. It's crazy, especially when you consider that Star Wars and the Matrix were also designed around Jungian archetypes and consciousness, not to mention the works of Charlie Kaufman (Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind, Synecdoche New York, Being John Malkovich) and PT Anderson (Boogie Nights, There Will be Blood). Our society is defined to an incredible degree by the works of Jung, and nobody I know has ever even heard of him. If you want to see something fascinating, look up The Red Book, Jung published it in 1930, it totally looks like its from LOTR (published in 1955, The Hobbit in 1937). Jung said that the death of one age is defined by the birth of a new age, the reason the Elves were migrating prior to the Age of Men. Wow, it's like I never really saw these movies that i always loved. Expanding consciousness is already happening.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
bennewmanMay 28, 2018
Influential, Exiting, sometimes even funny Lord of the Rings the Fellowship of the Ring kicks off the series with a bang.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
ZerpnosMar 5, 2017
Sinema tarihinin Kült filmlerinden olan Yüzüklerin Efendisinin ilk filmi olan Yüzük Kardeşliği;
Fantastik, Orta çağ ve edebiyat seven biri olarak bence beklentilerimi karşılamıyor. İlk film olarak konuyu anlatım açısından gayet yeterli olanSinema tarihinin Kült filmlerinden olan Yüzüklerin Efendisinin ilk filmi olan Yüzük Kardeşliği;
Fantastik, Orta çağ ve edebiyat seven biri olarak bence beklentilerimi karşılamıyor. İlk film olarak konuyu anlatım açısından gayet yeterli olan film Aksiyonu fazla veremiyor ve İyi bir film oluyor.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
opethagallochNov 17, 2017
This 3 hour long epic is only the beginning of the adventure, yet it manages to leave you in awe and absolutely in love with the world created by Tolkien. I remember the first time I saw this, I couldn't wait for the second one.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
JPKJun 22, 2019
Beginning To A Pretty Much Perfect Trilogy
Fellowship Of The Ring is a tremendous start to a historically amazing trilogy.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
ANTtheKNEEEENov 19, 2021
Obviously a classic. The world is amazing. I dont know what else to say. :DD
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
CoreGamer1408Dec 16, 2018
One of the best fantasy movies ever made and a epic start to TLOTR. The casting is phenomenal nobody feels out of place. Pretty interesting adaptation of Tolkien works.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
alexandreaDec 1, 2021
One of the most fun movies I have ever seen in my life, it just feel like a true adventure.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
RockoDaFoxxoNov 24, 2017
As good as its reputation has gotten. The visuals are mind-blowing even to this day, but what really struck many audiences was its engaging, intense, emotionally-powerful story and deep character development. It's one of those rare moviesAs good as its reputation has gotten. The visuals are mind-blowing even to this day, but what really struck many audiences was its engaging, intense, emotionally-powerful story and deep character development. It's one of those rare movies that's beautifully crafted yet still fun to watch. A masterpiece.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
PikeaxMar 9, 2019
This is based on the extended edition and encompasses all three LotR movies.
This movie is a classic. Tolkien's world is brought to life in truly epic fashion here. Sure it runs long, but that length ensures that nothing in the story is leftThis is based on the extended edition and encompasses all three LotR movies.
This movie is a classic. Tolkien's world is brought to life in truly epic fashion here. Sure it runs long, but that length ensures that nothing in the story is left out. I suggest judging all three Lord of the Rings movies as one collective whole, rather than as three stand alone movies. This trilogy was meant to be watched this way and the experience isn't complete without that.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
tiagomacedsFeb 20, 2018
A trilogia não poderia ser aberta de melhor forma. Filme icônico que dá início a melhor saga da história do cinema
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
kilgrimMar 22, 2021
This was the last film that surprised me - for me it marks the end of cinema - about no film after it I could say "that's new!"
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
spacebear1Jan 5, 2018
Lord of the Rings: Fellowship of the Ring is one of the most perfect films that I've ever seen. All of the characters were perfect, I really liked Frodo Baggins, Sam Gamgee, and Gandalf the Grey. The cinematography was flawless as well as theLord of the Rings: Fellowship of the Ring is one of the most perfect films that I've ever seen. All of the characters were perfect, I really liked Frodo Baggins, Sam Gamgee, and Gandalf the Grey. The cinematography was flawless as well as the spectacular music and action sequences. In the end, this is a flawless masterpiece.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
TheRussianatorApr 10, 2018
The beginning of this epic is as well-written as it is shot. The beautiful locations, amazing CGI, the acting, and the great characters make this 3 hour masterpiece fly by very fast.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
Jaredc324Dec 11, 2019
An example of pure wonder in preface, prologue storytelling... divulging you with authenticity and richness in exposition and story that most fantasy films pose to have. Fellowship of the Ring is the real deal and mark of greatness in it'sAn example of pure wonder in preface, prologue storytelling... divulging you with authenticity and richness in exposition and story that most fantasy films pose to have. Fellowship of the Ring is the real deal and mark of greatness in it's genre and class.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
LoletinAlexisMar 29, 2020
After many years of having to start this trilogy, I only needed to finish the first one to understand the fanaticism for this literary saga.
Although the fights don't convince me thanks to cameras that move too much without showing much,After many years of having to start this trilogy, I only needed to finish the first one to understand the fanaticism for this literary saga.
Although the fights don't convince me thanks to cameras that move too much without showing much, everything else is simply perfect.
Also some special effects were below the level shown in general, but that was 2001, is understood and forgiven.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
drone41Feb 9, 2018
One of the best movies for sure. First, incredible, but not the best part in trilogy. Brilliant.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
FilipeNetoFeb 17, 2018
Based on the novel by J.R.R. Tolkien and directed by Peter Jackson, this is the first film in the trilogy "The Lord of the Rings," one of the most striking and most profitable in recent cinema. The film is set in an imaginary world, MiddleBased on the novel by J.R.R. Tolkien and directed by Peter Jackson, this is the first film in the trilogy "The Lord of the Rings," one of the most striking and most profitable in recent cinema. The film is set in an imaginary world, Middle Earth, where humans coexist with fantastic creatures such as elves, dwarfs, orcs's hobbit's etc. In this film, the balance of this illusory world is at stake because of the war against the evil lord Sauron, who eagerly wants to dominate, corrupt and submit all forms of life. In the midst of these events, two hobbit's living in the Shire, a little-known part of Middle Earth, have the difficult task of hiding the weapon that can decide the course of the war: a ring that gives power to Sauron and he desperately seeks to recover.

Everything in this film, a contemporary epic, is perfect: the stunning scenery in New Zealand are breathtaking, the costumes were meticulously designed, the characterization is the top current range in film and computerized animations have been widely used to obtain scenes truly spectacular. The cast, in turn, is luxurious: in this film we have Elijah Wood, Sean Astin, Dominic Monaghan and Billy Boyd (respectively, in the roles of the four hobbit's Frodo, Sam, Merrin and Pippin), Christopher Lee (as Saruman the magician), Sir Ian McKellen (as the Galdalf wizard the Grey), Cate Blanchett (as Lady Galadriel), Viggo Mortensen (as the walker Aragorn), Orlando Bloom (as the elven archer Legolas) and John Rhys-Davies ( as the dwarf warrior Gimli) and other very talented actors who gave the best of themselves to honor the audience with a movie luxuriously well done.

It's not by chance that this movie, as well as the rest of the trilogy, had the impact it had. This is one of the most popular and profitable films of the century, maybe one of the best movies ever, marking the opening of the public to a new generation of epic films. There is only one mandatory film for any movie buff but one of the movies that few people could not see.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
filmbuff96Mar 14, 2018
An enchanting story from start to finish, and journey unlike any other before it. Peter Jackson truly creates a fantasy epic of the already epic story that is Tolkien's, The Lord of the Rings.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
karatistosJan 19, 2020
The Peter Jackson's director's cut of the Lord of the Rings trilogy remain as the zenith of cinematographic achievement.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
Star_ScreamMay 23, 2020
One of the best movies ever. This trilogy is by far the best fantasy ever created
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
Page:
More From This Movie

92 Critic Reviews

9.0 User Reviews

Details & Credits|Trailers

Current Movie Releases
By MetascoreBy User Score
1 77 Project Hail Mary
2 75 Send Help
3 73 Hoppers
4 72 The Sheep Detectives
5 68 Crime 101
SEE ALL
Essential Links
New on Amazon Prime Video
New on Netflix
Coming Soon to DVD/Blu-ray
SEE ALL