Netflix | Release Date: November 1, 2019
8.1
USER SCORE
Universal acclaim based on 1250 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
1,034
Mixed:
121
Negative:
95
Watch Now
Stream On
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)
9
amheretojudgeNov 27, 2019
So what do you do when you have defined the genre, sealed it tight, preserved with time that keeps mining excelsior from it. You open the bottle, says Marty.

The Irishman The director Martin Scorsese tells his story, his perspective, his
So what do you do when you have defined the genre, sealed it tight, preserved with time that keeps mining excelsior from it. You open the bottle, says Marty.

The Irishman

The director Martin Scorsese tells his story, his perspective, his unbiased take visually. He is one of the few directors alive and working passionately, hungrily(!)- You'd think that maturity over the years would decay his obsession, but he is latched onto that young man's game like any other new filmmaker trying to make his or her mark.- and sophisticatedly that brought the "catalyst" element into the TO-DO list of a director. I mean, think about it, his films spend more time on slow motion shots,- in this said-overly-long-but-you-don't-actually-want-shorter runtime the slow motion takes are basically the front page cover that comes in like fliers in such biographies- elaborated jokes and dead silence where Robert De Niro, Joe Pesci and Al Pacino alike dicey actors chews the script paper, the rest of the blah-blah historical events are fast forwarded with long physical sequences. Now if you look into those thousands and thousands of storyboards, Marty though not writing the script; the screenwriter Steven Zaillian did a fabulous job, is in control of the film more than you'd imagine. Never have I seen his film, where a footage falls short or the displayed images fall flat. Everything hits the sweet spot right into your heart. And this one, the most. Especially for me. The Irishman is a surprisingly satisfying and oddly a perfect end; if he makes it his last of the gangster genre, to all the films that he has piled upon his desk. The show that is placed so delicately in front of us, is neither an answer to escape nor salvation nor payback nor some bloodlusted revenge. It is exactly what Marty did, does. Remembering those times, simply that. The final act is one of the finest things I have experienced in recent times.
Expand
3 of 9 users found this helpful36
All this user's reviews
5
AllanbaxterNov 29, 2019
Where do I start? If you are looking for a sitting on the edge of your seat movie, this isn't it, move on! If you are going to watch it on Netflix, make sure you are comfortable with a pillow and blanket, you may fall asleep. I love all theseWhere do I start? If you are looking for a sitting on the edge of your seat movie, this isn't it, move on! If you are going to watch it on Netflix, make sure you are comfortable with a pillow and blanket, you may fall asleep. I love all these actors, but for me, this was a HUGE MISS. Expand
3 of 9 users found this helpful36
All this user's reviews
10
ThatFilmGuy20Nov 27, 2019
A fine curated piece of art, that's what Scorsese put before our eyes, he brought out everything in his arsenal of skills, every move is calculated to the teeth, every work is accounted for, it never skips a beat, it comes packaged in a smartA fine curated piece of art, that's what Scorsese put before our eyes, he brought out everything in his arsenal of skills, every move is calculated to the teeth, every work is accounted for, it never skips a beat, it comes packaged in a smart setup which is not surprising with a director like Scorsese, in its over three hour runtime, not a single second is wasted, every little thing meant something, every frame worked towards the story, whether it's a one-second still or a ten minutes sequence, everything clicks here.

The performances, my god, where should I start? everyone brought their A-game and some more, the whole cast was infinitely charismatic, but the lead trio, De Niro, Pesci, Pacino were just phenomenal, true masters of their trade, absolute strong presence, when they're on-screen, you're tuned in, not by choice, they just demand that of you, it's just fascinating for me to see a long sequence rich in dialogue between arguably the best two actors alive, the back and forth here is everything but acting, it is too real, that's how astounding they are, Pesci again, in my opinion, delivers so relentlessly as he always does, and when on-screen he takes control, he commands, not even De Niro can match his level, he just has this thing, it's unbelievable. Scorsese always referred to Cadillacs as the top of the industry, well this film is a Cadillac, it has endless class, I feel privileged and honored to have watched this, something that history will hail its cult status in years to come, A Marvelous MASTERPIECE.
Expand
3 of 9 users found this helpful36
All this user's reviews
10
fsali6582Nov 21, 2019
Sublime, detalladamente impecable, la actuación de Al Pacino se destaca entre un elenco de actores notables. La película mas madura de Scorsese anticipando la despedida del mejor cine de los últimos 50 años.
3 of 9 users found this helpful36
All this user's reviews
10
NavyBeanNov 18, 2019
If you're expecting Goodfellas or Mean Streets you're in the wrong decade. This is a much more reflective, symbolic and contemplative film than any of Scorsese's previous mob films. It's quite the ride to watch these legendary performers playIf you're expecting Goodfellas or Mean Streets you're in the wrong decade. This is a much more reflective, symbolic and contemplative film than any of Scorsese's previous mob films. It's quite the ride to watch these legendary performers play roles that seem to fit them like a five fingered glove. I do have a couple small peeves, I don't know that calling someone "you people" as a slur was a thing in the era it's supposedly used. And then there's a whole fish conversation that seems long, unnecessary and improvised in a bad way. Expand
2 of 6 users found this helpful24
All this user's reviews
3
MccuskyDec 2, 2019
Not much difference between other mob movies, kinda dull and uneventful. I would probably have enjoyed it more if it was my first gangster movie but this just about rolls through every cliche there is. Although performances were good INot much difference between other mob movies, kinda dull and uneventful. I would probably have enjoyed it more if it was my first gangster movie but this just about rolls through every cliche there is. Although performances were good I couldn't find the characters that convincing Expand
2 of 6 users found this helpful24
All this user's reviews
9
m15964Nov 30, 2019
It's really interesting to watch De Niro and Pacino together in this absolutely magnificent movie from one of the great directors of all tome, Martin Scorsese. The story of this film is full of details that writer surely did his best for itIt's really interesting to watch De Niro and Pacino together in this absolutely magnificent movie from one of the great directors of all tome, Martin Scorsese. The story of this film is full of details that writer surely did his best for it and obviously the director made it in a very professional way. Undoubtedly, The Irishman is one of the best films in Scorsese's career.
Don't forget that this film finally ended acting in bad movies from Pacino and De Niro, this means maybe we would watch them in better projects than before, and it's really good for their fans.
Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
9
ArthuuDec 2, 2019
Outstanding writing served with top notch themed noir plot and memorable characters played by holywood's greatest; big tribute to Goodfellas and a must watch in general
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
10
MrNightOwlDec 5, 2019
This film is masterpiece. Yeah no for everbody but it is. Fantastic work with camera and music. Fantastic work Mr.Scorsese
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
10
Proteus7xDec 8, 2019
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Scorsese has outdone himself with this love letter epilogue called "The Irishman". It seems as if the older Scorsese gets, the more he manages to master art and nuance of film. This mafioso period piece with remnants of politics, betrayal and survival documents the life of Frank Sheeran, a WW2 veteran who had a close affiliation with the Bufalino crime family and Jimmy Hoffa.

Based on the non-fictional book "I Heard You Paint Houses" the film, clocking in at 3 hours and 30 mins, does a brilliant job at luring the viewers into the various characters and does not feel like a lengthy film at all. The film spans over 50 years from 1950 to 2000.

Robert De Niro who plays Frank Sheeran, the main character within the film, delivers an enthralling performance from start to finish. Joe Pesci, who has stayed away from the spotlight, delivers an astounding performance playing Russell "McGee" Bufalino who's demeanor is more calm, mellow but commanding as opposed to Goodfellas and Casino. However, it is Al Pacino who plays Jimmy Hoffa that steals the show delivering a stupendous performance who has links with the mob and ultimately befriends Frank Sheeran.

Scorsese's cinematic chops are in prime form in the film, paying attention to detail in every sequence of the film, allowing the film's sequencing to run as smoothly and adequately as possible. The screenplay by Steve Zaillian is as enticing, gripping and poignant as a film can get leaving audiences with questions of their own by the end of the film. The editing, costume design and cinematography among other elements all complement each other in order to bring about life to the screen. The best way to see the film is on the big screen for the full experience, the TV screen just wont cut it but it boils down to preference.

Some people have complained about the film's length, which I have found surprising because I thought the runtime was perfect and I would not have minded if the film added an extra 10 to 20 minutes. Films like Once Upon A Time in America, Schindler's List and The Godfather 1 and 2 have all shared similar lengths and at the time of release, the length of the films were not criticised as much as this film. It shows how the attention spans of today's audience has changed. Other complaints were to do with CGI de-aging that Scorsese used on all three characters. I personally thought the technology was excellent and it really de-ages the characters really well. Viewers are able to notice the technology in the first flashback scene where Pesci and De Niro are having a conversation about the truck. However, others thought it looked phony on the characters and that it was annoying to observe. I rate this film 5/5 and urge people to see the film without any interruption. I would also emphasize that audiences see the film twice due to various information and elements in the film being missed in the first screening. I would recommend that the viewer wait a week to view it a second time. Martin Scorsese is my favorite director and I must say The Irishman has become my favorite film by the director. Congratulations Scorsese on this masterpiece!
Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
9
FaultlinespineNov 30, 2019
Very well made, character-driven drama with extraordinary performances by all. The world building and attention to detail really invests you in the story. It manages to balance realism and no frills grit with entertainment value very well.
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
9
FalzalatDec 1, 2019
The music selections were great. The shooting scenario is great. all the scenes were like a work of art. a great film with great attention to detail. From the smallest player to the leading roles, everyone has performed perfectly.
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
0
gabrielrodvilDec 20, 2019
This is the worst film of 2019. The worst movie from Scorsese. The greatest waste of movie budget in the history of movies. This is the film that the characters from The Producers would've made if instead of Springtime for Hitler they decidedThis is the worst film of 2019. The worst movie from Scorsese. The greatest waste of movie budget in the history of movies. This is the film that the characters from The Producers would've made if instead of Springtime for Hitler they decided to make a film. That's how bad this movie is. Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
10
NickTheCritickNov 4, 2021
The ultimate gangster's epic that also works as a piece of America's history.
This movie is glorious.
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
0
Thejaw221Nov 30, 2019
This movie was so absolutely boring I didn’t even wait to get to the end. I shut it off. the Robert De Niro we fell in love with well...he has departed for places unknown. Unfortunately one of his worst movies.... This film was so badThis movie was so absolutely boring I didn’t even wait to get to the end. I shut it off. the Robert De Niro we fell in love with well...he has departed for places unknown. Unfortunately one of his worst movies.... This film was so bad Hollywood didn’t even want it Expand
7 of 22 users found this helpful715
All this user's reviews
0
AutumnrayneNov 26, 2019
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Utter garbage. The CGI anti aging was hard to watch for 3+ damn hours. It's like Scorsese is trying to bring back an updated godfather / Casino movie, but he was blind folded when trying to hit the mark. It has way too much back and forth about getting Jimmy Hoffa to behave or he would get killed, and if you've seen Blow with Johnny Depp, then you've seen the ending to this film. It's too long, too much CGI, utterly nothing happens but they sprinkle in people getting shot in the face here and there for intensity. Skip it, ir rent it later. Expand
10 of 32 users found this helpful1022
All this user's reviews
10
KojimaStrandNov 8, 2019
A Martín Scorsese Film! Se trata simplemente del poder de la unión, unimos el nombre de Martín Scorsese y Robert De Niro, unimos Al Pacino y Joe Pesci... Y pumm: CINE DE MAFIA
4 of 13 users found this helpful49
All this user's reviews
10
Erik_Of_BloomNov 27, 2019
In a depressing age of cinema where superhero wank, trash like Charlie’s Angels and the like, are what pass as ‘film’ this movie is like the most delicious breath of fresh air. This movie reminds you what movies can be, what a talentedIn a depressing age of cinema where superhero wank, trash like Charlie’s Angels and the like, are what pass as ‘film’ this movie is like the most delicious breath of fresh air. This movie reminds you what movies can be, what a talented director is, and why the medium is worth saving from accountants and hacks. It’s fantastic all around. Do not miss it. Expand
4 of 13 users found this helpful49
All this user's reviews
10
Matthew0705Nov 26, 2019
An amazing film and the magnum opus of Scorsese 's career. I just wish people actually saw this movie before reviewing.
3 of 10 users found this helpful37
All this user's reviews
9
CMCNov 10, 2019
Very entertaining, unnecessarily too long without quite becoming epic, and a somewhat predictable replay of the boys doing their mafia thing. Great acting, but De Niro is just his usual De Niro. Al Pacino does a great job of acting but theVery entertaining, unnecessarily too long without quite becoming epic, and a somewhat predictable replay of the boys doing their mafia thing. Great acting, but De Niro is just his usual De Niro. Al Pacino does a great job of acting but the film suffers because I think he was mis-cast; a more bland meathead tough-guy type was needed for that role. Joe Pesci was the surprise. He was allowed to play a more restrained, non-whiny role and he was excellent. For all of the concentration on the Teamsters stuff, I still did not feel like I learned that much new about that world. De Niro has two wives and there is no development of his relationship with either of them. There is also a lot of footage about his daughter rejecting him, but this also seems underdeveloped, forced and not convincing. There are a few cinemagraphic Scorsese "effects" moments like slow-motion crowd shots, but none of these are original in 2019, and none are gripping like some scenes from Goodfellas. While I completely agree with Scorsese's critique of the Marvel Action movies, and this is most definitely a film and not a movie, his extended critique of predictable franchises with safe money actors hits a little too close here as well. Expand
2 of 7 users found this helpful25
All this user's reviews
4
katezoeNov 30, 2019
Disappointed and I am a huge fan of Scorsese since the beginning of his career and have loved his prior mob films. Movie is too long. Stylistically unstylish picture without the luridness of “Casino”, pulse-pounding narrative of “TheDisappointed and I am a huge fan of Scorsese since the beginning of his career and have loved his prior mob films. Movie is too long. Stylistically unstylish picture without the luridness of “Casino”, pulse-pounding narrative of “The Departed” or madness/brutality of “Goodfellas.” Expand
2 of 7 users found this helpful25
All this user's reviews
9
Moviereviewer15Nov 17, 2019
As much as I think Martin Scorsese should keep his trap shut regarding Marvel movies, if he wants millennials to have his movie be part of the 2020 Oscars’ Best Picture nominees, I will admit that #TheIrishman is really good thanks to a castAs much as I think Martin Scorsese should keep his trap shut regarding Marvel movies, if he wants millennials to have his movie be part of the 2020 Oscars’ Best Picture nominees, I will admit that #TheIrishman is really good thanks to a cast of Robert De Niro, Joe Pesci (who I call Pesky), Marvel-lovin’ Al Pacino and Ray Romano. Basically, I see it as Martin Scorsese doing a big budget movie that’s a cross of a period piece and an episode of HBO’s The Sopranos mixed with mafia vibes of Goodfellas (which I have never seen). Having seen it on the big screen, I believe people should do their best to see it in theaters that they can find it playing at. It’s a shame Netflix screwed this movie. Final rating: 4.5 stars out of 5. 9/10 ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️.5 Expand
2 of 7 users found this helpful25
All this user's reviews
9
BeastJ18Nov 27, 2019
A slow burn that is meditative and introspective. Scorsese's direction is a voyeuristic look at the full life of a truck driver turned hitman. Schoonmaker does a terrific job of pacing a long story in the most effective way possible, makingA slow burn that is meditative and introspective. Scorsese's direction is a voyeuristic look at the full life of a truck driver turned hitman. Schoonmaker does a terrific job of pacing a long story in the most effective way possible, making every scene feel like an important piece of a puzzle in the growth and withering of some very important criminal figures. I hate to say that the film starts out a little rough with some unconvincing de-aging special effects and some violent action performed by De Niro as a younger man, but his movements are very telling of the actor's real age and does not look realistic, which was overcompensated by some bad foley work to make his actions sound more impactful. These small early shortcomings are soon forgotten though as the film continues and only gets more engrossing by the moment. The direction is masterful, the technical aspects are predictably great, the story is beat-for-beat brilliant and the performances are all around fantastic, especially (of course) by De Niro, Pacino and Pesci. Unsurprisingly, one of the best films of the year. One of the greatest directors of all time delivers another knockout. Expand
2 of 7 users found this helpful25
All this user's reviews
7
Bertaut1Nov 24, 2019
Far too long, but the existential and eschatological elements make up for it

Based on the 2004 book by Charles Brandt, I Heard You Paint Houses, written for the screen by Steven Zaillian, and directed by Martin Scorsese, The Irishman is
Far too long, but the existential and eschatological elements make up for it

Based on the 2004 book by Charles Brandt, I Heard You Paint Houses, written for the screen by Steven Zaillian, and directed by Martin Scorsese, The Irishman is about aging, loss, taking stock. One of the best reviewed films in years, although I certainly don't disagree that it has masterful elements, I felt it was just too long. Don't get me wrong, I have no problem with long films – I'm a fan of pictures such as The Godfather Part II (1974), Once Upon a Time in America (1984), Sátántangó (1984), Dances with Wolves (1990), The Tree of Life (2011). However, such length has to be narratively justified, and I just felt that in The Irishman, it wasn't, with the film's 206 minutes occasionally feeling padded and (dare I say it) self-indulgent.

In 2003 Frank Sheeran (Robert De Niro), living in a nursing home and close to death, tells the story of his time as the go-to hitman for the Bufalino crime family. In 1954, he becomes friends with family patriarch Russell Bufalino (Joe Pesci), and soon, Bufalino has him carrying out various hits. Later, Bufalino introduces him to Jimmy Hoffa (Al Pacino), president of the Mob-funded Teamsters union. Facing federal investigation, Hoffa is volatile, unpredictable, and confrontational and Bufalino wants Sheeran to keep him out of trouble. However, as the years go by, Hoffa continues to antagonise his Mob backers, and some of them soon come to see him as more of a liability than an asset.

The Irishman is written in regret. Sheeran spends much of the film trying to ameliorate his relationship with his daughter Peggy (played by Lucy Gallina as a child and Anna Paquin as an adult), who knows what he does for a living, and despises him for it. Another important thematic element is that as each gangster appears for the first time, a subtitle tells us who they are, and lists the date of their deaths and how they were murdered. There's no better illustration of just how concerned the film is with the nature of transience.

In the last act, this is distilled down to its very essence, essentially positing that the only important thing you leave behind is your relationships with other people, and Sheeran has badly mismanaged his, resulting in him sitting alone in a nursing home at Christmas. In GoodFellas and Casino, the protagonists lose their wealth, possessions, status, but in The Irishman, the loss is more existential – Sheeran loses his soul. It's also impossible not to see the meta dimension – Scorsese himself looking back on his career, remembering the classics of yesteryear, keenly aware that old-age is stalking him.

In terms of the acting, although Pacino is fun (I would gladly watch an entire film composed of nothing but him and Stephen Graham, who plays a rival Teamster, insulting one another), it's not an especially accurate depiction of the real Hoffa (Jack Nicholson's less flamboyant depiction was much more authentic). As for De Niro, this is his first not-phoned-in performance in decades, and he imbues the character with an interiority that speaks to his sociopathy if not necessarily his psychopathology. However, the real standout performance is Pesci, who plays Bufalino as quiet, calm, considered, highly intelligent, but cold and sociopathic.

If the film has a single problem, it's the runtime. This has been a recurrent problem in recent Scorsese films, but this is the first time he's strayed from over-long into self-indulgence. The film simply doesn't warrant this length; whole scenes could easily be removed without compromising the story, character beats, or emotion. Another issue is one that has cropped up in all of Scorsese's Mob films – glorification. Obviously, The Irishman is about the toxic masculinity of this world and the lonely endgame (if one even gets to the endgame), but much as was the case with the (frankly stomach-churning) softening of Jordan Belfort in The Wolf of Wall Street (2013), Scorsese runs a very real risk of glamorising what he claims to be condemning.

For me, The Irishman was a very good movie, but not the masterpiece many have felt it to be. But that's just me, and I can certainly recognise and celebrate such ambitious filmmaking, especially coming at a time when more and more it feels like films are being made by committees rather than by artists. Arguably Scorsese's most eschatological film, certainly since Kundun, The Irishman is the story of how one man lost his soul, and, by extension how the world for which he lost it dehumanises and degrades those who participate in its rites. Although Sheeran is brought down by old-age, abandonment, and the merciless nature of human existence, Scorsese refuses to afford him an easy out – he made his choices, and he must now live, and die, with the consequences.
Expand
2 of 7 users found this helpful25
All this user's reviews
0
fanglemeisterDec 24, 2019
Only made it 29 minutes in, couldn’t take any more. The so-called talent phoned in their performances; these guys are all ready for retirement and it shows. Please spare us from more of the tough guy schtick.
1 of 4 users found this helpful13
All this user's reviews
2
BroyaxDec 1, 2019
Scorsese retourne à ses amours, à savoir la grande saga mafieuse dont il a le secret ou plutôt dont il avait le secret dans le temps, jadis... il a convié à cette réunion nostalgique les comparses d'antan comme Joe Pesci et Robert de NiroScorsese retourne à ses amours, à savoir la grande saga mafieuse dont il a le secret ou plutôt dont il avait le secret dans le temps, jadis... il a convié à cette réunion nostalgique les comparses d'antan comme Joe Pesci et Robert de Niro ainsi qu'un petit nouveau, Al Pacino !... sans compter Harvey Keitel qui avait joué dans Taxi Driver !

On l'a compris, c'est un film de **** jeunes ici... qu'il a fallu rajeunir vraiment par ordinateur, l'histoire se déroulant sur quelques décennies. Alors, il ne faut pas s'étonner si nos vieux mal photoshopés ressemblent un peu aux frères Bogdanov ! c'est clairement raté et rien à faire, on n'arrive pas à s'y faire...

L'autre souci -énorme aussi celui-là- concerne la narration et le rythme qui se traînent lamentablement, car le film déambule à **** pas comme un fossile sur son déambulateur : il ne faut pas moins de 3h30 pour y arriver... éventuellement mais au bout d'un heure, les paupières se font déjà lourdes alors que cette saga tourne en rond sur elle-même comme un pépé sénile d'Alzheimer.

La réalisation reste naturellement très soignée et souvent élégante, la voix off est bel et bien là mais l'humour féroce des Affranchis ou de Casino a quasiment disparu, dilué dans les 3h30 de ce long gala d'anciens combattants qui n'en finit pas...

A dormir debout, mou et dépassé, The Irishman n'est qu'une ombre très pâle et pauvrette des gloires du temps d'avant mais la nostalgie n'est plus de saison, camarade, même si Netflix met la main à la poche, balançant le fric par les fenêtres... en vain.
Expand
1 of 4 users found this helpful13
All this user's reviews
10
opeloDec 6, 2019
One of The best movies of The year, Maybe even of decade. Must see for those how like criminal dramas.
1 of 4 users found this helpful13
All this user's reviews
9
JLuis_001Nov 19, 2019
When talking about Martin Scorsese's movies, people usually talk about gangster movies. This is something that in a unfortunate measure encloses the director in a small niche which is somewhat sad considering he's a director who has dabbledWhen talking about Martin Scorsese's movies, people usually talk about gangster movies. This is something that in a unfortunate measure encloses the director in a small niche which is somewhat sad considering he's a director who has dabbled many other genres but obviously several of his most famous movies are gangster films. Now with The Irishman I think to some extent Scorsese delivers his dream epic and also an end point.
I'm not saying I think he won't make a gangster movie again but where can he go next after this one? I can't help watching this movie as the twilight of a career for everyone involved. I mean from Niro to Pacino to Joe Pesci and Scorsese himself.

As I said The Irishman is his epic, not the best film of his filmography but that doesn't diminish it in any way. After all, I think that for all his devoted followers like me, this is the movie that was needed of him: A phenomenal drama and at the same time a resolution.
A film that transports you to films like Goodfellas and Casino but still offering something new and rewarding and that's surprising because if you consider the simple core of the movie - The career of a hitman like Frank Sheeran - Scorsese transforms it into a story that involves: Politics, corruption, violence and death.
Frank is the center of the story and all the way we go with him takes us to his sad and lonely final step because the story never ceases to be his, but that's the beauty of The Irishman. Externally it might seem like a very practical story but the whole journey we go through and all the events that it encompasses make it a fabulous experience.

The duration? Yes, it's huge but any tested film lover I think has seen movies of the same length or even longer so I don't think it's a problem. But the casual viewer? Maybe it could be intimidating but it is worth it. Honestly it's worth it. It's worth it for the performances, for the story, for its direction and for its ambition.

And what else can I say, if a movie involving Martin Scorsese, Robert De Niro, Al Pacino and Joe Pesci doesn't move your interest?
To be honest if that doesn't do it then saying anything else is useless.
Expand
2 of 9 users found this helpful27
All this user's reviews
10
ahmedaiman1999Nov 28, 2019
Scorsese has never done what he does best in a more mature, sumptuous, confident, sophisticated and immensely profound way. I have absolutely no clue how such sprawling epic can be exquisitely, and gracefully, controlled like that. Add toScorsese has never done what he does best in a more mature, sumptuous, confident, sophisticated and immensely profound way. I have absolutely no clue how such sprawling epic can be exquisitely, and gracefully, controlled like that. Add to this a mournful quality that's woven deep down into the film's authentic soul.

Finally, Scorsese has made a film that I can easily give five stars. Definitely one of the greatest films of the decade, nay of the century, nay of all time!

(10/10)
Expand
2 of 9 users found this helpful27
All this user's reviews
8
Rebecca31Nov 10, 2019
The highly anticipated The Irishman has finally hit cinemas so don’t miss the chance to see it on the big screen. I’m not being dramatic but if you want to see this in a cinema you’ll only have a couple of weeks before it’s gone. Not to worryThe highly anticipated The Irishman has finally hit cinemas so don’t miss the chance to see it on the big screen. I’m not being dramatic but if you want to see this in a cinema you’ll only have a couple of weeks before it’s gone. Not to worry because all you Netflix fans will be able to watch it from the comfort of your own home at the end of the month with the option of pausing for as many bathroom breaks as you’ll need. At three and a half hours long The Irishman probably won’t appeal to some cinemagoers, although if you just resist the urge to buy a gallon of coke then you’ll be fine.

Directed by Martin Scorsese and filled to the brim with a standout cast. Robert De Niro, Joe Pesci, Al Pacino, Anna Paquin, Stephen Graham, Harvey Keitel, the list goes on and I won’t name everyone but there are more than a few faces you’ll recognise. Spanning decades, The Irishman is told from the point of view of mobster/hitman Frank Sheeran (De Niro). I really loved this film, a brilliantly written story, and what stood out the most for me aside from the acting was the script. Fast-paced, witty with a bit of dark humour thrown into the mix. It feels authentic, it’s unexpectedly emotional and will make you laugh. The acting from everyone is exceptional but particularly Joe Pesci’s performance stole the show for me. Regarding the lengthy running time, I did feel it was a little too long. For the most part I was engaged but in the last act of the film it was starting to feel dragged out. Almost like Scorsese didn’t want it to end, but can we blame him? He’s given us the best performances from De Niro, Pacino and Pesci in years. There was enough material here that this could have easily been a mini-series. Each to their own, the running time isn’t bothering everyone but The Irishman could have lost 10 or 15 minutes easily.

The digital de-aging of the main characters is something I was concerned about as we’ve seen this technology used a few times now and it’s clearly getting better. I was worried it would be distracting and look a little silly but this is far from true. It isn’t quite perfect yet but I’m sure it’s only a matter of time, more importantly it’s at a point where you it doesn’t take you out of the film and you quickly forget about it. Although it looks impressive and gave Scorsese the opportunity to make a film over a few decades using the actors he wanted I believe there is a fine line between using CGI to make current actors look older or younger and using it to replace them completely. Makeup can only do so much and CGI needs to step in if you want to make the likes of De Niro and Pesci look significantly younger. The technology has improved to this point where you can use it in a film without it being too much of a distraction but to use it to bring back a dead actor (yes I’m talking about James Dean) then it’s gone too far. The day CGI is used to replace actors completely and taking a performance away from a living actor then it’s the day it’s gone too far and I dread to think what will happen to film if this idea gains popularity. Scorsese has shown us how it should be used in The Irishman and the result is a truly terrific film you won’t want to miss. The Irishman was never going to be at Goodfellas level. As far as I’m concerned The Godfather I, II and Goodfellas are peak gangster movies and nothing will ever beat them. Film fans take the time to see The Irishman, highly recommended.
Expand
3 of 14 users found this helpful311
All this user's reviews
8
swingNov 22, 2019
Loved the acting. Loved the story. That said, it wasn't as good as Casino or close to Goodfellas. It was basically about this crime family mobster and his life. Mostly it had to do with Jimmy Hoffa and evets of the day, like the Bay ofLoved the acting. Loved the story. That said, it wasn't as good as Casino or close to Goodfellas. It was basically about this crime family mobster and his life. Mostly it had to do with Jimmy Hoffa and evets of the day, like the Bay of Pigs failed invasion, the assasination of the Kennedys, and more. The biggest problem I had with the movie was it's length. It easily could have been cut by 1 hour. Maybe because it's Netflix, they wanted a long movie. But, the movie was compelling and I was able to sit through it with just a little squirming. Expand
1 of 6 users found this helpful15
All this user's reviews
8
KeithDowNov 10, 2019
There’s no question Martin Scorsese has forever left his mark on cinema. Still to this day he serves as the ordained staunchest defender of cinema. And when his maker finally reclaims him to the grandest of Wonder Theaters in the heavensThere’s no question Martin Scorsese has forever left his mark on cinema. Still to this day he serves as the ordained staunchest defender of cinema. And when his maker finally reclaims him to the grandest of Wonder Theaters in the heavens above, he’ll deservedly be placed on the Mount Rushmore of cinema down here on earth, forever perched just a bit higher and with far greater permanence than us regular folk.

This review won’t be some drawn out ode to one of the greatest filmmakers of all time—and in particular our favorite director. His latest flick, ‘The Irishman,’ is magnanimous in its breadth and scale, though it isn’t perfect. We wish the blood effects used throughout the film were practical instead of CGI. The Canada Dry product placement is nagging. The decision to cast Action Bronson for a certain scene is downright bizarre and the ending should’ve been edited down, shaving off some of the bloated 3.5 hour run time.

Yet think about what this film represents. We have Scorsese directing De Niro, Pacino, and Pesci along with a veritable “who’s who” of the gangster genre. It’s a once-in-a-lifetime reunion of what is called the “New Hollywood” era of cinema, the movement in American film history from the mid-1960s to the early 1980s when a new generation of young actors and filmmakers came to prominence in the U.S.

We were fortunate enough to see this film at the gorgeous and historic Belasco Theatre. The experience felt like a throwback to the golden age of cinema. We’ll always cherish the memory and be thankful for all the enjoyment and pleasure Mr. Scorsese has given us over the years. If you’ve benefited the same, see the movie in select theaters now or on Netflix beginning November 27th.
Expand
1 of 6 users found this helpful15
All this user's reviews
10
sachineldhoNov 27, 2019
Movie of a lifetime. The Irishman is like Goodfellas, but more real and more intense. A story of friendship and betrayal.
1 of 7 users found this helpful16
All this user's reviews
0
TratatatataDec 9, 2019
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The most scandalous film, barely watched, the feeling that I spent three hours in the house of the elderly, not because of the age of the heroes, but because of the burdensome plot. Expand
1 of 8 users found this helpful17
All this user's reviews
4
Lambo442Dec 31, 2019
This movie is so boring. Whatever hapenned to a film being entertaining? Instead it's just a history lesson full of dull union and political wranglings. The plot is bloated, convoluted and way too hard to follow. This is what happens when youThis movie is so boring. Whatever hapenned to a film being entertaining? Instead it's just a history lesson full of dull union and political wranglings. The plot is bloated, convoluted and way too hard to follow. This is what happens when you make a film based on a true story like this. Truth is definately duller than fiction here. No likeable characters, no excitement or suspense. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
3
Arnold_ZiffelDec 15, 2019
TERRIBLY long.. and usually, tedious. A Who's Who of old Mafia actors; DeNiro an adenoidal caracature of himself.. repeating his lines, repeating his lines.. In the end, just a DEPRESSING excersize in Mafia bleakness; you don't care about ANYTERRIBLY long.. and usually, tedious. A Who's Who of old Mafia actors; DeNiro an adenoidal caracature of himself.. repeating his lines, repeating his lines.. In the end, just a DEPRESSING excersize in Mafia bleakness; you don't care about ANY of these people. There are moments of sudden, gory violence, all with no value. It's as if Scorcese is trying to give a Morality Lesson after all the "glamourous" Mob films of the past. The ending sucked...and I was just happy to get out of the theater. Nicely FILMED, though.. Wait to see it for free. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
0
namelessFeb 5, 2020
I've thought about this movie a lot. I've loved Scorsese movies for decades. But this is not good. Initially, I would rate it a 5 but on reflection, this was a complete waste of my time. I can not figure out why people are raving about it.I've thought about this movie a lot. I've loved Scorsese movies for decades. But this is not good. Initially, I would rate it a 5 but on reflection, this was a complete waste of my time. I can not figure out why people are raving about it. DeNiro is terrible. He does an impersonation of himself as a young man but he is moving like old man. I can't believe people are really watching the whole thing, they must be fast-forwarding through parts of it and not telling anyone. I have that same feeling about this movie that I had after watching any of the Star Wars 1,2,3 that Lucas went back and made. I apologize to Scorsese because you have an immense talent, but I suspect you already know it doesn't work. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
10
CrimsonFlushDec 1, 2019
Great movie, but Frank Sheeran was a pathological liar, not a pathological killer. Movie should get an oscar nod, brings back some of the old crew from Goodfellas
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
9
JamanDec 4, 2019
I thoroughly enjoyed every minute of The Irishman. OK, the age-rectifying CGI wasn't convincing - even off-putting at times - but otherwise it is a brilliantly made, engrossing film with superb performances all-round. I can't vouch for it'sI thoroughly enjoyed every minute of The Irishman. OK, the age-rectifying CGI wasn't convincing - even off-putting at times - but otherwise it is a brilliantly made, engrossing film with superb performances all-round. I can't vouch for it's historical accuracy, but who can? Joe Pesci deserves all the plaudits coming his way, he was mesmerising. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
8
JoeCoolMar 15, 2020
Superb acting, excelent directing, beautiful cinematography but just too darn long. Otherwise this would have been a masterpiece. I doubt I'd want to see it again.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
10
mrmonsterNov 28, 2019
Yet another Scorsese masterpiece. Robert de Niro, Al Pacino, and Joe Pesci are all great in this very well-crafted film. Even Ray Romano delivers a pretty good performance. All in all, this movie is just astounding.
0 of 5 users found this helpful05
All this user's reviews
10
matthewmirlianiNov 30, 2019
It’s definitely worth the hype, and definitely worth the 3 1/2 hours of viewing time. Set against the backdrop of the industrial Mid-Atlantic during some of the country’s most turbulent political and social events, The Irishman is 2019’sIt’s definitely worth the hype, and definitely worth the 3 1/2 hours of viewing time. Set against the backdrop of the industrial Mid-Atlantic during some of the country’s most turbulent political and social events, The Irishman is 2019’s first perfect film - one that is so good, it doesn’t even feel like it belongs in this decade, but rather feels like a masterpiece unearthed from decades earlier. De Niro, Pacino, Pesci are everything you want them to be and more in their performances; the writing, pacing, and editing are tight; the humor is dark, fast, and intelligent; and the story unravels beautifully . While the running time may require patience and dedication, there truly is no wasted moment - no extraneous or lagging scenes - as everything fits together seamlessly to deliver a payoff that is truly worth it. Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
10
MoreiraNov 19, 2019
Uma obra prima! Scorsese faz seu filme mais melancólico em torno do crime organizado. É divertido nos momentos mais frenéticos e extremamente tocante nos mais intimistas. De Niro, Pacino e Pesci entregam performances memoráveis.
0 of 4 users found this helpful04
All this user's reviews
6
VickimageJan 10, 2020
First the positives. This movie is very watchable and brings a new element to Scorsese’s gangster films in being more of an autumnal look back from the vantage of old age. Now the negatives. DeNiro and Pacino are miscast. Frank Sheehan andFirst the positives. This movie is very watchable and brings a new element to Scorsese’s gangster films in being more of an autumnal look back from the vantage of old age. Now the negatives. DeNiro and Pacino are miscast. Frank Sheehan and Jimmy Hoffa were of Irish heritage. The likes of Liam Neeson would have been more appropriate as Sheehan. The middle section is repetitive and concentrating on Hoffa so much throws the movie off balance. Pacino in a bad hairpiece chewing the scenery doesn’t help. Bringing in the Kennedys etc has Scorsese treading into James Ellroy’s Underworld Trilogy territory. The female characters in the movie are afterthoughts. The pace is plodding and I didn’t know gangsters talked so much. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
9
AndremaxDec 3, 2019
Before watching The Irishman, the impression left is that Scorcese is repeating his several movie's formula but in a three-and-a-half hour tiring. But again, director proves us opposite, movie not only makes us creating an emotional loop withBefore watching The Irishman, the impression left is that Scorcese is repeating his several movie's formula but in a three-and-a-half hour tiring. But again, director proves us opposite, movie not only makes us creating an emotional loop with characters as history is driven naturally and spontaneous. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
8
moviemitch96Nov 28, 2019
IBeing a huge Martin Scorsese fan, especially his films in which Robert De Niro and Joe Pesci star (Goodfellas, Raging Bull, Casino), along with the fact that this would be Scorsese's final time working with both of these legendary actorsIBeing a huge Martin Scorsese fan, especially his films in which Robert De Niro and Joe Pesci star (Goodfellas, Raging Bull, Casino), along with the fact that this would be Scorsese's final time working with both of these legendary actors (Pesci declined to come out of retirement a reported 40 times when offered his role in this film), I was greatly anticipating this film suffice to say! In this film, De Niro plays a retired mobster that reflects back on his past involvement with a crime family (led by Pesci) and how he got involved with the criminal activities and eventual disappearance of political mobster Jimmy Hoffa (a stellar Al Pacino). And while it's definitely ambitious and features some brilliant performances from its all-star cast as expected, storywise, it simply felt all too familiar to me in several regards, not to say this was entirely bad, as it contained many great homages to previous classic crime/mafia films (Goodfellas, Casino, The Godfather trilogy), the list goes on and on. However, while the amount of winks and nods was welcomed and fun to see, at times it felt a little excessive to the point of seeming like fan service. As for the actors, De Niro gives his most complex, but also his most sentimental performance to date, as does Pesci. Their performances really did feel like a culmination of everything great they've ever done in their career, and especially in their past mob movies. Pacino however nearly steals the show as the hot-headed and eccentric Jimmy Hoffa. As for the rest of the story and other elements, like I said before, several scenes and a few plot points felt all too familiar, but the dialogue and character interaction in most scenes kept things pretty interesting for the most part. I will also say that the de-aging effects used for De Niro and some of the other actors actually worked surprisingly well and didn't appear too obvious or gimmicky to me at all. However, the last half hour or so when they're all old felt a little too sentimentally forced and corny to me, and this is where I began to feel underwhelmed, even by the time the last scene/shot was shown, which I will admit was a simple yet memorable shot. Overall, it's crazy long (three and a half hours!!!) and therefore does drag a little in spots throughout, but it serves for the most part as a satisfying, albeit slightly underwhelming end of an era for Scorsese, De Niro, and Pesci and their mob movies together. Expand
0 of 4 users found this helpful04
All this user's reviews
8
Brent_MarchantNov 29, 2019
Marin Scorsese's effort to "get the band back together again" for one last hurrah in the gangster movie genre initially struck me as a potentially sad attempt at trying to relive past glory. However, after having seen this offering, I wasMarin Scorsese's effort to "get the band back together again" for one last hurrah in the gangster movie genre initially struck me as a potentially sad attempt at trying to relive past glory. However, after having seen this offering, I was pleasantly surprised at how much I liked it, especially the excellent performances of Al Pacino and Joe Pesci. The 3.5-hour runtime was, admittedly, quite intimidating, too, though much of the film (except perhaps the last half hour) moves along at a surprisingly breezy pace, not at all indicative of its true length. And, of course, there was the gratuitousness factor, an element that, thankfully, didn't really factor in nearly as much as I expected it might. With all that said, don't let preconceptions hold you back from seeing this one; you're likely to walk away pleasantly surprised. Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
8
TedDawsonDec 4, 2019
A good one. De-Age-Technology was weird - especially on the eyes - To me De-Niro looked like Face-Swapped-Deepfaked with Robert Patrick. If you also put aside the question if Frank painted that much houses and esp. painted that ONE house -A good one. De-Age-Technology was weird - especially on the eyes - To me De-Niro looked like Face-Swapped-Deepfaked with Robert Patrick. If you also put aside the question if Frank painted that much houses and esp. painted that ONE house - you can watch a good mobster movie that also gave me a lot of emotions and connection to the characters. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
2
christothefuturJan 2, 2021
Love goodfellas so was high decent expectations for this. Way too long and not all that interesting.
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
2
Colig54Dec 17, 2019
Hard to watch, tried but couldn't finish several times, slow, weird sfx, cliched to the extreme. Totally boring and way too long.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
8
RatedRexNov 29, 2019
The pacing is a little uneven, which causes the first half of the movie to be a little hard to follow. But the movie picks up at around the 2-hour mark. Robert De Niro was outstanding in the lead role. It is his best performance sinceThe pacing is a little uneven, which causes the first half of the movie to be a little hard to follow. But the movie picks up at around the 2-hour mark. Robert De Niro was outstanding in the lead role. It is his best performance since "Raging Bull." Joe Pesci is also very good. I thought Al Pacino was miscast as Jimmy Hoffa. Overall, the movie is a must-see for anyone who loves cinema. Expand
0 of 5 users found this helpful05
All this user's reviews
2
G_KeeperDec 14, 2019
Once great actors walk through their parts in a meandering tale with occasional gore and violence. A 90 minute film might have worked. This bloated 3.5 hour film does not.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
10
alejandro970Nov 29, 2019
Martin Scorsese is back to his favorite recipe: real fact mob drama. Following closely the steps of Frank Sheeran and his career as teamster, labor union oficial and henchman; and what his connection with the mysterious disappearance ofMartin Scorsese is back to his favorite recipe: real fact mob drama. Following closely the steps of Frank Sheeran and his career as teamster, labor union oficial and henchman; and what his connection with the mysterious disappearance of nefarious leader James R. Hoffa. The strong cast makes the almost four hours flowing gentle as water between fingers. A shall to see. Expand
0 of 4 users found this helpful04
All this user's reviews
10
razvtDec 3, 2019
I expected this movie to be good since it has such a good cast and Scorsese as a director. But I didn't expect it to be a masterpiece. Outstanding movie from all aspects.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
10
II_Smaug_IINov 27, 2019
Однозначно лучший фильм 2019 года. Жалко Джокера и Форд против Феррари, добротные фильмы. Фильм местами очень тяжелый, оставляет тяжелое послевкусие. Судьба Хоффа очень меня расстроила, не буду говорить что там дабы не портить впечатления, ноОднозначно лучший фильм 2019 года. Жалко Джокера и Форд против Феррари, добротные фильмы. Фильм местами очень тяжелый, оставляет тяжелое послевкусие. Судьба Хоффа очень меня расстроила, не буду говорить что там дабы не портить впечатления, но это действительно очень тяжелая история и самое прискорбное это то, что она основана на реальных событиях. Порадовала также концовка, всех настигла карма, Бог, вселенная, Великий архитектор вселенной, называйте как хотите, впрочем это уже и неважно, фильм однозначно попал в мой топ 10 лучших фильмов, которые я пересматриваю раз в год. Спи спокойно ****, в долине больше нет бандитов.

Thank you Martin, you great man.
Expand
0 of 5 users found this helpful05
All this user's reviews
10
ryang1790Dec 3, 2019
Scorsese's latest masterpiece is also his most ambitious work to date, a tour-de-force of historical intrigue, compelling performances, and a razor-sharp script. While the 3 1/2 hour runtime may be a detriment at first, it quickly becomesScorsese's latest masterpiece is also his most ambitious work to date, a tour-de-force of historical intrigue, compelling performances, and a razor-sharp script. While the 3 1/2 hour runtime may be a detriment at first, it quickly becomes irrelevant as each scene slowly unfolds into the wider narrative, culminating in a final hour climax that is some of the best cinema ever to be filmed. Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
9
Joe627487136Nov 30, 2019
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. It is a movie that will teach people something.. A lot of people dislike De Niro's wooden acting... Maybe it is just because they do not understand...

The acting and story is just pure gold. If you remember when JKF being assassinated and J Hoffa and Frank knowing this from a small restaurant through television broadcast... Their reaction is just pure gold (especially Hoffa).

There are a lot of interesting facts inside the story as well. Robert Kennedy failed to accused Hoffa but once JFK got his presidency and Robert immediate being promoted and took down Hoffa...

Tbh to understand this movie, it would need the audience to know a bit about politics and history (which I think is very necessarily required and this additional requirement would be my reason for 9/10 but not 10/10) but besides that is just a pure masterpiece!
Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
10
Lonejumper23Nov 30, 2019
This is an outstanding movie and to see these 3 epic actors portray these roles was outstanding!!! 3.5 hrs went by in 2 hrs and the story is captivating and entertaining. To capture that era like this and to show the true reality of thatThis is an outstanding movie and to see these 3 epic actors portray these roles was outstanding!!! 3.5 hrs went by in 2 hrs and the story is captivating and entertaining. To capture that era like this and to show the true reality of that crime world to this level was surreal. DeNiro should get an Oscar for his acting and well done! Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
10
WellanSmysseDec 3, 2019
The Irishman ...

Sans doute LE film que j’attendais le plus en cette fin d’année ! A ce niveau là, ce n’est plus un film mais un chef d’œuvre, un diamant poli par l’art de Scorsese avec un magnifique De Niro
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
8
wevertonaguiiarDec 4, 2019
Obviamente esse é um bom filme, porém poderia ser ótimo. Dá pra sentir facilmente as 3h30; a família do personagem principal poderia ter sido mais bem explorada; e falta tensão aqui. Mas o elenco e o roteiro são bons e conseguem carregar oObviamente esse é um bom filme, porém poderia ser ótimo. Dá pra sentir facilmente as 3h30; a família do personagem principal poderia ter sido mais bem explorada; e falta tensão aqui. Mas o elenco e o roteiro são bons e conseguem carregar o filme. Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
2
PhuzMar 2, 2023
Pretty poor. Boring. Nothing happens. Unless you find shock value, or any value of entertainment in mafia shootings, then you will find little value in watching this.

Basically the stories of various gangsters, with zero personality,
Pretty poor. Boring. Nothing happens. Unless you find shock value, or any value of entertainment in mafia shootings, then you will find little value in watching this.

Basically the stories of various gangsters, with zero personality, dislikeable characters that are also pretty damn boring humans. Badly acted and not worth your time.

Even Cats was better than this.
Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
7
BerikDec 5, 2019
The Irishman is a movie based on a novel, describing a theory about the dissapearance of Jimmy Hoffa. It stars actors like Robert De Niro, Al Pacino and Joe Pesci, making for an interesting cast. As for the result though, i was expectingThe Irishman is a movie based on a novel, describing a theory about the dissapearance of Jimmy Hoffa. It stars actors like Robert De Niro, Al Pacino and Joe Pesci, making for an interesting cast. As for the result though, i was expecting something more thrilling.

The movie does its job of characterizing the several characters, but fails in creating a sense of excitement, tension or atmosphere. Lots of scenes feature very slow, awkward dialogues, and it doesn't help that the CGI that is supposed to make characters look younger and older looks very fake. De Niro looks like a freaking alien with his green eyes. It was enjoyable enough, but just enough as there isn't much in this movie to make it memorable (except the incredibly fake and creepy green eyes). Also, 3,5 hours is way to long considering how little excitement is in it. I give this movie a 7/10.
Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
9
theredskyDec 1, 2019
Martin Scorsese is still at the top of his game even after directing for more than 50 years. This is one of my favorite Scorsese films that he has directed behind Goodfellas and Taxi Driver. This film came so close to becoming a masterpieceMartin Scorsese is still at the top of his game even after directing for more than 50 years. This is one of my favorite Scorsese films that he has directed behind Goodfellas and Taxi Driver. This film came so close to becoming a masterpiece if it wasn’t for the first 30 minutes being a little too confusing. It was a little hard to understand what was going on but I eventually caught on to what was happening. There is not one bad performance in this film. Every actor brings their A-game especially Robert De Niro, Joe Pesci, and Al Pacino. Each of them is incredible in their roles and adds many different layers to their respective characters but I felt Joe Pesci did the best job. He made Russell Bufalino seem like an intimidating but kind character that was always intriguing to watch. Robert De Niro made his character, Frank Sheeran, seem like a hardcore badass who didn’t make enough time for his family and Al Pacino made Jimmy Hoffa feel like a kind yet hotheaded and naive man. The script and de aging effects done on these characters is great also. Most films that use de aging and aging effects don’t like that great in the light but Martin Scorsese found a way to make it look really good. The actors make these effects even better. When they are made to look younger, the actors use their physical performance to look younger and the same when they are aged to look older. They use their physical performance to make themselves feel older. Even though the movie is 3 and a half hours long, I never felt the runtime. The story is always investing even when it is confusing. I was never bored throughout the course of the film. The last hour of the film was fantastic. If you have seen the trailers then you know the film has Jimmy Hoffa in it played by Al Pacino and the last hour “deals” with him. It’s beautifully executed and acting and the final scene is heartbreaking yet intriguing. Although this is far from Scorsese’s first look at mobsters and gangsters, this film does enough that is unique to differentiate itself from his other works. The soundtrack choices were great and fit the tone of the film pretty well and all the other technical aspects were done pretty well. Overall, The Irishman is yet again another great look at mobsters with fantastic performances, a compelling story, and fantastic direction from Martin Scorsese. Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
10
JumpCut_OnlineDec 4, 2019
If it isn’t hyperbolic to say, The Irishman is yet another masterpiece from the master filmmaker, and one which can quite easily stand alongside the films previously mentioned here, and of course all of the other incredible pieces of work inIf it isn’t hyperbolic to say, The Irishman is yet another masterpiece from the master filmmaker, and one which can quite easily stand alongside the films previously mentioned here, and of course all of the other incredible pieces of work in Scorsese’s filmography. It is perhaps worth knowing that this might not be the “gangster” film you’re expecting from Scorsese, but it is exactly the sort of gangster film he should be making at this point in his career. It’s reflective, powerfully, surprisingly emotional and a perfect tribute to both his films that have come before this, and the man himself. Truly exceptional. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
10
Filmix16Dec 4, 2019
Le scènario est très bien développé dans son ensemble. L’histoire et les personnages évolue tous au même niveau. Al Pacino est plus que incroyable, Joe Pesci est très bin et Robert DeNiro est remarquable et Martin Scorsese nous offre unLe scènario est très bien développé dans son ensemble. L’histoire et les personnages évolue tous au même niveau. Al Pacino est plus que incroyable, Joe Pesci est très bin et Robert DeNiro est remarquable et Martin Scorsese nous offre un chef-d’œuvre. Le film a de bonnes idées et de la bonne musique. La fin est tout aussi surprenante pour seu qui connaissait la tragique fin de Jimmy Hoffa et seu qui ne la connaissait pas. Le vieillissement des acteurs est très réaliste et le rajeunissement n’est pas parfait. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
10
devilsdesignDec 4, 2019
The majority of the negative comments about this film originate from people who disagree with De Niros politics, namely his outspoken criticism of Trump. The New York posts Andrea Peyser is a clear example of this type of fake journalism.The majority of the negative comments about this film originate from people who disagree with De Niros politics, namely his outspoken criticism of Trump. The New York posts Andrea Peyser is a clear example of this type of fake journalism. Make sure to write the new York post that this woman should be fired for allowing her political views to dictate how she writes movie reviews. Make no mistake, Scorsese is at the top of his game with this one. its long but not slow and adequately fast paced condensing 50 years of history into a few hours. If you like gangster films of any type than you'll love this one. It has just about everything. Sometimes the CGI is noticeable but it doesn't really detract from the film and after a few minutes you don't even realize it's there. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
4
SiomeAug 8, 2021
story is ok, but damn the movie is boring as hell. Too long, no action, no creativity, story doesn't move during all movie. What a deception.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
10
BuongiornoPaulDec 2, 2019
I admit before watching The Irishman I was intimidated by the 3.5 hour run time, so I kept holding it off. Let me just say there is no reason to be intimidated, those 3.5 hours flew by extraordinarily quickly and made me wish more films wereI admit before watching The Irishman I was intimidated by the 3.5 hour run time, so I kept holding it off. Let me just say there is no reason to be intimidated, those 3.5 hours flew by extraordinarily quickly and made me wish more films were like this. Side note, the 'de-aging' technology was absolutely incredible, did not take me out of the moment and kept me in the movie. Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
4
glommanJun 18, 2020
I just don't know what this movie was trying to tell. It feels so artificially elongated and all the characters are just not likeable at all, they don't even have an interesting character development. Also the entire story felt kinda aimless,I just don't know what this movie was trying to tell. It feels so artificially elongated and all the characters are just not likeable at all, they don't even have an interesting character development. Also the entire story felt kinda aimless, sure it all leads to Frank feeling alone and pathetic in the end, but that's it? Jesus Christ
I don't recommend you watch this, maybe you'll like this, if you like other Scorsese movies, but I personally suffered through this one.
Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
9
gustavoriquelmeDec 4, 2019
And Scorsese did it again. I'm gonna talk about The Irishman in three words: What a picture.

Besides that, it's one of the greatest 2019 films for sure. An amazing direction, a great script, and memorable performances are enough to make this
And Scorsese did it again. I'm gonna talk about The Irishman in three words: What a picture.

Besides that, it's one of the greatest 2019 films for sure. An amazing direction, a great script, and memorable performances are enough to make this film a masterpiece.
Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
10
AnUserDec 3, 2019
Like every other work of Sir Scorsese it's very good crime /action /drama and... even can't be understand by 1 time watching , but know that it was a grate piece or effect and real work of art that could see from a good teamwork with netflixLike every other work of Sir Scorsese it's very good crime /action /drama and... even can't be understand by 1 time watching , but know that it was a grate piece or effect and real work of art that could see from a good teamwork with netflix and their stuffs for young actors part but could work more on Mr.Pesci but any way best. Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
10
NemosDec 4, 2019
It's rare in this day and age to see a movie actually warranting a 10, but this is one. It's a long movie, but it is as long as it needs to be and never goes flat. A must see!
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
10
ericrendeiroDec 1, 2019
3 hours and a half of pure slow story building. None the less, Martin Scorcerse has surpassed himself once again.
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
10
PopovalexDec 1, 2019
Идеально! Есть фильмы после которых ты просто смотришь титры и не можешь осознать, что произошло. А произошел великолепный фильм
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
7
Georgemuller052Nov 12, 2019
Es una buena película pero me dejó con ganas de más, recomendada hasta cierto punto.
0 of 5 users found this helpful05
All this user's reviews
10
BabysteveNov 25, 2019
Probably the best film of the last decade, and it's not even hard to make that decision. Masterpiece.
0 of 5 users found this helpful05
All this user's reviews
10
NonastikNov 27, 2019
I heard you paint houses.
Robert De Niro, Al Pacino, Joe Pesci and Martin Scorsese
one word, Masterpiece
0 of 6 users found this helpful06
All this user's reviews
10
ornitologistNov 27, 2019
Ingenious! Amazing! Unfortunately, such films are no longer made, this is the agony of cinema.
0 of 6 users found this helpful06
All this user's reviews
10
VufurNov 28, 2019
That movie is as mature as drinking an old Petrus wine in a 5 star hotel's cigar lounge.
It may not be technically perfect, but it's one of these rare cinematic masterpieces that makes history.
0 of 5 users found this helpful05
All this user's reviews
10
ariandramaNov 29, 2019
I don't even know how long it has been since I was waiting for this movie, and having finished watching it now, I can say the wait was totally worth it. It felt like a Finale of all the Gangster movies I have ever seen. Plus, Pairing PacinoI don't even know how long it has been since I was waiting for this movie, and having finished watching it now, I can say the wait was totally worth it. It felt like a Finale of all the Gangster movies I have ever seen. Plus, Pairing Pacino and DeNiro for a movie like this was one of the most blessed things that has happened to cinema in recent years. And last but not least, THANK YOU NETFLIX for doing this, specially in the age where all the money is stacked in Super Hero genre. Expand
0 of 3 users found this helpful03
All this user's reviews
10
martin57Nov 29, 2019
This film is epic. Yes, it's three and a half hours long, but so what. I was into it from beginning to end. Joe Pesci and Al Pacino are excellent, but this is Robert DeNiro's movie.
His performance is both explosive and subtle at the same
This film is epic. Yes, it's three and a half hours long, but so what. I was into it from beginning to end. Joe Pesci and Al Pacino are excellent, but this is Robert DeNiro's movie.
His performance is both explosive and subtle at the same time. Martin Scorsese and DeNiro together again is pure gold. I found myself googling Hoffa, the Kennedy's, Cuba, etc. to get more information. Cinematography and Set direction beautiful. I expect Oscar nominations all around. I'm going to watch it again!
Expand
0 of 3 users found this helpful03
All this user's reviews
10
Alex_1996Dec 1, 2019
A masterclass in storytelling. Scorsese employs flashes of his usual visual style, but this film is reliant on the performances and the layering and complexity of the decades-spanning story. Schoonmaker is on top of her editing powers as perA masterclass in storytelling. Scorsese employs flashes of his usual visual style, but this film is reliant on the performances and the layering and complexity of the decades-spanning story. Schoonmaker is on top of her editing powers as per usual. Not only is this an instant classic, but it serves as a wonderful addition to his oeuvre. Whereas GoodFellas is kinetically dynamic in its camera movement and editing, this film contrapuntally unravels with subtle flourishes and a slow-burn methodology, making for a contemplative film. By the film's conclusion you’ll come face-to-face with your own mortality and how you’d like to look back at your earlier life, which beckons a re-evaluation of life in the present moment. In the end, there is no doubt that this film surpasses its genre tropes and achieves what few films do: greatness. Scorsese delivers a classic to close the decade, and considering his being three years away from 80, I wonder what other tricks he may have up his sleeve, because if he can make something like this there is no telling what's to come. I'm deeply grateful to be on the receiving end of his art. Did I mention how great, Robert De Niro and company are? Folks this film is for all-time. Enough said. Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
9
SphericalDec 2, 2019
A harrowing tale. Plays great on a TV, regardless of what some might say.

The movie is almost a full reunion of all the actors we’ve grown accustomed with seeing in mobster cinema—and boy can they act!
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
9
SaharMDec 2, 2019
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. That is one of the best mobvie in dicade. The acting is perfect and when you wach the movie you want follow it Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
0
Diggler17Dec 28, 2019
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This was a horrible movie. Martin Scorsese did a marvelous job selling this to Netflix, because no one else would play it. Robert DeNiro, who acts as a military veteran, who never served and as a bad ass that couldn't fight his way out of a wet paper bag. As a military veteran, I was disgraced by his behavior and Scorsese shouldn't make another movie and Deniro should play roles to his left heeding political space allow him to.
Bottom line, horrible movie, horrible actors, horrible script. Cowards playing tough guys
Expand
0 of 6 users found this helpful06
All this user's reviews
1
RufusdogJan 13, 2020
No way to give spoilers for this movie... Just Another gangster film that takes place over decades the CGI is very bad and almost laughable because you can hear the really ancient actors voicing over themselves as young? Very Bland veryNo way to give spoilers for this movie... Just Another gangster film that takes place over decades the CGI is very bad and almost laughable because you can hear the really ancient actors voicing over themselves as young? Very Bland very boring very predictable. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
10
Rojas212Apr 7, 2020
I finally saw FULL HD streaming from Cats

Here is the site where I saw: FMOVIES21.ORG
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
10
Waldemar76Jan 8, 2021
Великолепный фильм. Пожалуй, лучший как среди снятых Мартином Скорсезе, так и вообще в жанре. Потрясающая по уровню погружения в эпоху трехчасовая экскурсия по криминальному миру через призму мировоззрения главного героя. В этом фильмеВеликолепный фильм. Пожалуй, лучший как среди снятых Мартином Скорсезе, так и вообще в жанре. Потрясающая по уровню погружения в эпоху трехчасовая экскурсия по криминальному миру через призму мировоззрения главного героя. В этом фильме прекрасно все: операторская работа, музыка, сюжет, актерская игра, атмосфера, итальянский колорит - одним словом, такие шедевры встречаются крайне редко, как золотые самородки в тоннах руды. Однозначно рекомендую к просмотру. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
1
otaviosbampatoOct 1, 2020
Has extremely no porpuse and may be one of the most overrated movies on this decade only because of it's cast. Really a movie for critics. Tried to watch a full hour and yawned more times than i did in a whole year. Not to mention theHas extremely no porpuse and may be one of the most overrated movies on this decade only because of it's cast. Really a movie for critics. Tried to watch a full hour and yawned more times than i did in a whole year. Not to mention the extremely terrible CGI from netflix. only netflix could do such a trash job at making movies. Glad they are banned from oscars. Still have no idea how this is a must-wacth, people giving 10's only because of the cast and scorsese, because realistically, if the movie had been made by some other less influent director and cast, this would be a 6 at most. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
2
TeshDec 31, 2020
This movie made me feel like a potato because the plot makes no kinda sense which was so dumb and disappointing but I have it a point because of the dialogue potential.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
6
AJ_13Jan 11, 2021
It just bored me, and a film with such an amazing cast and such an incredible director shouldn't.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
4
DimocracyJul 6, 2023
This film is soooooo boooooring. I almost fell asleep while watching. Bruuh
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
8
BHBarryDec 8, 2019
“The Irishman” stars Robert De Niro, Joe Pesci and Al Pacino in this epic saga of mob life in post World War II America. Based on the book by Charles Brandt and screenplay by Steven Zaillian, and ably directed by Martin Scorcese, the film“The Irishman” stars Robert De Niro, Joe Pesci and Al Pacino in this epic saga of mob life in post World War II America. Based on the book by Charles Brandt and screenplay by Steven Zaillian, and ably directed by Martin Scorcese, the film traces the life of Frank Sheehan (Mr. De Niro) as he rises from meat truck driver to a confidant of Jimmy Hoffa with ties to the “bosses” of the underworld. The film relies upon and uses “flashback” techniques which, if not done properly, might otherwise interfere with the viewer’s experience. In this instance, however, Mr. Scorcese masterfully utilizes the process to tell a story that, in spite of its 209 minutes of screen time, moves smoothly and rapidly from scene to scene. I give the film an 8 for affording the audience a gratifying theatrical experience and, in addition, for giving it the opportunity to witness the extraordinary acting talents of its 3 main stars as they perform under the magical wand of its director. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
Compi24Dec 14, 2019
Martin Scorsese frees himself from the bonds of typical studio parameters with "The Irishman," his first foray into alternative media distribution, and -- to be sure -- a solid one. I would, however, be lying if I said I wasn't a bit let downMartin Scorsese frees himself from the bonds of typical studio parameters with "The Irishman," his first foray into alternative media distribution, and -- to be sure -- a solid one. I would, however, be lying if I said I wasn't a bit let down by the certain elements in play here. Perhaps, it's the media-fuelled hype train powering this movie into the heights of my "most anticipated for the rest of the year" list, but a lot of the fuss made over the length, tech and certain cast members in this movie just didn't come across the way I worry they were supposed to. Was the de-aging impressive? I mean. Not really? It's nowhere near the level of distractingly bad that some have been saying it is, but, again, the impression it made in any direction was slight. Was the three-and-a-half hour runtime justified in the end? Startlingly, no. There are numerous moments, bits of dialogue, and even scenes that either repeat ideas we're already well-acquainted with or add nothing to the overall product as a whole. So why did I like this movie so much? Enter the final act, which tries (and mostly succeeds in) contextualizing the whole of what you've just watched, ultimately shaping the movie at large into one of the more mournful dirges on lost life, time and innocence that I've seen in quite some time. It really gave me pause to see Scorsese and Co. wax so pensively on the subject matter and characters at hand. It approached a plane of near-meta proportions and I was deeply taken by it all. I just wish we got there a tad quicker.

All in all, this is (I assume) a fitting end to Scorsese's reign as gangster movie maestro in chief. Sure, I've seen him do more with less in the subgenre, but it was nice to see the big man step up to the plate one last time.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
gracjanskiJan 16, 2020
The movie is a bit too long and slow paced. In addition we saw already so many gangster movies even with the same actors, that this doesnt touch me. Anyway still a good movie.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
bfoore90Mar 27, 2020
De Niro, Pesci and Pacino were absolutely incredible in this with Pacino probably putting on on of the best performances I've seen from him in a few years. At least since that Paterno biopic that he did for HBO. The "Irishman" isn't one ofDe Niro, Pesci and Pacino were absolutely incredible in this with Pacino probably putting on on of the best performances I've seen from him in a few years. At least since that Paterno biopic that he did for HBO. The "Irishman" isn't one of one Scorsese's best, i still feel The Departed holds that mantra but its certainly damn good. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
ciuciuriatkaDec 4, 2019
old pricks same ticks ..boring.not worth watch even 30min. champagne who does finish this "epic" thing. scorsese need take his young lads and retired so we could see some fresh faces.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
KeepzepackDec 9, 2019
The major reviewers were afraid to knock a movie so studded with stars, so they praised this movie when they should have panned it. Here's Scorsese longing for the Goodfella glory days and using the same cast to try to recapture it. This isThe major reviewers were afraid to knock a movie so studded with stars, so they praised this movie when they should have panned it. Here's Scorsese longing for the Goodfella glory days and using the same cast to try to recapture it. This is no Goodfellas. It's derivative. It's badly edited. It's boring. And worst of all, the movie keeps interrupting itself with captions under various characters that say things like: "Shot in the head in his driveway, July, 1980." These ridiculous captions take you out of the movie. It's 3 1/2 hours long, fercryingoutloud. It gets interesting in the 3rd hour, but it'll take a 2 1/2 hour slog to get you there. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
GotHeeeemJan 1, 2020
Amazing mob movie that takes you back to its roots. The music, directing, and acting are outstanding. Instant classic for the mob movie genre 10/10
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
MaxPayneIsGodJan 14, 2020
Masterful cinema, a flawless movie.
Classic Scorsese in every sense.
Powerhouse performances by De Niro, Pesci and Pacino
Truly, one of the greatest movies ever made.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews