Lionsgate | Release Date: November 22, 2013
7.9
USER SCORE
Generally favorable reviews based on 1533 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
1,285
Mixed:
138
Negative:
110
Watch Now
Stream On
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)
9
Jack97Dec 17, 2016
This is how you do a sequel! More emotion, more (better filmed) action and a more interesting plot. Pretty much everything about Catching Fire is better than the first film, and I liked the first film.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
Iky009Nov 27, 2016
The second part of the saga stands out, improves and deepens the plot and its characters, the action scenes have evolved, they have become better, this is for sure the best film of the franchise.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
oblique15Aug 23, 2014
This was definitely a step up from the first Hunger games. It gets deeper into whats going on outside of the games and that caught my interest. The ending makes you me believe the next one will be a step even better.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
Compi24Nov 24, 2013
It may be decidedly more grave than expected, but with such sobering thematic elements in play, the gravity is just the point. "The Hunger Games: Catching Fire" is a thrilling, brilliant, and carefully acted sociopolitical sci-fi action epic.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
SwatiFeb 10, 2014
The second instalment has more drama, conflict, engaging characters, and a vicious arena. A way is found to return the champions to the battlefield. But nothing is really what it seems to be. There are layers under which the differentThe second instalment has more drama, conflict, engaging characters, and a vicious arena. A way is found to return the champions to the battlefield. But nothing is really what it seems to be. There are layers under which the different characters are working.

Catching Fire takes the conflict steadily away from being everything about who survives in the arena to the larger issue, which is the tyranny of the Capitol. Katniss, for the sake of the audience, doesn't know much about what is being plotted in secret, mainly because she isn't the most discrete and patient of people.

Gale Hawthorne is developed further before the focus once again returns to Katniss and Peeta. Both of them must form alliances if they hope to have one of them survive. Finnick and Johanna breathe some life into an otherwise stagnant narrative. They are both cocky and witty and peculiar, and talented in the art of killing. Beetee is skilled with the use of electricity. Haymitch is much more cunning and resolved this time around. He seems to have a purpose he is keeping from both Katniss and Peeta.

President Snow wants Katniss to make the people of the districts believe that it was true love that made her want to eat the berries alongwith Peeta at the end of their previous expedition into the arena. People are taking her deathwish for a display of defiance. For her part she wants to cooperate so they would leave her and her family in peace. She just wants to live the rest of her life recovering from the mental damage she has suffered from killing all those people. But it isn't working and Snow finds another way for quelling the hopes of the inhabitants of the districts.

Hoffman plays the new gamemaker hired by Snow. He is tasked with arranging Katniss's death so the whole issue about the mockingjay would go away. He lives up to his name in his last performance of his life. Sadly we won't be able to see his character in the next two instalments.

The stakes are higher than the lives of both the characters. It is freedom that is the goal here and the movie ends in a way which would leave the viewers in no doubt about where the story is headed. The promise is large and I hope that they deliver. I know the last book was a bit underwhelming, so some modifications would have to be made to keep the following two sequels interesting. The theme discussed is the same as before_ human suffering though poverty, hunger, war and persecution.

They did everything they could have with this instalment. The budget was bigger. The set design, visual effects, costumes and weapons more impressive. But the reason the movie succeeds is they also went bigger with the characters. They felt more lively and real. If this instalment is any indication, the next two films are going to earn huge sums of money too. Catching Fire has turned the franchise very lucrative.

9.5
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
Rox22Mar 24, 2014
Kind of funny that the Hunger games of this movie only happen just over 80 minutes in. Plus this movie's version is ALLOT tamer and shorter than the first movie.

For the most part this movies real focus is the politic and the aftermath of
Kind of funny that the Hunger games of this movie only happen just over 80 minutes in. Plus this movie's version is ALLOT tamer and shorter than the first movie.

For the most part this movies real focus is the politic and the aftermath of the first movie. Storytelling and character development of the central characters is done well enough. However, there is little development of side characters, which makes me wonder why did they bother to have so many?

The shaky cam of the first movie is gone, but then again there is little need for it either.

Overall:
Catching Fire does have a bit more plot and a better overall story arch than the first movie. It expands on the universe and leaves you wanting more (which is coming.) However, in the end Catching Fire failed to really impress and felt more like this should have been made into a epilogue for the first movie and a prologue to the next. On it's own, it mostly feels like filler that easily could have been condensed and could have used some better overall writing.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
LeZeeFeb 7, 2014
Whatever you say I am not a big fan of this franchise. I did not like much the first installment other than a decent entertainment. So this was another 'let it go' movie from me. But when the time came to see it, I was a little surprised ofWhatever you say I am not a big fan of this franchise. I did not like much the first installment other than a decent entertainment. So this was another 'let it go' movie from me. But when the time came to see it, I was a little surprised of being better than the first. The second hour was good and before one was a mild slow. The real interest is the, follow-up movies from here on. The end of this part created a curiosity for the next movies of the series. Looks like it would be very interesting with big changes in story than first two.

The movie series supposed to be a trilogy, but you know it tasted big commercial success that mean big buck in filmmakers pocket. In 2013 this movie was the highest gross from north America. So like 'Deathly Hollows' and 'Breaking Dawn' this franchise following the same path by breaking the third volume into two. Whatever, I am expecting the third and the fourth movies 'Mockingjay part I and II' would have more exciting than previous movies with many twists and turns.

It was so sad to hear about Philip Seymour's sudden tragic demise. His best parts are yet to come in the next movies of the movie series. The franchise told they wrapped most of his portions of the last two volumes and now they decided to make minor changes in his character. That's good to hear, hope he it will be an unforgettable show from the great actor.

The end scene before the credits roll the logo of 'Catching Fire' changes into 'Mockingjay'. It was awesome, I just sensed some great is ahead. So like teenagers, it interested me and created curiosity. Looks like I got reason to watch 'Mockingjay' movies.

7.5/10
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
SimpleMethodNov 22, 2013
Catching Fire is a massive improvement over The Hunger Games in every way. It is shot and directed better on the whole, the action is clearer and the acting is much improved. The Spectacular Now is my favorite movie of the year, but this is aCatching Fire is a massive improvement over The Hunger Games in every way. It is shot and directed better on the whole, the action is clearer and the acting is much improved. The Spectacular Now is my favorite movie of the year, but this is a damn close second and still a 10. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
TheRyanMcNeilNov 22, 2013
Catching fire knocks the original off the podium. Two things that need to be mentioned. 1. The visual effects were stunning. & 2. The actors. So many great names in this film! Woody Harrelson, Philip Seymor Hoffman, Donald Sutherland, andCatching fire knocks the original off the podium. Two things that need to be mentioned. 1. The visual effects were stunning. & 2. The actors. So many great names in this film! Woody Harrelson, Philip Seymor Hoffman, Donald Sutherland, and Jennifer Lawrence. So good, a great ensemble. That being said, I felt like there wasn't much excitement. As well as there wasn't much of Caeser. (The talk show host)
None the less. I would go see it in theatres for he effects. Can't wait for the next two films.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
bradtheman123Jun 11, 2014
First of all I'd like to start out saying that I think this second one was better than the first. What amazes me the most about this is that the movie/story/book/author/director were able to keep the whole series going with this book. ThemFirst of all I'd like to start out saying that I think this second one was better than the first. What amazes me the most about this is that the movie/story/book/author/director were able to keep the whole series going with this book. Them thinking of a way to keep it going in such a clever fashion amazes me. This I think is better than the first because not only did it portray the story better but it did it in a way that gets me excited and suspended. Movie over book, but only for this second one, catching fire, for the first it would have had to be a whole different conversation. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
2
WheatersApr 26, 2014
I liked the original Hunger Games, but this second instalment was very disappointing. A lot of action at night, so we can't see what's happening. Too much of the movie was spent in the pre Hunger Games bit. The actual Hunger Games actionI liked the original Hunger Games, but this second instalment was very disappointing. A lot of action at night, so we can't see what's happening. Too much of the movie was spent in the pre Hunger Games bit. The actual Hunger Games action seemed too fake. It was action for actions sake, with no continuity or reason. Talking about continuity - every time you see Catniss, she has a different number of arrows in her quiver! Acid smoke that just stops, then magic water! Too ridiculous. I won't be watching the next instalment. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
spollardMar 16, 2014
Worse than the first one but still a decent movie. The first hour was interesting and really made you think but after that it turned into something everyone has already seen before. The game, not much different and not any better than theWorse than the first one but still a decent movie. The first hour was interesting and really made you think but after that it turned into something everyone has already seen before. The game, not much different and not any better than the game in the first one. Visuals are great and Jennifer Lawrence as usual is wonderful but in the end it is slightly above average movie with an 62.6 out of 100. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
3
JackValentineFeb 5, 2014
Catching Fire is another prime example of how Hollywood can truly bring out the worst in an adaptation of an already mediocre piece of writing.

The story picks up a few months after the events of the original, with the lifeless Katniss
Catching Fire is another prime example of how Hollywood can truly bring out the worst in an adaptation of an already mediocre piece of writing.

The story picks up a few months after the events of the original, with the lifeless Katniss Everdeen and laughably stupid Peeta Milark, continuing across the country on the victory tour of the previous Hunger Games.

To think that they can now label lead star Jennifer Lawrence as an Academy Award Winner is criminal to boot, but the fact that any merit could be sung to her appalling performance as Katniss, makes me question the very stability of peoples comprehension and/or impression of what quality writing and quality performances look like when they are melded into one.

It's hard to rely on the supporting cast, when the majority of the male roles are there just to make teen girls salivate, and the few female roles that are not Katniss are obviously there for pure sex appeal, to keep those teen girls teen boyfriends interested through this near two and a half hour excuse for a film.

Miraculously, the late Phillip Seymour Hoffman, with only about twenty minutes of screen time, offers salvation for every scene he appears in.

I've asked friends that loved the film, what did they actually love so much about it. One told me, that she LOVED the special effects.
But in a year that has given us Gravity, I don't think a film like this can even be viewed as a success in the SFX department.
Especially not with those bloody monkeys anyway…

There are a few slow pan shots at the beginning of the film that would make you think otherwise, but before you know it, we're back to obnoxious closeups with shaky-cam included.

As I have said before, upon reading the books, despite the poor writing, I would have been happy knowing that the targeted audience would be reading something which touches on some darker geopolitical messages that are not present in other acclaimed books for the age group.
The fact is though, that no one cares about that when it comes to the big screen. No one's asking themselves the big questions like, "Is the Hunger Games something that can be justified at all?" or "Why do they doubt the perseverance of humanity?". No. The big question echoing around the theatre, is "OMG, who is hotter, Peeta or Gale? lol #whatahottie #teamGale"

A simply awful film.

A 3 out of 10.

Jack Valentine
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
shpostalNov 24, 2013
There are not many surprises in "Catching Fire", the second in the Hunger Games trilogy, and that's good because it means the usual stellar acting of Jennifer Lawrence, maybe the best actress in Hollywood today, supported by a fine cast, withThere are not many surprises in "Catching Fire", the second in the Hunger Games trilogy, and that's good because it means the usual stellar acting of Jennifer Lawrence, maybe the best actress in Hollywood today, supported by a fine cast, with Donald Sutherland getting a more pronounced role as the evil President Snow. He truly casts a menacing shadow over the movie, just like in the book.
What that means is that those who normally prefer books to movie adaptations will be again pleased to see that "Catching Fire" does follow the book very closely. Jennifer Lawrence shows herself to be remarkably versatile and approachable. When in a few scenes she becomes very upset, you have no trouble believing her grief, so believable her performance. I predict a long and brilliant career for her.
The effects are great, the settings brilliant. Even for those who read the entire trilogy, one is already eagerly awaiting the final chapter "Mockingjay", that, like the first two installments, will have movie goers lined up outside their favorite theaters like no other movie has done in recent memory.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
WorstReviewsJan 18, 2014
The Hunger Games is now a powerhouse to behold. With Jennifer Lawrence's new found talent in brilliant acting she can hold this film on her back, and make the franchise as good as the books. Catching Fire was probably one of the most vitalThe Hunger Games is now a powerhouse to behold. With Jennifer Lawrence's new found talent in brilliant acting she can hold this film on her back, and make the franchise as good as the books. Catching Fire was probably one of the most vital books in the trilogy and this movie holds up well. The new director change caused for a more balanced and thought out film. Jennifer shows that shes not another bland Kirsten Stewart and she will need to grow on this in the coming films. 8/10 Great. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
gracjanskiJul 14, 2022
Better movie than the first one:
The dystopic future state of Panem is still perfectly made, some scenes were genious. Jennifer Lawrence and Josh Hutcherson have better scenes and are convincing here in opposite to the first movie. In
Better movie than the first one:
The dystopic future state of Panem is still perfectly made, some scenes were genious. Jennifer Lawrence and Josh Hutcherson have better scenes and are convincing here in opposite to the first movie. In addition it is a good idea to let adults fights instead of teenagers. The action scenes in the 2nd part are better also. Oh and no shaky cameras.
So why it is still not a 10 movie? Again the 2nd half of the movie isnt good enough.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
ElucidateMay 1, 2016
A significant improve on the first film. Great interpretation of the setting/scenery and better pacing. The series seems to be more established overall.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
TheApplegnomeFeb 9, 2014
A hell of improvement since the last movie, but it still got a boring start & a low tempo, as the previous movie had. The Hunger Games: Catching Fire got a beautiful story, and the movie itself is very well made and it got some interestingA hell of improvement since the last movie, but it still got a boring start & a low tempo, as the previous movie had. The Hunger Games: Catching Fire got a beautiful story, and the movie itself is very well made and it got some interesting and cool stuffs that you haven't seen in movies before, and the actors couldn't have been more awesome actually, and I really admire Donald Sutherland & Philip Seymour Hoffman's spectacular performance in this movie, but I also love the drama in this movie!

The bad thing about Catching Fire is the beginning, it wasn't unique at any way, a little boring & lengthy actually, and it continued to be lengthy for about one hour, until more things started to happen. The ending was beautiful and unique, but I felt that something really was missing in the ending, and it was quite stupid.
My conclusion of Catching Fire is that it's a beautiful movie, but it got many deficiencies, such as the opening scene, the tempo, lack of action & that the movie is a little boring at some places, and I think that they could have done much more in this movie! The Hunger Games: Catching Fire is watchable, but it might not be recommended for those who likes movies with action, but it's a great movie overall.

The Hunger Games: Catching Fire gets a 7/10
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
RevRonJan 24, 2014
I didn’t care for the first film but, at the behest of many friends and a girlfriend who loves the books, I gave this one a chance and actually found myself enjoying the experience. While I’m still not blown away by this franchise, I didI didn’t care for the first film but, at the behest of many friends and a girlfriend who loves the books, I gave this one a chance and actually found myself enjoying the experience. While I’m still not blown away by this franchise, I did think the story was much more interesting this time around and the introduction of new, more interesting characters, really helped get me into it. Granted, I still have some issues like the action isn’t that satisfying, Hutcherson isn’t a very memorable actor (and it play havoc on his character) and a lot of Jennifer Lawrence’s performance came out like overacting to me BUT I still think it was a decent film. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
TheDarkKnight22Nov 30, 2014
This movie was a lot better than the first hunger games movie. it had a lot better plot than the first movie. They explained more, and it kept me entertained throughout the whole movie.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
Ed_Jun 11, 2014
Briefly: waited for a movie like that one for a long time.

This Hunger Games film is much more about than killing. It's about love, deception, cruelty, politics, deception and humanity in a great mix. I'm extremely interested in politics
Briefly: waited for a movie like that one for a long time.

This Hunger Games film is much more about than killing. It's about love, deception, cruelty, politics, deception and humanity in a great mix. I'm extremely interested in politics and humanity, so this movie is absolutely for me. I enjoyed every minute of it.
Actors are perfect, they know how and when they have to show emotions.
Effects are also enthralling.
All in all, creators had a lot of work with this film but achieved an unbelievably incredible sequel.

Keep up the good work!
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
MovieGuysNov 23, 2014
A little better than the previous Hunger Games, Catching Fire gets all of the YA movie ingredients right, and treats them with the maturity and development they deserve. The shaky cam and bad cinematography that hurt the first film is greatlyA little better than the previous Hunger Games, Catching Fire gets all of the YA movie ingredients right, and treats them with the maturity and development they deserve. The shaky cam and bad cinematography that hurt the first film is greatly improved here, making this one the best of the series so far. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
2
Mike212Feb 6, 2014
Catching Fire is set a year after Katniss and Peeta survived the 74th Hunger Games; their actions in the Games sparked the fires of a rebellion throughout the districts. President Snow tries to quell the rebellion by using Katniss and PeetaCatching Fire is set a year after Katniss and Peeta survived the 74th Hunger Games; their actions in the Games sparked the fires of a rebellion throughout the districts. President Snow tries to quell the rebellion by using Katniss and Peeta and re-entering them in the 75th Hunger Games Anniversary alongside other veterans of the Hunger Games. Catching Fire has the premises of an amazing, dramatic and action-packed movie yet seems to fall flat when it’s meant to be at its best.

Don’t be mistaken, Catching Fire is not a bad movie and is a definite improvement over the Hunger Games. The larger budget and the directing skills of Francis Lawrence greatly improve the overall quality of acting and special effects seen in the movie. Yet dramatic moments such as the apparent deaths of a leading character is made stupid looking by Katniss’ weird crying face and the fact that the audience is not foolish enough to actually believe they would have killed them off. Jennifer Lawrence’s acting, along with some of her co-stars; falls flat at key moments of the movie even during the supposed Katniss actually falls for Peeta scene is stale. Then again I compare actors to Liam Neeson and the whole cast of Lord of the Rings, so maybe I’m setting too high a bar.

I’ve talked about some of the negatives now onto the positives; Sam Claflin as Finnick Odair is easily my favourite protagonist who competes in the Hunger Games. While he is not the best actor in the movie, that award goes to Woody Harrelson, he is the only one in the Games who you actually see fight other contestants and the mutated monkeys. President Snow the movies main antagonist is an easy competitor to Haymitch’s best actor spot; he may not have many lines in the movie but the ones he does he delivers perfectly and even just the close ups of his face show more emotion then Jennifer Lawrence’s entire performance. The special effects for the movie are a definite and obvious improvement from its prequel, which looked so fake it made Giant Shark vs. Mega Octopus look real.

Unfortunately I can’t go on with the good points of the movie because there are none left. So I will return to the negatives; plot twists. There is one major plot twist that is probably the most important thing in the entire movie, which I saw coming from a mile away, you can tell who good guys are and who the bad guys are in the movie because of the way they dress. If they look like they fell through Louie Spence’s wardrobe they are most likely the bad guys, the exception being President Snow. The ending of the movie is as weird as the way the people dress in the Capitol; it just seems to stop without any feeling of an actual conclusion. The Grey did the same thing but managed to pull it off because the Grey is a great movie, which just shows that that kind of ending does work and can make a movie excellent.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
FreedomFightersJan 8, 2017
After the outstanding critical and commercial success of "The Hunger Games," it was pretty clear that the second book, "Catching Fire," would be adapted into a film. And sure enough, it happened, this time directed by Francis Lawrence insteadAfter the outstanding critical and commercial success of "The Hunger Games," it was pretty clear that the second book, "Catching Fire," would be adapted into a film. And sure enough, it happened, this time directed by Francis Lawrence instead of Gary Ross. How did Francis Lawrence do? Excellent! "The Hunger Games: Catching Fire" is a smart, polished, and confident sequel that's wonderfully written, action-packed, extremely exciting and extremely entertaining, all while featuring a phenomenal performance from Jennifer Lawrence. If you're a fan of the series, you absolutely must watch "The Hunger Games: Catching Fire." Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
travellynMay 10, 2014
very much darker than the last book and film director francis lawrence knew what to leave in the book it is impressively directed and wonderfully written by the creator of the dark world as well as great acting this is one film the cast andvery much darker than the last book and film director francis lawrence knew what to leave in the book it is impressively directed and wonderfully written by the creator of the dark world as well as great acting this is one film the cast and crew were very careful with Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
marcmyworksJan 22, 2014
A pretty decent follow up to the original, with less 'tween-spirit' and more mature themes. Again we see a lot of young kids being killed without really caring about their characters, however it does leave me wanting to see more.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
JOSHDILISIJan 15, 2014
this is a great movie that i found followed the book pretty well, i found that it had a entertaining story and an ended the EXACT same way that the 2nd book ended. If you liked the first hunger games movie, you're gonna like this one.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
rhaynes7Nov 23, 2013
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. When the first movie came out, I knew they would overhype them, and I didn't come out of the movie impressed, but neither was I disappointed. For this movie, I expected it to be about the same or less, as the 2nd book was my least favorite of the two.

Boy, was I wrong!

Things aren't well in the world of Katniss. She just wants to live, and that's about it. As a result, she never thinks about the significance of the actions that she makes. As a result, she now finds herself as the face of rebellion, and President Snow is none too happy. She must now act for the Capital or watch everyone she loves die because of her actions in the first movie.

The movie does a magnificent job of showing how oblivious Katniss was to the problem's she created. Jennifer Lawrence did an excellent job showing how aloof Katniss wanted to be in this whole affair as she slips into insanity. As Katniss comes to realize how shallow and pathetic is, she begins to realize how important Peeta is just like the books. The other character's in the cast developed appropriately, showing how Katniss' actions have changed their lives and shows the cruelty of the Capital and it's extravagances much better than the first movie.

The weakest part of the 2nd book, the Victory Tour wasn't rushed over, and that came to be a good thing. It allowed them to really emphasis the fact that her train ride is never ending, and that she will always suffer for her actions.

Surprisingly, the movie was quite funny as well. Caesar's infectious laugh had me going every time, and the nonchalance of the Capital culture to their own cruelty in their gaudy culture was emphasized more than the first, which made the situation of Katniss and her loved ones more significant.

The arena was very well done, and really helped give life to some things that I couldn't do with the arena she was left in. The movie did a better job, in my opinion, of grasping the tension in the arena that the book did.

All in all, an excellent movie and better than the first.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
RensBNov 24, 2013
The Hunger Games: Catching Fire. A movie for which the expectations are set high. Yesterday I had the chance to finally see it, after a long wait since part one. From the moment the movie started, till it's end, I was completely sucked intoThe Hunger Games: Catching Fire. A movie for which the expectations are set high. Yesterday I had the chance to finally see it, after a long wait since part one. From the moment the movie started, till it's end, I was completely sucked into the movie. When it ended, I actually had to realise I was sitting in the cinema... From beginning till end, the movie is full of action, tension with a great story! I thought the movie had just begun when it actually ended.
I think Jennifer Lawrence Josh Hutcherson and all of the cast created a masterpiece!
In my opinion I would definitely recommend it to anyone who likes action/scifi movies.
As far as I know, I just can't wait until the 20th of november 2014 for the first part of The Hunger Games: Mockingjay
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
rnguyanDec 1, 2013
Overall the Hunger Game:Catching Fire was great movie pleasing to watch at most part, with more action than first movie, many memorable scenes throughout (The scenery of jungle nice!)
but-Note: some actors and actresses lack some
Overall the Hunger Game:Catching Fire was great movie pleasing to watch at most part, with more action than first movie, many memorable scenes throughout (The scenery of jungle nice!)
but-Note: some actors and actresses lack some chemistry and energy while acting out their parts.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
AGarcia732Jan 10, 2014
While the first Hunger Games movie was a bit lackluster and disappointing, the 2nd film does justice to the book and the author. Jennifer Lawrence was a bit emotionless in the first film (although maybe Katniss really would've been likeWhile the first Hunger Games movie was a bit lackluster and disappointing, the 2nd film does justice to the book and the author. Jennifer Lawrence was a bit emotionless in the first film (although maybe Katniss really would've been like that), but she improves her acting for the second film. The other victors like Beetee, Finnick, and Johanna were great. (Johanna was especially funny!) The rest of cast is good too, even though I feel like characters such as Cinna and Prim weren't in the movie enough (but unfortunately you can't fit everything from the book into the movie). Besides the victors, the addition of Presidents Snow's granddaughter was a nice touch. Things from the book were adapted well for the movie, and to sum it all up this movie was really good. I can't wait for the next movie!

The Hunger Games: Mockingjay, Part 1 will be released November 2014 and Part 2 in 2015.

If you liked this review, read my other ones on a wide variety of movies, TV shows, and videogames by clicking on my name, and please mark this review as helpful.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
jppl1999Apr 12, 2014
A young-adult franchise movie that reflects concretely the message from the book with an almost prefect performance from Jennifer Lawrence as Katniss Everdeen.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
dotredDec 31, 2013
One of the best movies of 2013 I think it is even better than gravity. The movie captures the world of the hunger games in an amazing way, and I loved every bit of the movie.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
MattG_123Jan 1, 2014
Far deeper in emotion and story than the first movie, and feels more interesting. There are politics involved and I loved the whole uprising, it feels like you're witnessing a revolution, some part of history.

The Hunger Games: Catching
Far deeper in emotion and story than the first movie, and feels more interesting. There are politics involved and I loved the whole uprising, it feels like you're witnessing a revolution, some part of history.

The Hunger Games: Catching Fire gets a 8.0/10
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
twerk-kingJan 2, 2014
Jennifer Lawrence is everything. She delivers a fantastic performance that makes the audience believe in her character's anger and vulnerability. Her acting has improved since the first movie and it truly makes this movie believable andJennifer Lawrence is everything. She delivers a fantastic performance that makes the audience believe in her character's anger and vulnerability. Her acting has improved since the first movie and it truly makes this movie believable and better than the first one. There were some scenes that needed to be fixed, but it's not that big of a deal for this #1 action movie of 2013. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
stasjoJan 6, 2014
i have learned that after watching the movie. its better to not over think it i am really disappointed i want my money back the only reason i'm glad i saw it because now i can understand the third one which hopefully better than the second one.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
bfoore90Nov 20, 2019
Catching Fire is an immense improvement over its predecessor. I didn't read the second book, but just going off of the film its an immediate improvement. The story and direction is much more polished with Francis Lawrence directing instead ofCatching Fire is an immense improvement over its predecessor. I didn't read the second book, but just going off of the film its an immediate improvement. The story and direction is much more polished with Francis Lawrence directing instead of Gary Ross, making the film much more action packed and fun. Jennifer Lawrence returns with the rest of the core cast, with Lawrence's performance continuing to ascend her into stardom. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
Queenm4321Jan 20, 2014
This movie isn't exactly what I thought it would be. It missed out on some major and small parts like the first movie. I understand that the movie has to fit into 1-2 hours, but at least try putting in more parts and a tad bit more action inThis movie isn't exactly what I thought it would be. It missed out on some major and small parts like the first movie. I understand that the movie has to fit into 1-2 hours, but at least try putting in more parts and a tad bit more action in this movie. The makeup and costumes were outstanding, but the movie in general?... I'd give this an 8. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
JpJuarioJan 24, 2014
''Spectacular!'' ''Knockout.'' ''Explosive!'' Jennifer Lawrence is fearless. The Hunger Games:Catching Fire will take your breath away. One of the Best adaptation of the book I've seen. One of the Best Achievement. Francis Lawrence gives a''Spectacular!'' ''Knockout.'' ''Explosive!'' Jennifer Lawrence is fearless. The Hunger Games:Catching Fire will take your breath away. One of the Best adaptation of the book I've seen. One of the Best Achievement. Francis Lawrence gives a suspenseful action film, It leaves you wanting more. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
jasper6333Nov 4, 2014
well i finally watched the movie and well i must say i am just dissapointed, the plot of this movie does not make a lot of sense. the ending is just weird. well okay lets shoot this barbed arrow at the lightning. the arena breaks down andwell i finally watched the movie and well i must say i am just dissapointed, the plot of this movie does not make a lot of sense. the ending is just weird. well okay lets shoot this barbed arrow at the lightning. the arena breaks down and wow there are the good guys, seriously how the **** did these guys know what Katniss would do and when, overall acting is mediocre. what a dissapointment Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
Christian0205Feb 23, 2014
It was really entertaining, Jennifer Lawrence is great in her role. Despite 2 hour long, it keeps you in expectation all the time. Definitely a must see
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
RamonGuerreroMay 2, 2014
It is not very common that a sequel turns out to be better than the original, but somehow here's Catching Fire, with an awesome performance by Lawrence and better CGI that makes this movie an amazing experience.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
CherryxldNov 23, 2014
Una película entretenida, que te deja con las ganas de ver "The Hunger Games: Mokingjay - Part 1", contiene una buena dirección artística, y el trabajo de Trish Summerville en el vestuario lo hace ser merecedor de no solo la nominación alUna película entretenida, que te deja con las ganas de ver "The Hunger Games: Mokingjay - Part 1", contiene una buena dirección artística, y el trabajo de Trish Summerville en el vestuario lo hace ser merecedor de no solo la nominación al Oscar si no también el galardón, esta película sin duda es una de las mejores del año, que en mi opinión, es mejor que "Gravity", y por mucho. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
lkalibaApr 14, 2014
The Hunger Games: Catching Fire is definitely an improvement upon the first film. With a deeper emotional depth and a better look at the series themes, and let's not forget an amazing lead performance from Academy-Award-Winner: Jennifer Lawrence.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
DrewtheDude85Mar 28, 2014
When I saw the first Hunger Games film, I enjoyed it but I went into it without reading the book at all. So I made sure that I read the books before the next film came out and I enjoyed the book enough to where I got really hyped for theWhen I saw the first Hunger Games film, I enjoyed it but I went into it without reading the book at all. So I made sure that I read the books before the next film came out and I enjoyed the book enough to where I got really hyped for the Catching Fire movie and it was amazing!! I enjoyed this movie so much and it was a lot better than the first Hunger Games movie. It had some great drama and suspense to keep me captive around the action scenes. The locations were also cool and I liked that they seemed more open and fleshed out in this movie than the first film. The characters were good, the acting was good, everything in this film is great. This is a one of kind film that I think sci-fi and dystopia fans will really enjoy, even if they didn't read the book. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
InspectorJavertApr 1, 2014
Catching Fire tops it's predecessor in almost every way. The actors have grown more comfortable in their roles, as the acting has improved greatly. The special effects are far better than what we got the last time around. And CeasarCatching Fire tops it's predecessor in almost every way. The actors have grown more comfortable in their roles, as the acting has improved greatly. The special effects are far better than what we got the last time around. And Ceasar Flickerman is twenty times funnier. The first hour of the movie solely focuses on the political tensions of Panem, and it is very well done. I even got scared by President Snow. (Not to mention the Peacekeepers actually look intimidating now). We also get to know more about victors that have been reaped for the 75 Hunger Games. This is a nice change from what we got in the last movie, "Cato bad! Marvel bad! They big! Kill! Run!" When we get to the Games, the movie retains all of it's tension from earlier and adds a nice layer of action to top it off. And there's almost no shaky camera this time. The two Mockingjay sequels are going to have to work hard to not be overshadowed. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
IMAX500May 22, 2014
This movie was 30% Train wreck. because when cattiness and peeta arrive in some other place, some guy got shot and I didn't know why? Now I know because they think he was causing trouble.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
diogomendesAug 28, 2015
Good movie with great acting and excellent cinematography, and its themes are compelling. Could've been better, for sure, but this an otherwise emotionally resonant and an entertaining film that will appease fans of the novel source, as wellGood movie with great acting and excellent cinematography, and its themes are compelling. Could've been better, for sure, but this an otherwise emotionally resonant and an entertaining film that will appease fans of the novel source, as well as those who are unfamiliar with it.

Final Score: 7.5/10
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
elsylorenaJul 19, 2014
Supera por mucho a la primera, posee unos mejores efectos visuales, un gran vestuario y maquillaje, aunque con un guión un tanto pobre, pero con actuaciones muy buenas, una magnifica dirección de Francis Lawrence, y es casi como si te leyeranSupera por mucho a la primera, posee unos mejores efectos visuales, un gran vestuario y maquillaje, aunque con un guión un tanto pobre, pero con actuaciones muy buenas, una magnifica dirección de Francis Lawrence, y es casi como si te leyeran el libro. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
Viper8787Apr 18, 2014
The first 30 minutes of this movie I was wondering whit was getting such high praise. And then it started to pickup and now I know why. Once the hunger games part started it was so good. And the ending was great. I cant wait for the next oneThe first 30 minutes of this movie I was wondering whit was getting such high praise. And then it started to pickup and now I know why. Once the hunger games part started it was so good. And the ending was great. I cant wait for the next one to come out. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
jmayApr 20, 2014
this is a great 2nd movie to the hunger games except it has a stupid ending which means i cant wait till the 1 st par of mocking jay (a 2 part 3rd movie for the hunger games) to come out in november 2014
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
43in2014Aug 1, 2015
Prior to watching this: I have seen the first film but have not read any of the books.

Premise: After wining the previous Hunger Games, Katniss is forced to enter the next one by the President, so she would be killed and the rebellion
Prior to watching this: I have seen the first film but have not read any of the books.

Premise: After wining the previous Hunger Games, Katniss is forced to enter the next one by the President, so she would be killed and the rebellion defeated.

Pros:
1). This has a good story and good action.

Cons: I
1). Though there are significant differences to the first film, it's not as original as the first film.

Score: 4/5 (no half scores) - Good enough to pay to watch it in the cinema.

Who would be satisfied with this film? All Hunger Games fans, most teens and most adults.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
CPD98Nov 22, 2014
Otro rollo para adolescentes, como la primera, pero peor.
"En llamas" es un copiar y pegar de la original, mas aburrida aún si cabe.
La parte en que no están los juegos se hace lenta y pesada, no ofrece nada interesante, y cuando salen los
Otro rollo para adolescentes, como la primera, pero peor.
"En llamas" es un copiar y pegar de la original, mas aburrida aún si cabe.
La parte en que no están los juegos se hace lenta y pesada, no ofrece nada interesante, y cuando salen los juegos... bueno, tampoco es que mejore mucho.
Llega al 5 raspado y da gracias, la gente que dice que esto es perfecto, en serio, sabéis poco o nada de cine.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
mockingjay20Jul 21, 2014
Jennifer Lawrence as Katniss is spectacular, the hunger games catching fire is much better than its predecessor, is visually beautiful, it is a glory to see, Josh Hutcherson as Peeta is beautiful. THE HUNGER GAMES IS THE BEST YEAR EXPERIENCE.Jennifer Lawrence as Katniss is spectacular, the hunger games catching fire is much better than its predecessor, is visually beautiful, it is a glory to see, Josh Hutcherson as Peeta is beautiful. THE HUNGER GAMES IS THE BEST YEAR EXPERIENCE. NO falls into clichés and stereotypes, is pure drama and action. TO THE FULLEST EXTENT SPECTACULAR OF THE WORD. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
1
MuryAug 2, 2014
So producers be like:
-So what do we do in this next movie?
-Idk man I was busy buying stuff with the money we got from the first release $$$ -Let's just throw in the same stuff we put in the first movie,Katness and Peeta get in the game
So producers be like:
-So what do we do in this next movie?
-Idk man I was busy buying stuff with the money we got from the first release $$$
-Let's just throw in the same stuff we put in the first movie,Katness and Peeta get in the game again,they kiss,they **** Gale he's a looser,he didn't fight in the dome as Peeta did and because Peeta couldn't find a suitable girlfriend even after all that
-Yeah man! that's good! And let's say there will be a rebelion which will **** the Capitol but we won't show any of that lol
-Ooh that's good,let's keep all that for the 3rd one.Alright people,let's do this !
All that being said,wake up people! You've just watched a rerun of the first movie which could've contained all the new stuff if it was 20 mins longer.If there is anything I appreciate about this movie is that it taught me to trust my intuition when I think my gf likes someone else but she says I'm the only one.There is proof that she is most probably surely lying.Thx for reading :)
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
3
BigZOct 7, 2014
Ugh, here we go again. Needless to say, I didn't watch this willingly and I am not wrong to have opposed watching it having now seen it. I have no experience with The Hunger Games books and perhaps that is what makes me so uninspired whileUgh, here we go again. Needless to say, I didn't watch this willingly and I am not wrong to have opposed watching it having now seen it. I have no experience with The Hunger Games books and perhaps that is what makes me so uninspired while watching the movies. Or maybe its the whiny teens with no acting skills or screen presence. Could possibly be the approach the director has on the whole absolute power over the people idea that through this movie makes it seem...fruity somehow. In any case, I find few things to like about this. It is better than Maze Runner, but that doesn't say much. Jennifer Lawrence just does not do it for me. The random mood swings and screams and freak outs from no where. Is she even mentally sound anymore? And this girl is the MOCKING JAY? The savior and leader of the rebellion? She just is not cast right as far as the female leader hardened warrior type she needs to be in a movie setting. You know, you are allowed to make movies based on popular books that still can help the non-reader keep up and understand what's going on and why certain characters do things. It isn't all that difficult. Up against its teen movie competitors, this isn't the worst. Not that that says much, I'm just bothered by movies so hyped up that are worth very little. Phillip Hoffman, Liam Hemsworth, Woody Harrelson, Donald Sutherland, all acting below their talents and abilities...ugh wasted. It was cool to see Lenny Kravitz and Stanley Tucci though. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
AdsonOct 15, 2014
Oh my goodness, this continuation is awesome and I can't wait for the next. The performance of the Cast, mainly Jennifer and Josh was incredible and the romance between Katniss and Peeta came so much better than the first movie, It would beOh my goodness, this continuation is awesome and I can't wait for the next. The performance of the Cast, mainly Jennifer and Josh was incredible and the romance between Katniss and Peeta came so much better than the first movie, It would be horrible if Peeta die. The story during the course of the movie go getting better and better until the epic end. The story isn't disappointing and the acting scenes is very good. I can't think in something that I would change. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
matt_2905Feb 21, 2015
This sequel is spectacular, a huge improvement over the first. It was gritty, edgy and politically refined. Its a glorious triumph for Lionsgate, bring on Mockingjay (part 1 and 2)
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
ShenziOct 12, 2014
410 Simply because the first half of the movie is brilliant. Everything is laid out well and enjoyable.

Second half.. Is a horrible trainwreck. It's amazing to see something that has done this so well in the past flump at it now. The
410 Simply because the first half of the movie is brilliant. Everything is laid out well and enjoyable.

Second half.. Is a horrible trainwreck. It's amazing to see something that has done this so well in the past flump at it now.

The second half provides a story that is all over the place and it's really weird how short it feels. It's like you get a smooth massage the first half and then the second half it feels like the movie is being forced into your head. Trying to make sense of what is going on.

It gets a 4 because it's the second half that is bad. It's kind of like cheap soda, it tastes sweet at first but then the horrible aftertaste makes you regret taking a sip
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
SythusRATINGSOct 19, 2014
The Hunger Games: Catching Fire begins as Katniss Everdeen returns home safe after winning the 74th Annual Hunger Games along with fellow tribute Peeta Mellark. Winning means that they must turn around and leave their family and closeThe Hunger Games: Catching Fire begins as Katniss Everdeen returns home safe after winning the 74th Annual Hunger Games along with fellow tribute Peeta Mellark. Winning means that they must turn around and leave their family and close friends, embarking on a Victor's Tour of the districts. Along the way Katniss senses that a rebellion is simmering, but the Capitol is still very much in control as President Snow prepares the 75th Annual Hunger Games (The Quarter Quell), a competition that could change Panem forever. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
JohnMasterLMar 9, 2015
THE HUNGER GAMES: CATCHING FIRE es de esas secuelas que son MUCHO mejor que su primera parte. Posiblemente fue por el cambio del Director: Francis Lawrence (anteriormente Gary Ross) porque en si la pelicula se siente diferente a su primeraTHE HUNGER GAMES: CATCHING FIRE es de esas secuelas que son MUCHO mejor que su primera parte. Posiblemente fue por el cambio del Director: Francis Lawrence (anteriormente Gary Ross) porque en si la pelicula se siente diferente a su primera parte, se siente mas madura, mas oscura, mas fuerte y poderosa que THE HUNGER GAMES. Tengo que destacar que CATCHING FIRE es de las mejores adaptaciones literarias que e visto en los últimos años, respeta cada pagina del libro, tiene detalles distintos, pero estos no afectan en nada a la historia original. Las actuaciones, la dirección, los efectos y el guion son por mucho mejores que su antecesora, en esta segunda parte veras mas violencia, mas criticas hacia el gobierno, rebeliones, y sobre todo, una pelicula mas Adulta. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
DBPirate1129Jan 11, 2015
With a much better plot, Catching Fire greatly improves upon its predecessor. Great new characters along with the same amazing quality of visual effects we saw in the first film make this a tough competitor for Mockingjay Part 1.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
spongeswiftJul 5, 2017
Best movie in the series. Catching Fire managed to take the good things in the first movie and make them better and basically threw away all of the bad problems and brought in some new ones like the movies feeling too empty.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
akino3May 31, 2017
I couldn't even get a single guess right! That's how surprising things were in Hunger Games: Catching Fire. Once again, the film keeps you on your toes, questions who you should trust and rewards you with its best possible ending. This isI couldn't even get a single guess right! That's how surprising things were in Hunger Games: Catching Fire. Once again, the film keeps you on your toes, questions who you should trust and rewards you with its best possible ending. This is hunger games, you know it won't disappoint! Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
CineAutoctonoDec 2, 2015
Here the second installment of The Hunger Games , vassalage , and the most dramatic chapter of Katniss Everdeen , and said perhaps the best chapter in the saga, since the return to more interesting game until the hour fictional PanemHere the second installment of The Hunger Games , vassalage , and the most dramatic chapter of Katniss Everdeen , and said perhaps the best chapter in the saga, since the return to more interesting game until the hour fictional Panem Rebellion Mockingjay , Primordial ! Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
gdiego135Dec 4, 2015
Not as great as the first one (my opinion) but still a great movie with beautiful visuals and nice special effects, worth watching. Man Katniss Everdeen is a BADASS!!!!!
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
aadityamudharApr 17, 2016
A development upon the first film in many ways, Catching Fire does require a little more subtlety in the delivery of its overall message, but still combines glamour with violence and fleshes out a universe that has proved to be captivatingA development upon the first film in many ways, Catching Fire does require a little more subtlety in the delivery of its overall message, but still combines glamour with violence and fleshes out a universe that has proved to be captivating and enthralling enough to maintain enough interest for the final installment. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
EpicLadySpongeJan 3, 2016
For Catching Fire, the games for hunger are really on the rampage and it'll get trickier by movie by movie. Catching Fire, like its predecessor, doesn't really deserve that high score, but it's still a decent movie to watch.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
NikitaBrandtJan 3, 2016
Awesome work from director, set decorator and actor squad. Francis Lawrence proved his professionalism. Also I have to admit music from James Newton.
(Actually I put so high mark probably because I fan of books and this film proved that
Awesome work from director, set decorator and actor squad. Francis Lawrence proved his professionalism. Also I have to admit music from James Newton.
(Actually I put so high mark probably because I fan of books and this film proved that screenplay can be adapt very well)
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
BarneyOnMTJan 5, 2016
WHAT I LIKED: It delves deeper than the first, tinkering with serious themes about political control and freedom. It's great to see the excellent cast and visuals back again too.
WHAT I DIDN'T LIKE: Once the games are being played, it feels
WHAT I LIKED: It delves deeper than the first, tinkering with serious themes about political control and freedom. It's great to see the excellent cast and visuals back again too.
WHAT I DIDN'T LIKE: Once the games are being played, it feels like a rather simular film to the first with fairly little to distinguish them visually, or in any way. It's also too long as a feature where the majority is spent repeating the games in simular fashion to the last one.
VERDICT: It may explore some themes, but it feels like a repetition of the last that's tinkering on the edge of a political thriller. Roll on part 3...
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
mrjurrianvrietApr 27, 2016
I was on the edge of my seat throughout the entire movie. I even cried. It's definitely better than the last Hunger Games. Catching Fire is full of action and has a great build up to the end.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
SrPepeNov 29, 2017
Sin duda esta es la mejor entrega de la saga. Una muy buena película, divertida, con una historia atrapante e interesante y unos nuevos personajes geniales.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
sjultiDec 6, 2016
This is by far the best in the hunger games series its even more action packed than the original, and their is a lot more variety in the cast their more interesting characters introduced, truly an amazing movie.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
MasterRileyJul 20, 2016
The best in the series. In a lot of ways it feels like what the original would of been if just executed better. It essentially does everything better from the original in every way. Bringing on a new director was a great idea, giving forThe best in the series. In a lot of ways it feels like what the original would of been if just executed better. It essentially does everything better from the original in every way. Bringing on a new director was a great idea, giving for better cinematography in particular. The performances, script, action, and production design as well really shine as well. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
AANickFanAug 10, 2016
The best movie in the series. It scared the **** out of us when I watched it with my friends when we were about 10. filler filler filler filler filler
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
ZerpnosMar 16, 2017
İlk filmin aksine daha çok umut dolu ve aksiyonlu geçen, seyir zevki oldukça yüksek bir film olmuş. Gelecek filmlerin daha aksiyonu bol ve umudun çok daha fazla olacağını, şimdiden sezebiliyorum.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
MonkiReviewsMay 28, 2017
The Hunger Games is back, and better. The action parts are amazing, and the start is very good. If you enjoyed the original, this is a must see. The best in the series.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
HPFANBOY1237Apr 9, 2017
The Hunger Games: Catching Fire, is even more emotionally driven and more captivating than the original! Not only that, but the directing is SO much better, this is a gorgeous film.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
JPKJun 24, 2019
Absolutely Mindblowing
Catching Fire not only improves upon it's predecessor, But is also by far one of 2013’s best movies.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
CoreGamer1408Dec 16, 2018
Not as emotionally impactive as the battle royal when it was between teens and little children. This Hunger Games was more about seasoned veterans. The political shenanigans of the Capital in how they tired to keep the district inline wasNot as emotionally impactive as the battle royal when it was between teens and little children. This Hunger Games was more about seasoned veterans. The political shenanigans of the Capital in how they tired to keep the district inline was kind of more interesting than the battle royal itself. Still good, but not as strong as the first film for sure. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
FilipeNetoMay 2, 2020
This film is the second in the adaptation of a literary trilogy by Suzanne Collins. I did not read them, I have no particular intention of doing so for any particular reason, so I will ignore the books and focus on the film, which was alreadyThis film is the second in the adaptation of a literary trilogy by Suzanne Collins. I did not read them, I have no particular intention of doing so for any particular reason, so I will ignore the books and focus on the film, which was already expected for those who saw the first one due to its open ending.

In this film, we continue to follow the story of Katniss Everdeen and Peeta Mellark, the unlikely Hunger Games winners we saw in the first film. They have to live the life of winners, but that life means becoming the target of national scrutiny, thanks to their popularity and the propaganda machine of President Snow, eager to use them to keep people entertained, without thinking about politics. But Katniss, against her will, had become a symbol for those who stand against that totalitarian regime, and Snow decides to organize new games where he can get rid of her in an exemplary way: designed to celebrate the seventy-five years of victory over the rebels, the new games will bring together just the winners from previous editions, knowing in advance that District 12 had only one female winner: Katniss will have to participate.

To begin with, its necessary to say that this film was not directed by the same director as the first. But this is something that the public will only notice if they are very attentive, since it matches, in quality and impact, the initial film. Everything is quite clear, especially if the audience has previously seen the first film (a premise to understand any sequels, of course). And if in the first film we see similarities between Panem and Ancient Rome, these similarities will become more visible as the Snow's regime reveals itself openly dictatorial, totalitarian and established on a cult of personality around him.

Jennifer Lawrence remained in excellent shape, as she had done in the first film. Her entire performance clearly reveals her mixed feelings and her character's intense and strong character. Josh Hutcherson is much better here than in the first film. He takes the initiative, quickly understands what needs to be done to survive the new challenges. Despite that, I can't take Hutcherson seriously and he always sounds strange to me. Okay, the defect may be mine, I admit, but that's how the actor's performance looks to me. Donald Sutherland never seemed so Machiavellian and somber as in this film, in an admirable performance that can be one of the most striking in the actor's recent career. Stanley Tucci was also amazing in the deeply satirical way in which he brought a sensationalist TV host to life. Elizabeth Banks and Woody Harrelson gain even more psychological depth. Philip Seymour Hoffman, Jeffrey Wright, Amanda Plummer, Sam Claflin, Lynn Cohen and Jena Malone also do a good job.

In addition to a great cast and a good story, the film has excellent production values: careful cinematography with good contrast, even better than in the first film; excellent sets and costumes and CGI and sound effects even more spectacular than the first ones. The soundtrack also deserves special mention for its effectiveness and beauty. Composed by James Newton Howard, it is one of those that remains in the ear long after we have seen the film.

Full of action and with an excellent story, this film is excellent and, for those who liked the first one, it will certainly be a must and leave the feeling that it was little. It is worth seeing and will definitely leave your appetite ready for the third film. However, and I repeat what I said in the review of the first film, I do not know how much younger children are prepared to see and, above all, to understand the story told. In addition, prevention remains: it is a film with some violent content and this has to be taken into account by parents and educators.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
4Nick3Apr 25, 2018
This film without a doubt improves on an already fantastic predecessor. Well directed, acted, scripted and filmed, it's the best of the four by a lot.
Rating: A+
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
NolanLundgaardSep 23, 2018
The first Hunger Games movie was amazing, so I was super excited to see its sequel, Catching Fire. All my excitement paid off. Catching Fire was just as good, if not better, than its predecessor. Again, the filmmakers did not drift away fromThe first Hunger Games movie was amazing, so I was super excited to see its sequel, Catching Fire. All my excitement paid off. Catching Fire was just as good, if not better, than its predecessor. Again, the filmmakers did not drift away from the book too much while adding a few original ideas, keeping it interesting. Overall, I had a fantastic experience and I cannot wait to watch Mockingjay: Part 1. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
ErikTheCriticSep 26, 2018
It's brilliantly acted, powerful and emotional. The directing is smooth, more thought-provoking than the first, and is very faithful to the book.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
M0NST3R_G4MINGMay 12, 2019
The Hunger Games: Catching Fire is like its predecessor a good movie. But there were some things that disturbed me a bit, so I found the first part better.

Story: The story's really good. Jennifer Lawrence acted really well as Katniss again!
The Hunger Games: Catching Fire is like its predecessor a good movie. But there were some things that disturbed me a bit, so I found the first part better.

Story: The story's really good. Jennifer Lawrence acted really well as Katniss again! The acting performances in The Hunger Games: Catching Fire are generally credible and very good. However, there is one thing in the story that bothers me extremely: In my opinion, the love story was destroyed. The love story was really good in the first part - and here everything became unbelievable and also very banal. That's what bothered me the most about the whole movie. That doesn't make the movie a bad movie at all. But the story could have been much better.

Effects and Others: The effects in the movie are really good, too. There's nothing wrong with that. I just think that the "Hunger Games" in the first part were better and more exciting. The ending in the second part was quite surprising and could have been a bit better.

Conclusion: All in all "The Hunger Games: Catching Fire" is a really good movie. There are some story technical problems, which could have been better realized, but the movie is still good. Everyone who liked the first part will have fun here too!
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
glommanSep 8, 2021
While it's not as good as its predecessor, it's still quite entertaining. It still feels way too polished for a mainstream audience, also it's still funny that so much time is dedicated to survival techniques, while nobody dies of thirst orWhile it's not as good as its predecessor, it's still quite entertaining. It still feels way too polished for a mainstream audience, also it's still funny that so much time is dedicated to survival techniques, while nobody dies of thirst or hunger in the actual games - ever.
A fun movie with the average bitter YA aftertaste
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
AWESOM-0Apr 27, 2020
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This movie wasn’t bad but I hope it develops and just doesn’t do more of the same in the next movie. If you could compare it to the Enders game story (which you really shouldn’t), this story doesn’t grow and mature enough to make me really enjoy it. Where as the Ender novels did both significantly. Overall, once I got past my issues with the hunger games story/novels I have found these movies enjoyable. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
Dostoyevsky3May 12, 2020
The Hunger Games: Catching Fire improves upon its predecessor with more of the tension driven action through the emotionally clinging characters while taking the film series into a new and exciting direction by an awe-inspiring moment.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
Sosmooth1982Dec 28, 2022
Another boring movie. This whole fake relationship thing too is really annoying. The movie would be better without that. It kind of ruins the movie for me.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
TEMP0Jun 16, 2020
It's a very interesting sci-fi dystopia, especially when it has that Empire Strikes Back step up vibe after its first installment
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
SoapNuggetJul 15, 2020
The Hunger Games Catching Fire is a perfect example of how to adapt a great book into a great movie, being much more enjoyable than the first one.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
mikesgold2KNov 16, 2021
Zgrabna kontynuacja jedynki, robiąca kilka rzeczy lepiej ale też wiele rzeczy gorzej od poprzedniczki. Historia jest nawet ciekawa zaś realizacja lepsza od 1
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
PhoenixReveiwsMay 14, 2021
Overall enjoyed it about the same as the first movie, but I feel like this one was better for one reason. We got to know the characters from the last movie, and we had more time to learn about the world-building and characters before theOverall enjoyed it about the same as the first movie, but I feel like this one was better for one reason. We got to know the characters from the last movie, and we had more time to learn about the world-building and characters before the games. The visuals are better than the last, the acting is great. The story keeps you developed in their world-building. I enjoy this movie as well as the last. The other too I need to watch again. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
MaddoxWhiteApr 24, 2021
A great follow up to the original. Takes what makes it good and expands on it.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
JACOBJORDANBAJun 23, 2021
I love The hunger games Jennifer Lawrence did a good job has katniss everdeen I just love the hunger games I love The hunger games and I love catching fire Mockingjay part 1 and Mockingjay part 2
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
GiugiOct 2, 2022
This movie is very nice and valid especially for the nice tournament finds and for the great way in which everything has been staged the whole. For the rest the film entertains you and is well acted.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
AvmOnOct 22, 2022
It was much better than the first movie. It captured the atmosphere and events from the book well enough.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
Fixer84Mar 17, 2023
The best of the saga. Everything that was the first film, however good, has been made ten times better.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews