Read User Reviews and Submit your own for The Hunger Games: Catching Fire

8

Fixer84Mar 17, 2023

The best of the saga. Everything that was the first film, however good, has been made ten times better.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

Sosmooth1982Dec 28, 2022

Another boring movie. This whole fake relationship thing too is really annoying. The movie would be better without that. It kind of ruins the movie for me.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

AvmOnOct 22, 2022

It was much better than the first movie. It captured the atmosphere and events from the book well enough.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

GiugiOct 2, 2022

This movie is very nice and valid especially for the nice tournament finds and for the great way in which everything has been staged the whole. For the rest the film entertains you and is well acted.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

All_ButTrU4Sep 25, 2022

After the somber power of the first installment the sequel Catching Fire returns even better. Gone is the slow start or uneven pace,no,Catching fire unfurls like a deliberate psychological thriller. We meet Katniss dealing with theAfter the somber power of the first installment the sequel Catching Fire returns even better. Gone is the slow start or uneven pace,no,Catching fire unfurls like a deliberate psychological thriller. We meet Katniss dealing with the ramifications of her protest,refusing to play their game and winning. The tension that permeates scenes between Katniss and president snow are hair raising alongside the appearing cracks of rebellion throughout the districts. What I love about this film and what made it substantially more concise is how it introduces us to ist world,from their Victor's Tour or the contrast in the Quater Quell games prep. Being introduced to the new tributes who aren't actually new but are instead previous Victor's allows for the brutal event to be complicated by experts. It's wonderfully complex and deadlier than it had ever been. The storyline of them figuring out the mechanics of the Arena or their experiences with each of the engineered obstacles proved the most satisfying in the entire franchise. Topped off by the stunning cliffhanger conclusion Catching Fire sits as a great example at delivering blockbuster television with a purpose, human story and action. It's an accessible accomplishment and undoubtedly a landmark in it's genre,ushering an unsuccessful wave of copy cats… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

gracjanskiJul 14, 2022

Better movie than the first one:
The dystopic future state of Panem is still perfectly made, some scenes were genious. Jennifer Lawrence and Josh Hutcherson have better scenes and are convincing here in opposite to the first movie. InBetter movie than the first one:
The dystopic future state of Panem is still perfectly made, some scenes were genious. Jennifer Lawrence and Josh Hutcherson have better scenes and are convincing here in opposite to the first movie. In addition it is a good idea to let adults fights instead of teenagers. The action scenes in the 2nd part are better also. Oh and no shaky cameras.
So why it is still not a 10 movie? Again the 2nd half of the movie isnt good enough.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

JJ2FAS4UDec 30, 2021

----------------------------------6.8/10-----------------------------------

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

mikesgold2KNov 16, 2021

Zgrabna kontynuacja jedynki, robiąca kilka rzeczy lepiej ale też wiele rzeczy gorzej od poprzedniczki. Historia jest nawet ciekawa zaś realizacja lepsza od 1

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

JAKEJACOBJORDSep 17, 2021

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

glommanSep 8, 2021

While it's not as good as its predecessor, it's still quite entertaining. It still feels way too polished for a mainstream audience, also it's still funny that so much time is dedicated to survival techniques, while nobody dies of thirst orWhile it's not as good as its predecessor, it's still quite entertaining. It still feels way too polished for a mainstream audience, also it's still funny that so much time is dedicated to survival techniques, while nobody dies of thirst or hunger in the actual games - ever.
A fun movie with the average bitter YA aftertaste… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

0

imthenoobJan 25, 2014

Catching Fire recycles everything we have already seen in the first film and adds nothing new to lay the groundwork for the future. The plot is as shallow as the characters and the acting suffers as a result. By the time I was halfwayCatching Fire recycles everything we have already seen in the first film and adds nothing new to lay the groundwork for the future. The plot is as shallow as the characters and the acting suffers as a result. By the time I was halfway through, I tuned it out and instead spent the rest of the time ragging on it with my sister.… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

10

JACOBJORDANBAJun 23, 2021

I love The hunger games Jennifer Lawrence did a good job has katniss everdeen I just love the hunger games I love The hunger games and I love catching fire Mockingjay part 1 and Mockingjay part 2

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

PhoenixReveiwsMay 14, 2021

Overall enjoyed it about the same as the first movie, but I feel like this one was better for one reason. We got to know the characters from the last movie, and we had more time to learn about the world-building and characters before theOverall enjoyed it about the same as the first movie, but I feel like this one was better for one reason. We got to know the characters from the last movie, and we had more time to learn about the world-building and characters before the games. The visuals are better than the last, the acting is great. The story keeps you developed in their world-building. I enjoy this movie as well as the last. The other too I need to watch again.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

MaddoxWhiteApr 24, 2021

A great follow up to the original. Takes what makes it good and expands on it.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

zNeverSleepingOct 14, 2020

O longa cumpre seu propósito: estabelece um universo, desenvolve os personagens e dá background para a conclusão da saga.

A desfecho do longa funcionou bem. O plot deixa-nos com um "símbolo de interrogação" na cabeça, fazendo com que aO longa cumpre seu propósito: estabelece um universo, desenvolve os personagens e dá background para a conclusão da saga.

A desfecho do longa funcionou bem. O plot deixa-nos com um "símbolo de interrogação" na cabeça, fazendo com que a curiosidade para as continuações aumente consideravelmente. O desenvolvimento dos personagens é promissor, fundamentando muito a base para os filmes decisivos. Basta assistir os próximos para saber se o "preparo de terreno" realmente resulta em algo.

Audio: English, with portuguese subtitles. Q60T 50' TV Speakers
Quality: 1080p SDR [PrimeVideo]… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

9

SoapNuggetJul 15, 2020

The Hunger Games Catching Fire is a perfect example of how to adapt a great book into a great movie, being much more enjoyable than the first one.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

TEMP0Jun 16, 2020

It's a very interesting sci-fi dystopia, especially when it has that Empire Strikes Back step up vibe after its first installment

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

0

Critic123456798May 17, 2020

Awful, meaningless, meaningless, mediocre ****
Book and film is a waste of time

Suzanne Collins - the most stupid ator rotten scum, without brains

0 of 4 users found this helpful04

All this user's reviews

10

Dostoyevsky3May 12, 2020

The Hunger Games: Catching Fire improves upon its predecessor with more of the tension driven action through the emotionally clinging characters while taking the film series into a new and exciting direction by an awe-inspiring moment.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

FilipeNetoMay 2, 2020

This film is the second in the adaptation of a literary trilogy by Suzanne Collins. I did not read them, I have no particular intention of doing so for any particular reason, so I will ignore the books and focus on the film, which was alreadyThis film is the second in the adaptation of a literary trilogy by Suzanne Collins. I did not read them, I have no particular intention of doing so for any particular reason, so I will ignore the books and focus on the film, which was already expected for those who saw the first one due to its open ending.

In this film, we continue to follow the story of Katniss Everdeen and Peeta Mellark, the unlikely Hunger Games winners we saw in the first film. They have to live the life of winners, but that life means becoming the target of national scrutiny, thanks to their popularity and the propaganda machine of President Snow, eager to use them to keep people entertained, without thinking about politics. But Katniss, against her will, had become a symbol for those who stand against that totalitarian regime, and Snow decides to organize new games where he can get rid of her in an exemplary way: designed to celebrate the seventy-five years of victory over the rebels, the new games will bring together just the winners from previous editions, knowing in advance that District 12 had only one female winner: Katniss will have to participate.

To begin with, its necessary to say that this film was not directed by the same director as the first. But this is something that the public will only notice if they are very attentive, since it matches, in quality and impact, the initial film. Everything is quite clear, especially if the audience has previously seen the first film (a premise to understand any sequels, of course). And if in the first film we see similarities between Panem and Ancient Rome, these similarities will become more visible as the Snow's regime reveals itself openly dictatorial, totalitarian and established on a cult of personality around him.

Jennifer Lawrence remained in excellent shape, as she had done in the first film. Her entire performance clearly reveals her mixed feelings and her character's intense and strong character. Josh Hutcherson is much better here than in the first film. He takes the initiative, quickly understands what needs to be done to survive the new challenges. Despite that, I can't take Hutcherson seriously and he always sounds strange to me. Okay, the defect may be mine, I admit, but that's how the actor's performance looks to me. Donald Sutherland never seemed so Machiavellian and somber as in this film, in an admirable performance that can be one of the most striking in the actor's recent career. Stanley Tucci was also amazing in the deeply satirical way in which he brought a sensationalist TV host to life. Elizabeth Banks and Woody Harrelson gain even more psychological depth. Philip Seymour Hoffman, Jeffrey Wright, Amanda Plummer, Sam Claflin, Lynn Cohen and Jena Malone also do a good job.

In addition to a great cast and a good story, the film has excellent production values: careful cinematography with good contrast, even better than in the first film; excellent sets and costumes and CGI and sound effects even more spectacular than the first ones. The soundtrack also deserves special mention for its effectiveness and beauty. Composed by James Newton Howard, it is one of those that remains in the ear long after we have seen the film.

Full of action and with an excellent story, this film is excellent and, for those who liked the first one, it will certainly be a must and leave the feeling that it was little. It is worth seeing and will definitely leave your appetite ready for the third film. However, and I repeat what I said in the review of the first film, I do not know how much younger children are prepared to see and, above all, to understand the story told. In addition, prevention remains: it is a film with some violent content and this has to be taken into account by parents and educators.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

AWESOM-0Apr 27, 2020

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This movie wasn’t bad but I hope it develops and just doesn’t do more of the same in the next movie. If you could compare it to the Enders game story (which you really shouldn’t), this story doesn’t grow and mature enough to make me really enjoy it. Where as the Ender novels did both significantly. Overall, once I got past my issues with the hunger games story/novels I have found these movies enjoyable.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

bfoore90Nov 20, 2019

Catching Fire is an immense improvement over its predecessor. I didn't read the second book, but just going off of the film its an immediate improvement. The story and direction is much more polished with Francis Lawrence directing instead ofCatching Fire is an immense improvement over its predecessor. I didn't read the second book, but just going off of the film its an immediate improvement. The story and direction is much more polished with Francis Lawrence directing instead of Gary Ross, making the film much more action packed and fun. Jennifer Lawrence returns with the rest of the core cast, with Lawrence's performance continuing to ascend her into stardom.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

JPKJun 24, 2019

Absolutely Mindblowing
Catching Fire not only improves upon it's predecessor, But is also by far one of 2013’s best movies.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

M0NST3R_G4MINGMay 12, 2019

The Hunger Games: Catching Fire is like its predecessor a good movie. But there were some things that disturbed me a bit, so I found the first part better.

Story: The story's really good. Jennifer Lawrence acted really well as Katniss again!The Hunger Games: Catching Fire is like its predecessor a good movie. But there were some things that disturbed me a bit, so I found the first part better.

Story: The story's really good. Jennifer Lawrence acted really well as Katniss again! The acting performances in The Hunger Games: Catching Fire are generally credible and very good. However, there is one thing in the story that bothers me extremely: In my opinion, the love story was destroyed. The love story was really good in the first part - and here everything became unbelievable and also very banal. That's what bothered me the most about the whole movie. That doesn't make the movie a bad movie at all. But the story could have been much better.

Effects and Others: The effects in the movie are really good, too. There's nothing wrong with that. I just think that the "Hunger Games" in the first part were better and more exciting. The ending in the second part was quite surprising and could have been a bit better.

Conclusion: All in all "The Hunger Games: Catching Fire" is a really good movie. There are some story technical problems, which could have been better realized, but the movie is still good. Everyone who liked the first part will have fun here too!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

CoreGamer1408Dec 16, 2018

Not as emotionally impactive as the battle royal when it was between teens and little children. This Hunger Games was more about seasoned veterans. The political shenanigans of the Capital in how they tired to keep the district inline wasNot as emotionally impactive as the battle royal when it was between teens and little children. This Hunger Games was more about seasoned veterans. The political shenanigans of the Capital in how they tired to keep the district inline was kind of more interesting than the battle royal itself. Still good, but not as strong as the first film for sure.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

ErikTheCriticSep 26, 2018

It's brilliantly acted, powerful and emotional. The directing is smooth, more thought-provoking than the first, and is very faithful to the book.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

NolanLundgaardSep 23, 2018

The first Hunger Games movie was amazing, so I was super excited to see its sequel, Catching Fire. All my excitement paid off. Catching Fire was just as good, if not better, than its predecessor. Again, the filmmakers did not drift away fromThe first Hunger Games movie was amazing, so I was super excited to see its sequel, Catching Fire. All my excitement paid off. Catching Fire was just as good, if not better, than its predecessor. Again, the filmmakers did not drift away from the book too much while adding a few original ideas, keeping it interesting. Overall, I had a fantastic experience and I cannot wait to watch Mockingjay: Part 1.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

DyliebarAug 3, 2018

Saying Catching Fire is an improvement over the first is a huge understatement!

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

10

4Nick3Apr 25, 2018

This film without a doubt improves on an already fantastic predecessor. Well directed, acted, scripted and filmed, it's the best of the four by a lot.
Rating: A+

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

SrPepeNov 29, 2017

Sin duda esta es la mejor entrega de la saga. Una muy buena película, divertida, con una historia atrapante e interesante y unos nuevos personajes geniales.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

spongeswiftJul 5, 2017

Best movie in the series. Catching Fire managed to take the good things in the first movie and make them better and basically threw away all of the bad problems and brought in some new ones like the movies feeling too empty.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

akino3May 31, 2017

I couldn't even get a single guess right! That's how surprising things were in Hunger Games: Catching Fire. Once again, the film keeps you on your toes, questions who you should trust and rewards you with its best possible ending. This isI couldn't even get a single guess right! That's how surprising things were in Hunger Games: Catching Fire. Once again, the film keeps you on your toes, questions who you should trust and rewards you with its best possible ending. This is hunger games, you know it won't disappoint!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

MonkiReviewsMay 28, 2017

The Hunger Games is back, and better. The action parts are amazing, and the start is very good. If you enjoyed the original, this is a must see. The best in the series.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

HPFANBOY1237Apr 9, 2017

The Hunger Games: Catching Fire, is even more emotionally driven and more captivating than the original! Not only that, but the directing is SO much better, this is a gorgeous film.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

ZerpnosMar 16, 2017

İlk filmin aksine daha çok umut dolu ve aksiyonlu geçen, seyir zevki oldukça yüksek bir film olmuş. Gelecek filmlerin daha aksiyonu bol ve umudun çok daha fazla olacağını, şimdiden sezebiliyorum.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

FreedomFightersJan 8, 2017

After the outstanding critical and commercial success of "The Hunger Games," it was pretty clear that the second book, "Catching Fire," would be adapted into a film. And sure enough, it happened, this time directed by Francis Lawrence insteadAfter the outstanding critical and commercial success of "The Hunger Games," it was pretty clear that the second book, "Catching Fire," would be adapted into a film. And sure enough, it happened, this time directed by Francis Lawrence instead of Gary Ross. How did Francis Lawrence do? Excellent! "The Hunger Games: Catching Fire" is a smart, polished, and confident sequel that's wonderfully written, action-packed, extremely exciting and extremely entertaining, all while featuring a phenomenal performance from Jennifer Lawrence. If you're a fan of the series, you absolutely must watch "The Hunger Games: Catching Fire."… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

Jack97Dec 17, 2016

This is how you do a sequel! More emotion, more (better filmed) action and a more interesting plot. Pretty much everything about Catching Fire is better than the first film, and I liked the first film.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

sjultiDec 6, 2016

This is by far the best in the hunger games series its even more action packed than the original, and their is a lot more variety in the cast their more interesting characters introduced, truly an amazing movie.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

Iky009Nov 27, 2016

The second part of the saga stands out, improves and deepens the plot and its characters, the action scenes have evolved, they have become better, this is for sure the best film of the franchise.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

AANickFanAug 10, 2016

The best movie in the series. It scared the **** out of us when I watched it with my friends when we were about 10. filler filler filler filler filler

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

4

TokyochuchuJul 25, 2016

The Hunger Games: Catching Fire is a poor sequel that has little in the way of payoff or excitement. Plus the ending leaves you with a very, very annoying cliffhanger. And the movie it's way overlong to boot.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

MasterRileyJul 20, 2016

The best in the series. In a lot of ways it feels like what the original would of been if just executed better. It essentially does everything better from the original in every way. Bringing on a new director was a great idea, giving forThe best in the series. In a lot of ways it feels like what the original would of been if just executed better. It essentially does everything better from the original in every way. Bringing on a new director was a great idea, giving for better cinematography in particular. The performances, script, action, and production design as well really shine as well.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

ElucidateMay 1, 2016

A significant improve on the first film. Great interpretation of the setting/scenery and better pacing. The series seems to be more established overall.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

mrjurrianvrietApr 27, 2016

I was on the edge of my seat throughout the entire movie. I even cried. It's definitely better than the last Hunger Games. Catching Fire is full of action and has a great build up to the end.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

aadityamudharApr 17, 2016

A development upon the first film in many ways, Catching Fire does require a little more subtlety in the delivery of its overall message, but still combines glamour with violence and fleshes out a universe that has proved to be captivatingA development upon the first film in many ways, Catching Fire does require a little more subtlety in the delivery of its overall message, but still combines glamour with violence and fleshes out a universe that has proved to be captivating and enthralling enough to maintain enough interest for the final installment.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

3

SpangleApr 3, 2016

Here is a sequel that lives up to the hype of the original. The Hunger Games: Saving Peeta is a worthy sequel to a really awful first installment. Equally as bad, this sequel features terrible acting, even worse writing, and a stupidly inaneHere is a sequel that lives up to the hype of the original. The Hunger Games: Saving Peeta is a worthy sequel to a really awful first installment. Equally as bad, this sequel features terrible acting, even worse writing, and a stupidly inane plot that shows Katniss rebelling against everyone she encounters and pouting for two and a half hours. Before I go further, Liam Hemsworth is a horrifically bad actor. Whew lad does he ever suck. The film is an entirely grating experience featuring the weirdo hair designs of the first film. Even worse though, it strands its actors in a hopeless wasteland of ineptitude that even the best actor would struggle to find success in. Ultimately, this feels more like a bloody version of Gossip Girl than it does a truly engaging dystopian science fiction film, which I feel like is not the goal. The dialogue is cringe-inducing and falls flat nearly 100% of the time. The ending is telegraphed from the start, so when it finally happens, you are left to roll your eyes and thank God it is over. Overall, Catching Fire is a bad movie that does have good special effects, but fails in every other arena. If this film were in the Hunger Games, it would be die second. The original would die first.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

BarneyOnMTJan 5, 2016

WHAT I LIKED: It delves deeper than the first, tinkering with serious themes about political control and freedom. It's great to see the excellent cast and visuals back again too.
WHAT I DIDN'T LIKE: Once the games are being played, it feelsWHAT I LIKED: It delves deeper than the first, tinkering with serious themes about political control and freedom. It's great to see the excellent cast and visuals back again too.
WHAT I DIDN'T LIKE: Once the games are being played, it feels like a rather simular film to the first with fairly little to distinguish them visually, or in any way. It's also too long as a feature where the majority is spent repeating the games in simular fashion to the last one.
VERDICT: It may explore some themes, but it feels like a repetition of the last that's tinkering on the edge of a political thriller. Roll on part 3...… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

NikitaBrandtJan 3, 2016

Awesome work from director, set decorator and actor squad. Francis Lawrence proved his professionalism. Also I have to admit music from James Newton.
(Actually I put so high mark probably because I fan of books and this film proved thatAwesome work from director, set decorator and actor squad. Francis Lawrence proved his professionalism. Also I have to admit music from James Newton.
(Actually I put so high mark probably because I fan of books and this film proved that screenplay can be adapt very well)… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

EpicLadySpongeJan 3, 2016

For Catching Fire, the games for hunger are really on the rampage and it'll get trickier by movie by movie. Catching Fire, like its predecessor, doesn't really deserve that high score, but it's still a decent movie to watch.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

gdiego135Dec 4, 2015

Not as great as the first one (my opinion) but still a great movie with beautiful visuals and nice special effects, worth watching. Man Katniss Everdeen is a BADASS!!!!!

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

CineAutoctonoDec 2, 2015

Here the second installment of The Hunger Games , vassalage , and the most dramatic chapter of Katniss Everdeen , and said perhaps the best chapter in the saga, since the return to more interesting game until the hour fictional PanemHere the second installment of The Hunger Games , vassalage , and the most dramatic chapter of Katniss Everdeen , and said perhaps the best chapter in the saga, since the return to more interesting game until the hour fictional Panem Rebellion Mockingjay , Primordial !… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

diogomendesAug 28, 2015

Good movie with great acting and excellent cinematography, and its themes are compelling. Could've been better, for sure, but this an otherwise emotionally resonant and an entertaining film that will appease fans of the novel source, as wellGood movie with great acting and excellent cinematography, and its themes are compelling. Could've been better, for sure, but this an otherwise emotionally resonant and an entertaining film that will appease fans of the novel source, as well as those who are unfamiliar with it.

Final Score: 7.5/10… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

xDaudexAug 21, 2015

Without trying to over-hype the movie I would like to say this is one of the best movies I have ever seen. I would stress that you should watch the first movie before this one, otherwise it will not be nearly as good.

Pros: SwitchesWithout trying to over-hype the movie I would like to say this is one of the best movies I have ever seen. I would stress that you should watch the first movie before this one, otherwise it will not be nearly as good.

Pros:
Switches traditional gender roles
World building
Extremely exciting story developments

Cons:
Some sections of the story seem rushed, though this is a typical issue when converting a book to a movie. This is less of an issue that it was in the first movie.
The amount of people left at any given time is not stated as often as it should
There is more of a natural disaster approach to the deaths than conflict between people like the first one. I find the latter more interesting.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

43in2014Aug 1, 2015

Prior to watching this: I have seen the first film but have not read any of the books.

Premise: After wining the previous Hunger Games, Katniss is forced to enter the next one by the President, so she would be killed and the rebellionPrior to watching this: I have seen the first film but have not read any of the books.

Premise: After wining the previous Hunger Games, Katniss is forced to enter the next one by the President, so she would be killed and the rebellion defeated.

Pros:
1). This has a good story and good action.

Cons: I
1). Though there are significant differences to the first film, it's not as original as the first film.

Score: 4/5 (no half scores) - Good enough to pay to watch it in the cinema.

Who would be satisfied with this film? All Hunger Games fans, most teens and most adults.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

moonman1994May 19, 2015

Although a very entertaining The Hunger Games: Catching Fire is not as exciting of a return to the world of the Hunger Games as one would like. A large flaw, like in the original film, is that the directing and writing seems to be centeredAlthough a very entertaining The Hunger Games: Catching Fire is not as exciting of a return to the world of the Hunger Games as one would like. A large flaw, like in the original film, is that the directing and writing seems to be centered around maintaining a PG-13 rating. However the movie is still solid and continues to have great acting jobs by the entire cast, and keeps the view excited to see the next installation in the series.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

homer4presidentMar 13, 2015

The Hunger Games: Catching Fire is a rare dystopian action flick packed with enough smarts to back up its subtext and provocative themes. Even when things get extremely brutal, we're always gripped by the constantly unnerving events andThe Hunger Games: Catching Fire is a rare dystopian action flick packed with enough smarts to back up its subtext and provocative themes. Even when things get extremely brutal, we're always gripped by the constantly unnerving events and complex character detail.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

9

JohnMasterLMar 9, 2015

THE HUNGER GAMES: CATCHING FIRE es de esas secuelas que son MUCHO mejor que su primera parte. Posiblemente fue por el cambio del Director: Francis Lawrence (anteriormente Gary Ross) porque en si la pelicula se siente diferente a su primeraTHE HUNGER GAMES: CATCHING FIRE es de esas secuelas que son MUCHO mejor que su primera parte. Posiblemente fue por el cambio del Director: Francis Lawrence (anteriormente Gary Ross) porque en si la pelicula se siente diferente a su primera parte, se siente mas madura, mas oscura, mas fuerte y poderosa que THE HUNGER GAMES. Tengo que destacar que CATCHING FIRE es de las mejores adaptaciones literarias que e visto en los últimos años, respeta cada pagina del libro, tiene detalles distintos, pero estos no afectan en nada a la historia original. Las actuaciones, la dirección, los efectos y el guion son por mucho mejores que su antecesora, en esta segunda parte veras mas violencia, mas criticas hacia el gobierno, rebeliones, y sobre todo, una pelicula mas Adulta.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

matt_2905Feb 21, 2015

This sequel is spectacular, a huge improvement over the first. It was gritty, edgy and politically refined. Its a glorious triumph for Lionsgate, bring on Mockingjay (part 1 and 2)

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

DBPirate1129Jan 11, 2015

With a much better plot, Catching Fire greatly improves upon its predecessor. Great new characters along with the same amazing quality of visual effects we saw in the first film make this a tough competitor for Mockingjay Part 1.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

talhalafciDec 20, 2014

Absolute perfection.Best of its series, best of its genre, beyond science fiction and adventure, The Hunger Games: Catching Fire is a thrilling dark drama.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

TheDarkKnight22Nov 30, 2014

This movie was a lot better than the first hunger games movie. it had a lot better plot than the first movie. They explained more, and it kept me entertained throughout the whole movie.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

MovieGuysNov 23, 2014

A little better than the previous Hunger Games, Catching Fire gets all of the YA movie ingredients right, and treats them with the maturity and development they deserve. The shaky cam and bad cinematography that hurt the first film is greatlyA little better than the previous Hunger Games, Catching Fire gets all of the YA movie ingredients right, and treats them with the maturity and development they deserve. The shaky cam and bad cinematography that hurt the first film is greatly improved here, making this one the best of the series so far.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

CherryxldNov 23, 2014

Una película entretenida, que te deja con las ganas de ver "The Hunger Games: Mokingjay - Part 1", contiene una buena dirección artística, y el trabajo de Trish Summerville en el vestuario lo hace ser merecedor de no solo la nominación alUna película entretenida, que te deja con las ganas de ver "The Hunger Games: Mokingjay - Part 1", contiene una buena dirección artística, y el trabajo de Trish Summerville en el vestuario lo hace ser merecedor de no solo la nominación al Oscar si no también el galardón, esta película sin duda es una de las mejores del año, que en mi opinión, es mejor que "Gravity", y por mucho.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

CPD98Nov 22, 2014

Otro rollo para adolescentes, como la primera, pero peor.
"En llamas" es un copiar y pegar de la original, mas aburrida aún si cabe.
La parte en que no están los juegos se hace lenta y pesada, no ofrece nada interesante, y cuando salen losOtro rollo para adolescentes, como la primera, pero peor.
"En llamas" es un copiar y pegar de la original, mas aburrida aún si cabe.
La parte en que no están los juegos se hace lenta y pesada, no ofrece nada interesante, y cuando salen los juegos... bueno, tampoco es que mejore mucho.
Llega al 5 raspado y da gracias, la gente que dice que esto es perfecto, en serio, sabéis poco o nada de cine.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

JacobNov 17, 2014

Usually when I watch a film adaptation of a book I find it hard to enjoy it. I’ve read the source material and am often comparing it to the book. Maybe it’s the fact that the book isn’t as fresh in my mind as with other film adaptations ofUsually when I watch a film adaptation of a book I find it hard to enjoy it. I’ve read the source material and am often comparing it to the book. Maybe it’s the fact that the book isn’t as fresh in my mind as with other film adaptations of books, maybe it’s the fact that the filmmakers actually cared about making a good movie, or maybe its both but this is one of those rare moments where I really enjoyed the adaptation. Often in Hollywood the adaptation is either an massively trimmed down version of the story (ex. the later Harry Potter films and Ender’s Game) or excessive padding (ex. The Hobbit films) so it is nice to see a film that does it right. Not only is Catching Fire a really good adaptation of a pretty solid book and in doing so creates a far superior sequel that serves as The Empire Strikes Back of the franchise (although Empire Strikes Back is in a whole different ball game). Even though by the time I’ve written this review the film has been out for almost a year this is a must watch for Hunger Games fans (both of the book and the film). Fans will be delighted to see a faithful adaptation of the book that hits most of the key points and for the most part is the book they remember (with some exceptions but nothing too distracting or annoying). The story covers most of the key moments and doesn’t gloss over too much, the characters are given time to breath and are well acted, and the direction is far superior to its predecessor. Catching Fire is one of those rare sequels that is better than its predecessor and one of those rare film adaptations of books that does its job well. With the franchise having two good films under its belt I worry about Mockingjay. With the third book being my least favorite this could be to Hunger Games what Spider-Man 3, X-Men 3: The Last Stand, and Pirates of the Caribbean: At World’s End where to their franchise the threequel that ruined everything. It doesn’t help that is being split into two films. For now lets enjoy the middle installment, which will probably be remembered as the best of the franchise and good film in its own right. If you love the book and are worried this film will ruin it don’t this franchise is in good hands shame I can’t say the same for the Hobbit films.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

8

vikesh2206Nov 10, 2014

With a deeper exploration of the ones behind the Hunger Games, this sequel retains the glory of the book, adds an aura of political astuteness and obviously the brains and brawns of the cast.

3 of 4 users found this helpful31

All this user's reviews

5

jasper6333Nov 4, 2014

well i finally watched the movie and well i must say i am just dissapointed, the plot of this movie does not make a lot of sense. the ending is just weird. well okay lets shoot this barbed arrow at the lightning. the arena breaks down andwell i finally watched the movie and well i must say i am just dissapointed, the plot of this movie does not make a lot of sense. the ending is just weird. well okay lets shoot this barbed arrow at the lightning. the arena breaks down and wow there are the good guys, seriously how the **** did these guys know what Katniss would do and when, overall acting is mediocre. what a dissapointment… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

SythusRATINGSOct 19, 2014

The Hunger Games: Catching Fire begins as Katniss Everdeen returns home safe after winning the 74th Annual Hunger Games along with fellow tribute Peeta Mellark. Winning means that they must turn around and leave their family and closeThe Hunger Games: Catching Fire begins as Katniss Everdeen returns home safe after winning the 74th Annual Hunger Games along with fellow tribute Peeta Mellark. Winning means that they must turn around and leave their family and close friends, embarking on a Victor's Tour of the districts. Along the way Katniss senses that a rebellion is simmering, but the Capitol is still very much in control as President Snow prepares the 75th Annual Hunger Games (The Quarter Quell), a competition that could change Panem forever.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

AdsonOct 15, 2014

Oh my goodness, this continuation is awesome and I can't wait for the next. The performance of the Cast, mainly Jennifer and Josh was incredible and the romance between Katniss and Peeta came so much better than the first movie, It would beOh my goodness, this continuation is awesome and I can't wait for the next. The performance of the Cast, mainly Jennifer and Josh was incredible and the romance between Katniss and Peeta came so much better than the first movie, It would be horrible if Peeta die. The story during the course of the movie go getting better and better until the epic end. The story isn't disappointing and the acting scenes is very good. I can't think in something that I would change.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

4

ShenziOct 12, 2014

410 Simply because the first half of the movie is brilliant. Everything is laid out well and enjoyable.

Second half.. Is a horrible trainwreck. It's amazing to see something that has done this so well in the past flump at it now. The410 Simply because the first half of the movie is brilliant. Everything is laid out well and enjoyable.

Second half.. Is a horrible trainwreck. It's amazing to see something that has done this so well in the past flump at it now.

The second half provides a story that is all over the place and it's really weird how short it feels. It's like you get a smooth massage the first half and then the second half it feels like the movie is being forced into your head. Trying to make sense of what is going on.

It gets a 4 because it's the second half that is bad. It's kind of like cheap soda, it tastes sweet at first but then the horrible aftertaste makes you regret taking a sip… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

3

BigZOct 7, 2014

Ugh, here we go again. Needless to say, I didn't watch this willingly and I am not wrong to have opposed watching it having now seen it. I have no experience with The Hunger Games books and perhaps that is what makes me so uninspired whileUgh, here we go again. Needless to say, I didn't watch this willingly and I am not wrong to have opposed watching it having now seen it. I have no experience with The Hunger Games books and perhaps that is what makes me so uninspired while watching the movies. Or maybe its the whiny teens with no acting skills or screen presence. Could possibly be the approach the director has on the whole absolute power over the people idea that through this movie makes it seem...fruity somehow. In any case, I find few things to like about this. It is better than Maze Runner, but that doesn't say much. Jennifer Lawrence just does not do it for me. The random mood swings and screams and freak outs from no where. Is she even mentally sound anymore? And this girl is the MOCKING JAY? The savior and leader of the rebellion? She just is not cast right as far as the female leader hardened warrior type she needs to be in a movie setting. You know, you are allowed to make movies based on popular books that still can help the non-reader keep up and understand what's going on and why certain characters do things. It isn't all that difficult. Up against its teen movie competitors, this isn't the worst. Not that that says much, I'm just bothered by movies so hyped up that are worth very little. Phillip Hoffman, Liam Hemsworth, Woody Harrelson, Donald Sutherland, all acting below their talents and abilities...ugh wasted. It was cool to see Lenny Kravitz and Stanley Tucci though.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

pierremSep 28, 2014

I don't think a movie aimed for teenage girls can be any better. In this view, 10/10 is deserved. But as an actual film, 7 seems fair to me. Maybe even 8.

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

2

LJHayesSep 24, 2014

I don't get it. I just do not get it. The first Hunger Games was an unoriginal, monotonous mess. This film (while there are marginal improvements) is essentially a re-hash of the same thing. The first hour is almost a scene for sceneI don't get it. I just do not get it. The first Hunger Games was an unoriginal, monotonous mess. This film (while there are marginal improvements) is essentially a re-hash of the same thing. The first hour is almost a scene for scene re-enactment of the previous film just with a bit more of the bad guys doing bad guy things. Then finally the actual hunger games starts about 80 minutes in and 90% of it happens off screen while we're shown a bunch of exciting shots of our protagonists walking, sitting, climbing trees or struggling with their forced love triangle. It's a thrill ride.
A big TV in the sky tells us that a bunch of disposable background characters died off screen which I guess we're supposed to care about but I can't help thinking it would've been way more involving if the main characters had come into some kind of conflict with them at any point rather than facing off against CGI smoke and monkies.
Speaking of the main characters, there is no development on them from the first film. Katniss remains a sullen, brooding misery while Peeta continues to play the role of damsel in distress (much like the first film, almost every scene he is involved in features him moaning about something or needing to be rescued). The supporting characters like Finnick and Johanna are way more entertaining to watch since they actually have some semblance of a personality. Then there's Elizabeth Banks' horrific attempt at an English accent which is almost physically painful to the ear.
So while I have to admit that this is an improvement on the first film, that really isn't saying much. It is beyond me why this is so popular. The story has been done before, the characters are completely unrelatable and the visuals and writing aren't exactly exceptional.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

7

beingryanjudeSep 2, 2014

A superb follow-up to the the first of the series, Catching Fire proves the trilogy's worth amidst Harry Potter and the Lord of the Rings. By Catching Fire, Jennifer Lawrence is well on her way to become America's finest young actress--everA superb follow-up to the the first of the series, Catching Fire proves the trilogy's worth amidst Harry Potter and the Lord of the Rings. By Catching Fire, Jennifer Lawrence is well on her way to become America's finest young actress--ever present here.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

7

oblique15Aug 23, 2014

This was definitely a step up from the first Hunger games. It gets deeper into whats going on outside of the games and that caught my interest. The ending makes you me believe the next one will be a step even better.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

1

MuryAug 2, 2014

So producers be like:
-So what do we do in this next movie?
-Idk man I was busy buying stuff with the money we got from the first release $$$ -Let's just throw in the same stuff we put in the first movie,Katness and Peeta get in the gameSo producers be like:
-So what do we do in this next movie?
-Idk man I was busy buying stuff with the money we got from the first release $$$
-Let's just throw in the same stuff we put in the first movie,Katness and Peeta get in the game again,they kiss,they **** Gale he's a looser,he didn't fight in the dome as Peeta did and because Peeta couldn't find a suitable girlfriend even after all that
-Yeah man! that's good! And let's say there will be a rebelion which will **** the Capitol but we won't show any of that lol
-Ooh that's good,let's keep all that for the 3rd one.Alright people,let's do this !
All that being said,wake up people! You've just watched a rerun of the first movie which could've contained all the new stuff if it was 20 mins longer.If there is anything I appreciate about this movie is that it taught me to trust my intuition when I think my gf likes someone else but she says I'm the only one.There is proof that she is most probably surely lying.Thx for reading :)… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

mockingjay20Jul 21, 2014

Jennifer Lawrence as Katniss is spectacular, the hunger games catching fire is much better than its predecessor, is visually beautiful, it is a glory to see, Josh Hutcherson as Peeta is beautiful. THE HUNGER GAMES IS THE BEST YEAR EXPERIENCE.Jennifer Lawrence as Katniss is spectacular, the hunger games catching fire is much better than its predecessor, is visually beautiful, it is a glory to see, Josh Hutcherson as Peeta is beautiful. THE HUNGER GAMES IS THE BEST YEAR EXPERIENCE. NO falls into clichés and stereotypes, is pure drama and action. TO THE FULLEST EXTENT SPECTACULAR OF THE WORD.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

elsylorenaJul 19, 2014

Supera por mucho a la primera, posee unos mejores efectos visuales, un gran vestuario y maquillaje, aunque con un guión un tanto pobre, pero con actuaciones muy buenas, una magnifica dirección de Francis Lawrence, y es casi como si te leyeranSupera por mucho a la primera, posee unos mejores efectos visuales, un gran vestuario y maquillaje, aunque con un guión un tanto pobre, pero con actuaciones muy buenas, una magnifica dirección de Francis Lawrence, y es casi como si te leyeran el libro.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

0

HoraceBagusJul 18, 2014

Ya kids killing eachother, just what I wanted to see, sandy hook massacre must get even better ratings? You sick fuks? Me thinks not, no creativity whatsoever

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

8

Kylenine1Jun 16, 2014

I love the story and the special effects are good. The only bad side to this movie is that sadly we've been here before with the first film. I think I sort of went in knowing what this film was going to be like. I wouldn't be surprised if theI love the story and the special effects are good. The only bad side to this movie is that sadly we've been here before with the first film. I think I sort of went in knowing what this film was going to be like. I wouldn't be surprised if the last two movies are scored lower than the first two. I think the first one is the best. Whenever a new movie comes out you don't know what to expect, will it be good, or will it be bad? No one knows until someone sees it. The one thing I've seen over the years is in all genres especially in action and horror films the special effects have gotten way better. Catching Fire is an awesome sequel, but if there's one Hunger Game film to watch over and over again, it's without a doubt, the first film will always be the best.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

8

mrniceJun 13, 2014

It kept me excited but also provided food for thought. I love how the whole of it reflects back on the viewer... we witness first-hand how seductively entertaining a show like Hunger Games would be. But while watching the show, we get theIt kept me excited but also provided food for thought. I love how the whole of it reflects back on the viewer... we witness first-hand how seductively entertaining a show like Hunger Games would be. But while watching the show, we get the benefit of seeing through the lies and peaking into the backstage drama, which has more depth in this sequel. The ending surprised me. Recommended!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

bradtheman123Jun 11, 2014

First of all I'd like to start out saying that I think this second one was better than the first. What amazes me the most about this is that the movie/story/book/author/director were able to keep the whole series going with this book. ThemFirst of all I'd like to start out saying that I think this second one was better than the first. What amazes me the most about this is that the movie/story/book/author/director were able to keep the whole series going with this book. Them thinking of a way to keep it going in such a clever fashion amazes me. This I think is better than the first because not only did it portray the story better but it did it in a way that gets me excited and suspended. Movie over book, but only for this second one, catching fire, for the first it would have had to be a whole different conversation.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

Ed_Jun 11, 2014

Briefly: waited for a movie like that one for a long time.

This Hunger Games film is much more about than killing. It's about love, deception, cruelty, politics, deception and humanity in a great mix. I'm extremely interested in politicsBriefly: waited for a movie like that one for a long time.

This Hunger Games film is much more about than killing. It's about love, deception, cruelty, politics, deception and humanity in a great mix. I'm extremely interested in politics and humanity, so this movie is absolutely for me. I enjoyed every minute of it.
Actors are perfect, they know how and when they have to show emotions.
Effects are also enthralling.
All in all, creators had a lot of work with this film but achieved an unbelievably incredible sequel.

Keep up the good work!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

StaticSpineMay 29, 2014

Once again I liked the pre-games dystopian sequences, but this times the games were more intense and the whole story becomes more complex. I like the fact that the plot moves from hunger games to revolution. Overall, this part is slightlyOnce again I liked the pre-games dystopian sequences, but this times the games were more intense and the whole story becomes more complex. I like the fact that the plot moves from hunger games to revolution. Overall, this part is slightly better than the first movie.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

IMAX500May 22, 2014

This movie was 30% Train wreck. because when cattiness and peeta arrive in some other place, some guy got shot and I didn't know why? Now I know because they think he was causing trouble.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

travellynMay 10, 2014

very much darker than the last book and film director francis lawrence knew what to leave in the book it is impressively directed and wonderfully written by the creator of the dark world as well as great acting this is one film the cast andvery much darker than the last book and film director francis lawrence knew what to leave in the book it is impressively directed and wonderfully written by the creator of the dark world as well as great acting this is one film the cast and crew were very careful with… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

RamonGuerreroMay 2, 2014

It is not very common that a sequel turns out to be better than the original, but somehow here's Catching Fire, with an awesome performance by Lawrence and better CGI that makes this movie an amazing experience.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

2

WheatersApr 26, 2014

I liked the original Hunger Games, but this second instalment was very disappointing. A lot of action at night, so we can't see what's happening. Too much of the movie was spent in the pre Hunger Games bit. The actual Hunger Games actionI liked the original Hunger Games, but this second instalment was very disappointing. A lot of action at night, so we can't see what's happening. Too much of the movie was spent in the pre Hunger Games bit. The actual Hunger Games action seemed too fake. It was action for actions sake, with no continuity or reason. Talking about continuity - every time you see Catniss, she has a different number of arrows in her quiver! Acid smoke that just stops, then magic water! Too ridiculous. I won't be watching the next instalment.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

jmayApr 20, 2014

this is a great 2nd movie to the hunger games except it has a stupid ending which means i cant wait till the 1 st par of mocking jay (a 2 part 3rd movie for the hunger games) to come out in november 2014

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

Viper8787Apr 18, 2014

The first 30 minutes of this movie I was wondering whit was getting such high praise. And then it started to pickup and now I know why. Once the hunger games part started it was so good. And the ending was great. I cant wait for the next oneThe first 30 minutes of this movie I was wondering whit was getting such high praise. And then it started to pickup and now I know why. Once the hunger games part started it was so good. And the ending was great. I cant wait for the next one to come out.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

lkalibaApr 14, 2014

The Hunger Games: Catching Fire is definitely an improvement upon the first film. With a deeper emotional depth and a better look at the series themes, and let's not forget an amazing lead performance from Academy-Award-Winner: Jennifer Lawrence.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

jppl1999Apr 12, 2014

A young-adult franchise movie that reflects concretely the message from the book with an almost prefect performance from Jennifer Lawrence as Katniss Everdeen.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

BobboApr 11, 2014

I like science fiction. I like post apocalyptic stories. I like dystopian stories. I like smart original stories. I like the Hunger Games. It's a fine story about an Atheist utopia where everyone's happy and peaceful and life is goodI like science fiction. I like post apocalyptic stories. I like dystopian stories. I like smart original stories. I like the Hunger Games. It's a fine story about an Atheist utopia where everyone's happy and peaceful and life is good without gawd.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

firstevil87Apr 3, 2014

Catching fire is a movie based on the second book of the hunger games trilogy.
It actually managed to stay true to the source material even though it could be difficult to follow for newcomers. Some cuts had to be made in order to fit in theCatching fire is a movie based on the second book of the hunger games trilogy.
It actually managed to stay true to the source material even though it could be difficult to follow for newcomers. Some cuts had to be made in order to fit in the movie-time vs book-time but they do not harm the story flow.
Katniss Everdeen is the main character, surviving the first deadly edition of the hunger games and now trying to find a way to elaborate what happened to her while trying to move on with her life.
What she doesn't know is that her actions are inspiring a revolt in the whole world, so she must decide if obeying the capitol rules or be the "mockingjay" and be the embodyment of the spark of the rebellion.
The story is captivating from start to finish, new additions to the cast are welcome and well rounded enough to be likable and relatable.
Main problem is that it ends on a big cliffhanger wich will see its resolutions in the two upcoming films.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

1

NAQURATORApr 2, 2014

probably a good book and story, but translate this into a movie and you get nothing worth watching. The first movie was basically the tournament or the condemned with kids, bad story but still entertaining to watch. The only problem is I hadprobably a good book and story, but translate this into a movie and you get nothing worth watching. The first movie was basically the tournament or the condemned with kids, bad story but still entertaining to watch. The only problem is I had the same expectations from this movie, 1 hour of survival fights, since I just don't care about the story because of the first movie... Well guess what, in this one they fight like 20 min and for the rest they talk about their totally bizar society that doesn't hold together and for one reason or another I hated every single one of the costumes in this movie. It's like we're set back 50 years. So yeah if u liked the story good for you but if you just watch this for the sake of entertainment you're going to fall a sleep. I really can't figure out what it is exactly but I really didn't like this movie. In my opinion this is just a really bad movie.

just my opinion… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

8

InspectorJavertApr 1, 2014

Catching Fire tops it's predecessor in almost every way. The actors have grown more comfortable in their roles, as the acting has improved greatly. The special effects are far better than what we got the last time around. And CeasarCatching Fire tops it's predecessor in almost every way. The actors have grown more comfortable in their roles, as the acting has improved greatly. The special effects are far better than what we got the last time around. And Ceasar Flickerman is twenty times funnier. The first hour of the movie solely focuses on the political tensions of Panem, and it is very well done. I even got scared by President Snow. (Not to mention the Peacekeepers actually look intimidating now). We also get to know more about victors that have been reaped for the 75 Hunger Games. This is a nice change from what we got in the last movie, "Cato bad! Marvel bad! They big! Kill! Run!" When we get to the Games, the movie retains all of it's tension from earlier and adds a nice layer of action to top it off. And there's almost no shaky camera this time. The two Mockingjay sequels are going to have to work hard to not be overshadowed.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

DrewtheDude85Mar 28, 2014

When I saw the first Hunger Games film, I enjoyed it but I went into it without reading the book at all. So I made sure that I read the books before the next film came out and I enjoyed the book enough to where I got really hyped for theWhen I saw the first Hunger Games film, I enjoyed it but I went into it without reading the book at all. So I made sure that I read the books before the next film came out and I enjoyed the book enough to where I got really hyped for the Catching Fire movie and it was amazing!! I enjoyed this movie so much and it was a lot better than the first Hunger Games movie. It had some great drama and suspense to keep me captive around the action scenes. The locations were also cool and I liked that they seemed more open and fleshed out in this movie than the first film. The characters were good, the acting was good, everything in this film is great. This is a one of kind film that I think sci-fi and dystopia fans will really enjoy, even if they didn't read the book.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

Rox22Mar 24, 2014

Kind of funny that the Hunger games of this movie only happen just over 80 minutes in. Plus this movie's version is ALLOT tamer and shorter than the first movie.

For the most part this movies real focus is the politic and the aftermath ofKind of funny that the Hunger games of this movie only happen just over 80 minutes in. Plus this movie's version is ALLOT tamer and shorter than the first movie.

For the most part this movies real focus is the politic and the aftermath of the first movie. Storytelling and character development of the central characters is done well enough. However, there is little development of side characters, which makes me wonder why did they bother to have so many?

The shaky cam of the first movie is gone, but then again there is little need for it either.

Overall:
Catching Fire does have a bit more plot and a better overall story arch than the first movie. It expands on the universe and leaves you wanting more (which is coming.) However, in the end Catching Fire failed to really impress and felt more like this should have been made into a epilogue for the first movie and a prologue to the next. On it's own, it mostly feels like filler that easily could have been condensed and could have used some better overall writing.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

benoskiMar 20, 2014

A wonderful thrill ride of a sequel that vastly improves the first film in every way! As a reader of the book, I'm proud to say I really enjoyed this. Bring on Mockingjay Part 1!

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

0

angrylouisMar 19, 2014

what the hell is this the plot makes absolutely no logical sense they all speck like the editor speed there voices up extremely high oh and wait for this **** when there are fun survival fights they put it in **** pitch black!!!!!! why so iwhat the hell is this the plot makes absolutely no logical sense they all speck like the editor speed there voices up extremely high oh and wait for this **** when there are fun survival fights they put it in **** pitch black!!!!!! why so i had no idea what was going on all i knew that there was two people trying to fight these beasts from clearly something that is from matrix from where they change things in the arena and why the hell dogs what the **** so wait wait wait you can make anything like a t-rex or a **** mecha but you make dogs what the **** and all the people in the arena are clearly rip offs of characters from one of the best games in the world tomb raider the main boy and girl are clearly laura croft and peter the other geologist and its appoling and the president is the profit from bioshcok infinity and well everyone else is a dochue thus movie is terrible how could anyone **** up a such a good plot like this… Expand

2 of 2 users found this helpful20

All this user's reviews