Warner Bros. Pictures | Release Date: December 14, 2012
8.0
USER SCORE
Generally favorable reviews based on 3007 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
2,447
Mixed:
365
Negative:
195
Watch Now
Stream On
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)
7
horcrux2007Sep 26, 2014
I think "An Unexpected Journey" was a reasonably good start to the soon-to-be Hobbit trilogy. It's exciting, adventurous, and engaging, but it might strain your patience at a running time of nearly three hours because some scenes dragged onI think "An Unexpected Journey" was a reasonably good start to the soon-to-be Hobbit trilogy. It's exciting, adventurous, and engaging, but it might strain your patience at a running time of nearly three hours because some scenes dragged on for a very long time. Another problem I had was that it tried to connect to The Lord of the Rings way too much such as the addition of a few characters and an overly long intro scene. It's still a nice first chapter in what I think will be a great series despite those faults. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
SythusRATINGSOct 19, 2014
The adventure follows the journey of title character Bilbo Baggins, who is swept into an epic quest to reclaim the lost Dwarf Kingdom of Erebor from the fearsome dragon Smaug. Approached out of the blue by the wizard Gandalf the Grey, BilboThe adventure follows the journey of title character Bilbo Baggins, who is swept into an epic quest to reclaim the lost Dwarf Kingdom of Erebor from the fearsome dragon Smaug. Approached out of the blue by the wizard Gandalf the Grey, Bilbo finds himself joining a company of thirteen dwarves led by the legendary warrior, Thorin Oakenshield. Their journey will take them into the Wild; through treacherous lands swarming with Goblins and Orcs, deadly Wargs and Sorcerers. Although their goal lies to the East and the wastelands of the Lonely Mountain, first they must escape the goblin tunnels, where Bilbo meets the creature that will change his life forever…Gollum. Here, alone with Gollum, on the shores of an underground lake, the unassuming Bilbo Baggins not only discovers depths of ingenuity and courage that surprise even him, he also gains possession of Gollum’s “precious” ring that holds unexpected and useful qualities… A simple, gold ring that is tied to the fate of all Middle-earth in ways Bilbo cannot begin to know. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
JohnMasterLJan 4, 2015
Peter Jackson regresa después de tantos años a la tierra media de una forma épica, espectacular y increíble. Visualmente es Perfecta, en todos los aspectos es magistral. Aunque no este al nivel de "El Señor de Los Anillos" es y sera unPeter Jackson regresa después de tantos años a la tierra media de una forma épica, espectacular y increíble. Visualmente es Perfecta, en todos los aspectos es magistral. Aunque no este al nivel de "El Señor de Los Anillos" es y sera un clásico por siempre. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
thomasljoguesNov 13, 2014
Though the first piece of Jackson's Hobbit Trilogy by no means lives up to the expectations set by the LOTR trilogy, it is worth seeing, as it often times lives up to the book's well-earned famed. A bit sloggish at times and cartoony inThough the first piece of Jackson's Hobbit Trilogy by no means lives up to the expectations set by the LOTR trilogy, it is worth seeing, as it often times lives up to the book's well-earned famed. A bit sloggish at times and cartoony in physics (the main characters go through the ridiculous unscathed) it is a decent film for those not expecting a masterpiece. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
ShedeggDec 6, 2014
ThE hobbit an unexpected journey, is the prequel of the Lord of the rings saga, therefore it contains some of the characters from the Lord of the rings movies such as gandalf the grey. This is the first of the three instalments so it can getThE hobbit an unexpected journey, is the prequel of the Lord of the rings saga, therefore it contains some of the characters from the Lord of the rings movies such as gandalf the grey. This is the first of the three instalments so it can get a bit boring as you're getting to know the characters. You will see the races like the orcs making big appearances. It does contain scenes of action but there are not so many of them that you get overwhelmed. If you are going to watch this and you find it boring then I'd watch the second instalment, the desolation of smaug. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
Le__XenomorphDec 28, 2014
This movie did not wow or disappoint me. It was a good enough movie to establish the Hobbit trilogy and introduce the characters, for sure. However, the worst problems of this movie were boring scenes and an unnecessarily long running time.This movie did not wow or disappoint me. It was a good enough movie to establish the Hobbit trilogy and introduce the characters, for sure. However, the worst problems of this movie were boring scenes and an unnecessarily long running time. But the Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey is definitely a solid movie and is a great setup for the trilogy. 7/10 (good) Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
RufatDec 18, 2014
Peter Jackson made a perfect ending for his middle earth odyssey. And Martin Freeman was awesome. Best of Hobbit series. More action and more fun. And more disappointing because of it is the last
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
WheelzFourReelzDec 29, 2014
The pacing is very uneven at times, but The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey is a very well done return to Middle Earth with enough action, heart, and lore to keep people satisfied.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
emlugo123Feb 22, 2015
The first hour of this movie or so is really long and tedious. I watched this with my brother and he fell asleep. But after the first hour the pace did pick up somewhat. There is a lot of CGI in this film, something that I was ratherThe first hour of this movie or so is really long and tedious. I watched this with my brother and he fell asleep. But after the first hour the pace did pick up somewhat. There is a lot of CGI in this film, something that I was rather disappointed with, I wish they had used real life actors instead. Do NOT watch this film in 3D, my eyes could not adjust to the 3D so I had the watch the movie with my 3D glasses off. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
homer4presidentMar 11, 2015
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. First off, I do like the movie. Martin Freeman is excellent as Bilbo. He truly embodies the character. The dwarves are very well cast too. Unfortunately, the script makes arbitrary changes to several key scenes. I was very upset that they almost completely changed the scene with the trolls. Tolkien did it best in the book and why Mr. Jackson and troop of writers changed the scene only seems like they were arrogant enough to believe that they could do better. They didn't. The scene in the movie is crude and not funny at all. it also tries to turn the focus on Bilbo when it was originally meant to show Gandalf as a tricky and wise wizard.

Otherwise, the visuals, the action scenes, and musical score are excellent. It's not a bad movie, just don't expect book, or you will be sorely disappointed.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
thebombMar 25, 2015
Everyone who adored the Lord of the Rings trilogy did their best to enjoy The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey just as much, yet only few could honestly say they did. One of the biggest problems of An Unexpected Journey is that it's far tooEveryone who adored the Lord of the Rings trilogy did their best to enjoy The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey just as much, yet only few could honestly say they did. One of the biggest problems of An Unexpected Journey is that it's far too stretched lengthwise, making it hard to stay interested during its 3 hour run time. After an hour I had a feeling I never experienced while watching LotR: I got bored. Not entirely, yet enough to wish the film were shorter. The cast is quite decent, Martin Freeman does a good job playing Bilbo. However, it's hard to get attached to the company of dwarfs since Jackson didn't put much emphasis on individuality(hell, I didn't even know which dwarf was supposed to be who, despite knowing all the names from the book). The addition of Radagast as a character who wasn't present in the book felt unnecessary as he didn't serve a useful purpose. Others, like Thorin's nemesis Azog, the pale Orc were a conclusive addition.

In spite of these rather negative aspects, An unexpected Journey had very satisfying moments as well. The troll fight, the dwarfs being trapped in "Goblin town" and Gollum's riddles were well adapted moments, giving hope for even better things to come in the next two parts. I know the non-CGI Orcs in LotR were cooler but it wasn't troubling either to see CGI Orcs since they are well done, as are the fighting scenes(even if they are bizarre at times).

Yes, An unexpected Journey could've been better and with LotR being a masterpiece, fans had very high expectations Jackson couldn't quite live up to. I would still watch the film over and over again as the great moments outweigh the weaker ones by far. It's good entertainment and serves as a satisfying beginning to the Middle-Earth saga.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
Termin8terApr 19, 2016
The Hobbit: Unexpected Journey is a good movie, but a serious step back from LOTR in terms of scope and storytelling. Here are my reasons that this is not as good as LOTR: Firstly, their is an over-reliance on CGI. The LOTR movies barely usedThe Hobbit: Unexpected Journey is a good movie, but a serious step back from LOTR in terms of scope and storytelling. Here are my reasons that this is not as good as LOTR: Firstly, their is an over-reliance on CGI. The LOTR movies barely used any CGI, but this uses far too many green-screen sets, and It gets very annoying. Second, there are far too many jokes and dry humor that it ruins the flow and intensity of the story.
These two glaring problems seriously hold back this movie from being awesome. Overall, Unexpected Journey is a good movie, but not nearly as good as FOTR, and the LOTR trilogy.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
MovieManiac83Apr 23, 2015
In 2001, only a few months after the fall of the World Trade Center, Peter Jackson swept us away to Middle Earth with The Fellowship of the Ring. It was a wondrous three-hour achievement: the first major attempt at serious, big budget epicIn 2001, only a few months after the fall of the World Trade Center, Peter Jackson swept us away to Middle Earth with The Fellowship of the Ring. It was a wondrous three-hour achievement: the first major attempt at serious, big budget epic fantasy. It succeeded beyond anyone's wildest imagination ("imagination" being the key term), and Fellowship, along with its follow-ups, The Two Towers and The Return of the King, convinced Hollywood that there was unexplored ore in the fantasy mine. Now, nine years after closing the book on The Lord of the Rings, Jackson has returned to the scene of his greatest success. The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey, the first installment of a three-part adaptation of Tolkien's first Middle Earth adventure, is both more and less of the same. There are numerous concrete reasons why An Unexpected Journey fails to live up to the standard set by The Lord of the Rings, but the most critical is also the most intangible: the magic is gone (or at least muted). An Unexpected Journey is a competent, entertaining effort but it neither enthralls nor amazes in the way its predecessors did. There's no question that Jackson is attempting to recapture something elusive and, although there are stretches when he comes close, he never quite attains that goal. It would be monumentally unfair to label The Hobbit as a "failure," but calling it a "disappointment" would be reasonable. Jackson established expectations with The Lord of the Rings; his inability to fulfill them is perhaps a trap of his own making.

The Fellowship of the Ring is 400 pages; Jackson adapted it into a three-hour theatrical release. The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey covers the first 100 pages of a 270-page book; the movie version runs only 10 minutes shorter than The Fellowship of the Ring. And therein lies this production's Achilles Heel: its long-windedness. An Unexpected Journey does not earn its 168-minute running time. From the beginning, there's a sense of bloating and self-indulgence. Roughly the first half requires a dose of caffeine to stay awake and focused. Things improve considerably during the second half. In fact, the final 45 minutes are tightly paced and riveting. But the strong ending cannot fully compensate for the way the movie meanders and stumbles during its first two hours. I think there's a very good, perhaps even a great, movie contained within An Unexpected Journey, but a ruthless editor was needed to unearth it. Perhaps the DVD Special Edition for this picture should feature less footage rather than more.

In a sense, it's unfair to assign a final "grade" to The Hobbit until all three parts are available. Perhaps, when viewed as a whole, the movies will provide a smoother, more richly textured experience than what is hinted at by An Unexpected Journey. Maybe some of the secondary characters will come to life. In this first chapter, only Bilbo, Gandalf, and Thorin show sufficient personality to distinguish themselves.

Unfortunately, there are also some unforgivably cartoonish moments. The shots of Radagast (Sylvester McCoy) being chased by goblins while riding a rabbit-pulled sleigh look like a video game excerpt. There are other isolated scenes that have a similar problem with the CGI being too apparent. The stone giant battle is impressive but it looks more like an outtake from a Transformers film than something that belongs in The Hobbit. On the other hand, there are some wonderful scenes: a council with Gandalf, Elrond, Saruman, and Galadriel; riddles in dark with the most vivid, detailed Gollum to date; and the climactic stand-off with the White Orc. Jackson does a great job crafting the goblin's underground kingdom. The troll encounter does justice to the book. Rivendell mimics what we saw in The Lord of the Rings. And the glimpses of Smaug make us want to see more.

Visually, The Hobbit is being released in four different flavors: digital 2-D, 3-D at 24 frames-per-second (fps), 3-D at 48 fps, and 3-D IMAX. Having seen it in the 48 fps version, I have a few comments. First, neither the doubled frame rate nor the 3-D adds much to the overall experience. Both are superfluous. The 3-D does not create a richer environment, although neither does it corrupt the experience. The 48 fps is less noticeable than I expected. There are scenes when it causes the images to be crisper and brighter but, especially in instances of high CGI content, it creates a non-cinematic picture. That may be the primary reason why isolated moments feel like video game outtakes. My advice: avoid all the visual flourishes and see this in good, old-fashioned 2-D. The Lord of the Rings didn't need 48 fps or 3-D and there's no conceivable reason why The Hobbit should. It's certainly not better because of it.

Still, for all of its faults, which are more numerous than those in any of The Lord of the Rings' chapters, Jackson successfully navigates the return to Middle Earth.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
NecrophatDec 18, 2017
Amazing, amazing trilogy. Wow, what an add on to Lord of the rings, this entire new trilogy is just adding to the masterpiece that is Middle Earth, a must watch.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
PeterAlexanderJun 10, 2015
The first instalment of the Hobbit series succeeds, by the most part, to take its viewers back to Middle Earth. Whilst the film is visually stunning at times and demonstrates a magical proportion of promise, it does not provide the movieThe first instalment of the Hobbit series succeeds, by the most part, to take its viewers back to Middle Earth. Whilst the film is visually stunning at times and demonstrates a magical proportion of promise, it does not provide the movie going experience of the Lord of the Rings. Peter Jackson swerves from the winning formula that brought him so much love from fans. An over reliance on CGI effects and comedic and at times kiddish humour is prevalent throughout the film. Although I urge Lord of the Rings fans to steady their expectations, the return to Middle Earth provides some spectacular moments and presents clear promise for the next two films. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
2
AaronDWassermanJun 26, 2015
Yes, this movie is that bad. It is soooo boring beyond belief. It is so hard to imagine that Peter Jackson is behind this. And worse yet, there are gonna be 3?! for real!? hell no im out
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
Th3GreenHorne7Jul 5, 2015
I remember watching the LOTR trilogy when I was a kid and I enjoyed it. Now 9 years Peter Jackson decides to make The Hobbit trilogy, am I worried? No I'm not. The Hobbit An Unexpected Journey is a great start to the trilogy. I love the storyI remember watching the LOTR trilogy when I was a kid and I enjoyed it. Now 9 years Peter Jackson decides to make The Hobbit trilogy, am I worried? No I'm not. The Hobbit An Unexpected Journey is a great start to the trilogy. I love the story and I love the CGI which is amazing and the cast give amazing performances as always, and Peter Jackson redelivers the world of Middle-Earth that looks the same and feels the same. Unlike LOTR, there wasn't very much makeup on the Orcs which was a little disappointing, that was like one of the thing I couldn't agree on. But there's a trilogy, enough time for improvement. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
BoogeeFilmGuyJul 15, 2015
This was the movie I was waiting for, the movie I was prepared for almost a week before release, dressed as Frodo. My friend came along with me to a screening, and needless to say, I wasn't disappointed with what I saw. The visuals areThis was the movie I was waiting for, the movie I was prepared for almost a week before release, dressed as Frodo. My friend came along with me to a screening, and needless to say, I wasn't disappointed with what I saw. The visuals are stunning, the soundtrack is fantastic, the fight scenes are stellar, everything about it was great to me. Agreed, this film wasn't as good as The Fellowship of the Ring, but its an adventure the whole family can enjoy, whereas the LOTR trilogy had some scenes that would scare a few young kids. Anyway, a must-see for fans of the Middle-Earth universe. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
DanilSirotkinJul 26, 2015
Хоббит: Нежданное Путешествие (The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey) не является моим самым любимым фильмом про Средиземье, но он занимает особое место среди моих любимейших фильмов. Началось всё с рекламы этого фильма по ТВ в декабре 2012.Хоббит: Нежданное Путешествие (The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey) не является моим самым любимым фильмом про Средиземье, но он занимает особое место среди моих любимейших фильмов. Началось всё с рекламы этого фильма по ТВ в декабре 2012. Тогда мне нравился Властелин Колец, но я не являлся его фанатом, и вообще поклонником мира Толкина. Затем, в марте 2013, в очередной раз показали трилогию ВК, которую я смотрел много раз, но после этого просмотра я окончательно увлёкся миром Толкина, и стал хотеть диск с недавно вышедшим Хоббитом (диск ВК у меня уже был, ещё с 2011, но я его почти не смотрел (и зря), так как он казался мне скучноватым и сложноватым для моего, узковатого тогда, восприятия. Этот (полупиратский) диск пылился у меня на полке. (В то время я фанател только от Гарри Поттера)).Сразу же после "Возвращения Короля" показали документальный фильм - "Монстры Толкина", в котором учёные размышляли о Толкине, и в котором вкратце прошлись по сюжету книги "Хоббит". После этой передачи мне ещё больше захотелось посмотреть Хоббита. В апреле вышел диск, и я купил его там же, где брал ВК - в маленьком ларьке с грубой продавщицей, которая торговала какими-то полупиратскими дисками, от коробок с которыми, правда, шёл удивительный запах. Стоил он 120 рублей. Я отдал деньги и пошёл во двор школы, чтобы посыпать песком лунки с цветами, которые я сажал для урока ботаники (на самом деле для себя). Уставший, я положил диск на землю и присел. Я начал рассматривать коробку. Мне очень нравился постер в левом нижнем углу. Я долго смотрел на него. Эх, какое это было время... Придя домой, мы с мамой вставили диск в DVD, и, с тарелками картофельного пюре с грибами, уселись смотреть фильм, на тогда ещё небольшом квадратном телевизоре. С одной только заставки с красивой музыкой я, уже будто заранее, перенёсся в фильм. Боже, как он мне понравился! Начинался он с предисловия от лица старого Бильбо, который рассказывал о королевстве гномов Эребор. Он говорил о нападении дракона Смауга на него. Говорил о Торине, внуке короля, что он с многими уцелевшими гномами стал скитаться по миру. Затем действие переносилось в Шир, где показывалась жизнь Бильбо и Фродо. Бильбо сел отдохнуть на скамейку, прикурил, и стал вспоминать молодые годы. Вдруг, нас перенесли на 60 лет назад, и мы увидели сидящего на той же скамейке молодого Бильбо, к которому подходит Гэндальф. Всё, с этого момента знаменитая история начинается. К Бильбо буквально "вламываются" гномы с Гэндальфом, громят его дом и съедают всё, что было в кладовой (что выглядит очень комедийно). После, они поют и танцуют, и к ним приходит запоздавший Торин Дубощит, который вместе с Гэндальфом рассказывает о походе, который они предприняли, чтобы вернуть свою родину, Эребор, захваченную драконом. Наутро они уезжают без Бильбо. Проснувшись, и обнаружив, что гномов нет, Бильбо решается на путешествие, это решение и становится для него нежданным. По пути герои проходят через множество опасных приключений: попадают в плен к троллям (которые также оказываются очень комедийными, хоть и страшноватыми. Затем они сбегают от погони орков. Оказываются у эльфов в Ривенделле, где какое-то время гостят там. Уходя, идут через горы и попадают в грозу, да ещё во время битвы каменных великанов. Ночуя в пещере, попадают в плен к гоблинам. Встречают их уродливого и толстого короля, который только и делает, что сидит на троне, поставив ноги на гоблинов, как на подставку, и распевает режущие слух песни, грозится поломать кости гномам и всячески изувечить их, но так ничего и не делает. Бильбо же в это время сваливается в пещеру к Голлуму, где, конечно, находит кольцо и играет с Голлумом в загадки. Тем временем подоспевший Гэндальф спасает глуповатых гномов и повелевает им драться - (почему-то гномы сами до этого не додумались). Бильбо также сбегает от Голлума, и в лесу встречается с командой. Далее следует трогательная речь, опять погоня от орков, красивый эпизод с соснами, и, мой любимый эпизод - с полётом на орлах... Затем опять трогательная речь Торина по поводу того, что Бильбо спас его, и кадр с глазом дракона. Всё. - (я по началу думал, что фильм должен быть только один, и поэтому офигел, когда пошли титры). "И что здесь такого?" - опять спросите вы. И окажетесь неправы. Может тут нет какого-то большого смысла, этот фильм, также как и ВК, является эталоном фэнтези. При его просмотре атмосфера и прекрасная музыка делают своё дело - вы полностью погружаетесь в фильм. Естественно,- от актёров до грима, от спецэффектов и до музыки,- всё в этом фильме идеально, и я рад, что этот фильм снял Питер Джексон, а не Гильермо Дель Торо, как планировалось (как бы тот ни был хорош, режиссёр ВК больше подходит на эту роль). Фильм вышел неспешным, но вовсе не скучным, НЕТ! То ли фильм действительно так хорош, то ли он пришёлся мне на определённое время, но я его буквально "обожествлял" и "обожествляю" и по сей день. Он сказочный и хорошо передаёт книгу. Но справился ли Джексон со 2 частью? 100/100 или 10/10 или 5/5 или 4/4. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
alijarchiieFeb 2, 2020
The best and only thanks peter you are awesome i am so glad that lives with you in the same time
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
DanBurritoSep 15, 2015
Coming from someone who hasn't seen LOTR it was decent enough. Martin Freeman does a very good Bilbo Baggins and my favourite scene is the scene with Gollum. Andy Serkis is perfect for that role. Again, I don't know how it compares to Lord OfComing from someone who hasn't seen LOTR it was decent enough. Martin Freeman does a very good Bilbo Baggins and my favourite scene is the scene with Gollum. Andy Serkis is perfect for that role. Again, I don't know how it compares to Lord Of The Rings but I thought it was watchable. A couple of scenes that weren't in the book were a little unnecessary though. Some of them work and some don't. For example the "Stone giants" scene is kind of random and leaves you thinking "why did they put THAT scene in? Isn't the movie extended enough by now?". Ah well. I can't think of a good sentence to finish this review so bye. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
aadityamudharApr 18, 2016
I quite liked this movie, but it could have been better. The original Lord of the Rings movies did not use CGI unless it was necessary. The orcs were men in costume and makeup, which made Jackson's depiction of middle earth seem more realI quite liked this movie, but it could have been better. The original Lord of the Rings movies did not use CGI unless it was necessary. The orcs were men in costume and makeup, which made Jackson's depiction of middle earth seem more real somehow. In this new film, Jackson uses CGI as a crutch (nearly every creature is computer generated), and it hurts the continuity and flow of the story. This movie is pretty sweet in its own way, but if the creators had stuck with their original pattern (more make up and costumes, and less CGI) I would have thought it flawless. It's certainly enjoyable, and I'm looking forward to the next two installments, but I don't feel like this can be categorized as a classic. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
EpicLadySpongeJan 26, 2016
It feels like a weak Lord of the Rings trilogy with an interesting start. You're starting to know that Peter Jackson directed both the Lord of the Rings and the Hobbit all together to make 6 movies connect with each other. Worth the shot to watch.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
gameguardian21Mar 10, 2016
An unexpected surprise, this movie is. The hobbit is a great start to a new trilogy. While defiantly not as good as the lord of the rings, this still remains a solid prequel to the original trilogy.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
JosephFret14Jan 11, 2016
The hobbit is a visual masterpiece. It has a great cast that portray great characters. The action sequences are incredibly shot and the fast pace story keeps you drawn in the whole time. All in all a fantastic Movie.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
nahtan1244Mar 12, 2016
A prime example of why critics can be stupid sometimes. I have read parts of the book and I don't get why people are making such a big fuss about the book to movie adaptation. Some of the lines and scenes are taking straight from the book.A prime example of why critics can be stupid sometimes. I have read parts of the book and I don't get why people are making such a big fuss about the book to movie adaptation. Some of the lines and scenes are taking straight from the book. Martin freeman is brilliant playing bilbo baggins and just like the LOTR there are some very good flash back sequences. The dwarfs were a good combination of funny and brutish. Bilobos game of riddles with gullom was one of the best parts of the movie and Ian mckellan does very good as gandalf. Now the pacing could have been better and the first 45 minutes with the dwarfs were entertaining but could have been cut down. Plus The scene with the stone giants was cool but I felt it had no part in the movie and peter jack son just added it in for the spectacle. Also The scenes with radagast did not feel like they belonged in the movie and sorta slowed the movie down. Overall while not a perfect book to movie adaptation the hobbit and unexpected journey is very entertaining and better than what the critics are making out to be. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
night4Apr 28, 2016
The interpretation of the books was best in this first movie, the others got really, really bad.

My biggest issue is that Martin Freeman was miscast. He's an incredible actor, just not a good Bilbo.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
AmericarnaudMay 6, 2016
Great movie. The beginning is a bit long, and I would have liked a little bit less CGI, but the acting, the scenario, and returning to Middle Earth make it a great movie.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
3
Aaron_WassermanJun 1, 2016
I need to be honest. I HATE this movie. So much that I never finished the trilogy. Such a downgrade from Lord of the Rings. Yes I know The Hobbit book came first and it was much more kid friendly, but the movie was slow and long, and dull andI need to be honest. I HATE this movie. So much that I never finished the trilogy. Such a downgrade from Lord of the Rings. Yes I know The Hobbit book came first and it was much more kid friendly, but the movie was slow and long, and dull and boring. Complete pile of CRAP. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
JP32Nov 16, 2022
Peter Jackson has defined his career as the fantasy-epic guy, but what makes him special is his robust cinematic ingenuity. He has a range of directorial skills, not just as a visionary or a special effects pioneer, but as a storyteller,Peter Jackson has defined his career as the fantasy-epic guy, but what makes him special is his robust cinematic ingenuity. He has a range of directorial skills, not just as a visionary or a special effects pioneer, but as a storyteller, actor’s coach, showman. His Hobbit is fittingly family-friendly, wonderfully full of charm and humor. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
3
DeanomiteJan 12, 2020
I do not begrudge Peter Jackson, to me the LOTR trilogy is the most brilliant film trilogy ever. Even today, while i study Jungian philosophy, those movies grow in my estimation. I write this not because the Hobbit trilogy is a joyless cashI do not begrudge Peter Jackson, to me the LOTR trilogy is the most brilliant film trilogy ever. Even today, while i study Jungian philosophy, those movies grow in my estimation. I write this not because the Hobbit trilogy is a joyless cash grab, but because i am rewatching the old Hobbit cartoon and loving it. But it is not available on metacritic, so i write here that you should see the cartoon from 1978. It is awesome, when the animation studio went bust it became Ghibli with Miyazaki. See that. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
JPKJun 23, 2019
Not Quite Lord Of The Rings
The first chapter of The Hobbit Trilogy may not be a masterpiece, but it’s still a great film.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
CoreGamer1408Dec 16, 2018
Read the Hobbit it is unlike the more sophisticated Lord of the Rings trilogy. Well the hobbit is one simplistically written children's book. They did a good job of fleshing out these films and characters from one children's book. Not as epicRead the Hobbit it is unlike the more sophisticated Lord of the Rings trilogy. Well the hobbit is one simplistically written children's book. They did a good job of fleshing out these films and characters from one children's book. Not as epic as LOTR movies, but a darn good try considering the limited and simplistic source material they had to work with. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
PikeaxMar 9, 2019
This is based on the trilogy as a whole.
The Hobbit is a wonderful book but it simply doesn't have enough content to be spread between three movies. Each movie doesn't really tell a cohesive story on its own and while I judged the Lord of the
This is based on the trilogy as a whole.
The Hobbit is a wonderful book but it simply doesn't have enough content to be spread between three movies. Each movie doesn't really tell a cohesive story on its own and while I judged the Lord of the Rings as a whole because it improves an already amazing experience, The Hobbit has to be judged as a whole because the movies make no sense in any other method of viewing. Even still they hit middling at best and never truly great.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
Mihael_Prislin0Dec 25, 2017
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. What an awesome comeback of Peter Jackson's Middle-earth saga. The movie was awesome, and I can't wait to see The Desolation of Smaug and The Battle of the Five Armies. The movie provides some great action scenes, like the goblin chase and final breakdown between dwarf fellowship and Orcs. It provides some great intriging moments to, like the game Bilbo was playing with Gollum. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
spacebear1Jan 4, 2018
The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey is an amazing first film in an amazing trilogy. I loved all of the characters, especially Martin Freeman's Bilbo Baggins and Ian Mckellan's Gandalf the Grey. I especially loved the spectacular cinematographyThe Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey is an amazing first film in an amazing trilogy. I loved all of the characters, especially Martin Freeman's Bilbo Baggins and Ian Mckellan's Gandalf the Grey. I especially loved the spectacular cinematography and the visual effects. Andy Serkis' Gollum is also a great character to bring in. My only real complaint is that the film takes a while to start up but in the end, this is an amazing film. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
wiiy71Dec 30, 2017
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
ty92Dec 11, 2019
I love this movie. It's the best of movie from this trilogy of Hobbit movies. I think it's one of the more rewatchable movies ever made. I understand why people hate on the other two movies but not this one. This one is just perfect. I likeI love this movie. It's the best of movie from this trilogy of Hobbit movies. I think it's one of the more rewatchable movies ever made. I understand why people hate on the other two movies but not this one. This one is just perfect. I like all the characters. The story is great. It looks good. The music is also great. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
Jaredc324Dec 11, 2019
What a heartwarming return that's only flaw in being too long is somewhat contradicted as being back in this world isn't something any fan and moviegoer of the 21st century would wish to cut short on. But it's characters and backstory seem toWhat a heartwarming return that's only flaw in being too long is somewhat contradicted as being back in this world isn't something any fan and moviegoer of the 21st century would wish to cut short on. But it's characters and backstory seem to have a beat too many in terms of exposition (making it less mysterious, and therefore less surprising). It's just such a wonder to be back in the visionary interpretation of Peter Jackson's Middle Earth again, even if it's length does make "An Unexpected Journey" seem more than it needs to be. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
BeatrixKiddoSep 14, 2019
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. It was good, full of adventure with nice songs. But l think this movie and the second could easily be as one.. nevermind, l loved the characters, the visual effects and the fights. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
FilipeNetoApr 29, 2018
After the thrilling success of "Lord of the Rings", it is imperative to milk the cow and get more money from the audience. So, the producers decided to make a three movies prequel (much like what happened with "Star Wars") inspired by "TheAfter the thrilling success of "Lord of the Rings", it is imperative to milk the cow and get more money from the audience. So, the producers decided to make a three movies prequel (much like what happened with "Star Wars") inspired by "The Hobbit", the first novel by J.R.R. Tolkien. In this film, the first of this trilogy, young Bilbo Baggins is hired by a group of dwarfs to help them recover their mountain, conquered by a dangerous dragon who watches over a colossal treasure. In the middle of this plot, the film core, is Thorin Oakenshield, heir to the dwarve throne, and Galdalf, the gray wizard who links this plot to another, which develops in parallel and focuses on the struggle against the orks led by Azog, sworn enemy of the dwarfs and a traditional ally of the Dark, who mysteriously work in an abandoned fortress where there lives an evil, without name or physical form.

Anyone who has read the original book may criticize the way the film adapts it, but I'm not the best person to judge it because I did not read the book, I never found it in Portuguese. The actors were fine. Ian McKellen remains impeccable as Gandalf, but brings nothing new to a character we already know from LOTR. In fact, Gandalf does not have as much impact, not to mention that McKellen cannot avoid accusing some fatigue, difficult to swallow in a character who supposedly should look younger in this new trilogy. The film also fails to show us how much time has passed since the arrival of the dragon, especially if we watch characters like Thorin, who seems immune to aging. I say this because there is no difference between this film's Thorin and the one that is represented in some combat scenes, allegedly situated in distant past and shown to the public in a flashback. Martin Freeman made a convincing and credible Bilbo. In the supporting cast, the dwarfs looked good to me, Cate Blanchett always looks good as Galadriel and Sylvester McCoy is very funny in the role of Radagast, a character which could have been introduced in a more elegant way. Cinematography is banal and boring. There are sequences where this is so clearly noted that it removes all emotion from what we're seeing. The special and visual effects are awesome but there is a sense that it has been exaggerated and some scenes are so unrealistic that we simply cannot feel it. Finally, the soundtrack, by Howard Shore, is powerful, impactful and meets the expectations of the public.

The Hobbitt came after the resounding success of LOTR and its difficult to meet expectations. The first film in this new trilogy is not necessarily bad, but its far from the cinematic brilliance of the first trilogy. The sense of danger is rarer, emotion is scarce, everything seems artificial and stagnant.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
SirKrustyMar 8, 2018
This is definitely the best movie of 2012. Everything is great, and if it wasn't for the fact that I only give one movie in a series a 10, and I enjoyed BOTFA more, I would give this movie an easy 10! WATCH IT
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
meydianarizkiNov 10, 2022
Suitable for kids IMO.
I think they really messed up the hobbit movies in a sense that they could have been a lot better, the book was good after all. They made these movies very "cartoonish" so to speak, and i think they were targeting the
Suitable for kids IMO.
I think they really messed up the hobbit movies in a sense that they could have been a lot better, the book was good after all. They made these movies very "cartoonish" so to speak, and i think they were targeting the kids in the first place, so yes there is violence - but yes it is still suitable for kids, it doesn't get much worse than violence in a comic book or something like that. Although you have to judge on the behalf of your own children, check to movie yourself before trusting me, i don't want to cause traumas by recommending movies for too young kids. LOL at the one who rated this 18+, you can google "The hobbit, dwarf king decapitated" and see that the scene is not nearly as bad it sounds like. The violence does not look realistic at all, the movie if pg-13, and in my opinion can be observed by 7 year old as well, it is way better than letting them play GTA or something that people actually do let their 7 years olds do.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
meydianarizki21Nov 9, 2022
And I thought the Lord of the Rings trilogy was something before, but this prequel that happened before that trilogy is just as surprising, intense, fierce, magical, stunning and so much more, starting with this one. I'm extremely compelledAnd I thought the Lord of the Rings trilogy was something before, but this prequel that happened before that trilogy is just as surprising, intense, fierce, magical, stunning and so much more, starting with this one. I'm extremely compelled and astonished by all that Bilbo went through in this beginning of his first adventure, it's like you can see where Frodo got his feeling of adventure when Lord of the Rings came around. Out of all the dwarves in this film my absolute favorites are Fili and his brother Kili since not only are they rather adorable and sweet but they're also super brave, they have strong hearts and no fear like the others do, they also know how to make the best out of any situation whether it involves fighting or not. My sister's favorite in the company is Thorin Oakenshield probably because he kind of resembles her, he's got a bit of an attitude and he sometimes is rather uptight, but he's also very good looking and he definitely knows how to treat the ones closest to him whether it's friends or family. It's also no surprise to me that Bilbo discovers the One Ring in this one, I guess you could say that it sets up the very thing that began before the 60 year timeline that happened after Bilbo found the Ring and before it was passed on to Frodo against Bilbo's better judgment. All in all this film is beyond wonderful and captivating, the musical scores, the languages, the familiar faces from Lord of the Rings, the way the story itself begins and plays out so far in this film, everything. Even the truth of how the One Ring really landed into Bilbo's possession, the truth of how he found the sword known as Sting before he gave it to Frodo, the reveal of the very blade that stabbed Frodo in the first film of Lord of the Rings and the background story behind it, the truth that revealed that the White wizard Saruman was originally on the good side before we see him in Lord of the Rings now working for the Enemy and the fact that he and Gandalf are not the only wizards out there, and not to mention the bond that Bilbo and Thorin were able to form after all they've been through so far in this film, it all begins to unfold the story of Bilbo's very first adventure in such a way that I myself can't really describe too much. If you're looking for another outstanding and intense fantasy adventure to get into like you probably have with Lord of the Rings than you've got to dive into the trilogy of The Hobbit, the story of how one rather young hobbit was willing to step outside of his comfortable and wonderful home and dare to risk it all for a company of sweet and incredible dwarves trying to take back their home that was taken from them so long ago. The Lord of the Rings is an adventure all by itself and also one of the greatest adventures that my family has ever had the pleasure of growing up with, but if you're looking for something that's just as intense and wonderful as that trilogy than The Hobbit is the next big and perfect adventure trilogy for you. It all really begins with An Unexpected Journey, a journey that you'll want to go on over and over and over and over and over and over and over again. I know I will!!! Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
ErikTheCriticSep 25, 2018
This first "Hobbit" movie does have certain pacing issues, however as a whole it is still a very enjoyable movie with breathtaking visuals and an outstanding portrayal of Bilbo Baggins played by Martin Freeman.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
Mikibruno02Nov 8, 2020
I state that in my view, it was not easy to return to "Middle Earth" after more than 10 years. The prologue and the beginning of the film are truly spectacular: wonderful colors, scenery and above all music by Howard Shore. However, the filmI state that in my view, it was not easy to return to "Middle Earth" after more than 10 years. The prologue and the beginning of the film are truly spectacular: wonderful colors, scenery and above all music by Howard Shore. However, the film takes too much liberty over the Lord of the Rings trilogy - the Oscar-winning 17 trilogy had never fallen into such ridiculous scenes. Memorable performances, especially that of Ian McKellen and Andy Serkis who returns as Gollum and makes his scene my favorite of the entire film. The soundtrack is very beautiful, not comparable to that of L.O.T.R. but still pleasant. Overall rating: 8. Some screenplay choices can be improved and in particular some scenes where the photograph is even opaque and makes the screen effect white. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
mandrake88Jul 6, 2019
If i see the big picture, Gandalf would have saved the team from a lot of trouble if he just summoned the eagles at the beginning of the movie to transport them to the vicinity of Lonely Mountain :) but i understand great stories dont workIf i see the big picture, Gandalf would have saved the team from a lot of trouble if he just summoned the eagles at the beginning of the movie to transport them to the vicinity of Lonely Mountain :) but i understand great stories dont work like that. Overall, the movie was a read adventure. The dramatic scenes with Golum are outstanding. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
DiptanshuJul 3, 2020
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Visually stunning and beautiful movie!Each and every fight scenes were epic and awesome but as a prequel its a decent movie!the music was phenomenal same as LOTR trilogy,the acting was amazing,the CGI and Visuals were Improved and it was literally a Piece Of Art,the story was decent and screenplay was quite okay,the 1st half was literally utter slow and boring.the LOTR's 1st movie "the fellowship" was slow at start but the world building and intro to all it was Riveting to watch where-as in this the intro was good but the conversation and all felt stretched although the starting Frodo's intro and Gandalf's entry was amazing then the whole dwarfs thing and till they left the Bilbo's house it was annoying as hell,after that the adventure at start was slow the momentum was gained from the Trolls and the King's old enemy fight it was awesome scene then the whole journey according to Gandalf and the Rivendell scene was literally the piece of art the scenery and Epic music it was worth experiencing,the Wizards talk was awesome,and great to see Elf's king and Galadriel back again the Conversation between them was brilliant the "small daily life happiness thing in life" scene from Gandalf about Hobbit worthy in team it was satisfyingly beautiful scene,then the whole Journey ahead with obstacles and the ups and downs it was amazing.the mountain destruction scene was amazing.the whole movie the spaces and plot-points left for sequel and the build-up for Dragon's story-line as well as the Brown wizards fear of waking dead person thing was amazing as per build-up to sequel,the further journey the Goblins fight and escape was awesome as hell,the other side the Gollum's and Bilbo's backstory was amazingly showcased there Riddle's game was literally amazingly fun and awesome,after the escape From Goblin's the Ending fight between old enemy of Dwarf king and himself was literally awesome and Nail-biting.the tree's hideout for Dwarfs fearing the Wolf kind-of thing then the ending rescue by beloved Eagles before falling it was satisfying and amazing,before that the Bilbo's brave fight against the Enemy of king and after that the appreciation scene from king for saving his life it was amazing and sweet end!The whole movie except for slow and stretched plot at 1st half it was a good prequel! Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
r96skFeb 20, 2021
Of course off the level of its 'The Lord of the Rings' predecessors, but I have to say I thoroughly enjoyed 'The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey'.

It has good lure to it, the plot is more than interesting, it features pleasant callbacks and -
Of course off the level of its 'The Lord of the Rings' predecessors, but I have to say I thoroughly enjoyed 'The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey'.

It has good lure to it, the plot is more than interesting, it features pleasant callbacks and - like LOTR - looks exquisite. As for the casting, I like 'em. Martin Freeman (Bilbo) is, like Elijah Wood, an actor I've always found hit-and-miss, but I really did enjoy Freeman's performance here - the humour is his usual schtick, though the rest of his showing is strong.

Ian McKellen (Gandalf) returns and is as much a joy to watch as before. None of the others, though all good, stand out massively, James Nesbitt (Bofur) does bring decent comedic stuff.

Hopefully the two sequels to this are just as fantastic!
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
0
NintendoforlifeJan 11, 2021
what is lord of the rings? absolutely amazing. what is the hobbit? the absolute best way to ruin lord of the rings. the acting is terrible. the movie switches between stupid family humor scenes, and heads flying off in war. that is not howwhat is lord of the rings? absolutely amazing. what is the hobbit? the absolute best way to ruin lord of the rings. the acting is terrible. the movie switches between stupid family humor scenes, and heads flying off in war. that is not how you make a family appropriate movie. 1/10 for a decent story. DO NOT WATCH. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
FaxiAug 18, 2020
The Hobbit is a adventure filled with action and excitement. After watching the first Hobbit movie in the trilogy after many years of not giving any interest in the trilogy, i was so in to the world of Middle-Earth. I felt like every sceneThe Hobbit is a adventure filled with action and excitement. After watching the first Hobbit movie in the trilogy after many years of not giving any interest in the trilogy, i was so in to the world of Middle-Earth. I felt like every scene was interesting and not a single scene made me felt like watching a bunch of boring scenes with no kind of action. The story of Bilbos journey was really well told, and all the characters that gets introduced in the movie are well acted, and it just makes the movie feel like a true adventure. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
Movie_FreakJun 16, 2020
A really good film. I really think this film should come under critical reevaluation shortly, like The Shining (1980), because its laughable that this film got lower metacritic scores than the next film, ad even the last which was a bad film.A really good film. I really think this film should come under critical reevaluation shortly, like The Shining (1980), because its laughable that this film got lower metacritic scores than the next film, ad even the last which was a bad film. It does not achieve what the Lord Of The Rings did, I don't think its even close, but still a really good film. Right from the brilliant production design and costumes, to the stunning visuals, almost everything goes in the right direction. Martin Freeman and Sir Ian Mckellen both give fine performances. Although you can't deny that it's extremely slow-paced as the first hour itself consists of the dwarves meeting at Bilbo's home when it should have been done in less than 30 minutes, a really engaging and appealing movie! Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
SoapNuggetJul 14, 2020
The film leans to far into 3D technology and distracting CGI while trying to stretch a small children's book into a 3 hour long epic while failing spectacularly
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
merugoAug 28, 2022
An utter yawn. The Hobbit is a children's book in comparison to the LotR trilogy (I believe Tolkien himself said as much). The comparative weight of this film exemplifies that. The acting is fine but this is entirely skippable
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
Cementer200Sep 27, 2020
The Hobbit An Unexpected Journey is a good movie. .
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
twistedoracleAug 14, 2020
what a wonderful movie! Peter jackson did a great job adopting tolkien's the hobbit and made a leggiadrous prequel to the lord of the rings.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
PmckSep 6, 2020
While not as good as lord of the rings, this movie is still very fun to watch.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
iCampoRamilNov 16, 2021
Era difícil igualar a LOTR, pero consigue acercarse bastante, sobre todo esta entrega.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
omnifaceMar 8, 2021
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. a fun movie for olden times

pros
very fun to watch
the danger isnt scary
the people are great
good villain too
decent writing cons
journey is a bit long but can also be a pro not the best in the series but one of the best despite semi poor title
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
Direk_Jun 28, 2021
So yeah it's a very nice movie the plot is good this is 1 out of 3 of all the parts i will see how it will be next, but at the moment a very good movie
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
Homebody101Dec 5, 2021
A flawless movie that's accessible for a wider age group than LOTR. My most highly regarded movie of all time because of the quality of the acting, directing & the sheer brilliance of the storyline.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
ErgonimicApr 1, 2022
This movie serves as fun entertainment, but the movie is simply boring and forgettable.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
0
thegolMay 9, 2022
Have been looking forward to this since I was a child over 40 years ago, sadly after the brilliance of the LOTR films this is just a CGI mess I can't believe it's from the same director. Avoid
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
0
ThunderMonkeyJun 16, 2022
I can only think of one expression for this, cheap.
You can tell that the film was produced quickly and did not cost much money.
No comparison, not even close to Lord of the Rings.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
Manuel189qqSep 26, 2022
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
Manuel89qqNov 4, 2022
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
Fixer84Mar 16, 2023
Obviously if you think that this is a LOTR prequel series it is a product, but inevitably, far inferior. In the end it is none other than The Hobbit. Exactly, The Hobbit.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews