The Grand Budapest Hotel

9

TanyaMayoMay 20, 2016

This comedy film, written and directed by extraordinary Wes Anderson, tells you a story of a concierge Gustave, who was blamed in a murder of a woman he loved. During the film he tries to prove his innocence with help of a bellboy ZeroThis comedy film, written and directed by extraordinary Wes Anderson, tells you a story of a concierge Gustave, who was blamed in a murder of a woman he loved. During the film he tries to prove his innocence with help of a bellboy Zero Moustafa, who becomes his friend.
The story takes place in imaginary country – the Republic of Zubrowka.
One peculiar detail, the narrative is formed as a story within a story within a story within a story. Moreover, it is divided into several chapters.

Without revealing other important details of the plot, I can point out the visual style and direction of the film. It is so engrossing that you rivet to it.

The cast carried out an outstanding performance. All actors were incredible, specially Ralph Fiennes as Monsieur Gustave and Tony Revolori as young Zero Moustafa.

It is common knowledge that sparkling screenplay and magnificent cast's work are key factors of film's success.
In this particular case, all worked out perfectly.

By the way, the movie received widespread critical acclaim and as a result many nominations for different awards.

In a conclusion, the movie is marvelous. You must have no doubt and hesitations – watch and enjoy!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

shiftworkerAug 22, 2016

Engaging, funny, clever and visually sumptuous. I could sing the praises of this treasure, and recommend it to every grown-up I know. I have seen it several times and will no doubt indulge again before too long. Why not 10? Because the leadEngaging, funny, clever and visually sumptuous. I could sing the praises of this treasure, and recommend it to every grown-up I know. I have seen it several times and will no doubt indulge again before too long. Why not 10? Because the lead character, Monsieur Gustave gets right up my nose. Perhaps I'm just too picky.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

TheRussianatorFeb 16, 2018

The Grand Budapest Hotel is another unique movie from Wes Anderson. The actors give their all, the script is very smart, and the cinematography is amazing. You will have a great time and wont be bored

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

Vitor007Sep 2, 2018

A story totally engaging, light, smart and fun. As much as Wes Anderson is criticized at some points in the script, winding himself up in this film, the same proves his immense ability to create a good story. Wes is getting closer toA story totally engaging, light, smart and fun. As much as Wes Anderson is criticized at some points in the script, winding himself up in this film, the same proves his immense ability to create a good story. Wes is getting closer to perfection. Unforgettable. 9.0/10… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

IsaacJFeb 19, 2019

Wes Anderson is perhaps one of the most delightfully unusual filmmakers working today, his films characterised by picturesque symmetry, wry humour and more than a hint of the macabre. The Grand Budapest Hotel is no different and actuallyWes Anderson is perhaps one of the most delightfully unusual filmmakers working today, his films characterised by picturesque symmetry, wry humour and more than a hint of the macabre. The Grand Budapest Hotel is no different and actually stands as one of Anderson’s finest films; it’s precisely choreographed, gorgeous to look at and, above all, an intelligent comedy that pays homage to bygone cinema whilst adding its own unique spin.
Though the action may jump time periods (whether it’s from Tom Wilkinson’s direct narrator or F. Murray Abraham’s narrator within the story), it centres around The Grand Budapest Hotel, an elite establishment for the rich and pampered in the fictional state of Zubrowka. Our attention is immediately turned to M. Gustave (Ralph Fiennes), the hotel’s concierge, who tends to the guests with a managed slickness… that is when he isn’t courting dowagers into his room. The film takes off on a race of storytelling, as Gustave is framed for the murder of an old lover (a prosthetic-clad Tilda Swinton) and must flee the law and who knows else with only the help of his protégé, lobby boy, Zero (a suitably boyish Tony Revelori, when not played 30 years down the line by a mellow F. Murray Abraham).
The film is a delightful farce, Anderson and Hugo Guiness’ script providing intelligent and subtle comedy that delivers even amid such a frenetic and occasionally scatty pace. For the most part though, The Grand Budapest Hotel is as tightly wound as one could expect from Wes Anderson; even amid the absurdity of ski chases and severed fingers, there’s a remarkable level of control to the madness, helped along by Anderson’s assured writing and direction. Employed in the cast is a who’s who of star-studded spectacle; Ralph Fiennes, Willem Dafoe and Saoirse Ronan are plot-central, but around them are bit cameos from the likes of Bill Murray, Jeff Goldblum and Lea Seydoux. Fiennes leads with rapier-sharp timing as Gustave, his performance radiating clipped composure, all complete with an irresistible charm. The supporting cast are admittedly largely one-note (occasionally the abundance of celebrity proves a little distracting) but are earnest enough to drive the film through.
Where the film has perhaps received the highest praise, however, is its design. The Grand Budapest hotel is a visual treat, its design vibrant yet avowedly architected. There’s almost a sense of the characters having been painted on screen; from the bright colours, sharp angles and miniature set pieces, the film feels as much a spectacle of art as an espionage romp. Alexandre Desplat’s score is perfectly judged, the musical voice established by the distinct and innovative use of the balalaika. The film is shot with equal verve, snapping from camera ratios incessantly to produce an energised and unexpected cinematography that boosts the narrative. At points, the movie may be a case of style over substance, but the film’s unusual design only seems to enhance one’s enjoyment of it.
The Grand Budapest Hotel is a strange film, a comedy full of black humour and gentlemanly profanity. Thoroughly entertaining and visually enchanting, this is certainly a gem from Wes Anderson.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

NouraEleanorJan 3, 2020

Everything is directed with perfection. Unlike any other movies, this movie has chapters and uses lots of plots. The only thing that I don't give it 10 is just because how short and fast the story was. I didn't get a chance to understand itEverything is directed with perfection. Unlike any other movies, this movie has chapters and uses lots of plots. The only thing that I don't give it 10 is just because how short and fast the story was. I didn't get a chance to understand it from the first watch. But, I can accept it.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

RobwinzApr 19, 2020

Wes Anderson's masterpiece, this movie has got an amazing vintage look to it and it's got some god damn phenomenal camera work. Also, this movie has got an interesting story with some really talented actors and they all do a really good jobWes Anderson's masterpiece, this movie has got an amazing vintage look to it and it's got some god damn phenomenal camera work. Also, this movie has got an interesting story with some really talented actors and they all do a really good job for what they're given. Finally, M. Gustave (Ralph Fiennes) and Zero (Tony Revolori) have got some really good chemistry with each other and there's a lot of heart and soul with their characters.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

NickTheCritickApr 23, 2022

Monsieur Gustave is the concierge but in fact the director of the Grand Budapest Hotel located in the imaginary Zubrowka. Above all, she enjoys the confidence (and something more) of elderly ladies. One of these, Madame D., entrusts him withMonsieur Gustave is the concierge but in fact the director of the Grand Budapest Hotel located in the imaginary Zubrowka. Above all, she enjoys the confidence (and something more) of elderly ladies. One of these, Madame D., entrusts him with a precious painting. Following her death, her son Dimitri accuses M. Gustave of murdering her. The man ends up in prison. The close complicity that binds him to his very young newly hired immigrant goalkeeper Zero will be of great help.
Anderson wants to make us smile about the countless adventures to which he subjects his protagonists. However, this does not cancel, indeed accentuates, the reflection on those borders that for too long in Europe have been points of no return for tens of thousands of people arrested and made to disappear and today they reappear in other less tragically evident but always fundamentally hostile ways.
However, this film also wants to be, from its very abstract as well as sharply mild beginning, a reflection on the art of storytelling.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

TVJerryMar 26, 2014

Wes Anderson movies are like a lovingly-stocked curio cabinet: engaging to look at and fascinating to marvel about. Ralph Fiennes heads up the cast of zany eccentrics as the concierge of the titular establishment. He includes the new LobbyWes Anderson movies are like a lovingly-stocked curio cabinet: engaging to look at and fascinating to marvel about. Ralph Fiennes heads up the cast of zany eccentrics as the concierge of the titular establishment. He includes the new Lobby Boy on his escapades, which include stealing a painting, escaping from prison and eluding the invading forces. Visually, this is a symmetrical delight: the locations are gorgeous and the detail is exquisite. The deadpan dialogue and comical staging keeps the pacing on its toes. If you enjoy cinema that's more about form than content, you'll find this hotel a lovely place to visit. Stay thru the credits to enjoy an animated man dancing to a delightful song.… Expand

4 of 5 users found this helpful41

All this user's reviews

8

DarthPreampJun 23, 2014

Solidly good movie. Not for kids. Very mature content. It was surprisingly laugh out loud funny for being a very seriously themed movie! The acting was excellent, the writing was decent to good, and it is an interesting movie in terms of theSolidly good movie. Not for kids. Very mature content. It was surprisingly laugh out loud funny for being a very seriously themed movie! The acting was excellent, the writing was decent to good, and it is an interesting movie in terms of the ideas it presents on both modern and Europe past.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

8

DukeJonJan 30, 2015

An extremely well crafted and quirky film by Wes Anderson. Beautifully shot with a charming story stuffed full of well realised characters this is a treat to behold. Brilliant acting by Ralph Fiennes, though I would have preferred if they'dAn extremely well crafted and quirky film by Wes Anderson. Beautifully shot with a charming story stuffed full of well realised characters this is a treat to behold. Brilliant acting by Ralph Fiennes, though I would have preferred if they'd left out some of the star cameos as they were just a distraction.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

phenomrock11Jan 18, 2015

As my first Wes Anderson movie I did not know exactly what to expect, but I certainly had high expectations for the movie following the huge wave of Oscar nods. What may seem like a complex and preposterous plot unfolds quite lovingly thanksAs my first Wes Anderson movie I did not know exactly what to expect, but I certainly had high expectations for the movie following the huge wave of Oscar nods. What may seem like a complex and preposterous plot unfolds quite lovingly thanks to the wonderful performances of Ralph Fiennes and Tony Revolori. While there is an excess of characters, I think it was all part of the fun. The cinematography was unique and truly sets the stage for the comedy that is very subtle at times; you should not expect a build up of jokes that end in an eruption of laughter, but rather to find yourself smiling throughout. Overall, a very enjoyable and genuine comedy, although perhaps not worthy of all the commotion it has stirred.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

lasttimeisawJul 1, 2014

Wes Anderson has been steadfastly honing his finesse since the outset of his career starting from BOTTLE ROCKET (1996) when he was only 27, from then, this wunderkind’s filmography has flourished healthily, presently he is among the mostWes Anderson has been steadfastly honing his finesse since the outset of his career starting from BOTTLE ROCKET (1996) when he was only 27, from then, this wunderkind’s filmography has flourished healthily, presently he is among the most successful auteur in US indie ground and internationally his fame also balloons with his audience, his eighth feature THE GRAND BUDAPEST HOTEL, this year Berlin International Film Festival’s opening film (and Grand Jury Prize winner) and a genuine box-office triumph, indicates he is not slowing down in any aspect.
read rest of my review on my blog: google cinema omnivore, thanks… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

beingryanjudeSep 3, 2014

Yes, outrageous. Yes, extravagant. And yes, heartfelt and brilliant. The Grand Budapest Hotel is one of Wes Anderson's finest achievements to date. Holstered by a unique performance from Ralph Fiennes and a marvelous ensemble, the film soarsYes, outrageous. Yes, extravagant. And yes, heartfelt and brilliant. The Grand Budapest Hotel is one of Wes Anderson's finest achievements to date. Holstered by a unique performance from Ralph Fiennes and a marvelous ensemble, the film soars high above Europe. Don't forget Tilda Swinton's brilliant cameo.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

8

geedupJun 10, 2014

Average story but good storytelling with great pictures. I like the spattering of other major actors in the film. However it isn't the story nor these actors but rather Wes' vision for this film that brings it to like with great colors andAverage story but good storytelling with great pictures. I like the spattering of other major actors in the film. However it isn't the story nor these actors but rather Wes' vision for this film that brings it to like with great colors and some imagination. His first such success in some time I'd say. Although without supreme, laugh out loud moments, well worth the watch.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

dev92Jul 24, 2014

Slightly too much Wes Anderson makes me rate this film just under Moonrise but it is still an extremely enjoyable film. Ralph Fiennes steals the show with a breathtaking performance, brimming with fun and comedic value, something I honestlySlightly too much Wes Anderson makes me rate this film just under Moonrise but it is still an extremely enjoyable film. Ralph Fiennes steals the show with a breathtaking performance, brimming with fun and comedic value, something I honestly didn't think that Fiennes had despite seeing him in In Bruges. Would definitely recommend to pretty much anybody (except for Michael Bay fans).… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

Compi24Mar 22, 2014

Wes Anderson's "The Grand Budapest Hotel" is a riotously funny and shockingly poignant opus with brilliant camerawork, satisfyingly characteristic production design, and some really adorable performances.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

LeZeeJun 17, 2014

One of the director I always look forward to his movie release is that Wes Anderson. Well, who don't like his movies if they are aware of his masterworks. He's one of the unique filmmakers with extraordinary ideas. I always love hisOne of the director I always look forward to his movie release is that Wes Anderson. Well, who don't like his movies if they are aware of his masterworks. He's one of the unique filmmakers with extraordinary ideas. I always love his screenplay, especially his miniature cinema sets. He believes in those technics and presents on the screen awesomely than completely done with computer graphics. In this movie as well he used them very nicely and gives pleasure to watch it.

As usual this movie too a comedy with director's traditional actors in it. A comedy that set in the backdrop of a hotel theme and their employees. This hotel is called 'The Grand Budapest Hotel' located on the edge of the Alp mountain in a fictional EU country Zubrowska. The story proceeds with the two layers of flashback to the years 1968 and 1932. It unfolds the life story of Gustave, prestigious hotel's caretaker and his pupil Zero, a lobby boy. Theirs struggle over the accusation of a crime and the other side world war is on a verge to invade the nation. Whether they successful to defend against the charges or not is the remaining story speaks.

Nice story and performances with eye catching visuals. Easily one of the best of this year. It looks very ordinary if it was a usual style movie, but Wes Anderson's touch made all the differences. The adventures are the highlights in all of his movies and so in this movie. Lots of whites and pinks you can see on the screen which is kind of trademark of this movie. In this humour movie violence partially attached, but safely avoided all the cruelties. With the lend of Saoirse Ronan character the story exploits a little bit youthful romance side. The introduction of other characters in the middle of the storytelling made more venturesome in the later parts.

I kind of doubt to suggest it if you are unfamiliar with Wes Anderson's earlier works. You should better start with them before committing this movie. There's a reason, because you may not indulge it like my friend who saw this with me who never hear the director. Otherwise, it is..., of course it is another masterwork by Wes. Anyway, I loved it and waiting for his new project announcement.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

BradySmithDec 2, 2014

After watching the G.B.H. again, I enjoyed it more than the first time around. It's a Wes Anderson movie, and it comes with all of his quirks, good and bad. This time though, I felt like his characters were given some room to breath. RalphAfter watching the G.B.H. again, I enjoyed it more than the first time around. It's a Wes Anderson movie, and it comes with all of his quirks, good and bad. This time though, I felt like his characters were given some room to breath. Ralph Fiennes, in the lead role, gives a great performance. Anderson has created a really memorable character for him to inhabit. In Moonrise Kingdom, I felt like the characters and performances were secondary to the production and set pieces, but here Anderson has corrected that mistake. The movie also doesn't put young children into shocking situations like Kingdom did, which is a plus for me since I found those situations to be morally lacking. The production design here is still top notch, especially the hotel itself. The ending is unexpectedly poignant, and it highlights just how much you've come to care for the characters over the relatively brief running time. Overall, it's a memorable and funny movie. It's still somewhat of an acquired taste, but I can't deny its quality, uniqueness, or the fact that I enjoyed it quite a bit.… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

8

nicholasbertApr 22, 2014

Not as intriguing as usual, I think, but still a million times better than anything that has come out lately. I couldn't stop wondering how they managed to gather so many famous actors in one film. The movie itself is kind of slow compared toNot as intriguing as usual, I think, but still a million times better than anything that has come out lately. I couldn't stop wondering how they managed to gather so many famous actors in one film. The movie itself is kind of slow compared to what we were promised in the trailer, but the humour is great and it is genuinely Wes Anderson.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

AndremaxDec 1, 2018

Cartunest and without compromisse, what makes movie very funny and flowing.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

sammurphy66Jul 14, 2014

Bolstered by a fantastic cast, great premise, first class acting, and a funny script, The Grand Budapest Hotel ranks as Wes Anderson's best work to date.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

8

NotRogerEbertJun 8, 2014

I can attest to this being one of the most visually interesting movies of all time. Every shot feels like a work of art, and a lot of time and effort was put into casting, cinematography, editing, and costume/set design. It's a perfectlyI can attest to this being one of the most visually interesting movies of all time. Every shot feels like a work of art, and a lot of time and effort was put into casting, cinematography, editing, and costume/set design. It's a perfectly realized world. With that being said, I didn't want the movie to end. At the same time, I wasn't riveted at what I was experiencing. It was the visual style that pulled me in, but not much else. The script is sharp and eloquently written, but it feels a tad overly classy. It's hard to say why I don't think this is perfect because it is (cinematically speaking). Perhaps a second viewing is in order. Whatever the case is, I recommend this to film buffs exclusively as one can appreciate the care and detail that went into each second of runtime. I don't know how casual watchers would interpret the film. It's something to see for yourself and be the judge of.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

MissRainbowtieJun 12, 2014

Wes Anderson makes movies for perfectionists. His eye for detail and meticulous structure finds the perfect blend of story, tone and humour in The Grand Budapest Hotel. Ralph Fiennes shines as Gustave H, and is perhaps his best performance toWes Anderson makes movies for perfectionists. His eye for detail and meticulous structure finds the perfect blend of story, tone and humour in The Grand Budapest Hotel. Ralph Fiennes shines as Gustave H, and is perhaps his best performance to date. Enjoyable, whimsical and instant replay value.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

tvhandyAug 26, 2014

Wes Anderson is an unstoppable monster in film, creating masterpiece after masterpiece that can do no wrong for their originality is a notch above the rest. The Grand Budapest Hotel is no except.

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

8

inaneswineNov 14, 2017

While the film loses its grip on the plot sometimes, its selling factor is its wonderfully silly humour - many laughs coming from its unique cinematography.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

douglasnotdougJun 23, 2014

Artistically its fun and lively. The performances are all fun and the directing is top notch. The ending is surprisingly poignant for a movie this stylistic. It isn't Wes Anderson's best but it is a really good movie.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

OwlieAug 22, 2014

Not what I expected!
This was a fresh breath for me. It had that 'old people humour', which was proven to me by the old lady sitting in front of me, literally pointing and laughing at the screen.
Story was well kept and captivating noNot what I expected!
This was a fresh breath for me. It had that 'old people humour', which was proven to me by the old lady sitting in front of me, literally pointing and laughing at the screen.
Story was well kept and captivating no matter how kooky it was.
Thoroughly enjoyed it.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

VorheesOct 23, 2014

Within a notion of a modern Pagliacci- this film's whimsical, satirical and tongue and cheek nature run concurrently and in parallel nature with the quick paced role the film moves. Fiennes and Revolori are excellent and the characters endureWithin a notion of a modern Pagliacci- this film's whimsical, satirical and tongue and cheek nature run concurrently and in parallel nature with the quick paced role the film moves. Fiennes and Revolori are excellent and the characters endure you to care for their flawed nature and utter faults as it pertains to the plot. Eloquently set in the mountains of Hungary, Anderson brings out the best of his embellished and baroque cinematography. With an inlay of narrative voices enveloping the entire plot- the film succeeds at placing you at a derivative story-arch that comically comes crashing down (that somewhat personifies a Byronian heroic trait on the part of Fiennes- perhaps to his own fault). The film's slight downfall is the inherent burlesque and farce dichotomy that may be, at times, "overplayed" by the beau monde/ privileged humor that arises through seemingly unconventional plot points.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

8

AngeloGeorgiouJan 2, 2015

What a hilariously off beat black comedy by Wes Anderson. I found myself transfixed by the amazing cinematography, characters, soundtrack and sets. Ralph Fiennes shined as Gustave H and Tony Revolori as Zero Moustafa played as his straightWhat a hilariously off beat black comedy by Wes Anderson. I found myself transfixed by the amazing cinematography, characters, soundtrack and sets. Ralph Fiennes shined as Gustave H and Tony Revolori as Zero Moustafa played as his straight man foil. A great first movie to kickoff my 2015.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

8

DokaluJan 17, 2015

The Grand Budapest Hotel is a funny, emotional story, that will keep you entertained all the way through. Zero Moustafa, an immigrant for the war, goes to work in a famous European hotel, where M. Gustave works as a legendary concierge.The Grand Budapest Hotel is a funny, emotional story, that will keep you entertained all the way through. Zero Moustafa, an immigrant for the war, goes to work in a famous European hotel, where M. Gustave works as a legendary concierge. There, they both will have amazing stories to talk about.
This film is enchanting, funny, very entertaining and a little emotional. You wil be laughing from the beginning to the end. It's a pretty cool, fresh story. The directing is very good, and the acting is excellent, especially from Ralph Fiennes as M. Gustave who was spectacular. This movie is about the story, but still, there was some parts with visual effects that look just awful. Some will say that the fact that it looks awful makes the movie even funnier, oh well, opinions. Though, everyone who likes good movies, stories, and comedy, has to watch this one.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

AndoniZarrJan 18, 2015

More style over substance, but it is definitely the closest Wes Anderson has been to create complex emotions rather than complex production designs. The characters have great moments and Fiennes performance is outstanding. Not an AndersonMore style over substance, but it is definitely the closest Wes Anderson has been to create complex emotions rather than complex production designs. The characters have great moments and Fiennes performance is outstanding. Not an Anderson fan, but this film is something everything must watch at least once.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

AravindhMar 10, 2015

The Grand Budapest Hotel is a typical Wes Anderson film, which at times looks silly and devoid of purpose, but which is visually splendid, artfully acted and often funny, to make for a fairly enjoyable viewing.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

MrMovieBuffFeb 1, 2016

Wes Anderson directs an all star cast in 'The Grand Budapest Hotel', a sophisticated and colorful experience told as a story, within a story, within a story.

The movie focuses on an eccentric hotel concierge named Monsieur Gustave H (aWes Anderson directs an all star cast in 'The Grand Budapest Hotel', a sophisticated and colorful experience told as a story, within a story, within a story.

The movie focuses on an eccentric hotel concierge named Monsieur Gustave H (a charismatic Ralph Fiennes) as he sends his dearly loved Madame D (Tilda Swinton) to go off on holiday and enjoy herself in Lutz. He then meets his Lobby Boy named Zero (Tony Revolori) who seems committed to his work and the two get on just fine.

Things don't go according to plan when it seems that in the newspaper headline that Madame D was murdered and her legacy must go to someone. Gustave and Zero then travel to see what was written in her will and it seems that she leaves the famous painting "Boy with Apple" to Gustave, and not her son (played Adrien Brody).

Gustave and Zero then steal the painting and are on the run from the law, hiding due to the fact that Gustave was accused of murdering the innocent and frail Madame D, he is arrested and Zero must look after the hotel until Gustave breaks out of jail, which Wes Anderson crafted with such detail.

What really impressed me with this movie was the crafting and the sheer attention to detail that the director has put, also on the character development. This is one of the most organised movies I have ever seen in my entire life, every little thing is done with perfection.

But, where there is lush style, there must also be some substance...the plot is very well written and the fact that it is told like a story, within a story, within a story is truly inspired and is great for anybody who is looking to be a future filmmaker.

The comedy didn't always work for me from time to time, I will admit that, but the story is so well told and the visuals is just remarkable, this is how you seamlessly mix style and substance.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

acaiberryMar 20, 2015

When watching The Grand Budapest Hotel, the scenery and the camerawork to produce the picture stood out the most. Why this is important is because the picture and the scenery throughout the movie was truly magnificent and made you feel as ifWhen watching The Grand Budapest Hotel, the scenery and the camerawork to produce the picture stood out the most. Why this is important is because the picture and the scenery throughout the movie was truly magnificent and made you feel as if I were transported back into time during a tumultuous period. But what really got me is the marvelous ability of Wes Anderson: create a heartfelt message in a deceptively thoughtful comedy.

The brilliancy of costume, music score, cinematography all to go along with a seemingly intriguing story makes this film a must watch. While only giving it an 8, do not pass up an opportunity to watch this as the quick-wit humor was there to get the audience amused by the adventure of the protagonists in this movie. I recommend this to those who want to experience the art of film without the special effects of unnecessary CGI.

The vibe I got was like I was watching a play and yes it was hard to stop watching most of the time. However there was a bit that prevented the score from being any higher. A lot of scenes were extremely lifeless and alot of times the scenes were too eccentric so talk about a weird sense of balance. There's some lack of character to character and individual development which is forgivable but it doesn't allow the audience to grasp as much a sense of affection for the cast. Also, if you don't like jumping around then that will bother you. Overall, this movie has deserved the accolades and recognition it has received and I appreciated the nice organization of the staging/set.

Word to describe: Stylish, there's a reason it won so many awards especially in design, direction, and production. The movie itself is truly unique in its presentation.
This is okay to watch alone or with a friend or 2. Don't even think about inviting the annoying friend who you'll think will try to predict everything. Just let the story come to you as it is.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

Rutger-KikkertJan 17, 2016

On technical level this movie is a masterpiece. Great acting, unique storytelling, great writing and very well and uniquely shot. But I found myself not really have that much fun with this movie that I was expecting. That is due to theOn technical level this movie is a masterpiece. Great acting, unique storytelling, great writing and very well and uniquely shot. But I found myself not really have that much fun with this movie that I was expecting. That is due to the storytelling. It sure is unique, but I thought is was very messy. Also I didn't find myself being al that interested in the characters and the story. And finally I found the phasing to be to fast and made the movie feel way too short and too small of movie.
Even though is still think this is a good movie that can be very entertaining and funny at times.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

skcFeb 13, 2016

Watched this film out of boredom whilst on my flight...And surprisingly enjoyed this film, the awkward humor was just entertaining to watch and very unique.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

whatirememberMar 6, 2017

This was my first Wes Anderson film, somehow, and I loved it. I’ve learned, by watching more of his films, that the kookiness and palette and composition and framing and satisfaction that I felt while watching this film is a sensation you getThis was my first Wes Anderson film, somehow, and I loved it. I’ve learned, by watching more of his films, that the kookiness and palette and composition and framing and satisfaction that I felt while watching this film is a sensation you get from watching all of Anderson’s stuff. In the theater, I just kept saying “Wow!” and “that’s beautiful” and “how’d he think of that?” and “have you seen anything like that before?” And I was saying it all to myself but I still remember it, and it felt like everyone could hear me and was saying the same thing.

But when we left the theater and I told you what I thought, you said back to me “I really hate that **** It’s so pretentious and stupid, and I hope you reconsider.” And it’s not like I don’t see that it can be pretentious, but I’d just had a revelation in my entire brain about movies and art. You walked quietly for a while and then started talking about some much better movies, which I hadn’t seen and couldn’t comment on. I wasn’t sure at that moment what to do with all of my thoughts and ideas. Movie Rating: 8/10
Viewing Experience: 7/10… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

glommanMar 28, 2021

I've come to the Grand Budapest Hotel and enjoyed my stay.

This movie is fun, creative, well-produced, yet also dramatic. Everything from the subtle worldbuilding in the background to the Mexico-shaped birthmark on Agath's cheek just reeksI've come to the Grand Budapest Hotel and enjoyed my stay.

This movie is fun, creative, well-produced, yet also dramatic. Everything from the subtle worldbuilding in the background to the Mexico-shaped birthmark on Agath's cheek just reeks of creativity and the love for film-making. This is a Wes Anderson film, so, if you don't like his other movies, you'll probably also don't like this one too. For me the movie kind of missed an emotional personal note, it's fun to watch, sure, and I don't know, if such a thing would've benefacted the movie greatly, but that would've elevated the movie for me personally to even greater extents.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

DawdlingPoetNov 20, 2021

The first thing to mention in relation to this film is that it is very stylised, very sort of exaggerated-ly bright and colourful, with heavy emphasis on yellow, orange and blue lighting. It has something of a sort of painting type look to itThe first thing to mention in relation to this film is that it is very stylised, very sort of exaggerated-ly bright and colourful, with heavy emphasis on yellow, orange and blue lighting. It has something of a sort of painting type look to it throughout. Its set in a ficticious land but one tha appears very Russian in style, perhaps art nouveau.

The actions that take place seem very blunt and quite sudden at times. The various characters are quite frank and straight to the point in nature, in dialogue and behaviourally. You could say there's a frantic sense to it but then the plot pace, or so I felt anyway, as I say was generally quite slow. Its certainly got that cult film in the making feel to it. I found it a bit hard to keep track of the story in parts but then as some of you may have gathered from previous reviews, I can be a bit easily distracted and especially complicated storylines aren't necessarily my 'thing'. This seemed very much like a comic book (turned to real life, of course) depiction of someones wild imagination. There's definitely a strong quirkiness throughout, incase you hadn't guessed that already. It certainly left me guessing what may happen at any given point, since the plot twists seemed quite random and it was certainly a pleasing watch to the eye. Its split in to various parts, as if its a book thats being read out loud, only when each new part starts, it appears on screen along with a painting, somewhat like old (silent?) black and white films.

The cinematography in this film s particularly good and I imagine this film would look especially good when viewed on a particularly large screen, or if seen in a cinema, although of course now its out on DVD. Although I found the plot to be ultimately rather slow and the direction to be confusing, its still quite engrossing, which I put down to the interesting use of camerawork, obviously the style (lightning etc.) factor and the quirkiness of the characters, plus the use of music. There is a heavy use of music, classical pieces and various incidental pieces - mainly string instruments, heightening the tension as relevant to the scene. I felt that the use of the score really added to the atmosphere in this film - it again, along with the lighting etc., has a really Eastern European or perhaps moreso Russian feel to it, although later on it also has a bit of an Italian feel to it too (when mandolin type instrument can be heard). There's also dream like chime pieces played once or twice and even a Transylvanian feel in one scene, with sombre organ music played while one moody authoritative character plods down a hotel corridor.

It overall has such a dreamlike feel to it that it did reel me in but its hard to convey this without providing actual clips of the film itself. If your familiar with the directors previous films (its directed by Wes Anderson, who also directed The Royal Tennenbaums, Rushmore, the Darjeeling Limited etc.), then you'll likely have a good rough idea of what this is like. There's a believability (I may be slightly making up such terms, I admit but hopefully you know what I mean(!)) issue, in terms of what happens and the consequences - again thinking about this, it very much makes me think of this being a dream like depiction. I wouldn't say it entirely takes away from the film - perhaps it adds to it in a way. There's definitely a sort of larger than life and fantastical element to it.

This won't appeal to everyone, by any means but then Wes Andersons films do tend to be that way. The dialogue is quite poetic, at least in various scenes throughout although not exclusively, due to some more sombre dialogue in parts and even curse words uttered ocassionally (believe it or not!). Yes this is really quite a quirky film but it is rather engrossing and could certainly have been worse.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

AJ_13Jan 11, 2021

Its so original, colorful and absurd that you will like it. The cast is absolutely amazing.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

JJ2FAS4UDec 29, 2021

----------------------------------7.8/10-----------------------------------

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

frightopiaMar 19, 2023

This film was extremely Wes Anderson, which is a good thing of course. Such a beautiful film.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

LynMay 21, 2014

Enjoyed "The Grand Budapest Hotel," though it won't be anywhere near the top of my "best of Wes Anderson" list. Visually, it's totally delightful, and Ralph Fiennes amps up his character nicely. But the slapstick bits go on and on ... andEnjoyed "The Grand Budapest Hotel," though it won't be anywhere near the top of my "best of Wes Anderson" list. Visually, it's totally delightful, and Ralph Fiennes amps up his character nicely. But the slapstick bits go on and on ... and most of the "big name" actors have little more than cameos. Unlike "Royal Tenenbaums," you don't look at someone like a Gwyneth Paltrow or a Ben Stiller and say, "Wow, I've never seen that person quite like this before." And it doesn't create the quirky magic of "Moonrise Kingdom," which was probably my favorite film that year. Still, a fun time.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

netflicApr 14, 2014

This movie is claimed to be a comedy-drama. I would characterize it as a mixture of a theater-of-absurd and a fantasy movie with a few funny twists. The director is Wes Anderson who is quite known. Many famous actors play small roles in theThis movie is claimed to be a comedy-drama. I would characterize it as a mixture of a theater-of-absurd and a fantasy movie with a few funny twists. The director is Wes Anderson who is quite known. Many famous actors play small roles in the movie and they do not disappoint. The movie is based on works of Stefan Zweig. It is a story of Mr. Gustave, a head concierge of a famous hotel and his protege in training Zero. Their adventures take place in a fictional Republic of Zubrowka while Europe is changing so swiftly between two world wars. Nostalgia for "sweet old times" is obvious.
If you are in for a realistic movie, this one is not for you.… Expand

0 of 5 users found this helpful05

All this user's reviews

7

BshopAug 16, 2014

Great film by Wes Anderson. Saw it first when it was at limited release at a small theater.
Reminded me of Moonrise Kingdom but with more eccentric characters.
In summary, if you like Wes Anderson films, you'll like this one. I bought itGreat film by Wes Anderson. Saw it first when it was at limited release at a small theater.
Reminded me of Moonrise Kingdom but with more eccentric characters.
In summary, if you like Wes Anderson films, you'll like this one. I bought it because I like his style. Movies are an escape, an alternate reality and this movie has that atmosphere and feeling. At least worth a rental.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

foxgroveMar 12, 2014

Hallelujah! I have finally seen a Wes Anderson film that I like. The mind bogglingly clever screenplay tips its hat to past eras of film making, but is very much a piece of writing that has Anderson's signature all over it. This, for once,Hallelujah! I have finally seen a Wes Anderson film that I like. The mind bogglingly clever screenplay tips its hat to past eras of film making, but is very much a piece of writing that has Anderson's signature all over it. This, for once, is a good thing. The design of the film, as in a lot of Anderson's work, is just beautiful and many effects are visually striking. A positive roster of character actors contribute to the fun (Saoirse Ronan's lack lustre turn aside) with Tllda Swinton and Willem Dafoe standing out. Everything is elevated, however, by the absolutely brilliant performance of Ralph Fiennes which is second only to his Amon Goeth in Schindler's List. I may still have reservations about Anderson and to a lesser extent this film, but if Fiennes isn't nominated for an Oscar next year for this deliciously sublime portrayal then that will be more of a farce than the film itself.… Expand

1 of 6 users found this helpful15

All this user's reviews

7

FadeBlackMay 9, 2017

Like much of Anderson's works, it offers fantastic cinematography and set designs, he is a master like no other in this field. Moving paintings indeed, he is a true artist. The trouble is with the largely bland story and plot. It isLike much of Anderson's works, it offers fantastic cinematography and set designs, he is a master like no other in this field. Moving paintings indeed, he is a true artist. The trouble is with the largely bland story and plot. It is entertaining enough, but never really reaches somewhere far, never really transcends or does something memorable. Quirky and good, but not much more.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

7

TheApplegnomeDec 29, 2014

The Grand Budapest Hotel is a classic among other films in the comedy genre this year.

The old fashioned theme of The Grand Budapest Hotel is one of the aspects I totally love. It’s also smooth, excellent and the cinematography might beThe Grand Budapest Hotel is a classic among other films in the comedy genre this year.

The old fashioned theme of The Grand Budapest Hotel is one of the aspects I totally love. It’s also smooth, excellent and the cinematography might be one of the best and most unique I have seen. The soundtrack is no exception; it gives the film feeling and pace. 2014 have been a great year, and that totally includes this movie. This film surpassed my expectations; it’s almost a flawless film. The directing is spectacular, just as the structure. It’s a real adventure, which is both entertaining and cheerful. The characters are great, and I really felt close to them all. There are many well-known actors in The Grand Budapest Hotel, and I really enjoyed that. But Tony Revolori as zero isn’t the best actor; he’s a bit too stiff for the role.

Great cinematography and superb comedy, that’s the strengths of this film. Unfortunately are the first 20-30 minutes not as entertaining as the rest of the film and the film could have gotten a higher rating if there had been even more funny stuff.

The Grand Budapest Hotel gets a 7.5/10.… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

7

FrankTCastleJan 3, 2015

An entertaining and quirky tale of murder, romance and the bond between a concierge and his apprentice. The star studded cast do a great job and deliver a fun drama with a healthy amount of comedy sprinkled here and there.

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

7

eagleeyevikingJun 18, 2014

Despite its slow pace and overabundance of characters, Wes Anderson's The Grand Budapest Hotel is quirky, acted flawlessly and shot in typical Wes Anderson fashion.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

watchoutch02Aug 22, 2022

It's alright but I was expecting a lot more from the plot. The first half was good, and then it almost fell apart

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

7

brohugMar 29, 2014

Another quirky diorama is added to the impressive collection of Wes Anderson who could be considered America's foremost auteur. And yet...

The film is beautiful in its color and set designs. A ravishing impression of continental empiricalAnother quirky diorama is added to the impressive collection of Wes Anderson who could be considered America's foremost auteur. And yet...

The film is beautiful in its color and set designs. A ravishing impression of continental empirical splendor in a Slavic country prior to something like World War II. The question is, as for several of Anderson's last few films: how does it make you feel? The sight and offbeat gags are there and aplenty but can they support something that is not quite drama or comedy, and certainly not conventional storytelling.
The last few scenes of the film redeem the previous segments as the relationship between M. Gustav H. and the Lobby Boy is cemented as a bond that finally feels genuine. And when the telescopic looking glass of the story's three time periods are finally pressed together, I did feel something close to profound melancholy for the memory of all the central characters in each age, no matter how ridiculous they were depicted.

Rushmore, The Royal Tenenbaums, and The Life Aquatic combined to showcase a new and unique voice in American cinema. In Rushmore, Max Fischer ambitiously pulls together a school stage play adaptation of the film Serpico. I loved that conceit then, but feel like that now IS the conceit for many of Anderson's latest films, including GBH and Moonrise Kingdom. Terrific actors reciting very serious-sounding, direct dialogue with middle school earnestness.… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

7

usherd369Mar 31, 2014

This is the best 'Wes Anderson film' to date, but not Wes Anderson's best film to date. It's large cast ensemble, sporadic punchlines and use of enframing lend itself to be very entertaining and tightly crafted from beginning to end, but alsoThis is the best 'Wes Anderson film' to date, but not Wes Anderson's best film to date. It's large cast ensemble, sporadic punchlines and use of enframing lend itself to be very entertaining and tightly crafted from beginning to end, but also lend itself to be much of the same. Nevertheless, if you're a fan of Wes Anderson's catalog - or a casual moviegoer - this is certainly another work that should be enjoyed by all.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

7

Potarto72Dec 21, 2014

The first thing I knew about Grand Budapest Hotel after leaving the theater was that some moments shined over others. 60% of the film is interesting enough, but lacks a great driving mechanism or significant motive. However, chunks of itThe first thing I knew about Grand Budapest Hotel after leaving the theater was that some moments shined over others. 60% of the film is interesting enough, but lacks a great driving mechanism or significant motive. However, chunks of it really stand out, being as funny and charming as any Wes Anderson movie I've seen. A similar trend exists with the film's actors and characters. The new and upcoming Tony Revolori, and the A-List veteran Ralph Fiennes are excellent as the film's head protagonists. Adrien Brody as Dmitri is hilarious, and Wes Anderson's other signature actors (Bill Murray, Ed Norton, Jason Schwartzman) all make small cameos. The only problem with this film is, some of the characters and situations are severely underutilized. As you can see above, plenty of major stars have a role, but many of them are either too short or too simple. Situations are sometimes built up and then let off easy. I think Anderson has tried a bit too hard to pack stars and visuals in, that the film's direction has resulted in some shortcomings. Regardless, they certainly don't detract from the film in any way, and Grand Budapest Hotel still makes for a funny adventure film that bleeds charm and whimsy, in typical Anderson style.… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

7

ValttuxdMay 9, 2014

This is an odd one... I don't really know if it's a good movie or not... I love Wes Anderson, but this isn't anything like any of the previous ones... That's a bad thing. I miss the "innocent" Wes Anderson of Rushmore and The Life Aquatic. InThis is an odd one... I don't really know if it's a good movie or not... I love Wes Anderson, but this isn't anything like any of the previous ones... That's a bad thing. I miss the "innocent" Wes Anderson of Rushmore and The Life Aquatic. In conclusion: It's a good movie, but I wouldn't call it a Wes Anderson movie.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

KovacsBowmanJun 15, 2014

As a general rule I love quirky, odd films and The Grand Budapest Hotel certainly delivers on that front.

The story will keep you involved and wanting to know more throughout the film, the style of filming also adds to the general positiveAs a general rule I love quirky, odd films and The Grand Budapest Hotel certainly delivers on that front.

The story will keep you involved and wanting to know more throughout the film, the style of filming also adds to the general positive atmosphere. With some strong acting and equally strong odd ball characters you are sure to enjoy this film.

There are plenty of twists and turns and several cameo roles by some famous actors. But unfortunately this is where the positives end for me. The film feels like it is trying so very hard to look like a quirky independent production, but sadly missing the spot somewhat.

It seems with every character in this film, talking role or not they just have to be odd or doing something odd in the background which detracts from the great story. Also some of the "comic book" style scenes really do not work in this film.

Sadly this is a little bit of a miss for me, yes it does have a strong story and great atmosphere but struggles to hit the sweet spot. Certainly worth a rent for a family film with plenty of odd ball action and I would certainly sit down and watch it again sometime.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

ydnar4Jul 21, 2015

The Gran Budapest Hotel is beautifully shot and captures some lovely set pieces. The film displays several of Wes Anderson's common signatures. Ralph Finnes is outstanding in the lead role and he dominates the screen. Look out for some ofThe Gran Budapest Hotel is beautifully shot and captures some lovely set pieces. The film displays several of Wes Anderson's common signatures. Ralph Finnes is outstanding in the lead role and he dominates the screen. Look out for some of Anderson's other collaborators scattered throughout the film.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

vikesh2206Nov 10, 2014

Despite its slow pace and overabundance of characters, Wes Anderson's The Grand Budapest Hotel is quirky, acted flawlessly and shot in typical Wes Anderson fashion.

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

7

MarianasPilotsOct 9, 2017

Wes Anderson is definitely an acquired taste. His strange comedy style isn't for all, and even I found myself wondering where this film was going in a couple places. There were a couple gags that went on for far too long, but in the end thisWes Anderson is definitely an acquired taste. His strange comedy style isn't for all, and even I found myself wondering where this film was going in a couple places. There were a couple gags that went on for far too long, but in the end this film was a thrill ride with non-stop laughs and great performances all the way around. It's hardly my favorite Anderson film, but it's one I'm so glad I watched.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

JamesDefoeJul 11, 2020

Despite having stunning visuals and likeable characters, many of the events that you would want to watch unfold happens off screen and you never get to see it. The narrative also never does enough effort to be less predictable. Overall,Despite having stunning visuals and likeable characters, many of the events that you would want to watch unfold happens off screen and you never get to see it. The narrative also never does enough effort to be less predictable. Overall, though, it is a pleasant experience.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

akshatmahajanAug 8, 2021

The Grand Budapest Hotel has nothing new in it, it is same flashback story telling about a crime adventure. What makes this movie different is that it was executed in a different way. These type of stories don't have impact on audience thatThe Grand Budapest Hotel has nothing new in it, it is same flashback story telling about a crime adventure. What makes this movie different is that it was executed in a different way. These type of stories don't have impact on audience that much but the execution of this movie made this movie to have impact on tue audience.

Almost everything in this movie; direction, acting, pace setting, tone built-up was good. The interaction scenes between two main leads were grasping. The pace and tone setting was also good. Everything in the movie looked real, not forceful. Only thing which I didn't like about this movie was that last hour was very much uneven and was little bit unbalanced. Overall, you must give it a try. You will enjoy this different adventure which comprises of crime and drama.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

TheQuietGamerOct 30, 2014

It's a very unique film. At times coming off as quite odd. There are quite a few funny moments throughout, however it does still feel light on humor in the end. Perhaps it relies to much on whimsy to get it through. Regardless there's anIt's a very unique film. At times coming off as quite odd. There are quite a few funny moments throughout, however it does still feel light on humor in the end. Perhaps it relies to much on whimsy to get it through. Regardless there's an interesting plot filled with oddball characters to keep things entertaining when the laughs are sparse. Still as a whole I do feel it's missing something. It's just not funny enough to get by, and a unique theme can only carry you so far.… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

6

mepittsApr 4, 2014

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. OK, bottom line--would I recommend people go see this? Sure, with some reservations. It was silly and fun with great pacing, lots of enjoyable cameos and fascinating production values, location and interior shots (real or CGI). And the relationship between the lobby boy and his girlfriend (and to a lesser extent between the lobby boy and the Ralph Fiennes character) demonstrated some depth of feeling, but that said, and since two of those three characters were dead at the telling, I found the movie essentially "soul-less"--very clever and sophisticated but fairly empty and dark at its core.… Expand

3 of 4 users found this helpful31

All this user's reviews

6

Trev29Jul 20, 2014

Wes Anderson brings creativity and style to this above average story. There were certainly funny and even exciting moments to this movie, but in the end it just didn't wow me.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

NightReviewsMar 23, 2014

“You see, there are still faint glimmers of civilization left in this barbaric slaughter house that was once known as humanity”. If there was ever a quote to sum up the films of Wes Anderson, this would be high on the list. Highly inventive,“You see, there are still faint glimmers of civilization left in this barbaric slaughter house that was once known as humanity”. If there was ever a quote to sum up the films of Wes Anderson, this would be high on the list. Highly inventive, absurd, and at times, narratively incoherent, Anderson’s eighth feature film is a grand, accommodating feature whose self is probably not as grand as the cast it has rounded out.

From Ralph Fiennes, Harvey Kietel, Bob Balaban, Saoirse Ronan, Lea Seydoux, to regulars Tilda Swinton, Adrien Brody, Jason Schwartzman and of course Bill Muarry, The Grand Budapest Hotel is a formidably full house of A-list actors who happily lend their skills to the highly inventive and immensely visual Anderson. Aside from the wholly impressive cast, is the quirky and unmistakably unique vision of Anderson himself.

If you haven’t been fortunate enough to experience a Wes Anderson film yet, you are surely missing out on one of the most elaborate, detailed, and symmetrical styles of film-making ever known. Anderson’s style, renown and admired by many, may very well be the American indie art-house King and The Grand Budapest Hotel may very well be his grandest and most admirable spectacle yet–although it may not be his most engaging or beloved.

The Grand Budapest Hotel is an empirical picture, in every sense of the word. Throughout his career as a writer/director, Anderson has defined and refined his vision to the point that every heist; every adventure; or every group of individuals, can easily be distinguishable, as if their existence could only be understood within an Anderson film. The essence of the characters within The Grand Budapest, as well as his overall vision, is creatively maintained thanks to the purity of the scenarios and wackiness of the characters Anderson houses, in whatever setting it may be. For decades now, Anderson has bequeathed to film-lovers everywhere and audiences’ alike, a signature style unlike any other.

There are countless films where the characters have come secondary only to the immense and elaborate setting they are placed in. For example, in many films urban settings; New York City has played a pivotal role (see: Shame and Annie Hall), The Wild West (see: The Three Burials of Melquiades Estrada, Unforgiven), and exotic locales within Europe set the landscape for timeless stories of intrigue, lust, love and tragedy (see: Vicky Cristina Barcelona and The Bicycle Thief.). In Anderson’s world, although many of his settings are within the very real world we live in today, sublets of his world are envisioned within our world, and in essence, these locales become the greatest character of them all, housing very small, intricate tales of the people whose stories are shared in its presence. The setting this time, is none other than the Grand Budapest. A hotel, that houses the highly empathetic new lobby boy Zero (Tony Revolori) and his journey to becoming the irreplaceable sidekick to the one and only infamous concierge M. Gustave H (Ralph Fiennes). Among the many other patrons of the hotel and each of their individual secrets, tall tales, and life memories, Anderson centres the film around a priceless painting, now put in the hands of Gustave thanks to death of M. Gustave’s latest deceased romance, the mysteriously elder Madame D (an unrecognizable Tilda Swinton). What transpires, is an array of fantastical plot schemes and recanted storytelling that may only make sense when mentioning the name of Wes Anderson.

Like any other Anderson film, the stories are only secondary to their execution. Anderson’s films are the closet things to mathematical proofs, where the process of plot-making comes first before the final, usually predictable and happy outcome. Anderson may have come off one of his most cherished screenplays with his last film Moonrise Kingdom, and The Grand Budapest Hotel may in no way trump it, but thankfully, it never tries. Instead, after exploring the unfathomable bond between young lovers, Anderson penetrates deep and long the affections of friendship and the importance of patronage within the industry of service and hospitality. Surprisingly this is a theme that he has yet to encounter, especially after his beloved muse and frequent collaborator Kumar Pallana passed and served as nothing less than a staple to the Anderson cannon. Think of The Grand Budapest Hotel as a large and completely dysfunctional family taking care of you, much like Anderson’s earlier work The Royal Tenenbaums, only this time, imagine them slotted at the other end of a hotel reception desk.… Expand

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

6

Apotheosis34Apr 21, 2014

Wes Anderson's film is decently paced, written moderately well, and contains a bevy of talented actors who all conspire to do their part, but falls just short of consistently capturing attention and drawing laughs with its comedic intention.Wes Anderson's film is decently paced, written moderately well, and contains a bevy of talented actors who all conspire to do their part, but falls just short of consistently capturing attention and drawing laughs with its comedic intention. It's just too eccentric for its own good. Far too many times were the laughs forced, as if the few members of the audience were laughing out of a desire to show themselves they "got the joke".

By no means was it a bad film, however. The filming style was fairly straightforward but well done. Shots were pleasingly spaced and different ratios chosen for different time periods, effectively separating the periods without any intrusion or confusion for the audience. The set design and chosen locations fit the tone and general "feel" of the plot. The actors played each character off of one another to create some creatively comedic moments as well as others filled with tension. With a few exceptions - Edward Norton's peculiar character - the dialogue was performed well; Ralph Fiennes in particular did a wonderful job.

Despite these positives, the unneccsariy eccentricity of the film combined with its wholly uninteresting plot made the film rather tedious to sit through. Although it was, perhaps, not technically a comedy, The Grand Budapest Hotel certainly tried to appear like one but did little to capitalize on the actors it was given. The comedy fell short of being funny in nearly all cases, save for a few here and there. The moments were obvious and some juvenile in their humor.

The film did have a novel or bookish feel to it - its plot seemed better suited to a written medium, but it was effectively conveyed on film.

Though it did succeed in some areas, The Grand Budapest Hotel failed to consistently produce an interesting narrative and tried to hard to be a comedy combined with an odd plot. It was an above average film, but only just so, and with a veteran director in Wes Anderson with a talented cast in did not rise to the occasion and meet expectations.… Expand

3 of 4 users found this helpful31

All this user's reviews

6

DarkShamanSep 12, 2014

Sometimes boring, sometimes worth a smile. A classic educational movie with many symbolic elements, very fit for a high school audience to teach them about morals.

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

6

GJBariJan 19, 2015

The Grand Budapest Hotel is funny and charming, and very much what you'd expect from Wes Anderson. In fact, I don't think it's too much of a stretch to say that there's really nothing new here. Wes Anderson makes all of his movies to appealThe Grand Budapest Hotel is funny and charming, and very much what you'd expect from Wes Anderson. In fact, I don't think it's too much of a stretch to say that there's really nothing new here. Wes Anderson makes all of his movies to appeal to the audience that he already has in the palm of his hand. In some ways that's a good thing, because Anderson certainly has a very unique style that appeals to a lot of people, and in other ways it's a bad thing, because there's never any attempt to expand his audience; it's just another Wes Anderson flick. I'm low-balling this review on purpose as a warning: I actually happened to really like this movie, but then again I am a Wes Anderson fan, and if you're a Wes Anderson fan, you'll probably like this movie also. However, if you're not a Wes Anderson fan, don't even bother with this one. Definitely a good flick, but by no means Anderson's best.… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

6

AgentLviJul 7, 2023

not bad movie, but not good either. The story is really miss & match, visual is decent, and the voice is also decent

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

donnelbrApr 2, 2014

Meh, the film is interesting, and it's fun to see so many stars in one film. But it falls short in the laughs department. It's silly, and cute, and oh so clever, but left me a bit bored. I have a feeling some of the high reviews are fromMeh, the film is interesting, and it's fun to see so many stars in one film. But it falls short in the laughs department. It's silly, and cute, and oh so clever, but left me a bit bored. I have a feeling some of the high reviews are from folks who are pleased with hollywood taking them a little more seriously. However, for me it was a bit dull.… Expand

6 of 12 users found this helpful66

All this user's reviews

5

JonDocApr 2, 2014

Okay so the trailer for this movie was great - it zinged along and promised a fast-paced film but the reality is that the feature itself is surprisingly slow by comparison. The marketing men lied to us! I was expecting a rollicking farce butOkay so the trailer for this movie was great - it zinged along and promised a fast-paced film but the reality is that the feature itself is surprisingly slow by comparison. The marketing men lied to us! I was expecting a rollicking farce but this was more drawn out. It wasn't bad per se, just not very good. Nothing new. Seen it all before. I much preferred Life Aquatic and Moonrise Kingdom in terms of originality. And like that last film, Bill Murray is again wasted in this.… Expand

2 of 7 users found this helpful25

All this user's reviews

5

MikefromAngusJul 6, 2014

Overall I like Wes Anderson movies, but with this one. It reminded me, of all recycled things I already seen in his other movies. Worse of all, the story or the atmosphere didn't catch my attention. Overall it was a 5 out of 10 for me

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

ClariseSamuelsJul 29, 2014

The Grand Budapest Hotel is more remarkable for its similarity to previous work by Wes Anderson than it is for its basis in the works of Stefan Zweig. Anderson makes much of this literary inspiration but the movie is not based on anyThe Grand Budapest Hotel is more remarkable for its similarity to previous work by Wes Anderson than it is for its basis in the works of Stefan Zweig. Anderson makes much of this literary inspiration but the movie is not based on any particular Zweigian tome—Anderson claims it is a conglomeration of two works by Stefan Zweig. First, Ungeduld des Herzens, literally The Impatience of the Heart. However, as a someone who holds a PhD in German literature, I would translate it as “The Restless Heart” (sorry, there are no italics in the Metacritic text box!), whereas the English edition is in fact called Beware of Pity. The second work cited by Anderson is Rausch der Verwandlung, literally translated as The Intoxication of Transformation, but again, I would translate it as “The Ecstasy of Change”—the English title is actually The Post Office Girl. In addition to merging influences from these two works, Anderson has put Zweig himself in the movie, thus incorporating biographical elements as well. It is such a mishmash that it appears the most Zweigian element in the movie is Tom Wilkinson's portrayal of the aged author. Wilkinson bears a strong resemblance to Zweig.

I was more struck by the resemblance of the film to Moonrise Kingdom. The cinematography has the same eerie lighting that gives it a fairy-tale aspect, and the subject matter is treated in the same Andersonian style—a lot of eccentric characters merging together in unconventional ways. And the script has a very Andersonian bearing with no relationship whatsoever to the style of Stefan Zweig. Like Moonrise Kingdom, sentences are short and declarative. Characters express themselves rather tersely and bluntly, but in a heartfelt way, which is charming and extremely American, even perhaps Californian. Only Ralph Fiennes as Gustave has a European flavor to his personality, but despite his British accent, he is too exaggerated (as are many of the characters) and has no real connection to a Zweigian mode of expression.

Another noteworthy resemblance to Moonrise Kingdom is the cast—we see Edward Norton, Tilda Swinton, Bill Murray, and Harvey Keitel making a comeback. And there are surprises, such as Ron Goldblum and Owen Wilson. A bit like the post-office girl of Zweig's novel, a young lobby boy who is escaping the devastation and overwhelming poverty of war finds himself in an opulent and extravagant hotel that gives him privy to the lives of the preposterously rich. It both changes him and forces him to take refuge in his real self, however humble. The film tells the story of how this grand old hotel of the Austro-Hungarian Empire changed and evolved over the years, becoming more sterile and functional with modernity, but more specifically the film recounts how the lobby boy eventually became the sole owner of the hotel. That is the essence of the Zweigian influence, in addition to the fact that the story is being told to the young Stefan Zweig (Jude Law), who later recounts the tale in his writings as the elder Stefan Zweig (Tom Wilkinson).

Unfortunately, Grand Budapest Hotel is not quite as charming as Moonrise Kingdom, and by the end of the film, the endless train of eccentric behaviors and character quirks starts to daze the viewer's mind. Additionally, the film neglects to capture the essence of the German spirit, much like Eyes Wide Shut tried to convey the essence of Arthur Schnitzler's Traumnovelle but failed because it was just too American. Perhaps it is just a fact that Hollywood directors find it difficult to comprehend the shadowy depths and the tortured substance of modern German literature.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

TyranianSep 19, 2019

I like Wes Anderson but didn't really enjoy this film, has some good humour but really unlikeable characters.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

csw12Jul 27, 2014

For Wes Anderson "The Grand Budapest Hotel" is a masterpiece, but that doesn't mean it was all that great. What made it better than his other films was its fast paced, incorporated humor and had some better acting. In the end though it was amFor Wes Anderson "The Grand Budapest Hotel" is a masterpiece, but that doesn't mean it was all that great. What made it better than his other films was its fast paced, incorporated humor and had some better acting. In the end though it was am average film.… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

5

analogkid280Apr 1, 2014

A very visually appealing movie that has many subtle elements. Such as the deserts they eat at the end in the future not having the pristine appeal that the ones in the past where made. Plot wise well, uh ok. I did like looking around theA very visually appealing movie that has many subtle elements. Such as the deserts they eat at the end in the future not having the pristine appeal that the ones in the past where made. Plot wise well, uh ok. I did like looking around the hotel at the different times and comparing them in my mind. The story just was a little weak.… Expand

2 of 7 users found this helpful25

All this user's reviews

5

Rox22Aug 2, 2015

If anything, I'm a bit conflicted in my opinion of this movie. On the one hand I loved the brisk paced humor and wit that is placed throughout the film. But on the other hand it lacked any real development. It almost felt like a more seriousIf anything, I'm a bit conflicted in my opinion of this movie. On the one hand I loved the brisk paced humor and wit that is placed throughout the film. But on the other hand it lacked any real development. It almost felt like a more serious take on an episode of that old TV show 'Allo "allo.

The is a plethora of interesting and unique characters, but they are also just for show. Most of the cast feel more like props than actual people. The two main leads work well together, but almost the whole time it feels like we are just getting a glimpse of a much bigger story.

Overall:
The Grand Budapest Hotel feels like a pilot film to much bigger world. There are so many good ideas here, it is such a shame they aren't touched on more. While it is a nice movie, it ultimately feels hollow. An empty, pretty shell of what it should have been.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

NitishAug 15, 2014

I liked the Moonrise Kingdom more than this movie, Although there are huge similarities between the overall framing of the movies and also i can reconcile many scenes as similarly crafted but this time it lack the smoothness.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

patrickpotterMar 21, 2014

There is a difference between having a style, and copying the style of The Royal Tenenbaums. Unfortunately this film is more of a copy, filled with cameos and fake characters. I almost wouldn't have been surprised to see a muppet to pop up atThere is a difference between having a style, and copying the style of The Royal Tenenbaums. Unfortunately this film is more of a copy, filled with cameos and fake characters. I almost wouldn't have been surprised to see a muppet to pop up at one point. The best Anderson films are the creative, inspired ones with characters you care about, which is basically all of them up until The Grand Budapest Hotel.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

5

charlieburyMar 20, 2014

You can either love or hate Wes Anderson, or you can love and hate him at the same time. Unfortunately, The Grand Budapest Hotel has torn me apart. It is undeniably perfect Anderson: obsessive and strict design, colour palettes, composition,You can either love or hate Wes Anderson, or you can love and hate him at the same time. Unfortunately, The Grand Budapest Hotel has torn me apart. It is undeniably perfect Anderson: obsessive and strict design, colour palettes, composition, framing and blocking. However, it is essentially missing something; my emotions traversed from sheer boredom to stifled laughter to disorderly admiration. My conclusion is that Anderson has become too overworked; I dislike him for this, yet at the same time a part of me admires the man for his precise ingenious.

The film starts and immediately you taste Anderson’s stop-motion style with precise camera panning and boxed framing. The film then jumps through three prologues of time, with the familiar Anderson narration and expose of shots, until we land ourselves at The Grand Budapest Hotel between the wars in a fictional state of Europe. What follows is a story of chapters with crimes, chases, mischief, rivalry, envy and even slapstick comedy. It is all tightly wound and then released like a chasm, the chapters seem somewhat disjointed, the acts become emotionally sterile and ultimately there isn’t a chance for the story to coerce.

We are presented with the same Anderson, but also a new Anderson. He presses on his comedic roots and concentrates on the physicality of funny. M. Gustave (Ralph Fiennes) is the prime consent for this, and Fiennes is brilliantly on key creating a few treasurable notes of laughter. On occasion, this isn’t just through material act, but also sharp, witty and almost obscene dialogue. In one scene, he utters to the new lobby boy (whose elder self is predominantly narrating the story – F. Murray Abraham). “When you’re young it’s all fillet steak, but as you get older, you have to move onto the cheaper cuts.” If you like Anderson for his melancholic charm and grounded representations of struggling individuals in a fantastical yet realistic world (think Moonrise Kingdom and The Royal Tenenbaums), then don’t have high expectations for this, you won’t get what you came for.

This film is being highly applauded (a reason for my great expectations), yet for all the same reasons, the obvious stylistic reasons. I haven’t seen a single review commenting on how they related to the story on a personal or cultivating note. Are we focusing on a cinematic story here, or what appears to be a theatrical and all-too whimsically clever telling of one?

Lastly, I will mention what is palpable and largely unsettling: the ensemble cast of great name actors all battling for a screen spot. A great cast list can give a film much admirable credit, however Anderson has gone a bit overboard here, with Harvey Keitel, Bill Murray and Owen Wilson popping up for five or so minutes, the story becomes even more fictitious and preposterous. I won’t list the rest of the cast, simply search it on IMDB or watch the film, but it is certainly remarkable yet somewhat heedless.

It was a muddled evening, and to be honest I am still rather mystified amidst my contemplations on the film. Frankly, I was disappointed and the film is no more than what Anderson’s lavish style makes it. One might say you are better off trying to watch it inside out.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

5

TheMadNagApr 29, 2014

Found this movie to be boring, and really not all that great. I didn't laugh really for this to be a comedy, and was actually confused on how it could get such great reviews. Perhaps my taste in movies is terrible but this just wasn't there.

2 of 6 users found this helpful24

All this user's reviews

5

Raven25Sep 20, 2014

I enjoy comedy. This is not a particularly funny film. At best, you might get a short chuckle. It is AVERAGE. There is nothing terribly wrong with it and nothing amazing right with it either. The plot is lazy and slow, the acting andI enjoy comedy. This is not a particularly funny film. At best, you might get a short chuckle. It is AVERAGE. There is nothing terribly wrong with it and nothing amazing right with it either. The plot is lazy and slow, the acting and characters are contrived and transparent, the scenery is apt but nothing more.… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

5

pesho_oneOct 28, 2014

It is beautifully shot, there are many famous actors appearing, but it is an utter nonsense nevertheless. It gets old and boring really quick. It is way too pretentious and taking itself too seriously while loosing grip and focus of its ownIt is beautifully shot, there are many famous actors appearing, but it is an utter nonsense nevertheless. It gets old and boring really quick. It is way too pretentious and taking itself too seriously while loosing grip and focus of its own twists and perks. It tries to be funny and it even succeeds at times, but the uncertain attempts are far too many. It just tries too hard.
As a whole, it will be perceived rather as a piece of art, which you can respect, but never really like. Avoid if you seek engaging movie, but watch if you are into the actors/director (still the performances are way too theatrical to really shine). And I am afraid, at the end, it did lean toward a waste of time for me.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

5

Movi3R3vi3werNov 27, 2014

Even though it's highly overrated, Wes Anderson managed to create one of the weirdest, odd, quirky, and original movies I have seen in years. With a stellar cast this is a mostly enjoyable movie.

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

5

YesterJan 25, 2020

All pomp and no substance. It's not a bad thing, but you should know beforehand since it's not for everyone.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

4

charles19Apr 6, 2014

Wow. What a waste of money and time. This is a very highly stylized movie. I really didn't like it because: (a) it is not believable on any level, (b) I couldn't empathize with the characters at all, and (c) it lacks drama... half-way throughWow. What a waste of money and time. This is a very highly stylized movie. I really didn't like it because: (a) it is not believable on any level, (b) I couldn't empathize with the characters at all, and (c) it lacks drama... half-way through the movie I was still waiting for something significant to happen. Throw in significant over-acting and you have a movie that I don't think I would even watch on my TV at home. Yes, it is visually stunning. That's about the only positive aspect it has.… Expand

4 of 8 users found this helpful44

All this user's reviews

4

Honest-reviewsJun 8, 2014

I was disappointed with this movie. There was raving reviews which the movie could never live up to, but even without considering these reviews the movie is average and watchable. There are a few moments where you'll **** but the majority isI was disappointed with this movie. There was raving reviews which the movie could never live up to, but even without considering these reviews the movie is average and watchable. There are a few moments where you'll **** but the majority is very unfunny and overacted. It is more a light-hearted movie than an out-and-out comedy.

It is watchable, but slow at times and does not at all deserve the critical acclaim. I believe there is an element of snobbery behind the reviews that rave about this movie. Had it been an unknown foreign movie without the big name actors, it would be rightly called average.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

4

aztecinkcJul 28, 2014

For those who view "Bottle Rocket" as Anderson's best (read: unpretentious, original, and unburdened by the ornamentation he would eventually become transfixed by), it's not surprising that GBH is a disappointment. When once obscure wasFor those who view "Bottle Rocket" as Anderson's best (read: unpretentious, original, and unburdened by the ornamentation he would eventually become transfixed by), it's not surprising that GBH is a disappointment. When once obscure was entertaining, it now becomes distracting. When once bizarre was endearing, it now becomes, well, just so bizarre it leads nowhere. The film goes many directions, and none of them capture you or make you care about how they end. You just want it to end.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

4

Deni1985Dec 23, 2014

I liked Rushmore, and have watched every single Wes Anderson movie since Rushmore. Fool me once shame on you fool me twice shame on me, is how the saying goes? I'm a quadruple fool then.

What gets to me is that I watch these boring drawnI liked Rushmore, and have watched every single Wes Anderson movie since Rushmore. Fool me once shame on you fool me twice shame on me, is how the saying goes? I'm a quadruple fool then.

What gets to me is that I watch these boring drawn out movies (I admit the visuals are good) and everyone gives these movies good ratings, and I watch them. Looking back at the Royal Tenenbaums, or Life Aquatic, or even Moonrise Kingdom, I really don't remember a point to the movie, I don't really remember what the whole outcome was. I remember seeing some of my favorite actors in them, I remember seeing good cinematography, but I also remember looking at my watch every five minutes, hoping that the movie will finish up already! And here is my gripe with Wes Anderson movies: boring, drawn out, gimmicky.

A good movie is when I'm mad the movie ended so soon (even if it was a 3 hour movie). I can't say this about any of Anderson's movies. Every time the credits roll, I'm happy that the movie finally ended, and I endured another Anderson film. I shouldn't be relived to see the credits after 90 minutes, but with Wes Anderson I too often am.

No more Wes Anderson for me. I won't be ashamed of saying the same thing to my friends who love his movies (or so they say).… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

3

marco34laMar 30, 2014

I'm sorry this movie was grossly over-hyped. I found it to be mildly entertaining and not nearly as good as
'The royal Tananbaums.' Ididn't find it funny at all - it was trying to be slapstick at times
and screwball at others - but failedI'm sorry this movie was grossly over-hyped. I found it to be mildly entertaining and not nearly as good as
'The royal Tananbaums.' Ididn't find it funny at all - it was trying to be slapstick at times
and screwball at others - but failed miserably. Again, it's a tepid adventure, not worth the hype or the positive reviews.… Expand

6 of 14 users found this helpful68

All this user's reviews

3

NavyBeanApr 23, 2014

Best for the smug. The "too-loud laughter of the art-house patron" is a review that would work on this film. There's an audience for this that wants to think they're in on the joke and the rest of us rabble don't have the emotionalBest for the smug. The "too-loud laughter of the art-house patron" is a review that would work on this film. There's an audience for this that wants to think they're in on the joke and the rest of us rabble don't have the emotional intelligence to see the forest. But the joke's on them.

This is a beautiful-looking, highly-styled, clever but EMPTY film. These are Wes Anderson characters in Wes Anderson settings. The dialogue is cute, but gets old by the end ... there's no arc, no development ... just odd, quirky characters who are odd and quirky for the sake of it.

Rushmore and Moonlight Kingdom worked because the characters were great, lonely people. There are no great characters in GBH ... and the story is thin ... but it does look nice.… Expand

8 of 13 users found this helpful85

All this user's reviews

3

ariel84Jun 18, 2014

well, that was an hour and a half i could've spent watching something else. i love only two anderson films (the royal tanenbaums and darjeeling limited). they were stylized, but not to the point where the actors were props. the stories ofwell, that was an hour and a half i could've spent watching something else. i love only two anderson films (the royal tanenbaums and darjeeling limited). they were stylized, but not to the point where the actors were props. the stories of both were touching. this film should've been much better. it could've revolved around the society of concierges and been delightful. too many A list actors with very little to do. the centering of virtually every shot drove me a little crazy. it was watching a series of still life tableaus. i kept thinking, "this is so hipsterish, why am i watching this?"… Expand

4 of 7 users found this helpful43

All this user's reviews

3

LowbrowCinemaMar 18, 2014

Wes Anderson has great style and wit but THE GRAND BUDAPEST HOTEL is one more effort from Anderson that is totally satisfied with being nothing more than cute. The film looks great, quite amazing in fact, but really is this trite exerciseWes Anderson has great style and wit but THE GRAND BUDAPEST HOTEL is one more effort from Anderson that is totally satisfied with being nothing more than cute. The film looks great, quite amazing in fact, but really is this trite exercise all that this talented filmmaker and cast can really accomplish? A little soul, na inkling of depth or insight would be nice. Ralph Fiennes totally scores though in a wonderful central role. But once he leaves the screen, I just got bored.… Expand

6 of 12 users found this helpful66

All this user's reviews

3

drewstroyerApr 5, 2014

I went in expecting to love the movie based on the high Metacritic score and boy was I disappointed. There weren't specific things to hate but there was very little to love. I found two things positive: 1) the acting was solid, 2) theI went in expecting to love the movie based on the high Metacritic score and boy was I disappointed. There weren't specific things to hate but there was very little to love. I found two things positive: 1) the acting was solid, 2) the directing and cinematography seemed well done to me, although not my style. However, the script was so uninteresting I would have walked out had I not been with friends. The few laughs I had were small chuckles, and the humor was little more than a character getting frustrated and screaming curse-words. I had absolutely zero attachment to any of the characters or the plot. The movie wasn't much more than an adult cartoon. They may as well have been dropping anvils on each other.… Expand

5 of 7 users found this helpful52

All this user's reviews

3

RMckayJan 2, 2022

I wish I could at least give this a mixed review, as I'm such great fan of Bottle Rocket, Rushmore, Tennenbaums etc... but with this overcooked mess of a star-studded cheap shot, Wes totally loses me in boredom and overbakes aesthetic. ItI wish I could at least give this a mixed review, as I'm such great fan of Bottle Rocket, Rushmore, Tennenbaums etc... but with this overcooked mess of a star-studded cheap shot, Wes totally loses me in boredom and overbakes aesthetic. It seems Wes bought into his own hype. I'd love to see Wes break out of square he's painted himself into. I saw this in theaters and if someone told me this was actually a parody film of a Wes Anderson film, I'd believe them. One word, overcooked. And if you want two words, overcooked and overhyped. If you've been watching Wes since the beginning, there's no denying that Wes has drank his own pigeonholed Kool Aid.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

3

ziaHassanApr 27, 2015

This movie and its 8+ rating perfectly shows, how holiwood has gone down. The drama never reaches climax in a weak story. Not many touching movie. The story starts at around 30 minutes and Ralph Fienes delivers too many unbelievable dialogue.This movie and its 8+ rating perfectly shows, how holiwood has gone down. The drama never reaches climax in a weak story. Not many touching movie. The story starts at around 30 minutes and Ralph Fienes delivers too many unbelievable dialogue. None of the characters create any emotion and touches the viewer.
Too many A list artists don't make the cut.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

2

jgzegerNov 21, 2014

I hated this movie! The characters are way over the top and there isn't much of interest in the plot. Ralph Fiennes is a good actor ,but I was expecting Bill Murray to have a bigger role than his two minutes on the screen.

1 of 5 users found this helpful14

All this user's reviews

2

wisertimeApr 7, 2014

Seems to appeal to the Wes Anderson Die hards. I haven't seen all his movies. Rushmore was decent, but not as great as people make it out to be. Some fans calling this his best...well if that's not an endorsement for seeing more of hisSeems to appeal to the Wes Anderson Die hards. I haven't seen all his movies. Rushmore was decent, but not as great as people make it out to be. Some fans calling this his best...well if that's not an endorsement for seeing more of his work.

I found it dull and boring (and it really takes a lot to bore me at a movie..though Gravity was boring too). There were no laughs whatsoever. Too much "style", no substance. Didn't care about the characters at all and the ones I might have, were hardly on screen. Dull, repetitive, silly, stuipid, over the top, over hyped, tired. I couldn't wait for it to end. Tries to be serious, political, funny, silly, artful, homage and fails on all accounts. Ok it looked ok, the makeup and wardrobe was very good, but that's about it. Ralph Fines was good, but not his best work. People giving this 10's are hipsters or out of their minds.… Expand

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

2

TerrorpinMar 22, 2017

I liked moonrise kingdom, but this only got 15 minutes of my time. Think this one is definitely a 'MARMITE' film. Not for me, but can understand why it would appeal to a lot of people.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

The Grand Budapest Hotel

User Reviews