Warner Bros. Pictures | Release Date: November 22, 2006
7.9
USER SCORE
Generally favorable reviews based on 564 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
438
Mixed:
56
Negative:
70
Watch Now
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)
3
ThazariFeb 25, 2023
Feels like it tries to be a Cloud Atlas kind of movie with interconnected lives and multiple timelines, but the execution falls flat and doesn't really have anything meaningful to say. Dialogue was poor and characters unlikable.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
Voodoo123Feb 5, 2023
Potent somber imagery abound, an hour and a half of visual poetry asks the viewer to interpret the vagaries of a scientist's obsession with saving his dying wife while she authors a book exploring a man's obsession with the legend of a treePotent somber imagery abound, an hour and a half of visual poetry asks the viewer to interpret the vagaries of a scientist's obsession with saving his dying wife while she authors a book exploring a man's obsession with the legend of a tree of life.

In tandem to this we also seems to explore a visual manifestation of her own novel of a conquistador as he attempts to find an elixir of life for his queen (also played by the same actors). Fascinating but for me things felt too over cooked to enjoy consuming.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
0
AngryAlienDec 20, 2022
Good for people who never seen anything really great like Space Odyssey or One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest. Cliched, boring, lying, and racist movie. Nobody even noticed that the movie is about the woman - Queen of Spain, who concurred LatinGood for people who never seen anything really great like Space Odyssey or One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest. Cliched, boring, lying, and racist movie. Nobody even noticed that the movie is about the woman - Queen of Spain, who concurred Latin America and exterminated Mayans (as well as her own people) in order to get an eternal life. And this is the love you are praising? The love for a woman who is evil herself, and see nothing except her to be worthy of living. I am not surprised the World is in deep trouble. When majority of people cannot see truth because it is hidden behind a beautiful romantic picture. By telling that this movie is about love, you agree - it is OK to go around and kill a couple of millions so that my love can live. Moreover, if you kill enough, you will find the tree of life and become like GOD!!! This you call a great movie? Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
SameirAliDec 31, 2021
From my favorite director, The Fountain is not very favorite movie. It was a great experimental film though. Many impressive visuals are there as usual. But, as a whole, the struggle and the three generations where to clubbed together toFrom my favorite director, The Fountain is not very favorite movie. It was a great experimental film though. Many impressive visuals are there as usual. But, as a whole, the struggle and the three generations where to clubbed together to provide an amazing experience for the audience. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
DawdlingPoetNov 27, 2021
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This had the look and feel of a low-ish budget sci-fi film, with lots of scenes featuring the main character in different ages and settings, trying to make sense of things. I was attracted to it due to the fact it deals with themes of mortality and questions what the future may bring. Its reasonably mysterious in tone and Hugh Jackman gives a decent performance as the main character, Tommy. However, I thought that his wife, Isabel Creo (played by Rachel Weisz) looked almost young enough to be his daughter - in fact at first I assumed she was his child but maybe thats just me(?). If your a fan of Hugh Jackman then there are some scenes that you might enjoy in terms of being aesthetically pleasing. The special effects are ok, not brilliant but ok. There is quite a lot of mystical symbolism present, which might not be the sort of thing to appeal to all film fans or even sci-fi fans in general but there is, so I thought I ought to mention that. I would have preferred it if there was less of the scenes set in the medieval times personally but of course, others may feel differently.

I liked the themes (loss, control and mortality mainly) and I enjoyed this film for the most part, although it did seem a little rough around the edges and I can't say I fully followed all plot elements/angles (plus there is some definite cheese present at times due to the script but the performances are, for the most part, quite decent), its not a bad film as such and so I'd recommend it, especially to other fans of Hugh Jackman. Oh and I should perhaps also include a trigger warning - self harm is depicted if but briefly.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
a-certified-dumJul 12, 2021
Personally one of my favourite movies. Tells a very touching and compelling story that has a lot to unpack.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
JohnCLasherasMay 8, 2021
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The Fountain Review and Analysis
by John Cravo Lasheras
Rating: 9.7/10 (Second viewing)

The Fountain is the story of Tommy Creo and Isabel “Izzie” Creo, who are a married couple both researching a cure for death and aging. Tommy is more literal in his approach, as he is technically in the movie a scientist, a doctor, a generalist and specialist in terms of the science of aging and gerontology. Isabel is Tommy’s love in life and the movie centers around their deep bond for one another in the face of death, and literally so, wherein Isabel dies because of cancer later on in the movie. The movie takes place in two different superimposing realities at once, one version is real life wherein Tommy is trying to save humanity from death by researching a cure for death and aging. Another, is within the pages of The Fountain, which is Isabel’s book, that she has been writing as a function of being inspired not only by Tommy, but through her acceptance of fate, through her creative license to merge history, fiction and reality in the now, into a masterpiece concerning the futility of immortality, and the inevitability of death, and how through death, there is the ultimate release from the suffering of life. These superimposing realities loop back into one another, cinematographically, through almost instant jump-cuts, merging of such realities with different costume design, mise en scene, but functionally cover the same superimposed and merged storylines.

The real reality that Tommy and Izzie live in is revealed throughout the movie, and the periodicity of such instances in the movie converges closer to zero, as the two realities intertwine with one another, effectively becoming Tommy’s life. The reality of The Fountain bleeds into the real world and as Izzie requests of Tommy, he finishes her incomplete book when she reveals this later to him, on her deathbed. Tommy is left to decide the metaphorical fate of The Fountain, deciding ultimately that he will try to find this cure, and he accepts his merging with the dying star Xilbalba, which metaphorically represents (and ironically enough), creation through death.

The superimposing and looped in realities converge and diverge often throughout the film, detailing in reverse, the fate that Tommy chooses, wherein he decides to ironically enough, kill the tree of life that is sustaining him, and life, generally, to ascend the suffering of life, but through the creation of death.
Quite often we are shown his journey to Xilbalba in the context of Izzie, in real life, wherein Tommy is experiencing flashbacks to the fate that he decides, at the end of the writing of The Fountain. One of the most tragic ironies in this film is that many people die on the way to eternal life, but they justify such things even before they die, by as side characters, reminding Tommy (through Isabel’s writing) that death is an inevitability. One good example of this irony exists in the character of the Inquisitor, who is trying to kill Isabel in the story, wherein Isabel writes herself in as Queen Isabella of Spain (I believe at the time, in the 1500s, it was Aragon & Castile which had fought for power over the Iberian peninsula).

The Fountain as a movie is a technical, metaphorical and spiritual masterpiece by Darren Aronofsky, his crew, the actors within the movie and everyone else who made Aronofsky’s vision come to fruition. It teaches us a lesson about the futility of immortality, especially in the face of when we lose who and what we love most, and it gives us a chance to recollect on the existential and ontologically based questions, of the peculiar fate, and of more importantly, a peculiar beginning that comes from the ending and beginning of all things. I am left wondering if Tommy is optimistic or hopeful at the end, but I am instead conflicted, thinking that he wants to give the gift of immortality to everyone, but his everything and everyone in life, the love for Isabel and Isabel herself are now gone. Tommy, in my opinion, probably did not make himself immortal, but chose to live in suffering, alone, desiring to see Isabel in Heaven, preparing himself for the creation that comes after death.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
ArthurLApr 20, 2021
At age 36, still my all-time favorite movie. It's beautiful; a masterpiece. Hugh Jackman is excellent, I felt the emotion and drama were not excessive. It's an emotional and existential journey. When I watch and rewatch this film, I am him.At age 36, still my all-time favorite movie. It's beautiful; a masterpiece. Hugh Jackman is excellent, I felt the emotion and drama were not excessive. It's an emotional and existential journey. When I watch and rewatch this film, I am him. There is both simplicity and profundity here, depending on what you choose to believe. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
Onlyclassicvg1Jan 31, 2021
This movie was absolutely beautiful. I just loved it so much. There's something fantastic about it, but it seems everyone doesn't get it based on some reviews I've read. I found The Fountain to be intense, emotional, touching and…
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
bfoore90Nov 14, 2020
t's a film seemingly about many things from death to love to acceptance, the point of The Fountain is seemingly that it's about many of life's questions. Like most of Aronofsky's filmography, I found the film to be a poignant, compelling andt's a film seemingly about many things from death to love to acceptance, the point of The Fountain is seemingly that it's about many of life's questions. Like most of Aronofsky's filmography, I found the film to be a poignant, compelling and creative tale about a man's obsession with death and saving his wife from it. Hugh Jackman and Rachel Weisz are incredible in this and the visual effects and Clint Mansell's score are extremely effective in this tale about a man who doesn't want to lose the love of his life. Also, Clint Mansell's score for Mass Effect 3 was phenomenal. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
6
bataguilaNov 12, 2019
Es muy buena la forma que aborda la cultura y la mitologia maya, aprendes bastantes cosas. El problema de este director es que nunca es redonda sus historias, siempre las deja abierta. en este caso abre 3 hilos dramaticos y solo cierra 1
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
Carol_reviewsApr 22, 2019
Like Alejandro Jodorowsky before him the Fountain balances kitsch and art. Not everyone will be pleased. But those who love cinema should be excited for this is Aronofsky tapping in to the things that make cinema great.
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
8
FilipeNetoAug 22, 2018
This film is quite intellectual and philosophical and, thus, cannot be seen with the same eyes with which we see mainstream commercial cinema. In my point of view, specialized critics should be the first to take this into account when they'reThis film is quite intellectual and philosophical and, thus, cannot be seen with the same eyes with which we see mainstream commercial cinema. In my point of view, specialized critics should be the first to take this into account when they're writing but, judging by what has been said about this film, it seems they're paid to speak badly and not to judge fairly. The movie isn't the trash they said, though I didn't like some script options. But it's eminently metaphorical and philosophical character will displease the overwhelming majority of the public, who normally seeks out films of easy digestion, for pure entertainment.

The action happens in three distinct timings, using non-linear narrative to intertwine it through metaphors and linking elements. The pace is purposefully slow, allowing the powerful soundtrack of Clint Mansell to elegantly harmonize with perfect cinematography and astonishing visual effects. That may seem surprising given the relatively modest budget with which everything has been achieved. The work of Hugh Jackman and Rachel Weisz is absolutely impeccable, particularly his.

Now let's go to the script. This is the point where, for me, the film is less interesting. Addressing very complex issues from a philosophical and existential perspective (transcendentality, mortality, what is beyond death, our relationship with the Sacred etc.), it raises a series of questions that never answers in order to let each viewer think. But truth is the film points the way to the answer, as if it wanted to do it but didn't have the guts. This gave me a sense of dissatisfaction, of absence of closure. Then there are small details in which the script clearly makes beginner mistakes, such as putting the Maya alive and well during the arrival of the Conquistadors, when we know that the Mayan civilization disappeared before the year Thousand of the Christian era, five hundred years before Columbus. I know it's a minor detail, but as a historian I don't like to see things like this.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
annbdJun 22, 2018
Completely brilliant and beautiful, The Fountain allowed us to look at the depths of the innermost, intimate and emotional side of our soul in terms of the love and loss of our closest person in this world. With the help of Clint Mansell'sCompletely brilliant and beautiful, The Fountain allowed us to look at the depths of the innermost, intimate and emotional side of our soul in terms of the love and loss of our closest person in this world. With the help of Clint Mansell's touching music, the observer sink into the well directed story and is 'bewitched'. Captivate, fascinating and personal. Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
7
drlowdonApr 7, 2018
The Fountain focuses primarily on Tom Creo, a biologist who faces losing his wife Izzie to cancer. Intertwined within this story are the tales of a sixteenth century conquistador and, what appears to be, a space traveller in the twenty-sixthThe Fountain focuses primarily on Tom Creo, a biologist who faces losing his wife Izzie to cancer. Intertwined within this story are the tales of a sixteenth century conquistador and, what appears to be, a space traveller in the twenty-sixth century. Exactly how these three stories are linked is open to debate, even amongst those that have seen the movie.

If you’ve ever seen any movies by director Darren Aronofsky (such as Requiem for a Dream or Black Swan) you’ll be familiar with the way he plays around with the structure of the stories he tells and leaves many aspects up to the views to interpret, and that has never been more true than it is here. Critics have always been hugely divided on the merits of this movie and I can imagine some will absolutely love this movie whilst others hate it.

Personally I did find a lot to enjoy here with excellent performances by Rachel Weisz and Hugh Jackman and visually the movie is spectacular in places. The central concept, revolving around the way we handle death, is also tackled in an original manner and its admiral to see filmmakers take a chance with their movies. Yes, things arguably become a little muddled in places, and some may accuse The Fountain if being style over substance at times but flawed ambition is always more interesting than generic competence in my book.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
JhonnyRocketMar 11, 2018
A really inspiritional and beautiful movie.
The structure it´s something very different and new.
Way ahead from his time.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
saucyninja007Sep 18, 2017
In my opinion, this movie is a masterpiece, but that isn't to say it is without faults. The biggest problem with the movie is the way it is told. To be cutting between 3 story lines taking place at different times and telling each individualIn my opinion, this movie is a masterpiece, but that isn't to say it is without faults. The biggest problem with the movie is the way it is told. To be cutting between 3 story lines taking place at different times and telling each individual story slightly out of order can be a little confusing and ruins the narrative flow at times. That being said, I found the film to be profound and emotionally moving. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
NerobSep 6, 2017
its spiritual movie at its best.the soundtrack and musical score is also thebest thing in this film. awsmly acted by hugh jackman and rachal.
love it.its something new .aa must watch film for all
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
BscombstarAug 8, 2017
it's a very difficult and scrambled movie, but it's so sensual, touching, and Thoughtful that nobody shoud stay Indifferent. I guess it's one of my favorite movies now
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
alejandro970Nov 27, 2016
A mind- bending, hallucinatory experience of a quest -in the name of love- for the fountain of eternal youth. Hugh Jackman shows by himself there is live beyond Wolverine. A bit confusing but worthwhile.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
Anwar-MkayedJan 2, 2015
Can be interpreted on many levels, or enjoyed superficially as just a 'film'. However, for many who watched it, the depth of it can not be felt immediately but rather reflect upon as one might do after a mystical dream, and even enjoy it evenCan be interpreted on many levels, or enjoyed superficially as just a 'film'. However, for many who watched it, the depth of it can not be felt immediately but rather reflect upon as one might do after a mystical dream, and even enjoy it even after The End. Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
9
SkulbSep 25, 2014
Sometimes being intelligent is a problem, which Aronovsky found out when he released The Fountain. Because roughly half of all human beings are completely incapable of noticing allegory, or any other complex language activities for thatSometimes being intelligent is a problem, which Aronovsky found out when he released The Fountain. Because roughly half of all human beings are completely incapable of noticing allegory, or any other complex language activities for that matter, the movie was criticized up one side and down the other by an army of nincompoops. But they can be safely ignored as usual.

The Fountain is presented as three separate alternating stories, with Hugh Jackman leading all three of them, and Rachel Weiss with him in two of them. The first is presumably in the present, where Jackman is a biologist who is trying to save his dying wife by experimenting on monkeys. The second is set in the 1500s, with Jackman as a conquistador looking for immortality on behalf of the Spanish queen, and this is actually the book Rachel Weiss`character is writing, a detail many people seem to have missed. And the third is a sort of astral allegory of life and death, and one of the weirdest damn things I`ve seen in a while. But really, all three are the same story, dealing with the same topic from three different angles. The second aspect of this triple allegory is that it is not just multiple angles on the subject of life and death but also represents different levels of reality. Because Weiss` fiction (The conquistador part.) is obviously less real than the present day narrative, the implication is that the astral part of the movie is more real than it. Or in other words that spiritual and conceptual reality is superior to physical reality, which again is superior to fiction. Read some Plato and then watch The Fountain again and you`ll understand this part of it.
The result is a tad confusing at first, like time distortions and multiple levels of reality tend to be in movies. But a second viewing cleared most of it up for me.

The movie is otherwise wonderfully cast and directed, visually distinct and has some of the best music I`ve heard in any move. For much of the movie I was convinced that it had to have been made by Current 93 or perhaps Michael Cashmore, but as it turns out the man responsible is Clint Mansell, one time singer in pop Will Eat Itself and collaborator with Trent Reznor. All the complaining about this movie does for me is make me lose faith in humanity, or at least the intelligence of large portions of it. God forbid anyone should try and tackle a difficult subject in a movie, or to be so rude as to do it in a challenging way! Now where`s my twelfth Transformers movie in five years????
Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
4
beingryanjudeAug 31, 2014
The Fountain is a visual tale, told by Darren Aronofsky in a typical, complex fashion. The art direction may be Oscar-rate; however, the film makes a few missteps along the way.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
soulJoe88Jul 24, 2014
(german)
Ein wirklich einzigartiger Film, der trotz seiner enormen Hintergrundgeschichte noch Platz für Spekulation lässt. Erst beim vierten oder fünften mal ansehen hab ich den Film wirklich verstanden. Ich kann durchaus nachvollziehen,
(german)
Ein wirklich einzigartiger Film, der trotz seiner enormen Hintergrundgeschichte noch Platz für Spekulation lässt. Erst beim vierten oder fünften mal ansehen hab ich den Film wirklich verstanden. Ich kann durchaus nachvollziehen, dass einige, die den Film nur einmal sehen oder sich nicht mit dieser gewaltigen Materie des Film befassen wollen ihn als verwirrend oder sogar schlecht empfinden. Allen Film Liebhabern dieser Welt lege ich ihn jedoch sehr an´s Herz, ich kenne nichts Vergleichbares im Medium Film.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
SpangleMar 26, 2014
Holy cow. I went into this one with the lowest possible expectations, but what I got in return was a moving story of accepting death, but just saying that does this film significant injustice. First off, the visual effects were jawdroppinglyHoly cow. I went into this one with the lowest possible expectations, but what I got in return was a moving story of accepting death, but just saying that does this film significant injustice. First off, the visual effects were jawdroppingly gorgeous. At times, I could not contain my awe and found myself almost moved to tears by these visuals. I simply cannot describe to you how gorgeous this film is without having you sit down and watch it. The visuals alone make this a crowning achievement in cinema and undoubtedly a crowning achievement for Darren Aronofsky, who's vision for this film comes through load and clear and was a resounding success. Aside from the visuals, the soundtrack was absolutely sublime. Much like the visuals, it was beautiful, elegant, and breathtaking at every turn. Hugh Jackman turned in a phenomenal performance as well.

My main complaints surrounding this one surround the confusing nature of it. The nonlinear storytelling was great, but made for a confusing film as we bounced around between characters and then you had to try to find your footing again. However, that is simply me being petty. While it was hard to follow at times and made your brain explode at others, the story as well was quite moving and was really what helped to put the icing on the cake for me. While I think it could have been less compiicated, I am more content with the way it is currently. It is hard for me to understand the criticism aimed at this one. The way the story is presented also gives rise to a very good idea about the true nature of this film. Ultimately, there may just be one story in this one with it being directly tied to the other elements of this film.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
bodhi_zFeb 11, 2014
This film is about dealing with the loss of someone you deeply love. Denying death, then finally accepting it. It is a lyric poem of fantastic and beautiful images; an atypical, yet exceptional film. I found it one of the most beautiful,This film is about dealing with the loss of someone you deeply love. Denying death, then finally accepting it. It is a lyric poem of fantastic and beautiful images; an atypical, yet exceptional film. I found it one of the most beautiful, touching, artistic movies I’ve seen in a long time. Metaphorical images are used frequently, and metaphorical story lines. I know many who are confused by this movie. I don’t know why; I experienced it as simple and straightforward. Perhaps it is because the theme is one that is intimately familiar to me and that is why it was immediately recognizable. I hope, through time, this film will receive the recognition it deserves.
Finish it.
Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
8
amirsJan 20, 2014
انسان و مساله‌ی بودن یا نبودن

مرگ مهم‌ترین دغدغه‌ی ذهنی بشر از گذشته‌های دور تا به امروز به حساب می‌آید و همیشه با ترسی عظیم هم‌راه بوده. انسان از زمانی که موجودی مرگ‌آگاه شد همیشه به دنبال رهایی از چنگال این شبح عظیم بوده که در لحظه
انسان و مساله‌ی بودن یا نبودن

مرگ مهم‌ترین دغدغه‌ی ذهنی بشر از گذشته‌های دور تا به امروز به حساب می‌آید و همیشه با ترسی عظیم هم‌راه بوده. انسان از زمانی که موجودی مرگ‌آگاه شد همیشه به دنبال رهایی از چنگال این شبح عظیم بوده که در لحظه لحظه‌ی زندگی هم‌راه اوست و همین هم‌راهی همیشگی انسان را در تعلیقی ابدی نگاه می‌دارد. چیزی که این قدر به ما نزدیک است چرا باید موجب هراسمان شود چرا به آن عادت نمی‌کنیم؟ دلیلش ناشناخته بودن مرگ است. از بعدش هیچ نمی‌دانیم همین ما را می‌ترساند.
البته وقتی درباره‌ی مرگ حرف می‌زنیم باید این را در نظر گرفت که خود مرگ مد نظر است یا پیامدهای آن (منظورم از پیامد؛ مواجه شدن‌مان با مرگ دیگران، خاصه عزیزان‌مان است).
مرگ و زندگی ‍‍پیوسته در کانون آثار برجسته‌ی هنر و ادبیات جهان قرار داشته. شگفتی ندارد اگر نخستین کتابی که از تمدن‌های بزرگ باستانی به دست ما رسیده است، کتاب مردگان مصر و نخستین افسانه، افسانه گیل گمش بابلی باشد که در تلاش و تکاپو برای یافتن گیاه جوانی و زندگی جاودان بود، و کهن‌ترین هراس یا آرزویی که از انسان آن روزگاران شناخته‌ایم، هراس از مرگ و آرزوی نامیرایی باشد.
در طول تاریخ؛ بشر مدام سعی بر آن داشته تا خود را از چنگال مرگ برهاند. گاه با مواجه نشدن با آن تا زمانی که از سایه درآید و رخ نشان دهد، گاه با نفی کردنش و باور به حیات پس از مرگ (بازتولد در اشکال مختلف)، و گاه این اواخر به کمک پیشرفت علم، مرگ را بیماری دانستن و این که هر بیماری درمان دارد به مبارزه با آن رفته. در تمامی این راه‌های مواجهه با مرگ که با یک‌دیگر متفاوت‌اند، یک چیز مشترک وجود دارد و آن هم عدم پذیرش مرگ (آن طور که هست یا حداقل نشان می‌دهد) و میل به جاودانگی است. البته در این بین بوده‌اند کسانی که دانسته‌اند از مرگ گریزی نیست اما از هراسش چرا.
فیلم چشمه ساخته‌ی دارن آرنوفسکی فیلمی است درباره‌ی مواجهه با مرگ (البته من این طور دیدمش) هر چند که شاید به دلیل زمان کوتاه فیلم (برای چنین مساله‌ای) آن بخش پیامدهای مرگ (از دست دادن عزیز) بسیار پررنگ‌تر است.
Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
4
imilhoferDec 26, 2013
This film is too clever for its own good, and came across forced and disjointed. In all honesty, I had no idea what was happening for the majority of this corny film, and it wasn't a pleasant lack of understanding (Mulholland Drive), but aThis film is too clever for its own good, and came across forced and disjointed. In all honesty, I had no idea what was happening for the majority of this corny film, and it wasn't a pleasant lack of understanding (Mulholland Drive), but a lack of understanding that led me to question whether watching it was a good use of my time or not. Burstyn offered some class, and Aronofksy is blatantly talented, but here he pushed it too far, and produced a contrived hour and a half of nonsense, worsened by Rachel Weisz's sheer dullness. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
10
heartheindieDec 26, 2013
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. As should be apparent, I am taking a jump back in time to review The Fountain. This just so happens to be one of my all time favorite films. For some, it is a cult classic. Reviews were fairly mixed, and understandably so. The movie is certainly not for everyone, even though it features some well respected actors at their finest, most notably the famous Hugh Jackman who is most known for his work as Wolverine in various X-MEN films and spin-offs. Indeed, the allure of this film for me stands in it's philosophical disposition, imagery, music, and overall emotion. Aronofsky, who is well known for his films Pi, Requiem for a Dream, and Black Swan (with more on the way as we speak), takes a real artistic plunge with this work as he explores heavy existential themes. Death, life, and rebirth are all on display. The film itself unfolds at three periods of time juxtaposed with one another. Initially, it is complex if you are unfamiliar with more complex storytelling styles. Even more so because each character is played by the same actor. For instance, Jackman himself plays three characters in this film. One from the past during the Inquisition, one during the "present day" as a doctor of sorts, and one in the distant future as a yogi freely floating on a "space ship" heading towards total enlightenment and oneness with the universe, and perhaps more importantly, his love.

Read more on Hear the Indie: http://heartheindie.com/film-reviews/2013/11/15/darren-aronofsky-the-fountain-film-review
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
Penelope1970atxDec 13, 2013
Just watched The Fountain and I loved the romantic part, mostly because I long for love like that. Anyway, I came to my own interpretation before reading other reviews and to make it short: The scientist struggled with immortality, espJust watched The Fountain and I loved the romantic part, mostly because I long for love like that. Anyway, I came to my own interpretation before reading other reviews and to make it short: The scientist struggled with immortality, esp after his love died. But through finishing the story I think he realized, by tapping into his spiritual side, that even though our physical bodies are not immortal, we all have immortality in the way of our spirits. Planting the tree on her grave was a symbolic gesture, and a way to express his new realization in his human, physical, though ego driven, self. Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
10
ThegodfathersonNov 16, 2013
The Fountain is a touching experience, a film that expresses real love. From Director- Darren Aronofsky who directed marvels such as PI and Requiem For A Dream has outdone his limits in this film. Portraying Immortality and Greed for life inThe Fountain is a touching experience, a film that expresses real love. From Director- Darren Aronofsky who directed marvels such as PI and Requiem For A Dream has outdone his limits in this film. Portraying Immortality and Greed for life in a way that you will have stuck in a disturbing way. Hugh Jackson did marvellous in the main role and Rachel Weitz was good as well. The film is visually brilliant, disturbing at times, touching and heartwarming. Also a slow mind bender at times but a must watch. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
SwatiOct 5, 2013
I was so immersed and solemn throughout that it felt an hour longer than it really was. The subject matter concerned with the value of life and immortality. Three stories run in parallel and it takes real concentration and interest toI was so immersed and solemn throughout that it felt an hour longer than it really was. The subject matter concerned with the value of life and immortality. Three stories run in parallel and it takes real concentration and interest to understand what's going on. That may sound like it's hard to follow, but it isn't true. The first time I watched it like the teenager that I was. The second time I was twenty-five, and really in a position to appreciate the scope and complexity of the tale being told. The movie has divided critics and the audience into two factions, and some hate the movie for that alone. But I'm telling you, it takes multiple viewings for the message to sink in. Not because the director botched the job, but because he trusted his audience to arrive at the conclusion by themselves, without any help. And that, in my opinion, is how I'd rather a story would be told. It isn't often attempted because it's risky and who would want to do that when millions of dollars are at stake. This feat has made me respect Aronofsky more. The fact that the score is literally the best I have ever heard plays no small part in my conviction that this movie is one of the greatest movies ever made. When I read people spewing filth all over this film, I'm reaffirmed in my belief that true greatness is hard to fathom. It takes patience, an eye for detail, good intention, open mindedness and a warm heart. Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
7
StaticSpineOct 1, 2013
The storyline is decent and somehow interesting and philosophic. The visuals and the soundtrack both are outstanding. Hugh Jackman is great, he made a passionate and possessed character, but the most huge letdown for me was the role ofThe storyline is decent and somehow interesting and philosophic. The visuals and the soundtrack both are outstanding. Hugh Jackman is great, he made a passionate and possessed character, but the most huge letdown for me was the role of Rachel Weisz, she is a real beauty indeed, but I didn't feel compassion to her character, I didn't care, her role was so bleak and shallow, though all the plot was spinning around saving her life. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
iadaoSep 5, 2013
One of the most astounding films I have ever seen.

It ties together it's different story arcs in a sublime fashion. Seems to be about living wrong and dying right. The directing and cinematography is strong throughout and gorgeous at
One of the most astounding films I have ever seen.

It ties together it's different story arcs in a sublime fashion.

Seems to be about living wrong and dying right.

The directing and cinematography is strong throughout and gorgeous at points.

Good performances across the board.

And as a free bonus it annoys religious people by implying that there is no real difference between Catholics, Buddhists, and Mayans ^o^
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
efesto14Jul 20, 2013
Deep, romantic andDeep, romantic and mystic...........................................................great!................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
2
seancriswellApr 5, 2013
The tree of life and the fountain of youth. The possibilities for themes and visuals are endless. Unfortunately Aronofsky chooses to bog us down in a melodrama with two characters that he never gives us a chance to connect with. This film isThe tree of life and the fountain of youth. The possibilities for themes and visuals are endless. Unfortunately Aronofsky chooses to bog us down in a melodrama with two characters that he never gives us a chance to connect with. This film is trying very hard to be complex but the story arc is simple. A doctor is trying to save his dying wife. She knows what he will not accept. The rest is surreal visuals revolving around the afterlife.

All of this would be a great idea if there were characters involved that I cared about. My second issue with the Fountain is the visuals. For a film that is relying heavily on visuals they are pretty bland here. If there is a bright spot I think it is Jackman's performance. I don't think I have ever seen him convey emotion in such a believable way. The Fountain had some promise but in the end never delivers.
Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
8
Andys_ReviewsSep 29, 2012
I have to admit this is the second time I
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
Redz0neMay 17, 2012
This movie is rather ostentatious in it's attempt to weave the stories of three lifetimes into one. some may consider it a hit, some may consider it a miss and some may see it only as one of "those" movies that requires "sensory enhancement"This movie is rather ostentatious in it's attempt to weave the stories of three lifetimes into one. some may consider it a hit, some may consider it a miss and some may see it only as one of "those" movies that requires "sensory enhancement" (*wink wink*)

still, a decent film to watch if you have the patience. it tells a rather deep story about the love of two soul mates and Hugh Jackman's performance is actually pretty good since he's able to convey subtlety at some points and mind-bending madness at another. some may say it's pretentious but i would suspect that they lost track because you do have to pay attention and people with short attention spans will likely hate it.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
DoehlMar 25, 2012
Aronofsky creates a metaphoric and meditative experience for his audience, but when he tries to create poetry, his results are more corny than they are compelling
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
CooterPatooterMar 22, 2012
Aronofsky's unique eye and Clint Mansell's near-perfect scoring highlight this bold film about mankind's eternal struggle with the concept of death. The three stories flow together seamlessly and help each other weave a tale that takes placeAronofsky's unique eye and Clint Mansell's near-perfect scoring highlight this bold film about mankind's eternal struggle with the concept of death. The three stories flow together seamlessly and help each other weave a tale that takes place over a thousand years. The Fountain will break your heart many times over before it's through and you won't ever forget it. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
MelcherOct 9, 2011
Easily one of the best films I've ever seen on so many levels. Visually alone it is incredible, but when you add in the story, themes, direction and character portrayal it just becomes magic. Aronofsky captures something incredible in hisEasily one of the best films I've ever seen on so many levels. Visually alone it is incredible, but when you add in the story, themes, direction and character portrayal it just becomes magic. Aronofsky captures something incredible in his portrayal of 3 parallel story-lines about life, death, and love. It is a deep film and can be interpreted in many ways and is a treat to watch every time. Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
9
2hip2beahipsterSep 29, 2011
Ambitious and beautiful. That's all I can say. How one man love turns into his hatred towards death and search for immortality, and how once immortality is finally reached, man will long to die, and be with the one sent him off for the questAmbitious and beautiful. That's all I can say. How one man love turns into his hatred towards death and search for immortality, and how once immortality is finally reached, man will long to die, and be with the one sent him off for the quest of immortality in the first place. Aronofsky shows great skill and ingenious by writing up this script. Also, the cinematography is stunning and extremely well done even 5 years after the movie was filmed. Underrated and overly criticized. I think the ambitions of the movie are what made the critics expect something more, but what else they were expecting? Beats me. Great flick. Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
5
J-ShapAug 27, 2011
Aronofsky is adventurous in ways that many filmmakers are not. He is able to be bold, grab an idea by the horns and take it where he wants to, and choosing to do so in the methods he sees as the most clear. The Fountain is a misfire on thisAronofsky is adventurous in ways that many filmmakers are not. He is able to be bold, grab an idea by the horns and take it where he wants to, and choosing to do so in the methods he sees as the most clear. The Fountain is a misfire on this concept. It is a film disconnected from any sort of root (which is odd, given that trees show up a lot in it), the audience or it's own story. It has all of its interests into itself, but never bothers to actually care for what it's trying to do, because it's too busy thinking. Can't it just stop to smell the roses. Kubrick could do that. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
ZiggyStardustJun 16, 2011
Darren did an amazing job on this movie. I sincerely do not understand its low score, contrary to other movies like "Requiem for a dream" that get ridiculous good reviews. If you really enjoy movies and aren't a close-minded individual youDarren did an amazing job on this movie. I sincerely do not understand its low score, contrary to other movies like "Requiem for a dream" that get ridiculous good reviews. If you really enjoy movies and aren't a close-minded individual you should watch this movie, because you'll enjoy it. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
stu_collierMar 14, 2011
This in up in my list of favorites one of the best films i have seen. It really explored life,death and love and something in-between. This film will leave you thinking for sure well worth watching.
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
10
Zlatan91Feb 27, 2011
Fantastic movie,simplified stories,great characterization,i literally can feel Jacks pain...beautiful movie,it just motivate for deeper thinking and trying to understand this life that we all live...
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
0
vibor123Feb 16, 2011
Like all Arofonsky movies, this is **** up too, but is very bad way. It is very boring, confusing and badly directed, story is bleak and too deep for most people. I am not suprised that this movie was box office flop..
1 of 7 users found this helpful16
All this user's reviews
10
Tejas25Jan 6, 2011
There are no words to express what i felt after watching The Fountain, this movie is so beautiful in its own way it explores the man's greed for life and immortality. Excellently directed and perfectly acted movie. Aronofsky's a brilliantThere are no words to express what i felt after watching The Fountain, this movie is so beautiful in its own way it explores the man's greed for life and immortality. Excellently directed and perfectly acted movie. Aronofsky's a brilliant filmmaker Rachel Weisz is good Hugh Jackman gives a Bravura a career defining performance you can feel the pain of Jackman's Character :( . You should'nt miss this. Beautiful just Beautiful!!! Expand
4 of 5 users found this helpful41
All this user's reviews
0
LondonTrueloveNov 8, 2010
I thought The New World with Colin Farrell was the worst movie I would ever see in my life....then I saw this heap of steaming feces. If I could give it a negative score I would.
2 of 11 users found this helpful29
All this user's reviews
10
triptychOct 19, 2010
Rarely are a script, a screenplay and a score perfectly intertwined to produce a true cinematic masterpiece. The Fountain comes very close. A dark and surreal journey of unlimited hope in tragic circumstances. Genius.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
ChicksSep 14, 2010
This movie was absolutely beautiful. I just loved it so much. There's something fantastic about it, but it seems everyone doesn't get it based on some reviews I've read. I found The Fountain to be intense, emotional, touching andThis movie was absolutely beautiful. I just loved it so much. There's something fantastic about it, but it seems everyone doesn't get it based on some reviews I've read. I found The Fountain to be intense, emotional, touching and extraordinary. Like nothing I've seen before. Expand
5 of 5 users found this helpful50
All this user's reviews
10
M_AlexSep 14, 2010
I love this movie. I saw it in the cinema, and I return to it pretty often. However, it should be said that its a very curious thing, owing to what RyanM write in his, admittedly insightful review, with which I agree, with two exceptions: II love this movie. I saw it in the cinema, and I return to it pretty often. However, it should be said that its a very curious thing, owing to what RyanM write in his, admittedly insightful review, with which I agree, with two exceptions: I think Jackman is very good here, and I consider the fact that the film is a bunch of allegories, heavily metaphorical, and that the plot is not explicitly stated (one could even say that the drawing of the lines to the dots that this movie presents is left to the reader) a positive thing. Weisz is, as always, stunning, though I'm heavily biased here. The music is wonderful, and the soundtrack is one of my favourite ones. Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
10
tech953Aug 29, 2010
this movie is a clear work of genius it brings many ideas and concepts to the table and translates them with near perfect precision.
Coupled with a unforgettable musical score, this movie made me cry and stare in wonder at the same time.
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
10
EnanAug 23, 2010
Living forever would be hell. Eternity claws at the heart of Aronofsky's temporally transcendent hero, Thomas. Hugh Jackman plays Thomas, but the character embodies director/writer Aronofsky's complex and insightful interpretation of whatLiving forever would be hell. Eternity claws at the heart of Aronofsky's temporally transcendent hero, Thomas. Hugh Jackman plays Thomas, but the character embodies director/writer Aronofsky's complex and insightful interpretation of what immortality means. Beyond humanity conquering time, this film tackles how ideas, and even feelings, can be inherently timeless. The Fountain courageously examines what keeps us here and why we eventually need to go.

Aronofsky's ability as a director has been hailed with both Pi and Requiem for a Dream. The Fountain is unlike anything he has done before. He provokes audiences intellectually, spiritually and viscerally, but this time, with extra concern for plot and character dynamics. Like Fellini, putting his wife in his films compels a richer and more passionate creation. Weisz proves more enchanting in this sci-fi spirit quest than any other film to date. Instead of isolation and dependence, Aronofsky focuses on interconnectivity. A responsibility to his wife, new born, and devoted fans gives birth to a film that aspires to be something timeless itself. Aronofsky, more than anything, demonstrates how much he expects of himself.

Moving within the millennia spanning the films narrative are the souls of Thomas and Izzi. They are tied to each other and the tree of life. Uniquely positioned as the tie that binds them to the tree is love. In every period, Thomas scrambles to save Izzi in some way. Thomas exasperatingly challenges the life threatening circumstances Izzi faces. Battling Mayan warlords, cancerous tumors or traveling to Xibalba(The Place of Fear) are dwarfed by the life purpose Izzi instills in him. The limitations of love and devotion are reluctantly acknowledged, as Thomas becomes a slave to hope and memory.

The very essence of existence comes into play as fantasy is given as much legitimacy in the film as reality. The scenes from the Mayan period are melded together with the fiction Izzi is writing in present day. The line between truth and fiction disintegrates as the three stories continually intertwine. The motives of the characters are similar in each, but it takes the fantasy to provoke their destinies. Thomas's ultimate fate and acceptance of reality can only happen in surreal settings where anything is possible.

The Fountain delves into the ineffable headfirst. Infinite possibility lies at the heart of life and death. One answer is as valid or invalid as the next without a map key. The closest we come to understanding it all is when determining what it isn't. Aronofsky posits the question as the answer stylishly, uniquely and profoundly.
Expand
10 of 12 users found this helpful102
All this user's reviews
3
UnImpressedAug 29, 2009
I'm loving the fact that there are so many reviews on here claiming to understand this film and dogging those who didn't. Interestingly enough, I don't think I read two of those reviews that agreed on what the film was about, I'm loving the fact that there are so many reviews on here claiming to understand this film and dogging those who didn't. Interestingly enough, I don't think I read two of those reviews that agreed on what the film was about, or very many that attempted to explain it at all. I understand that many of those people and others will say that is the beauty of the film, that it can mean so many things to so many different people. But when something 'can' mean so many things to so many people, then it ultimately means nothing, doesn't it? I'm an open minded individual and watched this film, first of all thinking it was going to be something else, but then to read how long it was and ask myself "It was ONLY 96 minutes long?" I don't know, I'm sure many people could have a hayday with my review, but when a film feels an hour longer than it actually is, and when it ultimately , in my humble opinion, means nothing, then it is not a masterpiece, but a garbled mess of something that can't be explained. But of course, I know I have a more analytical than creative mind, so take it for what you will. Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful
10
RobSAug 20, 2009
Hands down, the most astonishing science fiction film of the past decade. Awesome on every level, and a sleeper destined to become a future classic. In 20 years from now, it will appear in lists of the greatest science fiction films ever Hands down, the most astonishing science fiction film of the past decade. Awesome on every level, and a sleeper destined to become a future classic. In 20 years from now, it will appear in lists of the greatest science fiction films ever made, if not in lists of the greatest films. Just as Bladerunner and 2001: A Space Odyssey do these days, despite both being widely ridiculed when they were first released... Also features possibly the most beautiful soundtrack score ever, by Clint Mansell. Even those who didn't understand or like the film, pretty much acknowledge that the music is a rare masterpiece. Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful
10
MichaelHAug 19, 2009
Death is the road to awe. Beautiful. An exceptional piece of emotive movie making. The visual effects take you to a different plane and it's breathtaking. Hugh Jackman outshines everyone in his role and truly reaches outt o his Death is the road to awe. Beautiful. An exceptional piece of emotive movie making. The visual effects take you to a different plane and it's breathtaking. Hugh Jackman outshines everyone in his role and truly reaches outt o his emotional and soft side. An amazing picture of love and the lasting hold it has on us. Expand
2 of 2 users found this helpful
10
AlexandraJun 10, 2009
The fact that this movie got such dismal reviews is a testament to how emotionally and intellectually dead the general populace is. This movie doesn't follow the conventional formula that is palatable to the average viewer. History has The fact that this movie got such dismal reviews is a testament to how emotionally and intellectually dead the general populace is. This movie doesn't follow the conventional formula that is palatable to the average viewer. History has demonstrated time and time again that masterpieces are rarely understood and appreciated at the time of their debut. The Fountain is one of those masterpieces. Only those viewers who are willing to take the poetic beauty of this film on its own merits will understand this movie's evocative emotional power. Aronofsky has created something rich and sensuous; the spectacular visuals, the incredible score, and the complex story overwhelmed me to such a degree that I sometimes had to remind myself to breathe. I can't get this movie out of my head, and that is a beautiful thing. Expand
2 of 3 users found this helpful
10
LaurieEJun 2, 2009
It isn't the destination, its the journey that is important. Similar to "Being Human" with Robin Williams; good way to broach difficult issues of life and death.
1 of 1 users found this helpful
0
killdarrenMay 8, 2009
Darren Aronofsky...a director who holds his audience or anyone for that matter, at absolute contempt. His films do NOTHING but divide critics and audiences and this pretentious hack is laughing all the way to the bank. Enjoy!
1 of 5 users found this helpful
10
DarenBJan 23, 2009
Deepest movie I've ever seen, very philosophical.
2 of 2 users found this helpful
7
foutainJan 16, 2009
Nice movie to have ... met. It is hard for me to understand some of the critics. Many say The Fountain is complicated, but I see no point in discussing any lack of understanding in terms of a movie review -> Concerning this movie, Nice movie to have ... met. It is hard for me to understand some of the critics. Many say The Fountain is complicated, but I see no point in discussing any lack of understanding in terms of a movie review -> Concerning this movie, understanding means feeling. If someone doesn't get it, well, you are human, are you? Be it possible there are inhumane critics. Be it possible many like to pose simple questions in order to irritate people. Don't ban a movie for what it does with you because as long as it does affect you, it is useful. 3 levels of time - that a problem? I'd say: it's a must if you ever try to bring up a universal message - three at least. Good number. What else is remarkable: We surely don't need all the footage and top-secret background info, who cares? Art is which works! All you fans, be aware that strongly recommending to buy a ticket or dvd is the uttermost thing to do. Re-telling the whole happening looks like stuffing the internet. Back to the roots: I like the movie from a consumer's point-of-view for its deep passion. I appreciate it from a writer's point-of-view for a daring entreprise. I love it from a male romantic's point-of-view for its (somehow psychological) precision. I can easily recommend you to buy the thing, but I will add: Aside from other laudations spoken out over time, perhaps truly earned, I suggest you prepare for something different from what most people think how a movie should develop and towards something that allows you to let go and feel a specific meaning you always assumed to be ... out there. No, my name's not Darren. Keep whispering. *chuckle* Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful
9
ChrisP.Dec 28, 2008
This film has really hooked me, despite its flaws. Tommy and, especially, Izzy are too broadly drawn as characters: in the DVD commentary, Aronofsky admits he wanted them to be archetypes, so their love story lacks the little details and This film has really hooked me, despite its flaws. Tommy and, especially, Izzy are too broadly drawn as characters: in the DVD commentary, Aronofsky admits he wanted them to be archetypes, so their love story lacks the little details and specificities that might have made it really emotionally vivid and put the film over the top for those critics who hated it for the complicated and ambiguous trio of timelines. Really the movie isn't about Tommy and Izzy, but about Tommy and his own denial of death; Izzy's mortality is just a vehicle for Tom to confront his own. So it's another movie in which the female lead is basically a masculine projection, and that maybe is its real flaw. But Tommy's journey through grief to ... well, you'll see ... is still moving for me. And, yes, it might be because of the soundtrack, which works for this film as no soundtrack ever has before, tying together the three separate timelines into one emotional arc. It's also visually gorgeous; during production the planned use of computer graphics had to be scrapped for macrophotography for budgetary reasons, and thank god, because the results are beautiful and unlike anything else I've seen on film. Overall, even though I could't put the pieces together logically as I was watching it, I found that there was an emotional logic to the film that was deeply satisfying. Although I like to analyze the heck out of films, this is one that really does work well if you just let it wash over you. Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful
10
ArturoL.Dec 7, 2008
It´s pure poetry and beauty. Probably you won´t understand ALL the movie, but you will feel it.
1 of 1 users found this helpful
10
NDNov 28, 2008
Anything that Hollywood turns out which makes you think, feel, and learn all at the same time is bound to get terrible reviews from all the famous tunnel-visioned critics. It's beautiful, audacious, and every time you watch it, you come Anything that Hollywood turns out which makes you think, feel, and learn all at the same time is bound to get terrible reviews from all the famous tunnel-visioned critics. It's beautiful, audacious, and every time you watch it, you come away with something new. There's not a raiting for that. Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful
7
TroelsS.Oct 19, 2008
I have got to say, that the music is the reason why I really like this movie. Yeah, the film itself is different and pretty (and I respect the director and writer of The Fountain, cause it's so easy to follow - a film like this can I have got to say, that the music is the reason why I really like this movie. Yeah, the film itself is different and pretty (and I respect the director and writer of The Fountain, cause it's so easy to follow - a film like this can easily lose focus), but especially the music supports the scenes in a perfect way. Clint Mansell might be the one of the best filmsoundtrack-makers of the decade. But I'm not saying the movie would be bad without the great soundtrack, cause it's a really touching movie, which deserves better grade by critics. Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful
10
ArlisS.Sep 30, 2008
Beautiful, so many things go through my mind when trying to understand it, that it teaches me along the way. I'd love to see more movies like this one, rather than the brainwashing bullshit we see everywhere else.
1 of 1 users found this helpful
9
DavidM.Sep 28, 2008
Completely polarizing - and I certainly know why. But, beautiful, intelligent and nothing but ambitious from start to finish. Remember folks, this is "science fiction"...it's not a documentary, it's "science fiction". Clint Completely polarizing - and I certainly know why. But, beautiful, intelligent and nothing but ambitious from start to finish. Remember folks, this is "science fiction"...it's not a documentary, it's "science fiction". Clint Mansell's soundtrack is one of the most amazing pieces of music ever composed. Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful
10
pgSep 10, 2008
It is a little like trying to explain why you like your favorite food. This happens to be the kind of film that is my "favorite food." I don't understand the viciously hostile reviews by some critics of this movie other than to suspect It is a little like trying to explain why you like your favorite food. This happens to be the kind of film that is my "favorite food." I don't understand the viciously hostile reviews by some critics of this movie other than to suspect that some folks haven't gotten over the whole "Mom made me eat my vegetables" thing. Hey, I used to hate onions and now I love them. I have watched this film many times and I love it! The movie is not hard to understand unless you say so (because it can be understood however you want to relate to it). It is not trivial or contrived unless you say so (if you think you're having a bad day - you probably are). It is definately not as good as Picasso painting a portrait of Shakespeare while humming a Beatles tune, but then again...that never happened anyways (that I know of). Best served with wine and chocolate, and a loved one (preferably warm, not a plant, and still in this current plane of existence) There -- that's a sufficiently symbol-laden, mini-review in keeping with this movie's style. Expand
2 of 3 users found this helpful
10
RobertZ.Aug 24, 2008
You truly have to be open minded to comprehend this movie. I have watched this masterpiece about 4 to 5 times and every time I watched it I would discover new ideas, metaphors, symbolisms, realizing more and more clearly what message the You truly have to be open minded to comprehend this movie. I have watched this masterpiece about 4 to 5 times and every time I watched it I would discover new ideas, metaphors, symbolisms, realizing more and more clearly what message the director is trying to convey. This aspect alone points to the artistry of the movie. Music of Beethoven, Mozart, Bach, Chopin works precisely the same way. This masterpieces of music grow on us over the years and every time we comeback to them with new experiences we discover something new in them. Thats what makes piece of art work timeless. On the top of this Aranovsky is a visual artist his movie is a visual Odyssey that adds to the viewers imaginative delight and conveyance of the essence of the movie. One examples: the ring that gets lost, when his wife collapses and he walks in circle waiting, to the glass sphere he is traveling in, to the tattooed lines on his body that circle around like the trees rings, to finally the the being that enters the (cicrcle) the sphere of light to finish the journey. This are all symbolic representations of reincarnation and repetitive events of our lives that just manifest themselves in different transmutations. In addition this movie is a rare gem because of the topic the director chose. Most of movies now a day focus on violence and the dark side of the human nature and even the so called good characters have very little good in them. Here Aranovsky portrays many faucets of human nature but the strongest highlight is the human spirit the soul of the human being. Its about our highest possible expression, transcending our physical illusion that are so real to us and entering our final stage of enlightenment that sheds the mortal suffering because of the realization of the highest truth about our true nature. In my book Aranovsky is one of the best and most brilliant movie directors alive. I have seen all his movies and when I went to see the fountain it was because of his earlier movies that I saw. With every movie he created his artistic expression is truly transcending to new heights. Mr. Aranovsky please keep creating and delighting your audience. Cheers. Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful
9
DanielH.Jul 27, 2008
Wow! Incredible film, really. The more I attempt to analyze it, the more I am reminded that this is a love fantasy. It is like a 10th century French poem depicting chivalry and mortality. Beautiful.
2 of 2 users found this helpful
10
CHJun 26, 2008
This is the most underrated movie in the past 10 years. The true star of this film is not the actors, but Aronofsky. From his brilliant script to the absolutely stunning visuals (who else would've thought of using chemical reactions as This is the most underrated movie in the past 10 years. The true star of this film is not the actors, but Aronofsky. From his brilliant script to the absolutely stunning visuals (who else would've thought of using chemical reactions as the backdrop?), Aronofsky's brilliance in this movie constantly shines through. It is an absolutely amazing film. I'm disappointed that more critics, and laypeople, alike did not understand Aronofsky's vision for this film. Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful
3
RichardK.May 28, 2008
Yes, it may be visually intriguing, but with a main character that shows no true depth or connection to anything around him, I found this movie equally difficult to connect to.
0 of 1 users found this helpful
9
BertS.May 22, 2008
A sensory masterpiece intertwined with deeply emotional storylines (esp. if u ever spent time with a loved one with cancer) with an overall sci-fi fantasy blanket. Wayyyyy too ambitious but if you're in the right mood - it will take you A sensory masterpiece intertwined with deeply emotional storylines (esp. if u ever spent time with a loved one with cancer) with an overall sci-fi fantasy blanket. Wayyyyy too ambitious but if you're in the right mood - it will take you somewhere special. Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful
10
RRMay 3, 2008
The Fountain is a spiritual film that eschews most trappings of what people expect of a movie these days. If you're looking for easy-to-chew-n-digest fluff, you won't find it here. If you have an open mind, you should be prepared The Fountain is a spiritual film that eschews most trappings of what people expect of a movie these days. If you're looking for easy-to-chew-n-digest fluff, you won't find it here. If you have an open mind, you should be prepared for a beautiful and moving work of art that features two actors at the top of their form. The central theme is transcendence, and although the film plays with three time periods, representing superstition, science, and spirituality as a symbol of mankind's progression (in a hopeful, Nitzschean sense), it is not bound to that kind of structure. Ultimately, it transcends space and time to remind us of why we are who we are: because of our undying souls. The symbolism may be Buddhist in nature, but the films' essence is as timeless and non-religious as one can hope for. To all you critics: I sympathize. You have a lot of work to do, and to encounter a film that leaves you scratching your heads must be frustrating as hell. But don't pan something just because you don't understand it. Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful
9
PhilR.Apr 19, 2008
A truly amazing film like no other. I admire the directors effort, but I feel his one failing was not fleshing out the two main characters and their love for each other. Had he done this the viewers would have been able to identify more with A truly amazing film like no other. I admire the directors effort, but I feel his one failing was not fleshing out the two main characters and their love for each other. Had he done this the viewers would have been able to identify more with the underlying story of love and how it relates to death. Anyhow a movie that need multiple viewings to understand. And one of the most incredible scenes in recent memory. The part where Tomas drinks from the tree of life. Mind blowing imagery and allegory in an unforgettable climax. It is hard to believe the film was shot on such a low budget. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
JohnP.Apr 18, 2008
I am tired of reading critics mentioning time travel in their reviews of this movie. After watching this movie, I have to say that I was captivated throughout, not only by the visuals and ideas presented, but also by how the majority of I am tired of reading critics mentioning time travel in their reviews of this movie. After watching this movie, I have to say that I was captivated throughout, not only by the visuals and ideas presented, but also by how the majority of viewers failed to see the simplicity of the story. The main character is rooted in the present. The flashbacks to the past are only the primary characters readings of his wife's novel and his attempt to complete the novel's ending is the flash forwards to the future, in which he expresses his desire to reach to the heavens to fulfill his love. Time travel, immortality... not sure why people are fixated on those themes as there is no indication that the flashbacks and flashforwards are anything more than figments of the primary characters dreams, readings and aspirations for his love (all btw happening in the present). Oh well... nuff said. Eat that Ebert ! Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful
10
JesseS.Apr 10, 2008
Awesome. One of those movies you can watch over & over again, or, like the director says, solve differently a la rubik's cubism.
2 of 3 users found this helpful
10
EthanK.Mar 29, 2008
You have to be a very open minded person to truly enjoy this film. This movie truly demonstrates that you don't have to introduce a character to know who he is. I don't know how many movies I've seen that starts out like,"hi, You have to be a very open minded person to truly enjoy this film. This movie truly demonstrates that you don't have to introduce a character to know who he is. I don't know how many movies I've seen that starts out like,"hi, my name is..." the plot is very simple to tell the truth, its about a man in a struggle to come to terms with death, not just his wife but himself as well. This movie is indeed very hard to put into words. I can understand that a person may not like this film, no movie is loved by everyone. But I don't think that gives them the right to make biased opinions to a very under appreciated work of art, that they don't even understand in the first place. They could have simply said in the review,"I didn't understand the movie and cant make a comment." Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful
10
JustinB.Mar 18, 2008
This is truly one of the most beautiful movies made in recent years. The story is amazing, with a message as deep and meaningful and one can be. Great movie.
1 of 1 users found this helpful
10
ThomasK.Mar 17, 2008
For those of you who cast aside this work of art as nothing more than a pretentious 'art flick', you are sadly mistaken. It is personal to the core. Through the tellings of the three personae of past, future, and present, this For those of you who cast aside this work of art as nothing more than a pretentious 'art flick', you are sadly mistaken. It is personal to the core. Through the tellings of the three personae of past, future, and present, this movie brings to life the core essence of humanity and life itself. The pretentious ones are those who begrudge this film for the fact that what may seem a simple axiom to them was elaborated over the course of a 90-some odd minutes. The impact of this movie is not what could be summarized of this movie in a few words, but rather the journey the protagonists take throughout the course of it, as well as the visually stunning way the movie was brought together from end-to-beginning. This movie is only frustrating for those who become impatient watching water boil. For others, it expresses a true experience into the indomitable cycle of life. Those who say otherwise are the pretentious ones. Expand
2 of 3 users found this helpful
10
RodrigoM.Mar 16, 2008
this is a movie just for some kind of persons that really knows the truth, the real nature in this world, its amazing this movie it change my life and my destiny i know what to do know in my life.
1 of 1 users found this helpful
10
SamN.Mar 8, 2008
Like this year's Sunshine, The Fountain is a near perfect collaboration of performances, visuals, plot, and music. I'm surprised by some of the comments on here; it's not a very hard film to get. Jackman's performance is Like this year's Sunshine, The Fountain is a near perfect collaboration of performances, visuals, plot, and music. I'm surprised by some of the comments on here; it's not a very hard film to get. Jackman's performance is severely underappreciated, and easily deserved an Oscar nomination. The most underrated movie of 2006. Expand
3 of 4 users found this helpful
0
ScottGMar 1, 2008
One of the worst movies in the history of bad moviemaking. No genuine important ideas were examined, no sense was made of a senseless storyline, and it was just plain silly.
0 of 2 users found this helpful
10
ChristianFeb 19, 2008
for those that don't know this is actually more than just a chick flick for those that have done there studying it is actually a more religious then a love story. there is an actual story in the bible about the tree of life.
1 of 1 users found this helpful
9
JimS.Feb 18, 2008
I look forward to one day seeing the complete, uncut film.
1 of 1 users found this helpful
9
JustinGFeb 1, 2008
The Fountain is a 'love-it-or-hate-it' sort of film. It has only one undeniable quality: it's beautiful. Color and texture come together beautifully; the dark, rainy Mayan jungle, the snow-covered fields of modern America, and The Fountain is a 'love-it-or-hate-it' sort of film. It has only one undeniable quality: it's beautiful. Color and texture come together beautifully; the dark, rainy Mayan jungle, the snow-covered fields of modern America, and the Orion Nebula's golden nuclear rain are breathtaking to behold, especially in HD. Unfortunately the film tries to answer questions that some people go to church for, so those with strongly-held beliefs about the nature of life, death, and God might end the film feeling confused, threatened, even offended. Those of us who, like Aranofsky, are looking to reconcile the illusory conflicts between science and spirituality will likely find it an intensely rewarding experience. Expand
2 of 2 users found this helpful
1
RoryP.Dec 29, 2007
I agree with Ryan D. a frustrating experience to watch. To anyone who is contemplating seeing this film, please heed the following advice - With respect to all things artistic and lacking bullsh*t, do not watch this film, it would be a I agree with Ryan D. a frustrating experience to watch. To anyone who is contemplating seeing this film, please heed the following advice - With respect to all things artistic and lacking bullsh*t, do not watch this film, it would be a laborious waste of your valuable time. Trust me on this, such a critique is not down to the stroppy interpretation of one mere mortal long since out of college, this is not about me making a point for the sake of coming across as superior or smart-every ounce of sanity in my body tells me It is a bad film: Lending any connotations of pretension to The Fountain would be doing it a favour-Its got nothing to say about life that couldn't be said in five minutes in the same sloppy format-its got nothing to say about life that hasn't been said better in other vastly superior films (i don't know, badlands or the thin red line by Terrence Malick for example). To anyone who likes this film, i apologize for saying what i am about to say because i am sure you are a intelligent sensitive and loving person who has done nothing malicious enough to deserve such a harsh appraisal of your sense of self, but seriously, YOU ARE DELUDED. Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful
4
KeithJNov 3, 2007
I think this movie might be better on a second viewing. I enjoy complex movies (my recent favorite is Pan's Labyrinth, for example); however, as I watched The Fountain, I really had little idea what was "real" (in the movie's I think this movie might be better on a second viewing. I enjoy complex movies (my recent favorite is Pan's Labyrinth, for example); however, as I watched The Fountain, I really had little idea what was "real" (in the movie's logic) and what wasn't. There are three storylines. There is a bizarre and fantastic one set in the past; then, we are transported to a bizarre and fantastic one in (I guess?) the distant future; then, we segue to a relatively normal one in approximately the present day. In retrospect, I think the present and future realities were "real", and the one set in the past was fiction/metaphor. However, as you go through the movie, if nobody tells you that, you have no firm ground to stand on; you spend your time trying to decipher the basics, not appreciating whatever truths it is trying to convey. I am tempted to rent the movie and watch it again, because I think I'd enjoy it more knowing what I know now. However, I feel compelled to give it a fairly low mark anyway, because I think it's a flaw of the movie that the viewer has to waste so much mental energy on unimportant things (which part is "real") that it takes away from the rest. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful
0
RyanD.Sep 8, 2007
This film is like a cheerleader. Very pretty, but very dumb.
0 of 2 users found this helpful
7
NickA.Aug 20, 2007
Darren Aronofsky, through his long and tedious struggle to bring his most cherished script to the screen, had accumulated some serious hype around what would eventually become 'The Fountain.' Just under seven years from its Darren Aronofsky, through his long and tedious struggle to bring his most cherished script to the screen, had accumulated some serious hype around what would eventually become 'The Fountain.' Just under seven years from its conception in the mind of the film Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful
10
NaniFayeAug 18, 2007
This movie involves some of my most favorite themes and interests - the tree of life, the Mayans, scientists, new medicines discovered from plants in the rainforest, books, the acceptance of death, the fight against death, hope, peace, and This movie involves some of my most favorite themes and interests - the tree of life, the Mayans, scientists, new medicines discovered from plants in the rainforest, books, the acceptance of death, the fight against death, hope, peace, and space travel. One of the primary dynamics in the movie is the contrast between the man who is spending all his time and energy trying to find a way to keep the woman alive. One wonders if perhaps his time was better spent by spending time with her, listening to her, loving her, and just being with her in her final days. To me that is the crux of the movie, and I felt it deeply - her acceptance of death, and his fight against it (and essentially against her in a way). I have not stopped thinking about this movie since I watched it, and I absolutely love it. For me, and I understand for many others, it is the epitome of beauty and depth. And yes, in the end some things didn't add up, and the "lotus position" was hokey for sure - meditation does not involve any physical posture, it is an inner state of being (but how to show that visually? Then again, the first time I watched the movie, I thought the space bubble was in fact the man's inner state of being, portrayed visually, and was a not a "real" place but a representation of what was in his head...who knows...). But the heart was there and the intentions were good, even if the portrayal of the themes was not perfect - but who has done this and these themes before any better? I must say also though that my own life experiences and background and interests had a profound effect on the way I received this movie. So many of the visuals, the themes, and the ideas are so embedded in me that if the movie were based on some other visuals and themes, I might not have really liked it at all. (Botany, Medicine, Anthropology, Space Travel, Meditation, and the death of a Beloved). Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful
9
CrystalJul 30, 2007
How do you explain let alone film someone's conscious experience? This film was excellent in that it attempted to provide visuals for the metaphysical experiences attached to loving, dying, and the character's own internal How do you explain let alone film someone's conscious experience? This film was excellent in that it attempted to provide visuals for the metaphysical experiences attached to loving, dying, and the character's own internal struggle. He never time traveled, the "time travel" sequences were a type of literary or visual tool to show the viewer how the character understood his role toward his wife's condition. Excellent and at times overbearingly touching. Expand
2 of 2 users found this helpful
6
NINJul 24, 2007
I give it a 6 for making me feel like I had some barbiturates. The concept is amazing but unfortunately it was not captured in the film. It would have been a better film if they stuck and focused on one lifetime. I bet Hugh Jackman himself I give it a 6 for making me feel like I had some barbiturates. The concept is amazing but unfortunately it was not captured in the film. It would have been a better film if they stuck and focused on one lifetime. I bet Hugh Jackman himself didn't know what his own film was about. It was crazy, a big mess and a definite waste of time. I could definitely live without watching this film in my lifetime. Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful
2
nwbroncoJul 21, 2007
The only reason that I did not vote zero was the cg effects. E for effort. Aside from that, what do you get when you mix a little bit of opium, death fantasies, astronomy, eastern religion and no hope?? Anyone? You get 96 minutes of your The only reason that I did not vote zero was the cg effects. E for effort. Aside from that, what do you get when you mix a little bit of opium, death fantasies, astronomy, eastern religion and no hope?? Anyone? You get 96 minutes of your precious life ROBBED from you! Don't bother. Anyone with Judeo-Christian beliefs may get irritated at the ending. That is all. Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful
10
kalJul 15, 2007
Awesome, what movie making should always be about. A breath of fresh air from the generalized Hollywood empty headed easy to follow simpleton movies. If you think Die Hard or Rambo are good films then don't bother with this. If you are Awesome, what movie making should always be about. A breath of fresh air from the generalized Hollywood empty headed easy to follow simpleton movies. If you think Die Hard or Rambo are good films then don't bother with this. If you are a free thinker and crave artistic expression at its finest then this a film for you. I get the impression the bad reviews are from people who A: don't understand it or B: are not the type to think beyond the mundane. Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful
10
NikolaK.Jul 7, 2007
Great movie.
2 of 2 users found this helpful
9
TedL.Jul 4, 2007
I'm truly amazed at how many reviewers COMPLETELY missed the boat on this one. Honest, heartfelt, mesmerizing, heartbreaking and WELL ahead of it's time, THE FOUNTAIN will undoubtedly be looked upon in twenty years time as one of I'm truly amazed at how many reviewers COMPLETELY missed the boat on this one. Honest, heartfelt, mesmerizing, heartbreaking and WELL ahead of it's time, THE FOUNTAIN will undoubtedly be looked upon in twenty years time as one of the best films of the early 21st century. Man. Open your minds, people. Expand
2 of 2 users found this helpful
10
JeremyS.Jun 30, 2007
One of the most powerful films I've ever seen. Please don't hate it if you do not understand it. Give it a chance. Try it again. Listen to Ellen Burstyn's speech in the scene in the snow; it as well as Jackman's obvious One of the most powerful films I've ever seen. Please don't hate it if you do not understand it. Give it a chance. Try it again. Listen to Ellen Burstyn's speech in the scene in the snow; it as well as Jackman's obvious revelation toward the end of the film are the movie's seminal moments and nicely sum up its themes. This film isn't merely a love story, it's a story about death, love, peace, and facing mortality. It's about living well and dying with a measure of grace. Expand
2 of 2 users found this helpful
10
JeremyBJun 30, 2007
This movie touched me. It may not have touched other's but just as any work of art - some may understand and some may not. It's really just a matter of personal preference and style. I can see why some of you folks think it was a This movie touched me. It may not have touched other's but just as any work of art - some may understand and some may not. It's really just a matter of personal preference and style. I can see why some of you folks think it was a bad movie in some ways. For me it was amazing. I will also say it bears being watched multiple times in order to fully grasp the imagery and plot to the best degree. I enjoy movies that you need to and want to watch more than once to understand. I gave it a 10 because it is my new favorite movie and will be for a while until something else comes along...and with so many of the movies in the past years being just the opposite (shallow, uninteresting and overdone) it may be some time. Expand
3 of 3 users found this helpful