Read User Reviews and Submit your own for Superman II

7

KnuffleBunny180Sep 10, 2023

This is a SPOILER FREE review of the DONNER VERSION OF THE FILM:

This movie was a huge imporvement over the first film. It has much better antagonists and Superman has a really good internal conflict that paved the way for movies likeThis is a SPOILER FREE review of the DONNER VERSION OF THE FILM:

This movie was a huge imporvement over the first film. It has much better antagonists and Superman has a really good internal conflict that paved the way for movies like Spider-Man 2, which is one of the greatest superhero films of all time. I highly suggest watching this film. Overall, this gets a 7/10, go watch it!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

infraReconJun 4, 2023

A good Sequel with what seems to be more budget and exciting scenes, however, there are some things in this movie that feel a bit tacky but it gets the job done well enough.

Comparing this to Man of Steel 2013, I see where Zack Znyder gotA good Sequel with what seems to be more budget and exciting scenes, however, there are some things in this movie that feel a bit tacky but it gets the job done well enough.

Comparing this to Man of Steel 2013, I see where Zack Znyder got his ideas for his first Superman film.

This film compared to the first is somewhat better actually to the first. The first just drags a little too much, here, there are things going on but the plot with Superman feels too forced and at times none sensical which makes it lesser than the previous film.

All in all it's a great Sequel and I like it, these older films do delve deep into the characters that are portrayed and that's great as opposed to recent films.

And Again it takes its time and doesn't rush the plot even if it's a bit mashed up at times.

8/10, still great, a bit lesser in consistency but still great.

KNEEL BEFORE ZOD, So I can Watch Superman III.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

alerikandersonApr 26, 2023

Its better than the first one if we're talking about the Richard Donner Cut and the original version is right beside the first Superman.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

FionanMurphyAug 14, 2022

A fantastic sequel that follows the furthur adventures of superman to a tee

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

kyle20ellisMar 28, 2022

I love the original Superman film and consider it one of the all time great superhero films. This sequel is a worthy one. While it is uneven in tone, that I agree, and a tad overlong, the special effects are above decent and the score isI love the original Superman film and consider it one of the all time great superhero films. This sequel is a worthy one. While it is uneven in tone, that I agree, and a tad overlong, the special effects are above decent and the score is superb. The dialogue is pretty good and this film is probably the best plotted of all the films put together, being not too serious and not as silly as the succeeding two. The pacing is secure, and the subplot is sweet and doesn't distract. The direction is good, and the acting is fine. Christopher Reeve is still likable, and Gene Hackman and Terrence Stamp are rock-solid in the roles of Lex Luthor and General Zod. Overall, it isn't as good as the first film but it is the first and I think only worthy sequel(the third being lacklustre despite some good moments and the fourth being awful). 8/10 Bethany Cox… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

3

FilipeNetoOct 31, 2021

After the success of the first film, a sequel was predictable. However, I can't say it's as good or impressive as the first movie. In fact, if the first one seems old to me, this film looks even more dated and there is no doubt that it hasAfter the success of the first film, a sequel was predictable. However, I can't say it's as good or impressive as the first movie. In fact, if the first one seems old to me, this film looks even more dated and there is no doubt that it has fallen into complete oblivion. The script follows the story of the first film and reveals how Lois comes to know the identity of Clark Kent, with whom she begins to live a romance, despite the chaos that is caused by the arrival of three more Krypton inhabitants: the criminals who, soon at the beginning of the first movie, we have seen being thrown into space.

The film is, on the whole, a poor sequel. I felt there was an effort to learn from mistakes and improve the story told, but I think Clark and Lois' romance is one of the less interesting points of the film, and that it may have displeased many comic book fans. For me, who enjoyed seeing the way he hid his identity and tried to court her at the same time, it was a bit annoying. One of the most notable improvements is the introduction of three truly menacing villains, capable of making the "man of steel" sweat a little, despite the maintenance of the despicable Lex Luthor and the tiresome and somewhat fetishistic mania that Zod, the leader of the villains, has to have people kneeling before him.

Christopher Reeve remains an honorable and dignified Superman, even though he's not as fresh and committed as would be desirable. Also, Margot Kidder seems to be doing well and Gene Hackman, despite hardly showing up, takes advantage of the opportunities to try to do better than he did in the first film. Overall I liked the work of Terence Stamp, an actor who usually did not appear in big productions and is not so flashy and recognized, but has talent and ability. Even so, I felt that he overacts and sounds artificial many times.

On a technical level, the film continues to focus on elaborate and eye-catching visual effects, following in the footsteps of the first film. It's not surprising, then, nor how cheap, primitive and unbelievable it is for our eyes, today. The cinematography seems to me slightly better than in the first film, as it is not so nebulous and makes a positive use of the filming locations and sets, which are more natural and elegant. It's a shorter than its predecessor, and that's another notable improvement. The soundtrack, on the other hand, is basically inherited from the initial movie, which is good.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

alejandro970Oct 2, 2021

His greatest success is to preserve the charisma of the previous installment, now with more dangerous villains and a sub-story of love that is functional enough and an epic climactic battle. The only drawback is that for current generationsHis greatest success is to preserve the charisma of the previous installment, now with more dangerous villains and a sub-story of love that is functional enough and an epic climactic battle. The only drawback is that for current generations the special effects look rustic. What I don't understand is why there are two different editions; it is a matter of seeing both and comparing. In loving memory of Christopher Reeve.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

adrenilinmattMar 29, 2021

This movie wipes the floor with the first. In every way. Given that these movies are upwards of 40 years old now, we can forgive the aging of the effects, surely. Doesn’t take a genius to realise that technology was limited in 1980. However,This movie wipes the floor with the first. In every way. Given that these movies are upwards of 40 years old now, we can forgive the aging of the effects, surely. Doesn’t take a genius to realise that technology was limited in 1980. However, this film manages to be dazzling all the same, and does not deserve this user score. It’s a 10, and I hope my 10 drags the score up a little. Far better than the first. Far far far better. Pacing is perfect, no boring parts like the first one. Just so much better than the first. Better better better.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

6

Onlyclassicvg1Jan 9, 2021

Well, to (hopefully) clear a few things up a) Metacritic "weighs" some reviews to count for more than others. I don't necessarily agree with it but it's the fact of things. b) There are a lot of movies that exist here that… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

gracjanskiDec 29, 2020

Clearly a worse movie, than the first one: The character Superman doesnt get much new aspects and the worst of all: Some characters in the movie behave so dumb, that you think this movie is slapstick or a B movie. Especially the naivety ofClearly a worse movie, than the first one: The character Superman doesnt get much new aspects and the worst of all: Some characters in the movie behave so dumb, that you think this movie is slapstick or a B movie. Especially the naivety of Clark Kent is annoying.

What is good? It is a superman movie.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

noob328Dec 8, 2020

this film is incredibly underrated. like wow only 6.7? it's better than the first one

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

9

SoapNuggetJul 13, 2020

INCREDIBLE SEQUEL, Truly better than the first it ups the ante by adding General Zod and having (Once Again) Lex Luthor in the mix (played Excellently by Gene Hackman) truly a Magnificent film

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

1

OriginalDangerJul 5, 2020

The original Superman film was great but Christopher Reeve returns for Superman II... Three villains escape after a blast or something in space, they go causing havoc on earth and the leader is General Zod.... Sarah Douglas who plays one ofThe original Superman film was great but Christopher Reeve returns for Superman II... Three villains escape after a blast or something in space, they go causing havoc on earth and the leader is General Zod.... Sarah Douglas who plays one of the villains is ridiculous and can't act to save her life. Full of cheesey lines and gags and a horrible script and acting I'd say Superman II is one of the worst sequels ever made.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

RobwinzMay 22, 2020

It's not as good as the first Superman but it's still a decent sequel neither the less.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

superbatMay 4, 2020

In my opinion, this sequel was better than the original. Though overall it maintains the previous movie's campy tone, it's much darker and more intense. Reeve shines as Superman once again, and the chemistry between him and Lois Lane wasIn my opinion, this sequel was better than the original. Though overall it maintains the previous movie's campy tone, it's much darker and more intense. Reeve shines as Superman once again, and the chemistry between him and Lois Lane was great. Gene Hackman's Luthor, along with Zod and his cronies, were fantastic in this movie as well.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

MglovesfunJan 29, 2020

This is tame by modern standards. The plot is extremely straightforward and Superman and the three Kryptonians only meet after 95 minutes of the movie. The graphics are weak even by 1980s standards (A New Hope, 1977, has better graphics). YetThis is tame by modern standards. The plot is extremely straightforward and Superman and the three Kryptonians only meet after 95 minutes of the movie. The graphics are weak even by 1980s standards (A New Hope, 1977, has better graphics). Yet it is the best of the Christopher Reeve tetralogy, and the most entertaining.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

Mr-MonsterOct 22, 2019

This movie is definitely one of the best superhero movies of all time. much better than black panther, and it deserves a better rating than that movie. Even after about 40 years, this movie is worth to watch. the special effects where aheadThis movie is definitely one of the best superhero movies of all time. much better than black panther, and it deserves a better rating than that movie. Even after about 40 years, this movie is worth to watch. the special effects where ahead of its time. people have to watch it.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

MarvelJoeFeb 4, 2019

I'm surprise this movie has a higher score than Superman (1978). Christopher Reeves does a great job as Clark and Superman. It's a good sequel but the first still tops it.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

amheretojudgeJan 3, 2019

Guests That Takes Us For Granted.

Superman II Lester's more cheesy and more flawed super-ness is, against all odds, more entertaining. With glorifying characteristics of the characters to its best at the most critical moments to give aGuests That Takes Us For Granted.

Superman II

Lester's more cheesy and more flawed super-ness is, against all odds, more entertaining. With glorifying characteristics of the characters to its best at the most critical moments to give a jarringly exhilarating, is a way of saying how grand the characters are, just in a loud voice. There was a very easy way to mend the broken in here, but unaware of the lack of lucid narration, the knack for a knockout enthralling punch feels empty. As far as the conversations are concerned, they grow one dimensional and more questionable than its first installment.

If Hackman gets that same over confident and self praising role to portray, the shallowness of Stamp's character, is something that outnumbers it on potential. As it was previously, the only thing charms its way out, no matter how cringe-worthy, is the repartee between Reeve and Kidder that is ought to be cheesy, and hence lands safely to the tone of the storytelling. The creation of the environment of the Moon, the final battle and the logistics of both the physics and character's perspective; all these essential points are poorly crafted out.

On terms of performance, Reeve's plastered non-expressive performance fails to deliver the gravitas of the scene especially the one where out protagonist gets beaten to blood, even then there is none whatsoever genuineness on his portrayal. Kidder on the other hand, as on overly obsessed reporter somehow works, whilst once again, Hackman is misused completely from head to toe. But as much as uncomfortable these flaws makes you, there is a lot to be amazed at, lot to reboot your mind to a kid-like, scoffing the limitations on the visual effects, it surely feels a blockbuster. Superman II is a far better and engaging than its previous one, a rare thing to come across and to pull off.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

3

gzayas91Jun 21, 2017

Same thought as with first one. Not of a fan of this, I much rather watch Batman v Superman. That to me is Superman 2. Is totally unfair that BvS was slammed as hell by critics.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

SonicHD7May 31, 2017

Superman (Christopher Reeve) foils the plot of terrorists by hurtling their nuclear device into outer space, but the bomb's shock waves free the Kryptonian villain General Zod (Terence Stamp) and his henchmen Ursa (Sarah Douglas) and NonSuperman (Christopher Reeve) foils the plot of terrorists by hurtling their nuclear device into outer space, but the bomb's shock waves free the Kryptonian villain General Zod (Terence Stamp) and his henchmen Ursa (Sarah Douglas) and Non (Jack O'Halloran) from their imprisonment. Traveling to Earth, they threaten the planet with destruction at the same time that Superman decides to renounce his superpowers in order to live a normal life as Clark Kent with his new love, Lois Lane (Margot Kidder).… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

MrMovieBuffApr 28, 2017

'Superman II' is an incredible sequel, filled with everything you loved about the first movie, and takes it to a tight story with some incredibly paced work and an overall, satisfying installment to the "Superman" franchise. Clark Kent'Superman II' is an incredible sequel, filled with everything you loved about the first movie, and takes it to a tight story with some incredibly paced work and an overall, satisfying installment to the "Superman" franchise. Clark Kent (Christopher Reeve) is back, and must now face his toughest enemy yet, General Zod (Terrence Stamp), while Lois Lane (Margot Kidder) thinks that she might be closer to the identity of Superman than she thinks. Overall, 'Superman II' is still a visually stunning sequel, with a great story wrapped in there, the execution may be clunky in a few places, but you will have fun with it.… Expand

2 of 2 users found this helpful20

All this user's reviews

10

TheMoeJan 4, 2017

Superman II was a great film. Way better than 3 or 4 and it has almost no flaws. General Zod is amazing and Reeve as Superman is amazing, as well. This movie is a 10/10.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

UNARMED_JORDAug 21, 2016

boasting a better story line, better villains and overall a better movie Superman II is in my opinion the best superman movie to ever be released, just great stuff.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

EpicLadySpongeMay 3, 2016

I don't know how in the world is this ranked higher than the original Superman, but don't question critic logic. Just enjoy what they have in store for you.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

gameguardian21Mar 20, 2016

While not as good as the first one, this superman story continues the superman legacy that lasted two movies. With a entertaining villian, superman still heroic, and story, this was the superman movie that was the last good one before the 2000"s.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

MovieNightMar 6, 2016

Here's a new one: a director's cut from someone who isn't the credited director. When producers Alexander and Ilya Salkind decided to make a Superman film, they adopted the same strategy they chose for The Three Musketeers and The FourHere's a new one: a director's cut from someone who isn't the credited director. When producers Alexander and Ilya Salkind decided to make a Superman film, they adopted the same strategy they chose for The Three Musketeers and The Four Musketeers: shoot two at once and save some money. But as with the Musketeers films, the plan didn't quite work out. The Salkinds fired Superman director Richard Donner before he could complete the sequel, brought in Musketeers director Richard Lester to replace him, and lost the participation of Gene Hackman (who declined to come back for the Lester-shot footage) and Marlon Brando (whose footage was cut after he raised a stink over missing profits from the first Superman). Released in 1980 in Europe and 1981 in America, Superman II met with popular success, but fans, teased by footage that showed up in TV cuts, kept the idea of a truer, Donner-ier version alive, and the clamor has finally culminated in a new cut reconstructed by Michael Thau with Donner's approval.

The standard line holds Lester's version as too camp, blaming him for all the film's failings and crediting Donner with everything that works. That wouldn't be fair even if it didn't disrespect Lester (here repeatedly called "the other director"), who helmed masterpieces like A Hard Day's Night and Petulia, especially since the new cut reveals that Donner deserves a great deal of the credit and blame for both versions of Superman II. Most of the key scenes originated with Donner, and while his cut solves some of the original version's problems (no more Superman logo snares made out of cellophane), it has problems of its own.

Big problems. Anyone wanting to avoid camp will want to fast-forward through the painful comedic scenes featuring Hackman as Lex Luthor, with moll Valerie Perrine. One key scene obviously comes from patched-together screen tests, and the finale maddeningly repeats a cheap trick from the first Superman film. It's nice to see the Brando footage and the restored scenes of Christopher Reeve and Margot Kidder's breezy chemistry. But where the original cut at least played as a relatively cohesive movie, loose ends and all, this looks like little but loose ends. It's a curio, not a corrective.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

TheDude-Jul 19, 2015

Superman 2 is a rare sequel that improves upon the original the action for its time is very solid the characters are great and is easily one of the most fun and entertaining superhero films to watch.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

10

fatoshajdini101Oct 27, 2014

Just like the first film, Superman II is one of the greatest movie ever! The best fight scene between the Man of Steel and the three Kryptonian criminals including General Zod is quite a tremendous battle and he is one bad-ass villain forJust like the first film, Superman II is one of the greatest movie ever! The best fight scene between the Man of Steel and the three Kryptonian criminals including General Zod is quite a tremendous battle and he is one bad-ass villain for this movie.Same script made by Mario Puzo(who previously worked on the Godfather trilogy) and as for Lex Luthor now a supporting role he is even more comical than the first film.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

10

SythusRATINGSOct 18, 2014

A trio of Krypton villains threaten havoc on Earth, while Superman and Lois Lane are just becoming involved in a long awaited love affair -- an affair which may cost Superman his super powers.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

9

nick_knackSep 30, 2014

More villains and more action than before create a better and more exciting film, though at times like its predecessor, Reeves performance as the Man of Steel as well as Terrance Stamp's Zod cause Superman II to nearly top the original.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

9

diogomendesSep 3, 2014

Much better than the pointless, dim-witted named as "Man of Steel". Just when you thought the classic was already enough, studio Warner Bros. brings another well-paced, stylish and nicely acted flick.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

4

MovieGKMay 8, 2014

Worse than the first and since the first is out of time now... yeah... It couldn't have the great action of course so it focused again on the humor part. Even more this time. It almost became a kids cartoon.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

SNLover44Mar 1, 2014

The best out of the QUADRILOGY LOVED IT SOO MUCH!!! Great Cast, Great Bad guy, Great Lines, Great super AND A GREAT DIRECTOR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! RICHARD DONNER DID IT AGAIN!!!

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

8

marcmyworksJan 22, 2014

Superman's back and this time he's had it. Actually in all seriousness this is the best of the Reeve Superman films as he battles his own kind and has to defend the planet he calls home.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

9

cag11Nov 29, 2013

Although this was even more cheesy than the first Superman, it still has a great amount of cool that made this movie a decent sequel. This will always be my favorite Superman sequel, ever.

2 of 2 users found this helpful20

All this user's reviews

8

SuperheroMoviesAug 19, 2013

Featuring still decent effects for its time, soul-filled humor, and a story that shows tremendous heart, this sequel is an exciting and faithful follow-up to the phenomenal original.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

7

wrightm1Jun 26, 2013

Although the original Superman will always be the strongest in my eyes, I still really quite enjoyed this film. With a montage to start the film off, just in case you have forgotten anything from the previous film, but this film is simplyAlthough the original Superman will always be the strongest in my eyes, I still really quite enjoyed this film. With a montage to start the film off, just in case you have forgotten anything from the previous film, but this film is simply just fun, and the most entertaining thing for me was watch Lois lane and Superman play off each other and see how their relationship developed.

That and General Zod of course, who is a truly great villain played by the one and only Terence Stamp. I will be interested to see Michael Shannon's take of the character in Man of steel... Had to mention it at some point. It's a Superman review.

And it is Superman week. Lets face it.

The main problem I had with the film is that I felt that there were some bits that felt too placed, and could have been cut out completely. The film does seem to drag in the middle a little bit which could arguably be down to the troubled production, with a switch of director in the middle of production from Richard Donner to Richard Lester. This resulted in a problem with the tone of the film, as Donner wanted a dark film while Lester tried to add in a lot of slapstick- which to be honest were the bits that dragged the film down- what I would call the silly parts, when the film suddenly becomes a cartoon for a few minutes.

I will be interested to see Richard Donner's cut.

I enjoyed Superman 2, although it doesn't have the same magic of the first one it is still a great superhero film.… Expand

2 of 2 users found this helpful20

All this user's reviews

0

fonzieJun 23, 2013

I was so impressionable as a kid that I had no idea how to criticize a movie or compare it to others on special effects. To me it was one of the greatest movies from a child's perspective. I grew up and now realize it was a B movie and I'mI was so impressionable as a kid that I had no idea how to criticize a movie or compare it to others on special effects. To me it was one of the greatest movies from a child's perspective. I grew up and now realize it was a B movie and I'm not comparing it to today's special effects films because that's unfair, instead I'm comparing it to Star Wars which is the movie which was truly ahead of its time in production, acting, storyline and special effects. Star Wars has truly stood the test of time. Sorry, but Superman II is a joke and people seem endeared to Christopher Reeves out of nostalgia and patriotism but he was a terrible actor. The only actor in that film worth anything was Gene Hackman… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

8

DollisJun 14, 2013

I seen the movie man of steel and i give 3 and a half star's that doesn't mean it is a bad movie., i like more Superman (1978) and Superman II (1980) and the soundtrack of Superman (1978) is better.

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

9

cub317May 22, 2013

No, I do not think that this movie is the best Superhero movie of all time. However, I do think that this is a very good movie. This movie was made back in a time when people thought superheroes were more romantic and silly than anythingNo, I do not think that this movie is the best Superhero movie of all time. However, I do think that this is a very good movie. This movie was made back in a time when people thought superheroes were more romantic and silly than anything else (if you want another movie like that, all three of Sam Raimi's Spider-Man movies). This movie is a perfect movie that shows what superheroes were like during that era. I believe that the main reason a lot of people do not like this film as much as they used too is merely because this is the era of more grown up superhero movies (Christopher Nolan's Batman movies) which are much darker. Superman II is definitely the perfect movie for romantic superhero fans. It is very charismatic and heroic at the same time. It has a simple plot with villains threatening to take over the world, but the hero always triumphs in the end, and also gets the girl. While this plot is simple, so were the original Spider-Man movies which came out much later. Probably my only real complaint about this movie is that even though the romantic hero plot was good for the time, it is a little outdated now, as more grown up superhero movies have been released. I still think that this a great movie nonetheless.… Expand

2 of 2 users found this helpful20

All this user's reviews

2

MundtyMay 10, 2013

Caught this on T.V. with my friend one night. Hadn't seen it since I was about 6 and it was cringe worthy to the point of not being able to look away. I wasn't expecting a timeless classic, you have to lower your standards this being aCaught this on T.V. with my friend one night. Hadn't seen it since I was about 6 and it was cringe worthy to the point of not being able to look away. I wasn't expecting a timeless classic, you have to lower your standards this being a super hero movie and being a product of the 80's. But my god, I was not expecting such a hilariously unwatchable disaster. It's not the bad special fx, or even the somewhat dated feel of the movie... Superman II's biggest problem is it's actors delivery and total lack of subtlety in their performance. Some of it can surely be blamed on the director for accepting the takes, but a lot of the lines are delivered so unbelievably bad you wonder how they made it past the cutting room floor. The story isn't much better, just an excuse to have an all out brawl in the middle of the city... you can see where directors like Michael Bay major influences are. Grab some popcorn and spend hour and a half re-familiarizing yourself with this movie. Even my friend who's fairly open to watching almost any mindless action flick couldn't contain his laughter re-watching this.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

McCorpseMar 2, 2013

liked this one a lot, in my opinion it was probably even better than the first one. One of the biggest reasons would probably be the villains. They are a physical match for superman so they pose more of a threat than lex luthers so calledliked this one a lot, in my opinion it was probably even better than the first one. One of the biggest reasons would probably be the villains. They are a physical match for superman so they pose more of a threat than lex luthers so called intelligence. Since supermans new villains can fly there is one really good scene of them battling it out and throwing large objects at each other and fighting while flying. The dated special effects add a cheese factor but its really fun to watch. There is also a very cool scene on the moon that felt very sci-fi like, this was a great scene i thought looked very cool. These two things were in my opinion better than anything that happened in the origonal. On the negative side though there was some pretty stupid plot elements that might be hard for some people to look passed, i personally just laughed and shrugged it off. One thing i found funny was how supermans mom tells him he can turn into a human but will never be able to regain his old powers and then he easilly gets his powers back using the green crystal, that was ridiculous, also lex luthers escape from jail in a hot air balloon was silly. Overall superman 2 is a cheesy good time i found more entertaining than the first… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

5

MouthofSauronDec 10, 2012

"Superman II" has none of the charm of its predecessor, and it is plagued by particularly bad special effects. The character of Superman is more deeply developed and the narrative is artfully paced.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

tontoSep 12, 2012

It can be campy but it's fun and original, exploring a fallible side of Superman through his decision to rid himself of his powers for Lois Lane. Zod, of course, is classic. It's a shame Donner couldn't finish his version, but I feel LesterIt can be campy but it's fun and original, exploring a fallible side of Superman through his decision to rid himself of his powers for Lois Lane. Zod, of course, is classic. It's a shame Donner couldn't finish his version, but I feel Lester did a fine job finishing the project.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

9

MonsieurEamesJul 12, 2012

My favorite of the Superman movies. I don't know how on Earth this film got a 5.8 User Score. This was also the most interesting, as Superman finally had someone who could really challenge him and he doesn't always emerge victorious. ThisMy favorite of the Superman movies. I don't know how on Earth this film got a 5.8 User Score. This was also the most interesting, as Superman finally had someone who could really challenge him and he doesn't always emerge victorious. This film also explores Clark's and Lois' relationship much more than in the first film, which proves to me that its an improvement.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

10

ZilcellApr 14, 2012

Superman II is every bit as good as the first, and even possibly better. When it comes to stories in superhero movies, this is about as good as it gets.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

2

DarwinNov 16, 2011

I'm giving this movie a 2 because I like the idea of it. The actual implementation has much to be desired. The special effects are awful in context with the times. The fight scenes are laughable. Watching equally strong (invincible)I'm giving this movie a 2 because I like the idea of it. The actual implementation has much to be desired. The special effects are awful in context with the times. The fight scenes are laughable. Watching equally strong (invincible) superbeings fight is much more boring than watching a regular street fight. It always amazes me that Hollywood could never put together a great Superman movie. The original Superman movie was decent but fell apart in the second half. This movie is dumb from start to finish.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

grandpajoe6191Sep 22, 2011

"Superman 2" is definitely overrated by critics. However, it still stands out as a comic ovation and appeals heartfully to the audience.

4 of 6 users found this helpful42

All this user's reviews

3

MetalDoctorOct 7, 2010

Just the thought of this film being above the Godfather part1 and 2 is unbelievably angers me.We have two masterpieces and many more(like LOTR and Patton) being rated lower than this cheesy action flick.I don't think it should even beJust the thought of this film being above the Godfather part1 and 2 is unbelievably angers me.We have two masterpieces and many more(like LOTR and Patton) being rated lower than this cheesy action flick.I don't think it should even be included in the High Scores list because there are just 7 reviews.… Expand

8 of 16 users found this helpful88

All this user's reviews

5

JonathanKDec 7, 2009

Is there some sort of Metacritic loophole here? I agree with the bulk of these reviews: This was a fun popcorn-chewer in its day, but it was never *that* good. I don't know if Reeves' tragic later life (and early death) may have Is there some sort of Metacritic loophole here? I agree with the bulk of these reviews: This was a fun popcorn-chewer in its day, but it was never *that* good. I don't know if Reeves' tragic later life (and early death) may have influenced these ratings, but it certainly seems that way. A year or two ago I decided to rent the first one to show my kids, owing to the (then) stellar MetaCritic rating. I remember enjoying the film when I saw it decades ago, and thought perhaps there was more to the movie than I was able to glean at the time. Not only did my kids think it was "nothing special", but it left me disappointed too. Perhaps the inflated score is an artifact of a valiant attempt by Metacritic to review older movies? If so, I hope it's temporary. Rotten Tomatoes' reviews of older movies are hopelessly skewed to the positive and thus completely unreliable. I would love to have a reliable alternative that's not hopelessly romanticized.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

JamesHNov 24, 2009

Very entertaining, it has a lightness about it and plenty of action. Winning performances, excellent score and in 1980 the special effects were great.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

DanSOct 7, 2009

Still the greatest Superman movie ever made, and still one of the greatest super hero movies ever made.

0 of 1 users found this helpful

8

GoxPSep 26, 2009

This is not the score on the original Superman 2 from 1981 (which I would score 4, even as a kid back then). No, this is for 2006, Superman 2 - The Richard Donner Cut, which is not complete, but "must see" for all you Superman lovers out This is not the score on the original Superman 2 from 1981 (which I would score 4, even as a kid back then). No, this is for 2006, Superman 2 - The Richard Donner Cut, which is not complete, but "must see" for all you Superman lovers out there. This version feels like completely different film.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

2

SteveWSep 12, 2009

You have got to be kidding me. The number #2 rated movie of all time?? It was OK for 1981, but just OK. By today's standard, the story is way too slow, and the characters too cheesy and simple. Unlike the other "greats," it hasn't You have got to be kidding me. The number #2 rated movie of all time?? It was OK for 1981, but just OK. By today's standard, the story is way too slow, and the characters too cheesy and simple. Unlike the other "greats," it hasn't stood the test of time. In my view, the 99 score shows a serious flaw with this system.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

JoelW.Sep 10, 2009

This film is fantastic. And even more so because it's a sequel. I think it's terrific. And I dont understand how anyone can say this is "Unwatchable" - have those users never seen "Grandma's Boy", "Club Dread" or "Going This film is fantastic. And even more so because it's a sequel. I think it's terrific. And I dont understand how anyone can say this is "Unwatchable" - have those users never seen "Grandma's Boy", "Club Dread" or "Going Overboard"? THEY'RE unwatchable!… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful

8

PaulASep 9, 2009

OK, keep in mind that the reviews used to calculte the 99 score are most likely from when the movie came out and not current reviews! when Superman 2 came out it deserved this score! Has it aged well? maybe not, but it's still a damn OK, keep in mind that the reviews used to calculte the 99 score are most likely from when the movie came out and not current reviews! when Superman 2 came out it deserved this score! Has it aged well? maybe not, but it's still a damn good movie, and for it's time it very much deserved it's universal acclaim, now can we please move on.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

5

EusebioPSep 7, 2009

Don't take me wrong, the movie is ok for a Saturday afternoon with nothing else to do... But the second place of the list!! This is madness!!

0 of 0 users found this helpful

4

ThomasWSep 4, 2009

Look, people: if you know anything about statistics, most movies should not get more then about a 7 or less than about a 3. This is NOT a great movie, and I agree that the score it receives from metacritic is skewed by too few reviews, and Look, people: if you know anything about statistics, most movies should not get more then about a 7 or less than about a 3. This is NOT a great movie, and I agree that the score it receives from metacritic is skewed by too few reviews, and it also seems to be the case that some viewers here are responding with fake responses to inflate the numbers... one word responses like "Incredible!!!!" are useless.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful

4

DerekK.Aug 16, 2009

Ok for its time but doesn't age well. a bit soppy.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

6

ByronLJ.Jul 7, 2009

Sure it's enjoyable in its own way, much like you wish you had a proton pack watching Ghostbusters, you wish you had those SuperPowers like Superman. I don't remember this film being even half as good as the Meta Critic Score leads Sure it's enjoyable in its own way, much like you wish you had a proton pack watching Ghostbusters, you wish you had those SuperPowers like Superman. I don't remember this film being even half as good as the Meta Critic Score leads one to believe.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

CrisenM.May 20, 2009

Loved it!

6 of 9 users found this helpful

0

ChristopherE.May 7, 2009

This movie is practically unwatchable. The fact that it has earned "universal acclaim" and a score of 99 based on critics reviews throws the whole notion of the movie critic into doubt. Who are these people?

0 of 0 users found this helpful

2

brianw.Apr 14, 2009

I agree with the other posters: this film is highly, highly overrated. Cheesy, poorly acted, overwrought and just plain stupid.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

RichardOMar 2, 2009

A fun fantastic film that still stands the test of time, Christopher Reeve played the lead role(s) perfectly and will be sadly missed. The John Williams Score is probably one of the most memorable and uplifting in Cinema history and still A fun fantastic film that still stands the test of time, Christopher Reeve played the lead role(s) perfectly and will be sadly missed. The John Williams Score is probably one of the most memorable and uplifting in Cinema history and still gives me goose bumps when played, should this be No:2 in the list? Not really, but still a 10 in my eyes!!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

6

KPFeb 27, 2009

Although I don't have any problem with this film, it's 99 rating makes me question the entire metacritic system, more specifically the critic realm. This film is simply is no where near a 99.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

JaredKNov 11, 2008

This loud goofy campy fun, see it.

1 of 1 users found this helpful

10

TedFOct 28, 2008

Superman II is bright, funny, and clever. Even with all the innovations in special effects so many super hero movies lack the chemistry that Superman I and II had. I love the brains over brawn ending.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

1

MichaelBSep 9, 2008

I re-watched this a few months ago, and it is just as awful as I remember it being. I cringe every time I see this movie in the #2 spot. Please, Metacritic, retire this movie.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

4

JustinLSep 8, 2008

Overated, only top 100 because there's only 6 positive reviews. If there were at least 20, then it would even things out a bit.

6 of 8 users found this helpful

10

FrankS.Aug 23, 2008

Great movie. One of the best of the "modern" superhero movies. Released in 1980 you can see the effect of this movie on newer releases such as Spiderman II and even The Dark Knight. I enjoyed Superman Returns, but not nearly as good as Great movie. One of the best of the "modern" superhero movies. Released in 1980 you can see the effect of this movie on newer releases such as Spiderman II and even The Dark Knight. I enjoyed Superman Returns, but not nearly as good as Superman II or even the original.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful

0

EdwardC.Aug 11, 2008

It's a horrible and dull movie.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

6

JohnFAug 7, 2008

Overrated, the only reason metacritic gave it a swell review was because there were only 7 critics to average from.

3 of 4 users found this helpful

4

BrendenS.Jul 24, 2008

Can someone tell me why the critics love this movie, and the average viewer watches it merely to mock it. Even for its time this movie was a joke. Sure it may have serious character involvement and a DECENT plot line, but in the end it looks Can someone tell me why the critics love this movie, and the average viewer watches it merely to mock it. Even for its time this movie was a joke. Sure it may have serious character involvement and a DECENT plot line, but in the end it looks cheap, feels cheap, and makes you feel like you just got cheated after you watch it.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

RyanF.Jul 23, 2008

My favorite Super Hero movie still of all time. This movie contains all the vital components that makes Comic Books so appealing. Action, Drama, Searching one's intersoul, redemption, and Earth's Greatest Protector against 3 My favorite Super Hero movie still of all time. This movie contains all the vital components that makes Comic Books so appealing. Action, Drama, Searching one's intersoul, redemption, and Earth's Greatest Protector against 3 equally powerful threats in the Greatest Showdown of our time. I wish this production team would gather together and do a remake of the story with new age special effects, minus Brandon Routh and Kate Boswell, but find the closest equals to Christopher Reeve and Margot Kidder. It would be an even bigger hit! But then again, I love the classics in their original form, so might as well leave it be. Check out the Richard Donner Cut, it is just as good!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

ChrisCJul 22, 2008

Arguably the greatest comic book movie of all time. that includes the dark knight.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

1

NicholasD.Jul 13, 2008

I have to agree with previous comments of how horribly overrated this movie is. I remember loving it as a kid, so hired it along with the supergirl movie. I was as disappointed with how bad the storyline, script, editing and general vision I have to agree with previous comments of how horribly overrated this movie is. I remember loving it as a kid, so hired it along with the supergirl movie. I was as disappointed with how bad the storyline, script, editing and general vision and morals were in this movie as much as I was pleasantly surprised with how good (most of) supergirl was. I am therefore surprised that most critics - including those whose opinions i generally hold in high regard, give this movie such a highscore and supergirl such a low score.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

4

JohnDoeJul 8, 2008

Come on! this movie not that good. I feel a sleep during it. Its got "Ok" moments but thats all.

1 of 4 users found this helpful

5

ShaunCJun 30, 2008

I don't really see how this achieved a 99....and I understand what others have said about viewing the rating with respect to the 'Superhero Genre" but I still don't buy how that should give it the 2nd highest score of all I don't really see how this achieved a 99....and I understand what others have said about viewing the rating with respect to the 'Superhero Genre" but I still don't buy how that should give it the 2nd highest score of all time....It is a decent movie at best...… Expand

3 of 8 users found this helpful

0

LeonardoP.Apr 11, 2008

Its an horrible movie, a completely waste of time. I don't now why it was so loved by the critics. Its is terrible, like the others super heroes movies. I completely don't recommend it.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

JohnMFeb 12, 2008

This film is one of the best superhero films of all time. I have one movie poster left on my wall and its this film, the poster has the villains flying up towards superman, with a burning metropolis underneath, an awesome image. But second This film is one of the best superhero films of all time. I have one movie poster left on my wall and its this film, the poster has the villains flying up towards superman, with a burning metropolis underneath, an awesome image. But second on this list seems kind of odd, in the top 50 yeah. Overall its a bit corny, makes up stupid super powers, but is fun romp for all ages.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

0

EvanC.Jan 27, 2008

Terrible, just terrible. My whole family hated it. It wasted my beautiful summer night. This could have been amazing, but is impossible to be.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

0

DamonA.Jan 27, 2008

This just blows. A huge letdown. And 99/100!!! You have to be kidding me. The affects are cheesy, and tries to be a classic, but totally is not.

0 of 1 users found this helpful

0

TomC.Jan 27, 2008

Saw this in the summer, and whats the hype anyway? Super-man 2 and Superman the movie are both cheesy and corny shows. Christopher Reeve is terrible at acting, the script has a complex function. And it just sucks. Crappy movie.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

4

LaurenceC.Jan 18, 2008

Ok, I don't get it. I came to Metacritic to get good subjective reviews on films I may wish to see. Major flaw here, either with reviews, American critics, or general scoring method. Someone going to fix it? Or do I have to go search Ok, I don't get it. I came to Metacritic to get good subjective reviews on films I may wish to see. Major flaw here, either with reviews, American critics, or general scoring method. Someone going to fix it? Or do I have to go search specific critics who are intelligent?… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful

7

MikeQJan 10, 2008

The 99 score is ridiculous. If you call a 5 average, this film is a little above, so I think a 7 is fair. So, this ranks higher than LOTR, Star Wars, Raiders of the Lost Ark, etc etc......ridiculous.

0 of 1 users found this helpful

10

DeepuG.Dec 19, 2007

Excellent movie. Reeve at his best. All-time classic.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

ErikHDec 6, 2007

While it's not a bad movie, it's rating is far too high. I don't think it should be included on this list because its Metascore is based on only four credited reviews, not the minimum of seven. It's a movie overrated by a While it's not a bad movie, it's rating is far too high. I don't think it should be included on this list because its Metascore is based on only four credited reviews, not the minimum of seven. It's a movie overrated by a loop-hole. Superman: The Movie was better.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

MichaelM.Jul 25, 2007

You have to look at this movie's rating subjectively. Objectively, it's not the 2nd best movie ever made, but in the subgenre of "superhero movies," it's among the 3 best I've ever seen. Movie reviewers have to take all You have to look at this movie's rating subjectively. Objectively, it's not the 2nd best movie ever made, but in the subgenre of "superhero movies," it's among the 3 best I've ever seen. Movie reviewers have to take all of this context into account. That's why it's here.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

1

BobStoddardJul 22, 2007

This movie is horribly overrated. Terrible.

1 of 4 users found this helpful

1

EvanSJul 20, 2007

Having just watched the Richard Donner cut, I don't get it. 99? The narrative is discombobulated, the acting is pure cheese, the bad guys are drab, the effects, script and character development were not as good as the first Superman Having just watched the Richard Donner cut, I don't get it. 99? The narrative is discombobulated, the acting is pure cheese, the bad guys are drab, the effects, script and character development were not as good as the first Superman movie. This movie's a mess and it's listed on this list of "best ever." How did this mistake happen?… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful

10

ZacharyMJul 11, 2007

Although Superman II had it's outlandish moments, the overall production of Lesters take on the DC comic series is phenomenal. Where this film excels is in it's direction--combining an amazing script with the momentum of the plot Although Superman II had it's outlandish moments, the overall production of Lesters take on the DC comic series is phenomenal. Where this film excels is in it's direction--combining an amazing script with the momentum of the plot leave the viewer in anticipation for the climax without over analysis or explanation.… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful

5

MarkT.Jun 14, 2007

Definitely a flaw in the polling. There should be a rule that movies with less than 10 reviews do not get to be included in the ratings list of "best" and "worst" of all time. This is just kinda silly. Look at all of the others it has jumped Definitely a flaw in the polling. There should be a rule that movies with less than 10 reviews do not get to be included in the ratings list of "best" and "worst" of all time. This is just kinda silly. Look at all of the others it has jumped over. A real head-shaker.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

SimonM.Apr 10, 2007

Yes it's camp, yes it's dated, but it is F__cking awesome.

1 of 2 users found this helpful

5

LanceE.Mar 12, 2007

I have to agree with reviewer John B's comment "How could any reasonable mathmatical formula make this the second best movie of all time?" This is a mild escape movie. Several of Zod's lines are classics & the rampant product I have to agree with reviewer John B's comment "How could any reasonable mathmatical formula make this the second best movie of all time?" This is a mild escape movie. Several of Zod's lines are classics & the rampant product placement is fun to joke about, but I can think of a LOT-- a LOT!-- of films more deserving of the second place slot.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

BryanH.Feb 4, 2007

Good but not great. Soundtrack, action and romance certainly don't stack this film against the classics. Even for Sci-Fi, it's no "Bladerunner".

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

DemetriS.Jan 5, 2007

Excellent movie. We all have likes and dislikes, but don't give this movie a 0-5 score because your'e mad it has such a avg. high score from the critics! Rate it what you truely think it deserves. I thought it was excellent in 1981 Excellent movie. We all have likes and dislikes, but don't give this movie a 0-5 score because your'e mad it has such a avg. high score from the critics! Rate it what you truely think it deserves. I thought it was excellent in 1981 and still do.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

DanH.Jan 4, 2007

Statistics is why this movie rates inordinately highly. Only seven reviews listed here while most movies are subjected to as many as twenty on this site. And no low-scoring reviews are even listed... Could be a 99, but there's not Statistics is why this movie rates inordinately highly. Only seven reviews listed here while most movies are subjected to as many as twenty on this site. And no low-scoring reviews are even listed... Could be a 99, but there's not sufficient data on this site to tell.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

4

ChristianW.Jan 3, 2007

Back in 1981 this seemed like a good film. Boy has it aged. The last five minutes are particularly lame. The script is incredibly dumb. Metacritics credibility has been tarnished here.. or is it the credibility of reviewers? Rose-tinted Back in 1981 this seemed like a good film. Boy has it aged. The last five minutes are particularly lame. The script is incredibly dumb. Metacritics credibility has been tarnished here.. or is it the credibility of reviewers? Rose-tinted nostalgia has no place in film reviews if you ask me.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

SydBarrett'ssanityDec 27, 2006

Amen to that, Sean B. If Superman could see those who contravene the film so adamantly, he'd tell them what color panties they were wearing AND how pathetically and unfoundedly bunched they were. Is it worthy of a 99? No. But good Lord, Amen to that, Sean B. If Superman could see those who contravene the film so adamantly, he'd tell them what color panties they were wearing AND how pathetically and unfoundedly bunched they were. Is it worthy of a 99? No. But good Lord, people. Take a deep breath and relax. One would be inclined to think some of you had just woken from a drugged state to learn General Zod himself had you gagged and bent over with your wrists bound to your ankles, readily standing by with a handful of recycled lubricant and a huskily whispered promise that "you'll learn the hard way to kneel before Zod, young man." It's the evolving story of Superman. A tale that will forever summon forth innocent childhood dreams to become greater than the ordinary, and be a part of something much larger than ourselves. And it's on that level, the essence of Superman, where I'd like to think the film succeeds best. It's a fun flick... try to enjoy it.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful