Star Trek Into Darkness

8

Josh27Apr 13, 2016

Pretty entertaining, not a perfect picture but worth watching if you are a fan of the series or other sci-fi stories. I hate when people come back to life though...really hate that.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

joeyperezJun 2, 2013

solid 8. very decent and watchable film, with some contemporary echoes and a ton of action. stands up well as a trek film or an action film. obviously were all in a different universe now, but hey its just one more frontier for our heroes.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

josephjacob3232May 22, 2013

Well can what can I say but damn good fun this movie was really good not a star trek fan but I enjoyed this and the first one JJ Abrams does a good job of giving these movie a polish over the originals and can I say Benedict Cumberbatch wasWell can what can I say but damn good fun this movie was really good not a star trek fan but I enjoyed this and the first one JJ Abrams does a good job of giving these movie a polish over the originals and can I say Benedict Cumberbatch was amazing i would give the a 10 out of 10 very enjoyable but I would say not for everyone… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

TylerDsCreationMay 25, 2013

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Back in 2009, J.J. Abrams did something that seemed almost impossible. He took a long lost franchise (Star Trek) and rebooted it to not only make a movie for the fanboys, but to just make a good movie in general. He succeeded, and he made a great movie that both Trekkies and non Trekkies will enjoy all the same. Now in 2013, he has come out with the next installment and I will say this now, the first one was awesome...this one was incredible.
Star Trek: Into Darkness took the franchise to a whole new level with its cool new dark twist on the series that I absolutely loved. It’s no longer pretty lights and comedic relief (although this one was funny), it’s about the darker part of the franchise and this one is dark. With this aspect I thought that it somehow even managed to overcome the first one. No, I know exactly how it’s better and I’ll tell you why.
Have you ever heard of Benedict Cumberbatch? I sure haven’t, but now after this movie I’ll be searching for him. He was the actor that played the ominous and interesting John Harrison a.k.a. Kahn and he killed it. He elevated every scene he was in. The way he talked, the way he moved, and the way he stood was all so eerie and just plain cool. “Shall we begin?” AWESOME! The other actors did a good job, no Cumberbatch though. No, the other actors did great jobs, but they weren’t on Cumberbatches level for sure though. I thought that Zachary Quinto (Spock) did a better job in this one than the first one. He had a scene in there that actually got me choked up that I’ll talk about later.
An aspect in this one that wasn’t in the first one was the element of surprise. I felt like the first Star Trek was bit predictable. It wasn’t really predictable, but it had that sense where you kind of knew where it was going. This one had nothing of the sort. There was this dark twist to the series that probably helped that aspect too. It added to the anxiety of the action sequences and just the movie in general. I was wondering was going to happen next.
There was also that emotional depth that was in the first one back in this. It was more about family and what you would do for your family in this one. Kahn’s whole plan is to save his crew who are frozen in these torpedoes and he refers to his crew as his family and it really gives something for Kirk to build upon and same with Spock. The emotional resonance is deep too, there are layers. You end up feeling for the characters and there is this scene that gets me choked up and teary eyed. It’s where Kirk has saved the ship but with the consequence of dying of radiation poisoning and Spock is talking to him from the other side of this chamber. There is this story ark about Spock trying to feel and how he doesn’t choose to feel and this scene breaks him. Kirk is telling him how he’s scared and about how he feels of the situation and he asks him how he can choose to not feel and Spock says, “I don’t know.” Spock is crying and then Kirk puts his hand against the glass and Spock puts his up to it in his signature way and they’re crying, I’m crying. But then Kirk begins to separate his fingers into the same way Spock has his and it’s beautiful to say the least. Kirk dies and to end the scene with a bang, Spock takes his hand off the glass and screams, “KAHN!” It’s phenomenal how they did this and I loved every second of it.
Star Trek: Into darkness is a dark and interesting installment to the franchise and is, in fact, better than the first. It has great directing, brilliant acting (Cumberbatch), phenomenal writing, and some truly thrilling action sequences. It digs deep with its emotional depth and really shoves the point across that you should do anything for your family with full force. Into darkness was brilliant and perfect, and if J.J. Abrams can reboot the Star Wars franchise like he did this one, I’ll believe that man can do anything.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

Nickkix37May 19, 2013

I'm a big Star Trek fan and to see this movie made me feel like I was in another world. The movie was great visually. The story line was interesting and left you on the edge of your seat. I personally was hoping for more in this movieI'm a big Star Trek fan and to see this movie made me feel like I was in another world. The movie was great visually. The story line was interesting and left you on the edge of your seat. I personally was hoping for more in this movie especially with a longer appearance of the true Spock. After finishing the movie I was left with a "is that it" feeling. Personally I enjoyed this movie and wold recommend it to fan out there!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

YanLCMay 23, 2013

This movie is brilliant. I don't know what else to say. Just go see it, trust me, you'll love it. Funny, smart and holy crap the villain is played by a brilliant actor you might recognize if you watch big shot British TV. Definitely got myThis movie is brilliant. I don't know what else to say. Just go see it, trust me, you'll love it. Funny, smart and holy crap the villain is played by a brilliant actor you might recognize if you watch big shot British TV. Definitely got my bang for the buck.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

lismis7000May 21, 2013

In to darkness is n awesome movie going experience. The movie is full of twists and turns involving many of the characters including Kirk, Spock McCoy and others. The visual effects are no just there for people t gawk t, rather, they are partIn to darkness is n awesome movie going experience. The movie is full of twists and turns involving many of the characters including Kirk, Spock McCoy and others. The visual effects are no just there for people t gawk t, rather, they are part of the plot. I loved that ever actor was give his or her big moment on screen. I also loved that the actors get these iconic roles they are play, and that is no easy task, But, Chris Pine and company are up to the task and deliver big time. This is the first great blockbuster of the year. I will measure everything else against it… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

CTZQMay 23, 2013

Satisfaction. That was what swirled around me when the movie ended. Even after the lights flickered on and the credits began flashing on the screen, I barely noticed them. Satisfaction purged out of me in warp speed, and scenes in the movieSatisfaction. That was what swirled around me when the movie ended. Even after the lights flickered on and the credits began flashing on the screen, I barely noticed them. Satisfaction purged out of me in warp speed, and scenes in the movie danced in my mind. Finally, I realised why my friend had been raving about the movie, because I myself had a big mouthful of that sheer goodness.

I walked out of the theater with my mind reeling back to earlier scenes. I thought of the concrete character development, which enabled me to fully relate to the characters. It felt as if I had known them long ago. People might deem the relationship between Jim and Spock cheesy, but I say that's the type of relationship we humans are lacking in real life, where facades thrive.

On the way back home, I once again walked down the memories of the build up of the movie. A solid plot, a dashing, evil villain made sure the adrenaline stayed pumping through my veins. The twists and turns in the plot had stolen my breath in the movie, and now it was stealing my ability to concentrate in walking home.

During the movie, I found myself absorbed in the story throughout. One cunning villain was enough to send Starfleet into turmoil. Then came Admiral Marcus, who added to the confusion of who was really the villain. In the end, it came as a surprise that both of them were evil.

I reached home, tired yet happy. As i lay on my bed, a fleeting sense of fuzziness came over me. Thanks J.J.Abram, I thought. Thanks for letting me know some awesome and wonderful people. I closed my eyes-I would need to sleep early. Tomorrow, I would have to go back to join Captain Kirk and Spock in another adventure. I would return to the theater and Star Trek Into Darkness-to boldly go where no man has gone before.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

Prodigy2013Aug 20, 2013

Director J.J. Abrams may have taken a bit too long to release the second installment to his rebooted franchise, but it was worth the wait, as ‘Star Trek Into Darkness’ was just as fantastic as its predecessor. All the cast members are back inDirector J.J. Abrams may have taken a bit too long to release the second installment to his rebooted franchise, but it was worth the wait, as ‘Star Trek Into Darkness’ was just as fantastic as its predecessor. All the cast members are back in this Star Trek sequel; and with the main characters already developed, the writers spend much of their time evolving the Kirk-Spock dynamic and introducing the new baddie to the scene. When a member of Star Fleet goes rogue and carries out a series of attacks on the Organization, Kirk is charged with conducting an intergalactic manhunt for the terrorist. However, the deeper he goes the more he discovers the true nature of our terrorist and the true shades of Star Fleet. From its high stakes beginning to its higher stakes end, absolutely no time was wasted in the progression of the story, in fact there was very little time for air. Abrams move from set piece to set piece swiftly; and plot layers, gave way to more plot layers and propulsive action scenes. While this may seem scary in writing, the movie flowed smoothly, and the delightful characters remained central. To be honest, what makes ‘Star Trek into Darkness’ such a solid sci-fi action movie wasn't the plethora of visual effects and action scenes; it was the characters at the center of it. A character-driven movie is always more appealing than an effects-driven one and this movie was arguably more of the former. Initially, I questioned the casting choice of Benedict Cumberbatch, but there’s no denying the strength of his performance as our duplicitous new villain. The Wrath of Fans should probably be at ease. I must admit, filmmakers could have paused and explore some of the thematic ideas of this sci-fi adventure a bit further; but that’s a fairly minor complaint for a summer blockbuster this smart and entertaining.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

NineteenHundredMay 23, 2013

'STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS' is an absolutely brilliant space-adventure movie. Just as good, if not, better than the first.

Surprisingly for a summer blockbuster, the plot holds up very well to scrutiny, containing little to no plot holes'STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS' is an absolutely brilliant space-adventure movie. Just as good, if not, better than the first.

Surprisingly for a summer blockbuster, the plot holds up very well to scrutiny, containing little to no plot holes (unlike the 2009 film). The script contains some very strong, resonant themes like friendship, family and loss, which are amazingly brought forth through great writing, directing and acting.

The acting by all the cast is excellent, especially by the villain played by Benedict Cumberbatch. The main crew from the first film are all quite excellent especially Chris Pine as Captain Kirk. Also, newcomer Alice Eve is surprisingly good playing a new crew member.

The action is perfectly paced and contains some of the most thrilling sequences I've seen for a long time in a sci-fi movie.

The sound effects are top notch and the music score is awe inspiring.

Overall, STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS is a great sci-fi roller-coaster ride of imagination, immersion, darkness, thrill and adventure. A must see.

10/10… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

CriticWesMay 25, 2013

STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS

Star Trek Into Darkness is J.J. Abrams' second installment into the reboot of the Star Trek series. It stars Chris Pine, Zachary Quinto, Benedict Cumberbatch, and Zoe Saldana. In this film, the crew of theSTAR TREK INTO DARKNESS

Star Trek Into Darkness is J.J. Abrams' second installment into the reboot of the Star Trek series. It stars Chris Pine, Zachary Quinto, Benedict Cumberbatch, and Zoe Saldana.

In this film, the crew of the Enterprise embarks on a mission to track down a terrorist after a massive attack on Star Fleet.

This film is amazing! It's non-stop action from start to end. Any brief lulls were filled with comedy and insights adding to the depth of the characters.

The acting was great. I really like Chris Pines as the young Captain Kirk, Zachary Quinto is great as Spock, but Benedict Cumberbatch takes the cake as the terrorist. He's a great actor and really added a lot to this film.

The visual and special effects were fantastic and although, I don't think one would necessarily need to see this movie in 3D to enjoy it, I'd recommend it. I was simply blown away by how much fun I had watching this movie.

I enjoyed J.J. Abrams' first Star Trek quite a bit, but in my opinion, this one topped it.

Everyone will like this movie. Just go see it!
My grade for this film: A

To view my grading scale, go to: facebook.com/CriticWes
To view my movie blog, go to: http://www.mix93.com/pages/16393587.php?… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

overtwinnyMay 24, 2013

Great Villain, but I could of used a little bit more humor then the non stop gloom. The non stop action is great, but this movie seems like its trying very hard to be just like the dark knight. The villain and action are enough to warrant aGreat Villain, but I could of used a little bit more humor then the non stop gloom. The non stop action is great, but this movie seems like its trying very hard to be just like the dark knight. The villain and action are enough to warrant a ticket purchase. The 3-D was good, but not as good as iron mans. Overall can't really complain about much besides the fact it isn't as good as the original.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

aglehmerMay 24, 2013

With Star Trek: Into Darkness, J.J. Abrams manages to re-imagine and re-invigorate an entire cast of characters while upgrading an epic story with spectacular effects and compelling modern-day allegories. He carefully adapts the narrative toWith Star Trek: Into Darkness, J.J. Abrams manages to re-imagine and re-invigorate an entire cast of characters while upgrading an epic story with spectacular effects and compelling modern-day allegories. He carefully adapts the narrative to the uncertain moral tenor of our times (fighting terrorism vs protecting human rights), while paying deference to the villains from the 1960s Cold War era that birthed the whole enterprise (grin).

Unfortunately, what’s been lost in translation has been the rich character struggles of yesterday whether the original Spock’s long journey from self-sacrifice, rebirth, and evolution into wise statesman (and dear friend) or Data’s many years of transcending his robotic limitations to discover, explore, shun, and ultimately embrace emotion (albeit with a microchip regulator). There are memorable moments of character development in the Star Trek reboot, but they’re mostly bite-sized nuggets made for 10 second TV spots, tightly squeezed between high-octane special effects sequences.

All of this is to be expected. Big budget action flicks are as competitive as ever, and so, the pleasant niceties of complex, empathetic characters are often first to be sacrificed. It’s just very hard for me to feel the same passion or gravitas as when Spock said to James T. Kirk: “Jim, I have always been, and always will be your friend,” or even when Data reacts joyfully to hearing from his creator that he is “Not less perfect than Lore!”

Still, my central beef with this film is far deeper, and admittedly, totally unfair to the franchise. For the Star Trek narrative or rather, its “neo-religion” of progressive technological progress is shared almost universally by sci-fi authors, movie producers, and storytellers the world over. At its core, it’s a vision of increasing energy use, increasing human ease, and increasing mobility not just around our beautiful blue orb, but across our solar system, galaxy, and beyond.

Accustomed as we humans (or at least we industrial humans) have become to cheap and abundant energy and the ceaseless introduction of new consumer goods and whiz-bang techno-gadgets it seems only natural that the destiny of humankind is to one day transcend this earthly realm, and spread the gospel of material progress to the stars, does it not?

It does not.

Lurking behind the cover story of terrorism and modern unease is an even more troubling development: the endgame of fossil-fueled civilization, and hence, the end of space travel.

Sound absurd? Not really.

Let’s take a moment to piece together the evidence: the desperate rush of invasions by powerful nations into the last remaining oil- and gas-rich territories (Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria, to name only a few); mounting unrest and revolutions in those same regions as energy and food costs rise; the mad scramble by energy corporations into remote regions (deepwater drilling in the Gulf of Mexico and the Arctic and highly polluting extraction from Canada’s “tar sands”); “like there’s no tomorrow” wealth grabs and tax cuts by the elite as joblessness, poverty, and inequality grows; and the increasing ferocity of global warming super-charged tornadoes, hurricanes, tsunamis, and typhoons not to mention the attendant global risks to food security, water availability, and seaside populations that climate change represents.

The scaffolding of industrial civilization is starting to show some serious fractures, and no replacement energy sources or technological miracles are ready-and-waiting to save it. If the good folks at the Association for the Study of Peak Oil are even close to being right in their prediction that we’ll soon have to live with less and less overall energy to conduct the activities of modern life, then we’d better stop dreaming of star treks and start coming back to Earth.

That one-time energy bank beneath the earth’s surface that fossilized millions of years ago isn’t coming back. We’ve used most of it already, to power our vehicles, light up our cities, and yes, take us beyond the confines of our planet. But now, faced with the coming end of that generous endowment, we must finally make peace with our own homeworld and one another.

In some ways, the realization that our species will not travel the stars is very sad. We humans are brilliant, creative, and capable of profound love. We’ll simply have to wait for other species with greater resources to find us, and hope that they too, had conceived of some “prime directive” which forbids them from interfering in other worlds at least not until we’re ready.

In other ways, the fact that we’re finally bumping up against ecological and energy limits is of great relief. Perhaps the worst-case scenarios of climate chaos may simply not be possible. At long last, we shall have to reconnect with our own planet.

Perhaps Abrams could call the movie Earth Trek: The Journey Home.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

IndraVonFriosMay 25, 2013

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. well, finally had a chance to watch this movie, after little bit effort and probably the last day before all the cinema in da town flooded with fast 6, I aint no Trek Freak, but always love scifi movies, ST is apure entertaiment movie, with good effect and all that stuff, the story? hm.. well.. just cliche conspiracy on high order, but with little twist and turn.. yeah its a good movie on saturday night.. which is OK.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

garma1975May 25, 2013

It's difficult for me to find a movie I can't criticize in any way.
Today I watched one of the fews.
I expected a lot, because I love the Star Trek series and movies and I got even more than what I expected. I think Abrams is a genius andIt's difficult for me to find a movie I can't criticize in any way.
Today I watched one of the fews.
I expected a lot, because I love the Star Trek series and movies and I got even more than what I expected.
I think Abrams is a genius and it's incredible how he managed to permate all the movie with pure star trek essence.
The chracters are perfect.
Pace is perfect.
Dialogues are great.
The funny moments are perfect in terms of timing and being funny but not silly or stupid.
And perfectly similar to those in the original series.
Visual effects, photography, lights are perfect.
I could not vote less than 10 for this movie because I really can't think of a flaw... if not that it ended.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

callumjsouthDec 13, 2014

Deserves credit because it actually feels like Star Trek. The story is delivered well by terrific acting talent. Although Benedict Cumberbatch is certainly more convincing as an eccentric genius than he is as a ruthless villain. The adventureDeserves credit because it actually feels like Star Trek. The story is delivered well by terrific acting talent. Although Benedict Cumberbatch is certainly more convincing as an eccentric genius than he is as a ruthless villain. The adventure you'd expect from this franchise is thankfully present. As is the USS Enterprise. The special effects compliment the story making the experience even more special. One big shortcoming though, is the lack of convincing character development that was key in the 2009 film.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

ParanormalfreakMay 27, 2013

Loved this movie went to see it with my uncle and aunt. I actually had never seen the first one and have never been a star trek fan really but I was impressed. I absolutely loved Kahn he was the best character out of everyone.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

Take-it-from-meMay 28, 2013

Though I am not a trek fan, this movie did entertain me a but. I did not have a bad time, or felt like I wasted my time, but I was not interested much and was okay with the ride for more of the laughs then the dramatics.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

TerenceYiboFeb 3, 2014

很爽快的黑暗系科幻大作，视听效果在IMAX3D屏幕中达到最大化，3D效果激赞，角色很多但每个角色都有其独特的人格和思维，整个电影节奏流畅，几场大战惊险刺激，配乐激赞。

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

GabiiRRSJun 4, 2013

Never been a treekie but I have enjoyed the reboot of the series. I liked the acting and loved the visuals, my favorite thing is definitely the villain (haven’t seen Star Trek 2: The wrath of Khan). Yes, it’s a little predictable butNever been a treekie but I have enjoyed the reboot of the series. I liked the acting and loved the visuals, my favorite thing is definitely the villain (haven’t seen Star Trek 2: The wrath of Khan). Yes, it’s a little predictable but everything else makes up for that.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

ceefrostyJun 5, 2013

Yet another contribution to J.J. Abrams near flawless collection of films. From a massively horrifying villain to spectacular special effects "Star Trek Into Darkness" delivers. No questions asked. Just #seeit

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

TheHandsomeGmrJun 5, 2013

The pacing in this movie is so damn fast it's almost impossible too follow. Other than that...... Into Darkness is very good movie with a few odd desicions. Why do they only go on two planets?

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

MovieMikeReviewJun 6, 2013

J.J. Abrams and the crew of The Enterprise return for Star Trek Into Darkness, the sequel to the surprisingly successful 2009 reboot that silenced Trekkie naysayers the world over. J.J. Abrams continues to surprise by accomplishing somethingJ.J. Abrams and the crew of The Enterprise return for Star Trek Into Darkness, the sequel to the surprisingly successful 2009 reboot that silenced Trekkie naysayers the world over. J.J. Abrams continues to surprise by accomplishing something rarely achieved in film franchises… creating a sequel that is better than the original. The success of the first film was largely thanks to the spot-on casting of familiar characters developed over 11 films and four television series; specifically Chris Pine and Zachary Quinto as Captain James T. Kirk and Mr. Spock, respectively. The same is true of the latest installment which keeps the spirit of these beloved characters alive while taking some clever liberties that cement Star Trek Into Darkness as the greatest blockbuster of the year thus far.

Star Trek Into Darkness starts off on a distant planet whose inhabitants are at risk of an active volcano that could wipe out the entire primitive civilization. It is up to the crew of the Enterprise to lay the volcano to rest while going unnoticed by the indigenous population (per a Starfleet mandate that Spock is only too happy to continuously remind Kirk about). Captain Kirk and Bones (Karl Urban) distract the native people in a mad dash that sets the pace for the film and makes the most of the vivid CGI and 3D technology, while Spock is lowered into the volcano to activate a device that will render the volcano inert. Inevitably the plan fails and Spock is trapped in the belly of the volcano causing Kirk to violate the mandate, despite the ever-logical thinking Spock’s insistence on sacrificing himself for the greater good.

No good deed goes unpunished as Captain Kirk loses command of the Enterprise, becoming First Mate under Admiral Pike (Bruce Greenwood), while Commander Spock gets reassigned as a result of Kirk’s reckless behavior and inability to take responsibility for his actions. While still brooding over his demotion, a bomb goes off at Starfleet’s main archives in London. Kirk and the rest of the crew, including Spock, Bones, Uhura (Zoe Saldana), Sulu (John Cho), Scotty (Simon Pegg), Checkov (Anton Yelchin), and a sexy stowaway (Alice Eve) are back onboard the Enterprise and off to kill the man responsible for the attack against the archives. The man responsible being none other than Starfleet agent John Harrison played by a brilliant Benedict Cumberbatch, whose onscreen presence threatens to steal the spotlight from the rest of the cast.

The Enterprise is in a race against the clock to track down and eliminate Harrison that has them bouncing from London to Kronos, the home world of the Klingons, and galaxies in-between at warp speed. Enraged by Harrison’s wanton betrayal, Captain Kirk is an emotional mess whose desperation to kill the Harrison is palpable, despite the rest of the crew’s reluctance to kill Harrison without a fair trial. It is here that Star Trek Into Darkness finds its major theme hinted at in the opening sequence of the film how do our feelings affect the choices we make, specifically in the gray area where the line of right and wrong is blurred? To remain as free of spoilers as possible I will simply say that the manhunt for Harrison offers the opportunity for some fun-filled action sequences that pit Kirk and Spock against Harrison, whose super-human strength and intellect prove to be more than a match for the duo.

The film rings true to J.J. Abrams fashion with its fair share of lens flares and twists that will have you guessing and second-guessing what will happen next. The members of the supporting cast aid Star Trek into Darkness with romance and comedic relief; Scotty’s quips and wit bring ease to the intense film, and Uhura, in the midst of a lover’s quarrel with Spock, provides a heartfelt edge to the blockbuster. Characters such as Chekov and Sulu, who saw major roles in the first film, take a back seat to the emergence of new characters and the heart-pounding performances of the Star Trek franchise’s main characters. Writing credits go to Roberto Orci, Alex Kurtzman, and Damon Lindelof who manage to deliver a fresh film that pays homage to the original series. Star Trek Into Darkness is a triumphant blockbuster that offers more than its predecessor more action, more laughs, and more heart.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

NobodysCriticJun 6, 2013

If you liked the first Star Trek reboot you will want to see this one too based on just that you should see it. Star Trek Into Darkness was an excellent movie with plenty of action and Treky in it. This movie had excellent acting, A greatIf you liked the first Star Trek reboot you will want to see this one too based on just that you should see it. Star Trek Into Darkness was an excellent movie with plenty of action and Treky in it. This movie had excellent acting, A great story, and plenty of plot twist to keep you holding on to the edge of your seat entertained. I was never a Star Trek fan but then i saw the reboot and I had anticipated this one thinking Mr. Abrams would deliver and boy did he. overall if you saw the reboot of Star trek and liked it then defiantly give this one a shot, though i can not speak from a true Treky stand point because i have not seen the old show's or movie's. In my opinion this one is a bit better then the reboot. Check it out.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

VandyPriceJun 7, 2013

When I walked into 2009's Star Trek I'd never seen anything prior that had anything to do with the beloved television series and the several movies it spawned. I grew up a child of the 90's and was first introduced to Star Wars and simplyWhen I walked into 2009's Star Trek I'd never seen anything prior that had anything to do with the beloved television series and the several movies it spawned. I grew up a child of the 90's and was first introduced to Star Wars and simply stuck with it as by that point Trek had grown into the Patrick Stewart/Next Generation series that was by all accounts, beyond me. Still, walking into J.J. Abrams re-booted take on the Trek franchise with no idea what to expect, no pre-conceived notions of the characters, or any idea what the story might revolve around I was pleasantly surprised to learn how accessible it was and how much I enjoyed it. I didn't know if the original series had ever taken the time to tell the origins of the crew that made up the Enterprise but I assumed if they had it was not to the depth this film did. That due to this it would be extremely exciting for fans of the original series to be able to see some of their favorite characters in the younger stages of their lives and for those that were new to the world it would serve as a fitting introduction to everyone. Between that film and the now second installment in Abrams series, Star Trek Into Darkness, I still have yet to dig into anything more that exists in the Star Trek canon. In many ways it simply feels like too daunting a task to try and catch up on nearly fifty years of material while on the other hand I wanted to be able to experience these films made in my day and age as fresh experiences with no notion of what should happen and why, but instead a willingness to see where these new adventures take us and maybe catch up on the backstory sometime down the road where it will be just as fascinating for me to see where these characters eventually go as it was for long time fans to see where they came from. So, this is not a review from a guy who caught all of the references or understood all of the inside jokes that likely took place, but instead I offer the point of view of someone who very much enjoyed the 2009 film and was eagerly awaiting (and hoping) the sequel would follow the series' main proclamation of going boldly where no man has gone before.

read the whole review at www.reviewsfromabed.com… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

J-ForceJun 7, 2013

For a Trek fan like myself it was one of my favorite movies of all time. I noticed it was a remake of star trek 2 the wrath of khan. It had great action, great special effects and a amazing story line. They should make more movies like thisFor a Trek fan like myself it was one of my favorite movies of all time. I noticed it was a remake of star trek 2 the wrath of khan. It had great action, great special effects and a amazing story line. They should make more movies like this for example. The movie was so amazing that it had me clapping in the movie theater. Its an exciting movie for all star trek fans and non star trek fans. J.J Abrams did a fantastic job on this film. (Much better than the wrath of khan)… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

dougaussieJun 25, 2013

What i really dig about star trek are time travel alternative timelines, i thought a better actor could have played khan since the original actor was spanish and this guy looks pommy. I would have liked to have seen it in 3D because space andWhat i really dig about star trek are time travel alternative timelines, i thought a better actor could have played khan since the original actor was spanish and this guy looks pommy. I would have liked to have seen it in 3D because space and planets look great in 3d on the big screen, but i didn't cause sometimes the novelty of 3d detracts for me. As a star trek movie it sits up there but not a top effort.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

Dimitris01Dec 2, 2013

The direction and visual effects are very good, the villain is sinister and makes you wonder what he plans to do. However, the second half is worse than the first and the movie fails to deliver what you expect: there is no star trek (theThe direction and visual effects are very good, the villain is sinister and makes you wonder what he plans to do. However, the second half is worse than the first and the movie fails to deliver what you expect: there is no star trek (the Enterprise is immobilized for a long time) and no darkness (no one dies and some secondary characters function as comic reliefs). Moreover, the villain is defeated in a silly way (he should have checked the cargo), the Klingons appear only to have their butts kicked and Kirk is missing from the climax, as if the writers could not decide who the protagonist is, him or robotic Spock.
argonautis.eu… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

mpmartinJul 10, 2013

As someone that watched the original series and ST: TNG more times that I can admit, I love these new movies. This second installment is very, very good. I enjoyed seeing Peter Weller do a turn as an admiral. Story isn't as strong as it wasAs someone that watched the original series and ST: TNG more times that I can admit, I love these new movies. This second installment is very, very good. I enjoyed seeing Peter Weller do a turn as an admiral. Story isn't as strong as it was for the first, but still decent, and the acting is again superb. I don't think I can ever tire of seeing Chris Pine go from anguish to calm in under 30 seconds. Benedict Cumberbatch was a wonderful new Khan, even if he's British and much younger than Ricardo. Changes from Wrath of Khan like this did not take away from the enjoyment factor of this film. Fantastic special effects (again), wonderful score, and good costumes. Awaiting the Blu-ray release to watch it again.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

funtimzJul 10, 2013

I wasn't a big fan of past Star Trek movies and TV series but the new star trek movie made the world interesting for me and Star Trek Into Darkness added to that interest. Great movie.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

smaug87Oct 10, 2013

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Star Trek Into Darkness

puts on a show in his latest feature

Abbram's new vision of the long running Sci-Fi franchise may not please the most hardcore fans but never the less 'Star Trek Into Darkness' brings plenty of entertainment and thrilling action.

The Starship Enterprise must capture a terrorist after he strikes a blow on Section 31 on Earth. They find out he is located on the planet Kronos but must take great caution to avoid starting a war with the Klingons. Kirk and Spock's friendship is strained as Spock is trying to balance his out right honesty in his duties and his loyalty towards the captain.

Benedict Cumberbatch, best known for his leading role in successful BBC series 'Sherlock' steals the show with a outstanding performance as Harrison. Once more Chris Pine (Kirk) and Zachary Quinto (Spock) played great off each other, providing the comedy while giving true portrayals of their character. Alice Eve is brought in to play scientist, Dr Carole Wallace. It seems like a clear attempt to bring in a female hero but for the most part is one dimensional.

The films predecessor was clearly used to set up the character but little is done to progress those characters but to Abbram's credit the rare occasions when we see developments they are done very well. Despite these flaws 'Into Darkness' is still a fantastic addition and a fun action packed film. It brings potential and promise to the third installment set for a 2016 release.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

4

psyberdelicDec 24, 2013

It could have been so much better! There were moments but there was so much dumb stuff going on (starship under the ocean,,,???) that it really detracted from the story, 30% cool. 70% stupid.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

Candid_ReviewsJul 12, 2013

"Star Trek: Into Darkness" is a sleek, smart, well-crafted movie that takes the Star Trek genre to a whole new level. The characters are funny and witty, and although we've seen much of the plot before in older movies, the movie is well worth"Star Trek: Into Darkness" is a sleek, smart, well-crafted movie that takes the Star Trek genre to a whole new level. The characters are funny and witty, and although we've seen much of the plot before in older movies, the movie is well worth the price of the ticket. "Star Trek: Into Darkness" is a step-up from 2009's "Star Trek", with smarter action, smarter dialogue, and a smarter plot. "Star Trek: Into Darkness" is the movie we've all been expecting: it's clever, engaging, and thrilling. "Star Trek: Into Darkness" is sure not to disappoint, and will keep you engaged until it's end.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

DibbHansenJul 18, 2013

This film is so visually dazzling and epic that it tops the original films and the 2009's film by a ton. The film is so entertaining that there is not a single dull moment. This film is so well acted, scripted, directed that I cannot wait toThis film is so visually dazzling and epic that it tops the original films and the 2009's film by a ton. The film is so entertaining that there is not a single dull moment. This film is so well acted, scripted, directed that I cannot wait to see another one. Superb entertainment!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

JeveuzacJul 19, 2013

A good movie full of special effects, fairly good performances, but the story was unconvincing. It's a movie that just want to see once. but the movie manages to entertain

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

xmesa234Aug 28, 2013

Great story. Great plot; not easily given away. Very very few clichés. Great effects. Great actors. Great movie.

I have to admit, JJAbrams knows how to make a sci-fi movie.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

4

SchnitzelPoofNov 4, 2017

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Spoiler warning: Kirk dies at some point in this movie, but they bring him back shortly after. I suspect that if he knew how bad the movie has turned out, he would've preferred to remain dead.
I get that these are not actually Star Trek films - that the Star Trek elements are just window dressing - but even standing on its on, I found very little to like in the film.
Probably good for kids who can't see the bad/lazy writing, and are impressed by the light-show.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

TheApplegnomeAug 9, 2016

Into Darkness does not fall short behind of 2009’s reboot -- it’s a big step-down, but it’s still a success when it comes to entertainment.

The crew is back, with splendid characters and natural chemistry. Kirk is immature as always -- andInto Darkness does not fall short behind of 2009’s reboot -- it’s a big step-down, but it’s still a success when it comes to entertainment.

The crew is back, with splendid characters and natural chemistry. Kirk is immature as always -- and some romance is continuously developing between Nyota and Spock. It’s not the most character-driven film -- they seriously lack more development and inside. Antagonist does on the other hand deliver relatable motivations even if a more “want-to” to win against him would have made it an even greater film. Cumberbatch brought a big win! It’s a more action-anger driven version of what we know Star Trek used to be -- with a mix of mystery, corruption & some “meh:s”. Visuals & cinematography is a pure wonder yes, but it simply isn’t that much of a “wow” -- with its less passionate story with fragments of convenient/illogical events & plot holes. The latest installment “Beyond” success over this when it comes to character depth -- this is however a better directed and got more focus on story. It’s a popcorn-flick for the sci-fi/action fan -- that’s for sure. But a “meh” ride for others.

Personal rating: 80/100
Critical rating: 74/100… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

Wholock98Aug 8, 2013

I was never a big Trek fan but Into Darkness was a movie that I was pleasantly surprised with and wouldn't mind watching again. The performance by Benedict Cumberbatch was amazing and I was not disappointed by any moment. It had a good plotI was never a big Trek fan but Into Darkness was a movie that I was pleasantly surprised with and wouldn't mind watching again. The performance by Benedict Cumberbatch was amazing and I was not disappointed by any moment. It had a good plot and the best part about it is that the action scenes were nicely put together and didn't in anyway like it was forced.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

LTRSep 15, 2013

This is a good science fiction movie.I thought it would be better then what it was,but the story is great,the characters are great and it had some great special effects.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

Saggarwal20Aug 22, 2013

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I really enjoyed this movie it's got action, guns and a chase between Spock and Khan. The only reason why I rated this 9 is when Kirk died if the door was locked, how did they get this body out of that room? But besides that great directing by J.J Abrams and very good acting by Chris Pine Zachary Pinto and Benedict Cumberbatch… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

FranzHcriticAug 28, 2013

Overly-melancholic at the dramatic points, and slightly convoluted, even for Star Trek. Yet Pine and Quinto keep the film going as Shatner and Nimoy did for the last 50 years. The visuals were great, as was the action scenes. I could see it again.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

kirangeloAug 25, 2013

I have not seen Wrath of Khan but even with that being said ST: ID was disappointing. I am a big fan of JJ Abrams' work, with Heroes, Lost, Fringe, Felicity, and the 2009 Star Trek and I know he is a good director but the script was averageI have not seen Wrath of Khan but even with that being said ST: ID was disappointing. I am a big fan of JJ Abrams' work, with Heroes, Lost, Fringe, Felicity, and the 2009 Star Trek and I know he is a good director but the script was average in terms of storytelling at best. The film suffers from insufferable pacing and action scenes, among other things it was intense scene, after scene, after scene, after scene, so much so that there is not much breathing room. Almost every scene is a mix of humor, emotion, and action, almost as if the writers had thought they'd created a "fool-proof formula" for what they considered to be a "good scene". The downside is it gets old after awhile and I was left yearning for even one solid, long, uninterrupted scene of action instead of a mix of small amounts of everything. The other major disappointment is John Harrisson. Benedict Cumberbatch is absolutely amazing as John but his backstory and screen time were both severely lacking. They flesh out neither of those aspects enough which ultimately leads to Khan being not as villainous as I'd hoped and not reaching his full potential as an antagonist, which is not his fault but the writers'. The acting is really solid though and nobody was an outlier. The effects are also top-knotch. Oh, and kudos for the political commentary and Leonard Nimoy's cameo. I wish that the story wasn't so poorly written but overall, I enjoyed it as a summer blockbuster even though I wish it could have reached its full potential.

Oh, and PS Magical resurrection blood? Really? Really.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

askewglassesAug 28, 2013

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The sequel to the 2009 film has the crew of the Starship Enterprise attempting to stop a volcanic eruption on some far off planet. They succeed but in the end break the "Prime Directive" by having the natives learn of their existence. When the crew returns, Captain Kirk (Chris Pine) is stripped of his command of the Enterprise for his actions.
But when a terrorist known as Star Fleet's own John Harrison (Benedict Cumberbatch) has blown up a record building in London, all the Captains and First Officers, including Kirk and Spock (Zachary Quinto) are called for a meeting. The meeting is foiled however when John Harrison attacks Star Fleet. Harrison teleports away to the Klingon homeward, and Kirk demands of Admiral Marcus (Peter Weller) to reinstate him. Kirk gets his wish and he along with Spock, Uhura (Zoe Saldana), "Bones" (Karl Urban), but not Scotty (Simon Pegg) set off after Harrison. Before the Enterprise leaves, Star Fleet loads it with prototype torpedoes, and the Chief Engineer Scotty does not approve. Upon his leaving, Chekov (Anton Yelchin) is promoted and the crew is on their way after Harrison. But this only the beginning in a long tale of twists, turns, and betrayals.
The plot is very complex, which is one reason this movie is so pleasing. There are very few moments that the viewer can see coming. The plot is of course powered by the wonderful performances in the film.
Chris Pine plays a very believable Kirk and gives new depth to the character that may have been lost in early renditions by William Shatner. The relationship between Spock and Uhura is further explored and it really brings out the humanity in the half-Vulcan. Bones gives some great lines which both celebrate and satirize the original series and movies. Simon Pegg playing Scotty also is a great comic relief. His performance is reminiscent of James Doohan before him, being just as over the top and also having fun with the role. But the best performance for sure is by Benedict Cumberbatch. Cumberbatch as John Harrison is threatening, he is complex, and he is smart. The character is great but he is all the better with Cumberbatch as the actor.
On a visual side the vastness of space is really felt. The effects are also great and also at certain moments pay tribute to the original, such as when the Enterprise enters warp speed.
The film's biggest fault though is the ending. It feels rushed, a bit anticlimactic and lacks some originality that the rest of the movie had.
But despite the ending I believe it is a great film and definitely worth a watch. I'd recommend it to Star Trek fans (although they most likely wouldn't enjoy the ending) and to people who would just enjoy a fun sci-fi adventure with good action, great characters, and a smart plot.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

TroopmindSep 18, 2013

It Was the Best Movie I Ever Watch. The Scenes Are Very Epic And Awesome I Watch This Movie 2 Times And I Love It! Is Soo Amazing. Star Trek Was The Best!

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

anthonyslewisSep 14, 2013

If you thought the casting of this group of people was perfect when Bad Robot re-energized the franchise in 2009 then you haven’t seen anything yet! The entire ensemble works so well together, you really get that sense of family that StarIf you thought the casting of this group of people was perfect when Bad Robot re-energized the franchise in 2009 then you haven’t seen anything yet! The entire ensemble works so well together, you really get that sense of family that Star Trek perfected in the original series movies and onward. The cast has it in spades. Once again the writers have found a big moments for every single member of the Enterprise family and they did it with even better style than we saw in 2009.
Yes there are many homages to past Star Trek shows and movies (most of which will only be caught be the real die hard fans) and yes there are one or two very notable call backs to a previous Star Trek film which I thought was done as good if not better in some places than the original. Everything seemed to be done with even more emotional punch than I expected.

The casting of Benedict Cumberbatch was a stroke of genius. He was so cold and calculating with his words that he virtually stole every scene he was in. In fact he was so convincing that I am pretty sure there even a few Trekkies out that that actually believe he wasn’t really the bad guy in this film. They would attribute that to Peter Weller’s Admiral Marcus. Weller played Marcus so obvious that you could tell he was going to be a villain from the get go and I think that was the point. Marcus was the idiot bad guy who thought he controlled the man who is the real bad guy and ultimately he pays the price for it.

The film looks better (if that is possible) than its predecessor with a new warp effect and lots of new imagery (especially of 23rd century Earth). The movie didn’t lose it’s breakneck pace even though I think they did slow things down more properly in this film as opposed to the last.

Overall this felt much more like a traditional Star Trek movie as opposed to the first movie which did remarkable well considering it needed to be restricted to also telling an origin story. Star Trek Into Darkness is a thrilling action/adventure movie if you want it to be that, but it also has deeper meanings underneath the surface about giving Government too much power, war mongering, and whether or not it is worth the cost of war to stop one man. As with any good Star Trek our heroes wrestle with many of the same questions we wrestle with today.

I can’t believe I am saying this…but…watch out Wrath of Khan. Star Trek Into Darkness is my new favorite film in my favorite film franchise.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

MovieGuysMay 2, 2014

Star Trek: Into Darkness is a well-made tribute to the original series that comes with a punch. Fans of the original and moviegoers alike will enjoy its dazzling visuals and well-structured story.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

R4z3rSep 18, 2013

First, let me begin by simply stating that this is a fantastic movie featuring a well-paced and authentic screenplay that takes advantages of the best audio and video production available.

The movie features a new villain, new in the senseFirst, let me begin by simply stating that this is a fantastic movie featuring a well-paced and authentic screenplay that takes advantages of the best audio and video production available.

The movie features a new villain, new in the sense those who watch the first movie (2009) have not met him before as well as introduces a number of characters and races we know in ways that are believable and fun. While at times the movie is predictable, the film includes some twists and turns that keep you enjoying the entire ride. While some fan favorites may not feature as central a role as one would hope, the characters all play an important role in making this a believable environment. For those with families, this would probably be good for anyone 10-12 years old or older. The movie features some lingerie (well, "sexy" underwear) and a few instances of profanity (s word being the worst). Obviously whether this movie is appropriate would depend on your family, but my personal opinion would be as stated above.

The audio in the movie is fantastic and features strong low frequency extensions (aka will make your subwoofer work) when ships go to warp and other events occur which I won't spoil for you. The highs are warm and vibrant and not shrill or harsh. The sound field envelopes you a few times in a full 360º experience for those with surround sound, with phasers firing, characters talking and action occurring on all sides. Overall, the Dolby HD track on the Blu-Ray would be considered a reference quality audio that is perfect to show off a home theater or to marvel at with your family. This is engaging and purposeful sound that truly transforms the experience.

The video is sharp and crisp, in beautiful 1080p (Blu-Ray version) with saturated colors where appropriate. The film benefits from a larger screen as you can get more details and can truly appreciate the scale and work that was put into this, but any device will do. There is a little bit of film grain (the little speckles on the picture) which is really only noticeable if looking for it on the darker scenes and in some of the fog like effects. Throughout the film, the camera is very close to the characters, showing detail and color, but can get a bit much if the constant camera motion bothers you. CGI was well done, and never appeared "fake", all of it blended well and felt like part of the set. For some viewers, you may want to watch this at night, or in a room that you can control the light as the sunlight on the TV may wash out some of the blacks, causing you to miss some of the detail that can be found in the dark colors and the blacks.

Overall, this film is a wonderful experience. It will stimulate all of your movie-goer senses (auditory, visual, and touch if you have a subwoofer). The script is well written, nicely paced, and albeit predictable at times, wholly enjoyable. I would highly recommend this movie to anyone who enjoys Sci-Fi, Action, and great character interaction.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

mymediaSep 30, 2013

Stunning visuals, great plot (slightly complicated but well written), impressive sets, great character chemistry and development, really nothing to complain about with this brilliant movie.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

DuczekNov 2, 2013

I enjoyed it thoroughly althought I have never seen Star trek before. The story is intresting, the evil character well acted by Benedict Cumberbatch and the special effects are stunning.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

AssassinationMar 17, 2014

A Great Sequel From A Wonderful Movie !!!

** Star Trek Into Darkness ** * This movie has everything to be best of its franchise its a very successive sequel with great scripting , screenplay and perfect visual effects .This movie hasA Great Sequel From A Wonderful Movie !!!

** Star Trek Into Darkness **

* This movie has everything to be best of its franchise its a very successive sequel with great scripting , screenplay and perfect visual effects .This movie has more awesome stuffs with a good story which is packed with lots of action, humor and excitement that drives this movie as a complete success giving us a great treat once again !! .

* The factors that gave the previous movie of this sequel a huge success its being repeated once again in this movie giving the huge advantage and clarity to the whole movie .

* The characters in this movie were perfect because they did their work perfectly without any faults ,mismatch & mistakes they were all well developed their performance was great during screenplay because it was beautifully executed thus its makes this movie more entertaining and exciting .

* The Actors performance were fantastic they gave the life to their characters to this movie they deserve applause to their works reigniting the same efforts that are done to the previous movie and for new comers in this movie did there excellent performance as well ! .

* The Screen play was brilliant it utilized all the characters perfectly displaying correct amount segments need to be executed that gives all that excitement and adventure that we are seeking from this movie .

* Visual Effects are utilized up to the core with all essentials it has gathered during the screenplay its sparkles with all the clarity .

* The Director J.J. Abrams has once again gave us the wonderful movie he deserves an applause for making such a great sequel that is both exciting and wonderful !! .

* The Movie is overall great and awesome !! with all the clarity it has gathered it shines like sparkling gemstones !! .

Star Trek Into Darkness :**********

(10/10) Stars… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

marcmyworksDec 21, 2013

A decent sequel that falters on trying to recreate the magic of the original Star Trek 2. Not only is some of the casting questionable but the lack of camaraderie between the characters that was seen in the first instalment leaves a bitterA decent sequel that falters on trying to recreate the magic of the original Star Trek 2. Not only is some of the casting questionable but the lack of camaraderie between the characters that was seen in the first instalment leaves a bitter note in my mouth.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

Aidon_mNov 18, 2013

The film wasnt perfect, but few films are. However, it did entertain and the good aspects certainly outweigh the bad.
Cumberpatch played Kahn very well, a strong villain was something the last film lacked so it was great to see a villainThe film wasnt perfect, but few films are. However, it did entertain and the good aspects certainly outweigh the bad.
Cumberpatch played Kahn very well, a strong villain was something the last film lacked so it was great to see a villain that you can respect is properly bad, a villain that had I have met face to face, I would be very frightened of.
The characters were also much more compelling this time around. Kirk actually grew as a person, overcoming his arrogance and self interest to save the lives of his crew members.
An excellent sequel and a an excellent film.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

Jpz38_HetzerDec 1, 2013

I kinda hate star trek. But even I loved this movie. Everyone in the movie was great. All around great movie. Definitely worth seeing if you can. Best Star Trek ever done.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

FilmHackNov 28, 2013

Hot flippin good for a scifi action thriller. The last two latest films for ST have actually rescued it. I can't wait for the next installment. The first was really tremendous. This one builds on the former success. Personally, I'm getting aHot flippin good for a scifi action thriller. The last two latest films for ST have actually rescued it. I can't wait for the next installment. The first was really tremendous. This one builds on the former success. Personally, I'm getting a bit tired of the low scoring guys gotta ask y'all a question: are you alive? Does your heart beat? If you hate the franchise so much, why see any of the films? If you have a heart. If you have an independent personality. This film will give you some great entertainment.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

ambenderDec 28, 2013

Better than J.J. Abrams' first Star Trek installment, Into Darkness works primarily because of its actors (Zachary Quinto and Benedict Cumberbatch in particular) and because its action sequences are expertly constructed and don't exhaust the viewer.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

xolveSep 13, 2014

Rip-roaring blockbuster rollercoaster ride - does not disappoint, though I ended up rooting for the villian more than the enterprise for much of the film. Hard not to when he's so much more interesting than the protagonists.
Still, goodRip-roaring blockbuster rollercoaster ride - does not disappoint, though I ended up rooting for the villian more than the enterprise for much of the film. Hard not to when he's so much more interesting than the protagonists.
Still, good setup for the wrath of khan, I guess. 8 stars, only because essentially it's popcorn, but great popcorn.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

Voodoo123Nov 13, 2022

More of the same? Well here it is - another kurtzman and Abrams outing with souch emphasis on the action and well you can just about throw away any previous star trek lure because pew pew pew.... Sorry got a bit distracted there! Lots ofMore of the same? Well here it is - another kurtzman and Abrams outing with souch emphasis on the action and well you can just about throw away any previous star trek lure because pew pew pew.... Sorry got a bit distracted there! Lots of bright lens flares and Dutch tilts with a camera so close it kisses the actors cheeks. It's a fun cinematic couple hours and yes, you can leave your brain at the door.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

HealingToolboxAug 25, 2023

2023: Watched it again. This is as good as sci-fi movies get. Please note all the talent in the writing, producing, directing, acting and VFX. On my second watch, I'm struck with constant the action is and how well this works. It uses2023: Watched it again. This is as good as sci-fi movies get. Please note all the talent in the writing, producing, directing, acting and VFX. On my second watch, I'm struck with constant the action is and how well this works. It uses sci-fi tropes but I think this script was written then continually revised by all the talent involved. The same tropes which look more tired on The Expanse here are delivered with Spielbergian vitality and freshness. An amazing team accomplishment.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

DiskJul 15, 2014

How does Abrams’ second effort fare in this 2013 sequel? Let’s find out
‘Star Trek Into Darkness’ is the sequel to the modern day star trek franchise starring Chris Pine, Benedict Cumberbatch, and is directed by J.J Abrams. In this film weHow does Abrams’ second effort fare in this 2013 sequel? Let’s find out
‘Star Trek Into Darkness’ is the sequel to the modern day star trek franchise starring Chris Pine, Benedict Cumberbatch, and is directed by J.J Abrams. In this film we follow the continuing adventures of the U.S.S Enterprise and the crew that inhabits it.
The entire crew returns to this film on top of new faces as well. The film opens and we get to witness first glance what kind of excitement these people go through. This film also stretches the bounds of Spock and Kirk’s friendship, putting them through tests that could be the difference of life and death. Quinto’s Spock finds trouble understanding the meaning of true friendship because he (like all vulcan) cannot help but think on more of a logical scale. Throughout the course of the movie he must struggle to channel his human half.
That’s also not to say the other character’s are without conflicts. Kirk must deal with his superiors orders as he is a loose cannon when it comes to following the rules. Zoë Saldana’s character must deal with her relationship with Spock, and Cumberbatch’s character terrorizes the entire federation with his evil plan.
Speaking of which, Cumberbatch plays his role to a tooth. Not only providing the film with a good villain, but a very memorable antagonist for the entire star trek franchise. The way he slowly explains himself while remaining obscure until the very end makes him beyond interesting.
The communication between he and kirk at points was the most interesting parts of the film. However, the visuals are something to be noticed as well. They are top notch and stimulating. Something the star trek franchise has always been known for having.
If there are any gripes, I would say that (while not being a long time fan) I noticed that much of the lore has been tweaked and the traditional star trek format has been replaced with more of an action based genre. However, many sci-fi elements still remain and most of all I have to become aware that this is Abrams’ timeline. While the original timeline did happen, this one is still good even with some changes and they are not something that is very bothersome. The only real bothersome thing I did find was a lazy moment in the script at the end. While I did enjoy the twist in roles of two characters, I didn’t like the sudden abrupt climax. I felt that it could have been concluded smoother. It felt as if they ran out of time and had to put the end together in a matter of hours.
Other than that, I found that this new trek improved much on some faults the first had (like the villain) while also providing new ideas that contrasted with old ones. New Trek is more than a summer movie, and it’s not so much a fan only film.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

ydnar4Feb 15, 2015

Star Trek Into Darkness is the sequel to the 2009 reboot of the series and although I prefer the first film over this one it is still strong and worth watching. All the key characters from the crew we love were back once again. Chris PineStar Trek Into Darkness is the sequel to the 2009 reboot of the series and although I prefer the first film over this one it is still strong and worth watching. All the key characters from the crew we love were back once again. Chris Pine plays Captain Kirk well once again and displays true heroism throughout the film despite acting on so many random impulses. Benedict Cumberbatch enters the series as Khan, who will likely be taking a big part in the rest of the films regardless of how many there are. The special effects are sharp and the there is never a dull moment, there is even a little humour from Scotty.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

adpirtleAug 1, 2016

Where Star Trek played fast and loose with science, its sequel throws it (and plot logic) out the window in favor of a high-octane action flick with too much ambition and too little heart. It doesn't help matters that the last act of the filmWhere Star Trek played fast and loose with science, its sequel throws it (and plot logic) out the window in favor of a high-octane action flick with too much ambition and too little heart. It doesn't help matters that the last act of the film is an intentional rip-off of the original Star Trek II. It thinks its being clever, but it's really just sad to watch. There's nothing like trying to remake the most stirring scene the original cast ever pulled off to show the flaws in the new franchise.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

4

Kai82Feb 2, 2021

In short it is excellent until a twist / reveal that harmed the movie. Then came the saddest and most emotional scene and we started laughing. They used something that will make a comparison unavoidable and that will make this movie lookIn short it is excellent until a twist / reveal that harmed the movie. Then came the saddest and most emotional scene and we started laughing. They used something that will make a comparison unavoidable and that will make this movie look inferior (I am vague because of spoilers). Longer version: After the reboot we were hyped for the next movie. Into Darkness promised to show more of the dark sides of the Federation and Starfleet that all series but especially DS9 and to a bit lesser degree TNG showed existed. For example it is impressive what amount of slavery, mass-murdering, suppression and intolerance the Federation tolerates. Even the first directive is flawed as in some cases you can translate it to “The helpless must die no matter what” (Shown and questioned also in the TNG episode Homeward). But lets get back to the movie. It was a darker and more matured approach and I praise them for the execution and bravery. After a violation of the first directive (I would be proud to do the same as it is my moral duty) Kirk is demoted and should be back to the Academy while Spock would be transferred to another Starfleet ship. But the intervention of his mentor Christopher Pike now Admiral lets both be back on the Enterprise but under Pikes command. Later something terrible happen that hit Starfleet as much as Kirk and now is the hunt for justice or vengeance or maybe a bit of both. Again I am a bit vague because of mayor spoilers. The story and movie itself is really good and would have been in the 8-10/10 territory. If it were not for the following the only complaint would be that it could be to dark for Star Trek for some (not including me). Then comes a reveal that hits hard and takes you out of the immersion. You will instantly recognize it and then make also comparisons and speculations. They set the bars to high with this for them. It is a shame as I was greatly entertained until then. To clarify: I watched it back from a holiday in Japan with friends in a plane on the way home (Great holiday, great country and nice people by the way). We missed it in the cinema before and used this long flight to correct this mistake. When the reveal came we looked at each other in disbelieve. From then on we made comparisons, it could not hold up and took us out of the immersion. I already mentioned that the saddest and most emotional scene made us laugh really hard. We could not take it serious after the reveal and as a sidenote some later events were foreseeable (They made a twist for the most predictable thing to make it not so but the point itself is proven). Again without it it may have worked except you already know this would not be final. It is sad that this destroyed the movie for us and I must admit that it is maybe a bit harsh. For the actors I repeat my judgment from the prequel. They did a fine job in giving us a fresh and good take on beloved characters. Chris Pine as Kirk, Zachary Quinto as Spock and Karl Urban as McCoy deliver and I never doubted them being the iconic characters. This is also true for Zoe Saldanan as Uhura, Anton Yelchin as Chekov (maybe not suited as engineer;-), Simon Pegg as Scotty and John Cho as Sulu. All deliver a good to great performance. For the new once. Benedict Cumberbatch as John Harrison is really good. He is one of the most underrated actors and is like Morgan Freeman as he always delivers a remarkable performance. However later in the movie he is or becomes mismatched and it speaks a lot that he is not criticized for it as he does still a great performance. Alice Eve as Dr. Carol Marcus does a good performance but I will criticize the director for using her in a fan service scene (Or did it had a deeper meaning / reason I missed). Peter Weller as Admiral Alexander Marcus is great and I wont spoil why. Again such a good cast and great performance. As before the special effects are fine and there are no missteps in visuals and soundtrack. Overall I hate to give this movie such a low rating for a misstep. However it was a misstep or twist that harmed the movie and let us not take the rest serious. Without this I think it is a really good movie with some smaller or ignore-able weaknesses. If you do not know the source of the complaint see my rating as 9/10 but I know then that you are not a Star Trek fan or barely know anything about the lore of it (Which is fine by the way as you cant know everything).… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

anichelsJan 1, 2016

It was certainly a good movie, not as good as its predecessor, Benedict Cumberbatch was a very frightening and convincing villain. Into Darkness deceives you into thinking Kahn is one of the good guys until the end.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

Syrinx80Nov 10, 2014

I introduced the world of Star Trek to my family with this one. I've always been a casual fan of the series, and the JJ Abrams treatment hasn't really ruffled any of my feathers. It's a solid, well-thought out film with just the rightI introduced the world of Star Trek to my family with this one. I've always been a casual fan of the series, and the JJ Abrams treatment hasn't really ruffled any of my feathers. It's a solid, well-thought out film with just the right amount of homage to the original films, and just the right amount of its own ideas. Every major character from the series gets just about enough screen time, and the plot is complex enough to keep you glued to your seat in case the action wasn't enough. Overall, a well-done film, on par if not better than Abrams' initial foray into the Star Trek universe. If the new Star Wars movie even approaches this level of filmmaking, it will be light years from Lucas' attempts at the prequels.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

homer4presidentMar 13, 2015

The thing that makes this film is its ability to be witty and unsuspecting. The new villain is what I would say the next step to this franchise. The villain was smart and willing. most of all, he was caring and would do anything for hisThe thing that makes this film is its ability to be witty and unsuspecting. The new villain is what I would say the next step to this franchise. The villain was smart and willing. most of all, he was caring and would do anything for his family which kind of messes with morals. This sequel just makes me anxious to see the third.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

BB_CriticMay 12, 2015

Don't listen to all the negative reviews. They are just butt-hurt trekkies who only like the tv shows and feel that this movie is "killing" Star Trek. Anyways, this movie is awesome. It has an awesome villian, Khan played by BenedictDon't listen to all the negative reviews. They are just butt-hurt trekkies who only like the tv shows and feel that this movie is "killing" Star Trek. Anyways, this movie is awesome. It has an awesome villian, Khan played by Benedict Cumberbatch and he gives a really emotional performance, not to mention the amazing CGI and action coreography. Star Trek Into Darkness is a really solid sequel with some really solid action. 9/10… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

spencieJul 24, 2016

J.J. Abrams is back at the helm of the rebooted Star Trek franchise and he does better than ever, Star Trek Into Darkness is a sci-fi masterpiece and beats every single Star Trek movie up to date. Abrams took what the last film had and addedJ.J. Abrams is back at the helm of the rebooted Star Trek franchise and he does better than ever, Star Trek Into Darkness is a sci-fi masterpiece and beats every single Star Trek movie up to date. Abrams took what the last film had and added a better villain and more jaw-dropping action sequences.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

AaronDWassermanJun 26, 2015

A great follow up to the previous film! the cast is so amazing and compelling. JJ continues to prove he is an visionary writer and director. The film is the ideal summer blockbuster

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

audreythomas25Feb 15, 2016

Star Trek Into Darkness still manages to be an even more enjoyable film than its precursor.

Watch it here for free http://www.watchfree.to/watch-22afe3-Star-Trek-Into-Darkness-movie-online-free-putlocker.html

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

aadityamudharApr 18, 2016

When I saw the reviews that were coming in for Star Trek Into Darkness, I rolled my eyes. The first one got good reviews and in my opinion, that movie was a mess. So my expectations were low going into this film; "just another stupid popcornWhen I saw the reviews that were coming in for Star Trek Into Darkness, I rolled my eyes. The first one got good reviews and in my opinion, that movie was a mess. So my expectations were low going into this film; "just another stupid popcorn movie that will sully the name of Star Trek". I was even ready to go get a refund and go watch Iron Man 3 if need be. Boy was I wrong. This outing was thoroughly entertaining, flowed logically (a huge issue with the last film), and even had some good character moments. People also acted like people in this film, and Kirk was less of an idiot this time around and actually grew as a character. Story was pretty solid; some of technical details were off but I can't complain. Reveals were well paced and the action was handled well. There was one moment near the end that had me rolling my eyes and wondering what the hell the writers were thinking (hint: it isn't very original). However, upon reflection it made sense, and the reactions of the characters was believable. Though, one will have to accept that time has passed between this movie and the last, so the non-nonsensical character dynamics in the last film have evolved and been fine tuned into something sane and rational. Also, the main villain has been given a lot more menace and demonstrates why he's a major threat (you'll see what I mean when you watch the film).… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

EpicLadySpongeJan 26, 2016

This Star Trek movie might be a nerf from its predecessor. Other than that, it's really an enjoyable ride for 2013's greatest movies for the best 2013.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

gameguardian21Mar 24, 2016

Star trek still continues to impress as it still remains action packed, star wars like, and a great story. Plus we have a better villian, kanan, who is great.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

SrPepeJan 5, 2018

No se si supera a la primera pero tiene un nuevo villano excelente y cuenta una historia super disfrutable.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

Muskrat147Jul 31, 2016

A solidly crafted story, mixed with improved acting and special effects, Into Darkness manages to impress many fans of the originals with its familiar, yet powerful villain, and strong action sequences.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

Aaron_WassermanJun 1, 2016

A great followup by JJ and Co. Not being a Star Trek guy, JJ made this franchise newer while staying loyal to the old fans and making it loveable for a new audience. The standouts of this sequel are Quinto and Cumberbatch.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

CinemaphileJul 29, 2016

Star Trek Into Darkness is the most successful attempt to date, to restore Paramount's franchise to Gene Roddenberry's positive vision of a mature humanity bettering itself through peaceful exploration and personal introspection. SinceStar Trek Into Darkness is the most successful attempt to date, to restore Paramount's franchise to Gene Roddenberry's positive vision of a mature humanity bettering itself through peaceful exploration and personal introspection. Since Roddenberry's death, Star Trek has grown darker with each iteration, relying more and more on gunboat diplomacy and all out war. Into Darkness doesn't exercise those demons, it is the most action packed and the most violent story of the franchise. But, despite these slick, hyper kinetic, hyper realistic, hyperbolic affectations which are more and more common to our cinematic fare these days, JJ Abrams and company return to the staple of the franchise:

The morality play.

Yes, we know this isn't your father's Star Trek. What some also forget, is that this incarnation is more than a garden variety reboot, it's a alternate universe, one that mirrors our current Age and its sensibilities. Despite being tooled to appeal to a wider, non-Trekcentric audience, the producers take a riff from the 2009 reboot and expand on it. The destruction of Vulcan has made Starfleet paranoid and increasingly militaristic. So hard core Trekkers seeking a reintroduction of a classic Trek villain will be sorely disappointed, as Kirk and crew's first encounter with said villain unfolds in a new and unexpected fashion. Kirk and Spock still have yet to form that bond which gave Star Trek The Wrath Of Khan its emotional impact, but the struggle to build that understanding and trust drives this film, in between pyrotechnics and gorgeous money shots. Within the epic spectacle, we are reintroduced to the founding principle of the Star Trek universe, the breaking of which is the theme of Into Darkness. It's easy to miss that theme, as Into Darkness' plot is overly complex, having to rely on more than one deus ex machina to fit the narrative together, in addition to throwing in dozens of wink/nod's for loyal Trekkers. Despite being buried in the muddled plot, the point is clear - it's those wrong choices we make, in hope of positive outcomes that lead Into Darkness.

Much ado has been made about the sloppy plotting of Into Darkness. Ultimately, the lack of focus keeps it from being a great film, let along a great Trek film. Apologists have been dismissing Into Darkness as a popcorn muncher - which it is - but its saving grace as a good Trek film is that it remains true to the spirit of the characters in the series with the snappy back and forth we expect from Kirk, Spock, McCoy and Scotty.

Potentially mirroring the opening sequence and the closing sequence of this film, let's hope that the next installation in the franchise turns the page on 20 years of wayward Trek - perhaps, Star Trek Into Brightness.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

TheArchetypesSep 9, 2016

Star Trek Into Darkness is a decent space adventure for Kirk and Company. Benedict Cumberbatch is especially cool as a re-envisioned Khan. A major downside, however, is the clumsy reworking of scenes from the original Wrath of Khan, which inStar Trek Into Darkness is a decent space adventure for Kirk and Company. Benedict Cumberbatch is especially cool as a re-envisioned Khan. A major downside, however, is the clumsy reworking of scenes from the original Wrath of Khan, which in turn opens up the movie to direct comparisons with the former classic... and that inevitably reflects badly on the Into Darkness.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

alejandro970Aug 28, 2020

The crew of the Enterprise is overtaken by an enemy that puts the peace of the Universe, the Federation and themselves hanging by a thread. True to the original idea, and with a nod to the classic series, the action levels fulfill theirThe crew of the Enterprise is overtaken by an enemy that puts the peace of the Universe, the Federation and themselves hanging by a thread. True to the original idea, and with a nod to the classic series, the action levels fulfill their mission of satisfying fans of the saga.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

Thatonenerd2187Feb 3, 2017

Star trek into darkness is a sequel, while not as good as the original, is still a worthy successor to the first one. The action is still very tense, and is better than the first one because of it being better shot and choreographed. TheStar trek into darkness is a sequel, while not as good as the original, is still a worthy successor to the first one. The action is still very tense, and is better than the first one because of it being better shot and choreographed. The characters here have much more depth to them. Kirk and Spock, bones, and the other star fleet members still have their great chemistry that is very well acted. The villain especially is so great, khan is so well written and acted, he ended up being my favorite character. The special effects are still as great as every as J.J Abrams has proven that he is a great film director. The only thing holding this movie back is some ridiculous moments that made me laugh a little. But overall, this movie is a must watch from me.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

DominArsenOct 27, 2019

As well as the first. The introduction scene is great in both music and atmosphere and this departure with it is very well taxed. The villain is great because there is a surprising surprise to 2 shots. Everything is served with BenedictAs well as the first. The introduction scene is great in both music and atmosphere and this departure with it is very well taxed. The villain is great because there is a surprising surprise to 2 shots. Everything is served with Benedict Cumberbatch and it changes everything so it is strong. Listed in Star Trek it fits perfectly to the universe

Aussi bien que le premier. La scene d'introduction est géniale autant dans la musique que dans l'ambiance et ce départ avec elle est trés bien fiscellé. Le méchant est géniale car il y a une surprise surprenante à 2 coups. Le tout est servi avec Benedict Cumberbatch et ça change tout tellement il est fort. Inscrit dans Star Trek cela colle parfaitement à l'univers… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

LillieyMay 28, 2017

On its own, a pretty good film with a great cast. But coming of the joy that was Star Trek (2009), it falls short of expanding this alternate universe of TOS or deepening the characters. B-

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

CoreGamer1408Dec 9, 2018

Seriously stop making Star Trek a try hard Star Wars will ya. Weak cry baby villain. I suppose this is a sign of our snowflake times. Passable action movie without a Star Trek heart or soul.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

2

dramaticwordsAug 16, 2020

Terrible remake of Wrath of Khan that takes the best moments and makes them into mockeries, wrapping them in a plot that makes no sense.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

spacebear1Dec 8, 2017

JJ Abrams' Star Trek Into Darkness is easily on of the best film sequels ever made. The characters are just as great as they were in the first film and the action sequences are FANTASTIC.The villain Khan is a major improvement over the lastJJ Abrams' Star Trek Into Darkness is easily on of the best film sequels ever made. The characters are just as great as they were in the first film and the action sequences are FANTASTIC.The villain Khan is a major improvement over the last film's villain, Nero. In the end, this is another fantastic installment of this new Star Trek series.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

prestongreenDec 17, 2017

Love this film to pieces. Such an entertaining movie with lots of great/memorable scenes. So many great performances all across the board and Benedict Cumberbatch as Khan is fantastic. There are also some scenes that really pack an emotionalLove this film to pieces. Such an entertaining movie with lots of great/memorable scenes. So many great performances all across the board and Benedict Cumberbatch as Khan is fantastic. There are also some scenes that really pack an emotional punch by the end that I was definitely not expecting. I cared for each of the characters and it was a satisfying experience. One of Abram's best and just a generally solid Star Trek movie.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

wiiy71Dec 30, 2017

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

FilipeNetoAug 22, 2018

This movie follows "Star Trek" 2009, continuing the effort to create a new story around the characters of the immortal television series of the seventies. This time, the plot revolves around the first encounter between Kirk and Khan, one ofThis movie follows "Star Trek" 2009, continuing the effort to create a new story around the characters of the immortal television series of the seventies. This time, the plot revolves around the first encounter between Kirk and Khan, one of his most powerful and fearsome enemies. Any similarity between the plot of this film and the plot of "The Wrath of Khan" (1982 film) is not mere coincidence but rather homage to the previous work, assuming these films as "heirs" of their predecessors. Leonard Nimoy's discreet but forceful presence is also an honorable tribute to one who has become one of the most recognizable faces in the "Star Trek" universe.

The film retains the main core of the previous cast. Chris Pine, Zachary Quinto, Zoe Saldana, Karl Urban, Simon Pegg, John Cho and Anton Yelchin give life to the central characters, with Benedict Cumberbatch embodying the villain. We cannot talk about mistakes from the cast. They worked well. Even CGI was generally better than in the immediate 2009 movie, though some things remain unrealistic and there are certain plot holes that elementary science knowledge could have avoided. With this movie, Star Trek saga shows us that its solid in cinema and still has a lot of good things to give us.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

merijnjFeb 21, 2018

(92/100)
Great follow up to the first reboot. It borrows from WOK, yes, but it's new enough to be different.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

BilalPervaiz58Dec 2, 2018

One of the Best Sci-fi Movies.
One of my Favorite Movies.
Amazing Story for Space Lovers,
Full of Stunning Action & Creativity
Also VFX, Cast, etc everything is just tremendous
I really Enjoyed and liked the film
Best Regards

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

MrsDrStrangeAug 11, 2018

I dont really like Star treck movies but is amazing. I watched is because of Benedict Cumberbatch and I LOVED IT

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

2

GarethBOct 21, 2018

This marks the moment I gave up on modern star trek... English Khan, unearnt NOOOOOOO after they have been at each others throats for the entire last movie, Khan juice cures everything and the moment I saw the Enterprise parked.... underwaterThis marks the moment I gave up on modern star trek... English Khan, unearnt NOOOOOOO after they have been at each others throats for the entire last movie, Khan juice cures everything and the moment I saw the Enterprise parked.... underwater whilst they were on an away mission I realised that a moron had walked in off the street and written the story for this.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

ErikTheCriticOct 14, 2018

With a far more intriguing villain played by Cumberbatch, and more of the same dazzling visuals and brilliant storytelling, "Star Trek Into Darkness" is arguably a better film than its predecessor.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

Dandy-Mr-DMay 19, 2021

Better than the first, and anything so far that's come after with Star Trek. Into Darkness is masterfully done with elements of mystery, exceptional sci-fi action, and star performances least not at all from the illustrious BenedictBetter than the first, and anything so far that's come after with Star Trek. Into Darkness is masterfully done with elements of mystery, exceptional sci-fi action, and star performances least not at all from the illustrious Benedict Cumberbatch. A must see for any Star Trek fan.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

DiptanshuAug 20, 2020

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Mind-blowing Sequel!Khannn literally Benedict was menacingly awesome and whole Crew was great,the story,the music,Visuals and direction its pure art and the references and recreation of ending from Old Sequel it was clever nostalgia moment and the Action scenes they were pure Bad-ass and skeptically brilliant.the music at credits were Bad-ass too!The whole movie the plot of Revenge the starting intro to Khan and his deed it was pure masterclass entry then the crew's entry and there mission of volcano it was awesome,the sudden fight at meeting from Khan and 1st eye exchange of Kirk and Khan was goosebumps moment,then the death of admiral it was emotional then Kirk's mission to avenge and the fight at klingon it was spectacularly brilliant then whole tricks of Khan and later the slow unfolding of khan's origin and star-fleets admiral's thing it was awesome but it kind-of felt little stretched but as we go after some times the twists and Kirk and Khan teaming up it was awesome,the Spock prime's entry was amazing and the Khan's plan reveal it was mind-blowing then the ending 30 mins it was edge of the seat mind-blowing entertaining half the fight and the recreation of old sequel's ending it was heart-touching,the ending speech of Kirk was amazing its an satisfying end!Overall its an Brilliantly Awesome and a Masterpiece Sequel!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

4

Rick444Apr 17, 2020

It is way too emo, to the point it kinda seems homoerotic. The first part portrayed a conflict, clash between two individual, rebellious misfits. Part two changed it into an unbearable homoerotic love story. It's way too much, and repeatingIt is way too emo, to the point it kinda seems homoerotic. The first part portrayed a conflict, clash between two individual, rebellious misfits. Part two changed it into an unbearable homoerotic love story. It's way too much, and repeating old scenes with small changes just made the movie into an unbearable mix that was going nowhere and ended up nowhere. No wonder why no-one cared anymore for part 3.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

Yesimakc127Apr 27, 2020

Star tek in the darkness is a major part of #StarTek film franchise and it's a rare because in this film #Cumberbatch is appeared.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

1

ahollandMay 29, 2021

A ridiculous script which cannot possibly be saved by the special effects. It is a failure as a Star Trek story, as a science fiction story, and as a movie.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

LionhartJan 18, 2023

I'm no Star Wars, Star Trek Fan. Watching this made me show interest in the franchise, excellent movie! Fans n non fans alike will enjoy this movie easily, it grabs your attention from start to finish.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

liamexeNov 2, 2022

I enjoyed the film, but I would have enjoyed it much more if it hadn't been a retelling of a previously seen story—especially one that is widely regarded as the best of the original Star Trek movies. (And then there was that one scene, evenI enjoyed the film, but I would have enjoyed it much more if it hadn't been a retelling of a previously seen story—especially one that is widely regarded as the best of the original Star Trek movies. (And then there was that one scene, even if it had been "flipped," that had been taken from the original movie. I grimaced at it.) However, the entire cast—including the "guest" stars—was excellent, and they all received quality scenes (except maybe Chekov and Sulu, who got short shrift this time out). There is a lot to like in this film because the Klingons were not eliminated from the final product and there was a lot of action. Still, I'm hoping for something fresh and unique.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

Star Trek Into Darkness

User Reviews