Sherlock Holmes
Warner Bros. Pictures | Release Date: December 25, 2009
7.4
USER SCORE
Generally favorable reviews based on 753 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
585
Mixed:
118
Negative:
50
Watch Now
Stream On
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)

User Reviews

User scoreBy dateMost helpful
8
AnnK.Jan 12, 2010
Refreshing. Great fun. Didn't come to this conclusion until about 24 hours after watching; this Sherlock and Watson and crew stays with you and ripens somehow. Excellent character development of all the major plays and also of many of Refreshing. Great fun. Didn't come to this conclusion until about 24 hours after watching; this Sherlock and Watson and crew stays with you and ripens somehow. Excellent character development of all the major plays and also of many of the peripherals. All in all a rollicking, fun ride. Am going to see again.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
RuthK.Jan 13, 2010
I have read all the Sherlock Holmes stories several times over AND I am a mature person of 60ish. I thought the plot was a clever interpretation of the stories for today's cinema - the biffo and the World Domination seem essential for I have read all the Sherlock Holmes stories several times over AND I am a mature person of 60ish. I thought the plot was a clever interpretation of the stories for today's cinema - the biffo and the World Domination seem essential for an action/adventure movie to hold its own. Interesting Holmes only plucked at his violin, I thought this verged on looking odd, but perhaps it was necessary. A violin sounds better in a book! I thought the characterisations were very true to the stories, interpreted for the biffo and also to lighten the tone a bit. I really liked the sense of fun of the actors and in the plot, that helped the movie a lot. RDJ and Jude law were excellent, each challenging the other to lift their game. The set and scenes were pretty good too, I like the grey and dull tones for the atmosphere.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
PiaV.Jan 14, 2010
Excellent movie. Very entertaining...Loved Downey, Law and Adams performances.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
NickGJan 17, 2010
Very fast pace and fun movie, some violence but not extreme. Excellent new take on showing Holmes thought pattern (slow-mo fight scenes). Added +1 as I like Guy Ritchie's other movies and this is in a similar vein. 9/10 if your not a Very fast pace and fun movie, some violence but not extreme. Excellent new take on showing Holmes thought pattern (slow-mo fight scenes). Added +1 as I like Guy Ritchie's other movies and this is in a similar vein. 9/10 if your not a Ritchie fan.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
JonW.Jan 18, 2010
Loved it. One of Ritchie's best movies, and Downey was hilarious.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
JohanFMar 29, 2010
I don't know what all the critics are so mad about. Of course, this movie is nothing like the old books, but hey, did they want it to be like that? I think teh crowd would be bored to tears if they would have to watch an hour and a half I don't know what all the critics are so mad about. Of course, this movie is nothing like the old books, but hey, did they want it to be like that? I think teh crowd would be bored to tears if they would have to watch an hour and a half of Holmes questioning some random person and in the last 10 minutes solving the case. This movie took some liberties (read: a lot) if you want to compare it to the books, but the fantastic plot and entertaining action scenes, this movie should've been rated way higher.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
KevinBMar 29, 2010
Great action/thinking movie... Not sure why so many bad reviews... I enjoyed it all the way through.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
MikeBApr 28, 2010
Cleverly done and entertaining.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
4
SamJMay 16, 2010
This movie was boring. It was also very gray; not fun to look at, and it didn't make any sense.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
SteveFMay 16, 2010
Critics are totally wrong on this movie..I thought it was really great.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
5
SusanL.Dec 25, 2009
The film comes across as a cartoon... characters which should have died multiple times, rise with nary a scratch on them.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
BarryS.Dec 25, 2009
This was a well paced and cleverly conceived movie. Doyle would have approved. I think too many people are used to Basil Rathbone and perhaps they could not "let go" and enjoy this updated Sherlock Holmes.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
unclepaulDec 26, 2009
Entertaining at it's worst, Sherlock Holmes shows a restained Guy Ritchie touch, with appropriate levels of fun from all concerned characters. I liked the dirtier Holmes, with his well-travelled knowledge of the martial arts and French. Entertaining at it's worst, Sherlock Holmes shows a restained Guy Ritchie touch, with appropriate levels of fun from all concerned characters. I liked the dirtier Holmes, with his well-travelled knowledge of the martial arts and French. I expect a better sequel.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
JoeyKDec 26, 2009
Yes, it's a different kind of Sherlock Holmes, but it's still a good one. It's a Hollywood treatment of the character, but it works.The first thing the movie does is show Holmes using his quick wit and amazing observational Yes, it's a different kind of Sherlock Holmes, but it's still a good one. It's a Hollywood treatment of the character, but it works.The first thing the movie does is show Holmes using his quick wit and amazing observational skills to beat up a guy. The movie is simultaneously clever and explodey. It works. Recommended.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
daneDec 26, 2009
Very good, some great acting, boring at times however.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
MarthaR.Dec 27, 2009
Very entertaining movie. We all know going in this is NOT your mother's Sherlock Holmes, so no one should be critical of the outlandish scenes. It's witty, great action, wonderful sets and visually intriguing aura of dirty London. Very entertaining movie. We all know going in this is NOT your mother's Sherlock Holmes, so no one should be critical of the outlandish scenes. It's witty, great action, wonderful sets and visually intriguing aura of dirty London. Downey is mesmerizing! I was in awe of the stunning action scenes and actually cringed waiting for the moment of danger to pass. Lots of fun surprises in this movie.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
BrianJ.Dec 27, 2009
Not a movie for Holmes fans who cant look past the interpretation of the character they grew up with. That said, The writers have done something compelling. They took everything that "Is" Sherlock Holmes and without adding anything of their Not a movie for Holmes fans who cant look past the interpretation of the character they grew up with. That said, The writers have done something compelling. They took everything that "Is" Sherlock Holmes and without adding anything of their own, created a completely different representation of the character. What comes out IS an enjoyable character, even if it is diluted slightly by Robert Downey Jr. (when did he magically become a one-trick pony?) and Jude Law makes for a perfect counterpoint and Ally as Watson. The Plot, barring sensationalism, IS a Doyle-esque mystery, and the Technique used by Richie and his Cinematographer(s?) to show Holmes' thoughts and deductions is a great, if slightly over used feature of the narrative. I admit, I grew up as a huge fan of the Character (and the Jeremy Brett rendition), so it took 15 minutes or more of screen time for me to finally shut off that voice in my head saying "That's not Holmes!" Once I got passed that, I found a fun, enjoyable, decidedly "Sherlock Holmes-like" Flick. I'd definitely recommend it to anyone who isn't a die-hard fan of the source, and to any true fan who can get passed the differences in this version, and enjoy the movie beneath.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
WilliamJ.Dec 28, 2009
This movie seems to have more of the original books in mind than the old Holmes movies, to which I believe is an optimal decision. If Doyle was alive today, he would've made a Holmes movie similar to this one.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
6
FrankO.Dec 28, 2009
I enjoyed this movie but it felt very long. The chase scenes and the beginning set-up were too long. I liked the interaction and relationship between Holmes and Watson. Was this suppose to be an action/adventure story or a mystery? It did I enjoyed this movie but it felt very long. The chase scenes and the beginning set-up were too long. I liked the interaction and relationship between Holmes and Watson. Was this suppose to be an action/adventure story or a mystery? It did not do justice to either.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
FabioDec 29, 2009
Great movie, we finally have a Sherlock and a Watson as close as possible to Doyle's books. also we find in the movie all the most important elements from the original books. movie's ending is open to sequel. I'm only a tiny Great movie, we finally have a Sherlock and a Watson as close as possible to Doyle's books. also we find in the movie all the most important elements from the original books. movie's ending is open to sequel. I'm only a tiny bit disappointed to some exaggerations (you ask yourself how they came out alive from certain situations), but that really doesn't matter so much.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
adrianj.Dec 29, 2009
When i saw 57 i had to make a comment cause the movie was very good. he looks and acts nothing like the Sherlock Holmes we grew up with but the movie was very funny and action packed.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
DanCDec 31, 2009
Starts off very slow, but the action scenes are great and its a pretty clever story.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
ShadoeD.Dec 30, 2009
Not the classic Holmes by any means but still very, VERY worth watching!
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
RobertLDec 30, 2009
Awesome job Guy. Jude was never more entertaining and Robert looked like he was having a great time with the part.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
4
criticsRmadDec 30, 2009
Critcs weren't so mad this time around. This was boring, boring, boring drivel. I haven't been this disappointed in a movie in a long time. Didn't care about the characters and couldn't care less what happened to them. I Critcs weren't so mad this time around. This was boring, boring, boring drivel. I haven't been this disappointed in a movie in a long time. Didn't care about the characters and couldn't care less what happened to them. I like the new idea of Holmes and Watson, but the movie just didn't start up. I couldn't wait for it to be over.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
CharlieD.Dec 30, 2009
Really enjoyed the movie, I found it to be a very different take of an action movie and included everything that I love about Sherlock Holmes in it.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
BryanKDec 30, 2009
Ever since Arthur Doyle wrote the original novel adventures of Sherlock Holmes, their have been a variety of film versions of the stories. Now at the end of this year, a new film version arrives to bring this character into twenty-first Ever since Arthur Doyle wrote the original novel adventures of Sherlock Holmes, their have been a variety of film versions of the stories. Now at the end of this year, a new film version arrives to bring this character into twenty-first century. The film adaptation has a mixed result in its execution and concept. Without revealing the plot, it is implied as a supernatural Sherlock Holmes story, which feels more it should be titled, "Sherlock Holmes meets the Devil rides out". At first, the plot moves at a rapid pace, but slows down by the thirty minute mark. In the title character is Robert Downey Jr who leads the film very well. His take on the character is a more sarcastic and tongue in cheek version with only a decent amount of seriousness. Jude Law is pretty good as Watson and is the serious man between the two appearing a complete commanding actor. As for Rachel McAdams, she has her moments and then she does not. While she does well in her role as Holmes' "female companion", her American voice sounds somewhat out of place in Victorian England. The film's colouring is another aspect which needs to be discussed. The film is shot in a monotone colour scheme in which browns and dark greys appear with the only truly vibrant color being the red in McAdams' dress. However their are problems with the film's structure. At the conclusion, in what could be an open and darker ending, the film seems to go on a little too long and leaves open the idea of a followup. Overall a pretty well done film, but not without its faults. Anyway, Happy New Year to everyone at Metacritic.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
RichM.Dec 31, 2009
Sherlock Holmes is not a character I've ever had any real interest in and Guy Ritchie seemed to be getting worse by the film, so this wasn't exactly a film I had great expectations for. But much to my suprise its a hoot from start Sherlock Holmes is not a character I've ever had any real interest in and Guy Ritchie seemed to be getting worse by the film, so this wasn't exactly a film I had great expectations for. But much to my suprise its a hoot from start to finish. The writers have crafted the Holmes and Watson characters into something both interesting and easy to buy in to. Their relationship gives weight to film that could easilly have lost itself in its slightly bizzare plot and Ritchie's trademark direction. Go see… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
4
SteveSDec 30, 2009
Slapdash, senseless and all about effects. Yes RD Jr is fabulous but this vehicle is in constant overdrive and not worth the trip!
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
BenDec 25, 2009
Very enjoyable, different kind of Sherlock.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
PatrickN.Dec 25, 2009
Great escape with two great actors. Yes you are going to a Holmes movie but you are also going to see a Guy Ritchie affair. If you like Ritchie movies you will like this. If you want pure Holmes, as so many critics pretend, watch PBS. Great escape with two great actors. Yes you are going to a Holmes movie but you are also going to see a Guy Ritchie affair. If you like Ritchie movies you will like this. If you want pure Holmes, as so many critics pretend, watch PBS. Can't wait for the sequel.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
DeborahS.Dec 25, 2009
A perfect movie. Robert Downey, Jr. and Jude Law are terrific.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
SuzieQDec 25, 2009
Really good, this is another kind of Holmes. Downey and Law are done their job.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
LindaCDec 25, 2009
Thanks to Basil Rathbone and Nigel Bruce, there is an extraordinary benchmark of character texture and tenor which the classic novel protagonist Holmes and Watson should possess. Downey is superb at finding and sustaining a tone and rhythm Thanks to Basil Rathbone and Nigel Bruce, there is an extraordinary benchmark of character texture and tenor which the classic novel protagonist Holmes and Watson should possess. Downey is superb at finding and sustaining a tone and rhythm that is new yet as captivating as that portrayed for years by Rathbone. Jude Law does not bring a fresh appeal to Watson; however, he adequately provides the character and personality contrast to Rathbone needed to complete the dynamic duo. About 16 family and friends went to see it. We all concluded we cannot wait to see the sequels which we hope will be plenty!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
6
AaronGDec 26, 2009
It's kind of a hard movie to like. I mean, the cast and acting is great, and the script is never really bad, but at the same time nothing that happens makes you go "OH MY GOD I HAVE TO SEE THAT AGAIN". The story is a bit hard to follow It's kind of a hard movie to like. I mean, the cast and acting is great, and the script is never really bad, but at the same time nothing that happens makes you go "OH MY GOD I HAVE TO SEE THAT AGAIN". The story is a bit hard to follow and the way Sherlock figures things out are kind of silly. There's huge potential for Guy Ritchie to make a franchise off this movie, and I think I might like that. But one thing I've GOT to say, this is a beautifully made movie. All the sets and costumes, even the scenery, matches the mood of the plot perfectly. The grey-blue color scheme adds to the mood instead of taking away from it like some other films (coughtwilightcough). It wasn't a bad movie at all, but I can understand why some won't like it. If you're interested in seeing this, go ahead and watch it, you'll enjoy.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
TArkoBDec 26, 2009
Would've been a nine if Downey woudn't have mumbled his way through the film.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
CraigW.Dec 27, 2009
The writing was excellent -- "Holmes" is in some ways truer to the character in the book here than past Holmes movies have been. This is not a "re-imagining" of the character. It's a very engaging, authentic-feeling ride for anyone who sees it.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
WilliamC.Dec 27, 2009
Sherlock Holmes: A Mystery to Solved As the Christmas festivities come to a close, other opportunities open up in the world of theatrical entertainment, with the release of Sherlock Homes starring Robert Downy Jr., Jude Law, and Rachel Sherlock Holmes: A Mystery to Solved As the Christmas festivities come to a close, other opportunities open up in the world of theatrical entertainment, with the release of Sherlock Homes starring Robert Downy Jr., Jude Law, and Rachel McAdams. Yet with this installment of Holmes, after so many before have been a delightful and true emersion into the pages of creator Arthur Conan Doyle, has become like so many movies of this generation; an action thriller full of explosions and special effects. The plot takes us out of the original stories, and into a time where Holmes (Downy) has become despondent from a lack of cases, after solving his latest one in the opening of the movie. Watson (Law) is preparing to move out of 221B Baker Street to consider marriage. Although this is obviously putting strain on the dynamic duo… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
DavidH.Dec 27, 2009
Rodney was simply great in this movie.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
JohnR.Dec 27, 2009
This is not your grandfather's Sherlock Holmes, but Law and Downey are expertly directed, the story is complex and very chock full of Holmes' style discovery. Add to that two lovely ladies and gorgeous CGI of 19th Century London This is not your grandfather's Sherlock Holmes, but Law and Downey are expertly directed, the story is complex and very chock full of Holmes' style discovery. Add to that two lovely ladies and gorgeous CGI of 19th Century London and you very much get your monies' worth. This is the beginning of a long franchise, I am certain.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
5
larryk.Dec 29, 2009
Boring. Where was the tension? Where was the drama? Ordinary. Law and Downey tried to click but no real chemistry ever developed. McAdams was thrown into the mix, but still no chemistry. Humor was lame, drawing out nary a chuckle. Too bad, Boring. Where was the tension? Where was the drama? Ordinary. Law and Downey tried to click but no real chemistry ever developed. McAdams was thrown into the mix, but still no chemistry. Humor was lame, drawing out nary a chuckle. Too bad, it looked like a lot of work went into creating this period piece. It was a great looking movie. And although Downey threw a lot of punches in the film, "Sherlock Holmes" as a whole delivers only soft blows at best. It won't knock you out.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
MelF.Dec 29, 2009
Guy Ritchie has done a great job turning the stereotypical Holmes persona on its head. Drawing more on Conan Doyle's books than his moviemaking predecessors, Ritchie has cast RDJ and Jude Law as the cocky, dirty, and delightful Holmes Guy Ritchie has done a great job turning the stereotypical Holmes persona on its head. Drawing more on Conan Doyle's books than his moviemaking predecessors, Ritchie has cast RDJ and Jude Law as the cocky, dirty, and delightful Holmes and Watson. This movie leaves little room to dissappoint.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
5
JasonWDec 29, 2009
They turned Sherlock Holmes in to a freaking ninja / action hero. Thanks for f'ing it up, Hollywood.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
TinaC.Dec 29, 2009
One of the best movies i have ever seen. Robert Downey Jr. at his best and Jude Law was magnificent. This movie earns two thumbs from me.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
CTDec 29, 2009
Downey's acting is excellent. I liked the movie, its funny and witty.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
JudyTDec 29, 2009
Every original remake. Humorous and interesting. Very good pairing of Downey and Law.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
RobertP.Dec 31, 2009
This movie absolutely deserves better than a 6.7 or a 57 as a score! I just saw it yesterday and it was just superb! A mystery, an action, and a comedy in one astounding movie to perfectly top all others for the better part of the decade!
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
LouiseH.Dec 31, 2009
I can't fault this movie. It's was so smart and sassy, delightfully witty and gritty. Downey pulled off a perfect intellectual master of observation that is wonderfully messed up and hopeless. The Holmes and Watson dynamic was I can't fault this movie. It's was so smart and sassy, delightfully witty and gritty. Downey pulled off a perfect intellectual master of observation that is wonderfully messed up and hopeless. The Holmes and Watson dynamic was fantastic. I also loved the puncy soundtrack.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
JawclAug 17, 2010
I don't understand why this movie got such bad ratings, I thought it was BRILLIANT!!! Robert Downey Jr. was perfect for Holmes, he was funny, yet serious at the same time. I thought it was an amazing movie for the holidays, it totally madeI don't understand why this movie got such bad ratings, I thought it was BRILLIANT!!! Robert Downey Jr. was perfect for Holmes, he was funny, yet serious at the same time. I thought it was an amazing movie for the holidays, it totally made me happy after seeing it. I must say though, it was a little unreal when they knocked down some of the bad guys.... But good must always win!!!


Enjoy the movie!!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
ERG1008Sep 17, 2010
Guy Ritchie's interpretation of Conan-Doyle's famous sleuth with Black Magic, bare-knuckle boxing & general 19th Century japery.
Nice to see GR back on form in this action-adventure romp which has its clever twists & turns with a very strongGuy Ritchie's interpretation of Conan-Doyle's famous sleuth with Black Magic, bare-knuckle boxing & general 19th Century japery.
Nice to see GR back on form in this action-adventure romp which has its clever twists & turns with a very strong cast (even Jude Law is good!).
Took me a while to warm to RDJ's Holmes as he is very much a hyper-active thuggish brute but by the end I was won over.
The whole thing looks great too with Tower Bridge under construction, scaled down Piccadilly Circus & a great authenticity.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
C1G4N0Sep 8, 2010
Nice action movie. Good performances and directing. Entertaining but I can understand the negative critic scores, after all it is a movie about Sherlock Holmes and this is definitely not the Sherlock Holmes we are used to.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
txrangersfan72Sep 19, 2010
Although the trailers only had me moderately interested, I guess they were a good manager of expectations because this move was PHENOMENAL! Robert Downey Jr is superb as the intellectual detective Sherlock Holmes. Jude Law is perfectly castAlthough the trailers only had me moderately interested, I guess they were a good manager of expectations because this move was PHENOMENAL! Robert Downey Jr is superb as the intellectual detective Sherlock Holmes. Jude Law is perfectly cast as his partner, Dr. Watson. Even though the trailers are full of the witty quips that run rampant in this flick, they don't do justice in showing just how intelligently this story is delivered. The script is near flawless. The story is intoxicating from the first minute. The acting is immensely entertaining. The sets were exquisite. The directing was surgically executed. Like Batman Begins, the story is almost nonstop, even up to the very end when the sequel is teased. Except instead of the Joker, we learn that Professor Moriarty will be the next villain!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
BairdoSep 22, 2010
Holmes works out and is sort of American, and Watson is young and not fat? Gotcha. Better keep Guy Richie away from the franchises that actually hinge on obesity.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
MovieLonely94Nov 2, 2010
this movie has been led to perfect performances from Robert Downey Jr and Jude Law.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
FlapjackOct 22, 2010
Why this film is getting the bad reviews I've seen is beyond me. Great actors, great scenes, good direction and a pretty good story. What the hell is wrong with you people? /rant.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
LondonTrueloveNov 11, 2010
Ehhh, not nearly what I expected. I'm a huge fan of Robert Downey Jr. and an even bigger one of Guy Ritchie, so naturally when I heard this film was being made I got excited. Not at all lived up to the anticipation. Watch if you like, butEhhh, not nearly what I expected. I'm a huge fan of Robert Downey Jr. and an even bigger one of Guy Ritchie, so naturally when I heard this film was being made I got excited. Not at all lived up to the anticipation. Watch if you like, but you're not missing anything if you don't.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
RumblebeeloveJan 8, 2011
The backdrop and music are fantastic, while the actors really seem spot on. There is a unique sense of style and all the actors fit well. Camerawork and effects are great, but not too overwelming. I enjoyed the interesting touch editing.The backdrop and music are fantastic, while the actors really seem spot on. There is a unique sense of style and all the actors fit well. Camerawork and effects are great, but not too overwelming. I enjoyed the interesting touch editing. Robert Downey Jr. delivers, as well does Jude Law, though I would love to see Mark Strong being a hero one day. My only complaint is that I figured everything out before the end.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
JonnyFendiJan 20, 2011
Before thiz newest version, there are about 200 movies that brought Sherlock into wide-screen and more than 70 Actors played as thiz famous character. Sherlock Holmes is a well-known detective on Sir Arthur Conan Doyle novels (Which firstBefore thiz newest version, there are about 200 movies that brought Sherlock into wide-screen and more than 70 Actors played as thiz famous character. Sherlock Holmes is a well-known detective on Sir Arthur Conan Doyle novels (Which first time published on 1887). Sherlock on thiz movie is Robert -Iron Man- Downey Jr., Accompanied by his fellow side-kick Dr. John Watson (played by Jude Law). The Other Casts are Rachel McAdams and Mark Strong. Downey Jr. seem does not care how to perform Sherlock authentically, otherwise he just act with his style and just have fun on his version of Sherlock. As we knew, Sherlock is discreet, calm, and charismatic person. But in the end, I think viewers also agree to put beside the original Sherlock for a while, bcoz thiz version is enjoyable. In the overall, The movie was very good enough and very funny with a good fresh concept. The Director is Guy Ritchie. Ritchie known as Indie-Director, which is his best works are LOCK, STOCK, AND TWO SMOKING BARRELS (1998) and SNATCH (2000). The plots in thiz movie is excited on the beginning, a little lame on the middle of film, and closed with just customary ending. After watching thiz movie, maybe its cross on our mind, Downey Jr. on his version of Sherlock resembles with Will Smith performance on WILD WILD WEST (1999). But we must to admit that thiz movie have some plus poins compare with Smith WILD WILD WEST. Both of the movies show us a new style on the legendary figures. Here he comes, The Funky Sherlock!

Visit My Blog on JONNY'S MOVEE on : http://jonnyfendi.blogspot.com… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
MoviebuffreviewApr 6, 2011
The first time I saw this movie, I hadn't really read a lot of the Sherlock Holmes stories so I wasn't that familiar with the character. However, after becoming more familiar with the character, I really enjoy this movie. Thanks to some greatThe first time I saw this movie, I hadn't really read a lot of the Sherlock Holmes stories so I wasn't that familiar with the character. However, after becoming more familiar with the character, I really enjoy this movie. Thanks to some great performances, especially Robert Downey Jr., a script that is original while accurately recreating the characters, and some good humor, Sherlock Holmes is a movie worth seeing. A little cliche? Yes, but definitely good.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
codfather96Aug 19, 2011
Ritchie puts his own spin on the Sherlock story making him much more of a street smart detective and more of a oddball to society than god like genius. The story is a little bit complicated and losses steam but the performance from Downey isRitchie puts his own spin on the Sherlock story making him much more of a street smart detective and more of a oddball to society than god like genius. The story is a little bit complicated and losses steam but the performance from Downey is great, Jude Law is good and really grounds the movie as Watson and even though the supporting cast is forgettable they are made up for with fantastic slow motion run through of how Sherlock will dispatch his enemies, which is great as normally in action movies they just beat the crap out of their enemies but in this Sherlock narrates how he will beat them up and gives us the various injures they will sustain. I is a decent film but not having a great story in a Sherlock Holmes film is kind of stupid.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
tman267Feb 19, 2011
I went to see this movie with a friend, and was expecting a great movie. Ultimately it didn't live up to the expectations of a Sherlock Holmes movie. However, it was extremely entertaining. I enjoyed the mixture of deduction and modernI went to see this movie with a friend, and was expecting a great movie. Ultimately it didn't live up to the expectations of a Sherlock Holmes movie. However, it was extremely entertaining. I enjoyed the mixture of deduction and modern technology. The plot was interesting, but I was able to figure it out a good twenty minutes in. Overall, it was really entertaining, but would have been better if they made up a new character instead of Sherlock Holmes.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
EmuChickenMay 14, 2011
So I rented this one, expecting it to be like an old crime whodonnit thing - and was kinda surprised. Never knew the Holmes / Watson combination were like Batman and Robin!?!
... Come to think of it, this IS Batman in the 19th century! (orSo I rented this one, expecting it to be like an old crime whodonnit thing - and was kinda surprised. Never knew the Holmes / Watson combination were like Batman and Robin!?!
... Come to think of it, this IS Batman in the 19th century! (or was it early 20th century!?)
The plot was far too difficult for my wife to understand, - was similar to "Da Vinci Code" but added a "bit" of reality to the ending (still I understood, wife, not a clue)
As it got to around an hour in, it felt like the story was dragging a little longer than it needed.
As a rundown, Batman (the new style) + Da Vinci Code = Sherlock Holmes. .. who'd have guessed!?… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
rotkuJan 15, 2012
Brilliant acting from Downey Jr raises this movie from middle of the road to a good film. Some good camera work adds to the fight scene although at times it feels a bit like a Victorian CSI episode.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
MrCinnamonMay 29, 2011
This film has received much negative criticism from numerous sources. They say its too "thuggish", too "brutish" and that its a crude imitation of what sherlock holmes should be. Yet there is one thing niggling at me.
It seems that had it notThis film has received much negative criticism from numerous sources. They say its too "thuggish", too "brutish" and that its a crude imitation of what sherlock holmes should be. Yet there is one thing niggling at me.
It seems that had it not been called sherlock holmes, then the film would have received much better reviews. All these people have it in their heads that because it is holmes then it MUST be this or that.
To this I say, what a load of..... The film is very good. There is a fantastic balance of mystery, action and clever details. Some of which you may not notice at first. The acting throughout is superb, from all those involved. The plot and story development is well thought out and ends with a brilliantly executed scene which reveals all to the audience.
All round it was a very good film, well worth the money for a cinema ticket or DVD. Don't listen to these prejudiced fools who tell you it can't be good just because it isn't like the sherlock of old. This is an outstanding adaptation of the classic tales.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
SolveigDec 28, 2011
I loved it. Great performances by the actors!
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
giri2706Aug 5, 2011
I wouldn't call this a classic but a must watch for some action, suspense and thrill. Both Robert Downey Jr. and Jude Law portrayed their characters very well. I am waiting for the sequel !!
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
avatar16Dec 17, 2011
Trop attaché à l'image qu'on lui donnait dans les films précédents, il m'a été difficile d'accorder le moindre intérêt à ceTrop attaché à l'image qu'on lui donnait dans les films précédents, il m'a été difficile d'accorder le moindre intérêt à ce Sherlock Holmes version 2010. Et franchement, s'il n'avait pas quelques atouts en poche, je resterais sur ma décision. A commencer par son allure de blockbuster et sa mise en scène (ralentis, certains cadrages) parfaitement inutile, sans parler de l'ambiance un brin agaçante (Hans Zimmer n'est pas le meilleur à chaque fois). Mais je dois reconnaître que l'ensemble est largement sauvé par l'interprétation et par le scénario, véritable enquête policière qui rend le film divertissant et intrigant. Car voilà les seuls qualificatifs que je donnerais pour juger ce Sherlock Holmes : un blockbuster plutôt sympathique, mais pas aussi exceptionnel de ce qui se faisait entendre.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
jos95Jul 17, 2012
There isn't much of a mystery in this movie, but Sherlock Holmes mostly benefits from Robert Downey Jr's performance, and his pairing with Jude Law as Watson. Mark Strong gives chills as Blackwood and for what seems like the first time inThere isn't much of a mystery in this movie, but Sherlock Holmes mostly benefits from Robert Downey Jr's performance, and his pairing with Jude Law as Watson. Mark Strong gives chills as Blackwood and for what seems like the first time in movie history, the love interest gets cuts and bruises! One of many ways the movie avoids cliches. The action is also very imaginative and brilliantly realized. It's not your grandpa's version of Sherlock, but it's a great popcorn flick nonetheless.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
1
JonathanCAug 13, 2012
Absolutely terribly put together. I cant see how this is getting any good reviews at all. There is just too much wrong with it. The plots are weak. The story telling has holes and the pace is awkward at best. The fight scenes are laughable,Absolutely terribly put together. I cant see how this is getting any good reviews at all. There is just too much wrong with it. The plots are weak. The story telling has holes and the pace is awkward at best. The fight scenes are laughable, not to mention pathetic for a period piece and clashes with everything Sherlock Holmes of books was about.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
EssenceOfSugarDec 21, 2011
Since this is based on an inspiring part of historical literature, people have come at it with their all, and what I'm mostly hearing is that it has turned much into an action movie and that they were 'getting tired of people being beatenSince this is based on an inspiring part of historical literature, people have come at it with their all, and what I'm mostly hearing is that it has turned much into an action movie and that they were 'getting tired of people being beaten up'. What might have been missed is the intellect that was deduced by Holmes, and that people may more have noticed the significant amount of violence because of it being seen on screen, and you have to look closer in order to pick up the lesser significant and more unnoticed details. Sherlock Holmes may have had violence and explosions in it, but it showed Holmes as an experienced person that didn't just go around injuring people for the fun of it. He looked for clues, he came to conclusions, he used logic. Ritchie may have spiced up this new Holmes a little more than people expected, but it added to the fun of the movie. It didn't show him in a new light, it just showed us his capabilities and his strength for his environment. People might not have picked up on this, and the fact it might have been 'too complicated and boring' means that they probably weren't focusing on it as such to figure it out for themselves. You might have expected what was going to happen, seeing as it was based on a piece of famous literature, but Sherlock Holmes of course is opened to interpretation. Then why go in there and see it, not bother to focus on the finer details, at least enjoy the film, and beforehand think you're going to expect something completely different? It's confusing how people thought this film would happen, and how it was going to turn out. With all these production teams and crews designing and creating this imaginative piece of media, why think you're going to get a tame bunch of people solving mysteries without any spice like the book says?
I, myself, loved the performance by Robert Downey Jr., who seemed to fit into the role like a glove. Why bother with any other actor when you've got him around to play a bohemian detective who performs experiments on animals (O.K, a little out of touch there)? Although he's American, that was not a barrier to him when he spoke in a brilliant Victorian English accent. It's harder than you think trying to cast these people, and what better way than such a famous star? Not to mention the good-looking British actor Jude Law, who, fair to say, did a superb job as Dr. Watson. Not bad picking an actor who lives on the opposite side of the pond, as they say.
As I said, I think many people missed out on the joyfulness and intellect of the film, because there was so much in there to look for. The characters themselves were not on a 'clown caper' or some unimportant journey as such, but I think there was more to them than people actually thought. Although films are for entertainment, you can also see the difference between this and what Conan Doyle wrote. It's a free country when it comes to this kind of interpretation, as Ritchie did nothing to harm one of the most famous fictional characters in history. The darkness of it did not put me off at all, it merely added to the climax, and it was extremely useful in aiding the referencing of the character's next worst scheming supervillain, Professor Moriarty. Since when can films like these pull of darkness, action, mystery and suspense, comedy and adventure without screwing up? And here we have it, a solid gold take on the famous detective, Sherlock Holmes. You can't get much better interpretation than this - there is no equal in this war - as this, my friends, is king.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
MediaCriticOct 16, 2011
A good movie but nothing spectacular. The set was great and the story-line worked well. There is some funny moments in it as well, along with the serious scenes of the film. The actors played their parts well and the fighting and actionA good movie but nothing spectacular. The set was great and the story-line worked well. There is some funny moments in it as well, along with the serious scenes of the film. The actors played their parts well and the fighting and action scenes were choreographed well. Based in London a long time ago, Sherlock Holmes and his partner have to investigate a mystery where is seems someone has came back from the dead. It's a good movie and worth a watch.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
MadDadMar 24, 2013
Great movie. Great intriguing plot and amazing acting. If there is one thing that bothered me, it was the fact that most of Sherlock Holmes' wit took a backseat to the more favoured action sequences which are not staple of Holmes. The movieGreat movie. Great intriguing plot and amazing acting. If there is one thing that bothered me, it was the fact that most of Sherlock Holmes' wit took a backseat to the more favoured action sequences which are not staple of Holmes. The movie balanced action and wit pretty well. But I found myself at the edge of my seat much more this time, and it had a more intriguing plot. I liked it-… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
TyranianApr 13, 2019
Ritchie's take on Sherlock has great music, action and Mark Strong but you may tire of Downey and Law before the end.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
StevenFMar 13, 2013
This film sort of came out of the blue as an all-out action bonanza, a modern yet still classic tale on the eccentric detective, and I think Guy Ritchie has did an excellent job of bringing the character to life on the big screen, and leavesThis film sort of came out of the blue as an all-out action bonanza, a modern yet still classic tale on the eccentric detective, and I think Guy Ritchie has did an excellent job of bringing the character to life on the big screen, and leaves the opportunity for the audience to come along for the ride.
A contemporary take on the timeless detective, we have a cold opening of Sherlock (Robert Downey Jr) sneaking out of a carriage and attempting to infiltrate a ritual killing at the hands of the films main villain, Lord Blackwood (Mark Strong), but the films soon plays out as a mystery thriller.
Jude Law takes the reigns as Dr. John Watson, and the chemistry between himself and Downey Jr is excellent, a true friendly bromance.
The film scenes involving bullet time are some of the best of the film, when Sherlock analyses and anticipates what is about to happen, all done in a beautifully rendered set piece.
The movie rarely slows down through its action-packed run, throwing many explosions and revelations at many turns to keep the viewer enticed as to what is happening.
There is certainly many aspects of the historic character that Ritchie has stayed true to, the pipe, the violin and of course the martial arts rumours, but they perfectly blend in with the pace of the film, almost like a heroic mix of RocknRolla.
The one thing that can be said which is little nerving is perhaps the over the top feel of everything, at times its maybe just a little too perfect for Holmes to figure out what is going on, but then agin that isn't what the film is about, it is there to shock and surprise with its epic set pieces that would put the best of the superhero films out there to shame.
Downey Jr puts in a commanding performance as the detective and certainly introduces a different sort of character that we haven't necessarily seen before, combining his sparkling wit and charm to have plenty of comedic and memorable scenes with the expansive cast.
There is a fantastic soundtrack with upbeat and catchy notes to engage the scenes, and with stellar talent here, also including Rachel McAdams as the devious Irene Adler, and a host of British talent including Eddie Marsan and Kelly Reilly, this is certainly a film that will be enjoyed by most.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
AB77Jan 6, 2012
Action, Adventure, Mystery, Thriller, Crime............The movie fully succeeds in achieving success in all these genres and also adds an element of humor........All in all,its TOTAL ENTERTAINMENT...!!!
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
RkypkzJan 7, 2012
Ð
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
JuanoloMar 31, 2012
First off, this is probably a 9.25 out of 10. This movie is great. Action sequences are great. Story is really good. Acting good. RD Jr. Does a good job, and so does Jude law. Score is good to. Cameraing as it slows down and does the sameFirst off, this is probably a 9.25 out of 10. This movie is great. Action sequences are great. Story is really good. Acting good. RD Jr. Does a good job, and so does Jude law. Score is good to. Cameraing as it slows down and does the same thing is kind of cool, and kind of pointless. Overall, this is a great movie that you should watch. Recommend completely.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
Tall_But_ShortJul 29, 2012
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The first half of Sherlock Holmes was boring, the second half was much better, and then the ending was just dumb. I'm not saying it was a bad film, it just wasn't Sherlock Holmes. The ending when Blackwood comes out of nowhere and pushes Sherlock's "girlfriend" off the bridge was so dumb that I really started laughing. It was just silly, but even this movie isn't great, it can still be mildly entertaining with some clever moments with Robert Downey Jr. and Jude Law.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
OfficialMar 8, 2014
A fantastic performance from Robert Downey Jr., who was perfect to play Sherlock Holmes. We have an excellent cast, an intelligent story and script, and overall resembles a recommended film for all who enjoy mysteries.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
theahsanhaseebAug 28, 2012
Robert Downey, Jr. as Sherlock Holmes; that's something worth watching. I loved his acting, obviously, because I am a huge Downey, Jr. fan. The plot involved more mystery and suspense, and that's the core fact I liked this film a lot. GuyRobert Downey, Jr. as Sherlock Holmes; that's something worth watching. I loved his acting, obviously, because I am a huge Downey, Jr. fan. The plot involved more mystery and suspense, and that's the core fact I liked this film a lot. Guy Ritchie was able to deliver it properly. Well, to me, at least.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
SpangleJan 3, 2015
Overall, Sherlock Holmes is simply a very fun little film. Robert Downey Jr, Jude Law, Rachel McAdams, and Mark Strong, are all excellent and the case presented to Holmes is very compelling. I really like the explanation of what went down atOverall, Sherlock Holmes is simply a very fun little film. Robert Downey Jr, Jude Law, Rachel McAdams, and Mark Strong, are all excellent and the case presented to Holmes is very compelling. I really like the explanation of what went down at the end, really was nice to see all of the elements of the film come together like that. The film was also really well shot and the story was told nicely, so kudos to the cinematographer and director Guy Ritchie for those things, respectively. The slowed down effect used on a couple of occasions was also incredibly cool and well down, though I don't really think those particular scenes were needed, but I certainly appreciated the craft there. There are a few other elements I didn't really think this one needed, but overall, it was a very enjoyable and well made film that serves as good entertainment for two hours. Sure, it's no Citizen Kane, but not every film has to be.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
dev92Aug 25, 2012
The film was fine but I genuinely think that it would have been better off without Rachel McAdams. Nothing against the lady but her character just seemed to be put in there to incorporate a female lead. The story itself is rather good and IThe film was fine but I genuinely think that it would have been better off without Rachel McAdams. Nothing against the lady but her character just seemed to be put in there to incorporate a female lead. The story itself is rather good and I thought that Jude Law in particular was great.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
Compi24Nov 28, 2012
Featuring remarkably written characters and dialogue, Guy Ritchie's reimagining of the classic literary character proves to be one helluva fun ride.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
WriteFilmLive21Mar 17, 2013
Sherlock Holmes is one of those immortal literary characters who boasts so many film adaptations under his belt that he needs no introduction beyond his name. Even if you've never read any of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's classic mystery storiesSherlock Holmes is one of those immortal literary characters who boasts so many film adaptations under his belt that he needs no introduction beyond his name. Even if you've never read any of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's classic mystery stories involving the British detective, you probably already know of his astounding observational powers, proclivity for cocaine in the absence of mental stimulation, and that he's a master fighter? All right, so obviously, Robert Downey Jr.'s Holmes is taking some slight liberties in that arena, and overall the movie is certainly aiming to please the modern action audience with a tale inclusive of rather frenetic action sequences and quickly-paced mystery elements. Too quickly-paced, in my opinion. The film just seemed to go by a little too fast for me, and I never really got the sense of any real suspense or palpable conflict. In all honesty, this really felt more like a 2-hour promo for the sequel to get you primed for a battle against Holmes's equally immortal archnemesis, Moriarty. However, there is still some fair entertainment value to it all, and in the end I enjoyed it enough to want to check out the second film.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
WiesyJan 18, 2013
I like this movie a lot, Jude Law and Robert Downey Jr. first together on the silver screen. Good Story and very good cast.One of the best movies of 2009.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
KernJan 23, 2013
I give it a 6 because I genuinely enjoyed the movie, the actors and the scenarios; it's a good little unassuming action flick. On the other hand, I can't give more than 6 because it was advertised as Sherlock Holmes and it's not Holmes. ToI give it a 6 because I genuinely enjoyed the movie, the actors and the scenarios; it's a good little unassuming action flick. On the other hand, I can't give more than 6 because it was advertised as Sherlock Holmes and it's not Holmes. To those people who didn't like the movie on account of it not being a Holmes film, erase the title from your mind and start thinking about the character as Johnny McAwesomeville, and you'll find yourselves enjoying it too; it worked for me.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
killian13Jul 7, 2013
this new adaptation of Sherlock Holmes is very well directed .
Guy Ritchie has mixed the old adaptation and a new who is a bit modern
all the cast play very well
good job Guy
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
Cloudlv9Jul 17, 2013
Robert Downey is brilliant. Love how people say this is nothing like Sherlock Holmes. Wonder if they know that in the books he was a Cocaine addict... oh and to all the people who said it was too "Grey"...Never Ever Ever go to London, you'llRobert Downey is brilliant. Love how people say this is nothing like Sherlock Holmes. Wonder if they know that in the books he was a Cocaine addict... oh and to all the people who said it was too "Grey"...Never Ever Ever go to London, you'll hate it.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
DibbHansenJul 18, 2013
An interesting film that is interesting to follow and visually is beautiful. And the music is inspiring as well (Hans Zimmer does fantastic here, as usual) However, the story is a bit hard to follow and Downey Jr. is a great actor and all,An interesting film that is interesting to follow and visually is beautiful. And the music is inspiring as well (Hans Zimmer does fantastic here, as usual) However, the story is a bit hard to follow and Downey Jr. is a great actor and all, but at times I struggle to hear what he is saying. The film has good action and a good ending, so overall I enjoyed the film.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
MovieGuysMar 22, 2014
Sherlock Holmes is an electrifying, high-caliber entertainment experience at the movies. Downey, Jr. is great as Holmes, and Law's Watson is just as good. The two have chemistry and dominate the screen. The slow motion and creative use ofSherlock Holmes is an electrifying, high-caliber entertainment experience at the movies. Downey, Jr. is great as Holmes, and Law's Watson is just as good. The two have chemistry and dominate the screen. The slow motion and creative use of cinematography just adds to the experience. If you plan on watching this movie, just be ready to use your deductive skills, because this is one complex story to figure out.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
RayzorMooseNov 16, 2013
Sherlock Holmes detects moments of clever intrigue.
The overall film is simply uninteresting. The acting is good and the script is average. The direction is bizarre with random slow motions that attempt to enhance anti climatic sequences of action.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
mishabridunJan 10, 2014
I love everything about this movie. The SLO-MO fight scenes, to Downey's humorous take on the classic character, this movie has it all. The story is amazing and so is the movie overall. This is definitely a good watch for anyone who enjoys aI love everything about this movie. The SLO-MO fight scenes, to Downey's humorous take on the classic character, this movie has it all. The story is amazing and so is the movie overall. This is definitely a good watch for anyone who enjoys a action comedy and a mystery, with a classical touch all packed in one!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
bfoore90Jan 2, 2020
Robert Downey is brilliant, Jude Law is exceptional and Guy Ritchie's melding of 19th century mystery with modern day humor, action and dialogue is exceptional.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
Voodoo123May 10, 2022
Triple AAA blockbuster action adventure punches above its weight with style and incredibly strong casting. Very entertaining!
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
Zanessa250QIApr 4, 2016
**** You!!!!!!!!!!!! Peter Travers...........................................................................................................................................
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
CineAutoctonoDec 5, 2015
Sherlock Holmes is an interesting little boring movie , but , and more when in the presence of Mr. actor Robert Downey, Jr. , who put the character , a little sympathy and eccentricity.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
audreythomas25Feb 9, 2016
Ultimately, it achieves what it sets out to do: to entertain.

Watch this here for free http://www.watchfree.to/watch-29d767-Sherlock-Holmes-A-Game-of-Shadows-movie-online-free-putlocker.html
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
BarneyOnMTJan 5, 2016
WHAT I LIKED: This film shines out as a historic crime film thanks to it's character portrayals and quirky yet gritty style. Robert Downey Jr gives one of the best performances of his career, making the character his own and building one ofWHAT I LIKED: This film shines out as a historic crime film thanks to it's character portrayals and quirky yet gritty style. Robert Downey Jr gives one of the best performances of his career, making the character his own and building one of the best portrayals of any character in a long time. Yet the entire cast are excellent, aided by some truly authentic, timely world building and a smart, witty script. Not to mention the brilliant action where Guy Ritchie's amazing cinematography and the scoring comes into play. This is one of those quirky films that just clicks.
WHAT I DIDN'T LIKE: Overall, it's a ball of fun, but could be shorter, and the plot is a bit confusing, and it's not true to the 'original source material,' (but then that isn't really the idea here.)
VERDICT: A quirky film from Ritchie that just clicks, that's largely thanks to the convincing cast.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
CalibMcBoltsMay 30, 2016
Sherlock Holmes is quite an entertaining movie but by no means a good one. The obvious fault is the script, it's all over the place, same thing with the cheesy villain, the movie is over long and many scenes could have easily been scrapped toSherlock Holmes is quite an entertaining movie but by no means a good one. The obvious fault is the script, it's all over the place, same thing with the cheesy villain, the movie is over long and many scenes could have easily been scrapped to resolve the pacing issues Sherlock Holmes has. As for Mr Holmes, Robert Downey Jr. portrays him beautifully however the character is ridiculous, how he is put in this film makes him look like an action hero, he fights, shoots, kicks runs, and everything an action hero would do. Sherlock Holmes is more of an action movie than a witty, mysterious, compelling thriller, what a Sherlock Holmes should be! Just look at the show Sherlock, they hit everything right on the head with how to portray a diverse character like Holmes perfectly. Aside from Holmes being an action hero, there is also a very Holmes-like trait missing in this flick. He is not funny, neither sarcastic nor cynical throughout the entire film! That's something what makes the show Sherlock so immaculate. It's bloody hilarious! Sherlock Holmes may get you to chuckle softly a couple of times but by no means is this movie hilarious (in a dark way) as it should be.

Sherlock Holmes is just the next thing that is being thrown into the SFX reboot machine called Hollywood, and instead of making a compelling film that is genuinely good, they take the easy way out to make a complex character simple and throw him into an action movie to please average audiences and cash in on a massive box-office.

I gave it a 7/10 because Sherlock Holmes is still somewhat entertaining, despite being too long and uninteresting at times. If you have nothing better to do and want to watch something decent. Sherlock Holmes isnt a terrible way to spend the evening.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
eva3si0nJun 18, 2017
This's good film about great detective Holmes. Yes, film realise earlier series Sherlock from BBC, but action happens in the 19th century and it cool. Plot is easy and rectilinear, acting of actors is excellent. The only shortcoming -This's good film about great detective Holmes. Yes, film realise earlier series Sherlock from BBC, but action happens in the 19th century and it cool. Plot is easy and rectilinear, acting of actors is excellent. The only shortcoming - Moriarty is absent.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
Page:
More From This Movie

57 Critic Reviews

7.4 User Reviews

Details & Credits|Trailers

Current Movie Releases
By MetascoreBy User Score
1 81 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple
2 77 Project Hail Mary
3 75 Send Help
4 73 Hoppers
5 71 The Sheep Detectives
SEE ALL
Essential Links
New on Amazon Prime Video
New on Netflix
Coming Soon to DVD/Blu-ray
SEE ALL