Read User Reviews and Submit your own for Sherlock Holmes

10

AnnLJan 1, 2010

What more do you need in a movie? Great actors leading you on a exciting adventure and keeping you entertained the whole ride. Good work Mr. Richie!

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

XavierE.Jan 3, 2010

One of the wittiest movies I've seen.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

TimA.Jan 4, 2010

Brilliant film.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

DanielTApr 6, 2010

What the hell are the critics complaining about? They are basically saying that the movie is nothing like thew books. Have you even read them? It is a brilliant adaptation of the stories that Doyle wrote!

1 of 1 users found this helpful

10

JDustJan 15, 2010

the movie was overall quite intruguing and enjoyable. the cinematography was quite unique in some parts, such as at the beginning and in the chase scene leading up to the shipyard. the plot was believable and quite intriguing, and when not the movie was overall quite intruguing and enjoyable. the cinematography was quite unique in some parts, such as at the beginning and in the chase scene leading up to the shipyard. the plot was believable and quite intriguing, and when not compared to the books was an exceptional movie. the psychology was thrilling.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

KatieYJan 2, 2010

Sherlock Holmes was a great movie. Holmes was full of action and definitely kept me to the edge of my seat. Robert Downey Jr. was spectacular in Sherlock Holmes, gee its no surprise that he was nominated for a Golden Globe for this movie. I Sherlock Holmes was a great movie. Holmes was full of action and definitely kept me to the edge of my seat. Robert Downey Jr. was spectacular in Sherlock Holmes, gee its no surprise that he was nominated for a Golden Globe for this movie. I will most likely plan on seeing more of Guy Ritchie's films.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

PDFeb 13, 2010

Excellent movie. i just simply loved the story narration and the thrill. awaiting the sequel.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

NicolaM.Dec 28, 2009

Awesome movie Brilliant acting (Rob and Jude are pretty damn good together) and finally something similar to the original Holmes, not to mention the beautiful Old London reconstruction

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

PaulADec 31, 2009

I knew critics were useless at what they do... but seriously lol, don't quit your day job guys! Best movie of 2009 without a doubt.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

NickGJan 17, 2010

Very fast pace and fun movie, some violence but not extreme. Excellent new take on showing Holmes thought pattern (slow-mo fight scenes). Added +1 as I like Guy Ritchie's other movies and this is in a similar vein. 9/10 if your not a Very fast pace and fun movie, some violence but not extreme. Excellent new take on showing Holmes thought pattern (slow-mo fight scenes). Added +1 as I like Guy Ritchie's other movies and this is in a similar vein. 9/10 if your not a Ritchie fan.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

JakeRDec 27, 2009

A perfect movie. The critics should stop acting like elitist bastards. Some say it was too much action for Holmes, some say it was boring. We either have snooty elitists or gun-obsessed action-heads. It was a the best movie of 09

1 of 1 users found this helpful

10

WilliamJ.Dec 28, 2009

This movie seems to have more of the original books in mind than the old Holmes movies, to which I believe is an optimal decision. If Doyle was alive today, he would've made a Holmes movie similar to this one.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

DeborahS.Dec 25, 2009

A perfect movie. Robert Downey, Jr. and Jude Law are terrific.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

LindaCDec 25, 2009

Thanks to Basil Rathbone and Nigel Bruce, there is an extraordinary benchmark of character texture and tenor which the classic novel protagonist Holmes and Watson should possess. Downey is superb at finding and sustaining a tone and rhythm Thanks to Basil Rathbone and Nigel Bruce, there is an extraordinary benchmark of character texture and tenor which the classic novel protagonist Holmes and Watson should possess. Downey is superb at finding and sustaining a tone and rhythm that is new yet as captivating as that portrayed for years by Rathbone. Jude Law does not bring a fresh appeal to Watson; however, he adequately provides the character and personality contrast to Rathbone needed to complete the dynamic duo. About 16 family and friends went to see it. We all concluded we cannot wait to see the sequels which we hope will be plenty!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

TinaC.Dec 29, 2009

One of the best movies i have ever seen. Robert Downey Jr. at his best and Jude Law was magnificent. This movie earns two thumbs from me.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

CTDec 29, 2009

Downey's acting is excellent. I liked the movie, its funny and witty.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

LouiseH.Dec 31, 2009

I can't fault this movie. It's was so smart and sassy, delightfully witty and gritty. Downey pulled off a perfect intellectual master of observation that is wonderfully messed up and hopeless. The Holmes and Watson dynamic was I can't fault this movie. It's was so smart and sassy, delightfully witty and gritty. Downey pulled off a perfect intellectual master of observation that is wonderfully messed up and hopeless. The Holmes and Watson dynamic was fantastic. I also loved the puncy soundtrack.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

JawclAug 17, 2010

I don't understand why this movie got such bad ratings, I thought it was BRILLIANT!!! Robert Downey Jr. was perfect for Holmes, he was funny, yet serious at the same time. I thought it was an amazing movie for the holidays, it totally madeI don't understand why this movie got such bad ratings, I thought it was BRILLIANT!!! Robert Downey Jr. was perfect for Holmes, he was funny, yet serious at the same time. I thought it was an amazing movie for the holidays, it totally made me happy after seeing it. I must say though, it was a little unreal when they knocked down some of the bad guys.... But good must always win!!!

Enjoy the movie!!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

tman267Feb 19, 2011

I went to see this movie with a friend, and was expecting a great movie. Ultimately it didn't live up to the expectations of a Sherlock Holmes movie. However, it was extremely entertaining. I enjoyed the mixture of deduction and modernI went to see this movie with a friend, and was expecting a great movie. Ultimately it didn't live up to the expectations of a Sherlock Holmes movie. However, it was extremely entertaining. I enjoyed the mixture of deduction and modern technology. The plot was interesting, but I was able to figure it out a good twenty minutes in. Overall, it was really entertaining, but would have been better if they made up a new character instead of Sherlock Holmes.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

SolveigDec 28, 2011

I loved it. Great performances by the actors!

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

giri2706Aug 5, 2011

I wouldn't call this a classic but a must watch for some action, suspense and thrill. Both Robert Downey Jr. and Jude Law portrayed their characters very well. I am waiting for the sequel !!

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

EssenceOfSugarDec 21, 2011

Since this is based on an inspiring part of historical literature, people have come at it with their all, and what I'm mostly hearing is that it has turned much into an action movie and that they were 'getting tired of people being beatenSince this is based on an inspiring part of historical literature, people have come at it with their all, and what I'm mostly hearing is that it has turned much into an action movie and that they were 'getting tired of people being beaten up'. What might have been missed is the intellect that was deduced by Holmes, and that people may more have noticed the significant amount of violence because of it being seen on screen, and you have to look closer in order to pick up the lesser significant and more unnoticed details. Sherlock Holmes may have had violence and explosions in it, but it showed Holmes as an experienced person that didn't just go around injuring people for the fun of it. He looked for clues, he came to conclusions, he used logic. Ritchie may have spiced up this new Holmes a little more than people expected, but it added to the fun of the movie. It didn't show him in a new light, it just showed us his capabilities and his strength for his environment. People might not have picked up on this, and the fact it might have been 'too complicated and boring' means that they probably weren't focusing on it as such to figure it out for themselves. You might have expected what was going to happen, seeing as it was based on a piece of famous literature, but Sherlock Holmes of course is opened to interpretation. Then why go in there and see it, not bother to focus on the finer details, at least enjoy the film, and beforehand think you're going to expect something completely different? It's confusing how people thought this film would happen, and how it was going to turn out. With all these production teams and crews designing and creating this imaginative piece of media, why think you're going to get a tame bunch of people solving mysteries without any spice like the book says?
I, myself, loved the performance by Robert Downey Jr., who seemed to fit into the role like a glove. Why bother with any other actor when you've got him around to play a bohemian detective who performs experiments on animals (O.K, a little out of touch there)? Although he's American, that was not a barrier to him when he spoke in a brilliant Victorian English accent. It's harder than you think trying to cast these people, and what better way than such a famous star? Not to mention the good-looking British actor Jude Law, who, fair to say, did a superb job as Dr. Watson. Not bad picking an actor who lives on the opposite side of the pond, as they say.
As I said, I think many people missed out on the joyfulness and intellect of the film, because there was so much in there to look for. The characters themselves were not on a 'clown caper' or some unimportant journey as such, but I think there was more to them than people actually thought. Although films are for entertainment, you can also see the difference between this and what Conan Doyle wrote. It's a free country when it comes to this kind of interpretation, as Ritchie did nothing to harm one of the most famous fictional characters in history. The darkness of it did not put me off at all, it merely added to the climax, and it was extremely useful in aiding the referencing of the character's next worst scheming supervillain, Professor Moriarty. Since when can films like these pull of darkness, action, mystery and suspense, comedy and adventure without screwing up? And here we have it, a solid gold take on the famous detective, Sherlock Holmes. You can't get much better interpretation than this - there is no equal in this war - as this, my friends, is king.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

MadDadMar 24, 2013

Great movie. Great intriguing plot and amazing acting. If there is one thing that bothered me, it was the fact that most of Sherlock Holmes' wit took a backseat to the more favoured action sequences which are not staple of Holmes. The movieGreat movie. Great intriguing plot and amazing acting. If there is one thing that bothered me, it was the fact that most of Sherlock Holmes' wit took a backseat to the more favoured action sequences which are not staple of Holmes. The movie balanced action and wit pretty well. But I found myself at the edge of my seat much more this time, and it had a more intriguing plot. I liked it-… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

RkypkzJan 7, 2012

Ð

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

SwatiFeb 7, 2013

The scenes between Holmes and Watson were witty and fun to watch. I've not read a lot of Sherlock Holmes, but I can tell the movie presented him to be a little too eccentric. Holmes and Watson excel in hand to hand combat, which I thoughtThe scenes between Holmes and Watson were witty and fun to watch. I've not read a lot of Sherlock Holmes, but I can tell the movie presented him to be a little too eccentric. Holmes and Watson excel in hand to hand combat, which I thought unlikely. Ironically, I can believe Watson to be great in fighting, given he's a seasoned soldier. The antagonist was brilliant, so was the plot and the mystery. I thoroughly enjoyed every minute of it.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

mishabridunJan 10, 2014

I love everything about this movie. The SLO-MO fight scenes, to Downey's humorous take on the classic character, this movie has it all. The story is amazing and so is the movie overall. This is definitely a good watch for anyone who enjoys aI love everything about this movie. The SLO-MO fight scenes, to Downey's humorous take on the classic character, this movie has it all. The story is amazing and so is the movie overall. This is definitely a good watch for anyone who enjoys a action comedy and a mystery, with a classical touch all packed in one!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

Zanessa250QIApr 4, 2016

**** You!!!!!!!!!!!! Peter Travers...........................................................................................................................................

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

SeyeerGameJun 9, 2021

I really liked this movie. Robert Downey Jr. is a cool sherlock, totally! So! 10/10

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

ChajFeb 1, 2023

They really did the character justice. I've read all the books, and they didn't miss a beat. Hats off to the cast.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

WillLJan 3, 2010

If this film wasn't marketed as 'Sherlock Holmes" and the characters were unrelated to the Holmes universe, then this film would have far better ratings. The reviews are simply written by people who are dismayed at the re-writing If this film wasn't marketed as 'Sherlock Holmes" and the characters were unrelated to the Holmes universe, then this film would have far better ratings. The reviews are simply written by people who are dismayed at the re-writing of Holmes' personality and adaptation by Downy Jr.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

GarthNJan 9, 2010

I have not seen a class movie since Slumdog, this was a very good movie. Guy Ritchie is back now that he is over Madona, maybe now he will continue to make some good movies.

1 of 2 users found this helpful

9

WesApr 3, 2010

I'm not sure why the critics disliked this movie so much. As a person who has never read a Sherlock Holmes novel, I found the movie quite enjoyable. Well shot, well acted, and very entertaining.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

JanelleM.Jan 10, 2010

Very funny and tense which we all love and quite a thinking movie but brilliant.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

JG.Jan 2, 2010

I am not a Guy RItche movie fan but he did a wonderful spin on the Sherlock Holmes story. I enjoyed every moment and cannot wait for a sequel.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

RitchieP.Jan 2, 2010

This movie was awesome. The story was fast paced and intriguing. The acting was phenomenal, and the effects were decent.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

DaveJan 3, 2010

This is one of the best movies i have seen so far this year(2009) and maybe one of the best films i have ever seen. The script was very good and the story was extremly enjoying. One of the best things in Sherlock Holmes was the actors; This is one of the best movies i have seen so far this year(2009) and maybe one of the best films i have ever seen. The script was very good and the story was extremly enjoying. One of the best things in Sherlock Holmes was the actors; Robert Downey, Jr. And Jude Law. They are perfect and makes the movie great. Everybody has to see this movie. Honestly i cant really see how Sherlock Holmes can bee called a bad movie. It`s a great moie.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

kenGJan 4, 2010

Not Basil Rathbone's Sherlock Holmes. But still a Sherlock Holmes that is an awful lot of fun.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

DavidP.Jan 5, 2010

Extremely entertaining.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

ColinJan 7, 2010

Damn good movie. Damn good.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

IsabelleK.Jan 12, 2010

Brilliant film with good directing and an excellent, complicated storyline. It's obvious that Downey Jr and Law enjoyed making this film. The only problem was that it was a little bit long.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

ChrisKJan 5, 2010

I thought it was fun, fast, and a blast to watch. Seems like critics wanted it to be boring, staunch, and unexciting. Too bad for them. See it. Robert Downey Jr. and Jude Law killed it. A beautiful period piece with loads of laughs.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

Richb.Jan 5, 2010

Fun enough to be intelligent, and yet confident enough to wink while pulling you into the inside jokes. Near brilliant.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

LenVMay 15, 2010

This picture currently has the same grade as Downey's other recent blockbuster, "Iron Man 2." Both average out to a 57. That's difficult to comprehend, since the Iron Man sequel is a piece of garbage, while this movie is full of This picture currently has the same grade as Downey's other recent blockbuster, "Iron Man 2." Both average out to a 57. That's difficult to comprehend, since the Iron Man sequel is a piece of garbage, while this movie is full of all of the suspense that the Iron Man sequel failed to capture. Applying Sherlock Holmes-like deduction to this case, I can only guess that the critics have used different standards in evaluating "Sherlock Holmes," treating it as a literary adaptation. Well, it's not Arthur Conan Doyle; it's based on a comic book version. And the result is actually better than yet another stuffy Doyle adaptation would have been: it's stylish, funny, exciting. I'm disappointed to see critics sniff at "Sherlock Holmes" just because there's a book somewhere behind it. The only misstep is Rachel McAdams, who plays her role seductively but makes it hard to imagine that she was ever a master criminal.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

LauraR.Dec 25, 2009

I thoroughly enjoyed this movie. Definitely more action oriented than the old movies but I still found it to be clever.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

LarryJDec 26, 2009

Intense, breath-taking, and a overall great performan by Robert Downey, Jr...this movie will please all action goers. Cheers!

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

AndrewM.Dec 28, 2009

Great action movie balanced well with detective work. It seems like most people think they're Sherlock Holmes experts and complain that the wrote his character bad in this film. Look it up! the original Sherlock Holmes was a eccentric, Great action movie balanced well with detective work. It seems like most people think they're Sherlock Holmes experts and complain that the wrote his character bad in this film. Look it up! the original Sherlock Holmes was a eccentric, dirty cock addict. They wrote him exactly as they should have.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

RuthK.Jan 13, 2010

I have read all the Sherlock Holmes stories several times over AND I am a mature person of 60ish. I thought the plot was a clever interpretation of the stories for today's cinema - the biffo and the World Domination seem essential for I have read all the Sherlock Holmes stories several times over AND I am a mature person of 60ish. I thought the plot was a clever interpretation of the stories for today's cinema - the biffo and the World Domination seem essential for an action/adventure movie to hold its own. Interesting Holmes only plucked at his violin, I thought this verged on looking odd, but perhaps it was necessary. A violin sounds better in a book! I thought the characterisations were very true to the stories, interpreted for the biffo and also to lighten the tone a bit. I really liked the sense of fun of the actors and in the plot, that helped the movie a lot. RDJ and Jude law were excellent, each challenging the other to lift their game. The set and scenes were pretty good too, I like the grey and dull tones for the atmosphere.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

PiaV.Jan 14, 2010

Excellent movie. Very entertaining...Loved Downey, Law and Adams performances.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

JonW.Jan 18, 2010

Loved it. One of Ritchie's best movies, and Downey was hilarious.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

JohanFMar 29, 2010

I don't know what all the critics are so mad about. Of course, this movie is nothing like the old books, but hey, did they want it to be like that? I think teh crowd would be bored to tears if they would have to watch an hour and a half I don't know what all the critics are so mad about. Of course, this movie is nothing like the old books, but hey, did they want it to be like that? I think teh crowd would be bored to tears if they would have to watch an hour and a half of Holmes questioning some random person and in the last 10 minutes solving the case. This movie took some liberties (read: a lot) if you want to compare it to the books, but the fantastic plot and entertaining action scenes, this movie should've been rated way higher.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

KevinBMar 29, 2010

Great action/thinking movie... Not sure why so many bad reviews... I enjoyed it all the way through.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

MikeBApr 28, 2010

Cleverly done and entertaining.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

SteveFMay 16, 2010

Critics are totally wrong on this movie..I thought it was really great.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

BarryS.Dec 25, 2009

This was a well paced and cleverly conceived movie. Doyle would have approved. I think too many people are used to Basil Rathbone and perhaps they could not "let go" and enjoy this updated Sherlock Holmes.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

JoeyKDec 26, 2009

Yes, it's a different kind of Sherlock Holmes, but it's still a good one. It's a Hollywood treatment of the character, but it works.The first thing the movie does is show Holmes using his quick wit and amazing observational Yes, it's a different kind of Sherlock Holmes, but it's still a good one. It's a Hollywood treatment of the character, but it works.The first thing the movie does is show Holmes using his quick wit and amazing observational skills to beat up a guy. The movie is simultaneously clever and explodey. It works. Recommended.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

daneDec 26, 2009

Very good, some great acting, boring at times however.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

MarthaR.Dec 27, 2009

Very entertaining movie. We all know going in this is NOT your mother's Sherlock Holmes, so no one should be critical of the outlandish scenes. It's witty, great action, wonderful sets and visually intriguing aura of dirty London. Very entertaining movie. We all know going in this is NOT your mother's Sherlock Holmes, so no one should be critical of the outlandish scenes. It's witty, great action, wonderful sets and visually intriguing aura of dirty London. Downey is mesmerizing! I was in awe of the stunning action scenes and actually cringed waiting for the moment of danger to pass. Lots of fun surprises in this movie.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

FabioDec 29, 2009

Great movie, we finally have a Sherlock and a Watson as close as possible to Doyle's books. also we find in the movie all the most important elements from the original books. movie's ending is open to sequel. I'm only a tiny Great movie, we finally have a Sherlock and a Watson as close as possible to Doyle's books. also we find in the movie all the most important elements from the original books. movie's ending is open to sequel. I'm only a tiny bit disappointed to some exaggerations (you ask yourself how they came out alive from certain situations), but that really doesn't matter so much.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

adrianj.Dec 29, 2009

When i saw 57 i had to make a comment cause the movie was very good. he looks and acts nothing like the Sherlock Holmes we grew up with but the movie was very funny and action packed.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

DanCDec 31, 2009

Starts off very slow, but the action scenes are great and its a pretty clever story.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

CharlieD.Dec 30, 2009

Really enjoyed the movie, I found it to be a very different take of an action movie and included everything that I love about Sherlock Holmes in it.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

BenDec 25, 2009

Very enjoyable, different kind of Sherlock.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

PatrickN.Dec 25, 2009

Great escape with two great actors. Yes you are going to a Holmes movie but you are also going to see a Guy Ritchie affair. If you like Ritchie movies you will like this. If you want pure Holmes, as so many critics pretend, watch PBS. Great escape with two great actors. Yes you are going to a Holmes movie but you are also going to see a Guy Ritchie affair. If you like Ritchie movies you will like this. If you want pure Holmes, as so many critics pretend, watch PBS. Can't wait for the sequel.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

SuzieQDec 25, 2009

Really good, this is another kind of Holmes. Downey and Law are done their job.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

CraigW.Dec 27, 2009

The writing was excellent -- "Holmes" is in some ways truer to the character in the book here than past Holmes movies have been. This is not a "re-imagining" of the character. It's a very engaging, authentic-feeling ride for anyone who sees it.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

DavidH.Dec 27, 2009

Rodney was simply great in this movie.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

MelF.Dec 29, 2009

Guy Ritchie has done a great job turning the stereotypical Holmes persona on its head. Drawing more on Conan Doyle's books than his moviemaking predecessors, Ritchie has cast RDJ and Jude Law as the cocky, dirty, and delightful Holmes Guy Ritchie has done a great job turning the stereotypical Holmes persona on its head. Drawing more on Conan Doyle's books than his moviemaking predecessors, Ritchie has cast RDJ and Jude Law as the cocky, dirty, and delightful Holmes and Watson. This movie leaves little room to dissappoint.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

JudyTDec 29, 2009

Every original remake. Humorous and interesting. Very good pairing of Downey and Law.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

RobertP.Dec 31, 2009

This movie absolutely deserves better than a 6.7 or a 57 as a score! I just saw it yesterday and it was just superb! A mystery, an action, and a comedy in one astounding movie to perfectly top all others for the better part of the decade!

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

AngelsdawnSep 6, 2010

I'm loving the reviews here, the stupidity within the statements: "It was too rational" and "It was too complicated and boring" are reminding me once again that most movie-goers prefer to have their hand held throughout an entire movie ratherI'm loving the reviews here, the stupidity within the statements: "It was too rational" and "It was too complicated and boring" are reminding me once again that most movie-goers prefer to have their hand held throughout an entire movie rather than use their deductive skills. Too rational? are you kidding? you actually need 'magic' to enjoy something? Sherlock Holmes is ALL about the mystery being solved, everything being presented and known. If you don't like that then why did you even bother to go watch? @the Sherlock Holmes purists, every other hero of some of the oldest stories in time have transitioned into numerous changes like this one(batman, being a man without powers, being a sort of detective on his own, was changed a lot over the years). The picture of however you imagined Sherlock to be might not be the same as the next person beside you. Its open to interpretation, unless you seek to extinguish everyone's creativity due to your close mindedness. The characters weren't empty, their relationship was fully realized (Sherlock and Watson, two detectives fighting over small, inconsequential things, Watson being tired of Sherlock's antics, and yet what unifies them is the mystery for the time being. Sherlock feeling stuck in his life, feeling as though he is being abandoned, trying to pull his old friend back into the game so he wont be the only one who's trapped and alone, his character develops from there but I wont spoil it) and it was very much apparent that they cared deeply about each other, but most would rather that their emotions surface in a much more obvious way. Its ridiculous to give this movie a bad review just because you didn't bother paying attention.

As for the science and the technology in this movie, it wasn't a copout. All of this was at their disposal back then. Sherlock Holmes, whatever version you prefer of him, was above all else a man of science. Also it goes without saying that in the books and in the cartoon or live action series on tv, things did go slower and there was less action. However in movie format things have to be sped up a bit in order to fit everything in, otherwise the movie would wind up being 3-4 hours and coming wayyy over their estimated budget. Its impractical, and to say otherwise means most of you don't have a clear grasp on what making a movie entails, including the reviewers of these magazines. Besides it all works out in the end, and I found the pacing to be especially stimulating, kept me at attention the entire time.

I understand that you have to pump out these reviews almost everyday, but it doesn't mean you have to rush them like this. Hating a movie like this one while its successful doesn't make you a good critic, it just makes an idiot, especially when you assume this was made for a younger generation or for the "ADD crowd". Branding them the ADD crowd while skipping over the fountain of medical terms used in the proper way(for once in a mainstream movie, no pseudo-science, no **** spells or rituals), the witty jokes and all of the deductions and experiments Holmes made all tied together in one neat conspiracy(Which given a little thought, wasn't all that complicated to those who said it was) just makes you look like your the one who deserves the label.

Also what was mentioned was the exaggerated scenarios. They were pretty lucky to survive I will admit, but one thing I found realistic was the part when they lost a whole night's sleep after the fight. This is something I rarely see in movies, usually the fight is over, hero carries on like a good soldier. This humanized them, and it wasn't the only occasion in the movie where they did this.

One last comment before I leave this review to those whom aren't as gullible as the rest, the hand to hand combat wasn't as uninspired as some claim it to be. While being as intelligent as Holmes with the reflexes he possessed, its not hard to observe the fact that every hit he made was calculated beforehand, as displayed in the very beginning of the movie. When he didn't have time to calculate his every movement he used things like the electricity conductor or chains or guns etc to gain an advantage. I honestly don't get how all of this could have been missed by so many reviewers, but that's fine. I hope that if you've read this you've decided to rent or buy this movie. Whatever you decide, its definitely worth the look.… Expand

11 of 12 users found this helpful111

All this user's reviews

9

txrangersfan72Sep 19, 2010

Although the trailers only had me moderately interested, I guess they were a good manager of expectations because this move was PHENOMENAL! Robert Downey Jr is superb as the intellectual detective Sherlock Holmes. Jude Law is perfectly castAlthough the trailers only had me moderately interested, I guess they were a good manager of expectations because this move was PHENOMENAL! Robert Downey Jr is superb as the intellectual detective Sherlock Holmes. Jude Law is perfectly cast as his partner, Dr. Watson. Even though the trailers are full of the witty quips that run rampant in this flick, they don't do justice in showing just how intelligently this story is delivered. The script is near flawless. The story is intoxicating from the first minute. The acting is immensely entertaining. The sets were exquisite. The directing was surgically executed. Like Batman Begins, the story is almost nonstop, even up to the very end when the sequel is teased. Except instead of the Joker, we learn that Professor Moriarty will be the next villain!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

Lambo442Dec 3, 2010

I thought this film was great. Great performances all around, very atmospheric. It also manages to be authentically Holmes, although the action's on a slightly larger scale. But how could anyone not enjoying watching Holmes work out how toI thought this film was great. Great performances all around, very atmospheric. It also manages to be authentically Holmes, although the action's on a slightly larger scale. But how could anyone not enjoying watching Holmes work out how to take down his opponents in more unique ways.… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

9

StevenFMar 13, 2013

This film sort of came out of the blue as an all-out action bonanza, a modern yet still classic tale on the eccentric detective, and I think Guy Ritchie has did an excellent job of bringing the character to life on the big screen, and leavesThis film sort of came out of the blue as an all-out action bonanza, a modern yet still classic tale on the eccentric detective, and I think Guy Ritchie has did an excellent job of bringing the character to life on the big screen, and leaves the opportunity for the audience to come along for the ride.
A contemporary take on the timeless detective, we have a cold opening of Sherlock (Robert Downey Jr) sneaking out of a carriage and attempting to infiltrate a ritual killing at the hands of the films main villain, Lord Blackwood (Mark Strong), but the films soon plays out as a mystery thriller.
Jude Law takes the reigns as Dr. John Watson, and the chemistry between himself and Downey Jr is excellent, a true friendly bromance.
The film scenes involving bullet time are some of the best of the film, when Sherlock analyses and anticipates what is about to happen, all done in a beautifully rendered set piece.
The movie rarely slows down through its action-packed run, throwing many explosions and revelations at many turns to keep the viewer enticed as to what is happening.
There is certainly many aspects of the historic character that Ritchie has stayed true to, the pipe, the violin and of course the martial arts rumours, but they perfectly blend in with the pace of the film, almost like a heroic mix of RocknRolla.
The one thing that can be said which is little nerving is perhaps the over the top feel of everything, at times its maybe just a little too perfect for Holmes to figure out what is going on, but then agin that isn't what the film is about, it is there to shock and surprise with its epic set pieces that would put the best of the superhero films out there to shame.
Downey Jr puts in a commanding performance as the detective and certainly introduces a different sort of character that we haven't necessarily seen before, combining his sparkling wit and charm to have plenty of comedic and memorable scenes with the expansive cast.
There is a fantastic soundtrack with upbeat and catchy notes to engage the scenes, and with stellar talent here, also including Rachel McAdams as the devious Irene Adler, and a host of British talent including Eddie Marsan and Kelly Reilly, this is certainly a film that will be enjoyed by most.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

AB77Jan 6, 2012

Action, Adventure, Mystery, Thriller, Crime............The movie fully succeeds in achieving success in all these genres and also adds an element of humor........All in all,its TOTAL ENTERTAINMENT...!!!

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

JuanoloMar 31, 2012

First off, this is probably a 9.25 out of 10. This movie is great. Action sequences are great. Story is really good. Acting good. RD Jr. Does a good job, and so does Jude law. Score is good to. Cameraing as it slows down and does the sameFirst off, this is probably a 9.25 out of 10. This movie is great. Action sequences are great. Story is really good. Acting good. RD Jr. Does a good job, and so does Jude law. Score is good to. Cameraing as it slows down and does the same thing is kind of cool, and kind of pointless. Overall, this is a great movie that you should watch. Recommend completely.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

theahsanhaseebAug 28, 2012

Robert Downey, Jr. as Sherlock Holmes; that's something worth watching. I loved his acting, obviously, because I am a huge Downey, Jr. fan. The plot involved more mystery and suspense, and that's the core fact I liked this film a lot. GuyRobert Downey, Jr. as Sherlock Holmes; that's something worth watching. I loved his acting, obviously, because I am a huge Downey, Jr. fan. The plot involved more mystery and suspense, and that's the core fact I liked this film a lot. Guy Ritchie was able to deliver it properly. Well, to me, at least.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

WiesyJan 18, 2013

I like this movie a lot, Jude Law and Robert Downey Jr. first together on the silver screen. Good Story and very good cast.One of the best movies of 2009.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

Cloudlv9Jul 17, 2013

Robert Downey is brilliant. Love how people say this is nothing like Sherlock Holmes. Wonder if they know that in the books he was a Cocaine addict... oh and to all the people who said it was too "Grey"...Never Ever Ever go to London, you'llRobert Downey is brilliant. Love how people say this is nothing like Sherlock Holmes. Wonder if they know that in the books he was a Cocaine addict... oh and to all the people who said it was too "Grey"...Never Ever Ever go to London, you'll hate it.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

MovieGuysMar 22, 2014

Sherlock Holmes is an electrifying, high-caliber entertainment experience at the movies. Downey, Jr. is great as Holmes, and Law's Watson is just as good. The two have chemistry and dominate the screen. The slow motion and creative use ofSherlock Holmes is an electrifying, high-caliber entertainment experience at the movies. Downey, Jr. is great as Holmes, and Law's Watson is just as good. The two have chemistry and dominate the screen. The slow motion and creative use of cinematography just adds to the experience. If you plan on watching this movie, just be ready to use your deductive skills, because this is one complex story to figure out.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

audreythomas25Feb 9, 2016

Ultimately, it achieves what it sets out to do: to entertain.

Watch this here for free http://www.watchfree.to/watch-29d767-Sherlock-Holmes-A-Game-of-Shadows-movie-online-free-putlocker.html

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

outlaststandingJun 18, 2022

Maybe movie would looks little different from the novels, but the movie is really fun and recommndable.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

EvinC.Jan 2, 2010

Cool flick. Downey Jr. and Law make a great duo. Love Them.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

PeterSJan 16, 2010

I liked it a lot! But I had to forget everything I read as a kid. As an action movie it's great.

1 of 1 users found this helpful

8

DonaldC.Jan 18, 2010

Excellent movie, entertaining and fun. Great action. Holmes and Watson compliment each other nicely.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

JamesH.Feb 6, 2010

Sherlock Holmes brings more than a few quick street fighting scenes that brings some critiques to give an automatic hate to the movie. The use of not your fathers Holmes is an excuse for those who can not get past their own childish nature. Sherlock Holmes brings more than a few quick street fighting scenes that brings some critiques to give an automatic hate to the movie. The use of not your fathers Holmes is an excuse for those who can not get past their own childish nature. The movie itself brings us an interesting take on not just Holmes, but the times he lived in. To chuck it aside because its not him sitting there for 30 minutes smoking his pipe then coming up with the answer is to insult Doyle.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

RodneyM.Mar 29, 2010

I enjoyed this movie very much, the relationship between Watson and Holmes, feels very similar to that of Dr.House and hes college Wilson.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

JohnBMar 30, 2010

I'm having a difficult time understanding why the lower end of the critics believe this to movie to be so deficient. Is this the best crime drama since the dawn of time? No. Is this an exact replica of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's I'm having a difficult time understanding why the lower end of the critics believe this to movie to be so deficient. Is this the best crime drama since the dawn of time? No. Is this an exact replica of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's famously brilliant short stories and novels? Of course not. But if it where either of the two it would probably be not nearly as entertaining. For those of you who remember, I'd like you to imagine making an exact replica of the "Encyclopedia Brown" series on screen. It would be the same with Sherlock Holmes. Both accomplish their tasks of solving the crime by sheer powers of deduction. I imagine it would be quite tiresome after awhile, just watching someone analyze the facts to reach a conclusion. For that, you could take a Logic course at your local community college and achieve the same effect. Guy Ritchie brings to the series a fun and engaging aspect to Holmes that allows the viewers to be simultaneously entertained and intrigued by Holmes tendency towards the criminal (readers will remember things such as his opium addiction) and his genius as the detective. The film was ultimately an entertaining portrayal of a classic character intended to amuse, bedazzle and intrigue us. I believe Guy Ritchie accomplished just that. That isn't to say that the movie is without fault. Some moments seem a little far-fetched than others and the tension between Adler and Holmes could have been played up a bit. This, however, does not diminish the overall quality that I believe the movie to have. To those expecting a movie portraying a brooding mastermind in the dark solving the crime in a quiet and matter-of-fact brilliance then you clearly have come to the wrong place for entertaining cinema. If you expect a well-balanced mix of action, humor, and, of course, mystery, then I believe "Sherlock Holmes" is well worth the viewing.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

BatjinApr 18, 2010

First of all Downey and Jude were both very good. The story was not as good as the acting. As a whole it was a decent movie. To the crics who gave 50 or below: we are living in the 21st century, where the real stories that Conan Doyle wrote First of all Downey and Jude were both very good. The story was not as good as the acting. As a whole it was a decent movie. To the crics who gave 50 or below: we are living in the 21st century, where the real stories that Conan Doyle wrote wouldn't satisfy as a blockbuster movie, it needs to be embellished with fast paced action scenes (or a bit of comedy). Although I am a big fan of the books I found the slight change in the story entertaining.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

AdamKApr 5, 2010

With all these low scores and sad reviews claiming the film to be "one of the worst films ever" seriously? Heres a few worse films... Changing Lanes, Snakes on a Plane, and Spiderman 3 (oh how I hate Spiderman 3).

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

RodneyW.Jan 1, 2010

Robert Downey Jr is amazing... one of his best.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

rayb.Jan 1, 2010

This is a solid tongue-in-cheek movie!

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

JoeSJan 25, 2010

I liked the pics for Sherlock Holmes and Watson I thought Jude Law and Robert Downy JR were great and not bad action stars it also has a nice plot to it.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

HyperSApr 17, 2010

The visuals (action sequences and scenery) were superb. The acting was great. And the story, while briefly making you think "oh great some unrealistic supernatural trash", comes together nicely in the end. Yes the "old" Holmes is no more in The visuals (action sequences and scenery) were superb. The acting was great. And the story, while briefly making you think "oh great some unrealistic supernatural trash", comes together nicely in the end. Yes the "old" Holmes is no more in this movie.. but honestly... a more badass "I'm going to not only kick your ass with my mind, but with my fists as well" opens the door to far more interesting encounters and simply...a far more entertaining movie.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

AnnK.Jan 12, 2010

Refreshing. Great fun. Didn't come to this conclusion until about 24 hours after watching; this Sherlock and Watson and crew stays with you and ripens somehow. Excellent character development of all the major plays and also of many of Refreshing. Great fun. Didn't come to this conclusion until about 24 hours after watching; this Sherlock and Watson and crew stays with you and ripens somehow. Excellent character development of all the major plays and also of many of the peripherals. All in all a rollicking, fun ride. Am going to see again.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

unclepaulDec 26, 2009

Entertaining at it's worst, Sherlock Holmes shows a restained Guy Ritchie touch, with appropriate levels of fun from all concerned characters. I liked the dirtier Holmes, with his well-travelled knowledge of the martial arts and French. Entertaining at it's worst, Sherlock Holmes shows a restained Guy Ritchie touch, with appropriate levels of fun from all concerned characters. I liked the dirtier Holmes, with his well-travelled knowledge of the martial arts and French. I expect a better sequel.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

BrianJ.Dec 27, 2009

Not a movie for Holmes fans who cant look past the interpretation of the character they grew up with. That said, The writers have done something compelling. They took everything that "Is" Sherlock Holmes and without adding anything of their Not a movie for Holmes fans who cant look past the interpretation of the character they grew up with. That said, The writers have done something compelling. They took everything that "Is" Sherlock Holmes and without adding anything of their own, created a completely different representation of the character. What comes out IS an enjoyable character, even if it is diluted slightly by Robert Downey Jr. (when did he magically become a one-trick pony?) and Jude Law makes for a perfect counterpoint and Ally as Watson. The Plot, barring sensationalism, IS a Doyle-esque mystery, and the Technique used by Richie and his Cinematographer(s?) to show Holmes' thoughts and deductions is a great, if slightly over used feature of the narrative. I admit, I grew up as a huge fan of the Character (and the Jeremy Brett rendition), so it took 15 minutes or more of screen time for me to finally shut off that voice in my head saying "That's not Holmes!" Once I got passed that, I found a fun, enjoyable, decidedly "Sherlock Holmes-like" Flick. I'd definitely recommend it to anyone who isn't a die-hard fan of the source, and to any true fan who can get passed the differences in this version, and enjoy the movie beneath.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

ShadoeD.Dec 30, 2009

Not the classic Holmes by any means but still very, VERY worth watching!

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

RobertLDec 30, 2009

Awesome job Guy. Jude was never more entertaining and Robert looked like he was having a great time with the part.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

RichM.Dec 31, 2009

Sherlock Holmes is not a character I've ever had any real interest in and Guy Ritchie seemed to be getting worse by the film, so this wasn't exactly a film I had great expectations for. But much to my suprise its a hoot from start Sherlock Holmes is not a character I've ever had any real interest in and Guy Ritchie seemed to be getting worse by the film, so this wasn't exactly a film I had great expectations for. But much to my suprise its a hoot from start to finish. The writers have crafted the Holmes and Watson characters into something both interesting and easy to buy in to. Their relationship gives weight to film that could easilly have lost itself in its slightly bizzare plot and Ritchie's trademark direction. Go see… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

JohnR.Dec 27, 2009

This is not your grandfather's Sherlock Holmes, but Law and Downey are expertly directed, the story is complex and very chock full of Holmes' style discovery. Add to that two lovely ladies and gorgeous CGI of 19th Century London This is not your grandfather's Sherlock Holmes, but Law and Downey are expertly directed, the story is complex and very chock full of Holmes' style discovery. Add to that two lovely ladies and gorgeous CGI of 19th Century London and you very much get your monies' worth. This is the beginning of a long franchise, I am certain.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful