Read User Reviews and Submit your own for Saw II

10

The_D4RknesSAug 4, 2023

My favorite! I love the atmosphere of this film and the filters that were used in it... Not to mention the deaths that are uncomfortable to watch.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

ReniachiiMar 20, 2022

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Al ser una secuela, es normal que sea comparado con su predecesor pero yk what? quiero dejar de hacer eso. Saw 2 es una muy buena película. Me gusta mucho como las trampas tienen una forma de escapar haciéndolo por tu cuenta o con ayuda de alguien y es algo que aprecio mucho, por que las trampas de Saw somehow me impresionan más que cualquier otra mierda like sure, puedo ver gore o lo que sea, pero las trampas de saw son más una tortura lenta pero a cámara rápida, lo que lo hace súper inquietante de ver, sin mencionar el estrés del timer que tiene la mayoría.

Recuerdo que la única escena que vi de esta peli fue la del pozo de jeringas, y en su tiempo me pareció bastante fuerte, pero hoy viéndolo de adulta y entendiendo el dolor de todo (encima por que la mina estaba descalza)... idk fue bastante desesperante.

Ahora, hay algo de los killing games que usualmente no me gustan, y es el hecho del famoso "waiting game". Lo que más odio de cosas como squid game o danganronpa es que todo va alrededor de los personajes, y lo digo en el sentido de que el conocimiento de cada personaje del cast son cruciales para avanzar en la historia, y el guión se aprovecha de esto matándolos y poniendo un plot twist barato por que "woow estaba ahí pero no lo sabías pq se murió lool" o en casos más específicos como danganronpa/squidgame, el juego es un battle royale xd
es por esto que prefiero danganronpa 1 ya que ahí estaba el plan con alter ego y todo, pero de nuevo; no es un escape room, es solo un waiting game.

Ahora, a que viene este rant? a que SAW trae gente que se conoce ligeramente. Que se odia, que se ama o que simplemente se tienen miedo, y los lockea en un timer de usualmente 2 horas or so aunque la peli dure 1 hora y 30min. Esto está hecho para que la película te parezca más corta y manipular tu subconsciente haciéndote creer que te gustó o que quedaba mucho tiempo cuando en realidad no era así, y lo amo lmao. Sin duda lo mejor es ver como gente que se odia tiene que vencer su orgullo y cooperar, otros directamente lo hacen a su manera, y desde siempre todas las pelis de SAW tienen formas de hacerlo solo o cooperando, tomando el ejemplo de cortarse el pie, como pasó en la primera entrega. SAW es acerca de retrasar lo inevitable, de dar una respuesta obvia, rápida pero súper dolorosa, aún así dando alternativas variadas pero que consumen un recurso tan preciado como lo es el tiempo, y esta presión es consciente para todo el mundo, creando así momentos súper memorables, impactantes y grotescos, y es por eso mismo que siempre le digo a la gente que la historia es de las cosas más importantes y necesarias en cualquier medio, por más sutíl que sea.

Esta película dejó bastantes cabos sueltos por que el cast no tuvo la habilidad de desencubrir todo para el espectador, sin embargo no lo veo un problema, pero un recurso que espero sea usado en películas/juegos posteriores ya que se siente es algo hecho a propósito. Muy feliz con todo lo que es SAW so far.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

MrPajamasFeb 4, 2021

Saw 2 is more or less the same as Saw 1, just bigger, more action-packed and overall probably not better, but it's definitely not bad. We won't see Doctor or Adam here, but there's Amanda, which is nice, and then a few new characters, which ISaw 2 is more or less the same as Saw 1, just bigger, more action-packed and overall probably not better, but it's definitely not bad. We won't see Doctor or Adam here, but there's Amanda, which is nice, and then a few new characters, which I personally liked. They must escape together. Compared to one, there is a faster pace and there is not just one room or actually as if it is, but it has more floors. There's always something going on here. In the end, I was very satisfied and the overall resolution of the story, which, although not surpassing the previous part, is still great and overall I recommend Saw 2.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

10

Catenary44Jun 7, 2021

$.$.$.$.$.$.$.$.$.$.$.$.$.$.$.$.$.$.$.$.$.$.$.$.$.$.$.$.
》■》■》■》■》■》■》■》■》■》■》■》■》■》■》■》■

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

Exigent93Jun 4, 2021

$,$,$,$,$,$,$,$,$,$,$,$,$.$.$.$.$.$.$.$.$.$.$.$.$.$.$.$.
●》●》●》●》●》●》●》●》●》●》●》●》●》●》●》●》●》●

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

10

Tendril28May 29, 2021

&=&=&=&=&=&=&=&=&=&=&=&=&=&=&=&=&=&=&=&=&=&=&=&=&=&=&=&=
&+&+&+&+&+&+&+&+&+&+&+&+&+&+&+&+&+&+&+&+&+&+&+&+&+&+&+&+

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

10

Depose570May 16, 2021

````````````~~~~~~~~~~,,,,,,,.......,,,,,,,,,,》》》》》》
bjjbihhihiihihihhijhihihhubfhdfdjghfugjgugufyguguggugggg

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

Josephgamers65May 2, 2021

Saw II this is the follow up to the first and it's really disappointing a lot of the characters are boring The only Characters I really like is Eric Daniel and Jigsaw the Scenes where Eric And Jigsaw Are Arguing Is the best in this movieSaw II this is the follow up to the first and it's really disappointing a lot of the characters are boring The only Characters I really like is Eric Daniel and Jigsaw the Scenes where Eric And Jigsaw Are Arguing Is the best in this movie Daniel was just captive in this movie and helping others Jigsaw was good in this movie also making backstory to why he does what he does but the only thing I hate what he said was he did not kill anyone what do u mean u killed a bunch of people So Saw II is not that good gets very boring because the characters are just not that interesting So I give Saw II a C-… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

6

JLauSep 25, 2020

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Same guy from the first one sets up a new game where a cop has to try and find his missing son but if he was actually listening, he could've just sat there and his son would've been fine.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

robertoiglesiasMay 6, 2020

This is my favorite Saw film, due to how simple the story is and how easy it is to follow. I also liked the characters and the traps they had to go through.

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

1

Ryo91Apr 17, 2020

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1/10 * Nicht so Meins. Zu viel abgeschlachte.

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

7

gracjanskiJan 26, 2020

It is a worse movie than the first one, but still worth to watch. Acting and the characters are a bit annoying: too much **** too much screaming.
The plot is good with some nice twists.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

7

JPKDec 12, 2019

Decent Sequel
It’s not as good as the original, But Saw II is another satisfying round of gory horror.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

ErikTheCriticSep 25, 2018

Just like the first, but this time we have some new well-designed plot twists. We also have more gruesome traps where victims die in all sorts of gory ways.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

Movie3Jul 15, 2018

Should have stopped at the first one. Though still intense and hard to watch...that needle pit, YIKES!!!

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

4

Fire_CharizardApr 21, 2018

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I found saw 2 to be the most “meh” film in the series, I watch it as part of the marathon of saw films I do, but the traps in saw 2 are so bland, only the opening one got my heart going. It’s my least liked saw 2. When I found out that the nerve agent was killing the characters off slowly killed the whole trap concept as they where all rushing to get the antidote. The to see the whole film already happened. Not a fan of that kind of twist. Overall watchable but not my first choice in the saw series.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

4

MrTacoBobSep 3, 2017

I didn't even like the original that much now there is a sequel.It's the same thing just tying in with the bland and dumb storyline. It's just the same thing with the same gore! And from there it got worse.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

Meth-dudeJul 22, 2017

Definitely not as good and memorable as the first one, but it doesn't mean that the movie is all that bad. The acting was okay, the movie was still intense and the final twist was very surprising. While it may not be that good of a movie andDefinitely not as good and memorable as the first one, but it doesn't mean that the movie is all that bad. The acting was okay, the movie was still intense and the final twist was very surprising. While it may not be that good of a movie and it falls flat in comparison with it's predecessor, it's still not a bad movie.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

GamecubeLoverSep 3, 2016

Still flawed but the movie is still good. In metascore I would give this 70/100 but still being flawed but still scary and kinda improved but the series will be milked.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

5

marcmyworksAug 31, 2016

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This film did contain two of the craziest death scenes I had ever seen. The first was the pit of needles and the second was the razors in the box. I will say the SAW films make me value my life tremendously.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

2

EpicLadySpongeApr 1, 2016

You want to know what that II and those two totally dried up fingers show up? The finalized score on my review. So totally (not) horrifying and scary.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

4

MovieManiac83Apr 25, 2015

Silly, gratuitous, and nonsensical as they are, the Saw movies may have something to them after all. Much like The Three, the serial-killer film scripted by "Donald Kaufman" in Adaptation, they're written in full knowledge of all theirSilly, gratuitous, and nonsensical as they are, the Saw movies may have something to them after all. Much like The Three, the serial-killer film scripted by "Donald Kaufman" in Adaptation, they're written in full knowledge of all their bone-collecting, skin-stitching, Seven Deadly Sins-reckoning predecessors, yet the psychology has been completely stripped away, leaving only the gimmicks behind. To some extent, the Saw franchise may be the B-movie answer to classier fare like The Silence Of The Lambs and Se7en—both Saw and the new Saw II reveal their heady moral and thematic agendas as pseudo-sophisticated window dressing for the grisly contraptions they actually are. Stripped down to the barest genre essentials, Saw is a spring-loaded killing machine, packed with sadistic little deathtraps and ludicrous macabre twists, and its quickie sequel offers more of the same, which should again appease viewers who enjoy being jerked around.

In a novel reversal on the original, evil puppetmaster Tobin Bell (nicknamed "Jigsaw" because he cuts puzzle pieces out of his victims' skin) pulls back the curtain and spends the entire movie in plain sight, but he still holds all the cards. Though not quite as tortured as Danny Glover's madman-in-the-attic in Saw, cop Donnie Wahlberg has reason for stress when he discovers that Bell has abducted his son (along with about half a dozen others), and is holding them in a booby-trapped house. Through security monitors mounted in every room, Wahlberg and his team can only watch helplessly as the hostages struggle to free themselves within the two hours before their bodies implode from the nerve gas being pumped through the vents. But Bell relishes his role as dungeonmaster, so he offers a way out in the form of a game: If the hostages can figure out the combination to the safe in the middle of the room, they'll find the antidote inside.

As in Saw, the solutions are often just as bad as the problem: Sure, you can unlock that spiked steel trap mounted on your head, but first you have to find the key, which is planted behind your eye socket. (Here's a scalpel. Enjoy.) Bell claims he never kills anybody and that his victims are masters of their own fate, but that's a little like a schoolyard bully grabbing a weakling's arm and doing the "stop hitting yourself" routine. Co-writer Leigh Whannell, the sole creative holdover from the original, knows well enough not to mess with success, and he perpetuates Saw's sick, arbitrary formula without fail. The good news for moviegoers is that there's a way to enjoy Saw II: Simply grab the scalpel from under the chair, carve a hole in your forehead, and remove your frontal lobe.… Expand

0 of 6 users found this helpful06

All this user's reviews

7

lukechristianscMar 30, 2015

Saw II is not my favorite film in the series, but the film gets gory and fun. Director Darren Lynn Bousman replaces James Wan, which why this movie sucks.The problem with "Saw" is characters are half-baked. with no proper direction like WanSaw II is not my favorite film in the series, but the film gets gory and fun. Director Darren Lynn Bousman replaces James Wan, which why this movie sucks.The problem with "Saw" is characters are half-baked. with no proper direction like Wan did in the first "saw" fails on every level. Grade C+… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

MarickFeb 15, 2015

Saw II is a 2005 Canadian-American horror film, a sequel to 2004's Saw and the second installment in the seven-part Saw franchise, directed and co-written by Darren Lynn BousmanI think that the movie is not as good as the first one. The storySaw II is a 2005 Canadian-American horror film, a sequel to 2004's Saw and the second installment in the seven-part Saw franchise, directed and co-written by Darren Lynn BousmanI think that the movie is not as good as the first one. The story captivates me not so much, but still makes me be quite interested. If you liked the first part of the series, I Saw ie, the second might seem to you weaker.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

3

YourOtherMotherFeb 1, 2015

Haven't even seen 30 minutes of it and I don't plan to. This film looks like complete crap. It's been made to make money due to the success of the first Saw which is probably my favourite film ever. This film sucks bollocks, and I haven'tHaven't even seen 30 minutes of it and I don't plan to. This film looks like complete crap. It's been made to make money due to the success of the first Saw which is probably my favourite film ever. This film sucks bollocks, and I haven't even seen most of it. I just know. Don't bother watching this crap.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

horcrux2007Sep 4, 2014

"Saw II" is one of the rare sequels that is just as good, if not better, than the original. It's slower than the first film, but it's still very interesting and intense. Another great thing about this sequel is that it's a lot different than"Saw II" is one of the rare sequels that is just as good, if not better, than the original. It's slower than the first film, but it's still very interesting and intense. Another great thing about this sequel is that it's a lot different than its predecessor, and it's not just a rehash with more blood. If you're a fan of the first one, I highly recommend this one.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

8

TylerDurden900Jul 16, 2014

Saw 2 isn't as good as the first but the movie is a decent sequel. The movie has some new actors and there
are cool effects once again. The story is weaker in this one and the first story was much more effective.

5 of 7 users found this helpful52

All this user's reviews

8

MichMartMar 3, 2014

Saw II has a very interesting talk with meanings and a good plot. The acting is really good and the twists are amazing and nearly better than in the first Saw-movie.

2 of 2 users found this helpful20

All this user's reviews

6

spollardFeb 26, 2014

It has loss the unique and clever nature of the first one. We're used to the idea now so they tried to introduce some new and exciting traps that definitely helped the film. However, the acting is comical at times and overall it was just notIt has loss the unique and clever nature of the first one. We're used to the idea now so they tried to introduce some new and exciting traps that definitely helped the film. However, the acting is comical at times and overall it was just not that well done. At best this is an average movie, I gave it a 56.4 out of 100… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

7

LelandskellDec 23, 2013

Saw I was very good, and Saw II is a very good sequel, that has a lot more to offer, such as better deaths, better story and more characters and settings. Good movie, 7/10.

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

6

OfficialNov 2, 2013

"Saw II" is just like the first film but this time, the filmmakers have come up with new plot twists that are really well designed. Jigsaw returns as the villain, and designs more gruesome traps where victims dies in all sorts of gory ways.

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

6

Annoymous1May 3, 2013

This averaged lower than the first movie since it doesn't actually have average traps. Unlike the future Saw films, this one lacks what saw is in memory for, the torture sequences. It is very low and they really aren't that good. But it isThis averaged lower than the first movie since it doesn't actually have average traps. Unlike the future Saw films, this one lacks what saw is in memory for, the torture sequences. It is very low and they really aren't that good. But it is still good enough to get a positive review.… Expand

0 of 12 users found this helpful012

All this user's reviews

8

Jamez45545Jan 26, 2013

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The best of the Saw movies. This is probably because of the character development of Jigsaw, Eric Matthews, Amanda Young and and Daniel Matthews. What I always loved about the movies were the character development, and the story. The traps don't matter in this movie, it's all about Eric Matthews trying to find his son and doing everything he can to find him. Tobin Bell gives a great performance as Jigsaw/John Kramer. The movie may have flaws with the characters in the Nerve Gas House and some of the traps but over all it's a great detective movie & a good thriller check it out.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

8

homicidalfuryDec 23, 2012

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Not as good as the followers but better than the original, but it has a **** up plot, father loses his son to some **** who traps him up in a room filled with gas, thats really **** up… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

5

potatoes351Oct 30, 2012

Saw II, sequel to the pretty darn good Saw, is a completely different film to its predecessor. Yes the Jigsaw killer is back and has a new game in place with a larger number of people in play this time round. The story of Detective MatthewsSaw II, sequel to the pretty darn good Saw, is a completely different film to its predecessor. Yes the Jigsaw killer is back and has a new game in place with a larger number of people in play this time round. The story of Detective Matthews is a fairly boring affair, a rogue cop who does whatever he can to get an arrest even planting evidence, attacking suspects and giving false statements is in the list of things he is known for. Jigsaw has taken his son and several others and placed them in a house with the simple premise to get the antidote to the toxin in the air for each person by completing set tasks for each person. Whist being interrogated by Matthews Jigsaw must keep his game in play and keep Matthews distracted long enough to lure him into an even bigger trap. Saw II is a crime drama with some blood thrown in here and there, nothing compared to the edge of your seat thriller the first was.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

vini1904Aug 14, 2012

A good horror movie with a good strain on the environment and engaging characters. The scenes can be electrifying excitement and pass to anyone who is watching.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

4

HalfwelshmanMar 18, 2012

Saw II is bigger, bloodier, but not better than its predecessor. Sure, Jigsaw's "games" are more extravagant and brutal, but the film lacks the clever plotting and tension of the original Saw. John Kramer (Tobin Bell) still makes a fantasticSaw II is bigger, bloodier, but not better than its predecessor. Sure, Jigsaw's "games" are more extravagant and brutal, but the film lacks the clever plotting and tension of the original Saw. John Kramer (Tobin Bell) still makes a fantastic horror movie villain - he's charismatic, threatening and utterly deranged, and its great to get under the skin of the character a little in this installment (no matter how unpalatable it might be) and understand what makes him tick. Donnie Wahlberg's Detective Eric Matthews makes a good enough protagonist, and the explosive extended dialogue scene between him and Kramer is the most compelling in the film. The rest of the cast are a bit underwhelming, and simply serve as lambs to the slaughter for the purpose of entertainment. I can't really deny that the film has moments that serve a certain deranged craving for schadenfreude found in all human beings, but the film as a whole loses a great deal of its energy and motivation after the first couple of these torture-porn-serving set-pieces. It just doesn't engage quite as the first film did, and only works on a single level. The film's big twist is also rather underwhelming when compared to the shock of the first film's - this time round, you see it coming a mile off. Still, Saw II is diverting, and makes for a decent enough Friday night gore-fest, just don't expect anything more.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

6

imthenoobFeb 9, 2012

Saw 2 is a decent sequel. Tobin Bell is amazing as Jigsaw and Donnie Wahlberg was a great addition too, Their two characters had a lot of great back and forths in the film. The acting is still good. The horror is good but the traps this timeSaw 2 is a decent sequel. Tobin Bell is amazing as Jigsaw and Donnie Wahlberg was a great addition too, Their two characters had a lot of great back and forths in the film. The acting is still good. The horror is good but the traps this time around are not scary at all but they do still provided a little bit of suspense because it was hard to predict the outcome. The twist ending was interesting but a little predictable (I figured it out about 1/2 way into the movie). Still, Its a suprisingly decent horror film that trys to live up to the first film but fails imo.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

RonaldOVOXOFeb 1, 2012

I love this movie the plot and the traps are so original the creators gave horror movies hope. I thought this was going to be the worst horror movie but its actually the best

11 of 21 users found this helpful1110

All this user's reviews

6

spadenxDec 4, 2011

Eh it was ok, The traps werent that scary and the actors in the nerve gas house were below average. However Tobin Bell saves the day with his amazing performance as Jigsaw and Donnie Wahlberg plays a solid lead as well. Not as good as theEh it was ok, The traps werent that scary and the actors in the nerve gas house were below average. However Tobin Bell saves the day with his amazing performance as Jigsaw and Donnie Wahlberg plays a solid lead as well. Not as good as the previous film but its still a solid addition to the series.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

asylumspadezNov 25, 2011

Actually pretty disapointing. The actors (in the nerve gas house) sucked pretty hard but the rest of the cast was good. Tobin Bell was fantastic as Jigsaw and gives a chilling performance as well. The traps were rather disapointing and didntActually pretty disapointing. The actors (in the nerve gas house) sucked pretty hard but the rest of the cast was good. Tobin Bell was fantastic as Jigsaw and gives a chilling performance as well. The traps were rather disapointing and didnt really frighten you at all though. Worth watching for Bell's performance but thats it.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

7

VRossiNov 9, 2011

Wickedly fun. Not as enjoyable as the first fun in every way possible. But that's acceptable judging by the inventive deaths that make the whole things worth watching. The plot is just a little less complex to my liking.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

4

grandpajoe6191Sep 18, 2011

"Saw 2" is baked with mindless flesh and blood, grinded a barely-acceptable plot twist, and mixed with terrible character depth unlike its prequel. Consider to pass this terrible movie, for you WILL gross out.

3 of 16 users found this helpful313

All this user's reviews

9

TheQuietGamerMay 18, 2011

Saw II fixes just about every flaw of the first movie, the acting is better, it's set up better, and has another shocking conclusion, if you liked the first movie this is a must watch.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

XtremeNov 25, 2010

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This is the best Saw movie I've seen. I can't say that is the best of all, because I didn't saw the last one (Saw 3D).
The whole Saw saga is totally underrated, no one can predict the ending of this sequel. That's one of the most unpredictable movies I've ever seen. Is quite clever.
I really liked the first one, but Saw II is so much better. When it ended I was really impressed. Can't wait to see the last one.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

3

VonCarlssonNov 22, 2010

This film is not in any way thinking outside of the box. It's just very clichÃ©.
Now that doesn't have to be the killing blow to a film, there are plentiful of good films that are pretty clichÃ©.
However, this film isThis film is not in any way thinking outside of the box. It's just very clichÃ©.
Now that doesn't have to be the killing blow to a film, there are plentiful of good films that are pretty clichÃ©.
However, this film is not only clichÃ©, but have a storyline which a 14 year-old could come up with. I feel genuinely embarrassing that a grown up person comes up with something this shallow, and dare call it good film. It simply isn't a good film from a storyline perspective.

As regard to character development, there is nearly none. It really goes to show what the real purpose is.
The real purpose is as simple as a outlet for sadistic and primitive urges. Not that there's something wrong with that. But trying to market it as anything else than what it is, is just wrong.

If you like blood, unrealistic scenes(in a film that tries to be realistic) and no story to speak about whatsoever, then this is a film for you.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

5

MovieLonely94Oct 19, 2010

it wasn't that good, but its just wasn't nearly terrible. it had a lack of style and plot, but the acting wasn't so bad and the death scenes were more grisly than the original. Saw II is pretty much worth a try.

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

7

ERG1008Sep 3, 2010

More fun & games with Mr. Jigsaw but this time with the "tough" one from New Kids on the Block.
At one point it turns into a sinister version of The Crystal Maze but without Richard O'Brien with his leopard skin jacket.
Clever & entertainingMore fun & games with Mr. Jigsaw but this time with the "tough" one from New Kids on the Block.
At one point it turns into a sinister version of The Crystal Maze but without Richard O'Brien with his leopard skin jacket.
Clever & entertaining as was the first.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

7

seankAug 7, 2009

It borrows a lot from the first one but it still is nearly as good.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

DanFJan 26, 2009

I don't understand why so many people believe the saw movies have no plot. I have only seen the first three and I thought the first was boring and not as gorey as the hype. But the second was a happy surprise, and I believed the plot I don't understand why so many people believe the saw movies have no plot. I have only seen the first three and I thought the first was boring and not as gorey as the hype. But the second was a happy surprise, and I believed the plot kept me glued to the screen much more effectively.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

5

JasonS.Oct 23, 2007

I loved the 1st movie but this one dropped the main reason the other one was so good. You knew why each person was kidnapped. It seems as if they cut out the back story to almost all of the characters.

0 of 1 users found this helpful

7

ABAug 26, 2007

By placing more of an emphasis on the villain and his motives, "Saw II" creates a more interesting story than that of the first film. Sadly, however, because of the mediocre dialogue, the film itself is far less captivating than the By placing more of an emphasis on the villain and his motives, "Saw II" creates a more interesting story than that of the first film. Sadly, however, because of the mediocre dialogue, the film itself is far less captivating than the original. Still, "Saw II" is great by modern horror movie standards.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

5

MattO.Jul 1, 2007

I absolutely hated the first Saw movie when I watched it, mainly because it seemed like a boring retread of Se7en. I had a hard time caring about the characters, and I couldn't understand how or why it became such a hit. I can't I absolutely hated the first Saw movie when I watched it, mainly because it seemed like a boring retread of Se7en. I had a hard time caring about the characters, and I couldn't understand how or why it became such a hit. I can't explain why I chose to see this one, but I thought it would be good for a laugh or two. However, it turns out that this is a much better movie than the first. That being said, it isn't saying much. But, what the first Saw lacks, this one semi makes up for. I was actually interested in whether the characters lived or died. (to say I actually cared, though, is overstepping the bounds) But, either the actors (not the police, but the eight or so locked in the house) or the director had some way to keep the movie interesting enough for me to keep watching, and interesting enough for me to want to see Saw III.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

1

GaborA.Jan 27, 2007

The worst of the first three(please don't make anymore). The whole middle section, which ultimately turns out to be pointless after the end, plays out like a really bad rendition of Cube. It doesn't even fit the Saw bill The worst of the first three(please don't make anymore). The whole middle section, which ultimately turns out to be pointless after the end, plays out like a really bad rendition of Cube. It doesn't even fit the Saw bill considering everyone's fate isn't tied to their own desire to live but more to the selfishness and idiocy of those around them. All the Saws are over the top gross and illogical, but Saw II is the only one I've seen thats actually boring as hell.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

1

RyanH.Jan 3, 2007

This movie thought it was much smarter than it actually was. The plot is just running some innocent people through a double dare course that actually hurts you. While there was a lot of gore that attracted most of the audience, the story This movie thought it was much smarter than it actually was. The plot is just running some innocent people through a double dare course that actually hurts you. While there was a lot of gore that attracted most of the audience, the story itself could have been the most mindless plot ever. Pretty predictable when the writer tries to show you how ingenious the criminal is by connecting the beginning of the story with the end. Once again all the characters in the story are stupid idiots who should have all been dead years ago by drinking poison under the sink by accident.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

JordanG.Nov 4, 2006

Though the first one has a better plot and more imaginitive scenes this Saw still is a great movie. Those you say this is just disgusting gore didn't pay attention and didn't see the first movie or didn't pay attention their Though the first one has a better plot and more imaginitive scenes this Saw still is a great movie. Those you say this is just disgusting gore didn't pay attention and didn't see the first movie or didn't pay attention their either. The twists and turns in this series are sick and amazing. The first one i find better but still this is a great movie… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

0

RedFaceNevousNateOct 20, 2006

I am hoping that the third movie will be better than the first two because the first two REALLY sucked.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

0

[Anonymous]Oct 20, 2006

Even worse than the first one. Just disgusting and pointless. No real plot, just one unshocking twist and a lot of bad acting. This movie has no impact but a sore stomach. Utter Garbage, a new filmmaking low. The worst film of the year.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

TerryOct 15, 2006

Just as great as the first.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

FloSep 2, 2006

Great twists, great traps, just what you need. Can't wait for number 3. You know the rules to make it work.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

3

VidM.Jun 13, 2006

Nothing new here. If you liked the first, you'll like this too.

0 of 1 users found this helpful

0

AndreaJun 4, 2006

What a dull movie! Is this suposed to be scary or completely absurd? Most of the time I actually wished Jigsaw just killed them all. And that's o.k. because stupidity is suposed to be paunfull! Complete waste of time (and money).

0 of 0 users found this helpful

3

DrewJun 3, 2006

Saw the first (no pun intended...) and was really excited for the second - totally failed to live up to the original - don't bother unless you are bored or want to see liberal splashes of blood

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

TristanL.Mar 31, 2006

Fantastic film, gorier than Saw, and utilising some lovely set pieces. The point is not the gore but the intricacy and the actual plot - listen and obey the rules and you win.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

AlexZ.Mar 7, 2006

I give it an 8. There were some scenes which did not make sence at all. Who can lock a door with a club to hold back somebody or other little details. Apart from those, undisturbing, flaws the movie is great. The acting was good, especially I give it an 8. There were some scenes which did not make sence at all. Who can lock a door with a club to hold back somebody or other little details. Apart from those, undisturbing, flaws the movie is great. The acting was good, especially by Tobin Bell ( playing Jigsaw ). The plot twist was hard to get but once you got it, it's a brilliant and very good one. Could've been more scary though! That's why only an 8.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

3

RichardS.Feb 21, 2006

Saw 2 (and 1) in a nutshell. 1) [***SPOILERS***] Hypocritical murder puts a bunch of people in a room where survival is practically nil. 2) Most of them die. 3) Crappy illegitimate twist. 4) One person in the end who isn't dead and is Saw 2 (and 1) in a nutshell. 1) [***SPOILERS***] Hypocritical murder puts a bunch of people in a room where survival is practically nil. 2) Most of them die. 3) Crappy illegitimate twist. 4) One person in the end who isn't dead and is left alone in a room. Problems with the movie. 1) Where does this cancer ridden patient get all the time and energy to plan these things? (You might note he is hooked up to an IV and respirator) 2) Where does he get all the money for these elaborate schemes? How in the heck can he afford several empty residencies? (Don't forget the 2 warehouses, but hey maybe he rents?) 3) How did he become an electrician, plumber, construction worker, metal working specialist, carpenter, and blacksmith so quickly? Unless of course he hired somebody? 4) Why is everyone so incredibly stupid in this movie?… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

DrewF.Feb 19, 2006

Surprisingly solid sequel. The way they tie up loose-ends from the first film is very neat. Nice twists, too. I was stunned by how much i liked this. Will be adding it to my collection (alongside the original).

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

JonathanD.Feb 19, 2006

one of my favorite suspense movies... if your looking to be scared dont turn here its not scary just freaky... people dont pop out around corners people dont chase eachother for the most part its just a movie that you wont fully understand one of my favorite suspense movies... if your looking to be scared dont turn here its not scary just freaky... people dont pop out around corners people dont chase eachother for the most part its just a movie that you wont fully understand untill the end which makes it great. and tony b if you payed attention to the movie SPOILER(you would know that jigsaw didnt kill those people the lady did) i wish that before people said bad things about a movie they would understand the movie first. its really a good movie for those of you who want to be freaked out or like suspence movies and its a great movie if you liked the first.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

4

TylerD.Feb 18, 2006

What a let down. The first movie is so much better than Saw II. It tried way too hard and the ending seemed very forced. You can tell the director was changed. What a horrible ending. It turned from good to a shitty episode of CSI in What a let down. The first movie is so much better than Saw II. It tried way too hard and the ending seemed very forced. You can tell the director was changed. What a horrible ending. It turned from good to a shitty episode of CSI in minutes. I was looking foward to seeing this so much, and I have to say I'm extremely disappointing. If Saw III comes out, which I'm sure it will, let's hope it goes back to it's roots. Sure, Saw II had it's scary and disturbing parts, but the other parts of the movie just seemed poorly acted. Very poorly acted. The ending was just...ugh. I can't even begin to explain how bad it was. Forced is one word that comes to mind. Another? Well...very, very bad. Better luck next time, Darren Bousman. Better luck next time.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

3

TonyB.Feb 17, 2006

this movie didnt completely suck on for a few saving graces however this movie is not near worth a purchase quite possibly a rental at the most. however if you enjoyed the first one greatly which i cant say i did then i recommend it to you this movie didnt completely suck on for a few saving graces however this movie is not near worth a purchase quite possibly a rental at the most. however if you enjoyed the first one greatly which i cant say i did then i recommend it to you but if u didnt like the first one much you will hate the second.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

BrittneyB.Feb 16, 2006

Saw 2 has an excellent story line, the terrifying scenes and the twisted ending, gives the movie a brilliant feel to it. I rated it a 9 because it was rather gorey but it was still a clever film. I give it two fingers up! !

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

KyleL.Feb 13, 2006

Ha! Honestly, it scared the crap out of me....i always put myself in the characters situation, and this wasnt a good situation. Very 'intelligent' movie. Really gets you to think about it.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

0

AlistairD.Jan 17, 2006

Saw II is a horror scetch show. The plot is only there to try and justify random scenes of violance. I hope the writter of the film didn't get paid.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

JoelT.Jan 12, 2006

Good horror flick. Slightly better then the original.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

4

DarylL.Jan 1, 2006

Unfortunately the sequel overall doesn't compare to its superior original. Though the sequel continues the series of gruesome deaths the movie isnt as smart as its predecessor.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

GerronKDec 15, 2005

Saw II is a well done horror flick, in an era where horror flicks are rarely well-done. I remember thinking how the hell could they make a sequel to "Saw", but they did, and it's a complete legitimate sequel. Those who did not see the Saw II is a well done horror flick, in an era where horror flicks are rarely well-done. I remember thinking how the hell could they make a sequel to "Saw", but they did, and it's a complete legitimate sequel. Those who did not see the first will need to see it to totall appreciate the second movie. It was pretty well done.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

WallyS.Dec 8, 2005

Dissapointing, considering the original movie was sensacional, but this sequel lacks the good plot of the original, and the characters here are highly superficial, played by actors horribly and directed with no inspiration. What saves the Dissapointing, considering the original movie was sensacional, but this sequel lacks the good plot of the original, and the characters here are highly superficial, played by actors horribly and directed with no inspiration. What saves the movie are the stong and gory scenes that to me looked very cool, but otherwise it is a completly trash film.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

ToynaP.Dec 7, 2005

Awsome movie I compleatly recomend this movie to anyone!!!!!!

0 of 0 users found this helpful

0

skrumpDec 2, 2005

This is properly the worst movie I've ever seen. First of all, the character roles are just ripped off from the cube movies in a halfassed way. The plot is not original and has no point. This is hollywood-boredom. Sure as hell This is properly the worst movie I've ever seen. First of all, the character roles are just ripped off from the cube movies in a halfassed way. The plot is not original and has no point. This is hollywood-boredom. Sure as hell isn't art or food for thoughts. Secondly, there's constant screaming and bad cutting trying to make up for the nonexisting thrill. Made me turn down the volume and eventually also turn off the tv. This sucks. Even worse than Saw I, which I only thought was stupid because of the 'I'll-cut-my-leg-off-for-no-damn-reason-other-than-try-to-copy-that -original-version-of-nightwatch-scene". I would really like to meet the people behind this so I could tell them face to face how much I hate this piece of crap. :(… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

mamucNov 22, 2005

Very genialitic is this film director:))

0 of 0 users found this helpful

3

SomeGuyNov 22, 2005

Logic and continuity has been thrown out the window in this waste of a sequel. It feels like the filmmakers just threw a bunch of scenes together in the hope that a movie would materialise. And shouldn't it say "scene missing" before Logic and continuity has been thrown out the window in this waste of a sequel. It feels like the filmmakers just threw a bunch of scenes together in the hope that a movie would materialise. And shouldn't it say "scene missing" before and after every scene? If not, the director and editor must have really screwed this film up. And the supposed 'connectivity' between it and the first film simply opens up more plot holes, bringing the total number to 3156789982533456782981976. At least they managed to include a little trailer for the film within the actual film (I am referring to that pointless montage that came before the big twist), which must be a first. It has some okay scenes, but overall, do yourself a favour and watch the first film, which was clever, original, and expertly crafted, not lazily thrown together.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

AlanI.Nov 21, 2005

This movie was better in many ways then the first one. What I liked about the first movie was how clever the twist and turns the movie took the viewer until the final surprise. What I didn't like was the poor acting and a few This movie was better in many ways then the first one. What I liked about the first movie was how clever the twist and turns the movie took the viewer until the final surprise. What I didn't like was the poor acting and a few unrealistic kill scenes . In Saw 2 the acting was way better. What I didn't like was how they rushedbrushed past some of the individual histories of some players ( why include them). Still all in all the story kept you guessing until the final twist. As in the first movie these final scenes flashed so quickly, it was hard to grasp the full implication of the story. I am a little suprised by some of the writers who seemed to have hated the first movie, but then went ahead anyway and spent their hard earned money to see the second- why? I wouldn't have.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

1

stephyk.Nov 21, 2005

The film was very very not worth while going to see! it was even worse than the first one which i thought was impossible!

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

MarcB.Nov 19, 2005

I don't know why you all thought this was a disaster. I loved the movie it could have been a bit more gruesome but overall such a good movie. Loved the catch at the end.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

KellyWNov 18, 2005

The plot is again stellar, and the tension is even more gripping than in the last film!!

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

BoboP.Nov 17, 2005

Great movie, loved the beginning.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

LindseyW.Nov 14, 2005

I was pleased by the ending and liked how the movies were so connected.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

JodyT.Nov 10, 2005

Fabulous.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

lukeg.Nov 9, 2005

Heaps good mvie and must see

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

GlynnHNov 9, 2005

[***SPOILERS***] If you pay attention to the film, JOE B, you would know that it was not Jigsaw who set this all up, it was the girl from the first movie. Since he had nothing to do with the setup, he is then not responsible for anyone who [***SPOILERS***] If you pay attention to the film, JOE B, you would know that it was not Jigsaw who set this all up, it was the girl from the first movie. Since he had nothing to do with the setup, he is then not responsible for anyone who died. This is also what he does in the first movie, enlists someone else to set everything up so his hands are clean of any deaths. END OF SPOILER This movie was awesome. Kept my eyes glued to the screen from beginning to end. Let's just say that the syringes are alone enough reason to go see this. It rocked and I am hooked for whatever else they have to throw at us.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

5

MoNov 8, 2005

[***SPOILERS***] The movie was ite. i dont knoe bout the rest but i kinda figured the big twist when WARNING SPOILER AHEAD... the girl never coughed and seemed perfectly stable while the others were dying due to the nerve gas. I did like the [***SPOILERS***] The movie was ite. i dont knoe bout the rest but i kinda figured the big twist when WARNING SPOILER AHEAD... the girl never coughed and seemed perfectly stable while the others were dying due to the nerve gas. I did like the part of if the cop followed the rules of jigsaw while talkin to him he would have gotten his son back.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

BrentT.Nov 7, 2005

This movie grasped my attention as much as the first one did; playing Jigsaws game is something that the audience can even enjoy. I found myself trying to figure out the ending so it wouldn't catch me off guard, but to no avail. It got This movie grasped my attention as much as the first one did; playing Jigsaws game is something that the audience can even enjoy. I found myself trying to figure out the ending so it wouldn't catch me off guard, but to no avail. It got me good. As for the idiot writing for the Boston Globe, go get a pair and realize that watching others suffer isn't the basis of this movie.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

anthonyv.Nov 6, 2005

Movie Critic Spin 101: focus on the one thing about a movie that you hated, amplify it in your review, and brush aside everything else. This movie was nowhere near as bad as the critics said it was. Yeah, parts of it are unusually cruel and Movie Critic Spin 101: focus on the one thing about a movie that you hated, amplify it in your review, and brush aside everything else. This movie was nowhere near as bad as the critics said it was. Yeah, parts of it are unusually cruel and inhumane, and Jigsaw's claim that he never killed any of his victims is questionable (did the ricin find its way through the vents by itself, Jigsaw? nice try). But overall I thought it was great. The acting, dialogue, and plot are nowhere near as bad as J.R. Jones and Wesley Morris claim they are … Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

0

daveNov 6, 2005

Yet more Hollywood garbage!!!

0 of 0 users found this helpful

5

JoeB.Nov 5, 2005

It was alright, but not great. There were several gaping plot holes. For example: if Jigsaw insists he never kills his victims, what happened with the girl played by Beverly Mitchell? And the twist at the end is good with the son but not the It was alright, but not great. There were several gaping plot holes. For example: if Jigsaw insists he never kills his victims, what happened with the girl played by Beverly Mitchell? And the twist at the end is good with the son but not the other huge thing. Although more movies could be made as a result, they won't nearly have the scary overtones. And the acting in this movie sucked.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

6

CurtH.Nov 3, 2005

I think the movie was alright, but it could have been way better. The "games" that the jigsaw killer used in the first movie were much better. I think they shouldn't have grouped that many people in one house for the main plot. I also I think the movie was alright, but it could have been way better. The "games" that the jigsaw killer used in the first movie were much better. I think they shouldn't have grouped that many people in one house for the main plot. I also think that the first "game" with the nail mask was almost better than the rest of the movie.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

JoeNov 3, 2005

" There is no way to get past the unbelievable, gaping plot gap" A- great sentence form (that is sarcasm. B- what was the 'gaping plot gap'? Because I missed it. The movie is great- makes you think. From the first scene. Here is a " There is no way to get past the unbelievable, gaping plot gap" A- great sentence form (that is sarcasm. B- what was the 'gaping plot gap'? Because I missed it. The movie is great- makes you think. From the first scene. Here is a exercise. The whole movie, from the first scene, put yourself in the shoes of the people in the game. Try to ignore the dramatic irony when you can.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

KharaghNov 2, 2005

Brilliant!

0 of 0 users found this helpful

6

AmyNov 2, 2005

Not as clever as the first one, well on it's way to becoming another 'slasher' flick, a group of people trapped in a house, most of them die, it's a bit old. Plus, i thought the bathroom was under a warehouse in the first Not as clever as the first one, well on it's way to becoming another 'slasher' flick, a group of people trapped in a house, most of them die, it's a bit old. Plus, i thought the bathroom was under a warehouse in the first one? Didn't see the ending coming though, although with hindsight it was kind of obvious.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

6

chuck76Nov 1, 2005

A clever twist on the original and not a bad little yarn, can see this series running and running. The acting is still pretty ropey though and I've always had a problem with the fact that not all of the victims are guilty of a serious A clever twist on the original and not a bad little yarn, can see this series running and running. The acting is still pretty ropey though and I've always had a problem with the fact that not all of the victims are guilty of a serious crime, maybe that's just me.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful