Read User Reviews and Submit your own for San Andreas

5

rmurray847Aug 10, 2023

I have always loved disaster movies. They are almost all terrible, but they are often on the leading edge of special effects. And I'm talking about all the way back to Irwin Allen's TOWERING INFERNO or even back to GODZILLA. As a kid, thoseI have always loved disaster movies. They are almost all terrible, but they are often on the leading edge of special effects. And I'm talking about all the way back to Irwin Allen's TOWERING INFERNO or even back to GODZILLA. As a kid, those movies blew me away with their awesome destructive power! In recent times, films like DEEP IMPACT or TWISTER breathed new life into the genre, featuring what are now pretty dated, but were once pretty advanced, effects. I enjoyed 2012, not for it's great script, but for it's outstanding scenes of global destruction (and Woody Harrelson's delightfully unhinged performance).

So I prepared for the same guilty-pleasures with SAN ANDREAS. But it let me down to some degree because the "non-destruction" scenes were particularly dumb and unbelievable. Bad script, bad characters, bad acting. Dwayne Johnson can be quite a charming actor and he seems on the surface to be well equipped for an undemanding lead role like this. He will never win an Oscar, but his physical presence and charm should have tided him over. But his part was SO painfully cliched and by-the-numbers that even The Rock crumbled under the weight of its high school level writing. It was as though a child had watched a bunch of disaster movies and was told to write the dialogue to be like all those. Or perhaps it's more accurate to say that it felt computer-generated. No soul...just plot points to tick off. Estranged ex-wife and her new husband who is clearly doomed to die (yep, just put Carla Guggino in Amanda Peets' role from 2012). Attractive daughter in distress, causing Johnson to abandon his role as a search and rescue guy when the world most needs him? Check. Cardboard scientific characters will little purpose other than explaining to us the "science" of what is going on in a vain effort to lend credibility (thinking DAY AFTER TOMORROW here). Check. A "cute" kid who is spunky but still needs a bit of rescuing? Check. A romance developing out of nowhere when everyone ought to be focused on things like staying alive and the end of the world (thinking the POSEIDON remake). Check.

Add to that some truly dreadful performances by Guggino and Alexandra Daddario (as the daughter), along with embarrassing turns for Paul Giamatti (as the "scientist"...hope he got a good paycheck) and Archie Panjabi as "the TV reporter." Just not good.

Fortunately, the movie is still watchable due to its scenes of destruction. There is perhaps 20 minutes here of truly jaw-dropping special effects work as we watch major cities crumble to the ground in spectacular fashion. This is the stuff viewers like me come for. And SAN ANDREAS delivers. (I watched in 3D...the 3D is okay, but I don't think it adds so much that you should go out of your way to see it in that format.) The CG cities are convincingly rendered and more convincingly toppled. (Things get dicier near the end when Johnson and Guggino zip around on a speedboat through CG debris. They never quite look like they're really ON the water.) So I enjoyed those moments very much. They are just as rote and predictable as everything else...but as I said, I take guilty pleasure in these movies.

So, for me, it's 3 stars. If you DEMAND good scripts and acting from your disaster movies...keep looking. This is perhaps a one-star film for you. And if you have a higher tolerance for bad writing and acting, then this might even be a 4 or 5 star movie. So take my thoughts in their context. If I watch this movie again some day, I'll be skipping MANY scenes and just cutting to the chase of some great destruction!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

AmateurfilmVWRJun 5, 2023

Pretty comparable to 2012 or The Day After Tomorrow. The science behind it is likely absurd but who goes to these movies for the science?

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

eva3si0nFeb 12, 2023

San Andreas classic disaster film. Only this time there is not so much "Hollywood" patriotism, the whole plot is concentrated on the local events of one small group of people and everything else is pushed into the background. And if theSan Andreas classic disaster film. Only this time there is not so much "Hollywood" patriotism, the whole plot is concentrated on the local events of one small group of people and everything else is pushed into the background. And if the viewer begins to watch the film like me only for the sake of large-scale destruction in CGI, then he will enjoy watching. You shouldn't look to San Andreas for acting or story twists. This is a regular disaster film, in which most of the nonsense is not related to reality. But the scenes of destruction are perfectly shot and the tsunami scene is excellent. You need to watch this in IMAX on the big screen… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

Kdog152Jan 14, 2023

You know, there's a definite correlation between films that do good and bad on metallic. Films that do good, are films that are simple and are usually either heavily based on a book and have little special effects to them and only have goodYou know, there's a definite correlation between films that do good and bad on metallic. Films that do good, are films that are simple and are usually either heavily based on a book and have little special effects to them and only have good acting BC there's no change complex plot. Films that do bad or mediocre, are the ones where you can see the makers and actors have tried and the ones where you can see that a lot of love and thought went into them. This film fits into those unfairly reviewed films. This film is phenomenal and just amazing. And you know its actually good BC if you look on other sites or just anywhere else other than metacritic, you'll see that it has done well a long with all the other poor reception films. This is why metacritic should be discontinued, BC it's full of bias and clearly not regulated for hate reviews. Many other really good films have fallen victim to the metacritic scandal.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

Tulip7148Nov 20, 2022

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Love the movie we need a part 2 with the same people it's my favorite watch it all the time… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

DolphinReviewsJul 21, 2022

A decent action movie, it’s fun if a bit generic. It’s a mid movie but nothing painful to watch.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

DawdlingPoetNov 28, 2021

This is a high octane, fast paced action/drama disaster film. It very much follows in the usual pattern of disaster films, as far as there being the women (perhaps previously (in the past) regarded as 'damsels') in distress, the determinedThis is a high octane, fast paced action/drama disaster film. It very much follows in the usual pattern of disaster films, as far as there being the women (perhaps previously (in the past) regarded as 'damsels') in distress, the determined main male character who vows to save those dear to him and so on.

I can't say I'd ever thought I'd say this but one of the first criticisms that came to mind, as far as this film is concerned, was the over-use of CGI. It isn't a film featuring a disaster, its just about a constant visual disaster that goes 'all guns blazing', once it starts, with so much in the way of explosions, crumbling and toppling buildings and other such things that I felt myself thinking there's no way this could surely be anywhere near real. Now whether that is the case or not, I can't really say but I was very aware that I felt desensitised from what was going on visually, as it appeared so constant and perhaps over the top. For one thing, the main female character, Emma seemed incredibly lucky in not succumbing to the initial earthquake effects. I shant risk spoiling the film by revealing more plot details as such but I definitely felt that it didn't seem very likely, or realistic, that she was somehow able to do what she did. Equally, the main character, Raymond, also seemed to be somehow particularly nimble and able to pull off things which (call me a pedant or an unfair critic, perhaps in some regards I maybe am? but I'm just being honest here) I didn't feel, instinctively, were very credible. To be fair to the film, thinking of other similar films of recent times such as 2012, of course the plot isn't meant to be analysed down to the very last second but I didn't feel that the special effects and camerawork entirely made up for what I felt was very much a basic and perhaps rushed script.

Having said that, I did think that Dwayne Johnson was a good actor to have play the main character, Ray. He does relatively well playing the usual action man, guy to the rescue type role. He has featured in comedy films (such as in Get Smart and Tooth Fairy) but for the most part he's well known for roles in action films. Other cast members include Carla Gugino as Emma and Alexandra Daddario as their daughter, Blake. Paul Giamatti plays Dr. Laurence Hayes (a seismologist who was aware of the impending incidents), Ioan Gruffudd plays Daniel Riddick and Art Parkinson plays Ollie Taylor, a young boy who sparks up a conversation with Emma near the start of the film.

One thing I felt was pretty cheesy and made me cringe a little was the fact that early on its made clear the relationship between Ray and Emma is shaky at best, with a divorce seemingly being on the cards. The theme (if it counts as a theme?) of a disaster bringing home the idea of family being more important than most other things is, well I hope you'd agree, very much an old, tired one. I'm certainly not saying that there's no truth to it but I did feel it was a little cheesy and predictable. There were one or two other particular scenes which I felt seemed a bit too convenient or unlikely lucky, for want of another term. Normally I quite enjoy these sort of films, from a visual perspective and I don't deny that they can be quite engrossing and entertaining. I certainly wouldn't say this isn't at all entertaining and, as I say I realise its not a film to be overly analysed in detail but it just somehow didn't 'ring true' for me. I can only think that the plot wasn't quite developed enough, with not enough characterisation, as I'm not sure I did feel I was 100% bothered about the outcome to the main characters, as harsh as that may sound. Its pretty much a known 'thing' that if you don't care a great deal about the main characters and want them to do well, then the film isn't going to particularly great or certainly memorable. I feel it'd be unfair to say that this film (pardon the slight, earthquake related pun) falls down as far as being watchable and mildly entertaining is concerned - I think it felt a bit too sort of rushed, consisting of various cliches and thus being a bit too predictable.

Musical score wise, the music used wasn't especially memorable, other than one quite gripping scene involving people falling from the sky, which is accompanied by stringed instruments. The camerawork is quite good at showing their position as they fall through the sky, with the local surroundings shown at various angles and that sort of thing.

Content wise, there is only brief use of strong language but there is some potentially frightening scenes for young viewers. By this I mean there is a lot of blood, people with various injuries, some (inevitable) violence, although nothing too graphic or explicit. The general theme of impending doom is obviously one that may frighten or upset younger viewers. There are no sex scenes or full on nudity. Due to this, the film carries a 12 rating. I imagine most teens would be fine watching this.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

bestreviewereveSep 1, 2016

This movie is highly under rated, and heavily mis-reviewed. This movie was awesome. The entire time from when the earthquake happened to the very last minute, I was on the edge of my seat, biting my fingernails, and all other signs ofThis movie is highly under rated, and heavily mis-reviewed. This movie was awesome. The entire time from when the earthquake happened to the very last minute, I was on the edge of my seat, biting my fingernails, and all other signs of anxiety. IT WAS INTENSE. Movies like these you never know who survive, so you are constantly wondering who will make it out of there difficult circumstances. The duo of Alexandra Daddario and Dwayne Johnson is amazing, and something as a movie goer will not forget in a long time.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

EliassalassAug 2, 2021

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Creo que esta muy bien hecha, los efectos especiales son buenos y se sienten reales algunas reacciones de los personajes frente a los sismos que viven durante la película, si es cierto que se me hace un poco exagerado el primer terremoto de la película porque se supone que Los Angeles es una ciudad propensa a los terremotos y por ende sus estructura debe ser resistente y en la película el primero terremoto ya genera derrumbes de proporciones catastróficas y en la vida real si habrían daños pero no de esa magnitud al menos no en una ciudad como esa, a no ser que los estadounidenses sean un asco haciendo edificios… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

BrandanaMar 28, 2021

If it's a disaster movie you're looking for, this won't disappoint!

The devastation is incredible to say the least. Over the top in the most magnificent ways. Sure, there's some fudging the science and the human side of drama is *slightly*If it's a disaster movie you're looking for, this won't disappoint!

The devastation is incredible to say the least. Over the top in the most magnificent ways. Sure, there's some fudging the science and the human side of drama is *slightly* cheesy, but I personally also found it moving. Definitely had tears of joy/relief at a couple of moments, which doesn't happen too easy for me.

All in all, it is a *ride,* start to finish. Without a doubt, you get what you came for.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

FilipeNetoDec 19, 2020

"Another earthquake film in which California will be obliterated." That's what I thought when I discovered this film. I was not mistaken. It's just another disaster film, similar to so many others in its mistakes and virtues: it's stupid, but"Another earthquake film in which California will be obliterated." That's what I thought when I discovered this film. I was not mistaken. It's just another disaster film, similar to so many others in its mistakes and virtues: it's stupid, but it entertains wonderfully.

Against the backdrop of the famous "Big One", the devastating earthquake that hangs over California like a Damocles Sword, the film follows the efforts of a veteran of the Los Angeles Emergency Services to save her own daughter in San Francisco, in a story that is perhaps the most odd I have ever seen in a disaster film. He totally ignores his professional duty, selfishly choosing to save those who matter to him instead of presenting to his service and saving as many lives as possible. Of course, in the midst of all, he saves other people, if he were not the hero, but it was not what motivated him. And of course, the daughter proved to be totally capable of getting away with herself when everything seemed like the Apocalypse.

The cast is led by an actor I have never particularly liked, Dwayne Johnson, but who has risen considerably in my expectations since he proved to be more than just a muscle mount. He's not brilliant, but he has improved and choose more carefully his roles, gaining with that. Here, he does what he has to do and gets along reasonably well, but he does not establish any chemistry with Carla Gugino, who plays the ex-wife he still cares about, and who seems to be acting with a wall instead of a human actor. Paul Giamatti is a noble actor who is used to dignified characters and with a certain charisma, and he had everything he needs here. Alexandra Daddario, on the other hand, brings to the film a dose of charm and fun in the feminine, in addition to a beautiful curvaceous body.

Personally, I think that what draws the most attention in this film, in addition to the most comical moments that lighten the tension, is the massive dose of CGI where the film spent a notable slice of the budget. And California has never been more beautifully devastated! The CGI is wonderful and there are visually extraordinary scenes that make us think that only in a movie can someone escape by a hair for a wall falling the next instant. With the massive dose of destruction, so realistic that we can smell it, and the decent work of the cast, the film makes up for any defects with solid entertainment and acquires value for that very reason.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

4

TyranianApr 17, 2020

Has some okay visual effects but the writing in this film is as bad as it gets.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

bfoore90Oct 16, 2019

The Rock stars in yet another mindless disaster movie. Solid premise with good performances but a complete bore for being a disaster flick

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

mishaelSep 16, 2019

hope comes second movie this was enjoyable alot I enjoy everything about it

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

goncalocoutoOct 20, 2018

"San Andreas" é um filme excitante, com bons efeitos especiais e com uma direção de arte impressionante. 'The Rock' é um pão!!!
7/10

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

2

paulraisedFeb 3, 2019

No content, no substance, no depth, some dialogue I guess. If you compare this to any disaster movie from the 70s or 80s it's just appalling, and those movies were not very good.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

DominArsenDec 8, 2018

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Sans Andreas est un bon film
Un mélange de destruction et d'émotion envahit la salle de Cinéma tel un tremblement de terre qui écala celle-ci en 2.

Plus sérieusement un film fort sympathique avec Dwayne Johnson (que je trouve bon acteur)
De beaux effets spéciaux c'est certain Une excellente musique de thème
Une histoire américaine ...
Une bonne 3D
et un Dolby Atmos bon dans l'enssemble (sa reste du tremblement terre mais certain débris et son sont trés bien intégré enfin ...) Pour avoir une éxcélente séance Atmos ce mettre au milieu... (un petit conseil comme sa

Mais ça ressemble beaucoup trop à 2012
[spoiler] On commence par faire monter la pression en m’étant en scène la peur du vide. Puis on commence les hostilités avec des effets précurseurs à la destruction massive ensuite on soutient cette tension puis on EXPLOSE tout !!!! (Visuellement c'est 2 villes entières qui passe sous terre ) avec au passage une mise en scène de la peur de la noyade .... [/spoiler] En gros si vous y allez pour des flingues et un scénario pousser (bien que les deux on déjà beaucoup de mal à coexistait) je crois que ce n'est pas la bonne porte.

Moi j'ai aimé… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

ErikTheCriticOct 15, 2018

Though having some really cheesy dialogues and corny storytelling, this movie is surprisingly not that bad, with some pretty intense disasters happening on screen and The Rock being charismatic and likeable as always.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

hornysoulSep 22, 2018

Um filme muito cativante e espetacular com efeitos visuais de arregalar os olhos e com alguns conjuntos de ação bem dirigidos. O melodrama e a história sentimental ficaram bem no plano geral do filme. O elenco é bom, mas o roteiro deixa muitoUm filme muito cativante e espetacular com efeitos visuais de arregalar os olhos e com alguns conjuntos de ação bem dirigidos. O melodrama e a história sentimental ficaram bem no plano geral do filme. O elenco é bom, mas o roteiro deixa muito a desejar. Gostei da atuação de Alexandra Daddario.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

DudeFromIcelandAug 24, 2018

It's a cliche disaster movie and doesn't try to be anything other then that. It's harmless with fun action scenes and some decent performances.

Not spectacular but a serviceable film that has it's moments.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

4

popo13Jul 31, 2018

meta has some serious bugsmeta has some serious bugsmeta has some serious bugsmeta has some serious bugsmeta has some serious bugsmeta has some serious bugsmeta has some serious bugsmeta has some serious bugsmeta has some serious bugsmeta hasmeta has some serious bugsmeta has some serious bugsmeta has some serious bugsmeta has some serious bugsmeta has some serious bugsmeta has some serious bugsmeta has some serious bugsmeta has some serious bugsmeta has some serious bugsmeta has some serious bugsmeta has some serious bugsmeta has some serious bugsmeta has some serious bugs… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

Aladdin718Mar 24, 2018

A good movie to watch once. Dwayne Johnson, the action and view of the cities being destroyed carry the movie.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

ambermdFeb 25, 2018

It does its job as a touching action film, with characters you learn to care about and amazing action sequences; although the score is very odd especially at the beginning of the movie and the acting is barely average with some horribleIt does its job as a touching action film, with characters you learn to care about and amazing action sequences; although the score is very odd especially at the beginning of the movie and the acting is barely average with some horrible British accents thrown in there for the fun of it.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

0

Chiscokid88Oct 15, 2017

Cheesy visual effects, poorly written scripts, forgettable characters, and random scenes that doesn't move the story are ingredients making one of the worst films ever made.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

MonkiReviewsMay 28, 2017

I thought it was great. It started out normal, then became one of the best disaster movies ever. The acting is great, and shines throughout the whole thing. It was amazing.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

3

NoudjuhhMay 21, 2017

Cliche after cliche is what this movie is. Writing this script probably must have taken less than a single hour, because this movie is about the drama and drama only. What is important to me as a viewer is that you start to care about theCliche after cliche is what this movie is. Writing this script probably must have taken less than a single hour, because this movie is about the drama and drama only. What is important to me as a viewer is that you start to care about the characters, but with this movie, you just don't feel anything for them. They are just the main characters in a disaster movie and nothing more.

If you really, and I mean REALLY are into disaster movies, you might give it a try, but otherwise, just skip this one.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

Meth-dudeApr 19, 2017

The movie was stupid, predictable, unbelievable and cliché, but it was fun. I mean you don't watch it expecting a masterpiece and the special effects, the acting and the entertainment were all good enough. It's no masterpiece, but it's a funThe movie was stupid, predictable, unbelievable and cliché, but it was fun. I mean you don't watch it expecting a masterpiece and the special effects, the acting and the entertainment were all good enough. It's no masterpiece, but it's a fun movie to watch.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

S1r-R34lApr 10, 2017

OH, HELL YEAH!!! Now, this is one hell of a thrill'n'spill rollercoaster ride of a BIG Hollywood CGI Movie. Leave your brain at the door and just enjoy.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

ZerpnosMar 5, 2017

Rock'ın başrol oynadığı bir film olan San Andreas, Fay hattında ki kırılmalar ve büyük bir depremin olacağının önceden belirlenmesiyle birlikte aksiyon başlar. Fakat yeteri kadar iyi olmayan hikayesiyle, güzel bir görselliği birleştiren film,Rock'ın başrol oynadığı bir film olan San Andreas, Fay hattında ki kırılmalar ve büyük bir depremin olacağının önceden belirlenmesiyle birlikte aksiyon başlar. Fakat yeteri kadar iyi olmayan hikayesiyle, güzel bir görselliği birleştiren film, ortalama bir seviyeden fazlası olamıyor.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

RalfbergsAug 26, 2016

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This movie has great city destruction scenes and I can only imagine how cool they looked on the big screen. Also the story is interesting to follow. At this point one may ask why only 6 out of 10? Because it has so many unreallistic parts it's crazy, and so many cliches - the good guys win, everyone is where they need to be at the exact moment etc. So you can watch it for the cool shots of city destroying, but the whole story has been overused… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

4

Stargirl04May 15, 2016

I absolutely love natural disaster movies really that like the scariest kind of horror film. However, The Rock just ugh, made it super cheesy and at times definitely made it feel unrealistic. special effects were cool but not much for content. :(

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

adpirtleMay 5, 2016

As a disaster movie, San Andreas works better than some of its recent, big-budget predecessors. That's not to say that it's a great film or anything close to it. The plot is bog standard for the genre, and some of the dialogue is soAs a disaster movie, San Andreas works better than some of its recent, big-budget predecessors. That's not to say that it's a great film or anything close to it. The plot is bog standard for the genre, and some of the dialogue is so predictable that you're likely to get there before the actors at least half the time.

But it looks terrific. If disaster porn isn't your thing, you'll probably be bored, but then why on earth are you watching a Dwayne Johnson film named after a fault line in the first place? Mr. Johnson is, by the way, as fun and charismatic as ever.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

6

VincentDXMar 24, 2016

The movie was entertaining and all, but certainly not very memorable. I feel like the disaster-film genre needs more diverse movies! It's always the same: earthquake, tsunami, etc., with the same basic story over and over again.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

3

nightblade00Mar 22, 2016

*Girl/Woman Screams* ... *crashing sound* ...is what I am sure 75% of the movie's subtitles would look like. Its not good. Repetitive and boring for an action flick. Special effects are great one scene and suck the next. Even the Rock*Girl/Woman Screams* ... *crashing sound* ...is what I am sure 75% of the movie's subtitles would look like. Its not good. Repetitive and boring for an action flick. Special effects are great one scene and suck the next. Even the Rock couldn't save this one from stinking up the joint. If you must watch it, wait until you are on the couch, tired, and don't care if you fall asleep.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

2

PaulystanMar 12, 2016

The ridiculous cliches and set piece script are a given in a disaster film but this one is really bad. That said, if you have never lived through a significant earthquake, this film could be for you. If you have lived through a seriousThe ridiculous cliches and set piece script are a given in a disaster film but this one is really bad. That said, if you have never lived through a significant earthquake, this film could be for you. If you have lived through a serious earthquake, this film will make you a little bit sick in your mouth... But mostly over the screen.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

CineAutoctonoMar 4, 2016

When I saw " San Andreas " giving me the inevitable differences of good and bad.

The good news is that the special effects are very good , Dwayne Johnson an outstanding performance, the best of Dwayne Johnson is his perfomance of aWhen I saw " San Andreas " giving me the inevitable differences of good and bad.

The good news is that the special effects are very good , Dwayne Johnson an outstanding performance, the best of Dwayne Johnson is his perfomance of a superdad to the rescue of his daughter, especially Alexandra Daddario is very pretty, and, incredible recreation of the earthquake , and well destructive.

The downside is the end , I had to make comparisons of this film withthe from "2012 " to " 2012 " there was total destruction , the city of Los Angeles starting to pieces, great, instead " San Andreas " the land shall not be opened in Los Angeles and the development of the story is a little folly.

This is good and bad that I wanted to highlight… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

RickyReviewsFeb 17, 2016

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. San Andreas is a good disaster movie to watch, starring Dwayne Johnson, Alexandria Daddario, and Carla Gugino. The film is about the San Andreas fault line in California going off, triggering a 9.1 in Los Angeles, and a 9.6 in San Francisco. We also get a neat scene in which a 7.1 destroys the Hoover Dam in Nevada. The drama behind the film is Dwayne is estranged to Gugino, but is reunited with her when Daddario is trapped in San Francisco. The two make it from Los Angeles to San Francisco, by helicopter, by stealing a car in Bakersfield, to flying an airplane than a stranger near King City, California offered them for the stolen truck. I won't spoil the rest of the movie, but I will say that it is set in San Francisco for the remainder of the film. The special effects are top notch, possibly the best of any other disaster movie. From the tsunami wave going over the Golden Gate Bridge to the collapse of Los Angeles' AON Center, this film won't disappoint in that factor. However, the cheesy parts with Paul Giamatti brought the movie down to a 9/10. "Who should we call?" asks a CalTech student. "Everybody" whispers Giamatti. Hahaha. Great movie though!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

3

nahtan1244Jan 24, 2016

This movie had all the stereotypes about disaster movies. I don't normally predict whats going to happen in movie but i could predict the ending from a mile away. A tough and able rescue man has a hot daughter who meets a hot boy who getsThis movie had all the stereotypes about disaster movies. I don't normally predict whats going to happen in movie but i could predict the ending from a mile away. A tough and able rescue man has a hot daughter who meets a hot boy who gets into danger who the girl develops an instant love for, building get destroyed however against all odds they save the city and everyone is ok. Pretty predictable if you ask me. Plus i just wasted this movie for you so you won't have to go buy it on DVD. From the trailers i though this was going to be good. Ugh looks can be deceiving.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

3

BarneyOnMTJan 6, 2016

WHAT I LIKED: At the end, its a thrilling gripping rescue tale with amazing special effects, plus the cast set up the characters well
WHAT I DIDN'T LIKE: It was just collapsing building after collapsing building, and it's not particularlyWHAT I LIKED: At the end, its a thrilling gripping rescue tale with amazing special effects, plus the cast set up the characters well
WHAT I DIDN'T LIKE: It was just collapsing building after collapsing building, and it's not particularly inventive or fresh. But mostly it's VERY cheesy and cliched, plus it takes ages to get going.
VERDICT: A cliched, dull, uninventive story packed with CGI that only gets exciting at the end.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

0

eagleeyevikingJan 5, 2016

Campy, stupid, boring and overlong, San Andreas is an absolute disaster for the Rock and others involved that would measure high on the Richter scale.

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

3

EpicLadySpongeJan 4, 2016

Another typical disaster movie for a waste of 114 minutes. Not worth seeing unless you're in it for Dwayne Johnson... then that's a different story I don't want to talk about.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

SlyckNickChickJan 1, 2016

Talk about none stop action. This movie totally was a nail biter for me, and gave slight chills. The possibility (or shall I say when it happens) of this actually happening even makes for a more compelling movie. I really liked it andTalk about none stop action. This movie totally was a nail biter for me, and gave slight chills. The possibility (or shall I say when it happens) of this actually happening even makes for a more compelling movie. I really liked it and would definitely put this on a must much watch a few times. Don't listen to any of the negative reviews out there watch it for yourself and you decide, guaranteed you will not be overly disappointed.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

dekemoviegeekDec 31, 2015

For disaster epic junkies this one fits neatly in the recent genre of Cali destruction, especially one certain famous landmark. The Rock is solid in his expectant cheesy performance as he wrestles with having to save his ex and their daughterFor disaster epic junkies this one fits neatly in the recent genre of Cali destruction, especially one certain famous landmark. The Rock is solid in his expectant cheesy performance as he wrestles with having to save his ex and their daughter from perils of earth shaking proportions. The reference to my required Bay area stop Coit Tower really spoke to me, put on your disbelief suspenders and enjoy the gooey schmaltz!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

0

amirchickkekDec 27, 2015

I thought it was about GTAaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

5

alexbclarkDec 23, 2015

California is destroyed. Millions are dead. Thanks Obama.

All considered, San Andreas is what it’s supposed to be. Loud, dumb and visually spectacular. Without The Rock this movie is probably complete garbage. And even though the movieCalifornia is destroyed. Millions are dead. Thanks Obama.

All considered, San Andreas is what it’s supposed to be. Loud, dumb and visually spectacular. Without The Rock this movie is probably complete garbage. And even though the movie showed disregard to the laws of science, San Andreas is still 1,000,000% more believable than The Rock’s work on Fast & Furious.

You're not watching San Andreas because it's a "good" movie. You're watching it because you want to see The Rock punch an earthquake into submission. If you don't mind shutting your brain off for two hours, San Andreas is fine or whatever.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

3

DCEdmondsNov 30, 2015

"San Andreas" 10 Scale Rating: 3.0 (Bad) ...

The Good: As expected from the trailers, the effects were well done. The scale of the destruction was amazing to see and capture the imagination. As with most disaster films, it was entertaining"San Andreas" 10 Scale Rating: 3.0 (Bad) ...

The Good: As expected from the trailers, the effects were well done. The scale of the destruction was amazing to see and capture the imagination. As with most disaster films, it was entertaining to see landmarks destroyed in creative ways.

The Bad: I don't expect award winning performances from big budget disaster films, but I do expect performances that are at least somewhat decent. I didn't get that here. Dwayne Johnson's undeniable charisma usually makes up for a bad film, but he was wooden and stiff here. His character was poorly written and everything about him was cliche. The rest of the cast was even worse. They tried to cram in personalities and back stories for everyone, but they felt like an afterthought and I didn't care about a single character in the film. Lastly, the film was full of comedic moments that were not meant to be comedic. In fact, every escape and "near miss" action moment caused me to laugh out loud at the absurdity of it all. Epic destruction is all around, yet our leads consistently overcome impossible odds and survive unscathed. You expect and accept this from a film like this to some extent, but they took it way too far and included far too many of these laughable moments.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

3

Fb29Nov 26, 2015

Script is terrible. Worst Paul Giamatti performance ever. Daddario is hot and her boobs are awesome. Special effects pretty good. Overall a bad movie. And I love the rock and awesome boobs, so this should have been targeted right at me.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

smiyamotNov 21, 2015

A good, summer disaster movie. If you don't live in an earthquake zone, this might seem too far fetched. Yes, the movie takes a lot of liberties with science, but it's an action/disaster movie, get over it. We have trapped people to beA good, summer disaster movie. If you don't live in an earthquake zone, this might seem too far fetched. Yes, the movie takes a lot of liberties with science, but it's an action/disaster movie, get over it. We have trapped people to be rescued, scientists "studying" earthquakes, all sorts of impossible feats of daring do. It's the "Poseidon Adventure" or the "Burning Inferno" all over again.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

4

sanyrubNov 15, 2015

Typical disaster movie. Can be entertaining. Don´t look for anything else. Oh and after Mad Max Fury Road this year, all these CGI overload which gets bigger and bigger with the years seems just so unimpressive (if used right it is great, butTypical disaster movie. Can be entertaining. Don´t look for anything else. Oh and after Mad Max Fury Road this year, all these CGI overload which gets bigger and bigger with the years seems just so unimpressive (if used right it is great, but lately it is being too much and the only thing going on in so many of these blockbusters, for example in most of the comic book movies, which have literally nothing else going on for them).… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

5

TheQuietGamerNov 5, 2015

There are a few moments of pretty glorious destruction here. Unfortunately everything else in the movie is just boring and completely predictable. "San Andreas" borrows stale tropes from other disaster movies and mixes in bland charactersThere are a few moments of pretty glorious destruction here. Unfortunately everything else in the movie is just boring and completely predictable. "San Andreas" borrows stale tropes from other disaster movies and mixes in bland characters played by usually talented actors who just aren't trying here.

The family drama that is supposed to make us care about and root for these characters falls flat on it's face. We've seen this stuff before and know exactly how it's going to play out. Maybe it would be a little bit better if these characters didn't suck. They aren't fleshed out at all and they are given some cheesy lines. You can tell the actors know the material they have been given is generic and subpar, because they put forth no effort at all. It makes things harder to watch.

The movie's big moments of destruction can be quite grand and exciting. Some moments of shoddy CGI and special effects are noticeable, but sometimes the shear scope of the chaos onscreen is enough to make us overlook it. It's just a shame there isn't more of it. It takes a little bit for the destruction to start taking place, but once it does it really delivers and doesn't let up for a bit. Unfortunately once it does let up it never really gets that energy again. We are left following the plot which dips into moments of all too familiar melodrama with characters we just don't care about. The film really only has two moments of truly exciting set pieces and the rest just drags on.

It's meant to be an exciting, mayhem filled popcorn flick, but it doesn't deliver enough mayhem. When the city starts to crumble we are treated to exciting spectacle that really is a blast to watch. It's a shame the rest of the film that follows isn't nearly as good. Everything is boring from that point on and makes this a movie not worth recommending. You've seen this disaster movie before, and it was more exciting then. Maybe not as pretty, but certainly more fun.

I give "San Andreas" a 5.5/10.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

6

WJSOct 31, 2015

Spectacular, eye-popping visual effect and some well directed action set pieces highlight this at times overwrought, melodramatic and over sentimental story. It's a well cast but the script leaves a lot to be desired.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

SchroederRockOct 23, 2015

It's big and it rarely takes a moment of pause - San Andreas is a massive disaster movie that has been done several times before, but it doesn't displace the awe that comes with destruction on such incredible scale. You won't find any OscarIt's big and it rarely takes a moment of pause - San Andreas is a massive disaster movie that has been done several times before, but it doesn't displace the awe that comes with destruction on such incredible scale. You won't find any Oscar performances here, just a roller coaster ride that carries enough twists and turns, ups and downs, to satisfy the thrill seeker in its intended audiences. The best part, from a science standpoint, is that these aren't just mindless earthquakes but sequential seismic events that are all a part of the fault-line that so many people in the Western United States are watching closely for the biggest disaster moment of the last century. Whether or not it will be quite THIS bad is anyone's guess, but San Andreas does a lot to walk through some of the scenarios that people might fact should something this horrific ever strike near home. Anyone walking into this should know what to expect and, if you do, you shouldn't be disappointed.… Expand

2 of 2 users found this helpful20

All this user's reviews

6

SnowDayOct 20, 2015

San Andreas was entertaining enough and great to make fun of, however I wished it would have had the balls to make fun of itself. It did not have those balls.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

4

BrianMcCriticOct 15, 2015

A disaster movie that makes the script to a Roland Emmerich movie look Oscar worthy. Don't get me wrong it's not a complete mess, but not even The Rock's charm and charisma can save this film from being a pretty big bore. C-

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

1

djniceyOct 12, 2015

I've seen some dumb B movies, but this one has to be among the very worst. The acting is wooden, the plot must have taken about 2 minutes to write, it has the most ridiculously stupid and clichéd scenes and some truly cringe-worthy dialogue.I've seen some dumb B movies, but this one has to be among the very worst. The acting is wooden, the plot must have taken about 2 minutes to write, it has the most ridiculously stupid and clichéd scenes and some truly cringe-worthy dialogue. The film is so bad its unintentionally funny.

The only disaster in this film is the movie itself.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

OzzieVikingOct 8, 2015

Absolutely great movie but it feels recycled. I really wouldn't take the kiddies to see this movie because they will have brown pants at the end and nightmares for a year. Dwayne Johnson's acting was far superior in this movie to Fast andAbsolutely great movie but it feels recycled. I really wouldn't take the kiddies to see this movie because they will have brown pants at the end and nightmares for a year. Dwayne Johnson's acting was far superior in this movie to Fast and Furious 7 and it truly shows that a summer disaster movie can open up a person's acting skill.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

8

Closeremperor16Oct 3, 2015

Seriously guys stop comparing this film to 2012!! Disaster movies have been around for a long time and they are ALL pretty similar. The biggest difference with this film is that the rock is way more likable a lead then john Cussack.

ThisSeriously guys stop comparing this film to 2012!! Disaster movies have been around for a long time and they are ALL pretty similar. The biggest difference with this film is that the rock is way more likable a lead then john Cussack.

This film knows what it is trying to be and it does it well, the plot is simple but takes time to flesh out the characters and the rock carries the emotional side plots with his family very well.

The action is well staged and looks great and the film manages to be thrilling the whole way through with a touch of heart and some simple character development.

All in all this a good example of a big budget disaster movie with solid performances and a simple but engaging premise.

And regarding 2012, that film had some good set pieces sure but it was strung together with lazy writing , annoying characters and a garbled confusing plot and terrible pacing.

San Andreas is the simple entertaining disaster movie that 2012 should have been.

If you ever liked disaster movies and just want to see a good example of one then watch this film. It isn't a cinematic master piece but it was never trying to be and it is a hell of a lot better then 2012 (I hate that film 3.5 out of ten).… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

7

horizonbtsSep 29, 2015

This is a fun disaster movie, with all the thrills and frills! If your expecting academy award performances, then this isn't the movie for you. If your expecting over the top actions, good special effects, with an average storyline-that isThis is a fun disaster movie, with all the thrills and frills! If your expecting academy award performances, then this isn't the movie for you. If your expecting over the top actions, good special effects, with an average storyline-that is atypical of movies like this then go ahead watch and enjoy. All in all it was what I expected, but still enjoyable, I will say some of the special effects and super human type efforts were just a tad bit over the top… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

2

beingryanjudeSep 26, 2015

There are far worse premises for a blockbuster action film. But when you mix it with mostly shoddy special effects, god-awful dialogue and some very questionable acting... you have another disappointing Dwayne Johnson film.

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

6

ConnorkirkerSep 20, 2015

San Andreas is good with the special effects. But the plot is overstuffed and the characters is just not that thrilling. But Dwayne Johnson has a great performance in the movie.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

8

sexyanneSep 15, 2015

The effects are very realistic and I had so much fun watching this movie. It felt so real.

Watch it here for free http://www.watchfree.to/watch-2a3aa8-San-Andreas-movie-online-free-putlocker.html

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

4

csw12Sep 5, 2015

I'll take a wild guess and say the writers spent no more than a day on the script because the best way to describe anything but the action sequences is pathetic. Its borderline embarrassing in parts and silly. The movie works better when theI'll take a wild guess and say the writers spent no more than a day on the script because the best way to describe anything but the action sequences is pathetic. Its borderline embarrassing in parts and silly. The movie works better when the camera shows the larger picture instead of the personal view of lousy characters. Oh did I mention its the biggest cliche movie of all time? .… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

5

VercodaSep 4, 2015

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Opening with a clumsily executed car crash (dumb, careless - if not selfish - driver + unconvincing CGi = a weak opening), at least San Andreas didn't take long to set The Rock up as The Nicest And Most Understanding Guy Ever. No wonder his wife left him; short of singing with nuns or stroking kittens, The Rock's utter niceness was laid on too much.

Moving swiftly on - subtly hammering home product placement shots repeatedly throughout the film (I think... I should buy... Apple products...), and San Andreas turned in an averagely entertaining disaster film, albeit odd that, curiously, left this viewer feeling slightly underwhelmed in the epic disaster stakes. Oh, sure, there are some heat set pieces here and there - with an awful, awful lot of expositi- sorry, 'character development' to sit though.

The film's final act had me distractedly wondering what kind of kick-ass speedboat they'd been lucky enough to find - nothing, and I mean Nothing, could give its engine/blades Any difficulty as it went full pelt through an earthquake and tsunami ravaged city, with unimaginable debris everywhere - while The Rock continued his Most Amazing Superdad shtick to the end.

Ultimately, sure, San Andreas was entertaining, but despite the spectacle it underwhelms, ever so slightly shortchanging the audience. Throw in a little too much talk, one astoundingly lucky coincidence after another, overt product placement, and - sorry, guys - a couple of miscast British leads, and San Andreas doesn't make a particularly durable impression (at least 2012 knew it was pure silliness - its destruction of LA is more eye-popping than San Andreas). However, The Rock was as watchable as ever, and the daughter in the film was pretty great (a nice turn from the actress, and decent scripting, considering), with both doing a lot to boost the film's otherwise paper-thin characters.

Overall, San Andreas will leave you shaken, not stirred.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

0

yashdanAug 30, 2015

Such such SUCH a stupid movie!!!

The effects are maybe the only good things in this movie! The story is soooooo lame!

Why i have to write 150 characters when i can sum it up in a few words?!

3 of 4 users found this helpful31

All this user's reviews

0

ThePutinatorAug 29, 2015

In the realm of stupid movies, there is but one King. San Andreas the First, and let's pray there's never a second one. The only good aspect of this movie are Alexandra Daddario's **** bouncing around.

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

6

tvnewsguidoAug 28, 2015

It was about what I expected.

The filmmakers just kept throwing things at their heroes in order to block them as they try to accomplish the thing they need to accomplish. It's an old school disaster flick with all the tropes thatIt was about what I expected.

The filmmakers just kept throwing things at their heroes in order to block them as they try to accomplish the thing they need to accomplish.

It's an old school disaster flick with all the tropes that entails. It's a big screen action thing with nice characters that you feel good about cheering for.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

MovieGuysAug 22, 2015

A worthwhile action movie with some great CGI, San Andreas does feel a little bit too similar to "2012", but is good nonetheless. The plot and the script is below usual standards, but the film makes up for it in special effects andA worthwhile action movie with some great CGI, San Andreas does feel a little bit too similar to "2012", but is good nonetheless. The plot and the script is below usual standards, but the film makes up for it in special effects and explosions- isn't that why you came to see it in the first place?… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

0

XDMetalbabeAug 5, 2015

The worst movie I've seen so far for 2015. The special effects aren't so special. Actually they are pretty lame and boring. What a waste of time and money.

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

10

moviecritic_Jul 29, 2015

AMAZING is the only word I can use to describe this. I would rate this the best movie of may 2015. Drama cliffhanger-placed movie, which keeps you at the edge of your seat. Would recommend to everyone 11+

5 of 13 users found this helpful58

All this user's reviews

8

Dishonored2Jul 25, 2015

I really like this Movie,amazing special effects,But this Movie is just about to The Rock and is Daughter and the
Disaster,but i pay 4 Euro in Cinema city

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

6

Jim222001Jul 23, 2015

San Andreas has all the disaster movies cliches. Such as a family trying to reunite during a crisis; that we even saw in Godzilla last year for instance.
You also have the Rock of course having to be there for his ex wife (Carla Gugino) andSan Andreas has all the disaster movies cliches. Such as a family trying to reunite during a crisis; that we even saw in Godzilla last year for instance.
You also have the Rock of course having to be there for his ex wife (Carla Gugino) and be the hero she and her daughter needs. While Gugino's new boyfriend of course is a coward. The Rock and Gugino some how finding time to discuss where their marriage went wrong is also pretty cliche.
However the movie has great cgi and plenty of exciting gripping moments. While the Rock and Carla Gugino (Spy Kids) work well together and they should; this is like their 3rd movie together. I was into the movie throughout despite deja vu from many disaster films that have come before it.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

7

FamilyGuy117Jul 18, 2015

What more can you say... The Rock and a Disaster movie!!!

It had all you need and some more.Plus in 3D, wow!!!!!!!

I can't wait till it comes out on Blu Ray...

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

6

duncan1964Jul 16, 2015

For those of us who remember the disaster movies of the 70's and 80's this is a nice little time warp movie. The San Andreas fault is opening up and The Rock is the only one who can save us, with nothing more than a helicopter, a speedboatFor those of us who remember the disaster movies of the 70's and 80's this is a nice little time warp movie. The San Andreas fault is opening up and The Rock is the only one who can save us, with nothing more than a helicopter, a speedboat and grim determination. The cliches are all present and correct, as are the gaping plot holes and stereotypical characters only this time with a whole bunch of CGI magic to make it look ultra real. Forgettable popcorn fodder.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

1

michalhullukJul 2, 2015

The movie was so bad and I mean it. The only good thing was about special effects, so I suggest to cut down all the other scenes and then the movie would last for 30 minutes and then you could go home. I am glad I have watched the movie withThe movie was so bad and I mean it. The only good thing was about special effects, so I suggest to cut down all the other scenes and then the movie would last for 30 minutes and then you could go home. I am glad I have watched the movie with my unlimited cinema card, so I did not have to pay anything extra. Bland stupid plot, unrealistic to the extreme, horrible acting, very predictable, lack of any depth.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

6

AliceofXJun 30, 2015

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The film begins with a scene of a careless driver who seems to have no regard for her safety and well being, or that of others. If you were in the mood to search for deeper meanings in a supposedly dumb action flick this is almost a subtle introduction to the story. The film's disaster earthquake that wrecks everything could be taken as symbolic for Ray and Emma's divorce and the damage that the separation of families does to children.

That said, this is about as deep as the story goes. As is typical of action movies the action takes the front seat instead of the plot and in San Andreas it is just exciting enough to make you ignore the plot weaknesses. If anything San Andreas could have done with less unnecessary back story and cringe worthy dialogue.

Particularly the worst part would have to be the Malory Talk where it gets all dramatic as Ray is talking with Emma about their dead daughter. It is just so out of tone with the rest of the film. And of course I did not think for one second that Blake was actually going to die.

Overall San Andreas is an enjoyable action flick that is fun to watch but nothing too special that you would have to rush to the cinema to see it.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

5

TheDude-Jun 29, 2015

San andreas has some cool special effects but the characters are poorly written, most of the performances were stale and awful, the one liners were cheesy as hell and every single 90s disaster film cliché makes an appearance in san andreas.San andreas has some cool special effects but the characters are poorly written, most of the performances were stale and awful, the one liners were cheesy as hell and every single 90s disaster film cliché makes an appearance in san andreas.
Overall: Stupid movie with some cool special effects… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

5

diogomendesJun 28, 2015

A superb cast and entertaining destruction can't make up for the movie's likable, yet underwritten characters and preposterous plot, but it still works as a reasonably standard popcorn entertainment.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

3

RoraEstJun 28, 2015

It's just easily survival movie. That's why I never doubt how 'The Day After Tomorrow' is better. Somehow, I wonder if there's a video game to survival from natural disasters. I bet that video game is better than this one.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

1

SimpsonsJun 27, 2015

There's nothing to say about this movie...visually spectacular and "somewhat" entertaining but with a lazy and superficial script that gives ZERO development to the characters to follow this earthquake journey. Even Dwayne Johnson's charismaThere's nothing to say about this movie...visually spectacular and "somewhat" entertaining but with a lazy and superficial script that gives ZERO development to the characters to follow this earthquake journey. Even Dwayne Johnson's charisma is not worth of our money and time but well, we already knew what would be this movie, a Hollywood dumb disaster movie. What surprises me is why so many people watched this poop...… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

9

NatT96Jun 23, 2015

It was a solid experience, a couple hitches in the plot and the actions done by Johnson. I would have to say it did keep me interesting, despite the crap load of cliches it had.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

7

WheelzFourReelzJun 23, 2015

It's cheesy, predictable, incredibly cliché, and honestly pretty dumb, but San Andreas is a lot of fun to watch with solid performances, amazing visuals, and powerful sound design.

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

4

chugheadJun 21, 2015

Another apocalyptic disaster summer film. It has to fit in there somewhere to skim off the rest of the blockbuster successes. San Andreas is like Donald Trump running as a presidential candidate to crash the party just to get attention andAnother apocalyptic disaster summer film. It has to fit in there somewhere to skim off the rest of the blockbuster successes. San Andreas is like Donald Trump running as a presidential candidate to crash the party just to get attention and recognition, but not to be taking seriously. It makes 9/11 look like a ****… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

6

WillColeJun 20, 2015

This film may have an amazing use of special effects but the boring storyline that could have been easily more action packed spoiled it. The whole film is basically 'The Rock' moving from one vehicle to another until he eventually saves hisThis film may have an amazing use of special effects but the boring storyline that could have been easily more action packed spoiled it. The whole film is basically 'The Rock' moving from one vehicle to another until he eventually saves his daughter in a not even a tiny bit exciting ending. This film could of been much more suspenseful and could of used a better director and a few better actors.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

kivayugimotoJun 20, 2015

A good action disaster movie starring the Rock; who was great in the film. The movie also starred Alexandria Daddario (of True Detective fame) as the daughter of the Rock character, and she was also great in the movie. If you want to have aA good action disaster movie starring the Rock; who was great in the film. The movie also starred Alexandria Daddario (of True Detective fame) as the daughter of the Rock character, and she was also great in the movie. If you want to have a good time seeing an action movie, this is one to see. The movie also showcased some San Francisco landmarks, an area we were going to visit the following week.… Expand

3 of 3 users found this helpful30

All this user's reviews

8

CP30Jun 18, 2015

I can't believe this movie received such bad reviews! I thought it was great! It had action, it made me laugh a little, & above all else it made me cry and I mean like ball out crying. Carla Gugino who played the mom was so believable whenI can't believe this movie received such bad reviews! I thought it was great! It had action, it made me laugh a little, & above all else it made me cry and I mean like ball out crying. Carla Gugino who played the mom was so believable when she thought she lost another child she literally broke my heart. Not to mention it makes you think how you shouldn't take anyone or anything for granted bc you never know what can happen.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

1

Zack2981Jun 15, 2015

If you like pretty good special effects and scenes of major landmarks being decimated in the same cheesy vein as Independence Day, then you may very well enjoy San Andreas. If you enjoy things that most movies are required to have (likeIf you like pretty good special effects and scenes of major landmarks being decimated in the same cheesy vein as Independence Day, then you may very well enjoy San Andreas. If you enjoy things that most movies are required to have (like story, believable characters, and plot points that make sense) you most likely will not. There is nothing even remotely original or interesting about this movie and if you've ever seen any disaster movie before then you already know how the "family dynamic" story played out. Emphasis on "played out".

There is a certain amount of cheese and silliness that I am willing to take in my action movies but the sheer amount of contempt and disdain that San Andreas shows for its audience overshadows anything that could have otherwise been enjoyable. The dialogue is perfunctory at best and the plot points are so completely ludicrous that you feel kind of like an idiot just suspending your disbelief to go along for the ride. This movie is designed for those who don't want to think while watching their movies. If you are quite content not using your brain whatsoever, then by all means go check out San Andreas. However, if you find cookie-cutter characters who always make exactly the right decisions based on no information and sheer luck then you'll probably find this movie as insufferable as I did. And I'm a Rock fan! But not even that can make me okay with this stupid, horrible, insulting excuse for a movie. All of the positive reviews for this movie (which I'm shocked by, frankly) seem to have been written by teenagers who have never seen special effects before. Because they're actually NOT THAT GREAT! I mean, if you want to watch The Rock boating through what could be a very cool video game background, then you can see that here. And yeah, the earthquake stuff looks cool. But in the end, that's all it is. A bunch of shaking around with absolutely nothing of substance holding it up.

Skip this one.… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

6

theofficeJun 13, 2015

The movie is OK. I mean you know what you are getting when you walk in (lots of major disaster type situations with "the rock" saving the day). The movie is a roller coaster and does it well. Sure the situations the characters survive isThe movie is OK. I mean you know what you are getting when you walk in (lots of major disaster type situations with "the rock" saving the day). The movie is a roller coaster and does it well. Sure the situations the characters survive is completely impossible but honestly if it wasn't that way the movie wouldn't be good at all. The one guy that bothered me was the scientist. He really wasn't a good actor and the character himself seem too detached from the world around him to seem believable.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

BrantonJun 11, 2015

San Andreas is a serviceable disaster flick. There is nothing particularly thrilling, enjoyable, or inspiring, not even with the aid of the new 4Dx. The film plays on the common ground of many disaster flicks dating back to Titanic (1997).

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

TheFallen1GOTHJun 9, 2015

The movie itself is fantastic, but not necessarily Oscar-worthy. It contains quite a few cliches here and there, but for the most part, if you're wanting to pass 2 hours by, this movie is for you. It's loud and intense. For the people thatThe movie itself is fantastic, but not necessarily Oscar-worthy. It contains quite a few cliches here and there, but for the most part, if you're wanting to pass 2 hours by, this movie is for you. It's loud and intense. For the people that say this movie isn't realistic, they're basically saying that a huge mega-quake (like the one that happened near Japan in 2011) apparently won't happen.

Don't rely on my opinion though. You have your own. Just don't tell us that like the movie to neuter ourselves because we simply liked it.… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

8

goldfinchJun 7, 2015

The Rock and company give convincing performances and are likable. The effects are very good. Just enough character development is provided to give the stunts some real heft. Recommended.

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

1

bradchengJun 7, 2015

California, in the words of Steely Dan, tumbles into the sea and "San Andreas" somehow manages to make it boring. The inept script for "San Andreas" has less verbal fireworks than your average made for TV movie and possibly less than aCalifornia, in the words of Steely Dan, tumbles into the sea and "San Andreas" somehow manages to make it boring. The inept script for "San Andreas" has less verbal fireworks than your average made for TV movie and possibly less than a tupperware party. In a nutshell, "San Andreas'" completely brain-dead script focuses on the "original" story of a steroid+collage infused couple -- who are "nearly" divorced --being swept together by massive catastrophe. That weary chestnut is complimented by a bevy of equally "original" characters like cowardly rich guys; moronic youngster who fall in love within 5 seconds, and knowing scientists who take hours to start shouting "Take cover": This movie has everything you want in an utterly cliched movie and more. One of the most laughably bad scripts I've had to sit though in a long time. And people around here poke fun at "Interstellar?" This is a reminder how we need to fall down on our knees and praise movies like "Interstellar" that at least try to say something smart. At least if the effects in "San Andreas" were worth waiting out the doldrums, it might have made sitting through the movie worthwhile, but they weren't even that good. Just average computer bits showering down all over the place. And you know the pace: SPFX -- talk -- SPFX -- talk --- and talk -- and talk. And what talk. Who writes scripts like "San Andreas" -- some rich producer's wife while she's having her nails done, chatting on the phone and watching a Lifetime movie? Once can only sit and scoff at the jello for lines the actors are given to work with. Even the mass of muscle known as The Rock looked weak and helpless about making this dog work. Even worse, it manages to make the smartest actor in Hollywood, Paul Giamatti look like an eyeball rolling puffin -- whose magical computer model predicts the end of the West Coast but doesn't tell him to at least put a call into a disaster agency to share the news. Word to director: When you're filming the apocalypse, next time try not to shoot the whole thing in medium closeup -- just ready for that leap to TV where it belongs. Poor TV.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

7

ReysonPointJun 7, 2015

San Andreas is big, loud, cheesy, and filled with clichés but boy Is it a fun movie. The film revolves around veteran Ray Gaines played by Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson (The Scorpion King, The Fast and the Furious) who after years of serving inSan Andreas is big, loud, cheesy, and filled with clichés but boy Is it a fun movie. The film revolves around veteran Ray Gaines played by Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson (The Scorpion King, The Fast and the Furious) who after years of serving in Afghanistan returns and works as a helicopter pilot for the Los Angeles Fire Department. As the movie continues we learn that Ray Gaines is taking some time off from work in order to take his daughter Blake played by Alexandra Daddario (Percy Jackson, Texas Chainsaw Massacre 3D) to her first week of college. However, Ray’s plans get interrupted by the destruction of the Hoover Dam, forcing him and his Rescue Team to go to work. Upon his arrival, he finds that various earthquakes are starting to happen all over the San Andreas Fault that is affecting the entire state of California. As the earthquakes continue to occur, Ray’s ex-wife played by actress Carla Gugino (Watchmen, Night in the Museum, Sin City) and his daughter Blake become endangered, therefore he must come to their rescue. Along with these characters, we also have Lawrence a seismologist, played by Paul Giamatti (Sideways, 12 Years A Slave) who plays a key role in the film. Lawrence’s main goal is to inform the citizens of California to evacuate and find shelter during this disaster.

As a film, San Andreas is not a masterpiece by any means, but I can assure you that it is an absolute blast to watch on a big screen. The effects team behind this movie did an excellent job bringing the disaster onto the big screen. A lot of the destruction scenes looked sharp, especially the Tsunami scene that “The Rock” Johnson goes against in his boat.

As for the performances in the film, they were not as bad as I expected. Dwayne Johnson steals the show like always thanks to his charismatic attitude and presence on screen. And let’s be honest, if he was not in San Andreas, the movie would be a complete disaster. So props to Mr. Johnson for that. As for the rest of the cast, no one really stood out to me. One of the major problems seen consistently throughout the film was the horrible script written by Carlton Cuse (Lost, Bates Motel) and Andre Fabrizio (Vice, The Prince). Thankfully there were times that the horrible screenplay was forgotten, due to Dwayne’s charm.

Overall, San Andreas has proven to be time well spent at the movies. To truly enjoy this one, you simply have to make sure to turn off your brain, let go, and enjoy this disastrous wild ride.

Final Score: 7/10… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

1

shpostalJun 7, 2015

I love my wife and it's only because of that fact that I was willing to see any movie with Dwayne Johnson, who makes Keanu Reeves look like he's overacting by comparison. There's a reason they call crap like "San Andreas" disasterI love my wife and it's only because of that fact that I was willing to see any movie with Dwayne Johnson, who makes Keanu Reeves look like he's overacting by comparison. There's a reason they call crap like "San Andreas" disaster movies, and it has nothing to do with earthquakes or tidal waves.
Hideously horrible acting and an even worse script guarantee this will be a stinker worthy of Mystery Science Theater. Yes, the special effects were done pretty well, but computer animation does all the work nowadays, and how hard is it to screw up demolition? If you want to see a city suffer, watch the most recent Godzilla movie. That had the lighting and fear down pat, where this flick was about as moving as watching a leaf fall off a tree. So that being said, here's what I'd rather do than EVER go to a Dwayne Johnson movie again:

Be held without charges in a Libyan jail.
Lie in state.
Listen to an accountant's lecture at a convention.
Jump into a pool full of wet cat food.
Listen to nothing but Bob Dylan for 24 hours without a break.

Get the idea?… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

8

MadMaxFuryRoadJun 7, 2015

You will either like San Andreas or hate it. I personally liked it but found it very loud and long. But Dwayne Johnson is awesome in this film and Alexandria Daddario is amazing and her boyfriend is too. You will also find some laughter andYou will either like San Andreas or hate it. I personally liked it but found it very loud and long. But Dwayne Johnson is awesome in this film and Alexandria Daddario is amazing and her boyfriend is too. You will also find some laughter and outstanding special effects.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

10

LesdionJun 7, 2015

WOOOOOOOOW!!!! Best describes the movie in EVERY way, and it best describes my reaction from the preposterous reviews the movie is getting!!!! I've been accurate on 12 of past 15 best pictue winners. Will usually read reviews before optingWOOOOOOOOW!!!! Best describes the movie in EVERY way, and it best describes my reaction from the preposterous reviews the movie is getting!!!! I've been accurate on 12 of past 15 best pictue winners. Will usually read reviews before opting in on a theater visit, but on San Andreas i didnt. The Rock, action flic, plenty of popcorn CGI...honestly wasn't expecting much,but man was i wrong.....TOTALLY blown away!!! Best special effects EVER! Best action & suspense EVER! Most surprising was how the director was able to let the acting, script, and family backstory/lovestory trump the incredible action sequences!!!! Much like the Deccaprio Winslet backstory in Titanic found a way to trump the ship's demise, the character development, and outstanding acting found a way to do the same in San Andreas!!! No Titanic, but in my book....this one deserves a WHOLE lot more respect than it's getting!!! SO SAD that with its poor critical reviews, this work of art will never receive its due rewards & accolades.....can anybody say.."300". Lastly, if it had more blood, guts, foul language, and nudity???? I guarantee you'd be seeing rave reviews....that might be the saddest part of all.… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

9

BarbulousJun 6, 2015

If you're the type that enjoys an epic disaster flick once in a while you will like this one. Some of the best effects ever and the acting was better than some are saying. Alexandra and Carla were very easy on the eyes. DJ was cool, and PaulIf you're the type that enjoys an epic disaster flick once in a while you will like this one. Some of the best effects ever and the acting was better than some are saying. Alexandra and Carla were very easy on the eyes. DJ was cool, and Paul Giamatti is one of my favorites (Sideways). Don't believe the red flag whiners, this movie was solid and everything it was supposed to be. I'm giving a 9 to make up for the haters.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

5

bigtunaonfilmJun 6, 2015

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This film had some amazing special effects and cinematography, and some pretty good performances from The Rock and Paul Giamatti, but that is about where the cinematic praise stops. The plot followed every single cliché in the book. I could predict what happened to each character when they were first introduced. Some of the things that happened in the film were physically impossible for a human to do and still live. The Rock passes by hundreds of people that he could have easily helped, but doesn't. That being said, this is still a very, very fun time at the movies. So if you want a movie that is Oscar-worthy, stay away, but if you want an awesome action popcorner, this is for you.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

1

donnelbrJun 5, 2015

This movie was terrible. Granted I went to the theater high, and so I actually enjoyed it. But the screenplay, directing, plot/story, and acting can be characterized by words such as lazy, formulaic, uninteresting, etc. The group thatThis movie was terrible. Granted I went to the theater high, and so I actually enjoyed it. But the screenplay, directing, plot/story, and acting can be characterized by words such as lazy, formulaic, uninteresting, etc. The group that produced this film was completely taking the piss out of the audience, the majority of whom they clearly expect to be on the wrong side of 100 IQ. I too was laughing out loud in many parts because the dialogue was so ridiculous and apathetically delivered. It's like the actors didn't take their delivery of dialogue too seriously to save themselves the embarrassment of looking like they're trying to make it work. But hey, as long as we keep paying for movies like this, the studios will keep making them. Shame on us, really.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

9

Creed_x_SlayerJun 4, 2015

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I must admit, I loved the movie. I found very little wrong with it, except there were a few parts in particular that I felt were not explained well enough. I did not appreciate the one scientist dying for the knowledge of understanding and predicting Earthquakes before we understood what it was he was working towards. Also the entire time I was in the theatre I felt that the game would be geared mostly towards the Earthquake, but considering it was supposed to be the biggest quake ever recorded I was upset at how little it was actually shown. I feel like the tsunami completely shadowed over the main quake. 9 out of 10, Great story and acting. Needs work on the disaster front though.… Expand

2 of 6 users found this helpful24

All this user's reviews

6

pguimsJun 4, 2015

Like most recent disaster movies, San Andreas is loud. It’s wildly noisy and action sequences just run one after another, leaving us catching our breaths. Who can breathe when tragedies seem non-stop? Though it becomes overkill and indulgent,Like most recent disaster movies, San Andreas is loud. It’s wildly noisy and action sequences just run one after another, leaving us catching our breaths. Who can breathe when tragedies seem non-stop? Though it becomes overkill and indulgent, the movie is undeniably exciting, bracing and intense. Broken roads and bridge (oh Golden Gate!), collapsing skyscrapers and structures (oh Hoover Dam!), mile-high waves, ship crashing into buildings and almost all elements of an exhilarating disaster film are present in San Andreas. Combined with realistic and awe-inspiring CGI effects, the movie is visually amusing.

However, San Andreas just banks on being entertaining. It has no solid plot and character development. As much as the film lightly rests on scientific truth, its plot is too shallow and dense. There are moments where innocent people get swept in the catastrophe. They should have been touching but they are not because it feels that the movie has no sense of human loss, of death and of its misery.

Sadly, the actors are not helpful as well. Johnson’s popping muscles, Gugino’s elegant grace and Daddario’s pretty face are attractive on scream but their performance falls short of being appealing. They don’t strike any chemistry and they simply look like a bunch of Hollywood stars running on rubbles or practicing impromptu stunts. Even in serious scenes when the audience should have shed a tear or two for them, they won’t because those moments are far from being moving but too close to being cheesy.

San Andreas is a good movie to watch while gulping a bottle of beer or munching some potato chips or popcorn. It only explores the emotion of being thrilled and high. But if you are up to something profound or even close to heart-wrenching or mind-boggling, better take your beer or chips and find something else.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews