Requiem for the American Dream

Name: Requiem for the American Dream
Genre: Biography, Documentary, News
Released: January 29, 2016
Duration: 73 min

2016

METASCORE

No score yet based on 3 Critic Reviews Awaiting 1 more review

tbd

USER SCORE

Universal acclaim based on 12 Ratings

See All

8.8

VOTE NOW

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

8.8	Your Score
8.8	User Score Universal acclaim based on 12 Ratings

Would you like to write a review?

There is a 75 character minimum for reviews. If your review contains spoilers, please check the Spoiler box. Please do not use ALL CAPS. There is no linking or other HTML allowed. Your review may be edited for content. 0/5000

Check box if your review contains spoilers

Play Sound

Please enter your birth date to watch this video:

You are not allowed to view this material at this time.

Requiem for the American Dream

Now Playing: Requiem for the American Dream

Movie Details & Credits

Gravitas Ventures | Release Date: January 29, 2016 | Not Rated

Summary: Requiem for the American Dream is the definitive discourse with Noam Chomsky, widely regarded as the most important intellectual alive, on the defining characteristic of our time - the deliberate concentration of wealth and power in the hands of a select few. Through interviews filmed over four years, Chomsky unpacks the principles thatRequiem for the American Dream is the definitive discourse with Noam Chomsky, widely regarded as the most important intellectual alive, on the defining characteristic of our time - the deliberate concentration of wealth and power in the hands of a select few. Through interviews filmed over four years, Chomsky unpacks the principles that have brought us to the crossroads of historically unprecedented inequality - tracing a half- century of policies designed to favor the most wealthy at the expense of the majority - while also looking back on his own life of activism and political participation. Profoundly personal and thought provoking, Chomsky provides penetrating insight into what may well be the lasting legacy of our time - the death of the middle class, and swan song of functioning democracy.… Expand

Director: Jared P. Scott and Kelly Nyks and Peter D. Hutchison

Genre(s): Biography, Documentary, News

Rating: Not Rated

Runtime: 73 min

See All Details and Credits

Watch Now

Buy on

Stream On

Expand

Metascore

tbd

Positive:

Mixed:

Negative:

Critic Reviews

Mick LaSalle

Mar 3, 2016

An entertaining film. Few will agree with every word spoken, but Chomsky’s vision of history is worth encountering and considering. Read full review

RogerEbert.com Godfrey Cheshire

Jan 29, 2016

The result is a film that feels less like a lecture than a provocative X-ray of current American political realities. Read full review

Daniel M. Gold

Jan 28, 2016

[A] well-paced and cogent seminar. Read full review

SEE ALL 3 REVIEWS

Write a Review

Negative:

User Reviews

I8yourreview

May 11, 2016

This sobering and understated documentary offers a much need dose of reality aimed at fostering a working class consciousness. Noam Chomsky's analysis of contemporary politics and society is, as always, pointed, unflinching and enlightening. Any progressive, humanist, activist or publicThis sobering and understated documentary offers a much need dose of reality aimed at fostering a working class consciousness. Noam Chomsky's analysis of contemporary politics and society is, as always, pointed, unflinching and enlightening. Any progressive, humanist, activist or public advocate would do well to take this film in, and do so more than once.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

OlalaBanana

May 10, 2016

This documentary is a little low on tempo, but explains in a great visual way what people talk about when they talk about the 'dissapearing middle class' and the one percent of the one percent. the visuals are cute, the message is distressing to say the least. Noam Chomsky explains to theThis documentary is a little low on tempo, but explains in a great visual way what people talk about when they talk about the 'dissapearing middle class' and the one percent of the one percent. the visuals are cute, the message is distressing to say the least. Noam Chomsky explains to the viewer how society has changed over the last century or so and does everything in his power to explain to us how on earth we got where we are now.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

MeritCoba

May 22, 2016

It is hard to level criticism at a documentary that has the famous Noam Chomsky as spokesperson in it. Who am I to naysay a man who knows more, has experienced more, means more and has more written all over. But this, in a strange manner, works both ways. When a documentary is out to proofIt is hard to level criticism at a documentary that has the famous Noam Chomsky as spokesperson in it. Who am I to naysay a man who knows more, has experienced more, means more and has more written all over. But this, in a strange manner, works both ways. When a documentary is out to proof something, accepting such because Chomsky says so sets us up for a fallacy called speaking from authority. But before continuing on: what is the documentary about anyway?

This documentary is trying to make the case that there is some kind of conspiracy to kill democracy and the American dream. It is not a documentary trying to give you an insight in the theories of Chomsky for instance or trying to give you an overview of his career. In fact Chomsky, being a linguist, is treading outside his area of expertise. We are in the land of economics, politics and power-mongers in general. Which doesn't mean that he has noting valid to say, but it is really a pity that what he seems to have revolutionized isn't being talked about or used. Linguistics, the use of language, is a powerful way to shape the world around us for it is the way we get to know the world. You can read books like 1984 or How to read Donald Duck to get and idea. Mind you that me naming them doesn't mean that I agree with the contents, it merely to give you examples.

The documentary is split in two parts. One with figures and charts that show how the divide between the rich and the rest of the country dramatically changes over the decades. It shows how all kinds of restraints and controls on banks and other financial institutions have been done away with. It shows how the labor unions declined and so on. It tries to make the case that power is getting monopolized. And this all commented upon by Chomsky. And there is nothing wrong with this as far as I can determine. .

It is the second part however that made me pause. It is where the documentary and Chomsky try to suggest that all of this is deliberate and aimed at undermining democracy and the American dream to the benefit... of who actually and planned by whom?
And here is the weakness of the documentary which is profound. Who are those people, Chomsky? Only a flimsy piece of evidence is given, which is where Chomsky strongly suggests that Alan Greenspan admitted in an open inquiry to promoting worker insecurity. I was baffled at this, for what use is a conspiracy that openly reveals itself and thus admits to being one? And as a matter of fact, it wasn't what Chomsky said it was. And Chomsky was even challenged on this back in 2014, but he didn't bother to correct himself and even repeats it in this documentary but now in sly way. The documentary shows Greenspan concluding something and then Chomsky immediately says in the next shot that it is deliberate. Suggesting again strongly that it was deliberate. It took me a few minutes to google this. You can do that too.

The documentary in this part reveals to be another conspiracy aimed at promoting the idea that yet another version of the Illuminati is at it again, only now they are so vague that we do not even get to know who these people are, what they do and how they do it. Chomsky talks unopposed and no criticism of what he says can be found in this documentary. It is preaching for the choir. It is propaganda.
Chomsky strikes me as a man walking in a forest who hears a tree topple over and concludes that a private company is out to wreck nature because the tree must have been cut down by a man, and that man can only work for a company and companies only do stuff because they aim at enriching themselves at the cost of anything else and therefore it is a deliberate way to wreck nature.
Upon investigation however it could very well be that the tree toppled over because it was old and decrepit. You can probably think of yet another explanation.
Alas this documentary doesn't give room for alternate explanations and this damages the whole purpose. For what would be the upshot of Chomsky's arguments? That a nefarious group of people plans this? Hence: get rid of this group and all will be well?

Chomsky shoots himself in the foot. For he has to twist language to vindicate his believes which is really shameful for a man who has been a linguist. Twisting words in one case with intent discredits everything else that is said for I do not have the time to fact check everything. And now? What can I trust you to say truthfully? I would almost say: shame on you, Chomsky and those who made this documentary and didn't bother to check and correct. You did yourself an extreme disservice.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

SEE ALL 3 REVIEWS