Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End

10

WillJun 30, 2007

Really good conclusion to the trilogy. The actors and everyone behind the scenes did a really good job.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

DanielBJun 30, 2007

Its really a good movie if you actually thinki about it, its packed full of different plots must have let it down. Its great entertainment thought up by people with brains, just watch it again if you don't believe me, just everything Its really a good movie if you actually thinki about it, its packed full of different plots must have let it down. Its great entertainment thought up by people with brains, just watch it again if you don't believe me, just everything about it is an aspect of intelligence. Superb it was, I thought it was a bit more serious than the last to, but still funny and one of the best movies made.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

PhillipV.Jun 5, 2007

After reading the scathing negative reviews i came to the rapid conclusion that these peaple are on one serios acid trip to possibly think that this was a bad movie. It was amazing. The special effects were to notch and the acting rocked. After reading the scathing negative reviews i came to the rapid conclusion that these peaple are on one serios acid trip to possibly think that this was a bad movie. It was amazing. The special effects were to notch and the acting rocked. Long movies are cool so that didnt bother me.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

6

FXTJun 5, 2007

I was waiting for better since the 2nd one but it was not all that bad. A good sequel, even if it's a little long.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

4

MitchM.Jun 6, 2007

It's get style points, and "eccentric performance" points, but founders on the shallow reefs of poor storytelling (god, the way they hop from ship to ship is so ... promiscuous ) and an overreach in terms of minutes the audience has to It's get style points, and "eccentric performance" points, but founders on the shallow reefs of poor storytelling (god, the way they hop from ship to ship is so ... promiscuous ) and an overreach in terms of minutes the audience has to sit in their seat and try to assimilate all of this mess.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

TonyLJun 6, 2007

Definitely better than part 2. I liked how everybody kept double-crossing each other. Really good special effects. Beats the heck out of Spiderman 3!

0 of 0 users found this helpful

2

RHJun 6, 2007

I loved the first Pirates move, and the second was good. this one had incredible special effects but the story was confused and hard to follow, and the ending was very unsatisfying. It's a shame... with just a little effort by the I loved the first Pirates move, and the second was good. this one had incredible special effects but the story was confused and hard to follow, and the ending was very unsatisfying. It's a shame... with just a little effort by the writers, this could have been the best of all… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

DerekS.Jun 6, 2007

Every review up above is seemingly fair enough, each emphasizing certain points that are, honestly, a portion of this twelve-movies-in-one movie. The sporadic storytelling will leave you befuddled and has no logical beginning or end and many Every review up above is seemingly fair enough, each emphasizing certain points that are, honestly, a portion of this twelve-movies-in-one movie. The sporadic storytelling will leave you befuddled and has no logical beginning or end and many end up being random tangents that could possibly bring ADD upon its entire audience. But the symbolism, cinematography, special effects, and hallmark character traits make it quite a copasetic conclusion to an enjoyable franchise, even though the ending does end up Disneyfied. It's a lovely little mess of a movie. Be warned though: Sparrow's closing line was much better in the context of the first film. Hell, even out of context it was better. Enjoy!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

0

HoraceJun 7, 2007

Jared, yes we were watching the same movie. Perhaps you are a very forgiving person or checked your brains in at the door. Pirates was a fantastic idea when it started and captivated all of us. However, the second movie was not really good Jared, yes we were watching the same movie. Perhaps you are a very forgiving person or checked your brains in at the door. Pirates was a fantastic idea when it started and captivated all of us. However, the second movie was not really good and this third sequel, well, the less said the better. Yes, they spent a fortune on special effects but without a storyline to go with them after awhile the audience realizes that the flick has become ridiculous without any feeling as no matter what no one dies or for that matter does any of the proceedings make any sense. That said, if you think this was a perfect movie deserving of a perfect score, then my score has to be a big fat goosegg to warn the unsuspecting public of how truly awful this movie really is.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

0

JoseM.Jun 9, 2007

This movie blew!! Oh man, I couldn't take it. Boring. Dumb. Ridiculous. LONGGGGGGGGGG. I hope they don't make a forth one, but if they do, they can count me out.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

BryantRJul 24, 2007

Amazing! The costumes and visual effects are amazing. Geoffrey Rush, Orlando Bloom , Bill Nighy (Davy Jones), Keira Knighty and Johnny Depp and others are fun to watch. It's Oscar worthy

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

JuicyTJul 26, 2007

This movie was okay, I would give it a 6, i'm just giving it a ten to kind of balance the scales. Anyway, POTC 3 was way too dark for its own good and has strayed too far from how the first one was. They kill off two characters, which This movie was okay, I would give it a 6, i'm just giving it a ten to kind of balance the scales. Anyway, POTC 3 was way too dark for its own good and has strayed too far from how the first one was. They kill off two characters, which also wasn't necessary, and the plot is all over the place, and bloom and knightley's acting is just....well....bad, but at least the action is cool and it's one of the only redeeming factors but it really is astounding at certain points.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

2

FedUpJul 28, 2007

How do you take one of the most lovable rascals and turn it into this garbage. Easy! Just dreadful!

0 of 0 users found this helpful

6

GatsbyJ.Sep 12, 2007

-The movie was entertaining, but like its predecessor, it wasn't very focused. I thought Black Pearl was a good movie for pure entertainment value: funny, clever, some nice action sequences and cinematography, with an actual plot-line. -The movie was entertaining, but like its predecessor, it wasn't very focused. I thought Black Pearl was a good movie for pure entertainment value: funny, clever, some nice action sequences and cinematography, with an actual plot-line. Dead Man's Chest was absolutely pointless: there were about three things that happened: Will meets Dad, audience meets Davie Jones and Calypso, and Jack dies. That's all that really happened in the movie. It also lacked focus and there was no framework holding everything together giving the reader a sense of purpose the movie was heading towards. -At World's End is far better than the second, but still a mediocre movie. The jokes were pretty immature, but it was funny at times. There's some awesome cinematography (like Jack in Davie Jone's locker) as well as the ending fight between Jack and Davie Jones on the ship, and some parts were quite clever. It started off so promising with the whole pirate's song (but then this is COMPLETELY forgotten about later) but then followed the path of Dead Man's Chest. The music, however, was great as always. -There was so much potential in this movie: at first I thought it would be about pirates being hunted down and having to form one last alliance to stand up against the British Armada (like the trailers promised). The whole concept of the pirate kings was very intriguing and clever. But all this potential was wasted since the movie wasn't about the pirates banding together, but focused on the love story between Calypso and Davie Jones, and Will and Elizabeth. Does anyone remember any other pirate ships fighting at the end besides the Black Pearl? Nope: they didn't show any of the other pirates lords against the British Armada during the final fight, which would have just been stunning and what I was most looking forward to from the trailers. -Ah well, wasted potential. Decent movie; SO MUCH BETTER than the second, but no where as good as the first. Just to reiterate: the second one sucked!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

2

matrix1004Jan 21, 2008

Dear Pirates 3, I HATE YOU, I HATE YOU, I HATE YOU. You suck & are terrible. You are so bad, in fact, that you almost make Pirates 2 look like Pirates 1. And that is saying a lot! How could something so great (Pirates 1) turn into this and Dear Pirates 3, I HATE YOU, I HATE YOU, I HATE YOU. You suck & are terrible. You are so bad, in fact, that you almost make Pirates 2 look like Pirates 1. And that is saying a lot! How could something so great (Pirates 1) turn into this and get so progressively worse? I hope you enjoy the company at the top of my Worst/Most Hated Movies Ever list.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

JohnA.Nov 23, 2007

A lot, lot, lot better than the critics would lead us to assume. Not quite as gripping as Pirates 1 but still worth a 9

0 of 0 users found this helpful

6

PeterJ.Dec 26, 2007

Ok, all of you reviewers are wrong. It is not an 8, 9, or a 10. Neither is it a 0, 1, 2, or 3. It was an average movie which is very disappointing compared to the previous installments. A 5 is exactly where this movie should be, but I give Ok, all of you reviewers are wrong. It is not an 8, 9, or a 10. Neither is it a 0, 1, 2, or 3. It was an average movie which is very disappointing compared to the previous installments. A 5 is exactly where this movie should be, but I give it an extra point for Depps character.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

0

EthanR.Dec 9, 2007

I really don't understand...did any of the creators of this movie actually watch the movie...its dreadful! i rented it and only got 1 quarter through the movie!! where did the coins come from? and if they're so important why does a I really don't understand...did any of the creators of this movie actually watch the movie...its dreadful! i rented it and only got 1 quarter through the movie!! where did the coins come from? and if they're so important why does a little criminal kid have one? why were crab rocks pushing jack sparrows boat through a land of sand? I JUST DON'T UNDERSTAND!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

4

JamesC.May 21, 2007

Really bad. Too many characters with bad development, the action scenes are just nothing special and all the feeling of the movie is just repetitive. Honestly, first Spider, then Shrek and now Pirates, what's happening ? Well, JohnnyReally bad. Too many characters with bad development, the action scenes are just nothing special and all the feeling of the movie is just repetitive. Honestly, first Spider, then Shrek and now Pirates, what's happening ? Well, Johnny depp continues to make a great work, alongside Geoffrey Rush witch actually provides itself the best thing in the whole movie. But Keira and Bloom ruined everything, they both gave razzie-worth performances, it's just embarrasing to watch. Also, the comedy that worked in the first two is quite missing here, and when it appears it's unecessary. The ending was quite nice, cliché but cool. If the rest of the movie had helped...… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

6

JosephF.May 25, 2007

Second best will be good enough is this potpourri of a pirate adventure/love story. Good: Johnny Depp gets the screen time that he lost in Pirates 2. Excellent special effects that do not overrun the story. Finishes with several nice plot Second best will be good enough is this potpourri of a pirate adventure/love story. Good: Johnny Depp gets the screen time that he lost in Pirates 2. Excellent special effects that do not overrun the story. Finishes with several nice plot twists with a bittersweet finale. Bad: The pieces do not always fit together in this extravaganza. Story meanders in the middle. Needed to be trimmed by 30 - 40 minutes.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

ScottO.May 25, 2007

Let's be honest - it's the third movie of a trilogy, and they are always the worst. Jedi, Godfather 3, Spiderman 3, Matrix Revolutions, X3, and the list goes on. I don't care if Return of the King was the one that won the Let's be honest - it's the third movie of a trilogy, and they are always the worst. Jedi, Godfather 3, Spiderman 3, Matrix Revolutions, X3, and the list goes on. I don't care if Return of the King was the one that won the Oscar - obviously a collective achievement. The lone exception might be Revenge of the Sith, but only because Clones was two-and-a-half of some of the most embarrassing hours in cinematic history. However, Pirates 3 gives you exactly what you need. The action and effects are spectacular and the story is methodic and ends right where it should. Sure, it all might be confusing for the "weak-minded" children whose parents will ignore the PG-13 rating, but the story does make sense. And yes, it's long and there are moments where they try too hard for laughs. And yes, Jack takes a back seat (USA Today, who gives no concrete evidence for the verbose, negative remarks). And no, it will not be a surprise hit. Why not? Come on, it's the third time around. But I liked it.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

6

NeilK.May 25, 2007

Eh... it was OK... in my opinion it was the WORST of the three films. As long as this movie was... there were several plot points that they managed to leave out. (D'oh!) Oh, and when the MONKEY is the most entertaining actor in the Eh... it was OK... in my opinion it was the WORST of the three films. As long as this movie was... there were several plot points that they managed to leave out. (D'oh!) Oh, and when the MONKEY is the most entertaining actor in the film... that could be a bad sign. But hey, if the summer gets hot near you this summer... $10 for three + hours of air conditioning might do the trick!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

AlysonM.May 25, 2007

This was the best movie i have everrrrrr seen. i love pirates of the caribean sooo much! it made me laugh...gasp...cry and soo much more. if they make a 4th i will be one of the happiest girls in the world =] this is just a great movie and iThis was the best movie i have everrrrrr seen. i love pirates of the caribean sooo much! it made me laugh...gasp...cry and soo much more. if they make a 4th i will be one of the happiest girls in the world =] this is just a great movie and i am hoping to see more. =]]… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

MarcyT.May 25, 2007

47 year old mom, 7 teenage girls, 2 teenage boys, and husband all loved it. A lot. Great visuals, great sets, great special effects, lots of humor, fast moving. Was on the edge of my seat in the final battle scene, glad the movie had several 47 year old mom, 7 teenage girls, 2 teenage boys, and husband all loved it. A lot. Great visuals, great sets, great special effects, lots of humor, fast moving. Was on the edge of my seat in the final battle scene, glad the movie had several minutes left to go, because it was so much fun. Was pleasantly surprised to actually see some character development. Only one character was all evil and the others actually had range. With 9 pirates, Davy Jones, Tia Dalma, Admiral Beckett, Wil Turner, and Elizabeth Swan all working for themselves, it is both unwise and unnecessary to attempt to keep track of who is friends/enemies/allies of who or what their plans are. Those who try are missing the whole point. It… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

6

J.RodMay 25, 2007

Ok, so this movie's not great by any means, but its decent. I mean, the storyline(s) are are thrown together pretty haphazardly at times but c'mon its a pirate movie. The main problem with this movie is that its almost 3 hours Ok, so this movie's not great by any means, but its decent. I mean, the storyline(s) are are thrown together pretty haphazardly at times but c'mon its a pirate movie. The main problem with this movie is that its almost 3 hours long! Once again, c'mon its a pirates movie! All in all, I was pleased that I found it way more entertaining than the last one.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

2

CarlaT.May 25, 2007

Insipid hogwash! I took my nephew to it, and he wanted to leave halfway through it (I was ready in the first half hour). We stayed til the end, but in hindsight, we should have left when he asked to leave. Strike that. We shouldn't have Insipid hogwash! I took my nephew to it, and he wanted to leave halfway through it (I was ready in the first half hour). We stayed til the end, but in hindsight, we should have left when he asked to leave. Strike that. We shouldn't have gone to see it to begin with!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

1

EvanS.May 25, 2007

Near the end of the movie, two ships are twirling down a funnel in the ocean - an appropriate metaphor for this absolute mess. I'll never get those 170 minutes back in my life.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

3

SteveMay 25, 2007

Boring.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

5

[Anonymous]May 26, 2007

So...confusing... but it's worth it just to see the pirates trilogy finish up. but i repeat. so... confusing.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

3

E.F.May 26, 2007

Plot too complicated for even bright casual observers.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

BillT.May 26, 2007

Okay... anyone who is giving this film below a 5 is a moron. Yes it's not a perfect film but come on... this is not a 5 or a 0!!! Technically, it is amazing and even with the flaws it is still better than most. People giving it that low Okay... anyone who is giving this film below a 5 is a moron. Yes it's not a perfect film but come on... this is not a 5 or a 0!!! Technically, it is amazing and even with the flaws it is still better than most. People giving it that low of a grade is just as ridiculous as the critics. They just didn't understand it so it is bad, basically they don't have the attention span or are just not very bright if they didn't get it.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

RalphR.May 26, 2007

Awesome! I loved the fact that all the characters were described in depth. It was hilarious and the effects were spectacular. The monkey was super funny and adorable. Jack Sparrow (Johnny Depp) was amazing as always and brought his character Awesome! I loved the fact that all the characters were described in depth. It was hilarious and the effects were spectacular. The monkey was super funny and adorable. Jack Sparrow (Johnny Depp) was amazing as always and brought his character to a new level.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

MaggieR.May 26, 2007

This movie is one of a kind! it is hilarious, action-packed, and all around great! Johnny Depp is an amazing actor and definitely shows it in this movie. The length for me was kind of long but I still enjoyed every second of it. They couldThis movie is one of a kind! it is hilarious, action-packed, and all around great! Johnny Depp is an amazing actor and definitely shows it in this movie. The length for me was kind of long but I still enjoyed every second of it. They could have minimized on the hallucinations but for me, the more Jack Sparrow, the better. Keith Richards did an amazing job portraying Teague Sparrow, Jack's dad. You definitely cannot miss this!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

JJrMay 26, 2007

The critics have no clue what they are talking about! this is one of the best movies this year. this movie entertains people from ages 8 to 80. with Jack Sparrow's sarcasm it makes the film all the more hilarious. Geoffory Rush does anThe critics have no clue what they are talking about! this is one of the best movies this year. this movie entertains people from ages 8 to 80. with Jack Sparrow's sarcasm it makes the film all the more hilarious. Geoffory Rush does an amazing job portraying Captain Barbossa. this is a must see movie.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

JordanG.May 26, 2007

Truly underrated by the critics. Granted, it's a tad long and can be confusing, but please... it easily trumps the second one in terms of action and really keeps you involved by adding constant twists to the story. Not perfect, but it Truly underrated by the critics. Granted, it's a tad long and can be confusing, but please... it easily trumps the second one in terms of action and really keeps you involved by adding constant twists to the story. Not perfect, but it finishes the trilogy well.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

SeanM.May 26, 2007

Not the best of the three movies, but ridiculously close to be as good as the first. With the second movie as more of a filler movie than an actual true film, the third one comes in and finished up the series as well. With the ending still Not the best of the three movies, but ridiculously close to be as good as the first. With the second movie as more of a filler movie than an actual true film, the third one comes in and finished up the series as well. With the ending still leaving us wanting and wondering this is probably the best movie of the summer thus far, if not, the entire summer.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

0

SallyD.May 26, 2007

I'm so depressed. I loved the first movie. I tried to convince myself that the second "wasn't that bad". Now i know. This third movie really is that bad.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

tonydannieMay 26, 2007

This was better then the second one. IT ties in everything and brought back the humor that was in the first one. No silly cannibals chasing Dear ol' Jack in this one and that is a plus for me.The 2 hours and 45 minutes just flew by.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

6

JohnB.May 26, 2007

As a huge fan of the series, I was taken aback at all the revisionism and plot twists. Maybe it's better after a second watch. Also -- perhaps we have become accostumed to a trilogy ending the story, therefore, we were looking for As a huge fan of the series, I was taken aback at all the revisionism and plot twists. Maybe it's better after a second watch. Also -- perhaps we have become accostumed to a trilogy ending the story, therefore, we were looking for perminace and answers.... did anyone ever claim that this was the end?… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

6

BitBurnMay 26, 2007

A little incoherent, a little long too. It wasn't all bad but It's not going to win any Oscars methinks, unless maybe for special effects.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

AceV.May 27, 2007

greatist pirates yet! makes up for the junk that was the second and is easly the best disney action/adventure ever.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

3

Func.May 27, 2007

Very disappointed.... No where near the rating of the first two movies... Long... boring... dragging on and on and on....:0(((

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

BobK.May 27, 2007

Dont listen to the bad reviews! It may be a bit confusing at times, with allegiances switching all the time, but thats good. It makes you not know whats going to happen.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

1

JosephMay 27, 2007

Sucked, sucked, sucked, and sucked some more. Boring from start to finish. I wouldn't recommend PIRATES to my worst enemy. One point for the make-up and effects.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

JacksonB.May 27, 2007

Stupid and over the top, but enjoyable.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

MotMay 27, 2007

Has all the elements of a great pirate movie and then some. The stories beginning is somewhat confusing but wraps up nicely in the end. Stay after the credits for an extra bonus.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

ChristopherW.May 28, 2007

No one imagined the first film would ever lead to an epic trilogy, but alas...here it is! Enormous budget is spent on some of the most lavish and jawdropping special effects and art/set direction I have ever seen. It's very long and No one imagined the first film would ever lead to an epic trilogy, but alas...here it is! Enormous budget is spent on some of the most lavish and jawdropping special effects and art/set direction I have ever seen. It's very long and very plot heavy, even more so than the first two, but I was never bored. In fact, I was entertained for nearly three hours. Not bad! Kudos to the writers and director for having lofty ambitions and meeting a good many of them. While the extravagant razzle dazzle effects are nearly overwhelming, the convoluted plotting maintains a sense that there is a story underneath it all. Uh, but maybe it's only a sense and nothing more. Whatever the final verdict, I'd recommend it anyway!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

4

CarmineM.May 28, 2007

The beginning 25 minutes was pretty cool and I thought it would be just as good as the others from that. Boy was I wrong though. First off Knightley's character is so laughingly dumb that I was cringing whenever she spoke. They try to The beginning 25 minutes was pretty cool and I thought it would be just as good as the others from that. Boy was I wrong though. First off Knightley's character is so laughingly dumb that I was cringing whenever she spoke. They try to make her into this tough pirate all of a sudden out of no where. (she was much better as the damsel in distress). In the beginning when she walks into the room of Singapore pirates and opens her jacket to reveal about 8 guns (including one huge gun that could never be hidden like that) was so cliched and stupid. Then I was laughing from the stupidity when the annoying calypso woman turns into a huge giant, then into 1000 crabs, then does nothing but create a whirlpool. Then it ends with probably the corniest scene I have ever seen in a movie, where Knightley and Will get married while fighting off bad guys on a ship that's in a whirlpool and practically on its side. Even Johnny Depp's character wasn't as charming and cool as in the first two movies. This was a waste of time and one of the most laugh out loud stupid/corny movies I have ever seen. You should be ashamed of yourself if you are over 13 and gave this movie a 9-10… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

WilliamS.May 28, 2007

A thouroughly entertaining sequel, probably the best of the three. Jack is back to save the day again, in his hilarious manner. I cant understand why it gets such negative reviews with such a substantial plot and significant humor.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

ofarevolution441May 28, 2007

I don't get what's wrong with people reviewing this. I seriously don't. Compared to some of the other crap I've seen recently, this is awesome. While the comedic undertones were a little too noticeable throughout, and I I don't get what's wrong with people reviewing this. I seriously don't. Compared to some of the other crap I've seen recently, this is awesome. While the comedic undertones were a little too noticeable throughout, and I didn't understand what was going on until around halfway, the movie was still an experience. Great way to end the series, in my opinion.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

SandaSMay 28, 2007

It was amazing. All complaints I've read are completely unfounded; this movie has finally proved that it can be 100% action-packed and STILL be amazing. Unlike Spiderman3 -which was good but a bit of a mess-PotC3 successfully packed the It was amazing. All complaints I've read are completely unfounded; this movie has finally proved that it can be 100% action-packed and STILL be amazing. Unlike Spiderman3 -which was good but a bit of a mess-PotC3 successfully packed the movie full of subplots. There was not ONE part that needed to be omitted. Many people claim that the Calypso part wasn't necessary. This is utter nonsense. It was completely necessary to the plot. It explained how Davy Jones got to be the way he did. How isn't that relevant? Plus it was a great way to tie Tia Dalma into the plot here. I loved Sparrow&Barbossa's little ego trips, absolutely brilliant! Another place I see a lot of criticism about the plot was that the marriage scene. 'Ohhh it was SOO cheesy...etc' This is simply not the case. It was the most romantic/adorable/sweet part in a movie that I have EVER SEEN. Honestly. I DARE you to find another trilogy out there that has had each movie be just as good as the other. These movies are absolutely epic, and will become classics. The accuracy of the 1st movie with the ride is great, it even inspired Disney to return the favor by adding Sparrow and Barbossa into the ride. Oh and the soundtrack is simply gorgeous. Brings tears to my eyes every time I listen to At Wits End, I See Dead People In Boats, and One Day. Ive heard the game is fantastic as well, although I have yet to play it. I just cannot say it enough: There will NEVER be another series of movies that is so incredible in EVERY SINGLE ASPECT.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

JamesMay 28, 2007

Didn't have any problem following it. And enjoyed it completely. Yes, the length is a factor. But all the storylines are successfully closed. And how can you go wrong with Jack.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

3

TravisR.May 28, 2007

I can't add anymore than everyone else already did. I just wanted to put my two cents in, saying it sucked. Loved the first one, 2nd was ok, third was lame as hell.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

KathleenGMay 28, 2007

POTC 3 was absolutely amazing! It was everything I hoped it would be and then some. It was challenging to keep up with the,"what's in it for me" subplots. The visual effects melded seemlessly within the storyline. I do not have the POTC 3 was absolutely amazing! It was everything I hoped it would be and then some. It was challenging to keep up with the,"what's in it for me" subplots. The visual effects melded seemlessly within the storyline. I do not have the qualifications necessary to constructively critique film art. The incredible number of 'man hours' required by cast and crew, often in very soggy conditions should be commended. A movie they should be proud of and one I will go see a few more times in the theater. Every ticket I buy is a "Yes" vote and that is a responsibility I do take seriously. So, YES to numbers 1,2 and 3 and I would most certainly welcome #4 if it came to be.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

4

AddisonC.May 29, 2007

It had moments but I actually was bored and left early. I didn't care and don't care that I will never know how it ended. What a mess!

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

TeehRMay 29, 2007

One should watch the first two before seeing this. It answers questions you had and questions you never thought of. I thought it was well done, full of action. Like Chase, I too thought "50 foot woman" scene with Tia could have been better, One should watch the first two before seeing this. It answers questions you had and questions you never thought of. I thought it was well done, full of action. Like Chase, I too thought "50 foot woman" scene with Tia could have been better, with all the creative minds involved in the making of this movie that is all they could come up with. Aside from that it was time and money well spent. This trilogy was fun, creative, imaginative, action packed, terrific acting and a true 'Swash-buckler' Disney style....thumbs up… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

5

CliveMay 29, 2007

[***SPOILER****] Actually every character's reasons for doing things in the movie made sense, its just that everything in the movie is so ridiculous that it takes the fun out of the story. They insult your intelligence by putting in [***SPOILER****] Actually every character's reasons for doing things in the movie made sense, its just that everything in the movie is so ridiculous that it takes the fun out of the story. They insult your intelligence by putting in mindless scenes that are just supposed to excite you but do they really make sense (both ships blasting the one at the end with like 50 cannons, why wouldnt he fire?) Everything in this movie was there purely to make you feel excited or make you feel sad. P.S. Knightley and Bloom getting married by the captain while fighting was easily the worst movie scene i have ever laid eyes upon and at this moment i wanted to leave the theatre. I still enjoyed some of the action and jokes so ill give it a 5.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

1

AndrewPMay 29, 2007

Simply, it was a poorly made over-complicated mess and managed to keep me wishing I could fall asleep.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

3

DklingenJun 13, 2007

It is so sad that Pirates has lost the simple light hearted fun of the first movie. It is like the Matrix all over again - great 1st movie, weak 2nd movie, poor 3rd movie.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

0

MikeJ.Jun 15, 2007

Holy Cow, I would have given this movie a negative number if it was possilbe. This movie was nothing less than stupid, dumb, boring and lonnnggg. If you want to see this movie I suggest going at bedtime and sleep through it. Save your money.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

KyleC.Jun 18, 2007

Suddenly, it's like LOTR all over again. Three hour movie, too long and complicated for children to digest, thus polarizing the reviewer scores into binary values of 0,1, and 10. Worst of the Pirate movies? MAYBE. But all the Suddenly, it's like LOTR all over again. Three hour movie, too long and complicated for children to digest, thus polarizing the reviewer scores into binary values of 0,1, and 10. Worst of the Pirate movies? MAYBE. But all the feeble-minded children giving this 2 or less have forced people who actually WATCHED the first two movies to make our final stand. They're PIRATES. They are out for Number 1 and no one else. Unifying the 9 biggest of them all under one banner takes balls the size of coconuts unless you're a woman. DMC touched on this, AWE drives it home. Critics purportedly loved the surrealist desert while bashing on wooden acting jobs, Will being the main accuse. Will cannot be another sweet Jack Sparrow- he's the honest hero in a den of thieves and beggars who, by the end of DMC was burned one time too many. A few things keep this finale out of classic territory. Keith Richards as Jack's father is a wasted opportunity for some Jack backstory, at a rare time where Jack can hallucinate just about anything the directors wanted him to. Why is Jack the way he is? What's their relationship? Same goes for poor Sao Feng, reduced to third-tier villain status, 'yellow-peril'ishly groping his 'Calypso' before his ignominious demise. All the old faces from the first movie retain interest, with an ending that puts all but a few lingering threads to rest. If you came in looking for The Godfather on the high seas, look again. Watch them in order or you'll make a pig's breakfast of the whole thing.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

1

MattC.Jun 22, 2007

This movie, like the last one, is three hours of absolute mind-numbing boredom. The action scenes (and there really aren't even that many of them) just plain suck and even Johnny Depp, who I usually like in just about anything, is This movie, like the last one, is three hours of absolute mind-numbing boredom. The action scenes (and there really aren't even that many of them) just plain suck and even Johnny Depp, who I usually like in just about anything, is starting to get on the nerves with his overdone Jack Sparrow character. What is wrong with all you people who think these movies are so great? Seriously, comparing them to the Lord of the Rings trilogy? There is no comparison whatsoever. The LOTR movies are beautifully directed works of art -- the Pirate movies (especially the last two) are completely overburdened wastes of time. Ten minutes into it and I was already regretting getting trapped into seeing another one of these incredible wastes of time. So there.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

6

Mr.MeatJun 24, 2007

"Louise T. gave it a 10: Finally, a movie that leaves the audience to do some thinking. I loved this movie, mostly for the same reason people hated it, the carefully weaving prophetic storyline is a gem. Pirates 3 is bold, defiant and "Louise T. gave it a 10: Finally, a movie that leaves the audience to do some thinking. I loved this movie, mostly for the same reason people hated it, the carefully weaving prophetic storyline is a gem. Pirates 3 is bold, defiant and gracefully ignites the imagination with its beauty and passion. 10+" LOL how about minus graceful, beauty and passion? as well as thinking, carefully and gem. actually ill disregard that entire review and give the truth. it was clumsy, overacted and less funny than the other two, however it had some pretty interesting action scenes, as well as some really attention grabbing special effects. it was still funny too, however quite a few jokes flopped, and a lot of scenes dragged on for too long. moderately enjoyable.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

AshtonM.Jun 26, 2007

It was pretty good ,but it kind of got me confused. Like that whole 10 year thing.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

DeeCeeJun 27, 2007

This movie wasn't the best thing that hit the cinemas...But it's great entertainment. It wasn't made in an attempt for an Oscar, so stop treating it like it was. If the movie sucked so bad why did it do so well at the box This movie wasn't the best thing that hit the cinemas...But it's great entertainment. It wasn't made in an attempt for an Oscar, so stop treating it like it was. If the movie sucked so bad why did it do so well at the box office? People like watching movies for entertainment.. not always to analyze every single aspect of the film, and if you watch this movie for the entertainment and not the criticism you'd understand. Sure the movie was a bit too long and convoluted but thats pirates...who the heck understands them anyway? Pirates is Epic. Huge Budget, Huge audience. You either love it or hate it. I'm waiting for the fourth installment of Jacks adventures...… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

JessalR.Jun 28, 2007

A great 3rd and final chapter on a pirate epic. There was a major consensus between the people who didn't rate it highly...they were confused. That is a lame excuse in my mind as this movie takes so much time explaining everything. A great 3rd and final chapter on a pirate epic. There was a major consensus between the people who didn't rate it highly...they were confused. That is a lame excuse in my mind as this movie takes so much time explaining everything. Another was the time, come on people, no one complained lord of the rings for going even longer. Just because this movie wasn't base on a book doesn't mean it could have an epic storyline. I only gave it a 9 because of some of the dialogue used by Cpt. Sparrow compared to the witty remarks in the first movie. Otherwise this is a great ending to an entertaining trilogy...drink up me hearties Yo Ho!!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

BrandonSJan 12, 2008

I went in with low expectations after reading so many bad reviews - But this movie was really fantastic. Not as good as the first, which is a true classic, but much, much better than the second. Whereas the second film was a meandering mess I went in with low expectations after reading so many bad reviews - But this movie was really fantastic. Not as good as the first, which is a true classic, but much, much better than the second. Whereas the second film was a meandering mess with no point, this was a grand, twisting and turning adventure - with a purpose. Though overlong, it nevertheless had great action sequences, humor, plot twists, and characters that make sense - because they act with devoted self-interest. A truly satisfying epic.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

AncplAEHHcJan 18, 2008

The crabs were pushing sparrow's boat since he was in davy jones' locker and he was going insane. and by the way, this movie was awesome

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

MichaelT.Dec 11, 2007

Cap'n Jack just remains Johnny Depp's best performance.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

6

ArielGDec 12, 2007

Watching the latest installment of Pirates of The Caribbean, I was reminded of the Godfather movies, where the first two were excellent, but the third one was a jumbled mess that shouldn't have been made. It still has the humour and Watching the latest installment of Pirates of The Caribbean, I was reminded of the Godfather movies, where the first two were excellent, but the third one was a jumbled mess that shouldn't have been made. It still has the humour and special effects that the first two POTC movies had, but it was severely lacking a decent story, was unnecessarily overdrawn. Johnny Depp was great (as always!) and the only redeeming quality to this movie. His great acting and off-beat humour made it bearable.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

0

DustinM.Dec 12, 2007

Three hours of failure.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

aqual.Dec 19, 2007

A very great ending...

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

RaulL.Dec 22, 2007

One of the best movies i've sees

0 of 0 users found this helpful

1

johnjohnDec 26, 2007

Worst movie with NO story that can be followed by any reasonable person.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

mayasDec 29, 2007

No movie could ever compare to the first POTC movie. I agree the last to movies were long and hard to follow. I still enjoyed them though. The third was much better than the second. Unfortunately you really have to think hard and catch No movie could ever compare to the first POTC movie. I agree the last to movies were long and hard to follow. I still enjoyed them though. The third was much better than the second. Unfortunately you really have to think hard and catch everything to make sense of these sequels. But with enough thought the movies are overall clever. Yes a little far fetched but good. If they make a forth I will go and see it. Oh and for you people saying bad things about Johnny Depp, without him these movies would have been pointless. He is awesome. And Knightley is a talented young actress.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

6

GoldenEye16Aug 22, 2010

Again, what I said about Dead Man's Chest except even more so here. Too long, entertaining and adventurous, but unnecessary and confusing. It was decent.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

ERG1008Aug 24, 2010

Third in the Pirates of the Caribbean series.
It's big, it's spectacular, it's over the top & overall very much good fun.
Great cameo (I won't give it away) & Johnny Depp, the excellent Geoffrey Rush & Bill Nighy all ham it up superbly.Third in the Pirates of the Caribbean series.
It's big, it's spectacular, it's over the top & overall very much good fun.
Great cameo (I won't give it away) & Johnny Depp, the excellent Geoffrey Rush & Bill Nighy all ham it up superbly.
Easily as good as the other two & certainly as dark if not darker in places.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

gm101Mar 15, 2011

Great ending to a great trilogy. I was really glad they got Jack Sparrow back, since he is my favorite character. Now I can't wait to see what's in store for Jack in the upcoming "On Stranger Tides."

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

0

asylumspadezNov 23, 2011

I sat through this film for nearly 3 hours and I hated it. The story was even worst then the previous film, The acting was terrible, and it ended terribly.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

ImUnavailableJul 1, 2011

It was never going to be easy to resolve the multiple story lines present at the end of Dead Man's Chest. At World's End makes this even more difficult by adding in a few extra story lines for good measure. The result is a jumbled film thatIt was never going to be easy to resolve the multiple story lines present at the end of Dead Man's Chest. At World's End makes this even more difficult by adding in a few extra story lines for good measure. The result is a jumbled film that tackles far too much, even with a particularly long running time. Because of the focus on tying up the loose ends of the story, not nearly enough time is dedicated to characters and important events. The main quest (to rescue Jack) is done and dusted in less than an hour and undermines the impact of the cliffhanger ending of DMC. Norrington, Chow Yun-Fat's Sao Feng and even the Kraken are all pushed to the side and play minor roles. This is disappointing as Norrington and the Kraken were of much greater importance to proceedings in DMC and Sao Feng was an interesting new edition. More troubling is the chance in the character of Will Turner who begins the movie as a sneering, almost villainous character but n the end returns to his usual self. This strange shift is clearly done for the benefit of the story but prompts the audience to dislike Will, a usually likable and morally upright character. The action scenes, though entertaining, drag on and quickly outstay their welcome. Though it wasn't terrible, I enjoyed the previous two films more; the first for its originality and the second for its dense but clear story. Both seem to be lacking in this movie.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

MachoHombreSep 1, 2012

It's a hearty watch...once every 10 years and a bottle of rum down the hatch, that is. Yo-ho! Before watching, I might add, one should note that there's a giant black lady involved. Aye, there be uncharted waters ahead. Scallywags, be warned.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

coolevMay 18, 2011

Disney is truly mad for the many action scenes and sword fighting stuffed into this film. Thank goodness for that 'cause if it didn't this movie would probably never work. Why should I watch any of these movies? Four of the Pirates filmsDisney is truly mad for the many action scenes and sword fighting stuffed into this film. Thank goodness for that 'cause if it didn't this movie would probably never work. Why should I watch any of these movies? Four of the Pirates films tried to bore me in the past - one of them succeed.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

wrldfilmMay 30, 2011

though the special effects are great, the series definitely loses steam with this movie and not even Johnny can keep it going. The writers seem to be running out of sudden plot twists to throw at us and it seems like the movie is a rollerthough the special effects are great, the series definitely loses steam with this movie and not even Johnny can keep it going. The writers seem to be running out of sudden plot twists to throw at us and it seems like the movie is a roller coaster, diving and swerving through several story lines that never clearly join but just continue on.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

ijy101Jun 18, 2017

It's crazy, full of paradoxes and often makes little sense, but it's easily the most fun I've had with one of these. The first one is great, definitely a better movie, but I find this one to be more entertaining as a whole. I love the pirateIt's crazy, full of paradoxes and often makes little sense, but it's easily the most fun I've had with one of these. The first one is great, definitely a better movie, but I find this one to be more entertaining as a whole. I love the pirate mythology, of course it doesn't make sense, it's not meant to. With zany adventures like this it's a lot more fun to ignore the plotholes and enjoy the spectacle of ships battling in the middle of giant whirlpool and of course Johnny Depp being weird. I feel like this movie got Captain Jack the best, rather than just relying of the jokes, they let his natural acting talent and odd behavior do all the comedy for him. The scene with him in Davy Jones Locker is possibly the best scene with Jack yet, just because we get an interesting insight into his personal hell. All in all it's a stonking great action romp with epic pirate action this movie is more than adequate and it makes for a fantastic ending to the original trilogy of films.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

julian_zizzleSep 13, 2011

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I liked the second movie pretty much but this one was not as good as first 2 movies. Surely it was pretty much fun and excitement during the whole movie, watching all that iconized characters brawl in an epic fight. But there is absolutely no meaning in some parts of the story. You will never guess what will happen if character x do one thing in a scene. Only the thing which the scripter wanted to happen happens, it doesn't have to make sense nor be logically accurate. Of course i never asked this movie to %100 realistic but sometimes even movie itself breaks its own rules. For example check some of main characters: Jack Sparrow, Will Turner and Captain Barbossa. All of these three have died at some point in these movies but actually always find a way to revive one dead guy. My advice is, if you want to bring all those dead people back to life, please don't do it three times. Even though i should say i enjoyed this one and whoever is to say he didn't is probably lying. So i give an 8 for this one.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

StevenFJun 30, 2013

There is a lot going on in the third instalment of this hugely successful franchise, and the final one of the continuing story from the the second entry. While still not capturing or even replicating the original, but it is mountains betterThere is a lot going on in the third instalment of this hugely successful franchise, and the final one of the continuing story from the the second entry. While still not capturing or even replicating the original, but it is mountains better than the Dead Man's Chest, and while you can't really miss a single minute for fear completely losing your place in this often puzzling and densely populated film, it is still very long, much longer than it should have been.
There is a lot to keep up with but after the climax of the original film, a crew sets out to rescue Jack from Davy Jones Locker, a place of nothing, to be punished, as expanded cast member Tia Dalma (Naomi Harris) outlines. But also afoot is the attempt to call the Brethren court, a pirate organisation made of all pirate lords to bring about the end of the East India Trading Company's rain of terror across the seas, led by their new pet Davy Jones (Bill Nighy), whose heart is owned by said company, hence his actions.
Captain Jack, meanwhile, mentally rots away as he wonders exactly where he is and if the things going on around him are truly real, his comical and whimsical attitude is again excellently performed through Johnny Depp, his character has indeed stood the test of the three films, and he is the most enjoyable thing to look forward to in this.
With that thought, there is again a lot of pointless and time-consuming elements of the film that contribute little to the cause, and with the continuing mutiny and rebellious nature of both Elizabeth Swan and Will Turner make it difficult give any sort of sympathy towards them. Their heightening love story within the film is distracting and too much emphasis is placed upon it, deterring from the more enjoyable aspects.
It is Jack and the returning Geoffrey Rush as Captain Barbosa that truly maintain the flashes of greatness from the original, Jack and his long conversations with himself, or Barbosa and his typical pirate nature, mix that in with a plot that although complex, does give the incentive to watch over again.
As visuals go, this is a true spectacle in front of you, beautiful, marvellous and a delight to the eyes, the final battle in particular is breathtaking, ships, pirates and storms galore. Effects an marvels don't get much bigger than this, combined with an impressive score.
Not as captivating as the original, quite lengthy with many unnecessary moments and the same goes for characters, but certainly better than the second with an impressive finale, epic set pieces characters staying true to their roots and continuing powerful performances from Depp, Rush and Nighy, oh and a cameo from a particular Rolling Stone, make this quite a worthwhile and explosive third showing.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

4

LandFApr 19, 2012

A disappointing third film in the Pirates series. It suffers from all the problems of the first and second, and then some. Much of the appeal of the first two are gone, and what remains is a confusing, boring, and unfunny second sequel.A disappointing third film in the Pirates series. It suffers from all the problems of the first and second, and then some. Much of the appeal of the first two are gone, and what remains is a confusing, boring, and unfunny second sequel. Problems abound from everywhere, so I'll be working hard to narrow it down. For one, Johnny Depp's role as Jack Sparrow is once again shrunken into a smaller part. Also there is absolutely no action that is even vaguely interesting (after the first half hour). In fact, the last hour is at least 45 minutes action, and it's surprisingly dull. In fact, it's tedious. It's just people killing each other, and nothing interesting about it. There's no variety, no interesting atmosphere. Just swords clashing. There is a plot, which is more than what can be said for the second, but it's so confusing, with so many characters and sub plots and deceptions and people changing sides, that it's almost completely incomprehensible. Most of the characters are obnoxious, and though that was apparent in the first two, it is even more so now. There are too many flat gags, too many boring scenes, and too many characters for the film to flow well. There were times when I wondered what the purpose was for really anything going on during the movie. There are some good things though. The first half hour is strong, just like the first two flicks, but after that, the movie is drop dead boring. The score is another winner from composer Hanz Zimmer, albeit a tad familiar. The acting is dependable, and even admist a thousand bad jokes, there's at least a few laughs (or chuckles really). There is one bizzare scene where godess of the sea, Calypso is turned back into her original form. This scene is so weird, stupid, and nonsensical, it's hard not to burst out laughing (I most certainly did). Let's just say that she grows about 1,000 feet high, talks like she has really bad congestion, looks like she's constipated, and eventually explodes into a million crabs. It's even more ridiculous on screen. When the film closes, you will either be waiiting in great anticipation for the fourth (if you enjoyed it), or you'll be fast asleep or about ready to be (if you're me).… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

4

imthenoobFeb 6, 2021

With a near 3 hour runtime, At World's End often feels more of a chore to finish than anything else due to poor editing, inconsistent pacing and a muddled main plot that tries to wrap up the half dozen side plots going on. It can make for aWith a near 3 hour runtime, At World's End often feels more of a chore to finish than anything else due to poor editing, inconsistent pacing and a muddled main plot that tries to wrap up the half dozen side plots going on. It can make for a rough watch at times because the moments where the film is actually good is too few and in-between.

It takes a little over 40 minutes to be introduced to Jack again and Davy Jones is painfully absent in the first 2/3 of the film. Considering Depp is the star and Jones is the built-up main villain, maybe introduced them both earlier? You can do that by editing down that overly long introduction for starters. You could also edit down parts with Sao Feng and his crew considering they have pretty much no relevance to the film past the halfway mark. I think trimming the run time at least 25-30 minutes, which is incredibly manageable, would have fixed most of the pacing issues and make it so it doesn't seem like we go a bulk of the runtime without seeing the stars of the film.

All in all, At World's End isn't bad but it is disappointing. There was simply too much going on and it felt like there was no time to really let things settle before we immediately go to the next thing.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

Critic2012Jun 11, 2012

The first film in the Pirates of the Caribbean franchise was great: Unfortunately, as the sequels were released, the whole thing went downhill from there.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

4

beingryanjudeAug 24, 2014

We continue to be roused... but, unfortunately, not positively enough. The best part is, perhaps, Keith Richards as father to our beloved Capt. Jack Sparrow. Guess they should've given him more screen time.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

Trev29Jul 6, 2013

It is a very long and quite complex movie, but still I enjoyed it. I just like the series and still thought it had all the great qualities of the first two. I suggest watching it twice before making a final judgement.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

T-rodneyApr 21, 2012

I like this movie,but the story wasn't really clear and it was too...too long.It had good humour,the action was great and I think this one is better than dead man's chest.So it's a good movie.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

GodotIsW8ing4UJul 3, 2013

Overall, an improvement over Dead Man's Chest. It suffers from somewhat excessive complexity and a rushed, "Return of the Jedi", "oh god we don't have time to wrap up all these loose ends, staple separate plots together and call it a day"Overall, an improvement over Dead Man's Chest. It suffers from somewhat excessive complexity and a rushed, "Return of the Jedi", "oh god we don't have time to wrap up all these loose ends, staple separate plots together and call it a day" kind of feel, but there's a constant sense that the movie is moving towards its conclusion, unlike Dead Man's Chest which seemed to just drift freely in whatever direction it felt like. The huge final battle is excellent, and the film's final third in general is its strongest, but it fails to live up to the first film, even if it beats out the second.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

OfficialNov 5, 2013

"Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End" is the third movie in the series. The movie, at almost three hours, is far too overlong. The story is so densely-plotted that if you miss ten minutes of the movie, it will leave you totally confused."Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End" is the third movie in the series. The movie, at almost three hours, is far too overlong. The story is so densely-plotted that if you miss ten minutes of the movie, it will leave you totally confused. But the action is exhilarating, epic and hugely action-packed. This explains the $300 million budget used for the movie.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

moonman1994Dec 23, 2013

Slightly better than it's predecessor but still nowhere near as good as the first film. Depp is still good in the lead but that's not enough to fully save the film. The main reason, in my opinion that this is better that Pirates 2 is thatSlightly better than it's predecessor but still nowhere near as good as the first film. Depp is still good in the lead but that's not enough to fully save the film. The main reason, in my opinion that this is better that Pirates 2 is that the new characters are more interesting and the action sequences are less drawn out and boring. All and all though it is upsetting that a film saga that started out with so much promise ended up like this.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

Jack101Sep 9, 2012

The first movie was exciting, the second was epic in special effects. This one had some cheesy down moments, and there great moments. But overall i think this movie was spectacular, and its a Best picture nomination in my book.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

4

RikiegeJan 23, 2013

Bored and a little bad. The worst of the series.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

gzayas91Jul 21, 2018

Bigger better than the second one. Favorite scene of the film was the opening when pirates are being hanged including a young boy who's gonna to hanged and then started to sing the song and then rest of the pirates started sing, very emotional.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

SwatiFeb 15, 2013

I think the character of the Singaporean pirate was underutilized. Elizabeth gaining influence was too lucky for me to be plausible. Beckett, however, hits the mark again. I expected more of Norrington after watching him develop in the courseI think the character of the Singaporean pirate was underutilized. Elizabeth gaining influence was too lucky for me to be plausible. Beckett, however, hits the mark again. I expected more of Norrington after watching him develop in the course of the previous film. The movie failed to pit the pirates against the navy after introducing us to the Brethren Court, which was disappointing. It was rarely fun and melodramatic. The ending was botched. I wouldn't mind an anticlimactic ending if it is done well. The movie as a whole was a lost opportunity in my view. They could have gone out in style.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

Rox22Oct 8, 2013

An improvement on the second movie, but still not as good as the first one.

As usual, effect are top notch, story is far more interesting this time round, yet also feels like more of the same at the same time. Knightly has perhaps theAn improvement on the second movie, but still not as good as the first one.

As usual, effect are top notch, story is far more interesting this time round, yet also feels like more of the same at the same time.

Knightly has perhaps the most interesting character as she really has changed allot since the first movie. I really did like seeing that development. Bloom is boring and very hard to sympathize with, aside from the end where he does grow a little. Depp is just doing yet another fantastic Jack Sparrow.

Overall: At World's End was good. It had allot of flaws but most were forgivable. An Epic finish to this chapter of the PotC franchise.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End

User Reviews