Buena Vista Pictures | Release Date: May 25, 2007
6.4
USER SCORE
Generally favorable reviews based on 1073 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
626
Mixed:
227
Negative:
220
Watch Now
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)
2
LionelP.May 31, 2007
Dull, too long, non-sensical, over indulgent CGI fest crap. Terrible
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
AcriticJun 24, 2007
The 3rd and final of stupid pirate movies. A waste of time.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
PatrickJun 29, 2007
Why does a film based on a ride need a sequel? And why does it need to become a trilogy? It's a pretentious attempt to become a Lord of the Rings type epic, but fails miserably. It's about the same legnth as LOTR, but way more Why does a film based on a ride need a sequel? And why does it need to become a trilogy? It's a pretentious attempt to become a Lord of the Rings type epic, but fails miserably. It's about the same legnth as LOTR, but way more dull. The plot was too long and complicated to understand, and not at all entertaining. It put me to sleep. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
RHJun 6, 2007
I loved the first Pirates move, and the second was good. this one had incredible special effects but the story was confused and hard to follow, and the ending was very unsatisfying. It's a shame... with just a little effort by the I loved the first Pirates move, and the second was good. this one had incredible special effects but the story was confused and hard to follow, and the ending was very unsatisfying. It's a shame... with just a little effort by the writers, this could have been the best of all Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
FedUpJul 28, 2007
How do you take one of the most lovable rascals and turn it into this garbage. Easy! Just dreadful!
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
matrix1004Jan 21, 2008
Dear Pirates 3, I HATE YOU, I HATE YOU, I HATE YOU. You suck & are terrible. You are so bad, in fact, that you almost make Pirates 2 look like Pirates 1. And that is saying a lot! How could something so great (Pirates 1) turn into this and Dear Pirates 3, I HATE YOU, I HATE YOU, I HATE YOU. You suck & are terrible. You are so bad, in fact, that you almost make Pirates 2 look like Pirates 1. And that is saying a lot! How could something so great (Pirates 1) turn into this and get so progressively worse? I hope you enjoy the company at the top of my Worst/Most Hated Movies Ever list. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
CarlaT.May 25, 2007
Insipid hogwash! I took my nephew to it, and he wanted to leave halfway through it (I was ready in the first half hour). We stayed til the end, but in hindsight, we should have left when he asked to leave. Strike that. We shouldn't have Insipid hogwash! I took my nephew to it, and he wanted to leave halfway through it (I was ready in the first half hour). We stayed til the end, but in hindsight, we should have left when he asked to leave. Strike that. We shouldn't have gone to see it to begin with! Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
AlienSpaceBatsNov 18, 2012
A cacophony of swashbuckling tedium. Stodgy throughout and suffers because it's taking itself far too seriously, the worst culprit for me being Keira Knightley's dreadful overacting. Forgettable.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
2
csw12Mar 25, 2012
The 3rd installment is completly messed up. The movie is even longer and even more complicated. Nobody knows what is going on and the characters have become wood and phonny. Actions scenes are a bore and sorry Jack but even you can't saveThe 3rd installment is completly messed up. The movie is even longer and even more complicated. Nobody knows what is going on and the characters have become wood and phonny. Actions scenes are a bore and sorry Jack but even you can't save this completed mess that people call a movie. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
2
FuturedirectorMay 19, 2017
Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End may soar thanks to its impressive battle sequences, but a terribly dull storytelling and unoriginal interpretations ruin the conclusion and become this sequel the worst of the saga yet.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
2
FilmBuff94Mar 31, 2016
Given it's origins as a theme park ride, it's apt that Disney's Pirates of the Caribbean trilogy has experienced a trajectory not unlike that of a rollercoaster: an initial high, followed by repeated plummets to nauseating lows. At World'sGiven it's origins as a theme park ride, it's apt that Disney's Pirates of the Caribbean trilogy has experienced a trajectory not unlike that of a rollercoaster: an initial high, followed by repeated plummets to nauseating lows. At World's End completes the story begun by last year's Dead Man's Chest, and features all the cacophonous action and paper-thin drama that helped sabotage its deflating predecessor. Aesthetically speaking, there's virtually nothing differentiating these films, as both boast Gore Verbinski's spatially incoherent battle scenes, Dolby-customized sonic bombast, and lavish special effects so lacking in fine detail that they're deliberately shrouded in murky darkness. Yo Ho Ugh, it's merely more of the same, and I do mean more; at a whopping 168 minutes, so much happens in At World's End that it's nigh impossible to keep up with all the various machinations and conflicting motivations crammed into Ted Elliott and Terry Rossio's script. Such overkill, however, is simply a tool of distraction aimed at diverting attention away from the fact that the film's existence is driven not by overarching narrative demands (there's barely enough substantive material to warrant even a 90-minute runtime), but by an insatiable corporate bottom line.

Previously on Pirates: Smash, bang, boom, and other loud, meaningless hijinks led fey rascal Captain Jack Sparrow (Johnny Depp) to be imprisoned in Davy Jones's locker, and insipid lovebirds Will Turner (Orlando Bloom) and Elizabeth Swann (Keira Knightley) to team up with newly resurrected Captain Barbossa (Geoffrey Rush) to help rescue Jack so he, in turn, could aid their quest to defeat squid-faced Davy Jones (Bill Nighy) and his new master, East India Trading Company bigwig Lord Beckett (Tom Hollander). That mouthful of a synopsis pales in comparison to the one necessitated by At World's End, whose myriad convoluted storylines involve most principal characters making promises to their mates, then engineering duplicitous back-room arrangements with their enemies (to further their own selfish ends), and then coming around and doing the right thing in the end because, well, it makes for a happier, safer, less morally complicated ending. Countless cross-purposes are simultaneously at work and yet, throughout, amount to naught, with the resultant plot muddle—made up of thinly sketched characters who are chiefly defined by their relationship to each other, and whose issues are dealt with in bite-size portions to make room for distended combat sequences—stinking like a pile of discarded corpses.

The film's primary thread concerns the historic convening of the Brethren Court (made up of the nine pirate lords, two of whom are Sparrow and Barbossa), providing At World's End with an opportunity to indulge in outlandish stereotypes (among them: the screaming Japanese pirate queen, the stuffy French pirate fop, and Chow Yun-Fat sporting a Fu Manchu as Singapore's stilted English-spouting Captain Sao Feng). Crass, to be sure, but no less laughably objectionable than the script's underlying clash between British capitalism (“It's just good business,” is Cutler's be-all excuse for treachery) and pirate “honor,” a concept Verbinski and company don't even bother trying to explain. In essence, we're meant to root for Jack and his plundering cohorts purely because they're the funny and/or hot ones. It's a strategy that might have been more tenable were it not for Bloom's enervating blandness, Knightley's counterfeit badass posturing and Braveheart-ish “Freedom!” speech (as well as her comical ability to keep her tanned face smudge-free), and the unavoidable sense that what was once unique and inspired about Depp's Sparrow has, at this point, become calculated and dull, his prancing and lisping and flailing about emitting the odor of a stale routine.

Absent rhythm or even basic narrative uniformity, the film careens clumsily, occasionally hitting upon a quirky moment—such as Jack's hallucinatory escapades in Davy Jones's locker and in the Flying Dutchman's brig—but mainly propping up its watery scenarios with recycled imagery (including three shots of boats bursting out of the ocean), pedestrian swordfights, and a dreary cameo from Keith Richards as the elder Sparrow. From beating aortas and heart-shaped lockets to enchanted compasses and cipher-laden maps, talismanic crap abounds, yet because the film's mythology carries no weight, these trinkets' supposed momentous value is nil; they're just so much costume jewelry. Meanwhile, limp romantic dilemmas are reconciled during a climactic showdown in which two battleships chase each other around a whirlpool in some bizarre (and immensely tedious) version of Pirate NASCAR.

At World's End—a spectacle composed of intangible CG, superficial performances, and twists and turns that are vapidly resolved—it's clear that the statement also pertains to this empty vessel of a Hollywood blockbuster franchise.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
1
SonnyS.May 24, 2007
The fight at the end was good the rest of the film dragged and didn't make arny sense.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
1
JuanM.Jun 3, 2007
Movie was very long, very convoluted, complicated to understand.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
1
AlpanaR.May 26, 2007
I haven't written a review on here before, but this movie was SO BAD that I felt like I had to warn others away. I was pretty familiar with the previous two installments, having seen both more than once, but I was confused throughout I haven't written a review on here before, but this movie was SO BAD that I felt like I had to warn others away. I was pretty familiar with the previous two installments, having seen both more than once, but I was confused throughout the movie. The first hour was totally unnecessary and boring and I basically lost my interest for the rest of the movie. It was not humorous, and hardly anyone laughed in the whole theater. I wish I had read/listened to more reviews before wasting my $11. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
1
WilliamHMay 29, 2007
All I kind think afterword was I want 3 hours of my life back.
1 of 1 users found this helpful
1
MattS.May 30, 2007
If you're at least 12 years old, you have no excuse to like this movie. Laughable dialogue, a jumbled plot, no emotional connections with the characters. A three hour bore, easily the worst movie I've seen all year.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
1
MichalC.May 24, 2007
This movie officially pushed me over the edge, much like the ship goes over the edge in the movie, an made me never want to see another movie ever again!!! Save your $9.50 and do something else... anything. Get a lobotomy instead of this This movie officially pushed me over the edge, much like the ship goes over the edge in the movie, an made me never want to see another movie ever again!!! Save your $9.50 and do something else... anything. Get a lobotomy instead of this movie! If you want to see a movie, go see something else... like Hot Fuzz or even 28 Weeks Later! The 168 minutes that consisted of this absurdly complicated plot, is 2 hours and 48 minutes of my life I will never get back again! My time is valuable as a chemical engineer, going for around $50 an hour, going off of this, this movie cost me $140. DISNEY, I WANT MY MONEY BACK!!! Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
1
FantasyMay 25, 2007
It's a disaster beyond all imagination but that still won't stop us from seeing it. We love Captain Jack Sparrow but what the creators have done is tarnish what should have been a great movie. Pity.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
1
PhilD.May 28, 2007
walking out after this movie i had no idea what happened. I tryed to follow what was going on but there was too many sub-plots. this movie may have action but for no good reason. When i want to see a good movie I want it to have a plot.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
1
JennyH.May 29, 2007
Absolutely retarded movie. Very poorly plotted and convoluted. I'm not sure the writers could even followed the plot of their own movie.
1 of 1 users found this helpful
1
AnnieMay 30, 2007
This movie was such a waste of time. Why would I go to watch the THIRD in a SERIES where all of the characters I loved DIE?!? Where the brains were on that, I will never know. And is it now Will Turner's locker? Stupid plot twist and This movie was such a waste of time. Why would I go to watch the THIRD in a SERIES where all of the characters I loved DIE?!? Where the brains were on that, I will never know. And is it now Will Turner's locker? Stupid plot twist and terrible ending. Even the people I know who liked the film are thinking of their own endings or expanding on this one because it was bad. Given how long the movie could take to resolve (more than two and a half hours) there is no excuse for it to be that bad. I miss the brevity and fun of the first one. The second two, which could have been great, aren't worth seeing again. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
1
JamesD.Jun 10, 2007
The movie is a bore. The story tries to accomplish too much, and the plot darts around dizzily like a drunken pirate. Ignoring the plot there are a few scenes here and there that attempt to resurrect the magic of the first movie in the The movie is a bore. The story tries to accomplish too much, and the plot darts around dizzily like a drunken pirate. Ignoring the plot there are a few scenes here and there that attempt to resurrect the magic of the first movie in the series. Audiences will find laughter to be scarce in this movie and enjoyment even harder to find. The battles are long and felt like watching CGI on steroids. Despite all of the effort put into making everything look as realistic as possible I have never felt more removed from a movie. The very ending of Pirates 3 feels like the ending to a different movie. The Pirates theme plays as Depp sails off triumphantly into the sunset. With hints at the end suggesting possibly another sequel I'm wondering how much more money Disney can make from a franchise that is more dead than Davy Jones. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
1
EvanS.May 25, 2007
Near the end of the movie, two ships are twirling down a funnel in the ocean - an appropriate metaphor for this absolute mess. I'll never get those 170 minutes back in my life.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
1
JosephMay 27, 2007
Sucked, sucked, sucked, and sucked some more. Boring from start to finish. I wouldn't recommend PIRATES to my worst enemy. One point for the make-up and effects.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
1
AndrewPMay 29, 2007
Simply, it was a poorly made over-complicated mess and managed to keep me wishing I could fall asleep.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
1
MattC.Jun 22, 2007
This movie, like the last one, is three hours of absolute mind-numbing boredom. The action scenes (and there really aren't even that many of them) just plain suck and even Johnny Depp, who I usually like in just about anything, is This movie, like the last one, is three hours of absolute mind-numbing boredom. The action scenes (and there really aren't even that many of them) just plain suck and even Johnny Depp, who I usually like in just about anything, is starting to get on the nerves with his overdone Jack Sparrow character. What is wrong with all you people who think these movies are so great? Seriously, comparing them to the Lord of the Rings trilogy? There is no comparison whatsoever. The LOTR movies are beautifully directed works of art -- the Pirate movies (especially the last two) are completely overburdened wastes of time. Ten minutes into it and I was already regretting getting trapped into seeing another one of these incredible wastes of time. So there. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
1
johnjohnDec 26, 2007
Worst movie with NO story that can be followed by any reasonable person.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
OrvilleS.Jun 6, 2007
Unforgivably dull and long. Vapid performances. Please, let's end this series of movies at 3. Don't do a fourth!
1 of 2 users found this helpful
0
RyencokeMay 28, 2007
Haha, oh man was this bad. I had no idea what was going on this movie at all. The only good thing about it was easily Johnny Depp & Kieth Richards. The first one was the only good one. Hollywood's usual "Let's try to sell-out".
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
DwightMay 28, 2007
I only have one question after watching nearly three hours of this disconnected garbage. What was the Director thinking? How in hell can you release something this bad? Someone, anyone in charge had to see how truly awful this was. Avoid at I only have one question after watching nearly three hours of this disconnected garbage. What was the Director thinking? How in hell can you release something this bad? Someone, anyone in charge had to see how truly awful this was. Avoid at all costs. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful
0
IainM.Jun 15, 2007
The longest 3 hours of my life, summed up in 3 words - silly, long, dull.
3 of 5 users found this helpful
0
ElenaJun 3, 2007
Discombobulated from the original. Just a lot of special effects to take advantage of the first Pirates and separate us, the suckers, from our hard earned money. What did P T Barnum once say.
1 of 1 users found this helpful
0
IGiveUpJun 4, 2007
Too long, impossible to follow, no chemistry, wooden acting, and a lame script. Other than that this trash was wonderful.
3 of 4 users found this helpful
0
mixmastajbOct 13, 2007
I am at a complete loss as to how anyone can defend this film. "In your face action," (which, in reality, it was far from) cannot make up for the very very poorly laid out plotpoints. I did not know what was going on more than half the time.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
BobH.May 26, 2007
Whomever is responsible for this effort should be flogged and quartered and then made to walk the plank. To take these wonderful actors and writes something this bad is to bad to be believed. As much as we loved the first Pirates, Whomever is responsible for this effort should be flogged and quartered and then made to walk the plank. To take these wonderful actors and writes something this bad is to bad to be believed. As much as we loved the first Pirates, that's how awful this last instalment in the series is. Even Captain Jack Sparrow can't save ths embarassment as the film is totally flat and appears to be written by a bunch of amateurs who don't have a clue in how to tell a story. At one point I considered walking out of the theater as this is how truly awful the movie is. Avoid at all costs. Two hours and forty five minutes and all you can find is a few chuckles between the boredom. You will be looking at your watch praying fot this garbage to mercifully be over. You have been warned. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
AaronMay 27, 2007
Moronic and an assault on the senses. Possibly the turkey of the year. No chemistry whatsoever thanks to the writers who have lost touch with all reality. Even a wonderful actor like Johnny Depp can't save this Captain Jack Sparrow. Beware!
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
BobbieMay 31, 2007
Totally lame without any chemistry. Wooden acting and quite frankly too long and boring.
1 of 1 users found this helpful
0
AricM.May 30, 2007
This movie left me angry. A complete waste of time.
1 of 1 users found this helpful
0
fdasdafaJun 13, 2007
Terrible, overly confusing and way to long.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
JimSJun 5, 2007
One word: stupid!. I don't understand the fascination with this series or Johnny Depp.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
CarolA.Jun 5, 2007
Talk about Jumping The Shark this flick is destined for one of the worst of the year. 300M on special effects and nothing more. Just a paycheck for the actors as no one stood out including the wonderful Johnny Depp. This movie is horrific. Talk about Jumping The Shark this flick is destined for one of the worst of the year. 300M on special effects and nothing more. Just a paycheck for the actors as no one stood out including the wonderful Johnny Depp. This movie is horrific. Too bad to be believed. Avoid at all costs. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
wtfisthisDec 18, 2007
I cannot described how bad this movie is. Absolute garbage. The first one made was good. The 2nd and this 3rd one however is ridiculous. It has no real new plot...rather it's just a continuation of the 2nd one. It gets incredibly boring I cannot described how bad this movie is. Absolute garbage. The first one made was good. The 2nd and this 3rd one however is ridiculous. It has no real new plot...rather it's just a continuation of the 2nd one. It gets incredibly boring and stale and is way too long. I forced myself to watch the entire movie hoping for some redeeming moments but no, it was garbage the whole way through. Keira Knightley is a horrid actress (looks horrid too) and her role in this movie is stupid. What you see in this movie isn't new...you'd have seen it all before in the first 2. That said, the fighting is all the same. You'd think people would learn that when trilogies are made, 90% of the time each movie is worse than the one before it and this is the case with the Pirates of the Caribbean trilogy. The fact that this one was made literally at the same time as the 2nd one definitely shows. Don't know why anyone would go out and buy this on DVD....save your money. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
AlexW.May 24, 2007
tripe. badly plotted. badly acted. occasionally cringeworth. never funny. rip pirates.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
SeanP.May 24, 2007
C-R-A-P! That about sums up the bloated, incoherent mess that is Pirates 3. Whoever said more is better didn't sit through this snoozefest. True, the action piece in the last third of the movie is epic, but for that to improve the C-R-A-P! That about sums up the bloated, incoherent mess that is Pirates 3. Whoever said more is better didn't sit through this snoozefest. True, the action piece in the last third of the movie is epic, but for that to improve the rating, that has to matter. But it doesn't! The movie had lost me far earlier than when the action kicks in. If the movie had been half as long, I might have given it a 3. But making me suffer for 3 whole hours. Captain Jack gets a goose egg. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
SorelyDisappointedMay 24, 2007
Three hours of my life that I'll never get back! And $8 (thank god it wasn't a big city cinema!)....I honestly loved the first two, but this one was a convoluted, bloated, and meandering mess. Don't get me wrong, the first two Three hours of my life that I'll never get back! And $8 (thank god it wasn't a big city cinema!)....I honestly loved the first two, but this one was a convoluted, bloated, and meandering mess. Don't get me wrong, the first two weren't exactly making my year-end Top Ten lists. This isn't high drama, it's cheap summer fun. True, but this time, where's the fun? I mean, there positively isn't even a single exciting or fantastical over-the-top action scene....just a lot of pathetic jokes that fall flat, confusion, and bored lead actors. Sink this one into the deepest depths of a maelstrom because she's far too infected with barnacles! Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
DumboMay 26, 2007
Anyone who gave this movie a perfect score of ten should check their brains at the door. Possibly one of the most boring overhyped movies ever. In a nutshell it is awful!
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
AmberMay 26, 2007
Way to long and totally boring. If this was the first instead of the third movie it would be gone within two weeks from the theater. The characters have no chemistry and act like wooden indians. Terrible is an understatement.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
ConnieH.May 27, 2007
Tragic waste of time, money, talent, potential.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
AndyM.May 27, 2007
God, I just came back from seeing this and I'm left with a brain-fry. 3 hours of mind numbing, plot-less crap. And they're gonna have a fourth?! Really, Disney. I know you think that 4 extravagant movies based on a children's God, I just came back from seeing this and I'm left with a brain-fry. 3 hours of mind numbing, plot-less crap. And they're gonna have a fourth?! Really, Disney. I know you think that 4 extravagant movies based on a children's ride will save you from your financial woes, but this... this is just ridiculous... Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
LadyfingerMay 27, 2007
Almost impossible to believe that such a promising first Pirates could be turned into something this awful. The characters are almost sterile in that they act like wooden indians. The warmth that Jack Sparrow had originally in the original Almost impossible to believe that such a promising first Pirates could be turned into something this awful. The characters are almost sterile in that they act like wooden indians. The warmth that Jack Sparrow had originally in the original is now gone. I don't believe that I have ever seen an action movie this boring. You just don't care for a single character whether they live or die. And if they die it means nothing as they come back to life anyway. Just totally lame and the writers should be made to walk the plank. You'll be looking at your watch mercifully praying for this to be over. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
CiaranG.May 28, 2007
This is the worst film I've seen in years. The only film that is worse is 'Dahmer'. I do not get this movie at all. The story does not actually appear to have a storyline, it's more a collection of random pirate related This is the worst film I've seen in years. The only film that is worse is 'Dahmer'. I do not get this movie at all. The story does not actually appear to have a storyline, it's more a collection of random pirate related rubbish. I have no idea what was happening in the film, there was no explanation, just random scenes put together of boats going over the edge of the world, sea monsters, english people and a woman who at one point turns into a giant and then turns into a mass of crabs and then disappears. I have no idea what that was about. There were so many completely random, wacky moments. But it wasn't exciting wacky or funny wacky, it was just awful wacky. There were parts were the film tried to be funny, but it was just too stupid. The story didn't make one bit sense. The music was good in parts, but it would have been better if I had a clue as to what was happening or what the triumphant music was for or why the ship was made from living skeletons and why Jack Sparrow had mini Jack Sparrows on each of his shoulders talking to him. I really, really wanted to sleep in parts of this film. I was glad to get out and go to the toilet. There were some crazy almost exciting action scenes and fights, but the majority of the film involved characters talking and squabbling about completely random, nonsensical things. What the hell were the pieces of eight for? Even if I was told I'd get £5 free to go see it again, I would definitely say no. I couldn't bare it. I was dying to take out my phone and play Solitaire or something whilst watching. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
NickN.May 28, 2007
the movie sucked hard. the story is bad, the actors suck and i couldn't laugh at all. they waisted 220 million USD and i wasted 168 minutes of my life.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
HugoJun 16, 2007
A real nightmare, boring, stupid, loud, annoying. You will beg for mercy and ask for the movie to end soon! And if you are lucky you will understand what the heck some of the characters are speaking, not to mention that suddenly we have A real nightmare, boring, stupid, loud, annoying. You will beg for mercy and ask for the movie to end soon! And if you are lucky you will understand what the heck some of the characters are speaking, not to mention that suddenly we have Chinese, Muslim, Hindu and African pirates among other stupid plots and characters. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
NumbyJun 3, 2007
Mind numbing why such an anticipated movie could turn out this awful. Totally disjointed and hard to follow. Half way through this crap you just don't care anymore what happens. Three hours long and boring.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
HoraceJun 7, 2007
Jared, yes we were watching the same movie. Perhaps you are a very forgiving person or checked your brains in at the door. Pirates was a fantastic idea when it started and captivated all of us. However, the second movie was not really good Jared, yes we were watching the same movie. Perhaps you are a very forgiving person or checked your brains in at the door. Pirates was a fantastic idea when it started and captivated all of us. However, the second movie was not really good and this third sequel, well, the less said the better. Yes, they spent a fortune on special effects but without a storyline to go with them after awhile the audience realizes that the flick has become ridiculous without any feeling as no matter what no one dies or for that matter does any of the proceedings make any sense. That said, if you think this was a perfect movie deserving of a perfect score, then my score has to be a big fat goosegg to warn the unsuspecting public of how truly awful this movie really is. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
JoseM.Jun 9, 2007
This movie blew!! Oh man, I couldn't take it. Boring. Dumb. Ridiculous. LONGGGGGGGGGG. I hope they don't make a forth one, but if they do, they can count me out.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
EthanR.Dec 9, 2007
I really don't understand...did any of the creators of this movie actually watch the movie...its dreadful! i rented it and only got 1 quarter through the movie!! where did the coins come from? and if they're so important why does a I really don't understand...did any of the creators of this movie actually watch the movie...its dreadful! i rented it and only got 1 quarter through the movie!! where did the coins come from? and if they're so important why does a little criminal kid have one? why were crab rocks pushing jack sparrows boat through a land of sand? I JUST DON'T UNDERSTAND! Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
SallyD.May 26, 2007
I'm so depressed. I loved the first movie. I tried to convince myself that the second "wasn't that bad". Now i know. This third movie really is that bad.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
MikeJ.Jun 15, 2007
Holy Cow, I would have given this movie a negative number if it was possilbe. This movie was nothing less than stupid, dumb, boring and lonnnggg. If you want to see this movie I suggest going at bedtime and sleep through it. Save your money.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
DustinM.Dec 12, 2007
Three hours of failure.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
asylumspadezNov 23, 2011
I sat through this film for nearly 3 hours and I hated it. The story was even worst then the previous film, The acting was terrible, and it ended terribly.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
0
tremaultJul 1, 2021
awful nonsensical pile of trash. not many films have literally made me physically roll my eyes, and this one succeeded on several occasions. it seems like it was written by first year film students.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
0
LightsideDec 9, 2017
Deserves an absolute zero for a mess of a plot, poor opening, boring dialogue, weird Jack Sparrow moments, too long of a movie and way too many characters. I'm slowly making my way through the whole five films and this one has to be the worstDeserves an absolute zero for a mess of a plot, poor opening, boring dialogue, weird Jack Sparrow moments, too long of a movie and way too many characters. I'm slowly making my way through the whole five films and this one has to be the worst so far. Special effects are great but too messy, over the top action scenes and overall a very dark movie. Still cringing at the Orlando and Keira acting scenes and weird love triangle going on. Sticking by the first Pirates movie as the best one by far. I hope Stranger Tides is better. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews