Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End
Buena Vista Pictures | Release Date: May 25, 2007
6.4
USER SCORE
Generally favorable reviews based on 1073 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
626
Mixed:
227
Negative:
220
Watch Now
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)

User Reviews

User scoreBy dateMost helpful
2
JustinHJun 2, 2007
The second film showed signs of sinking but in this lame third outing the film is torpedoed. The narrative is so full of holes that is near impossible to follow parts of the film and the acting is so wooden by keira and orlando that they The second film showed signs of sinking but in this lame third outing the film is torpedoed. The narrative is so full of holes that is near impossible to follow parts of the film and the acting is so wooden by keira and orlando that they could have been a part of the furniture. Rumour has it that there wasn't a script when filming began and it shows. I echoed one of the characters questions about jack sparrow where he says "is he planning this or is he making it up as he goes along, I think the person in question was actually referring to the script. Abysmal… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
BlahBlahJun 2, 2007
Aside from being the best movie to come out this year, this iteration of the Pirates series is easily the best of them all. It answers and closes every storyline, and does so in an amazing fashion. The plot is very easy to follow, too. Aside from being the best movie to come out this year, this iteration of the Pirates series is easily the best of them all. It answers and closes every storyline, and does so in an amazing fashion. The plot is very easy to follow, too. Additionally, it has some of the most gargantuan CG action scenes ever made, including the climactic battle fought in the midst of a CGI maelstrom. You have absolutely no reason to not see this movie multiple times.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
LeonardB.Jun 3, 2007
This is a movie made to go see at the "movies" very entertaining! as far as the plot, what was so hard to understand???? the trick is to just sit back and take it all in, its fantasy not always meant to make perfect sense...open your mind critics.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
4
BillC.Jun 3, 2007
This things a bear to follow, and the quirky fun of Pirates #1 is no where to be found. The Kieth Richards cameo is so disappointing as well. You can see where the money went...special effects a-plenty..too bad a better , shorter,more This things a bear to follow, and the quirky fun of Pirates #1 is no where to be found. The Kieth Richards cameo is so disappointing as well. You can see where the money went...special effects a-plenty..too bad a better , shorter,more cleaver story wasn't part of the deal. And the ending...it didn't seem to fit either. Disney just milked it's cash cow, and it shows. Bill C.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
JimSJun 5, 2007
One word: stupid!. I don't understand the fascination with this series or Johnny Depp.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
JustinB.Jun 5, 2007
I loved it! Those who couldn't follow it should have tried either watching the previous movies or they should have payed attention. My only qualm is that it was a little too long.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
6
JohnH.Jun 5, 2007
Well, I saw the first two movies and loved them both. This movie left me with mixed feelings. I haven't watched Pirates since the second one came out in theatres, and let me tell you, if you want to fully enjoy it, don't do that, Well, I saw the first two movies and loved them both. This movie left me with mixed feelings. I haven't watched Pirates since the second one came out in theatres, and let me tell you, if you want to fully enjoy it, don't do that, because it was confusing as h--l. However, as I watched more of the movie, parts came back to me, but even still, I found myself unable to comprehend some parts. I'm not sure if watching the first two would have helped or not, because I can usually recall movie facts pretty accurately, and there were parts of this movie that I just found completely irrelevant. It was too long. But, despite all that, I liked the movie. It had funny parts, and although somewhat cheesy, I found myself laughing at it. Recommendation: Watch the other two before you leave home on the day of going, and you'll like it.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
DaveM.Jun 5, 2007
This was genuinely one of the least enjoyable movies I've seen in years. Far too long, too many plots, characters (Chow Yun Fat's in particular was pointless), very little action barring an awful final half hour sea battle. Capt. This was genuinely one of the least enjoyable movies I've seen in years. Far too long, too many plots, characters (Chow Yun Fat's in particular was pointless), very little action barring an awful final half hour sea battle. Capt. Jack Sparrow was rendered irrelevant by the focus on Will and Elizabeth - Keira Knightley was very poor and Orlando Bloom not much better. Brief flashes of comedy were about the only thing to like with this one.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
CarolA.Jun 5, 2007
Talk about Jumping The Shark this flick is destined for one of the worst of the year. 300M on special effects and nothing more. Just a paycheck for the actors as no one stood out including the wonderful Johnny Depp. This movie is horrific. Talk about Jumping The Shark this flick is destined for one of the worst of the year. 300M on special effects and nothing more. Just a paycheck for the actors as no one stood out including the wonderful Johnny Depp. This movie is horrific. Too bad to be believed. Avoid at all costs.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
3
SwordS.Jul 3, 2007
This is an achievement: it manages to be tedious, dismally overcomplicated and shallow - all at the same time. Depp rehashes previous performances, only Rush acts convincingly and the old chemistry is totally absent between Knightley and Bloom. Sad.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
TravisB.Jul 6, 2007
This movie offers you the best of thrilling emotions, along with one of the most intricate and well written plots ever brought to the cinema. not to mention the great effects and action scenes.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
BernB.Sep 20, 2007
this movie was really fun and all of you people saying it was horrible you're not a movie critic so get over it and if you didn't get the plot you're just a dumbass.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
StacyK.Feb 3, 2008
I loved this movie! I dont think it was better than the second one, but it was definatly good. I follow these movies prety good! My fav. character is Will Turner!
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
LauraW.Feb 4, 2008
Absolutely amazing! I watched it 5 times in two days! I think that that Hans Zimmer is a rival to Mozart and Keira, Johnny and Orlando are definitely at their best in this movie!
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
henryhOct 1, 2007
Givin it a ten to credit the last 2 movies but really i'd give it a 7 or 6 since the acting is not really top and the movie was a bit too long, but overall great movie and great trilogy end.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
RubaD.Oct 14, 2007
This is a completely fantastic film it may be confusing but sit up pay attention for 1 minute or 2 now and again and you'll find it the best.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
wtfisthisDec 18, 2007
I cannot described how bad this movie is. Absolute garbage. The first one made was good. The 2nd and this 3rd one however is ridiculous. It has no real new plot...rather it's just a continuation of the 2nd one. It gets incredibly boring I cannot described how bad this movie is. Absolute garbage. The first one made was good. The 2nd and this 3rd one however is ridiculous. It has no real new plot...rather it's just a continuation of the 2nd one. It gets incredibly boring and stale and is way too long. I forced myself to watch the entire movie hoping for some redeeming moments but no, it was garbage the whole way through. Keira Knightley is a horrid actress (looks horrid too) and her role in this movie is stupid. What you see in this movie isn't new...you'd have seen it all before in the first 2. That said, the fighting is all the same. You'd think people would learn that when trilogies are made, 90% of the time each movie is worse than the one before it and this is the case with the Pirates of the Caribbean trilogy. The fact that this one was made literally at the same time as the 2nd one definitely shows. Don't know why anyone would go out and buy this on DVD....save your money.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
5
fredbobDec 29, 2007
Did not live up to the first two at all. I loved the first films.. but his one .... i really did not like. Hope they make another one and save the series!
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
CarlH.May 24, 2007
A huge disappointment.Instead of continuing with the concept they had they tried to add even more which only led to a huge mess that smells over the top in every single scene.The after the texts ending is totally out of place in such a movie.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
AlexW.May 24, 2007
tripe. badly plotted. badly acted. occasionally cringeworth. never funny. rip pirates.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
SeanP.May 24, 2007
C-R-A-P! That about sums up the bloated, incoherent mess that is Pirates 3. Whoever said more is better didn't sit through this snoozefest. True, the action piece in the last third of the movie is epic, but for that to improve the C-R-A-P! That about sums up the bloated, incoherent mess that is Pirates 3. Whoever said more is better didn't sit through this snoozefest. True, the action piece in the last third of the movie is epic, but for that to improve the rating, that has to matter. But it doesn't! The movie had lost me far earlier than when the action kicks in. If the movie had been half as long, I might have given it a 3. But making me suffer for 3 whole hours. Captain Jack gets a goose egg.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
TheLexMay 24, 2007
It rocked! It felt like the first film, but was even more action-packed! I enjoyed every minute of it!
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
SorelyDisappointedMay 24, 2007
Three hours of my life that I'll never get back! And $8 (thank god it wasn't a big city cinema!)....I honestly loved the first two, but this one was a convoluted, bloated, and meandering mess. Don't get me wrong, the first two Three hours of my life that I'll never get back! And $8 (thank god it wasn't a big city cinema!)....I honestly loved the first two, but this one was a convoluted, bloated, and meandering mess. Don't get me wrong, the first two weren't exactly making my year-end Top Ten lists. This isn't high drama, it's cheap summer fun. True, but this time, where's the fun? I mean, there positively isn't even a single exciting or fantastical over-the-top action scene....just a lot of pathetic jokes that fall flat, confusion, and bored lead actors. Sink this one into the deepest depths of a maelstrom because she's far too infected with barnacles!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
1
MichalC.May 24, 2007
This movie officially pushed me over the edge, much like the ship goes over the edge in the movie, an made me never want to see another movie ever again!!! Save your $9.50 and do something else... anything. Get a lobotomy instead of this This movie officially pushed me over the edge, much like the ship goes over the edge in the movie, an made me never want to see another movie ever again!!! Save your $9.50 and do something else... anything. Get a lobotomy instead of this movie! If you want to see a movie, go see something else... like Hot Fuzz or even 28 Weeks Later! The 168 minutes that consisted of this absurdly complicated plot, is 2 hours and 48 minutes of my life I will never get back again! My time is valuable as a chemical engineer, going for around $50 an hour, going off of this, this movie cost me $140. DISNEY, I WANT MY MONEY BACK!!!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
JohnHenryW.May 25, 2007
I write this review baring a message to all those reviewers out there: PAY ATTENTION TO THE FREAKING MOVIE. All you have to do is listen to what the characters are saying and the plot is there. It's complicated, but it's not I write this review baring a message to all those reviewers out there: PAY ATTENTION TO THE FREAKING MOVIE. All you have to do is listen to what the characters are saying and the plot is there. It's complicated, but it's not confusing if you pay attention to the film. Is that too much to ask of these reviewers? God forbid a movie should have a plot that requires more than four sentences to sum up. Other than that, the final battle delivers the greatest thrills. The special effects are still awesome, and the characters are still the same characters we got to know from the last movie. In my opinion, there was nothing more to ask from a movie that involves a crew of fish pirates. It's great entertainment. IF you are willing to actually pay attention to it.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
LoriW.May 25, 2007
I loved the movie!! Would see it again. If you truly loved the first and second you will have no problem following the story line. Go in thinking its for a good time and you will love it - go in thinking negative (like other reviewers) you I loved the movie!! Would see it again. If you truly loved the first and second you will have no problem following the story line. Go in thinking its for a good time and you will love it - go in thinking negative (like other reviewers) you will only go away dissapointed. They all did what they do best and did it well!!!!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
5
THATMOVIEGUYMay 25, 2007
The most convoluted plot imaginable. 20 different twists that don't feel like twists, just annoying plot sublines that are hard to keep up with. Waiting for it to end (for 2 hours) was excruciating, made only somewhat tolerable by the The most convoluted plot imaginable. 20 different twists that don't feel like twists, just annoying plot sublines that are hard to keep up with. Waiting for it to end (for 2 hours) was excruciating, made only somewhat tolerable by the gorgeous Keira Knightley and the many facets of her character explored (sex goddess, tomboy, to war lord??). I loved the first 2, and I hope you are not as let down as me by At World's End.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
LainaD.May 25, 2007
This was one of the most brilliant movies i have ever seen and i have seen a lot. Full of humor, action, and other points of intrigue i never lost interest in it for one second.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
JamesB.May 25, 2007
On par with the original, it's the most fun I've had at the movies in a long time. A great cast, great story, and great effects make Pirates of the Carribean one of the most solidly entertaining film franchises of all time. Way to On par with the original, it's the most fun I've had at the movies in a long time. A great cast, great story, and great effects make Pirates of the Carribean one of the most solidly entertaining film franchises of all time. Way to go out with a bang, nicely done guys.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
1
FantasyMay 25, 2007
It's a disaster beyond all imagination but that still won't stop us from seeing it. We love Captain Jack Sparrow but what the creators have done is tarnish what should have been a great movie. Pity.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
JosephO.May 25, 2007
A fantastic movie, many genuine laughs, story can be confusing, great effects and fighting scenes.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
MikeH.May 25, 2007
Amazing, well worth the wait! watch this movie regardless of what anyone else says, good or bad, you must see it.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
RaffiiN.May 25, 2007
I thought it was a real good film. Better than the second but not as good a the first.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
6
JoshM.May 25, 2007
There were parts that were a major stretch, but, all in all, as a mindless summer movie it was entertaining.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
JasonP.May 25, 2007
I can't understand why everyone is trashing this movie, and if they are, it's for the wrong reasons. Most people are saying that the last 30 minutes of the movie was the best part, but for me it was the worst part. Everything that I can't understand why everyone is trashing this movie, and if they are, it's for the wrong reasons. Most people are saying that the last 30 minutes of the movie was the best part, but for me it was the worst part. Everything that happened leading up to the final battle sequence was fantastic! I think the big problem is that most of the people who come to see this movie only want flashy special effects and humor (well... they got their dose of it for the last part of the movie, minus the humor). No one really cares about the Pirates's intriguing and original story line. Overall, for the first 2 hrs and 15 mins, this movie was just as good as the original Pirates movie. All the cleverness, character plots, and humor were all done to perfection with no trace of cheesiness anywhere! I was pleasantly surprised to see that Jack Sparrow was just as funny in this film as the first, because in the second he failed to make me laugh once. I'm sad to hear that people complain about movies being three hours long, and when they can't follow a plot, they say it's too confusing or nothing is going on, but then when the action kicks in, everything turns around and all is right in the world. Once Callipso comes towards the end, you'll probably find me hanging my head in disgust for the remainder of the movie. At this moment, everything you find bad about the second installment reappears its ugly head and everything turns stupid. I'm extremely happy though, because the first 80% of this movie was a 10 for me... but then it turned into a 0... *works the calculator* Overall that's an 8.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
NikMay 26, 2007
Not quite as good as the first or the second, but still not bad at all. Sure there are a few points in the film where I felt that there was more plot than I could grasp, and a few moments that were just plain 'lame'; but the way Not quite as good as the first or the second, but still not bad at all. Sure there are a few points in the film where I felt that there was more plot than I could grasp, and a few moments that were just plain 'lame'; but the way the filmmakers manage to tie up it nicely at the end, and the warmth in your heart many fans of the series will get after seeing all their favorite characters and enemies come together for a visual spectical is enough to keep you entertained for 170-min running time.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
JazzR.May 26, 2007
This movie was amazing! It is a great finish to the pirates trilogy. It was hilarious and action packed. Johnny Depp did an incredible job as Captain Jack Sparrow. At World's End is definitely a must-see.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
CoryG.May 26, 2007
This was one of the best movies that I have ever seen. I personally think that the critics are on a "hate" streak with all of the movies this summer. Whatever movie that we were expecting, they just crush it down into nothing. This movies This was one of the best movies that I have ever seen. I personally think that the critics are on a "hate" streak with all of the movies this summer. Whatever movie that we were expecting, they just crush it down into nothing. This movies visuals and storyline, as well as the actors, were all outstanding. This movie met and exceeded my expectations. The only thing that I would like there to be, is more. More movies to be coming. This is a movie worth watching over and over again.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
JSMay 26, 2007
I hope they will put the Pirates movies in Davy Jones locker now. The first one was fun, the second one was okay, World's End is just plain boring. The special effects, of course, are gorgeous, but it's impossible to care about I hope they will put the Pirates movies in Davy Jones locker now. The first one was fun, the second one was okay, World's End is just plain boring. The special effects, of course, are gorgeous, but it's impossible to care about these characters any more or even to figure out what motivates them. Who's dead? Who's alive? Who's undead? Who loves who? Who are the good guys? Who are the bad guys? Stay home and, if you must, see the movie on dvd when it comes out. It's definitely not worth spending $10 on a theater ticket for.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
SHideMay 26, 2007
Even though I am still not sure how I feel about the ending, I think this movie was great. It had action, romance, comedy, everything you need for an excellent movie it contained. Its a must see!!
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
AdamH.May 26, 2007
I absolutely loved this movie because it tied everything together for me. I liked the David Lynchian world of the Land of the Dead and I liked all the "mind-boggling" plot twists. All the reviewers who are confused are just not paying I absolutely loved this movie because it tied everything together for me. I liked the David Lynchian world of the Land of the Dead and I liked all the "mind-boggling" plot twists. All the reviewers who are confused are just not paying attention and, in my opinion, a little daft. It's really not that hard to follow. I love all the characters (except Cutler Bennett who is just BORING) and the journeys they take. The last hour delivers all the goods! This one rocks! YO HO HO!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
DumboMay 26, 2007
Anyone who gave this movie a perfect score of ten should check their brains at the door. Possibly one of the most boring overhyped movies ever. In a nutshell it is awful!
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
QuaidMay 26, 2007
Did not like the first two, but this was awesome. It jumped right into the action rather than leading up to it. Finally! The scene at the end was amazing. The film was much more funny and sarcastic than all the rest.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
SusanS.May 26, 2007
Loved it. Pure fun. No complaints. Good acting, special effects, awesome entertainment. Critics are nuts. Hope it makes 2 billion and leaves the sour puss critics coughing up its dust. And it was too short. Not a single person moved, got up Loved it. Pure fun. No complaints. Good acting, special effects, awesome entertainment. Critics are nuts. Hope it makes 2 billion and leaves the sour puss critics coughing up its dust. And it was too short. Not a single person moved, got up for popcorn, bathroom, chatted during the showing I went to.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
AmberMay 26, 2007
Way to long and totally boring. If this was the first instead of the third movie it would be gone within two weeks from the theater. The characters have no chemistry and act like wooden indians. Terrible is an understatement.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
5
JasonM.May 26, 2007
This movie was better than Dead Man's Chest, but did not live up to the expectations of the Curse of the Black Pearl. At times the writing was poor and over done to the extreme. This movie is worth a rent, but i don't recommend This movie was better than Dead Man's Chest, but did not live up to the expectations of the Curse of the Black Pearl. At times the writing was poor and over done to the extreme. This movie is worth a rent, but i don't recommend going to the cinema for this one. You can see the daughter of a governor become Queen of the Pirates on your couch rather than spending ten dollars for this one.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
3
KyleM.May 26, 2007
Mind-numbingly awful. I actually laughed more than I did in the second movie, but the vast majority of the humor is basic slapstick, a far cry from the Deppisms of the first film. One of those rare movies during which my mind is screaming, Mind-numbingly awful. I actually laughed more than I did in the second movie, but the vast majority of the humor is basic slapstick, a far cry from the Deppisms of the first film. One of those rare movies during which my mind is screaming, "Just end already!"… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
CarlP.May 27, 2007
Holy S&*^, I can't believe so many people ripped this movie up. What the hell did you expect! It's a fantasy movie about pirates. If this movie was to far-fetched for you, you should probably stick to movies like, "the green mile", Holy S&*^, I can't believe so many people ripped this movie up. What the hell did you expect! It's a fantasy movie about pirates. If this movie was to far-fetched for you, you should probably stick to movies like, "the green mile", or "the holiday". This movie was kick-ass and anyone who thinks otherwise obviously didn't like the first two and shouldn't have seen the third.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
ConnieH.May 27, 2007
Tragic waste of time, money, talent, potential.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
C.GonzalezMay 27, 2007
Amazing. one of the best summer movies ever. have never written a review, but this movie forced me to just to bump it's score a tiny bit, seeing as everyone who is giving it such negative comments has something stuck up their arses.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
AndyM.May 27, 2007
God, I just came back from seeing this and I'm left with a brain-fry. 3 hours of mind numbing, plot-less crap. And they're gonna have a fourth?! Really, Disney. I know you think that 4 extravagant movies based on a children's God, I just came back from seeing this and I'm left with a brain-fry. 3 hours of mind numbing, plot-less crap. And they're gonna have a fourth?! Really, Disney. I know you think that 4 extravagant movies based on a children's ride will save you from your financial woes, but this... this is just ridiculous...… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
HyperShadowMay 27, 2007
[***SPOILERS***] Take the circus and replace the clowns with pirates and that is your movie in a nutshell. The franchise is officially dead and it went down in flames. I can usually sit through a movie and enjoy the special effects even if [***SPOILERS***] Take the circus and replace the clowns with pirates and that is your movie in a nutshell. The franchise is officially dead and it went down in flames. I can usually sit through a movie and enjoy the special effects even if the movie is bad, but I was just dying for this movie to end. Problems: - Plot confusing and too much crammed together. Not only was it confusing, but it was a pointless confusing. - I didn't care about any of the characters.. in fact by the end I was just hoping someone would stab them and end this misery.. whats the point if they can all be revived? - Law defying fight sequences... in a whirl pool way up on a ship having a swordfight having zero trouble balancing on a skinny beam. Flying inbetween ships at will as if the ropes were being suspended in the sky. Monkey being on fire shot out of a cannon and the next minute perfectly fine. The scene of the captain going down with his ship was so over the top I was laughing. No realism at all! - The marriage scene was probably the most uncomfortable lamest scene in a movie I have ever witnessed. I was cringing and squirming in my seat hoping it would end. - And sooo much more.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
KayDeeMay 27, 2007
I went to this movie having read no reviews and was hyped. Reading these reviews afterwards I can't fathom how some people gave it 9's and 10's ... are these real people or people paid by Disney to write phoney reviews? God I went to this movie having read no reviews and was hyped. Reading these reviews afterwards I can't fathom how some people gave it 9's and 10's ... are these real people or people paid by Disney to write phoney reviews? God awful plot.. was there a plot? No purpose just a waste of time. No real bad guys... no real good guys. I had nothing to root for and no one to care about. The special effects were totally unrealistic to the point I was saying "No way" and "Lame". Most of the action sequences were soo zoomed in that my head started hurting. The entire movie aside from the following was pathetic: - Will's father I thought was done well. - Some good scenery. - Elizabeth (forgot her real life name) who I thought was annorexic had some smoking legs. - A few laughs here and there. DO NOT SEE THIS MOVIE! For the love of God... It is really bad. Makes a mockery of the first two and is an insult to film-making and to film-goers..… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
5
RyanMay 27, 2007
This movie just sucked... the storyline is convoluted, the plot goes nowhere, and at about 3 hours this is too much. Just watch the first "Pirates", it'll always be remembered as the best one! The visuals are nice but they can't This movie just sucked... the storyline is convoluted, the plot goes nowhere, and at about 3 hours this is too much. Just watch the first "Pirates", it'll always be remembered as the best one! The visuals are nice but they can't save the movie.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
5
ScottG.May 27, 2007
I loved the visuals in the opening and began to believe they could recapture the magic from the first film (don't get me wrong--I liked the second film; didn't love it). Following the opening sequence, the next hour and a half was I loved the visuals in the opening and began to believe they could recapture the magic from the first film (don't get me wrong--I liked the second film; didn't love it). Following the opening sequence, the next hour and a half was a mess. The shifting alliances and NUMEROUS council meetings were akin to C-SPAN w/pirates. The last hour picked up the pace and brought me back into the picture, but grudgingly by that point, since I felt like so much of my time had been wasted. When I left, I had the same complaints as when I saw Spiderman 3--too much story relying on too many coincidences and too loosely told.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
LadyfingerMay 27, 2007
Almost impossible to believe that such a promising first Pirates could be turned into something this awful. The characters are almost sterile in that they act like wooden indians. The warmth that Jack Sparrow had originally in the original Almost impossible to believe that such a promising first Pirates could be turned into something this awful. The characters are almost sterile in that they act like wooden indians. The warmth that Jack Sparrow had originally in the original is now gone. I don't believe that I have ever seen an action movie this boring. You just don't care for a single character whether they live or die. And if they die it means nothing as they come back to life anyway. Just totally lame and the writers should be made to walk the plank. You'll be looking at your watch mercifully praying for this to be over.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
3
YewfaiMay 27, 2007
It was a wasted 170 min. Even though I was trying my best to concentrate and take in all of the plots and sub-plots, I lost it after a while. The storyline is like the whirlpool at the end of the movie. Everything is sucked into a deep abyss It was a wasted 170 min. Even though I was trying my best to concentrate and take in all of the plots and sub-plots, I lost it after a while. The storyline is like the whirlpool at the end of the movie. Everything is sucked into a deep abyss with nothing clear and definite in sight.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
ChristyM.May 27, 2007
What a brilliant film, I went to see it yesterday and I thought it was fantastic. Don't listen to all of the people saying its a big money-making scheme because they're wrong, watch the fil for its story, although hard to follow, What a brilliant film, I went to see it yesterday and I thought it was fantastic. Don't listen to all of the people saying its a big money-making scheme because they're wrong, watch the fil for its story, although hard to follow, it has meaning and a brilliant storyline.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
1
PhilD.May 28, 2007
walking out after this movie i had no idea what happened. I tryed to follow what was going on but there was too many sub-plots. this movie may have action but for no good reason. When i want to see a good movie I want it to have a plot.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
AndresZ.May 28, 2007
What a true piece of crap this is. Bereft of any cinematic talent on (and off) the screen, Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End is the first film of the year - sorry Spidey - to truly blow. Picking off where it last left, the main What a true piece of crap this is. Bereft of any cinematic talent on (and off) the screen, Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End is the first film of the year - sorry Spidey - to truly blow. Picking off where it last left, the main synthetic narrative follows off where the last film left off: now, our heroes are in Signapore visiting Captain Sao Feng (Chow-Yun Fat), the pirate captain in the city itself. The next thing you know, they're off to save Jack, who, previously on the awful Pirates II, gets himself locked up in Davy Jones's Locker. From there, the narrative goes kabut; at one point, you could even say there is no such plot, just people fighting and smiling at each other. Once it reaches earth again, we find ourselves at the Brethren Court, made up of the nine pirate lords, two of whom are Sparrow (Johnny Depp) and Barbossa (Geoffrey Rush). Not only is it imbecilic, it's racist: watch as all of the Asians are the first ones whom are dead, as well as the screaming Japanese pirate queen, and the stuffy French pirate fop; then they start fighting. But anyway, eventually, Elizabeth Swann, played by the ludicrous Keira Knightley, gets elected to be the captain. Against whom, you ask? It's Davy Jones's (Bil Nighy) men allied with the British. Then there is a huge fight scene; then another one; then another one; then it's over!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
3
IanM.May 28, 2007
This movie was just very convoluted. The story, or lack of story, made no sense. The only reason the score is so high is thanks to some winning performances from Geoffrey Rush and Bill Nighy, The visuals are spectacular, but that cant save This movie was just very convoluted. The story, or lack of story, made no sense. The only reason the score is so high is thanks to some winning performances from Geoffrey Rush and Bill Nighy, The visuals are spectacular, but that cant save the movie.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
CiaranG.May 28, 2007
This is the worst film I've seen in years. The only film that is worse is 'Dahmer'. I do not get this movie at all. The story does not actually appear to have a storyline, it's more a collection of random pirate related This is the worst film I've seen in years. The only film that is worse is 'Dahmer'. I do not get this movie at all. The story does not actually appear to have a storyline, it's more a collection of random pirate related rubbish. I have no idea what was happening in the film, there was no explanation, just random scenes put together of boats going over the edge of the world, sea monsters, english people and a woman who at one point turns into a giant and then turns into a mass of crabs and then disappears. I have no idea what that was about. There were so many completely random, wacky moments. But it wasn't exciting wacky or funny wacky, it was just awful wacky. There were parts were the film tried to be funny, but it was just too stupid. The story didn't make one bit sense. The music was good in parts, but it would have been better if I had a clue as to what was happening or what the triumphant music was for or why the ship was made from living skeletons and why Jack Sparrow had mini Jack Sparrows on each of his shoulders talking to him. I really, really wanted to sleep in parts of this film. I was glad to get out and go to the toilet. There were some crazy almost exciting action scenes and fights, but the majority of the film involved characters talking and squabbling about completely random, nonsensical things. What the hell were the pieces of eight for? Even if I was told I'd get £5 free to go see it again, I would definitely say no. I couldn't bare it. I was dying to take out my phone and play Solitaire or something whilst watching.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
3
Capt.KiddMay 28, 2007
I gave it a three because, even though unrealistic, the effects are at times eye-popping. The Davy Jones character has two or three scenes that are very emotional (one in particular when he sheds a tear) and Geoffrey Rush is very good... I gave it a three because, even though unrealistic, the effects are at times eye-popping. The Davy Jones character has two or three scenes that are very emotional (one in particular when he sheds a tear) and Geoffrey Rush is very good... HOWEVER, the lame and just terrible and tasteless humor transformed potentially outstanding characters into buffoons. I loved Rush playing Barbossa, he is just brilliant, but the "jokes" that he had to say completely killed the nature of his character. Same thing with Davy Jones, he should be scary and intimidating, I loved that character! And what with the pirate with the squeaky voice? Is one laugh worth sacrificing the image of all the pirates? Depp good, but totally eclipsed by Rush. Bloom goes practically unnoticed, Knightley fails awfully to deliver the emotion that her character needs (her most important speech to the pirates is immaterial, plain, fake and weak). And the mind twisting storyline gets you all confused, which has the effect of not letting you connect with any of the characters. Bottom line: lacks emotion, good acting wasted on lame and uncreative lines, lousy humor strips pirates of their inherent style turning them into clowns, un-engaging storyline. Save your 7 bucks.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
MikePMay 28, 2007
Yeah, it's a bit long. But look, there plot twists are EXACTLY what make the first move so much fun. A very fun moive. See it.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
BethanyMay 28, 2007
Delightfully weird. I wish more mainstream movies would take these kinds of risks. The locker was brilliant.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
DrewM.May 28, 2007
Totally bizarre, and the plot seemed to be written by taking small bits of paper from a fishbowl. Even so, it was good, silly, surreal fun. A ship of Sparrows, a giant woman who gives crabs to everyone, and...Kieth Richards! It's a big Totally bizarre, and the plot seemed to be written by taking small bits of paper from a fishbowl. Even so, it was good, silly, surreal fun. A ship of Sparrows, a giant woman who gives crabs to everyone, and...Kieth Richards! It's a big goofy spectacle with some good laughs and impressive special effects, and that's what I was looking for.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
JayK.May 28, 2007
Excellent movie. Contrary to popular opinion here, the movie does have a plot, however, the plot is a supporting character to what has becom the "chronicles of Jack, Will, Elizabeth and Hector." As for the twists, anyone with about an ounce Excellent movie. Contrary to popular opinion here, the movie does have a plot, however, the plot is a supporting character to what has becom the "chronicles of Jack, Will, Elizabeth and Hector." As for the twists, anyone with about an ounce of intelligence that can hold their attention for more than a few seconds can easily follow them, and the they keep the movie unpredictable and entertaining. Unlike the second movie, this one has great humor again. Also, I found that the 168 minute run time ran by very fast. Extremely so the first time I saw it, with friends on Thursday, and still fast the second time I saw it, on Sunday with my Wife. For wht it's worth, I think its a great movie! Sit back, relax, don't take it too seriously and make your own decision...… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
NickN.May 28, 2007
the movie sucked hard. the story is bad, the actors suck and i couldn't laugh at all. they waisted 220 million USD and i wasted 168 minutes of my life.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
4
DavidR.May 28, 2007
An incoherent mess, a shame on the filming industry. Heavily relying on special affects to give the audience a good time. Overall the plot is a mess, acting is stupid at times, when characters try to act funny, such as kiera knightly when An incoherent mess, a shame on the filming industry. Heavily relying on special affects to give the audience a good time. Overall the plot is a mess, acting is stupid at times, when characters try to act funny, such as kiera knightly when she brings out all those guns. The fight scene at the end was entertaining but blown by the marriage scene, that is just embarrassing to watch. To be honest i didn't like the second either, 1 word to sum it up. BORING. … Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
4
JLMay 28, 2007
The story in Pirates 3 is like the spaghetti of electrical cords below my desk. They're all connected in some way, but difficult to unravel and make any sense of the mess. The special effects in the final fight sequence are impressive, The story in Pirates 3 is like the spaghetti of electrical cords below my desk. They're all connected in some way, but difficult to unravel and make any sense of the mess. The special effects in the final fight sequence are impressive, but this accounts for a very small portion of a very long running movie. P3 is, after all, a story to be enjoyed by both the young as well as the old - so a clearer storyline, more action, and definitely more wit and humor in the sauce would have made this dish much more palatable. I'd give it a 5 if it were shorter, but given it took up 168 minutes of my time, I'm taking it down a notch.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
3
RogaL.May 28, 2007
This is my first ever review here, and I'm doing this to prevent people from being disappointed by this film. To start things off, I found Pirates 1 & 2 both where very enjoyable, true Blockbusters, so hopes where there, that part 3 This is my first ever review here, and I'm doing this to prevent people from being disappointed by this film. To start things off, I found Pirates 1 & 2 both where very enjoyable, true Blockbusters, so hopes where there, that part 3 would deliver. It doesn't. For it's length it doesn't really tell anything, and what it does it's unnecessarily confusing. The sfx are over the top, bordering on ridiculous. You don't build any affection to any of the characters. Sure, the film has it's moments, but not nearly enough to make it worthwhile spending your cash on. Don't get me wrong, I'm perfectly aware what to expect from a summer blockbuster and what not. But Pirates 3 is just one big mess. Save your money and buy yourself a bottle of rum, chances are high you'll have a better pirate adventure that way.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
JoanthanWMay 29, 2007
This movie runs like a theme-park ride - you slide from one event to the next with a thin premise tying it all together. But it's a pretty sweet ride. This movie was visually beautiful at times, and good fun for the rest. Stacked up This movie runs like a theme-park ride - you slide from one event to the next with a thin premise tying it all together. But it's a pretty sweet ride. This movie was visually beautiful at times, and good fun for the rest. Stacked up against your basic summer popcorn movie, you get your money's worth.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
ChaseMay 29, 2007
Okay, look
0 of 0 users found this helpful
4
JM.May 29, 2007
No comparison to the original, but Capt. Jack is amazing and Keira Knightley is stunning. However, the plot was muddled, the twists weren't very twisty, and the run time ran like a marathon runner. It may have been the fact that so much No comparison to the original, but Capt. Jack is amazing and Keira Knightley is stunning. However, the plot was muddled, the twists weren't very twisty, and the run time ran like a marathon runner. It may have been the fact that so much was happening yet nothing really pulled me in (other than Depp) or the fact that two hours in there was no end in sight. Whatever it was, this is the first movie I've ever fallen asleep (in a theater) to.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
SarahsTMay 29, 2007
This film is absolutely brilliant it brings together the best of both the other films!
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
ThomasSMay 29, 2007
The plot was senseless drivel, the movie overly long, and I regret the money and time I invested in seeing it.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
PriyaH.May 29, 2007
It was too long and the story was definitely too complicated but the movie still had a lot to offer. for starters at least there was a story. and the action scenes were amazing!! but probably the most redeming feature was the unexpected turn It was too long and the story was definitely too complicated but the movie still had a lot to offer. for starters at least there was a story. and the action scenes were amazing!! but probably the most redeming feature was the unexpected turn of events at the end. lets hope however, that the adventure does NOT continue.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
3
RobertB.May 29, 2007
What kind of children's movie opens with mass hangings? The action is still generally enjoyable but yes, some things in this movie just don't make any sense (plotwise). Much of the non-action scenes were likely provided by the What kind of children's movie opens with mass hangings? The action is still generally enjoyable but yes, some things in this movie just don't make any sense (plotwise). Much of the non-action scenes were likely provided by the writers of Days of Our Lives. At least 30 minutes could have been trimmed from this movie without missing a thing. If you were disappointed by the 2nd Pirates movie, this will only lower your opinion of the franchise.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
JessL.May 29, 2007
I really really loved it. I haven't heard many good things about it but the movie was awesome. It is definitely better than the second one...I think the only drawback was the length of the movie...it was really long but i didn't I really really loved it. I haven't heard many good things about it but the movie was awesome. It is definitely better than the second one...I think the only drawback was the length of the movie...it was really long but i didn't feel much downtime at all. it might be a bit of confusing, but it definitely not as bad as a lot people makes it to be. After you finish the whole movie then you will understand what was happening all throughout the movie...definitely the best movie I have seen this year...well..the second best...the best is Pan's Labyrith… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
SkyG.May 29, 2007
I dunno whats up with people in here, its not overly confusing, it has a plot. the Keith Richards cameo is good and the characters all come to end of journey.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
4
MarkB.May 30, 2007
Maximize the weaknesses, minimize or kill the strengths. That's the "strategy" employed by such suicidal sequels as Speed 2: Cruise Control (in which Keanu Reeves is nowhere to be found, Sandra Bullock's character devolves from Maximize the weaknesses, minimize or kill the strengths. That's the "strategy" employed by such suicidal sequels as Speed 2: Cruise Control (in which Keanu Reeves is nowhere to be found, Sandra Bullock's character devolves from lovably quirky to intensely irritating, and the villain was once again an employee who was genuinely cheated by his bosses, making both Speed movies perfect porno for Al Dunlap and Jack Welch). So why are Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End producer Jerry Bruckheimer, director Gore Verbinski and writers Terry Elliott and Ted Russio stealing from the Speed 2 playbook? Do they really believe in their collective heart of hearts that what the millions and millions of moviegoers who made POTC1 a surprise smash in 2003 and POTC2 last year's Number One box office hit really wanted was an even longer and more bloated pseudo-epic with more enervatingly Byzantine plotting, lots and LOTS more talk, far less action...and MUCH less Johnny Depp?!? (At one point in POTC3, one of Captain Jack Sparrow's foes asks if Sparrow actually plans his actions--or just makes them up as he goes along. Is the Bruckheimer crew making an arrogant in-joke about themselves?) I'm tired of hearing about how two of this year's best and most original films, David Fincher's Zodiac and Robert Rodriguez/ Quentin Tarantino's Grindhouse, would've been better (and made more money) if their makers had tamed their personal indulgences and trimmed their work a bit when it's bloody obvious that Bruckheimer, Verbinski and gang are 2007's true purveyors of arrogant egomania. How else would you explain their presumptiousness in not only NOT bringing Sparrow back for a full half-hour and then, when doing so, explaining his survival from the teeth and tentacles of POTC2's truly spectacular sea monster, the Kraken (who isn't even seen onscreen here) in a manner that's extremely sloppy and haphazaed by any standards but especially so in a beloved franchise that so many enthusiastic moviegoers have emotionally invested themselves in? Even allowing for the supernatural elements tossed into the mix, to buy into Sparrow's reunion with the rest of the principals, you have to disavow any common-sense knowledge of geography, zoology, weather or just plain elementary school logic. (I recently watched a silly Johnny Weissmuller Tarzan movie, Tarzan's Desert Mystery, in which the Lord of the Apes ftravels on horseback from a desert climate to a jungle one in about 30 seconds of real time. That 1943 "B" movie's stupidity is at least excused by the fact that it WAS a low-budget programmer. Over half a century and with innumerable times the money involved, there is simply no excuse for the Pirates people to harbor such cavalier disregard for its storytelling OR its audience.) For everything that POTC3 gets right--the production design is, once again, wonderfully detailed, eye-filling and even whimsical; the story arc concerning my favorite supporting character, the unexpectedly complex and conflicted Norrington (Jack Davenport) reaches a fitting if bittersweet end, and the monkey IS irresistable--it gets three times as much wrong, nothing so much as a pirates' council that grinds the movie midway into an even deader halt. (I've been at homeowners' association meetings that were far livelier and more rich in genuine entertainment value, even WITHOUT surprise guest appearances by legendary rock gods.) Not much less miscalculated are the moviemakers' gratuitous and unnecessary stabs, so to speak, at social commentary involving Guatanamo Bay and the USA Patriot Act, culminating in the (implied) hanging of a young boy that makes this movie truly inappropriate for children, even with its PG-13 rating. (It IS notable from a historical and cultural context that the British Navy is depicted in this aggressively mainstream movie with the same attitude with which the U.S. Cavalry was treated in such revisionist, Vietnam-era westerns as Soldier Blue and Little Big Man.) Even the wildly elaborate, storm-swept climactic sea battle doesn't have a patch on the funny, Indiana Jones-esque bits, such as the three man water-wheel swordfight and the shish-kabob drop, that punctuated the otherwise uneven POTC2. But hey, by the time we're edging toward Hour Three (which seems like Hour Five), at least the big finale is highly welcome (to say nothing of highly overdue)...especially when it caps off a movie that forces its audience to walk a seemingly neverending plank.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
1
AnnieMay 30, 2007
This movie was such a waste of time. Why would I go to watch the THIRD in a SERIES where all of the characters I loved DIE?!? Where the brains were on that, I will never know. And is it now Will Turner's locker? Stupid plot twist and This movie was such a waste of time. Why would I go to watch the THIRD in a SERIES where all of the characters I loved DIE?!? Where the brains were on that, I will never know. And is it now Will Turner's locker? Stupid plot twist and terrible ending. Even the people I know who liked the film are thinking of their own endings or expanding on this one because it was bad. Given how long the movie could take to resolve (more than two and a half hours) there is no excuse for it to be that bad. I miss the brevity and fun of the first one. The second two, which could have been great, aren't worth seeing again.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
3
DonP.May 31, 2007
Impossible to follow any plot. Unlike that great trilogy the Lord of the Rings, I never knew whose side I was on - who was good and who was evil. As soon as I'd figured it out, it changed. The movie was an utter waste of time except for Impossible to follow any plot. Unlike that great trilogy the Lord of the Rings, I never knew whose side I was on - who was good and who was evil. As soon as I'd figured it out, it changed. The movie was an utter waste of time except for two things: 1) the scene where Jack is in some nether-world and the rocks turn into crabs who carry the ship to the water is like a scene from another, psychedelic film. I wanted to get stoned to watch that scene. It was totally out of place, and totally fun - the special effects were well used. 2) It's always amusing, as a gay man, to see that Disney's many gay writers are still having fun making penis jokes. Like at the end when Jack tells the girls "it really does look larger close up" and each girl saying how she "wanted to go for a ride" first....plus the bit with Jack having a small, flaccid telescope... again completely out of place but they are the only 2 things I found amusing!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
LionelP.May 31, 2007
Dull, too long, non-sensical, over indulgent CGI fest crap. Terrible
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
JeremyD.May 31, 2007
I liked it a lot. Better than the second but could not eclipse the first. I loved the characters.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
MichaelNMay 30, 2007
This movie is not as horrible as some say.... but it doesn't live up to it's hype. There are some really disappointing scenes but there are others that make it worth the watch. This movie is good enough for fans following the This movie is not as horrible as some say.... but it doesn't live up to it's hype. There are some really disappointing scenes but there are others that make it worth the watch. This movie is good enough for fans following the series but maybe just a rental for first time viewers.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
MikeC.Jun 1, 2007
I thoroughly enjoyed the movie, the comedy came more naturally than the second film, it pumped up the action, which is always necessary in a sequel, it pointed each of the characters in new directions, ostly because no one trusts anyone I thoroughly enjoyed the movie, the comedy came more naturally than the second film, it pumped up the action, which is always necessary in a sequel, it pointed each of the characters in new directions, ostly because no one trusts anyone anymore, and there actually plots twists with enough story background and kick backs to the precious movies to find something new atleast the first three times you see it, meaning rewatch value. I was dissapointed with the third film and how depressing it was for the characters, but "At World's End" brought the idea back that no matter how hard it was getting for the characters they were still able to make light of the situation. Nothing can beat the first film, because of the enjoyable shock first received from meeting such memorable characters. So if you can handle a little thinking while taking in breath taking graphics and hysterical encounters, and enjoyed the first film then you'll have a ball. If you didn't like the first film, or barely enjoyed the second, of course you won't enjoy the third, but come prepared to be entertained and still think, or you'll get side swiped with information.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
1
JamesD.Jun 10, 2007
The movie is a bore. The story tries to accomplish too much, and the plot darts around dizzily like a drunken pirate. Ignoring the plot there are a few scenes here and there that attempt to resurrect the magic of the first movie in the The movie is a bore. The story tries to accomplish too much, and the plot darts around dizzily like a drunken pirate. Ignoring the plot there are a few scenes here and there that attempt to resurrect the magic of the first movie in the series. Audiences will find laughter to be scarce in this movie and enjoyment even harder to find. The battles are long and felt like watching CGI on steroids. Despite all of the effort put into making everything look as realistic as possible I have never felt more removed from a movie. The very ending of Pirates 3 feels like the ending to a different movie. The Pirates theme plays as Depp sails off triumphantly into the sunset. With hints at the end suggesting possibly another sequel I'm wondering how much more money Disney can make from a franchise that is more dead than Davy Jones.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
3
LauraDJun 1, 2007
Within 5 minutes of the movie starting I felt myself already getting drowsy. 3 hours later after NOT falling asleep and trying to find a plot I found out I would have better spent my time sleeping. I gave it a chance and it didn't meet Within 5 minutes of the movie starting I felt myself already getting drowsy. 3 hours later after NOT falling asleep and trying to find a plot I found out I would have better spent my time sleeping. I gave it a chance and it didn't meet my lowest expectations.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
4
PaulK.Jun 15, 2007
Could this have been more mediocre? They should have fired the writing team and started over. Thoroughly disappointing. Skip it, really.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
HannahC.Jun 15, 2007
This movie was extremely entertaining! Anyone who says it was too long is out of thei rmind! I actually enjoyed the plot twists and jumps--it really kept you on the edge of your seat. And the effects were unbelievable.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
LouiseT.Jun 15, 2007
Finally, a movie that leaves the audience to do some thinking. I loved this movie, mostly for the same reason people hated it, the carefully weaving prophetic storyline is a gem. Pirates 3 is bold, defiant and gracefully ignites the Finally, a movie that leaves the audience to do some thinking. I loved this movie, mostly for the same reason people hated it, the carefully weaving prophetic storyline is a gem. Pirates 3 is bold, defiant and gracefully ignites the imagination with its beauty and passion. 10+… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
HugoJun 16, 2007
A real nightmare, boring, stupid, loud, annoying. You will beg for mercy and ask for the movie to end soon! And if you are lucky you will understand what the heck some of the characters are speaking, not to mention that suddenly we have A real nightmare, boring, stupid, loud, annoying. You will beg for mercy and ask for the movie to end soon! And if you are lucky you will understand what the heck some of the characters are speaking, not to mention that suddenly we have Chinese, Muslim, Hindu and African pirates among other stupid plots and characters.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
RobwhyJun 16, 2007
Just as good as the other 2, I guess some poeple dont have the mental capacity to watch a 2hr 45 min. Movie without forgetting what has happened. Its TOO LONG...... Everyone raved about titanic,pearl harbor, and others.Im not sure why poeple Just as good as the other 2, I guess some poeple dont have the mental capacity to watch a 2hr 45 min. Movie without forgetting what has happened. Its TOO LONG...... Everyone raved about titanic,pearl harbor, and others.Im not sure why poeple jump on bandwagons about movies, but this one was well worth my $10, and I wouldnt mind seeing it again.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
WilliamB.Jun 21, 2007
Awesome and incredible are just two of the adjectives to describe this movie. It would have been a 10 except for the poor ending.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
KaitlynB.Jun 22, 2007
Good plotline, just way too long. And some pointless stuff in there.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
FrankJun 23, 2007
It's great conclusion of the trilogy (not the series, I hope), every fan of first two films must see At World's End. I was stunned by action and there were less, but pretty good laughs. I watched first two films twice and I am It's great conclusion of the trilogy (not the series, I hope), every fan of first two films must see At World's End. I was stunned by action and there were less, but pretty good laughs. I watched first two films twice and I am interested in Pirates storyline, so I never lost track of the plot. It is complicated, but it is understandable. By the way, while I was watching, I never looked at my watch and I never thought to myself that the film is too long. I was tied to the seat until the end. Great film.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
AcriticJun 24, 2007
The 3rd and final of stupid pirate movies. A waste of time.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
PatrickJun 29, 2007
Why does a film based on a ride need a sequel? And why does it need to become a trilogy? It's a pretentious attempt to become a Lord of the Rings type epic, but fails miserably. It's about the same legnth as LOTR, but way more Why does a film based on a ride need a sequel? And why does it need to become a trilogy? It's a pretentious attempt to become a Lord of the Rings type epic, but fails miserably. It's about the same legnth as LOTR, but way more dull. The plot was too long and complicated to understand, and not at all entertaining. It put me to sleep.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
NumbyJun 3, 2007
Mind numbing why such an anticipated movie could turn out this awful. Totally disjointed and hard to follow. Half way through this crap you just don't care anymore what happens. Three hours long and boring.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
Page:
More From This Movie

50 Critic Reviews

6.4 User Reviews

Details & Credits|Trailers

Current Movie Releases
By MetascoreBy User Score
1 77 Project Hail Mary
2 75 Send Help
3 73 Hoppers
4 72 The Sheep Detectives
5 68 Crime 101
SEE ALL
Essential Links
New on Amazon Prime Video
New on Netflix
Coming Soon to DVD/Blu-ray
SEE ALL