Paramount Pictures | Release Date: May 5, 2006
7.8
USER SCORE
Generally favorable reviews based on 678 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
526
Mixed:
112
Negative:
40
Watch Now
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)
7
TyranianApr 12, 2019
Best mission yet, smarter plot, less ridiculous and ton of fun. Really grounds the series.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
Jedi_JettsonFeb 29, 2012
The tension and the antagonists are frenetic and make the mission continuous among an impossible level. Though, it is tied with Mission: Impossible II.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
javis10Jan 11, 2012
This is the less Mission Impossible thta I like, I don´t know why but it makes me sleep like in the middle of it and the action is not as good as the second film. And the bad guy, didn´t look like a bad guy to me. IThis is the less Mission Impossible thta I like, I don´t know why but it makes me sleep like in the middle of it and the action is not as good as the second film. And the bad guy, didn´t look like a bad guy to me. I was dissapointed with this. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
movie2187Dec 31, 2011
best film out of the 4.(GREAT VILLIAN,Mr.Hoffman) It has the intelligence of the first (the second best film after Fargo in 1996), and the action is almost as good as ghost protocol, the 2nd mission impossible is the weakest, (it is enjoyablebest film out of the 4.(GREAT VILLIAN,Mr.Hoffman) It has the intelligence of the first (the second best film after Fargo in 1996), and the action is almost as good as ghost protocol, the 2nd mission impossible is the weakest, (it is enjoyable even with all the flaws tho). Anyways I rink the films 1.Mi 3(10) 2.Mi 1(10) 3.Mi 4(9.5) 4. Mi2(7) Ghost Protocol is The Best Action film in years but it's story is pretty mediocre,even though the actual dialogue is clever and the pacing and cinematography is amazing for an action film) Overall Mi 3 is the best of the series because it executes everything! But M.I. 4 Has the best Action and is the Funniest, Mi 1 Has the best direction(I LOVED the feeling of paranoia and experimental cinematography) and Mi2 is fairly enjoyable even with flaws....Great Action Series Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
imthenoobFeb 8, 2021
MI3 introduces the kind of tone and style the films after this would take on and improve. It's certainly better than the previous two entries but the lack of Hoffman, despite being billed as the main villain, is disappointing and I just don'tMI3 introduces the kind of tone and style the films after this would take on and improve. It's certainly better than the previous two entries but the lack of Hoffman, despite being billed as the main villain, is disappointing and I just don't think the cast is that strong this time around either. Don't get me wrong, It's a solid movie and a quick watch but it doesn't ever really peak. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
SpangleAug 4, 2015
Having seen the first four Mission: Impossibles, I can safely say that MI3 is my favorite installment, solely because of Philip Seymour Hoffman. The best villain in the series and, honestly, one of the better ones in recent memory, Hoffman'sHaving seen the first four Mission: Impossibles, I can safely say that MI3 is my favorite installment, solely because of Philip Seymour Hoffman. The best villain in the series and, honestly, one of the better ones in recent memory, Hoffman's performance here is fantastic and deliciously evil. Tom Cruise is fantastic as well here, doubled by him performing most of his own stunts, which I continue to find very, very impressive. The action is well directed by JJ Abrams and the film most certainly entertains. Ving Rhames, Simon Pegg, and Keri Russell, are also really good. The scene with Russell has also left me paranoid whenever I have a headache, so thanks for that Mission: Impossible III. Overall, this one is a very good action film that entertains in spades and thanks to Hoffman's spectacular turn as the antagonist here, it is elevated above the other installments in the series. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
0
tremaultAug 3, 2022
The most awful, awful writing and direction. Although I figured out what was going on by rewinding and studying the shots, it was not at all clear what was happening or why. So much explosions and gun fire and noise, on what is supposed to beThe most awful, awful writing and direction. Although I figured out what was going on by rewinding and studying the shots, it was not at all clear what was happening or why. So much explosions and gun fire and noise, on what is supposed to be a covert mission by Ethan Hunt, a man who it has been made absolutely clear in past movies, prefers passivism. The dialogue is also horrendously bad. Ethan says without a hint of irony that he doesn't trust Luthor, a man he literally trusts with his life on many occasions in past films. The helicopter guys complains about how he 'always has to copy' even though he has never once had to in this film and we've never seen him before this mission. Simon Pegg goes off on some rambling nonsense speech about how the mcguffin is probably some doomsday device to destroy humanity because he heard an anecdote from a professor once, and the other guys stand there listening as if they are actually taking him seriously. It's just a small example, the film is absolute trash. I can't watch this all the way through. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
BrianMcCriticJun 20, 2013
It was good to see this series get back on track after a sub par sequel. J.J. Abrams brings a sense of style and story telling that gives this series back its kick. Plus it's always good to add Phillip Seymour Hoffman.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
LoRevisorJan 29, 2015
Eu subestimei Tom Cruise,ele é um bom ator,e dar uma excelente performance como Ethan Hunt nesse incrível Missão Impossível 3,Philip Seymour Hoffman dar uma boa performance como vilão mas creio que ele é um pouco Superestimado,MichelleEu subestimei Tom Cruise,ele é um bom ator,e dar uma excelente performance como Ethan Hunt nesse incrível Missão Impossível 3,Philip Seymour Hoffman dar uma boa performance como vilão mas creio que ele é um pouco Superestimado,Michelle Monaghan é excelente,Ving Rhames,Maggie Q,Simon Pegg,Jonathan Rhys Meyers,Keri Russell e Laurence Fishburne também estão excelentes,Com excelentes cenas de ação e muito suspense. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
MovieGuysFeb 9, 2014
A month ago, I would've wrote "Mission Impossible III isn't the best movie by itself, but a down-to-earth, no-bs performance by Phillip Seymour Hoffman really elevated the movie to a new level." Now (February 9th, 2014), I write the sameA month ago, I would've wrote "Mission Impossible III isn't the best movie by itself, but a down-to-earth, no-bs performance by Phillip Seymour Hoffman really elevated the movie to a new level." Now (February 9th, 2014), I write the same thing. The late actor's performance in this movie was one of his best, probably about 4th to Doubt, The Master, and Capote. His talents will be missed. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
ThatCooperGuyJul 25, 2015
"M:I 2" was really stupid, but "M:I III" is such a big improvement.

Why do most people hate this film? This is the first "M:I" movie that's GOOD! Like, really good! We've got great performances by Tom Cruise and his team. Along with a
"M:I 2" was really stupid, but "M:I III" is such a big improvement.

Why do most people hate this film? This is the first "M:I" movie that's GOOD! Like, really good! We've got great performances by Tom Cruise and his team. Along with a fantastic performance by the late Philip Seymour Hoffman, if there's one thing this guy knew how to do, it was playing an awesome villain. The action scenes are awesome, the stunt work is great, and the cinematography is pretty neat. There is lens flair, especially since this is a J.J. Abrams movie(his feature directorial debut, BTW). It's still a good first attempt in the director's chair for Abrams.

I recommend skipping the first two films and starting with this one. It's solid entertainment.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
marcmyworksFeb 8, 2017
This whole film felt like an extra long episode of Alias, from the flashbacks to the music and even down to some of the minor casting. The mission in this film didn't quite seem impossible but was a vast improvement on number 2.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
diogomendesAug 21, 2015
Good follow-up to the awful Mission: Impossible sequel, this movie managed to make the action and cinematography look better than the previous one, and Tom Cruise continues to shine. The soundtrack is terrific, and the pacing is really solid.Good follow-up to the awful Mission: Impossible sequel, this movie managed to make the action and cinematography look better than the previous one, and Tom Cruise continues to shine. The soundtrack is terrific, and the pacing is really solid. By far, I'd say this one had the best villain in the whole franchise. Overall, pretty decent movie with some twists and cool action.

Score: 6.5/10.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
moslegend34Jun 6, 2015
Par for the course. Lacked the suspense of the second movie or the plot of the first. Saved largely by impressive stunts, disguises, deadpan multilingual dialogue and Simon Pegg. To be fair the first scene in the building complex was 007Par for the course. Lacked the suspense of the second movie or the plot of the first. Saved largely by impressive stunts, disguises, deadpan multilingual dialogue and Simon Pegg. To be fair the first scene in the building complex was 007 worthy. Give it half an hour. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
iMakeMyOwnLuckMay 31, 2015
i hate the ending to this movie, its like a joke that noones laughing at....what happened to the bad guy (phillip seymour hoffman)?? why do they keep changing who the bad guy in imf is and ethan hunt is about as smart as a reasonably sizedi hate the ending to this movie, its like a joke that noones laughing at....what happened to the bad guy (phillip seymour hoffman)?? why do they keep changing who the bad guy in imf is and ethan hunt is about as smart as a reasonably sized rock in the movie Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
TheDude-Aug 2, 2015
Fast-paced, with eye-popping stunts and special effects, the latest Mission: Impossible installment delivers everything an action fan could ask for. A thrilling summer popcorn flick.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
sicranoAug 8, 2015
The First Mission: Impossible that i watch is this III or 3,,,,,is a great one ssomewhat underrated.....................................................................................
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
CineAutoctonoDec 6, 2015
Mission : Impossible III was a powerful film , and a lot of intrigue , where " Tomsito " for the third time playing all in a very dangerous mission , and for me the most dramatic .
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
aadityamudharApr 19, 2016
A great combination of the the first two movies' strengths. It felt like an extended version of the original television series. Great. If this is any indication of the summer to come, we are in good shape. JJ Abrams Trek venture is now highlyA great combination of the the first two movies' strengths. It felt like an extended version of the original television series. Great. If this is any indication of the summer to come, we are in good shape. JJ Abrams Trek venture is now highly anticipated for me. The bridge scene is riveting. Kong and the T-rexes riveting. Give Tom Cruise his props, not one of the three MIs has been a bomb. I feel justified in stating that these films are the closest equivalent to 007 we have. Moms, grandpops, and teenies likes MI. Fanboys stick to Bourne's mole-hunt upon mole-hunt contrived euro-sedan chase sequences. Don't get it twisted, I like those films, choppy editing and all, its just that they has strayed SO far from the brilliant source material. Which brings me full circle. IMF in Peter Graves' day was always about the hacker, the strongman, and the make-up artist. The fact that dude is crazy in real life adds to the believability that Ethan Hunt would do the insane base-jumping stunts in each movie. Oprah's coach was just conditioning. Props to VIC ARMSTRONG the second unit director AND stunt coordinator. He Indy being drug behind the nazi benz cargo truck in Raiders. Cruise and Abrams have managed to interject the Tom's personal life(engagement/googley eyes) into a blockbuster and it took NADA away from the characterizations, plot, or tone of the film. Jason Strahams and Karl Urbans take note. This is how to do it. He didn't have me at hello... But MI:3 had me at the lip reading, the execution scene, and moonwalking up and down the Vatican walls. Let see Robert Langdon do that! Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
alejandro970Jul 5, 2020
Tom Cruise maybe is not my favorite actor but he knows how to handle the franchise without twisting the series' original concept, and making it better and better. Now we see the hero, and his wife, with life hanging by a thread; The best areTom Cruise maybe is not my favorite actor but he knows how to handle the franchise without twisting the series' original concept, and making it better and better. Now we see the hero, and his wife, with life hanging by a thread; The best are the action scenes in The Vatican, Berlin and Shanghai. To see with a large plate of popcorn. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
2
BroyaxJul 1, 2018
Le début du film est particulièrement efficace, saisissant même... et laisse augurer du meilleur pour la suite des évènements. Hélas, ce n'est qu'un feu de paille -assez flamboyant tout de même par la grâce de cet incroyable acteur, leLe début du film est particulièrement efficace, saisissant même... et laisse augurer du meilleur pour la suite des évènements. Hélas, ce n'est qu'un feu de paille -assez flamboyant tout de même par la grâce de cet incroyable acteur, le regretté Philip Seymour Hoffman dont l'intensité crève l'écran. Du coup, même le nabot Tommy tente de se maintenir un peu au dessus d'une simple nullité, comme s'il apprenait à nager tout-à-coup !

Puis, les masques tombent, ceux d'un scénario qui peine à dissimuler son indigence voire sa bouffonnerie totale vers la fin... De l'action, il y en a, ça oui mais quelle importance puisque le trou du cul Abrams est atteint de la caméra de Parkinson ! l'action devient brouillonne et illisible, déjà pas aidée par un montage souvent nerveux. Des tas de trucs explosent, des cascades improbables se succèdent mais à quoi ça sert si c'est filmé par un épileptique ? à rien !

Il reste quelques moments d'infiltration typiques de Mission Impossible à peu près regardables (et délirants) mais le film décidément trop long se perd sur la vie sentimentale de Monsieur Hunt (et ça on s'en branle) et en dialogues parfois d'une telle bêtise qu'on arrive pas à y croire. Abrams a dû se croire dans un dessin animé idiot grandeur nature ou une sitcom avec des explosions pour en arriver là...

Et pourtant la distribution est assurément soignée avec des jeunes couteaux prometteurs, filles ou garçons (Jonathan, Keri, Maggie pour la galerie et même Aaron Paul !) sans compter Fishburne qui a encore grossi. Mais à quoi tout cela sert-il quand le scénario hystéro-bouffon se conjugue avec la réalisation lamentable de l'autre petzouille ? à que dalle !
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
MonkiReviewsMay 29, 2017
Better than the last, but still not great. The story was boring and filled with plot holes. The characters have improved a little also. This did have a lot of action though, which was good.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
ViniciusBritoAug 1, 2018
The third movie of the mission impossible franchise takes place years after the second one and Ethan Hunt is retired from the field but he trains others to become agents. Ethan quit the job most likely because he is looking foward to start aThe third movie of the mission impossible franchise takes place years after the second one and Ethan Hunt is retired from the field but he trains others to become agents. Ethan quit the job most likely because he is looking foward to start a family with his new girlfriend. Because of the struggle of a agent that he trained, he feels forced to get back to work for help and during this he find out some trafficking situations that he needs to work on to fix things. Directed by J. J. Abrams.
The story of this movie isn't much complex as the first one is, but it isn't so less interesting and so unrealistic as the second one. This movie have a story that it is functional, but not even by far it is the most attractive point here, it isn't very original and doesn't have big moments, but then again, it is functional, it definely works. It does have a plot twists that it is straight outta the first one, it is just like that one. Their team at principle it is just like the other 2, a guy to invade, one to hack and one to escape in an helicopter, but later on it changes and they get more creative, wich is always better. They gave time for us to care about some new characters that was needed, they start the movie with a flash foward, wich i'm not so sure about it, not sure if it was the better of the options. The movie also have some coincidences that is hard to bought but definely doesn't bother if you get your disbelief on point. There are some moments where the movie tries to make you believe in somethings that are just badly done. But you can feel the adrenaline and the urgency here, so they did a good job in this part. I also liked how the explained somethings that were used in the other two movies in this one, it was very nice.
The acting in this movie did a good job. The better one by far was Tom Cruise, givin to the character of Ethan Hunt a layer that we didn't had much in the other two movies, wich is more of a desperated one in a cliffhanger situation, he cries and completely forgot of that smile Ethan, Tom make me completely bought his concern and his rage in some moments, and also didn't forgot that trick personality at the same time, so he did a great job here with that overwhelmed Ethan. Michelle Monaghan had a supporting job, she was kind and sweet, he did very well what they told her to, no complains on her. Ving Rhames is here one more time, and his character still pretty damn cool, he convinced being that hacker, he had a little more time in this one to talk about different things, but he did so good as he did in the other ones. Simon Pegg is also in this movie and he was funny, and have a very crucial part in the story, his acting was on point passing that his character is not the most confident ever, but is also a believer. Philip Seymour Hoffman interpretate a villain that it is simply unidimensional, like is characteristic of this series, he is just bad and is threatning people all the time, he did a good job considering what they gave him to do, he convinced me that he is just a bad man with the way he look to others and the way that he talks. Laurence Fishburne is also here and didn't had much to do, he was like his role in CSI, didn't had much time, but he was functional.
The action was surely the high point in this movie, there is some sequences that are really brethtaking, the bridge sequence they did with maestry, that was just 100% nice, it was very good in every possible way. The first invading scene was cool, but i don't think that it was perfect, at the begining of that part it was good that they make things pretty clear what was going to happen, but in some moments it felt that they was just shooting to random places, they didn't convinced me that they knew what they are doing, maybe it was the montage, i'm not sure, but at the start things didn't felt way connected. The second mission that they had to pick it up, that was another really cool moment, it wasn't the most nice thing ever but still was really well done in that Vaticano place. And also more by the end things got more crazy, jumping trough windows, somethings that they decided not to show, wich i'm not sure if it also was the best of the ideas. But generally it was really cool. The soundtrack worked very well, they really contextualizes the scenes very well, so as the main theme it is still pretty damn cool.
The cinematography got back to how it was in the first movie, and it is great, using those Dutch angles, and a moving camera, a camera that almost never is calm it is always agitated with the situation and that is awesome.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
Kes4278Dec 28, 2019
It’s an improvement over the 2nd movie and Tom Cruise was good again. Really good action
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
LoletinAlexisApr 7, 2019
Mission Impossible III is a positive step forward after the horrible second installment of the saga.

- Good performances in general, especially Philip Seymour Hoffman. - J.J. Abrams created the style of the following Mission Impossible
Mission Impossible III is a positive step forward after the horrible second installment of the saga.

- Good performances in general, especially Philip Seymour Hoffman.
- J.J. Abrams created the style of the following Mission Impossible deliveries.
- Good management of the times, creating a balanced movie.

- Action well choreographed, but impoverished by camera movements very annoying.
- Twist of plot taken from the sleeve and without sense.
- The use of McGuffin.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
ahmedaiman9999Aug 21, 2018
Just from the opening sequence, and Philip Seymour Hoffman's fantastic villain I knew that this one is gonna erase John Woo's dull sequel from my memory. MI III is incredibly fast-paced that there is almost no downtime. However, that didn'tJust from the opening sequence, and Philip Seymour Hoffman's fantastic villain I knew that this one is gonna erase John Woo's dull sequel from my memory. MI III is incredibly fast-paced that there is almost no downtime. However, that didn't stop the emotional stakes from working. It also has breathtaking action set-pieces, cool stunts, dazzling special effects, twisty-turny plot that kept me thinking throughout its entire runtime. Its plot is twisted and convoluted yet, unlike the first installment, never confusing. Instead it's actually so clever and thought-provoking. Everything kept turning upside down, and I enjoyed that! Also this movie has an awesome cast. Besides Tom cruise who did his best as always, the cast includes Philip Seymour Hoffman who made a fantastic villain that, in my opinion, we didn't need any more depth to his character as long as what we have more than enough to serve the plot. Michelle Monaghan is great as Julia. Ving Rhames is badass as usual. Also I think Laurence Fishburne was a pleasant addition to the franchise. Simon Pegg didn't have much screen time, but the couple scenes he was in are pure GOLD!

Loved how the score fits the action scenes perfectly, and the cinematography also is very good, although I had some difficulties while watching with the excessive use of close-ups.

The wrap-up could have been a little bit more convincing, but it's fine nonetheless. Overall, I can say that J.J. Abrams saved the franchise after the clumsy second installment that was trying to make a James Bond out of Ethan Hunt. I also think Mission: Impossible III is one of the most entertaining and ,sadly, underrated action movies ever made.

(9/10)
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
LivingTribunalFeb 1, 2019
I love the villain so much, but this movie isn't really my type. Ethan feels little bit dumb and sometimes things go weirdly. Also, the plot wasn't the best. Still, it's pack of many great action sequences and great acting.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
Suhailmustafa01Jul 30, 2018
Fast paced, great action. A fresh breath after the second one. A solid entry
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
ThatOneNerdyGuyOct 4, 2018
J.J. Abrams knows how to make intense scenes and they work out perfectly in this movie. But there is a mcguffin that is never explained throughout the whole movie. and there is a overuse of the classic "blaring lights and shaking camera" youJ.J. Abrams knows how to make intense scenes and they work out perfectly in this movie. But there is a mcguffin that is never explained throughout the whole movie. and there is a overuse of the classic "blaring lights and shaking camera" you would expect from a movie made by him. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
zNeverSleepingJan 27, 2020
Incrível evolução dentre seus antecedentes.

Missão Impossível 3 tem tudo que um filme de ação precisa para brilhar e vai além! Elenco incrível, personagens humanificados, roteiro muito bem escrito, com cenas de tensão de tirar o folego,
Incrível evolução dentre seus antecedentes.

Missão Impossível 3 tem tudo que um filme de ação precisa para brilhar e vai além!
Elenco incrível, personagens humanificados, roteiro muito bem escrito, com cenas de tensão de tirar o folego, edição muito bem ordenada, OST de volta as origens, planos complexos e explicações que antes nem eram cogitadas, fora todo o suspense envolvido no enredo que torna a experiência muito mais vidrante.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
DiptanshuApr 19, 2020
Amazing movie!great music,story and screenplay with good acting sharp dialogues especially flag one from fishburne,this movie was not full of mask on playing someone it was very little in it but mask creation process was great.it is filledAmazing movie!great music,story and screenplay with good acting sharp dialogues especially flag one from fishburne,this movie was not full of mask on playing someone it was very little in it but mask creation process was great.it is filled with spectacular moments like kidnapping the villain it was tensed and amazing,bridge fight,swinging from building was great the music in it was hauntingly great this type of movies really made us feel antagonist is someone and it played out to be another one this franchise is great on that its unpredictable.Amazing rescue scene it feels tensed starting 30 mins was slow but good buildup after that the edge of the seat ride it was.climax was great rabbit foot starting and ending finished perfectly.overall not masterpiece as 1st one but fast paced awesomely great movie! Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
SoapNuggetJan 11, 2021
It's definitely better than 2, but this is a JJ Abrams film, and that means a lot of close ups, lens flares and a predictable plot, PSH truly gives a performance and Cruise shines as always, but the rest is fine
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
Toasty87Jul 11, 2020
Where the decline started not terrible but just acceptable quite wooden at times.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
HeroicAge616Oct 27, 2021
M:I III advances Cruise's Ethan Hunt beyond James Bond lite and ups the stakes despite some unfortunate plot conveniences.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
JJ2FAS4UDec 30, 2021
----------------------------------7.0/10-----------------------------------
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
royalguy07Jun 14, 2022
Perfectly paced, great villain, big hair improvement over MI2. This gave the franchise the legs it needed to enter its prime in the 2010s.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
PatFlores2003Apr 29, 2022
I would say that this movie of the saga is my favorite of the saga, and the truth is that I really liked it because of the direction of J.J. Abrahams in his directorial debut. Although it has some flaws that did not attract attention, theI would say that this movie of the saga is my favorite of the saga, and the truth is that I really liked it because of the direction of J.J. Abrahams in his directorial debut. Although it has some flaws that did not attract attention, the truth is that Tom Cruise achieved with his charisma to fulfill the mission. The action sequences are impressive, the music is good, the editing and cinematography are excellent and the production and direction I would say is spectacular. I must confess that it is my favorite movie of the saga because so far I have seen it twice, really!!!. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
liamexeJul 6, 2022
This is another another mainstream action movie. Stay clear from this movie if you're looking for one with an original plot. Before the film had even reached its halfway point, I knew how it would conclude. That's how foreseeably obvious itThis is another another mainstream action movie. Stay clear from this movie if you're looking for one with an original plot. Before the film had even reached its halfway point, I knew how it would conclude. That's how foreseeably obvious it was. There is only one "good man" slain during the entire film. It is quite improbable that someone could leap onto buildings from great heights and endure numerous gunfights without suffering even a single gunshot wound or serious injuries. The movie appeared to be set in our time period, yet there were a number of high-tech items that were clearly fake. such as the tool that created a lifelike mask of a person's face in a matter of minutes. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
Sopa_de_BaconJul 20, 2023
In my opinion this film is way better then the fisrt two, have a good vilian, good characters development and good action scenees, but a mediocre end. I recommend it.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews