Read User Reviews and Submit your own for Michael Clayton

9

johntechwriterMar 11, 2023

An unsparing exploration of corruption in American corporate culture, and how its tentacles spread to corporate service providers: in this case, the law firm representing a leading agricultural chemical company. The story is told through itsAn unsparing exploration of corruption in American corporate culture, and how its tentacles spread to corporate service providers: in this case, the law firm representing a leading agricultural chemical company. The story is told through its effects on the personal lives of the three principal actors: George Clooney, Tom Wilkinson, and Tilda Swinton. The latter two are actors’ actors, and Clooney proves he can ditch his suave persona and hang in there with them.

Every actor has a chance to shine in this film. The script is letter perfect, without a redundant or gratuitous word. The film’s technical aspects are good enough that you don’t notice them. The director wisely prevents anything from competing with the story, which is horrific, and utterly plausible. Nor is anything about this film preachy. Characters are simply who they are, and what they do in the legal maneuverings in their client’s defense speak for themselves.

Tom Wilkinson deserves special mention. His character has some bipolar issues, which gives Wilkinson license to play the middle-aged madman as only he can. (He got an Oscar nomination for his performance.)

Like my other favorite Clooney film, Syriana, Michael Clayton does not patronize its viewers by explaining every little detail. Literate viewers who prefer drama over action and are capable of keeping track of events as they unfold in parallel will absolutely bask in the quality of the writing and the principal actors’ ability to create completely original characters and play them with great integrity. This is American dramatic film making — a vanishing art — at its best.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

Richard552Aug 15, 2022

The final face off that Clooney has is pure brilliance. $1 to buy a Netflix account, Google search: vtvshare

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

4

KenRDec 22, 2021

Michael Clayton – The Cleaver film you have when you’re maybe not having a Cleaver Film

In Australia there was an ad for a drink called Claytons Tonic, it was ‘sold’ as the ‘Drink you have when you’re not Drinking’. Curiously, this scriptMichael Clayton – The Cleaver film you have when you’re maybe not having a Cleaver Film

In Australia there was an ad for a drink called Claytons Tonic, it was ‘sold’ as the ‘Drink you have when you’re not Drinking’. Curiously, this script for me played out much like that ad; It looked interestingly like the real thing...very polished and almost convincing but had something manufactured or fake about it. When writers take you backward and forwards in their narrative, I get the feeling they may be concealing something - this could be just so for this story. It’s savvy, strongly cast, and handsomely mounted but, do all the plot devices add up to a completely convincing story? Either I was not concentrating enough or perhaps there were details in Tony Gilroy’s script shrouded in unrealized potential? IE; Why give the hit-run driver such an integral role early in the piece, especially if this was only intended to introduce us to the grubby side of Clooney’s ‘prostitute’-type attorney’s character? Why did George erratically drive off into the country after leaving the hit-run-driver and stop to check out three horses on a hill (this had more of an air of fantasy about it) Why was Wilkinson’s attorney character secretly ringing Clooney’s young son to discuss a Sci-Fi book and highlighting sections of its pages? We know Wilkinson’s character was on the verge of a breakdown as a result of his realization of malpractice but did we need so many unnecessary details, of his outlandishly sordid actions? Why did the super professional hitmen risk planting a complicated bomb in Clooney’s car when they could have taken him out so much easier? Perhaps all these plot devices (and more) could have been introduced to us earlier or in a far clearer manner – this picture had ‘Oscar bait’ written all over it. While in some respects it might be better than some, it also seems somewhat pretentiously overwritten in its claims to fame. Parental warning; Potty-mouthed dialog and F-Bombs throughout.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

FilipeNetoDec 12, 2020

This film is one of those I saw out of curiosity, seduced by a short summary of its script and also by the luxurious cast, which includes George Clooney and Tilda Swinton (in my perspective one of those actresses somewhat overlooked, but whoThis film is one of those I saw out of curiosity, seduced by a short summary of its script and also by the luxurious cast, which includes George Clooney and Tilda Swinton (in my perspective one of those actresses somewhat overlooked, but who has a talent that we can't help but recognize). I'm glad I did, the film really deserves attention, even though it has been a little out of the public's attention.

The film weaves a pleasant thriller around a large law firm committed to the defense of an indigestible client: a chemical corporation, as guilty as sin in a class action filed by several plaintiffs, who accuse it of poisoning. When the lawyer leading the case, one of the most experienced in the firm, finds out the truth, has a nervous breakdown and is so possessed by his own guilt that he starts doing everything he can to report what he knows, even if it is highly damaging for the law firm that, desperate to contain damage, mobilizes a collaborator whose specialty is managing crises and dealing with difficult situations, a highly indebted man, with a life full of problems and who is adept at putting the truth into perspective. However, this situation will test his skills as well as his morality. I believe that no lawyer likes to defend unscrupulous clients that he knows they are guilty, but for the good lawyer even the Devil has the right to defense, and it is up to the lawyer to protect his client's interests as much as possible, no matter how bad he is. This thriller uses the theme of inner guilt well to question the extent to which a lawyer can dissociate himself from what he has to do professionally.

In addition to the appealing theme, the film has a truly seductive cast of actors. George Clooney is one of those actors who almost always does well in everything and has an almost bulletproof talent. Here, he gives life to an unpleasant character, someone I would not want for a friend and much less an enemy, an experienced, artful lawyer, skilled in handling facts and for whom the truth is a matter of perspective. But the actor does it in a way that it is impossible not to sympathize with the character and to realize how frustrated he is for what he does and little appreciated by the bosses themselves, despite basically doing their dirty work! Another actress worth mentioning is Tilda Swinton, who gave life to one of the directors of the chemical firm. She is a woman of few scruples and whose concern is to save the face of the firm even if it means lying unabashedly. She reminded me of those individuals who take a roasted chicken bone, wash it and try to sell it as a saint relic. The actress's performance was good enough to earn her the Oscar for Best Supporting Actress, and I think it contributed a lot to how she transformed the character into someone on the verge of a nervous or mental breakdown. But even more striking, for me, was Tom Wilkinson's performance, in a deeply tragic character.

I think the film is quite lukewarm on technical issues. There is no cinematography that stands out in any way, and the sets and costumes are basically the ones we could hope to find. In addition, we also have the fact that the film takes its time to attract our attention and to truly engage. One thing that I really liked was the way the film starts, with a whole brutal monologue about the law firm, able to take us immediately to the topic and put us right on the spotlight of the film. The scene of the car explosion was also well done and it is the moment where the special effects were able to participate more visibly.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

Compi24Apr 16, 2019

Tony Gilroy's Academy Award nominated directorial debut, "Michael Clayton," stars George Clooney as the titular legal fixer in question, whose firm encounters a snag when one of its top litigators turns coat in the face of a pending lawsuit.Tony Gilroy's Academy Award nominated directorial debut, "Michael Clayton," stars George Clooney as the titular legal fixer in question, whose firm encounters a snag when one of its top litigators turns coat in the face of a pending lawsuit. First off, as a fan of Tony Gilroy's co-writing work alone, I was pretty stoked to see this. And, to be sure, finally seeing Gilroy with his screenwriting gloves proverbially off made for such a satisfying cinematic experience. "Michael Clayton" is a carefully plotted, yet objectively engrossing story, punctuated with superb dialogue, deliberate thematic resonance, and incredible acting. It's a real bummer this didn't kick off a reinvigorated interest in the "corporate thriller" sub-genre, because the real-world feel and implications of everything just made for that much more of an entertaining watch. And, don't be fooled. Though you may find yourself questioning some decisions here and there, it all pays off in a terrifically gratifying conclusion that I won't soon forget. Fantastic work here.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

twall3Aug 19, 2020

I really respect Tony Gilroy as a screen writer, and I could see his intelligence in the dialogue spoken. That said, most of the movie felt like random scenes and confusing developments. My wife said it well: "I don't like movies where it'sI really respect Tony Gilroy as a screen writer, and I could see his intelligence in the dialogue spoken. That said, most of the movie felt like random scenes and confusing developments. My wife said it well: "I don't like movies where it's confusing and unenjoyable until the last 5 minutes, and then it all makes sense". For us, Mr. Gilroy was too smart for his own good. George Clooney did a great job acting, but when the scenes he's working through are confusing, it's still not fun to watch. Seem to contain unnecessary rabbit trails. Crude dialogue about 2 prostitutes going down on a guy, and for no help to the story. The next day I listened to the the commentary featuring the Gilroy brothers, and it made me appreciate the film a lot more. Tony even mentioned he realized he was asking a lot of the audience to keep watching when things didn't necessarily seem to make sense. Post-commentary I would give it a higher score, but for first time viewers you may not love it.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

AsHwAtThAmADec 12, 2019

The scene plotted well.. mr.Clooney did great job.. probably his best movies ever seen..

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

FrenchToastNov 7, 2018

This is one of those movies that you're sure people are saying good things about but you don't know why. I watched it and could tell the plot and acting would be well received but I never really knew what I was watching. I felt like it wasThis is one of those movies that you're sure people are saying good things about but you don't know why. I watched it and could tell the plot and acting would be well received but I never really knew what I was watching. I felt like it was hard to understand why characters were doing certain things.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

7

amheretojudgeMay 7, 2018

i know it's a long way..

Michael Clayton As much as detailed it is, the feature wanders off onto surface where even though character has offered enough range and room to fill in, it still feels disconnected somewhat. The writing is wittyi know it's a long way..

Michael Clayton

As much as detailed it is, the feature wanders off onto surface where even though character has offered enough range and room to fill in, it still feels disconnected somewhat. The writing is witty especially on the protagonist for it is portrayed to have potential and superior than any other characters and still it goes into its desperate and vulnerable zone that helps ground the feature. Tony Gilroy; the writer-director, has done some appreciative research and work in this project which pays off well in here. George Clooney has done a decent work in it and is supported with a great cast like Tilda Swinton and Tom Wilkinson. Michael Clayton peeps into the whole "law" world and manages to make it more from it and if it had gripping screenplay, the feature would have easily entered major league.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

MccuskyMar 3, 2018

A real masterpiece, each character is tense and real, story is smart and reflects the moralities that people of certain companies face. Each proposed flaw in a character is a strength from another perspective and sometimes vice versa, theA real masterpiece, each character is tense and real, story is smart and reflects the moralities that people of certain companies face. Each proposed flaw in a character is a strength from another perspective and sometimes vice versa, the film draws you in with these delicate touches and each of the individuals stories. Perhaps Clooneys best performance… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

The3AcademySinsNov 6, 2017

Michael Clayton is an incredibly strong character study that tries a little too hard at times to be a gripping thriller. George Clooney and Tilda Swinton have amazing acting arcs, and Clooney especially drives the action.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

10

DrBlahBlahMay 2, 2017

One of the most underrated films in recent memory. The best legal drama ever made, as well as a nuanced, impeccably written and directed existential thriller.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

1

EludiumQ36Oct 19, 2016

Awful, awful film. Here's an apropos riddle: what can put you to sleep in 30-mins and is about 10mg? "Michael Clayton", that's what, it has about 10mg of substance to it, the rest is a waste of your life. Seriously, I felt myself actually ageAwful, awful film. Here's an apropos riddle: what can put you to sleep in 30-mins and is about 10mg? "Michael Clayton", that's what, it has about 10mg of substance to it, the rest is a waste of your life. Seriously, I felt myself actually age as it plodded through its 2 hr run time. And yes, I FORCED myself to finish it so that I'd have no regret or caveat regarding this criticism. This film is easily on the Top 5 of anyone's list for films that will bore you to death. All's it is is a vanity vehicle for George, he's almost in every scene, and in close-up. He's just not all that and his acting range rivals that of Keanu Reeves in this, such a waste. Both he and his character are age 45 at the time of filming, and he's an old looking 45, most people that age these days look to be in their early 30s. As for all the positive reviews from the critics and so-called users here, just remember George is in Hollywood's Top 3 so there's nothing - including glowing reviews - that he cannot buy. I could go on and on but this film doesn't warrant any further waste of my time.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

4

grandpajoe6191Jan 8, 2016

George Clooney's "Michael Clayton" does not deliver; despite some solid acting from veteran actor George Clooney, the movie itself is a heap of muddled mess with some really complicated dialogue and story threads that lead nowhere. WhatGeorge Clooney's "Michael Clayton" does not deliver; despite some solid acting from veteran actor George Clooney, the movie itself is a heap of muddled mess with some really complicated dialogue and story threads that lead nowhere. What exactly is the theme? Environment for the win?? Didn't really buy me off.… Expand

4 of 12 users found this helpful48

All this user's reviews

9

bds92Sep 6, 2015

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Crime, legal, or police themed dramas have the tendency to be incredibly overblown, or simply transition into comedy. With the exception of the scene where Arthur Edens strips, Michael Clayton is actually pretty understated. The whole movie takes place on George Clooney's face, where you can see the regret, despondence, frustration and desperation of each moment where every single character is counting on him. There's no wild chase, no mystery to solve with good cops, bad cops, donuts and canines. There's a dirty lawyer, there's a dirty law firm, and there's a guy who never made up his mind about what he wanted to do with his life, or whether he wanted to be good or evil. Clooney is skilled enough as an actor to become a decent guy one moment, and a cold, heartless realist in the next, akin to the role he would later play in Up In The Air. The supporting cast is terrific, the story is realistic, Edens is a character you can both sympathize with and admonish, and Clooney carries everyone's burdens on his shoulders, if only for a little while. For such a ruthless cast of characters, this movie has a lot of heart and depth.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

beingryanjudeAug 27, 2014

With a stellar script and powerful direction from Tony Gilroy, it isn't surprising how passionate the performances were. Clooney, Wilkinson and Swinton--all in top form.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

SpangleJun 8, 2014

I typically find most George Clooney movies to be a tad boring, but this one was certainly not boring at all. Rather, it managed to have my attention from beginning to end trying to follow everything that was going on. For starters, the plotI typically find most George Clooney movies to be a tad boring, but this one was certainly not boring at all. Rather, it managed to have my attention from beginning to end trying to follow everything that was going on. For starters, the plot is a bit confusing and convoluted at times and that would be a bad thing if they did not resolve my questions at the end. Throughout, the tension is always present and keeps you on the edge of your seat as more and more questions get answered and the puzzle pieces start coming together. At the end of the day, it is amazing just how far some will go to keep their dirty secrets from being aired and, really, that is what this one is about. The film summary on many sites is somewhat accurate, but really fails to capture what this one is truly about. The writing here is also very sharp and the cinematography is very stylish as well. George Clooney is also great here, as well as Tom Wilkinson and Tilda Swinton in smaller roles. Then again, the acting as a whole was very good. Finally, the monologue delivered by Wilkinson at the beginning (and later finished as the story truly begins) is also phenomenally written and delivered. It really sets the tone for the rest of the film. Overall, "Michael Clayton" is a good, tense thriller that is a bit slow and confusing at times, but is undoubtedly satisfying.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

BradySmithDec 20, 2013

A very atmospheric and exceptionally well written drama that doubles as a thriller, Michael Clayton will grip any intelligent moviegoer until the end. The plot delves into corporation conspiracies, murder, and deceit galore, and it's allA very atmospheric and exceptionally well written drama that doubles as a thriller, Michael Clayton will grip any intelligent moviegoer until the end. The plot delves into corporation conspiracies, murder, and deceit galore, and it's all played out brilliantly. The cast is great and the direction is precise, but I couldn't help but feel that something was missing. I previously gave this movie a 9, but as time went on I began to realize that it's actually somewhat limited. It works almost perfectly when you're watching it, but it doesn't really linger on the mind when it's over. It also could have been more kinetic. I'm not saying that I wanted full on shoot outs, but a couple of fights should have been thrown in for good measure. Complaints aside, it's still very, very good. Forgot to mention how beautifully shot the film, but you'll see that for yourself.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

10

StevenFOct 8, 2013

Many people have notions of what a 'fixer' may actually do, some see rubber gloves and cleaning up crime scenes, others may see smooth talking, good looking and suited up individuals who confidently go about their job as a sought afterMany people have notions of what a 'fixer' may actually do, some see rubber gloves and cleaning up crime scenes, others may see smooth talking, good looking and suited up individuals who confidently go about their job as a sought after individual. But George Clooney plays a different sort of fixer, his character, Michael Clayton, is realistic in his approach to every part of his job, he isn't a miracle worker, nor does he make every problem disappear because at the end of the day, he simply cleans up the mess, but the bigger the mess, the more complex the clean-up. Clayton himself has problems of his own that he cannot sweep under the rug, while he may look the part, Clooney portrays a character who isn't everything he appears, he owes serious amounts of money to loan sharks after we discover his gambling habit, struggles with financing his life and desperately tries to repair his past mistakes but still creating new ones, all while taking on a big "mess". The law firm he works for is facing a crisis after one of its partners, Arthur Edens (Tom Wilkinson) has quite the mental breakdown in the midst of a massive court case which Arthur knows the company his firm is defending are guilty of their crimes, something Michael is desperately trying to amend. It's clear to see why we have the title named after our main character, it is focusing on the life a man leads who feels he has no purpose, a man who is taken for granted and then thrown to the side, something Clooney portrays through many forces and silent stares, while we also see how he tries to balance his life as a dad and a man with a job that he can't really explain to anyone, but he shares the screen with someone else who is confident in her job but masks her demons, lawyer for the big client, a client called UNorth being sued for illegal chemical dumping Karen Crowdor (Tilda Swinton), equally as cunning and potentially dangerous as Clayton. It's films like this where we look to the talent involved to realise they are the driving force of the film, the tension and chemistry they create while also taking from a sharp and smartly written piece from director and writer Tony Gilroy, who cleverly takes a sombre approach to have this business thriller being much more than it seems, there isn't realty an inspiring touch to leave you flabbergasted, but more about style and the performances, it focuses solely on the consequences of actions as we have many guilt-ridden characters with too much power on their hands. As mentioned, the performances are the standout moments of this film, Clooney proves his stability and grit while Swinton also shoes her worth as the sort of Yin to Clooney's Yang. It's a smart and complex film that stays intriguing thanks to its strong cast and compelling story.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

6

drlowdonJun 7, 2013

Lawyer Michael Clayton cleans up tricky legal problems for his companies wealthiest clients. After years on the job he’s had enough of, he’s middle-aged, divorced and realizes that his career is going nowhere but remains dependent on theLawyer Michael Clayton cleans up tricky legal problems for his companies wealthiest clients. After years on the job he’s had enough of, he’s middle-aged, divorced and realizes that his career is going nowhere but remains dependent on the company thanks to his gambling troubles and a failed attempt at opening a bar. When one of the companies partners goes AWOL after working on a case for six years Clayton is sent to get him back on the job but soon begins to unravel an uncomfortable truth about the case.

The movie forgoes action for the most part, instead choosing to let the truth behind the case gradually unravel through glimpses at legal documents and out of context conversations that really require the viewer to concentrate. Each of the major characters comes across as well rounded with some good performance throughout but the movie is held together by George Clooney, who remains a terrific screen presence and his characters gradual development plays a huge part in the movies overall success.

I have heard Michael Clayton described as a thriller, and that is perhaps the wrong word to use, but it is certainly an interesting movie and well worth investing two hours of your time.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

8

worleyjamersMay 26, 2013

Very, very, very slow and hard to follow at first. But, Michael Clayton is a very good thriller. A unique thing about this film, isn't the plot, but the way it appeals as a thriller. With the minimal use of a score and action, it's thrillsVery, very, very slow and hard to follow at first. But, Michael Clayton is a very good thriller. A unique thing about this film, isn't the plot, but the way it appeals as a thriller. With the minimal use of a score and action, it's thrills are driven by the acting. So many other thrillers depend on intense music and fighting, but this film depends solely upon it's brilliant cast. George Clooney, Tom Atkinson, and Tilda Swinton are fantastic in this film. Definitely worth a watch. I promise that after the slow first hour, it gets very good and intense.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

9

VidsRuleApr 1, 2013

This movie relies on a perfect complicated-yet-understandable story and the type of acting that is completely grounded in reality. You don't see Clooney have wild ups and downs because his character wouldn't have them. Same with all otherThis movie relies on a perfect complicated-yet-understandable story and the type of acting that is completely grounded in reality. You don't see Clooney have wild ups and downs because his character wouldn't have them. Same with all other actors including the hit men. Just pros. No yelling or screaming. Scarily, this is probably how pro hitmen work. They don't act or look different. And Wilkenson plays a man in the mists of a manic episode perfrectly. His is the only character that acts in extremes, but believe me, it's very realistic.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

8

WiesyJan 21, 2013

A complicated but good and exciting thriller. The best movie of 2007. Again Robert Ludlum blow my mind like he did by the Jason Bourne movies (Robert Ludlum is the writer of the Jason Bourne movies and this movie). I like the cast and theA complicated but good and exciting thriller. The best movie of 2007. Again Robert Ludlum blow my mind like he did by the Jason Bourne movies (Robert Ludlum is the writer of the Jason Bourne movies and this movie). I like the cast and the story. Nice movie.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

10

bram29Jan 19, 2013

i always wondered one thing when watching those b-movies that feature a lot of people getting sick because of evil companies with lots of money and the hero suing the company and winning because of his/her good heart: the side of the badi always wondered one thing when watching those b-movies that feature a lot of people getting sick because of evil companies with lots of money and the hero suing the company and winning because of his/her good heart: the side of the bad guys. because those movies tend to leave all the arguments of the bad guys at: they just want te make more money. here's something interesting: this movie plays from the viewpoint of the bad guys, and you know what? this one actually became a complicated character piece with lots of intrigue and businessmen in suits. and, my favourite, the good guys do not win in the end because they get lucky or because they love everybody so much. no, they do it the old fashioned way: by being smarter than the opposition.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

8

InsanityOnABunDec 21, 2012

Even with only a couple spots of true action, this film's characters and plot are engaging enough to sell the whole package. It is a bit slow, but it proves to be worthy.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

7

imthenoobApr 13, 2012

Very solid performances by the cast. The flaw of this though is that it's a little confusing at times and it never really peaks until the end of the film (around the last 20 minutes of the film). Its still a good movie though, I enjoyed watching it.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

6

Trev29Apr 2, 2012

I was pretty confused right off the back. It was over acted( like that is a surprise.) Still it wasn't that bad, but it wasn't very interesting. The ending picked up when everything began to connect.

2 of 2 users found this helpful20

All this user's reviews

9

ghorahnJan 6, 2012

A seriously enthralling movie. I'm a fan of thrillers, but I usually just start up a movie on netflix and then let the movie give me a reason to watch it. By the end of this movie, I was squatting in front of the tv, my heart racing. Loved it.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

2

blondevixenDec 21, 2011

Extremely boring....I could hardly stay awake enough to pay attention. Do not see this late at night or after more than one drink....you will soon be sound asleep.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

7

davenbettridgeNov 16, 2011

Although this movie is a little dry at times and the exact thing that the film makers are trying to say seems unclear to me, Michael Clayton is a solid movie with some good themes, relatable characters and some real good performances. ClooneyAlthough this movie is a little dry at times and the exact thing that the film makers are trying to say seems unclear to me, Michael Clayton is a solid movie with some good themes, relatable characters and some real good performances. Clooney is good throughout and his performance in the last scene is FANTASTIC and a must see. Recommended.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

TheGorillaAug 26, 2011

The movie looked so promising, but it was all lost, I don't know where and I don't know why? The movie went in different directions, and left me without answers and with many questions. It was disconnected, and I don't understand why theThe movie looked so promising, but it was all lost, I don't know where and I don't know why? The movie went in different directions, and left me without answers and with many questions. It was disconnected, and I don't understand why the little guy told Michael (George Clooney) the story from the book, and what about his uncle, and the story behind their relationship? The plot is really weak, and I don't know why the critics supported this movie. But, I was blown away with Tom Wilkinson's performance, he did a great job with Arthur. He gave the character a dimension. Clooney, on the other hand, acted himself, as usual. I believe that Clooney is the most boring actor I've ever seen.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

6

jp992751Jan 26, 2011

Just an ok film. Nothing special. Not sure why it got an Academy nomination for best movie, I can understand the acting as it was great and even the direction was top notch but the story was just really mundane. Not that it was bad, justJust an ok film. Nothing special. Not sure why it got an Academy nomination for best movie, I can understand the acting as it was great and even the direction was top notch but the story was just really mundane. Not that it was bad, just nothing original.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

6

ryancarroll88Aug 27, 2010

I applaud the first-time director Tony Gilroy for tackling a corporate suspense thriller with such level-headed decidedness, but the obfuscated dialogue and screenplay dulls the experience, and I didn't find the main character, MichaelI applaud the first-time director Tony Gilroy for tackling a corporate suspense thriller with such level-headed decidedness, but the obfuscated dialogue and screenplay dulls the experience, and I didn't find the main character, Michael Clayton, affecting enough to hold a vested interest in. However, to the movie's benefit, he cast is well-played, especially Tilda Swinton as the fragile corporate hound-dog.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

7

SteveApr 26, 2010

Kevin C is right, the first hour of the movie is completly and utterly confusing, (just like the movie 7 Pounds with Will Smith) In the theatre people were squirming in their seats looking at other people like" do you get this" In the end Kevin C is right, the first hour of the movie is completly and utterly confusing, (just like the movie 7 Pounds with Will Smith) In the theatre people were squirming in their seats looking at other people like" do you get this" In the end and after watching it again, I get it, and the ending is good, but holy crap it takes a while to get there. The acting is great. There's just one scence I still don't understand even after multiple watchings. In the book the Cloony's son is reading, there is a drawing of some tree's and some horses, and then later when George is driving in the country he see's what I believe to be a snapshot of the book drawing, with the horses and some tree's up on a hill. It's the scene where is car explodes. I just don't understand the connection, was reading the book the thing that saved him from getting blown up, what are the odd's that he would see these things right around when his car blew up. They don't make it clear enough the connection and I still don't understand it, can someone explain this. they should of had a disclosure on both of these movie's saying "you won't have a clue what is going on for the first hour, but then you'll get it".… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

JoshP.Mar 19, 2010

The year 2007 produced so several of instant classics in my book, and Michael Clayton is definitly one of them. This movie was, for the most part, a character piece, and George Clooney, along with the superb support from Tom Wilkinson and The year 2007 produced so several of instant classics in my book, and Michael Clayton is definitly one of them. This movie was, for the most part, a character piece, and George Clooney, along with the superb support from Tom Wilkinson and Tilda Swinton, most certainly delivered is best performance yet.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

averyFeb 12, 2010

I love this film. I don't understand how folks have such trouble with gilroy's plots. they aren't that byzantine. just watch some hitchcock for the 50's and 60's. duplicity is a bit too clever, but MC is very simple I love this film. I don't understand how folks have such trouble with gilroy's plots. they aren't that byzantine. just watch some hitchcock for the 50's and 60's. duplicity is a bit too clever, but MC is very simple legal case stuff. i mean, it's no more complex than an episode of boston legal. hey, mark t: don't bust on michael bay. it takes a great deal of talent to make the rock and armageddon, and do not forget that tony gilroy helped write armageddon. to each his talent.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

MarkTJan 24, 2010

Allow me to recommend two things for all who were bored by "michael clayton:" Ritalin and membership in the Michael Bay Fan Club.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

WinstonL.Dec 25, 2009

Sydney Pollack ALSO deserved an Oscar nod for ACTING!

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

JoeH.Oct 7, 2009

Just a solid legal thriller with great performances. Only the dull and the lazy will have trouble grasping this plot; anyone else will be sucked right in.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

1

NickGAug 2, 2009

I've had to force myself to watch this film on more than on occasion and I have to say that I still haven't quite caught on to the unnecessarily complicated plot.The performance of the actors, I have to say was quite I've had to force myself to watch this film on more than on occasion and I have to say that I still haven't quite caught on to the unnecessarily complicated plot.The performance of the actors, I have to say was quite convincing...But it still was enough for me to enjoy the film.It is baffling to see the acclaim this movie got-I doubt most of the reviewers understood this movie 100%.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

BobNJul 27, 2009

What matters to me in a film is the atmosphere, the tone, and how the characters and plot heighten or develop that tone. This film is simple. It is simply good. I love the tone of this film, the corporation lurking always in the background What matters to me in a film is the atmosphere, the tone, and how the characters and plot heighten or develop that tone. This film is simple. It is simply good. I love the tone of this film, the corporation lurking always in the background and the sense of dread. Simply put, one of the best films of the past 5 years.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

0

KevinC.Jan 10, 2009

Horrible. Watched it with 5 intelligent, educated professionals, and 1 hour in to it, when it was obvious everyone wanted to quit watching it we still couldn't tell you what the movie was about. Possibly the most boring film I've Horrible. Watched it with 5 intelligent, educated professionals, and 1 hour in to it, when it was obvious everyone wanted to quit watching it we still couldn't tell you what the movie was about. Possibly the most boring film I've ever tried to endure. I truly can't believe the acclaim this steaming pile of boredom received...it completely baffles me. God, it was so bad.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful

8

NathnNov 28, 2008

I wouldnt call it an incredible, amazing, perfect movie, but i found it very interesting. took a while for the whole plot to start to come together, although that might also be because all my friends were talking the whole time. Its a very I wouldnt call it an incredible, amazing, perfect movie, but i found it very interesting. took a while for the whole plot to start to come together, although that might also be because all my friends were talking the whole time. Its a very intelligent movie, and if you want a mindless movie to sit through, do not watch Clayton. you will be disappointed. however, if you like intelligent movies that make you think, Clayton is a winner. a slightly slow movie, but well worth it.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

BrandonS.Nov 1, 2008

Starts slow, but by the end is really captivating. Very suspenseful in the best possible way. Each half-hour of this 2-hour movie improves over the one that came before. I highly recommend this to fans of subtle characterizations, great Starts slow, but by the end is really captivating. Very suspenseful in the best possible way. Each half-hour of this 2-hour movie improves over the one that came before. I highly recommend this to fans of subtle characterizations, great acting, and intelligent writing and directing.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

CatS.Jun 18, 2008

Really fantastic. Suspenseful, and phenomenally acted. If you want a smart thriller that respects its audience, this is the one.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

0

MiKEMay 31, 2008

Well acted. but who cares? This movie was a bore! I made myself watch the whole movie, waiting for clever twist. But it never came.

0 of 1 users found this helpful

5

JohnN.May 6, 2008

Very slow and predictable. Characters had the potential, but the plot was weak.

0 of 1 users found this helpful

5

TonyB.Apr 2, 2008

Extremely well-acted but too slowly paced, it treads familiar ground; there is nothing new here. The three horses on the hill scene is pretentious and obvious, and the extended close-up of Clooney in the taxi at the end has "I'm the Extremely well-acted but too slowly paced, it treads familiar ground; there is nothing new here. The three horses on the hill scene is pretentious and obvious, and the extended close-up of Clooney in the taxi at the end has "I'm the star" written all over it.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful

4

JoshD.Mar 30, 2008

I really wanted to enjoy this movie but found it a little irritating... I know it is directed at a certain audience, and I also like to think I am in that audience but this movie just meandered along... George Clooney nearly looked like he I really wanted to enjoy this movie but found it a little irritating... I know it is directed at a certain audience, and I also like to think I am in that audience but this movie just meandered along... George Clooney nearly looked like he didn't know what was going on as well !… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful

9

MattA.Mar 27, 2008

Great movie with superb acting. George Clooney really surprised me, and i found his portrayal of michael clayton to be authentic and refreshing. Tom Wilkinson portrayed Arthur with complexity and depth, like a true mad genious. The film was Great movie with superb acting. George Clooney really surprised me, and i found his portrayal of michael clayton to be authentic and refreshing. Tom Wilkinson portrayed Arthur with complexity and depth, like a true mad genious. The film was never very suspensful, however, could be taken very seriously as a corporate thriller with interesting concepts and a thick plot. I highly recommend for those who love scandals, and who can easily comprehend these kinds of events.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

5

D.LebowskiMar 26, 2008

Hopefully people call this intellectual only because they had plenty of time while the movie was droning on to think about more interesting topics or daydream. The choices the characters have to make are ridiculous and seem contrived to Hopefully people call this intellectual only because they had plenty of time while the movie was droning on to think about more interesting topics or daydream. The choices the characters have to make are ridiculous and seem contrived to serve the weakly themed plot. Acting and direction were good, could have used an editing floor renovation.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful

9

AdrianG.Mar 24, 2008

An intelligent, earthy, fiery and fluid drama - all the elements were there, all the cliches challenged, the world evoked believable, the characters intriguing, and beguiling. The three horses on the hill evoked a moral clarity beyond spoken An intelligent, earthy, fiery and fluid drama - all the elements were there, all the cliches challenged, the world evoked believable, the characters intriguing, and beguiling. The three horses on the hill evoked a moral clarity beyond spoken words. Ultimately emotionally and intellectually satisfying, it cleverly questions how we can go on any other path than the truth. A wonderful companion to 'The Constant Garden'… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

5

AlecE.Mar 14, 2008

the acting is good but its just clooney playing himself, youve seen it before. the story is good but its nothing you havent seen before in a thousand michael crichton stories. old hat.

0 of 1 users found this helpful

5

JamesF.Mar 12, 2008

Nothing special here. This story should have been a hour crime solving TV show. Overhyped, I was disappointed.

0 of 1 users found this helpful

0

DeanC.Mar 11, 2008

Way too slow.took too long to develop.

0 of 1 users found this helpful

9

MichaelK.Mar 8, 2008

I must say, I was impressed by this movie and by the way this film was shot. This film attacked a very disturbing subject and brought it to the forefront very well. True, the topic it did attack is that to which so many people believe is not I must say, I was impressed by this movie and by the way this film was shot. This film attacked a very disturbing subject and brought it to the forefront very well. True, the topic it did attack is that to which so many people believe is not entirely entertaining, but it does have a time and place for its thought provoking nature. Contrary to so many of the reviews I have read about this movie, reviews about how the world doesn't work this way or how things don't just happen like this, I want you to take a step back for a moment and look at things from the films point of view. I am not saying it does happen this way, but I wouldn't be entirely surprised if I were you and you actually got a chance to walk the paths that some actually do every day.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

5

d.michelleMar 6, 2008

Entertaining with no basis in fact. Companies do bad things, but they are entitled to legal defense. Should the company have taken out a full page ad in WSJ announcing thier wrongdoing? Maybe they should settle with the people that were Entertaining with no basis in fact. Companies do bad things, but they are entitled to legal defense. Should the company have taken out a full page ad in WSJ announcing thier wrongdoing? Maybe they should settle with the people that were harmed? Oh wait... that happened. A GC that hires hitmen is about as plausible as one that uses her magic wand to curse opposing counsel.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful

3

NancyZ.Mar 2, 2008

Film went off in hundred directions and never quite developed anything. Clooney just broods. I can not see the hipe in this film. What a mess.

1 of 4 users found this helpful

8

LisaZFeb 29, 2008

Kickass ending. I like Clooney now. He's pretty good for a big actor. I like the crazy guy too. And the horses were pretty.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

davids.Feb 27, 2008

Stellar acting, an intelligent script and innovative direction distinguish this otherwise routine political thriller. Clooney and Gilroy are self-proclaimed devotees of 70s cinema - both the subject matter and the distorted framings and Stellar acting, an intelligent script and innovative direction distinguish this otherwise routine political thriller. Clooney and Gilroy are self-proclaimed devotees of 70s cinema - both the subject matter and the distorted framings and innovative juxtapositions are straight out of films like Network, Parallax View or Klute. One feels however that Clooney, good as he is, is straining a bit too hard to be heroic, or maybe the script is too reliant on grandstanding speeches. Still, Wilkinson and Swinton are good, too, as is Sydney Pollack. The opening of the film is a blistering start and propels us into the film. It is a cracking thriller, but perhaps a little pleased with itself at times, as in the final shot of Clooney in the taxi, which seems superfluous. It would be a better ploy to just watch him enter the taxi say drive and then film the taxi drive off in to the distance. There's one subtle 70s ploy the filmmakers missed.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

AnneA.Feb 26, 2008

2/26 Just saw. Absolutely fabulous!!! Best movie we've seen in years should of won more oscars!!!

0 of 1 users found this helpful

4

XavierL.Feb 25, 2008

Reminds me of The Firm, but worse. Of course, because it's handsome George staring, and since he's determined to be recognized as an actor, this pseudo-artistic faux-70ies thriller is pleasing the critics, but not the Reminds me of The Firm, but worse. Of course, because it's handsome George staring, and since he's determined to be recognized as an actor, this pseudo-artistic faux-70ies thriller is pleasing the critics, but not the discriminating viewer who enjoys a well-made movie, i.e. don't pretend to make one if your cliche's are...so cliche'! when it pretends to be one.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful

2

JoeT.Feb 25, 2008

The Western elite are flawed and morally bankrupt, I get it. ...Impeccably shot though.

0 of 1 users found this helpful

8

AlexFeb 24, 2008

Great character, and plot development. The ending was somewhat of letdown; somewhat predictable and very fast. Other than that it was a great film. Very intense and kept my attention throughout. Stuart, only a right wing moron would see this Great character, and plot development. The ending was somewhat of letdown; somewhat predictable and very fast. Other than that it was a great film. Very intense and kept my attention throughout. Stuart, only a right wing moron would see this movie the way you did. It has NOTHING to do with politics, and EVERYTHING to do with inside corruption.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

KathleenK.Feb 24, 2008

Satisfying modern day noir; tightly composed script weaves complex personal stories together to build a tense layered thriller. Understated and darkly realistic acting by Clooney, Wilkinson, Tida Swinton score high praise. Worth re-viewing Satisfying modern day noir; tightly composed script weaves complex personal stories together to build a tense layered thriller. Understated and darkly realistic acting by Clooney, Wilkinson, Tida Swinton score high praise. Worth re-viewing to fully enjoy how the script pulls all those loose ends together with such elegance.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

5

SamuelG.Feb 24, 2008

All movies of this sort delight in loose ends, so I'll not dwell on those. Instead, something about the movie's paradoxes. A self-consciously slick Hollywood product that adopts all of the fetishizing gimmicks of the advertising All movies of this sort delight in loose ends, so I'll not dwell on those. Instead, something about the movie's paradoxes. A self-consciously slick Hollywood product that adopts all of the fetishizing gimmicks of the advertising used by the story's evil company? A paean to seeing the world clearly, to taking a fearless moral stand, that treats humans like cartoons and suggests an equation between ethical status and real estate values? And yet again Tilda Swinton wins praise for impersonating a robot… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful

10

PatEFeb 24, 2008

Intricate, subtle, tense--well-served by the score--not a single wrong note in the acting, the theme wonderfully summarized in the confrontation between Wilkinson's and Clooney's characters (o.k., maybe the loaves were a bit too Intricate, subtle, tense--well-served by the score--not a single wrong note in the acting, the theme wonderfully summarized in the confrontation between Wilkinson's and Clooney's characters (o.k., maybe the loaves were a bit too much). Every single relationship between characters -- such as the brothers -- well defined without bombast...cinematography both clever and serving to advance the story, with some truly wonderful shots. A complete package without a wrong note. My husband and I loved it.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

JTFeb 24, 2008

On the whole this was an enjoyable movie. Not as earth shatteringly good as some people seem to say it was, but still a good movie. As some of the other comments make clear, you won't like it if you're a corporate tool who has been On the whole this was an enjoyable movie. Not as earth shatteringly good as some people seem to say it was, but still a good movie. As some of the other comments make clear, you won't like it if you're a corporate tool who has been brainwashed to believe that corporate greed is good and that any critiques of capitalism are solely a product of some radical left wing cabal.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

6

PaulaC.Feb 23, 2008

So So. Interesting portrayal by Tilda Swinton and I loved Tom Wilkinson. The scene with the horses was contrived and empty. George Clooney was good but not Oscar good.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

SMFeb 20, 2008

I have enjoyed this movie the most among the nominees of this year.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

3

ChristopherS.Feb 20, 2008

This movie spent a lot of time showing us how flawed and difficult Michael Clayton's life is, he gambles, he's divorced, his restaurant is being sold off, his father is hooked up to oxygen his brother is an alcoholic loser and This movie spent a lot of time showing us how flawed and difficult Michael Clayton's life is, he gambles, he's divorced, his restaurant is being sold off, his father is hooked up to oxygen his brother is an alcoholic loser and he's in debt to who? Mobsters? And he has till Friday to pay them off? If he doesn't then what?. So What!! I suppose to serve as a contrast to his great abilities as "fixer". But the one scene where the best "fixer" in the business shows his stuff is at the very beginning when he is called upon to help a client with a sticky hit and run problem. What does he offer this desperate man as a solution? The name of a good trial attorney! The client was understandably unimpressed, so was I. The rest of the movie he's nothing more then a glorified baby-sitter and he screws that up pretty badly. The scene in the field with the horses falls flat simply because Clooney is incapable of letting himself go emotionally. As a result it comes off as an awkward contrivance created simply to get the character out of the car. As a hero Michael Clayton is unimpressive and unimposing. As a villain, Karen Crowder is laughable. This underwritten nebbish of a character is all that stands in Michael's way? Give me a break. The climactic confrontation at the end is a joke. I felt sorry for Crowder and thought Clayton looked more like a classroom bully who gets his kicks picking on little girls then an avenging hero standing up for truth and justice. Totally unimpressive.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful

3

StuartC.Feb 17, 2008

This is an anti capitalist diatribe worthy of a left wing zealot like Clooney. And by the way don't you require a body to make sure someone is dead?

0 of 1 users found this helpful

10

JackFeb 17, 2008

Oscar worthy. Not for the younger crowd.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

JayH.Feb 13, 2008

Complex and intense thriller, excellent acting, especially by Tom Wilkinson. Nice pacing and tense. Well directed, great score and editing. A solid piece of filmmaking.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

JudyTFeb 12, 2008

Good but nothing new or original and definitely not an Oscar contender for movie or performance by George Clooney. If anyone should have been considered it would be Tom Wilkinson as Arthur.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

MichaelE.Feb 12, 2008

No classic, but if every Hollywood movie turned out like this (and they all should), then I would be a much happier man. I absolutely have a crush on Tilda Swinton.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

KGFeb 11, 2008

Sydney Pollack did a good job as the head lawyer. No one in the packed theater dared move at the end until we saw all of the credits. Nice trick. I didn't get the horses.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

AriK.Jan 31, 2008

Very cool and gratifying film. An amazing cast too.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

ChadS.Jan 29, 2008

"Am I clean?" Those are the ironic words of a "company man" who just planted a bomb in another company man's car. The real hero of "Michael Clayton" isn't the George Clooney character, or Arthur Edens(Tom Wilkinson); it's "Am I clean?" Those are the ironic words of a "company man" who just planted a bomb in another company man's car. The real hero of "Michael Clayton" isn't the George Clooney character, or Arthur Edens(Tom Wilkinson); it's Michael's 9-year-old son Henry, who is clean; who is good. That's why Michael gets out of the car for a closer look at the horses. Overwhelmed by a wave of love for his son, this morally-compromised man realizes that being a father redeems his bad business decisions, and disappointing career in the law firm. As Michael gets up close and personal with the band of equine faces, he regrets his patronizing attitude towards Henry's enthusiasm about a book; a book that Arthur appropriates for the cover page of a report which will lead to his salvation; the same book that Michael ignores. "Am I a good movie," asks "Michael Clayton". Yes, perhaps, even a great one. (As a side note: Is this writer/director a Scientologist? Yes, Arthur's awakening is primarily motivated by his penis, but the once complicit lawyer also goes off his meds. Without the psychotropic drugs, Arthur is an improved man. Can you imagine the controversy "Michael Clayton" would court from the media if Tom Cruise played the titular former prosecutor?)… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

0

JasonW.Jan 29, 2008

I didn't buy the premise of this movie. In real life, a lawyer off the rails like the one portrayed here would simply be replaced by his firm. The excuses for not doing this were flimsy. Furthermore, what's with this hackenyed I didn't buy the premise of this movie. In real life, a lawyer off the rails like the one portrayed here would simply be replaced by his firm. The excuses for not doing this were flimsy. Furthermore, what's with this hackenyed plot? Big, bad, greedy corporation is taken down by good-hearted hero. Please! This theme has been done to death. I don't understand what the critics see in this unoriginal work.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful

0

AndrewD.Jan 29, 2008

A great film for people who are deeply moved by class action suits, lawyers droning endless legalese, and George Clooney's expressionless face. Corporate "thrillers" suck. Who wants to watch movies about this stuff? Workaholics? Save A great film for people who are deeply moved by class action suits, lawyers droning endless legalese, and George Clooney's expressionless face. Corporate "thrillers" suck. Who wants to watch movies about this stuff? Workaholics? Save yourself the expense and just work some overtime--you'll get the same thrill and make an extra buck or two in the process.… Expand

0 of 4 users found this helpful

9

JeffB.Jan 28, 2008

This was an intelligent, suspenseful, and intricate corporate thriller which was bolstered by some electric performances. All three actors who were nominated for Oscars were deserving, and the tension built as the pieces slowly started This was an intelligent, suspenseful, and intricate corporate thriller which was bolstered by some electric performances. All three actors who were nominated for Oscars were deserving, and the tension built as the pieces slowly started coming together. This was a very entertaining movie, and one of Clooney's best performances ever.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

EricL.Jan 28, 2008

Decent movie. Tom Wilkinson was amazing in this movie and so was George Cloony.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

5

LindaL.Jan 27, 2008

Wow, considering the reviews & rankings this film got, I really was disappointed that it was not more suspenseful. Not one detail in it startled me, unnerved me or surprised me. Clooney looked and seemed exactly the same throughout. (For a Wow, considering the reviews & rankings this film got, I really was disappointed that it was not more suspenseful. Not one detail in it startled me, unnerved me or surprised me. Clooney looked and seemed exactly the same throughout. (For a brilliantly portrayed white-collar guy who's gradually consumed by the angst of a stressful situation, please see Russell Crowe in "The Insider.") Good acting by all, but the plot is less exciting than than a typical episode of "Law & Order: Criminal Intent." I would guess that critics' and the Academy's love for Clooney must account for this film being judged so stupendously superior to others that are much more engrossing and suspenseful . . . "Eastern Promises" comes to mind (also with good acting, and a lot more actually happens).… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful

0

FrankS.Jan 27, 2008

Talking heads. Far too much dialogue. To the filmmakers: learn to use your medium. Less is more. Show, don't tell. A picture is worth a thousand words. And PLEASE don't have one character read the CV of another character aloud! Talking heads. Far too much dialogue. To the filmmakers: learn to use your medium. Less is more. Show, don't tell. A picture is worth a thousand words. And PLEASE don't have one character read the CV of another character aloud! Take a screenwriting course to learn how to avoid this. (How do millions get spent on a fundamentally bad movie...? And these critics--are they paid off by the studio or something?)… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful

1

MichaelPJan 27, 2008

I only give this a one because of a couple of decent scenes, one being at the very end. Otherwise, as many users said here, the most overrated film of the year. Much adieu about nothing, plot-wise. Structuring the whole movie as one long I only give this a one because of a couple of decent scenes, one being at the very end. Otherwise, as many users said here, the most overrated film of the year. Much adieu about nothing, plot-wise. Structuring the whole movie as one long flashback--by giving away a key ending scene--blew all the suspense for what might have been a very good part of the film. Overall, this felt contrived, like the filmmakers were trying too hard to be artsy and not hard enough simply to tell a good, gripping story. Your money is better spent on other films that are out right now.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful

7

BHJan 26, 2008

Definitely the performances were better than the script. I didn't feel the tension or the drama. Not enough development on the characters and thus I didn't care for them nor was there any character arcs.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

MarcusA.Jan 22, 2008

Oh my god, definitely one of the top 3 this year. No one is better than Clooney when he is at his best. If you don't like this movie it's probably because your too dumb to understand it.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

4

GeorgeMovieJan 22, 2008

Both my wife and I thought this was a ZZZZZZZZ. It was a SO WHAT movie. Based on the people in the audience. they didn't think much of this talky either. Maybe it's the Liberal George Cloony? Its a rental on a Nothings on Tv night.

0 of 1 users found this helpful

9

GeorgeC.Jan 16, 2008

People who don't like this movie are idiots.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

0

laladadaJan 14, 2008

I'd only give this movie a ten for the ten or so snores i heard in the unpacked theater screening. despite it being a free screening, i was quite upset that i lost two hours of precious time. actually, just an hour and a half...i got I'd only give this movie a ten for the ten or so snores i heard in the unpacked theater screening. despite it being a free screening, i was quite upset that i lost two hours of precious time. actually, just an hour and a half...i got some much needed sleep during the other 30 minutes. at least i left the theater somewhat rested.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful

9

ClayK.Jan 1, 2008

I agree that this is a thriller. The ending was not a let-down, and I felt that this is a sure pick for a Best Picture nomination. To me, it doesn't feel like a Best Picture winner, but a sure nominee.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

jerlrDec 28, 2007

One of the best films I've seen. Supberb writing and acting and great suspense. Clooney who is usually in macho roles does a wonderful nuanced performance of a man coming to grips with life

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

TimothyDungan-LevantDec 8, 2007

A solid, gripping genre piece -- not perfect, but very good, with a superb, low-key performance by Clooney at its center that gives it heft it might not otherwise have had.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

HovsepM.nDec 7, 2007

Great acting, great story telling. Sometimes the plot becomes slightly complicated , but it is fascinating to see how the actors maintain the tempo throughout the two hour movie.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

DanaM.Dec 2, 2007

Excellent thriller. Worth the entrance fee to see this well-made film. Great acting by all.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

TrollDec 2, 2007

Excellent direction. Clooney in his best inrerpretation: Oscar candidate.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

0

TaylorC.Nov 26, 2007

Holy crap this blew! I agree with Olson or whatever.

0 of 1 users found this helpful

9

MichaelM.Nov 26, 2007

A solid film in which all characters, good/bad/other are flawed - just like in real life. The "reveals" and character development are subtle. You don't need to be hit over the head to figure out why Clayton is divorced and how good/bad A solid film in which all characters, good/bad/other are flawed - just like in real life. The "reveals" and character development are subtle. You don't need to be hit over the head to figure out why Clayton is divorced and how good/bad a father he is, but it's all there for you to consume without an abundance of dialog or setup. Clooney gives us a character trying to separate what is right from what is reality as he attempts to find the grey area in between which will enable him to live with himself.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

5

KenGNov 18, 2007

The acting is good, and I could see and appreciate the attempt to make a "grown-up" movie, but all that doesn't make up for a script that takes a long time to get started, too often drags, and has too many unecessary scenes, that add The acting is good, and I could see and appreciate the attempt to make a "grown-up" movie, but all that doesn't make up for a script that takes a long time to get started, too often drags, and has too many unecessary scenes, that add nothing to the film, bogg down the story's forward momentum, and would have been better left on the editing room's floor. Also Swinton's pivitol character was seriously underwritten. In short, the performances were clearly better than the script. And no, I don't need explosions, car chases, and a lot of action to enjoy a movie.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful