Read User Reviews and Submit your own for Les Miserables (2012)

1

Kdog152Jan 4, 2023

I understand that this is a successful performance, and if you like, like a lot of ppl do, that's fine. But honestly, this film was very boring and this is ridiculously underrated.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

JP32Nov 16, 2022

The story is appropriately large, literary, and epic. The acting from Jackman, Crowe, and Hathaway is damn-near perfect. The rest are good enough. Yes, even Redmayne and Aaron Tveit, the most off-putting of the cast, get the job done. LesThe story is appropriately large, literary, and epic. The acting from Jackman, Crowe, and Hathaway is damn-near perfect. The rest are good enough. Yes, even Redmayne and Aaron Tveit, the most off-putting of the cast, get the job done. Les Misérables, despite the awkward sing-songy dialogue, ends up a powerful dramatic experience.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

Least_FrenchManOct 11, 2022

The Film, Les Misérables (Les Miz, colloquially), was an attempt at tackling Victor Hugo's masterpiece of French Romantic literature in a different method. Prior to this film, there were several attempts to adapt Victor Hugo's work to the bigThe Film, Les Misérables (Les Miz, colloquially), was an attempt at tackling Victor Hugo's masterpiece of French Romantic literature in a different method. Prior to this film, there were several attempts to adapt Victor Hugo's work to the big screen before, but Tom Hooper decided, in order to differentiate himself, would adapt instead the 1985 musical of Les Misérables with a star-studded cast, featuring the likes of Russel Crowe (Yes, from Gladiator), Hugh Jackman (Yes, Wolverine), and Anne Hathaway. It is important to note this now, as the mediocrity of many portions of the film can be explained by what Motivated the director in making this--that is to say, a chance to quickly produce a differentiated Les Miz film with big shiny Hollywood superstars so that he could make a name for himself. I seek not to attack this man, but I would have wanted him to have instead put in the time and respect to make the production worthy of the fame of the Book and beloved music, in that way, he, Tom Hooper, could have been celebrated for such an achievement instead of settling as he did.

The film had a lot of spirit in it. For those who are not aware of the story of the novel, it covers the 1832 June revolution in France against the July Monarchy, told through the lens of several characters, in particular, the thief searching for redemption Jean Valjean as he avoids the clutches of the law obsessive Inspector Javert. The production was magnificent in many regards, and certain set pieces were done well. The performance of Anne Hathaway in the number "I Dreamed a Dream" has already received its awards, so I feel no obligation to praise it here. However, the movie is terribly lacking in the whole "musical" department, for reasons I fail to see as anything higher than settling for mediocrity. Hugh Jackman is not a terrible singer, we see in the film "The Greatest Showman" that he has the talent to perform in a musical, and Russel Crowe, from what I have seen in videos he has done such as "Russell Crowe and Jeff Leyton Confrontation from Les Misérable" can sing the songs very well, yet both performers fail in their execution for this movie particularly. These criticisms would be light if it were not for the fact that we have to listen to both of these actors give sub-mediocre performances in two-thirds of all the musical numbers. Some additions to the story and choices though, I believe, were absolutely needed, or, perfect fanservice for fans of the musical. The attention to these detail grants us the audience, which he (Tom Hooper) knows to be musical fans, so much catharsis. For instance, there is a scene where Russel Crowe's character dignifies one of the fallen revolutionaries in the latter act (I am not saying who it is for those who have not seen the film), which grants audiences a great deal of closure on that character that otherwise would have been lacking in the stage-play. Additionally, with Les Miz's entire moral being forgiveness and growing in Saint Hood, the idea that Hugh Jackman's Character, Jean Valjean, the thief whose whole journey in the play is becoming a saint, is put on this journey by the bishop character at the beginning of the film who is played by Colm Wilkinson (The man famous for playing Jean Valjean in the Stage-play). That casting is brilliant and gives a meta-improvement to the well-established themes of the story that only true fans would get and such a message that such an improvement gives makes the message of the story all the more Inspiring as one realizes that the plot contains closure told through the medium of movies, via its casting, in this one scene.

Concluding, the story of Les Miz is such a Truth-filled masterpiece and study of the human person in its deep monologs of guilt and penance and heroic ballads on the pursuit of freedom, that I believe that no adaptation could truly destroy the magnificence of the work. However, I find it greatly disheartening as a fan of the musical and of the French romantic genre, that the director had such potential to use his actors and budget to create an epic out of this material, but instead settled for mediocrity. I love all of the people who worked in this production, but many of the creative choices were quite poor, and really brought down the adaptation. I would not recommend this movie to anyone who has never encountered the story of Les Mis, it is not totally unwatchable for someone familiar with the material.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

PimplupJun 5, 2022

I am so glad this musical/movie exists. It isn't for everyone, but I loved absolutely everything about it: music, acting, and story were all phenomenal.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

LuissDtMay 7, 2022

Les Miserables doesn't seem so miserable, the cast, the script, and all that production design is wonderful enough to make people love it... or at least talk about it

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

DawdlingPoetNov 21, 2021

I'm not usually especially keen on musicals but I did quite enjoy this, even though it consists almost entirely of songs. The songs I felt were quite rousing and it features an impressive cast, with Russell Crowe, Hugh Jackman, EddieI'm not usually especially keen on musicals but I did quite enjoy this, even though it consists almost entirely of songs. The songs I felt were quite rousing and it features an impressive cast, with Russell Crowe, Hugh Jackman, Eddie Redmayne, Sacha Baron Cohen and Anne Hathaway, among others. I found myself wondering what the outcome may be for various characters and hoping for the best for them. I know some people have criticised the (lack of) singing ability of the main characters - its true that their not especially known for being trained professional singers, being primarily actors but I couldn't say, hand on heart, that their singing ability (or lack of) badly affected my enjoyment of the fim as such. Whether they mimed the songs or not I don't know but either way, I felt I believed what I saw and heard and I enjoyed it as a film to watch and hear, so thats all that really matters surely?.

Also I felt it was quite an atmospheric watch - there were some good aerial (panoramic/landscape) shots, so the cinematography is quite good. Ok if your not a fan of musicals then this obviously won't be for you - you could argue its a bit too 'in your face' but I personally found myself quite enjoying it. Its a sad story but I wouldn't say its 100% negative in tone. I liked that it focussed on the morality/inner thoughts of those of a higher ranking in authority.

I wasn't familiar with the story and I knew it was a long film, based on a long play/musical, so I wasn't sure if I'd manage to stick with it until the end, as I can get bored by especially long films and musicals but in this instance, I did watch it all and as I say, I was surprised by how much I enjoyed it. It won't appeal to (be enjoyed by) everyone but for what it is, its a good film.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

0

DrBlahBlahNov 28, 2020

This unbearable adaptation of an unbearable musical travesties Hugo's great novel and assaults the ear with the musical stylings of Crowe and Jackman.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

MahmusSep 25, 2020

All this over a loaf of bread.

After having watched it multiple times, I can say almost certainly that this is one of my favorite movie musicals. Sure, it has its flaws and not all the actors sing as well as others, but **** if I care! I canAll this over a loaf of bread.

After having watched it multiple times, I can say almost certainly that this is one of my favorite movie musicals. Sure, it has its flaws and not all the actors sing as well as others, but **** if I care! I can hear the people singing the song of angry men, goddamnit!

Anne Hathaway steals the show, even with very little screentime. There's not much I can say about her rendition of "I Dreamed a Dream" that hasn't been said already. I'm sure even those who don't like this movie agree that she's absolutely incredible.

Everytime I watch it I find myself liking Russel Crowe as Javert more and more. I love making fun of his voice as much as anyone, but truth be told, he has an incredibly commanding presence in this film, even when he doesn't, if that makes sense. Really, everyone gives amazing performances.

There's just something about this that really gets me. Maybe it's the story or the songs or my love for musicals. Whatever it is, it just really works for me.

I know it's quite divisive, and I (kinda) get it; but when the beating of my heart echoes the beating of the drums, I can't help but let myself be enchanted by this movie.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

3

gracjanskiMay 12, 2020

They are singing all the time. Yes all the time and some of the actors even not so good. Why dont they sing only sometimes? I would endure this movie better.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

glommanDec 9, 2019

It's...different from other movies, not even in a bad way. I just love that everyone sings whatever they are trying to say, I guess that's what musicals are there for. It doesn't quite reach the iconic levels of West Side Story, which is theIt's...different from other movies, not even in a bad way. I just love that everyone sings whatever they are trying to say, I guess that's what musicals are there for. It doesn't quite reach the iconic levels of West Side Story, which is the only real comparison I can make with my limited knowledge about musicals, but it's definately worth at least one watch nonetheless in my humble opinion.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

BulgarianCriticMay 17, 2019

I really enjoyed this movie not even expecting that it was a musical.Some of the songs were pretty meh but i found 3 really good ones that i sometimes listen to on the bus.The story was ok and the actors did an amazing job but is normalI really enjoyed this movie not even expecting that it was a musical.Some of the songs were pretty meh but i found 3 really good ones that i sometimes listen to on the bus.The story was ok and the actors did an amazing job but is normal since they are all good actors… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

6

CynthiaTentacleMay 7, 2019

Look, I love 30 Odd Foot of Grunt frontman Russel Crowe as much as anyone, but he's badly miscast by the truly terrible, gimmicky, and over rated director of the film. (Tom Hooper, of Danish Girl and Kings Speech Fame) Ann Hathaway isLook, I love 30 Odd Foot of Grunt frontman Russel Crowe as much as anyone, but he's badly miscast by the truly terrible, gimmicky, and over rated director of the film. (Tom Hooper, of Danish Girl and Kings Speech Fame) Ann Hathaway is whatever, Eddie Redmayne is typically awful, and Amanda Seyfried's Cosette is a snooze, but the beautiful Samantha Banks absolutely shines in the role of Eponine! Hugh Jackman is also wonderful, elevating the material in every scene he's in. All in all, I would recommend seeing it at least one, and do think everyone involved, even including Tom Hooper, did the best job they could. Also, I will say that the film certainly feels expensive, if nothing else.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

TyranianApr 11, 2019

Pretty good musical with some great songs, Jackman and Crowe are good though some singers are very average.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

LoletinAlexisJan 22, 2019

Les Miserables is a very solid musical, but it sinks from a rhythm that will not please everyone and meaningless incongruities.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

9

FilipeNetoFeb 23, 2018

This film tells the story of Jean Valjean, a man condemned to hard labor for stealing food when he was hungry. After breaking parole, he will settle down with another name, but the goodness that he feels will compel him to take a child toThis film tells the story of Jean Valjean, a man condemned to hard labor for stealing food when he was hungry. After breaking parole, he will settle down with another name, but the goodness that he feels will compel him to take a child to look after, the daughter of a woman who couldn't help. Directed by Tom Hooper, the film has a screenplay written by William Nicholson and other helpers, based on the homonymous story of Victor Hugo. The cast is headed by Hugh Jackman, Russell Crowe, Anne Hathaway and Sacha Baron Cohen, among other actors.

The story of this film needs no introduction. This is one of the most famous novels of Victor Hugo, already adapted to the cinema, theater and also musical theater. In fact, most of the songs the film features are, in fact, taken from the stage musical. So, more than a film adaptation of a book, this is a film adaptation of a musical play.

No criticisms to make about the script: he convincingly adapts the story, preserving the magic of music. The actors are huge monsters of talent with excellent voices. Jackman gave a pure soul to his character, contrasting with the vocal gravity of Russell Crowe, who gave body to Javert, a man obsessed with the punishment of criminals and disbelieving in their rehabilitation. They're strong characters, played by seasoned actors with a huge presence on scene. The action scenes between them are breathtaking. Anne Hathaway also deserves a special mention, not only by the physical effort she felt to become Fantine (she became extremely thin and almost bald for the role), but mainly by the quality of what she could do. Staying with one of the most dramatic characters in the film, she played some of the most tragic scenes, and singed their saddest song, "I Dreamed A Dream". Its impossible not to cry watching these scenes and listening to the wonderful way the actress managed to sing that song and give a soul, almost martyr, to her character.

The scenarios are excellent and try to be faithful to the book and the story. The costumes too, and some of them deserve applause, portraying fairly the misery when the poorest lived. The visual effects fulfill their role discreetly but efficiently, and the soundtrack probably will be remembered by all who are watching this movie. Winner of three Oscars (Best Supporting Actress, Best Characterization, Best Editing and Sound Mixing), this is a film for the family and for everyone.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

panslabyrinthOct 28, 2017

Everytime I see this film it sends shivers down my spine. This film features spectacular performances from everyone, with one classical story that shall be told down for generations to come.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

0

JahosafatsSep 17, 2017

News flash ... Hugh Jackman and Russell Crowe CAN NOT sing but insisted on doing so the whole movie. Extremely painful to watch. Anne Hathaway was pretty good but there is no way she could save this turd.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

9

FadeBlackJun 18, 2017

One of the most majestic, heroic, poetic, awe-inspiring tales the world has ever told, delivered in probably the best cinematic version to date. While not as perfect as the actual musical, the performances in this film elevate is aboveOne of the most majestic, heroic, poetic, awe-inspiring tales the world has ever told, delivered in probably the best cinematic version to date. While not as perfect as the actual musical, the performances in this film elevate is above previous versions I feel. Freedom beats free whenever these songs are sang, and this effort will live on in history for quite some time to come.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

10

zan56Mar 28, 2017

This is a late review but this Movie is one of my all time favorites and I went from not wanting to watch it at all to being blown away. The cast did an amazing job as well as the entire directing and production team.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

russiangamerMar 7, 2017

Шедевр.
Очень эмоциональный фильм, который может тронуть до слёз. Все актёры играют потрясающе, очень красивые голоса в песнях. Декорации, костюмы, эффекты - всё на высоте!
Для людей, которые любят мюзиклы-это кино обязательно к просмотру.Шедевр.
Очень эмоциональный фильм, который может тронуть до слёз. Все актёры играют потрясающе, очень красивые голоса в песнях. Декорации, костюмы, эффекты - всё на высоте!
Для людей, которые любят мюзиклы-это кино обязательно к просмотру.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

MrMovieBuffOct 24, 2016

As far as musicals go, this one is definitely the most ambitious. 'Les Miserables', based off the novel by Victor Hugo in 1862, it has also been adapted into stage musicals, and there have been feature-length film adaptations in the past.As far as musicals go, this one is definitely the most ambitious. 'Les Miserables', based off the novel by Victor Hugo in 1862, it has also been adapted into stage musicals, and there have been feature-length film adaptations in the past. But, this time, director Tom Hooper ('The King's Speech') decides to adapt the musical with virtually more than 95% of the film's dialogue being executed in song.

In 1815, a man named Jean Valjean (a powerful Hugh Jackman) is prisoner, but is free on parole after being held for nineteen years because he stole a loaf of bread. He struggles to find work, and struggles to get back on his feet. After eight years, Jean becomes a factory owner, he is shocked when he sees Javert (Russell Crowe), his former prison guard, enter the factory, and he seems to recognize Jean, but no further questions are asked.

In Jean's factory, we meet a woman named Fantine (Anne Hathaway), who is dismissed by her co-workers when they discover that she has been sending her earnings to her illegitimate daughter named Cosette (Isabelle Allen). Later on, Jean decides to look after Fantine after she decides to go into prostitution since her unemployment, and also goes out of his way to find her daughter after Fantine's health slowly deteriorates.

However, the cunning Javert is on Jean's tracks every step of the way... but he manages to escape from him any way he can.

The film is beautifully crafted and expertly acted... the main cast give fantastic performances in terms of both acting and singing. Although, having said that, Russell Crowe's singing is a little stiff, and at times, sounds like a dying canine. But, he remains committed and sticks to the material that he has been given.

Jackman and Hathaway steal the show with their scenes, and they are fantastic singers... the plot maybe drawn out from time to time, as the run-time - which is 2 hours and 38 minutes - can feel slow, especially towards the second half. But you will be caught up in the drama, as the filmmaking is so immense and keeps you locked in.

This is not a film for people who don't like musicals, as the entire duration of the film is singing, but if you like musicals, and an emotionally tugging story with superb acting... this is the one for you.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

coach950Sep 5, 2016

A beautiful movie with beautiful singing. I would say the only problem is that every now and then they sing a little to quietly. The cinematography which many are attacking i personally thought was pretty great. That opening scene wasA beautiful movie with beautiful singing. I would say the only problem is that every now and then they sing a little to quietly. The cinematography which many are attacking i personally thought was pretty great. That opening scene was beautiful. Some of the shots were awesome. The set elements are beautiful. The acting is amazing. once again the only problem is they sing a little quiet every now and then but even that if you turn it up a little bit it is not that bad.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

CinemaphileJul 29, 2016

Though not a fan of musicals, this film made me a fan of THIS musical. Tom Hooper follows The King's Speech with another personal, yet epic peek into the lives of those living in the shadow of the failed French Revolution. Not a role isThough not a fan of musicals, this film made me a fan of THIS musical. Tom Hooper follows The King's Speech with another personal, yet epic peek into the lives of those living in the shadow of the failed French Revolution. Not a role is miscast - yes, even that of Baron Cohen's Thernardier. Hooper takes the additional chance by allowing screen actors sing with their own voices, giving this film an accessible feel that other, more highly operatic musicals lack. Yes, Les Mis The Movie lags in the Second Act, but that's not Hooper's or Schonberg or Boublil's fault, it's just the limitations of Victor Hugo's epic story. Les Mis The Movie is Blu Ray worthy and worthy of the top shelf of your collection.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

SpangleMay 13, 2016

Brilliant. Anne Hathaway honestly steals the show here, but Amanda Seyfried, Hugh Jackman, Eddie Redmayne, Samantha Banks, Isabelle Allen, Russell Crowe, and Daniel Huttlestone, make it competitive. Beautifully put together, Les MiserablesBrilliant. Anne Hathaway honestly steals the show here, but Amanda Seyfried, Hugh Jackman, Eddie Redmayne, Samantha Banks, Isabelle Allen, Russell Crowe, and Daniel Huttlestone, make it competitive. Beautifully put together, Les Miserables obviously has phenomenal music with phenomenal performances of its songs, but this beautiful and touching portrayal and musical really comes to life in the staging. Featuring fantastic stage design, costume design, and makeup, Les Miserables oozes beauty and 1800s France. Additionally, the cinematography is fantastic and truly soaks up this beauty to the max. From beginning to end, Les Miserables is a whirlwind of an experience that sweeps you up in its magic and never lets go until well after it ends.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

jmillsithMay 11, 2016

Eddie Redmayne was a complete shock with how magnificent he is. He is really fun to watch. And he is also really good looking and was really fun to look up and listen to. Eddie Redmayne is super duper hot.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

0

ArmoricalexMay 1, 2016

A true humanist "chef d'oeuvre"A true humanist "chef d'oeuvre"
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

EpicLadySpongeApr 15, 2016

At last, a movie I have struck since days. With Les Miserables, I have finally encountered faith, freedom, truth, and hope and that's what also this movie encountered as well.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

nahtan1244Mar 16, 2016

While not for everyone les miserables is sure to delight musical theater fans. The story has barley any dialogue and is mostly singing but that is how it was made from the begging. I love reading all the one star reviews. One review said andWhile not for everyone les miserables is sure to delight musical theater fans. The story has barley any dialogue and is mostly singing but that is how it was made from the begging. I love reading all the one star reviews. One review said and I quote "I went int this movie with have never seeing the play or knowing the source material and all I can see is this movie is the worst I have seen" Of course it's the worst because you had no idea what to expect. ughh some people. Anyway the whole cast is fantastic and my favorite part is the confrontation. The sword play and intense singing are just the perfect match. The one problem I had with this is that there are a couple points in the plot that don't exactly weave together well. With that being said the story about the human spirit should for sure empower us movie goers. Les miserables is everything I could want as a fan of the musical. Perfect in almost every way if your a fan of the musical that is… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

oDjentoDec 18, 2015

I don't typically like musicals so I have a bit of a bias, but the film is mostly well shot, and the singing is pretty solid overall. Some good comedic moments but I still can't fully engage with a story on screen when they're all singing. II don't typically like musicals so I have a bit of a bias, but the film is mostly well shot, and the singing is pretty solid overall. Some good comedic moments but I still can't fully engage with a story on screen when they're all singing. I appreciate the artistry here, but it just isn't for me sadly.
6.5/10… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

Cherry88Oct 21, 2015

The film "Les Misérables", a modern screen version of the historical novel by Victor Hugo, is worthily ranked among good films in my personal collection. After watching the trailer to this film I was full filled of expectations and went toThe film "Les Misérables", a modern screen version of the historical novel by Victor Hugo, is worthily ranked among good films in my personal collection. After watching the trailer to this film I was full filled of expectations and went to the cinema. And the film didn't disappoint me.
It's a great work. It is complete from the first minute to the last one. Nevertheless the film lasts about two hours and a half, it doesn't seem to be overextended. I was watching it in one breath, like enchanted. For me everything was perfect in this film. But I am going to say about everything step by step.
First, it is significant to mark the work of the director. Bright and colorful scenes of Paris in 19 century are worthy of praise. The environment is truly conveyed. Close-ups are amazing. They show the genuine emotions. Second, it is the acting technique. The actors did their best. They lived their characters' lives on the screen. They have proved that the star-studded cast is not only famous names but consummate professionals!
Third, the film shows startling originality. It was a bold experience to make a musical but it was a success. The lack of dialogues does not prevent viewers from understanding the deep message of the film. Music and songs are very powerful and catchy so that you can't get them out of your head. They grab your attention, maintain your interest and keep you in suspense till the very end. Live singing is so sincere. It makes everything more realistic. You feel actors' emotions and try to go through all peripeteias together with them.
To sum up, "Les Misérables" left a lasting impression. But I have to confess the film is not for mass audience. However in my opinion it's only one more advantage of this film.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

7

grandpajoe6191Aug 30, 2015

There isn't anything 'original' with "Les Miserables"; if I was the director and I read the book, I could probably make a movie pretty similar like this one. However, the acting from the multifaceted cast and the songs are very strong as itThere isn't anything 'original' with "Les Miserables"; if I was the director and I read the book, I could probably make a movie pretty similar like this one. However, the acting from the multifaceted cast and the songs are very strong as it was, for me, what really made the movie special in its own right. Overall a good enough movie to watch with your family.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

DBPirate1129Mar 3, 2015

I really did not expect to enjoy this movie but well, it turned out I did! I don't really understand how people dislike Russell Crowe's performance but I thought it was great (then again, I don't know much about singing). All the songs wereI really did not expect to enjoy this movie but well, it turned out I did! I don't really understand how people dislike Russell Crowe's performance but I thought it was great (then again, I don't know much about singing). All the songs were memorable, especially One Day More. I recommend for anyone who likes musicals or not!… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

6

ponderflixJan 22, 2015

The stage show is far, far superior. That goes without saying. I don’t ever want to hear Russell Crowe sing again......Instead of making a filmic version of the theatre production, it’s like they’ve tried to convey what a theatre productionThe stage show is far, far superior. That goes without saying. I don’t ever want to hear Russell Crowe sing again......Instead of making a filmic version of the theatre production, it’s like they’ve tried to convey what a theatre production would be if it was a film. So everything is sort of pantomime. Nothing is real looking, it’s all staged and theatrically lit which doesn’t work as a feature film.......They have used big names to fill out most of the cast, many of whom just don’t do a good enough job. That said I was completely enamoured by the original cast so I’m utterly biased..........Redeeming factors: easyish to follow. Attractive people singing good songs to a fairly decent standard. Amid all the silly things it’s a great story.

Full review available at the ponderflix site on wordpress.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

hodgesbJan 2, 2015

Les Miserables is quite different from the theater musical, but in my opinion the film is a masterpiece on it's own. Hugh Jackman, Russell Crowe, and Anne Hathaway performed masterfully and their onscreen musical performances blew me away.Les Miserables is quite different from the theater musical, but in my opinion the film is a masterpiece on it's own. Hugh Jackman, Russell Crowe, and Anne Hathaway performed masterfully and their onscreen musical performances blew me away. Recording the actor's signing on-set rather than in a studio must have been a great risk for director Tom Hooper, but the end result was an emotion-filled work of art. I do not agree with the critics who say the film's musical performances were overly dramatic, such as Hathaway's version of "I Dream a Dream". The original musical was less dramatic, so I can see why some critics may feel that way when comparing the two, but the dramatics felt right on film. Also, Russell Crowe's vocal performances received a lot of criticism, but I though the roughness of his voice was fitting for his character. Maybe he doesn't have the vocal range of a theater musical performer, but in this film his performance felt authentic. Overall, Les Miserables is a wonderful film and if you haven't seen it, you should. It's easily on my top 5 films list.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

CherryxldJan 2, 2015

e Miserable es un musical que sin dudas logra resaltar con su gran ambientación de la época en que se desarrolla esta película, pero, tristemente, en muy pocas veces llega a dar un entretenimiento factible.

Esta película se libera de unae Miserable es un musical que sin dudas logra resaltar con su gran ambientación de la época en que se desarrolla esta película, pero, tristemente, en muy pocas veces llega a dar un entretenimiento factible.

Esta película se libera de una manera satisfactoria en cuanto a muchas cosas del apartado técnico, como, por decir, el vestuario, que se enfoca bien en la época del film, o también se puede resaltar su banda sonora, pero en algo que falla en un punto un tanto declinado en este largometraje es en no transmitir en buen nivel un entretenimiento factible al público o entablar una relación sufrible con el espectador., aunque sí logra entablar una relación sentimental con el mismo, y eso hace que la historia se pueda sentir en un tono más indagable y fluyente, dándole así un mejor ambiente, volviéndose más ilustrada, prepotente y audaz.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

Compi24Dec 4, 2014

Even if it overstays its welcome, Tom Hooper's epic adaptation of the Hugo classic is remarkably well performed and finely staged with jaw-dropping sets and brilliant imagery.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

DCEdmondsNov 13, 2014

"Les Miserables" 10 Scale Rating: 8.5 (Excellent) ...

The Good: I was dubious about the cast, but that quickly faded. Great job all around as Jackman, Hathaway, and yes ... even Crowe ... did amazing jobs. The film seems to stay true to"Les Miserables" 10 Scale Rating: 8.5 (Excellent) ...

The Good: I was dubious about the cast, but that quickly faded. Great job all around as Jackman, Hathaway, and yes ... even Crowe ... did amazing jobs. The film seems to stay true to the source material as scenes that are typically left out of film versions were left in. Despite it's long run time (which was a drawback), I'm glad those were left in. They were important scenes.

The Bad: It runs long and feels it sometimes. While I'm glad they left important scenes in, they could have done without others to shorten the film. Far, FAR too many closeups as you'd sit for several minutes just watching someone's face as they sang. That aspect felt a little lazy.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

horcrux2007Sep 2, 2014

This is quite an incredible movie. Having never seen the play nor read the book (yet!), I thought this was a great film. It had great acting, beautiful songs, and a bittersweet plot. I really had no problem with the length because the movieThis is quite an incredible movie. Having never seen the play nor read the book (yet!), I thought this was a great film. It had great acting, beautiful songs, and a bittersweet plot. I really had no problem with the length because the movie had me so engrossed and entertained, and I was lost in the music. It's an absolutely amazing film.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

beingryanjudeAug 24, 2014

The bold, harsh emotion of the musical is certainly still present. Les Miserables suffers from one too many miscasts and a godawful performance from Russell Crowe as Javert. Nevertheless, Anne Hathaway gives the finest performance of herThe bold, harsh emotion of the musical is certainly still present. Les Miserables suffers from one too many miscasts and a godawful performance from Russell Crowe as Javert. Nevertheless, Anne Hathaway gives the finest performance of her career to date--closely matched by an impeccable Samantha Barks.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

morganrMar 25, 2014

When I first saw previews of Les Miserables, and realized that it was a musical, I had no desire whatsoever to see it. On a whim, I watched the movie with no positive intentions, and I can say that by the end my mind was blown. The storyWhen I first saw previews of Les Miserables, and realized that it was a musical, I had no desire whatsoever to see it. On a whim, I watched the movie with no positive intentions, and I can say that by the end my mind was blown. The story line, actors, scenery: everything was beautiful. As a former skeptic, my "judging a book by a cover" was proved entirely wrong. The music and acting goes straight for the heart and will leave you in tears with the heart wrenching ending. The only way I can describe this movie without babbling all day would be to call it pure genius. Its an absolutely stunning film.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

MemburgMar 4, 2014

An absolutely wonderful movie! Very powerful, very touching and all-around extremely enjoyable! The songs are also very memorable and awesome! One of my favourite 2012 movies.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

KayakMar 3, 2014

Having unintentionally dodged this story for so long, the first I see of it is this adaption, which I know is a great shame. It mostly feels like a homage to those who know this story well, and I know they rave about it. I'm sure the story isHaving unintentionally dodged this story for so long, the first I see of it is this adaption, which I know is a great shame. It mostly feels like a homage to those who know this story well, and I know they rave about it. I'm sure the story is brilliant on stage. However, for those who have no real knowledge of the piece, the characters are thrown at you pouring their hearts out and it's strangely hard to get emotionally invested until towards the end. I can't deny that I didn't enjoy it though.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

bestcritic55Jan 27, 2014

Overall reaction:
WOW. I was absolutely blown away. I cried and I laughed-basically showed more emotion then in real life. A must see. Anne Hathaway has a beautiful voice and gave such a heart-grabbing performance. Eddie and Amanda had suchOverall reaction:
WOW. I was absolutely blown away. I cried and I laughed-basically showed more emotion then in real life. A must see. Anne Hathaway has a beautiful voice and gave such a heart-grabbing performance. Eddie and Amanda had such an amazing chemistry, I thought is was real and not acting. Watch it. It won Oscars for a reason.
Bad side:
Russel Crowe couldn't sing to save his life, but he did a splendid job acting and portraying a man at war with himself.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

Iky009Dec 31, 2013

Em certos pontos foi um bom filme, porém a direção incompressível detona um pouco filme, mais há pontos positivos, como sua fabulosa direção de arte e seus personagens e sua trilha sonora.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

Movie1997Dec 14, 2013

Through the stand-point of someone who despises most musicals in general. This one is actually my favorite! I got really into the style this movie tried to achieve and even the musical numbers given by this fantastic cast. While a little slowThrough the stand-point of someone who despises most musicals in general. This one is actually my favorite! I got really into the style this movie tried to achieve and even the musical numbers given by this fantastic cast. While a little slow to get into in the beginning, it still picks itself up throughout the film and beyond. The best part of the movie for sure is Hugh Jackman's portrayal of Jean Valjean. He really reels in the best of all the songs with his incredible acting and even singing. Overall, truly the best musical I've seen in motion picture history! And that's saying something. I give it an A-!… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

FreetochoosNov 17, 2013

Was all the singing really nesessary? No, with the budget that the director had, he should have made a proper epic. All the singing actually destracts from the story. As for the characters, this film would be falling apart if it were not forWas all the singing really nesessary? No, with the budget that the director had, he should have made a proper epic. All the singing actually destracts from the story. As for the characters, this film would be falling apart if it were not for Crowe. Just a matter of personal opinion.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

SwatiOct 31, 2013

The first hour was brilliant. How Jean Valjean cheats authorities and his fate time and again, and how he finds redemption in a child. It was touching, and the feeling could have lasted had not what followed would have followed. Hugh JackmanThe first hour was brilliant. How Jean Valjean cheats authorities and his fate time and again, and how he finds redemption in a child. It was touching, and the feeling could have lasted had not what followed would have followed. Hugh Jackman and Anne Hathaway acted with such finesse that it would take something especially non-human not to feel for them. Even the songs during this duration were better. Alas, the feeling could not last. The movie quickly degenerated into a sort of love triangle. Who could give a damn about them when we'd just been exposed to possibly one of cinema's saddest protagonists? Yet the director persists and spoils any good feeling we might have about the movie, and we are on the brink of begging him to bring Valjean back. Fortunately the tone turns serious again and the plot focussed on the revolutionaries. But the lustre from before was lost and could not be regained. Not to mention that Eddie Redmayne is the most unmanly, overrated actor today. At over two and a half hours, it leaves you deeply exhausted to your bones. I was left with a headache, which shows I didn't enjoy the movie as much as I had wanted to. I couldn't help comparing it to Sweeney Todd, which was also a musical, but didn't go over the top and kept dialogue and singing balanced. One more Best Picture nominee that in my view didn't deserve to be nominated for the category.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

8

joao1198pedroOct 27, 2013

i don´t know why people hate so much this film,it was a good adaptation of the vitor hugo book and there was a great prodution in this film so why the hell the critics aren´t giving good grades for this movie.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

diego9901Oct 20, 2013

when I finished watching this movie I did not know that was the rewarding feeling or was that a good movie or was because I hold an entire movie in which all the dialogues are sung

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

MovieGuysSep 18, 2013

Les Mis just whisks you away with its charm and dramatic characters. The singing is okay by the actors, but you have to give them credit, as they don't sing in movies often. Also, director Tom Hooper (The King's Speech) directs the movie inLes Mis just whisks you away with its charm and dramatic characters. The singing is okay by the actors, but you have to give them credit, as they don't sing in movies often. Also, director Tom Hooper (The King's Speech) directs the movie in such a way that we are captivated by its awe and wonderment.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

3

alis956Sep 4, 2013

the story is great, the picture is so good but I did not like the musical theme which the movie was based on! so I couldn't complete it until the end!

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

8

oblique15Sep 2, 2013

I`m not a fan of musicals at all, so I watched this expecting to hate it, but I liked what it was all about. If you can get through the singing and focus on the story it`s a good watch.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

python2000Aug 28, 2013

Definitely entertaining whether it's above average I can't decide. In a movie where 99% of the dialogue is in song the actors have to be able to sing. Eddie Redmayne and Anne Hathaway are the best of the cast and sing perfectly. Most of theDefinitely entertaining whether it's above average I can't decide. In a movie where 99% of the dialogue is in song the actors have to be able to sing. Eddie Redmayne and Anne Hathaway are the best of the cast and sing perfectly. Most of the other actors are alright and sometimes sound like Mr Bean but there bearable. Amanda Seyfried is terrible at singing in this, she's better than me, but seriously get some lessons.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

2

DonkeybrainAug 22, 2013

Well I haven't laughed that much for ages! Lots of good actors making fools of themselves. It's amazing that they all took on the project! Can't be enough scripts around I guess. Loved the Liam Neeson version, much much more entertaining.

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

5

bitburnAug 16, 2013

Didn't work for me. I preferred the 1998 distribution with Liam Neeson and Geoffrey Rush. Having said that, I did like "some" parts but I was mostly annoyed by the singing. Too much of it.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

Voice0fReasonAug 10, 2013

It was a very interesting movie. Never having read the book or play, it will be an unbiased review. I enjoyed this movie. The directing of the movie was great, acting even better, and the music was incredible. The singing itself, well, wasIt was a very interesting movie. Never having read the book or play, it will be an unbiased review. I enjoyed this movie. The directing of the movie was great, acting even better, and the music was incredible. The singing itself, well, was hard at times. Between sobs and lots of people singing at once it was sort of hard to follow. Not too hard that I didn't understand it. It had romance with a runaway mixed together which what made the movie good. I will probably watch it again to be able to get the singing parts again. The characters were likable and it was humorous at times. It was a well of movie.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

roddamnAug 10, 2013

Deep and strong theme. Unforgettable characters. Superb acting. Gorgeous photography.

The singing is a bit tiring sometimes, and renders the film slow at moments. Also, the fight scene at the barricades is awkward and not very well thoughDeep and strong theme. Unforgettable characters. Superb acting. Gorgeous photography.

The singing is a bit tiring sometimes, and renders the film slow at moments. Also, the fight scene at the barricades is awkward and not very well though out.

But other than that, loved it.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

TrashcandanJul 21, 2013

For those of you who haven't seen the stage version of this musical I wish to clarify something. EVERY LINE is supposed to be sung. This movie does justice to the longest running stage musical. The Oscars were deserved. The only qualm I haveFor those of you who haven't seen the stage version of this musical I wish to clarify something. EVERY LINE is supposed to be sung. This movie does justice to the longest running stage musical. The Oscars were deserved. The only qualm I have with this musical is that Samantha Barks deserved an Oscar Nomination for her role and Hugh Jackman deserved the Oscar due to a much better portrayal of Jean Valjean than Daniel Day Lewis in this portrayal of Lincoln.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

PuciferJun 20, 2013

I think the film is best appreciated if you watch it like you were watching an opera. Of course, there are no "closeups" in opera, but the nonstop singing, the oversized emotions, the multiple deaths for hopeless and lost causes--these areI think the film is best appreciated if you watch it like you were watching an opera. Of course, there are no "closeups" in opera, but the nonstop singing, the oversized emotions, the multiple deaths for hopeless and lost causes--these are truly the building blocks of grand opera. And from time to time Les Miserables really does earn the right to be compared to grand opera.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

1

AlexanderLuthorJun 17, 2013

A miserable attempt to adapt this beloved musical for a film audience. Don't get me wrong, I like Russel Crowe under proper direction and in the right role, but his performance in this film was absolutely dreadful.

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

10

JenJen387Jun 15, 2013

Flawless LIVE acting and even singing. Each cast member proved worthy of their parts. I believe this movie deserves a much better rating considering all of the effort put into this movie. Even the barricade was real! Regardless, this is theFlawless LIVE acting and even singing. Each cast member proved worthy of their parts. I believe this movie deserves a much better rating considering all of the effort put into this movie. Even the barricade was real! Regardless, this is the first time they ever turned a musical into a movie and I think they exceeded their standards. This movie is a masterpeice, truly outstanding work. This movie got me crying so much, it's like they put their heart and soul into this production. I really hope they continue to do this to other musicals as well.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

0

MovieMan12Jun 13, 2013

So I already hate musicals, and this one just confirms how awful they are. Anne whats her name is so bad it makes Vince Vaughn look like a good actor. Disgusting, boring, and just plain terrible.

0 of 5 users found this helpful05

All this user's reviews

8

JacobsJun 9, 2013

Les Miserables is one of the best musicals that I have ever seen. It is based on true story. The songs are very good, for example I like Javert. I really recommend this movie..

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

lismis7000Jun 7, 2013

the is the best big screen adaptation of a Broadway musical in 5 years. tom Hooper takes to preserve many of the great original moments for the show. Hugh Jackman is incredible as valjean and Anne Hathaway is heart wrenching as the tragicthe is the best big screen adaptation of a Broadway musical in 5 years. tom Hooper takes to preserve many of the great original moments for the show. Hugh Jackman is incredible as valjean and Anne Hathaway is heart wrenching as the tragic Fantine. It is stirring, sad, and thought provoking Victor Hugo would have been singing along too.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

Forrestgump1Jun 4, 2013

"Les Mis is simply an astounding, captivating rendition of one of the most beloved musicals in history. Its not the best movie of the year but Filled with breathtaking performances, this three hour long spectacle is truly, what i like to say,"Les Mis is simply an astounding, captivating rendition of one of the most beloved musicals in history. Its not the best movie of the year but Filled with breathtaking performances, this three hour long spectacle is truly, what i like to say, incredible." A-… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

cnaeveMay 28, 2013

I am not a "musical" person by any stretch of the imagination, but when my friend pleaded with me to go see it with her, of course I did, that's what friends do. I had heard that the live musical version was good, so I thought if anything itI am not a "musical" person by any stretch of the imagination, but when my friend pleaded with me to go see it with her, of course I did, that's what friends do. I had heard that the live musical version was good, so I thought if anything it wouldn't kill me in the end, and all I can say is WOW, what an amazing movie. I never thought that I could "suffer" through a few minutes of a musical, much less fall in love with the entire 2+ hours of this movie. I have not only seen it in theaters, but I have seen it on an 8.5 hour flight to Russia, twice and have it downloaded on my iPad to watch again whenever I feel like it. The story, the message and the delivery of this was spot on. I couldn't care less that it might not be professionals singing as many critics seem to care about, but that is what makes this so much better. You feel as though you can feel their pain and emotions because they aren't professional singers, but rather letting their own personal emotions guide them. Of course there are always parts that I can criticize but won't in this review, all in all, it is a MUST SEE even if you don't enjoy musicals you might just fall in love as much as I did.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

TheWalrus2000May 20, 2013

Les Miserables is a powerful and depressing which is just what the adaptation needs. However, despite Anne Hathway great acting, Tom Hooper basically just made the musical with more awesome sound eits. So my message to this mixed film is, ifLes Miserables is a powerful and depressing which is just what the adaptation needs. However, despite Anne Hathway great acting, Tom Hooper basically just made the musical with more awesome sound eits. So my message to this mixed film is, if you want to be a musical, then dammit Hooper make a freaking musical for crying out loud.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

ICEExMagicMay 19, 2013

This is a creative way to bring a musical to a film.Even though it's weird hearing all the diolage spoked though singing,it is a very beautiful well developed film.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

InspectorJMay 18, 2013

Now, this review is coming from someone whom had never heard of the theatrical production of 'Les Miserables' nor read of the book, but I can soundly say this movie had me thoroughly impressed. Whilst I know movies rarely follow the exactNow, this review is coming from someone whom had never heard of the theatrical production of 'Les Miserables' nor read of the book, but I can soundly say this movie had me thoroughly impressed. Whilst I know movies rarely follow the exact footsteps of a book, I was quickly drawn in by the storyline, memorable characters and emotional instances.
Never has reality been delivered with this amount of perfection and emotion, with a score you will not forget. My only complaint, as all modest reviews must discuss, is that some characters are introduced too late in the film, that the audience does not build up as strong an emotional bond as they would have, if the characters were brought in earlier.

Overall, the best film I have seen so far this year; I cannot wait to see the production!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

EwanDaveyKeefeMay 16, 2013

Looking at this movie entirely from the single perspective of itself, instead of comparing it to its musical counterpart (To which i hear is brilliant). It is a good musical, with a cast to which any film would happily boast, with someLooking at this movie entirely from the single perspective of itself, instead of comparing it to its musical counterpart (To which i hear is brilliant). It is a good musical, with a cast to which any film would happily boast, with some outstanding performances from a plethora actors whom most would never relate to a musical, yet in some instances it is clear singing isn't their strong point.

The over use of singing is also ironically its downfall, the subtext is entirely removed with little to no speaking dialogue, instead a strange blend in certain scenes of song talk instead of some of the more apparent staged musical numbers. The rather odd over use of themed characters moments gives the French backdrop a strange feel, to how it feels more like "Oliver" at points.

As the film goes on (Mostly near to the start of the third act) i felt myself more distracted by patchy cinematography and began to be bored, not say the final stand of the revolutionaries was not interesting, its just how long takes and little change can begin to drag. It was heavily clear throughout that Tom Hooper was more focused upon during the Musical moments, the singers rather than these amazing sets.

to summarise, the film deserves praise for showing that Musicals can have a serious tone instead of the likes of "Hairspray" and the actors within in it deserve meritorious praise, yet it fails due to a long running time and lack of change, with little use of the large budget sets.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

ekmorseMay 14, 2013

Great movie with awesome songs. It is the best musical of all time. It is filled with emotions that is very amusing. The ending almost made me want to cry. It is the best

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

DukeJonMay 12, 2013

Mixed feelings about this film. Production values were very high and some of the performances were very good. I felt the singing was a bit hit and miss, particularly Russel Crowe who put in a disappointing performance. Helena Bonham CarterMixed feelings about this film. Production values were very high and some of the performances were very good. I felt the singing was a bit hit and miss, particularly Russel Crowe who put in a disappointing performance. Helena Bonham Carter and Sacha Baron Cohen characters were too nasty, with not enough comedy. I feel they should have reduced the length of the film by cutting out the filler. I've seen the theatre production and although 3 hours is acceptable for that, 3 hours for a film is just too long. The film was dull, drawn out and grim before picking up half way through. Good editing would improve this, reducing the total length by a third by cutting out the less memorable songs would improve things a lot.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

GTFOmyEGGSMay 8, 2013

The only reason I do not give Les Miserables a 9 or a 10 is because I hate Musicals. The story was gripping, the cast phenomenal, the character development was excellent. It was an emotional film that made me shed a tear more than once.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

swayApr 29, 2013

People seem to be confusing their subjective taste in movies to an objective appraisal of the movie if a movie is not to your taste, it does not make it a bad movie, and you shouldn't base your rating on whether you liked it or not. PeoplePeople seem to be confusing their subjective taste in movies to an objective appraisal of the movie if a movie is not to your taste, it does not make it a bad movie, and you shouldn't base your rating on whether you liked it or not. People making ratings based on their taste are making the movie rating here unreliable.

The people who voted 0 or 1, I'm talking to you. How can you not give credit to the amount of details that have been put into the movie? How can you not give credit to the performances put forward by these actors and actresses acting and singing simultaneously is not easy, especially when it is done live. Those of you complaining about how the actors cannot sing, and they should have hired professional singers. let me ask you, would you rather watch professional singers who can sing but who can't act in a movie? That would have been worse. This is a movie, not a stage opera. Apples to oranges.

There are many other examples but my point is that the movie is not getting credit where credit is due, because people are throwing ratings out based on their taste, and not based on how the movie actually is.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

7

MrHayden4495Apr 29, 2013

I had never seen the musical before I watched this film, and I'm confident enough to say that this was a good introduction to the multitude of Les Miserables's. The musical production in the film is amazing with live performances from HughI had never seen the musical before I watched this film, and I'm confident enough to say that this was a good introduction to the multitude of Les Miserables's. The musical production in the film is amazing with live performances from Hugh Jackman and Academy Award Winner for Best Supporting Actress Anne Hathaway (who was only in the film for 20 minutes). Unfortunately though, there are a few drawbacks. Helena Bonham Carter and Sacha Baron Cohen play the caretakers of Cosette. In other words, THEY PLAY THE EXACT SAME CHARACTERS FROM SWEENEY TODD. Apparently, the director just resorted to whoever played two goofballs in the nineteenth century in a movie: THESE TWO. It was annoying seeing that they were only in the movie to play the exact same parts as in Sweeney Todd. It took me out of the movie and it always reminded me that these two are from an entirely different film. Other than a few camera issues, such as the infamous bobbing, the film is marvelous and rich with musical entertainment.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

yune2Apr 21, 2013

A beautiful, touching film with a wide and recognizable cast. Although the singing is slightly off at times, the atmosphere will sweep any doubts away.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

Critic2012Apr 18, 2013

Les Miserables tells a simple and touching story, and although the film may not do it justice, there is certainly a beautiful element at its center that we would be fools to ignore.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

MavisGary610Apr 16, 2013

Having seen the play, and having read the original novel, I don't think this movie could've been any better. Bits of the book that aren't in the stage musical are wisely added into the film. GOOD changes from the play are made in the film,Having seen the play, and having read the original novel, I don't think this movie could've been any better. Bits of the book that aren't in the stage musical are wisely added into the film. GOOD changes from the play are made in the film, and every actor involved, even those in smaller parts, are sublime. I wish more material could've been created for Hathaway and Samatha Barks, because they were probably the best. Overall though, it's an extremely touching film that will make anyone with a soul, shed a few tears.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

alescio92Apr 13, 2013

Les Misérables directed by Tom Hooper, a great movie, good interpreters, big emotions, good songs, very interesting movie, There are two impressive moments in which two actresses make a big test, beautiful scenery and beautiful picture, inLes Misérables directed by Tom Hooper, a great movie, good interpreters, big emotions, good songs, very interesting movie, There are two impressive moments in which two actresses make a big test, beautiful scenery and beautiful picture, in short, I recommend the film, a lot of emotions this film.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

Joshthomas2014Apr 13, 2013

One of my most favorite movies of 2012 and worthy to be one of my favorite of all time. When first hearing about the film, I thought it would be overrated for being a Broadway production brought to the big screen, but I was definitely movedOne of my most favorite movies of 2012 and worthy to be one of my favorite of all time. When first hearing about the film, I thought it would be overrated for being a Broadway production brought to the big screen, but I was definitely moved by the very memorable experience within the cast and wonderful music.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

rapidfire705Apr 4, 2013

I'm going to make this short and say les miserable is the best movie I've seen seen all of 2012 to me a definite 10 out of 10 definitely see this movie you wont regret it.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

axelkochApr 1, 2013

Maybe I think like this because my local cinema didn't pause the movie, but this was just so tedious. While the intro of the movie was a rather weak debut, the second chapter was ceaselessly sublime and full with great, rememberable scenes.Maybe I think like this because my local cinema didn't pause the movie, but this was just so tedious. While the intro of the movie was a rather weak debut, the second chapter was ceaselessly sublime and full with great, rememberable scenes. Anne Hathaway's performance was perfect, but sadly this can't be said about the bigger part of the others. While Helena Bonham Carter and Sacha Baron Cohen added admirably funny touch the movie, I was quite disappointed with the rest of the cast. Yes, they were all good, but it's just not what I expected from such a big production. Hugh Jackmann did a great job most of the times, but I think his turn in this movie is overrated. The singing was also not as good as I expected it to be.

So much about the acting. A big plus point of the film is how it looks. Cinematography, make-up, costumes, set design, etc. are all quite Oscar- worthy. So the only major problem of mine with 'Les Miz' was the exhausting length. I admit that I've seen neither a stage performance nor an other movie based on Victor Hugo's novel in all my life therefore I was a total newbie to the story therefore I can't agree with the people that have read/seen 'Les Misérables' before and consider it a too short adaption of the story because the 158 minutes of this movie were already much too long for me.

But let's go back to the point where I was actually loving the movie, which is about the first hour and 15 minutes. After this second chapter was over and time fast-forwarded once again, the entertainment factor got lost in the skipped years. The revolution and the film's big love story are the new plot-points and that was far less interesting as the story of the films 2nd part. I admit, it was made totally fine, but it was just missing something to jazz it up (Anne Hathaway probably would've helped).

All in all, if you haven't seen any form of the story before like I did, you'll be better off getting the movie on home media so you can take a big break at some point you'll need that.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

1

CtheTavApr 1, 2013

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. N MY OPINION **MAY CONTAIN SPOIILER S** by CtheTav I had heard great things about this film going into it. It had Oscar buzz and had already taken multiple best picture awards. Apparently I saw a different version of the film because the film I saw was terrible! The "singing" in this film by the main cast is reminiscent of Mama Mia! Or Moulin Rouge as in big name karaoke at best. The majority of the big names can't sing with the exception of Russel Crow who is a bit better than the rest but still a long way off staring a singing career after this film, and to give Hugh Jackman the lead role when he is the worst singer of the lot is unforgiveable and a stupid move by the casting director. Another problem with this film is the fact that there is very little talking and everything is sing talked which, takes away from the songs as its difficult to tell when a song starts and ends which is why when initially writing this review I struggled to recall even 2 songs (2 hours after watching the film). Back to the plot now, so carefully hinged on the back drop of a French revolution showing that everyone's super poor or mega rich and the no one likes the king at the moment so it, revolution! There is no character development in this film at all after the first 5 minutes. Jon Valjean goes from angry thief to God loving good guy in 10 seconds or 8 years of unseen moments in the plot, feels guilty for not being granular about his employees actions, buys some kid, raises her and then realises "actually I lied to get where I am today but I'm okay with that", gets a mystery illness whilst lifting luggage and dies. Javert Javert goes from letter of the lawman (he literally sang a song about it) to a suicidal fool who can't deal with being given a second chance. The young revolutionary goes from tactician to screw it I'm in love over the course of 1 night (the same night he saw his entire friendship die horribly). At the end of this film the people at the barricade are all dead this is touted as a happy ending. This ending is miserable all of those who died as martyrs achieved nothing, so well done everyone, NOT! This film has the worst action sequences ever. Being shot in the chest and not bleeding? Why not? Did the budget not allow for fake blood to be used? Then the character has the audacity to sing for three minutes before dying, not dying immediately like most of the other idiots foolish enough to point the barrel of a gun at themselves and not just away from everyone Rubbish! Rating 1 out of 10 An awful film that received too much praise due to the stage production it was based on… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

3

Apemonkey666Mar 31, 2013

Musicals are not my thing. Up until now I have seen only 2 that worked: Moulin Rouge and Romeo Julliet (yes both Baz Luhrman's). With all the positive reviews and the high imdb score I was willing to give it a fair chance...but after 5,5Musicals are not my thing. Up until now I have seen only 2 that worked: Moulin Rouge and Romeo Julliet (yes both Baz Luhrman's). With all the positive reviews and the high imdb score I was willing to give it a fair chance...but after 5,5 mins I had reached the limits of my patience, I had to turn it off. This is just unbearable! Do they really have to sing EVERY SINGLE LINE of dialogue? No wonder this thing clocks in at 158 mins. It's better to burst out into song for no reason then to continuously pound people in the face with them. Some performers are great actors, sure, but that doesn't mean they have a great singing voice. Be realistic, no one is good at everything. I guess this film has a certain audience (it made 433 m$ worldwide) but I'm pretty certain I'm not one of them … Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

8

KPHooksMar 26, 2013

Though I am not a fan of musicals, and though it took me a good 15 minutes into the film to adjust to the constant musical numbers, I became immersed into quite a theatrical experience I haven't felt in a long time (with an amazing line ofThough I am not a fan of musicals, and though it took me a good 15 minutes into the film to adjust to the constant musical numbers, I became immersed into quite a theatrical experience I haven't felt in a long time (with an amazing line of acting from talented actors to support it). This movie will perhaps open my eyes and force me to reconsider the genre of musicals.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

10

RaymondMendez19Mar 26, 2013

It's a great movie one of the best of the year as it has all actors, music, production, love, everything I loved it and it was one of my favorites to win the Oscar for Best Picture.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

bibires46Mar 25, 2013

It's the one of the deepest movies I've seen. Although to speak by singing is a little bit frustrating I enjoyed it. The screenplay is incredibly nice, and the film has a special atmosphere, you must see it, must enjoy :D

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

AwesomeReviewerMar 24, 2013

“Les Miserables” is a beautiful movie to look at. The shots of France are great and Tom Hooper does a good job of us getting a sense of the time. He also directs a enormous cast of characters well and there are truly some memorable moments.“Les Miserables” is a beautiful movie to look at. The shots of France are great and Tom Hooper does a good job of us getting a sense of the time. He also directs a enormous cast of characters well and there are truly some memorable moments. However, I feel as if the film is devoid of any real emotion, which is ironic because that is what he so whole heartily tried to do. The actors try so hard to bring emotion to the screen, but it is a wasted effort. I couldn’t care for the characters our their story. Never have I ever felt like walking out of film so much like I did in this one.

The characters are interesting and layered, but that is credit to the source material. Anne Hathaway is the only one that made me feel an ounce of emotion throughout the film. Her version of “I Dreamed a Dream” is impeccable. Hugh Jackman, I believe gives a career performance. While I didn’t feel his emotions all the time, he did show a lot of range. Russell Crowe is good as well, but his singing is not very good. All the characters have their moments, but most of their emotions don’t get through.

The musical numbers are good, but the infuriating decision to make the characters sing everything did not pay off. I think a more traditional musical would have sufficed. The main musical numbers are good, but the overall choice did not work for me. Overall “Les Miserables” is a fundamentally well made film and I bet most people will enjoy it. However, for me this was a miserable experience. I appreciate the actors, director, and the sheer technical level of the film, but I could not get myself to care for anything happening on screen and the sing talking made me want to tear my own ears out (this is coming from someone who enjoys Ke$ha’s music). I give it 2.5/5, a technically well made film that is devoid of a satisfyingly emotional experience.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

LiretteRatingsMar 24, 2013

I saw the musical version of Les Miserables, it was very good and I enjoyed this movie. It is very long, almost three whole hours, I loved it and I think everyone will.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

0

BiffBarnacleMar 23, 2013

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I'm not typically one for writing reviews but I decided after suffering through this movie that I needed the catharsis of doing one. I'll begin by saying that I am a fan of the musical. I saw it with a touring group when they came through and I own the "Dream Cast" concert version. I believe Les Mis has some of the most beautiful music and themes I've ever seen in a musical, albeit presented through a loosely woven story. Unfortunately this latest version, while attempting to stay closer to the musical production, didn't seem to be assembled with the same quality. The most distracting thing to me was that many of the cast were weak singers. They were unable to reach their notes without straining or giving up before hitting them. Some of Javert's music was even rearranged to accommodate Mr. Crowe. I appreciate the actors' ability to break down emotionally when needed but the voices were not as strong as their performance and many times took away from the impact that a song could have had. Mr. Crowe and Mr. Jackman's solos were often muffled or nasal respectively. I cringed before Valjean began his "God on high" at the barricade uncomfortably fearing what was about to come. And Javert's Stars solo, which would normally be belted out with a strong baritone fell flat.

The cinematography was done in an odd manner. There were a lot of artistic angles presented. Some were interesting, like the sweep over the cross into the city toward the beginning. Others were very distracting like the butterfly on the gate during Cosette's duet with Marius in the garden. Valjean was annoyingly upstaged by a large-eyed banner during his solo at the barricade. The camera seemed handheld much of the time as well.

I greatly appreciated the cut during Fantine's first sexual encounter as a prostitute I was watching this with my family and questioned if I needed to do some editing of my own. Yet we were all taken aback at the decision to follow Javert all the way down to his bone crunching end in the Seine. I believe this would have been better had it been left to the imagination. It was actually distracting when done in such a blatant manner.

All in all I appreciated the sets and some of the singing as well as most of the art. I am glad someone made an attempt to bring the musical to video. Sadly, I think I would have enjoyed it more had they just filmed the actual stage play (like the 2011 Royal Albert Hall Phantom of the Opera). I decided to rate this a "0" to even out the unrealistically positive reviews. This should really be around a 6 in my book. Thanks for reading if you got through this!… Expand

0 of 9 users found this helpful09

All this user's reviews

9

BrianMcCriticMar 23, 2013

I loved this movie especially the performances of Anne Hathaway and Hugh Jackman. The singing is well done even Russell Crowe, I know he's not as good as Hathaway or Jackman but I thought he was solid.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

Nesbitt10Mar 23, 2013

"Les Misérables" isn't for everyone, but fans of the stage version will not be disappointed. While successfully "opening up" the musical far beyond the limitations of a theater-bound production, Tom Hooper retains its heart and soul. In many"Les Misérables" isn't for everyone, but fans of the stage version will not be disappointed. While successfully "opening up" the musical far beyond the limitations of a theater-bound production, Tom Hooper retains its heart and soul. In many ways, the movie is more opera than musical. There's very little dancing and even less spoken dialogue. Visually, "Les Misérables" is a splendid spectacle, with set and costume design that is second to none. Hooper does an excellent job recreating 19th century France, and it's in this area that the motion picture separates itself from the live version. What it lacks in the intimacy of singers performing directly to an audience, it gains in cinematic achievement. That being said--to the causal movie viewer unfamiliar with Victor Hugo's novel; a timeless testament to the survival of the human spirit--it is a tedious, bloated, and exhausting 238 minutes you'll never get back.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

Nathan25Mar 19, 2013

In my opinion, this is an excellent movie. Extremely touching form it's begining, altough i found really hard to watch musicals, this is a different one, based on a classic novel, tells a great story. I must said i didn't see the show, onlyIn my opinion, this is an excellent movie. Extremely touching form it's begining, altough i found really hard to watch musicals, this is a different one, based on a classic novel, tells a great story. I must said i didn't see the show, only the movie, so I based my critic only as a film addict, and not a les mis expert. The cast did a an excellent job. Hugh Jackman espectacular, Anne Hathaway outstanding, great job of Amanda Seyfried and and Russell Crowe. Also reallly impressive Samantha Barks on her debut.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

movieaddictMar 16, 2013

That's the best musical ever with the role of Anne Hathaway portraying Fantine being one of the best roles in 2012 movies. Hugh Jackman has a nice voice.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

4

zied12Mar 2, 2013

the only thing good about this movie is the performances of Anne Hathaway and Hugh Jackman, i hate it when all the movie is songs and there is not an actual dialogue, it gets boring

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

4

thairocks88Feb 27, 2013

I do love musicals. I am a big fan of Fred Astaire, Gene Kelly, Ginger Rodgers, and Cyd Charrise, The greatest musical has to be either Fiddler on the roof or Singin in the Rain. The problems with Les Miserable stem from the actual BroadwayI do love musicals. I am a big fan of Fred Astaire, Gene Kelly, Ginger Rodgers, and Cyd Charrise, The greatest musical has to be either Fiddler on the roof or Singin in the Rain. The problems with Les Miserable stem from the actual Broadway musical itself. The story "Les Miserables" by Victor Hugo is a chronicle of french life in the french revolution era. The purpose of the story was to show the hardships and exploitation of the French people in the most important eras in French history. To create a musical based on these hardships would trivialize and take away Hugo's masterpiece. The other problem is the language.Why create a musical that is in predominately in English (yes, there are french translations) that totally disrupts and destroys the cultural context of what the story is suppose to be about? When considering the 2012 version, an adaption of a huge Broadway musical with a colossal amount of fans waiting to see it makes it a for sure money maker.Yet, it does not allow an unacquainted audience to embrace the story or music. The story is redundant and the music, while I admit is great, really gets boring after the first 20 minutes of the cast screeching it in my face and really forcing me to like it. I felt the film had great points in photography and costuming, the film felt long and tiring. The pace of the film was like a roller coaster ride that after the 15th rendition of the same three songs, I gave up. The lack of professional singers (i.e. Russell Crowe and High Jackman) really made me doubt their musical prowess and I just hoped they were able to hit the really high notes. Th final problem is the song dialogue. I felt it was gimmicky and unnecessary. The great musicals of "Singin in the Rain" and "Fiddler on the Roof" used dialogue to move the stories forward and make the songs more enjoyable. "Les Mis" oversang their songs that could have potentially be a great musical. Yet, it disappointed this musical lover!… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

HonestOmi08Feb 25, 2013

such a touching movie. i cried from halfway all the way to the end. Eddie Redmayne and Amanda Seyfried work really well together and i am totally hooked on the songs from les mis. I think this movie deserves loads of awards and amanda andsuch a touching movie. i cried from halfway all the way to the end. Eddie Redmayne and Amanda Seyfried work really well together and i am totally hooked on the songs from les mis. I think this movie deserves loads of awards and amanda and eddie should date (in my opinion)… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

ChrisbyFeb 23, 2013

Hugh Jackman you deserve an Oscar for your performance "All Cast take a bow superb performances" Russell Crowe you where great as always singing was in character loved your portrayal

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

riferrariFeb 23, 2013

The story is great, but I'm judging it as a musical and I will have to give it a 5/10. In general I found the songs ridiculous and weird, yes there were good ones such as the Susan Boyle song or the song about revolution, but the rest wasThe story is great, but I'm judging it as a musical and I will have to give it a 5/10. In general I found the songs ridiculous and weird, yes there were good ones such as the Susan Boyle song or the song about revolution, but the rest was plain songs filled with obvious rhymes and bad singers. I can't compare this movie to musicals such as Singing in The Rain, or The Phantom of Opera.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

hoops2448Feb 21, 2013

Musicals are always a tough nut to crack, especially on film. This musical had even more to prove thanks to its well publicized live performances and in many ways it works brilliantly. The film follows Jean Valjean (Hugh Jackman), a man whoMusicals are always a tough nut to crack, especially on film. This musical had even more to prove thanks to its well publicized live performances and in many ways it works brilliantly. The film follows Jean Valjean (Hugh Jackman), a man who after 19 years of time in a work camp is released to live under constant watch, a man carrying a terrible burden and stigma. Because of this he breaks his parole only to be chased by a relentless inspector called Javert (Russell Crowe). Valjean makes a promise to a factory worker named Fantine (Anne Hathaway), who he fails, a promise to care for her daughter Cosette (Amanda Seyfried) although to do so he must continue running in search of his own redemption. The story is complex and this is where the first problem arose for me. It wasn't that the film was too hard to follow story wise, I've read the book so I knew the story before hand, I had also seen the 25th anniversary musical version, the problem was that with most musicals it takes a while to get into the swing of things. For instance you must get used to the idea of plot being conveyed through song, that the story is in the lyrics. It's an incredibly jarring film in this regard as there are moments where the cast sings in unison, but with separate lines, each with their own relevant feeling and plot developments. Dissecting these lines while trying to hear the other is almost impossible so information is missed and it lead to quite a few moments of complete confusion. The film also doesn't really manage to convey the rebellious nature of the musical, the brotherhood and other themes associated with the social anarchy depicted. However that doesn't mean as a serious piece of film making it is a failure, it has many other qualities. The film soars in its characterization, in fact the film is wonderful in its portrayal of redemption, with it giving a full and involving tale of Jean Valjean's rehabilitation and Hugh Jackman is sensational in the lead role. Equally as impressive is Anne Hathaway as Fantine despite her very limited screen time. Her tragic story is one of the most affecting parts of the film and one that sticks with you long after the end. The idea of recreation and reinvention, not only of a country but of people is one handled extremely well and the failure of some to change is something touched upon by the great performance by Crowe as Javert. However, the film overall is frustrating due to its problems with plot progression and its failure to capitalize on some of the key themes of the musical but it does manage to say some profound things, if only in passing with an ending that manages to make 2 and a half hours of misery seem somewhat joyous even if it only lasts a moment.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews