Warner Bros. Pictures | Release Date: July 21, 2006
6.3
USER SCORE
Generally favorable reviews based on 451 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
251
Mixed:
70
Negative:
130
Watch Now
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)
10
Mack9393Jan 30, 2023
This movie proves critics are full of it. This is great storytelling and deserves more love. Is it perfect? Nope, for me it’s Paul Giamatti’s stutter isn’t very good and takes me out of it, but he’s still a pro at drama. The lore leaves meThis movie proves critics are full of it. This is great storytelling and deserves more love. Is it perfect? Nope, for me it’s Paul Giamatti’s stutter isn’t very good and takes me out of it, but he’s still a pro at drama. The lore leaves me wanting more. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
MagicBuns1992Jul 17, 2020
I felt inspired to write a review for this movie because it is so unfairly rated by the critics! Is it a brilliant movie? No, it has it's flaws such as not always being consistent but it's good! Is it childish? Yes, but it's story was clearlyI felt inspired to write a review for this movie because it is so unfairly rated by the critics! Is it a brilliant movie? No, it has it's flaws such as not always being consistent but it's good! Is it childish? Yes, but it's story was clearly influenced by a children like fairy tale - it's meant to have that element! One of the things that truly stood out for me in this movie was that it did not play on the usual tropes, in fact the best twists in the movie work on this finely. The role the male protagonist is an example of this, the actor who plays him (Giamatti) isn't exactly a model. No, instead he's a typical man in an extraordinary situation and his "purpose" becomes one of the most heartwarming features of the movie.

This isn't a horror, it's a fairy-tale. It has a few funny jokes, the acting is strong enough to hold, it has some heartwarming moments and it also has a message. It may not be for everyone but I personally felt it had a heart-warming ambience; it's unusual and it truly gives of the feel that this is a an art piece that Shyamalan wanted to express.

Give it a try, you may just enjoy it.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
DubeauJun 23, 2018
Seen this movie many times now. For me it's a tale for children and adults. The way the story is told is really interesting because it unveils itself like a puzzle. The acting of Giamatti is amazing, and Bryce isn't bad. Some of the secondarySeen this movie many times now. For me it's a tale for children and adults. The way the story is told is really interesting because it unveils itself like a puzzle. The acting of Giamatti is amazing, and Bryce isn't bad. Some of the secondary characters are funny and they should have more space in the movie. The filming isn't always good. Bad angles and poor lighting are everywhere. The FX are decent but are very static in their presentation. The music has some very interesting tracks. Shyamalan went into another style of movie, and I think peoples were expecting much of the same. I give the movie a 68%. Giamatti and Howard saved that movie in my opinion. It's not that bad actually but visually it can be boring. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
DanBurritoSep 29, 2015
We all know that M. Night Shyamalan's career started plummeting at a certain point but he gets unfairly criticised for movies like this. I mean sure, it's a bit silly but it's also intruiging. Paul Giamatti was brilliant as usual and BryceWe all know that M. Night Shyamalan's career started plummeting at a certain point but he gets unfairly criticised for movies like this. I mean sure, it's a bit silly but it's also intruiging. Paul Giamatti was brilliant as usual and Bryce Dallas Howard was really good too. My biggest complaint was that there's this character who only works out one half of his body (so one arm is more muscular than the other) and while the character isn't forgotten or anything, you'd expect that detail to come in important. But still, it was an interesting movie, definitely better than some of the Shyamalan disasters. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
lukechristianscAug 26, 2015
Who cares if the story is fleshed out or Shyamalan's Greek-mythology bed time story is confusing, but "Lady In The Water" is mystical, magical and peaceful also scary, writer-director M. Night Shyamalan keeps us interested into the charactersWho cares if the story is fleshed out or Shyamalan's Greek-mythology bed time story is confusing, but "Lady In The Water" is mystical, magical and peaceful also scary, writer-director M. Night Shyamalan keeps us interested into the characters and the Greek-mythology, be glad he didn't make the film boring. A building manager Cleveland Heep (played by Paul Giamatti) rescues a woman named Story (Bryce Dallas Howard) from danger he discovers she is a narf a character from a bedtime story who is trying to make a treacherous journey from our world back into hers. Cleveland and his tenants discover that they are also characters in the bedtime story. Cleveland starts to fall in love with her he works together with his tenants to protect her from deadly creatures called "Scrunt" from preventing Story to go home to the "Blue World." WARNING: This isn't a family film. It's cliche'd and the story is silly but who cares, but this is Shyamalan's biggest ample imagination I have ever seen. Maybe this isn't Giamatti's best work but he and Howard did tried and that's all the credit I can give them. This fantasy film is magnificent and striking. Grade A- Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
Tss5078Feb 24, 2013
OK, what kind of drugs is M. Night Shyamalan on and how can I get some!? This is one weird, tripped out movie! Overall it's was good, but just very very weird. It has Shyamalan's typical, dark, methodical, presence, as well as his uniqueOK, what kind of drugs is M. Night Shyamalan on and how can I get some!? This is one weird, tripped out movie! Overall it's was good, but just very very weird. It has Shyamalan's typical, dark, methodical, presence, as well as his unique brand of humor. What's not typical thou is this story. I don't give spoilers, so let's just say the whole movie I was either saying WTF?!?! or WOW that's cool! It's a strange one, but unique and imaginative. It took me a little while to figure out, but ultimately I decided, I liked it! Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
DamienDarko777May 6, 2011
Meh. This movie is a little too heavy-handed for its own good, but if you can forgive that, then it turns out to be a pretty good fairy tale horror-fantasy with some decent scares and laughs.
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
9
HarvG.Oct 19, 2009
Weird, all the negative reviews. I had a knot in my throat several times in the movie. I can totally understand why someone wouldn't like this movie, but to say M.N.S. can't tell a story is wrong.
1 of 1 users found this helpful
10
AngelaHAug 15, 2009
I am continually drawn to this work every time I stumble upon it on cable -- and no matter what I was doing or should be doing -- am drawn back into it without fail, like a moth -- or 'butterfly' -- to the flame. And I don't I am continually drawn to this work every time I stumble upon it on cable -- and no matter what I was doing or should be doing -- am drawn back into it without fail, like a moth -- or 'butterfly' -- to the flame. And I don't for the life of me understand the critics' near-universal negative response to this movie. It makes me think they perhaps deserve the just-desserts fate of the critic in the movie. I thought critics were usually enamored with originality, multi-layered narratives, and meditations on film and storytelling. That this movie is all of these is undeniable. That is also beautiful and magical in the extreme is also without doubt. Perhaps it is these two more 'feminine' attributes that are lacking in today's critics -- notably, still mostly male -- and that is why the near universal defiling of this work of a true original master. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
StephenPApr 2, 2009
This is my favorite movie. People who review these films should not be taken so seriously. This film is not a horror movie, but an incredible story of love, redemption, and sacrifice. Those words could be used to describe many films, but as This is my favorite movie. People who review these films should not be taken so seriously. This film is not a horror movie, but an incredible story of love, redemption, and sacrifice. Those words could be used to describe many films, but as a teenage boy who is quite a film enthusiast, never have I seen a film that has impressed me more in the acting department (let alone cinematography, music, or direction) than Lady in the Water. I am not a fan of Shyamalan at all, as I didn't like Sixth Sense, Signs, or the Happening. But this movie, this is something different. This movie made me want to make films when I grow up. This movie actually changed my life, and M Night's character in the movie wasn't him blowing his own horn... he was simply filling the part of a character who was in the BEDTIME STORY he thought up for his kids. I love this movie, and I only wish that people could have another chance to see this. I was fourteen when I saw this film, and I cried. I was a fourteen year old teenage boy... and I cried. Paul Giamatti, Bryce Dallas Howard, (heck, even Bob Baraban) do a fantastic job. This movie will one day (hopefully) be seen for what it really is: a cinematic masterpiece. Obviously, my views are shared with a few other folk around, the high ratings for this movie are aplenty on this website. Thank you, M Night Shyamalan for changing my life with your beautiful film, and thank you Metacritic for allowing my voice to be heard. Peace. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
SteveFJun 15, 2008
Seeing most of the reviews for this movie I can see that you will either love it or hate. I love it!
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
VxDxFeb 22, 2008
Simply beautiful. I don't understand why people are so stupid as to think that just because the director made a horror movie or two in the past, his next movie is also a horror movie. Lady in the Water is not a horror movie - and imo, Simply beautiful. I don't understand why people are so stupid as to think that just because the director made a horror movie or two in the past, his next movie is also a horror movie. Lady in the Water is not a horror movie - and imo, even Night's previous movies were not horror movies. Since people ( especially critics ) are so used to categorizing every movie they see into one of the genres, they are not ready to think out of the box with a movie like this. And Night's bash on critics is just brilliant! One of the wonderful things about this movie is that there is not 'fantasy world' here. There is only reality through and through. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
PabloEJan 10, 2008
Maybe I am stupid, but I was touched by this movie. It is just a fairy tale after all and in my humble opinion much better than all that predictable Harry Potter cultural non-sense.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
RachelCNov 8, 2007
Unfortunately, promoters continue to advertise Night's movies as horrors because he once made a horror movie that people absolutely love. People go into these movies expecting to be terrified and therefore they lose the story because Unfortunately, promoters continue to advertise Night's movies as horrors because he once made a horror movie that people absolutely love. People go into these movies expecting to be terrified and therefore they lose the story because for some reason they become enraged at the fact that they weren't sickled by blood and gore every 5 minutes. This is a fantasy, The Village was a love story. All of Night's movies are amazing if you just sit down and watch them! This movie is beautiful, the scenes are gripping.. Cut the hatred of Night because people are using him to sell tickets to the horror obsessed. Would you really rather watch Saw 10?? Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
KalakaN.Jun 9, 2007
This is the first time I have ever seen a movie like this. The opening act, where Mr. Heap is in a cupboard under a sink killing an insect, is absolutely unique; all the way through to where the Asian girl translates that her mother wished This is the first time I have ever seen a movie like this. The opening act, where Mr. Heap is in a cupboard under a sink killing an insect, is absolutely unique; all the way through to where the Asian girl translates that her mother wished she could be more like her sister that married a dentist is so true to life, even though this is a first rate fantasy film. I loved it. I look at it often because there is always something I didn't get or see from a previous viewing. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
ShereefE.May 8, 2007
I believe the people reviewing this movie are too sick to understand the truthness of Night's movies. You all seem to judge Night's movies on the basis of them being Horror movies. BUT THEY ARE NOT HORROR MOVIES!! As some, who may I believe the people reviewing this movie are too sick to understand the truthness of Night's movies. You all seem to judge Night's movies on the basis of them being Horror movies. BUT THEY ARE NOT HORROR MOVIES!! As some, who may sometimes be able to open their minds to new ideas, may have noticed, all of his films relate to a certain important topic on life: such as religion, self-hate, self-ignorance, society and it's corruption on people, and even politics. If one just looks at the trailer, thinking that Night takes on the Horror genre at full, and runs to watch a movie they hope will present headless ghouls, bloody beasts, gruesome monsters and all the like (IMO this type of horror film is disgusting, and it has evolved in the last 10 years devastatingly, perhaps to keep the people's minds off what is truly horrible in this world), it is only normal that they will be dissapointed. However, if one goes into the Theatre with a clear conscience on his mind, he will soon realise the pureness of the film. This review is not only for The VIllage, but also for all the other Night movies that I feel were undoubtedly underrated, such as The VIllage or Signs. Some people are unable to understand that Night does not undertake the Horror genre as his dominating genre, he simply uses it to spice up his film and make it slightly more enticing and eye-grabbing for the people. And again, one must always remember that the horror genre has moved to heights that were before unimaginable. So to compre Night's horror with these new horrors would be to compare something non-comparable. That is all I have to say. I hope you will take this review seriously, and remember that I am not writing this review in hate towards the mainstream reviews, but simply in anger towards how they rate such movies that do not comply to one genre alone. Peace to you all. Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful
10
FrickinmediaApr 2, 2007
This movie is simply Brilliant!!! Very original, full of fantasy, but in a very real,
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
JoeyC.Mar 5, 2007
Poignant. Original. A terrific story told without swearing, blood, graphic violence, or sex. It's got fantasy, mystery, comedy, and suspense. Maybe the critics don't like the film because Shyamalan mocks them so directly. One of Poignant. Original. A terrific story told without swearing, blood, graphic violence, or sex. It's got fantasy, mystery, comedy, and suspense. Maybe the critics don't like the film because Shyamalan mocks them so directly. One of the better films I've seen in a while. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
DylanG.Feb 14, 2007
Super heart warming. I worked for years in a rep-movie theatre and have seen all kinds of indie films and I very much enjoyed this one. While this movie seems to have been hated by the critics I loved it. It breathed a freshness into both Super heart warming. I worked for years in a rep-movie theatre and have seen all kinds of indie films and I very much enjoyed this one. While this movie seems to have been hated by the critics I loved it. It breathed a freshness into both the way the story unfolds and its handling of fairytale cliches making somehow seem fresh all over again. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
AscenV.Feb 1, 2007
I love this film. Nothing important can be achieved without the participation of everybody. Everyone has something to say, especially children. They are nearer to the truth than adults. The voice of the heart is more powerful than the voice I love this film. Nothing important can be achieved without the participation of everybody. Everyone has something to say, especially children. They are nearer to the truth than adults. The voice of the heart is more powerful than the voice of reason (critics). The simpler the person is the most important his task may be. We dont need to go very far to find our purpose. Everything we need is just so close to us that we are not usually aware of it. The boy as the interpreter reading cereal boxes was so good!! This is one of my favourite films!! Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
DavidRJan 28, 2007
A masterpiece. Shyamalan proves he is a superb actor. I can only imagine how much better The Sixth Sense and Signs would have been if Shyamalan would have starred instead. I'm interested in seeing where he goes from here. His work is A masterpiece. Shyamalan proves he is a superb actor. I can only imagine how much better The Sixth Sense and Signs would have been if Shyamalan would have starred instead. I'm interested in seeing where he goes from here. His work is clearly far ahead of it's time and the critics simple-minded opinions. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
PeterRJan 28, 2007
This is a something you'll love or hate, but there's no way it will leave you indifferent. That should be reason enough to give it a chance, what you might discover is an incredibly beautiful movie.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
JamesL.Jan 26, 2007
I loved the movie. I thought it had a lot of heart and a message that is sadly missed in the world today.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
TrevorGJan 26, 2007
Like Derek P. already said....you really have to have an imagination to enjoy this film. If you do open up your imagination though, and decide to let the movie take you in.....you'll be pleasantly surprised. In my opinion this is up Like Derek P. already said....you really have to have an imagination to enjoy this film. If you do open up your imagination though, and decide to let the movie take you in.....you'll be pleasantly surprised. In my opinion this is up there with Shyamalan's best work. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
GenRJan 25, 2007
I really liked this movie. Much more than
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
DerekP.Dec 29, 2006
This is a movie that requires an imagination, which, obviously, there is a lack of in the world today, and a child-like open mind towards the story.... granted, it drags on in some parts and it is somewhat korny, it is a movie that goes to This is a movie that requires an imagination, which, obviously, there is a lack of in the world today, and a child-like open mind towards the story.... granted, it drags on in some parts and it is somewhat korny, it is a movie that goes to many levels untouched in film today... if you really admire the splendor of this film, you'll realize the originality and fantasy that is seen in few other films. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
LouPDec 22, 2006
This is a well-made, well-acted and fun movie. I don't know much about Shymalan, but its obvious that the critics have some preconceived dislike for the man and are not taking the movie on its own entertainment merits. It appears to me This is a well-made, well-acted and fun movie. I don't know much about Shymalan, but its obvious that the critics have some preconceived dislike for the man and are not taking the movie on its own entertainment merits. It appears to me that it is the critics and not Shyamalan who are taking themselves way too seriously. Just like the critic in the movie. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
PeterC.Dec 3, 2006
This movie, so under-rated and so misunderstood, rises to such beautifulness that it made me cry and if you really give it a chance it might touch you deep as well. The whole idea of oneness; deployed into such grandeur, making so much sense This movie, so under-rated and so misunderstood, rises to such beautifulness that it made me cry and if you really give it a chance it might touch you deep as well. The whole idea of oneness; deployed into such grandeur, making so much sense especially considering how our world is so very much screwed up nowadays (war in the middle east, poverty, aids, etc). No other movie has taken my breath away as much as this one did in years. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
DaisukeISep 8, 2006
An extraordinary good movie: original, fantastic, true, warmhearted. [***SPOILERS***] The encounter of an old myth and modern world is compelling. The roles were acted in a very natural way. Fun and drama were well balanced. The photography An extraordinary good movie: original, fantastic, true, warmhearted. [***SPOILERS***] The encounter of an old myth and modern world is compelling. The roles were acted in a very natural way. Fun and drama were well balanced. The photography was wonderful and so was the musical score. The message that people have forgotten to the listen to their inner voices is compelling. They have to do so again in order to stop the self destruction of mankind. This important and widely ignored truth is told here as a modern fairy tale. This is one of the best films I ever saw. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
RandallP.Sep 1, 2006
M. Night Shymalan, achieves old world mythic reverence for the unknown... in the most mundane of urban settings. The film contrasts what we know with what we feel... or at least used to feel .. towards the shadows and noises that disturb us M. Night Shymalan, achieves old world mythic reverence for the unknown... in the most mundane of urban settings. The film contrasts what we know with what we feel... or at least used to feel .. towards the shadows and noises that disturb us at night. This isn't meant to be shlock horror.. it is meant to be dark fantasy.. the way the old world feared fairy ringy and dopplegangers... Has our sense of wonder been so eroded that we trash even the exploration of this theme? Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful
10
AceM.Aug 29, 2006
Bottom Line: Critics trashed this movie only because Shyamalan has the critic character die! I am glad the critic died...NO ONE likes movie critics adn NO ONE listens to them! They complain about nothing original coming out of Hellywood Bottom Line: Critics trashed this movie only because Shyamalan has the critic character die! I am glad the critic died...NO ONE likes movie critics adn NO ONE listens to them! They complain about nothing original coming out of Hellywood (yes, Hellywood) and then when something VERY original comes out, they trash it! They're idiots! M. Night Shyamalan is one of the great storytellers of our time! A nice, very well done, very clean fantasy. I'm sure the fact that this movie is very clean of sex and profanity, that is another reason the idiot critics trashed it. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
NickR.Aug 27, 2006
I think you have to be in the right mood to enjoy this movie. It's a fairy tail not hi-art. The critics should get over themselves. Totally enjoyed it.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
TrinityX.Aug 18, 2006
Does not need a long review, is simple, don't hate art or original expressions, relax, the time is not over for a happy ending. Good.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
MannytoAug 18, 2006
Be happy and enjoy this great movie, is it for kids?, yes and for all ages, don't feel so old like many critics!!.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
ShawnO.Aug 17, 2006
This is not a movie for people who don't like to think about what they're seeing (most movie critics). The film is full of symbolism that must be understood to appreciate the story. If you're not willing to do that, don't This is not a movie for people who don't like to think about what they're seeing (most movie critics). The film is full of symbolism that must be understood to appreciate the story. If you're not willing to do that, don't bother going. It's really not a horror movie as some of the previews suggest. This is one of the best films of the year and well worth seeing a second time. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
[Anonymous]Aug 14, 2006
Good movie.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
PortmixAug 13, 2006
With ingenius, art and the best suspense since Signs, another good option for original tales seekers.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
thatguyAug 13, 2006
i have NO IDEA why the critics dissed this film so bad! thi smovie was much better than the though-low-rated-still-overrated the village. this movie, though it lacked scenes of horror, was a very incredible and beautiful.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
ShaunM.Aug 11, 2006
I love how people are so dumb and unperceptive. This is an excellent movie. Of course the critics didn't like this movie... the movie bashes critics outright! Whatever. Go see this and look forward to a DIFFERENT experience instead of I love how people are so dumb and unperceptive. This is an excellent movie. Of course the critics didn't like this movie... the movie bashes critics outright! Whatever. Go see this and look forward to a DIFFERENT experience instead of all the mindless drivel that seems to pollute the screens nowadays. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
DianaG.Aug 11, 2006
One of best this year, but not a movie for all kind of people ( critics for example ). A wonder tale, film made of heart.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
JerrodE.Aug 10, 2006
I really cannot believe that critics would bash this. I dont think it would be much of a stretch to imagine their real reasoning is his blatant stab at movie critics in the film. I personally give the man props for standing up for himself, asI really cannot believe that critics would bash this. I dont think it would be much of a stretch to imagine their real reasoning is his blatant stab at movie critics in the film. I personally give the man props for standing up for himself, as well as constructing one hell of a bedtime story. Shyamalan killed with this one and everyone knows it. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
AngelitoAug 10, 2006
Of course it is not like Citizen Cane, there is no comparisons, but this is another time and genre, genre dominated by Night S., an excelent movie, like always taking risks, I like the result.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
SalAAug 8, 2006
Beautifully crafted story. Shymalan is simply a master of storytelling, I have enjoyed all of his movies to date.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
ArthurH.Aug 8, 2006
This picture is maybe the best of this year until now. Bryce and Giamatti are brilliant!, others must learn " this is a good suspense ". Lady will be on my mind for a long time.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
A.Aug 8, 2006
Like always another movie full of surprises, thanks Mr. Night. Good!.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
HowardC.Aug 7, 2006
A warm tale told lovingly and beautifully. Critics have a baffling vendetta against Night, but his movies will outlast them.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
ChacasAug 6, 2006
Thank you stupid critics who say this movie is silly ?, you are calling us silly to all this 60 or 70 percent- part of the audience who really liked and enjoyed this amazing tale, after all Shyamalan is making his films for us, not for you!, Thank you stupid critics who say this movie is silly ?, you are calling us silly to all this 60 or 70 percent- part of the audience who really liked and enjoyed this amazing tale, after all Shyamalan is making his films for us, not for you!, for you are dedicated his character of movie critic who is killed!!, je, je... ok. you offend our way of think. But dont going to stop us of going to the theaters to see it again. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
SignerAug 6, 2006
Mikel G. is completely right!, many of us ( the critic public ) are not fools, we know and recognize when a movie has all we want to see, an excellent bedtime story, for me its director is one of the best top 3 of this early century, The L. Mikel G. is completely right!, many of us ( the critic public ) are not fools, we know and recognize when a movie has all we want to see, an excellent bedtime story, for me its director is one of the best top 3 of this early century, The L. In the Water is for all those adults who still knows how to be happy in this hard life with wars and Tsunamies, please dont forget you were children!, keep the faith and hope like a child does!. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
KeliAug 6, 2006
I absolutely adored this movie. It's been a while since I read any theatre theory, but I thought the "sloppy filmaking" felt more like an intentional alienation effect, used to make the audience ponder why Shyamalan would transport an I absolutely adored this movie. It's been a while since I read any theatre theory, but I thought the "sloppy filmaking" felt more like an intentional alienation effect, used to make the audience ponder why Shyamalan would transport an epic fantasy into a thoroughly modern setting. I am so glad I went to see it in spite of the negative reviews. Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful
10
MikelG.Aug 5, 2006
I think that the fact that they had a scene were they savagely tore apart and killed a movie critic might be the reason that the eggocentric critics wrote bad reviews... Shyalaman probably new that they were gonna write a bad review. I I think that the fact that they had a scene were they savagely tore apart and killed a movie critic might be the reason that the eggocentric critics wrote bad reviews... Shyalaman probably new that they were gonna write a bad review. I personally loved they movie and I give 100 thumbs up. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
RandyM>Aug 5, 2006
I was a bit skeptical when first hearing about Lady in the Water. I admit I do love Shyamalan's movies, but this one looked a little strange. And after seeing it, I admit it, it still is strange. But Lady in the Water is one of the most I was a bit skeptical when first hearing about Lady in the Water. I admit I do love Shyamalan's movies, but this one looked a little strange. And after seeing it, I admit it, it still is strange. But Lady in the Water is one of the most captivating fables I have ever witnessed. The movie also gets bonus points for having some pretty frightening sequences. The Scrunts are terrifying. Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful
10
BelorekhaAug 5, 2006
At this decade for me Shyamalan is one of the best and amazing-talented young directors, all his films are so original, some seems have envy of this, see again Lady in the water fool critics, this require more appreciation!!
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
RandallturnerAug 5, 2006
Loved it. This is exactly what it is advertised, a bedtime story. I'm going to be a father soon, and I can't wait to share it with my boy.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
ChrisI.Aug 4, 2006
Simply one of the best movies I've ever seen. I'll see it again, too, which is a rare thing for me to do. If I'd listened to the "professional critics" I would have missed out on something wonderful. The movie takes the Simply one of the best movies I've ever seen. I'll see it again, too, which is a rare thing for me to do. If I'd listened to the "professional critics" I would have missed out on something wonderful. The movie takes the mundane and elevates it to the unique. It takes the common and lifts it to the special. I left the movie feeling better about the world and the people in it, and strangely moved to want to be a better person. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
DavidAug 4, 2006
critics have been much to severe on this flick, its not "signs" or "sixth sense", but, it is a great fairy tale telling, with the odd characters we have to expect from this screenwriter. that a character playing a film/book critic is the critics have been much to severe on this flick, its not "signs" or "sixth sense", but, it is a great fairy tale telling, with the odd characters we have to expect from this screenwriter. that a character playing a film/book critic is the only victim of a grizzly (off screen) death, likely motivated most of the red ink. well worth matinee money! Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful
10
FreddyF.Aug 3, 2006
Well I think its a good movie, among the best 3 of this first mid of year, there are no perfect movie but this special film deserves more than 8.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
BrendanAug 2, 2006
Lady In the Water definantly does not deserve the low ratings these critics are giving. Shyamalan wrote this whole story for goodness sake! You must be pretty darn talented to come up with a story such as Lady in the Water. I definitely Lady In the Water definantly does not deserve the low ratings these critics are giving. Shyamalan wrote this whole story for goodness sake! You must be pretty darn talented to come up with a story such as Lady in the Water. I definitely reccomend this movie to anyone. Great job Shyamalan! Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
TimothyP.Aug 1, 2006
Best movie of 2006 so far...
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
DerekG.Aug 1, 2006
Perhaps a bit too literal of a "fairy tale," but I truly don't understand why the critics are trashing it so badly. Perhaps it's because of the critic character in the film. Did Shyamalan hit a bit too close to home?
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
CathyS.Aug 1, 2006
I can enjoy a lot this kind of suspense, stories and actings. Giamatti excelent as usual, ( Oscar must pay attention ).
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
MaryS.Aug 1, 2006
It was what I expected. A very sensational movie that I want to see again.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
DanN.Jul 31, 2006
Contrary to most of the media critics on here I actually enjoyed the movie. Part of the problem is that in the previews it was billed as a scary movie which it certainly is not. It's more fantasy than anything and should be viewed as Contrary to most of the media critics on here I actually enjoyed the movie. Part of the problem is that in the previews it was billed as a scary movie which it certainly is not. It's more fantasy than anything and should be viewed as such. Just relax and watch a decent bedtime story. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
PopR.Jul 31, 2006
If this movie was made by Sofia coppola or Spielberg without changing anything Critics would give an excelent review to Lady, but their critics are about Night Shyamalan not about the movie, therefore his movies are not made for they, are If this movie was made by Sofia coppola or Spielberg without changing anything Critics would give an excelent review to Lady, but their critics are about Night Shyamalan not about the movie, therefore his movies are not made for they, are made for us, the common public who without prejudices only go to the theaters to enjoy a fantastic and original tale. Remember he ( Night ) gave us the best performances of Bruce willis, Mel gibson, Holey joel osment and Bryce dallas...etc. Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful
10
JohnC.Jul 31, 2006
A very good film. Ive read many reviews by closedminded people who apparently did not see the film for what it is. Paul Giamatti is definitly in the running for Best Actor with a stellar performance. The reason I believe some critic are A very good film. Ive read many reviews by closedminded people who apparently did not see the film for what it is. Paul Giamatti is definitly in the running for Best Actor with a stellar performance. The reason I believe some critic are giving film lower marks is because it is made by Shamalan, and it did not live up to what they expected. It could have had a few things dont differently but all and all it is a pretty solid film. The bottotm line is go see the film, but do not go in expecting anything. And take the film as its giving, and hopefully you will see it the way I did and enjoy it. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
SarahB.Jul 31, 2006
Being a fan of Shyamalan I couldn't wait for this movie to come out. I believe he did not disappoint. One thing with M. Night that I love is that you have to get past the "horror" in his movies and look for the deaper meaning and Being a fan of Shyamalan I couldn't wait for this movie to come out. I believe he did not disappoint. One thing with M. Night that I love is that you have to get past the "horror" in his movies and look for the deaper meaning and intricate story. I thought "Ladyin the Water" was his most spectacular attempt in story telling, as beautiful stories go. I loved the symbolism, the humor, the suprise. It was Shyamalan and I loved it! Perhaps I'm biased, but I think everyone should give this one a try. Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful
8
BitBurnJul 30, 2006
This was, yet, another strong picture by M.Night and yes its right up there with Sixth Sense, Signs and The Village. A matter of fact, the movie was exactly what I come to expect from M.Night and I mean this in a good way. Yes, he uses the This was, yet, another strong picture by M.Night and yes its right up there with Sixth Sense, Signs and The Village. A matter of fact, the movie was exactly what I come to expect from M.Night and I mean this in a good way. Yes, he uses the same twists and spookiness as usual and this is possibly why he was booed by Hollywood critics but, come on, the guy has nothing to prove here. His recipe works, just like a Big Mac, and that's why we like it so much! Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful
10
AaronA.Jul 29, 2006
Tremendous film. The critics missed the point entirely.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
ChadS.Jul 29, 2006
"The Lady in the Water" plays like a wet dream for people who indulge in role-playing games like Dungeons and Dragons. How all the tenants readily accept their roles without even a shred of initial skepticism just doesn't work because "The Lady in the Water" plays like a wet dream for people who indulge in role-playing games like Dungeons and Dragons. How all the tenants readily accept their roles without even a shred of initial skepticism just doesn't work because the filmmaker failed to establish the right tone, a platform in which the fantastical could negotiate itself within its realistic setting. But if you're adamantly against the way big-budgeted major studio films are written, in most cases, more than one writer, you'll probably enjoy the quirks, warts and all. In melding the fantastical with the everyday, even the artwork for Helium's "The Magic City" is more successful. "The Lady in the Water"(who should be mute, or learned to speak English like Daryl Hannah in "Splash") has a naive charm; there's an unawareness of how loopy this whole cinematic ordeal really is. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
DavidP.Jul 29, 2006
Muggles dont understand this amazing film, they want movies about sex and wars to give good reviews, dont let our children lose the power of imagination or surprise, this tale is about love , come on!, is not an horror film, Nights Style is Muggles dont understand this amazing film, they want movies about sex and wars to give good reviews, dont let our children lose the power of imagination or surprise, this tale is about love , come on!, is not an horror film, Nights Style is suspense ( can see the difference? ). Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
BellaF.Jul 29, 2006
Beautiful story, I like it more than Pirates and Superman, this was made with a lot of heart.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
GuilleresJul 29, 2006
A jewel out of time, Alfred Hitchcok is back with good tales. Excelent!.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
JenniferP.Jul 29, 2006
It's a fairy tale. I went into the theatre aware that this movie was going to be a fairy tale, and it was everything I expected it to be. This sort of movie is for the kind of person that believed all those bedtime stories as a child, It's a fairy tale. I went into the theatre aware that this movie was going to be a fairy tale, and it was everything I expected it to be. This sort of movie is for the kind of person that believed all those bedtime stories as a child, and still wants to to believe in them now. There are little nuances, touches of humanity and humour in the film that bring it to life and flesh out the characters. The professional, paid critics out there may have seen too many movies for this one to truly ring as it should. Who should watch it? The casual moviegoer, the dreamer, the person who is satisfied with a simple story. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
PhishLJul 29, 2006
Either you love it or hate it. i think we should watch it with an open mind, keeping in mind its a fairy tale. also its something different, not like all the other formulaic crap that comes out of hollywood's bowels every single day!
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
MichaelO.Jul 28, 2006
The movie was excellent. It wasnt the same sort of twist as is usual for M. Nights movies, however the acting and little bits of flavor added throught were wonderful. The human element in this movie is unmissable.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
GaryM.Jul 28, 2006
Let me tell you why I gave this film an "8." This movie deserves to be seen. It deals with what should be true humanity and what being good is all about. Nowadays, being good is severely underrated. Empathy is only but a hazy dream. How do Let me tell you why I gave this film an "8." This movie deserves to be seen. It deals with what should be true humanity and what being good is all about. Nowadays, being good is severely underrated. Empathy is only but a hazy dream. How do we strive to become better? Survive life's ordeals? With love, unity, selflesness? It's true this movie has noticeable flaws, but overall it is the message, the complete product, which is truly overwhelming. This is this summer's nicest, feel good movie yet. But, hey, ... that is just my opinion. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
AngelG.Jul 28, 2006
A very good option for this season not so commercial and more creative than others.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
CynthiaL.Jul 27, 2006
I found the movie entertaining. A story, that kept my attention to the very end. I think the critics wanted this movie to fail. They were panning it before people got a chance to see it for themselves.
1 of 1 users found this helpful
8
SGJul 27, 2006
Critics are incredibly stupid to rate this movie, which is a fairy tale told in modern symbols, as having a lack of logic. They didn't get it!! It's not meant to be taken seriously or to be a magic to modern life type Critics are incredibly stupid to rate this movie, which is a fairy tale told in modern symbols, as having a lack of logic. They didn't get it!! It's not meant to be taken seriously or to be a magic to modern life type story---it's a bed time story for childreren, and nothing more. I think they just don't know how to advertise his movies properly. The characters are all simple because they live inside of the director's "childeren' book" which apparantly he concocted for his own kids. The only one of his movies that should be examined under the logics of real life is 6th sense. The others, like this one, are just folk tales or fairy tales. Critics are a waste of space. This was not a bad movie, if you recognize that its a fairy tale for kids. He has some damn good atmpospher tricks that no other director has. nuff said. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
LaoW.Jul 27, 2006
A brilliant contemporary adult fantasy with a certain amount of gleeful tweeking of film and film critics. Fantasy films of this type (Roan Innish, Cocteau's Belle et Bete etc) are rarely blockbusters, but this is a small delight with a A brilliant contemporary adult fantasy with a certain amount of gleeful tweeking of film and film critics. Fantasy films of this type (Roan Innish, Cocteau's Belle et Bete etc) are rarely blockbusters, but this is a small delight with a bigger box office than its audience oddly enough. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
AlexR.Jul 27, 2006
Good movie & a surprise for this summer.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
MissL.Jul 27, 2006
Gosford park, lost in traslation, The new world are some of the critic's favorite movies, they gave them good reviews, they like boring stories with out feet niether heads, and I think they hate the Talented Mr. Night Shyamalan...but Gosford park, lost in traslation, The new world are some of the critic's favorite movies, they gave them good reviews, they like boring stories with out feet niether heads, and I think they hate the Talented Mr. Night Shyamalan...but ok, The lady is a great movie that must be seen for all who believe in art, creativity...well I almost believe He is our Alfred Hitchcok. And could be better!!. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
ChadM.Jul 26, 2006
Is Lady in the Water a great film? Certainly not. But a 36? No, no, no, no, no. The incredibly harsh reviews Lady has received must be the byproduct of the current anti-Shyamalan movement apparently sweeping through Hollywood and critic Is Lady in the Water a great film? Certainly not. But a 36? No, no, no, no, no. The incredibly harsh reviews Lady has received must be the byproduct of the current anti-Shyamalan movement apparently sweeping through Hollywood and critic circles. The film suffers through a few inexcusable plot holes and some shamefully self-serving moments that are clearly Shyamalan's chosen method, albeit an immature one, of dealing with criticism. The majority of the film, however, is an interesting, original and beautifully filmed tale. Like him or not, Shyamalan is very skilled at creating mystery and fear for his audience, and that fact that he manages both again in light of the often absurd script only reinforces the idea that this guy does have some talent after all. He just needs someone to stand by him and smack him every time he comes up with a great idea like casting himself as a prolific writer or using some silly plot device such as a bedtime story told in inexplicably sporadic chunks to further the plot. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
JoS.Jul 26, 2006
This movie was such a unique and beautiful breath of fresh air after sequals, triquals, and remakes of the past four years. The story of every humans' unique purpose in the mundane world of reality, and urge to believe is poignently This movie was such a unique and beautiful breath of fresh air after sequals, triquals, and remakes of the past four years. The story of every humans' unique purpose in the mundane world of reality, and urge to believe is poignently told through a imaginative myth, and is remarkably and beautifully acted. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
TavoS.Jul 26, 2006
I like it a lot !!, some critics can go hell. The relevant for me is what people say.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
FrankM.Jul 26, 2006
Giamatti was brilliant as usual. Will I go see it again in the theaters like I did Signs and The Village? -yes. Will I rent or buy the DVD when it comes ou?t -yes of Couse!!. For me the creativy is the best.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
JeremyW.Jul 26, 2006
For the record: I loved "6th Sense" & "Signs", but hated "Unbreakable" & "The Village"--especially "The Village. So, that said, I was very skeptical when I paid my $10 to go see this movie. As it turned out, I was pleasantly surprised. This For the record: I loved "6th Sense" & "Signs", but hated "Unbreakable" & "The Village"--especially "The Village. So, that said, I was very skeptical when I paid my $10 to go see this movie. As it turned out, I was pleasantly surprised. This movie is not great, but it is entertaining. Most importantly, M.Night does not try to tack on some lame, completely implausible twist ending as in "The Village". He basically just made a bedtime story full of colorful characters and evil beasties. Compared to a lot of the other crap Hollywood has tried to force on us this Summer, this movie holds it's own around 7.0 Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
MireC.Jul 26, 2006
Good, amazing, original, I love this kind of suspense and the tales made for the kid inside of me always looking for surprises.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
HeidiH.Jul 26, 2006
Garfield 2 better than this amazing movie?, come on Critics!, sometimes you are so absurd!, this Night's movie has all that I want to see in the theaters: Art, why are you so afraid to recognize it, giving the same opinion that others ( Garfield 2 better than this amazing movie?, come on Critics!, sometimes you are so absurd!, this Night's movie has all that I want to see in the theaters: Art, why are you so afraid to recognize it, giving the same opinion that others ( critics ). Open your eyes,,, mmm! and your mind. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
[Anonymous]Jul 26, 2006
Good movie.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
AngelM.Jul 26, 2006
A powerful metaphor with a lot of heart -- which probably isn't what people expected or wanted from it.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
LarryH.Jul 26, 2006
A beautiful fairy tale that forces it's way into The Cove's reality. I don't understand why the critics are bashing this film. It's superb storytelling and great acting. Give me a film like this over the overly praised A beautiful fairy tale that forces it's way into The Cove's reality. I don't understand why the critics are bashing this film. It's superb storytelling and great acting. Give me a film like this over the overly praised Spiderman movies any day! Shyamalan is one of the best (if not the best) storytellers around. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
KirinH.Jul 25, 2006
Heard the bad reviews and went to see it anyways. I liked it a lot. Of course, I loved Unbreakable and many hated that one too. I think he is a genios...who else can be that imaginative? At least it is not a rehash of everything else!
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
JayE.Jul 25, 2006
M. Night Shyamalan's movies from this point out will all have a crippling flaw--they are not Sixth Sense. Any person who walks into a theater will expect a haunting thriller with a Big Twist at the end. When they see a heart-warming M. Night Shyamalan's movies from this point out will all have a crippling flaw--they are not Sixth Sense. Any person who walks into a theater will expect a haunting thriller with a Big Twist at the end. When they see a heart-warming though dark fairy tale with eccentric and interesting characters... they will be grossly dissapointed. What we have is a children's fairy tale that is told for the grownups, with dark visuals and off-beat characters with some very funny moments. We need to approach it as we approached the fairy tales of our youth. We know how to do that. What we have is a Tim Burton movie as told by M. Night Shyamalan. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
ZamF.Jul 25, 2006
Better than lost in traslation?, so far!!, that critics favorite boring movie in wich nothing happens, copy from a Japanese movie and they decided to give an oscar for being original?? ja, ja, Original script is Ladiy in the water, ( and not Better than lost in traslation?, so far!!, that critics favorite boring movie in wich nothing happens, copy from a Japanese movie and they decided to give an oscar for being original?? ja, ja, Original script is Ladiy in the water, ( and not boring ). Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
WayneP.Jul 25, 2006
Considering the films that usually make tons of money ~ the Hollywood sequels of sequels of forgotten TV shows, and the predictably predictable romantic sit-coms crowded with the latest, hotest "STARS" ~ it's hardly surprising that Considering the films that usually make tons of money ~ the Hollywood sequels of sequels of forgotten TV shows, and the predictably predictable romantic sit-coms crowded with the latest, hotest "STARS" ~ it's hardly surprising that Shyamalan's films are generally unappreciated. Admittedly Shyamalan is an something of an acquired taste, but for anyone who is simply too tired of the fast-food films that crowd the multi-plexs to even moan anymore, Lady in the Water, like all of Shyamalan's films, is deliciously different and unselfconscious fantasy. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
ElginB.Jul 25, 2006
Frankly, I think this movie was just a big F.U. to Shyamalan's critics, and not just with the film critic character. In fact, the movie breaks lots of "rules" filmmakers and other storytellers are supposed to follow. The characters are Frankly, I think this movie was just a big F.U. to Shyamalan's critics, and not just with the film critic character. In fact, the movie breaks lots of "rules" filmmakers and other storytellers are supposed to follow. The characters are thinly drawn and often stereotypical; the plot twists in the movie seem almost ad hoc and are often advanced by exposition instead of through action. Beyond that, Shyamalan has a lot of fun with his reputation by casting himself as a Messianic writer who's opus is entitled "The Cookbook"-- sounds like a reference to the Twilight Zone, to me. And, of course, there's the character of Farber himself who is made fun of in a much more overt fashion. Anyway, I think this movie was Shyamalan's attempt at showing that he can do everything the wrong way and STILL make an entertaining movie. The fact that he succeeds only shows how much of a true talent he is. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
RichardD.Jul 25, 2006
[***SPOILER***] As an experienced movie viewer, and self-esteemed critic, compared to the other movies I've seen this year, (Pirates of the Carribean 2, The Omen, among others...) this movie was a breath of fresh air. Here's where[***SPOILER***] As an experienced movie viewer, and self-esteemed critic, compared to the other movies I've seen this year, (Pirates of the Carribean 2, The Omen, among others...) this movie was a breath of fresh air. Here's where it is different from those others...it was hilarious, it was of appropriate length, the acting was great (except for the girl who played story...she didn't really impress), the plot was involved and actually went somewhere. I hated this movie for it's lack of the trademark Shyamalan twist, and yet I loved every minute of it. This movie is not "The Sixth Sense 5" as many expected. This movie stands alone as a great work, and Paul Giamatti stands as one of my favorite actors of the day. For all the critics who say "Shyamalan just wanted to justify his own work by casting himself as a writer whose work will eventually influence a great leader of the future (forecasted by the narf)." Now, OK, I would have agree with those critics about that prior to seeing the movie, but now after watching it, I really think he's just giving a giant middle finger to those critics. And if directors are not allowed to make a movie of their own...not allowed to involve creative spirit in the process of making the movie, then we will be left with a myriad of movies just like The Omen...plastic, pre-packaged copies of the same movies over and over again. Justification? One of the characters of the Lady in the Water, Mr. Ferber, is a fervent, realistic movie critic. One of the finest lines of the movie comes directly from his mouth: "Originality doesn't exist in Hollywood anymore." Shyamalan just said in six words what I have rambled about for an eternity in this post - that he made an original movie. Show me a movie you think is related to this one, and I'll tell you how you are wrong. I stand by Shyamalan as one of the premier directors of today, picking up where Spielberg, Lucas, and other great directors of the past four decades have left off. (Honestly, what was the last good Spielberg flick you saw?) I am a creative mind, and I respect others with creative purpose. See any movie by Darren Aronofsky and you will agree (I can't wait to see the Fountain). Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
JordanB.Jul 24, 2006
This movie was fantastic. No it wasn't like The Sixth Sense with a huge surprise at the end and I don't believe it was meant to be. It was a fun story full of characters that are likeable and in the case of the narf and This movie was fantastic. No it wasn't like The Sixth Sense with a huge surprise at the end and I don't believe it was meant to be. It was a fun story full of characters that are likeable and in the case of the narf and giamatti's character loveable. I consider this Giamatti's best work, and I sure hope that Shyamalan keeps turning out great films. also the critics can suck it. They thought New World was good and that was the biggest pile of self inflated bs (and more boring than alexander) I have ever seen. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
AlbitaMc.Jul 24, 2006
Full of surprises for me. My critique is short because T.L.I.W. Is another Night phenomenon. Excelent!.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
LucasR.Jul 24, 2006
We live in an age where we no longer celebrate originality. in fact we celebrate the lack of it. in a world of crap movies we have a movie like "Lady in The Water" it may not be perfect, or M.Night Shamalayns best work, but it tells a story. We live in an age where we no longer celebrate originality. in fact we celebrate the lack of it. in a world of crap movies we have a movie like "Lady in The Water" it may not be perfect, or M.Night Shamalayns best work, but it tells a story. It has humor, its focused, and your supposed to latch on to something here. You're supposed to hold on to the idea that no matter what circumstance you are in, no matter where your life has taken you, you can have an awakening. You can wake up one day and realize that you are not alone, you can believe in something, and others will believe in you when you do that. Its about hope. In an age of war, terrorism, and celebration of our moral decay. You have one guy who wants to tell a story, and he did. I swear M.Night Shalayan is way ahead of his time. His ability to create a world within a world and be able to relate to his audience is his most valuable gift. "think outside of the box". Too many critics follow a sort of rule/path in which they can compare and "intelligently" critique a movie. Art is art and at the end of the day, I walked out of that theatre feeling good about myself, and thats all that really mattered to me. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful