Paramount Pictures | Release Date: November 5, 2014
8.5
USER SCORE
Universal acclaim based on 4937 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
4,340
Mixed:
303
Negative:
294
Watch Now
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)
10
homandavoodiNov 9, 2014
I went to a long journey last night. I visited several faraway and uncanny places which most of people can’t even have imagination of them. I put my steps on the grounds which the mankind never touch them before. In confrontation of such aI went to a long journey last night. I visited several faraway and uncanny places which most of people can’t even have imagination of them. I put my steps on the grounds which the mankind never touch them before. In confrontation of such a huge bulk of love, greatness and wisdom I was feeling tiny and helpless. I got lost desperately in different dimensions of time and space so that I forgot to breath. I got closer to God and I met my own spirit. I saw Interstellar last night…. Expand
7 of 15 users found this helpful78
All this user's reviews
10
soulboy_amNov 6, 2014
I've been waiting for Interstellar for 1,5 years and today i've watched it. I won't say about its plot or music or cast or director's work. But it is a masterpiece, sure, the masterpiece that could be shot only by Christopher Nolan. Thank youI've been waiting for Interstellar for 1,5 years and today i've watched it. I won't say about its plot or music or cast or director's work. But it is a masterpiece, sure, the masterpiece that could be shot only by Christopher Nolan. Thank you for this movie, Chris. Now, i need to think about all. Expand
7 of 15 users found this helpful78
All this user's reviews
10
Cosmonaut15Nov 7, 2014
Nolan did add another one of the masterpiece to Sci-fi coomunity again. Scientific accuracy for visualization of black hole and wormhole is undoubtedly realistic since there is an astrophysicist working as film assistant. Hard science hadNolan did add another one of the masterpiece to Sci-fi coomunity again. Scientific accuracy for visualization of black hole and wormhole is undoubtedly realistic since there is an astrophysicist working as film assistant. Hard science had been poured into the film so much that it is hard for normal audience to really 100% understand the scientific theory behind the plot. Some of them were hiding in just few words like Quantum entanglement that the robot try to use to establish communication between inside and out side of the black hole.
To summarize, this film really catch my eyes at first glance and finally grab my heart at last.
Expand
7 of 15 users found this helpful78
All this user's reviews
8
Jim222001Nov 7, 2014
Fascinating and intriguing when the film isn't weird and hard to follow. The movie is great to look at and the cast is fantastic. But the film should have been more sci-fi and less about family and love.
7 of 15 users found this helpful78
All this user's reviews
10
hugom31Nov 8, 2014
This is for me the best movie of 2014 so far!, I really enjoyed it and i love it. i really recommend it. i don't want to spoil anything, but i just want to express myself about what i love of this movie and i love everything!
7 of 15 users found this helpful78
All this user's reviews
10
evearcherNov 6, 2014
GRIPPING SCI FI MOVIE WITH TECHNOLOGY AND STUFF !!

Yes, the movie is almost 3 hours long, and by the end of the movie you are glad it was and you actually wish there was more. In addition to the amazing visuals and the compelling story
GRIPPING SCI FI MOVIE WITH TECHNOLOGY AND STUFF !!

Yes, the movie is almost 3 hours long, and by the end of the movie you are glad it was and you actually wish there was more. In addition to the amazing visuals and the compelling story there are a few nice twists and turns throughout the movie that have you gripping your seat. Matthew McConaughey does an amazing job of carrying the movie as the lead, his performance is exceptional. Amazing acting, and a few tear jerking moments...very convincing stuff McChonaughey pulls off the loving father and astronaut with ease. Much better then umm "cof gravity". Highly recommend watching in IMAX 70mm version to create the full immersion experience. So, the story moves along at a good pace and keeps the audience glued to the screen, at the end of our screening there was almost a full standing ovation when the movie finished in a packed theater. Applause, applause and more applause . . . alright, alright, alright !!
Expand
11 of 24 users found this helpful1113
All this user's reviews
10
BshopNov 6, 2014
Great movie, great story, superb acting and overall a must-see.
Story followed a different path than most other sci-fi movies. Original story is a welcome feature.
See it in IMAX - it's worth it for the visuals. I'll probably see this 2 or
Great movie, great story, superb acting and overall a must-see.
Story followed a different path than most other sci-fi movies. Original story is a welcome feature.
See it in IMAX - it's worth it for the visuals.
I'll probably see this 2 or 3 times before it leaves theaters. Nolan does it again!
Reminded me of a cross between Gravity, 2001: A Space Odyssey (space peril and action sequences), Inception (twists and levels), and 12 Monkeys (a bit of time-travel).
In summary, see if you like sci-fi, see if you like Nolan's other films, see if you like original stories and space epics. Go see it man, it was great!
Expand
10 of 22 users found this helpful1012
All this user's reviews
10
JCouch777Nov 5, 2014
What an Incredible and Emotional film. INTERSTELLAR paints a beautiful picture of humanity while striving to be even more. Led by incredible performances from McConaughey and Chastain in particular, and complemented by the incredible writingWhat an Incredible and Emotional film. INTERSTELLAR paints a beautiful picture of humanity while striving to be even more. Led by incredible performances from McConaughey and Chastain in particular, and complemented by the incredible writing and direction, INTERSTELLAR stands out as the best of the year. (so far) Expand
10 of 22 users found this helpful1012
All this user's reviews
10
Trac3rNov 7, 2014
Wow! Just wow! Uhhhmaazing!!

Left the theater feeling awed and mind blown by this incredible journey that Christopher Nolan took my head trip on! The feelings and emotions i felt in this film were grand!! What a ride!! Acting,
Wow! Just wow! Uhhhmaazing!!

Left the theater feeling awed and mind blown by this incredible journey that Christopher Nolan took my head trip on! The feelings and emotions i felt in this film were grand!! What a ride!! Acting, cinematography, score, sound editing, and directing was top notch! I immediately placed this film in my top 10 of all time just after finishing my first viewing. It was that good!

But just like a lot of the critics... I too started thinking about all the plot holes and how all this could of really let up to its mind bending conclusion. I too was thinking... This was so close to being Nolan's masterpiece... If it wasn't for such a convuloted plot!

But while watching the movie, i just accepted everything in the moment because Nolan filmed the pacing beatifully and everything seemed to flow just right. I was never bored during this 3 hour movie... Every scene was engaging from minute to end. That being said... I still did have those questions to potential plot holes in the film. But even despite those flaws the movie was that amazing!

I know a film is even better for myself when i start questioning and thinking about the movie hours after i get home... And wanting to immediately watch it again a 2nd time to piece together anything that i may have missed. I believe the last movie that absorbed my thoughts that deeply after viewing was inception... AndWaduyuhknow.. Another nolan epic.

Now i did have to go on google to learn more about quantum mechanics, gravity/relativity, 4th and 5th dimensions, wormholes/blackholes... Because my knowledge was pretty limited in those fields prior to watching this film. And i do know that quantum physics and all the theories are exactly what they are... Theories. But the more i delve into this research, the more plausible this theory sounds backed upon scientific facts.

Now, even though researching all those topics, i still had those questions in the plot that still didnt make 100% sense to me and i feel what a lot of critics felt... That the movie was grand and epic even despite its flaws in the plot... So I tried to find my own interpretations to the plot holes. But with only 1 viewing and so much information given throughtout the movie, it was frustrating and I wished i could just go and watch it again a 2nd time.

But impatiently so.. i ended up finding a discussion forum on interstellar... Anndd ooh dammnn... After reading that discussion thread with everybodies different interpretations opened my eyes so much more to this movie.

Now when i watch it a 2nd time im convinced everything will fall into pieces perfectly based on all the different interpretations that others have received from the movie.

And thats exactly what makes Nolan stand apart from the other great directors like scorcese, spielberg, cameron, howard, etc... All these other directors are amazing because they weave the plot so tightly that you understand the movie in one sitting for the most part. But Nolan, oooh man... With memento, inception, the dark knoght trilogy(moreso memento and inception)... Really makes you think and glue together the missing pieces in the plot to your own interpretation, and will require at least 2 or more viewings to understand it all soundly.. and when you do... The movie becomes more personal for yourself and that much more grand and epic!

Now having said that... And after a night of digging and exploring the movie, themes, different interpretations, and field of quantum mechanics... This may very well be Nolan's masterpiece. Right up there with memento and the dark knight. But to me.. the themes that interstellar touches... Have spoken to me the most out of his other two masterpieces.

My initial reaction immediately after watching interstellar vaulted the movie into my top 10 of all time just from its sheer scope, brilliant acting, and pacing. But after a night of exploring deeper, this may very well be the best... And im sure after my 2nd viewing... It just may be... The greatest of all time.

Christopher Nolan's Masterpiece!
Expand
10 of 22 users found this helpful1012
All this user's reviews
2
SuperbuddhaNov 28, 2014
Boring lame and cliché. I didn't stay to watch the film in it's entirety. As the first hour did not managed to get my attention I just stopped watching. In a film what I like most is the storytelling, and in this case the plot doesn't reallyBoring lame and cliché. I didn't stay to watch the film in it's entirety. As the first hour did not managed to get my attention I just stopped watching. In a film what I like most is the storytelling, and in this case the plot doesn't really make sense and the characters are not interesting enough to relate. Interstellar is over ambitious, pretentious and ultimately a bad vanity project overblown by the media. Expand
5 of 11 users found this helpful56
All this user's reviews
10
gagoiersNov 12, 2014
The best thing about Interstellar is that, like Inception, the science and the ideas are as real, as sophisticated, and as advanced, as any ideas out there. If you see a critic or somebody saying this is convoluted or overly complex that saysThe best thing about Interstellar is that, like Inception, the science and the ideas are as real, as sophisticated, and as advanced, as any ideas out there. If you see a critic or somebody saying this is convoluted or overly complex that says more about their lack of understanding than about the movie. Expand
5 of 11 users found this helpful56
All this user's reviews
8
Pazzo7Nov 7, 2014
Interstellar is visually one of the best movies ever.Its enthralling,intriguing and entertaining for the first half and then in the second half the movie loses its charm.It was still entertaining but I wasnt as pleased as I was for the firstInterstellar is visually one of the best movies ever.Its enthralling,intriguing and entertaining for the first half and then in the second half the movie loses its charm.It was still entertaining but I wasnt as pleased as I was for the first hour and 30 min mainly because of some narrative problems.The finale was the most WTF-ish one I've ever seen but it wasnt as rewarding as I expected or wanted it to be.It was ridiculous.Some may argue with me one this one.I get it.Chris Nolan tried to transcend the science and wanted to reach for a mind-blowing ending but when you think about what happens after Cooper's choice thats what makes it ludicrous.This is the reason I give this movie a 8/10 rating.It was fun,charming (even though not for its entire length),entertaining and really really beautiful but the climax is absurd and not rewarding. Expand
5 of 11 users found this helpful56
All this user's reviews
9
DafsterNov 6, 2014
What I like about Interstellar is that while it has your classic sciency space travel elements, unlike other space-themed movies it does not put this element at its center. It's core rather, is something much deeper - a story of a father andWhat I like about Interstellar is that while it has your classic sciency space travel elements, unlike other space-themed movies it does not put this element at its center. It's core rather, is something much deeper - a story of a father and his daughter and their struggles of being apart. Space just happens to be one of the perfect themes for this idea and as a result, the movie is told well. I highly recommend it, as it is in no way "just another space movie". Expand
14 of 31 users found this helpful1417
All this user's reviews
2
jgzegerApr 3, 2015
One of the hokiest pieces of sci-fi crud I have ever seen. It is sort of a mash between Gravity, Star Trek and The Matrix except that these movies had more credulity. If you think that love is one of the basic dimensions of the universe alongOne of the hokiest pieces of sci-fi crud I have ever seen. It is sort of a mash between Gravity, Star Trek and The Matrix except that these movies had more credulity. If you think that love is one of the basic dimensions of the universe along with space and time, you'll probably love the movie. If not, give this show a miss as you'll puke at all the sentimentalism. Regarding the acting, Matthew McConaughey is awful as an astronaut with a southern drawl, and appearing in this movie hasn't helped Jessica Chastain's and Anne Hathaway's career any. They should have known better. Expand
4 of 9 users found this helpful45
All this user's reviews
9
MJKPSTANNov 7, 2014
Visually stunning, amazingly acted and thought provoking. It is thrilling, but flawed. The last 20 minutes is very convoluted, BUT, Interstellar's greatness, far outweighs it's faults. Interstellar is one of my fave movies of the year! 910.
4 of 9 users found this helpful45
All this user's reviews
9
mririshfoxNov 18, 2014
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. while Ann Hathaway and Mathew Mcconaughey were very weird choices considering neither has really shown the chops for sci-fi, they do put on quite a show.
the movie, like an actual space launch, starts of slow, but once they get through the wormhole the movie pretty much is non-stop until it jumps the shark at the end with the whole 5d existing in 3d with time distortions (this movie is not for the scientific faint of heart)
it takes a few minutes of watching, but just replace Hal 900 with Michal Caine and Matt Damon and you pretty much got 2001: a space odyssey, so i pretty much give it the same score as 2001 would get.
Expand
4 of 9 users found this helpful45
All this user's reviews
9
Silver1138Nov 5, 2014
Christopher Nolan has once again proved that he is one of the most important filmmakers of his generation. Interstellar is not just another space flick with impressive visuals. It tackles the most important issue we are currently facing onChristopher Nolan has once again proved that he is one of the most important filmmakers of his generation. Interstellar is not just another space flick with impressive visuals. It tackles the most important issue we are currently facing on our planet, namely our very survival in the face of overpopulation and unsustainable living, and the crucial need to overcome our natural instincts in order to evolve as a species.

The fact that movie critics and the audience will compare Interstellar with Stanley Kubrick’s masterpiece is a testament to the epic scope of the film. However, Nolan’s latest creation is less surreal and more focused on the future of mankind. Rather than abstractly dealing with our origins and place in the universe and assuming that Earth will be our base for reaching to the stars, Interstellar deals with the harsh realities of an increasingly hostile planet, our short-sighted way of life, our natural instinct of individual survival and how it now poses a threat to our survival as a species and, not least of all, the very unromantic, brutal nature of space travel and relativity.

At the same time, unlike 2001, it is not a purely intellectual film. It does not distance itself from human emotion, attempting to strike a balance between its grand scope and the feelings and failings of its characters. Whether it succeeds or not in this balancing act is something people will disagree upon, and it is probably the element that will make or break the film for you. As far as I am concerned, Nolan’s Interstellar is a triumph against the seemingly impossible odds which he faced in this undertaking.
Expand
11 of 25 users found this helpful1114
All this user's reviews
10
derwolf12Nov 6, 2014
Even it accepts many things from former SF. it still inspiring, astonishing and entertaining. It deserve to be the movie of 2014 and the milestong of SF history.
11 of 25 users found this helpful1114
All this user's reviews
10
Just1nsaneNov 8, 2014
This movie is one of the best trips ive ever taken in a movie. Its so amazing in every aspect. The movie is long but seemed not long at ALL. This is a must see in theaters
7 of 16 users found this helpful79
All this user's reviews
10
radmirkaNov 6, 2014
Фильм просто великолепен! Недавно вернулся из кинотеатра - это шедевр однозначно, 10 из 10. Несмотря на почти 3 часа времени не было ни одной скучной минуты. Очень порадовал Мет Деймон который неожиданно появился. Также нельзя не отметитьФильм просто великолепен! Недавно вернулся из кинотеатра - это шедевр однозначно, 10 из 10. Несмотря на почти 3 часа времени не было ни одной скучной минуты. Очень порадовал Мет Деймон который неожиданно появился. Также нельзя не отметить великолепную музыку - она очень хорошо передает настроение фильма. Рекомендовано к просмотру на 100%! Expand
10 of 23 users found this helpful1013
All this user's reviews
10
hamos786Nov 5, 2014
Thanks Nolan for giving a movie which will make you feel and keeps you puzzled in an Enchanted way.How much ever the critic or the people may criticize but one thing that everybody should understand that this movie has contributed a lot ofThanks Nolan for giving a movie which will make you feel and keeps you puzzled in an Enchanted way.How much ever the critic or the people may criticize but one thing that everybody should understand that this movie has contributed a lot of things abut space and would have definitely ignited many minds all over the world Expand
13 of 30 users found this helpful1317
All this user's reviews
9
WillybachNov 19, 2014
Interstellar is a movie that attempts to hark back to the pre-CGI days of Sci-fi movies - 2001: A space odyssey, Bladerunner, Alien - and it feels all the more 'real' and visceral for it. Indeed it is probably one of the most visuallyInterstellar is a movie that attempts to hark back to the pre-CGI days of Sci-fi movies - 2001: A space odyssey, Bladerunner, Alien - and it feels all the more 'real' and visceral for it. Indeed it is probably one of the most visually stunning movies since those aforementioned movies, if not surpassing them in several scenes. Perhaps, strangely, what I appreciated most in Christopher Nolan's efforts was a movie mostly devoid of exaggerated suspense, cheap scares, and throw-away once-liners that fade from memory almost as soon as theyy are uttered. It was a mature portrayal of humanity, and a chilling warning of where we might be headed.

Perhaps the only real weakness is in some of the plot mechanics early on. There are some moments that are jarringly unrealistic, from the apparent lack of detailed planning for the mission, a mission of unimaginable importance, to Cooper's seeming complete lack of knowledge of Quantum mechanics (something surely he would have been briefed on prior to launch). I do however concede he needed to inform the audience of some of the science behind their decision-making.

What the movie does exceptionally well, is attempt to marry an awe-inspiring journey into the furthest reaches of scientific knowledge with a commentary on human nature and emotional connections. Family, the reason for existence, the nature of the cosmos - all are concepts touched on, at times quite beautifully, in this motion picture. The acting is great. Matthew McConaughey is a stand-out and pretty much carries the emotional component of the film single-handedly.

I felt tempted to give it a 10, to counter the usual silly 0s that people often give films they feel disappointed in. It's epic. Certainly on of the greatest Sci-fi movies ever made. It's in my top 10 that's for sure. But then, there haven't really been that many EPIC sci-fi movies ever made. The movie does have its issues, and its not perfect. But I feel sure that it will live long in the memory, as all true classics so often do.
Expand
3 of 7 users found this helpful34
All this user's reviews
9
strangermoonNov 10, 2014
like michio kaku says if hawking books ideas importing this is the best realistic space journey movie. not like wtf 2001 style and not like just pointles action gravity style. its not 10 becuse some parts just carbon copy of inception.
3 of 7 users found this helpful34
All this user's reviews
2
BertoflyingfoxJan 24, 2015
More bloated exposition and drawn out yawn-inducing scenes of nothing happening. There's about 45 minutes of film here worth watching. Everything else is forgettable, melodramatic, and full of itself.
3 of 7 users found this helpful34
All this user's reviews
6
augurseerNov 8, 2014
Not a bad one, definitely visually great and well acted...has a few points where the obvious next scene actions pop in. I would describe it as if inception, the machinist and prestige have a three way.

The kind of movie that Neil Degrasse
Not a bad one, definitely visually great and well acted...has a few points where the obvious next scene actions pop in. I would describe it as if inception, the machinist and prestige have a three way.

The kind of movie that Neil Degrasse Tyson and Stephen Hawking will love for the ships but hate for the science. I tries to have science as a clear background and driving force but in the end "love" is the beacon home.
Expand
3 of 7 users found this helpful34
All this user's reviews
10
horcrux2007Dec 27, 2014
This was an unimaginably beautiful, intriguing, and intense film. Despite being a three hour movie, it keeps your attention with twists, breathtaking imagery, and thought-provoking themes. If you have a developed attention span and an openThis was an unimaginably beautiful, intriguing, and intense film. Despite being a three hour movie, it keeps your attention with twists, breathtaking imagery, and thought-provoking themes. If you have a developed attention span and an open mind, you'd be a fool to not see this. Interstellar is the best movie I've seen all year. Expand
3 of 7 users found this helpful34
All this user's reviews
5
tspaffordNov 11, 2014
Scientific accuracy? Really. Man orbiting planet ages 23 years while 2 other people are on planet below for several hours. Are the people on the planet moving near speed of light while orbiting craft is not? How do you get huge tidal waveScientific accuracy? Really. Man orbiting planet ages 23 years while 2 other people are on planet below for several hours. Are the people on the planet moving near speed of light while orbiting craft is not? How do you get huge tidal wave when water depth is 1-2 feet? Expand
3 of 7 users found this helpful34
All this user's reviews
7
antmancccNov 8, 2014
Once again, Christopher Nolan has explored an ambitious idea and presented a well-constructed movie. Interstellar can let us submerge ourselves into a space journey, also it reminds us that watching a film is a unique way to explore ourOnce again, Christopher Nolan has explored an ambitious idea and presented a well-constructed movie. Interstellar can let us submerge ourselves into a space journey, also it reminds us that watching a film is a unique way to explore our imagination. With more half baked comic book movies emerges, Interstellar is a precious gift from Christopher Nolan, it allows us to have an introspection of how we treat the movie industry instead of just entertaining. Expand
3 of 7 users found this helpful34
All this user's reviews
5
fantasyNov 8, 2014
I love science fiction movies as they are my favorite. I don't hate anyone. So it was with great anticipation that I looked forward to seeing Interstellar. After seeing the movie I didn't know whether to give it a 10 or a zero as I wasI love science fiction movies as they are my favorite. I don't hate anyone. So it was with great anticipation that I looked forward to seeing Interstellar. After seeing the movie I didn't know whether to give it a 10 or a zero as I was that torn in two directions. So first the Pro's in that the visuals are simply breathtakingly stunning. You feel like a kid in a candy store taking in all the sights and sounds that NASA provided of space. So now for the cons. The movie is way too long, and in parts drags on unmercifully. The character development other than Cooper is sadly lacking. There are more plot holes than blackholes. Matt Damon is totally miscast and distracts from the actual movie. There is way too much technical "gobbily **** going on in which you need to be a rocket scientist to understand what the characters are discussing. It all gets boring very fast. Other than Cooper and his daughter Murph there is no other character you really care for; unless, of course the Robot is considered a person. LOL Anne Hathway, a terrific actor in her own right, is totally miscast. Michael Caine is totally underutilized. John Lithgow is wasted. When the movies draws to its illogical conclusion you feel as if saying OK I just wasted 3 hours of my life. The message is simple. As the Beatles once said ALL YOU NEED IS LOVE! Expand
5 of 12 users found this helpful57
All this user's reviews
4
kurasanwichNov 14, 2014
You gotta be kidding me. These reviewers are way off. The greenlight on this one went something like this. Think Gravity meets Doctor Who meets Contact. Soooo stupid. Also very looong. I just can't understand how people think this is aYou gotta be kidding me. These reviewers are way off. The greenlight on this one went something like this. Think Gravity meets Doctor Who meets Contact. Soooo stupid. Also very looong. I just can't understand how people think this is a good movie. Its watchable but not gripping. It uses a good musical score to add drama to scenes that were not dramatic and the plot had little to do with linking those scenes. I regret spending 3 hours on this. Expand
5 of 12 users found this helpful57
All this user's reviews
10
YuRown92Nov 5, 2014
The Best Movie of the Year, clever story, good casting, perfect visual effects. No more words. Everybody, who likes good & clever stories, must watch this movie.
12 of 29 users found this helpful1217
All this user's reviews
9
dharmaNov 8, 2014
Nolan has done it again. While the critics were saying that Interstellar is too sentimental, they actually got the wrong idea. Nolan may be emulating Kubrick's attention to detail here, but he is essentially making a Spielberg film. ThatNolan has done it again. While the critics were saying that Interstellar is too sentimental, they actually got the wrong idea. Nolan may be emulating Kubrick's attention to detail here, but he is essentially making a Spielberg film. That sense of awe: check. Gooey sentimentality: check. I can't say anymore of the plot, but suffice to say: the visuals are breathtaking, the acting stupendous. It's not perfect: the dialogue is filled with a lot of exposition. But heck, still one of the best film of 2014. Bring your tissues folks. It's a tearjerker. Expand
7 of 17 users found this helpful710
All this user's reviews
10
DragsterWaveNov 5, 2014
Interstellar is a full experimental work of dazzling visual and thematic ambition. An epic futuristic adventure driven by pain, fear and regret. Nolan gives us a magnificent, dark, romantic, ambitious and risky clever piece. It is huge andInterstellar is a full experimental work of dazzling visual and thematic ambition. An epic futuristic adventure driven by pain, fear and regret. Nolan gives us a magnificent, dark, romantic, ambitious and risky clever piece. It is huge and covers not enough to see it once. Nolan takes us to the edge of the universe but reflecting on everything that makes us human. An intense space opera that dazzles and thrills. Nolan has done it again. Expand
13 of 32 users found this helpful1319
All this user's reviews
9
jjordanNov 5, 2014
This was an excellent film with huge ideas and a lot of heart - it is definitely a must see. The acting is phenomenal and the story is gripping and incredibly interesting. The effects were amazing as everybody was expecting. It willThis was an excellent film with huge ideas and a lot of heart - it is definitely a must see. The acting is phenomenal and the story is gripping and incredibly interesting. The effects were amazing as everybody was expecting. It will definitely be divisive but I applaud Nolan for the originality and gall of the film. In a time where we have ~29 superhero movies planned to release in the next 6 years, we need more visionary people pushing the limits and giving us original screenplays and fresh ideas that not only entertain, but stimulate critical thinking.

This is exactly what interstellar did, for me at least. Not once did I find myself bored, I felt as though I actually experienced the journey with the characters and could even share their emotions from time to time. This is what movies are about for me. As I watched, I forgot about my own troubles and cares and embarked on an incredible journey with an amazing cast and a story that causes you to wonder what the future has in store for us, and what really is potentially out there in our infinite universe.

Interstellar is not without flaws, but it is definitely a movie that deserves to be seen and contemplated. The score by Hans Zimmer is amazing and truly adds to the experience. Don't rely on other people's opinions or form an opinion based on others thoughts before seeing it. Just go see it, and enjoy the bold and spectacular journey it is!
Expand
12 of 30 users found this helpful1218
All this user's reviews
10
EvanmichaelNov 6, 2014
I havn't been this blown away by a movie since The Dark Knight Rises, the prvious film by master Christopher Nolan. I must say I was a little concerned after seeing the mixed reviews, but I did not need to be. This movie is absolutelyI havn't been this blown away by a movie since The Dark Knight Rises, the prvious film by master Christopher Nolan. I must say I was a little concerned after seeing the mixed reviews, but I did not need to be. This movie is absolutely fantastic. I heard criticism that it's too confusing and won't be accessable to a wider audience. I'm certainly no genius and I was never confused by the science talk. If I was to criticize the film I will say that it is does get a bit convoluted, and if it ended about ten minutes earlier it would of flowed a little more. That's all the negatives. This film is absolutely stunning, unique, original, mesmerizing, and absolutely awe-inspiring. This film will absolutely go down along side 2001 and Blade Runner as one of the great science fiction films. Oh and Tars and Case are freaking awesome. Not to spoil anything but there are sequences in this film that rival the Stargate sequence in 2001 as some of the greatest scenes in science fiction, if not film in general. Expand
8 of 20 users found this helpful812
All this user's reviews
5
terrible_lizardNov 8, 2014
You're not fooling me again, Mr. Nolan. Critics raved for "Inception," and fanbois were spawned by the million. I had to see for myself what Inception was. And it turned out to be beautiful, sterile, and incredibly dull; an elaborateYou're not fooling me again, Mr. Nolan. Critics raved for "Inception," and fanbois were spawned by the million. I had to see for myself what Inception was. And it turned out to be beautiful, sterile, and incredibly dull; an elaborate structure that was hollow on the inside. Now those same critics and same feverish fanbois are telling me how this new movie of yours will change my life yet again. Not fooling me Mr. Nolan, I doubt this will even rate a redbox rental. GOOD DAY to you sir. Expand
4 of 10 users found this helpful46
All this user's reviews
8
infinNov 8, 2014
Interstellar is an intriguing tale because of its human characters. It's a story of a family who want to do what they love with who they love but are torn apart by a small competing priority - saving humankind.

The science fiction
Interstellar is an intriguing tale because of its human characters. It's a story of a family who want to do what they love with who they love but are torn apart by a small competing priority - saving humankind.

The science fiction theories I struggled with in the credibility department, certain convenient one in a trillion coincidences detracted from the ingenuity and risk of gambles the crew take.

For the me most gripping aspects of Interstellar are the breathtaking foreign planet scenes and relationship between McConaughey and his daughter. The scenes on board the interstellar station are very reminiscent of Alien and the AI robot puts a news spin on HAL from 2001. The Matt Damon scenes are straight out bizarre!

Nolan is always guaranteed to leave you thinking, wondering and conjecturing with friends. I see other reviewers compare this to Gravity and for what it's worth - I thought Gravity was a far more riveting and thrilling tale.
Expand
4 of 10 users found this helpful46
All this user's reviews
6
BioHazardParkNov 11, 2014
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. It's one of those things where I have to accept that so many people will love this movie and I really found it barely ok. I feel that some of the people calling this a masterpiece might need to reevaluete their opinion.

It's tough to watch a movie almost 3 hour in length when my friend and I called out the major twists in the movie in the first act and kept doing so for the rest of the movie. The love will save us all is really laughable ... it feels like it would have been a decent 30 min twilight zone episode instead of a three hour movie about saving humanity from extinction.

I did enjoy and laugh at some of the one liners and I think this humor saved the movie for me.

Here is a list of things that bugged me and I have no doubt other people will disagree with and that's fine by me.

-They talk so much about the ghost in the first act, my friend and I said "hey it's probobly him pushing the books"
-The soundtrack covers so much of the dialogue I think I missed so many lines in the movie because I was not able to hear them
-So much of the script feels like set up pieces for scenes to come, it's down right annoying.
-This does not look like a visual spectacle, I am sorry but where exactly are these amazing scenes.
-To be compared to Kubrick and 2001 and some of the people are doing right now...you can not have scenes like...discovers nasa, says goodbye, is on a rocket out of space. If you feel this stuff is out of place when you watch a movie...that's how it is. The pacing/timing just feels wrong in so many scenes ...the rocket, watching the 28 year footage, leaving his daughter to find Brand etc
-The Matt Damon scene enforces the weak script, as they hammered the lines "Mann's the best of us, mann's this mann's that...I already felt this character is not going to be what it is...and as soon as you see him on the screen you are like "ok I know where this is going.,,,"
which is bad in my opinion
-I really did not buy into the emotion, of father daughter relationship. The scene where Cooper watches 28 years of footage just left me cold and seems also out of place...or not at the right pace.
-I was really annoyed at the transition of the boy to Casey Affleck, it felt weird, their voices were so different, reminded me I was watching a movie and it's hard to lose yourself in an epic sic-fi when this happens over and over.
-For a 3 hour movie the characters and their decisions sure feel underdeveloped.
-The whole dust things, everyone is driving pickups in the future, funny. There is no militaries for some reason but none of this seems somehow justified in the movie-logic. The older people in the beginning set up the movie for a good ending, as they are referencing the events to come as the past.

Anyway these are just some of the things that bugged me about the movie. It was not a bad flick it's just not the epic science fiction movie other people claim it to be.

For some that claim that you have to be a sophisticated thinker to understand the science ...miss the point ...it's a blockbuster movie that should not require a science course or a book reading prior to watching it. I understand these ideas are real, but I don't feel the implementation and execution in the movie is something pulled of but anyway...agree to disagree :)
Expand
2 of 5 users found this helpful23
All this user's reviews
9
MaxsonNov 8, 2014
Definitely my new favorite movie from the brilliant Christopher Nolan. Interstellar was intense, thrilling, and highly ambitious on every level. It felt like an roller coaster ride but with some complex narrative structure in it. The firstDefinitely my new favorite movie from the brilliant Christopher Nolan. Interstellar was intense, thrilling, and highly ambitious on every level. It felt like an roller coaster ride but with some complex narrative structure in it. The first act of the story was a bit slow for me, but everything went FULL BLAST after that. Visually, its one of the best looking films of 2014...in my opinion. If you want the full experience from this film, then I highly recommend you go see it in IMAX. GOOOOO SEE IT IN IMAX!!! TRUST ME!!!! Expand
2 of 5 users found this helpful23
All this user's reviews
10
scotyb91Mar 28, 2015
Holy moly. When I first saw Interstellar I said "wow, this is a moving picture, these pictures are moving to create a story of love, sacrifice and above all spaceships that twirl in outer space." Don't take my word for it, go out to yourHoly moly. When I first saw Interstellar I said "wow, this is a moving picture, these pictures are moving to create a story of love, sacrifice and above all spaceships that twirl in outer space." Don't take my word for it, go out to your nearest video store and experience the unmatched match made in heaven that is Interstellar: This is a movie. Expand
2 of 5 users found this helpful23
All this user's reviews
8
LowbrowCinemaNov 30, 2014
INTERSTELLAR is not a perfect film. And in fact, the first hour tired me totally. If I were home, I would have shut it off BUT thank god I was not and did not. INTERSTELLAR simply blew me away.
2 of 5 users found this helpful23
All this user's reviews
9
AlekhyaDasNov 18, 2014
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. *Note: My Analysis and the real 'Nolan'/movie explanations may diverge.
Abide with that. He is the monarch of all the **** flicks. :P

Interstellar: "Expect the Unexpected" should be the tagline of every Nolan movie. Same goes for this movie as well. Interstellar is a dazzling, striving, fascinating journey.

Interstellar is a smart blend of passions in a sci-fi movie. Nolan
always adds scarce emotions to all of his pictures which make me tear
up all the time, but this is his most sentiment betrothed movie for
sure. He has perfectly combined the bond between a dad and his
daughter. This movie proves that our love can truly surpass time and
space; that no matter how remote that special someone be, they will
always matter to our hearts against the cold milieu of survival.

Plot: The world is getting shattered by drought and famine, making it
unbearable for beings to endure. In the meantime, Cooper finds a
surreptitious NASA epicenter and goes out for a voyage to save the
world. A group of discovers must travel beyond our solar system in
search of another planet capable of Humankind. In the expedition, they
had to face a lot of footraces which coerce them to select between
their family and the future of the human race.

Now the movie goes quite clean till the first one and half hour. After
that, The Endurance crew gets to know the actual enigmas of this entire
trip.

1. The secret NASA center's Professor Brand has got two strategies of
saving the civilization. First, he promises Cooper that he will solve a
forward-thinking equation, which will help the NASA to take the Earth's
surviving populace into the space by launching a massive space station.
Second, if he fails in the solution, NASA has made pre-plans of reaping
a bank of fertilized human ova serving them to keep alive the humanity
after earth gets wholly devastated. The Endurance's job is to find the
flawless habitat for the subsistence of the embryos. They were to be
located in artificial wombs and carried to term. Of course, the crew
will devote the next 10-15 years taking care for a bunch of kids before
using the next set. The population bang would be exponential since the
next batch would be larger because there were more people available to
take care of them. Later we got to know that entire journey was a
swindle and Plan A was near to impossible. So plan B was the real plan.

2. Matt Demon [Dr. Mann]'s act was unforeseen. He proved that when you
are in a dying condition, the only thing you care about is you and your
family and nothing else.

The climax comes next. I personally believe that the movie should have
ended in a different way. The paradox they shown in the film and
Murph's apprehension of who "the ghost" was, to Matthew's realizing
what was going on, to that specific scenario in the black hole, to him
finding his daughter and the full Murphy station sequence. I would have
adored if Coop would have died entering the Black Hole. The earth would
have died out and Anne Hathaway and Edmunds start a new civilization. This would have left a cult ending, but Nolan always wants a twisted finale to all of his flicks. Nevertheless, the actual climax was nice as well. Apart from this the other departments were bang on, Heart touching acts, Superb Soundtrack, Wonderful DOP work, fabulous direction, etc. I felt that there was a problem with the sound-mix. The subtitles assisted well though. Anyways, I loved this much, much, much more than Gravity. I hope Interstellar gets plentiful Oscars this year like Gravity did. Must watch!
Expand
2 of 5 users found this helpful23
All this user's reviews
7
Filmwatcher123Nov 9, 2014
I was looking forward to this film all year, and now it's finally out i can say that it was a little disappointing, not terrible, just not great. For the most part the film is a lot of fun, creating a believable world that could easilyI was looking forward to this film all year, and now it's finally out i can say that it was a little disappointing, not terrible, just not great. For the most part the film is a lot of fun, creating a believable world that could easily represent humanities future, with some good acting and amazing effects the first hour or so of this movie was very enjoyable to watch. Then the downsides play in, one of which could have just been the cinema i was in but i have seen this comment elsewhere too, and that is that the music was so unbelievably deafeningly loud that you cannot hear key dialogue points and because of this draws you out of the story and leaves you feeling annoyed after any action scene turns up. My biggest annoyance with this film though has to be the ending, it seemed like Nolan was going more for a remake of 2001: A Space Odyssey and make an ending which is overly complicated and more of a Deus Ex than actually put in a decent ending to the movie. Overall i enjoyed this movie, but i believe it fell just short of being a classic by just a few odd decisions, in my opinion anyway. Expand
2 of 5 users found this helpful23
All this user's reviews
9
nolbert1983Nov 8, 2014
I've seen the movie yesterday and I must admit it I did not expect it will be that good. Mathew McConaughey is absolutely fantastic, the sound and the views are superb. The plot shows us that we are not ready to "fight" with time having ourI've seen the movie yesterday and I must admit it I did not expect it will be that good. Mathew McConaughey is absolutely fantastic, the sound and the views are superb. The plot shows us that we are not ready to "fight" with time having our loved ones back home. Anyone having children will feel touched.
See the movie for yourself - don't read the reviews. Everyone of us is different, and we decide what we like or dislike...
Expand
2 of 5 users found this helpful23
All this user's reviews
6
Truth_TellerNov 10, 2014
With the exception of Matthew McConaughey's accent, Interstellar isn't that difficult to understand. The graphics are mesmerizing (better than Gravity, in my opinion), and everything seems perfect until the last 30 minutes. I would thinkWith the exception of Matthew McConaughey's accent, Interstellar isn't that difficult to understand. The graphics are mesmerizing (better than Gravity, in my opinion), and everything seems perfect until the last 30 minutes. I would think that Nolan, of all people, would understand that not every movie needs a happy ending. His "too perfect" conclusion kills it for me. Expand
2 of 5 users found this helpful23
All this user's reviews
5
BarkerDennisNov 15, 2014
This movie was much longer than it needed to be. This 3 hr movie could have been edited down to 2 hrs. The sound editing was a mess. At times, it was difficult to understand what the characters were saying over the overly intenseThis movie was much longer than it needed to be. This 3 hr movie could have been edited down to 2 hrs. The sound editing was a mess. At times, it was difficult to understand what the characters were saying over the overly intense background music. The robotic character was ridiculous. A great big stainless steel rectangle that had a bizarre way of walking? Really, was that the best you could come up with? Modern day Robots from Japan are better than this obelisk At times, the theory of relativity took over the drama between the father and children. The idea that re-forestation never occurred to these earthlings to bring the oxygen levels back to normal for the future? The thesis that we are destroying our planet seemed to pander to the Hollywood left that created this mess of a movie. It was offensive. I did, however like the actors and their performances. Expand
2 of 5 users found this helpful23
All this user's reviews
10
mrfatpepperNov 7, 2014
Interstellar was ahead of its time, 20 years from now people will look back at this film and call it a "Masterpiece", Every thing from the writing to the acting was just perfect... The Visual Effects and Cinematography was "Breathtaking".
8 of 21 users found this helpful813
All this user's reviews
2
Rex_richardsDec 22, 2014
If you thought prometheus was intelligent, engaging and credible, this is the bore fest movie for you.
If you understood everything Bane honked through the cheesgrater on his face in the last batman, this is the mishmash mess for you.
If
If you thought prometheus was intelligent, engaging and credible, this is the bore fest movie for you.
If you understood everything Bane honked through the cheesgrater on his face in the last batman, this is the mishmash mess for you.
If you think superman really exists, and that we should be grateful for such thought provoking super science as his allergy to kypton, this is the 'science' movie for you.
If you never, ever, wonder why characters do utterly ridiculous things in movies and feel annoyed at incomprehensible plots, buy a ticket today.
if you don't feel a bit annoyed at a director deliberately mixing music and dialogue so NO ONE can hear what is being said, buy the t shirt.
If you have any kind of independent cognitive processes, and don't blindly follow the critics, really, honestly, skip it until it comes out onlne/disc and you can skip past the most boring bits.
Expand
12 of 32 users found this helpful1220
All this user's reviews
10
TurbodowgNov 30, 2014
Interstellar is a film for adults. A film for thinking adults. A film for adults who grew up in times of wonder and had to work hard for what they have today. A film for people mature enough to understand love and loss.

Interstellar is a
Interstellar is a film for adults. A film for thinking adults. A film for adults who grew up in times of wonder and had to work hard for what they have today. A film for people mature enough to understand love and loss.

Interstellar is a beautiful film, with a mesmerising music score to match its stunning visuals. The story is both fantastic and moving. The acting is top class and the writing is genius.

If you love science fiction and have a sense of wonder and understand adult themes and emotions watch this film. You will love it.
Expand
3 of 8 users found this helpful35
All this user's reviews
8
coooolsarathNov 8, 2014
Another master piece from NOLAN. "INTERSTELLAR" is a well weaved net of shear brilliance. film has a great number of contents to offer, it has everything that can shook you to the toes . the movie did shoooook me! . Nolan simply slingshot toAnother master piece from NOLAN. "INTERSTELLAR" is a well weaved net of shear brilliance. film has a great number of contents to offer, it has everything that can shook you to the toes . the movie did shoooook me! . Nolan simply slingshot to infinite distance in movie making industry, although there were some problems in the script the important 169 minutes offer everything one would expect. now its time to do some review on the movie. its screenplay is spectacular, more than INCEPTION. its only in my view . script gives us the glimpse of brilliance and hard work done by the film maker. he touched Stephan Hawking's BLACK HOLE PARADOX, Einstein's THEORY OF RELATIVITY everything physics had to offer. the movie starts with a silent, just to build on. Matthew McConaughey has done a great job to do this role. after slight introduction of human crisis Nolan tries to enter deep into charecter who lost his job, wife etc. the main charecter then enters to a voyage of script !. humanity is facing blight , human raise is struggling to produce food. every nation shut down their resources. whole of a kind is trying to make food. McConaughey stumbles into a secret NASA space station by the help of his daughter's GHOST story. now we get glimpse of suspense that script has to offer. he took his chance there to rescue mankind ,joined with some more scientists which include Hathaway . they were trying to solve the problem with gravitational equation, another planet with life forms. before the expedition they select three potentially good chance planets and try to communicate. these hard knowing scenes may suggest little boring if you are not a fan of Nolan movies. story continues till they enter into each planet first one had nothing in it. next one produce more problems as it is conflicted with another scientist who has selfish nature and it all goes into third and most dangerous planet. meanwhile in earth already fourty something years passed. twist in the story happens when McConaughey come to know about the fact that it was a sham, they were carrying life form to enhance new planet but not saving it . then the whole black hole thing comes all that drama sequence and then he fell into another five dimensional world where the rest of the story starts to reveal Matthew McConaughey gives his daughter secret to bend time and that is it . planet is saved then there is a glance into five dimensional world in future which was awesome to see. i was fascinated by thinking of growth of film makers in all these years. it is a must see movie. Expand
3 of 8 users found this helpful35
All this user's reviews
2
euuNov 8, 2014
This is the most stupid sci-fi movie since Prometheus at least and definately Chris Nolan's worst movie so far. I had very high expectations from this movie considering all the talented people involved in it's production and thought that IThis is the most stupid sci-fi movie since Prometheus at least and definately Chris Nolan's worst movie so far. I had very high expectations from this movie considering all the talented people involved in it's production and thought that I would get to watch a film that asks some interesting questions and delves ito complex ideas, instead what I got was just another story about how love beats reason and science. Which in the hands of a more subtle director wouldn't have been so bad, but Nolan tends to make every character explain how he/she feels instead of just showing it. 90% of this movie is just expozition or characters holding speeches about how they feel which makes it very hard to relate to any of them. But the good visuals and great music makes this whole mess pretty tollerable. Until the last 20 minutes at least. You really need to see to believe the black hole of stupidity that is the climax of this movie. Those were the most nonsensical 20 minutes I saw in recent memory. All logic and reason is tossed aside to make some lame speech about the power of love. I don't know what mind altering substances Nolan consumed when he wrote that ending but it sure as hell it didn't fell like something the guy who wrote Inception and The Dark Knight would come up with. All in all: if you are someone who just want to watch a smart sci-fi movie or even a good film in general avoid this pretentious mess. Expand
11 of 30 users found this helpful1119
All this user's reviews
3
gft4Nov 9, 2014
There was a movie named "Contact" which pretended to be a science fiction movie, until its fantasy/religious ending when the protagonist goes to heaven, says something about how poetry is more important than science and meets her dead father.There was a movie named "Contact" which pretended to be a science fiction movie, until its fantasy/religious ending when the protagonist goes to heaven, says something about how poetry is more important than science and meets her dead father. Very much like "Interstellar". If that's your idea of a SF movie, go ahead. I actually hated it. Don't be fooled by Christopher Nolan's previous work - it's his worst film ever - or by the name of the physicist Kip Thorne in the credits ("Contact" was also based on his - and Carl Sagan's - work, and see what happened). Some examples of the movie's "physics": A) scientists send a robot into a black hole so it can send data back to them from BEYOND the event horizon, B) planets orbiting a dark black hole (and nothing else) are illuminated by sunlight (!), C) the gravitational pull of the black hole rips everything apart, except the astronaut's body (magic!). More importantly, the reason why all humans must leave the Earth? Well, there are dust storms like in the 1930s in the middle of the USA, and some particular crops are affected by diseases. And that's pretty much it. Expand
11 of 30 users found this helpful1119
All this user's reviews
9
MantisNov 6, 2014
Where do I begin to describe this movie? This movie just thrills and amazes.
It shows you the possibilities of science, mankind, and life on the edge of hope and fear. The movie keeps you enticed and thrilled till the end, and it was not a
Where do I begin to describe this movie? This movie just thrills and amazes.
It shows you the possibilities of science, mankind, and life on the edge of hope and fear. The movie keeps you enticed and thrilled till the end, and it was not a moment too long. I just loved it and I think everyone should see this.
Expand
4 of 11 users found this helpful47
All this user's reviews
8
BrianMcCriticNov 8, 2014
Interstellar is a ambitious film you won't soon forget. While there are times you feel exasperated by the science and trying to fit everything in place in your mind, the sheer spectacle is something to behold. A-
4 of 11 users found this helpful47
All this user's reviews
1
hixpixNov 15, 2014
This is the worst movie I have ever seen. I understand relativity thank you very much. If you think this movie is based on real science you don't understand it. But forgetting the science this was still s horrible movie. It could haveThis is the worst movie I have ever seen. I understand relativity thank you very much. If you think this movie is based on real science you don't understand it. But forgetting the science this was still s horrible movie. It could have been half as long and still would have been crap. Two hours in I was hoping the human race would expire because it had produced this garbage. Expand
6 of 17 users found this helpful611
All this user's reviews
9
MattyiceNov 5, 2014
I came into the theatre expecting a great movie, similar to Nolan's other films, and that's what I got, sans a compelling story. The acting, cinematography, and CGI was great, but the story could have been more interesting. It had the themesI came into the theatre expecting a great movie, similar to Nolan's other films, and that's what I got, sans a compelling story. The acting, cinematography, and CGI was great, but the story could have been more interesting. It had the themes like Inception, but it was not as interesting as I would have liked. However, it was still a great movie and, while not one of Nolan's best, is still worth seeing at the cinema. Expand
8 of 23 users found this helpful815
All this user's reviews
0
WindupgirlNov 20, 2014
I'm a big fan of hard science fiction. This movie is an absolute mess. I'm amazed at so many positive reviews. Pure trash in my opinion. Give me a Neill Blumkamp, Ridley Scott or James Cameron scifi movie anytime...
5 of 15 users found this helpful510
All this user's reviews
3
pniklasNov 9, 2014
The overall quality of the movie is far below what one would expect. The story has a weak logic and the representation of scientific theories (e.g. extradimensional world) is rather unsatisfactory. The movie is lengthy and boring. I cannotThe overall quality of the movie is far below what one would expect. The story has a weak logic and the representation of scientific theories (e.g. extradimensional world) is rather unsatisfactory. The movie is lengthy and boring. I cannot rank it at the level of Contact or Apollo 13. Expand
5 of 15 users found this helpful510
All this user's reviews
7
KermitLaphroaigNov 7, 2014
I have a theory that when film makers begin to think they are Shakespeare that's when they start producing 3-hour movies. It is even worse when actors begin to think they are Shakespeare because then they start producing really bad 3-hourI have a theory that when film makers begin to think they are Shakespeare that's when they start producing 3-hour movies. It is even worse when actors begin to think they are Shakespeare because then they start producing really bad 3-hour movies. As a "Reds" survivor, I can testify to that. Luckily, Christopher Nolan is not an actor, but in producing "Interstellar", definitely the most cosmically bombastic space opera ever made, he is veering dangerously close to Shakespearean megalomania.

The essential idea behind the movie is to realistically represent space travel and the space environment, which the movie succeeds in doing, if you consider the earth dying to "climate change", aliens opening wormholes next to Saturn, surviving travel into black holes and performing time travel through 5-dimensional tesseracts to be realistic. The production values of the film, though, on items such as uniforms, space gear, instruments, ships and stations is really outstanding. Space buffs will love the hardware. There are also detailed representations of the nuances of docking, orbital transfers and other astronautically cool stuff.

Director/Writer Nolan does not produce all of this out of a vacuum. He takes a page out of the book of Space Odyssey 2001, more than a page actually. There is even a waltz. The scenes and special effects are also reminiscent of 2012's Prometheus and 2013's Oblivion. NASA obviously provided a lot of technical support. In fact the whole 3 hours sort of plays like an infomercial for NASA. Every space suit, ship and base station has NASA written all over it. I hope they paid him for all those placements.

The shortcomings of the film are many, but the biggest problem is the casting. When one member of the affirmative action team to save the earth, intones "This crew represents the best of humanity." you can hardly keep from laughing. The players are the least believable astronauts in world. Crying, blubbering, screaming, and PMSing all over the screen. If humanity is the hands of these guys, we are in deep trouble. To top off the complete mis-cast, Matt Damon shows up out of the blue as a marooned space commander. You are scratching your head, wondering if you are watching "Interstellar" or "Team America". Ironically, this is not the first time Will Hunting has ruined a perfectly good film. He had another movie-sabotaging cameo 14 years ago in Finding Forrester (2000). You have to wonder what sexual favors are involved in casting decisions like these.

The other misfire of the movie is the music. I think we should re-invade Europe and utterly destroy Germany this time, just so we do not have to listen to another Hans Zimmer score. I swear I need to start bringing ear plugs to showings. The score is so loud that in many scenes you cannot hear what the actors are saying, and I am not exaggerating. This would not be so bad if it only happened when the female lead was blubbering about her boyfriend, but on the contrary the loud music seemed to be reserved for those moments when they are explaining some technically complicated space math that you have to understand to follow the movie. So, you there yelling, "Wait, the tesseract's dimensionality is folding when what happens? I need to hear that again!" On the plus side, there are nice moments of silence illustrating the quietness of space, which is pretty quiet, because, you know, there is no air in space.

The strength of the movie, besides the special effects, is the pacing and dynamism, which Nolan seems to have a complete knack for. His script here is not so good as 2008's "The Dark Knight", but he keeps things moving and involving as only he can. Overall, as long as you don't mind a minor possibility of long-term hearing loss and can stand the malaprop acting, "Interstellar" is very entertaining.
Expand
3 of 9 users found this helpful36
All this user's reviews
9
joyalNov 11, 2014
new level of cinematic experience , Interstellar is a excellent sci fi film,beautifully n brilliantly filmed awesome visual treat, good acting, very good direction , interstellar is a special experience of entertainment.
2 of 6 users found this helpful24
All this user's reviews
10
WolfoxLiveNov 7, 2014
Another great mind bender from the master. A great journey which makes the audience think about it for days after watching it. I'm definitely going to see it again. Try to watch it in IMAX if you can, it's an amazing experience for this movie!
2 of 6 users found this helpful24
All this user's reviews
6
BikerjamesNov 23, 2014
It's time to suspend all belief and logic and get ready for another Christopher Nolan film. This film has a lot going against it - a soundtrack that annoys (do we really need loud music playing all the time in a film? I also could notIt's time to suspend all belief and logic and get ready for another Christopher Nolan film. This film has a lot going against it - a soundtrack that annoys (do we really need loud music playing all the time in a film? I also could not understand what they were saying in several parts of the film, especially Michael Caine's death bed scene), robots that are comical in their movements that no engineer would ever design, a bad guy played by Matt Damon because, well, you just have to have a bad guy thrown in somewhere, a docking sequence that could never possibly happen, extremely complex problems solved in short meetings that would normally take much longer, some bad acting thrown in here and there, and more. Countering that, however, is how beautiful the film looks and that was the saving grace of the film in the end. It was a mixed bag for me, but not a film I would want to see again. Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
7
quincytheodoreNov 12, 2014
It may not be as mindblowing as Inception, but it paints a clear picture of unworldly desolate journey in very personal level. Aside from the heavy emphasis of space flight, "Human is explorer" as the movie aptly described, the best part ofIt may not be as mindblowing as Inception, but it paints a clear picture of unworldly desolate journey in very personal level. Aside from the heavy emphasis of space flight, "Human is explorer" as the movie aptly described, the best part of the movie is relationship between humans themselves, mainly between Cooper and Murph. Visual is pleasant, the science is sound and atmosphere is grimly right, although the pace can be pretty slow at times. The movie serves as inspiration and education purpose, captivating audience with not just boring lecture but also with good simulation on how lives can be affected by the prospect of unforeseeable future.

Story is very heavy with scientific elements, there is much information to absorb and it could be overwhelming for those who aren't accustomed to sci-fi genre. To its credit, the movie tries to explain many complicated aspects as brief and as clear as possible, it can't be faulted with lack of research. The first act does take some time to roll, but for a good reason. Matthew McConaughey brings top notch acting in recent years, but perhaps his best one is this father-daughter relationship with Murph (Jessica Chastain). It's very believable, dynamic, occasionally amusing and thoroughly emotional. Jessica Chastain pulls off a great performance, better than her older counterparts.

Michael Caine, an old time accomplish to Nolan, as Depp to Burton, is fantastic as usual. There's so much depth to his character, much thanks to his natural parental charisma. Anne Hathaway plays as Brand, another astronaut with strong conviction but slight self-doubt. Every character here is flawed, there's no one with hero mentality, and it's more authentic to see them trying to solve their issues with such imperfection. Hathaway is more of a comrade than love interest, someone who shares the unique same fate, her tight suit will be missed though.

Writing is quite brilliant, very solid and humorous when needs be. It balances the complex stuff with simpler tone to ensure audience can still relate. Props to writers for making the robotic characters very lively even as they lumber around in metal case. Visual is littered with the gray tone of Nolan. This fits the estranged worlds and empty space, it's less blockbuster than previous galactic voyage of Gravity, but appealing on its own right. Music from Hans Zimmer is undoubtedly excellent, he hits the right tune and delivers some creeping moments of solitude. The overall sound effect is also good, transitioning between vacuum space and mechanic growl perfectly. The movie's production level is sky high.

Interstellar is admittedly a bit slow at times, it's inspirational but not as cinematically engaging and entertaining as Nolan's previous works. It manages to create a lonely perspective, a daunting self-reflective insight of human significant, or insignificant in cosmos time, but the best part about the movie is the bonds, might it be parental, platonic or romantic, or even robotic. In the end the star is the humans that make the equation more meaningful.
Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
5
tomizawaMar 7, 2015
As with any other of Nolan's films: captivating landscapes and flawless acting. Yet, I found it extremely predictable and a bit confusing at times. Was totally expecting to be dazzled and mind-blown by this movie but unfortunately it wasn'tAs with any other of Nolan's films: captivating landscapes and flawless acting. Yet, I found it extremely predictable and a bit confusing at times. Was totally expecting to be dazzled and mind-blown by this movie but unfortunately it wasn't the case... I was pretty bored and unimpressed. The ones that don't pay much attention to details might have a better time enjoying the movie. Good luck. Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
6
cryhardhumorJul 26, 2015
The first six hours of Interstellar are amazing and contain some of the most beautifully shot and thrilling scenes from a sci-fi movie, but the final act isn't just unsatisfying...it unravels the rest of what was a beautifully woven story.
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
9
Fabian-GonzaloNov 13, 2014
Interstellar is definitely the best movie of the year, this movie is just amazing, what can I say, is just nolan's movie, has a very solid argument, like his best movies, like the dark knight or inception, amazing effect, epic soundtrack,Interstellar is definitely the best movie of the year, this movie is just amazing, what can I say, is just nolan's movie, has a very solid argument, like his best movies, like the dark knight or inception, amazing effect, epic soundtrack, incredibles pictures, I didn't realize how fast the hours has gone, very entertaining film, I must say that it isn't an easy movie to understand, demands a little concentration, to get all its points, I need to see it again... but mega ultra recommended!!! 9/10 Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
7
AxgrinderNov 23, 2014
Without giving anything away, the basic plot line is this: Earth is dying, and the only way to save the human race may be to relocate to another planet. Something out there seems to be trying to show us the way, but exactly what we need toWithout giving anything away, the basic plot line is this: Earth is dying, and the only way to save the human race may be to relocate to another planet. Something out there seems to be trying to show us the way, but exactly what we need to do is murky. Fortunately, despite a severe lack of resources on earth, NASA has become a secret agency and has a rocket ship ready. The trip into space will be dangerous and without any guarantee of success, but what choice is there?
The director seems to want us to believe that we always a choice and that it may be our inner personality, as much as anything, that drives our decision making. The movie also spends a lot of time trying to convey how terribly lonely, emotionally wrenching, and potentially mentally debilitating it would be to spend extended periods of time alone in space, and that such trips are equally damaging to the emotions of those left behind on earth. Ultimately, the movie has good dramatic tension, but the director’s attempts to create emotional tension end up being a lot of interstellar flotsam and jetsam.
At times this movie can also be confusing, but will be less so if you keep in mind one of Einstein’s more bizarre discoveries: Time is not absolute, but is a function of motion. It passes more slowly for people traveling at very high speeds, relative to people who are moving more slowly. (You may also want to keep in mind that Einstein’s theories do not allow for travel back in time.)
At 2hrs 45min this is a relatively long movie, but it moves along quickly enough that you won’t feel like time has come to a total standstill. It contains an all-star cast, but some (like Matt Damon, Michael Caine) seem a bit miscast. Others (namely Ellen Burstyn) are unrecognizable. I don’t see any Oscar nominations for acting in this movie.
The movie has some tangential (and probably unavoidable) similarities to 2001: A Space Odyssey. For one, there is an intelligent (Hal-like) robot with a (human-like) personality, and you will ponder whether it’s going to develop some sort of (machine-like) schizophrenia that will cause it will override its programming and act against its human cargo in favor of preserving the mission. For another, the movie purposely leaves some questions unanswered. At the end it leaves you saying, “wait a minute” and you will be replaying the opening scenes in your mind to try and figure out if the actions of Mr. McConaughey make any sense at all.
It may not sound like it but, overall, I liked this movie. Only time will tell if it is destined to develop a ‘cult classic’ status, but my initial reaction is “Uhmmn, no.”
Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
7
alexvanhessingNov 18, 2014
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Firstly, I reluctantly gives scores for films in general but if I have to it's the one above.....

One thing struck me looking at user reviews for this films, almost everyone gave it a low score or a high score, "love it or hate it" I suppose, Though I didn't feel this. In my opinion films like this should be experienced subjectively but critiqued objectively.

Many people said the music overwhelmed the actors, dialogue, etc... sure, maybe, but why can't the film's score be a CHARACTER in a film sometimes? Remember how important the music was in Inception? Many films would be almost unimaginable without the music, it becomes a crucial part of the film like Dances With Wolves or There will Be Blood, some films don't need it at all like No Country for Old Men (that's right NO music, seriously). Some even said the casting was bad, which made me laugh because I couldn't imagine many people spouting philosophical jargon and pithy, humorous, comments better than McConaughey, after all, almost all the performances were very good also.

Other people have mentioned "plot holes" which I think they're confusing with script choices, I'm not saying they were good or bad, just different. Could Nolan have shown us more development with McConaughey's character? perhaps. Or, ceased with the scientific "lingo"? Maybe, though I feel like it was quite straight forward in most parts. These are simple choices made by a filmmaker, and lets not forget the fact that its called SCIENCE FICTON for a reason, it's ficton, not real. A lot of people seem to be missing this point entirely with ideas that certain elements of this film weren't logical, etc, or failed to explain certain things.

My critic of other people's critic continues with the one of the main aspects of the film with the "5th Dimension" idea. People seemed to have a problem with it, like me at first. I soon realised that this is Nolan we're talking about, the guy who left us wondering weather Di Caprio's character at the end of Inception was really awake or not. Could we not give the benefit of the doubt and assume for a second that this was McConaughey's fate as well? Maybe he was being metaphorical? or perhaps installing some symbolism into the film?

For my mind a filmmaker makes two films, one part for him and the other for the audience, knowing full well that the audience isn't going to fully comprehend every single thing in the film the filmmaker might well be inclined to write in some ideas of his own that make the film worth making in the first place. To this effect and for the following reasons I believe the "5th dimension" element to be, while on the surface an integral part of the plot, simply just means to an end. Firstly, unlike many American films about the end of the world, etc, we have no mention of God, religion, etc, just a small subplot about "ghosts" so in my mind this is Nolan's "God", the "5th dimension" is that unexplained feeling that was discussed in the film, the "love" of the film is physicalized here. The instruments used in Hans Zimmer's music gives it an every spiritual feel for no obvious reason since to film has nothing to do with spirituality per say, except for those of us who subjectively inject that into the film, which is fine. So in that respect I felt like he was underlying these themes musically, really driving home that idea we can't touch certain things in this life but can certainly feel them, no matter what the explanation. Also, two last things on this subject, several moment in the film there were discussions on death and what we experience when we die, one line describes that when we die we see our children, this happens to McConaughey in this moment, why take it so literally? Could it not be that he simply seeing his beloved at his most lonely terrifying moment? Lastly, the plain fact that after the "5th dimension" McConaughey awakes, barely alive, suddenly outside the orbit of Saturn awaiting a rescue ship. Really? or could it be a "Nolanism".

Overall, I'm not thinking this a 8 or 9 out of 10, and certainly not what other people are giving it, I think swinging either way is a mistake because while many of the films, as well as the execution is stunning, it's still a flawed film as many are, I just believe in looking into things a little closer before sending them to slaughter. Many reviews, both user and professional seem to miss crucial aspects of films when they watch them, especially when one bothers to write: "Boring, Boring, Boring", etc..... why bother unless you're willing to explain your actual thoughts in an intelligent and concise way?
Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
6
ozymandias79Jan 21, 2015
Some of the drama elements are forced and the movie slows right down for them, which doesn't help. Parts of the film are also very predicable, especially the arc with Matt Damon and toward the end. The robot design and their human qualitiesSome of the drama elements are forced and the movie slows right down for them, which doesn't help. Parts of the film are also very predicable, especially the arc with Matt Damon and toward the end. The robot design and their human qualities are stupid. The interactions with the robot are reminiscent of 80's anime. As the cherry on top, despite the near 3-hour length, the ending felt rushed and unsatisfying. Interstellar is different but its too flawed to be considered a good film. Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
6
XenixJan 28, 2015
The philosophy of the film says : " Destroy the Earth , there are more worlds out there "

The philosophy of 2001 says : "We do not need new worlds , we need mirrors "

Technically , the film is well done, but the massage is bad!
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
5
BillsettNov 13, 2014
I am truly angry at Christopher Nolan for making a great science fiction film and all but ruining it with an ear-splitting, bone-shaking soundtrack that obliterates much of the dialogue and distracts the viewer from absorbing and reacting toI am truly angry at Christopher Nolan for making a great science fiction film and all but ruining it with an ear-splitting, bone-shaking soundtrack that obliterates much of the dialogue and distracts the viewer from absorbing and reacting to the actual story told in this otherwise magnificent film. It's as if you were watching a great movie in a theater and a guy sat down next to you and yelled in your ear for the duration of the film. I know this is undoubtedly wishful thinking, but maybe someday Nolan will make a "director's cut" without the mind-numbing soundtrack. Now THAT would be a great film! Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
7
PeteStaivNov 19, 2014
I expected more from Interstellar. The movie is intense and beautifully shot, but you cannot deny the existence of flaws in the plot! Not the best Nolan's work
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
5
hockeymaniac87Apr 14, 2015
Yet another beautiful looking adventure from the mind of Christopher Nolan. Unfortunately, it's as wordy and overly complex as Inception.

The problem that I seem to have with Nolan's most recent films is that he tends to rely solely on
Yet another beautiful looking adventure from the mind of Christopher Nolan. Unfortunately, it's as wordy and overly complex as Inception.

The problem that I seem to have with Nolan's most recent films is that he tends to rely solely on intense imagery and excessive dialogue to drive his stories. His all-star cast becomes relegated to the duty of trying to explain the plot to the viewer while performing supplemental tasks or strolling around like an Allen Sorkin walk-and-talk. His characters are simply used as vehicles to push his convoluted plotline, and any real connection or empathy with them is suppressed by the importance to explain an excessively wordy exposition. What makes a great film is when great actors (not necessarily famous ones) weave into great characters that effortlessly escort the viewer into their world. Although there were some performances in the film that were admirable, Interstellar seemed to merely test the actor's ability to recite lines, not showcase their talents.

The best quality of any Nolan film, especially with Interstellar, is his use and non-use of sound. He's brilliant in understanding when sound and music are needed, and tends to have an "Easter egg" meaning to his scores. The cinematography is beautiful, and his use of unique over the shoulder camera angles is perfectly fitting. For these things I commend Nolan, as anyone should.

Maybe Interstellar is a perfect or above average movie for some people, but I feel that films like these are highly praised based on their blockbuster status, much like a pair of designer jeans or a fancy sports car. Christopher Nolan is a great writer and director, but for my taste and his future, I think he will have to reinvent his ability to tell stories and create new ideas. Interstellar seems to have been conceived after taking a long nap during a Cosmos marathon. Luckily for Nolan, he is able to call up his regular all-star cast, sprinkle in some famous boys from Boston, add a Michael Caine crying scene and push out a beautiful looking yet pretentiously wordy film whenever he comes up with a crazy idea
Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
6
EliascNov 9, 2014
I was hoping for a better film. 'Interstellar' is the science-based film we have all been hoping for which uses actual astrophysics and theory to tell a story of Earth's last gasp and the attempt to save humanity by escaping to the stars.I was hoping for a better film. 'Interstellar' is the science-based film we have all been hoping for which uses actual astrophysics and theory to tell a story of Earth's last gasp and the attempt to save humanity by escaping to the stars. However one would think that with almost three hours to play with that the film would have been more coherent. Perhaps the version I saw in the theater was faulty. It was the digital version and not the film nor the 70 mm version. Although the screen images were OK, it did not have the clarity of detail I have seen in other digital projections.
The plot was very good and interesting and I was not bored with the long sequences of expository dialogue that attempted to explain the science behind the events depicted in the film. The actors are outstanding in their roles and the depiction of spaceflight and other planets were very believable.
The film could have used better editing though. A few transitory scenes were hard to follow.
Part of the problem was the poor sound in the theater showing I attended. Throughout most of the film, the dialogue was hard to understand because of the very loud music tracks and the shrillness of the music. If I didn't already understand astrophysics, I would have been totally lost. As it was, I could not hear much of the significant conversations between the characters and had to guess at what significant plot point had just been revealed. I originally though that the poor sound quality was the theater's fault but later learned that the sound problem was often mentioned by professional film critics as well. Simply stated, the music too often overwhelmed the dialogue. I consider the use of this music score by Chris Nolan a major mistake and makes the film almost unwatchable. I hope to watch this film again in the future on DVD without the ear-piercing music soundtrack.
Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
7
The__ShowmanNov 9, 2014
Mind Boggling Visuals, Voice dominant Score, Matthew Mcconaughey's splendid performance and some paradoxical plot holes make movie little flat but still Nolan's exceptional direction makes it a delight to watch. I believe this Space Sci-FiMind Boggling Visuals, Voice dominant Score, Matthew Mcconaughey's splendid performance and some paradoxical plot holes make movie little flat but still Nolan's exceptional direction makes it a delight to watch. I believe this Space Sci-Fi drama needs more humor treatment than quantum physics conversations for PG13 to understand. But still it is one of the movies which is larger than life and something which needs dare to attempt. Kudos to Makers. Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
7
Tobi_WhateverNov 13, 2014
Interstellar looks and feels great most of the time but is not without problems and errors.
Aside from some questionable actions done by the main protagonists and the usual Hollywood ending, Interstellar tries really hard to be
Interstellar looks and feels great most of the time but is not without problems and errors.
Aside from some questionable actions done by the main protagonists and the usual Hollywood ending, Interstellar tries really hard to be scientifically accurate. The result is that all the small and big scientific errors are therefore much more noticeable.
While the first two thirds left me impressed, the ending was rather unsatisfying.
Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
5
Fabricionet232May 31, 2015
Interstellar really disappointed me.
While i was expecting a smart, entertaining sci-fi flick, what i saw was a boring, predictable and emotionless mess. It is really overlong, with a middle-chapter so predictable and boring that's
Interstellar really disappointed me.
While i was expecting a smart, entertaining sci-fi flick, what i saw was a boring, predictable and emotionless mess. It is really overlong, with a middle-chapter so predictable and boring that's frustrating. Tho, i must say it has got his moments but they're mostly courtesy of the awesome cast.
In conclusion, if you haven't watched any sci-fi movie, you gonna like it, but if you have seen films like Alien, Sunshine or 2001, you're bound to be disappointed, mostly because of the awful story.
Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
4
TheWinlockianDec 26, 2014
Sometimes lousy endings can ruin an otherwise-solid film, and Interstellar has become, for me, the go-to example of such blunders.
While some of my friends really enjoyed how the end played out, I could not help but sit back and wonder if
Sometimes lousy endings can ruin an otherwise-solid film, and Interstellar has become, for me, the go-to example of such blunders.
While some of my friends really enjoyed how the end played out, I could not help but sit back and wonder if Big Bird had received a writing credit for the climax and finale, as there was no longer an ounce remaining of the anticipation, wonder, grit, tension or brutality the film had spent so much time developing beforehand.
The story revolves around a dying earth and a quest by astronauts through an inexplicably-convenient wormhole to search out new planets capable of sustaining life. The initial search reveals a few likely new homes and a second team, led by NASA-pilot-turned-farmer Cooper (Matthew McConaughey), ventures through the anomaly to make contact with their most viable options.
While there’s a lot of cool stuff to geek out over, including black hole physics and theories behind long-distance space travel, these tantalizing plot points do not make up for how outstandingly clichéd and predictable the end wound up being. I mean, I feel like I spent the last half hour in the theater getting beat over the head with a two-by-four wrapped in barbed wire that had “plot device” burned into the side of it. I get it. It’s a happy ending for an otherwise-not-happy movie. If I had known, I would have waited until it came out on DVD.
And all of this could have been overlooked, except that it came from Director Christopher Nolan, the man who gave us Inception, The Prestige, Memento and Following, among other suspense-filled brain-teasers. I wanted exactly that kind of movie when I went to watch Interstellar, and was so outstandingly underwhelmed with what I got.
Interstellar makes me very nervous to watch whatever film Nolan comes up with next. But the opportunity to come across another of his knock-it-out-of-the-park films will likely outweigh such inhibitions, like the ending of Interstellar outweighed the rest of the movie.
Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
2
inandoutNov 8, 2014
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. How many roads must a man walk down...to see so much corn? This is a rough and tumble, big chunk of a film that I really wanted to love: such potential. And to a great degree it is lovable work despite some of the miserable dialogue, miscasting and simple mumbled silly confusion that it is. Nolan does not equal Kubrick. Really, you have to want to love it - and I do not want to discourage anyone from going to see it because there are some true hidden gems. But the true potential was not reached, not even with help of a wormhole, a black hole, the talented Mr. Ripley or all the magic of the 5th dimension. If love is the answer, you have to go through a heck of a lot of corn to find it. SOS...if you listen clearly I am sending you a coded message from another dimension. Save 3 hours of your life - or we can assume that this is also relative. Good luck, safe travels and don't forget to set a wake-up from the big nap on the way to Saturn. Expand
12 of 37 users found this helpful1225
All this user's reviews
5
CanisrahNov 14, 2014
I realize I'm in the minority here - but in my view this film wasn't very good. I went along with an open mind and high expectations given others had seen it and loved it.

While I held out hope right until the final frame that the genius
I realize I'm in the minority here - but in my view this film wasn't very good. I went along with an open mind and high expectations given others had seen it and loved it.

While I held out hope right until the final frame that the genius others saw would be made manifest - at the end I walked out thinking it was long, tedious and overwrought. Most of all, I couldn't stomach pervasive humanist ideology underpinning the whole narrative - masquerading as philosophy.

The film has lofty goals - tries to soar to the heights of human thought and experience - and fails leaving the viewer empty. We see characters striving for... what? Family love is a theme we can all relate too, yes, and it is used here to reasonable effect; but the narrative is trying to elevate our thoughts to something more... something more mind expanding and striking at the heart of existence itself. And the setting, out in space, is an environment that is well suited to contemplating our own tiny existence and asking big questions like whats the meaning of it all? Questions other films like Prometheus, Moon, and the seminal 2001 dealt with much more effectively (without providing answers of course).

Ultimately, the film poses these lofty questions and then attempts rather ingloriously to insert humanity into the frame as the answer - as if we were some sort of deity which is as absurd as it is meaningless. And the driving motivation of some characters to save the human race, to promulgate the human species - to what end? For what purpose? There is in this film, at it's core, an unexplained emptiness that means it cannot fulfill on the promise of the setting and the sweeping cinematography.

At best, it is average sci-fi trying to legitimize itself in pseudo science and faux humanist philosophy. At worst, and in keeping with one of the film's themes that time is precious...it's 3 hours you'll never get back.
Expand
3 of 10 users found this helpful37
All this user's reviews
8
quentntarantadoNov 6, 2014
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I enjoyed Interstellar very much, though I think it is not a perfect film.
Warning, spoilers:
First, I have several problems with Interstellar.
1) One is that Dylan Thomas quote, "Do not go gentle into that good night" is too literal for the situation. It irritated me that Nolan decided to quote it over and over.
2) Matt Damon's character was obviously going to go bugnuts and off everyone. This was telegraphed the moment he woke up.
3) Adult Murph, played by Jessica Chastain, burned the corn. I thought she was pretty desperate to help her sister-in-law and niece, because she might end up burning them with the corn.
4) Tom (Casey Affleck) comes back after putting out the fire, Jessica Chastain tells him (I think) their dad was talking to them through her watch and hugs him. With Murph's boyfriend Topher standing there with a tire wrench, Tom might conclude that Murph was burgling his house, or might even realize she started the fire, which she did. I fully expected him to punch her for coming back to their house.
Nevertheless,
1) I truly bought the idea man will stop exploring space and start saying the Moon landing was a lie. We are stupid enough to do that to ourselves.
2) I fully support this movie's pro-space agenda. It has its flaws, but I pray that it will be a box-office hit and have us looking to the stars again.
3) I love the space scenes, especially the wormhole and the black hole.
4) I love the space colony scene in the end, with people living in huge cylinders.
5) Chastain/Foy/Burstyn fully sold me on their father/daughter relationship with McConaughey. This is very important in accepting the film.
Expand
3 of 10 users found this helpful37
All this user's reviews
5
DalifeblivesNov 5, 2014
Didn't really like it. Too damn confusing. May need to watch it again but I'm tired of Nolan not explaining anything. Felt the same way about inception. I felt like you had to be a rocket space major to understand what was going on in the movie.
5 of 17 users found this helpful512
All this user's reviews
7
beingryanjudeNov 5, 2014
Despite a stellar journey through space and emotion, Interstellar unnecessarily became Nolan-ized in its third act. It's not quite enough to have brilliant visuals and formidable acting throughout--we're looking for a better conclusion.
2 of 7 users found this helpful25
All this user's reviews
4
philo-sofaNov 10, 2014
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I'm concerned I may not review this movie fairly given my expectations.

If you are however the kind of person who likes the above disclaimer as an approach to observing phenomena, be warned. This movie may be irritating for the scientifically literate: from magically fuelled spacecraft, to the idea that you can 'lift off' normal on rockets after going so far down a black hole's gravity well that time dilates to run one sixty thousandth of normal speed, this movie disappoints.

Not to mention the idea that (no really) you can't see anything on a planet from a spaceship as you land (even if that thing kilometres high and thousands long) nor receive pictures or historical logs. These are all fundamental plot points.

The cinematography was however excellent and the sound okay. Overall that made for epic movie fail, but maybe I just had to many expectations for it... that I can't say.
Expand
2 of 7 users found this helpful25
All this user's reviews
4
KilgortNov 9, 2014
Those guys who are telling that this film has anything to do with science just don't know what they are talking about. As Inception, this film is just imagination of author. Inception was interesting to watch, with spec effects and other niceThose guys who are telling that this film has anything to do with science just don't know what they are talking about. As Inception, this film is just imagination of author. Inception was interesting to watch, with spec effects and other nice stuff, this film is just boring as hell melodrama. Why Nolan said that this were Science-Fiction? He lied, it's just stupid melodrama that got nothing to do with science and fiction. Expand
2 of 7 users found this helpful25
All this user's reviews
4
Movie_DudeNov 12, 2014
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Just left the theater...had a lot of confusing parts

1. How did earth get to the position it was in...dust blowing
2. Was there a time line....how did cooper know how to fly and operate the new technology?
3. most confusing was the ending...this 7 layer 3d world of time...
4. he waited all this time to see his kids - why leave your die'n kid side..why didn't someone introduce him to his grand kids???? Why go after the female???
5. Matt Damon should of had a different part....
Expand
2 of 7 users found this helpful25
All this user's reviews
1
UncleBuckApr 12, 2015
Please let a black hole swallow all copies of this movie. In fact, I will attempt to travel back in time and prevent it from ever being made. Quite possibly the worst movie ever. I teach "space school," enjoy space movies in general, andPlease let a black hole swallow all copies of this movie. In fact, I will attempt to travel back in time and prevent it from ever being made. Quite possibly the worst movie ever. I teach "space school," enjoy space movies in general, and really enjoy adventure stories, but this is very poorly done. DO NOT purchase this on DVD, Blue Ray, or streaming service. Save you money and your 2 hours, and 20 minutes. Expand
2 of 7 users found this helpful25
All this user's reviews
6
francisrgoNov 7, 2014
"Interstellar" is a good SciFi Film but has couple of problems. First off it really drag in the beginning and the relationship between father and daughter could have been a little better. Secondly, the story needed more cohesiveness and at"Interstellar" is a good SciFi Film but has couple of problems. First off it really drag in the beginning and the relationship between father and daughter could have been a little better. Secondly, the story needed more cohesiveness and at some point it was just indulgent. The key lesson learned in this film is that "Time is just Relative" and the one thing that suppress or pass space is "Love." Which I, and everyone else in the auditorium, gasped for air. Lovely. The movie needed more explanation and I couldn't bypass how one thing leads to the other. What really made the movie good is the stunning visuals and soundtrack though "Gravity" was more masterful and complex. On a good note, Christopher Nolan is still a fantastic Director, Producer and Writer. Expand
9 of 33 users found this helpful924
All this user's reviews
0
llevinNov 22, 2014
This movie was a complete let-down, to say the least. The fact that over 1000 people thought this movie was good is scary to think about. Not one part of this movie made sense or became believable. Now we understand why Matt Damon didn'tThis movie was a complete let-down, to say the least. The fact that over 1000 people thought this movie was good is scary to think about. Not one part of this movie made sense or became believable. Now we understand why Matt Damon didn't want his name to appear anywhere. Horrible, don't waste your money. If you do decide to chance it, the first 20 minutes will clue you in - don't hesitate like we did, just leave and slip into a different movie. I give this movie a negative 5. Oy Vey Expand
4 of 15 users found this helpful411
All this user's reviews
3
raporgiFeb 22, 2015
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Incredibly boring and self indulgent! Why do "space opera" movies have to be such a slog. Anne Hathaway kept driving home the fact that she's supposed to be a scientist and in then middle of the movie starts all this crap about involving love into the equation. WTH was that? Matt Damon serves to real purpose in this movie, in fact most of the peripheral cast is useless and one note in this feature. Subtlety is definitely not Nolan's strong point as he sees fit to explain a lot of details in such a scripted and droll manner almost like people are simply reading off the cue cards. This movie is 1 1/2 hrs too long. The robots are really laughable and cringe inducing. I feel embarassed for Nolan especially the part where Hathaway's character gets herself into a jam due to stubborness and stupidity. That scene was really awful and the way one of the characters died was pathetic. Just watch this on Blu-ray so you're not forced to sit throught the whole thing. Collapse Expand
3 of 12 users found this helpful39
All this user's reviews
3
ryecaNov 23, 2014
Comparing this movie to "2001" is like comparing a turd to chocolate ice cream because they are both brown. If somebody tries telling you that this movie is somehow related or equivalent, don't talk to that person again. They don't know.Comparing this movie to "2001" is like comparing a turd to chocolate ice cream because they are both brown. If somebody tries telling you that this movie is somehow related or equivalent, don't talk to that person again. They don't know.

I'm just happy to know that when we are all out of food, we will still be able to kick back, look cool in our Carhartt jackets, and drink a beer on a porch.

This movie actually tries to play the "You're the only man for the mission" card, because apparently their highly intelligent robots can't be sent into space because they made them clumsy as hell.

The music is really loud (though really good, and powerful) to cover up poor dialogue.

You have to ignore the plot holes, otherwise you will want to pull your hair out.

Pretty much, this movie is beautiful **** Also, Nolan, come on - don't do the upside-down world parlor trick again. We saw it in inception. Move on.
Expand
3 of 12 users found this helpful39
All this user's reviews
3
gokellyNov 10, 2014
SPOILERS
I was really looking forward to this and it started out well enough but deteriorated quickly. As soon as Anne Hathaways character started talking about love being some 5 dimensional yoke I dismissed the movie as yet another 'sci-fi'
SPOILERS
I was really looking forward to this and it started out well enough but deteriorated quickly. As soon as Anne Hathaways character started talking about love being some 5 dimensional yoke I dismissed the movie as yet another 'sci-fi' written by someone that hasnt a clue about science. Seriously,are these creative types so insecure they have to constantly remind everyone that 'love' and 'creativity' trump reason and intellect? And yet again the main scientists turn out to be evil or supremely arrogant - apparently its a prerequisite if you have any desire to understand how the universe ACTUALLY works. Watch this one on blu ray - dont bother with the cinema.
Expand
2 of 8 users found this helpful26
All this user's reviews
2
flemieuxNov 10, 2014
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Too dumb for nerds, too smart for jocks, this movie panders to those between but suffers from too many incoherent lapses in reality to sustain disbelief and not enough explosions to keep the masses entertained. This movie fails on so many levels you may actually feel the effects of the relativity of time as its three hour span drones one for what seems like ten years.
The science of the movie is a mish mash of poorly conceived ideas and concepts the authors obviously do not understand and anyone with an iota of intelligence tunes out the minute they realize it takes rockets to actually sent the shuttle out of Earth's orbit but that the nifty little craft can hop onto and off any other planet with ease (even ones with significantly stronger gravities).
I don't need science to be perfect in my sci fi flicks. Fact is, I'd rather do without (the best sci fi usually does). However, if you're going to use science as a main plot element, you have to get it right or make it fuzzy enough to remain plausible. The ironic pseudo science of Hitchihiker's Guide to the Galaxy is actually more believable than the drivel served up in this fiasco.
The few highlights of this film are those reminiscent of Gravity and Apollo 13 and even these are not as poignant or well done as the originals.
But above and beyond all of its failings, this movie fails most utterly because it is ultimately boring.
Expand
2 of 8 users found this helpful26
All this user's reviews
2
pianoseedsNov 21, 2014
This was a fabulous movie.......not! How's about a coherent story line to start with; eh? What would possess big name stars to even consider acting in this dog? Wow. Or should I say (bow) wow.
2 of 8 users found this helpful26
All this user's reviews
1
TitaniumDragonDec 16, 2016
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. If there is one rule of a work of fiction, it is that you must care about the characters, because if you don’t care about the characters, it is very unlikely that you are going to care about what happens to them.

And, alas, I have to admit, I wasn’t left caring about the characters by the end of this movie – the only characters I really ended up caring about were the faceless robots, who seemed to have more personality than the human cast did. And given that the movie itself was resolved with a deus ex machina, it is really hard to recommend.

But I’m getting ahead of myself.

The movie opens with some farmers, and it becomes clear a ways into the movie that this is a sort of post-apocalyptic Earth. The movie doesn’t do a great job of showing this in shorthand, and ultimately, the problem is that magical nitrogen-breathing microbes are, apparently, killing everything.

Thus, humanity needs a new planet, and would-be-NASA Astronaut Joseph Cooper, who has turned to farming in the face of a global crop blight, needs to go to space to save the world by finding a new planet. But not just any sort of space trip – he’s going to go through a wormhole that someone has conveniently placed next to Saturn.

Interstellar is ostensibly a sci-fi movie, but it is ultimately fantasy. The beginning of the movie has Cooper is lead to the secret NASA facility to become humanty’s savior by aliens from beyond space-time sending him the coordinates by writing in dust in his house and knocking books of the shelves of his daughter’s bookcase. A wormhole conveniently appeared next to Saturn to give humanity a way out of the solar system.

And while this is all okay as setup, the movie continues to make contrivances. The ultimately solution to humanity’s plight is a deus ex machina delivered by aliens from beyond space-time – or possibly future humans. Whatever the case, it is a solution that comes not from the characters in the movie, but from an external force, meaning that, ultimately, all of the characters struggles were resolved by magic as well.

If the characters had been interesting, this might have been okay. But they weren’t. The central conflict of the movie – Cooper having to choose between saving people who already exist, and providing for a potential future for the human species – was potentially interesting, but ultimately, the movie doesn’t really go anywhere with it. Cooper is upset, certainly, but in the end nothing Cooper did really ended up resolving that conflict – it was resolved in his favor by external forces, and there’s no actual human resolution to it. Without any other personality to speak of - just these two character traits - he's not really a very interesting character.

His costar is Dr. Amelia Brand, a fellow astronaut who seems generally nice and sort of focused on the future. She is in love with one of the astronauts who was sent out before them and hopes to rescue them, but the most important thing to her is the future of humanity. However, there’s very little real personality here – again, I can’t list off more than a couple of character traits. She’s rather flat as a character, and just sort of is there.

And this problem is endemic to the cast – most of them feel like they’re just kind of there, and have maybe two personality traits tops. Only Michael Caine’s doctor character and Matt Damon’s Dr. Mann, the astronaut survivor who they find, feel at all like real people – and in both cases, it is quickly undermined by the plot. Dr. Mann in particular is problematic – he notes how lonely he felt and how scared he was of dying alone, but then tries to murder people for no real reason while talking about saving humanity. It is bizarre and nonsensical, and consumes a big chunk of the movie’s run-time for no real reason.

TARS and CASE, the two robots that are brought along on the spaceship, show more personality than the entire human cast – TARS is snarky, and the back-and-forths between TARS and the human cast are the best character moments in the movie. TARS and CASE feel like the real heroes to some extent, and honestly leave me wondering why they didn’t just send robots, as they are apparently both clever and adaptable. I enjoyed their wise-cracking, and their roles felt like the most interesting ones.

Sadly, they were not enough to carry the movie, and we’re left with a plodding 2 hour and 40 minute long film that doesn’t leave earth until 42 minutes in. My lack of concern for the characters meant that their success and failure didn’t touch me, and the constant contrivances meant I couldn't care about the plot. In the end, it felt like I was being drug by the nose through something full of puppets on strings, attempting to tell an arbitrary story without much real substance to it.
Expand
1 of 4 users found this helpful13
All this user's reviews
2
reelsightDec 21, 2014
Nonsense science coupled with a glacial pace of events and dull, predictable dialogue makes for a stinker of a movie. Luckily I was able to catch a long nap during the endless tedium of this artless lump of a movie so I was spared some ofNonsense science coupled with a glacial pace of events and dull, predictable dialogue makes for a stinker of a movie. Luckily I was able to catch a long nap during the endless tedium of this artless lump of a movie so I was spared some of the pain. For any serious fans of hard scifi based even loosely on current theory, this is a waste of time. Expand
1 of 4 users found this helpful13
All this user's reviews
6
EludiumQ36Jun 12, 2015
Almost 3 hrs long, this is more mini-series than movie and the slow pace/build up makes it seem all the more longer. The film's premise is great but it dies in execution. This should've been a much faster paced film instead of the sleepyAlmost 3 hrs long, this is more mini-series than movie and the slow pace/build up makes it seem all the more longer. The film's premise is great but it dies in execution. This should've been a much faster paced film instead of the sleepy classic "2001" it tries to emulate in some ways. The final half hour is where the payoff comes and it's appreciated and touching but again, it takes far too long to get to that point. Chris Nolan is a fine director but even the best have to be told to re-think their approach some times and this was one of those times. "Interstellar" could've and should've been much much better than this. Expand
1 of 4 users found this helpful13
All this user's reviews
7
21gramsJan 22, 2015
I'm extremely confused with this movie, is it sci-fi or fantasy, you know somewhat of a fairytale... I'm huge fans of physics, cosmology, astronomy and everything what is associated with that, but this movie just breaks apart in the middle ofI'm extremely confused with this movie, is it sci-fi or fantasy, you know somewhat of a fairytale... I'm huge fans of physics, cosmology, astronomy and everything what is associated with that, but this movie just breaks apart in the middle of it. I mean seriously, Nolan went to far with his imagination, he should have stick with the sci-fi genre, but instead he involves some stupid **** about love. I'm hardly trying to understand reasoning of doing such unexpected twist that is almost most cheesy twist in sci-fi movies history.

On the other hand I can't say it's a bad movie. The visuals are great, part of the plot is decent, acting is very good (especially for a sci-fi movie), so I'm don't even know what to think, how should I rate it.

Ok, so finally I think Nolan should stick with planet Earth and not go into space again, I mean never again. I can give it 7/10 for the good parts
Expand
1 of 4 users found this helpful13
All this user's reviews
2
ConjureApr 6, 2015
This movie was a supreme letdown.
Overly long with dragged out scenes. That It had some good actors is about the only redeeming aspect to it.
It should have been cut down by at least 30 minutes. Superfluous scenes reigned supreme in this
This movie was a supreme letdown.
Overly long with dragged out scenes. That It had some good actors is about the only redeeming aspect to it.
It should have been cut down by at least 30 minutes. Superfluous scenes reigned supreme in this flick.
A total waste of time.
Expand
1 of 4 users found this helpful13
All this user's reviews
7
DCEdmondsDec 7, 2014
"Interstellar" 10 Scale Rating: 7.0 (Good) ...

The Good: At times, the film is gripping and borders on epic. The characters are well written and fleshed out. McConaughey turns in one of the best performances that I have ever seen him give
"Interstellar" 10 Scale Rating: 7.0 (Good) ...

The Good: At times, the film is gripping and borders on epic. The characters are well written and fleshed out. McConaughey turns in one of the best performances that I have ever seen him give and his supporting cast (Hathaway, Caine, Affleck, Chastain, Bentley, and Damon) are also superb. The scientific aspects are fascinating and the science geek in me was very entertained for stretches. Nolan's depiction of the fall of humanity feels realistic (even if it's a tad preposterous) and hits home. Also, as McConaughey drifts further and further away from his family, you feel it. Well done, for the most part.

The Bad: At just under three hours, the film is too long. I personally don't usually mind lengthy films, but at times it feels drawn out for the sake of drawing it out ... especially near the end. Eventually, all the bad luck that the crew faces starts to wear on you. It feels near constant and also puts them in situations that they get out of by performing impossible feats or suddenly have a stroke of good luck instead. Lastly, the technical aspects will lose some. While I enjoy hearing people chat about time/space distortion, relativity, event horizons, and quantum physics ... I can only listen to so much of it and can't imagine how someone who ISN'T interested in those subjects would feel.
Expand
1 of 4 users found this helpful13
All this user's reviews