Genius on Hold

Name: Genius on Hold
Genre: Documentary
Released: March 1, 2013
Rating: 66

2013

METASCORE

Generally favorable reviews based on 5 Critic Reviews

See All

USER SCORE

No score yet

tbd

VOTE NOW

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

tbd	Your Score
tbd	User Score No score yet

Would you like to write a review?

There is a 75 character minimum for reviews. If your review contains spoilers, please check the Spoiler box. Please do not use ALL CAPS. There is no linking or other HTML allowed. Your review may be edited for content. 0/5000

Check box if your review contains spoilers

Play Sound

Please enter your birth date to watch this video:

You are not allowed to view this material at this time.

Genius On Hold

Now Playing: Genius On Hold

Movie Details & Credits

Freestyle Releasing | Release Date: March 1, 2013 | PG

Summary: Genius on Hold looks at the lives of Walter L. Shaw, a genius inventor who died poor, and his son, Walter T. Shaw, a notorious jewel thief.

Director: Gregory Marquette

Genre(s): Documentary

Rating: PG

See All Details and Credits

Watch Now

Stream On

Buy on

Stream On

Metascore

Positive:

Mixed:

Negative:

Critic Reviews

Ernest Hardy

Feb 26, 2013

One marvel of the film is how it conveys so much information so quickly, and with such accessibility. Read full review

Gary Goldstein

Feb 28, 2013

Marquette, aided by Frank Langella's precise narration, has crafted an engrossing and disturbing tribute. Read full review

Feb 25, 2013

Though overstuffed, his film eschews pop-doc conventions by opting for in-depth analysis over superficiality. Read full review

Bill Goodykoontz

Dec 13, 2013

It’s a mix of good films that could have been a single outstanding one. Read full review

Nicolas Rapold

Feb 28, 2013

This promisingly tragic tale is sunk by cartloads of context and an overbearing, slanted narration. Read full review

SEE ALL 5 REVIEWS

User Score

Write a Review

tbd

Positive:

Mixed:

Negative:

User Reviews

jdb26354

Mar 4, 2013

First, no credible reviewer could rate this 9 of 10, assuming that 10 is reserved for the finest films of all time, like Citizen Kane. There are too many imperfections to wedge into a single point demerit on a 10-point scale. Second, the movie is a bait and switch, of sorts, promising theFirst, no credible reviewer could rate this 9 of 10, assuming that 10 is reserved for the finest films of all time, like Citizen Kane. There are too many imperfections to wedge into a single point demerit on a 10-point scale. Second, the movie is a bait and switch, of sorts, promising the inventor, and delivering a whole lot of his errant son, who apparently made a name for himself as a convicted thief/burglar. The ad and trailer do not fairly portray the movie, so be forewarned. Third, the lack of visual material on the inventor himself, in particular, the lack of video, and even the relative scarcity of photos, stands out negatively, when juxtaposed with the copious footage of interviews of shabbily dressed unknowns attesting to various points in the narrative, or interpretations of U.S. economic policy (AT&T was a monopoly, don't you know?). Fourth, many of these shortcomings could have been overcome by a tighter timeline, and sharper focus on what motivated the man himself. Some context on the significance of the patents would have been quite helpful, as well. We never get much sense of when the patents for various devices were issued in relation to when the inventions themselves were first commercialized. As you can read, I left quite disappointed, although no less interested in the man himself.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

mpp

May 20, 2016

Painful. Nothing worse than a one-sided, sensationalized documentary...except when narrated by the most melodramatic voice ever. And while I am no fan of the power that big business and $ hold in the US, work product created while an employee of a company is pretty standard. The tradeoffPainful. Nothing worse than a one-sided, sensationalized documentary...except when narrated by the most melodramatic voice ever. And while I am no fan of the power that big business and $ hold in the US, work product created while an employee of a company is pretty standard. The tradeoff is a comfortable salary and zero risk while losing the chance at big money should the IP become profitable. On the other side, companies are willing to eat the salaries of R&D employees whose research leads to little or no profit, with the idea that others' will generate enough profit to make up the loss and then some.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

SEE ALL 2 REVIEWS