Dunkirk

10

NavyBeanJul 24, 2017

I've changed my rating on this film from 5 to 9 after a second viewing. There are indeed a lot of unanswered questions, but it doesn't matter. This is a spectacular film. I'll watch it again. Old review below: Very conflicted about this filmI've changed my rating on this film from 5 to 9 after a second viewing. There are indeed a lot of unanswered questions, but it doesn't matter. This is a spectacular film. I'll watch it again. Old review below: Very conflicted about this film and its director's intentions. It is a beautiful film and shot incredibly. The opening scene is amazing. But I felt little connection to the characters and what happens to the civilian kid on the boat seemed unnecessary and too sentimental at the end. And what's the point of Cillian Murphy's character? So many things unexplained and unknown. It may be the director's intent to comment on the chaos of war but it felt like wearing a beautiful suit that's two sizes too big.… Expand

11 of 30 users found this helpful1119

All this user's reviews

5

jgzegerJun 9, 2018

I found the story-telling here confusing and the visuals monotonous. I was perplexed as to why it was so highly rated.

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

0

erikmc12Jun 7, 2018

A theosophical war movie: Nature is a clock... Nolan is god, and the soldiers... his puppets; 'igne natura renovatur integra'... sacrifice is necessary, but peace will come with the new world order...

5 of 11 users found this helpful56

All this user's reviews

7

BeanmanJamesMay 31, 2018

I dont really have much to say about this one, apart from that it's good and I like it.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

AndrewBurgeMay 30, 2018

Christopher Nolan's 'Dunkirk' is a moment. Unlike most films, which take a procedural and mostly linear structured manner of development, 'Dunkirk' is one singular super-set-piece comprised of a handful of others. And because of this, itChristopher Nolan's 'Dunkirk' is a moment. Unlike most films, which take a procedural and mostly linear structured manner of development, 'Dunkirk' is one singular super-set-piece comprised of a handful of others. And because of this, it holds itself together like a meticulously and carefully crafted puzzle, almost like the inner workings of a Swiss watch.

The story revolves around the Dunkirk Evacuation during the early years of World War II when the entire British Army was pushed back to the beaches of Northern France and were nearly wiped out. Usually, when filmmakers present a historical event, they tend to focus on a handful of characters which come with their own personal baggage. And while this film has these elements, like two soldiers aiming to escape (Fionn Whitehead and Harry Styles) a civilian boat coming to the rescue manned by father and son (Mark Rylance and Tom Glynn-Carney) and two RAF pilots in the air struggling to help (Tom Hardy and Jack Lowden), Nolan does not focus on them more than it is necessary for the viewer, giving them minimalist dialogue making them a representation of their entire categories. This is what makes this film special. Nolan understands the art of film. He realizes that movies are not necessarily about people. They can be about whatever you feel. It is the most liberating art form and the most powerful and advanced.

That being said, while these characters are not given a lot of focus, somehow, in their brief moments they manage to shock, inspire and touch us through efficient screenwriting and perfect pacing. Overall, though it is Nolan's apocalyptic approach to the event which truly captures the viewer. You might argue that his films are over-produced, never giving you a moment to breathe, being always on the edge, and I actually agree! But there is something paradoxical in his over-the-top approach, especially here, where Nolan brings his best and worst tendencies to bare.

Nolan's approach here is presented through mostly panoramic views brilliantly executed by Hoyte van Hoytema's cinematography. The greatest result here is the way it creates an engulfing state of fear and despair without ever showing us the enemy properly, almost as if to present them as untouchable and invisible gods which would send their cataclysmic wrath in the forms of aerial bombardments.

So, if someone were to ask me if this I think this film was flawless, I would say no. It is over-produced, highly saturated and the soundtrack is constantly booming in your head. Yet it is the presence of all these elements together, what makes this film the best of 2017. Only a film mathematician like Christopher Nolan could fuse these flawed concepts into one perfectly crafted and polished moment.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

9

NerdHausMay 28, 2018

Unlike any war movie I have ever seen. Beautifully shot and great story telling.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

3

Astor_May 25, 2018

I have never been a fan of war films. If the plot is good enough, I would still give it a go. This film took itself too seriously. It feels like a historical book. No notable interesting characters. I could not get into this. Sorry.

2 of 5 users found this helpful23

All this user's reviews

3

3ebfan511Jul 23, 2017

Over-rated, and disappointing. The first 15 minutes were decent, and then I was almost falling asleep for the rest of the movie. (I think I did in fact fall asleep it was so boring.) This was advertised as some kind of super exciting warOver-rated, and disappointing. The first 15 minutes were decent, and then I was almost falling asleep for the rest of the movie. (I think I did in fact fall asleep it was so boring.) This was advertised as some kind of super exciting war movie, and saving private ryan is one of my favorite movies ever, and I go and instead I get one of the most boring war movies ever. I don't even mind if there isn't much action, but then at least give me interesting characters and story (like the Thin Red Line, also one of my favorite movies where the characters daydream in the middle of battles for minutes and minutes but you get to actually know the characters and their lives etc....great film.) This film had a lack of compelling action, guys are pretty much just retreating and you see the same few types of shots over and over again for an hour. I saw about 3 planes the entire movie, (the same 3 planes) and the same 100 guys, and thats about it. I did not see a single enemy soldier in the ENTIRE FILM. Almost NO CHARACTER even has DIALOGUE. Almost every character is nameless and faceless, which is fine for the first 15 minutes when they are under direct diress, but at some point people will like, open their mouths and want to know things about each other and character should be revealed. Film had weak action, with guys on boats doing nothing, and then not even any dialogue. and the music itself should have been good if it actually matched the action on screen. It was like hearing the great music from the Dark Knight during a foreboding moment of action when you are expecting a climax....only to see no climax, ever, throughout the entire film, repeat process for 1 hour, and that is "Dunkirk". Horribly over-rated and not a very good war film being over-rated based on the directors past work. I would rate is as one of Nolan's worst films, and the only one that...made me actually fall asleep. Terrible writing, and the music did not match the (lack of) action. Sub-par and a disappointment overall compared to these mindless "great" reviews. It was OK, but that was about it.… Expand

14 of 30 users found this helpful1416

All this user's reviews

1

rlw1955May 15, 2018

Soldiers lined up on a pier waiting to board a ship that’s taking wounded only. Officer states we are like fish in a barrel as you look back down the pier towards the beach as hundreds of non wounded are standing in line. A look on the beachSoldiers lined up on a pier waiting to board a ship that’s taking wounded only. Officer states we are like fish in a barrel as you look back down the pier towards the beach as hundreds of non wounded are standing in line. A look on the beach shows dozens of lines of men standing out in the open all in neat rows waiting on ships that aren’t there. German planes strafing and bombing the beach all the while you have a town right behind with all types of empty buildings where you could be taking shelter and be out of sight. Men taking fire in a beached ship and out of 300,000 men not one group got together to recon for the firing Germans. Not sure if this movie was actually trying to convey how terrible this situation was for the stranded at Dunkirk or to make the British military leadership look like buffoons. This movie was way overhyped. Not the worst movie I have ever watched but it could have been much more than what it was.… Expand

5 of 11 users found this helpful56

All this user's reviews

9

filmcapsMay 9, 2018

i get what nolan was trying to do with not giving the characters any story and back story but still made the movie feel empty. but it is still a visual storytelling masterpiece and a groundbreaking film. classic nolan

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

8

benskylerhillMay 6, 2018

Dunkirk is very much unlike the rest of Christopher Nolan's filmography. His earlier work--in particular The Dark Knight, Inception, and Interstellar--is very much large-scale and spectacle-driven while it still boasts narratives that areDunkirk is very much unlike the rest of Christopher Nolan's filmography. His earlier work--in particular The Dark Knight, Inception, and Interstellar--is very much large-scale and spectacle-driven while it still boasts narratives that are anchored by intelligent, complex dialogue. With Dunkirk, Nolan retains the visual and audio extravagance but trades in the intellect for simplicity. Sometimes this formula works in this case, and sometimes it doesn't.

As is to be expected from Nolan at this point, this film is gorgeous to look at. The set design incorporates actual sea vessels from World War II and is flawlessly constructed. All of the lighting and camera angles are seamless and serve to portray the brutality of war in a beautifully engaging way.

Where Dunkirk falls flat is in its storytelling methods. It's utilizes nonlinear storytelling that is never clear about when it jumps back and forth through time, thus making it difficult to decipher the movie's timeline. It's also a film that isn't about any one character or even group of characters. It's about the event; the Dunkirk rescue of 1940 is the film's only character. Because there is so little dialogue and yet so many people in the movie, there is no time to get to know any of the characters as people and thus it is hard to connect with the story in a deep, emotional way. Granted, it is to be understood that the film effectively portrays war as harsh and uncaring by not providing any characters to care about; but when it comes to watching a film, there ought to be a reason to care. It's a two-edged sword, really.

Christopher Nolan's departure from his somewhat predictable formula feels fresh and proves to be effective in crafting a compelling war thiller that is not perfect by any means but treats its historical source material with honest and dignified honor and respect.

Story: 5.5
Acting: 8.5
Script: 7.5
Visuals/Sound: 10
Entertainment Value: 7.5

OVERALL SCORE: 7.8/10… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

0

xrararaMay 5, 2018

Movie was horrible. Obnoxiously loud and incredibly boring. The worst movie I have ever seen, even more disappointing because I love the Dark Knight.

3 of 8 users found this helpful35

All this user's reviews

5

zstarkey20Apr 29, 2018

I liked the film, but it left me a bit disappointed. The moments of chaos seemed too controlled aside from moments of the sinking ship. Lastly, I wasn't thrilled with the ending and I left the movie slightly unsatisfied. All in all thoughI liked the film, but it left me a bit disappointed. The moments of chaos seemed too controlled aside from moments of the sinking ship. Lastly, I wasn't thrilled with the ending and I left the movie slightly unsatisfied. All in all though it's a movie worth seeing.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

10

0326990qdiun123Apr 27, 2018

이 영화가 주는 분위기와 긴장감에 완전히 압도되었다. 믿고 보는 크리스토퍼 놀란감독!

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

9

GrantD243Apr 25, 2018

I'm convinced that Christopher Nolan is one of the only directors working today that could pull off making a film like Dunkirk. Centered around an event during WW2 that not a whole lot of people know about, sparse dialogue, extensive actionI'm convinced that Christopher Nolan is one of the only directors working today that could pull off making a film like Dunkirk. Centered around an event during WW2 that not a whole lot of people know about, sparse dialogue, extensive action scenes/cinematic shots, and no true main character–but it all comes together to tell an incredible story? Yeah, you're gonna need someone like Nolan for that kind of film. And, boy, he delivers. The visuals are stunning, the dialogue is precise, and there is character development (which is one of the main complaints I've seen about this film). A film doesn't have to have loads of dialogue to develop its characters, and it doesn't have to focus on one character. Dunkirk uses primarily action for character development, with dialogue as a secondary device. And no, we're not meant to care about one character in particular, we're meant to care about all of the characters as a group. All of that aside, Dunkirk also just has a great story to it. The idea of essentially being stranded on a beach, surrounded, constantly bombarded by bombs, with no real hope for a successful rescue is truly maddening. I can't imagine what the soldiers felt like after going through all of that, but at least we get to see their story. Will Dunkirk do down as one of the best war films ever? Probably not. But I think it should.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

7

LivingTribunalApr 24, 2018

I know that this is a brilliant film, but I cannot agree that it deserves 94 rating when The Dark Knight got 82 and The Shawshank Redemption got 80. I don't think this is a better war movie than Saving Private Ryan. When you watch the film,I know that this is a brilliant film, but I cannot agree that it deserves 94 rating when The Dark Knight got 82 and The Shawshank Redemption got 80. I don't think this is a better war movie than Saving Private Ryan. When you watch the film, you'll feel like you are actually there in the middle of Dunkirk especially when you watched in IMAX. Hans Zimmer's composition was one of the best, and it changes the mood a lot.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

6

diomedesbcApr 21, 2018

I was surprised, the movie had such great reviews, but was pretty disappointing for me. Maybe I'm too critical because I know more than the average about the history. Still the story was kind of a let down.

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

6

destinyfan1Apr 15, 2018

One of the most overrated movies ever,it was extremely generic through the entire movie,moving from boat to boat ,shooting plane to plane ,it delivered nothing original,it did make you feel how hard it was to survive dunkirk , but the movieOne of the most overrated movies ever,it was extremely generic through the entire movie,moving from boat to boat ,shooting plane to plane ,it delivered nothing original,it did make you feel how hard it was to survive dunkirk , but the movie forgot to be enjoyable and was pretty boring at most times,but it did have great actors,and good visuals,good overview in the plane fights.
Recommended for people who are used to war movies,for others it will be boring… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

8

MonkiReviewsApr 2, 2018

I enjoyed this movie a lot. The acting was great, and they made the movie feel more real. The sound was very realistic also. The story, in my opinion, was very interesting. They brought each side story together into one big story. The onlyI enjoyed this movie a lot. The acting was great, and they made the movie feel more real. The sound was very realistic also. The story, in my opinion, was very interesting. They brought each side story together into one big story. The only bad thing about it is that the story felt a little rushed towards the middle. I liked this movie overall.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

10

madmal69Mar 21, 2018

One of the best films of the year, hands down. Flawless sound effects and visuals made me feel as if I were inside the film. Amazing performances all around.

1 of 5 users found this helpful14

All this user's reviews

9

bfoore90Mar 21, 2018

A powerful and intense look at the event that took place at Dunkirk during World War 2. Dunkirk is possibly one of the greatest victories for the British against nearly impossible odds, the Germans were fast approaching, time was short andA powerful and intense look at the event that took place at Dunkirk during World War 2. Dunkirk is possibly one of the greatest victories for the British against nearly impossible odds, the Germans were fast approaching, time was short and people were dying. While it does suffer because its lack of characterization and dialogue, it's still a great retelling of the events that occurred at Dunkirk… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

10

juliankennedy23Mar 21, 2018

Dunkirk is a taut arty recreation of Operation Dynamo that took place between May 26th and June 4th, 1940 where Britain managed to rescue about 400,000 of their own and allied troops that were encircled by the Germans and trapped on a sliverDunkirk is a taut arty recreation of Operation Dynamo that took place between May 26th and June 4th, 1940 where Britain managed to rescue about 400,000 of their own and allied troops that were encircled by the Germans and trapped on a sliver of land on the coast.

The operation is famous for its use of civilian craft and the sheer number rescued after the humiliating defeat on the mainland. It inspired newly elected Prime Minister Winston Churchill to make his “we will fight them on the beaches” speech.

The Good: Christopher Nolan has shown himself a brilliant director since “The Following” in 1998 and simply has not been as on top of his game as in this film. He uses, what could easily be a gimmick, an anachronic order of three separate time lines told simultaneously. I usually dislike movies that are not told in a simply chronological order but it simply works brilliantly here fitting both the material and the stories told within.

The movie is also a wonderfully minimalist affair with music used sparingly to create a great effect when it does appear and a taut running time that bluntly is a relief. Too often both war epics, recent Christopher Nolan films (I am looking your way Interstellar) and “important movies” in general seem to pad the running time to a kidney-busting three hours packing every piece of flotsam and jetsam surrounding the main story hoping something sticks with the audience.

The acting and cinematography are also top notch. The air combat scenes filmed with real fighter aircraft of the era are a sight to behold and simply a triumph.

The Bad: While the anachronic order certainly does work brilliantly upon reflection of the entire film, one can find it disorienting during the actual viewing if one does not expect it going in.

Nolan does an incredible job recreating the time period using actual ships that were at the evacuation and filming on the actual beach. However, his refusal to use CGI does create a city of Dunkirk that is remarkable intact compared to the actual city of that day and a beach that is not strewn with the hundreds of tanks and thousands of vehicles the British and French abandoned. While that is certainly excusable as an artistic choice the modern seat patterns on the train are a surprising anachronism.

In Conclusion: As the son of a man who survived the blitz and a grandson of a Royal Navy officer, I am certain my tearing eyes and warm feeling during the film will not be shared by all. It is, however, even for those with no personal connection, a brilliant combination of direction, cinematography, and music that is a filmmaking triumph. One of the best film I have seen this year.… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

6

wesker2012Mar 20, 2018

Another over-rated movie. Not enough characterization to be engaging. Didn't feel connected enough to the characters to feel their plight. Another case of beautiful cinematography and visuals, but hugely lacking in characters, emotion, andAnother over-rated movie. Not enough characterization to be engaging. Didn't feel connected enough to the characters to feel their plight. Another case of beautiful cinematography and visuals, but hugely lacking in characters, emotion, and drama. Felt more like a Hollywood depiction of something you'd see on the History Channel.… Expand

3 of 7 users found this helpful34

All this user's reviews

10

Minh18121999Mar 19, 2018

Dunkirk is intense as f***,Christopher Nolan,one of my favourite directors of all time, who directed this film the **** out of it.This is a very different war film,and also very different from Nolan's previous film,this films looksDunkirk is intense as f***,Christopher Nolan,one of my favourite directors of all time, who directed this film the **** out of it.This is a very different war film,and also very different from Nolan's previous film,this films looks gorgeous,the cinematography by Hoyte van Hoytema is so good,the loud and inspiring score by Hans Zimmer is the best score of 2017.This film is 106 minutes long and it is perfect fitted.The film has no character development or set up,which some critics complain about,but this makes Dunkirk more real and more focus on the event,despite its pg13 rating.The acting is top-notch.This film totally floored me,because of that,Dunkirk gets 10/10… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

0

AidinKianyMar 11, 2018

so boring.no story. no character. if it was for another director i vote 6 but for nolan it was awful. mr nolan, i suggest you to watch your previous movies again so you understand why this one disappoints us.
differences always cant be good.so boring.no story. no character. if it was for another director i vote 6 but for nolan it was awful. mr nolan, i suggest you to watch your previous movies again so you understand why this one disappoints us.
differences always cant be good.
at least not in this one.… Expand

8 of 15 users found this helpful87

All this user's reviews

10

Bheath2002Mar 11, 2018

The best war movie. Showed all traditional elements in a new and interesting way. Says a lot with little dialogue but I really felt like I was there. Perfect

0 of 4 users found this helpful04

All this user's reviews

0

mrdollarMar 10, 2018

Reminds me of "Fury" movie failure of absolute nonsense with anti-gravity plane, even manage to destroy enemy fighter without fuel. Same as terminator tank in "Fury". Boring, 2 hour long over hyped and clearly bribed "professional" reviews.Reminds me of "Fury" movie failure of absolute nonsense with anti-gravity plane, even manage to destroy enemy fighter without fuel. Same as terminator tank in "Fury". Boring, 2 hour long over hyped and clearly bribed "professional" reviews. This movie was a lie and everyone should ask for a refund.… Expand

4 of 9 users found this helpful45

All this user's reviews

7

VDSMar 10, 2018

I avoided this at the cinema because I don’t like war films (self-censorship at its worst). I’m still pleased I didn’t see it at the cinema, but not because it isn’t very good. It is good.

If you’re expecting a Christopher Nolan realityI avoided this at the cinema because I don’t like war films (self-censorship at its worst). I’m still pleased I didn’t see it at the cinema, but not because it isn’t very good. It is good.

If you’re expecting a Christopher Nolan reality bending flic, or a full on action bash, you’ll be disappointed. Or a Saving Private Ryan type overly-sentimental blood bath, again you’ll be disappointed.

What the movie has is layers, beautiful cinematography, minimal dialogue and only a few war movie clichés.

The stand out parts for me were the flying sequences, and the whole story line involving Tom Hardy as the Spitfire pilot. It looked beautiful, it was handled delicately, and it seemed happy to forgo glamor and focus on reality. The end was a bit cheesy, and that would be my criticism of the film in general. What started off as a surprisingly down to earth war film, did sink a little bit into cliché by the end.

However, I’d recommend it. But, one more word of warning, the Americans do not swoop in at the end and ‘save the day’, so if you’re wanting that, move along. This film focuses on the British, and how, I guess, we got the saying ‘the Dunkirk spirit’.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

10

CTHReviewsMar 8, 2018

Like Rogue One, it sacrifices character for spectacle. But luckily, it succeeds on every level of the word "spectacle". Christopher Nolan's war epic is extremely intense, with by far the best war action set pieces ever put to cinema.

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

4

JabboMar 7, 2018

I knew the basic story of Dunkirk, and was very excited to see a movie that expanded and detailed what happened at that historic event. I was severely disappointed that none of this occurred. The plot was bare bones, the character developmentI knew the basic story of Dunkirk, and was very excited to see a movie that expanded and detailed what happened at that historic event. I was severely disappointed that none of this occurred. The plot was bare bones, the character development non-existant, and in spite of the exemplary production values, it was a total letdown.… Expand

3 of 7 users found this helpful34

All this user's reviews

10

RrichardMar 6, 2018

Terrific movie. Highly recommended for all WW2 fans. Great sights and sounds.

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

10

MarvelJoeFeb 28, 2018

Christopher Nolan brought something new to the table and it was extremely scary that I felt like I was there.

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

9

sidneyrosehornFeb 26, 2018

beautiful film and highly recommended! All the acting is excellent. My only issue is that sometimes the background noise can be a little loud. Best viewed on a large TV or in the movie theatre

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

3

MaxPayneIsGodFeb 25, 2018

I understand the historical significance of this event, but as a movie? What a snore fest, this is a war movie not an after school special, not a single drop of blood spilled and the disjointed timeline is an overt way of admitting that thereI understand the historical significance of this event, but as a movie? What a snore fest, this is a war movie not an after school special, not a single drop of blood spilled and the disjointed timeline is an overt way of admitting that there is absolutely zero story. Give me Saving Private Ryan any day.… Expand

5 of 11 users found this helpful56

All this user's reviews

9

merijnjFeb 21, 2018

(93/100)
A new approach to a war movie that pays of when everyting comes together.

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

6

MadMaxFuryRoadJul 21, 2017

Visually, Dunkirk is a masterpiece. Really, Dunkirk is a work of art. It's beautifully directed, insanely loud, and visually stunning. The first five minutes of the opening was one of the best this year. There were a ton of memorable scenes,Visually, Dunkirk is a masterpiece. Really, Dunkirk is a work of art. It's beautifully directed, insanely loud, and visually stunning. The first five minutes of the opening was one of the best this year. There were a ton of memorable scenes, including a beach bombing sequence. However, storywise, the film contains flaws. The plot was pretty thinly written and at times, I felt as if I was just watching battle sequence without much substance (in other words, "a good plot"). Nevertheless, Dunkirk is one of those rare movies that is beautiful to look at and an overall good film to watch, even if the narrative isn't so intriguing.… Expand

7 of 20 users found this helpful713

All this user's reviews

9

kiankFeb 17, 2018

Dunkirk is a really good movie. I loved the way how all the pathways of all the different characters interconnected at the end. It is also really pretty and just really well done. One of the best war movies I've seen. My one complaint isDunkirk is a really good movie. I loved the way how all the pathways of all the different characters interconnected at the end. It is also really pretty and just really well done. One of the best war movies I've seen. My one complaint is that all the soldiers looked the same and I couldn't tell them apart. Overall, I'd give it a 8.8.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

8

TheQuietGamerFeb 15, 2018

Harrowing. Christopher Nolan's war film is not about big, bloody battles. Dunkirk's story takes place from several different perspectives. Cutoff and stranded, the British and French soldiers are just doing what they can to survive as theHarrowing. Christopher Nolan's war film is not about big, bloody battles. Dunkirk's story takes place from several different perspectives. Cutoff and stranded, the British and French soldiers are just doing what they can to survive as the Nazi's repeated attacks continue to reduce their numbers and moral as escape attempts are thwarted left and right. We will witness events from the eyes of those trying to leave Dunkirk and those trying to reach it in order to help, all primarily from the British viewpoint. An exquisitely beautiful film, Dunkirk surprised me by just how well it was able to convey the feelings of desperation the characters have without much spoken dialog. The tone is sad and even hopeless. Yet, things are never bleak enough to make it come off as a depressing experience a la The Road. No matter how brutal the setbacks are there's an undercurrent of light running throughout the film that keeps things from bringing the viewers down with a sense of all hope being lost for those onscreen. The ending is incredibly emotional, and not just for those with a soft spot for the military. These are more than just soldiers doing what is required of them. They are real people just trying to make it home or want to help. It's not just duty; it's humanity.

I found a slight, but fairly significant issue with how the narrative was presented. It's not entirely linear. There's a section in the latter half of the film where it will recap back to earlier events so that we may experience it from a different character. The time gap in between when we first witnessed it from a different perspective to when we make the leap back is so big it threw me off for a minute in regards to the timeline of events. I honestly can't think of a reason why Nolan didn't play it linearly outside of artistic/stylistic reasons. Personally, I think the choice hurt the flow of the movie.

Dunkirk is an impressive WWII movie that relies on it's characters and situation to portray the intensity of the war without relying on Nazi gunfire. In fact, we never actually see a Nazi onscreen. Some of their planes, yeah, but there isn't a traditional battle sequence to be found. None of the movie's power has been lost in taking this approach. Something that speaks well of the director's immense talent. It's a gripping film that will have you caring about characters before you even really hear them speak. Never before has such an awful situation made for such a beautiful watch.

8.1/10… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

5

SrPepeFeb 15, 2018

Mal filmada con personajes vacíos y partes muy aburridas. Tiene una excelente banda sonora y grandes efectos de sonidos, pero carece de la mística cinematográfica que atrapa al espectador y lo introduce en la historia.

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

7

DaddyO3Feb 14, 2018

I was told this movie was hard to follow and I should brush up on the history of Dunkirk. I did not get a chance to review the history and just jumped into the movie. It had multiple stories going on and I didn't think it was hard toI was told this movie was hard to follow and I should brush up on the history of Dunkirk. I did not get a chance to review the history and just jumped into the movie. It had multiple stories going on and I didn't think it was hard to follow. My 16 year old son and I both enjoyed it. It's no Lord of the Rings, but a solid 7/10.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

10

The_CalvinatorFeb 12, 2018

Christopher Nolan remains my favorite director, as he is the only one I feel can do anything and I will enjoy it. Different from other creators in Hollywood, I don't feel like I want anything specific from Nolan, I just want it to beChristopher Nolan remains my favorite director, as he is the only one I feel can do anything and I will enjoy it. Different from other creators in Hollywood, I don't feel like I want anything specific from Nolan, I just want it to be trademark HIS. The Batman Trilogy, Inception, Interstellar, and now Dunkirk all fall into the visually impressive and compelling from the start category that Nolan has masterfully perfected.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

5

HotelCentralFeb 7, 2018

What a shame that filmmakers of a former age wasted time and effort inventing characters and composing dialog and developing stories, when all they really had to do is patch together a few action scenes, instruct their thespians to ad lib aWhat a shame that filmmakers of a former age wasted time and effort inventing characters and composing dialog and developing stories, when all they really had to do is patch together a few action scenes, instruct their thespians to ad lib a few grunts or shouts, and call it a movie!

I mean, really, there is no story here. It's a series of anecdotes. It's a Studs Terkel oral history with newsreel footage substituted for words.

Watch this if you must. Myself, I'll re-watch a film with characters and story, such as Mrs. Miniver (1942).… Expand

3 of 7 users found this helpful34

All this user's reviews

6

TB1284fbFeb 4, 2018

Although the picture of the movie was phenomenal, the movie wasn't phenomenal. I thought it was good but didn't live up to the hype that everyone was saying. I didn't think the characters were really developed like they should have. They wereAlthough the picture of the movie was phenomenal, the movie wasn't phenomenal. I thought it was good but didn't live up to the hype that everyone was saying. I didn't think the characters were really developed like they should have. They were really just jumping from scene to scene on different events going on and didn't seem like the movie was really going anywhere. The acting was pretty good for the most part but the dialogue was the issue. Certain times in the movie there would be scenes where it had you on the edge of your seat so it was exciting in some parts.… Expand

2 of 5 users found this helpful23

All this user's reviews

5

WorldofLuckyFeb 3, 2018

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Overhyped, and ultimately a disappointment.

It is great to see a World War II movie come out this year. It is even better that it isn't American centric. I love my country, but we have made it this idea we won World War II by ourselves which isn't the case.

The movie has some pretty spots, taking the story of three groups that intertwine. The first group about British Spitfires (fighter planes) trying to give some cover, and engaging with German air force. Resulting in Tom Hardy having the only interesting action in the movie.

The second story about a small civilian ship as part of the armada of civilians coming to rescue the trapped soldiers and the story that unfolds when they pick up a soldier from a sunk ship.

Finally the third story is about two soldiers trying to survive on the beach, and wait for the rescue coming from the civilian ships.

It was interesting that all three stories occurred over different period of time but ended together. The fighters story was within an hour, the ship within a few hours, and the soldiers within a couple of days. I think this could work in other movies, and I suspect this will spark a lot of copycats for that style. We will hate this just as much as other niche storytelling styles within a few years.

The problem is there is actually very little story. It is hard to see that because the story keeps jumping around, but when you step back the story itself lacks anything. I have seen documentaries on Dunkirk that had more story. I don't know if there was never a full story, or if maybe the story got lost when Nolan was trying to break it up to fight the weird timing, but either way it is pretty barren.

I cared nothing about the soldiers at all, Nolan provided nothing for the audience to care about. Tom Hardy was interesting, but that was because of him, not because the story gave him anything. The only story I felt a little compelling was about the civilian ship, its crew of two teens and an older man and how they handle picking up a survivor. Even this story though was lacking on details and when you step back you wonder where the other half of the story went.

I will admit the possibility that the hype was so big that my expectations may be too high. I was told huge action sequences, and I didn't see that. This isn't Saving Private Ryan, or The Battle of Britain even. It was fairly boring for me, and I can really like slow movies. The movie has a short run time, but I was still looking at the clock before it was over.

The good: It is an interesting way to tell a story, and it is nice to see a non-American based World War II movie.

The bad: The pacing was slow, very little action or story, and very overhyped.

This is a movie I would recommend if you are a die hard World War II fan, but even then wait until it hits Netflix.… Expand

2 of 5 users found this helpful23

All this user's reviews

2

s053714Jan 27, 2018

I can't understand why so many people liked this movie. While the production values were good, they seemed to have forgotten things like a plot and character development, and maybe a little enlightening dialog. It was very uninvolving andI can't understand why so many people liked this movie. While the production values were good, they seemed to have forgotten things like a plot and character development, and maybe a little enlightening dialog. It was very uninvolving and ultimately quite dull.… Expand

7 of 14 users found this helpful77

All this user's reviews

0

infinite_Jan 27, 2018

This is not the worst movie of Nolan, this is one of the 10 worst movies ever made in cinema history...
the real rate of this s*it is like 10/100 or 1/10 but i give it ""0"" because of millions of millions of fools around the world that ratedThis is not the worst movie of Nolan, this is one of the 10 worst movies ever made in cinema history...
the real rate of this s*it is like 10/100 or 1/10 but i give it ""0"" because of millions of millions of fools around the world that rated this absolute s*it 10/10 !!!!!!… Expand

4 of 14 users found this helpful410

All this user's reviews

7

bobbymbJan 25, 2018

Christopher Nolan garancia az igényes és szórakoztató filmekre. A film nagyon jól össze van rakva, jók a vágások és látványos a film. Aki pörgős háborús filmre számít, annak unalmas lesz, de aki szereti a lassabb, de élvezhető jelenetekkelChristopher Nolan garancia az igényes és szórakoztató filmekre. A film nagyon jól össze van rakva, jók a vágások és látványos a film. Aki pörgős háborús filmre számít, annak unalmas lesz, de aki szereti a lassabb, de élvezhető jelenetekkel tarkított filmeket, azoknak tetszeni fog. 10/7.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

7

MemoryMuffJan 24, 2018

I love Nolan, he's an amazing director, the way he leads the story, he casts very well, chooses all the right guys for editing the movie, but I'd like to ask: IS THERE ANY OTHER GENRE OF WAR FILMS THAT THE THEME ISN'T WORLD WAR II? The movieI love Nolan, he's an amazing director, the way he leads the story, he casts very well, chooses all the right guys for editing the movie, but I'd like to ask: IS THERE ANY OTHER GENRE OF WAR FILMS THAT THE THEME ISN'T WORLD WAR II? The movie is a great, but I'm sick of WW II films, it's annoying.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

isjoaoJan 23, 2018

I have no comments to make about this movie, I just want to use the 75 character minimum limit for reviews.

5 of 7 users found this helpful52

All this user's reviews

5

shoulderoforionJan 23, 2018

Sorry, but Dunkirk wasn't all that great. To take one of the most heroic naval rescues in human history & to make it as boring as Nolan did should be a criminal. This was 2 hrs of a movie waiting to happen, but never did. Protip : get anSorry, but Dunkirk wasn't all that great. To take one of the most heroic naval rescues in human history & to make it as boring as Nolan did should be a criminal. This was 2 hrs of a movie waiting to happen, but never did. Protip : get an empty beach, shoot a movie on it, profit, i guess.… Expand

2 of 5 users found this helpful23

All this user's reviews

9

daviddelnorte23Jan 19, 2018

Dije que volvería a ver Dunkerque cuando salí del cine y así ha sido, Dunkerque me parece la mejor y la que más me gusta película de Nolan. Corta, intensa y brillante. Pero si tuviera que definir a la última obra del director británico en unaDije que volvería a ver Dunkerque cuando salí del cine y así ha sido, Dunkerque me parece la mejor y la que más me gusta película de Nolan. Corta, intensa y brillante. Pero si tuviera que definir a la última obra del director británico en una palabra sería: ÉPICA.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

7

currer_bellJan 13, 2018

This is your typical war movie that is getting rave reviews just because it's a war movie. I expected much more from Nolan's Dunkirk, especially since Inception is one of the best movie I've ever seen. Nonetheless, it's true the visuals andThis is your typical war movie that is getting rave reviews just because it's a war movie. I expected much more from Nolan's Dunkirk, especially since Inception is one of the best movie I've ever seen. Nonetheless, it's true the visuals and music is great. Acting is solid. It's also impressing to see Nolan make a movie out of a plot so thin. But that's also part of the problem ; the plot is really, REALLY thin. There's no story, no progression, no dialogues, no characters differences... So be aware that as far as entertainement is concern, Dunkirk can be a real nightmare.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

SavageYetiJan 13, 2018

one of the most boring war movies or movies in general that i have ever seen, i was so let down by this movie. it is by far one of if not the most overrated movie of the year. if you want a great war movie go watch fury because it blows thisone of the most boring war movies or movies in general that i have ever seen, i was so let down by this movie. it is by far one of if not the most overrated movie of the year. if you want a great war movie go watch fury because it blows this one out of the water.… Expand

4 of 9 users found this helpful45

All this user's reviews

9

TroddlaTJan 11, 2018

Loved the grey and bleak feeling of this film, the music really added to the suspense. There's not a traditional Hollywood feeling which I welcome there isn't a star who saves the day or any of that but tells a true story in a suspenseful way.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

luke100Jan 9, 2018

Visually masterful and with complex storytelling, this movie ended up being somewhat boring due to my complete lack of attachment and emotional response to almost any character or scene. It may be perfectly crafted, but it's also not thatVisually masterful and with complex storytelling, this movie ended up being somewhat boring due to my complete lack of attachment and emotional response to almost any character or scene. It may be perfectly crafted, but it's also not that interesting outside of that.… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

2

lucasquaresmaJan 6, 2018

Eutinha achado o filme bom quando terminei de assistir, apesar de arrastado no meio. Porém, depois percebi que não gostei: Achei um filme de guerra avulso, pretensioso (escorado total em fotografia e som), emocionalmente vazio (não senti nadaEutinha achado o filme bom quando terminei de assistir, apesar de arrastado no meio. Porém, depois percebi que não gostei: Achei um filme de guerra avulso, pretensioso (escorado total em fotografia e som), emocionalmente vazio (não senti nada pelo soldados). Sinceramente um filme esquecível.… Expand

4 of 9 users found this helpful45

All this user's reviews

5

erom1943Jan 5, 2018

I was very disappointed in this movie, primarily due to the rave reviews and hype. I expected a much more entertaining experience. Instead, I got more of a docudrama, showing the politics and horrors of war. It was, however, enlighteningI was very disappointed in this movie, primarily due to the rave reviews and hype. I expected a much more entertaining experience. Instead, I got more of a docudrama, showing the politics and horrors of war. It was, however, enlightening as to what went on at Dunkirk, which many Americans are unaware.
The director constantly used time changes which confused the viewer throughout, Not until I was more than half way through did I start realizing what he was doing. Characters were not well developed, and there was little plot, other than reenactment of actions during that battle, and the horrors the soldiers endured. I came away knowing more about what happened at Dunkirk, but felt depressed and unentertained. “Saving Private Ryan” it is not.… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

10

Phope5Jan 1, 2018

This was a momentous film. It made me feel: nervous excitement, scared, tearful, and then happy, inspired. I think it came at a good time, too. 10/10 Nolan is a master of masterpieces.

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

9

samermaty15Jan 1, 2018

Absolutely best film of this year , Christopher nolan by his unique vision made a movie that could show you what the real war is ,Amazing cinematography with magnificent orignal score by hans zimmer made this film one of christopher nolanAbsolutely best film of this year , Christopher nolan by his unique vision made a movie that could show you what the real war is ,Amazing cinematography with magnificent orignal score by hans zimmer made this film one of christopher nolan masterpieces.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

7

HelenHDec 31, 2017

Slightly too artistic for my taste (three storylines that join at one point) and a very simple plot, but good at capturing the mood and overall a good movie.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

sanyrubDec 31, 2017

We could say the film gives us one of the most brilliant thecnical spectacles we have ever seen. The film is a 10 in that regard. Stunning cinematography. Hanns Zimmer does it again with the score too. The guy is something else. And then...We could say the film gives us one of the most brilliant thecnical spectacles we have ever seen. The film is a 10 in that regard. Stunning cinematography. Hanns Zimmer does it again with the score too. The guy is something else. And then... there´s a but: there is no story (almost). It´s definitely not a flaw because it´s obvious that´s what Nolan went for this go around. But it makes it not have emotional punch, like Interstellar, Inception and other of his films have a plenty. Despite that, the film is not boring by any means, which says a lot about its quality. Deserves all the nominations it is gettings. But I would only give it the technical awards.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

JKHReviewsDec 29, 2017

Another great summer blockbuster with little to no plot...

Is what an idiot would say. Nolan has brought us back to the screen with his film 'Dunkirk' based on the disaster that occurred in Dunkirk during WWII, known as the largest militaryAnother great summer blockbuster with little to no plot...

Is what an idiot would say. Nolan has brought us back to the screen with his film 'Dunkirk' based on the disaster that occurred in Dunkirk during WWII, known as the largest military evacuation operation. This film was beautiful, stunning and mature in the sense that it shows us not the horror of war, but the fear. Truly teaching us the feelings of each and everyone of those young soldiers on the battlefield through it's amazing cinematography, creatively fitting score by Hans Zimmer and the films lack of dialogue. It's a film to sit down, enjoy, and leave the cinema without saying a word, trying to process the events. Truly a Nolan film.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

MacsMusicDec 29, 2017

I'm glad I'm not the only one who didn't love Dunkirk. It feels very slow and long, with long intervals with no dialogue. When people did speak, it was sometimes hard to understand what they were saying. The movie has long, anti-climatic dogI'm glad I'm not the only one who didn't love Dunkirk. It feels very slow and long, with long intervals with no dialogue. When people did speak, it was sometimes hard to understand what they were saying. The movie has long, anti-climatic dog fights that feel really boring. It has several long intervals where nothing happens. The music is really good, but often is more intense than the scene the music is playing in. All in all, not as good as people make it sound.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

2

zachlenDec 26, 2017

How is it possible for critics to sit through a film and not question what they are seeing that makes zero sense. Wearing a life jacket in water will keep one from sinking. Not according to Christopher Nolan . We see ,as did critics ,hundredsHow is it possible for critics to sit through a film and not question what they are seeing that makes zero sense. Wearing a life jacket in water will keep one from sinking. Not according to Christopher Nolan . We see ,as did critics ,hundreds of soldiers under water wearing life vests. That in of its self is an impossibility. There were also scenes that went fron day to night,back to day. This happened more times to count.Why do people feel the need to agree with todays critics instead of THINKING for themselves.… Expand

9 of 16 users found this helpful97

All this user's reviews

5

Sexbot-5000Dec 25, 2017

The movie is pretty. And that is half the problem. The other half is the constant use of the thumping soundtrack at all times. I liked the sound at first. An hour and a half in I had to take a break because the mental strain of the constantThe movie is pretty. And that is half the problem. The other half is the constant use of the thumping soundtrack at all times. I liked the sound at first. An hour and a half in I had to take a break because the mental strain of the constant thumping noise was really bad. Like “Do I even want to subject myself to this monotonous soul sucking noise?” bad. The other half of the problem is this is the most sterile war movie ever. No blood could have worked. No blood, dirt, facial hair, emotion, or any imperfections of any sort did not. It’s like watching a documentary accept it’s acctually cleaner than any documentary I have ever seen. It’s like they made war into an art exhibit it’s so clean. So overall I loved the airplane scenes and the amount of men and extras and the sense of scale was seriously mind blowing. If your someone who can’t stand really annoying sounds or someone who doesn’t like the idea of a WW2 as an art exhibit this movie isn’t for you.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

2

EludiumQ36Dec 23, 2017

I couldn't watch anymore than about half this boring a$$ film before I called time of death. However, I get that it was attempting to tell the "untold" stories and drama of that war or for any war for that matter. But that's for people thatI couldn't watch anymore than about half this boring a$$ film before I called time of death. However, I get that it was attempting to tell the "untold" stories and drama of that war or for any war for that matter. But that's for people that revel in the minutiae of life. Studio shills is my only explanation for all the 9s and 10s for this bore-fest. Save yourself the feeling of growing old while you attempt to watch this mess.… Expand

2 of 7 users found this helpful25

All this user's reviews

9

nutterjrDec 22, 2017

Wow! What a score! Hans Zimmer is a genius and without trying to take anything away from the cinematic orgasm captured by Christopher Nolan in glorious 70mm film and told in his favourite non linear way. But the tick tock really is whatWow! What a score! Hans Zimmer is a genius and without trying to take anything away from the cinematic orgasm captured by Christopher Nolan in glorious 70mm film and told in his favourite non linear way. But the tick tock really is what grabbed me the most.… Expand

0 of 4 users found this helpful04

All this user's reviews

9

JyroJyroJul 24, 2017

Dunkirk is a viceral masterpiece. The lack of character development and narrative is essential for inferencing the sheer scale of the situation. This isn't a story about individuals... this is a story about a narrowly avoided catastrophicDunkirk is a viceral masterpiece. The lack of character development and narrative is essential for inferencing the sheer scale of the situation. This isn't a story about individuals... this is a story about a narrowly avoided catastrophic military disaster. It is the chronology that is pure genius, although we should be accustomed to that with Christopher Nolan's work - and the music & sound design is awesome; barrages of deafening gunfire and plane fly-overs are followed almost immediately by near-silent expanses of hopelessness. Has to be seen in IMAX to be fully appreciated.… Expand

31 of 59 users found this helpful3128

All this user's reviews

8

markopolousDec 21, 2017

This movie surprised me quite a bit and I wouldn’t be surprised if I think it’s even better upon second viewing. Nolan has used a unique - if not greatly illuminating - structure to tell this massive ensemble story in a tightly edited 106This movie surprised me quite a bit and I wouldn’t be surprised if I think it’s even better upon second viewing. Nolan has used a unique - if not greatly illuminating - structure to tell this massive ensemble story in a tightly edited 106 minutes. While the plotting was a little confusing for too long in my opinion, and didn’t really amount to a major wow moment, I am really impressed with how Nolan chose to tell this story. His mastery of tone, particularly hopelessness, carries the viewer on the edge of our seat through the entire film. You really feel for nearly all the characters even though you hardly get to know them through dialogue or most normal techniques. The cinematography is quite beautiful, the score effective though overused. Cast is top notch. There are some very memorable elements to this film, like when the English soldiers get into the boat and it starts getting shot at by the Germans while the tide rises. The way they turn on each other as they deal with the flooding ship and enemy soldiers outside is a real nail biter. Nolan definitely stepped it up for this film.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

10

Ahmad_MohammadDec 20, 2017

Dunkirk 2017
معركة دنكيرك هي إحدى المعارك البارزة خلال الحرب العالمية الثانية التي نشبت بين قوات الحلفاء وألمانيا النازية، اندلعت على الجبهة الغربية في أثناء معركة فرنسا. شهدت معركة دنكيرك دفاع قوات الحملة البريطانية وبقايا القوات الفرنسية عنDunkirk 2017
معركة دنكيرك هي إحدى المعارك البارزة خلال الحرب العالمية الثانية التي نشبت بين قوات الحلفاء وألمانيا النازية، اندلعت على الجبهة الغربية في أثناء معركة فرنسا. شهدت معركة دنكيرك دفاع قوات الحملة البريطانية وبقايا القوات الفرنسية عن ميناء دنكيرك آخر الموانئ المتبقية في أيدي الجيش الفرنسي، وذلك في أثناء عملية إجلائها عن المدينة التي امتدَّت أسبوعاً من 26 مايو إلى 4 يونيو عام 1940 والتي انتهت بنقل ثلث مليون جندي.
هذه هي قصة الفيلم بالمختصر وانا ارى انه عمل عظيم يشبه بصورة كبيره الفيلم الروسي come and see من حيث الأجواء التي عشناها في الفيلم نولان هنا يرمي المشاهد لشواطئ دانكيرك ويتركنا نعاني ولو شعوريا ماعاناه أولئك الجنود .
عموما اعتقد ان هنالك قله قليله قد شاهدت الفيلم كما شاهدته فعلى طول الشريط المرئي هنالك موسيقى خلفيه تشد أعصابك على مدار عرض الفيلم وكلما مر الوقت كلما ازداد توترك .
الفيلم لا يروي لنا حرب او اشتباك بل هو لعملية أنقاذ ، من كان ينتظر بطل للفيلم او رصاص كثيف وتفجيرات وحرب طاحنه هناك افلام تلبي رغباتك ولكن بالتاكيد ليس دانكيرك ناهيك اصلا ان نولان لن يحرف التاريخ ليصنع فيلم مليء بالتفجيرات والاشتباكات هو كما قلت وضعنا داخل احداث تلك الحادثه .
لن أعقب على المؤثرات او التصوير او الموسيقى والاداء والإخراج وكل هذه الامور كلها عظيمه .… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

8

DomgwyDec 20, 2017

Christopher Nolan has developed a reputation as a continually ambitious and clever film-maker. His back-catalogue has played with the conventions of narrative (Memento), deconstructed film itself (The Prestige) and tackled challengingChristopher Nolan has developed a reputation as a continually ambitious and clever film-maker. His back-catalogue has played with the conventions of narrative (Memento), deconstructed film itself (The Prestige) and tackled challenging cinematic subjects such as the nature of reality (Inception) and the time-space continuum (Interstellar) with mixed results.

With Dunkirk, Nolan brings his unique sensibility to a true story of war and survival, and the results are equally stunning and ambitious.

Beyond the incredible cinematography and film-making craft on display the most striking thing about Dunkirk is its unique structure. Rather than following a linear narrative, the film cuts between three perspectives; land, sea and air. While the action cuts between these viewpoints the timelines can at times get a little confused, (an evacuation taking place at night cuts back to a dogfight in broad daylight for instance) which can distract from the film itself, at least on first viewing. As with most of Nolan’s films, Dunkirk demands repeat viewing and I’m sure on further thought these stylistic choices will become more clear.

Individually however each element of the story is played out perfectly. While a group of young soldiers battle to get home, a squad of Spitfire pilots desperately provide air-deference and a civilian father and son sail their small yacht across the channel to help in anyway they can.

Each thread is played with subtlety and pathos by the ensemble cast. There are no showy, oscar-bait performances in Dunkirk. Instead the cast deliver understated and powerful depictions of real men in real situations. For almost all his screen time, Tom Hardy (easily the biggest star in the film) is hidden behind a flight mask. It is a testament to his skill that with only his eyes he is able to communicate the indecision and internal conflict within his character.

Likewise, veteran actors Mark Rylance and Kenneth Branagh exude British fortitude with their stiff-upper lip attitude tinged with underlying emotion and empathy for the young men in harms way.

To say Dunkirk is light on action is a disservice, however in terms of battles this is no Saving Private Ryan. Instead Nolan depicts the constant threat to the British forces as an existential horror. The German forces are almost an element to be overcome like fire or the sea rather than an enemy with a set of goals and motivations. This approach* is incredibly effective and certainly succeeds in putting the audience in the position of the soldiers as the terrifying sound of the Luftwaffe dive bombers rises to meet the defenseless British ground forces.

On first viewing the sense of desperation and dread is only undermined by the films structure. As a tense scene on the beach inter-cuts with a claustrophobic standoff on the sea, you find yourself wondering, ‘hang on, was this the day before? or is this all happening at the same time?’. Ideally you should be so engrossed in the drama of the situations that questions like this shouldn’t matter too much. By cutting in-between though, Nolan sometimes denies scenes the opportunity to play out.

Towards the films climax however, the three threads are brought together in a breathtaking crescendo which makes all the narrative trickery worthwhile.

As with his previous film (Interstellar), the director has shown that his own ambition can sometimes be a hindrance. However each element of Dunkirk does a stunning job of recreating an amazing true story and the experiences of those involved. No doubt it will be a film that will be discussed and re-watched just as much as Nolan’s fictional works. If that demand for repeat viewings is his greatest trick, then the film maker has succeeded in bringing a little known military miracle to the public consciousness, not just for a few weeks during the summer blockbuster season, but for years to come.

*While showing the Germans as these faceless machines of war is effective, it does fall into the age old trap that war movies struggle to escape — demonizing the enemy. In all likelihood the soldiers on the other side of the conflict were also young men called up to serve their country and give their lives for someone else’s political beliefs. This isn’t a problem with Dunkirk specifically but more of a wider societal issue where cinema continues to reflect the old saying that ‘history is written by the victors’. While films such as Dunkirk and last years’ Hacksaw Ridge tell true stories of extraordinary heroism from the British and American sides of the war, any similar stories from the opposite side of the conflict seem to have been lost to history.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

7

ScraperDec 19, 2017

A well-crafted war piece destined to become a monument of British pride. Most characters in the several narratives of the film remain somewhat distant. We never get to know the depths of them through dialogue. The somber, intense scenarioA well-crafted war piece destined to become a monument of British pride. Most characters in the several narratives of the film remain somewhat distant. We never get to know the depths of them through dialogue. The somber, intense scenario does most of the talking, as soldiers attempt to cross the English Channel to survive the Nazi's advance.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

1

thovarainDec 19, 2017

If you didn't know the story of Dunkirk and missed the few explanatory lines at the beginning, you wouldn't know any more after watching this mess. Weak script, flat characters, too much filler (overlong dogfight, umpteen shots of sailorsIf you didn't know the story of Dunkirk and missed the few explanatory lines at the beginning, you wouldn't know any more after watching this mess. Weak script, flat characters, too much filler (overlong dogfight, umpteen shots of sailors abandoning ship). Nearly 40,000 soldiers died there but the 2 deaths of any import in the film are completely pointless. I'm sure it had a huge budget but you'd never know it.… Expand

6 of 13 users found this helpful67

All this user's reviews

5

SikkoDec 18, 2017

Do not buy into the critical hype. This is an ordinary war film at best.

Pro: The sense of desolation on the beach is decently represented. Con: The scale of the evacuation never hit home, 1000 ships participated, and some 84 alliedDo not buy into the critical hype. This is an ordinary war film at best.

Pro:
The sense of desolation on the beach is decently represented.

Con:
The scale of the evacuation never hit home, 1000 ships participated, and some 84 allied aircraft were lost. I got no sense of scale from the movie, except troops on the beach.
Lack of character depth and development
Poor aircraft CGI (patchy, there are scenes where Hurricanes are shown banking perfectly together, which ripped me out of the immersion)
Strangely, no sense of urgency around anything that happened.… Expand

7 of 15 users found this helpful78

All this user's reviews

9

Willyam_CarrDec 18, 2017

Dunkirk is easily Nolan's best film. The craftsmanship is impeccable; sound, cinematography, VFX, costume. It is an interesting narrative experiment that ultimately works, but struggles some.

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

10

kinoiskingDec 18, 2017

Nolan's simplest and yet greatest film yet. From the outset you are enthralled and immersed in the chaotic evacuation of Northern France, watching in IMAX it was as though I was really there. Strongly recommend!

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

9

ajgseriesDec 17, 2017

Christopher Nolan knows how to tell any story. I really liked the opening of the movie, with the pamphlets flying, threatening the troops. I don’t feel the movie slow, like many of this type. The movie keeps you with a constant panic, andChristopher Nolan knows how to tell any story. I really liked the opening of the movie, with the pamphlets flying, threatening the troops. I don’t feel the movie slow, like many of this type. The movie keeps you with a constant panic, and that’s because of the sound effects, IT’S AMAZING. The sound effects combined with the original score by Hans Zimmer is wonderful. There are some performances that stand out more than others, but in general there are no memorable performances… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

MiracSpectacDec 17, 2017

Dunkirk is an absolutely brilliant war story told through sound and atmosphere above all. I can't tell you how many times I practically felt the gunfire or bombs dropping in the theatre, something few films can truly master. It's a film thatDunkirk is an absolutely brilliant war story told through sound and atmosphere above all. I can't tell you how many times I practically felt the gunfire or bombs dropping in the theatre, something few films can truly master. It's a film that I will never forget, and it deserves the highest acclaim.… Expand

1 of 5 users found this helpful14

All this user's reviews

9

hugolonbDec 17, 2017

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. When watching a war movie, you usually get moments of stillness. Moments of soldiers telling other soldiers, through exposition dialogue, about their life back home. This movie has NONE of that. It's nail biting war from start to finish, and it is incredible. It truly is just about war. War is the main character. I have never seen a movie (I am counting Saving Private Ryan) that made me feel more like I'm actually there. Tom Hardy is fantastic in the movie, as well as Kenneth Branagh. The movie uses real planes, real boats, real beaches and real explosions. That is why Christopher Nolan is one of the greatest visual directors of our time, because he is fearless. So many current directors would not have done that. I was a bit afraid in the build up to this movie that boy band phenomena Harry Styles would ruin this movie with a lot of sub par acting, that it would be obvious he got the role not through Nolan but through the studio wanting a star name on the poster. But for one he isn't in the movie as much as the promotional content would have you believe, and he actually isn't a bad actor. Overall, this movie was beautiful, moving and truly, truly exciting. For me, this ranks amongst Nolans best work, and if it doesn't at least get nominated for Best Picture I will give up on the Academy.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

0

NazguleroAug 21, 2017

I always found any Nolan movie nauseatingly unwatchable. It took me a while to figure out why: it is the lack of human emotion, the lack of emotional investment. It is almost like when you talk to a robot, there is no connection. This movieI always found any Nolan movie nauseatingly unwatchable. It took me a while to figure out why: it is the lack of human emotion, the lack of emotional investment. It is almost like when you talk to a robot, there is no connection. This movie is no different. You do not give a camel's behind about one of the actors. It is all very static, acted out. lifeless.… Expand

5 of 16 users found this helpful511

All this user's reviews

4

syhpayDec 16, 2017

I am not fan of Nolan, i haven't ever seen something exept Interstellar, but this movie made me think, that he is genious. But after Dunkerk i was disappointed, why is this movie was so BORED, i almost fell asleep. The idea is cool,I am not fan of Nolan, i haven't ever seen something exept Interstellar, but this movie made me think, that he is genious. But after Dunkerk i was disappointed, why is this movie was so BORED, i almost fell asleep. The idea is cool, realisation is too bad, it's second time i regret spending money.… Expand

2 of 5 users found this helpful23

All this user's reviews

9

EikoxDec 15, 2017

Is not a movie for everyone. After see it a second time we can begin to notice missing details. A good movie with the signature of Nolan in every escene and story.

0 of 4 users found this helpful04

All this user's reviews

9

FortifierDec 15, 2017

Don't go into this film expecting an incredibly entertaining, Hollywood-style story. Go into this film expecting to literally feel like you're one of the soldiers in the battle of Dunkirk. That's what so good about this film.

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

3

PhrogressDec 12, 2017

Completamente una película ridícula, esperaba muchísimo del tan estimado Nolan, la historia es demasiado confusa y no deja muy en claro de que se trata todo ese cuento de más de 2 horas. Una completa decepción.

4 of 9 users found this helpful45

All this user's reviews

10

zorraDec 12, 2017

An important story & visual masterpiece by Nolan. Great work by ensemble cast: Mark Rylance, Jack Lowden, Cillian Murphy & Tom Hardy. Thoroughly enjoyed.

1 of 9 users found this helpful18

All this user's reviews

9

DubeauJul 29, 2017

Dunkirk follows closely certain characters and it plays with flashback. The music accentuate the tension and is interesting but surely not your typical orchestrated symphony. Even if the dialogues are sparse, you feel there is a very goodDunkirk follows closely certain characters and it plays with flashback. The music accentuate the tension and is interesting but surely not your typical orchestrated symphony. Even if the dialogues are sparse, you feel there is a very good reason for it. The actors are really good and seems all marked by the war in some ways. The film is more about the action then the strategy that went into the actual event and not war movie that focus on the bloody part too much. The planes scenes were my favourite because they show how hard it was to use them. The sky camera angles are spectacular and gives you the impression of being in the plane. I think the flashback between the planes and the boats can be hard to understand at first viewing. When I saw it a second time I was able to better connect the timeline. And in a way it made first viewing an exercise of connecting the dots... Otherwise this movie is intense because it doesn't really stop that much. It's nice to see Nolan getting behind an historical event, and see how he presented this. He did it with a certain form and style, with beautiful photography. I give it a 88%.… Expand

2 of 12 users found this helpful210

All this user's reviews

6

BabinskiDec 9, 2017

Finally saw it on blue-ray today after many months of anticipation and I was somewhat disappointed. I'm not a fan of non-linear timelines, and I think it was poorly executed here as the movie editing constantly takes you out of the moment andFinally saw it on blue-ray today after many months of anticipation and I was somewhat disappointed. I'm not a fan of non-linear timelines, and I think it was poorly executed here as the movie editing constantly takes you out of the moment and keeps jumping around. By the middle of the movie I wasn't invested in any of the characters and wasn't immersed in the plot. The conclusion was also underwhelming, as it didn't have the emotional impact Nolan tried to achieve and at sometimes actually felt kinda cringy.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

9

danielblakerevsDec 9, 2017

Getting ready to watch Christopher Nolan's war epic, I was bracing myself for total suspense. And boy, did the movie deliver. Yet, it is not the suspense which captured me the most. By the end, I went through pretty much all emotionsGetting ready to watch Christopher Nolan's war epic, I was bracing myself for total suspense. And boy, did the movie deliver. Yet, it is not the suspense which captured me the most. By the end, I went through pretty much all emotions conceivable to mankind. In one word, "Dunkirk" is a moment... simple as that. It does not contain moments of suspense, but rather it IS a moment of suspense gradually building and becoming more and more difficult and excruciating to watch (NOT IN A BAD WAY OF COURSE!) What really sets it apart is its ability to invoke the most primordial of human emotions. As it progresses these get more powerful, compelling the characters and the viewers. These emotions become so intense that the movie borders on horror. It is absolutely masterful, brilliant and yet, ridiculous but at the same time so real. Yes, the power of this movie does not stand only in the emotions it conveys but also in their rawness which is emphasized by exquisite production values, outstanding direction from Nolan and minimalist dialogue. The classic method of speech takes a back-step here, as the entire power of the movie is expressed through actions and, Hans Zimmer's haunting score. It permeates through every scene, literally from the start of the movie, to the very end! In the end, through masterful levels of production and Nolan's characteristic insistence on polished visual and auditory bravado, "Dunkirk" stands proud atop his very best work, maybe second only to his 2008 superhero action flick, "The Dark Knight".… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

9

joyalDec 7, 2017

Well crafted,Outstanding cinematography n excellent screenplay ,well fit music by Han zimmer beautifully filmed,emotionally deep engaging war movie presented without showing any brutal murder scenes or blood by brilliant maker Nolan

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

0

eeyoreDec 6, 2017

BORING. AS. HELL. The most overrated war movie of all time. I wouldn't be able to sit thru it once again even in five years from now. I don't get the insane hype.

7 of 15 users found this helpful78

All this user's reviews

0

xlt3000Dec 6, 2017

Fails utterly as a war and history film. Decent as thriller.
Very surprising how metacritic users give this film such high praise.
Dunkirk is essentially Nolan's excuse to make another one of his thriller, the WW2 setting is just accessory.Fails utterly as a war and history film. Decent as thriller.
Very surprising how metacritic users give this film such high praise.

Dunkirk is essentially Nolan's excuse to make another one of his thriller, the WW2 setting is just accessory. As a thriller, it delivers. Coupled with the stressful (but repetitive, one of his weakest) score from Hans Zimmer, the film always keeps the viewer under suspense.

However, in all other regards, the film is an abject failure. As a historical WW2 film, it fails because it is not realistic. Every shot is obviously filmed in stylistic ways to deliver suspense, but not realism. It is opera, almost. You do not see the Germans (even less than in a Spielberg film), you do not see real combat. You see bullets coming from nowhere and killing people. You see and hear bombs falling. But you dont see the enemy.

On a historical realism level, it is also completely out of place. Dunkirk is a ghost city, not a city full of scared French civilians. Again, the German Army (at least Recon troops) is nowhere to be seen. I did not even feel the scale of such a magnificient evacuation. I did not feel like 300,000+ people were just evacuated from that city. I felt like a couple line of people on board some destroyers, were saved. Not to mention the film itself is chock full of historical myths and inaccuracies, which I would have expected such a great director as Nolan to not make. The biggest myth being that the 300,000+ people were saved by the "small boats", when in fact most of them (at least 1/3rd French, which you also do not see in the film) were evacuated on board large ships (as historical footage on youtube shows). To summarize, the entire film takes the script from the most ridiculous British ego-stoking mythical writing of this battle. "300,000 men on that beach, thousands of little boats, in an élan of British National pride, came to save the soldiers, etc". Instead of what should have been a gritty battle in the streets, mass of people on destroyers, etc.

Finally, my biggest gripe, above and beyond the repetitiveness of the film and historical inaccuracy, is the laughable PG rating. The rating turns whats supposed to be a gut-wrenching war film, where I expect flak-decapitated soldiers, Stuka bombs disembowelling people, dead bodies rotting on the beach, etc...Into a completely colourless film. The entire film is strangely grey and dark, and when a bomb falls or shot is fired, bodies fly in the air (completely intact) without even a drop of blood on their face.

All in all, this film is a pretty thriller, not the realistic war film I expected Master Nolan to produce. And its a shame because the Battle of France (and generally the Western Front before the Americans came into the war late in 1944), is a very unexplored setting that merits much better.

Nolan, you disappoint me.… Expand

6 of 13 users found this helpful67

All this user's reviews

0

FranKenweenieDec 5, 2017

im gonna be honest this one is nolan's worst movie between his famous movies such disappointing film the only reason this movie got high rate is nolan and harry style

5 of 13 users found this helpful58

All this user's reviews

1

tosideDec 5, 2017

minute 1 hey this music so deep, absolutely something will happen.
minute 45 hey this music so deep, absolutely something will happen.
minute 90 hey this music so deep, absolutely something will happen.

7 of 15 users found this helpful78

All this user's reviews

8

Miles_SDec 3, 2017

Dunkirk is thrilling and suspenseful. A, in this age of streaming, rare film that truly must be seen in a theater to fully experience. In fact, without the big screen. This journey loses a great deal of it's effectiveness

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

8

GorbaxDec 2, 2017

Dunkirk is thrilling and suspenseful. A, in this age of streaming, rare film that truly must be seen in a theater to fully experience. In fact, without the big screen. This journey loses a great deal of it's effectiveness

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

10

Supahbanana56Nov 27, 2017

This is a great movie, and all its fails make up for its beautiful perspectives. The different people show the different perspective and jobs during the war. Even the actors do a perfect job of portraying the people who they are. However,This is a great movie, and all its fails make up for its beautiful perspectives. The different people show the different perspective and jobs during the war. Even the actors do a perfect job of portraying the people who they are. However, even though it may be confusing at first, Dunkirk really does win one of the best movies this year.… Expand

11 of 15 users found this helpful114

All this user's reviews

8

neothinkerNov 27, 2017

This movie doesn't have much action so if you're expecting Saving Private Ryan then you'll be disappointed. What you will get is a poignant picture of the events at Dunkirk.

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

9

gtwistNov 26, 2017

Dunkirk is devoid of really any real characters, or character development. However, Christopher Nolan has done this deliberately. There were thousands of soldiers on the battlefield. Dunkirk never gives you that moment to examine a character.Dunkirk is devoid of really any real characters, or character development. However, Christopher Nolan has done this deliberately. There were thousands of soldiers on the battlefield. Dunkirk never gives you that moment to examine a character. Like what a character would do when he goes back home, or something cliche like that. This movie is always moving, and I was always on the edge of my seat. Christopher Nolan has yet again made a brilliant movie with amazing cinematography and sound editing.… Expand

0 of 4 users found this helpful04

All this user's reviews

9

Easycw44Nov 25, 2017

Christopher Nolan has once again made a great movie, without much dialogue, he captures the essence of desperation, horror, and excitement. For anyone that is a history fan, it doesn't provide much for dialogue, more of a visual & visceralChristopher Nolan has once again made a great movie, without much dialogue, he captures the essence of desperation, horror, and excitement. For anyone that is a history fan, it doesn't provide much for dialogue, more of a visual & visceral experience of what it must have been like to have participated in those harrowing days. Kudos… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

9

FlaviusAetiusNov 22, 2017

One of the best films of the year. Flaws pointed out by critics, such as the lack of dialogue or character progression, actually play to Dunkirk's strengths. The intensity of the moment feels more realistic when a pilot is just a pilot and aOne of the best films of the year. Flaws pointed out by critics, such as the lack of dialogue or character progression, actually play to Dunkirk's strengths. The intensity of the moment feels more realistic when a pilot is just a pilot and a soldier is just a soldier.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

Dunkirk

User Reviews