Dunkirk
Warner Bros. | Release Date: July 21, 2017
8.2
USER SCORE
Universal acclaim based on 3245 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
2,732
Mixed:
292
Negative:
221
Watch Now
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)

User Reviews

User scoreBy dateMost helpful
10
DarkNight_Oct 30, 2017
Very cool movie
He brought together war and drama together and that is not the case in other films
It is also a silent film and a powerful event and gigantic music
4 of 10 users found this helpful46
All this user's reviews
9
CarFan1999Aug 2, 2017
In short, Dunkirk is a near-masterpiece. It’s a thriller that puts you on the edge of your seat throughout the runtime and only lets up for small amounts of time. What makes this movie unique is that it doesn’t focus on the characters, butIn short, Dunkirk is a near-masterpiece. It’s a thriller that puts you on the edge of your seat throughout the runtime and only lets up for small amounts of time. What makes this movie unique is that it doesn’t focus on the characters, but the event itself. In most war movies, we focus on a single character as they go through an event. In this case, the movie focuses on the event itself. It does focus particularly on a soldier played by One Direction’s Harry Styles, a father played by Mark Rylance, and a pilot played by Tom Hardy. However, there’s no backstory on any of these characters. Instead, we only see them as they go through this event. We see from their perspective, the events of Dunkirk.

The movie has 3 different plotlines. One focuses on the soldiers stuck on the beach. The second focuses on a dad and his two kids who answer the call and head to Dunkirk to aid in the rescue, despite the danger involved in doing that. The third focuses on airforce pilots and their efforts to take down Nazi warplanes. Nolan switches between the 3 plots throughout the movie and they all join together by the end. This movie is a little under 2 hours long and it gets into the action almost immediately after it starts. There isn’t much backstory provided, so it’s important to research the background of Dunkirk before you go and watch this.

Dunkirk is more of an experience than a movie. The camerawork makes us feel that we’re there right alongside these people. It makes us feel that we’re in the war, instead of watching the war. The sound work influences this as well. When bullets are fired, they are as loud as real bullets. When planes approach the soldiers on the beach, their roar will almost make your ears ring. When a ships sinks, the camera is at water level showing struggling soldiers trying to escape. The camera shows the airplane dogfight scenes in detail. Since minimal computer effects are used, it makes it all the more real. In fact, some of the small boats that were used in the movie were the actual boats that aided in the rescue in 1940. It all feels as if a cameraman were there with the troops in 1940, filming what was happening in real time. It makes the movie very realistic and horrifying. You’ll feel exhausted (in a good way) by the end.

Dunkirk’s also almost a silent movie as the characters say few lines. The action and soundtrack propel it forward. While it could have provided more backstory on the event and the characters, Dunkirk is a fantastic movie. It’s not as memorable as other movies, but the experience you feel while watching it is unlike any other film. I’d give this a 90%. It’s the type of movie that’s made for the big screen and you’re doing yourself a disservice by not seeing it in a theater. Dunkirk is a unique experience that’s worth seeing. It is a fitting tribute to the troops who served there.… Expand
2 of 5 users found this helpful23
All this user's reviews
8
KeithDowAug 4, 2017
Christopher Nolan is arguably the most technically proficient director in the game. From one film to the next, he ceaselessly pushes the boundaries of his craft, insisting upon large format cameras, actual film, and ever more complicatedChristopher Nolan is arguably the most technically proficient director in the game. From one film to the next, he ceaselessly pushes the boundaries of his craft, insisting upon large format cameras, actual film, and ever more complicated shots.

As a result--technically speaking--'Dunkirk' meets or exceeds every expectation. The expansive beach landscapes, claustrophobic interior settings, and countless practical effects all lend a sense of heightened realism to this historical drama.

Yet, it's the story itself that lacks the intensity Nolan was aiming for. The three vantage point structure detracts from the overall immersion into the film. Cillian Murphy's character is both confounding and frustratingly hollow. And there is a fair amount of repetitiveness to the plot. It should be noted that Hans Zimmer's score is nothing short of remarkable and serves as a much need thread of consistency throughout the film. However, when history has its say, 'Dunkirk' will likely reside on a lesser tier of Nolan's filmography.… Expand
2 of 5 users found this helpful23
All this user's reviews
10
WiscoJoeJul 21, 2017
A masterpiece, pure and simple. A perfect mix of craft, technology, emotion, and ethical considerations. Quite possibly the best-made and most enthralling film in Nolan's already legendary filmography. It's rare when a film reveals itself asA masterpiece, pure and simple. A perfect mix of craft, technology, emotion, and ethical considerations. Quite possibly the best-made and most enthralling film in Nolan's already legendary filmography. It's rare when a film reveals itself as a cinematic classic on first watch. Savor the moment.… Expand
9 of 23 users found this helpful914
All this user's reviews
9
Jess_HillJul 21, 2017
A phenomenal experience that is utterly relentless and superbly crafted, this is a film to see at the cinema. Nolan's masterful use of sound and score enhances the exquisite tension that permeates the entire film, and the sublimeA phenomenal experience that is utterly relentless and superbly crafted, this is a film to see at the cinema. Nolan's masterful use of sound and score enhances the exquisite tension that permeates the entire film, and the sublime cinematography is breathtaking to witness, with perhaps some of the best visual sequences of the last decade played out in a manner that is sure to delight WWII enthusiasts. With a sparse script, and a storyline focused across three converging timelines, this wasn't the updated Saving Private Ryan that I was expecting, but rather, a deft exploration of a WWII military failure told with striking clarity and complemented by some fine performances. An exceptional film. 9.01/10… Expand
7 of 18 users found this helpful711
All this user's reviews
10
mrpopo123Jul 26, 2017
Dunkirk is epic, loud, and stunning on every level. It's an immersive movie that takes the audience into the intense situation that is happening in the film. I had trouble breathing through out the entire film because it was so loud andDunkirk is epic, loud, and stunning on every level. It's an immersive movie that takes the audience into the intense situation that is happening in the film. I had trouble breathing through out the entire film because it was so loud and suspenseful. When I left the theater, my heart was still pounding.… Expand
5 of 13 users found this helpful58
All this user's reviews
9
noshighJul 26, 2017
Is it Nolan's best work? Maybe...or maybe not, but it is his most intense film. The cinematography is absolutely beautiful, and the soundtrack is just awesome. Some might not like the movie because of the direction with the story telling, butIs it Nolan's best work? Maybe...or maybe not, but it is his most intense film. The cinematography is absolutely beautiful, and the soundtrack is just awesome. Some might not like the movie because of the direction with the story telling, but I think the way the story is in the film is really brilliant.… Expand
5 of 13 users found this helpful58
All this user's reviews
8
MohamedHamadJul 23, 2017
Dunkirk delivers an unusual capture of a historic evacuation that passed unnoticed in previous WWII movies. I’d say that Nolan is obsessed with time throughout his career. In Dunkirk, he takes us through three perspectives; land, sea and air.Dunkirk delivers an unusual capture of a historic evacuation that passed unnoticed in previous WWII movies. I’d say that Nolan is obsessed with time throughout his career. In Dunkirk, he takes us through three perspectives; land, sea and air. The movie tells the three perspectives with different timelines; at land, the story spreads over a week, sea for one day and air for one hour. This script emphasize Nolan’s determination on doing things differently than almost all directors. In addition, the three perspectives meet at some points linking the whole jigsaw that he created. The lead character in the movie was the directing technique and Hans Zimmer score. Nolan kept audience on their feet elegantly with almost no bloody violent scenes even when people are blasted off. The intention I’d say not to fall in the trap of “the movie tells the horrific stories of war” but rather this movie “captures an untold story of war differently”.
However, dialogue was scarce and very simple not like any other dialogue in Nolan’s writings. May be was intentional to capture the era. Casting was brilliant but acting was very average except may be for Mark Rylance, Damien Bonnard and Barry Keoghan. N.B. Nolan is a big fan of covering up Tom Hardy’s face.… Expand
5 of 13 users found this helpful58
All this user's reviews
10
kevinharvey9Jul 23, 2017
NO SPOILERS

This film blew me away, after a slight disappointment of Interstellar (compared to his other work), Dunkirk is an absolute statement by Nolan that he is a master of film making. Everything from the cinematography (beautifullyNO SPOILERS

This film blew me away, after a slight disappointment of Interstellar (compared to his other work), Dunkirk is an absolute statement by Nolan that he is a master of film making. Everything from the cinematography (beautifully shot by Hoyte Van Hoytema), the action, the acting, the editing (a narrative that weaves between 3 different events brilliantly). The opening scene is stunning, with an escape through the streets onto the beach, until the German planes arrive, and when they arrive, it is terrifying. The sound design of the planes, to the bombs dropping, to the images of all these soldiers diving to the ground (and then just getting back up as if nothing happened so used to it they've become), it doesn't let up. See it on the biggest screen you can. This is what cinema is made for.… Expand
6 of 16 users found this helpful610
All this user's reviews
9
UNCLEPAULIEJul 27, 2017
I loved the film and would recommend it to everyone, I watched it on imax and it was amazing . I took a point off because of the lack of large battles scenes but that's just my preference .
3 of 8 users found this helpful35
All this user's reviews
10
meadowstreamAug 28, 2017
Absolutely brilliant: the weaving of the timelines, the character development with minimal dialogue, the unfolding of plot and theme without preachiness...this was one of those films that one could see several times and still get somethingAbsolutely brilliant: the weaving of the timelines, the character development with minimal dialogue, the unfolding of plot and theme without preachiness...this was one of those films that one could see several times and still get something from each viewing. The use of different filming parameters (depending on the scene) was interesting, too. My 18 yo son and I enjoyed it immensely.… Expand
3 of 8 users found this helpful35
All this user's reviews
10
deanableAug 2, 2017
Unique for its type; powerful film. amazing editing, music and special effects. The Tom Hardy scenes are somehow moving in an unusual way.
Sparse dialog but what there is, is very good.
3 of 8 users found this helpful35
All this user's reviews
10
NavyBeanJul 24, 2017
I've changed my rating on this film from 5 to 9 after a second viewing. There are indeed a lot of unanswered questions, but it doesn't matter. This is a spectacular film. I'll watch it again. Old review below: Very conflicted about this filmI've changed my rating on this film from 5 to 9 after a second viewing. There are indeed a lot of unanswered questions, but it doesn't matter. This is a spectacular film. I'll watch it again. Old review below: Very conflicted about this film and its director's intentions. It is a beautiful film and shot incredibly. The opening scene is amazing. But I felt little connection to the characters and what happens to the civilian kid on the boat seemed unnecessary and too sentimental at the end. And what's the point of Cillian Murphy's character? So many things unexplained and unknown. It may be the director's intent to comment on the chaos of war but it felt like wearing a beautiful suit that's two sizes too big.… Expand
11 of 30 users found this helpful1119
All this user's reviews
7
tibzoidJul 28, 2017
Not understanding why there is so much praise for what is at best a pretty middling war movie. My biggest complaint is that it doesn't do a good job of portraying the true scale of the evacuation. I think there's something wrong with filmNot understanding why there is so much praise for what is at best a pretty middling war movie. My biggest complaint is that it doesn't do a good job of portraying the true scale of the evacuation. I think there's something wrong with film criticism right now. We're so grateful for anything that approaches half-way decent that we lose all perspective. Dunkirk is perfectly okay entertainment but nothing more.… Expand
4 of 11 users found this helpful47
All this user's reviews
9
sashaCZ1Jul 21, 2017
I had goosebumps during some scenes. Some of the scenes were very intense. I liked the acting a lot. Hans Zimmer's soundtrack added a lot to the tension. It's an experience where you fight with the soldiers to survive. But it's a pityI had goosebumps during some scenes. Some of the scenes were very intense. I liked the acting a lot. Hans Zimmer's soundtrack added a lot to the tension. It's an experience where you fight with the soldiers to survive. But it's a pity Christopher Nolan didn't add any plot twist like in Inception and Interstellar. Overall, it's a must-watch and probably the best movie of the year for now. 9/10… Expand
5 of 14 users found this helpful59
All this user's reviews
10
HuaJul 21, 2017
Dunkirk was not a film in the conventional sense. For me it was a tense, realistic, riveting experience. Imagine yourself being transported into that climactic point of the Dunkirk evacuation. Sure, through traditional storytelling techniquesDunkirk was not a film in the conventional sense. For me it was a tense, realistic, riveting experience. Imagine yourself being transported into that climactic point of the Dunkirk evacuation. Sure, through traditional storytelling techniques in film, learn the backstories of characters, etc., but what you do learn and experience is the terror, the fear, the hope, the emotions these human beings felt -their struggle for survival. It's literally like Nolan shot footage of people back then doing what they would've been doing in those incredibly harrowing moments. This film celebrates those who risked everything while fighting for us, it shows us but a glimpse of what they went through and what they felt. It is without question the most realistic war film ever made (and, of course, is a must-see in IMAX). And finally, Tom Hardy's character and his whole story (every scene he was in till the end of the movie) was the biggest standout for me. Fionn Whitehead was brilliant too. … Expand
7 of 20 users found this helpful713
All this user's reviews
8
djniceyJul 24, 2017
Its massively over-rated by the critics. That said it is a very good movie, just not the masterpiece of cinema that it is purported to be by some.

The story is epic and is well scripted and very moving, it makes you really appreciate howIts massively over-rated by the critics. That said it is a very good movie, just not the masterpiece of cinema that it is purported to be by some.

The story is epic and is well scripted and very moving, it makes you really appreciate how lucky we are to live in this day and age and how differently people had it a short while ago. The action sequences are taut and enjoyable, the story is believable throughout and the characterisation is very good, there aren't any over the top superhero type characters, just ordinary people being thrown into extraordinary circumstances.

It does however have something missing that makes it miss the mark, it didn't live up to expectations for me, maybe I was expecting a Forest Gump or some unique quality to set it apart from the multitude of other war movies. In years to come I don't think this will be seen as a classic.

The sound was also horrible in some places, I say sound rather than music as it is just horrible wailing noises over and over and over, its done to increase the tension but it didn't work for me, by the end of the movie it had become very overused and a distraction more than anything else. Great film, everyone should watch it to appreciate how lucky we are, but not a Classic IMHO.… Expand
3 of 9 users found this helpful36
All this user's reviews
10
JbeeziJul 27, 2017
Breathtaking visuals, pounding soundtrack, a stirring moment in history and visionary directing make this a modern masterpiece. What a film.Christopher Nolan has surpassed himself yet again with a more nuanced and restrained approach toBreathtaking visuals, pounding soundtrack, a stirring moment in history and visionary directing make this a modern masterpiece. What a film.Christopher Nolan has surpassed himself yet again with a more nuanced and restrained approach to exposition and characterisation. Ignore the few naysayers. This film is a work of art. I had the pleasure of seeing it in the BFI Imax in London last night and it received applause at the end. First time in 25 years of cinema going that I have seen that.… Expand
3 of 9 users found this helpful36
All this user's reviews
10
JarodyJul 28, 2017
Christopher Nolan never disappoints. Dunkirk's incredible soundtrack and sound effects create the most realistic feel I have felt in a movie for a very long time and the lack of dialogue and character development may seem like a bad thing butChristopher Nolan never disappoints. Dunkirk's incredible soundtrack and sound effects create the most realistic feel I have felt in a movie for a very long time and the lack of dialogue and character development may seem like a bad thing but it actually adds to the gritty feel of the movie. There is absolutely nothing I can fault this movie on.… Expand
3 of 9 users found this helpful36
All this user's reviews
10
ReeceF11Aug 3, 2017
Dunkirk is one of the best war films I've ever seen. The soundtrack and overall sound in this is breathtaking. One of the best cinema experiences I've had. Would Definitely recommend 10/10.
3 of 9 users found this helpful36
All this user's reviews
7
OrangeknockoutAug 2, 2017
this movie barely gets a 7 out of me. I would give the movie a 6.9 if I could but there is no option for that. overall Dunkirk is a satisfying movie to watch. it has some moments in the movie where you go like," oh **** there are somethis movie barely gets a 7 out of me. I would give the movie a 6.9 if I could but there is no option for that. overall Dunkirk is a satisfying movie to watch. it has some moments in the movie where you go like," oh **** there are some genuinely intense moments in the movie where you are on the edge of your seat. the scenes are captivating primarily due to the movie's excellent musical score. the music in this movie is what really gives Dunkirk's scenes that final push to be truly epic.

I was thrown off a little though. Dunkirk is not your traditional war movie; I went in expecting a gory violent war movie, but was instead treated to a very non-violent war movie. not sure how Christopher pulled that off, considering its a war movie. overall, pretty good movie. the constant scene changing did confuse me a little and I felt like Dunkirk lacks in comparison to nolans other amazing movies. there is not much character development and I got lost at times at what was going on in the movie or who these people were.… Expand
2 of 6 users found this helpful24
All this user's reviews
7
ScraperDec 19, 2017
A well-crafted war piece destined to become a monument of British pride. Most characters in the several narratives of the film remain somewhat distant. We never get to know the depths of them through dialogue. The somber, intense scenarioA well-crafted war piece destined to become a monument of British pride. Most characters in the several narratives of the film remain somewhat distant. We never get to know the depths of them through dialogue. The somber, intense scenario does most of the talking, as soldiers attempt to cross the English Channel to survive the Nazi's advance.… Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
7
VDSMar 10, 2018
I avoided this at the cinema because I don’t like war films (self-censorship at its worst). I’m still pleased I didn’t see it at the cinema, but not because it isn’t very good. It is good.

If you’re expecting a Christopher Nolan realityI avoided this at the cinema because I don’t like war films (self-censorship at its worst). I’m still pleased I didn’t see it at the cinema, but not because it isn’t very good. It is good.

If you’re expecting a Christopher Nolan reality bending flic, or a full on action bash, you’ll be disappointed. Or a Saving Private Ryan type overly-sentimental blood bath, again you’ll be disappointed.

What the movie has is layers, beautiful cinematography, minimal dialogue and only a few war movie clichés.

The stand out parts for me were the flying sequences, and the whole story line involving Tom Hardy as the Spitfire pilot. It looked beautiful, it was handled delicately, and it seemed happy to forgo glamor and focus on reality. The end was a bit cheesy, and that would be my criticism of the film in general. What started off as a surprisingly down to earth war film, did sink a little bit into cliché by the end.

However, I’d recommend it. But, one more word of warning, the Americans do not swoop in at the end and ‘save the day’, so if you’re wanting that, move along. This film focuses on the British, and how, I guess, we got the saying ‘the Dunkirk spirit’.… Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
9
PipeCAug 29, 2017
Christopher Nolan's ode is a cutting-edge gem of technical art. Nolan is one of the almost non-existent filmmakers who keep active excitement with every new release, in this way, three years after his last work, he raises a love letter to warChristopher Nolan's ode is a cutting-edge gem of technical art. Nolan is one of the almost non-existent filmmakers who keep active excitement with every new release, in this way, three years after his last work, he raises a love letter to war cinema, a mega-production that highlights, in capital letters, an experience that gets by without dialogues, even episodically. Narratively, it's his film less cerebral and ambitious among a gold catalog led by "Interstellar" and "Inception", however, from the beginning, the story feels warm in its coldness, he assiduously introduces us into the heartless event. Being a learned man in the field of selection of tones and objectives for his psychological stories, his greatest strength lies in his form of making movies, here, Nolan displays a new record, one easier to keep pace: Narration in pictures.

The first scene is the best letter of presentation, which will serve as a pattern, for a film imparting intensity. The movie conjures up superlative landscapes, the opening sequence is the entrance of a superb artistic hypnosis, a display of magnificent frames strengthened by a majestic 70 mm and IMAX cameras, the colors and shadows explicit in pictures are which lead the story by far. Functional aerial shots from unsuspected angles, explosions, and gunshots piercing our senses, respectful and quasi-negligible digital effects that ratify the commitment to turn a movie ticket into an absolute visceral experience. Clearly, Nolan film would not be exempt from allegories and metaphors through images; the grayish scum brought by the strong tide is a synonym of human filth, the framing of the soldier taking off his attire and running to death on his own, portraying defeat and pride, the corpses that are buried by snorting wind, the endless lines of men in pursuit of "salvation", the palette of blues and greens from the scene where soldiers contemplate an imminent attack, the three men looking at nowhere, the corpses returning to the shore, the covenant between two men burying one innocent under rough sand or the perfect framings of Kenneth Branagh and Tom Hardy are dreamy compositions that speak through colors, shadows, lighting and setting, a master class of cinematography and photography. The seventh art didn't deliver as such adrenaline and justified action in a non-commercial film for a long time, an artistic and technical triumph. Get ready, because "Dunkirk" is going to transcend.

Hans Zimmer, a faithful Musketeer, returns recharged and ready to rise with well-deserved awards at the expense of his scores that not only include atmospheric obligations, these try to emulate stressful melody of a countdown, atomic effect of explosive artifacts, meteoric heartbeat or oxygen deficiency of the martyrs, a list of cadences endowing scenes with energy and tension like no other war film. Mr. Zimmer's wonders gain greater strength to the excellent work in the sound editing room, which accompanied by Shepard tone, are exciting. Gunshots are deafening, they are combined with the soundtrack, the crackling of the fire, the teeth chattering of a soldier, the cries of help under the water or the overflight over our heads provoke one of the most compelling cinematic experiences.

I will never forget "Dunkirk", the movie that made me lose my record about seeing a film in IMAX cinemas, two words: mind-blowing and memorable.

Some familiar faces go back, flaunting their high acting capacities. Hardy, Rylance and Murphy manage the cast purely masculine, understandable due to the context of the events. Each one offers spirit and personality to their characters to ease the following of the story. The performances of newcomers Fionn Whitehead, Jack Lowden and new soloist Harry Styles are laudable and rewarding in the skin of children with war uniforms. In fact, Whitehead and Styles make a powerful debut that places them on the radar of quality directors, also in a panorama of acting prestige.

What would be the best words to describe "Dunkirk"? When the logo of Warner and Syncopy, bathed in a light blue, are unified with the war melodies, my feelings and sensations exploded of delight for the work of Christopher Nolan, creator of cinema with deep fundamentals and objectives. Brimming with complex and magnanimous technical components, intelligent and moving performances, a tremendous soundtrack and unmistakable and always welcome Nolan touch, "Dunkirk" becomes one of the best cinematographic experience so far this year, likewise, its function of entertaining for two hours with lights and pirouettes is relegated by the message of peace, unity and solidarity, three constituents not present in our anatomy. Did you think that one of the greatest war speeches in history — promulgated by the British politician Winston Churchill — recited by the protagonist was limited merely to the circumstance of the film?… Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
10
Ahmad_MohammadDec 20, 2017
Dunkirk 2017
معركة دنكيرك هي إحدى المعارك البارزة خلال الحرب العالمية الثانية التي نشبت بين قوات الحلفاء وألمانيا النازية، اندلعت على الجبهة الغربية في أثناء معركة فرنسا. شهدت معركة دنكيرك دفاع قوات الحملة البريطانية وبقايا القوات الفرنسية عنDunkirk 2017
معركة دنكيرك هي إحدى المعارك البارزة خلال الحرب العالمية الثانية التي نشبت بين قوات الحلفاء وألمانيا النازية، اندلعت على الجبهة الغربية في أثناء معركة فرنسا. شهدت معركة دنكيرك دفاع قوات الحملة البريطانية وبقايا القوات الفرنسية عن ميناء دنكيرك آخر الموانئ المتبقية في أيدي الجيش الفرنسي، وذلك في أثناء عملية إجلائها عن المدينة التي امتدَّت أسبوعاً من 26 مايو إلى 4 يونيو عام 1940 والتي انتهت بنقل ثلث مليون جندي.
هذه هي قصة الفيلم بالمختصر وانا ارى انه عمل عظيم يشبه بصورة كبيره الفيلم الروسي come and see من حيث الأجواء التي عشناها في الفيلم نولان هنا يرمي المشاهد لشواطئ دانكيرك ويتركنا نعاني ولو شعوريا ماعاناه أولئك الجنود .
عموما اعتقد ان هنالك قله قليله قد شاهدت الفيلم كما شاهدته فعلى طول الشريط المرئي هنالك موسيقى خلفيه تشد أعصابك على مدار عرض الفيلم وكلما مر الوقت كلما ازداد توترك .
الفيلم لا يروي لنا حرب او اشتباك بل هو لعملية أنقاذ ، من كان ينتظر بطل للفيلم او رصاص كثيف وتفجيرات وحرب طاحنه هناك افلام تلبي رغباتك ولكن بالتاكيد ليس دانكيرك ناهيك اصلا ان نولان لن يحرف التاريخ ليصنع فيلم مليء بالتفجيرات والاشتباكات هو كما قلت وضعنا داخل احداث تلك الحادثه .
لن أعقب على المؤثرات او التصوير او الموسيقى والاداء والإخراج وكل هذه الامور كلها عظيمه .… Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
9
akenaton1984Aug 18, 2017
Increíble, de tomas limpias que recuerdan a los filmes de la segunda guerra mundial. Nolan aplica de nuevo su tropos característicos: la sociedad (la realidad) como un artificio, su desintegración y la libre elección como sustento. AlgunosIncreíble, de tomas limpias que recuerdan a los filmes de la segunda guerra mundial. Nolan aplica de nuevo su tropos característicos: la sociedad (la realidad) como un artificio, su desintegración y la libre elección como sustento. Algunos mirarán en él un discurso nacionalista, pero es más un canto al espíritu humano que retorna como esos aviones incendiados.… Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
10
ThisIsAkillAug 12, 2017
I never give a 10, I am not a 10 or 0 kind of reviewer. This is truly a masterpiece. Dunkirk is a thrilling, haunting picture of sound and cinematography. With no character development, and mostly no dialogue, this movie is mostly ran byI never give a 10, I am not a 10 or 0 kind of reviewer. This is truly a masterpiece. Dunkirk is a thrilling, haunting picture of sound and cinematography. With no character development, and mostly no dialogue, this movie is mostly ran by music which served it's purpose very well. Dunkirk is a truly a spectacle of action, drama and at times, horror. Such an intense, realistic take on war has never been filmed before, and hasn’t had me so immersed in the cinema for many years. Christopher Nolan has once again created a film that has you drawing for breath by the end.… Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
7
bobbymbJan 25, 2018
Christopher Nolan garancia az igényes és szórakoztató filmekre. A film nagyon jól össze van rakva, jók a vágások és látványos a film. Aki pörgős háborús filmre számít, annak unalmas lesz, de aki szereti a lassabb, de élvezhető jelenetekkelChristopher Nolan garancia az igényes és szórakoztató filmekre. A film nagyon jól össze van rakva, jók a vágások és látványos a film. Aki pörgős háborús filmre számít, annak unalmas lesz, de aki szereti a lassabb, de élvezhető jelenetekkel tarkított filmeket, azoknak tetszeni fog. 10/7.… Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
10
The_CalvinatorFeb 12, 2018
Christopher Nolan remains my favorite director, as he is the only one I feel can do anything and I will enjoy it. Different from other creators in Hollywood, I don't feel like I want anything specific from Nolan, I just want it to beChristopher Nolan remains my favorite director, as he is the only one I feel can do anything and I will enjoy it. Different from other creators in Hollywood, I don't feel like I want anything specific from Nolan, I just want it to be trademark HIS. The Batman Trilogy, Inception, Interstellar, and now Dunkirk all fall into the visually impressive and compelling from the start category that Nolan has masterfully perfected.… Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
7
DaddyO3Feb 14, 2018
I was told this movie was hard to follow and I should brush up on the history of Dunkirk. I did not get a chance to review the history and just jumped into the movie. It had multiple stories going on and I didn't think it was hard toI was told this movie was hard to follow and I should brush up on the history of Dunkirk. I did not get a chance to review the history and just jumped into the movie. It had multiple stories going on and I didn't think it was hard to follow. My 16 year old son and I both enjoyed it. It's no Lord of the Rings, but a solid 7/10.… Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
7
LivingTribunalApr 24, 2018
I know that this is a brilliant film, but I cannot agree that it deserves 94 rating when The Dark Knight got 82 and The Shawshank Redemption got 80. I don't think this is a better war movie than Saving Private Ryan. When you watch the film,I know that this is a brilliant film, but I cannot agree that it deserves 94 rating when The Dark Knight got 82 and The Shawshank Redemption got 80. I don't think this is a better war movie than Saving Private Ryan. When you watch the film, you'll feel like you are actually there in the middle of Dunkirk especially when you watched in IMAX. Hans Zimmer's composition was one of the best, and it changes the mood a lot.… Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
7
Vitor007Sep 23, 2018
"Dunkirk" shows that there is no protagonist in a war. Since its beginning it shows that everyone has its importance in a conflict, from a normal soldier, to a general on base. A weak point would be how complicated and confusing it becomes in"Dunkirk" shows that there is no protagonist in a war. Since its beginning it shows that everyone has its importance in a conflict, from a normal soldier, to a general on base. A weak point would be how complicated and confusing it becomes in a few moments, in general for the public, but manages to balance, not being too gloomy or even too comical. 7.3/10… Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
10
frdfdfdffJul 23, 2017
Incredible. This movie has me on the edge of my seat the entire time. Loved every bit of it Just an absolutely crazy cinema experience fdsfsdfsdfsdfsf
5 of 16 users found this helpful511
All this user's reviews
8
Cameronius_113Jul 21, 2017
Dunkirk was released in 2017 and was directed by Christopher Nolan. The film is a representation of the events that occured in Dunkirk during the second World War when hundreds of thousands of British soliders were trapped on the island'sDunkirk was released in 2017 and was directed by Christopher Nolan. The film is a representation of the events that occured in Dunkirk during the second World War when hundreds of thousands of British soliders were trapped on the island's beaches whilst waiting for help to come.

Christopher Nolan is a director well-known in the filmmaking industry today for being very ambitious and making films huge in scope; this film is a prime example. The film never tries to change itself to suit another audience or sub-genre and sticks to its own agenda of telling the story of the events that actually went down and how they occured, which is why some audience members may not be huge fans of this film.

The film isn't like most other war films such as Saving Private Ryan which incorporate many drama elements into them to make a more involving story; this film chooses to focus on the scale of the event rather than focusing on the characters of the film, focusing on characters being typically what most war films do and how the situation they are in is affecting them. The characters of this film are not a big part and there isn't much dialogue in the film either, which may put off some audience members for not being able to connect with characters. However, I do very much appreciate the fact that the film was never overly-dramatised or included needless exposition for the characters as they are not the focal point of the film, which is the main thing that sets this film apart from other war films I have seen.

As I've mentioned multiple times, the film is very ambitious in showing the scale of this event: the film has three different storylines occuring simultaneosly (one on land, one on sea, one on air) which helps to show how the event affected many more than just the soldiers stranded on the island. Also, the film is visually fantastic as well as the sound too; every single time a bullet shot or a plane flew by, I as an audience member felt in the moment of what had happened. The music in the background also added to the intensity of the film, one notable part of the score was a clock ticking throughout which added to the sense of urgency in each scene. There never really is a second in the film where anything stops to take a breath.

What I appreciated the most about Dunkirk was how it was rather experimental in parts, and has tried things that many other war films have never done before. The fact that the event itself was chose as the focal point was the key to creating an immersive cinematic experience and it was an "experiment" that overall proved to be very effective. It never turns over to show the political side to the story or add unnecessary character drama as, as Nolan himself as stated, it would "make the film bogged down" so it never felt over-crammed or messy, which is something difficult to avoid when telling a story with multiple aspects and sides to it. Thankfully the film wasn't overly long either, having a runtime of just 105 minutes when compared to other films of Nolan's such as The Dark Knight Rises (which has a runtime of around 165 minutes) and therefore it never dragged on or felt stretched out or boring.

Overall, Dunkirk is a film that may not be appealing to most audience members due to it taking a risk in its focal point, however I very much appreciated a change in style and this is a war film that I will definitely always remember and hopefully others will too. I would highly recommend this film, however only to the right audience.

8.1/10… Expand
4 of 13 users found this helpful49
All this user's reviews
10
The_T-10Jul 24, 2017
When talking about war movies, "Saving Private Ryan", "Apocalypse Now", "The Thin Red Line", and recently, "Inglorious Basterds" and "Hacksaw Ridge" come to mind. "Dunkirk", however, isn't that kind of war movies. This is not your averageWhen talking about war movies, "Saving Private Ryan", "Apocalypse Now", "The Thin Red Line", and recently, "Inglorious Basterds" and "Hacksaw Ridge" come to mind. "Dunkirk", however, isn't that kind of war movies. This is not your average mainstream war movie. In fact, I don't remember if I could see any blood, gore, excessive profanity, or NAZI (Except for those few last seconds of the movie). "Dunkirk" is more of a survival thriller than a WWII flick, but somehow, will always be remembered as an excellent WWII film, for good reasons too.

Nolan proves once again that rating isn't strictly a restriction to produce high-quality masterpiece. Many people were skeptical about a WWII movie with anything less than R-rated. Nolan and crew had the last laugh after all... The cinematography's gorgeous beyond words, the acting feels very genuine, with very very little dialogues and each characters have some depths (traumatic pilot, brave and unwavering weekend sailors, honorable officers, resilient soldiers, naive kids, and desperate young men surrounded by enemies from behind and wild ocean in the front).

Nolan got out from his recent sci-fi, mind-bending mega-blockbusters (The Dark Knight trilogy, Interstellar, Inception) to a documentary-like WWII movie, with equally outstanding, if not better quality. "Dunkirk" will, without doubt, be in the top 5 of my favorite war movies ever.

Oh, and should we even mention how great Nolan-Zimmer are when working together?… Expand
3 of 10 users found this helpful37
All this user's reviews
8
MugeshJul 22, 2017
Another good film by Nolan. The film has great cinematography and story. The film is very intense and takes the viewers into the film. The film is great but yet it did not satisfy my expectation. And ofcourse it is not his best film. It isAnother good film by Nolan. The film has great cinematography and story. The film is very intense and takes the viewers into the film. The film is great but yet it did not satisfy my expectation. And ofcourse it is not his best film. It is worth the time and days waiting for. The film contains an interesting sequence towards the climax of the film. Dunkirk is an over-expected movie. If Die hard Nolan fans like me are expecting to see his master piece, Dunkirk is not the right film.… Expand
3 of 10 users found this helpful37
All this user's reviews
10
michaelt8Jul 23, 2017
This movie is an absolute masterpiece from scene one. The visuals an cinematography are perfect. The acting is spot on. Even Harry Styles delivers a terrific performance. This is a gritty real movie that I encourage everyone to see. I willThis movie is an absolute masterpiece from scene one. The visuals an cinematography are perfect. The acting is spot on. Even Harry Styles delivers a terrific performance. This is a gritty real movie that I encourage everyone to see. I will certainly be watching it again in theaters and buying it on DVD.… Expand
3 of 10 users found this helpful37
All this user's reviews
9
SpangleJul 27, 2017
The first truly great film of 2017, Dunkirk is a return to the top of the filmmaking world for director Christopher Nolan after his last two efforts failed to rise to the stellar levels of his past works. In Dunkirk, Nolan has made a filmThe first truly great film of 2017, Dunkirk is a return to the top of the filmmaking world for director Christopher Nolan after his last two efforts failed to rise to the stellar levels of his past works. In Dunkirk, Nolan has made a film that is artistically challenging, possesses great cinematic merit, is accessible to a wide audience, and is a box office success. Not since the prime of Steven Spielberg or James Cameron has a filmmaker been better able to turn their works into ones that are both must-watch spectacles accepted by mass audiences and cinematic achievements. Though praising Nolan has become somewhat faux pas amongst cinephiles, those who deny that Nolan is one of the best working directors today are perhaps lost in the hype surrounding his works. With his latest effort, Nolan rises to the challenge set before him by film lovers to become more than just an entertaining director of great films, but flawed, works. In a stripped down celebration of human will, Dunkirk is perhaps the finest artistic achievement of Nolan's career of consistent success.

Ever since filmmaking became an accepted piece of artistic expression, war films have been a mainstay. Whether it is All Quiet on the Western Front, The Bridge on the River Kwai, Paths of Glory, Apocalypse Now, Platoon, Full Metal Jacket, Saving Private Ryan, The Thin Red Line, or any number of other greatly celebrated works, war films often prove to be the greatest challenge of its filmmakers' careers. Forged in the blood of the fallen, attempts to build characters amidst the sea of carnage, and trying to make a universal statement about anything, the genre has its share of master works, imitators, and misfires. While the 21st Century has had its fair share of strong war films, none have quite risen to the level of being the definitive war film of the era until Dunkirk. Stepping away from the brutal carnage and character-driven nature of many great war films, Nolan takes a page out of Terrence Malick's book in how to make a war film: capture its essence. Focusing on character development and carnage in equal measure proves to be the undoing of far too many war films with not enough screentime to go around. So, like Malick, Nolan seeks to capture the feeling and experience of being at the Dunkirk evacuation through the stories of those on the land, in the sea, and flying in the air. Names are never mentioned. Dialogue is sparce. Characters are paper thin. Yet, through this work, Nolan manages to silently and loudly strike at the very essence of what it is to be human.

Perhaps no film has better used its IMAX capabilities than Dunkirk, becoming the Avatar of IMAX cinema. With bombs dropping all around, men yelling in the distance, rifles firing, and the ominous hum of German fighter planes in the distance, Dunkirk is a truly immersive experience that makes the audience more than a spectator. It turns us into a participant. The struggles of the characters to reach England and escape from soon-to-be German-held territory in France needs no character development or long scenes of backstory to make us sympathetic for the characters. Instead, it forges a brotherhood found only in the trenches, emblazoned in a way that only the unity of shared experience can conjure. By simulating the feeling of being surrounded from all sides, Nolan makes us root for anybody his camera finds. Their names are inconsequential and who they are has no impact. We root for them not because the film tells us to, but because we feel a sense of unity and brotherhood with these men. These becomes our boys. Our friends. Our brothers. To watch them suffer and die is to lose a part of ourselves. To save them and watch them reach the British shore is a cause not just for celebration, but unabashed jubilation. In creating this feeling, Dunkirk is a film that feels like no other, casting aside individuality and focus on developing single characters in favor of creating familiarity in the entirety of the British forces.

A slimmed down script that chooses its words carefully certainly bolsters this, as the film is devoid of exposition and character development of any type. Words come at a premium and, unlike in his lesser works, Nolan ensures no word is out of place. Every time a character opens their mouth to speak, those words and their impact is felt due to the rarity of speech in the film. It is for this reason that Dunkirk is best viewed as an experience. In line with Nolan's attempts to drop the audience in Dunkirk and give them the lay of the land, historical details are a rarity. Conversations about the battle's role in the war, how disposable these men are to the British, and the current state of affairs in the war are kept to a minimum. As such, this is not a film to educate. While many war films seek to have a cohesive narrative that explains the events of the war, Dunkirk does no such thing. Nolan never flirts with this possibility, nor embraces it at all.… Expand
2 of 7 users found this helpful25
All this user's reviews
9
GoreaffectionJul 28, 2017
Nolan proves yet again that no director comes close to his talent. For a reviewer its a hard task to review this movie as the movie has to be reviewed both for its technical prowess and also for its emotional message. The movie is made withNolan proves yet again that no director comes close to his talent. For a reviewer its a hard task to review this movie as the movie has to be reviewed both for its technical prowess and also for its emotional message. The movie is made with almost no CGI which means shooting those aerial fights and sea battles is a benchmark in cinematography itself. The movie gives a strong message of human spirit although most of it due to its source material. What is unique about the movie is that it portrays this without the use of dialogues or forced emotional scenes. It is a visual experience simply cannot be put into words. I have never before been so terrified of the sound of a fighter plane swooping down for a kill. This movie changes film making and brings a fresh perspective to movies in its purest form without any distraction.… Expand
2 of 7 users found this helpful25
All this user's reviews
10
MadVikingJul 21, 2017
This isn't your typical hero WW2 film, it's a WW2 film that's gritty, nameless and direct. The actors feel more like actual soldiers than actors, and they do their job magnificently on the terms set forth by Nolan. It's not a film to tell theThis isn't your typical hero WW2 film, it's a WW2 film that's gritty, nameless and direct. The actors feel more like actual soldiers than actors, and they do their job magnificently on the terms set forth by Nolan. It's not a film to tell the history of Dunkirk, it's a film to show the history of Dunkirk. It's not pretty, it's not fancy CGI and heroic deeds. And in that way, the film 100% succeeds on the premises it sets. It simply put as good at portraying the events at Dunkirk, as "Band of Brothers" is at telling how **** WW2 was.… Expand
3 of 12 users found this helpful39
All this user's reviews
9
shpostalJul 21, 2017
I was looking forward to "Dunkirk" because it's a good WWII story of courage and idiocy (Winston Churchill refusing to provide adequate Navy ships to help rescue his soldiers - one of the worst world leaders in history. He was theI was looking forward to "Dunkirk" because it's a good WWII story of courage and idiocy (Winston Churchill refusing to provide adequate Navy ships to help rescue his soldiers - one of the worst world leaders in history. He was the "mastermind" behind the appalling slaughter of 50,000 British armed servicemen in 1915 at Gallipoli, on the tip of the Turkish side of the Dardanelles, a narrow channel that links the Mediterranean and Black Seas. They were trapped by Ottoman forces on a tiny spit of beach and could not advance but only be picked off like clay pigeons, and Churchill flatly ignored the Navy's pleas to withdraw and criticized them even after the horrible death toll, preferring to stay even longer. So it doesn't surprise me he was responsible for this terrible strategy that fortunately did not have the cataclysmic results. No, Churchill instead appealed to the citizenry to go to a French beach under heavy Luftwaffe and submarine attack to rescue 300,000 British, French and Belgian soldiers trapped like sitting ducks waiting to withdraw from the Nazi blitzkrieg which in early 1940 was unstoppable. The movie "Dunkirk" is a fine representation of the events of this heroic effort by civilians with no arms to defend themselves or the soldiers they ferried back to Britain under heavy air attack. It is not a remake of "Saving Private Ryan", nor is it nearly as shocking. The film focuses on several things going on simultaneously, and does a remarkable job of capturing the danger and again, heroism of people who should not have had to risk their lives because Churchill was once again behaving like a buffoon. No mention of his piss poor judgment is made here, but as a factor in the real life evacuation, it's a detail that can't be ignored. Only a mention of getting one destroyer at a time is brought up, and is only briefly criticized, but that's a minor point. The only top name actor is Tom Hardy, whom we only see through flying goggles right up to the movie's conclusion, but he still manages to be his usual stellar self. The cinematography is excellent and the story is moving. This doesn't involve gore, or long drawn out scenes of attacks and defense, although enough is there to tell the story properly. Otherwise, "Dunkirk" is a fine movie about a tale of heroes that not many people outside WWII history buffs may be aware even happened.… Expand
2 of 8 users found this helpful26
All this user's reviews
9
Jordwilson82Jul 23, 2017
I loved this movie, quite a bit. It was strictly told from the perspective of the british soldiers so that you experience how horrific it was for them. There is no Michael Bay Pearl Harbor drama such as romance or brotherly love. This is aI loved this movie, quite a bit. It was strictly told from the perspective of the british soldiers so that you experience how horrific it was for them. There is no Michael Bay Pearl Harbor drama such as romance or brotherly love. This is a film about the evacuation of 400 000 british soldiers stranded at Dunkirk during World War 2. It is extremely authentic and realistic, visually stunning and the sound and music is fantastic.… Expand
2 of 8 users found this helpful26
All this user's reviews
10
almoAug 17, 2017
Nolan at his best. Great soundtrack. Pulse-pounding tension despite not being action-packed. A war film about what it's like to be there. Best seen in IMAX.
1 of 4 users found this helpful13
All this user's reviews
10
LeoGalizaOct 13, 2017
The best blockbuster of 2017. Intense, beautiful with a non-cliche storytelling. Amazing sound effects and cinematography. A masterpiece. Chris Nolan in his best form.
1 of 4 users found this helpful13
All this user's reviews
9
WaelAug 10, 2017
If you thought Christopher Nolan couldn't outdo himself after 'Inception', 'The Dark Knight' trilogy, or even 'Interstellar', you should go see 'Dunkirk' to prove yourself wrong. The film kicks off with a bang, and whether it's in a littleIf you thought Christopher Nolan couldn't outdo himself after 'Inception', 'The Dark Knight' trilogy, or even 'Interstellar', you should go see 'Dunkirk' to prove yourself wrong. The film kicks off with a bang, and whether it's in a little street, or out on the shore, the scenery is absolutely gorgeous. Then, throughout all its sequences, it details the fight for survival, and the cruelty of the World War in true war-movie fashion. Some scenes are definitely gonna have you hyperventilating from stress, and the performance of the whole ensemble cast is absolutely beautiful. Merging the astonishing visuals, with the emotions-filled score is a huge plus point. Last, but not least, the screenplay writing turns out to be very creative, depicting three independent, but later overlapping plots. GENIUS!
In conclusion, 'Dunkirk' is easily the best movie released this summer, and watching it was a real treat, for both the eye and the heart.… Expand
1 of 4 users found this helpful13
All this user's reviews
10
juliankennedy23Mar 21, 2018
Dunkirk is a taut arty recreation of Operation Dynamo that took place between May 26th and June 4th, 1940 where Britain managed to rescue about 400,000 of their own and allied troops that were encircled by the Germans and trapped on a sliverDunkirk is a taut arty recreation of Operation Dynamo that took place between May 26th and June 4th, 1940 where Britain managed to rescue about 400,000 of their own and allied troops that were encircled by the Germans and trapped on a sliver of land on the coast.

The operation is famous for its use of civilian craft and the sheer number rescued after the humiliating defeat on the mainland. It inspired newly elected Prime Minister Winston Churchill to make his “we will fight them on the beaches” speech.

The Good: Christopher Nolan has shown himself a brilliant director since “The Following” in 1998 and simply has not been as on top of his game as in this film. He uses, what could easily be a gimmick, an anachronic order of three separate time lines told simultaneously. I usually dislike movies that are not told in a simply chronological order but it simply works brilliantly here fitting both the material and the stories told within.

The movie is also a wonderfully minimalist affair with music used sparingly to create a great effect when it does appear and a taut running time that bluntly is a relief. Too often both war epics, recent Christopher Nolan films (I am looking your way Interstellar) and “important movies” in general seem to pad the running time to a kidney-busting three hours packing every piece of flotsam and jetsam surrounding the main story hoping something sticks with the audience.

The acting and cinematography are also top notch. The air combat scenes filmed with real fighter aircraft of the era are a sight to behold and simply a triumph.

The Bad: While the anachronic order certainly does work brilliantly upon reflection of the entire film, one can find it disorienting during the actual viewing if one does not expect it going in.

Nolan does an incredible job recreating the time period using actual ships that were at the evacuation and filming on the actual beach. However, his refusal to use CGI does create a city of Dunkirk that is remarkable intact compared to the actual city of that day and a beach that is not strewn with the hundreds of tanks and thousands of vehicles the British and French abandoned. While that is certainly excusable as an artistic choice the modern seat patterns on the train are a surprising anachronism.

In Conclusion: As the son of a man who survived the blitz and a grandson of a Royal Navy officer, I am certain my tearing eyes and warm feeling during the film will not be shared by all. It is, however, even for those with no personal connection, a brilliant combination of direction, cinematography, and music that is a filmmaking triumph. One of the best film I have seen this year.… Expand
1 of 4 users found this helpful13
All this user's reviews
10
RrichardMar 6, 2018
Terrific movie. Highly recommended for all WW2 fans. Great sights and sounds.
1 of 4 users found this helpful13
All this user's reviews
9
potatoman222Aug 10, 2017
Christopher Nolan volta em o que pode ser considerado o mais diferente de seus filmes. Aqui a guerra é exibida de forma nova - e louvável. Dentre os êxitos o maior dele vai para a estética que é um verdadeiro deleite ao espectador. A trilhaChristopher Nolan volta em o que pode ser considerado o mais diferente de seus filmes. Aqui a guerra é exibida de forma nova - e louvável. Dentre os êxitos o maior dele vai para a estética que é um verdadeiro deleite ao espectador. A trilha sonora de Hans Zimmer nos imerge na experiência fantástica e nos transporta para a praia de Dunkirk. O filme não trabalha muito bem seus personagens. A situação em que eles se encontram é o verdadeiro protagonista do filme de forma em que todos os personagens podem ser compactados em um só, mas isso não é algo que me incomodou.… Expand
1 of 4 users found this helpful13
All this user's reviews
9
kwameryanAug 18, 2017
Absolutely loved it. A compelling story told with minimal dialogue, jaw-dropping images and one hell of a soundtrack. A must-see film - the best I've seen this year.
1 of 4 users found this helpful13
All this user's reviews
9
CineAutoctonoAug 17, 2017
The Movie of the Year, "Dunkirk" was a powerful movie, because the story, the perfomances, the edition, the photography and the environment of the WWII, was incredible, Christopher Nolan hits again.
1 of 4 users found this helpful13
All this user's reviews
10
TheSpoiler18Nov 15, 2017
This has to be one of the best war movies that I have ever seen. As a lover of history, this was obviously a must-see. When I finally watched it, I fell in love with the characters. The action was amazing, the visuals beautiful, the storyThis has to be one of the best war movies that I have ever seen. As a lover of history, this was obviously a must-see. When I finally watched it, I fell in love with the characters. The action was amazing, the visuals beautiful, the story complex, and the score completely awe-inspiring. Once again, Christopher Nolan does not disappoint!… Expand
1 of 4 users found this helpful13
All this user's reviews
8
KaptenVideoAug 1, 2017
Ahh... Nolan. Who doesn't love Christopher Nolan, eh? One of the most acclaimed directors working today, a cinematic genius behind modern classics such as "The Dark Knight" trilogy, "The Prestige", "Inception" and "Interstellar"...
Well, IAhh... Nolan. Who doesn't love Christopher Nolan, eh? One of the most acclaimed directors working today, a cinematic genius behind modern classics such as "The Dark Knight" trilogy, "The Prestige", "Inception" and "Interstellar"...
Well, I hate to be a party pooper (as always), but I have never shared the mad love every other movie fan I know has to share for him. I mean, his works are a'ight, but I never found them to be as great as everybody else seemed to think.
I guess I liked early Nolan the best – "Memento" and especially "Insomnia" –, when he was more interested in characters and building suspense than just creating the biggest baddest epics available.
Of course, Nolan is good at creating suspense and orchestrating action setpieces, but even his best works "Inception" and "Interstellar" have suffered from being overlong and pompous. Not to mention his third and last Batman which felt like a big pompous piece of crap.
Having written all that, I liked "Dunkirk" a lot. It's not only one of the finest movies of 2017 (so far), one of the most thoughtful war dramas I've seen, and also Nolan's best yet.
Although if you go to cinema expecting his usual, you may well leave disappointed, because this epic World War II tale is quite unlike anything we have come to associate him with.
After all these years, it must be supremely difficult to create a war drama with something fresh to show or say.
But Nolan is not afraid of challenges, and he has managed to pull off a movie which is both epic and intimate, artsy and mainstream-friendly, adrenaline-filled and deep at the same time. It's what the movie lovers always wait for but rarely get: a thinking man's blockbuster.
"Dunkirk" shows the experience of war from the another angle rarely seen or thought of, at least in movies. It's about human frailty, loneliness, isolation and enduring the limbo between chaos and salvation that war is made of.
Of course, there’s also enough explosions and eye-candy, but the whole thing is rather artsy in a good way. Not much dialogue or clearly defined events too, just people waiting (because there's nothing else left for them to do) and trying to survive.
There is not even a single clearly-defined central character, although there are several main storylines to follow, sometimes not in chronological form.
The story is about thousands of Allied troops surrounded by enemy forces, trapped on the beach and waiting for rescuing.
We have some well-known actors here, such as Tom Hardy, Kenneth Branagh and Cillian Murphy, but it's not really an actor's movie (ie, meant to let somebody shine) but fitting everything into a carefully crafted cinematic mosaic.
Speaking about war part, I especially loved the flight and air battle scenes. The immediacy, the sound effects. Also the fact that they were often made from pilot’s viewpoints, so it feels more realistic. The pilot shoots and we see target plane catching fire only after a while, for example.
All in all, „Dunkirk“ is the Nolan movie that has touched me the most. It’s about real things, emotions and experiences, and the action is thrillng. Another beautiful achievement for one of the most liked and successful auteurs working in mainstream cinema today.
Watched it in IMAX which probably add something to the experience, at least from technical standpoint. But it’s surely a good looking and sounding movie on any screen or setup, methinks.… Expand
1 of 4 users found this helpful13
All this user's reviews
7
rewwexAug 7, 2017
What makes a movie tick? Soul, passion & heart. This movie didn't have any of those. Audiovisually stunning, but empty inside. Maybe this movie speaks to British audiences more than to the rest of us?
1 of 4 users found this helpful13
All this user's reviews
9
Michael_Stars_5Aug 9, 2017
A gritty, suspenseful, not so violent war movie may be seen in the next decades as a true classic from talented filmmaker Christopher Nolan. I did find flaws in Dunkirk but forgot about them in minutes when I was thrown back into amazingA gritty, suspenseful, not so violent war movie may be seen in the next decades as a true classic from talented filmmaker Christopher Nolan. I did find flaws in Dunkirk but forgot about them in minutes when I was thrown back into amazing shots and action scenes. The sound is spectacular, being able to watch the film in 70mm was gorgeous and fun, and it's already a must see for people who aren't familiar with Nolan. Don't miss this one!… Expand
1 of 4 users found this helpful13
All this user's reviews
9
DutchboiAug 9, 2017
Very well written and constructed movie. One of the few movies this year that had me on the edge of my seat from start to finish. Beautifully composed soundtrack to go with it as well. Christopher Nolan astonishes yet again with thisVery well written and constructed movie. One of the few movies this year that had me on the edge of my seat from start to finish. Beautifully composed soundtrack to go with it as well. Christopher Nolan astonishes yet again with this thrilling yet gruesomely realistic war epic.… Expand
1 of 4 users found this helpful13
All this user's reviews
10
kinoiskingDec 18, 2017
Nolan's simplest and yet greatest film yet. From the outset you are enthralled and immersed in the chaotic evacuation of Northern France, watching in IMAX it was as though I was really there. Strongly recommend!
1 of 4 users found this helpful13
All this user's reviews
10
Minh18121999Mar 19, 2018
Dunkirk is intense as f***,Christopher Nolan,one of my favourite directors of all time, who directed this film the **** out of it.This is a very different war film,and also very different from Nolan's previous film,this films looksDunkirk is intense as f***,Christopher Nolan,one of my favourite directors of all time, who directed this film the **** out of it.This is a very different war film,and also very different from Nolan's previous film,this films looks gorgeous,the cinematography by Hoyte van Hoytema is so good,the loud and inspiring score by Hans Zimmer is the best score of 2017.This film is 106 minutes long and it is perfect fitted.The film has no character development or set up,which some critics complain about,but this makes Dunkirk more real and more focus on the event,despite its pg13 rating.The acting is top-notch.This film totally floored me,because of that,Dunkirk gets 10/10… Expand
1 of 4 users found this helpful13
All this user's reviews
9
MattyiceJul 24, 2017
There is little doubt that Dunkirk is an absolutely beautiful movie and a film fanatic's dream. The film is superbly shot, has masterful and powerful sound mixing, and features a fantastic soundtrack from Hans Zimmer. The film is alsoThere is little doubt that Dunkirk is an absolutely beautiful movie and a film fanatic's dream. The film is superbly shot, has masterful and powerful sound mixing, and features a fantastic soundtrack from Hans Zimmer. The film is also well-acted, although dialogue is minimal. The action is gripping and entertaining, while the stakes of entire invasion are insanely high. Additionally, I loved the fact that the story follows an abnormal but intriguing plot structure (it is divided in three parts: land, sea, and air, all with different time frames).

What prevents this film from being a masterpiece that critics claim it is are two aspects. The first is that there is no character development because it does not follow any individual character, which is new and emphasizes the terror of the war over drama, for sure, but takes out some of the individual stakes usually found in great films. The second part is the confusing timeline. While I wasn't confused, the people I saw it with were, because of the way its cut, it could make it complex understanding what's going on and when if you weren't paying attention early on.

While those two cons hold the film back from being a masterpiece, this film is beautiful, fun, and engaging. Absolutely worth seeing, ESPECIALLY IN IMAX.… Expand
2 of 9 users found this helpful27
All this user's reviews
10
MiracSpectacDec 17, 2017
Dunkirk is an absolutely brilliant war story told through sound and atmosphere above all. I can't tell you how many times I practically felt the gunfire or bombs dropping in the theatre, something few films can truly master. It's a film thatDunkirk is an absolutely brilliant war story told through sound and atmosphere above all. I can't tell you how many times I practically felt the gunfire or bombs dropping in the theatre, something few films can truly master. It's a film that I will never forget, and it deserves the highest acclaim.… Expand
1 of 5 users found this helpful14
All this user's reviews
9
JalumbiJul 31, 2017
The perfect performances, beautiful cinematography, an increasing sense of tension anchored by Hans Zimmer score, and a narrative that surpisingly takes the film to unexpected depth, makes 'Dunkirk' one of Nolan's, and war films in general, best.
1 of 5 users found this helpful14
All this user's reviews
8
CrunchyIvanJul 24, 2017
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. La película es sorda. Muda. Bastante sobria. La música, minimalista. Sin quejas. Delibaradamente ausente. De lo contrario, anularía la supuesta historicidad en la que nos vemos transportados. Por eso, tiraron de efectos interesantes como una especie de ‘drone’ en violín muy rasgado muy rápido con ligera perturbación en el tempo al ascender o en la ejecución de cada nota ligeramente animalizada. Ergo, una elección de tono poco orquestal que da un tono encarnado de guerra. Sin excesivo decoro. Sí hubo, no obstante, una parte más Nolan o Zimmer, con un evidente ascenso emocional que supuestamente debía expresar un clímax que ni fu ni fa. Lo notas porque la orquesta empieza a unirse en notas sostenidas y el violín mantiene unas notas justo cuando la cámara centralea el plano en la cara del general con una emotiva respuesta. Esto era en un contexto en que venían barcos. Un sargento le pregunta al otro sargento más tocho e importante (Kennet Branagh): “¿Quién viene, señor?” silencio, cámara agrandando la cara de emoción de Kennet Branagh : “…Viene nuestro hogar”. Y barcos con banderas británicas, música orquestal muy alta y emotiva.

El punto es que otras escenas sí lograron expresar de manera más efectiva, sin señales de aplauso. Cuando los aviones bombardean, la experiencia como espectador es apabullante, la de literalmente sentirse a expensas de chillidos de pájaros que resuenan en bombas, cadáveres, y silencio. Y zumbidos. La ambientación realmente fue buena. El sonido, de nuevo, minimalista, tuvo sus mejores momentos en los sutiles efectos de ingeniería basados en zumbnidos, ritmos mecánicos, de fondo…ayudan sobremanera a esta intención de Nolan de presentarnos en un entorno lo más realista posible que casara con lo severo de la guerra.

El argumento, igual. Apenas hay. Nolan se ha centrado en transmitir la historia de lo que ocurrió en Dunquerque desde la más realista y mundana perspectiva de cualquier soldado británico. Se aleja de la epicidad barata de la industria, del belicismo, y de su propia filmografía.

Lo más interesante y peculiar en lo que respecta a la formalidad del argumento es la temporalidad narratológica. Es simple, pero efectiva. Bien ejecutada. Un recurso que confunde lo suficiente al espectador y lo relaja y activa de las historias entrelazadas que acontecen las horas de la batalla. De lo contrario, una narración lineal basada en un lapso tan corto de tiempo podría ser aburrido. Pareció acertado, no se notó forzado y fuerza al espectador a hacer un ligero esfuerzo para reorganizar los eventos. Lo que hace es simple: un día de acción lo divide en tres perspectivas separadas entre sí por unas pocas horas. Entonces, cuentas lo que ocurrió hace un día a X personaje, seguido de lo que ocurrió hace una hora a Y personaje, y lo que ocurre ahora a X e Y personaje (por ejemplo). Así, crea un contraste obvio en el que se van juntando las consecuencias, los escapes y salvaciones con los ataques y muertes, dando una textura diferente al relato.

Me gustó. No me gusta clasificar y dar nota a películas que acabo de ver. Pienso que se debe notar en frío. No obstante, mis impresiones ahora son: ha sido un esfuerzo valiente y natural de Nolan, dejando atrás la a veces aburrida epicidad de otras películas como Interestellar u Origen. Aquí ha hecho un esfuerzo realista. Lo situaría probablemente por encima de las dos películas mencionadas.

Ahora una nota numérica sin perspectiva ni sistema de notas.

Nota: 8.

Ejecución cinematográfica impecable, sin esfuerzos dramáticos: imagen a veces perfecta, otras veces, bien. Música cumple con creces, si bien tampoco sobresaliente (lo mejor, los incesantes paisajes sonoros y los medio ragas minimalistas de corte industrial). Argumento: no era el objetivo de Nolan. Lo cual es una virtud que caracteriza la película. Pero el hecho, está ahí. Apenas hay diálogo. Todo lo contado es visto. Y lo visto, no llega a alcanzar tal grandeza ni los acontecimientos llegan a ser trasncendentales, si bien conforman una incesante tensión y emoción.

(El arte de no pensar, wordpress blog)… Expand
1 of 5 users found this helpful14
All this user's reviews
8
ConorMacleodAug 20, 2017
Dunkirk is a great historical reflection of the events during World War II. Supported by the foundations of an intense score, Dunkirk features transparent dramatic performances that accentuate the time period and a simple narrativeDunkirk is a great historical reflection of the events during World War II. Supported by the foundations of an intense score, Dunkirk features transparent dramatic performances that accentuate the time period and a simple narrative intertwined into three different divisions of time; effectively mixing up the way the audience perceives the events of the narrative.

Dunkirk: A- (VG5)… Expand
1 of 5 users found this helpful14
All this user's reviews
9
PopcornNMoviesJul 28, 2017
Nolan tells a story about a terrifying situation in which soldiers need to be delivered out of harms way. The filmmaking elevates this movie, along with sound design, and a haunting score from Hanz Zimmer. A couple shots made me whisper "WOW"Nolan tells a story about a terrifying situation in which soldiers need to be delivered out of harms way. The filmmaking elevates this movie, along with sound design, and a haunting score from Hanz Zimmer. A couple shots made me whisper "WOW" to myself in the IMAX theater. Nolan once again plays with time and as the timeline becomes more clear, a brilliant story opens up. It's perfectly paced with a solid runtime that keeps audiences engaged. It's one of, if not the best, of Nolan's filmography.… Expand
1 of 5 users found this helpful14
All this user's reviews
9
bereczkibenceJul 28, 2017
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. A future classic and a terrific movie experience. One of the best war films I've ever seen and definitely the most touching and beautiful one since 'The Thin Red Line'.

Nolan succeeded in making a thrilling and exciting movie out of a simple story by messing with timeline and narratives. However, the real genius of the film is in the visuals. The 70mm IMAX format really paid off: with breathtaking extreme long shots, shaky-cam close-ups and a great deal of practical effects, the film creates an atmosphere that's tense, beautiful, realistic and terrifying at the same time. Hans Zimmer's score is brilliant, the ticking clocks and half-note orchestral steps set the tone of the film pretty early on.

I think what really makes the film so tense - besides the visuals and the score - is the lack of the German army during the whole movie. The Allied Forces know they're there: they talk about them, you can hear gunshots, see planes dropping explosives, torpedoes tearing ships apart, constant smoke in the background but can never see a German soldier (bar one of the last scenes, but even then, their faces remain hidden).

The thing that makes the movie only a 9/10 for me, is that it touches on some pretty interesting and thought-provoking themes - like the British Navy not allowing the French on their boats or the shell-shock driven actions of Cillian Murphy's character - but never explores them deep enough. This is caused by the great spectrum of characters in the movie. On one hand it's a huge advantage: the audience sees the events through many perspectives that cross each other near the end of the movie, but can never really dive deep into the thoughts and feeling of the protagonists (the lack of dialogue and constant cuts between different storylines don't help either).

I highly recommend Robert Merle's brilliant novel: Week-end at Zuydcoote on the same subject wich tells the story of a French soldier during the Dunkirk evacuation. Merle, beeing a Dunkirk survivor himself, tells the events from an entirely different point of view that depicts the Brits in a lot less heroic way.

All in all, Dunkirk is probably the best movie of the year because it's brilliant in almost all aspects of film-making. Hats off, Chris Nolan.… Expand
1 of 5 users found this helpful14
All this user's reviews
10
tsmothers93Oct 11, 2017
Dunkirk is one the best war films in film history. It does not display overused violence to unnerve an audience, it displays the horrors of war with tone and tension. The technicality of the camerawork shows that Nolan is one of the bestDunkirk is one the best war films in film history. It does not display overused violence to unnerve an audience, it displays the horrors of war with tone and tension. The technicality of the camerawork shows that Nolan is one of the best directors in film history. Every visual and every sound leaves you on the edge of your seat, much like the men on the beach are on constant alert. The lack of dialogue lends itself to the reality of war and the unfamiliarity with the soldiers and the battlefield. The film is one of the best of the year.… Expand
1 of 5 users found this helpful14
All this user's reviews
10
madmal69Mar 21, 2018
One of the best films of the year, hands down. Flawless sound effects and visuals made me feel as if I were inside the film. Amazing performances all around.
1 of 5 users found this helpful14
All this user's reviews
7
TrevorsViewJul 21, 2017
Now I presume the modern-day art house/blockbuster wizard will at last earn his first Oscar nomination for directing his tenth feature film, Dunkirk. He deserves it, as he creates a true cinematic spectacle set around a subject made for aNow I presume the modern-day art house/blockbuster wizard will at last earn his first Oscar nomination for directing his tenth feature film, Dunkirk. He deserves it, as he creates a true cinematic spectacle set around a subject made for a true “guy’s night in.” Unlike other WWII films focused on the inner journey, Nolan utilizes the IMAX screen’s visual splendor to grasp the British soldiers’ first-person perspective whilst treading through turmoil to get back home.

For you longtime Nolanites, you should be pleased to hear that the Dark Knight director achieves what he promised us in his passion project: a well-researched claustrophobic thriller. Everything he has never been very good at in the past, such as expositional dialogue, is left out, while his true strengths, such as bending the rules, remain. He relies on action, rather than philosophical ramblings, to communicate his message. This project also demonstrates the best of his actor direction; the number of soldiers he directs unnerves you to watch as they line up at the beach and unanimously gaze upon the terror above. His finished product almost resembles real recolorized news footage.

These somehow endless events unravel in three separate narratives, each overlapping over different lengths of time. One takes place on the mole over a week, one takes place on the sea over a day, and one takes place in the air over an hour. (Think: Magnolia with a smaller cast) Each subplot feels truthful in authenticity as they unravel in real time, the clock pressing upon each one. The stories appear disconnected, then soon merge together into a graceful singular conclusion.

Each of these men, whether on the ground, on the sea, or in the air, are not meant to be understood on a personal level, particularly with the older soldiers. Nolan’s intention is in fact less for you to connect with the fictionalized war heroes, and more to see how the cost to fight affected everyone involved. Despite whatever little we learn of these men caught in the anarchy, we still believe them as traumatized souls as we watch them gaze upon death at every corner, even in the dry, empty French town behind them.

Aside from the lack of a memorable character study, you still see the soldiers support each other in the heat of their conflicts. Sadly though, a much present father-son relationship misses its open chance at adding some needed heart to give us a breather from the mayhem.

For the intended effect, Nolan’s heart-stopping experience must only be watched on the biggest screen out there, with the best quality speakers in the world. In the theater, the ear-splitting gunfire and jet engine hum rattles you from the inside all the way to beneath your seat. As for the visual elements, the impressive dogfights tumble sideways and upside down over the vast ocean. Then on the ground, the seafoam sprays onto your 3D glasses, disorienting your vision as the ship of soldiers loses buoyancy. Inside the interiors, the camera comes in uncomfortably close to the heated action, leaving no space left to squirm in your seat; it gives such a contrast against the massive exteriors, it makes you ponder each sequence’s behind-the-scenes process.

The intensity here would be wasted without the urgent music by the legendary Hans Zimmer. His score never stops ticking as the time for the bomb to go off gets nearer, which he achieves by stressing the stiff, harsh sounds of strings. You rarely realize the score’s effective prowess, as you’re too focused on the revulsion to notice. Heck, you could use Zimmer’s new Oscar-worthy piece to motivate your study sessions!

Yet like any great director, people will always find more critiques to press against Christopher Nolan’s greatest success. He deserves the already voiced criticisms about the little representation toward anyone besides British men, and he deserves further criticism about lacking a distinct “so what” to what is another WWII feature. But as a whole, Dunkirk stands as Christopher Nolan’s most thoughtful film to date; it impacts you enough to further research and discuss that dreadful day. Understanding the tragedy of violence is precisely what today’s generation needs to understand, and Nolan just put us back on the right path.… Expand
3 of 16 users found this helpful313
All this user's reviews
9
DubeauJul 29, 2017
Dunkirk follows closely certain characters and it plays with flashback. The music accentuate the tension and is interesting but surely not your typical orchestrated symphony. Even if the dialogues are sparse, you feel there is a very goodDunkirk follows closely certain characters and it plays with flashback. The music accentuate the tension and is interesting but surely not your typical orchestrated symphony. Even if the dialogues are sparse, you feel there is a very good reason for it. The actors are really good and seems all marked by the war in some ways. The film is more about the action then the strategy that went into the actual event and not war movie that focus on the bloody part too much. The planes scenes were my favourite because they show how hard it was to use them. The sky camera angles are spectacular and gives you the impression of being in the plane. I think the flashback between the planes and the boats can be hard to understand at first viewing. When I saw it a second time I was able to better connect the timeline. And in a way it made first viewing an exercise of connecting the dots... Otherwise this movie is intense because it doesn't really stop that much. It's nice to see Nolan getting behind an historical event, and see how he presented this. He did it with a certain form and style, with beautiful photography. I give it a 88%.… Expand
2 of 12 users found this helpful210
All this user's reviews
9
badgerryan19Jul 24, 2017
Another great movie by Christopher Nolan. Pretty much now going into all his movies all you gotta think is it gonna be a 9 or a 10. He's pretty much that good. I think this movie is one of his bests. I was a little confused about the run timeAnother great movie by Christopher Nolan. Pretty much now going into all his movies all you gotta think is it gonna be a 9 or a 10. He's pretty much that good. I think this movie is one of his bests. I was a little confused about the run time when I first saw it (106 minutes) being this is a huge historical event, but now I understand. The entire movie from the opening shot is no stop action and the movie focuses more on the actual event than the build up and huge speeches from brave men. The movie was very enjoyable and its loud and thrilling as well. The score is superb and Hans Zimmer and Nolan always seem to work beautifully with each other. The dog fights are intense and it's no Hollywood dogfights with loud explosions and blaring gunfire no its real gritty realistic action. The movie doesn't have a lot of dialogue, but that is to be expected. During an event like this you aren't gonna be sitting around chatting about every day things, your gonna be frighten, scared and shocked of the situation. The one thing about the movie that does lack is the character development, which there is practically none. I understand though because like I said it's more about the event and not the build up. There are just brave men stuck in a bad situation. All in all Nolan gives us another great movie that everyone should see ion the big screen.… Expand
1 of 6 users found this helpful15
All this user's reviews
10
FilmJunkie2020Nov 11, 2017
Dunkirk is a film of little dialogue, loud sounds, and extreme emotion. Regardless of what you thought about Christopher Nolan before, with Dunkirk, he has given us a masterclass in storytelling.
1 of 6 users found this helpful15
All this user's reviews
9
anmolrawatJul 24, 2017
It's not a movie, but an artistic piece that will surely bag many Oscars. I was a tad bit disappointed because something was missing from the movie. I absolutely loved the direction. Nolan shines here and arguably, it's all in his court thisIt's not a movie, but an artistic piece that will surely bag many Oscars. I was a tad bit disappointed because something was missing from the movie. I absolutely loved the direction. Nolan shines here and arguably, it's all in his court this time because there is no script to the movie. It's all about how he has portrayed the events through his perspective. I loved the BGM, which is obvious when Hans Zimmer is involved. I loved the acts; so believable. even Harry Styles, a singer gave a flawless act, now that's good direction. I loved the cinematography. Those grand shots with that epic score was phenomenal. I loved the climax scene. It gives you goosebumps literally. I loved how it does not involve back stories of characters, those blood boiling dialogues, war strategies, lead characters coming out like hero or the melodrama that is common with war movies. It is about the rescue and that's what you get to see. Loved his narration in three different perspectives. But still, I missed something.… Expand
1 of 7 users found this helpful16
All this user's reviews
8
43in2014Jul 21, 2017
The short review: It has many tense moments, all enchanced by great sound effects and a great Hans Zimmer soundtrack, but the film is too slow, has insufficient number of events and has an unsuccessful Momento(another Nolan film)-likeThe short review: It has many tense moments, all enchanced by great sound effects and a great Hans Zimmer soundtrack, but the film is too slow, has insufficient number of events and has an unsuccessful Momento(another Nolan film)-like story-telling style.
> Related media: The film is based on a real event. There's a 1958 film of the same name, but I've not seen it.
> What's it like?: Over 400,000 British and French soldiers trying to hold off Hitler's invasion of France had been defeated and pushed backed to, and are surrounded on three sides at, the port of Dunkirk. What followed is a slow and deadly evacuation to England, made worse by (1) The unexpected speed and success of the German army, (2) The Royal Navy not committing its best ships to the rescue in order to save them for the next battle, (3) The presence of German submarines, fighter planes and bombers, and (4) The limited range of the RAF fighter planes flying out from England.
> Pros:
> 1) There were many long tense moments, all enchanced by great sound effects and a great soundtrack. In reality, the entire evacuation took place over ten days, and the soldiers had to endure the waiting, the German fighter planes and the lack of food and water. The film makes you feel the dread of the wait and fear the possibility of death.
> Cons:
> 1) The film moved too slowly in many scenes. In one aspect, it seemed to want to emphasise the seriousness of some events by slowing things down. In other aspects, it tried to cover the slow movement of mid-twentieth century crafts. The slow trip of a sailing boat on engine power over the English Channel was just about bearable while the slow flight of Spitfire fighters (compared to modern jet fighters) was not that fun too. The director should have told more interesting stories or did better editing to speed up the storytelling.
>
2) The director had used the trope of one of his earlier film, Momento, to arrange his story in a non-linear form. However, it wasn't well done and it felt confusing and unconvincing.
>
3) The director had used the actions of a several lead characters to advance the plot. But as half of the lead actors are not that well known, and there were too many of them to cover, it was hard to feel for the characters. More focus on fewer lead characters would be better. >
4) There were supposed to be thousands of sea vessels of all sizes arriving in Dunkirk during the evacuation, but I saw no more than 20 at one time when viewing from Dunkirk Beach. Surely there was enough budget get more vessels in the water or to use CGI? >
5) Considering his CV and continuing from the previous point, Nolan should have been able to get a bigger budget to have more things happen in this film. I felt more could be done.
> How would the the different age groups rate it?
Children: (not rated for children)
Teens: Average
Young adults: Good
Medium age adults: Good
Old adults: Good
> Rating: 4/5 (no half scores). It's worth to see it in the cinema.… Expand
2 of 18 users found this helpful216
All this user's reviews
10
zorraDec 12, 2017
An important story & visual masterpiece by Nolan. Great work by ensemble cast: Mark Rylance, Jack Lowden, Cillian Murphy & Tom Hardy. Thoroughly enjoyed.
1 of 9 users found this helpful18
All this user's reviews
9
Kes4278Jul 30, 2017
It was a great movie. Not as great a Christopher Nolan's The Dark Knight but it was still a really good movie. The gun shots are so loud at IMAX and I hated that.
1 of 13 users found this helpful112
All this user's reviews
8
DirigiblePulpSep 28, 2017
This is a hard movie to love, at least at first. I appreciate what Nolan did with the overlapping storylines and the nonlinear storytelling, revealing time and perspective to be all-together subjective. I'm just not sure it always works fromThis is a hard movie to love, at least at first. I appreciate what Nolan did with the overlapping storylines and the nonlinear storytelling, revealing time and perspective to be all-together subjective. I'm just not sure it always works from a pure storytelling point of view. What is achieved is non-stop intensity, but at the expense of character, story and a bigger picture. The chaos of war has never been clearer but at what cost.

I found myself appreciating the ways in which each storyline overlapped and how that changed the perspective of the whole thing more than I did actually watching the film. Maybe it's something that will be rectified with time and more reflection. And this isn't to say the movie doesn't work, because it does and it never stops compelling and drawing in your interest, your mind, and your emotions.

Not up for debate however is the stunning majesty of this film. 70mm Imax at the Grand Canyon two days in a row and it was a visual feast like I've almost never experience before. The trailers leading up to the film looked good and all but then suddenly it was like someone opened a six story window into another world - it was that clear and that dramatic the increase in quality of the picture. Picture quality isn't supposed to get better when it gets bigger, especially this big, and yet there I was experiencing it. Let's hope we don't ever lose this.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
8
tonyGreenJan 29, 2020
Economical, visceral and very real. And starkly beautiful. Zimmer's soundtrack is perfectly cold and brooding, and the cinematography is very good.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
10
kyle_hydeJul 30, 2017
Today is Christopher Nolan's birthday and mine too and I decided to celebrate it watching Dunkirk. Best birthday gift ever. It make me feel lots of emotions, even if the length is 106 minutes it feels longer because you really get immersed onToday is Christopher Nolan's birthday and mine too and I decided to celebrate it watching Dunkirk. Best birthday gift ever. It make me feel lots of emotions, even if the length is 106 minutes it feels longer because you really get immersed on the plot. The acting is great, Hans Zimmer gives a powerful score and the camera angles are awesome. In this age of CGI and slow motion abuse is great to see a movie that doesn't do that. Overall a 10/10… Expand
0 of 5 users found this helpful05
All this user's reviews
9
nutterjrDec 22, 2017
Wow! What a score! Hans Zimmer is a genius and without trying to take anything away from the cinematic orgasm captured by Christopher Nolan in glorious 70mm film and told in his favourite non linear way. But the tick tock really is whatWow! What a score! Hans Zimmer is a genius and without trying to take anything away from the cinematic orgasm captured by Christopher Nolan in glorious 70mm film and told in his favourite non linear way. But the tick tock really is what grabbed me the most.… Expand
0 of 4 users found this helpful04
All this user's reviews
8
SchroederRockJul 31, 2017
Dunkirk is loud, varied/dynamic and epic. I had high expectations going in and the movie didn't disappoint. The story of Dunkirk and the British fleet being stranded on a beach just a short ways from English shores is quite a tale. NolanDunkirk is loud, varied/dynamic and epic. I had high expectations going in and the movie didn't disappoint. The story of Dunkirk and the British fleet being stranded on a beach just a short ways from English shores is quite a tale. Nolan tells the tale with his usual creative approach - layering 3 story-lines that fit together like pieces of a puzzle, which will connect in its final minutes. That won't make you go "a-ha!" like some of Nolan's other work but it will help fuse together the events and characters a little better. The clever approach of telling 3 stories that cover land, air and sea is interesting to think back on but it's also not essential for audiences to catch. It's all one event and it's explored with excellence in most cases.

Perhaps my biggest gripe with the movie is the lack of character background. That doesn't take away from the movie as-is but I felt less attached to the characters because of that. Without throwing any spoilers into the mix, it kind of helps throw one of the only plot twists into the mix but prevented me and those that I saw the movie with from walking away thinking this was a 10/10 film. It's worth a theater visit for sure, I just think Nolan missed an opportunity to add another layer here and make this movie a no-brainer for lots of Academy Awards for next year. The music and sound effects are intense. Zimmer and his associates here find ways to leverage intense moments with a crescendo of sound and music mix. Often, I found myself tensing up as the music or effects built up - the same approach used in The Dark Knight.

I will note that there was an article I read that said the lack of character backstory is intentional to help the audience feel more immersed in the events as if they were there experiencing it, however interesting characters tend to be a primary driver in taking a movie from good to great and Dunkirk pumps the brakes perhaps a little too much in that department for my preferred taste. Anyways, go see it!… Expand
0 of 3 users found this helpful03
All this user's reviews
8
TheQuietGamerFeb 15, 2018
Harrowing. Christopher Nolan's war film is not about big, bloody battles. Dunkirk's story takes place from several different perspectives. Cutoff and stranded, the British and French soldiers are just doing what they can to survive as theHarrowing. Christopher Nolan's war film is not about big, bloody battles. Dunkirk's story takes place from several different perspectives. Cutoff and stranded, the British and French soldiers are just doing what they can to survive as the Nazi's repeated attacks continue to reduce their numbers and moral as escape attempts are thwarted left and right. We will witness events from the eyes of those trying to leave Dunkirk and those trying to reach it in order to help, all primarily from the British viewpoint. An exquisitely beautiful film, Dunkirk surprised me by just how well it was able to convey the feelings of desperation the characters have without much spoken dialog. The tone is sad and even hopeless. Yet, things are never bleak enough to make it come off as a depressing experience a la The Road. No matter how brutal the setbacks are there's an undercurrent of light running throughout the film that keeps things from bringing the viewers down with a sense of all hope being lost for those onscreen. The ending is incredibly emotional, and not just for those with a soft spot for the military. These are more than just soldiers doing what is required of them. They are real people just trying to make it home or want to help. It's not just duty; it's humanity.

I found a slight, but fairly significant issue with how the narrative was presented. It's not entirely linear. There's a section in the latter half of the film where it will recap back to earlier events so that we may experience it from a different character. The time gap in between when we first witnessed it from a different perspective to when we make the leap back is so big it threw me off for a minute in regards to the timeline of events. I honestly can't think of a reason why Nolan didn't play it linearly outside of artistic/stylistic reasons. Personally, I think the choice hurt the flow of the movie.

Dunkirk is an impressive WWII movie that relies on it's characters and situation to portray the intensity of the war without relying on Nazi gunfire. In fact, we never actually see a Nazi onscreen. Some of their planes, yeah, but there isn't a traditional battle sequence to be found. None of the movie's power has been lost in taking this approach. Something that speaks well of the director's immense talent. It's a gripping film that will have you caring about characters before you even really hear them speak. Never before has such an awful situation made for such a beautiful watch.

8.1/10… Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
8
drlowdonJul 30, 2017
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Dunkirk tells the true story of the famous events in which hundreds of thousands of allied soldiers were evacuated from the beaches of Dunkirk and saved from capture or death at the hands of the invading German troops. Director Christopher Nolan has a stellar of history of creating intelligent big budget “summer blockbuster” movies (The Dark Knight and Inception being two prime examples) and he delivers again with Dunkirk. There is no shortage of action on land, at sea or in the air but Nolan’s now signature style of playing around with the chronology of scenes weaves the story into a web that continually ramps up the tension to a fitting climax.… Expand
0 of 4 users found this helpful04
All this user's reviews
10
kman5473Jul 30, 2017
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Nolan does it again, but this time with his first historical film. First, let me start by saying that if anyone else had decided to make a war film with just a handful of dialogue throughout and essentially only action, it almost definitely would not have worked. Performances are stellar throughout, but the real focus Nolan has in this WWII epic is about the real, shoulder-to-shoulder struggle that the soldiers on the front line were being put up against. If there was any CGI in this movie, I didn't notice it because nearly all of it was practical effects. Such a smart choice to have it so the only monologue throughout the film was the speech Churchill published in the papers the day after the evacuation. There is no playing with the emotions by way of artistic license in this film; it is all very grounded in its reality presented on screen. Nolan proves cinema is not dead.… Expand
0 of 6 users found this helpful06
All this user's reviews
7
currer_bellJan 13, 2018
This is your typical war movie that is getting rave reviews just because it's a war movie. I expected much more from Nolan's Dunkirk, especially since Inception is one of the best movie I've ever seen. Nonetheless, it's true the visuals andThis is your typical war movie that is getting rave reviews just because it's a war movie. I expected much more from Nolan's Dunkirk, especially since Inception is one of the best movie I've ever seen. Nonetheless, it's true the visuals and music is great. Acting is solid. It's also impressing to see Nolan make a movie out of a plot so thin. But that's also part of the problem ; the plot is really, REALLY thin. There's no story, no progression, no dialogues, no characters differences... So be aware that as far as entertainement is concern, Dunkirk can be a real nightmare.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
8
dharmaAug 7, 2017
A master at the peak of his career, Christoper Nolan utilizes his influence to create a relatively 'unusual' (i.e. reality based) blockbuster. Essentially an Imax showcase, it pulls out all sort of tricks that Nolan has learned throughoutA master at the peak of his career, Christoper Nolan utilizes his influence to create a relatively 'unusual' (i.e. reality based) blockbuster. Essentially an Imax showcase, it pulls out all sort of tricks that Nolan has learned throughout the years: large scale set pieces, both land and aerial, filmed in glorious IMAX. Too bad that at times, the film lost a bit of its intensity, simply because of its simple narrative (despite being told in Nolan's typical non linear style. This will be a big contender for all the technical Oscars in 2018.… Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
10
Iky009Jul 29, 2017
Nolan's cold and raw war in the smallest details, the reality is vivid and cruel, there is much more there in that port of Dunkirk, there are people helping each other, struggling and trying to survive at all costs, in the face of a horribleNolan's cold and raw war in the smallest details, the reality is vivid and cruel, there is much more there in that port of Dunkirk, there are people helping each other, struggling and trying to survive at all costs, in the face of a horrible war. Nolan brilliantly escapes the sameness of the genre by showing one of the best war films of recent years.… Expand
0 of 5 users found this helpful05
All this user's reviews
8
sanyrubDec 31, 2017
We could say the film gives us one of the most brilliant thecnical spectacles we have ever seen. The film is a 10 in that regard. Stunning cinematography. Hanns Zimmer does it again with the score too. The guy is something else. And then...We could say the film gives us one of the most brilliant thecnical spectacles we have ever seen. The film is a 10 in that regard. Stunning cinematography. Hanns Zimmer does it again with the score too. The guy is something else. And then... there´s a but: there is no story (almost). It´s definitely not a flaw because it´s obvious that´s what Nolan went for this go around. But it makes it not have emotional punch, like Interstellar, Inception and other of his films have a plenty. Despite that, the film is not boring by any means, which says a lot about its quality. Deserves all the nominations it is gettings. But I would only give it the technical awards.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
8
NathonasAug 18, 2017
Solid war movie. I think its biggest weakness is the difficulty of combining the three perspectives into one coherent storyline, and the lack of a central character.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
9
joyalDec 7, 2017
Well crafted,Outstanding cinematography n excellent screenplay ,well fit music by Han zimmer beautifully filmed,emotionally deep engaging war movie presented without showing any brutal murder scenes or blood by brilliant maker Nolan
0 of 3 users found this helpful03
All this user's reviews
10
AndremaxJul 10, 2018
The realism in this picture is incredible. An emotional, epic, strong and attractive story. One of the best Nolan's movies.
0 of 3 users found this helpful03
All this user's reviews
10
kwjduffJul 30, 2017
Dunkirk is one of the best war movies of all time. Its unique structure makes it very different to other war movies. The best thing about this movie is how intense it is, with the outstanding music from Hans Zimmer and the use of actual gunDunkirk is one of the best war movies of all time. Its unique structure makes it very different to other war movies. The best thing about this movie is how intense it is, with the outstanding music from Hans Zimmer and the use of actual gun shots, explosions and aeroplanes. The movie screams authenticity, which makes it feel so real. While this review is short, I do want emphasise that it is better if you go see it for yourself, as it really is an incredible movie.… Expand
0 of 5 users found this helpful05
All this user's reviews
9
FortifierDec 15, 2017
Don't go into this film expecting an incredibly entertaining, Hollywood-style story. Go into this film expecting to literally feel like you're one of the soldiers in the battle of Dunkirk. That's what so good about this film.
0 of 3 users found this helpful03
All this user's reviews
10
marcmyworksJul 30, 2017
Dunkirk is the type of film I normally would feel uneasy watching because of its real and visceral nature. However Director/Writer Christopher Nolan focuses more on the emotional nature of groups of characters rather than the gore we normallyDunkirk is the type of film I normally would feel uneasy watching because of its real and visceral nature. However Director/Writer Christopher Nolan focuses more on the emotional nature of groups of characters rather than the gore we normally see in a film about WW2. This film is beautifully shot, with an eerily silent, yet suspenseful quality.… Expand
0 of 5 users found this helpful05
All this user's reviews
9
oDjentoAug 13, 2017
This isn't a war movie, it is a survival movie. A film that has an interesting narrative structure that doesn't hold your hand to try explain the chronology. The film is tense, largely in due part to Hans Zimmers score but Nolans directingThis isn't a war movie, it is a survival movie. A film that has an interesting narrative structure that doesn't hold your hand to try explain the chronology. The film is tense, largely in due part to Hans Zimmers score but Nolans directing here is incredible, some truly breathtaking scenes and sequences. The script struggles at times and I found "The Sea" storyline the least effective (decent payoff for the end though) but everything else is incredibly made. So much visual storytelling and atmosphere, with hardly any dialogue to propel the movie forward. Kenneth Brannahs character is pointless admittedly, just being paid to walk up and down a promenade and spout out things about trying to get home but still despite this films few minor shortcomings overall the whole payoff is amazing. Great ending too, when you finally hear that stopwatch stop ticking you finally release the tension that you've built up from start to end over the movie. A must watch for sure, and even better in IMAX.… Expand
0 of 3 users found this helpful03
All this user's reviews
9
bfoore90Mar 21, 2018
A powerful and intense look at the event that took place at Dunkirk during World War 2. Dunkirk is possibly one of the greatest victories for the British against nearly impossible odds, the Germans were fast approaching, time was short andA powerful and intense look at the event that took place at Dunkirk during World War 2. Dunkirk is possibly one of the greatest victories for the British against nearly impossible odds, the Germans were fast approaching, time was short and people were dying. While it does suffer because its lack of characterization and dialogue, it's still a great retelling of the events that occurred at Dunkirk… Expand
0 of 3 users found this helpful03
All this user's reviews
8
temptershellSep 17, 2017
Film about war in anti-war climate. Showing the tragedy of the war and all of this conflict of turmoil went out to Nolan excellently only in my case I did not buy it. Practically no soundtrack and tiring, long scenes with panoramas orFilm about war in anti-war climate. Showing the tragedy of the war and all of this conflict of turmoil went out to Nolan excellently only in my case I did not buy it. Practically no soundtrack and tiring, long scenes with panoramas or sequences of military conflict just bore me. The film is worth attention but unfortunately it is not my climate.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
8
poewilsonSep 30, 2017
The P.H. Metric 82/100

Directing: 9/10 The directing takes a hit, not because of Nolan’s efforts, but because of the script supervisor who I place in the directing section. Within the opening bombing of the film, (aside from PG-13ingThe P.H. Metric 82/100

Directing: 9/10

The directing takes a hit, not because of Nolan’s efforts, but because of the script supervisor who I place in the directing section. Within the opening bombing of the film, (aside from PG-13ing something that should have been utterly horrific) the beach that was just blasted with several bombs does not seem to have taken a strike in any form. The men laying on the ground have no blasts sites near them or anything of that nature and this same issue reappears through out the film.

As for Nolan from the moment we hit the beach and you see that shot taken of those two wooden pillars you can feel the influence of silent era films, which gives Dunkirk a completely different delivery to 99% of the other war films out there.

Acting: 6/10

Due to the film be shot in the vein of a silent film the acting did not need to be perfect and the sheer lack of dialogue presented Nolan with the chance to cast near unknowns which added to the depth of the film and the soldiers naivete, however what little acting was on display did not amount to any grand gesture of the art, but instead more akin to Bicycle Thieves.

Cinematography: 9/10

Superb, not Lubezeki great, but excellent none the less (also I should divulge I am a huge Cinematography nerd) I have been a fan of Hoytema’s work since Låt den rätte komma in and he continues to impress with some of his most exquisite work to date.

Editing 9/10

Superb, couple of shots that did not quite gel as well as they should but ultimately the editing is on point and delivers action in just the right manner.

Score: 10/10

Hans Zimmer’s score is pulse pounding and on point in every frame of the film, from start to finish it will leave you a sense dread that the film itself never truly captilaises on, but that is in no way the fault of Zimmer. Nolan’s use of the Shepard tone was brilliant and really gives life to the piece.

Visual Effects: 9/10

Are stunning and capture the world perfectly, but this like many of Nolan’s other films are due to his love of practical effects and I tend to agree if they are done correctly, you get a better quality image that does not age near as horribly.

Writing: 5/10

The film takes a heavy hit in terms of the writing, what with the script running a lean 76 pages. I can appreciate the improvised nature Nolan was trying to create, as war is chaos and there are no heroes spewing golden lines of perfection, however the lines that were on display were unrelentingly movie-esque to the point that the sense of realism that he was trying to portray with the improvisation gets washed away in a sea tropes.

Production Design 8/10

Again only for the pedantic but there are host of anachronisms that plague the film and several shots with buildings that should not be there, that really feel like production design and costume design issues.

Costume Design 8/10

Again only for the pedantic but there are host of anachronisms that plague the film and several shots with buildings that should not be there, that really feel like production design and costume design issues.

Make-up/Hairstyle 9/10

Make-up had an easy run on this film when compared to many modern war films, but for what they did contribute they did a great job. No awards obviously, but they came out and made sure that everything looked decent.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
8
markopolousDec 21, 2017
This movie surprised me quite a bit and I wouldn’t be surprised if I think it’s even better upon second viewing. Nolan has used a unique - if not greatly illuminating - structure to tell this massive ensemble story in a tightly edited 106This movie surprised me quite a bit and I wouldn’t be surprised if I think it’s even better upon second viewing. Nolan has used a unique - if not greatly illuminating - structure to tell this massive ensemble story in a tightly edited 106 minutes. While the plotting was a little confusing for too long in my opinion, and didn’t really amount to a major wow moment, I am really impressed with how Nolan chose to tell this story. His mastery of tone, particularly hopelessness, carries the viewer on the edge of our seat through the entire film. You really feel for nearly all the characters even though you hardly get to know them through dialogue or most normal techniques. The cinematography is quite beautiful, the score effective though overused. Cast is top notch. There are some very memorable elements to this film, like when the English soldiers get into the boat and it starts getting shot at by the Germans while the tide rises. The way they turn on each other as they deal with the flooding ship and enemy soldiers outside is a real nail biter. Nolan definitely stepped it up for this film.… Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
9
UrbanlistenerJul 30, 2017
One of Nolan's best project so far, a masterpiece in its own lane that offers a hideously beautiful spectacle about the battle of Dunkirk. The cinematography is absolutely gorgeous, the music is mesmerizing, the acting is perfect in itsOne of Nolan's best project so far, a masterpiece in its own lane that offers a hideously beautiful spectacle about the battle of Dunkirk. The cinematography is absolutely gorgeous, the music is mesmerizing, the acting is perfect in its subtle and nuanced way and the visual effects are breathtaking. We are literally thrown into battle from the first second and it never ends until the last. An unnerving and highly stressful experience that gives the full scope of what happened at Dunkirk decades ago, without exaggerating anything, using shock value or showing any blood and gore.… Expand
0 of 6 users found this helpful06
All this user's reviews
9
spencieOct 23, 2017
Christopher Nolan's most intense movie, Dunkirk is a masterfully directed and edited film. The cinematography is beautiful and the directing is just so perfect. The performances are all great, but the characters have nothing to them. DunkirkChristopher Nolan's most intense movie, Dunkirk is a masterfully directed and edited film. The cinematography is beautiful and the directing is just so perfect. The performances are all great, but the characters have nothing to them. Dunkirk is one of the most unique war films I've ever seen not because of the story, but because of the great, unique editing and perfect directing.… Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
8
jbrown8989Aug 8, 2017
Lived up the hype! Surprisingly there was not much dialogue but the cinematography was amazing. It is different from your traditional movie as it gets right into the action instead of building up to the storyline. Definitely one of the betterLived up the hype! Surprisingly there was not much dialogue but the cinematography was amazing. It is different from your traditional movie as it gets right into the action instead of building up to the storyline. Definitely one of the better movies this year.… Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
Page:
More From This Movie

94 Critic Reviews

8.2 User Reviews

Details & Credits|Trailers

Current Movie Releases
By MetascoreBy User Score
1 77 Project Hail Mary
2 75 Send Help
3 73 Hoppers
4 71 The Sheep Detectives
5 68 Crime 101
SEE ALL
Essential Links
New on Amazon Prime Video
New on Netflix
Coming Soon to DVD/Blu-ray
SEE ALL