2001: A Space Odyssey
Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer (MGM) | Release Date: April 2, 1968
8.2
USER SCORE
Universal acclaim based on 1319 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
1,086
Mixed:
79
Negative:
154
Watch Now
Stream On
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)

User Reviews

User scoreBy dateMost helpful
0
csw12Nov 16, 2014
From one of the dumbest opening scenes to an ending that can be describe as one of the worst in history, a 2001: A Space Odyssey is nothing but a dull pretentious film that for almost it's 3 hour length, had less to offer than a blank whiteFrom one of the dumbest opening scenes to an ending that can be describe as one of the worst in history, a 2001: A Space Odyssey is nothing but a dull pretentious film that for almost it's 3 hour length, had less to offer than a blank white wall. This is the worst science fiction movie I've ever seen.… Expand
3 of 13 users found this helpful310
All this user's reviews
0
SelnAdamsApr 30, 2013
When a film "requires" you to always wonder, it has failed.

A good movie should be able to stand on its own and not require one to interpret more than the bear meaning of it's content. The more a movie needs to be analyzed apart fromWhen a film "requires" you to always wonder, it has failed.

A good movie should be able to stand on its own and not require one to interpret more than the bear meaning of it's content.

The more a movie needs to be analyzed apart from its self, the more it becomes a subjective object in the mind of the viewer.

Why would I need to watch 2001 and ponder about life and the universe when I can ponder about the subject at anytime, anywhere?

Write something, or find a new profession.… Expand
3 of 14 users found this helpful311
All this user's reviews
2
Delta_AssaultSep 28, 2011
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I recently rewatched 2001 to reassess it. Give it another fair shake. It's still just... not good. The pace is still excruciatingly slow, and that 15-20 minute MP3 visualizer sequence still looks dumb. You can tell that by the end, they aren't even trying anymore, and just started showing footage of the Grand Canyon with loopy colors. The monkey sequence at the beginning's probably the best part of the film, it's not quite as bad. It's not quite as slow and dull. The makeup work they did on those apesuits was great, you can stand back a bit from the television and if you didn't know it was a film, you might actually think it was documentary footage. I've read all four 2001 novels by Arthur C. Clarke. The 2001 novel's great. The story's very well told in that book. But Kubrick's storytelling just kills this story. Just kills it. It's an epic journey, a literal Space Odyssey. I just don't think Kubrick's storytelling conveys that in a satisfying manner. And again, nobody needs to sit in a theater and stare at a visualizer sequence for 15 minutes. That's just torture. It was just aimless, tedious and boring. Whereas I think a human being traveling through a stargate and observing the wonders of the universe, stars being birthed, supernovas exploding, interstellar exchange systems, etc, would be awed and amazed. I was not awed and amazed by what they showed me. It did not look like the wonders of the universe while traveling at a high speed. It looked like colorful garbage. Followed by some footage of the Grand Canyon and an ocean with color substitution. That's not the majesty of the universe. Wearing the audience down with tedious rubbish is not the same as wearing Bowman down with amazing galactic sights. The latter is what's supposed to be going on in the story. Some might argue that the rubbish is supposed to be rubbish because what Bowman is going through can't actually be processed, his mind won't accept it, and so it has to be shown as a jumble of rubbish. Well, that's just not good film-making. You can't just throw up your arms and declare it unfilmable, and show us a lot of **** onscreen. Film is a visual medium, we need to see stuff. That stuff should generally be interesting to watch. Showing us really awful visuals and declaring it to be the point and that it's supposed to be really awful visuals, well... that might be the intent, but it doesn't change the fact that the viewer has just seen really awful visuals. That's not fair to the audience. If your whole concept is to have something that's unimaginable and incomprehensible and unknowable, just stop right there. Don't make the **** film, at all. There's nothing to be done with that, just don't go on the endeavor.… Expand
2 of 10 users found this helpful28
All this user's reviews
0
AnthonyP.Jul 1, 2008
After hearing all this acclaim for this movie I thought it was going to be a spectacular movie. Instead I was submitted to 25 minutes of monkeys screaming at eachother, over an hour total of scenes of space with just music or breathing, and After hearing all this acclaim for this movie I thought it was going to be a spectacular movie. Instead I was submitted to 25 minutes of monkeys screaming at eachother, over an hour total of scenes of space with just music or breathing, and and a sparse half hour total of actual dialogue. The concept is great, the execution is painfully slow and boring.… Expand
1 of 5 users found this helpful
6
NitishJul 23, 2013
First thing first, this is not a movie; this is a piece of art completely focused on realism, logics and detailing of complicated space science of expected future. Additionally some imaginations are also added in the movie to giveFirst thing first, this is not a movie; this is a piece of art completely focused on realism, logics and detailing of complicated space science of expected future. Additionally some imaginations are also added in the movie to give philosophical and dramatic touch.
Overall this is a combination of Failure and success and both are so much mixed up with each other that one can’t classify them.
Still elements of success and failure are as under:-

SUCCESS POINTS
• Most detailed and realistic picturization of outer space and technology.
• Realistic acting.
• No attempt to create any kind of thrill, a completely different approach for a Sci-Fi movie.
• Beautiful use of Music.

FAILURES POINTS

• Lack of connectivity through entire movie between the different phases.
• Lack of conclusiveness. (Either thrill or conclusiveness, one is must).
• Poor ending.… Expand
1 of 5 users found this helpful14
All this user's reviews
9
SilverManOct 7, 2012
It doesnt make any sense!!!! It's hard to understand the story, and it's too long and it has some unnecessary parts, therefore it looks like they prefer the worst scenes. I just gave it a 9 becuase this is not a movie, it is a psychdelicIt doesnt make any sense!!!! It's hard to understand the story, and it's too long and it has some unnecessary parts, therefore it looks like they prefer the worst scenes. I just gave it a 9 becuase this is not a movie, it is a psychdelic experience, a outrageous epiphany. It must be aprecciated with patience and open-mind.… Expand
1 of 7 users found this helpful16
All this user's reviews
0
davidbApr 19, 2009
This movie made me so mad I went on the internet and searched for worst movie ever so I could vote for it.
0 of 9 users found this helpful
10
AlonsoCApr 2, 2010
Pink Floyd in movie form.
0 of 1 users found this helpful
10
EdCNov 23, 2009
A movie for the ages. Gets your attention early and never lets go. A movie I can watch a hundred times and still get fascinated by. The Best movie of All Time.
0 of 1 users found this helpful
0
AdamN.Aug 19, 2009
If I were a US soldier who held a terrorist captive and wanted to receive valuable or any source of information from him, but the sergent refuses to give me any, make him watch this horrible film in a dark chamber. He'll be pleading for If I were a US soldier who held a terrorist captive and wanted to receive valuable or any source of information from him, but the sergent refuses to give me any, make him watch this horrible film in a dark chamber. He'll be pleading for mercy to get him out of there.… Expand
0 of 4 users found this helpful
0
ThomasB.Dec 28, 2008
The worst film I've ever seen. What does the film want to be? This is no art it's only crap. Please dont see this film, every euro you would spend on it is lost, lost, lost.
0 of 18 users found this helpful
10
SouravDec 31, 2010
2001: A Space Odyssey is a 1968 science fiction film by Stanley Kubrick (who happens to be my favourite director as well). Being my favorite film, I have recommended this it to almost everyone I know. This review is more like an answer to2001: A Space Odyssey is a 1968 science fiction film by Stanley Kubrick (who happens to be my favourite director as well). Being my favorite film, I have recommended this it to almost everyone I know. This review is more like an answer to those who found this film slow-paced, and for those yet to watch it, you may continue to read this as a disclaimer to the film-

Iâ… Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
7
AlienSpaceBatsJul 30, 2011
Its tempting to consider 2001 a companion piece to Arthur C. Clarke's novel only, as its visual narrative can be hard to grasp for many. Is it boring? Yes, but will it blow your mind? Probably.
0 of 3 users found this helpful03
All this user's reviews
10
cpt_zeep23Sep 7, 2011
kubrick's 2001 is a film that when i first saw it, i hated it. i think it's the kind of film that you have to... speak it's language to understand what the hell is going on. having said that, watching the film now i have to say it's one of mykubrick's 2001 is a film that when i first saw it, i hated it. i think it's the kind of film that you have to... speak it's language to understand what the hell is going on. having said that, watching the film now i have to say it's one of my favorite films. it's utterly hypnotic and that tremendous sense of everything that is unfathomable is all through the film. i really liked hal, the artificial intelligence and found it profoundly disturbing when they "killed" him. as far as the ending goes, i have my own interpretation of it, but a definite answer as to what it "means", i have no idea. but i'm not sure i want to know. it's as mysterious as the universe.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
8
JLLorenJan 2, 2013
An amazing cinematic experience that engages the viewer with its visuals. Blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
10
SherwoodReviewsApr 4, 2012
Beautiful, mesmerising, dazzling, astonshing, there really aren't enough adjectives in the world with which to successfully describe Kubrick's Sci-Fi masterpiece. Few films, if any, take the viewer on a trip like this one; it is less likeBeautiful, mesmerising, dazzling, astonshing, there really aren't enough adjectives in the world with which to successfully describe Kubrick's Sci-Fi masterpiece. Few films, if any, take the viewer on a trip like this one; it is less like watching a story unfold than like having part in a strange and beautiful experience, a journey into the unknowable. Simply put, I have never seen a film that had such a profound, emotional effect on me, and it is, quite possibly, the greatest movie ever made.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
10
MB1097Sep 18, 2013
Don't kid yourself. It isn't for everybody. Kubrick wasn't interested in mass appeal by any stretch of the imagination. He wanted to explore the depths of mans technological capacity, which meant highlighting his inherent flaws. In essence,Don't kid yourself. It isn't for everybody. Kubrick wasn't interested in mass appeal by any stretch of the imagination. He wanted to explore the depths of mans technological capacity, which meant highlighting his inherent flaws. In essence, this is a film about error, about questions. And, in the end, it leaves us bewildered.… Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
7
CPD98Jul 21, 2014
Que difícil es hacer una crítica de esta película... la odio y me gusta a la vez. Una película muy compleja, buena para la época en la que se hizo, ya que si la hubieran hecho el año pasado puede que le bajara dos o tres puntos. De KubrickQue difícil es hacer una crítica de esta película... la odio y me gusta a la vez. Una película muy compleja, buena para la época en la que se hizo, ya que si la hubieran hecho el año pasado puede que le bajara dos o tres puntos. De Kubrick hay obras mejores pero esta al fin y al cabo es una buena película.… Expand
0 of 3 users found this helpful03
All this user's reviews
10
AxeTAug 30, 2018
In IMAX for the first time upon its 50th anniversary re-release, there is no more fitting title for the large format and there is perhaps no work of cinema with a bigger canvas except maybe "Star Wars". Its visual effects and soundtrack areIn IMAX for the first time upon its 50th anniversary re-release, there is no more fitting title for the large format and there is perhaps no work of cinema with a bigger canvas except maybe "Star Wars". Its visual effects and soundtrack are as realistic, as awesome, and as transcendently artistic as any that came before or have since in its wake. This is science fiction at its loftiest taking on the story of mankind itself with more grandeur and mystery than any motion picture has ever dared. Though known for its experimental nature over conventional narrative form the simple story is actually potently strong in its brilliant minimalism in service of sublime theme. It's Kubrick's greatest masterpiece of many, and like all his work does not readily appeal in typical 'movie movie' ways nor fully divulge itself upon initial viewings.… Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
9
merijnjFeb 21, 2018
(93/100)
Stanley YOU ARE MY HERO! This movie is one of my favorite sci-fi movies of all time.
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
10
DwayneHernandeAug 13, 2019
In my opinion the great film ever made. This is art. From the technical skills to the themes and motifs nothing can match 2001 in my opinion. Citizen Kane asks good questions central to the meaning of life of a man, but 2001 asks us to ponderIn my opinion the great film ever made. This is art. From the technical skills to the themes and motifs nothing can match 2001 in my opinion. Citizen Kane asks good questions central to the meaning of life of a man, but 2001 asks us to ponder not just our lives but our very place in the vast cosmos. The film is long, but you won't look at the watch at all. The cinematography is still so good it is hard to imagine this is a 50-year-old film. Keir Dullea is great as the center stage in a mainly special effects laden film, but such is his composure that we the audience associate with him solely, against the backdrop of the cold, inconsiderate blackness of space and high tech. Thus Spake Zarathustra will forever be associated with this great film and the soundtrack is so good in complementing its subject one cannot imagine the film without it. Above all 2001 A Space Odyssey is the work child of a genius(The greatest motion picture ever, all things considered)… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
2
mckaing10277Jun 8, 2022
the audio is horrible to go along with the dated 60s style. I couldn't make it through this dated classic
0 of 6 users found this helpful06
All this user's reviews
3
cirkomiknaApr 21, 2022
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This movie feels highly overrated to me. It hasn't aged well, too. This movie doesn't make sense at all. There are three independent story arcs that don't have anything to do with each other. The first arc is that people found signs of alien life, and people are sent to investigate that. But that story point is completely dropped. Why is it in the movie?
The second arc is how the crew struggles with HAL. That was maybe revolutionary 40 years ago, but it does not hold up. There are so many good films with robots turning on their masters that you don't need to sit through this. Like the whole film, this conflict is way to stretched out, slow paced and boring. At the same time, considering that nothing happens, the conflict escalates and is resolved way to fast. There's not even a hint of the tension that other films managed to achieve with the same theme. And then there's the ending, which does not make sense at all. People like to act all pretentious and call it artistic and transcending, but it's just a bunch of noise and colors bundled together with scenes that don't make any sense. The entire movie has just been obliterated by the passage of time.… Expand
0 of 6 users found this helpful06
All this user's reviews
10
RobS.Mar 2, 2010
A Classic that still holds up after 40+ years. One of my favorites however, I had read the book before seeing the film, so the story makes sense.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
WakoJ.May 7, 2006
Finally saw this flick and finally understand what all the fuss is about, from those who love it and from those who hate it. For my part, I mostly appreciated this as one is apt to appreciate an awe inspiring work of art. I liked it more Finally saw this flick and finally understand what all the fuss is about, from those who love it and from those who hate it. For my part, I mostly appreciated this as one is apt to appreciate an awe inspiring work of art. I liked it more after doing some reading on it, guess I'm not smart enough to figure everything out by myself. Perhaps that is the point of the movie, and the best advice I can give: don't try to figure it out too much. In time things will sink in and bring different meanings to different people, the way all great art does.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
JamesMNov 19, 2005
Like Kubrick's own A Clockwork Orange, 2001: A Space Odyssey is striking, hypnotic and masterfully directed. Unlike that film, however, 2001 is less direct and allows it's true motives to slowly unfold. As each amazing event is Like Kubrick's own A Clockwork Orange, 2001: A Space Odyssey is striking, hypnotic and masterfully directed. Unlike that film, however, 2001 is less direct and allows it's true motives to slowly unfold. As each amazing event is revealed, the moon landing, HAL, the incredible and ambiguous conclusion, the viewer feels increasingly amazed and stunned. Few other films create the same haunting effect that 2001 achieves, and I do not think there is a single more philosophical film in existance. 2001 must be seen by everyone. Whether you may find it slow, tedious or pretentious, 2001 succeeds in making something bigger of our existances than the day to day lives we currently live. Films simply do not get any better.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
JimfromChicagoDec 9, 2005
When a prehistoric ape, having used a bone as a primitive tool, tosses it in the air, and suddenly it changes into a white spacecraft in Earth orbit, one of cinema's greatest movie moments has struck you square. This movie has many more When a prehistoric ape, having used a bone as a primitive tool, tosses it in the air, and suddenly it changes into a white spacecraft in Earth orbit, one of cinema's greatest movie moments has struck you square. This movie has many more unforgetable images. As a movie bad guy, compare Hal to, say, Darth Vader. Isn't Hal a profoundly more chilling character? Do you, like me, find yourself in difficult situations where the first thing entering your mind is, "Open the pod bay door, Hal." After 25 years of advances in movie special effects, space flight has still never been more beautifully portrayed. Yup, I like thlis flick.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
tornwalda.Apr 26, 2005
This is without a doubt one of the best films ever made. Stephen Hunter from the Washington Post is a complete idiot if he rates this film with 10 out of 100. A timeless classic.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
PatC.Apr 3, 2006
A presentation without conclusions where the viewer must do all the thinking, and a solid reassurance that man's ultimate place in the universe is, at least for a time, a very lonely one. But for every level it attempts, no film excels better.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
JohnSMay 23, 2009
The best audio-visual mediation on the origins, the now and the future of man. The depth of this movie is only revealed over successive viewings. Still waiting for kubrick's successor in the celluloid format.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
JimT.Aug 19, 2009
Is there a rating greater than 10? This movie would have it. A work of true genius. And much more, a spiritual journey. Kubrick went for it and hit a home run, for all time.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
JakeB.Aug 12, 2006
I'm always fascinated by the mixed reviews of this film. There's basically no middle ground. You either love it or hate it. Not surprisingly, most of the works of Stanley Kubrick receive similar treatment. Such is the price of true I'm always fascinated by the mixed reviews of this film. There's basically no middle ground. You either love it or hate it. Not surprisingly, most of the works of Stanley Kubrick receive similar treatment. Such is the price of true artistic genius and I believe the term aptly applies to him. Film is our most modern form of art. It is a learned craft in the same vein as painting or music composition. Yes, I'm saying a film can be on the same level as a Debussy symphony or a Dostoevsky novel, for examples. The operative word is "can" or "may." Its collaborative nature doesn't exclude it as an art form. When Michaelangelo painted the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel, he couldn't have done it without carpenters and assistants. But, it was his vision, and a film can be the spawn of one person's imagination and efforts and that person is the director. A director free from the control of a studio, who involves him or herself in every aspect of the filmmaking process, particularly the script, photography and the editting, is just like a painter or composer. There are few filmmakers with this level of power, skill and knowledge. Stanley Kubrick was one of the few. And, 2001: A Space Odyssey is truly a work of art. Time, the true measure by which these things are judged, will tell. When historians of the future analyze the accomplishments of man (of this epoch) from an artistic perspective, this film will be an example of our capabilities, and I'm not sure we could present a better one.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
IanR.May 18, 2007
Masterfully done. Every aspect of the film, from the slow build up of anticipation, the overtone of visual and audio, to the audacious and hypnotic ending, adds to the overall depiction of mans inability to manipulate the unstoppable force Masterfully done. Every aspect of the film, from the slow build up of anticipation, the overtone of visual and audio, to the audacious and hypnotic ending, adds to the overall depiction of mans inability to manipulate the unstoppable force of time and the transitional stages it brings. The director tacitly demonstrates the central concept of this allegorical film with a combination of elements uncommon in modern film making. Brilliant, absolutely brilliant.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
NathanHNov 20, 2009
No science fiction film has ever come close to this. Haters: go watch Transformers and stop criticizing something you don't understand.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
DanielRMar 19, 2009
This film is simply just art. The film includes phemomenal use of music; mankind's best music played against the backdrop of outer space where there is no mankind, the acting present is flawless while never shining, nor does it have to This film is simply just art. The film includes phemomenal use of music; mankind's best music played against the backdrop of outer space where there is no mankind, the acting present is flawless while never shining, nor does it have to be as this film focuses more on machines and the beauty and mystery of space which is shown beautifully and mysteriously here. The plot may be hard to follow by a lot of viewers but there is no denying that is cinematic art at it's very best and most probably the best film of kubrick's career and possibly the best film ever made. Prepare to be amazed.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
TonyB.Nov 25, 2005
This is, quite simply, among the greatest of films. What it does is to seamlessly and brilliantly mesh science fiction, philosophy, religion, and political and social commentary and satire into one grand design. I have seen it numerous times This is, quite simply, among the greatest of films. What it does is to seamlessly and brilliantly mesh science fiction, philosophy, religion, and political and social commentary and satire into one grand design. I have seen it numerous times in theatres with variously sized screens and on video and still maintain there has never been anything like it. (And it was made by Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, not Warner Brothers, despite what the Metacritic people say!)… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
AmriT240892Jul 31, 2011
Stanley has proved that no other director can stand next to him by this movie.The greatest epiphany? That the monolith represents the film screen itself, with its black rectangular appearance. And that the monolith is also depicted as theStanley has proved that no other director can stand next to him by this movie.The greatest epiphany? That the monolith represents the film screen itself, with its black rectangular appearance. And that the monolith is also depicted as the catalyst for change only encourages the notion that we actually evolve as we watch ourselves on the screen, and furthermore, BECOME what we see. And that's what 2001 is ultimately about; becoming. Constant becoming.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
ImUnavailableJul 10, 2011
A masterpiece unlike any other movie. The multiple stories and themes combine to make an experience that really does feel like an odyssey. This is a movie about evolution, progression and existence, although it may fly over some viewersA masterpiece unlike any other movie. The multiple stories and themes combine to make an experience that really does feel like an odyssey. This is a movie about evolution, progression and existence, although it may fly over some viewers heads. The beginning and ending sequences were particularly impressive due to the reliance on imagery to tell the story in the absence of dialogue. The brilliant cinematography beautifully captures the grace and majesty of traveling in space but also of the vast nothingness that fills it. Anyone with even a vague interest in cinema should see this movie.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
cabritaJul 16, 2012
The film works as a transcendent of genre. It is a true art film! Space Odyssey attempts to give us a sense of awe through it's great audio visual experience. To quote Ebert loosely it works in a similar way as music!
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
MetallicCriticDec 13, 2011
What I found wrong with this film? Absolutely nothing. Everything was very well produced. The acting, directing, writing they where all perfect. I rarely give a film a perfect five star rating. This film deserves the stars and maybe evenWhat I found wrong with this film? Absolutely nothing. Everything was very well produced. The acting, directing, writing they where all perfect. I rarely give a film a perfect five star rating. This film deserves the stars and maybe even more. I fell in love with HAL 9000. He(it) had a rather dull feel to his personality. The film did mention that HAL 9000 had feelings. Which was perfect for building up the plot. Did anyone else notice that technology was predicted in this film? Technology such as video phone, and ipads. The whole time I was viewing this film I was confused. I should have read the book. But after watching the film I did some reading online. I was like, now I get it. Genius pure genius. The monolith made me think very hard, especially at the end. My favorite part had to be the colors at the end, very artistic. With a very slow paced plot and no flaws I recommend this to anyone that is a movie literate.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
House0fWolves_Dec 16, 2011
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Some parts were extremely interesting, some were hard to sit through. The color sequence that lasted ten minutes and the long first stage of evolution with the primates were definitely both my favorite parts of the film. The ending was confusing and awful, in my opinion. It left me wondering why they would end a film with that much potential like a premature fetus.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
jack977Jan 11, 2013
Its greatness lies in the fact that it raises many questions, but never answers any of them. The best dialogues in the film come in the form of silence - the sheer volumes they speak. 2001 is not meant to be understood. It's meant to be felt.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
Iky009Jan 6, 2014
Clássico máximo da ficção científica, um dos filmes mais emblemáticos do cinema.Clássico máximo da ficção científica, um dos filmes mais emblemáticos do cinema. … Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
SwatiDec 7, 2013
2001 is a visual and audio marvel. The visual effects and the set design were decades ahead of its time, and still look exquisite in the twenty-first century. Many of its techniques were imitated, and a greater number were inspired by it.2001 is a visual and audio marvel. The visual effects and the set design were decades ahead of its time, and still look exquisite in the twenty-first century. Many of its techniques were imitated, and a greater number were inspired by it.

The movie starts around the time humans came into being. Two tribes of apes clash over a pond of water. One is driven away. They discover something that perhaps gives them intelligence, which they use to defeat their rivals. The plot jumps into the future where a similar object, which might have been left behind by intelligent beings some four million years earlier, is discovered on the moon. A team is sent to Jupiter to further investigate the matter.

A number of themes are explored in the movie, the chief among them is our curiosity to find beings who are at the same level of intelligence, if not more, than us. In that pursuit, the humans of this future world have invented a supercomputer to assist in the voyage to the distant planet, but which eventually malfunctions and is prone to consider its logic superior. This is an early example of technological singularity depicted on the big screen.

The technology of the future world (which we still have not arrived at more than a decade after the year 2001) is dominated in outer space by the Americans and the Russians. The spacecraft carry passengers to and fro from space stations where research is being carried on.

All this mystery would have created a sense of urgency, but Kubrick downplays it and concentrates on the narrative instead of resorting to cheap tricks. This movie is not about tension and drama. It is quite clear that Kubrick, by deliberately keeping the pacing in check, wants us to have a look around the world he has created and reflect. The images are original but the music is classical, and they blend so well I couldn't help feel engrossed in the narrative.

In the genre of science fiction, there is no parallel, chiefly because other movies have concerned itself with complex ideas, and though they may have succeeded, can only be watched a limited number of times. But 2001 is such a basic sci-fi flick that it never aged. Even after more than forty years since it came out, 2001 still manages to hold its own against other films in the genre in the departments of visual effects and art direction. By keeping the story simple, Kubrick has ensured that its ideas do not become outdated, and succeeded in bestowing a timeless quality upon the movie.

He said somewhere along the lines that everyone will take its own meaning from the movie, and has made no attempt to explain the ending. This is the same approach he later applied with another movie of his, The Shining, but which in my opinion suffered because I could not see the coherence in it. But here, by keeping his ambition in check, and showing only what is necessary to the onward flow of the narrative, he has excelled. 2001: A Space Odyssey is my favourite Stanley Kubrick film.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
My_VenomFeb 23, 2014
Outstanding use of everything that has to do with film. Cinematography, scenery, direction, pace, dialectics, score and especially narrative. The most fascinating and thought provoking film I have ever seen. Way past 10/10
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
George-rootsOct 13, 2013
My favourite Science-Fiction movie of all time, Stanley Kubrick began making something that would change the face of the movie going experience, and represent a growth in the industry that only comes once in a lifetime

It's obvious to sayMy favourite Science-Fiction movie of all time, Stanley Kubrick began making something that would change the face of the movie going experience, and represent a growth in the industry that only comes once in a lifetime

It's obvious to say nothing looked like this before in 1968, the moon landing was still a year away and no one knew what the earth looked like from up there. That model space station circling that painting of the earth is burned into my brain and perfectly transcends beyond the scope of any average Hollywood movie

The First 20 mins alone is a silent masterpiece, When at a time the world was growing so rapidly, Kubrick rewound time and showed you something so prehistoric that I also don't think there has been anything else quite like it, suddenly you're shot thousands of years into space and it's obvious that this movie really is just an accompany piece to some incredibly large scale music pieces (if that wasn't so obvious from the title sequence). The Monolith is so Arthur C. Clarke, to this day it's identity is still shrouded in mystery, does it grant knowledge or just appear at pivotal events? regardless the mystery has endured the objects charm and legacy.

Towards the final act, astronaut David Bowman fights for control over the spaceship against the HAL 9000, in a harrowing display of humanity's reliance in computers, symmetrical rooms unnerving silence all eventually builds towards the trippy Jupiter and Beyond sequence, I very much recommended Pink Floyd's "Echoes" for something truly mind blowing.

Despised on release but later praised by so many critics this film will probably never be fully understood, but whatever the hell it's suppose to be it is something truly mysterious and beautiful much like the idea of space exploration itself, it's so obvious the film is built to accompany a series of classical music pieces than it is storytelling, watching 2001 is proof respect can be brought to the science fiction genre with staggering results, dare I say science eventuality?

Final Verdict: Beautiful music, Stunning visuals and a story set throughout the years and stars themselves... Only Kubrick could have pulled this off.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
FranzHcriticOct 25, 2013
Forgive me for being corny, but the movie is cinematically flawless, it's effects are shocking for 1968. The first authentic sci-fi about the physics of space. Stanley Kubrick imagined and eventually created a masterpiece of cinema, with aForgive me for being corny, but the movie is cinematically flawless, it's effects are shocking for 1968. The first authentic sci-fi about the physics of space. Stanley Kubrick imagined and eventually created a masterpiece of cinema, with a very well-thought out HAL character. The idea of a computer being ironic and being able to beg for it's life is brilliant and unfathomable. It is the archetype of the modern science fiction film.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
Jonathan3204Dec 2, 2013
2001 (not to be confused with the year) is a mind-blowing motion picture that blows the stars outer space with it's artistic production
..............
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
AkashVijayJan 19, 2015
2001: A Space Odyssey is slow, meditative, poetic and philosophical. It's artistry in its purest form. 2001 unfolds like an enchanting symphony in which each note lingers long enough for us to contemplate its significance and appreciate its2001: A Space Odyssey is slow, meditative, poetic and philosophical. It's artistry in its purest form. 2001 unfolds like an enchanting symphony in which each note lingers long enough for us to contemplate its significance and appreciate its allure. It feeds the soul and strikes a chord of affinity within our beings. 2001 encourages us to ask big questions about the birth of intelligence, first contact, the usefulness of tools and our place in the universe. But it doesn't always give us answers; it rather proposes we search for them in our own subconscious. People need to watch this film with an open mind; only then they'll be able to uncover the genius behind it.
While reading a captivating book, we picture the events described in our heads. The book just draws the lines on the paper, it proposes that we fill in the colors ourselves. And each person fills the page with different colors; everyone conceives the incidents differently. Kubrick takes this idea a notch further. He gives us a page filled with colors and he entreats us to draw the lines, he's asking us to interpret the storyline as we wish. No matter how many times you view it, no matter how much you scrutinize it, the curtains of mystery never fall and the novelty never wears off. 2001 breaks new grounds outshining previous titles and remains unsurpassed today. If great artists such as Picasso, Beethoven and Shakespeare would've watched this film, I'm sure they'd smile. 2001 may lack dialogue but who cares? 'Words' are overrated. It may not win hearts but it wins over the soul. It's a gem that needs to be treasured not dug under the soil. Why? Let's just say because it deserves it.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
Kai82Sep 24, 2021
A true classic of the science fiction genre and often high up in the lists of most influential movies of all times. It is based on Arthur C. Clarke’s short story “The Sentinel” which was expanded to a book and part of a bigger arc. ActuallyA true classic of the science fiction genre and often high up in the lists of most influential movies of all times. It is based on Arthur C. Clarke’s short story “The Sentinel” which was expanded to a book and part of a bigger arc. Actually Arthur C. Clark was a mathematician and physicist so he knows what he is writing about. A lot of physicists published science fiction novels to earn a bit of extra money but mostly with an alias to avoid harming their reputation. This is the reason why there are so many working concepts in science fiction even when many things are embellished. Together with director Stanley Kurbick’s dedication and talents it became a hit. Also I think this movie is the reason why science fiction has classic music added to it (Think it works well by the way). The story starts with a flashback to the far prehistoric era. Showing how prehumans developed the skills or idea to use tools while a black monolith is present. The story continues in the future where mankind has evolve to a near Earth spacefaring society. A monolith was found on the Moon which far predates human civilization and did send out a signal to Jupiter. The USA will build a spaceship and send a crew to secretly investigate Jupiter for answers together with a supercomputer named HAL 9000. This is the set up for the story. It is an epic journey full of dilemmas. Everything works quite well and I see no missteps here. Many scenes are common pop culture knowledge as things are referenced in countless other medias. To be fair the story telling can be too slow for others and it is a frequent complaint that I see as valid even if I disagree. Another point is the ending that confused many people. There is the anecdote that Arthur C. Clark visited another country (USA I think but I am not sure) and the guy who controlled is passport recognized him and said to him that he would not let him into the country if he did not explain the ending. Visually this movie is impressive. I think no other word than epic is valid. The sets, scenery and visuals are so immersive that we never doubted anything. For those who disagree: There is the conspiracy theory that Stanley Kubrick filmed the moon landing (This is not a joke). The cast is remarkably good. There is Keir Duella as Dr. David Bowman. He is an excellent protagonist and delivers a praiseworthy performance. Douglas Rain is the voice of HAL 9000 and he flashes out the character in an excellent way. I think his voice acting improves the experience a lot. Gary Lockwood as Dr. Frank Poole is sometimes a bit overlooked and deserves credits too. All the others deliver a good performance and this cast is truly excellent. Of cause I praise Stanley Kubrick. He is a legendary director and his filmography is full of some of the greatest or better said well know and influential movies of his era. Then there is the music. This movie is like I said the reason classical music is associated with science fiction films. It has a lot of famous tracks like “Also sprach Zarathustra”, “Lux Aeterna” and “The blue Danube”. It fits strangely perfect here. Overall this is a must see in movie history. Bonus knowledge: Some of the shown technology was so spot on that it was used in the lawsuit between Apple and Samsung about the invention of the tablet (Again not a joke).… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
DenisManuOct 12, 2014
2001:A Space Odyssey manages to intrigue you every way by telling a story in a very unconventional way.With hidden messages and meanings, Stanley Kubrick's vision improved the material and gave it an artistic value.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
mangonerfOct 26, 2014
Masterpiece stanley kubrick does a great job and hall is really scary one of the best films everin hollywood and for those people who think its overrated you just are impacient this film is amazing and a must see
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
PanapaokNov 11, 2014
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. To start with, I can definitely say that 2001 A Space Odyssey is a film with great potential and premise, deals with a big amount of important themes and achieves to remain a film of great importance.

Stanley Kubrick worked pretty hard on this film and managed to create some of the best visual effects ever made. His direction is amazing and he gives to the film an eerie atmosphere.

Some dismissed the film as boring and incomprehensible. Well If you consider 2001 boring you must definitely have really small imagination. Of course it is like a silent film but Kubrick supports the point of the film with great artistry and leaves us think and search in our mind and our hearts.

2001 A Space Odyssey is a spellbinding and absorbing adventure in secret paths that we may never find out in our lives because they are too short.

To end I can definitely say that 2001 is not only one of the best sci-fi movies ever made but also one of the best generally. It is one of the most thought provoking films (like all the sci-fi should be) and inspires our awe in every minute of it.

Of course there is an openness in the film's meaning especially in the ending shots which have an allegorical and philosophical meaning. For me 2001 is not a religious film but it's about science, discovery and mainly for evolution.

It's a film for adults and mature teenagers because it could be extremely weird and disturbing for younger audiences. But it's a must-see for every cinephile around the world.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
REDWOUNov 22, 2014
2001 was a great film. I think it's Stanley Kubrick's best film, but I haven't seen enough of his films to be sure of it. Definitely a film everyone should see before they die.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
Ben_WolfDec 28, 2014
Stanley Kubrick's great and grand masterpiece, 2001: A Space Odyssey, is perhaps his most hated and his most loved. People either love it (5 star ratings) or hate it (no star ratings). Debate around this film has been going on since itsStanley Kubrick's great and grand masterpiece, 2001: A Space Odyssey, is perhaps his most hated and his most loved. People either love it (5 star ratings) or hate it (no star ratings). Debate around this film has been going on since its release in 1968. But the vast percentage of the controversy has played out over the last several years. It seems the new generation does not like this film because of its slow pace and outdated visual effects (which in my opinion are some of the best in history).

But behind the swayed images, is a story of humanity, the things that we go through and much more. This is a truly genius work of art. This is one of the greatest (if not THE greatest) film that has ever been made.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
StarlessJan 2, 2015
The perhaps greatest movie ever conceived by humanity, masterfully directed by Stanley Kubrick, expresses beautifully what Arthur C. Clarke envisioned with his epic four book trilogy. Transcendental, pleasant, smart, interesting,The perhaps greatest movie ever conceived by humanity, masterfully directed by Stanley Kubrick, expresses beautifully what Arthur C. Clarke envisioned with his epic four book trilogy. Transcendental, pleasant, smart, interesting, thought-provoking, this is all the evolution of film making is about. With an awe-inducing soundtrack by Strauss, combined with the cold, dark atmosphere of outer space, where no one can hear you scream and where evolution and creation's secrets lie. The Monolith spreads secrets to all ears; few are bound to truly listen. "It's full of stars!"… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
MattBrady99Nov 25, 2016
"Daisy."

So I just saw "2001" at a film festival and it was kinda incredible. Why do I feel like I just ticked off my bucket list of things to die before you die. I've been waiting a long time to watch this on the big screen. I already seen"Daisy."

So I just saw "2001" at a film festival and it was kinda incredible. Why do I feel like I just ticked off my bucket list of things to die before you die. I've been waiting a long time to watch this on the big screen. I already seen the movie about 3 or 4 years ago, but my memory of the film isn't that strong. So when I was picking what movies I wanted to see at (LIFF), and this was on the list, as the festival also shows classic movies.

Re-watching this movie was quite the experience. Nothing like a massive screen and loud speakers blasting off beautiful music while drifting in space. From the dawn of man till the end of human life. The cycle repeats.

But seriously, what can I honestly say about "2001" that hasn't been said already. It's one of the greatest Sci-Fi films of all time. It's groundbreaking and pure genius. Even at the slower pace parts, I was still engaged. After it was over, I was contemplating on it.

For a 1968 film, it's visual effects still hold up today and looks way more convincing than today. Well, there was a couple of effects that was noticeable, but the rest (which is mostly practical) still looks amazing. The "Star Gate" sequence is one example of a trippy and a breathtaking effect that it owned Kubrick an Oscar.

Every shot in this movie is like something you would hang up on your wall. Kubrick has been known for being a perfectionist of his work. This is a work of an artist that doesn't just get praised for how much he dose, but how little. Three years of making this - you can get easily attached to your work that after awhile you find the hidden beauty of the story. Do it 40 or 127 times until you get what you want and exactly how you wanted. A similar method that Chaplin use for "City Lights". But it isn't just images that kept me attention and I don't think Stanley was intending on that. There's plenty of scenes that goes on forever, not for spectacle, but more of use to inhabit everything that's going on.

It also helps that music in this is so beautiful, but very eerie at the right moments. I can take the monolith on the moon scene as a great example of the bone chilling music. It may be scary for some, because of "Requiem for Soprano" playing in the background, but I kinda see like this:

Man discovers a 4 million year old structure buried under the surface of the moon. Perfect angles and a disturbingly flawless complexion. imagine if this event actually occurred in reality and you were sitting in front of your TV when a breaking news bulletin interrupts your program. Just imagine the weight of the emotions you feel. There is no explanation for how this structure could even exist. its impossible! It will be the most reality-shattering event in the history of the world.

It's one of my favorite scenes of all time, because the scene alone perfectly captures that feeling. No explanation. No answers. No reason.

Overall: Films like "Space Odyssey" is why I love movies. Extraordinary and beautiful work of art. "2001" isn't just a classic for it's effects or the show stealer Hal9000, but how it wants to inspire and enlarge us. A space voyage that evokes questions and kept the audience in awe for 48 years.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
GHarrisonDec 24, 2017
Visually exceptional masterpiece with a soundtrack so fantastic its usage has become cliché. Dramatic, intense, iconic and truly incredible to think it's almost half a century old. For me Clive, Kubrick's finest.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
RalfbergsDec 1, 2021
This certainly isn't for an average viewer. First of all as for cinematography Kubrick doesn't disappoint just like in all his movie and it really is 10 out of 10. Secondly, the futuristic feel and the fact that so many things where predictThis certainly isn't for an average viewer. First of all as for cinematography Kubrick doesn't disappoint just like in all his movie and it really is 10 out of 10. Secondly, the futuristic feel and the fact that so many things where predict that exists now but in those times didn't really exist, is also insane. So from this aspect I agree, the movie is incredible. As for the plot itself - I do think it could've been better. Yes, now people are guessing what it meant or explaining it etc, but there are many movies which are much less known and also show things ambiguously, but people bash them and say they don't mean nothing. I really enjoy most of other Kubrick's movies, but this is somewhat in the middle - I like the visuals, but I didn't like the ending that much and also I think some shots are too long - like you can watch at 8 times speed and nothing changes really.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
smartmartSep 18, 2015
A surreal adventure through space from master filmmaker Stanley Kubrick. The film is absolutely beautiful and will have any viewer guessing what the film's true meaning is.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
davidcreator123Jun 25, 2015
What a film!

2001: A Space Odyssey is a movie of its own. It's not a movie you can casually watch in the background of a conversation or talking to anyone. It's a movie you really have to listen to, otherwise you won't enjoy it.What a film!

2001: A Space Odyssey is a movie of its own. It's not a movie you can casually watch in the background of a conversation or talking to anyone. It's a movie you really have to listen to, otherwise you won't enjoy it.

"Considered to be the greatest Sci-Fi film of all time" I completely agree and recommend this gem of cinema!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
kyle20ellisMar 28, 2022
To me, this is not only Kubrick's best film but also a milestone of the genre. It is quite long at around two and a quarter hours, and it is slow, that I agree with. But it is never boring, well not to me it isn't. Besides, and this is up toTo me, this is not only Kubrick's best film but also a milestone of the genre. It is quite long at around two and a quarter hours, and it is slow, that I agree with. But it is never boring, well not to me it isn't. Besides, and this is up to interpretation, but I think the slow pacing is deliberate, it adds to the haunting and eerie quality 2001 has and also to assimilate every shot which speak volumes, and also 2001's greatest strength is actually in the details.

The story is somewhat abstract in its structure but is also quite complex, innovative and interesting yet has a simple message, and the screenplay and direction by Kubrick are superb. The acting is not the film's best asset, but it is good enough, with Douglas Rain the standout as the voice of HAL 9000 as he is really quite brilliant. Two things especially make 2001 so good. One are the visuals- even after all those years they are simply outstanding. The cinematography is indeed splendid, as are the colours and settings, but there are so many memorable images. The images of the giant Starchild floating through space and the tribe of apes painfully putting two and two together still resonate considerably even now. The other is the music. Coming from a big classical music enthusiast, I was delighted by the use of Also Sprach Zarathustra and On the Beautiful Blue Danube and how they combined with the visuals were exceedingly clever.

Overall, this is a truly wonderful film that is worth seeing for the visuals and music alone and still continues to intrigue and perplex with the ending. As much as I like Oliver and Chitty Chitty Bang Bang, two of my childhood favourites, and the brilliant Lion in Winter to me this is it... the best film of 1968. 10/10 Bethany Cox… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
mcwalshJul 28, 2015
Glorious in every aspect, Kubrick's magnum opus is beyond the meaning of a space adventure. It is an art movie with emotional and intense drama, along with a profound metaphor that still intrigues. The best movie of all time.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
RobertBroganSep 26, 2015
Some movies get acclaim in their time, but then years later they do not seem so great. For the first hour while rewatching 2001, particularly the moon base sequences, I was wondering if this is really an all-time great movie. But after theSome movies get acclaim in their time, but then years later they do not seem so great. For the first hour while rewatching 2001, particularly the moon base sequences, I was wondering if this is really an all-time great movie. But after the mission to Jupiter begins, the show starts and it does not feel dated. If anything, it gets better on repeat viewings, with more to pick up. 2001 is full of exemplary pioneering spirit and does deserve to be called one of the all-time greats.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
smiyamotNov 29, 2015
This was made way, way back in time. To make a high budget sci-fi movie was unheard of. We follow evolutionary quantum leaps in the history of mankind to today (in the movie) where we are following a signal sent to Jupiter. This is also anThis was made way, way back in time. To make a high budget sci-fi movie was unheard of. We follow evolutionary quantum leaps in the history of mankind to today (in the movie) where we are following a signal sent to Jupiter. This is also an early questioning of artificial intelligence (HAL) versus human intelligence. Not quite sure what the last act of the movie was saying, but I have the DVD in my collection so I can view it and figure it out.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
SiavashtitkanJun 19, 2016
the best movie of cinema history! ...................very mysterious and smart and very philosophical.you just need to see that match cut of the bone to the spaceship;it gives you everything that he wants you tothe best movie of cinema history! ...................very mysterious and smart and very philosophical.you just need to see that match cut of the bone to the spaceship;it gives you everything that he wants you to know:history,philosophy,politic and meta-physic science.you'll be surprised by Kubrick's imagination and moving that to the screen even better.he is not the [perfect director].he's much more than that.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
PanchogulJun 14, 2020
Es curioso, la primera vez que vi esta película hace ya tantos años la encontré aburrida, pero hoy en día la considero una de las mejores películas de ciencia ficción de todos los tiempos.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
EpicLadySpongeJan 5, 2016
There's much from the movie that you'll enjoy. You know what else could mean sound and minimal dialogue in this movie? It means that some people won't give this movie the score as expected, but at least those science fans can at least showThere's much from the movie that you'll enjoy. You know what else could mean sound and minimal dialogue in this movie? It means that some people won't give this movie the score as expected, but at least those science fans can at least show this movie a little bit higher, right?… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
PachekoviskMar 16, 2016
A MASTERPIECE
One of the greatest movies of all time
THE greatest sci-fi film of all time
A great symbolic movie
One of my favorite movies
nothing more to say.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
TheFilmDoctorMar 22, 2016
Perhaps it takes the passage of time to gain the perspective to call some films great. Certain movies, despite being ridiculed upon their initial release, have been "re-discovered" years later and labeled as forgotten classics. It's aPerhaps it takes the passage of time to gain the perspective to call some films great. Certain movies, despite being ridiculed upon their initial release, have been "re-discovered" years later and labeled as forgotten classics. It's a universal truth that art isn't always immediately recognized as such - this is why so many revered painters, authors, and composers have died in poverty and relative obscurity. Filmmakers face some of the same challenges - in a business climate, courage is the number one characteristic needed by anyone with the goal of fashioning a work that is deliberately thought-provoking but lacking in mass appeal. Such idealistic intentions won't inflate any director's bank account, but they may make an enduring statement. That brings us to the subject of this review: Stanley Kubrick's 2001: A Space Odyssey. Despite gaining additional adherents and growing more respected with each passing day, 2001 would likely be a failure if shown to a typical, MTV-weaned group of multiplex patrons. Watching this film demands two qualities that are sadly lacking in all but the most mature and sophisticated audiences: patience and a willingness to ponder the meaning of what's transpiring on screen. 2001 is awe inspiring, but it is most definitely not a "thrill ride." It is art, it is a statement, and it is indisputably a cinematic classic.

he level of anticipation surrounding 2001 was as high as that to accompany any cinematic event before or after. Not only had Kubrick developed the project in complete secrecy, but, with the space race in its final laps, the world was ready to inhale any whiff of science fiction. But 2001 did not satisfy everyone. In fact, the initial reaction could charitably be called mixed. While a minority of those in early audiences recognized that they had witnessed the birth of a masterpiece, many movie-goers were nonplused and confused. Several influential mainstream publications panned the film, and, while it was successful at the box office, it was not the blockbuster some had expected it to be. Yet 2001 did not die. Instead, its reputation grew, and, by the mid-'70s, it had become a Goliath.

It's questionable which element of 2001 stands out the most clearly: the pacing, the music, or the visuals. In truth, the three are inseparable. Like a skilled chef, Kubrick blended them together to form a dish of incomparable excellence. They are unique ingredients, yet, once mixed, they can no longer be reconstituted into their original forms. For most movies, this is not the case, but that's one of many areas in which 2001 is an exception. Listening to a soundtrack of this film provokes an avalanche of images in the mind's eye. Can anyone who has seen 2001 listen to the Johann Strauss' "Blue Danube Waltz" and not think of the shuttle docking at the space station? And Richard Strauss' rousing, unforgettable "Also Spoke Zarathustra" has become synonymous with this picture. (In fact, "Zaruathustra" is often referred to as the "Theme from 2001".)

In terms of its approach to the science fiction genre, 2001 stands alone. This is a space-based movie without zooming spaceships, laser shootouts, or explosions. The action, to the degree that there is action, is viewed from a detached perspective. Spacecraft move (relatively) slowly, they do not zip around at the speed of light. The result is a cold, majestic motion picture, a movie that seeks to remind us of the vastness of space and our relatively insignificant place in it. Kubrick's intention with 2001 was not to thrill us with battles and pyrotechnics, but to daunt us with the realization of how much there is that we do not understand. The movie's slowness (and it is slow) not only allows us to absorb the images, music, and atmosphere, but provides the opportunity to think about the implications of what Kubrick is saying. As enjoyable as Star Wars is, it does not encourage deep introspection. 2001 demands it.

I can think of two other movies that have consciously borrowed aspects of Kubrick's 2001 style. (There may be others, but either I have forgotten them or I never knew about them to forget.) They are Star Trek: The Motion Picture and Contact. Both slowed their pace to awe the viewer with a cavalcade of visual images. It worked in the latter case but not in the former.

2001 needs to be experienced to be appreciated. It loses something on a TV screen; even the best home video setup can't replicate what it's like to see the movie in a theater. Over 40 years after its release, 2001 has lost none of the qualities that make it an acknowledged masterwork.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
night4Jul 10, 2016
While this movie isn't perfect, it's so close in so many ways it deserves a 10.

What's most memorable, perhaps, is its authentic late 60's space vibe that other shows and movies have been emulating or honoring for decades. It's truly aWhile this movie isn't perfect, it's so close in so many ways it deserves a 10.

What's most memorable, perhaps, is its authentic late 60's space vibe that other shows and movies have been emulating or honoring for decades. It's truly a work of art.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
JonathonBMay 22, 2016
Regardless of one's personal taste, "2001: A Space Odyssey" is filled with grand, philosophical ideas, and stunning imagery and special effects that hold up extremely well for modern audiences. Avoid it if you desire to see a moreRegardless of one's personal taste, "2001: A Space Odyssey" is filled with grand, philosophical ideas, and stunning imagery and special effects that hold up extremely well for modern audiences. Avoid it if you desire to see a more conventional film with traditional dialogue scenes and characterizations, for Kubrick uses image and sound as fuel for his otherworldly story. Truthfully, some will find the film's slow, deliberate pace frustrating, though, for discerning viewers, "2001" is a revered classic that offers rich rewards.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
CalibMcBoltsMay 30, 2016
There is only ONE thing stopping this film from being no.1 on all the "best of all time" lists. The people that love this film worship it (including me) & the people that hate it only hate it because they are naive & impatient. If everyoneThere is only ONE thing stopping this film from being no.1 on all the "best of all time" lists. The people that love this film worship it (including me) & the people that hate it only hate it because they are naive & impatient. If everyone had patience in this world & people ACTUALLY paid attention to the whole film without falling asleep? It would be EVERYONES Greatest film ever made. The true monilith of cinema.

No words can describe how masterful this film is. It's more than just a film, it's somthing else entirely. To me, the TRUE meaning of the words "masterpiece" & "experience" is - "2001: A Space Odyssey".

There's more deep meaning and hidden messages in this film than all of Chris Nolan's films combined.

To explain to the Naive and impatient folk. there IS a reason for the 5 minite scenes of (so-called) "nothing".
We spend 10 minutes looking at apes in plain desert, showing us how we developed human behavour for the first time.
THEN....all of a sudden, we're seeing a spaceship & spacestation. Without the 5 minute scenes, The film wouldn't be able to make us appreciate the technology we've managed to create since the "dawn of man". Think of those scenes as a 'celebration' of tenchnology & space travel.
All those 5 minute scenes of "nothing" are one of the most important aspects of the film.

There is even a reason as to why the film plays 5 minutes of music before the film starts.
The song 'requiem' plays whenever a monolith appears on-screen. Stanley uses 'Requiem' to not only create a chilling mood but also give the monolith a voice. 'Requiem' is the monolith's voice speaking to whoever it is facing. By having the music play over the black screen at the beginning of the film Kubrick is actually showing us the first monolith. Doesn't the black screen go on for a little too long? That was done intentionally by Kubrick. This is the monolith speaking to the audience themselves which suggest that we're about to witness a film so grand and so magnificent that it will open up our eyes to things we've never even thought possible.?

This is a movie that needs thinking, repeated viewings, and more thinking, it's ambiguous and multilayered.
It's a philosophical journey that makes you wonder about life.
A masterpiece still fresh to this day, it looks like it hasn't dated a single year, it has phenomenal special effects, a brilliant screenplay and story, astoundingly perfect acting with one of the greatest villains of all time, along side the best use of music in a motion picture to this day.
This movie is among a special catagory in science-fiction movies, 2001 is not concerned with thrilling us, but with inspiring our awe.
Watching this film demands two qualities that are sadly lacking in all but the most mature and sophisticated audiences: patience and a willingness to ponder the meaning of what's transpiring on screen. 2001 is awe inspiring, but it is most definitely not a "thrill ride." It is art, it is a statement, and it is indisputably a cinematic classic.

Kubrick's best work, and in my eyes, the greatest motion picture ever created and i doubt it will ever be triumphed.

2001: A Space Odyssey is a must-see for every cinephile!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
stgrunuMar 29, 2018
This is one of those movies that chase you forever. After my first watch I couldn't sleep and couldn't stop thinking about it. I hate myself for taking so long before watching it.
It honestly is one of the best pieces of media I've watchedThis is one of those movies that chase you forever. After my first watch I couldn't sleep and couldn't stop thinking about it. I hate myself for taking so long before watching it.
It honestly is one of the best pieces of media I've watched and it's one of those movies you just want more from but at the same time you don't.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
Joao452364Jan 3, 2017
Um Filme que quebra todas as barreiras de como fazer um bom Sci-Fi, 2001: Uma odisseia no espaço traz tudo de melhor que um Sci-Fi precisa ter: Um roteiro emocionante e denso, e efeitos visuais maravilhosos, que são reforçados pela fotografiaUm Filme que quebra todas as barreiras de como fazer um bom Sci-Fi, 2001: Uma odisseia no espaço traz tudo de melhor que um Sci-Fi precisa ter: Um roteiro emocionante e denso, e efeitos visuais maravilhosos, que são reforçados pela fotografia e Mixagem de som.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
alejandro970Aug 13, 2017
One of Kubrick top works and that changed the way of telling space travel stories, based on Arthur C. Clarke book. To see it requires a lot of discipline as spectator, and something that gives greater strenght is the background music (BlueOne of Kubrick top works and that changed the way of telling space travel stories, based on Arthur C. Clarke book. To see it requires a lot of discipline as spectator, and something that gives greater strenght is the background music (Blue Danube, Zaratustra). The space oddity of ever.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
kieranlborgJul 9, 2019
This movie is a simple yet significant representation of the human race from the eye of the great Stanley Kubrick or else its a no bad computer vs human movies. It depends if you want to watch the movies and take it at face value or if youThis movie is a simple yet significant representation of the human race from the eye of the great Stanley Kubrick or else its a no bad computer vs human movies. It depends if you want to watch the movies and take it at face value or if you want to immerse yourself in the story.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
gNov 12, 2016
Stanley Kubrick & science-fiction novelist Arthur C. Clarke puts a great visual to a film like this for it's great special FX by hand. Every film has a beauty of special FX in it's own way, 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968) is one of the mostStanley Kubrick & science-fiction novelist Arthur C. Clarke puts a great visual to a film like this for it's great special FX by hand. Every film has a beauty of special FX in it's own way, 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968) is one of the most memorable space film.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
eva3si0nJan 31, 2022
2001: A Space Odyssey is probably the best Sci-Fi film in history. It was shot more than 50 years ago, but still looks great and relevant. It is difficult to imagine what impression the film left in the audience in 1968. Kubrick is clearly a2001: A Space Odyssey is probably the best Sci-Fi film in history. It was shot more than 50 years ago, but still looks great and relevant. It is difficult to imagine what impression the film left in the audience in 1968. Kubrick is clearly a genius, especially for his filming of the ending of the film. 2001: A Space Odyssey is a real pillar of all Sci-Fi cinema, it is difficult to imagine how many paintings drew inspiration from A Space Odyssey. I regularly review the film every few years. One of the best films in history.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
VirgonoShakaMay 26, 2018
2001: A Space odessey is one of the fundamentals of Sci-fi and I can definitely say that it is honor well deserved. Not only it has some incredible effects for it's time, but the way the story starts, and how it uses it's dialogues, silence2001: A Space odessey is one of the fundamentals of Sci-fi and I can definitely say that it is honor well deserved. Not only it has some incredible effects for it's time, but the way the story starts, and how it uses it's dialogues, silence and music to convey it's message is superb. My only gripe would be that the last scene is maybe a tad bit too long and can be hard on the eyes. But other than that, this is one journey that everyone, not matter where they come from, should embark in.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
Kevin41Jan 4, 2017
This movie revolutionized the use of the frame, that here is no longer a simple tool to tell, but it takes on a meaning of its own, being able to express the meaning by itself. Images must "speak": it is for this reason taht the timing ofThis movie revolutionized the use of the frame, that here is no longer a simple tool to tell, but it takes on a meaning of its own, being able to express the meaning by itself. Images must "speak": it is for this reason taht the timing of this film are dilated and shots lasting longer than expected. In this work, in fact, Kubrick creates a communication with the viewer that exceeds the verbal level, reducing the dialogue to a minimum quantity. Music and images become strnger than any words and this is just a skill that the movie has, which is to hit the unconscious without words.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
daniel678Jun 9, 2017
One of the best movies ever made in the history of cinema. Shocking, real, minimalist, very well told. 2001 is pure cinema. The closest to perfection. Photography, direction, art direction, film, all this and more deserving of all possibleOne of the best movies ever made in the history of cinema. Shocking, real, minimalist, very well told. 2001 is pure cinema. The closest to perfection. Photography, direction, art direction, film, all this and more deserving of all possible prizes. Stanley Kubrick gives us a masterpiece that will last for all eternity and will go to Jupiter and beyond. Stanley Kubrick did it to perfection. 2001 A SPACE ODYSSEY FOREVER.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
jack2244Mar 19, 2017
Personally my favorite Stanley Kubrick movie. It is by far his most acclaimed movie besides A Clockwork Orange. It really isn't as boring as some people put it out to be. It is a really interesting movie so yeah, that's all I have to say about it.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
MehrshadNPAug 28, 2019
Producing a Si-Fi movie in the 60s would be easy.But creating one that would fit the technology of 2020 is mind blowing!
Kubrick made a movie that not only is way beyond its time,but is also so meaningful.
Making a "meaningful" si-fi movieProducing a Si-Fi movie in the 60s would be easy.But creating one that would fit the technology of 2020 is mind blowing!
Kubrick made a movie that not only is way beyond its time,but is also so meaningful.
Making a "meaningful" si-fi movie and still keeping it a "Kubrickian" work of art is not going to be easy...… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
BeastJ18Apr 21, 2018
Without a doubt, the greatest and most perfect movie of all time. Kubrick combined and exceeded art, culture and intellect. It triumphs on the highest level in all filmmaking aspects, beautiful cinematography, cerebral editing, masterfulWithout a doubt, the greatest and most perfect movie of all time. Kubrick combined and exceeded art, culture and intellect. It triumphs on the highest level in all filmmaking aspects, beautiful cinematography, cerebral editing, masterful direction, remarkably analytical and genius writing, superbly subdued and appropriate acting and voice performance, breathtaking stunt coordination, revolutionary production design and costuming, stunning sound design, immortal musical integration and the most breathtaking visual effects ever made. It was far ahead of its time and filmmakers are still striving to create something that even slightly echoes this film. A perfect combination of artistry and intelligence, never to be surpassed.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
JLuis_001Sep 6, 2017
One of the greatest epics in science fiction in all history, it's been more than 45 years since it was released and still to this day it remains one of the biggest if not the biggest reference of the genre.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
sharathegde1995Dec 23, 2017
Mostly remembered as an innovation for future sci-fi films to come, this Stanley Kubrick film is a tale of Human evolution, Science and technology , space adventure and much more told in the most bizarre yet thought-provoking way
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
CTHReviewsFeb 1, 2018
2001: A Space Odyssey is a cinematic, science fiction masterpiece. I had so many questions when I first watched it, and I still do now.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
theCRITIC2May 21, 2018
I hate how this movie doesn't have a score of 100 here in Metacritic. This movie is I think one of the best films ever created (if not the best). If you're criticizing this film because it's not entertaining and it's boring, you're doing itI hate how this movie doesn't have a score of 100 here in Metacritic. This movie is I think one of the best films ever created (if not the best). If you're criticizing this film because it's not entertaining and it's boring, you're doing it wrong. This film is not supposed to be entertaining, this film is the testimony of the future, an allegory in other terms. The shot of this film from beginning up to the ending is marvelous (especially the ending sequence). There was no scene in this where I wasn't amazed by the cinematography, every scene is a painting. Stanley Kubrick is truly one of the best directors of all time to have ever lived and I think this is his best work throughout his entire life. The soundtrack of this film is also great like the use Also Sprach Zarathustra: Einleitung at the opening and at the ending of film or the use of the Waltz on the Blue Danube or even the breathing sound which some have said that Kubrick himself recorded is astounding.
You could argue that every actor in this film feels robotic and that is actually one of the points of this film, technology has taken and driven us to the point that we ourselves are robotic in many ways. This film influence the Sci-Fi genre (which would influence George Lucas in his film Star Wars 9 years later) and in fact not only the genre, but also the whole film industry. This film is as genius is as genius as the one who directed it. I love this film so much, go watch this if you haven't but don't go watch this like something entertaining or just your regular pastimes, watch this like you're viewing a series of paintings painted by Kubrick himself and also a poetic testimony of what future could bring to the existence of humanity.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
LivingTribunalJul 11, 2020
This movie itself is a Monolith of the movie industry. I've watched many classics, but this is on whole other level.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
GrantD243Apr 25, 2018
2001: A Space Odyssey is a film I've been wanting to watch for a while now. I've always heard that it's a great one, and that it is a must-watch for sci-fi fans. Well, I finally watched it yesterday, and I enjoyed it. I think it's a very2001: A Space Odyssey is a film I've been wanting to watch for a while now. I've always heard that it's a great one, and that it is a must-watch for sci-fi fans. Well, I finally watched it yesterday, and I enjoyed it. I think it's a very solid sci-fi film with an interesting story that can be interpreted in more than a few ways (as proven by the hundreds of explanation/theory videos and essays that are out there). The thing that struck me the most about the film is how beautiful it is for a 1968 release. There are some shots that you could show me completely out of context and I'd probably think that it's from a modern movie. The effects are also truly incredible for the era. I am definitely looking forward to attending one of the 70mm screenings that they'll be doing with Nolan's restored version soon. This is also one of those films where I'm going to have to watch it multiple times. It's not really an option. The first time around I was merely trying to take everything I could in, but now I can go back and pay more attention to certain things. With all of that being said, this isn't a perfect film. I think some of the sequences drag on a little too long (although I'm sure audiences were not complaining back when this first came out) and the story does move a little too slow for me at times. But I was still very much satisfied when it ended.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
cameronhalmansJan 9, 2019
Rich with symbolism and outstanding visual effects/cinematography, 2001: A Space Odyssey transcends time. Confusing yes, but once you understand Kubricks vision, this film clicks. 100/100
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
mrafrotastic00Jun 2, 2018
Cinematic Masterpieces: 2001: A Space Odyssey. Starring: Keir Dullea. Gary Lockwood. Douglas Rain. Directed by Stanley Kubrick. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer. No one has ever experienced a film like "2001: A Space Odyssey." Science-fiction moviesCinematic Masterpieces: 2001: A Space Odyssey. Starring: Keir Dullea. Gary Lockwood. Douglas Rain. Directed by Stanley Kubrick. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer. No one has ever experienced a film like "2001: A Space Odyssey." Science-fiction movies have tried to be as profound as Kubrick's masterpiece, but they lack an elaborately complex theme. To contemplate that this motion picture was released in 1968, fifty years ago, conveys how Kubrick's film is a stunning achievement. "2001: A Space Odyssey" is a creepily breathtaking meditation on mankind from an evolutionary perspective; the film score and cinematography exude an unsettling atmosphere for audiences. Stanley Kubrick is the real star of this motion picture, because he was able to establish a revolutionary film with the help of a superb cast and crew. From the opening sequence to the wicked conclusion, "2001: A Space Odyssey" is a ravishing, sophisticated study of humanity.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
Maarten95Feb 8, 2019
This movie contains the most complex story I have ever seen in a movie before. The movie tries to tell that humanity can only advance through conflict. I doubt anyone however will understand its story by simply watching the movie and thatThis movie contains the most complex story I have ever seen in a movie before. The movie tries to tell that humanity can only advance through conflict. I doubt anyone however will understand its story by simply watching the movie and that might be its biggest flaw. I didn't enjoy the movie until I read on the plot on the internet after the movie was over. If you like complex stories then this is a great movie.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
MattJacks2003Mar 9, 2019
This movie has all lovely and sexy pieces of music and this movie is pretty damn fascinating.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
Filmix16Mar 19, 2019
Un scénario original.Des effets bien réussit pour un film de 1969.Stanley Kubrics offre sa meilleure adaptation au cinéma.Une trame sonore incroyable.Des idées mémorables.Les acteurs sont bons comme ils devraient êtres.La direction photo estUn scénario original.Des effets bien réussit pour un film de 1969.Stanley Kubrics offre sa meilleure adaptation au cinéma.Une trame sonore incroyable.Des idées mémorables.Les acteurs sont bons comme ils devraient êtres.La direction photo est superbe.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
Will_PalmerApr 26, 2019
This movie is truly astounding, the leaps made by this film cannot be understated. Stanley Kubrick shines in the definitive sci-fi movie before star wars. It is ingenious with long drawn out, silent, speechless sequences. Which explain moreThis movie is truly astounding, the leaps made by this film cannot be understated. Stanley Kubrick shines in the definitive sci-fi movie before star wars. It is ingenious with long drawn out, silent, speechless sequences. Which explain more through symbolism and imagery than any other movie could with dialogue. It is a testament to the movie franchise and cinema today wouldn't be the same if it wasn't made.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
WillemJApr 28, 2019
Kubrick's 2001 is a classic that should be shown in history classes. It's soundtrack played in music lessons. And even more, be playing in all theaters once a year - to show any upcoming filmmaker the true way of making a great picture. It'sKubrick's 2001 is a classic that should be shown in history classes. It's soundtrack played in music lessons. And even more, be playing in all theaters once a year - to show any upcoming filmmaker the true way of making a great picture. It's from the 60s but it easily outstands todays Hollywood's flicks.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
ChristianTianApr 28, 2019
2001: A Space Odyssey is visual poetry, and like great poetry it demands something from you. Stanley Kubrick created films for people who seek more than escapist entertainment, and with 2001 he gave us an audacious conceit that is staggering2001: A Space Odyssey is visual poetry, and like great poetry it demands something from you. Stanley Kubrick created films for people who seek more than escapist entertainment, and with 2001 he gave us an audacious conceit that is staggering in its ambition, representing through film the 'Cosmic Ascension' with the utmost gravitas. There is real beauty in 2001 akin to the great masters of painting. The famous 'Space Ballet' is the most beautiful sequence in film history and it predates the age of computer graphics. It not only withstands today's visual standards in a technical sense, but contemporary filmmakers have yet to surpass its intense detail and realism. So much of the story exists visually, something film audiences may find disconcerting, but if you disconnect from the realm of motherhood and apple pie and answer to the demands made of you, you may find rich rewards. Within its grand scope and immeasurable odds, 2001 tells us a story: the story of evolution. The first monolith inspires apes to use tools as a violent means to justify ends; the second monolith motivates men to pursue a mysterious radio signal into the cold, dark, vacuum of space; and the third monolith pulls Dave through the stargate, across vast oceans of time and space, where upon his last dying breath, he reaches toward it one final time before his rebirth as the starchild, marking the ultimate phase in human evolution: to a being of pure energy and spirit with limitless capabilities and ungraspable intelligence, and the savior of humanity.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
clem666Sep 13, 2021
As my score shows it I have very mixed feelings about this movie. Considered a classic, I only discovered it this week (in 2021), which makes it very difficult to bridge the fifty years-gap between its genesis and my very first look. ThatAs my score shows it I have very mixed feelings about this movie. Considered a classic, I only discovered it this week (in 2021), which makes it very difficult to bridge the fifty years-gap between its genesis and my very first look. That being said I still can (even if partially) comprehend why this feature is so important to the hearts of many. Yet it is not my case.

Of course, "2001: A Space Odyssey" benefits from exceptional visuals, sequences and staging. Yes, the colours, the lighting, the perspective and the montage are outstanding. Obviously the soundtrack is really intense and adds a lot to the story (or what seems to be so), even if such a sound environment reveals quite a lot of Kubrick's megalomania when conceptualizing this movie. It is undeniable that the acting (even if represents so few of the work) is great. To conclude with positive aspects I would say that the messages behind this feature are really interesting.

Despite these assets what ruined the experience for me was (amongst others) the movie length. I totally get that the concepts of space and time are really close and that representing such a fact in a movie requires both silences and very dark sequences. But here it is just too much. If you saw the first ten minutes of it you do know what I mean. The story is way too confusing. Events succeed each other without any obvious link or explanation. If Kubrick manages to make us deduce some symbols and causes of events he also surprisingly manages to make his movie just unintelligible and messy. If you witnessed the twenty last minutes of it you do know what I'm talking about. In overall the third and fourth acts are simply mindnumbing in addition to be punctuated by this endless weird psychedelic sequence. Until the end, I looked for something to hold onto, I looked for meaning in all those silent scenes I saw, but nothing came. It gets weirder and weirder until Kubrick finally lets you out of his indelicate, jerky experience.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
Page:
More From This Movie

84 Critic Reviews

8.2 User Reviews

Details & Credits|Trailers

Current Movie Releases
By MetascoreBy User Score
1 77 Project Hail Mary
2 75 Send Help
3 73 Hoppers
4 71 The Sheep Detectives
5 68 Crime 101
SEE ALL
Essential Links
New on Amazon Prime Video
New on Netflix
Coming Soon to DVD/Blu-ray
SEE ALL