Read User Reviews and Submit your own for 2001: A Space Odyssey

10

ChrisNortonAug 7, 2023

A near perfect movie, one of the greatest films of all time. Should be on everyone's top ten list of all time. To say this film was beyond its time in 1968 is an understatement from its technicality, set design, execution of every shot - it'sA near perfect movie, one of the greatest films of all time. Should be on everyone's top ten list of all time. To say this film was beyond its time in 1968 is an understatement from its technicality, set design, execution of every shot - it's all some of the best you'll ever see and will leave you in complete awe. It's a film that is everlasting in time and will make you question what is the meaning of life and what is out there? It also somehow predicts at some point a machine created by man can also create its own ego and conflict with that man, meaning life or death and the struggle for our existence of both. At the end it also might say does the struggle for existence really matter? And by how much? I can only imagine when this film originally came out the conversations it spawned from it's accompanied viewers and it will continue to inspire that forever.

Setting, Conflict, Character, Dialogue, Theme, Plot, and Climax: A+

Runtime: 2:29

Audience Engagement (do you feel runtime): No

Top Genres: Adventure, Sci-Fi (Fiction)

Genre(s) rating Adventure - 9 Sci-Fi- 10

Genre Average Score: 9.5 Directing: 10 Cinematography/lighting: 10 Story/Narrative: 10 Structure: 9 Dialogue: 10 Score(music): 10 Editing: 10 Acting: 10 Characterization: 8 Mise en Scène/Visual Design: 10 Visual Effects: 10 Sound Design: 10 Costumes/Makeup: 10 Lasting Impact: 10 Originality: 10

Overall: 9.78… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

infraReconJun 23, 2023

"What in the actual F is this movie" is the reaction I had after watching this, I had to do a little research into the ending because it just hits you like a Brick. Now before going on about how I wouldn't say I like this movie, that it's a"What in the actual F is this movie" is the reaction I had after watching this, I had to do a little research into the ending because it just hits you like a Brick. Now before going on about how I wouldn't say I like this movie, that it's a masterpiece...

Let me say this, this is a well-filmed, uneasy, exciting movie about the potential evolution of mankind, while this won't necessarily be the path we will choose anytime soon, I think that in the grand scope of things, and I mean grand, this movie explores potential vital things that the human race will have to endure.

I like everything up to the point of the very end, I think it's a bit creepy and maybe a bit forced that Dave became a, well you know.

For a movie made back in 1968 where there was literally little to no CGI, it's impressive. Does it still hold up by today's standards? Ha, No but I understood the intention.

Is this a masterpiece of a space film, well that's purely based on your perspective, and personally I don't think so.

It's not the story it's just that it maybe takes a little bit too long on some scenes, it would've been better if there were more scenarios happening, also some plot lines and scenes are a bit stupid, maybe it's just me but I saw the whole reading the lips of the 2 characters an obvious thing that would happen, but it's still all around great.

I'm gonna give this an 8/10, for some, this may be boring, but for others fairly interesting.
We need a more modern space movie with this type of film prowess, done correctly, only this time make it have the 70s, and 80s flare to it, focusing perhaps on a specific period of human space evolution.

Nothing like the Cloverfield paradox, something Drama based, uneasy, and realistic.

Space may be the final frontier but we first need to conquer reviews.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

ChleoslJun 16, 2023

"Movie" is an "Expression". and this movie had expressed the original, universal value for entire humanity, eternity beyond trinity. the transcends of individual intelligence, society intelligence, (our) real genuine to it's intellect own,"Movie" is an "Expression". and this movie had expressed the original, universal value for entire humanity, eternity beyond trinity. the transcends of individual intelligence, society intelligence, (our) real genuine to it's intellect own, existing as intelligence itself; showing our future, genuinely.

The looking of advancement and omnipresentic value of existing intelligence, on the existing universe. In the perspective of human, to the universal value of us and beyond intellectual bodies.

my all time favorite.
pure aesthetics form of value universal.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

EdReviewMay 21, 2023

2001: A Space Odyssey is not just a science-fiction film, it is THE science-fiction film par excellance.
All sci-fi films released after 1968 owe something to it.
This film is mesmerizing and it glues you to the screen with extraordinary2001: A Space Odyssey is not just a science-fiction film, it is THE science-fiction film par excellance.
All sci-fi films released after 1968 owe something to it.
This film is mesmerizing and it glues you to the screen with extraordinary shots that show just how visionary Kubrick was. Its slow pace can be tedious for some people, but I really don't consider it a flaw. If I really have to find a downside, it is that over the course of the film it's impossibile to become emotionally attached to the characters, because they are not so developed. 2001: A Space Odyssey is the film that showed how science-fiction cinema can be great cinema.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

Maxisgoat1717Apr 9, 2023

Why it rocks: A very revolutionary film. A film that really made you think about yourself. 2001 makes you think about the endless vacuum of space and the horrors of our own technology. The first time viewing this is unlike anything I’ve everWhy it rocks: A very revolutionary film. A film that really made you think about yourself. 2001 makes you think about the endless vacuum of space and the horrors of our own technology. The first time viewing this is unlike anything I’ve ever experienced in my life. It felt like I was watching the movie of the universe. It was something I’ll never experience again.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

1

johnnyboy53Jan 21, 2023

2001: A Space Odyssey is an interminable snooze-fest that will have you counting the minutes until the end. Sure, the special effects may have been groundbreaking in 1968, but let's be real, they look pretty cheesy now. And what's with the2001: A Space Odyssey is an interminable snooze-fest that will have you counting the minutes until the end. Sure, the special effects may have been groundbreaking in 1968, but let's be real, they look pretty cheesy now. And what's with the ending? I have no idea what I just watched. Was it a psychedelic trip or a sci-fi flick? I'm still trying to figure out what the monoliths represent. All I know is that I wasted two hours of my life on this pretentious mess. Save yourself the trouble and go watch The Martian instead. At least that movie knows what it wants to be.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

Raiden301Sep 18, 2022

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. When I first tried watching 2001, I thought it was the most boring movie ever. You just want Hal to show up and cause trouble but instead you're dealing with monkeys for 15 minutes. On my second viewing something about the film clicked and I found it to be one of the most beautiful films I've ever seen. While the classic theme of the film can come off as silly when the money sashes a bone onto the skeletal remains of a mammoth. The music genuinely carries other parts of the film later. For example the entire first half is mostly silence, with the addition of classical music as we're shown off all the spectacular effects Kubrick has painstakingly created. The story mostly comes in slowly until the introduction of Dave and Hal, who develop an interesting dynamic, which becomes a total opposition to each other by the end. Hal himself is one of the best representations of the artificial intelligence concept, from the clear pride he displays in his voice, to his desperate peas by then end of his story, he encapsulates all sorts of human emotion throughout his time.in the film. The ending becomes a different story all together with dave gaining a weather of knowledge that turns the film into an lsd trip. While many people might think this last segment of the film means nothing, to me it means everything. I don't necessarily want to say what my interpretation is, because I think this is a scene you should see without any influences on what to think or feel about it. Regardless Kubrick's 2001, is one of the greatest achievements in film without a doubt. I highly recommend it to anyone who wants to experience a different type of film that's more comfortable with visually conveying it's ideas to you then any real character interaction. It's beautiful and please watch it… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

2

mckaing10277Jun 8, 2022

the audio is horrible to go along with the dated 60s style. I couldn't make it through this dated classic

0 of 6 users found this helpful06

All this user's reviews

8

royalguy07Jun 5, 2022

Features about 25 minutes too much of overindulgent setup and display. But I was ultimately won over by the other 2 hours of gorgeous "how the F did they shoot that scene?" cinematography and composition.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

3

cirkomiknaApr 21, 2022

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This movie feels highly overrated to me. It hasn't aged well, too. This movie doesn't make sense at all. There are three independent story arcs that don't have anything to do with each other. The first arc is that people found signs of alien life, and people are sent to investigate that. But that story point is completely dropped. Why is it in the movie?
The second arc is how the crew struggles with HAL. That was maybe revolutionary 40 years ago, but it does not hold up. There are so many good films with robots turning on their masters that you don't need to sit through this. Like the whole film, this conflict is way to stretched out, slow paced and boring. At the same time, considering that nothing happens, the conflict escalates and is resolved way to fast. There's not even a hint of the tension that other films managed to achieve with the same theme. And then there's the ending, which does not make sense at all. People like to act all pretentious and call it artistic and transcending, but it's just a bunch of noise and colors bundled together with scenes that don't make any sense. The entire movie has just been obliterated by the passage of time.… Expand

0 of 6 users found this helpful06

All this user's reviews

10

NickTheCritickMar 28, 2022

One of those masterpieces that you can hardly explain in words. Any word spoke to describe this movie may just be superfluous. This film is light years ahead of its time, still modern today and, in hindsight, frighteningly predictive. One ofOne of those masterpieces that you can hardly explain in words. Any word spoke to describe this movie may just be superfluous. This film is light years ahead of its time, still modern today and, in hindsight, frighteningly predictive. One of the greatest films ever shot by one of the greatest directors ever.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

10

kyle20ellisMar 28, 2022

To me, this is not only Kubrick's best film but also a milestone of the genre. It is quite long at around two and a quarter hours, and it is slow, that I agree with. But it is never boring, well not to me it isn't. Besides, and this is up toTo me, this is not only Kubrick's best film but also a milestone of the genre. It is quite long at around two and a quarter hours, and it is slow, that I agree with. But it is never boring, well not to me it isn't. Besides, and this is up to interpretation, but I think the slow pacing is deliberate, it adds to the haunting and eerie quality 2001 has and also to assimilate every shot which speak volumes, and also 2001's greatest strength is actually in the details.

The story is somewhat abstract in its structure but is also quite complex, innovative and interesting yet has a simple message, and the screenplay and direction by Kubrick are superb. The acting is not the film's best asset, but it is good enough, with Douglas Rain the standout as the voice of HAL 9000 as he is really quite brilliant. Two things especially make 2001 so good. One are the visuals- even after all those years they are simply outstanding. The cinematography is indeed splendid, as are the colours and settings, but there are so many memorable images. The images of the giant Starchild floating through space and the tribe of apes painfully putting two and two together still resonate considerably even now. The other is the music. Coming from a big classical music enthusiast, I was delighted by the use of Also Sprach Zarathustra and On the Beautiful Blue Danube and how they combined with the visuals were exceedingly clever.

Overall, this is a truly wonderful film that is worth seeing for the visuals and music alone and still continues to intrigue and perplex with the ending. As much as I like Oliver and Chitty Chitty Bang Bang, two of my childhood favourites, and the brilliant Lion in Winter to me this is it... the best film of 1968. 10/10 Bethany Cox… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

ChoppersBagFeb 28, 2022

There are not many words I can use to describe this film but I will say this: 2001: A Space Odyssey is a masterpiece, Amazing Story, Incredible Cinematography, and a soundtrack that you won't be able to get out of your head for months.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

SeyeerGameFeb 25, 2022

при просмотре данного шедевра, у меня возникло сильное желание завести себе домашнюю обезьяну

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

eva3si0nJan 31, 2022

2001: A Space Odyssey is probably the best Sci-Fi film in history. It was shot more than 50 years ago, but still looks great and relevant. It is difficult to imagine what impression the film left in the audience in 1968. Kubrick is clearly a2001: A Space Odyssey is probably the best Sci-Fi film in history. It was shot more than 50 years ago, but still looks great and relevant. It is difficult to imagine what impression the film left in the audience in 1968. Kubrick is clearly a genius, especially for his filming of the ending of the film. 2001: A Space Odyssey is a real pillar of all Sci-Fi cinema, it is difficult to imagine how many paintings drew inspiration from A Space Odyssey. I regularly review the film every few years. One of the best films in history.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

JayCasparDec 21, 2021

A Masterpiece? Yes.

Groundbreaking? Yes.

Beautiful? Yes.

The best science fiction Film ever made? No.

No, because I don't believe in Imperialism.

A must see? Most definitely.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

RalfbergsDec 1, 2021

This certainly isn't for an average viewer. First of all as for cinematography Kubrick doesn't disappoint just like in all his movie and it really is 10 out of 10. Secondly, the futuristic feel and the fact that so many things where predictThis certainly isn't for an average viewer. First of all as for cinematography Kubrick doesn't disappoint just like in all his movie and it really is 10 out of 10. Secondly, the futuristic feel and the fact that so many things where predict that exists now but in those times didn't really exist, is also insane. So from this aspect I agree, the movie is incredible. As for the plot itself - I do think it could've been better. Yes, now people are guessing what it meant or explaining it etc, but there are many movies which are much less known and also show things ambiguously, but people bash them and say they don't mean nothing. I really enjoy most of other Kubrick's movies, but this is somewhat in the middle - I like the visuals, but I didn't like the ending that much and also I think some shots are too long - like you can watch at 8 times speed and nothing changes really.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

Arthur2021Nov 21, 2021

The best movie about space I’ve ever seen.I assure you by watching it you won’t be disappointed.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

DawdlingPoetNov 20, 2021

I found this to be quite an impressive film - not so much in terms of amazing special effects but moreso the absorbing mix of music used with the symbolism behind the visuals. Its quite old fashioned looking nowadays but then, of course, theI found this to be quite an impressive film - not so much in terms of amazing special effects but moreso the absorbing mix of music used with the symbolism behind the visuals. Its quite old fashioned looking nowadays but then, of course, the film dates from the late 1960s so thats hardly surprising, more inevitable. As others have, I believe, argued, it feels very relevant in modern day society, I say that with my thought being the main themes present, which I'd say are isolation, humanity (the future of) and within that, community (the importance of community), plus of course our reliance on technology.

It wouldn't feel quite so impactful if it weren't for the stirring use/placement of classical music. Its a very atmospheric film I'd say and I liked that I could hear the more mechanical, automated type noises in the background of scenes, reminding us that technology is relied upon to keep the spacecraft operating, adding to the artificial or sterile feel to the place, which in this instance is good, as unlike in other films, it (to me) felt genuinely unnerving, how close to the perceived environment the viewer felt through the use of sound and music. There are times when there's no dialogue and all that can be heard is, for example, the sound of oxygen flowing into a spacesuit, to keep the person alive while investigating outside the vessel.

There is definitely a feel of 'big brother' about it - with the computer device HAL 9000 being the inbuilt 'voice of technological reason' you could say. That voice being quite unemotional, quite matter-of-fact (you could say, robotic, funnily enough). There is something unsettling about that somehow. I thought it was interesting how said device/being seemingly challenged the humans/astronauts on board by making some potentially challenging observations and raising questions. I felt it was a well thought out script and it inevitably was quite thought provoking, in terms of me wondering where society is heading in the medium term. I find it hard to imagine we'll all routinely be in space but then no doubt people would find it very hard to believe we could interact with others by video screens in real time as is shown on this film released in the late 60s and that is now possible via iPhones and Facetime and the like.

I noted the use of what seemed to me like pinhole camera angles/shots used, whereby the viewer only sees the middle of the image, or at other times around the sort of border of the shot the surroundings appear to be pointing inwards. This added to the sense of claustrophobia, I felt. I'd say there's almost a hypnotic sense to it.

I was just watching this at home on a smallish (under 28 inch) screen but yet I felt surprisingly engrossed in it and I quite enjoyed it - its certainly one of the better sci-fi films I've seen, so I'd happily recommend it and give it a high star rating.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

Kai82Sep 24, 2021

A true classic of the science fiction genre and often high up in the lists of most influential movies of all times. It is based on Arthur C. Clarke’s short story “The Sentinel” which was expanded to a book and part of a bigger arc. ActuallyA true classic of the science fiction genre and often high up in the lists of most influential movies of all times. It is based on Arthur C. Clarke’s short story “The Sentinel” which was expanded to a book and part of a bigger arc. Actually Arthur C. Clark was a mathematician and physicist so he knows what he is writing about. A lot of physicists published science fiction novels to earn a bit of extra money but mostly with an alias to avoid harming their reputation. This is the reason why there are so many working concepts in science fiction even when many things are embellished. Together with director Stanley Kurbick’s dedication and talents it became a hit. Also I think this movie is the reason why science fiction has classic music added to it (Think it works well by the way). The story starts with a flashback to the far prehistoric era. Showing how prehumans developed the skills or idea to use tools while a black monolith is present. The story continues in the future where mankind has evolve to a near Earth spacefaring society. A monolith was found on the Moon which far predates human civilization and did send out a signal to Jupiter. The USA will build a spaceship and send a crew to secretly investigate Jupiter for answers together with a supercomputer named HAL 9000. This is the set up for the story. It is an epic journey full of dilemmas. Everything works quite well and I see no missteps here. Many scenes are common pop culture knowledge as things are referenced in countless other medias. To be fair the story telling can be too slow for others and it is a frequent complaint that I see as valid even if I disagree. Another point is the ending that confused many people. There is the anecdote that Arthur C. Clark visited another country (USA I think but I am not sure) and the guy who controlled is passport recognized him and said to him that he would not let him into the country if he did not explain the ending. Visually this movie is impressive. I think no other word than epic is valid. The sets, scenery and visuals are so immersive that we never doubted anything. For those who disagree: There is the conspiracy theory that Stanley Kubrick filmed the moon landing (This is not a joke). The cast is remarkably good. There is Keir Duella as Dr. David Bowman. He is an excellent protagonist and delivers a praiseworthy performance. Douglas Rain is the voice of HAL 9000 and he flashes out the character in an excellent way. I think his voice acting improves the experience a lot. Gary Lockwood as Dr. Frank Poole is sometimes a bit overlooked and deserves credits too. All the others deliver a good performance and this cast is truly excellent. Of cause I praise Stanley Kubrick. He is a legendary director and his filmography is full of some of the greatest or better said well know and influential movies of his era. Then there is the music. This movie is like I said the reason classical music is associated with science fiction films. It has a lot of famous tracks like “Also sprach Zarathustra”, “Lux Aeterna” and “The blue Danube”. It fits strangely perfect here. Overall this is a must see in movie history. Bonus knowledge: Some of the shown technology was so spot on that it was used in the lawsuit between Apple and Samsung about the invention of the tablet (Again not a joke).… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

clem666Sep 13, 2021

As my score shows it I have very mixed feelings about this movie. Considered a classic, I only discovered it this week (in 2021), which makes it very difficult to bridge the fifty years-gap between its genesis and my very first look. ThatAs my score shows it I have very mixed feelings about this movie. Considered a classic, I only discovered it this week (in 2021), which makes it very difficult to bridge the fifty years-gap between its genesis and my very first look. That being said I still can (even if partially) comprehend why this feature is so important to the hearts of many. Yet it is not my case.

Of course, "2001: A Space Odyssey" benefits from exceptional visuals, sequences and staging. Yes, the colours, the lighting, the perspective and the montage are outstanding. Obviously the soundtrack is really intense and adds a lot to the story (or what seems to be so), even if such a sound environment reveals quite a lot of Kubrick's megalomania when conceptualizing this movie. It is undeniable that the acting (even if represents so few of the work) is great. To conclude with positive aspects I would say that the messages behind this feature are really interesting.

Despite these assets what ruined the experience for me was (amongst others) the movie length. I totally get that the concepts of space and time are really close and that representing such a fact in a movie requires both silences and very dark sequences. But here it is just too much. If you saw the first ten minutes of it you do know what I mean. The story is way too confusing. Events succeed each other without any obvious link or explanation. If Kubrick manages to make us deduce some symbols and causes of events he also surprisingly manages to make his movie just unintelligible and messy. If you witnessed the twenty last minutes of it you do know what I'm talking about. In overall the third and fourth acts are simply mindnumbing in addition to be punctuated by this endless weird psychedelic sequence. Until the end, I looked for something to hold onto, I looked for meaning in all those silent scenes I saw, but nothing came. It gets weirder and weirder until Kubrick finally lets you out of his indelicate, jerky experience.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

Gamzguy17Aug 21, 2021

Amazing. I wish I could summarize my experience of Stanley Kubrick's "2001: A Space Odyssey" using one word, but that is unfeasible. Sure, I typed ‘Amazing' as the one opening word of this review, but it is an understatement because KubrickAmazing. I wish I could summarize my experience of Stanley Kubrick's "2001: A Space Odyssey" using one word, but that is unfeasible. Sure, I typed ‘Amazing' as the one opening word of this review, but it is an understatement because Kubrick has boldly sculptured a magnificently ambitious work of art which continues to innovate filmmaking, challenge audience expectations and perceptions, and welcome intellectual discussions about its subject matter. If I could award a film that goes above and beyond a five star rating, this would be it.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

Abso_lute1Jul 14, 2021

A beautiful and mesmerizing piece of cinema that is undeniably a masterpiece as well as very subtle.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

Amirhosein2005Jul 4, 2021

An extremely amazing and wonderful film that is considered one of the greatest science fiction films. A film that closes the mouths and captivates the eyes! It is definitely amazing to see a film about the evolution of human beings with aAn extremely amazing and wonderful film that is considered one of the greatest science fiction films. A film that closes the mouths and captivates the eyes! It is definitely amazing to see a film about the evolution of human beings with a very beautiful visual style of the 60's!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

akshatmahajanJun 15, 2021

2001: A Space Odyssey is ahead of it's time. Movie came in 1968 and showed so many things which didn't exist before 90s. This movie is said to be best space movie ever made. I disagree. Yes, it might be best space movie of it's time but not2001: A Space Odyssey is ahead of it's time. Movie came in 1968 and showed so many things which didn't exist before 90s. This movie is said to be best space movie ever made. I disagree. Yes, it might be best space movie of it's time but not of all time.

Movie doesn't make perfect sense to me. The story is normal, the characters don't really get through you and the ending made no sense to me. The movie was unnecessarily slow paced and too long (2½ hours). Movie didn't have any proper explaination. I just think this movie is too much overrated. I liked this movie just because it was ahead of its time wheather you talk about visual effects, general idea of the movie and the idea of what space was like. Overall, I liked the movie for the reasons I told earlier but at the same time I would same that it is overrated and boring.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

DipkhatiwadaMar 24, 2021

Cinema's biggest achievement . One of the hypnotic films with some of the best special effects ever

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

ZiphiasFeb 20, 2021

The greatest film ever made. It tells a profound story of humanity and evolution. It completely blew me away on first watch and it was engaging all the way through. Even though I hate the word, this is a so-called masterpiece and perhaps theThe greatest film ever made. It tells a profound story of humanity and evolution. It completely blew me away on first watch and it was engaging all the way through. Even though I hate the word, this is a so-called masterpiece and perhaps the greatest of such.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

Onlyclassicvg1Feb 18, 2021

2001: A Space Odyssey is a countdown to tomorrow, a road map to human destiny, a quest for the infinite. To begin his voyage into the future, Kubrick visits our prehistoric ape-ancestry past, then leaps millenia (via one of the most2001: A Space Odyssey is a countdown to tomorrow, a road map to human destiny, a quest for the infinite. To begin his voyage into the future, Kubrick visits our prehistoric ape-ancestry past, then leaps millenia (via one of the most mind-blowing jump cuts ever conceived) into colonized space, and ultimately whisks astronaut Bowman (Dulle… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

AJ_13Jan 11, 2021

This film is one of the infinite reasons why Kubrick was way ahead of his time. The cinematography and OST are stunning. Nevertheless it may be a bit slow and its ending practically cant be understood unless you search an explanation for it.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

Edgy_666Dec 26, 2020

Bluffing! A real aesthetic slap in the face! Of a nameless beauty. With amazing special effects.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

ThejodjeremieOct 30, 2020

The movie has nice visuals and great acting for a movie that came out in 1968 but it's very slow and boring at times. I can kinda see how this movie is considered great but for me it just didn't work.

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

10

MahmusSep 25, 2020

2001: A Space Odyssey is a miracle.
A thought-provoking exploration of the mankind's place in the universe, but most surprisingly, an incredibly entertaining and endlessly rewatchable audio-visual experience, despite its slow pace.
This2001: A Space Odyssey is a miracle.
A thought-provoking exploration of the mankind's place in the universe, but most surprisingly, an incredibly entertaining and endlessly rewatchable audio-visual experience, despite its slow pace.

This movie keeps my eyes glued to the screen for its whole runtime. Through the long sequence of ships moving through space, through the seemingly endless stargate sequence, even when it's literally just a black screen, I'm hooked; hypnotized, entranced. Once it's starts, there's no going back.

This movie came out in 1968 and it still holds up. The effects are some of the best of all time. The sound is terrifying. The visuals are stunning.

This is easily one of the most beautiful films ever. Everything comes together so perfectly. Lighting, set design, costumes, special effects, music, colors, sound, editing; It's all cinematic perfection.

This is the ultimate Sci-fi film.
One of the few movies that I would call Perfect.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

0

AKMindsAug 18, 2020

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I just wasted over 2 hours watching this guff.

The first 5 minutes was LITERALLY nothing. A black screen with some noises. We're already off to a great start if I'm having to fast forward through the intro.

The movie begins with some apes having a fight, finding a big Tetris piece and then freaking out. This part went on for far too long! 20 minutes into the film and we finally get to the space part. VERY slow shots of ships passing and spinning, once again nothing at all happening. And then some characters have a meeting, it's all very boring... Then they go to the moon 45 minutes in and see the Tetris piece from the ape bit before with slightly different context... I say slightly different as there's NO CONTEXT FOR EITHER! It's just Tetris block as ape or Tetris block as human. The humans try to take a photo of it and then it makes an awful racket and suddenly everything that had happened for the last hour did not matter in the slightest!

We're at the part even people who know nothing about the movie know. HAL, this part had so much potential but it wasn't related to anything that came before it and it ended before it had the chance to explore it's full potential and make the plot work. Instead of being a big villain, HAL is beaten is about 4 minutes with no real fight or struggle, the entire time the movie is driving me insane with it's poor use of sound effects and strobe lighting. The movie gave me a migraine and that's no exaggeration. The lights on screen flashing, the repetitive noises were over the top and made this movie a nightmare for me.

Oh by the way, when we're introduced to HAL and Dave and the other bloke we're completely taken away from the other cast. No one sticks around, it's like having a James Bond film where 45 minutes in James Bond is just not heard from again and we have to follow a bunch of other people instead and they're not having a Martini shaken not stirred and finding the bad guy, they're instead playing table tennis and we're expected to continue watching like everything is fine.

Anyway, after this part the film flashed up an INTERMISSION screen for a very long time, I was debating whether or not to get myself a choc-ice at this point... And then we resume and after the HAL stuff happened the main guy gets attacked by more RGB lights than every Instagram post combined and then the film goes so far up it's own arse it becomes pretentious. The film explains nothing, says screw you and just ends with the main guy getting old and dying but becoming some reborn alien baby. WHAT!? I don't even have words for this, it's utter nonsense.

The film has some incredible visuals for 1968 but the extremely slow pace, shots that just don't end, interesting plot points that don't get explored enough and pacing I could only describe as Grandma who's memory is degrading explaining something she once experienced, focusing in on every little detail for the points that don't matter and aren't interesting but anything with potential and excitement squandered away.

This movie is a disaster, it's not a case of me not getting it and anyone who comes at me saying this cannot accept criticism. This is not a masterpiece, this is just a pretentious wankfest for pompous media students who think they're above everyone else for watching a film that was trying to have "meaning."

0/10 - If you've heard about this film being iconic and want to give it a try, DON'T!… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

7

xklnbx14Aug 4, 2020

The only reason I'm giving this film a seven is because of the ending which piqued my interest. Otherwise, it would have been a six. The setting is incredibly well made, the symbolism is cool, but the pacing is just so, so slow. The acting,The only reason I'm giving this film a seven is because of the ending which piqued my interest. Otherwise, it would have been a six. The setting is incredibly well made, the symbolism is cool, but the pacing is just so, so slow. The acting, for me, just wasn't quite there, but I enjoyed some of it, so it would have been a six but the ending was quite intriguing, so it's a seven.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

ShonnakanJul 26, 2020

A dazzling movie whose ambitions lie as high as the stars...... 2001 : A Space Odyssey by Stanley Kubrick is a revolutionary movie. The visual effects used in this movie still holds up after 52 years of release.The storytelling is subtle andA dazzling movie whose ambitions lie as high as the stars...... 2001 : A Space Odyssey by Stanley Kubrick is a revolutionary movie. The visual effects used in this movie still holds up after 52 years of release.The storytelling is subtle and requires a lot of attention and thought. Not everyone
will understand the intentions of this movie but if you do, this movie will grow on you and never leave your mind......… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

abrarqadirJul 21, 2020

2001 is Not my favorite Kubrick film, but I would feel silly if I didn't acknowledge it as Kubrick's best. 2001 must be on the short list for best Movie of all time. This is despite the fact that the movie is undeniably boring. But slowly2001 is Not my favorite Kubrick film, but I would feel silly if I didn't acknowledge it as Kubrick's best. 2001 must be on the short list for best Movie of all time. This is despite the fact that the movie is undeniably boring. But slowly hurtling through space could be nothing but boring, which only adds to the iconic realism. It is unendingly shocking that this movie was made in the 60's, and yet manages to stand head and shoulders above any other movie's representation of living in the dark vastness of space. Even Interstellar ends up feeling somewhat childish after seeing this. The 2 astronaut leads may seem "cold and distant" but are exactly what someone in their position would be. The celestial ballet Kubrick manages to convey/visualize is certainly spiritual in nature, even if no religious thought sits behind it. This film's prescience in visualizing the future (i.e. now - the present) is stupefying. The "Hal" storyline holds as much suspense as a Hitchcock movie. I was underwhelmed by the very end of the film, but I have also come to believe that Kubrick is both bad at, and apathetic to, the art of ending movies. I don't think he finds any joy in the end of movies, and it shows. But even certifiable flaws cannot upend this movie's clear status as 21st Century Masterpiece.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

LivingTribunalJul 11, 2020

This movie itself is a Monolith of the movie industry. I've watched many classics, but this is on whole other level.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

PanchogulJun 14, 2020

Es curioso, la primera vez que vi esta película hace ya tantos años la encontré aburrida, pero hoy en día la considero una de las mejores películas de ciencia ficción de todos los tiempos.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

3

Everybody-Jun 9, 2020

Probably out of all the well known mainstream films this is the slowest, it's also very cryptic and the final "star child" sequence is excruciatingly boring, torture to sit through. It has one redeeming factor HAL 9000, who is a great villainProbably out of all the well known mainstream films this is the slowest, it's also very cryptic and the final "star child" sequence is excruciatingly boring, torture to sit through. It has one redeeming factor HAL 9000, who is a great villain and if this movie had of had an easier to follow plot (or any plot at all) then maybe it could have utilised him to his full potential, the voice of HAL is just perfect, it has a real smug condescending sense of superiority to it and he has a great look, that red eye.

This movie seems to be more appreciated for it's effects than it's plot (if it even has a plot) which is fine if people enjoy it good for them but personally I am after something different, I want a great story in my films not a great sleeping pill. 3 out of 10 for HAL and one scene involving him in particular.… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

10

FRETIYRApr 28, 2020

An EPIC movie, by Stanley Kubrick and yet is one of the greatest movies of all time, might not predicted the future but still is amazing to watch

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

0

MircojujubeApr 27, 2020

this is the most overrated movie in all cinema history and anydody who says they understood it is lying, it's just a gigantic show off of visual and special effects, if it were done today it would be destryed by critics but it's 50 years oldthis is the most overrated movie in all cinema history and anydody who says they understood it is lying, it's just a gigantic show off of visual and special effects, if it were done today it would be destryed by critics but it's 50 years old and made by kubrick so it has to be a masterpice... **** if you'd like to see a good kubrick movie watch shining or clockwork orange, if you want to watch a good space movie check out interstellar or the martian.

disappointed… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

10

Louw_BurgerApr 4, 2020

One of the most influential of all sci-fi films -- and one of the most controversial -- Stanley Kubrick's 2001 is a delicate, poetic meditation on the ingenuity -- and folly -- of mankind.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

5

lagendofdoomFeb 6, 2020

I have a really mixed feelings about the movie,
on one had the visuals and the shots are simply outstanding very impressive and mind blowing, the carefully planned shots, the way the characters move in the spaceship the composition and miseI have a really mixed feelings about the movie,
on one had the visuals and the shots are simply outstanding very impressive and mind blowing, the carefully planned shots, the way the characters move in the spaceship the composition and mise en scene is just phenomenal.
On the other hand the characters are forgetful, the story in the beginning and the ending is nonexistent, nothing makes sense, you can try and interpret it however you want which is something that is both positive and negative I took it the negative way for the simple reason that I laughed at those scenes of how it doesn't make any sense.
The worst of all is the pacing oh god the pacing... you could shorten the movie by 1 hour and it still would be the same.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

7

MglovesfunFeb 4, 2020

While I can sympathize with people who don't like this film, I was very much drawn into the whole atmosphere and very much enjoyed it. My attention did wander in parts, however.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

The3AcademySinsJan 24, 2020

To this day, 2001: A Space Odyssey is one of the most inventive, original, and though provoking movies that has ever been made. The visual effects are mind-boggling, and the story is simple and open to interpretation. Whenever I watch thisTo this day, 2001: A Space Odyssey is one of the most inventive, original, and though provoking movies that has ever been made. The visual effects are mind-boggling, and the story is simple and open to interpretation. Whenever I watch this movie, I always wonder what the original audiences thought of it, and if they knew how pervasive and long lasting the piece of art that is this movie would persist? Definitely one of the best science fiction movies ever created.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

8

TheEventsOf1989Dec 29, 2019

A tangent on subject material or origins doesn't mean a movie is a failure. And while 2001: A Space Odyssey is a heavy re-interpretation of the original short story, it doesn't fall short of being a icon of cinema. But that's not the reasonA tangent on subject material or origins doesn't mean a movie is a failure. And while 2001: A Space Odyssey is a heavy re-interpretation of the original short story, it doesn't fall short of being a icon of cinema. But that's not the reason for all its fame, the story and visuals puts a distinct feeling on the audience, allowing for many different takes and perceptions, but I didn't see this as to prestigious or artsy. I think if you have the patience, you can easily enjoy the drama.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

jakepanek0125Sep 15, 2019

The single greatest achievement in the history of cinema - maybe even in general. A profound, striking film. MASTERPIECE

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

beeanadouAug 31, 2019

The beginning was great, music was fine but really not get getting what the ending is about.....

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

10

MehrshadNPAug 28, 2019

Producing a Si-Fi movie in the 60s would be easy.But creating one that would fit the technology of 2020 is mind blowing!
Kubrick made a movie that not only is way beyond its time,but is also so meaningful.
Making a "meaningful" si-fi movieProducing a Si-Fi movie in the 60s would be easy.But creating one that would fit the technology of 2020 is mind blowing!
Kubrick made a movie that not only is way beyond its time,but is also so meaningful.
Making a "meaningful" si-fi movie and still keeping it a "Kubrickian" work of art is not going to be easy...… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

DwayneHernandeAug 13, 2019

In my opinion the great film ever made. This is art. From the technical skills to the themes and motifs nothing can match 2001 in my opinion. Citizen Kane asks good questions central to the meaning of life of a man, but 2001 asks us to ponderIn my opinion the great film ever made. This is art. From the technical skills to the themes and motifs nothing can match 2001 in my opinion. Citizen Kane asks good questions central to the meaning of life of a man, but 2001 asks us to ponder not just our lives but our very place in the vast cosmos. The film is long, but you won't look at the watch at all. The cinematography is still so good it is hard to imagine this is a 50-year-old film. Keir Dullea is great as the center stage in a mainly special effects laden film, but such is his composure that we the audience associate with him solely, against the backdrop of the cold, inconsiderate blackness of space and high tech. Thus Spake Zarathustra will forever be associated with this great film and the soundtrack is so good in complementing its subject one cannot imagine the film without it. Above all 2001 A Space Odyssey is the work child of a genius(The greatest motion picture ever, all things considered)… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

kieranlborgJul 9, 2019

This movie is a simple yet significant representation of the human race from the eye of the great Stanley Kubrick or else its a no bad computer vs human movies. It depends if you want to watch the movies and take it at face value or if youThis movie is a simple yet significant representation of the human race from the eye of the great Stanley Kubrick or else its a no bad computer vs human movies. It depends if you want to watch the movies and take it at face value or if you want to immerse yourself in the story.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

branflakes4547Jun 25, 2019

Absolutely incredible. It is so rare that a movie blows me away time and time again, but this movie captures my attention immediately and never ceases to let go. I saw it 5 times before seeing it in theaters, and even for the sixth andAbsolutely incredible. It is so rare that a movie blows me away time and time again, but this movie captures my attention immediately and never ceases to let go. I saw it 5 times before seeing it in theaters, and even for the sixth and seventh time in a theater it blew me away. Probably the pinnacle of film making, and I do not believe it will ever be topped. It is certainly not for everybody, and there is no problem with that. But speaking for myself it is the bar to be reached by anyone and everyone in the coming decades. The cinematography, the sound design, the lighting, the acting, the writing, the production design (also the same person that did the special effects for the original star wars), literally everything about this film except possibly the pacing is just completely masterful. Definitely a movie everybody should see. If you don't like it, well that's okay, the average modern moviegoer will not be impressed. But if you like it, watch it again, and you will enjoy it just as much as every time preceding it. 110% mindboggling, and I do not use that term lightly. My jaw was on the floor, even on the seventh viewing. Always new stuff to uncover with this film… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

3

imthenoobJun 2, 2019

Visually stunning but that is about it. There is very little dialogue and you could honestly skip more than half the movie and not miss a beat. 2001 would have been much better as a short film than a feature.

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

10

ChristianTianApr 28, 2019

2001: A Space Odyssey is visual poetry, and like great poetry it demands something from you. Stanley Kubrick created films for people who seek more than escapist entertainment, and with 2001 he gave us an audacious conceit that is staggering2001: A Space Odyssey is visual poetry, and like great poetry it demands something from you. Stanley Kubrick created films for people who seek more than escapist entertainment, and with 2001 he gave us an audacious conceit that is staggering in its ambition, representing through film the 'Cosmic Ascension' with the utmost gravitas. There is real beauty in 2001 akin to the great masters of painting. The famous 'Space Ballet' is the most beautiful sequence in film history and it predates the age of computer graphics. It not only withstands today's visual standards in a technical sense, but contemporary filmmakers have yet to surpass its intense detail and realism. So much of the story exists visually, something film audiences may find disconcerting, but if you disconnect from the realm of motherhood and apple pie and answer to the demands made of you, you may find rich rewards. Within its grand scope and immeasurable odds, 2001 tells us a story: the story of evolution. The first monolith inspires apes to use tools as a violent means to justify ends; the second monolith motivates men to pursue a mysterious radio signal into the cold, dark, vacuum of space; and the third monolith pulls Dave through the stargate, across vast oceans of time and space, where upon his last dying breath, he reaches toward it one final time before his rebirth as the starchild, marking the ultimate phase in human evolution: to a being of pure energy and spirit with limitless capabilities and ungraspable intelligence, and the savior of humanity.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

WillemJApr 28, 2019

Kubrick's 2001 is a classic that should be shown in history classes. It's soundtrack played in music lessons. And even more, be playing in all theaters once a year - to show any upcoming filmmaker the true way of making a great picture. It'sKubrick's 2001 is a classic that should be shown in history classes. It's soundtrack played in music lessons. And even more, be playing in all theaters once a year - to show any upcoming filmmaker the true way of making a great picture. It's from the 60s but it easily outstands todays Hollywood's flicks.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

Will_PalmerApr 26, 2019

This movie is truly astounding, the leaps made by this film cannot be understated. Stanley Kubrick shines in the definitive sci-fi movie before star wars. It is ingenious with long drawn out, silent, speechless sequences. Which explain moreThis movie is truly astounding, the leaps made by this film cannot be understated. Stanley Kubrick shines in the definitive sci-fi movie before star wars. It is ingenious with long drawn out, silent, speechless sequences. Which explain more through symbolism and imagery than any other movie could with dialogue. It is a testament to the movie franchise and cinema today wouldn't be the same if it wasn't made.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

JamedrisApr 10, 2019

One of those mind-blowing movie that left you amazed and you want to tell your friends about it as soon as possible, but you know that most of them will not appreciate it in the way you did. I had two or three approaches but I am more thanOne of those mind-blowing movie that left you amazed and you want to tell your friends about it as soon as possible, but you know that most of them will not appreciate it in the way you did. I had two or three approaches but I am more than glad that I did decide to watch it. Any cinema fan should see it, even despite for the classic-role of this title. Also, HAL = IBM -1 letter each, but y'all know this. :) +fav… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

10

Filmix16Mar 19, 2019

Un scénario original.Des effets bien réussit pour un film de 1969.Stanley Kubrics offre sa meilleure adaptation au cinéma.Une trame sonore incroyable.Des idées mémorables.Les acteurs sont bons comme ils devraient êtres.La direction photo estUn scénario original.Des effets bien réussit pour un film de 1969.Stanley Kubrics offre sa meilleure adaptation au cinéma.Une trame sonore incroyable.Des idées mémorables.Les acteurs sont bons comme ils devraient êtres.La direction photo est superbe.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

MattJacks2003Mar 9, 2019

This movie has all lovely and sexy pieces of music and this movie is pretty damn fascinating.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

Maarten95Feb 8, 2019

This movie contains the most complex story I have ever seen in a movie before. The movie tries to tell that humanity can only advance through conflict. I doubt anyone however will understand its story by simply watching the movie and thatThis movie contains the most complex story I have ever seen in a movie before. The movie tries to tell that humanity can only advance through conflict. I doubt anyone however will understand its story by simply watching the movie and that might be its biggest flaw. I didn't enjoy the movie until I read on the plot on the internet after the movie was over. If you like complex stories then this is a great movie.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

BeastJ18Apr 21, 2018

Without a doubt, the greatest and most perfect movie of all time. Kubrick combined and exceeded art, culture and intellect. It triumphs on the highest level in all filmmaking aspects, beautiful cinematography, cerebral editing, masterfulWithout a doubt, the greatest and most perfect movie of all time. Kubrick combined and exceeded art, culture and intellect. It triumphs on the highest level in all filmmaking aspects, beautiful cinematography, cerebral editing, masterful direction, remarkably analytical and genius writing, superbly subdued and appropriate acting and voice performance, breathtaking stunt coordination, revolutionary production design and costuming, stunning sound design, immortal musical integration and the most breathtaking visual effects ever made. It was far ahead of its time and filmmakers are still striving to create something that even slightly echoes this film. A perfect combination of artistry and intelligence, never to be surpassed.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

cameronhalmansJan 9, 2019

Rich with symbolism and outstanding visual effects/cinematography, 2001: A Space Odyssey transcends time. Confusing yes, but once you understand Kubricks vision, this film clicks. 100/100

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

4

jonslowDec 15, 2018

I must say I don't get the hype of this movie. I could not even see the whole thing in one sitting because i was having trouble staying awake.

2 of 2 users found this helpful20

All this user's reviews

0

alex_gkoumas7Oct 21, 2018

Probably the worst movie I ever seen. There is absolutely no story to tell just some random dialogue between the tragical performances of the cast. Each scene is 5min just spinning arround.. And some people dare compare this movie withProbably the worst movie I ever seen. There is absolutely no story to tell just some random dialogue between the tragical performances of the cast. Each scene is 5min just spinning arround.. And some people dare compare this movie with Nolan's masterpiece Interstellar. Pathetic!… Expand

4 of 5 users found this helpful41

All this user's reviews

10

AxeTAug 30, 2018

In IMAX for the first time upon its 50th anniversary re-release, there is no more fitting title for the large format and there is perhaps no work of cinema with a bigger canvas except maybe "Star Wars". Its visual effects and soundtrack areIn IMAX for the first time upon its 50th anniversary re-release, there is no more fitting title for the large format and there is perhaps no work of cinema with a bigger canvas except maybe "Star Wars". Its visual effects and soundtrack are as realistic, as awesome, and as transcendently artistic as any that came before or have since in its wake. This is science fiction at its loftiest taking on the story of mankind itself with more grandeur and mystery than any motion picture has ever dared. Though known for its experimental nature over conventional narrative form the simple story is actually potently strong in its brilliant minimalism in service of sublime theme. It's Kubrick's greatest masterpiece of many, and like all his work does not readily appeal in typical 'movie movie' ways nor fully divulge itself upon initial viewings.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

10

GinaKJun 21, 2018

Definitely one of the best films ever made and certainly the best science fiction film made so far because it speculates not just about humans in space but about the universe itself. I have seen this film many times – and I finally appreciateDefinitely one of the best films ever made and certainly the best science fiction film made so far because it speculates not just about humans in space but about the universe itself. I have seen this film many times – and I finally appreciate Kubrick’s achievement. I have also seen many newer science fiction films, and I love many of them (for example, the Alien films), but this one is special because it goes beyond normal science fiction themes to speculate about the universe. And you need to see this film in a theater on the big screen and with a modern sound system even though it is not as spectacular as some contemporary films. It made me appreciate what an inspired director can do when he makes a great film, even when he doesn’t blow me away with spectacular special effects.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

5

ahmedaiman9999Jun 7, 2018

To be honest, I hate 2001, because I think it tells its relies so heavily on its message that there's almost no story to tell. It keeps repeating its messages, that we have already recognized from the get-go, throughout its running time.To be honest, I hate 2001, because I think it tells its relies so heavily on its message that there's almost no story to tell. It keeps repeating its messages, that we have already recognized from the get-go, throughout its running time. Adding insult to injury, it tries to be riveting by showing how wonderful the camera work is,how mesmerizing the cinematography is, how fascinating the production design is, how masterful the editing is, etc. While all these technical points made this movie the most beautiful movie I've ever seen, instead of relying on the technical aspect, I think it should have engaged us with the use of narrative elements, such as a dramatic plot, well-wrought and fleshed-out characters, or in a worst-case scenario, a mysterious event or even character. Also, this movie is the most boring movie I've ever watched.

(5.5/10)… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

9

AkumaJackJun 6, 2018

2001: A space odyssey is the definition of Masterpiece. Although is a very slow paced movie it has one of the best directing i've ever seen. The Soundtrack is perfect and the whole "plot" is very meaningful. This film is so deep that will2001: A space odyssey is the definition of Masterpiece. Although is a very slow paced movie it has one of the best directing i've ever seen. The Soundtrack is perfect and the whole "plot" is very meaningful. This film is so deep that will tell you more about yourself that any other piece of art you'll ever experience.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

10

mrafrotastic00Jun 2, 2018

Cinematic Masterpieces: 2001: A Space Odyssey. Starring: Keir Dullea. Gary Lockwood. Douglas Rain. Directed by Stanley Kubrick. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer. No one has ever experienced a film like "2001: A Space Odyssey." Science-fiction moviesCinematic Masterpieces: 2001: A Space Odyssey. Starring: Keir Dullea. Gary Lockwood. Douglas Rain. Directed by Stanley Kubrick. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer. No one has ever experienced a film like "2001: A Space Odyssey." Science-fiction movies have tried to be as profound as Kubrick's masterpiece, but they lack an elaborately complex theme. To contemplate that this motion picture was released in 1968, fifty years ago, conveys how Kubrick's film is a stunning achievement. "2001: A Space Odyssey" is a creepily breathtaking meditation on mankind from an evolutionary perspective; the film score and cinematography exude an unsettling atmosphere for audiences. Stanley Kubrick is the real star of this motion picture, because he was able to establish a revolutionary film with the help of a superb cast and crew. From the opening sequence to the wicked conclusion, "2001: A Space Odyssey" is a ravishing, sophisticated study of humanity.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

VirgonoShakaMay 26, 2018

2001: A Space odessey is one of the fundamentals of Sci-fi and I can definitely say that it is honor well deserved. Not only it has some incredible effects for it's time, but the way the story starts, and how it uses it's dialogues, silence2001: A Space odessey is one of the fundamentals of Sci-fi and I can definitely say that it is honor well deserved. Not only it has some incredible effects for it's time, but the way the story starts, and how it uses it's dialogues, silence and music to convey it's message is superb. My only gripe would be that the last scene is maybe a tad bit too long and can be hard on the eyes. But other than that, this is one journey that everyone, not matter where they come from, should embark in.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

theCRITIC2May 21, 2018

I hate how this movie doesn't have a score of 100 here in Metacritic. This movie is I think one of the best films ever created (if not the best). If you're criticizing this film because it's not entertaining and it's boring, you're doing itI hate how this movie doesn't have a score of 100 here in Metacritic. This movie is I think one of the best films ever created (if not the best). If you're criticizing this film because it's not entertaining and it's boring, you're doing it wrong. This film is not supposed to be entertaining, this film is the testimony of the future, an allegory in other terms. The shot of this film from beginning up to the ending is marvelous (especially the ending sequence). There was no scene in this where I wasn't amazed by the cinematography, every scene is a painting. Stanley Kubrick is truly one of the best directors of all time to have ever lived and I think this is his best work throughout his entire life. The soundtrack of this film is also great like the use Also Sprach Zarathustra: Einleitung at the opening and at the ending of film or the use of the Waltz on the Blue Danube or even the breathing sound which some have said that Kubrick himself recorded is astounding.
You could argue that every actor in this film feels robotic and that is actually one of the points of this film, technology has taken and driven us to the point that we ourselves are robotic in many ways. This film influence the Sci-Fi genre (which would influence George Lucas in his film Star Wars 9 years later) and in fact not only the genre, but also the whole film industry. This film is as genius is as genius as the one who directed it. I love this film so much, go watch this if you haven't but don't go watch this like something entertaining or just your regular pastimes, watch this like you're viewing a series of paintings painted by Kubrick himself and also a poetic testimony of what future could bring to the existence of humanity.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

AtomicjackMay 16, 2018

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This film is... interesting. i personally can not argue with the impact this movie had and its heavy symbolism (most of which i do not understand) but this film was over hyped for me as people called it the best film of all time. And do not even get me started on the acid trip sequence near the end of the film, i got a splitting head ache from watching it. overall its fine but way too over hyped and personally confusing.… Expand

2 of 2 users found this helpful20

All this user's reviews

8

GrantD243Apr 25, 2018

2001: A Space Odyssey is a film I've been wanting to watch for a while now. I've always heard that it's a great one, and that it is a must-watch for sci-fi fans. Well, I finally watched it yesterday, and I enjoyed it. I think it's a very2001: A Space Odyssey is a film I've been wanting to watch for a while now. I've always heard that it's a great one, and that it is a must-watch for sci-fi fans. Well, I finally watched it yesterday, and I enjoyed it. I think it's a very solid sci-fi film with an interesting story that can be interpreted in more than a few ways (as proven by the hundreds of explanation/theory videos and essays that are out there). The thing that struck me the most about the film is how beautiful it is for a 1968 release. There are some shots that you could show me completely out of context and I'd probably think that it's from a modern movie. The effects are also truly incredible for the era. I am definitely looking forward to attending one of the 70mm screenings that they'll be doing with Nolan's restored version soon. This is also one of those films where I'm going to have to watch it multiple times. It's not really an option. The first time around I was merely trying to take everything I could in, but now I can go back and pay more attention to certain things. With all of that being said, this isn't a perfect film. I think some of the sequences drag on a little too long (although I'm sure audiences were not complaining back when this first came out) and the story does move a little too slow for me at times. But I was still very much satisfied when it ended.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

0

FranKenweenieApr 22, 2018

the most boring meaningless movie i have ever seen just an overrated director where is the freaking story charcters are just ****

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

10

cinemabonApr 8, 2018

Stanley Kubrick's masterpiece broke new ground and became the blueprint for all science fiction movies to follow.

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

10

stgrunuMar 29, 2018

This is one of those movies that chase you forever. After my first watch I couldn't sleep and couldn't stop thinking about it. I hate myself for taking so long before watching it.
It honestly is one of the best pieces of media I've watchedThis is one of those movies that chase you forever. After my first watch I couldn't sleep and couldn't stop thinking about it. I hate myself for taking so long before watching it.
It honestly is one of the best pieces of media I've watched and it's one of those movies you just want more from but at the same time you don't.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

SilentTacticianFeb 21, 2018

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. A fantastic film but it wasn't able to keep me entertained. Lifeless characters and a dull plot. The best thing about this movie was the voice of Hal and its interaction with the pilots. Everything else is what brought this movie down for me.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

9

merijnjFeb 21, 2018

(93/100)
Stanley YOU ARE MY HERO! This movie is one of my favorite sci-fi movies of all time.

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

10

ScorsescockFeb 1, 2018

This film you might not get on the first watch but it all comes together it's truly amazing. it uses visual storytelling and little dialogue to show exactly what's happening and provide a deep hidden message about change both good and bad.This film you might not get on the first watch but it all comes together it's truly amazing. it uses visual storytelling and little dialogue to show exactly what's happening and provide a deep hidden message about change both good and bad. P.S. best special effects ever.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

10

CTHReviewsFeb 1, 2018

2001: A Space Odyssey is a cinematic, science fiction masterpiece. I had so many questions when I first watched it, and I still do now.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

3

MacsMusicDec 30, 2017

This is one of the weirdest, and slowest movies that I've ever seen. Every scene was 5 minutes longer than it had to be, and watching this movie was a painful experience as a result. The plot is complete nonsense, with no real direction orThis is one of the weirdest, and slowest movies that I've ever seen. Every scene was 5 minutes longer than it had to be, and watching this movie was a painful experience as a result. The plot is complete nonsense, with no real direction or anything. The only redeeming factors are Hal, and the music.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

9

GHarrisonDec 24, 2017

Visually exceptional masterpiece with a soundtrack so fantastic its usage has become cliché. Dramatic, intense, iconic and truly incredible to think it's almost half a century old. For me Clive, Kubrick's finest.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

sharathegde1995Dec 23, 2017

Mostly remembered as an innovation for future sci-fi films to come, this Stanley Kubrick film is a tale of Human evolution, Science and technology , space adventure and much more told in the most bizarre yet thought-provoking way

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

JLuis_001Sep 6, 2017

One of the greatest epics in science fiction in all history, it's been more than 45 years since it was released and still to this day it remains one of the biggest if not the biggest reference of the genre.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

alejandro970Aug 13, 2017

One of Kubrick top works and that changed the way of telling space travel stories, based on Arthur C. Clarke book. To see it requires a lot of discipline as spectator, and something that gives greater strenght is the background music (BlueOne of Kubrick top works and that changed the way of telling space travel stories, based on Arthur C. Clarke book. To see it requires a lot of discipline as spectator, and something that gives greater strenght is the background music (Blue Danube, Zaratustra). The space oddity of ever.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

daniel678Jun 9, 2017

One of the best movies ever made in the history of cinema. Shocking, real, minimalist, very well told. 2001 is pure cinema. The closest to perfection. Photography, direction, art direction, film, all this and more deserving of all possibleOne of the best movies ever made in the history of cinema. Shocking, real, minimalist, very well told. 2001 is pure cinema. The closest to perfection. Photography, direction, art direction, film, all this and more deserving of all possible prizes. Stanley Kubrick gives us a masterpiece that will last for all eternity and will go to Jupiter and beyond. Stanley Kubrick did it to perfection. 2001 A SPACE ODYSSEY FOREVER.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

jack2244Mar 19, 2017

Personally my favorite Stanley Kubrick movie. It is by far his most acclaimed movie besides A Clockwork Orange. It really isn't as boring as some people put it out to be. It is a really interesting movie so yeah, that's all I have to say about it.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

LaskeudeungJan 28, 2017

Ya film ini dari awal sampai akhir nonjolin satu aspek doang, artisitik. Kenapa jadi lagendari ? Dikeluarin tahun 1968 tapi teknologi nyatanya baru kita temuin di abad 22. Jenius , tapi ya sekali lagi film artistik yang penonton blockbustersYa film ini dari awal sampai akhir nonjolin satu aspek doang, artisitik. Kenapa jadi lagendari ? Dikeluarin tahun 1968 tapi teknologi nyatanya baru kita temuin di abad 22. Jenius , tapi ya sekali lagi film artistik yang penonton blockbusters 100% bilang "aneh". Legend… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

8

Kevin41Jan 4, 2017

This movie revolutionized the use of the frame, that here is no longer a simple tool to tell, but it takes on a meaning of its own, being able to express the meaning by itself. Images must "speak": it is for this reason taht the timing ofThis movie revolutionized the use of the frame, that here is no longer a simple tool to tell, but it takes on a meaning of its own, being able to express the meaning by itself. Images must "speak": it is for this reason taht the timing of this film are dilated and shots lasting longer than expected. In this work, in fact, Kubrick creates a communication with the viewer that exceeds the verbal level, reducing the dialogue to a minimum quantity. Music and images become strnger than any words and this is just a skill that the movie has, which is to hit the unconscious without words.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

Joao452364Jan 3, 2017

Um Filme que quebra todas as barreiras de como fazer um bom Sci-Fi, 2001: Uma odisseia no espaço traz tudo de melhor que um Sci-Fi precisa ter: Um roteiro emocionante e denso, e efeitos visuais maravilhosos, que são reforçados pela fotografiaUm Filme que quebra todas as barreiras de como fazer um bom Sci-Fi, 2001: Uma odisseia no espaço traz tudo de melhor que um Sci-Fi precisa ter: Um roteiro emocionante e denso, e efeitos visuais maravilhosos, que são reforçados pela fotografia e Mixagem de som.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

MattBrady99Nov 25, 2016

"Daisy."

So I just saw "2001" at a film festival and it was kinda incredible. Why do I feel like I just ticked off my bucket list of things to die before you die. I've been waiting a long time to watch this on the big screen. I already seen"Daisy."

So I just saw "2001" at a film festival and it was kinda incredible. Why do I feel like I just ticked off my bucket list of things to die before you die. I've been waiting a long time to watch this on the big screen. I already seen the movie about 3 or 4 years ago, but my memory of the film isn't that strong. So when I was picking what movies I wanted to see at (LIFF), and this was on the list, as the festival also shows classic movies.

Re-watching this movie was quite the experience. Nothing like a massive screen and loud speakers blasting off beautiful music while drifting in space. From the dawn of man till the end of human life. The cycle repeats.

But seriously, what can I honestly say about "2001" that hasn't been said already. It's one of the greatest Sci-Fi films of all time. It's groundbreaking and pure genius. Even at the slower pace parts, I was still engaged. After it was over, I was contemplating on it.

For a 1968 film, it's visual effects still hold up today and looks way more convincing than today. Well, there was a couple of effects that was noticeable, but the rest (which is mostly practical) still looks amazing. The "Star Gate" sequence is one example of a trippy and a breathtaking effect that it owned Kubrick an Oscar.

Every shot in this movie is like something you would hang up on your wall. Kubrick has been known for being a perfectionist of his work. This is a work of an artist that doesn't just get praised for how much he dose, but how little. Three years of making this - you can get easily attached to your work that after awhile you find the hidden beauty of the story. Do it 40 or 127 times until you get what you want and exactly how you wanted. A similar method that Chaplin use for "City Lights". But it isn't just images that kept me attention and I don't think Stanley was intending on that. There's plenty of scenes that goes on forever, not for spectacle, but more of use to inhabit everything that's going on.

It also helps that music in this is so beautiful, but very eerie at the right moments. I can take the monolith on the moon scene as a great example of the bone chilling music. It may be scary for some, because of "Requiem for Soprano" playing in the background, but I kinda see like this:

Man discovers a 4 million year old structure buried under the surface of the moon. Perfect angles and a disturbingly flawless complexion. imagine if this event actually occurred in reality and you were sitting in front of your TV when a breaking news bulletin interrupts your program. Just imagine the weight of the emotions you feel. There is no explanation for how this structure could even exist. its impossible! It will be the most reality-shattering event in the history of the world.

It's one of my favorite scenes of all time, because the scene alone perfectly captures that feeling. No explanation. No answers. No reason.

Overall: Films like "Space Odyssey" is why I love movies. Extraordinary and beautiful work of art. "2001" isn't just a classic for it's effects or the show stealer Hal9000, but how it wants to inspire and enlarge us. A space voyage that evokes questions and kept the audience in awe for 48 years.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

gNov 12, 2016

Stanley Kubrick & science-fiction novelist Arthur C. Clarke puts a great visual to a film like this for it's great special FX by hand. Every film has a beauty of special FX in it's own way, 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968) is one of the mostStanley Kubrick & science-fiction novelist Arthur C. Clarke puts a great visual to a film like this for it's great special FX by hand. Every film has a beauty of special FX in it's own way, 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968) is one of the most memorable space film.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

night4Jul 10, 2016

While this movie isn't perfect, it's so close in so many ways it deserves a 10.

What's most memorable, perhaps, is its authentic late 60's space vibe that other shows and movies have been emulating or honoring for decades. It's truly aWhile this movie isn't perfect, it's so close in so many ways it deserves a 10.

What's most memorable, perhaps, is its authentic late 60's space vibe that other shows and movies have been emulating or honoring for decades. It's truly a work of art.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

SiavashtitkanJun 19, 2016

the best movie of cinema history! ...................very mysterious and smart and very philosophical.you just need to see that match cut of the bone to the spaceship;it gives you everything that he wants you tothe best movie of cinema history! ...................very mysterious and smart and very philosophical.you just need to see that match cut of the bone to the spaceship;it gives you everything that he wants you to know:history,philosophy,politic and meta-physic science.you'll be surprised by Kubrick's imagination and moving that to the screen even better.he is not the [perfect director].he's much more than that.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

CalibMcBoltsMay 30, 2016

There is only ONE thing stopping this film from being no.1 on all the "best of all time" lists. The people that love this film worship it (including me) & the people that hate it only hate it because they are naive & impatient. If everyoneThere is only ONE thing stopping this film from being no.1 on all the "best of all time" lists. The people that love this film worship it (including me) & the people that hate it only hate it because they are naive & impatient. If everyone had patience in this world & people ACTUALLY paid attention to the whole film without falling asleep? It would be EVERYONES Greatest film ever made. The true monilith of cinema.

No words can describe how masterful this film is. It's more than just a film, it's somthing else entirely. To me, the TRUE meaning of the words "masterpiece" & "experience" is - "2001: A Space Odyssey".

There's more deep meaning and hidden messages in this film than all of Chris Nolan's films combined.

To explain to the Naive and impatient folk. there IS a reason for the 5 minite scenes of (so-called) "nothing".
We spend 10 minutes looking at apes in plain desert, showing us how we developed human behavour for the first time.
THEN....all of a sudden, we're seeing a spaceship & spacestation. Without the 5 minute scenes, The film wouldn't be able to make us appreciate the technology we've managed to create since the "dawn of man". Think of those scenes as a 'celebration' of tenchnology & space travel.
All those 5 minute scenes of "nothing" are one of the most important aspects of the film.

There is even a reason as to why the film plays 5 minutes of music before the film starts.
The song 'requiem' plays whenever a monolith appears on-screen. Stanley uses 'Requiem' to not only create a chilling mood but also give the monolith a voice. 'Requiem' is the monolith's voice speaking to whoever it is facing. By having the music play over the black screen at the beginning of the film Kubrick is actually showing us the first monolith. Doesn't the black screen go on for a little too long? That was done intentionally by Kubrick. This is the monolith speaking to the audience themselves which suggest that we're about to witness a film so grand and so magnificent that it will open up our eyes to things we've never even thought possible.?

This is a movie that needs thinking, repeated viewings, and more thinking, it's ambiguous and multilayered.
It's a philosophical journey that makes you wonder about life.
A masterpiece still fresh to this day, it looks like it hasn't dated a single year, it has phenomenal special effects, a brilliant screenplay and story, astoundingly perfect acting with one of the greatest villains of all time, along side the best use of music in a motion picture to this day.
This movie is among a special catagory in science-fiction movies, 2001 is not concerned with thrilling us, but with inspiring our awe.
Watching this film demands two qualities that are sadly lacking in all but the most mature and sophisticated audiences: patience and a willingness to ponder the meaning of what's transpiring on screen. 2001 is awe inspiring, but it is most definitely not a "thrill ride." It is art, it is a statement, and it is indisputably a cinematic classic.

Kubrick's best work, and in my eyes, the greatest motion picture ever created and i doubt it will ever be triumphed.

2001: A Space Odyssey is a must-see for every cinephile!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

JonathonBMay 22, 2016

Regardless of one's personal taste, "2001: A Space Odyssey" is filled with grand, philosophical ideas, and stunning imagery and special effects that hold up extremely well for modern audiences. Avoid it if you desire to see a moreRegardless of one's personal taste, "2001: A Space Odyssey" is filled with grand, philosophical ideas, and stunning imagery and special effects that hold up extremely well for modern audiences. Avoid it if you desire to see a more conventional film with traditional dialogue scenes and characterizations, for Kubrick uses image and sound as fuel for his otherworldly story. Truthfully, some will find the film's slow, deliberate pace frustrating, though, for discerning viewers, "2001" is a revered classic that offers rich rewards.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

4

DoctorFilmMar 31, 2016

Stanley Kubrick is alive and well and living in Outer Space. Those filmgoers who have wondered what happened to the man who gave screen birth to "Lolita" and "Dr. Strangelove" can stop worrying. He's taken up a new hobby--science-fiction--andStanley Kubrick is alive and well and living in Outer Space. Those filmgoers who have wondered what happened to the man who gave screen birth to "Lolita" and "Dr. Strangelove" can stop worrying. He's taken up a new hobby--science-fiction--and his first effort comes close to running away with itself. One criticism that will be raised is that film cost too much for so "personal" (i.e. Kubrick) a film.

When Stanley Kubrick and sci-fi specialist Arthur C. Clarke first conceived the idea of making a Cinerama film, neither had any idea that it would run into a project of several years. Shooting actually began late December, 1965, in England and continued, if one counts added footage and retakes, until early this year. Much of the lengthy shooting time, of course, is attributable to the detailed special effects the story made necessary. Keir Dullea, for instance, completed another film (“The Fox”) and did a Broadway play (“Dr Cook’s Garden”) between completion of his role in “2001” and its current release.

Was all this painstaking research and work worthwhile? There will be many filmgoers, fortunately for Metro, who’ll think it was; there’ll be others who won’t see this in the finished handiwork of Kubrick and his staff. A major achievement in cinematography and special effects, “2001” lacks dramatic appeal to a large degree and only conveys suspense after the halfway mark. Despite the enormous technical staff involved in making the film, it is almost entirely one man’s conception and Kubrick must receive all the praise – and take all the blame.

The plot, so-called, uses up almost two hours in exposition of scientific advances in space travel and communications, before anything happens. The surprisingly dull prolog deals with the “advancement of man,” centering on a group of apes (the makeup is amateurish compared to that in “Planet of the Apes”). An important prop is also introduced but so sketchily that many viewers will scarcely note, and promptly forget it–a huge black monolith is shown briefly (to reappear light years later as the key to possible life on planets other than Earth).

The little humor is provided by introducing well-known commercial names which are presumably still operational during the space age: the Orbiter Hilton hotel, refreshments by Howard Johnson, picture phones by Bell, and Pan Am space ships (although one shown is carrying only a single passenger). A computer named Hal that can talk is, initially, good for a laugh but when it turns out to be the villain, this attitude quickly changes. Hal (voiced by Douglas Rain, although originally done by Martin Balsam) is one of the film’s best effects and surprisingly acceptable, considering reaction to it is based on the use of a voice.

Dullea and Gary Lockwood, as the two principal astronauts, are not introduced until well along in the film. Their complete lack of emotion becomes rather implausible during scenes where they discover, and discuss, the villainy of the computer. Except for William Sylvester, as the scientist who reveals the project to investigate possibility of life on another planet, the other human roles are little more than walkons.

Kubrick and Clarke have kept dialog to a minimum, frequently inserting lengthy passages where everything is told visually. One inside joke is the remark by a femme Russian scientist that her husband is busy elsewhere doing underwater exploration (Clarke’s real-life hobby). Scientific advances appear much further along than would seem possible for the 33 intervening years until 2001. The only earth shots shown are interiors transmitted over picture phones or closed-circuit TV but, incongruously, Earth citizens are shown dressed and acting 1968 while the scientists (even in their casual attire) wear stylized space-age garb.

Film ends on a confused note, never really tackling the “other life” situation and evidently leaving interpretation up to the individual viewer. To many this will smack of indecision or hasty scripting. Dullea, after being subjected to a wild celestial ride through a series of galaxies that create a psychedelic effort on both him and the audience, finds himself in a room decorated in a style familiar to Earth although the implication is that he’s on Jupiter. After confronting himself in various advance stages of age, he finally succumbs to the power generated by the black monolith (still unexplained) which has reappeared. The ending shot blends a planet with an orb-shaped view of an embryo, possibly suggesting the rebirth of civilization in another universe.

Ray Lovejoy’s editing, generally good, too often holds views to the point of losing interest while other scenes are chopped abruptly, sometimes with no explanation. This suggests some wholesale and rather hasty cutting decisions on the part of Kubrick. The 160-minute running time, still overlong, could be shortened sufficiently by some slicing in the lengthy introduction to make the intermission unnecessary.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

10

TheFilmDoctorMar 22, 2016

Perhaps it takes the passage of time to gain the perspective to call some films great. Certain movies, despite being ridiculed upon their initial release, have been "re-discovered" years later and labeled as forgotten classics. It's aPerhaps it takes the passage of time to gain the perspective to call some films great. Certain movies, despite being ridiculed upon their initial release, have been "re-discovered" years later and labeled as forgotten classics. It's a universal truth that art isn't always immediately recognized as such - this is why so many revered painters, authors, and composers have died in poverty and relative obscurity. Filmmakers face some of the same challenges - in a business climate, courage is the number one characteristic needed by anyone with the goal of fashioning a work that is deliberately thought-provoking but lacking in mass appeal. Such idealistic intentions won't inflate any director's bank account, but they may make an enduring statement. That brings us to the subject of this review: Stanley Kubrick's 2001: A Space Odyssey. Despite gaining additional adherents and growing more respected with each passing day, 2001 would likely be a failure if shown to a typical, MTV-weaned group of multiplex patrons. Watching this film demands two qualities that are sadly lacking in all but the most mature and sophisticated audiences: patience and a willingness to ponder the meaning of what's transpiring on screen. 2001 is awe inspiring, but it is most definitely not a "thrill ride." It is art, it is a statement, and it is indisputably a cinematic classic.

he level of anticipation surrounding 2001 was as high as that to accompany any cinematic event before or after. Not only had Kubrick developed the project in complete secrecy, but, with the space race in its final laps, the world was ready to inhale any whiff of science fiction. But 2001 did not satisfy everyone. In fact, the initial reaction could charitably be called mixed. While a minority of those in early audiences recognized that they had witnessed the birth of a masterpiece, many movie-goers were nonplused and confused. Several influential mainstream publications panned the film, and, while it was successful at the box office, it was not the blockbuster some had expected it to be. Yet 2001 did not die. Instead, its reputation grew, and, by the mid-'70s, it had become a Goliath.

It's questionable which element of 2001 stands out the most clearly: the pacing, the music, or the visuals. In truth, the three are inseparable. Like a skilled chef, Kubrick blended them together to form a dish of incomparable excellence. They are unique ingredients, yet, once mixed, they can no longer be reconstituted into their original forms. For most movies, this is not the case, but that's one of many areas in which 2001 is an exception. Listening to a soundtrack of this film provokes an avalanche of images in the mind's eye. Can anyone who has seen 2001 listen to the Johann Strauss' "Blue Danube Waltz" and not think of the shuttle docking at the space station? And Richard Strauss' rousing, unforgettable "Also Spoke Zarathustra" has become synonymous with this picture. (In fact, "Zaruathustra" is often referred to as the "Theme from 2001".)

In terms of its approach to the science fiction genre, 2001 stands alone. This is a space-based movie without zooming spaceships, laser shootouts, or explosions. The action, to the degree that there is action, is viewed from a detached perspective. Spacecraft move (relatively) slowly, they do not zip around at the speed of light. The result is a cold, majestic motion picture, a movie that seeks to remind us of the vastness of space and our relatively insignificant place in it. Kubrick's intention with 2001 was not to thrill us with battles and pyrotechnics, but to daunt us with the realization of how much there is that we do not understand. The movie's slowness (and it is slow) not only allows us to absorb the images, music, and atmosphere, but provides the opportunity to think about the implications of what Kubrick is saying. As enjoyable as Star Wars is, it does not encourage deep introspection. 2001 demands it.

I can think of two other movies that have consciously borrowed aspects of Kubrick's 2001 style. (There may be others, but either I have forgotten them or I never knew about them to forget.) They are Star Trek: The Motion Picture and Contact. Both slowed their pace to awe the viewer with a cavalcade of visual images. It worked in the latter case but not in the former.

2001 needs to be experienced to be appreciated. It loses something on a TV screen; even the best home video setup can't replicate what it's like to see the movie in a theater. Over 40 years after its release, 2001 has lost none of the qualities that make it an acknowledged masterwork.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

PachekoviskMar 16, 2016

A MASTERPIECE
One of the greatest movies of all time
THE greatest sci-fi film of all time
A great symbolic movie
One of my favorite movies
nothing more to say.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

4

CinemassacreMar 13, 2016

When Stanley Kubrick and sci-fi specialist Arthur C. Clarke first conceived the idea of making a Cinerama film, neither had any idea that it would run into a project of several years. Shooting actually began late December, 1965, in EnglandWhen Stanley Kubrick and sci-fi specialist Arthur C. Clarke first conceived the idea of making a Cinerama film, neither had any idea that it would run into a project of several years. Shooting actually began late December, 1965, in England and continued, if one counts added footage and retakes, until early this year. Much of the lengthy shooting time, of course, is attributable to the detailed special effects the story made necessary. Keir Dullea, for instance, completed another film (“The Fox”) and did a Broadway play (“Dr Cook’s Garden”) between completion of his role in “2001” and its current release.

Was all this painstaking research and work worthwhile? There will be many filmgoers, fortunately for Metro, who’ll think it was; there’ll be others who won’t see this in the finished handiwork of Kubrick and his staff. A major achievement in cinematography and special effects, “2001” lacks dramatic appeal to a large degree and only conveys suspense after the halfway mark. Despite the enormous technical staff involved in making the film, it is almost entirely one man’s conception and Kubrick must receive all the praise – and take all the blame.

The plot, so-called, uses up almost two hours in exposition of scientific advances in space travel and communications, before anything happens. The surprisingly dull prolog deals with the “advancement of man,” centering on a group of apes (the makeup is amateurish compared to that in “Planet of the Apes”). An important prop is also introduced but so sketchily that many viewers will scarcely note, and promptly forget it–a huge black monolith is shown briefly (to reappear light years later as the key to possible life on planets other than Earth).

The little humor is provided by introducing well-known commercial names which are presumably still operational during the space age: the Orbiter Hilton hotel, refreshments by Howard Johnson, picture phones by Bell, and Pan Am space ships (although one shown is carrying only a single passenger). A computer named Hal that can talk is, initially, good for a laugh but when it turns out to be the villain, this attitude quickly changes. Hal (voiced by Douglas Rain, although originally done by Martin Balsam) is one of the film’s best effects and surprisingly acceptable, considering reaction to it is based on the use of a voice.

Dullea and Gary Lockwood, as the two principal astronauts, are not introduced until well along in the film. Their complete lack of emotion becomes rather implausible during scenes where they discover, and discuss, the villainy of the computer. Except for William Sylvester, as the scientist who reveals the project to investigate possibility of life on another planet, the other human roles are little more than walkons.

Kubrick and Clarke have kept dialog to a minimum, frequently inserting lengthy passages where everything is told visually. One inside joke is the remark by a femme Russian scientist that her husband is busy elsewhere doing underwater exploration (Clarke’s real-life hobby). Scientific advances appear much further along than would seem possible for the 33 intervening years until 2001. The only earth shots shown are interiors transmitted over picture phones or closed-circuit TV but, incongruously, Earth citizens are shown dressed and acting 1968 while the scientists (even in their casual attire) wear stylized space-age garb.

Film ends on a confused note, never really tackling the “other life” situation and evidently leaving interpretation up to the individual viewer. To many this will smack of indecision or hasty scripting. Dullea, after being subjected to a wild celestial ride through a series of galaxies that create a psychedelic effort on both him and the audience, finds himself in a room decorated in a style familiar to Earth although the implication is that he’s on Jupiter. After confronting himself in various advance stages of age, he finally succumbs to the power generated by the black monolith (still unexplained) which has reappeared. The ending shot blends a planet with an orb-shaped view of an embryo, possibly suggesting the rebirth of civilization in another universe.

Ray Lovejoy’s editing, generally good, too often holds views to the point of losing interest while other scenes are chopped abruptly, sometimes with no explanation. This suggests some wholesale and rather hasty cutting decisions on the part of Kubrick. The 160-minute running time, still overlong, could be shortened sufficiently by some slicing in the lengthy introduction to make the intermission unnecessary.

But “2001” is not a cinematic landmark. It compares with, but does not best, previous efforts at science fiction; lacking the humanity of “Forbidden Planet,” the imagination of “Things to Come” and the simplicity of “Of Stars and Men,” it actually belongs to the technically-slick group previously dominated by George Pal and the Japanese.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews