10 Cloverfield Lane

4

doodlermanMar 22, 2016

It's the kind of movie that's been made a thousand times, but this time in tight quarters, feigning originality. I wanted to love this movie, but I may have been too bound to my original expectations. I expected something much more seriousIt's the kind of movie that's been made a thousand times, but this time in tight quarters, feigning originality. I wanted to love this movie, but I may have been too bound to my original expectations. I expected something much more serious and tensely paced. This movie is cliched ridiculousness. It's done better than most cliched ridiculousness, sure, but it devolves into something so stupid that it can't be forgiven.

John Goodman is good, but not particularly menacing. I guess I have my perceptions of him as a lovable big guy to blame for that, but for the duration of the film, I never felt threatened by him. The writing could be to blame, here. His character is almost immediately too obviously whacko. In his introduction, he doesn't immediately try explaining what's going on up in the world above, but instead makes cryptic statements that sound like he plans on doing horrible things. I know this is the writers' way of building suspense, but it lacks the subtlety to succeed in being suspenseful.

Mary Elizabeth Winstead is fantastic - her character is not. Or mostly not. The character arc is more forced than Sandra Bullock's in Gravity. It frustrates me when apocalyptic movies feature characters telling miscellaneous stories from their pasts as though it constitutes as full-fledged development. It doesn't. I want to see a character develop throughout a movie. Instead, her character's development remains on a steady plateau up until the ridiculous ending where her character takes a complete 180 after the climax. Without spoiling anything, I just want to say, the reveal is stupid. I laughed out loud it was so dumb. I was convinced the movie was trying to end humorously, but it was legitimately trying to be chilling with a reveal so generic.

I have a lot more I want to say about his movie, but only so much time. I might continue writing later.… Expand

4 of 14 users found this helpful410

All this user's reviews

3

Aldemir_LJun 4, 2016

Don't believe the hype!. A terrible blend of "Alien" (the film) with "Fallout" (the PC game). Starts from a good premise and good cast and acting, but then nothing more. By the middle of the movie the screenplay turns into a hilarious cliché.

4 of 14 users found this helpful410

All this user's reviews

4

AnonJMar 11, 2016

No matter how "thrilling" or whatsoever it is, the plot simply just makes no sense from start to finish and leaves way too many unfilled holes here and there. Surely many thrillers aren't known for complex and well thought-of plots as much asNo matter how "thrilling" or whatsoever it is, the plot simply just makes no sense from start to finish and leaves way too many unfilled holes here and there. Surely many thrillers aren't known for complex and well thought-of plots as much as the detailed depictions. But really, even seeing it in that light it's still just much more nonsensical than most other thrillers. At least it's certainly not worth such high scores seen around here. How could a film be good if the very premise it stands on just couldn't hold at all, and much of what the characters have been doing is just inexplicable? Such plot flaws are just too glaring to be ignored and really ruin everything else in it. Also I really don't see much of a connection between this one and the original Cloverfield at all, the ending just literally came out of nowhere and is totally unrelated to the main story.… Expand

5 of 18 users found this helpful513

All this user's reviews

3

jrodfilmsMar 20, 2016

this movie could have been more of an episode for a tv show than an actual feature length film. not much happens except these three people are stuck in a bunker. its very boring and then some action happens but its so dark you cant seethis movie could have been more of an episode for a tv show than an actual feature length film. not much happens except these three people are stuck in a bunker. its very boring and then some action happens but its so dark you cant see anything. avoid this movie.… Expand

6 of 22 users found this helpful616

All this user's reviews

2

hotfromcauldronMar 15, 2016

Captivity is not always captivating. To be stuck in a “Room” can be a great “Misery” or a miserable waste of time. It depends on if the characters or conversations are engaging to even peek our interests or make us care about their ultimateCaptivity is not always captivating. To be stuck in a “Room” can be a great “Misery” or a miserable waste of time. It depends on if the characters or conversations are engaging to even peek our interests or make us care about their ultimate escape - as in the perfect Collector. Cloverfield (2) is a loud , boring , 90 minute teaser for Cloverfield (3). John Goodman is way over the top with a surprisingly monotonous performance - while his two ungrateful prisoners are plain dull people with too many regrets for their limited time on earth.
The only lucky one is the man who escaped marriage - “Ben”.… Expand

6 of 22 users found this helpful616

All this user's reviews

5

GinaKMar 13, 2016

I found 10 Cloverfield Lane to be a major disappointment. Rod Serling’s Twilight Zone knew how to create paranoia in a small space, but not this film. I just got a new watch, which allows me to see the time in the dark, and I consulted it atI found 10 Cloverfield Lane to be a major disappointment. Rod Serling’s Twilight Zone knew how to create paranoia in a small space, but not this film. I just got a new watch, which allows me to see the time in the dark, and I consulted it at least three times during the first 90 minutes of this film, which seemed to take forever. I really didn’t care about the characters or their situation or what they ate or the board (bored) games they played. However, I did agree with some of the User Reviews I read – the last 15 minutes are great fun. My advice is to wait until it turns up on cable so you can fast forward over the first 90 minutes or tune in for the last 15.… Expand

4 of 15 users found this helpful411

All this user's reviews

1

antoinedoinelMar 14, 2016

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I felt like I was watching a student film with a big budget. The film was over scored so heavily that it was clear they had no confidence in their technique. Never for a moment is there an ounce of subtext. The set up reminded me of Polanski's first film: Knife in the Water, but without the growing menace, because here it's all on the surface. So much potential to play with trust and mistrust, with the games you need to play to survive, with understanding who is telling the truth, all just kind of tossed out the window for plot points.… Expand

7 of 27 users found this helpful720

All this user's reviews

6

bcdserraMay 6, 2016

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I really don't understand those high scores.
I love film, I almost love them all and I always find the good in them or at least appreciate what critics and other users saw in them. In this one however, the only good I found were the performances.
I don't get the "John Goodman is bad, no he's good, oh wait no he's bad with a little monster action in the last 5 minutes".
Make this a 100% psycho kidnapper movie or use that gimmick for suspense in the first half hour of a real monster movie and you've got a working formula.
Instead we get this schizophrenic treatment of the story that didn't make sense, and most viewers seem to think there's that brilliant twist, like nobody remembers the big spoiler that is THE TITLE OF THE MOVIE.
This leaves even the most openminded viewer with only one option when watching this: waiting for the creature to appear onscreen.… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

7

themovieguy123Mar 24, 2016

I was surprised how interesting this move was there was no time i was waiting for something to happen it always had some kind of tension there was something always on the line a good watch.

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

6

KPWarriorApr 4, 2016

The characters and plot are excellent. My mind swung one way then another trying to decide which way to interpret the clues as they unfolded. However once I saw the ending I felt a little deflated, a bit like having a Michelin star dinnerThe characters and plot are excellent. My mind swung one way then another trying to decide which way to interpret the clues as they unfolded. However once I saw the ending I felt a little deflated, a bit like having a Michelin star dinner with a last course of jam roly poly.… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

8

Antgiog1202Apr 27, 2016

The greatest thing about 10 Cloverfield Lane was that I didn't know what to expect coming into this movie. This was an outstanding Sci-Fi Thriller with it's breathtaking acting performances and direction of new comer Dan Trachtenberg. The oneThe greatest thing about 10 Cloverfield Lane was that I didn't know what to expect coming into this movie. This was an outstanding Sci-Fi Thriller with it's breathtaking acting performances and direction of new comer Dan Trachtenberg. The one performance that stands out the most was John Goodman. He was fantastic and I truely believe that he is a definate Oscar contender for the Best Supporting Actor category. Unfortunately, the Academy snubs great performances every year -- including Albert Brooks in Drive.

The only problem I have with the film is the way they titled it 10 Cloverfield Lane. It has nothing to do with it's predecessor so why give it that name? I feel as if it was a way to lure the audience into seeing this film since the first one was a success they can receive a higher gross. Because who wants to see a film about a girl trapped inside a house after a nuclear reaction... right?

10 Cloverfield Lane is everything you'd want to see in a Sci-Fi Thriller and will make you remember it for years to come.

Rating: 8/10

A+ = 10
A = 9
A- = 8
B+ = 7
B = 6
B- = 5
C+ = 4
C = 3
C- = 2.5
D+ = 2
D = 1.5
D- = 1
F = 0… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

6

ArthurSpoonerJul 2, 2016

10 Cloverfield Lane is marketed as a psychological thriller, and for the amount of time that it attempts to be a psychological thriller, it succeeds. Unfortunately, the plot weakens towards the end, and the movie instead starts to present10 Cloverfield Lane is marketed as a psychological thriller, and for the amount of time that it attempts to be a psychological thriller, it succeeds. Unfortunately, the plot weakens towards the end, and the movie instead starts to present itself as a sci-fi/action movie with an ending that leaves viewers puzzled about how exactly it got there. A fantastic first 90 minutes, strengthened by the performances of the three lead actors and small thrills, helps make up for this somewhat, but those looking for an exciting and logical ending will be highly disappointed.… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

4

sophiebennett52Mar 26, 2016

The first 3/4 of the movie was wonderful. It was dramatic and exciting. But, tragically, the last 1/4 of the movie was absolutely horrendous. The effects were terrible. It didnt seem original or like it fit the rest of the movie at all. IfThe first 3/4 of the movie was wonderful. It was dramatic and exciting. But, tragically, the last 1/4 of the movie was absolutely horrendous. The effects were terrible. It didnt seem original or like it fit the rest of the movie at all. If you're looking for a movie with a great build and a terrible ending filled with mediocre, unoriginal plot devices, then go ahead and drop $10 on this poorly done film… Expand

3 of 13 users found this helpful310

All this user's reviews

4

jez1968Apr 1, 2016

Good tension and build up for the first 90 minutes of the film totally ruined by the last 15 minutes of nonsense when the writer clearly didn't have a clue how to end it and rushed a ridiculous ending which got sillier by the minute. FeltGood tension and build up for the first 90 minutes of the film totally ruined by the last 15 minutes of nonsense when the writer clearly didn't have a clue how to end it and rushed a ridiculous ending which got sillier by the minute. Felt like the writer had given up after that first 90 minutes and given it to his 5 year old child to make up the rest.… Expand

3 of 13 users found this helpful310

All this user's reviews

6

Q8MarrongGlaceMay 20, 2016

Started normal then became more interested over the time until the last 10 min of the movie then boom the ending was so disappointing that makes me wondering , But not long once I find out that this is the first real movie for the director ,Started normal then became more interested over the time until the last 10 min of the movie then boom the ending was so disappointing that makes me wondering , But not long once I find out that this is the first real movie for the director , So maybe with more and more experience we will see a better movies in future from Mr. Trachtenberg .… Expand

1 of 5 users found this helpful14

All this user's reviews

8

MadMaxFuryRoadJun 17, 2016

Solid thriller movie that didn't have me completely at the edge of my seat. 10 Cloverfield Lane is very predictable and there really isn't anything that surprising about this film. However, it's a very entertaining thriller that should be funSolid thriller movie that didn't have me completely at the edge of my seat. 10 Cloverfield Lane is very predictable and there really isn't anything that surprising about this film. However, it's a very entertaining thriller that should be fun to watch at night. (80/100)… Expand

1 of 5 users found this helpful14

All this user's reviews

6

SwissDannyMay 19, 2016

Sorry, doesn't work for me. Goodman comes across as more of passive aggressive bully than a psychopath. The plot is full of holes and about a suspenseful as waiting for a London bus.

1 of 5 users found this helpful14

All this user's reviews

1

roscoeswaffleMar 13, 2016

John Goodman enters the Cloverfield universe and...pffffft....lets all the air out.
The only reason to see 10 C L is either:
- you'll pay to watch anything JG is in, or - morbid curiosity, for how an entire 146 minutes can be completelyJohn Goodman enters the Cloverfield universe and...pffffft....lets all the air out.
The only reason to see 10 C L is either:
- you'll pay to watch anything JG is in, or
- morbid curiosity, for how an entire 146 minutes can be completely devoid of a single original idea or line of dialogue
I loved the first Cloverfield, but this one: boo, hiss. (And no surprise at all that the Dome--the Dome!--was nearly empty for a Sunday evening showing two days--two days!!--after the Friday release.)… Expand

5 of 29 users found this helpful524

All this user's reviews

1

EludiumQ36Oct 26, 2016

Stupidest setup/story-framing ever! Faux-abduction with faux suspense that could've been avoided during their FIRST conversation. Instead, the ersatz abduction drama is drawn out over 45 freakin' minutes. And it's not till 90-mins into theStupidest setup/story-framing ever! Faux-abduction with faux suspense that could've been avoided during their FIRST conversation. Instead, the ersatz abduction drama is drawn out over 45 freakin' minutes. And it's not till 90-mins into the 97-min runtime that the invaders are revealed, and all of a sudden, meek, timid Michelle becomes an action hero ala La Femme Nikita exhibiting fitness, stamina, and a MacGyver-like propensity to improvise a solution from scraps at hand! And all this immature silliness falls at the feet of rookie-director Dan Trachtenberg whose technique is at the level flim school student.… Expand

1 of 6 users found this helpful15

All this user's reviews

0

coloradosnowmanMar 28, 2016

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Movie about a girl stuck in a bunker with a creepy John Goodman, she escapes, and yes, there's aliens flying around, in case that didn't seem already obvious given the movie's name. I just don't see why this has been getting good reviews, the acting is meh, the story doesn't really go anywhere and reveal anything you didn't already know was coming, and worst of all, there wasn't any point to making or releasing this film. NOBODY, I mean nobody, was asking for a Cloverfield spin-off film.… Expand

5 of 32 users found this helpful527

All this user's reviews

0

chicalisdMar 23, 2016

This is one of the worst movies I have seen in years. Can't beleive that some people are giving good reviews.

Don't waste your time and money, it is pretty bad. If you really see it, it doesn't make sense, the effects at the end are the worst.

6 of 46 users found this helpful640

All this user's reviews

3

kerrflannAug 18, 2016

The film started ok infact the film started brilliantly but honestly what on earth was that ending i lost track after that big explosion definitely would NOT name that a horror or even try to put it in the genre there is no good horror filmsThe film started ok infact the film started brilliantly but honestly what on earth was that ending i lost track after that big explosion definitely would NOT name that a horror or even try to put it in the genre there is no good horror films to watch anymore this sci-fi film didn't help… Expand

1 of 8 users found this helpful17

All this user's reviews

7

JacobDec 19, 2016

10 Cloverfield Lane is a phenomenal kept secret. While part of the Cloverfield verse the film works as a gripping standalone film with relatable characters in a high stakes drama in building tension. Moments are set up that may off later and10 Cloverfield Lane is a phenomenal kept secret. While part of the Cloverfield verse the film works as a gripping standalone film with relatable characters in a high stakes drama in building tension. Moments are set up that may off later and it all sucks you in. All of this makes the last twenty minutes frustrating when the film enters a tonal shift and explains elements of the world that would’ve been better left unexplored. Thankfully, the majority of the film is well done to the point where if it cut twenty minutes earlier it would’ve been solid as it’s pretty good.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

TheQuietGamerJul 2, 2016

It's a slow paced thriller. That's not really a bad thing. Often times the best thrillers are slow paced, as it allows for the director to deliver moments of ever increasing urgency that build up the tension as effectively as possible. ThatIt's a slow paced thriller. That's not really a bad thing. Often times the best thrillers are slow paced, as it allows for the director to deliver moments of ever increasing urgency that build up the tension as effectively as possible. That isn't so much the case here. Director Dan Trachtenberg seems to be perfectly okay with simply leaving our lead actress (Mary Elizabeth Winstead) in a weird, mysterious, and possibly dangerous situation that never really builds up anything until it goes off the deep end in it's finale.

It's a suitably creepy set up and John Goodman does a great job at keeping us guessing with his menacing performance. However what keeps the movie from having us on the edge our seats is that it's got no balls. It never does anything to really freak us out. Make us feel like these characters are in danger. At least not until right at the end. But at that point the whole thing is basically over. To make matters just a bit worse, it takes a goofy turn with it's final act.

Of course goofiness isn't something I should have been too shocked about. 10 Cloverfield Lane does make sure you know it has a sense of humor about itself. Most of the time it's knowing winks to the audience are used to bring a more human feel to the situation. Make it more believable and amplify what little tension it does have to keep us watching. A reminder that things could go batcrap at any second. Other times it just makes us laugh and causes some of the tension to go away. That's rare though.

Still, I can't give the movie credit enough for John Gallagher Jr. I know Goodman is the John everybody is raving about, but Gallagher is the one who caught my eye. He further helps to ground the film in reality and is just all around likable. The whole cast is fantastic, but it was Gallagher in his role reminiscent of a (younger) Jason Sudeikis that made the movie for me. It also helped that he was the only character onscreen who was fleshed out in any way.

That's another thing that takes away from the urgency of the situation. We are supposed to be worried for and care about Winstead's character, but we literally know nothing about her. We know only a little bit more about Goodman's character, but that's okay. The sense of mystery about him amplifies the potential danger. It really only hurts Winstead and unfortunately she's our lead. It also makes it odd to see her survival skills when they literally pop out of nowhere. How does she know how to do this stuff? Beats me. The movie doesn't tell.

So yeah, it's a thriller that doesn't have much tension. It's not completely devoid of it thanks to the mystery, but there isn't enough to please hardcore genre enthusiasts with lots of experience with movies of the like. Whether or not it's big reveal at the end will be a joke to you or not, I cannot say. It's definitely unexpected. However I personally thought it was kind of too over-the-top. Kudos to the movie for doing it though. Nice bit of originality to be honest.

There just needed to be more teeth to this film. Something to deliver some real bite. The set up was there, but it ultimately didn't deliver too much. It's not a terrible film and it's got fantastic performances all around. However it's on the verge of being so much more. It's like it needed a push to really take it somewhere and just never got one. So ultimately it's a decent, but ultimately unfulfilling thriller with nice production and a talented cast. Do with that info what you will.… Expand

0 of 5 users found this helpful05

All this user's reviews

8

OverpaidFeb 2, 2017

How do you review a film that is utterly brilliant until the last 15 minutes, which are mind-blowingly awful, and negate all of the clever political and human themes of the rest of the movie? Watch it until 15 minutes before the end, andHow do you review a film that is utterly brilliant until the last 15 minutes, which are mind-blowingly awful, and negate all of the clever political and human themes of the rest of the movie? Watch it until 15 minutes before the end, and then switch off.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

mrmonsterJun 17, 2016

Three words: OH! MY! GOSH! That is the mood I had from start to finish with this movie. Not only is this a great horror/sci-fi movie, this is one of the most suspenseful movies I've ever seen, and has an ending even M. Night ShaymalanThree words: OH! MY! GOSH! That is the mood I had from start to finish with this movie. Not only is this a great horror/sci-fi movie, this is one of the most suspenseful movies I've ever seen, and has an ending even M. Night Shaymalan couldn't come up with. This movie truly is a modern classic, and it's one of my favorites of the year already.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

j1trainMar 19, 2016

It all feels too familiar but that doesn't keep it from being clever and enjoyable. The first act of 10 Cloverfield Lane feels a bit off, the actors can't quite match the absurdity of the script, but once the absurdity goes all out, the filmIt all feels too familiar but that doesn't keep it from being clever and enjoyable. The first act of 10 Cloverfield Lane feels a bit off, the actors can't quite match the absurdity of the script, but once the absurdity goes all out, the film settles into an anxious groove. The end is bonkers no doubt. Whether you enjoy the ending or not will depend on whether you like these "big reveal" sci-fi stunts or prefer the claustrophobia and tension of the psychological thriller that comes before it.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

3

Bo33yJan 7, 2017

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The actors held this predictable film together. Hence a 3. There was only 3, maybe a fourth that didn't count. Predictable because this film was a The Divide rip off, it had ripped its ideas off of the Divide and then it pissed all over the end, with some kind of stupid given away hinted at all throughout, War of the Worlds ending, instead of the hope lost in The Divide, no not superwoman, how freaking predictable. Those Alien rip off, crossed with a house dog, flying in a district 9 drone crappy metal, and teeth, what, that then gets independence day'ed, with some War of the World tentacles was a joke and the gas, what, green crop duster gas, no wonder there was survivors, I mean stupid. Her escape was a joke. That Hazmat suite was a joke go duckie, what a quack. Him flailing about after being melted by acid, with the horrible pounding music from Home Alone to somehow be outside of the exploded bunker was a joke. The tension had built up well prior, credited to the actors. Except the dumb beginning whahaha, gee I wonder if I gets a signal, whahaha. What was that metal scream/squeak every time the door creaked, it was jarring.

But no it was for 12 year old's, I mean what, that was the cert on my sky programming, rendering it immune to the watershed, containing graphic violence, kidnapping, torture, swearing, psychotic behavior. Why was this film for 12 year old's, because every cinema release today is for 12 year old's, it makes even more box office money. Even if this film's content is definitely not for 12 year old's, and it should have ended so much better than its comedy wrecking what little horror its ripped off ride had not.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

LeZeeJun 24, 2016

Adds a new perspective to the original film yet it retained the mystery.

Initially it was called 'The Cellar', but later it became spin-off to 'Cloverfield'. It was a regular type screen narration, unlike the first film as a found footageAdds a new perspective to the original film yet it retained the mystery.

Initially it was called 'The Cellar', but later it became spin-off to 'Cloverfield'. It was a regular type screen narration, unlike the first film as a found footage style. But if you the original film fan, especially monster film fan, you might end in a disappointment. Because it was a psychological-thriller-mystery than the sci-fi-action-adventure.

Only the final act determines where and how it actually connects to the Cloverfield universe, yet not very evident other than the clue the title had given and the filmmakers insisted that is indeed from the same franchise. Because I felt, it was very close to other alien invasion films like 'Skyline' and 'Battle LA' or even the latest 'The 5th Wave' than the 'Cloverfield'.

I surely enjoyed this film, like an another crazy bunker hideout theme and something which is quite similar to the recent 'Room'. Since they have revealed its association with the 'Cloverfield', I expected different kind which was actually insanely misled everybody. If there won't be a sequel, then the link between the two films are unnecessary, so I'm waiting for that. But still a very good film without those mix-ups. And I recommend you all to consider it as a one-off film in order to have a great watching experience.

Another limited cast film with barely a four characters in it and shot in a single location that cost just $15m, but earned in multiple folds. All the credit goes to the marketing tactics to tie it up with the 2008 blockbuster. It would have also done great independently, in the end everybody, including fans and filmmakers are happy for what it is now.

The suspense was so good, but it was carried out for too long. The third act picked up its pace like hell which was obviously anticipated since 'Cloverfield' hooked to it. When everybody was thinking of monsters, it is going to delivers differently and that's how the film fairs.

7.5/10… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

sanyrubAug 30, 2016

Surprisingly effective (we´ve seen this type of film before) and well done. Perfect choice of characters (just 3) and the actors deliver. The most important thing is the plot, which despite seeming simple in the surface, keeps you interestedSurprisingly effective (we´ve seen this type of film before) and well done. Perfect choice of characters (just 3) and the actors deliver. The most important thing is the plot, which despite seeming simple in the surface, keeps you interested from start to finish and unsure. The last part grows bigger without ruining it or missing the tone. A very enjoyable watch.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

CapnAwesomeMar 28, 2016

This film is nothing like the first Cloverfield film, but it is great on its own. The film does an excellent job of building up suspense and making the audience question the motives behind the main characters. There are a lot ofThis film is nothing like the first Cloverfield film, but it is great on its own. The film does an excellent job of building up suspense and making the audience question the motives behind the main characters. There are a lot of intentionally unanswered questions that leave you thinking about the movie for hours after. You don't even need to watch the first Cloverfield to enjoy this incredibly well-made movie.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

renirulesMay 25, 2016

10 Cloverfield Lane is a cinematic achievement carried by the performances of the three lead actors. Particularly Goodman and Winstead. It particularly excels as a psychological thriller even though the second half of the film descends into10 Cloverfield Lane is a cinematic achievement carried by the performances of the three lead actors. Particularly Goodman and Winstead. It particularly excels as a psychological thriller even though the second half of the film descends into typical Hollywood horror film tropes. Its still an absolute must watch for anyone who is a fan of the horror genre.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

bfoore90Jun 19, 2016

10 Cloverfield Lane was almost an immediate improvement over the original Cloverfield in almost everyway. The movie was really well done with enough suspense, disturbia and jumps to keep you engaged without the shaky cam that plagued the10 Cloverfield Lane was almost an immediate improvement over the original Cloverfield in almost everyway. The movie was really well done with enough suspense, disturbia and jumps to keep you engaged without the shaky cam that plagued the first one. With great performances from the cast, especially John Goodman who earily keeps the audience guessing about his motivations and intentions while also showing you that monsters, do come in many forms.… Expand

0 of 5 users found this helpful05

All this user's reviews

6

dr_zoidberg590Dec 12, 2016

No real resolution or narrative. The whole point of a movie like this is you know nothing until the end. But at the end, we still know practically nothing.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

Meth-dudeJun 22, 2016

The acting was really good, the movie was interesting and entertaining. For me, the grand finale was the weakest point of the movie. The CGI was good and there was enough action, but it just didn't fit with the rest of the movie. It still isThe acting was really good, the movie was interesting and entertaining. For me, the grand finale was the weakest point of the movie. The CGI was good and there was enough action, but it just didn't fit with the rest of the movie. It still is a good movie even though the last half hour was disappointing.… Expand

0 of 4 users found this helpful04

All this user's reviews

8

ToFewViewsAug 19, 2016

This movie gives you a very unsettling feeling the whole time your watching and It's characters and environment just amplify the tension and suspense. This is a film that keeps you guessing on how things may play out and who is telling theThis movie gives you a very unsettling feeling the whole time your watching and It's characters and environment just amplify the tension and suspense. This is a film that keeps you guessing on how things may play out and who is telling the truth. All the actors do a amazing job and Jon Goodman stands out from the rest as this very hard to figure out character, You are always trying to guess what his intentions are. This movie isn't "Scary" like some may think, It'll have you on the edge of your seat but more in suspense and not for being terrified. This film also doesn't much of a tie to the original Cloverfield so keep that in mind. But I found this film amazing, It let's you try and figure out things for yourself and has tons of build up for a ending that feels mostly worth it. Anyone looking for a suspenseful thriller give 10 Cloverfield Lane a chance. Oh and not like it matters but great soundtrack to.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

tjman09Mar 18, 2016

10 Cloverfield Lane had a few appealing features, but didn’t seem as though it was poised to be as good as it was. Seeing the trailer the film looked odd, as it was a sequel to a found-footage disaster movie that was set in one location10 Cloverfield Lane had a few appealing features, but didn’t seem as though it was poised to be as good as it was. Seeing the trailer the film looked odd, as it was a sequel to a found-footage disaster movie that was set in one location amongst only 3 characters. 10 Cloverfield Lane is tensely confining, well-written, and takes the franchise in a totally different direction. That being said this film could have been great if it had not been part of the cloverfield franchise, however it also did well within that universe.

The film is very tense, similar to last year’s Room, in that it’s very confining and isolated. The film benefits from good performances all around, but most notably that of John Goodman who plays the sympathetic yet deranged Howard. Goodman’s cold yet soft performance helps build tension as the character clearly controls the situation, but is unpredictable and often erratic. With a brilliantly dark and somewhat nightmarish tone, the film plays out like a human version of mice in a rigged maze.

The story in the film is unpredictable and very well written, most likely due to the fact that “Whiplash” writer and director Damien Chazelle co-wrote the script. The story unfolds with one twist after another, with each twist bigger than the last, until the film builds into its climax perfectly. Another element that was very well done was the character development, as each character is well-rounded, and given a good arc. With a good story and great characters 10 Cloverfield Lane is a well-written sequel to Cloverfield, that even improves upon its predecessor.

One thing to note, while it may seem obvious, 10 Cloverfield Lane is very different from Cloverfield. Where Cloverfield was a found-footage disaster film with a huge scope, 10 Cloverfield Lane is a very confined traditionally shot thriller about people trapped in a bunker. That being said fans of the original may not be as fond of 10 Cloverfield Lane, whereas some who disliked Cloverfield may enjoy 10 Cloverfield Lane. However, they are very different films, with 10 Cloverfield Lane more focused on character development, and drama.
In the end, 10 Cloverfield Lane is a well crafted thriller, that delivers, mostly due to great writing. The film is very tense, well-acted, well-written,unpredictable, and very different from its predecessor in size and scope. The end result is a great film that is in many ways better than the original Cloverfield, because of the effort and care of the people making it. For those that love tense thrillers, or just in general great films, this film will surely entertain.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

MovieBuff4Mar 17, 2016

Few films are as incredibly tense and utterly gut-wrenching as 10 Cloverfield Lane. Not only is it perfectly acted (specially by John Goodman), well written and impeccably directed, it is also extremely unpredictable and unsettling. It's theFew films are as incredibly tense and utterly gut-wrenching as 10 Cloverfield Lane. Not only is it perfectly acted (specially by John Goodman), well written and impeccably directed, it is also extremely unpredictable and unsettling. It's the most amazing film experience I've had in a while and most definitely the best film of 2016 so far.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

9

DatamariApr 14, 2016

Very VERY good!
10 Cloverfield Lane, directed by Dan Trachtenberg is a fantastic film that can be enjoyed by anybody who enjoys thrillers. It's not necessarily a sequel to Cloverfield, but more like a spiritual successor. The two filmsVery VERY good!
10 Cloverfield Lane, directed by Dan Trachtenberg is a fantastic film that can be enjoyed by anybody who enjoys thrillers. It's not necessarily a sequel to Cloverfield, but more like a spiritual successor. The two films take place in the same universe, but they more or less happen at the same time. Don't go into this movie thinking it'll be a sequel. The movie itself is fantastic, it stars Mary Elizabeth Winstead as Michelle, a girl who, after getting into a car crash, wakes up in a fallout shelter with a mysterious man, played by John Goodman. He claims that the air above is unbreathable, and that he quickly took her and another man, played by John Gallagher, Jr., and they have to stay underground. I absolutely love this movie; Dan Trachtenburg was an amazing director. Although this isn't a horror movie, I was scared out of my mind that something bad was going to happen at every single situation. Throughout the film, we as the viewer have literally no idea what is going on, and if this guy is sane or not. We have no idea if the man is right, the air is toxic, and we're just seeing him the wrong way, or he's batsh*t insane and the air is just fine. Every time Michelle and Howard were in one scene at the same time, I was genuinely nervous as to what would happen between the two. The main selling point of this movie is it's tension, and it brought it. Sure, the ending was pretty abrupt, but I absolutely love this film, and is easily one of my favorite movies of 2016 so far.

10 Cloverfield Lane gets a 9/10.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

ReelViews94Mar 23, 2016

When J.J. Abrams released Cloverfield in 2008, it arrived cloaked in secrecy. Now, some eight years later, the film’s so-called “blood relative” (Abrams’ term, not mine), comes with a similar marketing strategy. Going-in, viewers are unlikelyWhen J.J. Abrams released Cloverfield in 2008, it arrived cloaked in secrecy. Now, some eight years later, the film’s so-called “blood relative” (Abrams’ term, not mine), comes with a similar marketing strategy. Going-in, viewers are unlikely to be certain what to expect and, emerging, they might not be quite sure exactly what they witnessed. The problems with 10 Cloverfield Lane result from attempts to tie it, however tenuously, to the earlier movie. Take away the disappointing, disjointed, and anti-climactic final act, and this is an effective white-knuckle psychological thriller. And, although the final 15 minutes don’t ruin the movie, they detract from its better parts.

The premise is simple: following a car accident, Michelle (Mary Elizabeth Winstead) awakens to find herself chained to a wall in what appears to be a basement. She soon learns that she has been brought to this place by the hulking, rather scary Howard (John Goodman), for her “own good.” The basement is actually a doomsday bunker with three occupants: survivalist Howard; his former handyman, Emmett (John Gallagher Jr.); and Michelle, whom Howard rescued from her smashed car. In the outside world, all is not well. According to Howard, apocalyptic events have occurred. His plan is for the three of them to shelter in place and wait it out until things are safe. Michelle thinks he’s crazy. Emmett isn’t so certain.

By using double-bluffs and red herrings, director Dan Trachtenberg crafts a claustrophobic psychological thriller that hums along nicely. Hitchcockian misdirection abounds. From moment-to-moment we’re never quite sure who (or what) Howard really is: a lonely savior whose paranoia has been validated or a creepy kidnapper acting out a twisted delusion? Is the situation outside the bunker real or a figment of Howard’s warped mind? Did “the Ruskies” attack? Or aliens? Or nothing at all? Perhaps Howard faked the mutilations of some pigs to “prove” that the air isn’t safe? So many questions… At times, 10 Cloverfield Lane has a similar vibe as the TV series Lost which, not coincidentally, was produced by Abrams’ Bad Robot Productions.

While keeping us guessing, 10 Cloverfield Lane provides several nail-biting scenes. Sound is an important part of how the tension is amplified - every noise is loud and the insistent musical score throbs. 10 Cloverfield Lane doesn’t employ “found footage” like the original Cloverfield. Camera movement is smooth and clean and the shots are composed to emphasize how cramped and uncomfortable the limited space is. The movie is presented from Michelle’s perspective and its tone varies with her mood. Her opinion of Howard and the situation changes frequently and the film reflects that. There’s even a goofy musical montage that shows the three companions playing board games and putting together puzzles like any “normal” family.

Winstead is a good choice to play the heroine because she’s strong yet feminine. (She previously appeared as Bruce Willis’ daughter in the fourth Die Hard film and as the lead in the prequel to John Carptenter’s The Thing.) John Goodman is a perfect Howard - Goodman has the rare talent of being able to play both a cuddly, likeable guy and a frighteningly dangerous one. In 10 Cloverfield Lane, he’s asked to do both.

The film’s failing is that, in linking it to Cloverfield, it abandons the elements that made the majority of the movie effective. The final fifteen minutes don’t work as a way to wrap up this story or as an introduction to a larger (generic) canvas. They feel tacked-on and rushed. Nevertheless, as weak as the conclusion may be, it doesn’t obfuscate the good things to precede it. 10 Cloverfield Lane is packed with suspense and tension and offers some of the best bait-and-switch work of any recent psychological thriller. It’s easy to forgive any missteps toward the end when considering the entire package.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

MrJimmyApr 16, 2016

If you were planning on watching this film hoping to get answer to all the questions you have had since watching Cloverfield, this film will disappoint you as it has none. This film does have something much better than answer though, evenIf you were planning on watching this film hoping to get answer to all the questions you have had since watching Cloverfield, this film will disappoint you as it has none. This film does have something much better than answer though, even more questions! The film starts of with Mary Elizabeth Winstead character Michelle running away from her life before being run off the road and waking up in a bunker occupied by Howard (John Goodman), who claims to have brought her there to wade out the apparent attack on the country. Also in the bunker is Emmett (John Gallagher Jr) who says he there for protection. But through several twist and turns you start to question the nature of Michelle situation, the Motivation behind her abduction and the fate of the world above the bunker. As each new revelation into what is happening is revealed the tension grows and grows. John Goodman plays his role as dooms day prepper, conspiracy nut brilliantly. The film constantly makes you re-evaluate your opinion of him going from a nut to, good Samaritan who has your sympathy, to possible someone much sinister. The film however lies mainly on the shoulders of Mary Winstead as it is through her eyes the audience watches the film and she is excellent through out. Michelle is a thoroughly engaging and resourceful character who you are one hundred percent routing for from start to finish. Emmett is also well played and will have you hoping he makes it out okay as well as being a brilliant friend for Michelle and source of irritation for Howard. The ending is as tense as the rest of the film and shows of the how bad ass Michelle is whilst adding so much more to what intrigue to what Cloverfield is and what is to come next. All round the movie is superb and as much as I hope all this will be explained, having it be what it is and making no sense with no context to what is happening is equally as entertaining.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

CarFan1999Aug 12, 2016

10 Cloverfield Lane has an interesting backstory. With the trailer coming out so soon before release and little known about the story, I went in knowing little of what to expect. Well, 10 Cloverfield Lane turns out to be a great, unique10 Cloverfield Lane has an interesting backstory. With the trailer coming out so soon before release and little known about the story, I went in knowing little of what to expect. Well, 10 Cloverfield Lane turns out to be a great, unique movie.

The story of a woman ending up inside a bunker to what seems like an abduction turns into something much more unique and original. Is this an abduction or is there an outside attack? The best part of the story is the vast amount of twists and turns. When the story seems to be going in one direction, the plot suddenly twists to something else that would question what just happened before. Information, plot details, and backstories are inferred, not plainly told. Because of this, the story is very investing and leaves the audience guessing as to what will happen next. Things that didn't seem logical before became logical and vice- versa. The tension is high and there are some jump- scare moments. Another great thing about the story is how original the whole thing is. There's nothing else like it and the unique plot plays off well.

The acting is also very good as John Goodman pulls a fantastic performance in addition to everyone else. However, there are two major issues. First, while the music score is nice, it's also quite overbearing and falsely hypes up the tension. In addition, the pacing is a bit uneven. There are a few dead spots where nothing much happens and it sucks away some investment from the story. All in all, 10 Cloverfield Lane is a highly original film with great acting, plenty of plot twists, and lots of tension; all wrapped up in an engrossing story.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

HappyislandsJan 10, 2017

10 Cloverfield Lane’s greatest strength is the performances from the three lead actors – John Goodman in particular, who gives a career best performance. I do think the ending, whilst not a total let down, could have been better crafted. It10 Cloverfield Lane’s greatest strength is the performances from the three lead actors – John Goodman in particular, who gives a career best performance. I do think the ending, whilst not a total let down, could have been better crafted. It does however, provide an added dimension to the film.… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

8

keanexAug 9, 2016

Forget about the original film Cloverfield. Just do it.

Okay. Now that you've forgotten about it we can talk about 10 Cloverfield Lane - a thriller/mystery that is phenomenally acted. I was on the edge of my seat the entire movie wonderingForget about the original film Cloverfield. Just do it.

Okay. Now that you've forgotten about it we can talk about 10 Cloverfield Lane - a thriller/mystery that is phenomenally acted. I was on the edge of my seat the entire movie wondering what events would unfold, a roller coaster for sure. I felt the ending was weak, but everything leading up to it was phenomenal.

Very much hoping they continue this story.… Expand