Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon: Breakpoint

 Xbox One
User Score
3.6

Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 303 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 86 out of 303
  2. Mixed: 25 out of 303
  3. Negative: 192 out of 303
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. sashimizhao
    Oct 9, 2019
    0
    boring to hell. Canning factory's final product. bugs everywhere. Division equipment system makes its attachments system useless. story line has no sense of existence. side missions are all simply from A To B back to A mode. Good job ubisoft.
  2. PANTYHANSTERU8
    Oct 9, 2019
    0
    Ubisoft thinks we are all stupid to have pre-ordered this game only to have it feel like the graphics are from 10 years ago..what were your developers doing the last 3 years? Did you hire graphic designers that stopped advancing in their careers 10+ years ago? the constant audio and visual glitches are entirely too abundant for this caliber of game. This was marketed as the successor toUbisoft thinks we are all stupid to have pre-ordered this game only to have it feel like the graphics are from 10 years ago..what were your developers doing the last 3 years? Did you hire graphic designers that stopped advancing in their careers 10+ years ago? the constant audio and visual glitches are entirely too abundant for this caliber of game. This was marketed as the successor to Wildlands and to be honest its more along the lines of the 3rd cousin twice removed. How are the graphics worse than its predecessor? then you pull the open beta to release a game that was exactly the same. Then its as if Ubisoft is panhandling its users when we already paid for a premium game. the weapons are weak, its as if they just mashed up destiny and the division as far as gear/weapon upgrades, the "home base" is so similar to the division its offensive. Ghost recon was a game separate from the rest, now its just like the rest. I feel like Ubisoft owes us all a game credit, because this is absurd and offensive. then the game trailers are literally nothing, not a single thing like the actual game. Dont get me started on missions...I leveled up to 100+ after 18 hours of game play. My character is strong, yet I cannot complete missions alone. They forced this into a multiplayer coop game. Why? Shameful at best.… Expand
  3. zKameloTT
    Oct 11, 2019
    0
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Um jogo reciclado do ghost Recon antigo sem contar o pay to Win, isso é bem triste… Expand
  4. AC4gVWRpfoheYCE
    Oct 13, 2019
    0
    I played an loved GRW a lot. GRW had it issues (e.g. really stupid/bad Ai), but it had some sort of soul. Had big hopes for GRB (AKA GRW 2.0)… but was very surprised – to say it politely – about what Ubisoft delivered: A micro transaction shop system with a simulation of a game. Holy moly.
  5. Gamelovers
    Oct 21, 2019
    0
    This is really trash. Don’t buy it. Even they give you this game as free, do not try it. It’s waste of time and give you much stress. I bought this as ultimate edition and it’s totally waste of money. There are too many bugs and also connection server issue. I have tried to contact with Ubi soft, I can’t connect to Ubi soft homepage(support). I curse Ubi soft and they should be punished asThis is really trash. Don’t buy it. Even they give you this game as free, do not try it. It’s waste of time and give you much stress. I bought this as ultimate edition and it’s totally waste of money. There are too many bugs and also connection server issue. I have tried to contact with Ubi soft, I can’t connect to Ubi soft homepage(support). I curse Ubi soft and they should be punished as scammer… Expand
  6. ronaldomaia
    Oct 21, 2019
    0
    I hate what they done to the PVP mode! It was so awesome how we could select a special class in Wild Lands. Now, everyone can be the same class, and it does not make any difference at all. Also, they put a radioactive barrier that forces you to play like any classic shooter game. This was not supposed to be a regular shooter game, this is not The Division, this is not Call of Duty. It wasI hate what they done to the PVP mode! It was so awesome how we could select a special class in Wild Lands. Now, everyone can be the same class, and it does not make any difference at all. Also, they put a radioactive barrier that forces you to play like any classic shooter game. This was not supposed to be a regular shooter game, this is not The Division, this is not Call of Duty. It was supposed to be an unique PVP gameplay such as Wild Land is. The movement of the character is clamsy. Plenty of bugs, cliches, glitches, terrible story, terrible characters animation, you really don't care about nomad. So sad, I used to be a huge fan of this game. But they want us to avoid this.
    Shame on you UbIsoft!!!    … Expand
  7. Darksideua
    Oct 25, 2019
    0
    Micro transactions everywhere, bugs and server problems, game is trash.. AVOID!
  8. SenorKoquonfaes
    Dec 6, 2019
    0
    Anyone rating this game higher than a 5 is being incredibly disingenuous and have lost all ability to rate games in an even remotely reasonable manner.

    The game launched as, and still is, a buggy, broken mess. The servers keep disconnecting or going down, so you can lose a chunk of your progress mid-way through a mission. Match-making is a complete joke. Character animations and NPC AI    Anyone rating this game higher than a 5 is being incredibly disingenuous and have lost all ability to rate games in an even remotely reasonable manner.

    The game launched as, and still is, a buggy, broken mess. The servers keep disconnecting or going down, so you can lose a chunk of your progress mid-way through a mission. Match-making is a complete joke. Character animations and NPC AI are laughably bad.

    The key takeaway for me is the fact that this full-priced, triple-A, live service game, is selling "time-savers". Meaning this game is placing a monetary value on playing this game less and it's admitting that it's a grindy, repetitive, time-sink of a game. Ubisoft have effectively pushed players into a pit and are selling them a ladder. This game has such egregious and predatory micro-transactions, it makes bog standard mobile games seem inviting.    … Expand
  9. AmadeusE
    Feb 25, 2022
    0
    Just a terrible, disappointing turn-off. It's way more complicated and way less likeable than Wildlands. Not much is improved and many things have only gotten worse. The world is yet another modern video game open world that's lazy, worthless and detrimental to the game. Basically another open world game that would instantly benefit from being more linear instead, like in the old days.Just a terrible, disappointing turn-off. It's way more complicated and way less likeable than Wildlands. Not much is improved and many things have only gotten worse. The world is yet another modern video game open world that's lazy, worthless and detrimental to the game. Basically another open world game that would instantly benefit from being more linear instead, like in the old days. Also, no offline play. And stupid unnecessary microtransactions all over the place.

    Character creation is also worse. And every woman is intentionally fugly. And I mean intentionally, which is just wrong to do. It's a rather common problem in many western games today. Wildlands had some decent options to creare an actual female character, comparable to the good old Rainbow Six Vegas games. Now, there isn't a single decent-looking female face anymore. And some of the "female" faces are literally men. Even real life has more feminine-looking women in the army. It's gotten to the point where men genuinely look better than women. If you cannot create a proper female character anymore, what is the point of giving the option? Well, for some reason, you can give your soldier blue hair now, so that says a thing or two about the silly bunch behind this one.    … Expand
  10. Merovengian
    Dec 15, 2019
    0
    This is the worst excuse for a game ever made since ET for the Atari 2600. Absolute trash. Wildlands is monumentally better and more enjoyable in every way. This game is a total disgrace.
  11. TheHulksRage
    Feb 10, 2020
    0
    I’m giving this game the least I can give it due to it REQUIRING an internet signal constantly just to play and it will keep kicking you if that drops even a little! I have spoken.
  12. SlimFreedom
    Dec 10, 2021
    0
    It was already a bad game now they're adding nft trash game trash developer
next
Page:

Awards & Rankings

18
#18 Most Discussed Xbox One Game of 2019

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
62

Mixed or average reviews - based on 30 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 6 out of 30
  2. Mixed: 19 out of 30
  3. Negative: 5 out of 30
  1. Official Xbox Magazine UK
    Nov 18, 2019
    50
    Breakpoint is huge and meaty, but fundamental flaws suck most of the fun out of it. [Issue#184, p.65]
  2. ZTGD
    Oct 24, 2019
    45
    It seems like Breakpoint saw the Assassin’s Creeds, the Far Cry’s, and The Divisions and decided it wanted to incorporate that into its own game. The issue is that throwing everything and the kitchen sink into the game isn’t going to make it great. They have a decent frame for Breakpoint and the feel of it is fine, but when trying to navigate the world or even the menus gives you a headache, it may be time to take a step back and think on what you need to do to make it better. The only way to play this game is with co-op friends. Single player people should avoid this one. You will be bored and frustrated within two hours. Even with some friends the issues will become bothersome, but at least you’ll have someone to complain with.
    Read full review
  3. Generación Xbox
    Oct 23, 2019
    70
    Unbalanced missions, poor optimization on Xbox One FAT drag down the overall good game that Ghost Recon: Breakpoint is.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »